RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT MUFINDI DISTRICT
Technical Assistance to Support the Development of Irrigation and Rural Roads Infrastructure Project (IRRIP2)
December 2017 This document was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by CDM Smith for the Technical Assistance to Support the Development of Irrigation and Rural Roads Infrastructure Project, Task Order number AID-621-TO- 12-00002, under the USAID Global A&E IQC (Contract No.: EDH-I-00-08-00023-00).
February 2013
This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by CDM International Inc.
OCTOBER 2012
This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by CDM International Inc. RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT MUFINDI DISTRICT
Technical Assistance to Support the Development of Irrigation and Rural Roads Infrastructure Project (IRRIP2)
Prepared by: Richard Mwakasitu, Roads Component Leader Keith F. Williams, P.E., Chief of Party Organization: CDM International, Inc. (CDM Smith) Submitted to: Boniphace Marwa, United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) USAID Contract No.: EDH-I-00-08-00023-00, Task Order AID-621-TO-12-00002 Report Date: 06 December 2017
DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION ...... 4
1.1 Project Overview...... 4 1.1.1 Overall FTF Goals and Objectives ...... 4 1.1.2 FTF Project Activities ...... 4 1.1.3 IRRIP2 Goals, Objective and Expected Results ...... 4 1.1.4 Rural Roads Infrastructure ...... 5 1.2 Mufindi District Rural Roads Prioritization Context ...... 5
2 DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION ...... 5
3 DISTRICT POTENTIAL...... 5
4 ROAD NETWORK DESCRIPTION ...... 6
4.1 Socio-economic Role ...... 6 4.2 Traffic ...... 6 4.3 Description of Roads...... 6 4.4 Drainage Structures ...... 6
5 ROAD PRIORITIZATION PROCESS...... 7
5.1 Training on the Prioritization Tool ...... 7 5.2 Approaches to the Prioritization Process ...... 7 5.3 Selection of the Road Segments ...... 7 5.4 Traffic Counts...... 8 5.5 Data Collection...... 8 5.6 Prioritization Tool Layout and Format ...... 8 5.7 Criteria used in the Prioritization Process ...... 8 5.7.1 Road Network Connectivity...... 8 5.7.2 Population ...... 9 5.7.3 Current Transport Demand ...... 9 5.7.4 Relevance to Agricultural Development ...... 9 5.7.5 Access to Social Services ...... 9 5.7.6 Road Condition...... 9 5.7.7 Cost Estimates ...... 9 5.8 Prioritization Tool Application...... 10 5.9 Prioritization Tool Output ...... 10
6 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...... 11
RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT MUFINDI DISTRICT i ANNEXES Annex A Data Collection Forms Annex B Tool Workings and Output Annex C Cost Estimates Annex D Location Map
TABLES Table 4.1: Road Network Distribution by Classification and Surface Type...... 6 Table 5.1: Prioritization Ranking...... 11
RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT MUFINDI DISTRICT ii Acronyms and Abbreviations
ADT Average daily traffic CM Council Manager - TARURA DROMAS District roads maintenance system FARIL Fixed Amount Reimbursement Implementation Letter FtF Feed the Future (a USAID food security initiative) GoT Government of Tanzania IRRIP2 Irrigation and Rural Roads Infrastructure Project 2 km Kilometer km/hr Kilometers per hour LGA Local government authority LGV Light goods vehicle MCC Manual classified count MGV Medium goods vehicle MT Motorized traffic NMT Non-motorized traffic NPV Net present value PQM Project Quality Management RRDP Rural Roads Development Project RUC Road user cost SOAG Strategic Objective Grant Agreement TANROADS Tanzania National Roads Agency TARURA Tanzania Rural and Urban Roads Agency TZS Tanzanian Shilling USAID United States Agency for International Development USD United States Dollars vpd Vehicles per day
RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT MUFINDI DISTRICT iii 1 INTRODUCTION This report documents the status of Mufindi District’s efforts to identify and prioritize rural roads within their network for inclusion in the “Rural Roads Development Project” rehabilitation activities included under the Irrigation and Rural Roads Infrastructure Project (IRRIP), funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).
1.1 Project Overview On July 26, 2005, the United States of America, acting through USAID and the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania (GoT), through the Ministry of Finance executed Strategic Objective Grant Agreement (SOAG) Number 12 for Incomes of Small Farmers Increased in Selected Agricultural Commodity Sub-Sectors. In order to achieve that Objective, the Parties agreed to work together under the Feed the Future (FTF) initiative to achieve the following Results: (1) Increased production of selected agricultural commodities and (2) Increased access to markets in selected community agricultural commodities. 1.1.1 Overall FTF Goals and Objectives The overall FTF goals and objectives are: Developing the rice sector to spur growth; Increasing food security through improved productivity, processing, transport, and storage in maize and rice sectors; and Improving nutritional status of Tanzanians through the development of the horticulture sector. 1.1.2 FTF Project Activities Among the activities to be implemented under the FTF initiatives are: IRRIP: IRRIP1 (engineering services) and IRRIP2 (technical assistance) Focus Value Chains for Staples (rice and maize) and Horticulture Food Processing Nutrition Policy Reforms Research and Training Monitoring and Evaluation 1.1.3 IRRIP2 Goals, Objective and Expected Results The IRRIP2 activity has its own goals, objectives and expected results. These are: Expanded access to markets: FTF Target is to rehabilitate at least 1,000 km of rural roads Improved and sustainable increase in irrigated agricultural productivity: FTF target is to add 47,000 ha of irrigated area through 7 smallholder schemes in Morogoro and Zanzibar (IRRIP1 + IRRIP2) Increased capacity of Government authorities involved in irrigation and rural roads infrastructure
RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT MUFINDI DISTRICT 4 1.1.4 Rural Roads Infrastructure Under IRRIP2 through Rural Roads Development Project (RRDP), approximately 1,000 km of strategic rural roads are planned to be rehabilitated and upgraded. These roads are: Collector and feeder roads in three districts of Iringa, Kilolo, and Mufindi District Councils in Iringa Region. Collector and feeder road in four districts of Chunya, Kyela, Mbeya and Rungwe District Councils in Mbeya Region.
1.2 Mufindi District Rural Roads Prioritization Context Mufindi district has a total road network of 1,023.14km that are under the jurisdiction of Mufindi District Council. The Mufindi roads traverse along Low and Semi Mountainous Zones, Highland as well as Savannah zone. It is one of the coolest and rainiest climates in Tanzania. The average annual temperature is 17.1 °C while precipitation here averages 1576 mm. Among many economic activities, the district is known for its tea and timber industries. Roads in Mufindi district experience frequent damages caused by heavy rains and the heavy traffic in timber production areas.
Rural roads in Mufindi District are categorized as Collector and Feeder roads most of them being of earth surface. These roads are mainly categorized in poor condition. Maintenance funding is mainly from one source and well below the level needed for maintenance, let alone improvement.
Approximately 1,000 km of roads will be rehabilitated and upgraded for all the seven districts under RRDP in Iringa and Mbeya Regions. This means that only part of Mufindi District road network can be covered by the project thus requiring a prioritization process to identify a priority list of roads.
2 DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION Mufindi District is one of the five Districts in Iringa region others being Kilolo, Mafinga Town Council, Iringa Rural and Iringa municipal.
Mufindi District has a total population of about 265,829 (2012 census) 125,896 people being male and 139,933 females. The District covers a total area of 7,325 square km. It has 4 Divisions, 28 wards and 134 villages.
3 DISTRICT POTENTIAL Mufindi district is potential for agriculture, livestock keeping and Commercial timber plantations. In the Eastern zone which covers the areas of Ifwagi, Ikongosi, Mdabulo, Mninga, Kasanga and Vikula the district is potential for cash crops like tea, coffee and timber; and food crops like maize, and beans. Horticulture is also practiced in this zone. In the western zone the district is potential for maize, cassava, beans and other food crops which cover the areas of Nyololo, Maduma, Mbalamaziwa and Tambalang’ombe etc.
RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT MUFINDI DISTRICT 5 4 ROAD NETWORK DESCRIPTION
4.1 Socio-economic Role The roads are mainly used to transport crops from villages and agricultural production areas to market centers. The roads also provide access to social and economic services (i.e. schools, dispensaries, health centers and District hospital).
4.2 Traffic The estimated traffic is more than 100 vpd for urban roads (Mafinga urban roads) and in rural areas traffic is less than 100 vpd. The number of vehicles increases depending on the season. The peak number of vehicle is experienced during harvesting period. Road segments in areas with high production of timber are characterized by occurrence of very heavy vehicles which collect logs from plantations to timber processing plants in Mafinga Town. These roads are heavily loaded and deteriorate shortly after maintenance and require adequate design.
4.3 Description of Roads 83% of the roads in Mufindi District are of earth standard with fair and poor condition. 15.5% are gravel roads and only 1.5% of the roads are paved. Most of these roads are in poor condition and others are fair due to insufficient maintenance caused by limited availability of funds for maintenance and rehabilitation to appropriate standards. The district roads are characterized by slippery, black cotton soil and red soil at both low land area and high land. Also, land sliding at highland areas develop slippery riding and potholes and hence increases travel time and vehicles maintenance’s cost. Table 4.1: Road Network Distribution by Classification and Surface Type Percentage Percentage by Road by Surface Road S/N Classification Surface Type Length (km) type Classification Paved 0 0.0% Gravel 157.83 15.4% 1 Collector Roads Earth 693.96 67.8% Sub-total 851.79 83.3% Paved 15.17 1.5% Gravel 1.5 0.1% 2 Feeder Roads Earth 154.68 15.1% Sub-total 171.35 16.7% TOTAL NETWORK 1,023.14 100.0% 100.0%
4.4 Drainage Structures The assessment conducted during the prioritization process revealed that most of roads require new drainage structures such as box culverts and pipe culverts. Most of these cross- drainage culverts along the prioritized roads are 7m wide. A few existing drainage structures need to be either replaced or repaired to improve their drainage function. For competition purposes, no major bridges are included in the study and if present they will be treated as a separate project.
RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT MUFINDI DISTRICT 6 5 ROAD PRIORITIZATION PROCESS Generally, prioritization aims at ranking interventions in a priority order that reflects their net contribution to social and economic welfare. In the language of economic appraisal, this means (for example) ranking in order of net present value (NPV) divided by cost. With the assistance of IRRIP team, for each LGA the TARURA Council Managers will be responsible for designing the road segments and producing the tender documents. The procurement entity (to be determined later) will then procure the contractor(s) for the works. The Prioritization process consisted of the following main steps: i. Training on the Prioritization Tool ii. Selection of the road segments from the District road network iii. Conducting traffic counts iv. Collection of field data such as rapid road condition assessment; cost estimates and social economic information etc. v. Analysis of data by use of the prioritization tool
5.1 Training on the Prioritization Tool IRRIP2 has developed a comprehensive, but simple and robust system for prioritizing rural road maintenance and rehabilitation interventions. The tool was developed to conduct a prioritization process based on a wider range of more quantifiable criteria. On 13th to 14th July 2017, the Council Managers (CMs) and their subordinates from Iringa, Kilolo and Mufindi in Iringa Region together with Chunya, Kyela, Mbeya and Rungwe from Mbeya Region convened and received training on utilization of the Prioritization Tool. During the training, participants could grasp knowledge on the following items: i. Tool layout and format ii. Approaches to the prioritization process iii. Criteria used in the prioritization tool iv. Collection of relevant information required for the tool including road condition assessment, cost estimates, traffic counts, socio-economic information and agricultural potentials v. Specific data requirements vi. Tool workings and output
5.2 Approaches to the Prioritization Process Approaches to the prioritization process included the following: Ranking interventions in a priority order that reflects contribution to economic welfare i.e. net present value divided by cost. A prioritization process which has intention of making road improvements with the impact of boosting the welfare of road Users. Prioritization should be in such a way that the roads with high positive impact to road users are ranked high. Saving in Road user costs (RUCs) are compared with change in estimated road agency costs (RACs)
5.3 Selection of the Road Segments Based on the purpose of the project, Mufindi LGA selected 23 road segments with a total length of 516km for prioritization process.
RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT MUFINDI DISTRICT 7 Criteria used in selecting the roads totaling 516km out of the district network of 1023.14 km were: i. All areas with other FTF projects i.e. NAFAKA, Mboga Na Matunda, Tuboreshe Chakula, etc.; ii. All areas potential for agricultural production; and iii. Rural roads serving more population to access social services such as health centers and schools.
5.4 Traffic Counts Traffic counts were done in two-way ADT from 7-day x 12 h standard DROMAS traffic count forms. The traffic count was conducted by road enumerators in 12-hour shifts from 6:00 am to 6:00 pm over 7 days for all selected roads.
5.5 Data Collection Data collected were categorized in two groups: i. Socio-economic related data which includes ward population, traffic volume, warehouses, markets, education/health facilities and relevance to agricultural development; and ii. Data related to road condition. These includes road classification, road length, number of days the road is impassable, current road condition and transit speed, and estimated total cost for improvement. Information like ward population, warehouses, markets, education / health facilities, relevance to agricultural development, road classification, road length and estimated number of days the road is impassable were compiled from office records and verified in the field. Information like traffic volume, road condition and estimated costs were collected from field work. Data collection was divided in two forms namely Form No 01 for socio-economic related data and Form No 02 for road condition related data. The completed forms are included in Annex A.
5.6 Prioritization Tool Layout and Format The tool is built in a Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet containing the Data, Workings Lock-ups and Ranking List. It is only in the Data sheet where input variables are done and editing process enabled. Below is the appearance of the pictorial image of an excel sheet.
5.7 Criteria used in the Prioritization Process The prioritization tool is built such that the following criteria are used to calculate the total economic benefits expected to be generated after the road improvements: 5.7.1 Road Network Connectivity This includes all selected road segments in the LGAs showing road names, road Classification, and Road Length.
Consideration was given to roads that are connected to arterial roads i.e. Trunk, Regional Roads and well-maintained collector roads.
RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT MUFINDI DISTRICT 8 5.7.2 Population Ward Population served by each road segment was taken and if the road crosses more than one ward the summation of the population of wards concerned will be adopted.
Population data was collected for the District Planning Office. 5.7.3 Current Transport Demand Classified traffic counts were conducted for seven days from 08 August to 14 August 2017 on each road segment. The decision on whether the recorded traffic is High, Medium or Low is made inside the prioritization tool.
The percentages of pedestrians and cycles carrying Loads were also recorded. 5.7.4 Relevance to Agricultural Development Relevance to agricultural potential was measured High, Medium or Low depending on the type and quantity of crops produced in areas serviced by a road segment. Areas with high production of cereal crops selected cash crops such as maize and rice/tea and coffee were ranked high together with areas with irrigation schemes, warehouses, large market centers and areas where other FTF projects are.
Agricultural information was collected from the District Agriculture Irrigation and Cooperatives Department. 5.7.5 Access to Social Services Existence of any social services like Secondary Schools or Colleges and Hospitals or Health Centers contributes to the total benefits of improving a road segment. Primary schools and dispensaries were not counted as they do not contribute any difference in the benefits generated.
Information on existence of secondary schools along the road segments was obtained from the Education Department while that for health facilities was obtained from the Health Department within the LGA. 5.7.6 Road Condition Road condition assessment was conducted for each road segment and recorded as Poor, Fair, or Good. All earth roads were categorized as poor regardless of the visibly good condition during the dry season.
An estimate of the number of days per year the road is impassable to anything larger than motor-cycle was done for each road segment.
Average transit speed in km/hr was estimated through speeding along the roads segments and using historical information. 5.7.7 Cost Estimates Preliminary cost estimates for all the road segments were determined after collection of the field data and proposing the necessary interventions for improvement of the roads to gravel standard.
Major Low Volume Loads activities of work included but not limited to: Clearing and grubbing Road Formation Fill and Cross fill
RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT MUFINDI DISTRICT 9 Gravel wearing course Installation of drainage structures such as pipe and box culverts, solid and vented drifts etc. Excavation of open drains like catch water and miter drains Construction of gabions protection works where necessary
After determining the cost for major activities, a percentage was added for preliminaries and general items. The final cost for each road was converted to ‘000 USD at an exchange rate of TZS 2,200. The summary of cost estimates is presented in Annex C.
5.8 Prioritization Tool Application The prioritization tool developed under IRRIP2 was used to generate the priority index for each road. The priority index (benefits/km/year÷cost/km) incorporates the following five elements: i. conventional RUC benefits to motorized traffic because of reduced IRI roughness arising from rehabilitation; ii. conventional RUC benefits to non-motorized traffic because of reduced IRI roughness on days when the road is passable; iii. on days when the road in its current condition is impassable (to all except non- motorized traffic and motor-cycles), the benefits of rehabilitation are a switch of mode from load-carrying motor-cycles to MGVs and a switch from loaded cycles and pedestrians to LGVs; iv. the transport benefit of high or medium agricultural potential is taken as similar in concept to generated (or “induced”) traffic (additional traffic in a corridor arising from a reduction of transport costs). For areas of high agricultural potential, the generated traffic is the fleet of MGVs needed to transport an additional 5t/ha x 200ha/km of road, each MGV assumed to have a 3t payload. For areas of medium potential the additional yield is 3t/ha and the area taken as 100ha/km. The agricultural benefit is the RUC saving of an MGV x veh-km traveling on a good as opposed to a poor road, with 50 percent added for agricultural inputs, etc.; and v. a social trip purpose benefit. This is taken as additional household trips (i.e. generated traffic) arising from rehabilitation. The population per km of road is rated as low (up to 1,500 people/km), medium (1,500-2,500/km) or high (>2,500/km) and each person is assumed to make five return trips per year in a small bus (dala-dala or equivalent) carrying ten passengers. As with agricultural benefits, the generated traffic benefit of additional household trips is the RUC saving of a small bus x veh-km traveled on a good as opposed to a poor road. This benefit can be scaled up to reflect the existence of a hospital or secondary school along the road.
5.9 Prioritization Tool Output The prioritization tool output is as summarized in the table below. Of the 23 roads in the prioritization process, the highest ranked road is Mdabulo - Lulanda road with priority index of 1.17 and the lowest is Mkuta - Ifupila road with priority index of 0.15 Details of the prioritization tool workings and output are presented in Annex B The roads were arranged in descending order of their prioritization ranking indexes as listed in the table below:
RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT MUFINDI DISTRICT 10 Table 5.1: Prioritization Ranking Rank of Road Length Index Index Ward Road Name Classification (km) Score 1 Mdabulo and Ihanu Mdabulo – Lulanda Collector 27.73 1.17 2 Malangali and Idunda Isimikinyi – Idunda Collector 14.00 0.99 3 Mtambula and Igowole Mtambula – Kisasa Feeder 13.57 0.91 4 Idunda and Itandula Idunda – Kinegembasi Collector 21.64 0.71 Mtwango, Ihanu, Sawala – Mkonge – 5 Luhunga Iyegeya – Lulanda Collector 40.27 0.66 Ihalimba – Igomtwa – 6 Ihalimba and Kibengu Usokami Collector 28.07 0.61 Makungu and Lugolofu – Magunguli 7 Kiyowela mashambani Collector 21.9 0.52 8 Nyololo and Maduma Nyololo – Maduma Collector 20.2 0.50 Mninga – Mkalala – 9 Mninga and Kasanga Kasanga Feeder 15.14 0.43 Tambalang'ombe – 10 Sadan and Ikweha Kwatwangwa Collector 40.7 0.43 Ikweha and 11 Bumilayinga Kisada – Ugenza Collector 8.1 0.39 12 Nyololo and Malangali Nyololo – Njojo Collector 18.9 0.37 Itandula and 13 Mtambula Iramba – Ipilimo Collector 13.89 0.35 14 Ifwagi Ifwagi – Mwitikilwa Collector 7.5 0.34 Mbalamaziwa, Mtambula and 15 Kasanga Maguvani – Udumuka Collector 29.16 0.26 16 Ifwagi and Mdabulo Mkuta – Ludili – Ilasa Feeder 26.1 0.24 17 Kiyowela and Idete Kiyowela – Idete Collector 40.42 0.22 18 Ikongosi and Ifwagi Mtili – Ifwagi - Mkuta Collector 13.59 0.22 19 Vikula and Ihanu Vikula – Kilosamufindi Collector 33.13 0.18 20 Ikongosi and Ihalimba Nundwe – Ikongosi Collector 26.98 0.18 Ihanu and Mpanga Lulanda – Mpanga 21 TZR Tazara Collector 37.2 0.17 22 Mdabulo Ifupila – Mdabulo Collector 9.1 0.16 23 Ifwagi Mkuta – Ifupila Feeder 8.6 0.15 TOTAL 515.9
6 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS According to the weights allocated to the criteria, the tool gives highest priority to the roads accessing FTF projects, i.e. areas with irrigation schemes, agricultural productive areas with warehouses, millers etc. Areas with high production of rice, maize, tea and coffee are also regarded to have high agricultural potential and score high ranking benefits as compared to other areas. Comments are sought on the following recommendations: i. If the agreement reached in the June 2017 Project Initiation Workshop persists, after the prioritization is done, the list of roads as shown in Table 5.1 will be basis for
RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT MUFINDI DISTRICT 11 Development Partners to select the number of road segments and length depending on the available financial resources. ii. Upon approval and selection of the road segments, TARURA Mufindi Council will conduct detailed engineering design with the support of IRRIP team. Designs are planned to commence in November 2017 and expected to be completed within five months to allow procurement of contractors to be done between April and June 2018, and construction works to commence in July 2018 iii. Agreement is expected to be reached between USAID, Development Partners and Mufindi LGA (Council Manager’s office) on the scope of works for the road segments to be selected from the prioritized list.
RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT MUFINDI DISTRICT 12 ANNEXES Annex A Data Collection Forms Annex B Tool Workings and Output Annex C Cost Estimates Annex D Location Map
RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT MUFINDI DISTRICT Annex A Data Collection Forms
Form No 01: Socio-Economic Data District: Mufindi District Data Compiled By: Simon E. Karungu Date: 23 October 2017 Educational/ Traffic Distribution Relevance to agricultural development health facilities Ward Non- No Road Name Motorized % Hospital pop. Motorized % ped. Sec. Traffic cycles / Health Rating Reasons Traffic school veh/day Center Cycles Ped. loaded loaded (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) 1 Ifwagi-Mwitikilwa 16,722 98 72 100 38% 26% 1 1 M Medium scale maize farming 2 T/ng'ombe - Kwatwangwa 16,798 36 169 163 24% 19% 1 1 H Irrigation Scheme/ Horticulture 3 Isimikinyi - Idunda 11,959 25 221 667 5% 0% 1 1 M Medium scale maize farming 4 Idunda - Kinegembasi 17,976 16 111 401 12% 4% 1 0 M Medium scale maize farming 5 Iramba- Ipilimo 22,343 32 150 198 10% 14% 1 0 H Large scale maize farming 6 Maguvani - Udumuka 26,406 12 92 119 15% 5% 1 1 H Large scale maize farming 7 Mtambula - Kisasa 23,936 90 503 399 7% 30% 1 0 M Medium scale maize farming 8 Mninga - Mkalala - Kasanga 22,707 55 279 275 26% 15% 1 1 M Medium scale maize farming 9 Lugolofu-Magunguli mashambani 20,291 81 343 476 49% 0% 1 1 H Irrigation Scheme/ Horticulture 10 Sawala - Mkonge - Iyegeya - 35,181 71 377 251 16% 14% 1 0 H Lulanda Tea and/or Coffee Plantations 11 Mkuta - Ludilo - Ilasa 26,064 57 113 33 25% 10% 1 1 M Other food crops 12 Nundwe - Ikongosi 27,927 29 99 40 18% 5% 1 0 M Other food crops 13 Ihalimba-Igomtwa-Usokami 27,011 45 392 224 19% 26% 1 0 M Other food crops 14 Vikula-Kilosamufindi 19,745 23 76 66 60% 20% 1 1 M Other food crops 15 Kiyowela - Idete 7,540 99 91 4 24.0% 11% 1 0 M Other food crops 16 Large market Mtili - Ifwagi-Mkuta 16,722 93 50 53 14.0% 3.0% 1 1 H center/Warehouse 17 Mkuta - Ifupila 16,722 25 74 40 50.0% 15.0% 1 1 H Tea and/or Coffee Plantations 18 Mdabulo - Lulanda 17,882 92 597 574 40.0% 15.0% 1 1 M Medium scale maize farming 19 Lulanda - Mpanga Tazara 9,267 19 106 64 75.0% 36.0% 0 0 M Other food crops 20 Ifupila-Mdabulo 9,342 25 74 40 60.0% 24.0% 1 1 H Tea and/or Coffee Plantations 21 Nyololo - Maduma 11,979 31 281 330 23.0% 17.0% 1 1 M Other food crops 22 Nyololo - Njojo 17,828 11 201 226 24.0% 21.0% 1 1 H Other FTF Projects 23 Kisada - Ugenza 14,349 28 134 272 13.0% 19.0% 1 0 M Other food crops
RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT MUFINDI DISTRICT Form No 02: Road Condition Related Data District: Mufindi District Data Compiled By: Simon E. Karungu Date: 23 October 2017
Road condition if no Length Days improvement Estimated Road condition No Road Name km impassable Transit Speed Assessment Total Cost after km/hr US$ '000 improvement (1) (2) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) 1 Ifwagi-Mwitikilwa 7.5 0 25 Poor 238 Good 2 T/ng'ombe - Kwatwangwa 40.7 0 20 Poor 1,126 Good 3 Isimikinyi - Idunda 14.0 0 25 Poor 379 Good 4 Idunda - Kinegembasi 21.6 0 30 Poor 392 Good 5 Iramba- Ipilimo 13.9 0 35 Poor 496 Good 6 Maguvani - Udumuka 29.2 0 25 Poor 865 Good 7 Mtambula - Kisasa 13.6 0 30 Poor 441 Good 8 Mninga - Mkalala - Kasanga 15.1 0 25 Poor 634 Good 9 Lugolofu-Magunguli mashambani 21.9 90 15 Poor 1,045 Good 10 Sawala - Mkonge - Iyegeya - Lulanda 40.3 0 25 Poor 1,298 Good 11 Mkuta - Ludilo - Ilasa 26.1 0 20 Poor 760 Good 12 Nundwe - Ikongosi 27.0 0 25 Poor 816 Good 13 Ihalimba-Igomtwa-Usokami 28.1 0 20 Poor 874 Good 14 Vikula-Kilosamufindi 33.1 0 25 Poor 1,034 Good 15 Kiyowela - Idete 40.4 60 18 Poor 1,334 Good 16 Mtili - Ifwagi-Mkuta 13.6 0 25 Poor 508 Good 17 Mkuta - Ifupila 8.6 0 20 Poor 369 Good 18 Mdabulo - Lulanda 27.7 0 30 Poor 874 Good 19 Lulanda - Mpanga Tazara 37.2 150 20 Poor 1,324 Good 20 Ifupila-Mdabulo 9.1 0 20 Poor 317 Good 21 Nyololo - Maduma 20.2 0 30 Poor 768 Good 22 Nyololo - Njojo 18.9 0 25 Poor 693 Good 23 Kisada - Ugenza 8.1 0 25 Poor 284 Good
RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT MUFINDI DISTRICT Annex B Tool Workings and Output
RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT MUFINDI DISTRICT Rural roads prioritization - Workings and results MUFINDI DISTRICT
Benefit estimates (rounded) in US$/km/year Access Conventional Mode switch Pop. Est Road to Priority RUC savings benefits Road Band cost condition Agric Basic school index = Rank Rank Classi- per US$ impro- From From pot social or Total ben of total of Ward Road Name fication km km per km vement MT NMT MC NMT benefits access health Benefits ÷cost benefit index (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) Ifwagi- From Poor Ifwagi Collector 7.5 M 31,700 4,090 4,760 0 0 180 530 1,060 10,620 0.335 14 14 Mwitikilwa to Good Tamba la Sadan and From Poor ng'ombe - Collector 40.7 L 27,700 1,270 9,080 0 0 740 260 520 11,870 0.429 13 10 Ikweha to Good Kwatwangwa Malangali Isimikinyi - From Poor Collector 14.0 L 27,100 880 25,120 0 0 180 260 520 26,960 0.995 3 2 and Idunda Idunda to Good
Idunda and Idunda - From Poor Collector 21.6 L 22,400 560 14,550 0 0 180 260 260 15,810 0.706 9 4 Itandula Kinegembasi to Good
Itandula and Iramba- From Poor Collector 13.9 M 35,700 1,130 9,610 0 0 740 530 530 12,540 0.351 12 13 Mtambula Ipilimo to Good Mbalamaziw Maguvani - From Poor a, Mtambula Collector 29.2 L 29,700 420 5,830 0 0 740 260 520 7,770 0.262 16 15 Udumuka to Good and Kasanga Mtambula Mtambula - From Poor Feeder 13.6 M 32,500 3,760 24,500 0 0 180 530 530 29,500 0.908 2 3 and Igowole Kisasa to Good Mninga - Mninga and From Poor Mkalala - Feeder 15.1 L 41,900 2,030 15,160 0 0 180 260 520 18,150 0.433 8 9 Kasanga to Good Kasanga Lugolofu - Makungu From Poor Magunguli Collector 21.9 L 47,700 3,380 17,070 210 2,020 1,470 260 520 24,930 0.523 4 7 and Kiyowela to Good mashambani Sawala - Mtwango, Mkonge - From Poor Ihanu and Collector 40.3 L 32,200 2,970 16,960 0 0 740 260 260 21,190 0.658 5 5 Iyegeya - to Good Luhunga Lulanda Ifwagi and Mkuta - Ludilo From Poor Feeder 26.1 L 29,100 2,100 3,850 0 0 180 260 520 6,910 0.237 18 16 Mdabulo - Ilasa to Good
RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT MUFINDI DISTRICT Rural roads prioritization - Workings and results MUFINDI DISTRICT
Benefit estimates (rounded) in US$/km/year Access Conventional Mode switch Pop. Est Road to Priority RUC savings benefits Road Band cost condition Agric Basic school index = Rank Rank Classi- per US$ impro- From From pot social or Total ben of total of Ward Road Name fication km km per km vement MT NMT MC NMT benefits access health Benefits ÷cost benefit index (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) Ikongosi and Nundwe - From Poor Collector 27.0 L 30,200 1,020 3,700 0 0 180 260 260 5,420 0.179 23 20 Ihalimba Ikongosi to Good Ihalimba- Ihalimba and From Poor Igomtwa- Collector 28.1 L 31,100 1,580 16,560 0 0 180 260 260 18,840 0.606 7 6 Kibengu to Good Usokami Vikula and Vikula- From Poor Collector 33.1 L 31,200 810 3,870 0 0 180 260 520 5,640 0.181 21 19 Ihanu Kilosamufindi to Good
Kiyowela and Kiyowela - From Poor Collector 40.4 L 33,000 4,130 2,040 170 180 370 260 260 7,410 0.225 17 17 Idete Idete to Good
Ikongosi and Mtili - Ifwagi- From Poor Collector 13.6 L 37,400 3,880 2,830 0 0 740 260 520 8,230 0.220 15 18 Ifwagi Mkuta to Good From Poor Ifwagi Mkuta - Ifupila Feeder 8.6 M 42,900 880 3,060 0 0 740 530 1,060 6,270 0.146 19 23 to Good Mdabulo and Mdabulo - From Poor Collector 27.7 L 31,500 3,840 32,010 0 0 180 260 520 36,810 1.169 1 1 Ihanu Lulanda to Good Lulanda - Ihanu and From Poor Mpanga Collector 37.2 L 35,600 670 2,700 80 1,800 370 260 0 5,880 0.165 20 21 Mpanga TZR to Good Tazara Ifupila- From Poor Mdabulo Collector 9.1 L 34,800 880 3,060 0 0 740 260 520 5,460 0.157 22 22 Mdabulo to Good Nyololo and Nyololo - From Poor Collector 20.2 L 38,000 1,090 16,820 0 0 180 260 520 18,870 0.497 6 8 Maduma Maduma to Good Nyololo and Nyololo - From Poor Collector 18.9 L 36,700 390 11,730 0 0 740 260 520 13,640 0.372 10 12 Malangali Njojo to Good Ikweha and Kisada - From Poor Collector 8.1 M 35,100 990 11,370 0 0 180 530 530 13,600 0.387 11 11 Bumilayinga Ugenza to Good
RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT MUFINDI DISTRICT Annex C Cost Estimates Cost Total Cost Rank Road Length Estimate Estimate of Ward Road Name Classi- (km) per km (USD) Index fication (USD) Mdabulo and 1 Ihanu Mdabulo - Lulanda Collector 27.7 31,500 872,550 Malangali and 2 Idunda Isimikinyi - Idunda Collector 14.0 27,100 379,400 Mtambula and 3 Igowole Mtambula - Kisasa Feeder 13.6 32,500 442,000 Idunda and 4 Itandula Idunda - Kinegembasi Collector 21.6 22,400 483,840 Mtwango, Ihanu Sawala - Mkonge - 5 and Luhunga Iyegeya - Lulanda Collector 40.3 32,200 1,297,660 Ihalimba and Ihalimba-Igomtwa- 6 Kibengu Usokami Collector 28.1 31,100 873,910 Makungu and Lugolofu-Magunguli 7 Kiyowela mashambani Collector 21.9 47,700 1,044,630 Nyololo and 8 Maduma Nyololo - Maduma Collector 20.2 38,000 767,600 Mninga and Mninga - Mkalala - 9 Kasanga Kasanga Feeder 15.1 41,900 632,690 Sadan and Tambalang'ombe - 10 Ikweha Kwatwangwa Collector 40.7 27,700 1,127,390 Ikweha and 11 Bumilayinga Kisada - Ugenza Collector 8.1 35,100 284,310 Nyololo and 12 Malangali Nyololo - Njojo Collector 18.9 36,700 693,630 Itandula and 13 Mtambula Iramba- Ipilimo Collector 13.9 35,700 496,230 14 Ifwagi Ifwagi-Mwitikilwa Collector 7.5 31,700 237,750 Mbalamaziwa, Mtambula and 15 Kasanga Maguvani - Udumuka Collector 29.2 29,700 867,240 Ifwagi and 16 Mdabulo Mkuta - Ludilo - Ilasa Feeder 26.1 29,100 759,510 Kiyowela and 17 Idete Kiyowela - Idete Collector 40.4 33,000 1,333,200 Ikongosi and 18 Ifwagi Mtili - Ifwagi-Mkuta Collector 13.6 37,400 508,640 19 Vikula and Ihanu Vikula-Kilosamufindi Collector 33.1 31,200 1,032,720 Ikongosi and 20 Ihalimba Nundwe - Ikongosi Collector 27.0 30,200 815,400 Ihanu and Lulanda - Mpanga 21 Mpanga TZR Tazara Collector 37.2 35,600 1,324,320 22 Mdabulo Ifupila-Mdabulo Collector 9.1 34,800 316,680 23 Ifwagi Mkuta - Ifupila Feeder 8.6 42,900 368,940 TOTAL 515.9 16,960,240
RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT MUFINDI DISTRICT Annex D Location Map for Prioritized Roads
RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT MUFINDI DISTRICT RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORT MUFINDI DISTRICT Technical Assistance to Support the Development of Irrigation and Rural Roads Infrastructure Project (IRRIP2)
U.S. Agency for International Development 686 Old Bagamoyo Road, Msasani February 2013 P.O. Box 9130 Dar es Salaam RURAL ROADS PRIORITIZATION REPORTTanzania This publication wasMUFINDI produced DISTRICT for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by CDM International Inc.
February 2013
This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by CDM International Inc.
OCTOBER 2012
This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by CDM International Inc.
OCTOBER 2012
This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by CDM International Inc.