Richard Graves Associates Ltd, Company Number

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

TM PROVIDING TRUSTED ECOLOGICAL ADVICE EXTENDED PHASE 1 ECOLOGICAL SURVEY OF LAND AT LANDHURST HARTFIELD Project Prepared By Approved by Client Status Date RGA047 A.R. Graves CEcol A.R. Graves CEcol VERVE FINAL AUG CEnv FCIEEM CEnv FCIEEM PROPERTIES 14 LTD Richard Graves Associates Ltd, Company Number: 7931959 Address: 10B Star Lane, Orpington, Kent, BR5 3LJ Tel: 020 32861419 E-mail: [email protected] www.richardgravesassociates.com Conditions of Use This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Verve Properties Ltd its consultants and the local planning authority by Richard Graves Associates Ltd. The purpose of the report is explicitly stated in the text. It is not to be used for any other purposes unless agreed with Richard Graves Associates. The copyright for the report rests with Richard Graves Associates unless otherwise agreed. According to the purpose of the report, survey information supplied reflects the findings of the surveyor at the time of the visit. Species and habitats are subject to change over time, some species may not be apparent at certain times (for example subject to seasonal variation) and some species may colonise a site after a survey has been completed. These matters should be considered when using this report. Richard Graves Associates takes no responsibility for ecological features present after the date of the most recent survey. Ecological information over two years old should be updated before use in a decision making process. Ecological desktop information from third parties including local records centres is used in accordance with the appropriate terms and conditions of the suppliers. Ecological information more than five years old should be considered of historic interest only and not be relied on for decision making. All Richard Graves Associates staff are members of, at the appropriate level of the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management (CIEEM) and subscribe to its code of professional conduct in their work. In accordance with the code limitations to the methods, results and conclusions will be accurately stated and any biological records collected as part of the project will be supplied to the appropriate local records centre one year after the date of issue of the report unless otherwise agreed. 2 Contents 1. Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 5 3. Methods ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Extended Phase 1 Survey ................................................................................................................ 6 4. Results and Evaluation ................................................................................................................ 8 Desktop Study .................................................................................................................................. 8 Phase 1 Survey .................................................................................................................................. 9 Protected Species ............................................................................................................................ 11 5. Recommendations ...................................................................................................................... 13 Habitats ........................................................................................................................................... 13 European Protected Species .......................................................................................................... 13 Other Protected Species................................................................................................................. 13 General Measures During Construction ..................................................................................... 14 6. Conclusion .................................................................................................................................. 15 7. References ................................................................................................................................... 16 8. Appendices ................................................................................................................................. 17 Appendix A - Figure 1. Phase 1 Survey Plan ............................................................................. 17 Appendix B – SBRC Desktop Summary ..................................................................................... 18 3 1. Summary Richard Graves Associates undertook an Extended Phase 1 survey of land at Landhurst near Hartfield, East Sussex. No statutorily or locally designated sites are within or adjacent to the site or are likely to be impacted by the proposed development. Hedgerows form the southern, eastern and western boundaries of the site and are of high or moderate ecological value. None of the other habitats recorded were of intrinsic ecological value. Evidence of bat and nesting bird activity was recorded within the site. However there was no evidence of bats roosting within the buildings and structures. In order to further avoid potential harm to protected species timing of demolition and vegetation clearance when these species are least likely to be present is recommended. The report concludes that there are no material considerations in respect of biodiversity which should prevent the local planning authority granting permission for the development. 4 2. Introduction Instruction Richard Graves Associates were instructed by to undertake an Extended Phase 1 Survey of land comprising of Plot 7 at Landhurst. The survey is required to inform the local planning authority, Wealden District Council of any ecological interest associated with the plot and requirements for appropriate mitigation. It is understood that all of the buildings within the current plot will be demolished. Location The site is located to the south of Gallipot Street / Hill, Landhurst, Hartfield, at Ordnance Survey (OS) grid reference at TQ 4715 3502 as part of the Landhurst Estate within a rural location. Assessment, Extended Phase 1 Survey The purpose of the assessment is to identify the habitats and species of ecological interest present, provide an indication of any protected species present and make recommendation for the protection of ecological features and mitigation. Protected Species are those, which are fully or partially protected by legislation. The relevant legislation includes: • The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 (HMG, 2010) • The Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) (HMG, 1981) • The Protection of Badgers Act 1992 (HMG, 1992) 5 3. Methods Extended Phase 1 Survey The Extended Phase 1 Survey is described in Guidelines for Baseline Ecological Assessment (Institute of Environmental Assessment, 1995). This approach is based on: A Handbook for Phase 1 Habitat Survey (JNCC, 2010 (Revised)), which includes classification of basic habitats and standard mapping, to which are added a desktop survey and a protected species walkover. The methodology is deviated from as target notes are not used on the plan but presented separately as waypoint generated by a GPS application (Peto, 2010) which provide more accurate locations and is easier to interpret for the reader. Hedges were also classified using the hedgerow evaluation and grading system (HEGS) (Clements, 1992) Desktop Study Baseline data for protected sites and protected species is held for most parts of the country, some of this, in particular protected sites, is open source (freely available) and some, in particular species information, may be supplied by local records centres for a charge. Given the location of the site in East Sussex the following source was consulted: • Sussex Biodiversity Records Centre (SBRC) A desktop study from SBRC (Sussex Biodiversity Records Centre, 2014) was obtained and is included as an appendix to this report. Protected Species Walkover and Phase 1 Survey The site was visited by Richard Graves and Phil Bolton on the 8th August 2014. Habitats were identified and are plotted on a map (Figure 2, Appendix A); botanical species were recorded and are noted in the text using nomenclature in accordance with (Stace, 2010) and (Veldhuijzen Van Zanten, 2010). Hedgerows were assessed for dormouse interest and potential and buildings were investigated for evidence of and potential for bats. Surveyor qualifications and experience The following surveyors conducted the work undertaken for the Landhurst site: Richard Graves Richard Graves BSc (Hons) MSc PGDip CEcol CEnv FCIEEM has over twenty years’ experience as a practising ecologist and has undertaken, commissioned and reviewed several hundred Extended Phase 1 Surveys all over the UK. Richard is a fellow of the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management (CIEEM) a chartered ecologist and a chartered environmentalist. Richard is also class licenced for great crested newt surveys, a class licenced bat surveyor and author of current good practice guidelines for bat surveys. 6 Phil Bolton Phil Bolton BSc (Hons) ACIEEM MACMA is an experienced ecologist and countryside manager with over thirty
Recommended publications
  • Entomology Day 2018 Wyre Forest Study Group

    Entomology Day 2018 Wyre Forest Study Group

    Wyre Forest Study Group Entomology Day 2018 ChaIR: Brett WestwOOD, RepOrt: SUsan LIMbreY Flights of Fancy Speakers from left: Wendy Carter, Steven Falk, Richard Comont, Brett Westwood, Malcolm Smart, Erica McAlister, Gary Farmer Steve Horton Chaired by Brett Westwood, our title gave speak- in 1983, this book, with its simple keys, big genera di- ers scope to cover a range of topics, out of which a vided into smaller keys and short snappy text with an recurring theme of concern about pollinating insects ecological flavour, made recording much easier, broke became apparent. down barriers, and influenced Steven’s own later work. He spent his second undergraduate year doing 13 dip- Steven Falk, in Breaking Down Barriers to In- tera plates for Michael Chinery’s Collins Guide to the vertebrate Identification, told us that throughout Insects of Britain and Northern Europe (1986), one of his career he has been committed to making entomol- five artists illustrating 2000 species, another ground- ogy accessible no matter what level of expertise peo- breaking book. Steven showed us how his technique ple may have. He started as an artist, and he showed us progressed through the book, for example with lateral some of his childhood, but far from childish, pictures of lighting giving a three dimensional effect. birds. He was as fascinated by the literature and by the artists and their techniques, as by the natural history, In 1985, work began on illustrations for George Else’s citing Roger Tory Peterson, the father of modern user- Handbook to British Bees. Pen and ink, using combi- friendly field guides, the draughtsmanship of Charles nations of stippling and cross-hatching, produced an Tunnicliffe using watercolours, and Basil Ede, using amazing array of tones and textures, and Steven ac- gouache, among others.
  • St Mawes to Cremyll Nature Conservation Assessment

    St Mawes to Cremyll Nature Conservation Assessment

    Assessment of Coastal Access Proposals between St Mawes to Cremyll on sites and features of nature conservation concern th 20 June 2019 Nature Conservation Assessment for Coastal Access Proposals between St Mawes to Cremyll About this document This document should be read in conjunction with the published Reports for the St Mawes to Cremyll Stretch and the Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA). The Coastal Access Reports contain a full description of the access proposals, including any additional mitigation measures that have been included. These Reports can be viewed here https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/england-coast-path-from-st-mawes-to-cremyll-comment- on-proposals A HRA is required for European sites (SPA, SAC and Ramsar sites). The HRA is published alongside the Coastal Access Reports. This document, the Nature Conservation Assessment (NCA), covers all other aspects (including SSSIs, MCZs and undesignated but locally important sites and features) in so far as any HRA does not already address the issue for the sites and feature(s) in question. The NCA is arranged site by site. Maps 1-8 on pages 38-44 show designated sites along this stretch of coast. See Annex 1 for an index to designated sites and features for this stretch of coast, including features that have been considered within any HRA. Page 2 Nature Conservation Assessment for Coastal Access Proposals between St Mawes to Cremyll Contents About this document .................................................................................................................
  • Mayor's Biodiversity Strategy

    Mayor's Biodiversity Strategy

    Connecting with London’s nature The Mayor’s Biodiversity Strategy July 2002 copyright Greater London Authority July 2002 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 ISBN 1 85261 385 8 Cover photograph credit PA Photos This publication is printed on Evolution Satin The Mayor’s Biodiversity Strategy Mayor of London iii contents foreword vi 1 introduction 1 2 London’s biodiversity: the context 7 London’s wildlife habitats 7 Woodland 8 Grassland 9 The River Thames and its tributaries 10 The canals 11 Ponds and lakes 11 Heathland 12 Farmland 12 Parks and squares 13 Cemeteries and churchyards 13 Gardens and allotments 14 Community gardens, city farms and ecology centres 14 Railway land, linesides and roadsides 14 Wasteland 15 The built environment 15 Protected sites 16 London’s rare species 19 The existing programme of work for biodiversity 20 The Mayor’s vision for London 22 Objectives for biodiversity 23 References 24 3 linkages with other strategies and crosscutting themes 27 Health 27 Sustainable development 28 Equality of opportunities 29 Access to natural green space 30 Threats to perceived safety and physical barriers to access 31 Paid and voluntary employment 31 Consultation 31 Black and ethnic minority people 31 Faith groups 32 Disabled people 32 Older people 32 Young people and children 32 State of the environment 32 The London Plan 33 Transport 33 iv Mayor of London The Mayor’s Biodiversity Strategy Economic development 34 Waste management
  • North Downs Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statements

    North Downs Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statements

    Biodiversity Opportunity Areas: the basis for realising Surrey’s ecological network Appendix 6: North Downs Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statements ND01: North Downs Scarp; The Hog's Back ND02: North Downs Scarp & Dip; Guildford to the Mole Gap ND03: North Downs Scarp & Dip; Mole Gap to Reigate ND04: North Downs; Epsom Downs to Nonsuch Park ND05: North Downs; Banstead Woods & Downs and Chipstead Downs ND06: North Downs Scarp; Quarry Hangers to the A22 ND07: North Downs Scarp; Woldingham ND08: North Downs; Banstead & Walton Heaths September 2019 Investing in our County’s future Surrey Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statement Biodiversity Opportunity Area ND01: North Downs Scarp; The Hog’s Back Local authorities: Guildford, Waverley Aim & justification: The aim of Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (BOAs) is to establish a strategic framework for conserving and enhancing biodiversity at a landscape scale, making our wildlife more robust to changing climate and socio-economic pressures. BOAs are those areas where targeted maintenance, restoration and creation of Natural Environment & Rural Communities (NERC) Act ‘Habitats of Principal Importance’, ie. Priority habitats will have the greatest benefit towards achieving this aim. Realising BOA aims will contribute to UK commitments to halt biodiversity declines, and their recognition directly meets current National Planning Policy Framework policy to plan strategically for the enhancement of the natural environment; to be achieved by providing net gains for biodiversity and establishing coherent ecological networks that are more resilient to current and future pressures (para. 170). Designation of BOAs also fulfils NPPF requirements to identify, map and safeguard components of wider ecological networks, and areas identified for habitat management, enhancement, restoration or creation (para.
  • County Wildlife Sites Criteria for Cornwall Appendices

    County Wildlife Sites Criteria for Cornwall Appendices

    Heading County Wildife Site Criteria for Cornwall Appendices Environmental Records Centre for Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly Appendix 1 List of County Wildlife Sites in Cornwall List current at July 2010 PENWITH P/K 1 Hayle Estuary and River System P1.1 Hayle Estuary P1.3 Treloweth Woods P1.4 St Erth Pools P/K 1.5 Relubbus Ponds P1.6 Carbismill to Relubbus P/K 2 North Coast P2.2 Great Moor Zawn to Porthmeor Cove P2.5 Towednack Quae Head to Clodgy Point P/K 2.7 Hayle Dune System P3 South Coast P3.1 Prussia Cove to Stackhouse Cove P3.2 Stackhouse Cove to Perran Sands P3.3 Marazion Marsh P3.4 Mount's Bay P3.5 Mousehole to Lamorna Cove P3.6 Lamorna Cove to Merthen Point P3.7 Merthen Point to Porthcurno P3.8 Porthcurno to Porthgwarra P3.9 Porthgwarra to Pendower Coves P3.10 Pendower Coves to Pordenack Point P3.11 Pordenack Point to Sennen Cove P3.12 Sennen Cove to Carn Gloose P/K 4 Red River Valley P/K 4.1 Lower Red River P5 Gwinear Tips and Trungle Valley P6.2 Clodgy Moor P7 Cold Harbour Marsh P8 Drift Reservoir P9 Higher and Lower Hill Woods(includes Trencrom Hill) P10 Selena Moor P10.1 West Selena Moor P10.2 East Selena Moor P11 Penwith Moors P11.1 Carn Brea, Tredinney & Bartinney Commons P11.2 Caer Bran and Sancreed Beacon P11.3 Carnyorth Common and Bostraze Bog P11.4 Chun Downs to Boswens Common P11.5 Boswarva Carn P11.6 Central Moors P11.7 Churchtown Common to Trendrine Hill P11.8 Rosewall Hill P11.9 Bussow Moor & Carn Stabba P11.10 Busvargus & Tregeseal Common to Dowran Common & Bosworlas Moor P11.11 Botrea Downs P11.12 Bosvenning
  • Dipterists Forum Events

    Dipterists Forum Events

    BULLETIN OF THE Dipterists Forum Bulletin No. 73 Spring 2012 Affiliated to the British Entomological and Natural History Society Bulletin No. 73 Spring 2012 ISSN 1358-5029 Editorial panel Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Assistant Editor Judy Webb Dipterists Forum Officers Chairman Martin Drake Vice Chairman Stuart Ball Secretary John Kramer Meetings Treasurer Howard Bentley Please use the Booking Form included in this Bulletin or downloaded from our Membership Sec. John Showers website Field Meetings Sec. Roger Morris Field Meetings Indoor Meetings Sec. Malcolm Smart Roger Morris 7 Vine Street, Stamford, Lincolnshire PE9 1QE Publicity Officer Judy Webb [email protected] Conservation Officer Rob Wolton Workshops & Indoor Meetings Organiser Malcolm Smart Ordinary Members “Southcliffe”, Pattingham Road, Perton, Wolverhampton, WV6 7HD [email protected] Chris Spilling, Duncan Sivell, Barbara Ismay Erica McAlister, John Ismay, Mick Parker Bulletin contributions Unelected Members Please refer to later in this Bulletin for details of how to contribute and send your material to both of the following: Dipterists Digest Editor Peter Chandler Dipterists Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Secretary 122, Link Road, Anstey, Charnwood, Leicestershire LE7 7BX. John Kramer Tel. 0116 212 5075 31 Ash Tree Road, Oadby, Leicester, Leicestershire, LE2 5TE. [email protected] [email protected] Assistant Editor Treasurer Judy Webb Howard Bentley 2 Dorchester Court, Blenheim Road, Kidlington, Oxon. OX5 2JT. 37, Biddenden Close, Bearsted, Maidstone, Kent. ME15 8JP Tel. 01865 377487 Tel. 01622 739452 [email protected] [email protected] Conservation Dipterists Digest contributions Robert Wolton Locks Park Farm, Hatherleigh, Oakhampton, Devon EX20 3LZ Dipterists Digest Editor Tel.
  • Scientific Name

    Scientific Name

    CYNLLUN GWEITHREDU BIOAMRYWIAETH LLEOL SIR GAERFYRDDIN – ANIFEILIAID DI-ASGWRN-CEFN CARMARTHENSHIRE S42/BAP – INVERTEBRATES OVERALL OBJECTIVES • To identify new sites for survey in the county. • Encourage volunteer interest in the range of invertebrates in the county. • To use key species as a focus for public/school engagement. • To raise awareness of these species and the issues affecting them. SPECIES PHOTO HABITAT/CARMS SITES ISSUES/ACTION REQUIRED Asilus crabroniformis • Lowland Grassland and Heathland • Apart from the loss of habitat, it Hornet robberfly • Much declined species of has been seriously affected by the Pryf llofrudd unimproved cattle or horse-grazed use of ivermectins (and other pastures and now very rare in animal medications) to control bot Carmarthenshire. fly, etc. in horses and other internal • Last recorded in 1997 but may parasites in cattle. These chemicals survive at a few of the small numbers are excreted in the dung and kill off unimproved pastures in the county. the larvae of dung beetles on • It flies in late summer (July-early which Asilus larvae are predatory. © Sam Bosanquet Sept) • Specialist survey is needed to Length: 25 mm check formerly known sites and other potential new sites. • Potential for public participation survey Bembidion quadripustulatum • Found on wetland margins, • Specialist survey is needed to Scarce Four-dot Pin-palp including bare sand, mud or chalky-clay check formerly known sites and Chwilen ddaear margins, well-vegetated fen margins, other potential new sites and bare silt lagoon margins. • Found on the banks of the Tywi near Llandeilo in 1996. Bidessus minutissimus • Lower reaches of rivers in association • Specialist survey is needed to Minutest Diving Beetle with sand and fine gravel banks.
  • Neu Entdecktes Vorkommen Der Hornissen-Raubfliege Asilus Crabroniformis Linnaeus, 1771 (Diptera: Asilidae) in Mittelfranken

    Neu Entdecktes Vorkommen Der Hornissen-Raubfliege Asilus Crabroniformis Linnaeus, 1771 (Diptera: Asilidae) in Mittelfranken

    ©Kreis Nürnberger Entomologen; download unter www.zobodat.at gal athea Band 32 • Beiträge des Kreises Nürnberger Entomologen • 2016 • S. 3-9 Neu entdecktes Vorkommen der Hornissen-Raubfliege Asilus crabroniformis Linnaeus, 1771 (Diptera: Asilidae) in Mittelfranken VERENA FRÖHLICH UND KLAUS VON DER DUNK Zusammenfassung Im Naturschutzgebiet Tennenloher Forst im östlichen Mittelfranken (N-Bayern) wurde ein Vorkommen der Hornissen-Raubfliege Asilus crabroniformis entdeckt. Das Areal ist gekennzeichnet durch Offensande und Heidebereiche. Seit 2003 verhindern Przewalski- Pferde die fortschreitende Sukzession zu einem Kiefernwald. Die Existenz der Wildpfer- de ist eine wesentliche Voraussetzung für die Ansiedlung der Raubfliege. Der Pferdekot lockt koprophile Insekten (vor allem Mistkäfer und Fliegen) an, die die Nahrungsgrund- lage für Asilus und ihre Larven bilden. Bemerkungen zum Einwanderungsweg und zur Gefährdung der Art beschließen diese Arbeit. Abstract In the protected area within the Tennenlohe-Forest (Eastern Middle Frankonia, North- ern Bavaria) a population of the hornet -robberfly Asilus crabroniformis could be found this summer. The biotope is a mixture of open sand and heather districts. To avoid an accelerating succession towards a pine forest a flock of Przewalski horses are kept here since 2003. Their hoof prints guarantee the status quo. The excrements of the horses attract a lot of coprophilous insects, coprophagous beetles and flies in particular. These represent the prey for the robberfly imagines. The fly’s larvae are predators of the bee- tle’s larvae in the underground. Remarks on the possible way of immigration and on the nevertheless vulnerable new population of Asilus concludes this paper. 1. Einleitung Als Gebietsbetreuerin der "Sandmagerrasen-Schutzgebiete bei Erlangen" bin ich zu- sammen mit meiner Kollegin Wiebke Bromisch unter anderem für das Beweidungspro- jekt mit Przewalski-Pferden im Naturschutzgebiet Tennenloher Forst zuständig.
  • Biodiversity Opportunity Areas: the Basis for Realising Surrey’S Ecological Network

    Biodiversity Opportunity Areas: the Basis for Realising Surrey’S Ecological Network

    Biodiversity Opportunity Areas: the basis for realising Surrey’s ecological network Appendix 7: Wealden Greensands Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statements WG01: Puttenham & Crooksbury WG02: Farnham Heaths WG03: Thursley, Hankley & Frensham Heaths WG04: Devil's Punch Bowl & Hindhead Heaths WG05: Hascombe, Winkworth & Hydon's Heath & Woodlands WG06: Blackheath, Chilworth & Farley Heaths WG07: Winterfold & the Hurtwood Greensand Ridge WG08: Leith Hill, Wotton, Abinger & Holmwood Greensand Ridge WG09: Limpsfield Heaths WG10: Reigate Heaths WG11: Holmesdale WG12: Albury & Shere Heaths & Parkland WG13: Abinger Roughs September 2019 Investing in our County’s future Surrey Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statement Biodiversity Opportunity Area WG01: Puttenham & Crooksbury Local authorities: Guildford, Waverley Aim & justification The aim of Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (BOAs) is to establish a strategic framework for conserving and enhancing biodiversity at a landscape scale, making our wildlife more robust to changing climate and socio-economic pressures. BOAs are those areas where targeted maintenance, restoration and creation of Natural Environment & Rural Communities (NERC) Act ‘Habitats of Principal Importance’, ie. Priority habitats will have the greatest benefit towards achieving this aim. Realising BOA aims will contribute to UK commitments to halt biodiversity declines, and their recognition directly meets current National Planning Policy Framework policy to plan strategically for the enhancement of the natural environment; to be achieved by providing net gains for biodiversity and establishing coherent ecological networks that are more resilient to current and future pressures (para. 170). Designation of BOAs also fulfils NPPF requirements to identify, map and safeguard components of wider ecological networks, and areas identified for habitat management, enhancement, restoration or creation (para. 174).
  • Chalk Downland

    Chalk Downland

    PROMOTING HABITAT MOSAICS FOR INVERTEBRATES Chalk downland Chalk downland encompasses open expanses of grassland, farmland and scrub. Wildflower-rich chalk grasslands, once covering extensive areas, are now restricted to small fragments sitting in a landscape of arable fields, improved pasture, hedges, woodland and quarries. This mixture of habitats (a mosaic) is, however, incredibly important for invertebrates – providing both breeding and adult foraging habitats. To conserve both common and rare species, it is vitally important to manage all these habitat features and develop a diverse landscape. Cradle Hill, Sussex - a habitat mosaic with arable margins, chalk grassland with scrub and a vehicle track. Right - Chalkhill Blue butterfly (Polyommatus coridon). Far right - Dingy skipper butterfly (Erynnis tages). Some S41 species found in chalk downland habitat mosaics S41 species are some of our rarest or most threatened Beetles: Set-aside downy-back beetle species which have been identified by the UK (Ophonus laticollis), government as needing particular conservation action. Mellets downy back (Ophonus melletii) Butterflies: Small blue butterfly (Cupido minimus), Crickets: Wart-biter bush-cricket (Decticus verrucivorus) Dingy skipper butterfly (Erynnis tages), Flies: Hornet robberfly (Asilus crabroniformis) Lulworth skipper (Thymelicus acteon) Bugs: Carline thistle leafhopper (Euscelis venosus), Moths: Straw Belle (Aspitates gilvaria), Chalk planthopper (Eurysa douglasi) Barred tooth-striped moth (Trichopteryx polycommata), Black-veined
  • An Introduction to Soldierflies and Allies Martin Harvey for Soldierflies and Allies Recording Scheme

    © Nigel Jones An introduction to Soldierflies and allies Martin Harvey for Soldierflies and Allies Recording Scheme Identifying soldierflies and allies Identifying the group is fun and with a bit of experience most species can quickly be recognised to genus at least. But as with all insect groups, there is a range from ‘easy’ to ‘difficult’. It is important that we check the records coming in to the recording scheme database to ensure that they are accurate. Everyone makes mistakes sometimes: flies can be difficult to identify, and errors can also occur when transcribing records. Use the checklist handout to see which species are flagged as being difficult to identify. If you have found a rare species, or a common species at an odd time of year or in an unusual location, it is important to record it with as much supporting evidence as possible. Such evidence can include a comment with the record along the lines of “I realise this is an unusual time of year but checked the identification and can confirm it”, but as well as that consider: • Keeping the specimen (‘voucher specimen’) to pass on to the recording scheme or another expert recorder (a live specimen may do the job if it can be passed on quickly). • Getting a good photo (preferably several photos from different angles, and record the size as well). • Getting a second (and third, fourth …) opinion from another experienced dipterist. The most frequently encountered species Never assume that the species you have found will be one of the common ones, always check! However, it is useful to know which species you are most likely to encounter, and the table below lists the ‘top 28’ species.
  • Other Invertebrates (1MB, Pdf)

    Other Invertebrates (1MB, Pdf)

    CARMARTHENSHIRE NATURE RECOVERY PLAN – OTHER INVERTEBRATES Environment (Wales) Act 2016 – Section 7 - Biodiversity lists and duty to take steps to maintain and enhance biodiversity The species listed in this table have been identified by Welsh Government as part of a list of species and types of habitat found in Wales that they consider are of key significance to maintain and enhance biodiversity in this country. This list (S7 list) is currently under review by WG and Natural Resources Wales. Public authorities (e.g. WG, councils) must take reasonable steps to maintain and enhance the species and types of habitat included in Section 7, and encourage others to take such steps. By safeguarding these species and habitats, improving their management and raising awareness about them it is hoped that a resilient natural environment in Wales will be sustained into the future. Most of the species here have not been recorded in Carmarthenshire for some time but included as this may well be because of lack of opportunity for recorder effort. SPECIES HABITAT/CARMS SITES ISSUES/ACTION REQUIRED Asilus crabroniformis • Lowland Grassland and Heathland • Apart from the loss of habitat, it Hornet robberfly • Much declined species of has been seriously affected by the use of ivermectins (and other unimproved cattle or horse-grazed pastures and now very rare in animal medications) to control bot Carmarthenshire. fly, etc. in horses and other internal parasites in cattle. These chemicals • Last recorded in 2005 in the west of are excreted in the dung and kill off the county but may survive at a few of the larvae of dung beetles on the small numbers unimproved which Asilus larvae are predatory.