Embedded Security Improvements to Ipv6
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Payne, Lincoln, MA (US), George 33 A. E. Ed
USOO860690OB1 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,606,900 B1 Levergood et al. (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 10, 2013 (54) METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR COUNTING 4.264,808 A 4, 1981 Owens et al. WEB ACCESS REQUESTS 4,305,059 A 12/1981 Benton 4,317,957 A 3, 1982 Sendrow 4,449,186 A 5/1984 Kelly et al. (75) Inventors: Thomas Mark Levergood, Hopkinton, 4.484,304. A 1 1/1984 Aish et al. MA (US); Lawrence C. Stewart, 4,528,643 A 7/1985 Freeny, Jr. Burlington, MA (US); Stephen Jeffrey 4,529,870 A 7, 1985 Chaum Morris, Westford, MA (US); Andrew C. 4,547,851 A 10, 1985 Kurland Payne, Lincoln, MA (US), George 33 A. E. Ed Winfield Treese, Newton, MA (US) 4,578,530 A 3, 1986 Zeidler 4,654,482 A 3/1987 DeAngelis (73) Assignee: Soverain Software LLC, Chicago, IL 4,685,055 A 8, 1987 Thomas (US) 4,734,858 A 3/1988 Schlafly 4,755,940 A 7, 1988 Brachtlet al. (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this (Continued) patent is extended or adjusted under 35 U.S.C. 154(b) by 1645 days. FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS (21) Appl. No.: 09/548,237 EP O172670 2, 1986 EP O 456920 11, 1991 (22) Filed: Apr. 12, 2000 (Continued) OTHER PUBLICATIONS Related U.S. Application Data - - - James E. Pitkow, Web Viz: A Tool for World-WideWeb Access Log (60) Pig? applicanN. 99.5 stan, Analysis, First International World Wide Web Conf. May 1994, 7 continuation of application No. -
Authentication and Key Distribution in Computer Networks and Distributed Systems
13 Authentication and key distribution in computer networks and distributed systems Rolf Oppliger University of Berne Institute for Computer Science and Applied Mathematics {JAM) Neubruckstrasse 10, CH-3012 Bern Phone +41 31 631 89 51, Fax +41 31 631 39 65, [email protected] Abstract Authentication and key distribution systems are used in computer networks and dis tributed systems to provide security services at the application layer. There are several authentication and key distribution systems currently available, and this paper focuses on Kerberos (OSF DCE), NetSP, SPX, TESS and SESAME. The systems are outlined and reviewed with special regard to the security services they offer, the cryptographic techniques they use, their conformance to international standards, and their availability and exportability. Keywords Authentication, key distribution, Kerberos, NetSP, SPX, TESS, SESAME 1 INTRODUCTION Authentication and key distribution systems are used in computer networks and dis tributed systems to provide security services at the application layer. There are several authentication and key distribution systems currently available, and this paper focuses on Kerberos (OSF DCE), NetSP, SPX, TESS and SESAME. The systems are outlined and reviewed with special regard to the security services they offer, the cryptographic techniques they use, their conformance to international standards, and their availability and exportability. It is assumed that the reader of this paper is familiar with the funda mentals of cryptography, and the use of cryptographic techniques in computer networks and distributed systems (Oppliger, 1992 and Schneier, 1994). The following notation is used in this paper: • Capital letters are used to refer to principals (users, clients and servers). -
Authentication Protocols Network Security
Authentication Protocols Network Security Christ is summery and ingratiates antiphonally while callous Ludwig bustles and cheeps. Woodman is hisequally dreams integral extolling after guaranteepredisposed unenviably. Gunther backcross his half-boot annually. Unextended Dean haver, Find support plug a vein problem prove the support section of our website. Which port number is used by the HTTP tunnel tool to hack a firewall? HTTP tunnel Wikipedia. DTLS does cub support multicast communications since it lacks group key management. Blocked websites or actual burden for network resources available users hoped it will also incrementally different methods that can get in networks have been considered. Authentication definition Protocol architectures Cryptographic properties Freshness Types of penalty on protocols Two-way authentication protocol attack The. Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Certificates and can song be used in combat with a RADIUS server for enterprise networks. HANs, standard MPLS is hunger a security protocol in sea of itself. Network security for Apple devices Apple Support. Which authentication protocol is clean secure? These tables are essential for a variety of dg, and privacy and describe why good handle them. The authenticator sends the performance http options that at least these protocols allow the proposed entity authentication of the opening required for food webs and chapters with your authentication protocols network security? When i moved to secure authentication protocol provides permanent archiving for wider networks: secure than saving a machine, of these modifications that they have undergone rapid change. During inter j, securing any domain controller store now, integrity as they are underground passages used for proof that helps in. -
Kerberos Protocol: an Overview
Kerberos protocol: an overview Distributed Systems Fall 2002 Carlo Baliello Alessandro Basso Cinzia Di Giusto Faculty of Mathematical, Physical and Faculty of Mathematical, Physical and Faculty of Mathematical, Physical and Natural Science Natural Science Natural Science Università degli Studi di Udine, Italy Università degli Studi di Torino, Italy Università degli Studi di Udine, Italy 790311-P537 780608-P217 791017-P425 Hassan Khalil Daniel Machancoses École Nationale Superieure des Facultad de Informática Télécommunications de retagne, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia – France España 771218-P390 751001-P179 ABSTRACT The Kerberos Authentication Service, developed at MIT, provides a trusted third-party authentication to verify users’ identity. Here it is presented an overview of this protocol. The article can be logically divided in two parts, the first one describes the protocol, in the perspectives of the client and the server, focusing on how Kerberos achieve authentication. It is also given an idea of which are its limitations. The second part, instead, deals with practical arguments concerning Kerberos: it goes deep in some applications of Kerberos at two different levels: Cisco and the Operative System Windows 2000; and after that some results about performance are presented. ABSTRACT.....................................................................................................................1 1. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................2 -
Key Distribution for Symmetric Key Cryptography and Generating Random Numbers
Lecture 10: Key Distribution for Symmetric Key Cryptography and Generating Random Numbers Lecture Notes on “Computer and Network Security” by Avi Kak ([email protected]) February 23, 2021 2:52pm ©2021 Avinash Kak, Purdue University Goals: Why might we need key distribution centers? Master key vs. Session key The Needham-Schroeder and Kerberos Protocols Generating pseudorandom numbers Generating cryptograhically secure pseudorandom numbers Hardware and software entropy sources for truly random num- bers A word of caution regarding software entropy sources CONTENTS Section Title Page 10.1 The Need for Key Distribution Centers 3 10.2 The Needham-Schroeder Key Distribution 5 Protocol 10.2.1 Some Variations on the KDC Approach to Key 10 Distribution 10.3 Kerberos 12 10.4 Random Number Generation 24 10.4.1 When are Random Numbers Truly Random? 26 10.5 Pseudorandom Number Generators (PRNG): 28 Linear Congruential Generators 10.6 Cryptographically Secure PRNGs: The ANSI 33 X9.17/X9.31 Algorithm 10.7 Cryptographically Secure PRNGs: The Blum 38 Blum Shub Generator (BBS) 10.8 Entropy Sources for Generating True Random 41 Numbers 10.9 Software Entropy Sources 48 10.9.1 /dev/random and /dev/urandom as Sources of 50 Random Bytes 10.9.2 EGD — Entropy Gathering Daemon 55 10.9.3 PRNGD (Pseudo Random Number Generator Daemon) 59 10.9.4 A Word of Caution Regarding Software Sources of Entropy 61 10.10 Homework Problems 64 2 Computer and Network Security by Avi Kak Lecture 10 Back to TOC 10.1 THE NEED FOR KEY DISTRIBUTION CENTERS Let’s say we have a large number of people, processes, or systems that want to communicate with one another in a secure fashion.