Some of the More Common Objects to View in PDF Format

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Some of the More Common Objects to View in PDF Format ANDROMADA page 1 OBJECT HRS. MIN. DEG. MAG. TYPE NGC 205 00 37.6 +41025 9.4 GALAXY TYPE E6 M31 224 00 40.0 +41.00 4.8 GALAXY TYPE SB M32 221 00 40.0 +40.36 8.7 GALAXY TYPE E2 NGC 752 01 54.7 +37.25 7.0 GALACTIC CLUSTER *70 NGC 891 02 19.3 +42.07 10.9 GALAXY TYPE SB NGC 7640 23 19.7 +40.35 11.3 GALAXY TYPE SB NGC 7662 23 23.5 +42.14 8.9 PLANETARY NEBULA NGC 214 00 38.7 +25.14 12.8 GALAXY NGC 404 01 06.6 +35.27 11.9 GALAXY NGC 709 01 49.8 +33.55 13.5 GALAXY NGC 753 01 54.6 +35.41 12.9 GALAXY NGC 7686 23 27.7 +48.51 8-13 OPEN CLUSTER ARIES NGC 697 01 48.6 +22.06 12.5 GALAXY NGC 772 01 56.6 +18.46 12.0 GALAXY NGC 821 02 05.6 +10.46 12.0 GALAXY NGC 877 02 15.3 +14.19 12.5 GALAXY NGC 972 02 31.3 +29.06 12.3 GALAXY NGC 976 02 31.2 +20.44 12.7 GALAXY NGC 1156 23 27.7 +48.51 8-13 OPEN CLUSTER AQUILLA NGC 6709 18 49.1 +10.17 8.0 GALACTIC CLUSTER NGC 6741 19 00.1 -00.31 12.0 PLANETARY NEBULA NGC 6751 19 03.2 -06.05 12.0 PLANETARY NEBULA B 133 19 04.5 -06.55 ? STARLESS DARK SPOT NGC 6755 19 05.4 +04.09 12.0 GALACTIC CLUSTER NGC 6756 19 06.2 +04.35 10.5 GALACTIC CLUSTER NGC 6760 19 08.6 +00.57 11.0 GLOBULAR CLUSTER NGC6772 19 12.0 -02.48 14.0 PLANETARY NEBULA I 4846 19 13.7 -09.09 12.0 PLANETARY NEBULA NGC 6778 19 15.7 -01.43 13.0 PLANETARY NEBULA NGC 6781 19 16.0 +06.26 12.5 PLANETARY NEBULA NGC 6790 19 20.4 +01.24 11.5 PLANETARY NEBULA NGC 6803 19 28.9 +09.58 11.0 PLANETARY NEBULA NGC 6804 19 29.2 +09.07 13.0 PLANETARY NEBULA NGC 6807 19 32.1 +05.35 14.0 PLANETARY NEBULA B 143 19 38.0 +11.00 ? DARK NEBULA NGC 6814 19 39.9 -10.25 ? GALAXY AURIGA NGC 1664 04 47.4 +43.37 11.0 GALACTIC CLUSTER *40 NGC 1778 05 05.0 +37.00 10.0 GALACTIC CLUSTER *10 I 405 05 13.0 +34.16 ? DIFFUSE NEBULA NGC 1857 05 16.6 +39.18 8.0 GALACTIC CLUSTER *45 NGC 1883 05 22.2 +46.30 13.0 GALACTIC CLUSTER *20 I 410 05 19.3 +33.28 9-12 GALACTIC CLUSTER*20 NGC 1893 05 19.3 +33.21 9-12 GALACTIC CLUSTER*40 NGC 1907 05 24.7 +35.17 10 GALACTIC CLUSTER*40 NGC 1912 05 23.5 +35.48 8.0 GALACTIC CLUSTER*100 NGC 1931 05 28.1 +34.13 ? DIFFUSE NEBULA NGC 1960 05 32.9 +34.07 9.0 GALACTIC CLUSTER*60 NGC 1985 05 34.5 +31.58 13.0 DIFFUSE NEBULA NGC 2099 05 49.0 +32.33 9.0 GALACTIC CLUSTER*150 I 2149 05 52.6 +46.07 10.0 PLANETARY NEBULA NGC 2126 05 58.1 +49.55 11-14 GALACTIC CLUSTER*20 NGC 2192 06 11..0 +39.50 12.0 GALACTIC CLUSTER*25 NGC 2281 06 45.8 +41.07 7 GALACTIC CLUSTER*30 AQUARIUS page 2 OBJECT HRS. MIN. DEG. MAG. TYPE M72 6891 20 50.7 -12.44 9.8 GLOBULAR CLUSTER M73 6994 20 56.4 -12.50 10.0 ASTERISM (4 STARS) H1 7009 21 01.4 -11.34 8.4 SATUNR NEBULA M2 7089 21 30.9 -01.03 6.3 GLOBULAR CLUSTER NGC 7293 22 27.0 -21.06 6.5 HELIX NEBULA NGC 7492 23 05.7 -15.54 10.8 GLOBULR CLUSTER NGC 7171 21 58.3 -13.31 12.8 GALAXY NGC 7184 21 59.9 -21.04 12.0 GALAXY NGC 7218 22 07.5 -16.54 12.7 GALAXY NGC 7252 22 18.0 -24.56 13.0 GALAXY NGC 7300 22 28.3 -14.17 13.2 GALAXY NGC 7302 22 29.7 -14.23 13.1 GALAXY NGC 7309 22 31.6 -10.37 13.2 GALAXY NGC 7371 22 43.3 -11.16 12.9 GALAXY NGC 7377 22 45.1 -22.35 12.5 GALAXY NGC 7392 22 49.2 -20.53 12.6 GALAXY NGC 7492 23 05.7 -15.54 12.3 GLOBULAR CLUSTER NGC 7585 23 15.4 -04.56 12.8 GALAXY NGC 7600 23 16.3 -07.52 13.1 GALAXY NGC 7606 23 16.5 -08.46 11.9 GALAXY NGC 7721 23 36.2 -06.48 12.4 GALAXY NGC 7723 23 36.4 -13.14 12.1 GALAXY NGC 7727 23 37.3 -12.34 12.0 GALAXY BOOTES NGC 5466 14 03.2 +28.46 10.0 GLOBULAR CLUSTER NGC 5248 13 35.1 +09.08 11.0 GALAXY NGC 5523 14 12.6 +25.34 12.8 GALAXY NGC 5533 14 14.1 +35.35 12.6 GALAXY NGC 5548 14 15.7 +25.22 12.9 GALAXY NGC 5557 14 16.4 +36.43 12.6 GALAXY NGC 5600 14 21.4 +14.52 12.4 GALAXY NGC 5614 14 22.0 +35.05 12.9 GALAXY NGC 5633 14 28.0 +31.25 12.9 GALAXY NGC 5660 14 28.1 +49.50 12.3 GALAXY NGC 5665 14 29.9 +08.18 12.7 GALAXY NGC 5669 14 30.3 +10.08 12.5 GALAXY NGC 5676 14 31.0 +49.41 11.9 GALAXY NGC 5687 14 33.3 +54.42 12.7 GALAXY NGC 5689 14 33.7 +48.57 12.6 GALAXY NGC 5739 14 40.6 +42.03 13.1 GALAXY NGC 5820 14 57.2 +54.05 12.9 GALAXY NGC 5899 15 13.2 +42.14 12.4 GALAXY CAMELOPARDALIS I 342 03 41.9 +67.57 12.0 GALAXY NGC 1501 04 02.6 +60.47 12.0 PLANETARY NEBULA NGC 1502 04 03.0 +62.11 8.0 IRREULAR CLUSTER NGC 1530 04 16.9 +75.11 13.0 GALAXY NGC 1596 04 26.0 +64.45 11.8 GALAXY NGC 1961 05 36.8 +69.24 11.6 GALAXY NGC 2146 06 10.7 +78.23 11.6 GALAXY NGC 2268 07 01.3 +84.30 12.2 GALAXY NGC 2314 07 03.8 +75.19 12.9 GALAXY NGC 2347 07 11.6 +64.54 12.7 GALAXY NGC 2336 07 16.2 +80.20 12.4 GALAXY NGC 2366 07 23.6 +69.08 12.6 GALAXY NGC 2403 07 32.0 +65.43 8.8 GALAXY NGC 2441 07 47.1 +73.06 12.7 GALAXY NGC 2460 07 52.7 +60.31 12.7 GALAXY NGC 2523 08 09.2 +73.45 12.7 GALAXY NGC 2551 08 18.8 +73.35 13.1 GALAXY NGC 2633 08 42.7 +74.18 12.6 GALAXY NGC 2655 08 49.4 +78.25 11.6 GALAXY I 3568 12 32.4 +82.51 11.6 GALAXY NGC 2715 09 02.0 +78.16 12.1 GALAXY CANES VENATICI page 3 OBJECT HRS. MIN. DEG. MAG. TYPE NGC 4449 12 25.8 +44.22 9.9 GALAXY TYPE 1 NGC 4490 12 28.3 +41.55 10.1 GALAXY TYPE SC NGC 4618 12 39.2 +41.25 11.1 GALAXY TYPE SC M94 4736 12 48.6 +41.23 7.9 GALAXY TYPE SB M63 5055 13 13.5 +47.17 9.5 GALAXY TYPE SB NGC 4242 12 14.9 +45.54 11.4 GALAXY TYPE SPIRAL M106 4258 12 14.9 +45.35 8.6 GALAXY TYPE SB M51 5194 13 27.8 +47.27 8.5 GALAXY TYPE SC WHIRLEPOOL GAL. NGC 5195 13 27.9 +47.31 8.4 GALAXY TYPE PEC. M3 5272 13 39.9 +28.38 6.4 GLOBULAR CLUSTER NGC 5005 13 08.5 +37.19 10.5 GALAXY TYPE SB NGC 5033 13 11.2 +36.19 10.6 GALAXY TYPE SB NGC 4151 12 08.0 +39.41 11.2 GALAXY NGC 4190 12 11.1 +36.54 13.2 GALAXY NGC 4214 12 13.1 +36.36 10.5 GALAXY NGC 4217 12 13.3 +47.22 11.9 GALAXY NGC 4220 12 13.7 +48.10 12.3 GALAXY NGC 4242 12 14.9 +45.54 11.5 GALAXY NGC 4144 12 15.0 +38.05 10.7 GALAXY NGC 4258 12 16.5 +47.35 9.0 GALAXY NGC 4346 12 21.0 +47.16 12.4 GALAXY NGC 4369 12 22.1 +39.39 12.4 GALAXY NGC 4389 12 23.1 +45.58 12.8 GALAXY NGC 4395 12 23.4 +33.49 11.0 GALAXY NGC 4460 12 26.4 +45.08 12.6 GALAXY NGC 4485 12 28.2 +41.58 12.5 GALAXY NGC 4631 12 39.8 +32.49 9.7 GALAXY NGC 4656 12 41.6 +32.26 11.0 GALAXY CANIS MAJOR NGC 2204 06 13.5 -18.35 ? GALACTIC CLUSTER*25 NGC 2207 06 14.3 -21.21 12.3 GALAXY NGC 2217 06 18.7 -27.14 12.0 GALAXY I 2165 06 19.6 -12.57 12.5 PLANETARY NEBULA NGC 2223 06 22.5 -22.49 12.7 GALAXY NGC 2244 06 27.6 -31.15 ? GALACTIC CLUSTER*50 NGC 2280 06 42.8 -27.35 12.7 GALAXY NGC 2283 06 43.8 -18.09 12.8 GALAXY M41 2287 06 44.9 -20.42 7.0 GALACTIC CLUSTER*50 NGC 2325 07 00.7 -28.38 12.9 GALAXY NGC 2327 07 01.9 -11.14 ? DIFFUSE NEBULA NGC 2354 07 12.2 -25.38 ? GALACTIC CLUSTER*60 NGC 2359 07 15.4 -13.07 11.0 DIFFUSE NEBULA NGC 2360 07 15.4 -15.33 9.0 GALACTIC CLUSTER*50 NGC 2362 07 16.6 -24.52 ? GALACTIC CLUSTER*30 NGC 2347 07 21.7 -13.09 ? GALACTIC CLUSTER NGC 2383 07 22.6 -20.50 12.0 GALACTIC CLUSTER*50 CASSIOPEIA NGC 103 00 22.6 +61.03 11-18 GALACTIC CLUSTER NGC 129 00 27.0 +59.57 9.0 GALACTIC CLUSTER NGC 133 00 28.4 +62.04 10.0 GALACTIC CLUSTER NGC 136 00 28.7 +61.14 ? GALACTIC CLUSTER NGC 146 00 30.3 +63.01 11.0 GALACTIC CLUSTER NGC 147 00 30.4 +48.14 12.1 GALAXY NGC 185 00 36.1 +48.04 11.8 GALAXY NGC 225 00 40.6 +61.31 9.0 GALACTIC CLUSTER*20 NGC 278 00 49.2 +47.18 11.6 GALAXY NGC 281 00 50.4 +56.19 8.5 DIFFUSE NEBULA I 59 00 53.7 +60.48 ? DIFFUSE NEBULA I 63 00 57.0 +60.35 ? DIFFUSE NEBULA NGC 358 01 01.0 +61.46 ? GALACTIC CLUSTER*25 NGC 381 01 05.2 +61.19 ? GALACTIC CLUSTER*40 NGC 436 01 12.4 +58.33 10.0 GALACTIC CLUSTER NGC 457 01 15.9 +58.04 8.0 GALACTIC CLUSTER CASSIOPEIA CONT.
Recommended publications
  • A Multivariate Statistical Analysis of Spiral Galaxy Luminosities. I. Data and Results
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server A Multivariate Statistical Analysis of Spiral Galaxy Luminosities. I. Data and Results Alice Shapley California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA, 91125, USA G. Fabbiano Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 P. B. Eskridge Ohio State University, Dept. of Astronomy, 140 W 18th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 ABSTRACT We have performed a multiparametric analysis of luminosity data for a sample of 234 normal spiral and irregular galaxies observed in X-rays with the Einstein Observatory. This sample is representative of S and Irr galaxies, with a good coverage of morphological types and absolute magnitudes. In addition to X-ray and optical data, we have compiled H-band magnitudes, IRAS near- and far-infrared, and 6cm radio continuum observations for the sample from the literature. We have also performed a careful compilation of distance estimates. We have explored the effect of morphology by dividing the sample into early (S0/a-Sab), intermediate (Sb-Sbc), and late-type (Sc-Irr) subsamples. The data were analysed with bivariate and multivariate survival analysis techniques that make full use of all the information available in both detections and limits. We find that most pairs of luminosities are correlated when considered individually, and this is not due to a distance bias. Different luminosity-luminosity correlations follow different power-law relations. Contrary to previous reports, the LX LB correlation follows a power-law with exponent − larger than 1. Both the significances of some correlations and their power-law relations are morphology dependent.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnificent Spiral Galaxy Is Being Stretched by Passing Neighbor 27 May 2021, by Ray Villard
    Magnificent spiral galaxy is being stretched by passing neighbor 27 May 2021, by Ray Villard animals—the gingham dog and calico cat—who got into a spat and ate each other. It's not so dramatic in this case. The galaxies are only getting a little chewed up because of their close proximity. The magnificent spiral galaxy NGC 2276 looks a bit lopsided in this Hubble Space Telescope snapshot. A bright hub of older yellowish stars normally lies directly in the center of most spiral galaxies. But the bulge in NGC 2276 looks offset to the upper left. What's going on? In reality, a neighboring galaxy to the right of NGC 2276 (NGC 2300, not seen here) is gravitationally tugging on its disk of blue stars, pulling the stars on one side of the galaxy outward to distort the galaxy's normal fried-egg appearance. This sort of "tug of war" between galaxies that pass close enough to feel each other's gravitational pull is not uncommon in the universe. But, like Credit: NASA, ESA, STScI, Paul Sell (University of snowflakes, no two close encounters look exactly Florida) alike. In addition, newborn and short-lived massive stars form a bright, blue arm along the upper left edge of The myriad spiral galaxies in our universe almost NGC 2276. They trace out a lane of intense star all look like fried eggs. A central bulge of aging formation. This may have been triggered by a prior stars is like the egg yolk, surrounded by a disk of collision with a dwarf galaxy.
    [Show full text]
  • GALEX Helix Nebula Poster
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration The Helix Nebula: What is it? The object shown on the front of this poster is the This “Mountains Helix Nebula. Although this object and others like it are of Creation” image called planetary nebulae (pronounced NEB-u-lee), they was captured by really have nothing to do with planets. They got their name the Spitzer Space ZKHQDVWURQRPHUV¿rst saw them through early telescopes, Telescope in infrared because they looked similar to planets with rings around light. It reveals them, like Saturn. billowing mountains of dust ablaze with A planetary nebula is the ¿res of active star really a shell of glowing gas formation. GALEX and plasma from a star at the can see the new stars end of its life. The star has forming, because they glow brightly in ultraviolet (UV) light. blown off much of its material However, the surrounding dust and gas clouds are cooler and and what is left is a very not so visible to GALEX. compact object called a white dwarf. For a while, the white dwarf is still hot and bright A Tug of War enough to make the material Planetary nebula JnEr1, A star is an amazing from the former star glow, as seen by GALEX. ! Ow! If not for balancing act between two ! * * gravity, my head and that is what we see as a * * would explode! beautiful nebula. Over 10,000 huge forces. On the one * years or so, the gas will drift away and the white dwarf will hand, the crushing force of the star’s own gravity Gravity Heat cool so much that we can no longer see the nebula.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide Du Ciel Profond
    Guide du ciel profond Olivier PETIT 8 mai 2004 2 Introduction hjjdfhgf ghjfghfd fg hdfjgdf gfdhfdk dfkgfd fghfkg fdkg fhdkg fkg kfghfhk Table des mati`eres I Objets par constellation 21 1 Androm`ede (And) Andromeda 23 1.1 Messier 31 (La grande Galaxie d'Androm`ede) . 25 1.2 Messier 32 . 27 1.3 Messier 110 . 29 1.4 NGC 404 . 31 1.5 NGC 752 . 33 1.6 NGC 891 . 35 1.7 NGC 7640 . 37 1.8 NGC 7662 (La boule de neige bleue) . 39 2 La Machine pneumatique (Ant) Antlia 41 2.1 NGC 2997 . 43 3 le Verseau (Aqr) Aquarius 45 3.1 Messier 2 . 47 3.2 Messier 72 . 49 3.3 Messier 73 . 51 3.4 NGC 7009 (La n¶ebuleuse Saturne) . 53 3.5 NGC 7293 (La n¶ebuleuse de l'h¶elice) . 56 3.6 NGC 7492 . 58 3.7 NGC 7606 . 60 3.8 Cederblad 211 (N¶ebuleuse de R Aquarii) . 62 4 l'Aigle (Aql) Aquila 63 4.1 NGC 6709 . 65 4.2 NGC 6741 . 67 4.3 NGC 6751 (La n¶ebuleuse de l’œil flou) . 69 4.4 NGC 6760 . 71 4.5 NGC 6781 (Le nid de l'Aigle ) . 73 TABLE DES MATIERES` 5 4.6 NGC 6790 . 75 4.7 NGC 6804 . 77 4.8 Barnard 142-143 (La tani`ere noire) . 79 5 le B¶elier (Ari) Aries 81 5.1 NGC 772 . 83 6 le Cocher (Aur) Auriga 85 6.1 Messier 36 . 87 6.2 Messier 37 . 89 6.3 Messier 38 .
    [Show full text]
  • Poster Abstracts
    Aimée Hall • Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge, UK 1 Neptunes in the Noise: Improved Precision in Exoplanet Transit Detection SuperWASP is an established, highly successful ground-based survey that has already discovered over 80 exoplanets around bright stars. It is only with wide-field surveys such as this that we can find planets around the brightest stars, which are best suited for advancing our knowledge of exoplanetary atmospheres. However, complex instrumental systematics have so far limited SuperWASP to primarily finding hot Jupiters around stars fainter than 10th magnitude. By quantifying and accounting for these systematics up front, rather than in the post- processing stage, the photometric noise can be significantly reduced. In this paper, we present our methods and discuss preliminary results from our re-analysis. We show that the improved processing will enable us to find smaller planets around even brighter stars than was previously possible in the SuperWASP data. Such planets could prove invaluable to the community as they would potentially become ideal targets for the studies of exoplanet atmospheres. Alan Jackson • Arizona State University, USA 2 Stop Hitting Yourself: Did Most Terrestrial Impactors Originate from the Terrestrial Planets? Although the asteroid belt is the main source of impactors in the inner solar system today, it contains only 0.0006 Earth mass, or 0.05 Lunar mass. While the asteroid belt would have been much more massive when it formed, it is unlikely to have had greater than 0.5 Lunar mass since the formation of Jupiter and the dissipation of the solar nebula. By comparison, giant impacts onto the terrestrial planets typically release debris equal to several per cent of the planet’s mass.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Rings but No Fellowship: Lotr 1 and Its Relation to Planetary Nebulae
    Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 1–16 (2013) Printed 17 October 2018 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) Two rings but no fellowship: LoTr 1 and its relation to planetary nebulae possessing barium central stars. A.A. Tyndall1,2⋆, D. Jones2, H.M.J. Boffin2, B. Miszalski3,4, F. Faedi5, M. Lloyd1, J.A. L´opez6, S. Martell7, D. Pollacco5, and M. Santander-Garc´ıa8 1Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, M13 9PL, UK 2European Southern Observatory, Alonso de C´ordova 3107, Casilla 19001, Santiago, Chile 3South African Astronomical Observatory, PO Box 9, Observatory 7935, South Africa 4Southern African Large Telescope. PO Box 9, Observatory 7935, South Africa 5Department of Physics, University of Warwick, CV4 7AL, UK 6Instituto de Astronom´ıa, Universidad Nacional Aut´onoma de M´exico, Ensenada, Baja California, C.P. 22800, Mexico 7Australian Astronomical Observatory, North Ryde, 2109 NSW, Australia 8Observatorio Astron´omico National, Madrid, and Centro de Astrobiolog´ıa, CSIC-INTA, Spain Accepted xxxx xxxxxxxx xx. Received xxxx xxxxxxxx xx; in original form xxxx xxxxxxxx xx ABSTRACT LoTr 1 is a planetary nebula thought to contain an intermediate-period binary central star system ( that is, a system with an orbital period, P, between 100 and, say, 1500 days). The system shows the signature of a K-type, rapidly rotating giant, and most likely constitutes an accretion-induced post-mass transfer system similar to other PNe such as LoTr 5, WeBo 1 and A70. Such systems represent rare opportunities to further the investigation into the formation of barium stars and intermediate period post-AGB systems – a formation process still far from being understood.
    [Show full text]
  • February 14, 2015 7:00Pm at the Herrett Center for Arts & Science Colleagues, College of Southern Idaho
    Snake River Skies The Newsletter of the Magic Valley Astronomical Society www.mvastro.org Membership Meeting President’s Message Saturday, February 14, 2015 7:00pm at the Herrett Center for Arts & Science Colleagues, College of Southern Idaho. Public Star Party Follows at the It’s that time of year when obstacles appear in the sky. In particular, this year is Centennial Obs. loaded with fog. It got in the way of letting us see the dance of the Jovian moons late last month, and it’s hindered our views of other unique shows. Still, members Club Officers reported finding enough of a clear sky to let us see Comet Lovejoy, and some great photos by members are popping up on the Facebook page. Robert Mayer, President This month, however, is a great opportunity to see the benefit of something [email protected] getting in the way. Our own Chris Anderson of the Herrett Center has been using 208-312-1203 the Centennial Observatory’s scope to do work on occultation’s, particularly with asteroids. This month’s MVAS meeting on Feb. 14th will give him the stage to Terry Wofford, Vice President show us just how this all works. [email protected] The following weekend may also be the time the weather allows us to resume 208-308-1821 MVAS-only star parties. Feb. 21 is a great window for a possible star party; we’ll announce the location if the weather permits. However, if we don’t get that Gary Leavitt, Secretary window, we’ll fall back on what has become a MVAS tradition: Planetarium night [email protected] at the Herrett Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Strong Evidence for the Density-Wave Theory of Spiral Structure from a Multi-Wavelength Study of Disk Galaxies Hamed Pour-Imani University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 8-2018 Strong Evidence for the Density-wave Theory of Spiral Structure from a Multi-wavelength Study of Disk Galaxies Hamed Pour-Imani University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Physical Processes Commons, and the Stars, Interstellar Medium and the Galaxy Commons Recommended Citation Pour-Imani, Hamed, "Strong Evidence for the Density-wave Theory of Spiral Structure from a Multi-wavelength Study of Disk Galaxies" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 2864. http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/2864 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Strong Evidence for the Density-wave Theory of Spiral Structure from a Multi-wavelength Study of Disk Galaxies A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics by Hamed Pour-Imani University of Isfahan Bachelor of Science in Physics, 2004 University of Arkansas Master of Science in Physics, 2016 August 2018 University of Arkansas This dissertation is approved for recommendation to the Graduate Council. Daniel Kennefick, Ph.D. Dissertation Director Vincent Chevrier, Ph.D. Claud Lacy, Ph.D. Committee Member Committee Member Julia Kennefick, Ph.D. William Oliver, Ph.D. Committee Member Committee Member ABSTRACT The density-wave theory of spiral structure, though first proposed as long ago as the mid-1960s by C.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hot, Warm and Cold Gas in Arp 227 - an Evolving Poor Group R
    The hot, warm and cold gas in Arp 227 - an evolving poor group R. Rampazzo, P. Alexander, C. Carignan, M.S. Clemens, H. Cullen, O. Garrido, M. Marcelin, K. Sheth, G. Trinchieri To cite this version: R. Rampazzo, P. Alexander, C. Carignan, M.S. Clemens, H. Cullen, et al.. The hot, warm and cold gas in Arp 227 - an evolving poor group. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Oxford University Press (OUP): Policy P - Oxford Open Option A, 2006, 368, pp.851. 10.1111/j.1365- 2966.2006.10179.x. hal-00083833 HAL Id: hal-00083833 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00083833 Submitted on 13 Dec 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 368, 851–863 (2006) doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10179.x The hot, warm and cold gas in Arp 227 – an evolving poor group R. Rampazzo,1 P. Alexander,2 C. Carignan,3 M. S. Clemens,1 H. Cullen,2 O. Garrido,4 M. Marcelin,5 K. Sheth6 and G. Trinchieri7 1Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Vicolo dell’Osservatorio 5, I-35122 Padova, Italy 2Astrophysics Group, Cavendish Laboratories, Cambridge CB3 OH3 3Departement´ de physique, Universite´ de Montreal,´ C.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2012.05245V2 [Astro-Ph.GA] 5 May 2021
    Draft version May 6, 2021 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX63 Charting the Galactic acceleration field I. A search for stellar streams with Gaia DR2 and EDR3 with follow-up from ESPaDOnS and UVES Rodrigo Ibata 1 | Khyati Malhan 2 | Nicolas Martin 1, 3 | Dominique Aubert1 | Benoit Famaey 1 | Paolo Bianchini 1 | Giacomo Monari 1 | Arnaud Siebert 1 | Guillaume F. Thomas 4, 5 | Michele Bellazzini 6 | Piercarlo Bonifacio7 | Elisabetta Caffau7 | Florent Renaud 8 | arXiv:2012.05245v2 [astro-ph.GA] 5 May 2021 1Universit´ede Strasbourg, CNRS, Observatoire astronomique de Strasbourg, UMR 7550, F-67000 Strasbourg, France 2The Oskar Klein Centre, Department of Physics, Stockholm University, AlbaNova, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden 3Max-Planck-Institut f¨urAstronomie, K¨onigstuhl17, D-69117, Heidelberg, Germany 4Instituto de Astrof´ısica de Canarias, E-38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 5Universidad de La Laguna, Dpto. Astrof´ısica, E-38206 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 6INAF - Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio, via Gobetti 93/3, I-40129 Bologna, Italy 7GEPI, Observatoire de Paris, Universit´ePSL, CNRS, 5 Place Jules Janssen, 92190 Meudon, France 8Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics, Lund Observatory, Box 43, 221 00 Lund, Sweden Corresponding author: Rodrigo Ibata [email protected] 2 Ibata et al. Submitted to ApJ ABSTRACT We present maps of the stellar streams detected in the Gaia Data Release 2 (DR2) and Early Data Release 3 (EDR3) catalogs using the STREAMFINDER algorithm. We also report the spectroscopic follow-up of the brighter DR2 stream members obtained with the high-resolution CFHT/ESPaDOnS and VLT/UVES spectrographs as well as with the medium-resolution NTT/EFOSC2 spectrograph.
    [Show full text]
  • International Astronomical Union Commission 42 BIBLIOGRAPHY of CLOSE BINARIES No. 93
    International Astronomical Union Commission 42 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF CLOSE BINARIES No. 93 Editor-in-Chief: C.D. Scarfe Editors: H. Drechsel D.R. Faulkner E. Kilpio E. Lapasset Y. Nakamura P.G. Niarchos R.G. Samec E. Tamajo W. Van Hamme M. Wolf Material published by September 15, 2011 BCB issues are available via URL: http://www.konkoly.hu/IAUC42/bcb.html, http://www.sternwarte.uni-erlangen.de/pub/bcb or http://www.astro.uvic.ca/∼robb/bcb/comm42bcb.html The bibliographical entries for Individual Stars and Collections of Data, as well as a few General entries, are categorized according to the following coding scheme. Data from archives or databases, or previously published, are identified with an asterisk. The observation codes in the first four groups may be followed by one of the following wavelength codes. g. γ-ray. i. infrared. m. microwave. o. optical r. radio u. ultraviolet x. x-ray 1. Photometric data a. CCD b. Photoelectric c. Photographic d. Visual 2. Spectroscopic data a. Radial velocities b. Spectral classification c. Line identification d. Spectrophotometry 3. Polarimetry a. Broad-band b. Spectropolarimetry 4. Astrometry a. Positions and proper motions b. Relative positions only c. Interferometry 5. Derived results a. Times of minima b. New or improved ephemeris, period variations c. Parameters derivable from light curves d. Elements derivable from velocity curves e. Absolute dimensions, masses f. Apsidal motion and structure constants g. Physical properties of stellar atmospheres h. Chemical abundances i. Accretion disks and accretion phenomena j. Mass loss and mass exchange k. Rotational velocities 6. Catalogues, discoveries, charts a.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Bright Nebulae Primary I.D. Alternate I.D. Nickname
    List of Bright Nebulae Alternate Primary I.D. Nickname I.D. NGC 281 IC 1590 Pac Man Neb LBN 619 Sh 2-183 IC 59, IC 63 Sh2-285 Gamma Cas Nebula Sh 2-185 NGC 896 LBN 645 IC 1795, IC 1805 Melotte 15 Heart Nebula IC 848 Soul Nebula/Baby Nebula vdB14 BD+59 660 NGC 1333 Embryo Neb vdB15 BD+58 607 GK-N1901 MCG+7-8-22 Nova Persei 1901 DG 19 IC 348 LBN 758 vdB 20 Electra Neb. vdB21 BD+23 516 Maia Nebula vdB22 BD+23 522 Merope Neb. vdB23 BD+23 541 Alcyone Neb. IC 353 NGC 1499 California Nebula NGC 1491 Fossil Footprint Neb IC 360 LBN 786 NGC 1554-55 Hind’s Nebula -Struve’s Lost Nebula LBN 896 Sh 2-210 NGC 1579 Northern Trifid Nebula NGC 1624 G156.2+05.7 G160.9+02.6 IC 2118 Witch Head Nebula LBN 991 LBN 945 IC 405 Caldwell 31 Flaming Star Nebula NGC 1931 LBN 1001 NGC 1952 M 1 Crab Nebula Sh 2-264 Lambda Orionis N NGC 1973, 1975, Running Man Nebula 1977 NGC 1976, 1982 M 42, M 43 Orion Nebula NGC 1990 Epsilon Orionis Neb NGC 1999 Rubber Stamp Neb NGC 2070 Caldwell 103 Tarantula Nebula Sh2-240 Simeis 147 IC 425 IC 434 Horsehead Nebula (surrounds dark nebula) Sh 2-218 LBN 962 NGC 2023-24 Flame Nebula LBN 1010 NGC 2068, 2071 M 78 SH 2 276 Barnard’s Loop NGC 2149 NGC 2174 Monkey Head Nebula IC 2162 Ced 72 IC 443 LBN 844 Jellyfish Nebula Sh2-249 IC 2169 Ced 78 NGC Caldwell 49 Rosette Nebula 2237,38,39,2246 LBN 943 Sh 2-280 SNR205.6- G205.5+00.5 Monoceros Nebula 00.1 NGC 2261 Caldwell 46 Hubble’s Var.
    [Show full text]