C NTENT 6 January 2019 L
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
BOA Paper 8/2011 (For Information on 20.5.2011) Updates on Complaints for the Quarter 1 – 3/2011 (Position As at 6.5.2011) A
BOA Paper 8/2011 (For information on 20.5.2011) Updates on Complaints for the Quarter 1 – 3/20111 (Position as at 6.5.2011) A. Complaints dealt with by the Broadcasting Authority Complaints Committee and considered by the Broadcasting Authority Title No. of Substance of Complaint Decision Complaints Radio Programme "Ordinary Done 1 - Three members of the public - the BA noted that the programme was a talk show Seriously" complained about the captioned broadcast on Saturday afternoons. In a segment (尋常事認真做) radio programme. The substance of entitled " 名 DJ 打比你" (English translation: the complaints was that the random Famous DJs Calling You), the hosts made random (RTHK Radio 2, 20 & 27 November prank calls by the programme hosts phone calls to members of the public, asked if 2010, 4 & 11 December 2010, would exert a bad influence on the they were aware that the hosts were famous DJs, 4:00pm-6:00pm) public and promote prank playing. and chatted about their listening habits. It was noted that most people who received the phone calls simply hung up when they found themselves engaged in nuisance calls from strangers. - the BA noted that although this type of "candid camera" presentation was not uncommon on television and radio programmes, some people found the calls obnoxious and offending. The hosts' remarks and discussion after making the calls were often frivolous, sometimes preceded by a burst of laughter, and seemingly complacent over the meaningless jokes on others. The frivolous tone and presentation of the hosts might give listeners an impression that it was harmless to make prank calls or ridicule people in such a 1 Content of this paper is extracted from the homepage of the Broadcasting Authority: http://www.hkba.hk/en/complaints/archives.html P.1 manner. -
OTT and Related On-Line Services in Arab Region
OTT and related on-line services in Arab Region Release 1.1 31/01/2017 Reality of OTTs in Arab Region The objective of the study is: 1- to have a global view on OTT and on-line services worldwide with the impact and trends of these services on national players and economies, 2- to have an overview on associated practices and relevant public policies worldwide and in the Region, 3- to propose recommendations on methods and approaches for preparation of associated policies and frameworks. _____________________________ The present document is the first release of the report. A draft questionnaire is proposed with this release and is intended to be submittedfor a survey to Regulators/policy Makers and Operators in the Region. The outcome of the survey with the related findings will be commented and included in a next version of this report. It is to note that, as the subject of OTT is being regularly debated in almost all regions with potential move and change in the related positions and decisions, some information reported in the present report may become outdated. __________________________________________________________________ OTT and related on-line services in Arab Region Executive Summary With the increase of global mobile broadband penetration, as well as the rapid adoption of connected devices, consumers have been provided with an access to a wide variety of on-line services which go beyond the traditional voice and messaging services provided by telecom operators (alias telcos *). These on-line services are reshaping the entire telecommunication eco-system, and are of great benefit to consumers worldwide, to the global economy and ubiquitous connectivity. -
Buyer Role Company Focused Markets What
BUYER ROLE COMPANY FOCUSED WHAT IS MAIN CRITERIA NEW TYPES OF MARKETS REPLACING LIVE FOR QUICK BUYS CONTENT IN SHOWS / NOW CONSIDERATION TO FURTHER FILL GAPS SPORTS ON TV? Airin Zainul Director Media Prima Berhad Malaysia New Dramas, New Price Animation Kids Animation / Prog Andri Detulong Head of PT. Satuvisi Abadi / Indonesia New Dramas, New Price, Genre Non-Dialogue Programming Onevision Kids Animation / Animation, Dubbed Acquisition Entertainment Prog, Reruns Content In Bahasa Arthit Promprasit Director - Thailand Motion Content Thailand Reruns Price, Quality -- Group Billy Yang Managing Director Chong-I Taiwan New Kids Animation Price, Quality, Genre Animation, International / Prog, Documentary Documentary, Corporation / Factual Drama. Chen Su Chiang Program Purchasing Wonder Singapore New Dramas, Price, Quality Same content Director Hypermedia Documentary / genres – need more Corporation Factual programs Chiyo MORI Manager ABC International Japan New Dramas Price, Quality Mini drama series with less episodes Didi Mukti CEO MOX Digital Indonesia New Dramas, New Price, Quality, eSports Indonesia Kids Animation / Genre, Language Prog, Reruns ATF Buyers Survey | April 2020 www.asiatvforum.com BUYER ROLE COMPANY FOCUSED WHAT IS MAIN CRITERIA NEW TYPES OF MARKETS REPLACING LIVE FOR QUICK BUYS CONTENT IN SHOWS / NOW CONSIDERATION TO FURTHER FILL GAPS SPORTS ON TV? Dominique Ullman Content Director, PT. OONA Media USA New Unscripted Price eSports Oona Global Indonesia Formats, Reruns Doris Ng Senior Manager - Medialink China New Dramas, -
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Introduction ANANDA KRISHNAN PROFILE AND BACKGROUND 3 - 8 MAXIS COMMUNICATION COMPANY PROFILE 9 - 12 ASTRO COMPANY PROFILE 13 - 20 STYLE OF LEADERSHIP 21 - 24 LEADERSHIP THEORY ADAPTATION 25 Conclusion 26 References 27 1 (a) Background of the leader: the aim of this section is to know and understand the leader as a person and the bases for his/her success. The data and information should be taken from any published sources such as newspapers, company reports, magazines, journals, books etc. INTRODUCTION ANANDA KRISHNAN Who is Ananda Krishnan? According to a report then by Bernama News Agency, the grandfathers of Tan Sri T. Ananda Krishnan and Tan Sri G. Gnanalingam had been brought to Malaysia from Jaffna by British colonial rulers to work in Malaysia¶s Public Works Department, a common practice then as Jaffna produced some of the most educated people in the whole country. Tan Sri Gnanalingam himself told one of our ministers that he wants to put something back into this country because his grandfather was Sri Lankan," Deputy Director-General of Sri Lanka's Board of Investment (BOI) Santhusht Jayasuriya had told a a group of visiting Malaysian journalists then, 2 according to the Bernama 2003 story. Gnanalingam, executive chairman of Malaysia's Westport, held talks with Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe during a visit to Malaysia in 2003 and the former followed up with a visit to Colombo. In the same year a Memorandum of Understanding was formalized in March this year between 'Westport' and the Sri Lanka Ports Authority (SLPA). Westport is keen to invest in Sri Lanka but no formal process has begun. -
Shirley LIN, Requesting Her Service As a Sole Panelist for This Dispute
(Hong Kong Office) ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION Case No: HK-2001321 Complainant: Television Broadcasts Limited Respondent: Hu Weisheng Disputed Domain Name: <tvbme.com> 1. The Parties and Contested Domain Name The Complainant is Television Broadcasts Limited, of 10/F, Main Building, TVB City, 77 Chun Choi Street, Tseung Kwan O Industrial Estate, Kowloon, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR). The Respondent is Hu Weisheng, of Hefei, Anhui 230031, People's Republic of China (PRC). The domain name at issue is <tvbme.com>, registered by the Respondent with GoDaddy.com, LLC, of 14455 N. Hayden Road, Suite 219, Scottsdale, AZ 85260, United States of America (USA). 2. Procedural History On February 24, 2020, the Complainant submitted the Complaint in English on domain name <tvbme.com> to the Hong Kong Office of the Asian Domain Name Dispute Resolution Centre (the "Centre"), in accordance with the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy") adopted by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) on August 26, 1999, the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy Disputes (the "Rules") approved by ICANN on October 24, 1999, and the Asian Domain Name Dispute Resolution Centre Supplemental Rules in effect as of July 31, 2015. The Complainant requested a single person panel. After receiving the Complaint, the Centre, in accordance with the Supplemental Rules, verified that the Complaint complied with the formal requirements of the Rules and the Supplemental Rules. In that regard, on February 24, 2020, the Centre requested the Registrar GoDaddy.com, LLC (the "Registrar") to provide following information within five (5) days if possible: 1. -
Television in Singapore: a Brief Introduction to Its Television Industry
-Journal of Arts, Science & Commerce ■E-ISSN2229-4686■ISSN2231-4172 TELEVISION IN SINGAPORE: A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO ITS TELEVISION INDUSTRY Aaron Rao, Lecturer, School of IT, Digital Media & Mass Communication, TMC Academy, Singapore. ABSTRACT TV arrived in Singapore on 15 February 1963 and since its inaugural launch Singapore’s TV industry has undoubtedly developed over the years. In the context of the four theories of the press, it can be quickly concluded that Singapore’s TV industry is Authoritarian by its regulative nature. Despite being a democratic country, the freedom to express freely what is on one’s mind through the use of TV as a medium is still extremely restrictive. As a result, there are many reasons as to why Singapore’s TV industry is still moderately unadventurous, especially where censorship is concerned. As the TV industry in Singapore is operated and fully controlled by the government, the content that appears on TV is usually highly censored, scripted to precision in accordance with the MDA guidelines, non-offensive and contain the usage of propaganda. This paper seeks to give a brief insight into not only the history and transformation of Singapore’s television (TV) industry to what it is today, but also to better understand how the said country’s TV industry currently operates, and how their content is produced as well as the impacts it has around the region. Keywords: Singapore, Television, Ownership, Censorship, Regulation. International Refereed Research Journal ■www.researchersworld.com■Vol.–V, Issue – 3, July 2014 [56] -Journal of Arts, Science & Commerce ■E-ISSN2229-4686■ISSN2231-4172 INTRODUCTION: In the context of the four theories of the press, it can be quickly concluded that Singapore’s TV industry is Authoritarian by its regulative nature. -
Kick, Push, Coast Kick, Push, Coast
Kick, Push, Coast Kick, Push, Coast Follow China Intercontinental Press Us on Advertising Hotline WeChat Now 城市漫步珠 国内统一刊号: 三角英文版 that's guangzhou that's shenzhen CN 11-5234/GO MARCH 2018 03月份 that’s PRD 《城市漫步》珠江三角洲 英文月刊 主管单位 : 中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室 Supervised by the State Council Information Office of the People's Republic of China 主办单位 : 五洲传播出版社 地址 : 北京西城月坛北街 26 号恒华国际商务中心南楼 11 层文化交流中心 11th Floor South Building, Henghua lnternational Business Center, 26 Yuetan North Street, Xicheng District, Beijing http://www.cicc.org.cn 社长 President: 陈陆军 Chen Lujun 期刊部负责人 Supervisor of Magazine Department: 邓锦辉 Deng Jinhui 编辑 Editor: 朱莉莉 Zhu Lili 发行 Circulation: 李若琳 Li Ruolin Senior Digital Editor Matthew Bossons Shenzhen Editor Adam Robbins Guangzhou Editor Daniel Plafker Shenzhen Digital Editor Bailey Hu Senior Staff Writer Tristin Zhang Digital Editor Katrina Shi National Arts Editor Erica Martin Contributors Paul Barresi, Sky Gidge, Lena Gidwani, Dr. Kate Gaynor, Bryan Grogan, Winnie Jin, Mia Li, Kheng Swe Lim, Erica Martin, Dominic Ngai, Katrina Shi HK FOCUS MEDIA Shanghai (Head Office) 上海和舟广告有限公司 上海市蒙自路 169 号智造局 2 号楼 305-306 室 邮政编码 : 200023 Room 305-306, Building 2, No.169 Mengzi Lu, Shanghai 200023 电话 : 传真 : Guangzhou 上海和舟广告有限公司广州分公司 广州市麓苑路 42 号大院 2 号楼 610 室 邮政编码 : 510095 Rm 610, No. 2 Building, Area 42, Luyuan Lu, Guangzhou 510095 电话 : 020-8358 6125 传真 : 020-8357 3859 - 816 Shenzhen 深圳联络处 深圳市福田区彩田路星河世纪大厦 C1-1303 C1-1303, Galaxy Century Building, Caitian Lu, Futian District, Shenzhen 电话 : 0755-8623 3220 传真 : 0755-6406 8538 Beijing 北京联络处 北京市东城区东直门外大街 48 号东方银座 C 座 G9 室 邮政编码 : 100027 9G, Block C, Ginza Mall, No. -
Chris Graves
Christopher Graves President & Founder Ogilvy Center for Behavioral Science Christopher Graves was named founding President of the Ogilvy Center for Behavioral Science in 2017 after serving 12 years as Global Chairman, Global CEO, and Regional (APAC) CEO for Ogilvy Public Relations. He also served as a member of the Ogilvy & Mather Worldwide Board and Executive Committee. Graves joined Ogilvy after two decades in media and news, including 18 years with Dow Jones & The Wall Street Journal. He also headed all news & programming for the TV networks CNBC Asia and CNBC Europe. Christopher was awarded a prestigious Rockefeller Foundation Bellagio Residency in 2016 for his work in behavioral science in communications. He was elected life member to the Council on Foreign Relations in 2010, the most influential foreign policy think tank in the US. Graves served two terms as chairman of the industry association, PR Council, and as a trustee of the Institute for Public Relations where he co-founded their behavioral insights initiative. Christopher is an active and highly-rated public speaker. He appears as a guest expert on television news, and as a guest anchor on CNBC. He has chaired sessions with world leaders and CEOs at the World Economic Forum (Davos and Summer Davos in China) for more than a decade. He has also been a speaker at the United Nations, SXSW, The Clinton Global Initiative, the World Islamic Economic Forum, and has keynoted hundreds of summits and corporate meetings. Leading two completely sold out sessions at SXSW Awards include: a Rockefeller Foundation Bellagio Residency; ESOMAR World Congress top prize; Marketing Research Society Grand Prix; four WPP Atticus Awards including the Grand Prix (for thought leadership); ICCO Hall of Fame; Campaign Asia Hall of Fame; Top 25 Innovator (Holmes Report); Agency of the Year, Asia Pacific PR Professional of the Year, Asia Pacific Consultancy of the Year; a news EMMY nomination and more than a dozen awards from The New York Film and Television Festivals and the Asian Television Awards. -
PDF Full Report
Heightening Sense of Crises over Press Freedom in Hong Kong: Advancing “Shrinkage” 20 Years after Returning to China April 2018 YAMADA Ken-ichi NHK Broadcasting Culture Research Institute Media Research & Studies _____________________________ *This article is based on the same authors’ article Hong Kong no “Hodo no Jiyu” ni Takamaru Kikikan ~Chugoku Henkan kara 20nen de Susumu “Ishuku”~, originally published in the December 2017 issue of “Hoso Kenkyu to Chosa [The NHK Monthly Report on Broadcast Research]”. Full text in Japanese may be accessed at http://www.nhk.or.jp/bunken/research/oversea/pdf/20171201_7.pdf 1 Introduction Twenty years have passed since Hong Kong was returned to China from British rule. At the time of the 1997 reversion, there were concerns that Hong Kong, which has a laissez-faire market economy, would lose its economic vigor once the territory is put under the Chinese Communist Party’s one-party rule. But the Hong Kong economy has achieved generally steady growth while forming closer ties with the mainland. However, new concerns are rising that the “One Country, Two Systems” principle that guarantees Hong Kong a different social system from that of China is wavering and press freedom, which does not exist in the mainland and has been one of the attractions of Hong Kong, is shrinking. On the rankings of press freedom compiled by the international journalists’ group Reporters Without Borders, Hong Kong fell to 73rd place in 2017 from 18th in 2002.1 This article looks at how press freedom has been affected by a series of cases in the Hong Kong media that occurred during these two decades, in line with findings from the author’s weeklong field trip in mid-September 2017. -
Market Research 2020
THE ITALIAN TRADE COMMISSION HONG KONG MARKET RESEARCH FILM 2020 SEPTEMBER F O S B A C K G R O U N D E Hong Kong Current Market Overview L 2 T S T A T I S T I C B A Hong Kong Box Office & Market Trend T 4 N S T A T I S T I C 5 Audio & Visual Equipment Industry E L O C A L F I L M I N D U S T R Y T 7 Loca Industry and Distribution G L O B A L D I S T R I B U T I O N N 8 International Investment and Recognition T E L E V I S I O N I N D U S T R Y O 10 Local TV Industry T R A D E S H O W C 1 1 Hong Kong FILMART A S S O C I A T I O N S 12 Hong Kong Trade Associations (Film Sector) R E F E R E N C E 13 Source and Reference BACKGROUND: V O L U M E 3 , I S S U E 3 HONG KONG CURRENT MARKET OVERVIEW Business Shock Under COVID-19 CINEMA CLOSED DUE TO CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC Under the tightened social distancing policies announced by the HKSAR government to fight against the coronavirus, cinemas were previously closed twice from March 27 to May 5 and July 15 to August 27 Hong Kong box office receipts plunged by more than 70% in the first six months of 2020 as audiences stayed away and cinemas shut down amid the coronavirus pandemic. -
2016 Annual Report
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS Revenue and Prot Attributable to 2016 2015 Change Equity Holders of the Company Revenue (Continuing operations) Prot Attributable to Equity Holders of the Company Performance 6,000 Earnings per share HK$1.14 HK$3.04 -62% Dividends per share 5,000 - Interim HK$0.60 HK$0.60 – - Final – HK$2.00 -100% 4,000 HK$0.60 HK$2.60 -77% 3,000 HK$’mil HK$’mil HK$’ million HK$’ Revenue 2,000 - Hong Kong TV broadcasting 2,707 3,105 -13% - Hong Kong digital new media 1,000 business 230 170 35% - Programme licensing and 0 distribution 1,019 951 7% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 - Overseas pay TV operations 169 186 -9% YEAR - Channel operations 90 105 -14% Earnings & Dividends# Per Share - Other activities 191 129 48% - Inter-segment elimination (196) (191) 2% Earnings per Share Dividends# per Share 4,210 4,455 -5% 4.5 HK$’mil HK$’mil 4 Segment (loss)/profit* 3.5 - Hong Kong TV broadcasting (71) 551 N/A 3 - Hong Kong digital new media business (29) 41 N/A 2.5 - Programme licensing and HK$ 2 distribution 444 410 8% - Overseas pay TV operations (40) (30) 31% 1.5 - Channel operations 2 18 -87% 1 - Other activities 27 11 151% 0.5 - Corporate support (33) – N/A - Inter-segment elimination 1 (1) N/A 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 301 1,000 -70% YEAR # excluding special dividend Total expenses∆ 3,888 3,439 13% 2016 Revenue by Operating Segment Profit attributable to equity holders 500 1,331 -62% % relating to 2015 are shown in brackets 31 December 31 December Hong Kong TV 2016 2015 broadcasting HK$’mil HK$’mil 63% (69%) Total assets 12,357 9,113 36% -
Broadcasting Ordinance (Chapter 562) Notice Is Hereby Given That The
Broadcasting Ordinance (Chapter 562) Notice is hereby given that the Broadcasting Authority has received an application from City Telecom (H.K.) Limited, a company duly incorporated in Hong Kong whose registered office is situated at Level 39, Tower 1, Metroplaza, No. 223 Hing Fong Road, Kwai Chung, N.T., for a domestic free television programme service licence. The particulars of the application in this Notice, as set out below, are provided by City Telecom (H.K.) Limited. Nothing in this notice shall affect or prejudice any powers, discretion and rights of the Broadcasting Authority or the Government. 1. COMPANY INFORMATION Principal shareholders City Telecom (H.K.) Limited (“CTI”) is a publicly listed company in Hong Kong under HKEx (Stock Code: 1137) and the U.S. under NASDAQ (Ticker Symbol: CTEL). As at 6 July 2010, the company’s shares are held by Top Group International Limited (44.42%) and other shareholders including Mr Ricky Wong Wai Kay (0.93%), Mr Lai Ni Quiaque and Mrs Lai Michelle Pek Lian (1.36%), Mr Paul Cheung Chi Kin (2.27%), Worship Limited (3.26%) and general public (47.46%). Compliance with statutory requirements (a) CTI submits that it is a company registered and incorporated in Hong Kong under the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) in 1992. (b) CTI submits that it is not a subsidiary of a corporation1. (c) CTI submits that the company and all persons exercising control of the company will be and remain fit and proper persons2. 1 Section 8(3) of the Broadcasting Ordinance and section 2 of Schedule 4 to the Ordinance prohibit a domestic free television programme service licence to be granted to or held by a company which is the subsidiary of a corporation.