Transport Variability of the Brazil Current from Observations and a Data Assimilation Model
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Ocean Sci., 14, 417–436, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/os-14-417-2018 © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Transport variability of the Brazil Current from observations and a data assimilation model Claudia Schmid1 and Sudip Majumder1,2 1National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, Miami, Florida, USA 2Cooperative Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Studies, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA Correspondence: Claudia Schmid ([email protected]) Received: 6 July 2017 – Discussion started: 4 August 2017 Revised: 1 March 2018 – Accepted: 14 May 2018 – Published: 7 June 2018 Abstract. The Brazil Current transports from observations the meridional transport and the sea level pressure explain and the Hybrid Coordinate Model (HYCOM) model are ana- 36 and 15 % of the covariance, respectively. Overall, the re- lyzed to improve our understanding of the current’s structure sults indicate that SAM, SASD, and El Niño–Southern Os- and variability. A time series of the observed transport is de- cillation have an influence on the transport of the Brazil Cur- rived from a three-dimensional field of the velocity in the rent. South Atlantic covering the years 1993 to 2015 (hereinafter called Argo & SSH). The mean transports of the Brazil Cur- rent increases from 3.8 ± 2.2 Sv (1 Sv is 106 m3 s−1) at 25◦ S to 13.9 ± 2.6 Sv at 32◦ S, which corresponds to a mean 1 Introduction slope of 1.4 ± 0.4 Sv per degree. Transport estimates derived from HYCOM fields are somewhat higher (5.2 ± 2.7 and The circulation in the South Atlantic has been studied exten- 18.7 ± 7.1 Sv at 25 and 32◦ S, respectively) than those from sively because it is an important part of the Atlantic Merid- Argo & SSH, but these differences are small when compared ional Overturning Circulation, which consists of a northward with the standard deviations. Overall, the observed latitude transport of relatively warm and fresh upper-ocean water of dependence of the transport of the Brazil Current is in agree- southern origin across the equator into the northern North At- ment with the wind-driven circulation in the super gyre of the lantic and a southward transport of relatively cold and salty subtropical South Atlantic. A mean annual cycle with high- deep water from the North Atlantic into the South Atlantic. est (lowest) transports in austral summer (winter) is found A summary of the circulation in the South Atlantic as well as to exist at selected latitudes (24, 35, and 38◦ S). The signif- the pathways of the flow and its role in the Atlantic Merid- icance of this signal shrinks with increasing latitude (both ional Overturning Circulation has been presented by Schmid in Argo & SSH and HYCOM), mainly due to mesoscale and (2014) and many others (references can be found in Schmid, interannual variability. Both Argo & SSH, as well as HY- 2014). COM, reveal interannual variability at 24 and 35◦ S that re- Herein, the focus is on the structure and variability of the sults in relatively large power at periods of 2 years or more Brazil Current, which is the western boundary current of in wavelet spectra. It is found that the interannual variabil- the subtropical gyre in the South Atlantic. This subtropical ity at 24◦ S is correlated with the South Atlantic Subtropical gyre is largely governed by the Sverdrup equation (Pond and Dipole Mode (SASD), the Southern Annular Mode (SAM), Pickard, 1983) and is part of the super gyre (Gordon et al., and the Niño 3.4 index. Similarly, correlations between SAM 1992; de Ruijter, 1982) which connects the subtropical circu- and the Brazil Current transport are also found at 35◦ S. Fur- lation in the South Indian and South Atlantic oceans. Mostly, ther investigation of the variability reveals that the first and the Brazil Current follows the shelf break quite closely, but second mode of a coupled empirical orthogonal function of it is impacted by mesoscale variability along its pathway that can give rise to meanders that separate it from the shelf break Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 418 C. Schmid and S. Majumder: Brazil Current transport temporarily (e.g., Schmid et al., 1995; Biló et al., 2014; Mill 18° S et al., 2015; Lima et al., 2016). As the Brazil Current reaches the confluence with the Malvinas Current, it is forced away 20 from the shelf break and ultimately feeds into the eastward 22 South Atlantic Current (e.g., Gordon, 1989; Garzoli, 1993; 24 Maamaatuaiahutapu et al., 1998). Just prior to this eastward 26 turn the southward transport increases due to the contribu- 28 tion from the Malvinas Current. Determining the source and 30 variability of the Malvinas Current (e.g., Vivier and Provost, 1999; Spadone and Provost, 2009) as well as what happens 32 east of the confluence is beyond the scope of this study. 34 Another feature of the circulation in this region is a north- 36 ward flow just east of the Brazil Current that originates near 38° S the confluence and is part of a recirculation cell that feeds -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 back into the Brazil Current. This recirculation cell has been Transport [Sv] described earlier (e.g., Stramma, 1989) and has been called the Brazil Current Front (e.g., Peterson and Stramma, 1991) Figure 1. Previously published estimates of the Brazil Current as well as the Brazil Return Current (e.g., Boebel et al., transports as a function of latitude. The line with a slope of about 1997). 1.6 Sv per degree is a fit to the transports measured in 19 to 32◦ S. The transport of the Brazil Current estimated in earlier The sources of the transport estimates are Fisher(1964), Signorini studies varies from north to south (Fig.1). This transport is (1978), Miranda and Castro Filho(1979), Miranda and Castro Filho within 1 to 7 Sv (1 Sv is 106 m3 s−1) between 19 and 22.5◦ S (1981), Evans et al.(1983), Evans and Signorini(1985), Gordon and in the upper 400 to 500 m and increases to about 17 Sv at Greengrove(1986), Garzoli and Garraffo(1989), Gordon(1989), Stramma(1989), Garfield(1990), Peterson(1990), Stramma et al. 28◦ S as the vertical extent and strength of the Brazil Cur- (1990), Zemba(1991), Garzoli(1993), Campos et al.(1995), Maa- rent increases. Farther south the Brazil Current transports are maatuaiahutapu et al.(1998), Müller et al.(1998), Jullion et al. mostly in the range of 10 to 30 Sv. Most of the estimates from (2006), Mata et al.(2012), Garzoli et al.(2013), and Biló et al. earlier studies are based on quasi-synoptic sections, while (2014). some are based on time series from moorings with current meters or inverted echo sounders (IESs). Previous studies of the temporal variability were typi- using climatology (e.g., Garzoli et al., 2013; Majumder et al., cally limited in terms of the length of the time series (e.g., 2016). Rocha et al., 2013) and the number of surveys (e.g., Mata In summary, this study will build on the earlier results with et al., 2012) or derived as a time series at one location (e.g., the focus on improving the knowledge about the mean trans- Goni and Wainer, 2001). In addition, studies based on hy- port of the Brazil Current and its variability. In preparation drographic measurements had to use a level of no motion or for this analysis a monthly observations-based time series of make assumptions about the barotropic flow (e.g., by pre- three-dimensional fields of the horizontal velocity was de- scribing a bottom velocity). The large variations in the trans- rived. This time series covers 23 years with a horizontal grid ports from the previous studies as well as the limited knowl- resolution of 0.5◦. The underlying dynamics of the observed edge about the temporal variability of the Brazil Current mo- variability on seasonal to interannual timescales are studied tivated this study on the characteristics and variability of this in conjunction with several ocean indices and sea level pres- current at a wide range of latitudes. sure as a proxy for the wind field that is forcing the subtrop- Another motivation is that, as is well known, estimates of ical gyre. the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation transports The paper is organized as follows. Section2 describes the derived from various observational products and models of- data and methods. Sections3 and4 analyze the structure and ten reveal similar amplitudes of the variability but can have variability of the Brazil Current transport. Section5 summa- significant differences when the means are compared. For the rizes the results. North Atlantic, this was shown, for example, by Msadek et al. (2014). The same is the case in the South Atlantic. An impor- tant challenge for Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circula- 2 Data and methodology tion transport calculations is the estimation of the transport in the western boundary current (the Brazil Current in the sub- Three oceanic data sets are used herein to derive an absolute tropical South Atlantic). All estimates of this transport face three-dimensional geostrophic velocity field. They are pro- the challenge of deriving the contributions on and often also files of temperature and salinity, subsurface velocities from near the shelf break. Typically, this challenge is resolved by float trajectories, and sea surface heights. In addition, wind fields are needed to estimate the Ekman velocity that needs Ocean Sci., 14, 417–436, 2018 www.ocean-sci.net/14/417/2018/ C.