CALCULUS from a Historical Perspective
Paul Yiu
Department of Mathematics Florida Atlantic University
Fall 2009
Chapters 1–49
Tuesday, December 2
Tuesdays 8/25 9/1 9/8 9/15 9/22 9/29 10/6 10/13 Thursdays 8/27 9/3 9/10 9/17 9/24 10/1 10/8 10/15 Tuesdays 10/20 10/27 11/3 11/10 11/17 11/24 12/1 Thursdays 10/22 10/29 11/5 11/12 11/19 *** 12/3 Contents
1 Extraction of square roots 101
2 Convergence of sequences 107
3 Square roots by decimal digits 113
4 a + a + + √a + 115 ··· ··· q 5 An infinitep continued fraction 117
6 Ancient Chinese calculations of π 121
7 Existence of π 125
8 Archimedes’ calculation of π 129
9 Ptolemy’s calculations of chord lengths 131
sin θ 10 The basic limit limθ 0 =1 135 → θ 11 The Arithmetic - Geometric Means Inequality 139
12 Principle of nested intervals 143
13 The number e 147
14 Some basic limits 151
15 The parabola 201 iv CONTENTS
16 Archimedes’ quadrature of the parabola 205
17 Quadrature of the spiral 209
18 Apollonius’ extremum problems on conics 213
19Normalsofaparabola 215
20 Envelope of normal to a conic 217
21 The cissoid 221
22 Conchoids 225
23 The quadratrix 231
24 The lemniscate 233
25 Volumes in Euclid’s Element 301
26 Archimedes’ calculation of the volume of a sphere 305
27 Cavalieri’s principle 309
28 Fermat: Area under the graph of y = xn 311
29 Pascal: Summation of powers of numbers in arithmetic pro- gression 313
30 Pascal: On the sines of a quadrant of a circle 315
31 Newton: The fundamental theorem of calculus 317
32 Newton: The binomial theorem 319
33 Newton’s method of approximate solution of an equation 321
34 Newton’s reversion of series 323
35 Newton: The series for sine and cosine 325
36 Wallis’ product 327 CONTENTS v
37 Newton: Universal gravitation 329
38 Logarithms 401
39 Euler’s introduction to e and the exponential functions 405
40 Euler: Natural logarithms 409
41 Euler’s formula eiv = cos v + i sin v 411
42 Summation of powers of integers 417
43 Series expansions for the tangent and secant functions 421
44 Euler’s first calculation of 1+ 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 425 22k 32k 42k 52k ··· 45 Euler: Triangulation of convex polygon 433
46 Infinite Series with positive terms 501
47 The harmonic series 507
48 The alternating harmonic series 511
49 Conditionally convergent series 515 45.0.1 2 ...... div Chapter 1
Extraction of square roots
Heron
Heron’s numerical example illustrating the use of his formula ∆= s(s a)(s b)(s c) − − − for the area of a trianglep in terms of its sides a, b, c and semiperimeter a+b+c s = 2 : Let the sides of the triangle be 7, 8, and 9. ...The result [of multiplying s, s a, s b, s c] is 720. Take the square root of this and it− will be− the area− of the triangle. Since 720 has not a rational square root, we shall make a close approxi- mation to the root in this manner. Since the square nearest to 720 is 729, having a root 27, divide 27 into 720; the result is 2 2 26 3 ; add 27; the result is 53 3 . Take half of this; the result is 1 1 5 26 2 + 3 (= 26 6 ). Therefore the square root of 720 will be very 5 5 1 nearly 26 6 . For 26 6 multiplied by itself gives 720 36 ; so that 1 the difference is 36 . If we wish to make the difference less 1 than 36 , instead of 729 we shall take the number now found, 1 720 36 , and by the same method we shall find an approxima- 1 tion differing by much less than 36 . Heron, Metrica, i.8.
Let a be a given positive integer. Consider the sequence (an) defined recursively by 1 a an = an 1 + , (1.1) 2 − an 1 − 102 Extraction of square roots
with an arbitrary positive initial value a1. The sequence (an) converges to the square root of a regardless of the positive initial value.
Example 1.1. Approximations of √2 with initial values a =1:
n an 1 1/1 1 2 3/2 1.5 3 17/12 1.4166666666666 4 577/408 1.4142156862745 ··· 5 665857/470832 1.4142135623746 ··· 6 886731088897/627013566048 1.4142135623730 ··· ···
Example 1.2. Approximations of √3 with initial value a1 =2:
n an 1 2 2 2 7/4 1.75 3 97/56 1.73214285714286 4 18817/10864 1.73205081001473 ··· 5 708158977/408855776 1.73205080756888 ··· 6 1002978273411373057/579069776145402304 1.73205080756888 ··· ···
Convergence
Why does the sequence (an) converge to √a? Note that 1 (i) with any arbitrary positive a1, all subsequent an are greater than √a, (ii) (an) is a decreasing sequence:
an 1 a 1 = 1+ 2 < (1+1)=1. an 1 2 an 1 2 − −
Since a decreasing sequence bounded from below converges, we write ℓ = limn xn. From (1.1), we have →∞ 1 a ℓ = ℓ + . 2 ℓ Solving this equation, we have ℓ = √a.
1This follows from the arithmetic-geometric means inequality. 103
2 2 1 a an a = an 1 + a − 4 − an 1 − − 1 a 2 = an 1 4 − − an 1 − 2 2 (an 1 a) = − 2− 4an 1 − 2 2 (an 1 a) < − − . 4a
Therefore, beginning with a1, by iterating n steps, we obtain a2,..., an+1, with
1 a2 a< (a2 a)2 n+1 − 4a · n − 1 1 2 4 < (an 1 a) 4a · (4a)2 − − . .
1 1 1 2 2n < − (a a) 4a · (4a)2 ··· (4a)2n 1 1 −
1 2 2n = 2n 1 (a1 a) (4a) − −
This shows that the convergence is very fast. For example, for a =2, if we begin with a1 = 2 and execute n steps, then we have a rational approximation an+1 satisfying
2 1 an+1 2 < 2n 3 . − 2 −
To guarantee an accuracy up to, for example, 10 decimal digits be- 1 yond the decimal point, we need to make the error < 1010 . This requires 2n 3 10 2 − > 10 , and it is enough to iterate 5 times. 104 Extraction of square roots
Reorganization It is more convenient to calculate the numerators and denominators sep- arately. If we write a = xn , then n yn
2 2 xn 1 xn 1 ayn 1 xn 1 + ayn 1 = an = − + − = − − . yn 2 yn 1 xn 1 2xn 1yn 1 − − − −
This leads to two sequences of integers (xn) and (yn) defined recursively
2 2 xn = xn 1 + ayn 1, − − yn = 2xn 1yn 1, − − with arbitrary initial values x1 and y1.
Exercise (1) Find a rational approximation r of √5 satisfying r2 3 < 1 . | − | 1030 (2) Construct two integer sequences (x ) and (y ) such that the xn n n yn 2 converges to the square root of 3 . (3) Let a be a positive integer. Consider a sequence (an) defined recursively by 1 a an = an 1 . 2 − − an 1 − (a) Show that the sequence does not converge regardless of the initial value. (b) Show that for every given positive integer ℓ, an initial value can be chosen so that the sequence is periodic with period ℓ. [Hint: rewrite the √a recursive relation by putting an 1 = ]. − tan θ (4) Start with two positive numbers a0 and a0, and iterate according to the rule an = √an 1 + √an 2. − − Does the sequence (an) converge? If so, what is the limit? (No proof is required).
Irrationality
Why is √2 an irrational number? Here are two simple proofs. 105
√ √ p (1) If 2 is rational, we write 2= q in lowest terms, then a square of side p has the same area as two squares of side q, and for this, the p p square is smallest possible. ×
q
q
p Yet this diagram shows that there is a smaller square which also has the same area as two squares. This contradicts the minimality of p. (Ex- ercise: what are the dimensions of the smaller squares involved?) (2) If √2 is rational, then there is a smallest integer q for which q√2 is an integer. Now, the number (q√2 q)√2 is a smaller integer multiple of √2, which is also an integer. This− contradicts the minimality of q.
Irrationality of √k n Here is a simple proof that for a positiveinteger n, √n is either irrational 2 p or integral. If √n = q in lowest terms, then both q√n = p and p√n = qn are integers. Since there are integers a and b satisfying ap + bq =1, we have √n = a pn + b qn, an integer. More generally,· for given· positive integers n and k, the number √k n is irrational unless n is the k-power of an integer. This fact follows easily from the fundamental theorem of arithmetic: every positive integer > 1 is uniquely the product of powers of distinct prime numbers. 3
The ladder of Theon
Consider an integer a> 1 which is not the square of an integer. Let b be the integer closest to √a (so that b √a < 1 ). | − | 2 2M. Levin, The theorem that √n is either irrational or integral, Math. Gazette, , 60 (1976) 138. Levin p2 has subsequently (ibid., 295) given an even shorter proof: Since the reduced fraction q = p√n = qn is an integer, q must be equal to 1, and √n is an integer. 3See the supplements to Chapter 1 for a more elementary proof. 106 Extraction of square roots
n Now, for each positive integer n, (b + √a) = xn + yn√a for pos- itive integers xn and yn. The sequences (xn) and (yn) can be generated recursively by
xn = bxn 1 + ayn 1, − − yn = xn 1 + byn 1, − − with x1 = b, y1 =1. 1 1 (1) Since b √a < 2 , xn yn√a < 2n . | − | | − | n (2) Since xn and yn are positive integers, yn > b and x 1 1 n √a < < . y − 2ny (2b)n n n
xn This shows that lim n = √a. →∞ yn Chapter 2
Convergence of sequences
A sequence (an) is said to converge to a number a if ultimately the terms of the sequence are as close to a as we like. This means that for any given ε> 0, there exists an integer N such that
a a <ε whenever n>N. | n − | We say that a is the limit of the sequence and write
lim an = a. n →∞
1 1 Example 2.1. (a) The sequence converges to 0: limn = 0. n →∞ n While this is intuitively clear, here is a proof. Given ε> 0, let N = 1 . ⌈ ε ⌉ For n > N, we have n> 1 1 . This means that 1 0 = 1 <ε. ⌈ ε ⌉ ≥ ε n − n Proposition 2.1. If limn an = A and limn bn = B, then →∞ →∞ (a) limn (an bn)= A B, →∞ ± ± (b) limn anbn = AB, →∞ an A (c) limn = , provided bn and B are nonzero. →∞ bn B Proof. A convergent sequence is bounded
Example 2.2. Let f(x) be a polynomial in x. If (an) converges to a, then (f(an)) converges to f(a). A sequence (an) is (i) bounded below if it has a lower bound A, i.e., an A for every positive integer n, ≥ 108 Convergence of sequences
(ii) bounded above if it has an upper bound B, i.e., an B for every positive integer n. ≤ The sequence is bounded if it has a lower bound and an upper bound. Otherwise, the sequence is unbounded, i.e., it exceeds any given positive number in absolute value. This means that given any M > 0, there exists an integer N > 0 such that a > M whenever n>N. | n|
Theorem 2.2. (a) An (ultimately) increasing sequence bounded above is convergent. Its limit is the least upper bound of the sequence. (b) A decreasing sequence bounded below is convergent. Its limit is the greatest lower bound of the sequence. Example 2.3. (a) Let a be a given real number. The sequence (an) is unbounded when a > 1. | | Proof. Without loss of generality assume a> 1, and write a =1+ b for b > 0. Note that an = (1+ b)n > 1+ nb. Therefore, given M > 0, let M 1 N be the least integer such that 1+ nb M, i.e., n b− . Then, n > M implies an > 1 + nb M,≥ showing that≥ the ⌈ sequence⌉ is unbounded. | | ≥ (b) The sequence (an) converges to 0 if a < 1. | | Proof. Again, it is enough to assume a > 0. Write a = 1 b for 0
1 1 1 Given ε> 0, let N = bε . Then, for n > N, n> bε and nb <ε. This n 1 ⌈ ⌉ n means a < <ε, and limn a =0. nb →∞ (c) The sequence (( 1)n) does not converge to any number, though it is bounded, and the subsequence− of odd numbered terms is a constant sequence, as is that of even numbered terms.
Example 2.4. Let (an) be a sequence such that (i) the subsequence of odd numbered terms converges to ℓ, and (ii) the subsequence of even numbered terms converges to the same ℓ. Then the sequence (an) converges to ℓ. 109
Proof. Given ε> 0, there are integers N1 and N2 such that (i) an ℓ <ε whenever n > N1 is even, (ii)| a − ℓ| <ε whenever n > N is odd. | n − | 2 Therefore, an ℓ <ε whenever n> max(N1, N2), showing that (an) converges to| ℓ.− |
Proposition 2.3. Let (an), (bn), and (cn) be sequences such that (i) ultimately 1 a b c , 2 n ≤ n ≤ n (ii) both sequences (an) and (cn) converge to ℓ. Then the sequence (bn) also converges to ℓ. 1 Example 2.5. limn 2 =0. →∞ √n +1 1 1 1 Proof. 0 < 2 < for every n. Since limn = 0, the result √n +1 n →∞ n follows from Proposition 2.3.
n (b) limn 2n =0. →∞ an (c) limn =0. →∞ n!
Infinite series
An infinite series
∞ a = a + a + + a + n 1 2 ··· n ··· n=1 X is convergent if the sequence of partial sums
s := a + a + + a n 1 2 ··· n is convergent. The sum of the series is the limit of the sequence of partial sums. Otherwise, it is divergent. For series of positive terms, we shall simply write an < when the series is convergent. ∞ (1) If the partial sums of a series of positive terms areP bounded, then the series converges. Proof: The sequence of partial sums, being mono- tonic increasing and bounded above, is convergent. (2) Comparison test for series of positive terms: Let an and bn be series of positive terms. P P 1This means that there is an integer N such that the double inequality holds whenever n > N. 2One or both of the inequalities may be replaced by <. ≤ 110 Convergence of sequences
(i) If a b ultimately and b is convergent, then so is a . n ≤ n n n (ii) If an bn ultimately and bn is divergent, then so is bn. ≥ P P n a ∞ Theorem 2.4. A geometric seriesP n=0 ar converges toP1 r provided r < 1. − | | P Example 2.6. 0.999 =1. ··· The decimal expansion of a number Every number between 0 and 1 can be written uniquely in decimal form:
0.a a a (2.1) 1 2 ··· n ··· where the digits a1, ..., an, . . . are integers between 0 and 9. This ex- pression is indeed an infinite series a a a 1 + 2 + + n + . 10 102 ··· 10n ···
Consider the sequence (sn) of partial sums defined by a a a s := 1 + 2 + + n . n 10 102 ··· 10n It is easy to see that it is an increasing sequence:
s s s 1 ≤ 2 ≤···≤ n ≤··· It is clearly bounded above since each
9 9 9 9 s + + + + = 10 =1. n ≤ 10 102 ··· 10n ··· 1 1 − 10 This shows that (2.1) defines a unique nonnegative number 1. Conversely, given a number α [0, 1], we determine≤ its decimal expansion as follows. ∈ a1 a1+1 (i) a1 is the integer satisfying 10 α< 10 . ≤ n ak (ii) Having defined a1, ..., an, we put sn = j=1 10k and define an+1 as the integer satisfying P a a +1 n+1 α s < n+1 . 10n+1 ≤ − n 10n+1 Equivalently, a = 10n+1(α s ) . n+1 ⌊ − n ⌋ 111
Theorem 2.5. Between any two real numbers, there is a rational number. Proof. Let α > β be two given real numbers. (1) If α is rational, then with a sufficiently large n, the rational number 1 α n is strictly between α and β. − an ∞ (2) If α is irrational, with a decimal expansion a0 + n=1 10n . There 1 is a sufficiently large N such that 10N < α β. The rational number N an − P n=1 10n is strictly between α and β since P N a ∞ a ∞ 9 1 α n = n = < α β. − 10n 10n ≤ 10n 10N − n=1 n=N+1 n=N+1 X X X N an This means that α> n=1 10n > β. P Exercise (1) Prove that between any two real numbers, there is an irrational num- ber. p (2) The decimal expansion of a rational number q (in lowest terms) is finite if and only if the prime divisors of q are 2 and/or 5. (3) Why is the decimal expansion of a rational number periodic? 112 Convergence of sequences Chapter 3
Square roots by decimal digits
Suppose a positive integer a is given in decimal form. To find its square root, divide the digits of a into blocks of two digits beginning with the right hand side. We represent this as
a a a 1 2 ··· n
where each ak, k = 2,...,n is a 2-digit number, and a0 has either 1 or 2 digits. (1) Set b1 := a1, and let q1 be the largest integer such that r1 := a q2 0. 1 − 1 ≥ Set Q1 := q1. (2) Suppose bk, rk and Qk have been defined. Form
bk+1 := 100rk + ak+1.
Find the largest integer qk+1 such that r := b (20Q + q )q 0. k+1 k+1 − k k+1 k+1 ≥
Set Qk+1 := 10Qk + qk+1. (3) Repeat (2) to find b1, b2,..., bn. Then b1b2 bn = √a . The calculation··· may⌊ be continued⌋ beyond the decimal points by adding pairs of zeros. 114 Square roots by decimal digits
2 5 5 8 6 6 8 5 0 6 5 4 6 7 8 4 5 3 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 4 45 2 5 4 2 2 5 505 2 9 6 7 2 5 2 5 5108 4 4 2 8 4 4 0 8 6 4 51166 3 4 2 0 5 3 3 0 6 9 9 6 511726 3 5 0 5 7 6 1 3 0 7 0 3 5 6 5117328 4 3 5 4 0 5 2 3 4 0 9 3 8 6 2 4 51173365 2 6 0 1 8 9 9 4 5 2 5 5 8 6 6 8 2 5 511733700 4 3 2 3 1 2 0 6 7
4 3 2 3 1 2 0 6 7 Chapter 4
a + a + + √a + · · · · · · q p Let a> 0 be a given number. What is the number
a + a + + √a + ? ··· ··· r q If this expression defines a number ℓ, it must satisfy ℓ = √a + ℓ, and so is the positive root of the quadratic equation x2 x a =0, namely, 1 √ − − ℓ = 2 (1+ 4a + 1). We justify the existence of the number ℓ as the limit of a convergent sequence (xn) of positive numbers defined recursively by xn+1 = √a + xn, (4.1) regardless of the (positive) initial value. For this, it is helpful to write 2 x x a =(x ℓ)(x + ℓ′) for ℓ,ℓ′ > 0. − − − (1) Suppose xn <ℓ. Then 2 2 2 2 (i) xn+1 ℓ = a + xn ℓ < a + ℓ ℓ =0, so that xn+1 <ℓ; (ii) x2 − x2 = a +−x x2 = −(x ℓ)(x + ℓ) > 0, so that n+1 − n n − n − n − n xn+1 > xn. Therefore, if x1 < ℓ, then the sequence (xn) is monotonic increasing, and is bounded above. The sequence necessarily converges to ℓ. (2) Suppose xn >ℓ. Then 2 2 2 2 (i) xn+1 ℓ = a + xn ℓ > a + ℓ ℓ =0, so that xn+1 >ℓ; (ii) x2 −x2 = a+x −x2 = (x −ℓ)(x +ℓ) < 0, so that x < x . n+1 − n n − n − n − n n+1 n Therefore, according as x1 > ℓ or < ℓ, the sequence (xn) is monoton- ically decreasing and bounded below, or monotonically increasing and below above. It necessarily converges to ℓ. 116 a + a + + √a + · · · · · · q p (3) Suppose x1 = ℓ. Then every xn = ℓ. Since the sequence (xn) converges, its limit ℓ satisfies, according to (4.1), 1 ℓ = √a + ℓ. Here are two examples for a =5 with different initial values.
n xn xn 1 1 3 2 2.449489743 2.828427125 3 2.729375339 ··· 2.797932652 ··· 4 2.780175415 ··· 2.79247787 ··· 5 2.789296581 ··· 2.791501007··· 6 2.790931131 ··· 2.79132603 ··· 7 2.791223949 ··· 2.791294687··· 8 2.791276401 ··· 2.791289073 ··· 9 2.791285797 ··· 2.791288067 ··· 10 2.79128748 ··· 2.791287887 ··· 11 2.791287782··· 2.791287855 ··· 12 2.791287836 ··· 2.791287849 ··· 13 2.791287845 ··· 2.791287848 ··· 14 2.791287847 ··· 2.791287848 ··· 15 2.791287847 ··· 2.791287847 ··· ··· ··· √5+1 Example 4.1. For a =1, this limit is the golden ratio ϕ = 2 .
Exercise (1) Let a and b be given positive numbers. Why does the expression
a + b + a + √b + s ··· r q (in which a and b alternate indefinitely) define a real number?
(2) Identify the numbers
1+ 7+ 1+ √7+ s ··· r q and
7+ 1+ 7+ √1+ . s ··· r q 1It is important to justify the existence of the limit before passing an recurrence relation to the limit. Here is a counterexample. Let (xn) be defined by xn+2 = xn+1 + xn with x1 = x2 = 1. The sequence certainly is unbounded and does not converge. The terms are the Fibonacci numbers. If we assume it converges to a limit ℓ, then ℓ = ℓ + ℓ, and ℓ = 0, an impossibility. Chapter 5
An infinite continued fraction
What is the number 1 a + 1 a + 1 a + . .. for a given a> 0? If we regard this as the limit ℓ of a sequence of fractions, where the n-th term is the fraction 1 a + 1 a + 1 a + . .. 1 + a
1 √a2+4 a with n copies a’, then ℓ = a + ℓ , and ℓ = 2 − . As noted in the preceding example, we need to justify the existence of the limit. The sequence in question can be defined recursively as 1 xn+1 = a + , x1 = a. xn
It is possible to work out an explicit expression for xn, by writing it in the form x = yn for another sequence (y ). The recurrence relation n yn−1 n becomes
yn+1 = ayn + yn 1, y0 =1, y1 = a. − 118 An infinite continued fraction
This is a second order homogeneous linear recurrence, with character- 2 istic equation λ = aλ +1. Denote by λ1 and λ2 the two characteristic values. Note that λa + λ2 = a and λ1λ2 = 1. Since their sum is −1 positive, we may write λ1 = λ> 1, and λ2 = −λ < 0. We have y = A λn + B λn n · 1 · 2 for appropriately chosen constants A and B. From the initial values, we have
A + B = 1,
Aλ1 + Bλ2 = a. Solving these, we have a λ λ λ a λ A = − 2 = 1 , B = 1 − = − 2 , λ λ λ λ λ λ λ λ 1 − 2 1 − 2 1 − 2 1 − 2 and λn+1 λn+1 y = 1 − 2 . n λ λ 1 − 2 It follows that λn+1 λn+1 λ2n+2 ( 1)n+1 x = 1 − 2 = − − . n λn λn λ(λ2n + 1) 1 − 2 Since λ> 1, it is clear that the limit is λ.
√5+1 Example 5.1. For a =1, this limit is (again) the golden ratio ϕ = 2 .
Exercise
(1) For which values of x1 will (xn) converge, where 2 xn+1 =3 ? − xn
(2) Show that regardless of initial value, the sequence (xn) defined recursively by 1 xn+1 =1 − xn 119
does not converge. (3) Let λ (0, 1) be a fixed number. Given a, b, define a sequence ∈ (xn) recursively by
x1 = a, x2 = b, xn = λxn 1 + (1 λ)xn 2. − − −
Show that the sequence (xn) converges and find its limit. 120 An infinite continued fraction Chapter 6
Ancient Chinese calculations of π
The ancient Chinese classics the Nine Chapters of the Mathematical Art adopted the formula
Area of circle = product of half-circumference and half-diameter with the rule “diameter one, circumference 3”. The third century com- mentator LIU Hui pointed out the inadequacy of this rule, and explained the mensuration of the circle by the method of dissection. Consider a circle of radius R. Denote by A its area. Inscribe in the circle a regular polygon of n sides, each of length an. For the regular n-gon, denote by (i) pn the perimeter, (ii) An the area, (iii) dn the distance from the center to a side, and (iv) c = R d . n − n Beginning with a6 = 1, LIU Hui first computed a12, making use of 2 the right triangle theorem: d = R2 a6 , c = R d , and 6 − 2 6 − 6 q 2 a 2 a 2 a 2 a = c2 + 6 = R R2 6 + 6 . 12 6 v r 2 u − r − 2 ! 2 u t 122 Ancient Chinese calculations of π
a12 c6
d 6 R
n an dn cn pn = n an 61 0.8660254 0.1339746 6 · 12 0.517638 0.9659258 0.0340742 6.211656
More generally,
2 a 2 a 2 a = R R2 n + n . (6.1) 2n v u − r − 2 ! 2 u t LIU Hui iterated the process several times and obtained
n an dn cn pn = n an 61 0.8660254 0.1339746 6 · 12 0.517638 0.9659258 0.0340742 6.211656(a) 24 0.261052 0.9914448 0.0085552(b) 6.265248(c) 48 0.130806 0.9978589 0.0021411 6.278688(d) 96 0.065438 6.282048(e)
1 2 He actually recorded the values of a2n and extracted their square roots to find a2n:
1The rounding off of the 6th digit after the decimal point is not correct. To 10 places, these are (a) 6.2116570824; (b) 0.0085551386; (c) 6.2652572265; (d) 6.2787004060; (e) 6.2820639017. 123
2 2431 a12 = 0.267949193445 (0.26794919 ) 2 7421 ··· a24 = 0.068148349466 (0.06814834 ) 2 7252 ··· a48 = 0.017110278813 (0.01711027 ) a2 = 0.004282154012 (0.004282153522 ··· ) 96 ··· 1 The area of the polygon can be computed as An = n 2 an dn. Indeed n · · the area of the regular 2n-gon is A2n = 2 an R. LIU Hui made use of the following inequality to estimate the area· of· the circle: A Now that A A = n 1 a c , and A =6 1 R2 =3R2. 2n − n · 2 · n · n 12 · 2 n an A2n An A2n A2n +(A2n An) 61− 3 − 12 0.517638 0.105828 3.105828 3.211656 24 0.261052 0.026796 3.132624 3.159420 48 0.130806 0.006720 3.139344 3.146064 96 0.065438 0.001680 3.141024 3.142704 From these, LIU Hui concluded that the area of the circle is 3.14 correct to two places of decimal. In the fifth century, ZU Chongzi (429–500) gave the value of π cor- rect to 6 decimal places, as between 3.1415926 and 3.1415927. His 124 Ancient Chinese calculations of π manuscript Sushu was lost. But it is generally believed that he carried out LIU Hui’s program further to regular polygons of sides 6 211 = 12288 and 6 212 = 25576: · · n an A2n An A2n A2n + (A2n An) − − 192 0.0327234632 0.0004205213 3.1414524722 3.1418729936 384 0.0163622792 ··· 0.0001051356 ··· 3.1415576079 ··· 3.1416627435 ··· 768 0.0081812080 ··· 0.0000262842 ··· 3.1415838921 ··· 3.1416101763 1536 0.0040906125 ··· 0.0000065710 ··· 3.1415904632 ··· 3.1415970343 3072 0.0020453073 ··· 0.0000016427 ··· 3.1415921059 ··· 3.1415937487 ··· 6144 0.0010226538 ··· 0.0000004106 ··· 3.1415925166 ··· 3.1415929273 ··· 12288 0.0005113269 ··· 0.0000001026 ··· 3.1415926193 ··· 3.1415927220 ··· ··· ··· ··· ··· 22 Zu also gave the crude approximation 7 and the fine approximation 355 113 for π. Chapter 7 Existence of π Area of circle in Euclid’s Elements Eucl. X.I Two unequal magnitudes being set out, if from the greater there be sub- tracted a magnitude greater than its half, and from that which is left a magnitude greater than its half, and if this process be repeated continu- ally, there will be left some magnitude which will be less than the lesser magnitude set out. Reformulation Let (a ) be a sequence of real numbers satisfying a < 1 a for every n n+1 2 · n n. Given ε > 0, there exists an integer N such that an < ε whenever n > N. Exercise (1) In Eucl. X.1, if each occurrence of the word “half” is replaced by “one third”, is the proposition still valid? (2) Is the proposition still valid without specifying that the magnitude subtracted each time be greater than a certain proportion of the magni- tude (from which it is subtracted)? 126 Existence of π Eucl. XII.1 Similar polygons inscribed in circles are to one another as the squares on the diameters. Eucl. XII.2 Circles are to one another as the squares on their diameters. Proof. If C(d) denotes the area of a circle, diameter d, then for any 2 2 d1,d2, C(d1) : C(d1)= d1 : d2. E K N F H M L G (i) Let C be the area of a circle. Suppose there is an inscribed n-gon of area An, each arc smaller than a semicircle. Bisecting the arcs, one obtains an inscribed 2n-gon, of area A . Then, C A < 1 (C A ). 2n − 2n 2 − n 1 EKF > segment EKF △ 2 1 = sum of shaded segments > segment EKF. ⇒ 2 (ii) Starting from an inscribed square, one can approximate, by re- peated bisection of arcs, the area C arbitrarily closely: given any positive ǫ, there is an inscribed regular n-gon for which C An < ǫ. − 2 (iii) Given two circles of diameters d1,d2, Euclid shows that if d1 : 2 d2 = C(d1) : X, then X cannot be smaller than C(d2). Suppose to the contrary that X 2 2 (iv) Suppose now d1 : d2 = C(d1) : X with X >C(d2). We 2 2 can rewrite this as d1 : d2 = Y : C(d2) with Y Exercise (3) A circle is approximated by a regular octagon obtained by cutting out corners from its circumscribed square. What is the approximate value of π? 128 Existence of π Chapter 8 Archimedes’ calculation of π Archimedes, in his Measurement of a Circle, gave the following inter- esting bounds for π: 1 10 3 >π> 3 . 7 71 To obtain the upper bound, Archimedes began with a regular hexagon circumscribing the circle, doubling the number of sides and determined the length of a side of a circumscribed regular polygon of 6 2n+1 sides in terms of one of 6 2n sides. He did the same thing for inscribed· polygons to obtain the lower· bound. A B ′ A C D X O ∠ 1 Consider a tangent AC to a circle, center O such that AOC is 2k of the circle, k = 6 2n, so that AC is one half of the length of a side of circumscribed regular· polygon of k sides. If the bisector of angle AOC intersects AC at A′, then A′C is one half of a side of a circumscribed regular polygon of 2k sides. If OA intersects the circle at B, and X the projection of B on OC, then BC is a side of an inscribed regular polygon of 2k sides, and BX 130 Archimedes’ calculation of π is one half of a side of an inscribed polygon of k sides. n Let an and bn be the perimeters of regular polygons of k = 6 2 sides, respectively circumscribed and inscribed in the circle. We have· an an+1 bn+1 bn AC = , A′C = , BC = , BX = . 2k 4k 2k 2k (1) Since OA′ bisects angle AOC, A′C : AC = OC : OA + OC = OB : OA + OB = BX : AC + BX. This gives an+1 bn 4k = 2k . an an bn 2k 2k + 2k From this, we have 2anbn an+1 = . an + bn 2 (2) Since BC2 = CX CD, we have CX = BC . Also, from the · CD similarity of triangles OA′C and BCX, we have A C CX BC2 ′ = = , OC BX CD BX and · 2 2 2 an+1 OC BC BC bn+1 = A′C = · = = . 4k CD BX 2 BX 4k bn 2 · · · Therefore, bn+1 = an+1bn. If we take the diameter of the circle to be 1, then a0 = 2√3 and b0 =3. The sequences (an) and (bn) defined recursively by 2anbn an+1 = , bn+1 = an+1bn an + bn both converge to the circumference of the circle,p namely, π. n n 6 2 an bn · 0 6 3.464101615 3 1 12 3.21539 3.105828541 2 24 3.15966 3.132628613 3 48 3.14609 3.139350203 4 96 3.14271 3.141031951 5 192 3.14187 3.141452472 This was the basis of practically all calculations of π before the 16th century. Correct to the first 34 decimal places, π =3.1415926535897932384626433832795028 ······ Chapter 9 Ptolemy’s calculations of chord lengths Ptolemy Theorem In a cyclic quadrilateral, the sum of the products of two pairs of opposite sides is equal to the product of the diagonals. B A E O C D Proof. Choose a point E on the diagonal AC such that ∠ADE = ∠BDC. Then triangles ADE and BDC are similar, and AD BD = AD BC = AE BD. AE BC ⇒ · · Also, triangles ABD and ECD are similar, and AB EC = AB CD = EC BD. BD CD ⇒ · · Therefore, AD BC + AB CD =(AE + EC) BD = AC BD. · · · · 132 Ptolemy’s calculations of chord lengths Calculation of chord lengths Ptolemy divided the circumference of the circle into 360 equal arcs, and the diameter into 120 parts, and expressed fractions of these parts in the sexagesimal system. x 180◦ 60◦ 90◦ 120◦ p p p p crd(x) 120 60 84 51′10′′ 103 55′23′′ Clearly, by the Pythagorean theorem, crd(x)2 + crd(180 x)2 =4. − B D C A C x y x 2 O O x 2 B D A Applying Ptolemy’s theorem, one has 1 crd(x y)= [crd(x)crd(180 y) crd(180 x)crd(y)] . ± 2 − ± − In particular, crd(2x) = crd(x)crd(180 x). − Also, x crd = 2 crd(180 x). 2 − − p Ptolemy then made use of these to determine crd(1◦). p 1. Calculations with a regular pentagon gave crd(72◦)=70 32′3′′. p 2. crd(12◦) = crd(72◦ 60◦)= = 12 32′36′′. − ··· 133 1 3. crd(6◦)= crd 12◦ = ; then crd(3◦), and 2 · ··· 1 ◦ p crd 1 = 1 34′15′′, 2 3 ◦ crd = 47′8′′. 4 4. To compute crd(1◦), Ptolemy made use of an interpolation based on an inequality crd(x) x < crd(y) y for arcs x>y smaller than a quadrant of a circle. 3 ◦ 3 (i) crd(1◦) : crd 4 < 1 : 4 , (ii) crd 1 1 ◦ : crd(1 ) < 1 1 :1. 2 ◦ 2 Therefore, 4 3 ◦ 2 1 ◦ crd > crd(1◦) > crd 1 . 3 4 3 2 p 2 ′′ p The two ends are respectively 1 2′50 3 and 1 2′50′′. Since crd(1◦) p is both less and greater than a length which differs from 1 2′50′′ insignificantly, Ptolemy took this for crd(1◦). 1 ◦ From this Ptolemy deduced that crd 2 is very nearly 31′25′′. Mak- ing use of this and the above relations, he was able to complete this 1 ◦ Table of Chords for arcs subtending angles increasing from 2 to 180◦ 1 ◦ by increments of 2 . Modern reformulation 1 If we take diameter of the circle to be 2, and write sin x = 2 crd(2x), 1 cos x = 2 crd(180◦ 2x) = sin(90◦ x), Ptolemy’s relations become our modern basic trigonometric− identities:− 134 Ptolemy’s calculations of chord lengths sin(x y) = sin x cos y cos x sin y, ± ± cos(x y) = cos x cos y sin x sin y; ± ∓ sin 2x = 2 sin x cos x; cos2x = cos2 x sin2 x = 2 cos2 x 1=1 2 sin2 x; − − − x 1 cos x sin2 = − ; 2 2 x 1 + cos x cos2 = . 2 2 Chapter 10 lim sin θ =1 The basic limit θ 0 θ → Theorem 10.1 (Ptolemy). For circular arcs x>y smaller than a quad- rant of a circle, crd(x) x < crd(y) y B H A C E F G O D Proof. ([?, pp.ii 281–282]). With reference to the diagram above, crd(AB) < crd(BC), we prove that crd(CB) arc CB < . (10.1) crd(BA) arc BA Bisect angle ABC to intersect AC at E and the circumference of the lim sin θ =1 136 The basic limit θ→0 θ circle at D. The arcs AD and DC are equal, so are the chords AD and DC. Since CB : BA = CE; EA, we have CE >EA. Construct DF perpendicular to AC. Note that AD > DE > DF . Therefore, the circle, center D, radius F E intersects DA at G, and the extension of DF at a point H. Now, F E : EA = ∆FED : ∆AED < sector HED : sector GED < ∠F DE : ∠EDA. From this, F A : AE < ∠F DA : ∠ADE, componendo CA : AE < ∠CDA : ∠ADE, CE : EA < ∠CDE : ∠EDA; separando CB : BA < ∠CDB : ∠BDA since CB : BA = CE : EA < arc CB : arc BA. This establishes (10.1) above. sin θ Theorem 10.2. limθ 0 =1. → θ Proof. Given a small arc of length θ on a unit circle of circumference C, 1 choose an integer n large enough so that the sector θ is between n and 1 2n of the circle: C C <θ< . 2n n By Ptolemy’s theorem, s2n sin θ sn C > > C 2n θ n 2n s sin θ n s · 2n > > · n . C θ C As θ 0, n . Since the two ends of the double inequality have the → →∞ sin θ same limit 1 as n , we conclude that limθ 0 =1. →∞ → θ 1 cos θ Corollary 10.3. limθ 0 − =0. → θ Proof. This follows from 1 cos θ = 2 sin2 θ . − 2 2 θ 1 cos θ θ sin 2 − = θ . θ 2 · 2 ! 137 As θ 0, the two factors have limits 0 and 1 respectively. Hence the limit the→ product is 0. 1 cos θ 1 Corollary 10.4. limθ 0 − 2 = . → θ 2 Differentiation of sine and cosine d(sin x) sin(x + h) sin x = lim − h 0 dx → h sin x cos h + cos x sin h sin x = lim − h 0 h → sin h 1 cos h = lim cos x sin x − h 0 · h − · h → sin h 1 cos h = cos x lim sin x lim − h 0 h 0 · → h − · → h = cos x 1 sin x 0 · − · = cos x. Exercise Prove that d(cos x) = sin x. dx − lim sin θ =1 138 The basic limit θ→0 θ Chapter 11 The Arithmetic - Geometric Means Inequality A.M. G.M. H.M. ≥ ≥ Lemma 11.1. For positive numbers a b, ≤ 2ab a + b a √ab b; ≤ a + b ≤ ≤ 2 ≤ equality holds if and only if a = b. A G H b a a P O b Proof. In the diagram above, a + b 2ab OA = , PG = √ab, PH = . 2 a + b Clearly, a PH PG OA b. Two of these are equal if and only the corresponding≤ ≤ points ≤A, G, ≤H coincide. This happens only when a = b. 140 The Arithmetic - Geometric Means Inequality For n given positive numbers a1, a2,..., an, we define 1 (i) the arithmetic mean A(a1, a2,...,an) := n (a1 + a2 + + an), n ··· (ii) the geometric mean G(a1, a2,...,an) := √a1 a2 an, and (iii) the harmonic mean · n ··· . H(a1, a2,...,an) := 1 + 1 + + 1 a1 a2 ··· an Note that 1 1 1 1 = A , , , . H(a , a , , a ) a a ··· a 1 2 ··· n 1 2 n Theorem 11.2 (AGI). For positive numbers a1, a2,..., an, A(a , a ,...,a ) G(a , a ,...,a ). 1 2 n ≥ 1 2 n Equality holds if and only if a = a = = a . 1 2 ··· n Corollary 11.3. For positive numbers a1, a2,..., an, A(a , a ,...,a ) G(a , a ,...,a ) H(a , a ,...,a ). 1 2 n ≥ 1 2 n ≥ 1 2 n Any two of these means are equal if and only if a = a = = a . 1 2 ··· n Lemma 11.1 is the arithmetic-geometric means inequality for 2 posi- tive numbers. We present several proofs of Theorem 11.2. We give the proof of AGI by A. L. Cauchy (1789–1857). 1 Cauchy’s proof Consider the statements P(n) for n =1, 2,... : a1+a2+ +an P(n) : ··· √n a a a for a ,...,a 0. n ≥ 1 2 ··· n 1 n ≥ (1) P(2) is valid by Lemma 11.1. (2) Assuming the validity of P(2k), we proceed to validate P(2k+1). This means that for nonnegative numbers a1, a2,...,a2k , a2k+1, a2k+2, ...,a2k+1 , we have to show that a + a k + a k + + a k+1 1 2 2 +1 2 2k+1 ··· ··· √a1 a k a k a k+1 . 2k+1 ≥ ··· 2 2 +1 ··· 2 1See the supplements for other proofs. 141 Now, a + a k + a k + + a k+1 1 ··· 2 2 +1 ··· 2 2k+1 1 a + a k a k + + a k+1 = 1 ··· 2 + 2 +1 ··· 2 2 2k 2k 1 k 2 2k k √a1 a k + √a k a k+1 by assumption of P(2 ) ≥ 2 ··· 2 2 +1 ··· 2 1 k 2 2k 2 √a a k √a k a k+1 by P(2) ≥ 1 ··· 2 · 2 +1 ··· 2 2k+1 = √a1 a k a k a k+1 . ··· 2 2 +1 ··· 2 Therefore, we have established P(2k) for all integers k 1. (3) Assume P(n). We have to validate P(n 1).≥ This means that − given n 1 nonnegative numbers a1, ..., an 1 with arithmetic mean − − An 1 and geometric mean Gn 1, we have to show that An 1 Gn 1. − − − ≥ − In order to apply P(n), we need an extra number an. For this, we take an = An 1. Note that the arithmetic mean is − (n 1)An 1 + An 1 An = − − − = An 1, n − and the geometric mean is n n 1 Gn = Gn−1An 1. − − n q n 1 n 1 n 1 Since An Gn, we have An 1 Gn−1An 1. From this, An−1 Gn−1, ≥ − ≥ − − − ≥ − and An Gn. Equality holds if and only if a1 = a2 = = an 1 = ≥ ··· − An 1. −With these, we claim that P(n) is valid for every integer n 1. In k 1 k ≥ fact, given n, there is an integer k such that 2 − < n 2 . Note that P(n) is valid by (2) above. If n = 2k, then P(n) is valid.≤ Otherwise, applying (3) 2k n times, we have − P(2k) P(2k 1) P(n + 1) P(n). ⇒ − ⇒···⇒ ⇒ Exercise We say that a function f defined on a closed interval [a, b] is concave if f x+y f(x)+f(y) for x, y [a, b]. 2 ≥ 2 ∈ 142 The Arithmetic - Geometric Means Inequality (1) Show that the logarithm function is concave on (0, ). 2 (2) Show that the sine function is concave on [0, π]. ∞ (3) Let f be a concave function on [a, b]. Show that for arbitrary x , x ,...,x [a, b], 1 2 n ∈ x + x + + x f(x )+ f(x )+ + f(x ) f 1 2 ··· n 1 2 ··· n . n ≥ n 2The base of logarithm may be taken to be any a> 1. Chapter 12 Principle of nested intervals Let (xn) and (yn) be two sequences of numbers satisfying (i) (xn) is increasing (non-decreasing), (ii) (yn) is decreasing (non-increasing), and (iii) every xn is smaller than every ym. If the difference xn yn can be made arbitrarily small, then the two sequences converge| to a− common| limit. The conditions (i), (ii), (iii) can be reformulated as x x x y y y , 1 ≤ 2 ≤··· n ≤···≤ n ≤··· 2 ≤ 1 or as a sequence of nested intervals [x ,y ] [x ,y ] [x ,y ] 1 1 ⊇ 2 2 ⊇···⊇ n n ⊇··· Leibniz test for convergence of alternating series Theorem 12.1. If (an) isa decreasing sequence of positive real numbers n converging to 0, then the alternating series ∞ ( 1) a converges. n=0 − n Proof. Since the sequence (an) is decreasing,P the partial sums sn = n ( 1)ka satisfy k=0 − k P s1 s1 s1 These give a sequence of nested intervals [s , s ] [s , s ] [s , s ] . 1 0 ⊃ 3 2 ⊃···⊃ 2n+1 2n ⊃··· Note that s2n s2n+1 = a2n+1. Since (an) converges to 0, then the nested intervals− define a unique real number s, which is the sum of the alternating series. Thus, for example, the alternating harmonic series 1 1 1 1 1 1 + + + − 2 3 − 4 5 − 6 −··· 1 converges since the sequence n decreases to 0. Remarks. (1) We shall show later that this series converge to log2. (2) Similarly, the alternating series 1 1 1 ( 1)n 1 + + + − + − 3 5 − 7 ··· 2n +1 ··· π also converges. The sum is 4 . Arithmetic-harmonic mean Consider the sequences (xn) and (yn) defined by 2xnyn xn + yn xn+1 = , yn+1 = , xn + yn 2 with initial values x1 = a, y1 = b. Note that xn+1 and yn+1 are re- spectively the harmonic and arithmetic means of xn and yn. If we begin with two positive x1 y1, this recurrence defines a sequence of nested intervals ≤ [x ,y ] [x ,y ] [x ,y ] . 1 1 ⊇ 2 2 ⊇···⊇ n n ⊇··· Since 2 xn + yn 2xnyn (yn xn) yn xn yn xn yn+1 xn+1 = = − = − − − 2 − xn + yn 2(xn + yn) yn + xn · 2 y x n − n , (12.1) ≤ 2 145 it is clear that limn (yn xn)=0. Therefore, the nested intervals →∞ − define a unique real number as the common limit of (xn) and (yn). Here are two examples. (a) With x1 =1, y1 =5; limn xn = limn yn = √5. →∞ →∞ n xn yn 1 1 5 2 1.6666666666666666666666666666 3 3 2.1428571428571428571428571428 ··· 2.3333333333333333333333333333 4 2.2340425531914893617021276595 ··· 2.2380952380952380952380952381 ··· 5 2.2360670593565926597190756683 ··· 2.2360688956433637284701114488 ··· 6 2.2360679774996011987237537947 ··· 2.2360679774999781940945935585 ··· 7 2.2360679774997896964091736607 ··· 2.2360679774997896964091736766 ··· 8 2.2360679774997896964091736687 ··· 2.2360679774997896964091736687 ··· ··· ··· (b) With x1 =2, x2 =5; limn xn = limn yn = √10. →∞ →∞ n xn yn 1 2 5 2 2.857142857142857142857142857142 3.5 3 3.146067415730337078651685393258 ··· 3.178571428571428571428571428571 4 3.162235898737389759533024554279 ··· 3.162319422150882825040128410915 ··· 5 3.162277659892622371735257166789 ··· 3.162277660444136292286576482597 ··· 6 3.162277660168379331986870264172 ··· 3.162277660168379332010916824693 ··· 7 3.162277660168379331998893544432 ··· 3.162277660168379331998893544432 ··· ··· ··· Exercise Find this common limit in terms of a and b. Justify your answer. The arithmetic-geometric mean Given two positive numbers a < b, let x1 = a, y1 = b, and x + y x = √x y , y = n n . n+1 n n n+1 2 Then 2 2 xn + yn (√yn √xn) (yn xn) yn+1 xn+1 = √xnyn = − = − 2 − 2 − 2 2(√yn + √xn) (y x )2 y x y x y x < n − n = n − n n − n < n − n . (12.2) 2(yn + xn) yn + xn · 2 2 Therefore, the sequence of nested intervals [xn,yn] defines a unique real number. This is called the arithmetico-geometric mean (agM) of a and b. 1 1C. F. Gauss (1777–1854) discovered the agM when he was 15 years old, and later its connections with the elliptic integrals. 146 Principle of nested intervals Example 12.1. agM(1, 2) n xn yn 1 1.0000000000000000000 2.0000000000000000000 2 1.4142135623730950488 ··· 1.5000000000000000000 ··· 3 1.4564753151219702609 ··· 1.4571067811865475244 ··· 4 1.4567910139395549462 ··· 1.4567910481542588926 ··· 5 1.4567910310469068190 ··· 1.4567910310469069194 ··· ··· ··· Example 12.2. agM(1, √2) n xn yn 1 1.0000000000000000000 1.4142135623730950488 2 1.1892071150027210667 ··· 1.2071067811865475244 ··· 3 1.1981235214931201226 ··· 1.1981569480946342956 ··· 4 1.1981402346773072058 ··· 1.1981402347938772091 ··· 5 1.1981402347355922074 ··· 1.1981402347355922074 ··· ··· ··· Remark. The estimates (12.1) and (12.2) can be improved to explain the fast convergence in both cases. For arbitrary initial values a < b, the difference yn xn is ultimately less than 2a. We may as well assume b a< 2a. Now− we have − 2 (yn xn) 1 2 yn+1 xn+1 < − < (yn xn) . − 2(yn + xn) 4a · − Iterating, we have 2 1 1 2 yn+1 xn+1 < (yn 1 xn 1) − 4a · 4a · − − − < ··· n (b a)2 < − 2n 1 (4a) − n b a 2 = 4a − . · 2a Chapter 13 The number e Nested intervals defining e 1 n 1 n+1 Let an := 1+ n and bn := 1+ n . (1) Consider the n +1 numbers 1 1 1 1+ , 1+ , ..., 1+ , 1. n n n n n(1+ 1 )+1 | n{z }1 Their arithmetic mean is n+1 = 1+ n+1 , and their product is 1 n 1 n+1 1 n 1+ n . By the AGI, 1+ n+1 > 1+ n , showing that the sequence (an) is increasing. (2) A similar reasoning applied to the n +1 numbers 1 1 1 1 , 1 , ..., 1 , 1 − n − n − n n shows that the sequence| (bn) is decreasing.{z } (3) Since the increasing sequence (an) is bounded above by b1, it is convergent (to a finite number). Now, since b a = 1 a , we have n − n n · n limn (bn an)=0. →∞ − 1 n 1 n+1 Therefore, the nested intervals 1+ n , 1+ n define a unique number : e h i 1 n 1 n+1 e = lim 1+ = lim 1+ . n n n n →∞ →∞ 148 The number e 1 n 1 n+1 n (1 + n ) (1 + n ) 1 2. 4. 2 2.25 3.375 3 2.37037037 3.160493827 4 2.44140625 3.051757813 5 2.48832 2.985984 6 2.521626372 2.941897434 7 2.546499697 2.910285368 8 2.565784514 2.886507578 9 2.581174792 2.867971991 10 2.59374246 2.853116706 20 2.653297705 2.78596259 30 2.674318776 2.763462735 40 2.685063838 2.752190434 50 2.691588029 2.74541979 60 2.695970139 2.740902975 70 2.699116371 2.737675176 80 2.701484941 2.735253503 90 2.703332461 2.733369488 100 2.704813829 2.731861968 1000 2.716923932 2.719640856 10000 2.718145927 2.718417741 The convergence of the sequences is quite slow. A faster calculation of e Here is another sequence of nested intervals defining e, with much faster convergence. n 1 n n 1 k 1+ = 1+ n k n k=1 ! Xn n(n − 1) · · · (n − k + 1) 1 = 1+ · k! nk k=1 Xn n(n − 1) · · · (n − k + 1) 1 = 1+ · nk k! k=1 X n 1 2 k − 1 1 = 1+1+ 1 − 1 − · · · 1 − · n n n k! k=2 n X 1 < 1+ k! k=1 Xn 1 1 − ( 1 )n 1 < 1+ =1+ 2 = 3 − < 3. 2k−1 − 1 2n−1 k 1 2 X=1 n 1 Let sn := k=0 k! . From the above calculation, it is clear that 1+ 1 n