Passive Fire Protection & Life Safety Design Standards
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Analysis of Ontario Fires and Reliability of Active Fire Protection Systems
ANALYSIS OF ONTARIO FIRES AND RELIABILITY OF ACTIVE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS by Chandra S. Juneja A thesis submitted to the faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Masters of Applied Science Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © Chandra S. Juneja, 2004 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Library and Bibliotheque et 1*1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 0-494-00745-1 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 0-494-00745-1 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la these ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation. -
Smoke Alarms in US Home Fires Marty Ahrens February 2021
Smoke Alarms in US Home Fires Marty Ahrens February 2021 Copyright © 2021 National Fire Protection Association® (NFPA®) Key Findings Smoke alarms were present in three-quarters (74 percent) of the injuries from fires in homes with smoke alarms occurred in properties reported homei fires in 2014–2018. Almost three out of five home with battery-powered alarms. When present, hardwired smoke alarms fire deathsii were caused by fires in properties with no smoke alarms operated in 94 percent of the fires considered large enough to trigger a (41 percent) or smoke alarms that failed to operate (16 percent). smoke alarm. Battery-powered alarms operated 82 percent of the time. Missing or non-functional power sources, including missing or The death rate per 1,000 home structure fires is 55 percent lower in disconnected batteries, dead batteries, and disconnected hardwired homes with working smoke alarms than in homes with no alarms or alarms or other AC power issues, were the most common factors alarms that fail to operate. when smoke alarms failed to operate. Of the fire fatalities that occurred in homes with working smoke Compared to reported home fires with no smoke alarms or automatic alarms, 22 percent of those killed were alerted by the device but extinguishing systems (AES) present, the death rate per 1,000 reported failed to respond, while 11 percent were not alerted by the operating fires was as follows: alarm. • 35 percent lower when battery-powered smoke alarms were People who were fatally injured in home fires with working smoke present, but AES was not, alarms were more likely to have been in the area of origin and • 51 percent lower when smoke alarms with any power source involved in the ignition, to have a disability, to be at least 65 years were present but AES was not, old, to have acted irrationally, or to have tried to fight the fire themselves. -
Product Line Brochure
Innovation that Endures www.fi relite.com Addressable Fire Alarm Control Panels MS-9050UD, MS-9200UDLS and MS-9600LS/MS-9600UDLS Addressability Within Reach Fire-Lite Alarms’ addressable product offering includes three Fire MS-9050UD Alarm control panels that vary in size and capability to meet a wide • Single SLC that provides support for 50 addressable devices (any combination range of needs, while offering superior value and fl exibility. Our ad- of addressable detectors and modules) dressable product line offers ease of installation and programming, • Integrated DACT for off-premises monitoring addressable point identifi cation, built-in digital communication, and • Annunciator bus supports up to 8 devices, including ANN-80 LCD remote NAC synchronization. Our super fast LiteSpeedTM protocol ensures that annunciator, remote serial or parallel printer gateway, and LED graphic annunciator the safety and security of your building and its occupants are always • Auto programming feature quickly confi gures detectors and modules met with the utmost urgency. Fire-Lite’s addressable product line sets • Two programmable Class B / A notifi cation appliance circuits (NAC) the benchmark for Fire protection with its innovative, non-proprietary, cost effective products. MS-9200UDLS Included features on our most popular addressable panels: • Single SLC provides support for 198 addressable devices • Ability to connect devices via unshielded “fi re” wire up to 10,000 • LiteSpeed protocol for SLC communication polls 10 devices at a time and operates feet, -
Fire Protection Application Guide Armacell's Products for Passive Fire Protection
FIRE PROTECTION APPLICATION GUIDE ARMACELL'S PRODUCTS FOR PASSIVE FIRE PROTECTION Tel.: +49 25 17 60 30 [email protected] www.armacell.eu 02 | Fire protection application guide Foreword “Nine dead in house fire.” Fortunately we don’t read this or similar headlines every day. Nevertheless, around 4,000 people die in fires every year in the EU member countries. In many cases, deaths, injuries and major damage to buildings can be prevented if the fire protection requirements are implemented correctly. Therefore, passive fire protec- tion in buildings aims to design, construct, modify and maintain build- ings in such a way that the outbreak of a fire and the spread of flames and smoke (fire spread) are prevented. And, if a fire does occur, it must be possible to rescue people and animals and carry out fire-fighting operations effectively. In terms of fire protection, building service equipment, such as pipe- work and ventilation systems, represents a particular weak point. Pipe- and ductwork passes through separating building elements (walls and ceilings), stairwells and corridors, and thus forms a path along which flames and smoke can spread. In the event of a fire, pipe- and ductwork has a significant impact on safety in buildings and can soon pose a seri- ous threat. The risk potential rises with the number of pipes and their various tasks, thicknesses, materials and media. Therefore, in order to achieve the necessary fire protection targets, service penetrations in separating building elements must be sealed off. These fire protec- tion measures can be carried out in accordance with the less strin- gent requirements of the MLAR (state building regulations) or with an approval. -
Laser Technology Smoke Detector
APPLICATIONS GUIDE Laser Technology Smoke Detector APPLICATIONS GUIDE Laser Technology Smoke Detector Contents Section 1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................................................................2 Section 2 Benefits ............................................................................................................................................................................2 Section 3 Applications ....................................................................................................................................................................2 Ideal Applications ..........................................................................................................................................................2 Applications to Avoid ....................................................................................................................................................2 Section 4 How it Works ..................................................................................................................................................................3 The Principles of Laser Detection...............................................................................................................................3 Section 5 Performance ...................................................................................................................................................................4 -
Fire Service Features of Buildings and Fire Protection Systems
Fire Service Features of Buildings and Fire Protection Systems OSHA 3256-09R 2015 Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 “To assure safe and healthful working conditions for working men and women; by authorizing enforcement of the standards developed under the Act; by assisting and encouraging the States in their efforts to assure safe and healthful working conditions; by providing for research, information, education, and training in the field of occupational safety and health.” This publication provides a general overview of a particular standards- related topic. This publication does not alter or determine compliance responsibilities which are set forth in OSHA standards and the Occupational Safety and Health Act. Moreover, because interpretations and enforcement policy may change over time, for additional guidance on OSHA compliance requirements the reader should consult current administrative interpretations and decisions by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and the courts. Material contained in this publication is in the public domain and may be reproduced, fully or partially, without permission. Source credit is requested but not required. This information will be made available to sensory-impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: (202) 693-1999; teletypewriter (TTY) number: 1-877-889-5627. This guidance document is not a standard or regulation, and it creates no new legal obligations. It contains recommendations as well as descriptions of mandatory safety and health standards. The recommendations are advisory in nature, informational in content, and are intended to assist employers in providing a safe and healthful workplace. The Occupational Safety and Health Act requires employers to comply with safety and health standards and regulations promulgated by OSHA or by a state with an OSHA-approved state plan. -
Case Study: Asbestos Joint Compound on Drywall/Sheetrock $100,000.00 Savings
CASE STUDY: ASBESTOS JOINT COMPOUND ON DRYWALL/SHEETROCK $100,000.00 SAVINGS SCOPE OF SERVICES: AET was contracted by a not-for-profit senior adult community facility to provide asbestos contracting services prior to planned demolition of one of their outdated buildings. An EPA NESHAP inspection of the building had previously identified 24,000 SF of asbestos containing joint compound associated with non-asbestos drywall on the interior walls of the building. The asbestos building inspector had made a recommendation to remove the joint compound and associated drywall prior to demolition. AET was asked to provide a competitive bid for asbestos work along with two other asbestos contractors. AET EXPERIENCE: Joint compound or mud is used to seal joints/seams of the drywall. After application and drying the compound is sanded before being painted. Sanding can create an inhalation hazard from the dust release. Joint compound used before 1980 can contain asbestos. OSHA regulates disturbance/exposure to joint compound and requires this building material to be analyzed separately from the drywall by PLM. The EPA regulates disposal of drywall/joint compound and allows for this combined material to be composited into a single matrix. When analyzed as separate layers by OSHA, the drywall itself rarely contains asbestos and the joint compound where asbestos is found usually contains between 2-4% chrysotile asbestos. However, when analyzed as a composite per EPA protocol, the combined building material (2 layers) rarely exceeds >1% criteria to be defined as ACM. ABATEMENT REQUIREMENTS/COST SAVINGS: AET informed the potential new client that the drywall/joint compound did not have to be removed prior to demolition. -
Fire Prevention and Control in Compressor Buildings
THE INGAA FOUNDATION, INC. 10 G Street, NE, Suite 700 • Washington, DC 20002 (202) 216-5900 • FAX (202) 216-0870 • www.ingaa.org Fire Prevention and Control in Compressor Buildings Prepared for The INGAA Foundation, Inc. by: Solomon Associates 13455 Noel Road Suite 1500 Dallas, TX 75240-6634 F-2004-50625 Copyright © 2004 by The INGAA Foundation, Inc. Table of Contents Executive Summary ii Introduction 1 Project Scope and Approach 2 Assumptions and Limitations 3 Project Results 4 Summary 6 Attachment A Master Summary Document A-1 Fire Prevention and Control Survey forDallas Compressor StationsLondon Beijing Shanghai Mexico City i Chennai Solomon Associates #4RL118C Dallas London Beijing Shanghai Mexico City Chennai Executive Summary Solomon Associates (Solomon) is pleased to submit the Fire Prevention and Control Survey for the results obtained from a survey designed to gather information on the fire prevention and control practices of Interstate Natural Gas Association of America (INGAA) membership. Some insurance industry loss control inspectors are recommending or requiring installation of active fire suppression systems in natural gas compressor buildings without due consideration of fire prevention efforts or costs versus benefits. The objective of this INGAA membership survey was to determine the extent to which insurance and risk management companies are requesting natural gas transmission companies to install active fire prevention controls, what types of active and passive controls are being used, and the incidence of fires. Active fire controls include a method of distinguishing the fire after ignition, whereas passive controls are methods to minimize fire risk or alert operators of a fire or fire condition. -
Rules and Regulations for Fire Alarm and Fire Sprinkler Systems
NORTH ATTLEBOROUGH FIRE DEPARTMENT 50 Elm Street, North Attleborough, Massachusetts 02760 Tel (508) 699-0140 • Fax (508) 643-0296 Issued: January 2020 Revised 02/10/2020 Rules and Regulations for Fire Alarm and Fire Sprinkler Systems The following rules and regulations shall govern the installation, use, and maintenance of all required fire alarm and fire sprinkler systems in the Town of North Attleborough. The rules and regulations are effective January 1, 2020 until otherwise revised or amended. They are intended to cover the most common variables encountered by architects, engineers, fire alarm and fire suppression professionals. These rules and regulations are subject to change and at no time should be considered complete towards all projects and scopes of work. Consult the fire prevention office after reading this document where additional clarification is required. Contents Section 1: General Requirements: ................................................................................................................... 2 Section 2: Engineer/Contractor Submittal and Plan Review ......................................................................... 3 Section 3: Interior System Design and Layout ............................................................................................... 6 Section 4: Sprinkler and Standpipe Systems ................................................................................................ 11 Section 5: Direct Connections to the North Attleborough Fire Department .............................................. -
Active Fire Protection Systems
NIST NCSTAR 1-4 Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster Active Fire Protection Systems David D. Evans Richard D. Peacock Erica D. Kuligowski W. Stuart Dols William L. Grosshandler NIST NCSTAR 1-4 Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster Active Fire Protection Systems David D. Evans Society of Fire Protection Engineers Richard D. Peacock Erica D. Kuligowski W. Stuart Dols William L. Grosshandler Building and Fire Research Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology September 2005 U.S. Department of Commerce Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary Technology Administration Michelle O’Neill, Acting Under Secretary for Technology National Institute of Standards and Technology William Jeffrey, Director Disclaimer No. 1 Certain commercial entities, equipment, products, or materials are identified in this document in order to describe a procedure or concept adequately or to trace the history of the procedures and practices used. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation, endorsement, or implication that the entities, products, materials, or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose. Nor does such identification imply a finding of fault or negligence by the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Disclaimer No. 2 The policy of NIST is to use the International System of Units (metric units) in all publications. In this document, however, units are presented in metric units or the inch-pound system, whichever is prevalent in the discipline. Disclaimer No. 3 Pursuant to section 7 of the National Construction Safety Team Act, the NIST Director has determined that certain evidence received by NIST in the course of this Investigation is “voluntarily provided safety-related information” that is “not directly related to the building failure being investigated” and that “disclosure of that information would inhibit the voluntary provision of that type of information” (15 USC 7306c). -
Guideline on Through Penetration Firestopping
GUIDELINE ON THROUGH-PENETRATION FIRESTOPPING SECOND EDITION – AUGUST 2007 SHEET METAL AND AIR CONDITIONING CONTRACTORS’ NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, INC. 4201 Lafayette Center Drive Chantilly, VA 20151-1209 www.smacna.org GUIDELINE ON THROUGH-PENETRATION FIRESTOPPING Copyright © SMACNA 2007 All Rights Reserved by SHEET METAL AND AIR CONDITIONING CONTRACTORS’ NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, INC. 4201 Lafayette Center Drive Chantilly, VA 20151-1209 Printed in the U.S.A. FIRST EDITION – NOVEMBER 1996 SECOND EDITION – AUGUST 2007 Except as allowed in the Notice to Users and in certain licensing contracts, no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrievable system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. FOREWORD This technical guide was prepared in response to increasing concerns over the requirements for through-penetration firestopping as mandated by codes, specified by system designers, and required by code officials and/or other authorities having jurisdiction. The language in the model codes, the definitions used, and the expectations of local code authorities varies widely among the model codes and has caused confusion in the building construction industry. Contractors are often forced to bear the brunt of inadequate or confusing specifications, misunderstandings of code requirements, and lack of adequate plan review prior to construction. This guide contains descriptions, illustrations, definitions, recommendations on industry practices, designations of responsibility, references to other documents and guidance on plan and specification requirements. It is intended to be a generic educational tool for use by all parties to the construction process. Firestopping Guideline • Second Edition iii FIRE AND SMOKE CONTROL COMMITTEE Phillip E. -
Firestopping & Smoke Seals 1 General
SPECIFICATION SECTION 07 84 00 FIRESTOPPING & SMOKE SEALS 1 GENERAL 1.1 SECTION INCLUDES 1.1.1 Comply with Division 1, General Requirements and Documents referred to therein. 1.1.2 It is the intent of this section of the specifications to establish a single, competent source to be responsible for providing all labour, materials, products, equipment and services, to supply and install the firestopping and smoke seal work for the entire project. 1.1.3 SUMMARY A. Provide firestop systems consisting of a material, or combination of materials installed to retain the integrity of fire-rated construction by maintaining an effective barrier against the spread of flame, smoke, and/or hot gases through penetrations, blank openings, construction joints, or at perimeter fire containment in or adjacent to fire-rated barriers in accordance with the requirements of the Building Code for this project. B. Firestop systems shall be used in locations including, but not limited to, the following: 1. Penetrations through fire-resistance-rated floor and roof assemblies requiring protected openings including both empty openings and openings that contain penetrations. 2. Penetrations through fire-resistance-rated wall assemblies including both empty openings and openings that contain penetrations. 3. Membrane penetrations in fire-resistance-rated wall assemblies where items penetrate one side of the barrier. 4. Joints in fire-resistance-rated assemblies to allow independent movement. 5. Perimeter Fire Barrier System between a rated floor/roof and an exterior wall assembly. 6. Joints, through penetrations and membrane penetrations in Smoke Barriers and Smoke Partitions. 1.2 RELATED SECTIONS 1.2.1 Related Sections to this Section include: 1.