DOCSLIB.ORG

Washington State Guidebook on Military and Community Compatibility

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Washington State Guidebook on Military and Community Compatibility Washington State Guidebook On Military and Community Compatibility July 2019 Washington State Guidebook On Military and Community Compatibility Commerce Mission: The Department of Commerce touches every aspect of community and economic development. We work with local governments, businesses and civic leaders to strengthen communities so all residents may thrive and prosper. Funding Statement: This guidebook was prepared under contract with the Washington State Department of Commerce, with financial support from the Office of Economic Adjustment, Department of Defense. The content reflects the views of the Washington State Department of Commerce and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Office of Economic Adjustment. Guidebook Contributors Washington State Department of Commerce Mark Barkley, assistant director, Local Government Division Mark McCaskill, American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP), managing director, Growth Management Services Dave Andersen, AICP, eastern regional manager, Growth Management Services Deanah Watson, program manager, Growth Management Services Genevieve Dial, program specialist, Growth Management Services Project Partners Julie Bassuk, AICP, partner, MAKERS Architecture and Urban Design LLP Beth Batchelder, associate 1, MAKERS Architecture and Urban Design LLP Dan Cloutier, research assistant, Department of Urban Design and Planning, University of Washington Acknowledgments Project Advisory Committee (PAC) Bill Adamson, South Sound Military and Communities Noelle Madera, Yakima County Partnership Larry Morrell, Sound Defense Alliance Erik Ashlie-Vinke, Economic Alliance Snohomish Kim Peacher, Northwest Training Range Complex County Steve Powers, city of Oak Harbor Jim Baumgart, Washington State Governor’s Office Jacob Rain, Washington Military Department Grant Beck, city of Yelm Jacqueline Reid, Snohomish County Jim Bolger, Kitsap County Allison Satter, city of Bremerton Dan Cardwell, Pierce County Tiffany Speir, city of Lakewood LTC Chris Cavin, Joint Base Lewis-McChord Tom Tolman, Joint Base Lewis-McChord Patty Charnas, Jefferson County Brian Tyhuis, Naval Air Station Whidbey Island Richard Corff, Trust for Public Land Hiller West, Island County Allan Giffen, city of Everett Jeff Wilson, City of DuPont Rich Hadley, Forward Fairchild Jeff Johnson, Fairchild Air Force Base 2019 | Washington State Department of Commerce | Guidebook on Military and Community Compatibility Washington State Guidebook On Military and Community Compatibility Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................1 Compatibility Planning .......................................................................................................................... 1 Project Context ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Part 1: Community Guide to Compatibility ..........................................................................................5 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................5 Balancing Community Vision and Military Mission .............................................................................. 5 Civilian-Military Compatibility ............................................................................................................... 7 Local Planning Structure and Public Processes ............................................................................... 10 Land Use Planning Framework ........................................................................................................... 10 Land Use Authorities ........................................................................................................................... 10 Local Plans and Land Use Regulations ................................................................................................ 13 Periodic Updates and Amendments ................................................................................................... 14 Participation in Planning Process ........................................................................................................ 17 Environmental Review Processes ....................................................................................................... 19 Military Background and Presence in Washington ......................................................................... 23 History ................................................................................................................................................. 23 Military Service Branches .................................................................................................................... 23 Military Authorities and Structure ...................................................................................................... 24 About Military Plans and Programs .................................................................................................... 26 Bases, Ranges, and Airspace ............................................................................................................... 29 Part 2: Technical Guide to Compatibility ........................................................................................... 35 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 35 Finding a Mutual Planning Context ..................................................................................................... 35 National Defense and Planning ........................................................................................................... 36 Base Plans and Joint-Planning ............................................................................................................. 38 Conservation Programs ....................................................................................................................... 52 2019 | Washington State Department of Commerce | Guidebook on Military and Community Compatibility Growth Management Requirements and Compatibility ................................................................. 56 Statewide Land Use Goals and Priorities ............................................................................................ 56 Stakeholders in Land Use Processes ................................................................................................... 59 Compatibility and Local Plans ............................................................................................................. 59 Compatibility and Local Codes ............................................................................................................ 60 Local Project Review and Permitting .................................................................................................. 62 Concurrency ........................................................................................................................................ 63 Consistency ......................................................................................................................................... 64 Plan Elements and Compatibility ........................................................................................................ 66 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 80 Compatibility Relies on Coordination ................................................................................................. 80 Part 3: Implementation Toolkit ......................................................................................................... 82 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 82 About Part 3: Implementation Toolkit ................................................................................................ 82 Case Studies: Coordination ................................................................................................................. 82 Compatibility in Comprehensive Plans ............................................................................................... 84 Integrating Military Training Routes ................................................................................................... 88 Compatibility in Local Codes ............................................................................................................... 91 Sample Policy Language ...................................................................................................................... 96 Sample Notifications and Disclosures ............................................................................................... 102 Checklists and Worksheets ......................................................................................................... 105 Sample Compatibility Project Process .............................................................................................. 105 Growth Management Act Military Compatibility Provision Checklists............................................. 106 Consultation Guidance: Energy Projects ..........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Defense - Military Base Realignments and Closures (1)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 11, folder “Defense - Military Base Realignments and Closures (1)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 11 of The John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON October 31, 197 5 MEMORANDUM TO: JACK MARSH FROM: RUSS ROURKE I discussed the Ft. Dix situation with Rep. Ed Forsythe again. As you may know, I reviewed the matter with Marty Hoffman at noon yesterday, and with Col. Kenneth Bailey several days ago. Actually, I exchanged intelligence information with him. Hoffman and Bailey advised me that no firm decision has as yet been made with regard to the retention of the training function at Dix. On Novem­ ber 5, Marty Hotfman will receive a briefing by Army staff on pos­ sible "back fill'' organizations that may be available to go to Dix in the event the training function moves out.
    [Show full text]
  • Port Security
    S. HRG. 107–593 PORT SECURITY HEARING BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION SPECIAL HEARING APRIL 4, 2002—SEATTLE, WA Printed for the use of the Committees on Appropriations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 81–047 PDF WASHINGTON : 2002 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 21-JUN-2000 10:09 Oct 23, 2002 Jkt 081047 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 U:\12HEAR\2003\081047.XXX CHERYLM PsN: CHERYLM COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia, Chairman DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii TED STEVENS, Alaska ERNEST F. HOLLINGS, South Carolina THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania TOM HARKIN, Iowa PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri HARRY REID, Nevada MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky HERB KOHL, Wisconsin CONRAD BURNS, Montana PATTY MURRAY, Washington RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois BEN NIGHTHORSE CAMPBELL, Colorado TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota LARRY CRAIG, Idaho MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas JACK REED, Rhode Island MIKE DEWINE, Ohio TERRENCE E. SAUVAIN, Staff Director CHARLES KIEFFER, Deputy Staff Director STEVEN J. CORTESE, Minority Staff Director LISA SUTHERLAND, Minority Deputy Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND RELATED AGENCIES PATTY MURRAY, Washington, Chairman ROBERT C.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal Engagement and the Region 10 Regional Response Team and Northwest Area Committee
    Tribal Engagement and the Region 10 Regional Response Team and Northwest Area Committee Mission The mission of the Region 10 Regional Response Team (RRT) and the Northwest Area Committee (NWAC) is to protect public health and safety and the environment during oil and hazardous materials incidents within the Pacific Northwest as mandated by the National Contingency Plan (NCP). We are also committed to developing response plans and coordinating preparedness activities prior to a pollution incident with our tribal partners. The National Contingency Plan The National Contingency Plan (NCP) is the federal regulation that dictates how the federal government, tribes and states will work together respond to significant oil and hazardous materials incidents. There are two interagency coordinating groups in the NW that are established through the NCP: the NW Area Committee and the Regional Response Team 10. Both groups cover OR, WA and ID, meet regularly, and share a steering committee. • The NW Area Committee (NWAC) is responsible for maintaining the NW Area Contingency Plan, which is our regional blueprint for how federal, tribal and state governments will respond to spills in a coordinated and effective manner. The NW Area Committee is open to anyone with an interest in spill response. This includes all government agencies, industry, response contractors, resource trustees, environmental advocates and private citizens. • Regional Response Team 10 (RRT10) has a more limited membership as defined by regulation, and is activated during a response to provide resources and assist with some response decisions. RRT10’s current members include the 15 federal agencies with authorities or resources for spill response, a representative from each state, and the Makah and Yakama Tribes.
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Simulation of Groundwater Flow at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton, Washington
    Prepared in cooperation with the Naval Facilities Engineering Command–Northwest Numerical Simulation of Groundwater Flow at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton, Washington Open-File Report 2016–1135 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Numerical Simulation of Groundwater Flow at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton, Washington By Joseph L. Jones, Kenneth H. Johnson, and Lonna M. Frans Prepared in cooperation with the Naval Facilities Engineering Command-Northwest Open-File Report 2016–1135 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2016 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov/ or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747). For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Jones, J.L., Johnson, K.H., and Frans, L.M., 2016, Numerical simulation of groundwater flow at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton, Washington: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Coast Guard Awards CIM 1560 25D(PDF)
    Medals and Awards Manual COMDTINST M1650.25D MAY 2008 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. Commandant 1900 Half Street, S.W. United States Coast Guard Washington, DC 20593-0001 Staff Symbol: CG-12 Phone: (202) 475-5222 COMDTINST M1650.25D 5 May 2008 COMMANDANT INSTRUCTION M1625.25D Subj: MEDALS AND AWARDS MANUAL 1. PURPOSE. This Manual publishes a revision of the Medals and Awards Manual. This Manual is applicable to all active and reserve Coast Guard members and other Service members assigned to duty within the Coast Guard. 2. ACTION. Area, district, and sector commanders, commanders of maintenance and logistics commands, Commander, Deployable Operations Group, commanding officers of headquarters units, and assistant commandants for directorates, Judge Advocate General, and special staff offices at Headquarters shall ensure that the provisions of this Manual are followed. Internet release is authorized. 3. DIRECTIVES AFFECTED. Coast Guard Medals and Awards Manual, COMDTINST M1650.25C and Coast Guard Rewards and Recognition Handbook, CG Publication 1650.37 are cancelled. 4. MAJOR CHANGES. Major changes in this revision include: clarification of Operational Distinguishing Device policy, award criteria for ribbons and medals established since the previous edition of the Manual, guidance for prior service members, clarification and expansion of administrative procedures and record retention requirements, and new and updated enclosures. 5. ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS/CONSIDERATIONS. Environmental considerations were examined in the development of this Manual and have been determined to be not applicable. 6. FORMS/REPORTS: The forms called for in this Manual are available in USCG Electronic Forms on the Standard Workstation or on the Internet: http://www.uscg.mil/forms/, CG Central at http://cgcentral.uscg.mil/, and Intranet at http://cgweb2.comdt.uscg.mil/CGFORMS/Welcome.htm.
    [Show full text]
  • Nisqually Transmission Line Relocation Project
    Nisqually Transmission Line Relocation Project Preliminary Environmental Assessment Bonneville Power Administration Fort Lewis Military Reservation Nisqually Indian Tribe Bureau of Indian Affairs October 2004 Nisqually Transmission Line Relocation Project Responsible Agencies and Tribe: U.S. Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration (Bonneville); U.S. Department of Defense, Fort Lewis Military Reservation (Fort Lewis); the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA); and the Nisqually Indian Tribe (Tribe). Name of Proposed Project: Nisqually Transmission Line Relocation Project Abstract: Bonneville proposes to remove and reroute two parallel transmission lines that cross the Nisqually Indian Reservation in Thurston County, Washington. Bonneville’s easement across the Reservation for a portion of the Olympia-Grand Coulee line has expired. Though Bonneville has a perpetual easement for the Olympia-South Tacoma line across the Reservation, the Tribe has asked Bonneville to remove both lines so the Tribe can eventually develop the land for its community. The land fronts State Route 510 and is across the highway from the Tribe’s Red Wind Casino. In addition, the Tribe would like Bonneville to remove the two lines from a parcel next to the Reservation that Fort Lewis owns. The Tribe is working with Fort Lewis to obtain this parcel, which also has frontage on SR 510. Bonneville is proposing to remove the portions of these lines on the Reservation and on the Fort-owned parcel and rebuild them south of SR 510 on Fort Lewis property. Fort Lewis is willing to have these lines on their federal property, in exchange for other in-holdings currently owned by Thurston County that the Tribe would purchase and turn over to Fort Lewis.
    [Show full text]
  • Major General Timothy J. Lowenberg
    MAJOR GENERAL TIMOTHY J. LOWENBERG The Adjutant General, Washington Major General Timothy J. Lowenberg was appointed Adjutant General of the State of Washington on 13 September 1999. As the Adjutant General, he is commander of all Washington Army and Air National Guard forces and Director of the State’s Emergency Management and Enhanced 911 programs. General Lowenberg also serves as Homeland Security Advisor to the Governor of Washington and as State Administrative Agent for all United States Department of Homeland Security grants awarded to Washington’s state, local, tribal and non-profit agencies and organizations. In addition, he serves as Chair of Homeland Defense and Homeland Security of the Adjutants General Association of the United States; Chair of the Governors Homeland Security Advisors Council (National Governors Association Center for Best Practices); Chair of the Governor’s Domestic Security Sub-committee; and Chair of the Governor's 2010 Winter Olympics Task Force Security Committee. From 2005 through 2008, he served as a founding Tri-Chair of the National Homeland Security Consortium - a coalition of more than two-dozen public and private sector national associations. General Lowenberg is a distinguished graduate of the Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps. He was commissioned in 1968 concurrent with award of a Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science from the University of Iowa. He earned a Doctor of Jurisprudence degree from the University of Iowa College of Law in 1971 and has served as Adjunct Professor of Law at the University of Puget Sound School of Law and Seattle University School of Law from 1973 to present.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Development Appendix
    Technical Appendices Economic Development Appendix Table of Contents City Profile ................................................................................................................. ED Appendix-2 Inventory of the Local and Regional Economy ......................................................... ED Appendix-3 Kitsap County Regional Economy ......................................................................... ED Appendix-4 Naval Base Kitsap .................................................................................................. ED Appendix-5 City of Bremerton Comprehensive Plan ED Appendix-1 Appendices Appendix Economic Development City Profile The City of Bremerton is the largest city in Kitsap County, only 11 miles across the water from Seattle and just 33 miles northwest of Tacoma off State Highway 16. The Washington State Ferry system conveniently links downtown Bremerton to downtown Seattle, providing unobstructed automobile access, a unique feature, in comparison to other satellite cities around Seattle. State highways tie Bremerton and Port of Bremerton facilities (including the Bremerton National Airport), to Tacoma on the south, and to the Hood Canal Bridge on the north, Puget Sound’s link to the Olympic Peninsula. The table below compares Bremerton statistics with Kitsap County and Washington State. Table EC-1 Bremerton Statistics, Compared with Kitsap County, State of WA Bremerton Kitsap County Washington State Population, 2014 Estimate 38,572 254,183 7,061,530 Population, 2010 37,729 251,133 6,724,540
    [Show full text]
  • 104 BULLETIN Carl A. Swedberg 635 Kalmia Ct. NW Issaquah, WA 98027 Ph: 425.557.1069 Email: [email protected] Web
    Total number of Regular members (living alums who are association members) % Class Membership = Total number of Living Graduates Mail them to me, if need be, and I will scan we waited for our vehicle them in. Then I will give the provider access to arrive from Juneau on so he can insert the captions. Also looking the barge. The rest of the for your "memories" to post on the site as itinerary for our journey well. Care to blog? You can do that on the was: (1) Portland, Oregon: site, too. Just click Log In and then Register. visited with youngest son Once registered and logged in you can post David, who is part of the and comment on others' posts as well. band scene there. We From William W. Pickrum: saw the movie "Shutter On September 14th, in the Maryland Island," in which oldest Gubernatorial Primary Election, Vita son Matt was credited received more votes than any other candidate in the visual effects as a for Kent County Maryland Democratic matte painter (his 2nd 71: Dan & Michele Clarke Wedding Central Committee. She finished over 1 big movie of the year, the percentage point over her closest rival. Local other was "Avatar."). (2) central committee members of the Maryland Los Angeles: visited oldest son Matt and saw Democratic Party are elected at the primary "Shutter Island" again with him poking us election held in September in gubernatorial when one of his scenes came up. (3) Arrived election years. Central Committee members in Phoenix the day before St. Patrick's Day are the grass roots-level elected volunteers and spent the next two months living out of of the State Democratic Party.
    [Show full text]
  • 194Th Wing Redesignated by 2Nd Lt
    Fall 2015 194th Wing redesignated By 2nd Lt. Hans Zeiger Wing has become a poor description Wing’s purpose, said Horn. “All of for this composite organization, and what we do is operations,” he said. JOINT BASE LEWIS-MCCHORD— doctrinally incorrect,” said Maj. Jes- With the shorter title, “less is The 194th Regional Support Wing se Ruhl, Wing executive officer, in more,” said Horn. “The name re- was redesignated as the 194th Wing remarks at the ceremony. flects a big tent.” in a ceremony at French Theater Even as the 194th has proved its The 252nd Group was the major here on August 8. In the new desig- value to the Guard’s federal mission, forerunner of the 194th Wing, said nation, the 194th will be under the its designation as a “regional sup- Ruhl in a brief description of the U.S. Space Command, while it was port wing” was a point of confusion, Wing’s history. In 1976, the Group previously under the Air Combat said Col. Jeremy Horn, 194th Wing took on a medical detachment at Command. commander. The word “support” Camp Murray to support the “The term Regional Support doesn’t adequately describe the (CONTINUED on PAGE 8) In this issue: Airmen lend support at fires Exercise Ever- and civilians from Incident green Tremor Management Teams as they Commander’s served in various roles in the Corner: “What’s fight against wildfires in Northern and Central Wash- in a Name?” ington. Operation Husky Air National Guardsmen Airborne have been supporting fire- fighting efforts and incident Airman Perez- commanders in seven differ- Resop recognized ent locations, including the as services Air- Okanogan Complex, which man of the Year has now become the largest wildfire in state history.
    [Show full text]
  • Pierce County Biodiversity Network Assessment August 2004
    Pierce County Biodiversity Network Assessment August 2004 Pierce County Biodiversity Network Assessment – August 2004 Acknowledgements Pierce County Planning and Land Services Department-Advance Planning Division Katherine Brooks, Senior Planner Karen Trueman, GIS Specialist Chip Vincent, Principal Planner Pierce County Executive’s Office Debby Hyde, Special Projects Coordinator Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife John Jacobson, Senior GIS Analyst, Habitat Program Marc McCalmon, Landscape Conservation Analyst, Habitat Program Erik Neatherlin, Landscape Conservation Planner, Habitat Program Michelle Tirhi, Urban Biologist-South Puget Sound Region University of Washington, Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Unit Karen Dvornich, Public Education and Outreach Coordinator, NatureMapping Program and Washington GAP Analysis Project Assistant Chris Grue, Principal Investigator and Leader, WACFWRU Metro Parks Tacoma John Garner, Education Coordinator Tahoma Audubon Society Bryan Flint, Conservation Coordinator Puyallup River Watershed Council Dave Seabrook TerraLogic GIS Chris Hansen, Principal Levon Yengoyan, Principal Authors Katherine Brooks, Pierce County Planning and Land Services Karen Dvornich, University of Washington Michelle Tirhi, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Erik Neatherlin, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Marc McCalmon, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife John Jacobson, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Reference Citation Brooks, K., K.M. Dvornich, M. Tirhi, E. Neatherlin, M. McCalmon, and
    [Show full text]
  • The Foreign Military Presence in the Horn of Africa Region
    SIPRI Background Paper April 2019 THE FOREIGN MILITARY SUMMARY w The Horn of Africa is PRESENCE IN THE HORN OF undergoing far-reaching changes in its external security AFRICA REGION environment. A wide variety of international security actors— from Europe, the United States, neil melvin the Middle East, the Gulf, and Asia—are currently operating I. Introduction in the region. As a result, the Horn of Africa has experienced The Horn of Africa region has experienced a substantial increase in the a proliferation of foreign number and size of foreign military deployments since 2001, especially in the military bases and a build-up of 1 past decade (see annexes 1 and 2 for an overview). A wide range of regional naval forces. The external and international security actors are currently operating in the Horn and the militarization of the Horn poses foreign military installations include land-based facilities (e.g. bases, ports, major questions for the future airstrips, training camps, semi-permanent facilities and logistics hubs) and security and stability of the naval forces on permanent or regular deployment.2 The most visible aspect region. of this presence is the proliferation of military facilities in littoral areas along This SIPRI Background the Red Sea and the Horn of Africa.3 However, there has also been a build-up Paper is the first of three papers of naval forces, notably around the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, at the entrance to devoted to the new external the Red Sea and in the Gulf of Aden. security politics of the Horn of This SIPRI Background Paper maps the foreign military presence in the Africa.
    [Show full text]