Minutes of the 4th Meeting of the Traffic and Transport Committee (2016) of Council

Date: 1 September 2016 Time: 2:33 pm – 4:41 pm Venue: K&TDO Conference Room

Attendee Time of Arrival Time of Departure Mr TSUI Hiu-kit (Chairman) Start of meeting End of meeting Ms KWOK Fu-yung (Vice-chairman) Start of meeting End of meeting Mr CHAN Siu-man, Simon 2:35pm 4:06pm Ms CHEUNG Wai-ching, Clarice Start of meeting End of meeting Mr CHOW Wai-hung, Rayman Start of meeting End of meeting Mr CHOW Yick-hay, BBS, JP Start of meeting 4:05pm Miss CHU Lai-ling Start of meeting End of meeting Mr HUI Kei-cheung 2:42pm End of meeting Ms LAM Chui-ling, Nancy, MH Start of meeting End of meeting Mr LAM Siu-fai 2:40pm 3:43pm Ms LAU Mei-lo Start of meeting End of meeting Mr LAW King-shing, MH Start of meeting End of meeting Mr LEE Chi-keung, Alan, MH Start of meeting End of meeting Mr LEUNG Chi-shing Start of meeting End of meeting Mr LEUNG Kam-wai Start of meeting End of meeting Mr LEUNG Tsz-wing, Dennis Start of meeting End of meeting Mr LEUNG Wai-man, MH Start of meeting 3:42pm Mr LI Sai-lung Start of meeting End of meeting Miss LO Yuen-ting Start of meeting End of meeting The Hon. MAK Mei-kuen, Alice, Start of meeting End of meeting BBS, JP Mr NG Ka-chiu Start of meeting 3:47pm Mr NG Kim-sing Start of meeting 3:59pm Mr PAU Ming-hong Start of meeting End of meeting Mr POON Chi-shing, MH Start of meeting End of meeting Ms TAM Wai-chun, MH Start of meeting End of meeting Mr TANG Shui-wah Start of meeting 4:34pm Mr WONG Bing-kuen 2:42pm End of meeting Mr WONG Yiu-chung, MH Start of meeting End of meeting Mr WONG Yun-tat Start of meeting End of meeting 1 Mr CHAN Dik-sau Start of meeting End of meeting Mr LAU Chi-kit 2:54pm 4:11pm Mr LAU Wing-fai 3:16pm End of meeting Mr LEUNG Kong-ming 3:06pm 3:41pm Mr YIP Pui-lam Start of meeting End of meeting

In Attendance Mr WU Tin-yau, Gordon Assistant District Officer (Kwai Tsing), Kwai Tsing District Office Mr LEE Hoo-tin, Stephen Senior Engineer/ PHL, Highways Department Mr CHAN Yuen-Heng, Jason Engineer/ PHL (2), Highways Department Mr CHEUNG Kin-keung, Martin Director, Mannings (Asia) Consultants Limited Mr LAM Wai-keung, Kenny Project Manager, Mannings (Asia) Consultants Limited Mr LEE Yik-yeung, Louis Project Engineer, Mannings (Asia) Consultants Limited Mr CHUNG Chak-tao Senior Engineer 4/ Central Kowloon Route, Highways Department Ms TAI Pik-ying Engineer 8/ Central Kowloon Route, Highways Department Mr Alan LOW Technical Director, Arup – Mott MacDonald Joint Venture Mr. Gerald KAM Consultant, Arup – Mott MacDonald Joint Venture Mr. Brad FONG Senior Engineer, Arup – Mott MacDonald Joint Venture Mr CHEUNG Chi-wei, Peter Engineer (NTW), Civil Engineering and Development Department Mr WONG Chi-kwong Officer-in-Charge, District Traffic Team, Kwai Tsing Police District, Police Force Mr TANG Siu-chung District Engineer/KT, Highways Department

2

Ms PUN Fun-yu District Engineer/SW(W), Highways Department Mr TAM Lai-ming Senior Transport Officer/Kwai Tsing, Transport Department Mr CHAN Hon-wing, Francis Engineer (Kwai Chung), Transport Department Ms FUNG Ka-kit, Peter Engineer (Tsing Yi), Transport Department Mr Utan WONG Senior Operations Officer, The Kowloon Motor Bus Co. (1933) Ltd Miss CHAN Hau-sin, Priscilla Executive Officer (District Council) 1, (Secretary) Kwai Tsing District Office

Absent with Apologies Mr CHOW Kam-pui (With prior notice) Ms LEUNG Ching-shan (With prior notice) Mr CHENG Shing-lung, MH (Without prior notice) Mr LI Man-ka (Without prior notice) Mr LEUNG Kwok-wah (Without prior notice) Mr LEUNG Wing-kuen (Without prior notice)

3

Opening Remarks

The Chairman welcomed Members and representatives of government departments and organizations to the meeting.

2. The Committee unanimously endorsed the application of absence by Mr CHOW Kam-pui and Ms LEUNG Ching-shan.

Confirmation of Minutes of the 3rd Meeting held on 16 June 2016

3. Mr LEUNG Tsz-wing, Dennis moved the endorsement of the above minutes, which was seconded by Ms LAU Mei-lo. The minutes were endorsed unanimously by the Committee without amendment.

Introduction of/Consultation Paper

Consultation on the Preliminary Design of the Proposed Lift and Pedestrian Walkway System between Kwai Chung Road and Wo Tong Tsui Street (Proposed by the Highways Department) (TTC Paper No. 29/D/2016)

4. The Chairman welcomed representatives from Highways Department (HyD) and Mannings (Asia) Consultants Limited to the meeting.

5. Mr LEE Hoo-tin, Steven and Mr LAM Wai-keung, Kenny introduced the above paper.

6. Mr LEUNG Chi-shing enquired about the capacity and speed of each elevator as well as the species of trees to be removed due to the project.

7. Mr LEUNG Kam-wai enquired about the time required for each elevator to go up and down, whether the roof cover of the waiting area could be enlarged, and the difference in construction time between the proposed design and the traditional design.

8. Mr WONG Yun-tat urged HyD to commence construction as soon as possible. He enquired about the transportation capacity of the elevator per hour, project completion time, whether more covered public

4 walkways would be constructed nearby, and whether pedestrian crossings from Wo Tong Tsui Street to Kwai Hing Estate would be added.

9. Mr LAM Siu-fai was concerned about the ventilation of the elevator. He stated that the number of pedestrians would increase correspondingly after the elevators had been put into operation, and urged the department to enlarge the covered waiting area. He enquired about the current progress of the project and whether it would be influenced by other factors.

10. Mr LEUNG Tsz-wing, Dennis enquired about the difference in operation speed and construction schedule between the proposed design and the traditional design, and whether any other existing slope elevator with similar design in Hong Kong could be taken as a reference. He was concerned whether the proposed design could cater for the pedestrian flow in the future.

11. Mr LEE Hoo-tin, Stephen gave a consolidated response as follows:

(i) The slope elevator system would be built along the slope and reached the top and its foundation would not be too deep. The adoption of the traditional design of vertical elevator would require deeper foundation, resulting in additional construction cost and had greater impact on the nearby environment in terms of appearance.

(ii) Slope elevators had been put into operation in some private development projects in Hong Kong including Discovery Bay, Tai O and Po Fook Hill. Their operation might be suspended in bad weather as they were installed in open space, while the elevators proposed to be installed could still operate in bad weather as roof cover would be added above them.

(iii) No geological information was available at the moment as ground investigation had not been conducted and the construction schedule was to be assessed. The information would be reported to the Committee once it was available.

5

12. Mr LEE Yik-yeung, Louis gave a consolidated response as follows:

(i) The capacity of each elevator would be 21 people tentatively, and it would take approximately one minute thirty seconds for each ride.

(ii) Slope elevators could provide point to point connection and save users walking time comparing to vertical elevators.

(iii) Currently, approximately a maximum of 700 people used the staircases per hour. In designing the capacity of the elevators, factors such as the existing users of the staircases, pedestrians from nearby streets, the number of public transportation users in the district and future population growth had been taken into account.

(iv) The species of trees influenced by the proposed construction project mainly included Acacia Confusa, Cinnamomum Burmannii and Celtis Sinensis.

13. Mr LAM Wai-keung, Kenny gave a consolidated response as follows:

(i) The roof cover above the waiting area of the proposedelevators was approximately 12 meters x 1.5 meters.

(ii) The project would be completed in shorter time as the construction of slope elevators required shallower foundation. Generally speaking, the construction would take three to three and a half years.

(iii) The machine room and part of the elevators would be built underground, which could help controlling the temperature during operation as compared to being placed in open space.

14. Mr CHAN Hon Wing, Francis gave a consolidated response as follows:

(i) Currently, traffic signal lights were set up at the junction of Wo Tong Tsui Street and Kwai Hing Road to control pedestrians crossing the street. Before more crossings were added, there was

6

a need to consider factors like the pedestrian flow, vehicular traffic and space constraints.

(ii) The Transport Department (TD) would monitor the change of pedestrian flow after completion of the elevator project and consider whether the pedestrian flow met the level required for building roof cover above footways as set out in the “Transport Planning and Design Manual”.

15. Mr CHOW Wai-hung, Rayman was concerned about future operation and maintenance given the sizes of the existing slope elevators in Hong Kong were smaller than that in the project to be implemented. He urged the department to build additional crossings and roof cover for walkways as soon as possible to cater the needs of the growing population arising from nearby public housing developments.

16. Mr LEUNG Kam-wai urged for extension of the roof cover above the waiting areas, and asked TD whether the current pedestrian flow would justify an extension of the roof cover above walkways nearby.

17. Mr WONG Yun-tat enquired about the standard of pedestrian flow required for extension of roof covers above walkways and suggested widening the walkway which connected and the siting and to add rails to it.

18. Mr LAM Siu-fai was concerned about poor ventilation of the elevators during summer time, and urged for installation of air conditioners in the elevators.

19. Mr NG Kim-sing enquired why a less common slope design was adopted and the operational difference between such design and that of the slope elevator in N Seoul Tower. He was also concerned about the ventilation of the elevators in case of malfunction.

20. Mr LEUNG Wai-man enquired about the difference between the slope elevator design and common design in terms of construction time needed. He was also concerned about the ventilation of the elevators in case of malfunction, and considered that the justifications provided

7

by TD for not extending the roof cover above the waiting areas and other auxiliary facilities were not strong.

21. Mr POON Chi-shing asked why the slope elevators were not adopted in general government projects and whether there would be any particular difficulty in maintenance. He suggested that air conditioning should be installed as it took relatively longer time to ride the elevators and roof covers should be added above the staircases.

22. Mr LEUNG Tsz-wing, Dennis commented that the department had not provided sufficient information including differences between the two designs in terms of construction time, pile depth as well as location of the machine room, and it had not consulted the Committee on whether to adopt the slope elevator design or not. He was also concerned about whether the waiting areas of the elevators would be adequate.

23. The Honourable MAK Mei-kuen, Alice remarked that members had hesitation in adopting slope elevator as it was a new design. She urged the department to provide more detailed information for members’ consideration, and enquired if members had time to consider whether the slope elevator design should be adopted or not.

24. Mr LEE Chi-keung, Alan supported the adoption of the slope design. He stated that there should not have big technical problems. Although slope elevators were rarely built in Hong Kong, they were very common overseas.

25. Mr YIP Pui-lam enquired why escalators were not considered to replace elevators.

26. Mr LEUNG Kong-ming asked whether wheelchair users would affect the transportation capacity of the elevators, whether wheelchair users were taken into account in calculating the increased pedestrian flow arising from the elevators system, and whether there would be any barrier-free access next to the system.

27. Mr LEE Hon-tin, Steven gave a consolidated response as follows:

8

(i) He understood members’ concerns about the operation of the system. The proposed project would serve as a reference to other similar projects and the department would take a prudent approach.

(ii) Vertical elevator designs were adopted more often in the past as factors such as location of the connections, steepness of the slopes and space on the ground available of the relevant projects were considered. As this project is situated on a flatter slope with larger site area, slope elevators were more suitable.

(iii) The capacity of the proposed slope elevator was similar to the existing ones at Discovery Bay which could accommodate 24 people.

(iv) The waiting area would be located between the two elevators and there would be covered waiting areas at the outer area to serve as buffer zones. The department would further study the feasibility of extending the waiting area.

(v) The moving speed of slope elevator was similar to that of the common ones at a rate of approximately one meter per second.

(vi) Wheelchair users and the potential increase in pedestrian flow were considered in the project proposal, and the entrance and exit of the elevator system would be barrier-free access.

(vii) Consultants would ensure that the internal environment of the elevators would be comfortable even without air conditioning.

(viii) Elevators were more suitable for general use than escalators. Escalators were generally installed in locations with high pedestrian flow, but were not suitable for people with disabilities.

(ix) The department would proceed with technical design for the next stage and gazettal after the project had been supported by the Committee. The department would provide information regarding technical details after the meeting if necessary.

9

28. Mr CHAN Hon-wing, Francis gave a consolidated response as follows:

(i) To construct roof cover above a walkway, the pedestrian flow should reach the standard of 4,000 people per hour. Details of the standard would be provided after the meeting.

[Post-meeting note: one of the standards for considering whether to build roof cover above a walkway is that the pedestrian flow on such walkway should be no less than 4,000 people per hour for at least three hours in a weekday.]

(ii) The department would further study the feasibility of widening the walkway in Kwai Hing Road and Tai Wo Hau Road and study the pedestrian flow.

29. Mr LAM Wai-keung, Kenny gave a consolidated response as follows:

(i) Maintenance of the elevators would be easier as it would be operated under roof covers, and was the same for both vertical and slope elevators.

(ii) N Seoul Tower’s elevators were for sightseeing purpose.

30. The Honourable MAK Mei-kuen, Alice and Mr LEUNG Tsz-wing, Dennis requested further technical information to be provided by the department.

[Post-meeting remarks: HyD had provided supplemental information in the TTC (Circulation) Paper No.16/2016 on 26 September 2016.]

31. Members unanimously supported the captioned project.

Central Kowloon Route – Proposed Temporary Barging Point in Kwai Chung (Proposed by the Highways Department) (TTC Paper No. 30/D/2016)

32. The Chairman welcomed representatives from HyD and Arup – Mott 10

MacDonald Joint-Venture to the meeting.

33. Mr CHUNG Chak-tao introduced the above paper.

34. Ms CHEUNG Wai-ching, Clarice reported that residents of Grand Horizon were against the proposed project due to their concerns about noises and dust pollution. She stated that the location chosen had once been a barging point in the past with the same problems.

35. Mr CHOW Wai-hung, Rayman stated that fugitive dust would probably be generated when dumping the mud, which would have an impact on residents nearby. The department must provide solutions for air pollution problem.

36. Mr CHOW Yick-hay welcomed changing the route of dump trucks and urged the department to come up with solutions for air and noise problems and closely monitor the pollution.

37. Mr LAU Wing-fai enquired whether any measures would be taken to reduce pollution during mud dumping and on the way to the barge.

38. Mr CHUNG Chak-tao replied that environmental impact assessment (EIA) had been conducted for the proposed project and the Area Liaison Group would keep close contact with people in the communities.

39. Mr Gerald KAM gave a consolidated response as follows:

(i) All relevant pollutions and impacts that would be arisen during operation were considered in the EIA and the result was in compliance with relevant statutory standards.

(ii) The department could extend waterproof covers as long as possible between the dumping spot to the barge to reduce fugitive dust during dumping.

(iii) During dumping, the department would keep spraying water in the tipping hall, three sides of which were walled up, to prevent fugitive dust.

11

(iv) An environmental team would inspect regularly to ensure that the contractor had implemented the relief measures effectively.

40. Mr CHUNG Chak-tao gave a consolidated response as follows:

(i) The department had done its best to cover the distance between the dumping spot and the barge with waterproof covers to reduce fugitive dust during dumping.

(ii) The department could inspect the operational environment and discuss possible improvement measures with Members when the barging point had been put into operation.

(iii) The department and the contractor would engage independent environmental advisory companies respectively to oversee the operation of the barging point, and conduct on-site inspection on a monthly basis.

41. Mr CHOW Wai-hung, Rayman suggested to add other substances into the construction waste and solidified it for convenience of transportation and reduction of environmental impact.

42. Ms CHEUNG Wai-ching, Clarice doubted whether the EIA report conducted in 2013 was still applicable and whether there were other locations more suitable as barging point. She asked HyD if they could provide examples of barging points with low pollution for reference, and considered that the barging point would pollute water nearby and affect the proposed angling zone in Tsing Yi.

43. Mr LAU Chi-kit enquired about departing direction and design of barges.

44. Mr Alan LOW responded as follows:

(i) There were existing facilities in Hong Kong that solidify mud by adding other substances into it, but such technology was not applicable to the mud disposed at the barging point.

12

(ii) After departure, the barge would generally head south towards Tuen Mun and Cheung Chau.

(iii) Kwai Chung was the only barging point available at the moment, as the existing barging point at Hing Wah Street (Nam Cheong) would be resumed in 2017 for housing development and the barging point in West Kowloon would be resumed at the end of this year for development of performance venue in West Kowloon cultural district.

45. Mr CHUNG Chak-tao gave a consolidated response as follows:

(i) Barging point would only be used when necessary to convey construction waste by sea.

(ii) Part of the construction waste would be put into sealed containers and the operation of the barging point would not pollute the sea nearby.

46. Ms CHEUNG Wai-ching, Clarice asked whether there were any barging points available in other areas, whether another EIA would be conducted and whether district consultation would be conducted again to explain to residents of Grand Horizon about the project.

47. Mr Alan LOW replied that the EIA report dated 2013 was still valid and the department had considered the barging point in , but it might not be a suitable choice as it was too steep and the transportation route was relatively long.

48. Mr CHUNG Chak Tao added that there was no contractor at the moment as the project had not started yet. The department could arrange Members and residents in the district to visit the barging point after it had commenced operation.

49. The Chairman and Ms CHEUNG Wai-ching, Clarice requested HyD to explain in details to the residents of Grand Horizon about the project as soon as possible in order to address their worries.

HyD

13

50. Mr CHUNG Chak-tao replied that, after this meeting, the department would arrange meetings with residents through the District Office.

51. There was no other opinion from Members. The Chairman stated that HyD would proceed with the proposed project in accordance with the proposals as set out in the above document and requested the department to communicate with residents in the district and explain to them about the project as soon as practicable.

Report Item

Working Group Reports

(a) Road Safety Working Group (TTC Paper No.31/R/2016)

52. Members endorsed the above paper unanimously.

(b) Public Transport Services Working Group (TTC Paper No.32/R/2016)

53. Members endorsed the above paper unanimously.

Information Paper

Kwai Tsing District Traffic Accident Report (TTC Paper No.33/I/2016)

54. Members noted the above paper.

Projects and timetables of major traffic improvement works completed in the past two months, in progress or to be commenced in six months by the Highways Department (TTC Paper No. 34/I/2016)

55. Members noted the above paper.

Lost Trip Report of Buses in Kwai Tsing District (March to April 2016) 14

(TTC Paper No. 35/I/2016)

56. Mr WONG Bing-kuen commented that the actual lost trip rate of Bus No. 48X was higher than that stated in the captioned document. He enquired about the actual bus trips in morning peak hours and whether passengers unable to get on a fully loaded bus at stops would be considered as lost trip.

57. Mr TAM Lai-ming replied that peak hours in the morning refer to 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and the situation that passengers were unable to get on a fully loaded bus at stops would not be considered as lost trip. He said that he would acquire details of the lost trips of Bus No. 48X after the meeting and follow-up accordingly.

Any Other Business

58. Ms LAM Chui-ling, Nancy enquired for Bus No. 68E from Tsing Yi Railway Station Bus Terminus towards Yuen Long Park, why did it stop at the junction of Fung Cheung Road and Hop Yick Road which was a narrow one-way road, but not the nearby bus stop of Bus No. 68F. The destination of both bus routes is Yuen Long Park. Sharing bus stop would provide convenience to passengers and prevent traffic jam. Also the second bus stop for all bus departing from Tsing Yi Railway Station Bus Terminus was On Mei House, which only required 1-2 minutes travelling time, but the Estimated Time of Arrival System (ETA) always projected that travelling time requires 5 minutes, making passengers missed the bus. She urged KMB to improve the situation.

59. Mr WONG Bing-kuen stated that no remarkable improvement of illegal parking had been seen in areas around Tai Ha Street except for Kwai Yin Court and urged TD to implement improvement measures as soon as possible.

60. Mr HUI Kei-cheung urged TD and the Police to put greater efforts in combatting illegal parking of motorcycles in Shek Tau Street. He enquired about the project schedule for installing ETA Display Panels (“Panels”) at both side of Exit B of the Tai Wo Hau Station, Kwai Yin Court, Fu On House and S.K.H Crown of Thorns Church in Texaco

15

Road, and suggested to enlarge the shelter above the bus stop at Exit B of Tai Wo Hau Station.

61. Mr LAU Wing-fai said that the arrival time of Bus No. 40 estimated by ETA was changing constantly and inaccurate, and urged KMB for improvements. He also enquired when Bus No. A32 would be put into services.

62. Mr TAM Lai-ming replied that further information regarding Bus No.

68E and Bus No. A32 would be provided after the meeting.

[Post-meeting note: As the width of Bus No. 68F in Yuen Long (Fung Cheung Road) Bus Terminus had only one carriageway, operation of both lines would be affected if they arrived at the bus stop simultaneously. As a result, Bus No. 68E for Yuen Long direction would not be able to share the same bus stop with Bus No. 68F. Bus No. A32 would commence operation on the proposed operation date in the fourth quarter of 2016 as set out in the Bus Route Programme for 2016/17.]

63. Mr Utan WONG gave a consolidated response as follows:

(i) KMB would consider installation of Panels in the locations mentioned by Mr HUI Kei-cheung as soon as possible depending on availability of resources.

(ii) ETA would be updated constantly due to changing road conditions. KMB would follow up the issue of inaccurate information provided by ETA at On Mei House bus stop and Bus No. 40 after the meeting.

64. Mr FUNG Ka-kit, Peter replied that he would look into whether the existing road signs had included the information of Northeast Park and whether the Park had met TD’s standard for marking on road signs after the meeting.

65. Mr CHAN Hon-wing, Francis reported that TD was preparing the plans of adding motorcycles parking spaces in Shek Tau Street and would

16

introduce measures to improve Tai Ha Street illegal parking problem in September.

66. Mr Utan WONG added that the bus stop above Ping Lai Path of was of an older design and KMB would consider the practicability to widen the bus shelter of the bus stop.

67. Mr WONG Chi-kwong commented that the Police had strengthened its efforts to combat illegal parking in Tai Ha Street and Shek Tau Street by placing traffic cones in the zebra crossings, listing the above roads as illegal parking black spots and enhancing prosecution.

68. Mr HUI Kei-cheung requested KMB to put forward the schedule for installation of Panels at bus stops already equipped with power supply (including both sides of Exit B of the Tai Wo Hau Station, Kwai Yin Court and Fu On House) as soon as possible. He urged KMB to improve the bus shelter outside Kwok Shui Road Park near Exit B, as the covered waiting area was not big enough for accommodating passengers of over 20 bus lines.

69. Ms LAM Chui-ling, Nancy remarked that information of the Northeast Park should be added on the road sign at the roundabout of Tam Kon Shan Road for drivers’ information, as the park was a landmark of Tsing Yi. The ETA should be able to provide more accurate arrival information at On Mei House bus stops as it was the next stop after Tsing Yi Station Bus Terminus.

[Post-meeting note: TD would consider adding road signs at the exit of Tam Kon Shan Road in the crossing of Tam Kon Shan and along the Tam Kon Shan Road to guide the way to the Northeast Park.]

70. Ms CHEUNG Wai-ching, Clarice suggested adding information of Tsing Yi Pier on road signs.

[Post-meeting note: There were five road signs located at and around the roundabout of Fung Shue Wo Road. Existing road signs which showed the way to the Tsing Yi Pier were considered enough and clearly indicated the location of the Pier.]

17

71. The Chairman said that the bus shelter above Hong Shun House bus stop was unable to cover most of the passengers waiting for Bus No. 42A, and urged relevant departments to take follow-up actions. The Kwai Tsing District Council (K&TDC) had been informed by TD about the introduction of Bus No. 68E additional bus stop in Fung Cheung Road later than Yuen Long District Council and shortly before its implementation. He urged TD to improve its communication with K&TDC.

72. Collective responses from Mr TAM Lai-ming were as follows:

(i) The Panels at Exit B of the Tai Wo Hau Station would be installed in 2017 and the specific timeframe would be discussed with KMB.

(ii) TD would refer the suggestion to KMB about extending the bus shelter over Hong Shun House bus stop after the meeting. As for communication issue regarding Bus No. 68E, the opinions from the Chairman and Members would be conveyed to relevant staff of the department.

73. Mr FUNG Ka-kit, Peter stated that the department would consider whether it was appropriate to add information of Northeast Park on the road sign at the crossing of Tam Kon Shan Road and information of Tsing Yi Pier on road signs after the meeting.

Date of Next Meeting

74. The next meeting was scheduled for 2:30pm on 13 October 2016.

Kwai Tsing District Council Secretariat October 2016

18