DOCSLIB.ORG

The Written British National Corpus 2014: Design, Compilation and Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Written British National Corpus 2014: Design, Compilation and Analysis The Written British National Corpus 2014: Design, compilation and analysis Abi Hawtin ESRC Centre for Corpus Approaches to Social Science Department of Linguistics and English Language Lancaster University A thesis submitted to Lancaster University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics December 2018 Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................................i Declaration ............................................................................................................... vi Abstract ................................................................................................................. viii List of Tables............................................................................................................ xi List of Figures .........................................................................................................xii List of Appendices ................................................................................................ xiii Acknowledgements ................................................................................................ xiv Chapter 1: Introduction ........................................................................................... 1 1.1 The British National Corpus 2014 .................................................................... 1 1.2 Distinguishing between spoken and written language ....................................... 3 1.3 Justifying the Written BNC2014 project ........................................................... 5 1.3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 5 1.3.2 The British National Corpus (BNC1994) .................................................... 6 1.3.3 The enduring popularity of the BNC1994.................................................... 9 1.3.4 Other corpora of written British English .................................................... 14 1.3.4.1 The Brown Family ............................................................................. 15 1.3.4.2 The Bank of English ........................................................................... 18 1.3.4.3 ukWaC .............................................................................................. 19 1.3.4.4 ICE-GB ............................................................................................ 20 1.3.5 Summary and justification for the project .................................................. 21 1.4 The project team and my ownership of the research ........................................ 22 1.4.1 The Written BNC2014 project team ......................................................... 22 1.4.2 Ownership of research .............................................................................. 22 1.5 Copyright and Permissions ............................................................................. 24 1.5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 24 1.5.2 Copyright law .......................................................................................... 25 1.5.3 Expert opinions ........................................................................................ 28 1.5.4 Definitions ............................................................................................... 29 1.5.5 Conclusion ............................................................................................... 29 1.6 Research aims and the structure of the thesis .................................................. 30 Chapter 2: Contemporary National Corpora ....................................................... 35 2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 35 i 2.2 The Corpus de référence du français contemporain (CRFC) ........................... 36 2.3 The Czech National Corpus (SYN2015) ......................................................... 41 2.4 The Thai National Corpus (TNC) ................................................................... 44 2.5 The American National Corpus (ANC) ........................................................... 47 2.6 Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) ..................................... 50 2.7 Deutsches Referenzkorpus (DeReKo) ............................................................. 52 2.8 Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 54 Chapter 3: Creating Representative and Comparable Corpora .......................... 57 3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 57 3.2 Corpus Representativeness ............................................................................. 57 3.2.1 Defining representativeness ...................................................................... 58 3.2.2 Sampling .................................................................................................. 59 3.2.2.1 Population definition ......................................................................... 59 3.2.2.2 Random sampling .............................................................................. 62 3.2.2.3 Proportional sampling ....................................................................... 64 3.2.2.4 Balance ............................................................................................ 67 3.2.2.5 Sample size ........................................................................................ 67 3.2.2.6 Number of samples ............................................................................ 69 3.2.2.7 Corpus size ........................................................................................ 70 3.2.3 Representativeness is not possible ............................................................. 72 3.2.4 The BNC1994 ........................................................................................... 75 3.2.5 Conclusion ................................................................................................ 76 3.3. Comparability in corpus design ..................................................................... 77 3.3.1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 77 3.3.2. Methods for creating and testing comparable corpora ............................... 80 3.3.2.1 Creating comparable corpora using web crawling ............................ 80 3.3.2.2 Testing corpus comparability ............................................................. 84 3.3.3 The Brown Family .................................................................................... 86 3.3.4 ARCHER ................................................................................................. 92 3.3.5 Conclusion ................................................................................................ 94 3.4. Representativeness vs. Comparability ............................................................ 95 3.4.1 The Problem ............................................................................................. 95 3.4.2 The Solution ............................................................................................. 98 Chapter 4: Designing the Written BNC2014 Sampling Frame ........................... 100 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................. 100 ii 4.2 Classifying texts in corpora .......................................................................... 100 4.2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................... 100 4.2.2 Genre Theory ......................................................................................... 101 4.2.2.1 Introduction ..................................................................................... 101 4.2.2.2 Approaches to genre ........................................................................ 101 4.2.3 Genre, register, style, text type – some definitions .................................. 103 4.2.3.1 Introduction .................................................................................... 103 4.2.3.2 Genre .............................................................................................. 104 4.2.3.3 Register .......................................................................................... 105 4.2.3.4 Style ................................................................................................ 106 4.2.3.5 Text type .......................................................................................... 107 4.2.3.6 Terminology in this thesis ................................................................ 107 4.2.4 Text classification in previous national corpora ...................................... 108 4.2.4.1 The Brown Family ........................................................................... 108 4.2.4.2 The Corpus de référence du Français contemporain (CRFC) .......... 110 4.2.4.3 The British National Corpus 1994 ................................................... 112 4.2.4.4 Summary ........................................................................................ 115 4.2.5 Text classification in the Written BNC2014 ........................................... 115 4.3 Design of the sampling frame
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Talk Bank: a Multimodal Database of Communicative Interaction
    Talk Bank: A Multimodal Database of Communicative Interaction 1. Overview The ongoing growth in computer power and connectivity has led to dramatic changes in the methodology of science and engineering. By stimulating fundamental theoretical discoveries in the analysis of semistructured data, we can to extend these methodological advances to the social and behavioral sciences. Specifically, we propose the construction of a major new tool for the social sciences, called TalkBank. The goal of TalkBank is the creation of a distributed, web- based data archiving system for transcribed video and audio data on communicative interactions. We will develop an XML-based annotation framework called Codon to serve as the formal specification for data in TalkBank. Tools will be created for the entry of new and existing data into the Codon format; transcriptions will be linked to speech and video; and there will be extensive support for collaborative commentary from competing perspectives. The TalkBank project will establish a framework that will facilitate the development of a distributed system of allied databases based on a common set of computational tools. Instead of attempting to impose a single uniform standard for coding and annotation, we will promote annotational pluralism within the framework of the abstraction layer provided by Codon. This representation will use labeled acyclic digraphs to support translation between the various annotation systems required for specific sub-disciplines. There will be no attempt to promote any single annotation scheme over others. Instead, by promoting comparison and translation between schemes, we will allow individual users to select the custom annotation scheme most appropriate for their purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Newcastle University Eprints
    Newcastle University ePrints Knight D, Adolphs S, Carter R. CANELC: constructing an e-language corpus. Corpora 2014, 9(1), 29-56. Copyright: The definitive version of this article, published by Edinburgh University Press, 2014, is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/cor.2014.0050 Always use the definitive version when citing. Further information on publisher website: www.euppublishing.com Date deposited: 23-07-2014 Version of file: Author Accepted Manuscript This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License ePrints – Newcastle University ePrints http://eprint.ncl.ac.uk CANELC – Constructing an e-language corpus ___________________________________________________________________________ Dawn Knight1, Svenja Adolphs2 and Ronald Carter2 This paper reports on the construction of CANELC: the Cambridge and Nottingham e- language Corpus 3 . CANELC is a one million word corpus of digital communication in English, taken from online discussion boards, blogs, tweets, emails and SMS messages. The paper outlines the approaches used when planning the corpus: obtaining consent; collecting the data and compiling the corpus database. This is followed by a detailed analysis of some of the patterns of language used in the corpus. The analysis includes a discussion of the key words and phrases used as well as the common themes and semantic associations connected with the data. These discussions form the basis of an investigation of how e-language operates in both similar and different ways to spoken and written records of communication (as evidenced by the BNC - British National Corpus). Keywords: Blogs, Tweets, SMS, Discussion Boards, e-language, Corpus Linguistics 1. Introduction Communication in the digital age is a complex many faceted process involving the production and reception of linguistic stimuli across a multitude of platforms and media types (see Boyd and Heer, 2006:1).
    [Show full text]
  • RASLAN 2015 Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing
    RASLAN 2015 Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing A. Horák, P. Rychlý, A. Rambousek (Eds.) RASLAN 2015 Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing Ninth Workshop on Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing, RASLAN 2015 Karlova Studánka, Czech Republic, December 4–6, 2015 Proceedings Tribun EU 2015 Proceedings Editors Aleš Horák Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University Department of Information Technologies Botanická 68a CZ-602 00 Brno, Czech Republic Email: [email protected] Pavel Rychlý Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University Department of Information Technologies Botanická 68a CZ-602 00 Brno, Czech Republic Email: [email protected] Adam Rambousek Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University Department of Information Technologies Botanická 68a CZ-602 00 Brno, Czech Republic Email: [email protected] This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, re-use of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Czech Copyright Law, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Tribun EU. Violations are liable for prosecution under the Czech Copyright Law. Editors ○c Aleš Horák, 2015; Pavel Rychlý, 2015; Adam Rambousek, 2015 Typography ○c Adam Rambousek, 2015 Cover ○c Petr Sojka, 2010 This edition ○c Tribun EU, Brno, 2015 ISBN 978-80-263-0974-1 ISSN 2336-4289 Preface This volume contains the Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing (RASLAN 2015) held on December 4th–6th 2015 in Karlova Studánka, Sporthotel Kurzovní, Jeseníky, Czech Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • Arabic Corpus and Word Sketches
    Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences (2014) 26, 357–371 King Saud University Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences www.ksu.edu.sa www.sciencedirect.com arTenTen: Arabic Corpus and Word Sketches Tressy Arts a, Yonatan Belinkov b, Nizar Habash c,*, Adam Kilgarriff d, Vit Suchomel e,d a Chief Editor Oxford Arabic Dictionary, UK b MIT, USA c New York University Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates d Lexical Computing Ltd, UK e Masaryk Univ., Czech Republic Available online 7 October 2014 KEYWORDS Abstract We present arTenTen, a web-crawled corpus of Arabic, gathered in 2012. arTenTen con- Corpora; sists of 5.8-billion words. A chunk of it has been lemmatized and part-of-speech (POS) tagged with Lexicography; the MADA tool and subsequently loaded into Sketch Engine, a leading corpus query tool, where it Morphology; is open for all to use. We have also created ‘word sketches’: one-page, automatic, corpus-derived Concordance; summaries of a word’s grammatical and collocational behavior. We use examples to demonstrate Arabic what the corpus can show us regarding Arabic words and phrases and how this can support lexi- cography and inform linguistic research. The article also presents the ‘sketch grammar’ (the basis for the word sketches) in detail, describes the process of building and processing the corpus, and considers the role of the corpus in additional research on Arabic. Ó 2014 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. 1. Introduction ber of the TenTen Corpus Family (Jakubı´cˇek et al., 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • CLIB 2016 Proceedings
    The Second International Conference Computational ​ Linguistics in Bulgaria (CLIB 2016) is organised within ​ the Operation for Support for International Scientific Conferences Held in Bulgaria of the National Science ​ Fund Grant № ДПМНФ 01/9 of 11 Aug 2016. National Science Fund ​ ​ CLIB 2016 is organised by: The Department of Computational Linguistics, Institute for Bulgarian Language, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences PUBLICATION AND CATALOGUING INFORMATION Title: Proceedings of the Second International Conference Computational Linguistics in Bulgaria (CLIB 2016) ISSN: 2367­5675 (online) Published and The Institute for Bulgarian Language Prof. Lyubomir ​ distributed by: Andreychin, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences ​ Editorial address: Institute for Bulgarian Language Prof. Lyubomir ​ Andreychin, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences ​ 52 Shipchenski prohod blvd., bldg. 17 Sofia 1113, Bulgaria +359 2/ 872 23 02 Copyright of each paper stays with the respective authors. The works in the Proceedings are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0). Licence details: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 ​ Proceedings of the Second International Conference Computational Linguistics in Bulgaria 9 September 2016 Sofia, Bulgaria PREFACE We are excited to welcome you to the second edition of the International Conference Computational ​ Linguistics in Bulgaria (CLIB 2016) in Sofia, Bulgaria! ​ CLIB aspires to foster the NLP community in Bulgaria and further the cooperation among researchers working in NLP for Bulgarian around the world. The need for a conference dedicated to NLP research dealing with or applicable to Bulgarian has been felt for quite some time. We believe that building a strong community of researchers and teams who have chosen to work on Bulgarian is a key factor to meeting the challenges and requirements posed to computational linguistics and NLP in Bulgaria.
    [Show full text]
  • Collection of Usage Information for Language Resources from Academic Articles
    Collection of Usage Information for Language Resources from Academic Articles Shunsuke Kozaway, Hitomi Tohyamayy, Kiyotaka Uchimotoyyy, Shigeki Matsubaray yGraduate School of Information Science, Nagoya University yyInformation Technology Center, Nagoya University Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8601, Japan yyyNational Institute of Information and Communications Technology 4-2-1 Nukui-Kitamachi, Koganei, Tokyo, 184-8795, Japan fkozawa,[email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Recently, language resources (LRs) are becoming indispensable for linguistic researches. However, existing LRs are often not fully utilized because their variety of usage is not well known, indicating that their intrinsic value is not recognized very well either. Regarding this issue, lists of usage information might improve LR searches and lead to their efficient use. In this research, therefore, we collect a list of usage information for each LR from academic articles to promote the efficient utilization of LRs. This paper proposes to construct a text corpus annotated with usage information (UI corpus). In particular, we automatically extract sentences containing LR names from academic articles. Then, the extracted sentences are annotated with usage information by two annotators in a cascaded manner. We show that the UI corpus contributes to efficient LR searches by combining the UI corpus with a metadata database of LRs and comparing the number of LRs retrieved with and without the UI corpus. 1. Introduction Thesaurus1. In recent years, such language resources (LRs) as corpora • He also employed Roget’s Thesaurus in 100 words of and dictionaries are being widely used for research in the window to implement WSD.
    [Show full text]
  • Student Research Workshop Associated with RANLP 2011, Pages 1–8, Hissar, Bulgaria, 13 September 2011
    RANLPStud 2011 Proceedings of the Student Research Workshop associated with The 8th International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP 2011) 13 September, 2011 Hissar, Bulgaria STUDENT RESEARCH WORKSHOP ASSOCIATED WITH THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE RECENT ADVANCES IN NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING’2011 PROCEEDINGS Hissar, Bulgaria 13 September 2011 ISBN 978-954-452-016-8 Designed and Printed by INCOMA Ltd. Shoumen, BULGARIA ii Preface The Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP) conference, already in its eight year and ranked among the most influential NLP conferences, has always been a meeting venue for scientists coming from all over the world. Since 2009, we decided to give arena to the younger and less experienced members of the NLP community to share their results with an international audience. For this reason, further to the first successful and highly competitive Student Research Workshop associated with the conference RANLP 2009, we are pleased to announce the second edition of the workshop which is held during the main RANLP 2011 conference days on 13 September 2011. The aim of the workshop is to provide an excellent opportunity for students at all levels (Bachelor, Master, and Ph.D.) to present their work in progress or completed projects to an international research audience and receive feedback from senior researchers. We have received 31 high quality submissions, among which 6 papers have been accepted as regular oral papers, and 18 as posters. Each submission has been reviewed by
    [Show full text]
  • MASC: the Manually Annotated Sub-Corpus of American English
    MASC: The Manually Annotated Sub-Corpus of American English Nancy Ide*, Collin Baker**, Christiane Fellbaum†, Charles Fillmore**, Rebecca Passonneau†† *Vassar College Poughkeepsie, New York USA **International Computer Science Institute Berkeley, California USA †Princeton University Princeton, New Jersey USA ††Columbia University New York, New York USA E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract To answer the critical need for sharable, reusable annotated resources with rich linguistic annotations, we are developing a Manually Annotated Sub-Corpus (MASC) including texts from diverse genres and manual annotations or manually-validated annotations for multiple levels, including WordNet senses and FrameNet frames and frame elements, both of which have become significant resources in the international computational linguistics community. To derive maximal benefit from the semantic information provided by these resources, the MASC will also include manually-validated shallow parses and named entities, which will enable linking WordNet senses and FrameNet frames within the same sentences into more complex semantic structures and, because named entities will often be the role fillers of FrameNet frames, enrich the semantic and pragmatic information derivable from the sub-corpus. All MASC annotations will be published with detailed inter-annotator agreement measures. The MASC and its annotations will be freely downloadable from the ANC website, thus providing
    [Show full text]
  • From CHILDES to Talkbank
    From CHILDES to TalkBank Brian MacWhinney Carnegie Mellon University MacWhinney, B. (2001). New developments in CHILDES. In A. Do, L. Domínguez & A. Johansen (Eds.), BUCLD 25: Proceedings of the 25th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 458-468). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla. a similar article appeared as: MacWhinney, B. (2001). From CHILDES to TalkBank. In M. Almgren, A. Barreña, M. Ezeizaberrena, I. Idiazabal & B. MacWhinney (Eds.), Research on Child Language Acquisition (pp. 17-34). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla. Recent years have seen a phenomenal growth in computer power and connectivity. The computer on the desktop of the average academic researcher now has the power of room-size supercomputers of the 1980s. Using the Internet, we can connect in seconds to the other side of the world and transfer huge amounts of text, programs, audio and video. Our computers are equipped with programs that allow us to view, link, and modify this material without even having to think about programming. Nearly all of the major journals are now available in electronic form and the very nature of journals and publication is undergoing radical change. These new trends have led to dramatic advances in the methodology of science and engineering. However, the social and behavioral sciences have not shared fully in these advances. In large part, this is because the data used in the social sciences are not well- structured patterns of DNA sequences or atomic collisions in super colliders. Much of our data is based on the messy, ill-structured behaviors of humans as they participate in social interactions. Categorizing and coding these behaviors is an enormous task in itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Jazykovedný Ústav Ľudovíta Štúra
    JAZYKOVEDNÝ ÚSTAV ĽUDOVÍTA ŠTÚRA SLOVENSKEJ AKADÉMIE VIED 2 ROČNÍK 70, 2019 JAZYKOVEDNÝ ČASOPIS ________________________________________________________________VEDEcKÝ ČASOPIS PRE OTáZKY TEóRIE JAZYKA JOURNAL Of LINGUISTIcS ScIENTIfIc JOURNAL fOR ThE Theory Of LANGUAGE ________________________________________________________________ hlavná redaktorka/Editor-in-chief: doc. Mgr. Gabriela Múcsková, PhD. Výkonní redaktori/Managing Editors: PhDr. Ingrid Hrubaničová, PhD., Mgr. Miroslav Zumrík, PhD. Redakčná rada/Editorial Board: PhDr. Klára Buzássyová, CSc. (Bratislava), prof. PhDr. Juraj Dolník, DrSc. (Bratislava), PhDr. Ingrid Hrubaničová, PhD. (Bra tislava), doc. Mgr. Martina Ivanová, PhD. (Prešov), Mgr. Nicol Janočková, PhD. (Bratislava), Mgr. Alexandra Jarošová, CSc. (Bratislava), prof. PaedDr. Jana Kesselová, CSc. (Prešov), PhDr. Ľubor Králik, CSc. (Bratislava), PhDr. Viktor Krupa, DrSc. (Bratislava), doc. Mgr. Gabriela Múcsková, PhD. (Bratislava), Univ. Prof. Mag. Dr. Stefan Michael Newerkla (Viedeň – Ra- kúsko), Associate Prof. Mark Richard Lauersdorf, Ph.D. (Kentucky – USA), prof. Mgr. Martin Ološtiak, PhD. (Prešov), prof. PhDr. Slavomír Ondrejovič, DrSc. (Bratislava), prof. PaedDr. Vladimír Patráš, CSc. (Banská Bystrica), prof. PhDr. Ján Sabol, DrSc. (Košice), prof. PhDr. Juraj Vaňko, CSc. (Nitra), Mgr. Miroslav Zumrík, PhD. (Bratislava), prof. PhDr. Pavol Žigo, CSc. (Bratislava). Technický_______________________________________________________________ redaktor/Technical editor: Mgr. Vladimír Radik Vydáva/Published by: Jazykovedný
    [Show full text]
  • The General Regionally Annotated Corpus of Ukrainian (GRAC, Uacorpus.Org): Architecture and Functionality
    The General Regionally Annotated Corpus of Ukrainian (GRAC, uacorpus.org): Architecture and Functionality Maria Shvedova[0000-0002-0759-1689] Kyiv National Linguistic University [email protected] Abstract. The paper presents the General Regionally Annotated Corpus of Ukrainian, which is publicly available (GRAC: uacorpus.org), searchable online and counts more than 400 million tokens, representing most genres of written texts. It also features regional annotation, i. e. about 50 percent of the texts are attributed with regard to the different regions of Ukraine or countries of the di- aspora. If the author is known, the text is linked to their home region(s). The journalistic texts are annotated with regard to the place where the edition is pub- lished. This feature differs the GRAC from a majority of general linguistic cor- pora. Keywords: Ukrainian language, corpus, diachronic evolution, regional varia- tion. 1 Introduction Currently many major national languages have large universal corpora, known as “reference” corpora (cf. das Deutsche Referenzkorpus – DeReKo) or “national” cor- pora (a label dating back ultimately to the British National Corpus). These corpora are large, representative for different genres of written language, have a certain depth of (usually morphological and metatextual) annotation and can be used for many differ- ent linguistic purposes. The Ukrainian language lacks a publicly available linguistic corpus. Still there is a need of a corpus in the present-day linguistics. Independently researchers compile dif- ferent corpora of Ukrainian for separate research purposes with different size and functionality. As the community lacks a universal tool, a researcher may build their own corpus according to their needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Abstracts
    EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE RESOURCES AND EVALUATION Held under the Patronage of Ms Neelie Kroes, Vice-President of the European Commission, Digital Agenda Commissioner MAY 23-24-25, 2012 ISTANBUL LÜTFI KIRDAR CONVENTION & EXHIBITION CENTRE ISTANBUL, TURKEY CONFERENCE ABSTRACTS Editors: Nicoletta Calzolari (Conference Chair), Khalid Choukri, Thierry Declerck, Mehmet Uğur Doğan, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Asuncion Moreno, Jan Odijk, Stelios Piperidis. Assistant Editors: Hélène Mazo, Sara Goggi, Olivier Hamon © ELRA – European Language Resources Association. All rights reserved. LREC 2012, EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE RESOURCES AND EVALUATION Title: LREC 2012 Conference Abstracts Distributed by: ELRA – European Language Resources Association 55-57, rue Brillat Savarin 75013 Paris France Tel.: +33 1 43 13 33 33 Fax: +33 1 43 13 33 30 www.elra.info and www.elda.org Email: [email protected] and [email protected] Copyright by the European Language Resources Association ISBN 978-2-9517408-7-7 EAN 9782951740877 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without the prior permission of the European Language Resources Association ii Introduction of the Conference Chair Nicoletta Calzolari I wish first to express to Ms Neelie Kroes, Vice-President of the European Commission, Digital agenda Commissioner, the gratitude of the Program Committee and of all LREC participants for her Distinguished Patronage of LREC 2012. Even if every time I feel we have reached the top, this 8th LREC is continuing the tradition of breaking previous records: this edition we received 1013 submissions and have accepted 697 papers, after reviewing by the impressive number of 715 colleagues.
    [Show full text]