DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1302.0240V1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1302.0240V1 Origins of the Expanding Universe: 1912-1932 ASP Conference Series, Vol. 471 Michael J. Way and Deidre Hunter, eds. c 2013 Astronomical Society of the Pacific Henry Norris Russell and the Expanding Universe David DeVorkin Senior Curator, National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C., USA Abstract. Henry Norris Russell, one of the most influential American astronomers of the first half of the 20th Century, had a special place in his heart for the Lowell Observatory. Although privately critical of the founder for his pronouncements about life on Mars and the superiority of the Mars Hill observing site, he always supported the Observatory in public and professional circles. He staunchly supported Tombaugh’s detection of a planet as leading from Lowell’s prediction, and always promoted V. M. Slipher’s spectroscopic investigations of planetary and stellar phenomena. But how did he react to Slipher’s puzzling detection of the extreme radial velocities of spiral nebulae starting in 1912, and how did he regard the extension and interpretation of those observations by Hubble and others in following decades? Here we describe the arc of Russell’s reactions, dating from Slipher’s first detection, as an indicator of how mainstream stellar astronomers reacted to the concept of an expanding universe. 1. Introduction Henry Norris Russell was one of the most influential American astronomers of the first half of the 20th Century (DeVorkin 2000). During his most active years, dating roughly from the eve of the first World War and lasting till the eve of the second, his influence was deeply felt not only as a frequent referee and arbiter of standards for American pro- fessional journals relating to astronomy, but as a spokesman for the profession, reaching popular and technically informed audiences in a monthly astronomy column for Scien- tific American. His column provided news of upcoming celestial events surrounding a simple star map, but it also became a bully pulpit for promoting the deeds and discover- ies of astronomers worldwide, as did his two-volume textbook that was an introduction to the profession for over a generation of astronomers (Russell et al. 1938). Russell’s career spanned what Peter van de Kamp, Richard Berendzen and others arXiv:1302.0240v1 [physics.hist-ph] 1 Feb 2013 have called, first, the “Galactocentric Revolution” and then the “Acentric Revolution” (van de Kamp 1965; Berendzen 1975). History will remember the 20th Century as the period when these revolutions in the human comprehension of the universe, in con- junction with the establishment of relativistic cosmology by Einstein and others, were discovered, elaborated and reinforced.1 Today, these concepts are in place, but how did those who were born and raised in a static stellar universe react at the time? Observational astronomers rose to the chal- 1An excellent summation of present historical knowledge, with an extensive bibliography, can be found in Smith (2009). 1 2 DeVorkin lenge, pragmatically conducting observational tests suggested by Einstein or inferred from his theories.2 Those without the means to make the delicate observations, or without the inclination, however, had fewer options to participate: among them, either ignore the implications and continue on studying the stellar universe, or incorporate the implications when they might be useful. Russell was in the last category. The Astrophysics Data System suggests that Russell invoked the term “expanding universe” only twice in refereed publications from 1931 - 1940, less frequently than de Sitter, C. A. Chant, W. H. McCrea and G. C. McVittie (9 times each), Eddington (4 times) and Hubble (3 times).3 And distinct from the others (save Chant, who was acting in his capacity as editor of the Journal of The Royal Astronomical Society of Canada), Russell did not try to contribute to the new dynamics other than to speculate on its implications for the formation of planetary systems. For these reasons, recounting how Russell reacted first to V. M. Slipher’s obser- vations of the extreme velocities of the spiral nebulae and then to their elaboration and correlation with distance by Hubble and others, will offer insight into how “normal” astronomers engaged the new framework. Of course, following Russell alone will not provide a full historical picture, but considering his influence, his example is a good place to start, on the occasion of this celebration of the centennial of Slipher’s initial detection of what ultimately was interpreted as the expansion of the Universe. 2. First Reactions In April 1920, the Dearborn Observatory astronomer Philip Fox wrote his friend V. M. Slipher, congratulating him on receiving the 1919 Lalande Prize of the Paris Academy for his nebular work. Fox also took the occasion to recall for Slipher how astronomers reacted when, at the 16th meeting of the American Astronomical Society (AAS) in Atlanta in December 1913, he read one of Slipher’s first announcements of the great radial velocities of a few bright spiral nebulae. “It has been a matter of very great gratification to me to see the recognition which your splendid work has been receiving,” Fox (1920) began, but then pointedly recalled: I believe you remember that at the time of the Atlanta meeting of the Astro- nomical Society I presented your paper on the high velocity of the nebulae, and it was greeted with some expression of incredulity, especially on the part of Professor Russell, to which I made a heated rejoinder... I note that he makes a confident reference to your work, however, in “Some Problems of Sidereal Astronomy,” published by the National Research Council. In the some four years between Russell’s initial reaction to Slipher’s work and when he prepared his influential essay “Some Problems of Sidereal Astronomy,” he came to accept the velocities as measured quantities. As his essay was intended to be a referendum on the state of astronomy, pointing to work that had to be done, he clearly 2There is an extensive literature, from, for instance, Wright (1966) to Crelinsten (2006). 3There were 224 hits total using the Astrophysics Data System’s full-text search (Beta version), searching on refereed papers with synonyms disabled. Henry Norris Russell and the Expanding Universe 3 identified the velocities of the spirals as a problem that needed to be addressed in the context of the “Sidereal Problem.” He, along with J. C. Kapteyn, A. Eddington and most mainstream astronomers, regarded the defining problem of sidereal astronomy as the spatial and kinematic arrangement of stars in the visible universe. The Sidereal Problem was then the search for order, trying to understand Kapteyn’s two star streams as the motions of particles in a spiraling vortex (Paul 1993). What of the spirals then? Were they part of the stellar system, or external to it? Russell was aware of the problem, but to appreciate where they (or any unexpected observation) fit in his larger scheme of things, we need to appreciate the state of the profession of astronomy at the time. This was a time of war, and for some, including Russell, there were questions of what was critical for the future of the profession after the war. The most contentious issue for the National Research Council (NRC)4, was what would be the nature of science after the Great War. In George Ellery Hale’s view, would international relations be re-established? Who was in, and who was out?5 Hale organized the deliberations around disciplines, and asked Russell to take the lead for astronomers, concentrating on what the nature of the discipline should be like. As Russell (1917b) explained his position to Harvard’s E. C. Pickering in November 1917, [T]here are two sides of astronomical research, one of which has to do with the collections of facts, and the other with their interpretation. The former was routine; the latter was not, and this was why, Russell (1917a) claimed, none of Pickering’s Harvard staff had been asked to write reviews for the NRC. Pickering’s own earlier reports, he pointed out to his old patron, had already covered the routine aspects. Now the other side needed airing: [I]t is upon studies of this sort that the future advances of any science must very largely depend. Considering that it had been Pickering who made the vast holdings of Harvard spectra and magnitudes available to Russell in past years, which led to his landmark study of the relations between the characteristics of the stars, Russell’s views could be thought of as insensitive. Russell indeed gave highest marks to interpretation, but he was always very defer- ential to those who collected the most interesting and useful observations, like Picker- ing, and indeed like Slipher, for it was upon their work that his career was based. His patronage of Slipher and Lowell Observatory needs to be understood in this way (as does his patronage of other observatories like Mount Wilson). Russell’s essay (Russell 1920c) had to wait till war’s end, and there he expressed his opinion very forcibly: The main object of astronomy, as of all science, is not the collection of facts, but the development, on the basis of collected facts, of satisfactory theories regarding the nature, mutual relations, and probable history and evolution of the objects of study. 4Of the National Academy of Sciences 5See Kevles (1995, 1971, 1968). 4 DeVorkin Figure 1. Starting in the late 1920s, Roger Lowell Putnam, the Observatory Trustee (r), was receptive to Russell’s (l) advice and intellectual patronage. Photo- graph by Clyde Fisher, circa late 1920s, Neg. #280362,courtesy Department Library Services, American Museum of Natural History. When those facts were collected properly, and presented clinically, they had to be dealt with.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ira Sprague Bowen Papers, 1940-1973
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf2p300278 No online items Inventory of the Ira Sprague Bowen Papers, 1940-1973 Processed by Ronald S. Brashear; machine-readable finding aid created by Gabriela A. Montoya Manuscripts Department The Huntington Library 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2203 Fax: (626) 449-5720 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org/huntingtonlibrary.aspx?id=554 © 1998 The Huntington Library. All rights reserved. Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington Collection Inventory of the Ira Sprague 1 Bowen Papers, 1940-1973 Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington Collection Inventory of the Ira Sprague Bowen Paper, 1940-1973 The Huntington Library San Marino, California Contact Information Manuscripts Department The Huntington Library 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2203 Fax: (626) 449-5720 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org/huntingtonlibrary.aspx?id=554 Processed by: Ronald S. Brashear Encoded by: Gabriela A. Montoya © 1998 The Huntington Library. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Ira Sprague Bowen Papers, Date (inclusive): 1940-1973 Creator: Bowen, Ira Sprague Extent: Approximately 29,000 pieces in 88 boxes Repository: The Huntington Library San Marino, California 91108 Language: English. Provenance Placed on permanent deposit in the Huntington Library by the Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington Collection. This was done in 1989 as part of a letter of agreement (dated November 5, 1987) between the Huntington and the Carnegie Observatories. The papers have yet to be officially accessioned. Cataloging of the papers was completed in 1989 prior to their transfer to the Huntington.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birth of Stars and Planets
    Unit 6: The Birth of Stars and Planets This material was developed by the Friends of the Dominion Astrophysical Observatory with the assistance of a Natural Science and Engineering Research Council PromoScience grant and the NRC. It is a part of a larger project to present grade-appropriate material that matches 2020 curriculum requirements to help students understand planets, with a focus on exoplanets. This material is aimed at BC Grade 6 students. French versions are available. Instructions for teachers ● For questions and to give feedback contact: Calvin Schmidt [email protected], ​ ● All units build towards the Big Idea in the curriculum showing our solar system in the context of the Milky Way and the Universe, and provide background for understanding exoplanets. ● Look for Ideas for extending this section, Resources, and Review and discussion ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ questions at the end of each topic in this Unit. These should give more background on ​ each subject and spark further classroom ideas. We would be happy to help you ​ expand on each topic and develop your own ideas for your students. Contact us at ​ the [email protected]. ​ ​ Instructions for students ● If there are parts of this unit that you find confusing, please contact us at [email protected] for help. ​ ● We recommend you do a few sections at a time. We have provided links to learn more about each topic. ● You don’t have to do the sections in order, but we recommend that. Do sections you find interesting first and come back and do more at another time. ● It is helpful to try the activities rather than just read them.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter I Review Papers Harlow Shapley
    Chapter I Review Papers Harlow Shapley Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.40.40, on 25 Sep 2021 at 08:30:59, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0074180900042340 Helen Sawyer Hogg and Willis Shapley remembering Willis Shapley fielding questions on his father Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.40.40, on 25 Sep 2021 at 08:30:59, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0074180900042340 SHAPLEY'S DEBATE Michael Hoskin Cambridge University The attempt to make three-dimensional sense of the Milky Way goes back to a most unlikely origin: the English antiquary of the early eighteenth century, William Stukeley, remembered today for associating the Druids with Stonehenge. Stukeley came from Lincolnshire and so was a fellow-countryman of Isaac Newton, and as a result he was privileged to talk with the great man from time to time. In his Memoirs of Newton Stukeley records one conversation they had in about 1720, in which Stukeley proposed that the Sun and the brightest stars of the night sky make up what we today would term a globular cluster, and this cluster is surrounded by a gap, outside of which lie the small stars of the Milky Way in the form of a flattened ring. Stukeley's remarkable suggestion was recorded only in his manuscript memoirs, and had no effect on the subsequent history of astronomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Milky Way.Key
    Our Milky Way Learning Objectives ! What is the Milky Way? The Herschels thought we were at the center of our Galaxy...why were they wrong? ! How did Shapley prove we aren’t at the center? What are globular clusters? Cepheid Variable stars? ! How do we use Cepheid Variables to measure distance? ! What are the components of our Galaxy? What color are old stars? Young stars? Does our Galaxy get older or younger as you move out (i.e. from the disk to the halo)? ! How do we know our Galaxy is a spiral galaxy? ! Do stars in our Galaxy’s disk orbit as Kepler’s Laws would predict? What is a rotation curve? Why does our Galaxy’s rotation curve suggest dark matter exists? The Milky Way ! Our Galaxy is a collection of stars, nebulae, molecular clouds, and stellar remnants ! All bound together by gravity ! Connected by the stellar evolution cycle Determining the Shape of our Galaxy ! The number of 6400 ly stars were counted in all directions from 1300 ly the Sun by Sun Caroline Herschel and her brother William ! They assumed that all stars have the same brightness and that space contains no dust – these are incorrect assumptions ! They thus concluded that the Sun is at the center of the Universe - which is not true The Importance of Dust ! Dust dims and reddens starlight ! There is more dust toward the center of the Galaxy ! Consequence: We underestimate the number of stars in one direction ! We appear to be near the center, but we’re not Us Star Sun Can’t see stars here (if we’re looking for blue light from them) How Do We Find the Galactic Center?
    [Show full text]
  • At the Harvard Observatory
    Book Reviews 117 gravitational wave physicists, all of whom are members of an international group of over a thousand scientists engaged with the detection apparatus at two widely separated sites, one in Livingston, Louisiana and the other in Hanford, Washington. The emails research- ers in the collaboration exchanged and the queries Collins sent to the physicists who acted for him as “key informants” provide the bulk of the material for Collins’ “real- time” observations of this discovery in the making. At times, Collins finds the community of researchers exasperating and wrong-headed in their, in his view, overly secretive attitudes to their results. But Collins is not a detached witness of the events he describes and analyses. Instead, he is overall a highly enthusias- tic fan of the gravitational wave community. Collins has not sought out for Gravity’s Kiss the kinds of evidence one might have expected a historian to have pursued. Gravity’s Kiss, however, should be read on its terms. It is a work of reportage from an “embedded” sociologist of science with long experience of, and valuable connections in, the gravitational wave community. Along the way, he offers sharp insights into the work- ing of these scientists. Collins proves to be an excellent guide to the operations of a “Big Science” collaboration and the intense scrutiny of, and complicated negotiations around, the “[v]ery interesting event on ER8.” Robert W. Smith University of Alberta [email protected] “Girl-Hours” at the Harvard Observatory The Glass Universe: How the Ladies of the Harvard Observatory Took the Measure of the Stars.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy HOMEWORK Chapter 15
    Astronomy HOMEWORK Chapter 15 1. Where in the Galaxy is the solar system located? a. in the nucleus; b. in the halo; c. in a spiral arm; d. between two spiral arms; e. in the central bulge. d. between two spiral arms. Also, 26,000 LY from the center. 2. What is located in the nucleus of the Galaxy? a. a globular cluster; b. a spiral arm; c. a black hole; d. the solar system; e. a MACHO. c. a black hole. Of 4 million M⊙. 3. Which statement about the Milky Way Galaxy is correct? a. Our Galaxy is but one of many galaxies. b. Our Galaxy contains all stars in the universe. c. All stars in our Galaxy take the same time to complete one orbit. d. Most stars in our Galaxy are in the central bulge. e. None of the stars in our Galaxy move. a. Our Galaxy is but one of many [billions] of galaxies in the universe. 5. How did Edwin Hubble prove that M31 is not a nebula in our Milky Way Galaxy? M31 is the Andromeda Galaxy, called “Andromeda Nebula” at the time. Hubble identified several stars in M31 as Cepheid variables, and measured their pulsation periods and apparent brightness. He then used the known relationship between period and luminosity of Cepheid variables to determine their luminosity. Finally, he used the inverse square law to obtain their distance. Their distance put them many times farther away than the size of our Galaxy, which Shapley had determined in 1915. If they are farther away than the size of our Galaxy, they have to be outside it.
    [Show full text]
  • How Supernovae Became the Basis of Observational Cosmology
    Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage, 19(2), 203–215 (2016). HOW SUPERNOVAE BECAME THE BASIS OF OBSERVATIONAL COSMOLOGY Maria Victorovna Pruzhinskaya Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire, Université Clermont Auvergne, Université Blaise Pascal, CNRS/IN2P3, Clermont-Ferrand, France; and Sternberg Astronomical Institute of Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991, Moscow, Universitetsky prospect 13, Russia. Email: [email protected] and Sergey Mikhailovich Lisakov Laboratoire Lagrange, UMR7293, Université Nice Sophia-Antipolis, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, Boulevard de l'Observatoire, CS 34229, Nice, France. Email: [email protected] Abstract: This paper is dedicated to the discovery of one of the most important relationships in supernova cosmology—the relation between the peak luminosity of Type Ia supernovae and their luminosity decline rate after maximum light. The history of this relationship is quite long and interesting. The relationship was independently discovered by the American statistician and astronomer Bert Woodard Rust and the Soviet astronomer Yury Pavlovich Pskovskii in the 1970s. Using a limited sample of Type I supernovae they were able to show that the brighter the supernova is, the slower its luminosity declines after maximum. Only with the appearance of CCD cameras could Mark Phillips re-inspect this relationship on a new level of accuracy using a better sample of supernovae. His investigations confirmed the idea proposed earlier by Rust and Pskovskii. Keywords: supernovae, Pskovskii, Rust 1 INTRODUCTION However, from the moment that Albert Einstein (1879–1955; Whittaker, 1955) introduced into the In 1998–1999 astronomers discovered the accel- equations of the General Theory of Relativity a erating expansion of the Universe through the cosmological constant until the discovery of the observations of very far standard candles (for accelerating expansion of the Universe, nearly a review see Lipunov and Chernin, 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Variable Star Classification and Light Curves Manual
    Variable Star Classification and Light Curves An AAVSO course for the Carolyn Hurless Online Institute for Continuing Education in Astronomy (CHOICE) This is copyrighted material meant only for official enrollees in this online course. Do not share this document with others. Please do not quote from it without prior permission from the AAVSO. Table of Contents Course Description and Requirements for Completion Chapter One- 1. Introduction . What are variable stars? . The first known variable stars 2. Variable Star Names . Constellation names . Greek letters (Bayer letters) . GCVS naming scheme . Other naming conventions . Naming variable star types 3. The Main Types of variability Extrinsic . Eclipsing . Rotating . Microlensing Intrinsic . Pulsating . Eruptive . Cataclysmic . X-Ray 4. The Variability Tree Chapter Two- 1. Rotating Variables . The Sun . BY Dra stars . RS CVn stars . Rotating ellipsoidal variables 2. Eclipsing Variables . EA . EB . EW . EP . Roche Lobes 1 Chapter Three- 1. Pulsating Variables . Classical Cepheids . Type II Cepheids . RV Tau stars . Delta Sct stars . RR Lyr stars . Miras . Semi-regular stars 2. Eruptive Variables . Young Stellar Objects . T Tau stars . FUOrs . EXOrs . UXOrs . UV Cet stars . Gamma Cas stars . S Dor stars . R CrB stars Chapter Four- 1. Cataclysmic Variables . Dwarf Novae . Novae . Recurrent Novae . Magnetic CVs . Symbiotic Variables . Supernovae 2. Other Variables . Gamma-Ray Bursters . Active Galactic Nuclei 2 Course Description and Requirements for Completion This course is an overview of the types of variable stars most commonly observed by AAVSO observers. We discuss the physical processes behind what makes each type variable and how this is demonstrated in their light curves. Variable star names and nomenclature are placed in a historical context to aid in understanding today’s classification scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • Lyman Spitzer 1914–1997
    OBITUARIES ried out sonar analysis at Columbia University Lyman Spitzer as a guide to anti-submarine tactics. After the Deaths of Fellows 1914–1997 war, he went back briefly to Yale and in 1947 he was invited to succeed Russell as Professor of Prof. J Wdowczyk yman Spitzer died on 31 March 1997 at Astronomy at Princeton. He accepted, and held Born 28 July 1935 the age of 82. He had a remarkably pro- the post until his formal retirement in 1982. Elected 11 April 1980 Lductive career that spanned quite diverse At Princeton he developed his theories of the Died 6 September 1996 areas of activity and led him to become one of interstellar medium, and the application of his Dr C P Gopalaraman the most influential American scientists of his great knowledge and understanding of physics Born 1 July 1938 time. His personal theoretical contributions to raised the subject to an exciting level. He Elected 13 May 1994 interstellar astronomy and to plasma physics quickly realized that observations of the inter- Died 3 September 1997 quickly established him as a world leader in each stellar gas were most important in the ultra- Mr S Bradford Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/astrogeo/article/38/6/36/194930 by guest on 24 September 2021 field. He was a pioneer in the opening up of violet where most of the resonance lines of the Born 28 February 1912 common elements lay. This led to a proposal Elected 14 April 1961 for an ultraviolet observatory satellite designed Died ? specifically to study the interstellar medium.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmic Times Teachers' Guide Table of Contents
    Cosmic Times Teachers’ Guide Table of Contents Cosmic Times Teachers’ Guide ....................................................................................... 1 1919 Cosmic Times ........................................................................................................... 3 Summary of the 1919 Articles...................................................................................................4 Sun’s Gravity Bends Starlight .................................................................................................4 Sidebar: Why a Total Eclipse?.................................................................................................4 Mount Wilson Astronomer Estimates Milky Way Ten Times Bigger Than Thought ............4 Expanding or Contracting? ......................................................................................................4 In Their Own Words................................................................................................................4 Notes on the 1919 Articles .........................................................................................................5 Sun's Gravity Bends Starlight..................................................................................................5 Sidebar: Why a Total Eclipse?.................................................................................................7 Mount Wilson Astronomer Estimates Milky Way Ten Times Bigger Than Thought ............7 Expanding or Contracting? ......................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Discoveries 1917 100” Hooker Telescope on Mt
    Discoveries 1917 100” Hooker telescope on Mt. Wilson 1920 “Debate on the Scale of the Universe” Interpretaon of the “Spiral Nebulae” Harlow Shapley “only gas clouds” within a single galacc Universe Sun far from the center Heber CurGs Sun at the center of our relavely small galaxy all the spiral nebulae are other galaxies Measure the size – HOW?? Fall 2018 1 Yardstck 1.Brightness (magnitude) 2.Parallax 3.Cepheid Variables November 23, 1924 Edwin Hubble, 35, published in the New York Times his discovery that there were many galaxies further away from the Milky Way. Fall 2018 2 MMilkyilky Way 1838 Discovery of stellar parallax 1838 Discovery of stellar parallax (F.Bessel) ) 1 1 1 Parsec = Parsec = = = 3.263.26 ly P (arcsec) (arcsec) 1 1 Mpc = 10= 106 parsecs = 3.26 million lightyears parsecs = 3.26 million lightyears Fall 2018 Fall 2018 213 Cepheid Variables At Harvard (Society For the Collegiate InstrucGon of Women) Oberlin and Radcliff Colleges she was capGvated by Astronomy. Variable stars vary periodically in brightness HenrieUa LeaviU HenrieUa found ~50) Cepheid variables Fall 2018 4 Edwin Hubble ! Confirmed the extra galacGc nature of nebulae using Cepheid variable yardsGck ! Observed that every galaxy appears to be moving away from every other one Farthest ones moving faster Fall 2018 5 Velocit measurement Doppler Effect Aer Einstein Fall 2018 6 Speed vs. Distance Fall 2018 7 Hubble Constant Not constant! Fall 2018 8 What is going on? Q1 Moving away? – the track back and find where they started Finally Copernicus is verified – we are not
    [Show full text]
  • JRASC, October 2002 Issue (PDF)
    Publications and Products of October/octobre 2002 Volume/volume 96 Number/numéro 5 [696] The Royal Astronomical Society of Canada Observer’s Calendar — 2003 This calendar was created by members of the RASC. All photographs were taken by amateur astronomers using ordinary camera lenses and small telescopes and represent a wide spectrum of objects. An informative caption accompanies every photograph. The Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada Le Journal de la Société royale d’astronomie du Canada It is designed with the observer in mind and contains comprehensive astronomical data such as daily Moon rise and set times, significant lunar and planetary conjunctions, eclipses, and meteor showers. The 1998, 1999, and 2000 editions each won the Best Calendar Award from the Ontario Printing and Imaging Association (designed and produced by Rajiv Gupta). Price: $15.95 (members); $17.95 (non-members) (includes postage and handling; add GST for Canadian orders) The Beginner’s Observing Guide This guide is for anyone with little or no experience in observing the night sky. Large, easy to read star maps are provided to acquaint the reader with the constellations and bright stars. Basic information on observing the Moon, planets and eclipses through the year 2005 is provided. There is also a special section to help Scouts, Cubs, Guides, and Brownies achieve their respective astronomy badges. Written by Leo Enright (160 pages of information in a soft-cover book with otabinding that allows the book to lie flat). Price: $15 (includes taxes, postage and handling) Looking Up: A History of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada Published to commemorate the 125th anniversary of the first meeting of the Toronto Astronomical Club, “Looking Up — A History of the RASC” is an excellent overall history of Canada’s national astronomy organization.
    [Show full text]