A History of Policies and Forces Shaping California Teacher

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A History of Policies and Forces Shaping California Teacher A History of Policies and Forces Shaping California Teacher Credentialing Commission on Teacher Credentialing Blackburn, Constance Teacher Representative Dean, Steven Teacher Representative Evans, Marlon Public Representative Freathy, Mark Teacher Representative Gahagan, Charles Teacher Representative Hines, James Teacher Representative Littman, Leslie Designee, Superintendent of Public Instruction McInerney, Carolyn School Board Member Oropeza-Enriquez, Irene Administrative Services Representative Sun, Ting Public Representative Wright, Hilda Teacher Representative Vacant Non-Administrative Services Credential Representative Vacant Faculty Member Vacant Public Representative Vacant Public Representative Ex-Officio Members Martin, Shane Association of Independent California Colleges and Universities Perry, Janis California Postsecondary Education Commission Sloan, Tine University of California Young, Beverly California State University Dale Janssen Executive Director Vision Statement Ensuring high quality educators for California’s diverse students, schools and communities. Mission Statement The mission of the Commission on Teacher Credentialing is to ensure integrity and high quality in the preparation, conduct and professional growth of the educators who serve California’s public schools. Its work shall reflect both statutory mandates that govern the Commission and research on professional practices. A History of Policies and Forces Shaping California Teacher Credentialing February 2011 Sacramento, California Edmund G. Brown, Jr. Governor of California Table of Contents Preface…………………………………………………………………..v Chapter 1 The California Context: Conflict and Continuity Dennis S. Tierney…………………………………………………..........1 To the distress of many, California has a unique political and social history, particularly when public education is involved. In this introductory chapter, the author attempts to capture the uniqueness of the California experience and to set out seven policy strands that have engaged policy makers in public education in this state. Chapter 2 California’s First 100 Years: Establishing State Responsibility for Quality of Teachers (1850–1950)–Irving G. Hendrick…………..17 The responsibility for certifying teacher qualifications and competence has not always been a state function. Early in California history, that responsibility was held by schools and districts. The author discusses the movement to increase professionalism in teaching through state standards and uniform governance and describes the rising influence of normal schools, teacher education faculty and, particularly, the University of California. Chapter 3 A Political Firestorm Surrounds the Fisher Credential Reform (1950–1961)–Sidney A. Inglis………………………………..32 In the 1950s, growing national dissatisfaction with the public school curriculum and the preparation of teachers fed directly into the political ambitions of a young Democratic legislator, State Senator Hugo Fisher, Armed with his party's and the Governor's support, Fisher pressed for stronger subject matter preparation of all teachers-- elementary and secondary--and reduced emphasis of their pedagogical preparation. In this chapter, the author draws upon primary documents including interviews with key players to tell the story of the first wave of California credential reform. i Table of Contents Chapter 4 California’s Fisher Act Unravels (1961–1965) Sidney A. Inglis………………………………………………………...58 The Fisher Act of 1961 painted the canvas of credential structure in broad strokes. It delegated to the State Board of Education the task of refining these concepts by defining its key terms--like "academic" and "non-academic"--and shaping its regulations. The task met with the ambitions of several activists Board members, who seized the opportunity to work outside the reach of the "educationists." In doing so, however, they came up against the strong political forces of the press, the professional organizations with specialized interests, and college teacher education faculty. The author’s account is supported by interviews with key players shortly after these events. Chapter 5 Development of the Ryan Credential Reforms (1966–1970) Sydney A. Inglis………………………………………………………..97 Leo J. Ryan, the driving force behind the Ryan Act of 1970, was an informed and astute politician. He worked hard to educate himself and his legislative colleagues on innovative and imaginative educational thinking of the late 1960s. He knew when to concede without compromising his principles. He understood how to coalesce the national drive for greater professionalization of teaching, the local press for a supply of qualified teachers who could be flexibly assigned, and the political pressures of special interest groups and party politics. Chapter 6 California Establishes an Independent Standards Board Responsible for Teacher Licensing (1971–1980)–Richard K. Mastain…………..148 In addition to making significant changes to the credentialing requirements, in a historic step, the California Legislature, in the Ryan Act of 1970 created the first independent standards board in the nation, the Commission on Teacher Preparation and Licensing. The purpose was a step toward establishing teaching as a recognized profession. The author recounts some of the early actions of the Commission as it assumed its responsibilities. ii Table of Contents Chapter 7 The Educational Reform Movement of the 1980’s (1981–1988) Ralph A. Brott………………………………………………………...232 This section chronicles the major events and issues leading to the enactment of the Marian Bergeson, Gary Hart, and Teresa Hughes educational reforms in 1988. The complexity of the reform ideas and the stands of various organizations leave little subtlety. However, putting the ideas together and gaining enough consensus among stakeholders to pass a major reform bill was remarkably difficult. The author seeks to outline the major notions, events and forces acting on teacher credentialing reform. Chapter 8 Fulfilling the California Promise (1988–1996) Dennis S. Tierney & Philip A. Fitch……………………....................287 During this period of time, there was an expansion of the Commission’s role and responsibilities. Resources were available allowing for additional staff, as well as additional mandated roles for the Commission. The development of program standards, accreditation procedures, automated licensure procedures, and credentialing practices led to a partial fulfillment of the promises and expectations for the independent educator licensing board established in 1970. Chapter 9 The Critical Role of Teacher Preparation in the School Accountability Movement of the 1990s (1996–2003) Linda G. Bond…………………………………………………...…....339 The Commission was increasingly visible as an agent of school reform through the preparation of teachers. This coupled with an accelerated demand for teachers as a result of class size reduction, led to increased attention to teacher accountability led to the SB 2042 teacher preparation reform. iii Table of Contents Chapter 10 The Survival and Revitalization of the Commission on Teacher Credentialing (2004–2010) Philip A. Fitch & Lawrence W. Birch…………………………..…....366 The Commission deliberated on substantive issues such as accreditation, standard setting and revision. However, the existence of the Commission was challenged, yet again, in a report by the Legislative Analyst Office (LAO) that recommended that the Commission be replaced and its functions be assumed by the State Board of Education. At the same time Senator Jack Scott sponsored omnibus legislation that gave the Commission additional responsibilities. As the Commission implemented the legislation, there was emphasis on improved communication with stakeholders. An on-line credential application system was introduced that significantly reduced the time and paper involved in credential processing. The Commission also supported a number of changed processes involving the use of technology. iv Preface This publication consists of ten chapters about the Commission on Teacher Credentialing written during a period of over twenty years. The initial chapters were written during the late 1980s and the later chapters written during the 1990s. The intention at the time was to publish the book during the mid-nineties, however the project was not completed at that time. At a later date, a decision was made to prepare an additional chapter that would contain information about the turn of the 21st century and first few years of the century. At that time, a draft of the book was placed on the Commission’s website, but the book was not printed. Since that time, one additional chapter has been prepared bringing the book up to date through 2010. The Commission is indebted to those who have contributed to the writing of this book. Each chapter was written using the individual style of each author. The comments and opinions expressed throughout this history are attributable only to the authors who contributed to this work. There was no attempt to use a single format for the presentation of the ideas felt to be most important by each author. Minimal editing has been done, primarily to maintain continuity and to preserve accuracy of information. Each chapter should be considered as an individual unit. Taken as a whole this book presents important historical background about teacher certification in California as well as a history of the first forty years of the Commission on Teacher Credentialing. Authors Dennis S. Tierney Dr. Tierney was a university
Recommended publications
  • From Master Plan to Mediocrity: Higher Education Performance & Policy in California
    ~ Perin,],'J ,!,., ,,, ,, I INSTITUTE for RESEARCH on HIGHER EDUCATION From Master Plan to Mediocrity: Higher Education Performance & Policy in California Joni E. Finney, Christina Riso, Kata Orosz, and William Casey Boland Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania April 2014 0 INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON HIGHER EDUCATION Contents Preface 2 Introduction 4 The Golden State: Its People, Economy, & Politics 5 The People of California 5 The California Economy 5 The Political Environment of California 6 The State’s Higher Education Structure 6 University of California 7 California State University 7 California Community Colleges 7 Gubernatorial and Legislative Powers over California’s Higher Education System 8 California Higher Education Performance 9 Preparation 9 Participation 9 Affordability 10 Completion 10 Research 11 Gaps in Performance 12 What Policies Explain Higher Education Performance Over Time? 13 The Complex Political Environment and Political Indifference 14 The Indirect Costs of a “Direct Democracy” 14 The Limitations of Term Limits 15 The Cost of Political Indifference and Short-Term Fixes 15 Absence of Statewide Higher Education Goals 16 Absence of Statewide Finance Strategy for Higher Education 18 State Appropriations Are Not Targeted to Performance 18 Tuition Setting Is Not Tied to Finance Policy 20 Financial Aid Is Increasingly Not Meeting Student Needs 21 Easing Student Transitions 23 Alignment Concerns between K-12 and Higher Education 23 College Transfer: The Unfulfilled Mission of the Master Plan 25 Inadequate Incentives for Improving the Career-Technical Education Pathway 27 Conclusion 27 Notes 29 References 36 About the Authors 48 1 FROM MASTER PLAN TO MEDIOCRITY: HIGHER EDUCATION PERFORMANCE AND POLICY IN CALIFORNIA Preface From Master Plan to Mediocrity: Higher Education Performance and Policy in California is the result of the hard work and persistence of nine graduate students enrolled in my Advanced Public Policy Seminar at the University of Pennsylvania in the spring semester of 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • California Women: Get on Board II California Coalition for Women
    Golden Gate University School of Law GGU Law Digital Commons California Agencies California Documents 7-1988 California Women: Get On Board II California Coalition for Women Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/caldocs_agencies Part of the Law and Gender Commons Recommended Citation California Coalition for Women, "California Women: Get On Board II" (1988). California Agencies. Paper 254. http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/caldocs_agencies/254 This Cal State Document is brought to you for free and open access by the California Documents at GGU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in California Agencies by an authorized administrator of GGU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Presentation By The California Coalition for Women A REPORT ON THE STATUS OF WOMEN ON CALIFORNIA’S BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS AND IN TOP POLICY POSITIONS Conducted under the California Women’s Appointment Project July 1998 J U L Y 1 9 9 9 . “As Governor, I will insist on a diverse makeup of cabinet members, political advisors and individuals serving in top state positions. Diversity does not end with minority appointments, but begins when women and other minorities play a significant role in guiding California into the “ 21st century. Governor Gray Davis, 1998 For more information contact: CALIFORNIA COALITION FOR WOMEN at the California Elected Women’s Association for Education and Research c/o CSUS 6000 J Street Sacramento, CA 95819-6100 916.278.3870 www.appointwomen.ca.gov
    [Show full text]
  • Student and School Indicators for Youth in California's Central Valley
    Student and School Indicators for Youth in California’s Central Valley ••• Anne Danenberg Christopher Jepsen Pedro Cerdán 2002 PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE OF CALIFORNIA Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Danenberg, Anne, 1954- Student and school indicators for youth in California’s Central Valley / Anne Danenberg, Christopher Jepsen, Pedro Cerdán. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 1-58213-060-4 1. Educational indicators—California—Central Valley (Valley) 2. Education—California—Central Valley (Valley)—Statistics. I. Jepsen, Christopher. II. Cerdán, Pedro, 1978- III. Public Policy Institute of California. IV. Title. LB2846 .D26 2002 370'.9794'5021—dc21 2002012852 Copyright © 2002 by Public Policy Institute of California All rights reserved San Francisco, CA Short sections of text, not to exceed three paragraphs, may be quoted without written permission provided that full attribution is given to the source and the above copyright notice is included. PPIC does not take or support positions on any ballot measure or state and federal legislation nor does it endorse or support any political parties or candidates for public office. Research publications reflect the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the staff, officers, or Board of Directors of the Public Policy Institute of California. Preface ________________________________________________________________________ This study was commissioned by The James Irvine Foundation as the first of two reports documenting the condition of youth
    [Show full text]
  • Marian Bergeson Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt2x0nd8k6 No online items Inventory of the Marian Bergeson Papers Processed by Chris Deutsch California State Archives 1020 "O" Street Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: (916) 653-2246 Fax: (916) 653-7363 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.sos.ca.gov/archives/ © 2009 California Secretary of State. All rights reserved. Inventory of the Marian Bergeson See Series Descriptions. 1 Papers Inventory of the Marian Bergeson Papers Collection number: See Series Descriptions. California State Archives Office of the Secretary of State Sacramento, California Processed by: Chris Deutsch Date Completed: June 2009 Encoded by: Jessica Knox © 2009 California Secretary of State. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Marian Bergeson Papers Dates: 1979-1994 Collection number: See Series Descriptions. Creator: Marian Bergeson, California Legislator Collection Size: 21 cubic feet Repository: California State Archives Sacramento, California Abstract: Marian Bergeson served as a California Legislator from 1979 to 1994. She was a member of the Republican Party. The Marian Bergeson Papers consist of 21 cubic feet of textual records from her term as an Assembly Member, 1979-1984, and from her term in the Senate, 1985-1992. Physical location: California State Archives Languages: Languages represented in the collection: English Access Collection is open for research. Publication Rights For permission to reproduce or publish, please contact the California State Archives. Permission for reproduction or publication is given on behalf of the California State Archives as the owner of the physical items. The researcher assumes all responsibility for possible infringement which may arise from reproduction or publication of materials from the California State Archives collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Higher Education in California
    PPIC HIGHER EDUCATION CENTER HIGHER EDUCATION IN CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA’S HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM EXPANDING COLLEGE ACCESS IMPROVING COLLEGE COMPLETION INCREASING EQUITY AND DIVERSITY INVESTING IN PUBLIC HIGHER EDUCATION MAKING COLLEGE AFFORDABLE MEETING CALIFORNIA’S WORKFORCE NEEDS STRENGTHENING CAREER EDUCATION California’s Higher Education System PPIC HIGHER EDUCATION CENTER OCTOBER 2019 California’s system is the largest—and among the most diverse— in the nation California’s higher education system has three public segments: the University of California (UC), the California State University (CSU), and the California Community Colleges. It also includes more than 150 private nonprofit colleges and about 160 for-profit institutions. In total, the state’s colleges and universities enroll almost three million students from a wide range of backgrounds. An additional 170 private for-profit trade schools (postsecondary institutions that award vocational certificates but do not offer degrees) enroll about 30,000 students. Eight out of every ten college students in California attend a public institution—and more than half are enrolled in the community college system. Even so, the share attending private schools is sizeable. Indeed, private nonprofit colleges enroll slightly more students than the University of California. Enrollment in private for-profit colleges has been declining after increasing sharply for many years. Unlike most other states, California has not had a coordinating body for higher education over the past several decades. This has made goal setting, oversight, and coordination more challenging. The structure and principles established almost 60 years ago by the Master Plan for Higher Education remain largely unchanged. The Master Plan allowed the state’s public system to accommodate dramatic increases in enrollment for several decades while providing broad access and charging little or no tuition.
    [Show full text]
  • Education in California Today
    EDUCATION IN CALIFORNIA TODAY Consider these facts: 100 of California’s nearly 2,500 high schools account for nearly half of the state’s dropouts; residents of coastal counties are two‐thirds more likely to have a bachelor’s degree than those of inland counties; 45 in 100 Latino adults in the Los Angeles metro area never completed high school. Education is one of three areas, along with health and standard of living that make up the American Human Development Index used to measure the well‐being of Californians in A Portrait of California. Based on the most recent available U.S. Census Bureau data on both school enrollment starting from age 3 and degree attainment of all adults age 25 and older, A Portrait of California explores the education attainment level of the Golden States’ residents by neighborhood and county, metro area, racial/ethnic group, and for women and men. STRIKING FINDINGS IN EDUCATION FROM A PORTRAIT OF CALIFORNIA: o The Bay Area region, stretching from Sonoma County in the north to San Benito in the south is the leader in higher education degree attainment. San Diego and greater Sacramento are next, with Northern California and the San Joaquin Valley at the bottom of the eight regions (see figure). o A resident of the San Joaquin Valley is only one third as likely to have graduated from college as one in the Bay Area. o In the San Joaquin Valley, over 28 percent of adults have not completed high school, about the level of the nation as a whole over a quarter century ago.
    [Show full text]
  • California's Economic Payoff
    California’s Economic Dr. Jon Stiles, Dr. Michael Hout, Dr. Henry Brady Institute for the Study of Payoff Societal Issues, UC Berkeley Investing in College Access & Completion EXECUTIVE SUMMARY April 2012 The benefits of higher education extend well beyond the direct payoff for students and include substantial gains to the state Californians with a college degree will earn $1,340,000 more than their peers with only a high school For every $1 California diploma invests in higher education, it will receive a net return on The state would have to increase its investment in $ investment of $4.50 higher education 3X $$$$ before it would fail to return its original investment The return is double for those who COMPLETE COLLEGE—$4.80 than for those who enter but fail to complete college—$2.40 By entering and completing college, the average Californian will spend $12 billion 4 years less in poverty, IOU reducing the expected number of years they receive cash aid By the time a graduate by more than 2 years reaches 38 years old, Past graduates of UC and the state’s initial investment CSU return $12 billion ECONOMIC is repaid in full annually to the state WELL-BEING California’s Economic Payoff Investing in College Access & Completion he State of California is looking to resolve the ongoing budget crisis in order to secure our economic future and the opportunity for all citizens to realize the California Dream. The continued budgetary challenges raise many questions about the most effective ways to secure these goals. What are the benefits of investing in higher education?In this report, And, conducted is it worth by itresearchers for Californians? at the Institute for the Study of Societal Issues at the University of California,T Berkeley, two of these questions are addressed: This study concludes that the benefits of higher education extend well beyond the direct payoff for students and include substantial gains to the state.
    [Show full text]
  • The Paper Vol. I No. 12
    as much a part of MSU as Wells Hall Ramparts v. MSU v. The CIA The University On The Run The statements from the various protagonists since last week's article ap­ peared in Ramparts magazine on MSU's 1955-1962 Vietnam advisory project have been, to say the least, Interesting and varied. Moreover, they have stimulated, at long last, a discussion of the type of educational project rep­ resented byMSU'slrole In Vietnam and of the various influences on the opera­ tion and outcome of such projects. To aid this discussion, "The Paper" contributes the following series of excerpts.—The Editors, Accusations that the MSU project was a CIA front are "ridiculous/* (Artnur) Brandstatter (chairman, School of Police Administration and Public Safety) sand. "I don't think anyone can make this statement/' **I can honestly say that I donotknow that there were any CIA people work­ ing there. Many people who were hired for their technical assistance were U.S. civil servants, including people from departments such as the Army, where their background may have included intelligence training." • • • Referring to implications in the article that MSU started its Vietnam project solely for the prestige involved, (Charles) Killingsworth (former chairman, Economics Department, now professor of labor and industrial relations) said: 44l can say with my own personal knowledge that President Hannah was not eager to take on this responsibility, and did so only at the request of the U.S. government." The Ad The State News Refused To Print Killingsworth said that he himself was not eager to take the trip to Vietnam.
    [Show full text]
  • Increase the Percent of SFUSD Graduates Who Complete a Post-Secondary Degree Within 6 Years
    Increase the percent of SFUSD Graduates who complete a Post-Secondary Degree within 6 years High School Graduates who Enroll in College and Complete within Six Years Source: National Student Clearinghouse 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 The above chart shows the percentage of SFUSD students who graduated between 2007 and 2011 who completed a post-secondary degree within six years of graduating from high school. Data Definition & the San Francisco Trend line The chart above shows the percentage of San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD) graduates that completed degrees at two and four-year institutions within six years of graduation. Each year on the chart represents the year in which a group of SFUSD students graduated from high school. For each year, the number of SFUSD graduates that enrolled in and completed a degree within six years is shown as a percentage of total SFUSD graduates from that year. For example, the last data point on the chart shows that 52% of the 3,885 students graduating from SFUSD high schools in 2011 completed either an Associate’s, Bachelor’s or advanced degree by 2017. Certificate programs are not included in the dataset. The percent of students who complete a post-secondary degree within six years is calculated using a service provided by the National Student Clearinghouse, StudentTracker. It is important to note that data for approximately 10% of each graduating cohort in not available through the National Student Clearing House. SFUSD uses StudentTracker to identify its graduates at U.S. colleges and universities.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Childhood Education in California
    RESEARCH BRIEF | SEPTEMBER 2018 Early Childhood Education in California Deborah Stipek Stanford University About: The Getting Down to Facts project seeks to create a common evidence base for understanding the current state of California school systems and lay the foundation for substantive conversations about what education policies should be sustained and what might be improved to ensure increased opportunity and success for all students in California in the decades ahead. Getting Down to Facts II follows approximately a decade after the first Getting Down to Facts effort in 2007. This research brief is one of 19 that summarize 36 research studies that cover four main areas related to state education policy: student success, governance, personnel, and funding. This brief summarizes findings from Early Childhood Education in California (September 2018), an extensive, multipart report examining the overall landscape of early childhood education (ECE) in California. For each topic listed below, the brief summarizes key findings and their implications for California policies related to young children and their families: The Early Learning Landscape Deborah Stipek and Peggy Pizzo Early Learning for Children with Disabilities Nancy Hunt Preparation and Training for Professionals in Early Childhood Education Deborah Stipek Strengthening California’s Early Childhood Education Workforce Lea J. E. Austin, Marcy Whitebook, and Raúl Chávez Program Quality Monitoring and Improvement Deborah Stipek and Sarah Ruskin Bardack PreK-3 Alignment Deborah Stipek Early Child Care Data Systems Deborah Stipek and Madhuvanti Anantharajan These and all GDTFII studies can be found at www.gettingdowntofacts.com. Introduction More than 24 million children ages 5 and younger live in the United States, and about one in eight of them—a little over 3 million—lives in California.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcript for Marian Bergeson
    CENTER FOR ORAL AND PUBLIC HISTORY CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, FULLERTON Orange County Politics Oral History Project An Oral History with MARIAN BERGESON Interviewed By Kira A. Gentry On October 29, 2013 and November 13, 2013 OH 5370.1 and 5370.2 This is an edited transcription of an interview conducted for the Center for Oral and Public History, sponsored by California State University, Fullerton. The reader should be aware that an oral history document portrays information as recalled by the interviewee. Because of the spontaneous nature of this kind of document, it may contain statements and impressions that are not factual. The Center for Oral and Public History encourages all researchers to listen to the recording while reading the oral history transcription, as some expressions, verbiage, and intent may be lost in the interpretation from audio to written source. Researchers are welcome to utilize short excerpts from this transcription without obtaining permission as long as proper credit is given to the interviewee, the interviewer, and the Center for Oral and Public History. Permission for extensive use of the transcription and related materials, duplication, and/or reproduction can be obtained by contacting the Center for Oral and Public History, California State University, PO Box 6846, Fullerton CA 92834- 6846. Email: [email protected] Copyright © 2013 Center for Oral and Public History California State University, Fullerton Marian Bergeson at her home in Newport Beach, California, 2013. O.H. 5370.1 CENTER FOR ORAL AND PUBLIC HISTORY CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, FULLERTON NARRATOR: MARIAN BERGESON INTERVIEWER: Kira A. Gentry DATE: October 29, 2013 LOCATION: Newport Beach, California PROJECT: Orange County Politics KG: This is an interview with Marian Bergeson for the Orange County Politics Oral History Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Warriors & Wildcats Report
    Warriors & Wildcats Report No. 45 C August 1, 2016 Happy summer from the Uni Hi Education Foundation, the official alumni support organization for University High School. Your comments and contributions make this report better, so send us a note at [email protected]. The Warriors & Wildcats Report is free for anyone who signs up: click here to go to the subscription page, fill in your name and e-mail address and you’ll receive the WWR in your e-mail inbox! T-E-L-L your friends! UHEF 2016 CALENDAR OF EVENTS Aug. 16 First day of 2016-17 term Campus Nov. 04 Homecoming: Football vs. Hamilton Kampmann Stadium Nov. 30-Dec. 03 “The Fantasticks” Stivelman Theater Dec. 05-09 7th Jim Nakabara Basketball Classic South Gymnasium Dec. 15 End of Fall semester Campus BARBARA NWABA ‘07 ON HER WAY TO THE OLYMPIC GAMES! After a drought of 68 years, Uni will again be represented in the Olympic Games by 2007 graduate Barbara Nwaba, competing in the two-day, seven-event heptathlon in track & field. Uni alum Jeff Slade ‘63 caught up with Nwaba by telephone after she won the U.S. Olympic Track & Field Trials heptathlon in July and provides this interview with the 2015 and 2016 U.S. Heptathlon champion: Slade: So, you're going to Rio! Tell me about that. UHEF Warriors & Wildcats Report Page 2 August 1, 2016 Nwaba: Yes, going to Rio. I'll be competing August 12 and 13, so it's a few weeks away, but I'm super excited and looking forward to what I've been fighting for over the last several years now, and I'm really looking forward to it.
    [Show full text]