DOCSLIB.ORG

418392 1 En Bookbackmatter 203..203 ++

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
418392 1 En Bookbackmatter 203..203 ++ Appendices Appendix 1 ACPO London Region City of London Police Metropolitan Police Service ACPO Eastern Region Bedfordshire Police Cambridgeshire Constabulary Essex Police Hertfordshire Constabulary Norfolk Constabulary Suffolk Constabulary © The Author(s) 2016 203 M. Roycroft, Police Chiefs in the UK, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-44105-4 204 Appendices ACPO South East Region Hampshire Constabulary Kent Police Surrey Police Sussex Police Thames Valley Police ACPO South West Region Avon & Somerset Constabulary Devon & Cornwall Constabulary Dorset Police Gloucestershire Constabulary Wiltshire Constabulary ACPO East Midlands Region Derbyshire Constabulary Leicestershire Constabulary Lincolnshire Police Northamptonshire Police Nottinghamshire Police ACPO West Midlands Region Staffordshire Police Warwickshire Police West Mercia Constabulary West Midlands Police ACPO North East Region Cleveland Police Durham Constabulary Appendices 205 Humberside Police North Yorkshire Police Northumbria Police South Yorkshire Police West Yorkshire Police ACPO North West Region Cheshire Constabulary Cumbria Constabulary Greater Manchester Police Merseyside Police Lancashire Constabulary Police Service of Northern Ireland ACPO Wales Region Dyfed Powys Police Gwent North Wales South Wales ACPO(S) Scotland Region Police Scotland Appendix 2: Peelian Principles 1829 The nine principles were as follows: 1. To prevent crime and disorder, as an alternative to their repression by military force and severity of legal punishment. 206 Appendices 2. To recognise always that the power of the police to fulfil their functions and duties is dependent on public approval of their exis- tence, actions and behaviour, and on their ability to secure and maintain public respect. 3. To recognise always that to secure and maintain the respect and approval of the public means also the securing of the willing co- operation of the public in the task of securing observance of laws. 4. To recognise always that the extent to which the co-operation of the public can be secured diminishes proportionately the necessity of the use of physical force and compulsion for achieving police objectives. 5. To seek and preserve public favour, not by pandering to public opinion, but by constantly demonstrating absolutely impartial service to law, in complete independence of policy, and without regard to the justice or injustice of the substance of individual laws, by ready offering of individual service and friendship to all members of the public without regard to their wealth or social standing, by ready exercise of courtesy and friendly good humour, and by ready offering of individual sacrifice in protecting and preserving life. 6. To use physical force only when the exercise of persuasion, advice and warning is found to be insufficient to obtain public co-operation to an extent necessary to secure observance of law or to restore order, and to use only the minimum degree of physical force which is necessary on any particular occasion for achieving a police objective. 7. To maintain at all times a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and that the public are the police, the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full-time attention to duties which are incum- bent on every citizen in the interests of community welfare and existence. 8. To recognise always the need for strict adherence to police-executive functions, and to refrain from even seeming to usurp the powers of the judiciary of avenging individuals or the State, and of authorita- tively judging guilt and punishing the guilty. 9. To recognise always that the test of police efficiency is the absence of crime and disorder, and not the visible evidence of police action in dealing with them. Appendices 207 Appendix 3: College of Policing Code of Ethics 1. Honesty and integrity: I will be honest and act with integrity at all times, and will not compromise or abuse my position. 2. Authority, respect and courtesy: I will act with self-control and tolerance, treating members of the public and colleagues with respect and courtesy. I will use my powers and authority lawfully and proportionately, and will respect the rights of all individuals. 3. Equality and diversity: I will act with fairness and impartiality. I will not discriminate unlawfully or unfairly. 3.1 Introduction 3.1.1 These standards reflect the expectations that the profes- sional body and the public have of the behaviour of those working in policing. They originate from the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012 (for police officers) and the Police Staff Council Joint Circular 54 (for police staff). 4. Use of force: I will only use force as part of my role and responsi- bilities, and only to the extent that it is necessary, proportionate and reasonable in all the circumstances. 5. Orders and instructions: I will, as a police officer, give and carry out lawful orders only, and will abide by Police Regulations. I will give reasonable instructions only, and will follow all reasonable instructions. 6. Duties and responsibilities: I will be diligent in the exercise of my duties and responsibilities. 7. Confidentiality: I will treat information with respect, and access or disclose it only in the proper course of my duties. 8. Fitness for work: I will ensure, when on duty or at work, that I am fit to carry out my responsibilities. 9. Conduct: I will behave in a manner, whether on or off duty, which does not bring discredit on the police service or undermine public confidence in policing. 10. Challenging and reporting improper behaviour: I will report, chal- lenge or take action against the conduct of colleagues which has fallen below the standards of professional behaviour. 208 Appendices Appendix 4: Powers of the Police and Crime Panel (PCP) The Panel does not scrutinise the Chief Constable – it scrutinises the PCC’s exercise of their statutory functions. While the Panel is there to challenge the PCC, it must also exercise its functions with a view to supporting the effective exercise of the PCC’s functions. This includes – (1) the power of veto (outside the Metropolitan Police District), by a two-thirds majority of the total Panel membership, over the level of the PCC’s proposed precept; (2) the power of veto (outside the Metropolitan Police District), by a two-thirds majority of the total Panel membership, over the PCC‘s proposed candidate for Chief Constable; (3) the power to ask Her Majesty’s Inspectors of Constabulary (HMIC) for a professional view when the PCC intends to dismiss a Chief Constable; (4) the power to review the draft Plan and make recommendations to the PCC who must have regard to them; (5) the power to review the PCC’s Annual Report and make reports and recommendations at a public meeting, which the PCC must attend; (6) the power to require relevant reports and information in the PCC‘s possession (except those which are oper- ationally sensitive) to enable them to fulfil their statutory obligations; (7) the power to require the PCC to attend the Panel to answer questions; (8) the power (outside the Metropolitan Police District) to appoint an acting Police and Crime Commissioner where the incumbent PCC is incapacitated, resigns or is disqualified; and (9) responsibility for com- plaints about a PCC, although serious complaints and conduct matters must be passed to the IPCC in line with legislation. Appendix 5: The National Police Coordination Centre (NPoCC) NPoCC is responsible for co-ordinating the deployment of police offi- cers and staff from across UK policing to support forces during large scale events, operations and in times of national crisis for example large scale flooding and civil emergencies. Appendices 209 The NPoCC team comprises of highly skilled officers and staff, from across UK policing, with a wealth of experience in event planning and police operations. It has a remit to: • Co-ordinate and broker mutual aid in both steady state and a crisis; • Co-ordinate a continuous testing and exercising regime to ensure effective mobilisation of national assets in a crisis; • Co-ordinate, collate and act as a national repository for capacity and capability in relation to the Strategic and National Policing Requirements on specialist UK policing assets; Appendix 6: 13 ROCU Capabilities ROCU capabilities: Phase one (2012–2013) 1. Regional intelligence units to gather, analyse and disseminate intelli- gence relating to organised criminal activity which affects several forces across a region. 2. Confidential intelligence units which perform a similar function for sensitive and covertly obtained intelligence. 3. Prison intelligence units to manage organised criminals serving prison sentences, and have direct relationships with the National Offender Management Service (NOMS). 4. Regional asset recovery teams to conduct financial investigations and recover assets obtained through criminal means. 5. Regional fraud teams to investigate organised criminals 6. Cybercrime teams specialising in tackling more serious types of cybercrime such as distributed denial of service attacks. 7. Undercover policing encompassing both foundation and advanced levels of support. 8. Specialist surveillance which is the covert installation of audio or video recording equipment in order to gather evidence of criminal activity. 210 Appendices 9. The Protected Persons Service (formerly Witness Protection). 10. Government Agency Intelligence Network (GAIN) co-ordinators in each ROCU to provide forces and ROCU investigators with access to intelligence held by partner agencies. 11. Operational security advisers to offer expertise to ROCUs and forces relating to covert law enforcement activities. 12. E-forensics services to analyse computers, mobile phones and other digital devices in order support investigations. 13. Asset Confiscation and Enforcement. Appendix 7: National intelligence model http://www.intelligenceanalysis.net/NationalIntelligenceModel.pdf Level 1 – Local issues – usually the crimes, criminals and other problems affecting a basic command unit or small force area. Level 2 – Cross-Border issues – usually the actions of a criminal or other specific problems affecting more than one basic command unit.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download the May 2016 Magazine
    May 2016 | Issue 86 NARPO THE MAGAZINE OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONnews OF RETIRED POLICE OFFICERS NARPO - the voice of retired police officers ‘To safeguard the rights of members and to promote measures for their welfare, with particular regards to pensions’ 2 NARPOnews Independent Financial Advice Exclusive offer for NARPO members Are you thinking about releasing funds from the equity in your home? Raising funds from your home using Equity Release could be one of the most important decisions you make in your life. Our advisors have been advising NARPO members for many years and in recent years have arranged a substantial number of Equity Release plans. We only recommend plans covered by the Equity Release Council (ERC) and we never use pressurised selling techniques. We can help you decide if equity release is right for you For something as important as Equity Release we will always fully review your financial circumstances to make sure we fully understand your objectives and the options available to you before making a recommendation to proceed. We only make a charge if you go ahead with the plan. Our fee is £675 upon completion of the plan. We will also be paid a commission from the provider in addition to the fee we have charged you and this will always be disclosed on the keyfacts illustration. This is a Lifetime Mortgage or a Home Reversion plan. In order that you understand the features and risks, we will always provide a personalised illustration following consultation. The Financial Conduct Authority does not regulate tax advice. CHECK THAT THIS MORTGAGE WILL MEET YOUR NEEDS IF YOU WANT TO MOVE OR SELL YOUR HOME OR YOU WANT YOUR FAMILY TO INHERIT IT.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Winter Edition
    Grapevine Winter cover section 4/9/07 08:31 Page 1 Grapevine Winter 2006 4/9/07 08:30 Page 1 From the Editor his issue is dominated by the launch of Gender Agenda 2- the Tevent held in London which was a real success. I know the launch has given many of you the motivation to get the momentum going again following all the excellent achievements NEWS since the Gender Agenda was launched in 2001. BAWP defends female officers after newspaper criticism 3 Please take the time to fill in the questionnaire on Page 4 giving Reader survey 4 us your views about what you would like to see in Grapevine and A study into networking – can you help? 5 don't forget to get your nominations in for the BAWP awards by December 31, 2006 so that we can formally recognise some of the Cleveland Police host women’s development day 6 great work going on across the country. Are you prepared for the Gender Equality Duty? 7 We have had so much to include in this issue that we have run out of space for the specialist network series- but I can assure you it will be back in the next edition. As always if you have any FEATURES stories that you would like to see featured in Grapevine please Cover story: get in touch. Gender Agenda 2 is launched 8-9 More than 300 people turn up to the London launch Dates for your diary Meet the BAWP committee members 10-11 2006 Put faces to names in our photo gallery Deadline for BAWP Award nominations – December 31.
    [Show full text]
  • Op Talla Positive Impact Briefing
    OFFICIAL Lincolnshire Police Response to COVID-19 Pandemic Positive Impact Briefing June 2020 Author: Kelly Rodgers Sponsor: ACC Kerrin Wilson Page 1 of 9 OFFICIAL Introduction Lincolnshire is a large and rural geographical area with a relatively poor infrastructure in terms of road network, in fact Lincolnshire has one of the worst Road Traffic Collision (RTC) rates in the Country, therefore travelling between locations can take much longer than anticipated. Over the last couple of years, police demand in Lincolnshire, in terms of the number of calls to the police and the number and complexity of recorded crimes has increased. However the number of police officers to deal with this increased demand has fallen, largely due to the reductions in funding and the requirement to maintain a balanced budget. This briefing demonstrates some of the positive impacts of policing the COVID-19 pandemic, when calls for service and crime demand reduced to become more equitable with the supply of police officers and staff. It demonstrates the level of service which can be achieved if sustainable increases in funding for resources were realised. Op Talla Response On 17th March, Lincolnshire Police reacted to Government advice and pulled together an Op Talla Major Incident Room (MIR) to help manage and steer the force response to the COVID-19 crisis. Under the Gold Command of ACC Wilson (with support from Supt Timmins), the MIR was made up of the following thematic cells: o Information and Intelligence cell o Resourcing and Welfare cell o Powers and Policies cell o Logistics cell o Comms cell We were able to formulate and deliver a coordinated, informed response ensuring our communities continued to receive a quality service and our staff understood what was expected of them in a very fast-moving environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on an Unannounced Inspection Visit to Police Custody Suites in Cleveland
    Report on an unannounced inspection visit to police custody suites in Cleveland 9 – 11 May 2011 by HM Inspectorate of Prisons and HM Inspectorate of Constabulary Report on an unannounced inspection visit to police custody suites in Cleveland 9–11 May 2011 by HM Inspectorate of Prisons and HM Inspectorate of Constabulary Crown copyright 2011 Printed and published by: Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary Ashley House Monck Street London SW1P 2BQ England Cleveland police custody suites 2 Contents 1. Introduction 5 2. Background and key findings 7 3. Strategy 11 4. Treatment and conditions 13 5. Individual rights 19 6. Health care 23 7. Summary of recommendations 27 Appendices I Inspection team 30 II Summary of detainee questionnaires and interviews 31 Cleveland police custody suites 3 Cleveland police custody suites 4 1. Introduction This report is one of a series on police custody carried out jointly by our two inspectorates. These inspections form an important part of the joint work programme of the criminal justice inspectorates. They also make a key contribution to the United Kingdom’s response to its international obligation to ensure regular and independent inspection of all places of detention1. The inspections look at strategy, treatment and conditions, individual rights and health care. The unannounced inspection looked at the custody suites run by Cleveland police. The force operates three suites designated under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE). Each operates 24 hours a day and together they provide a total cell capacity of 71. There was good strategic management of custody, assisted by a positive relationship with the Police Authority and an active independent custody visitors scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • Article the Surveillance Dimensions of the Use of Social Media by UK Police Forces
    The Surveillance Dimensions of the Use of Article Social Media by UK Police Forces Elena M. Egawhary Columbia University, USA [email protected] Abstract This paper explores the various surveillance practices involved in the use of social media for communication and investigation purposes by UK police forces. In doing so, it analyses internal policy documents and official guidance obtained through freedom of information (FOI) requests sent to 46 police forces in the United Kingdom. This analysis finds that UK police forces advise their staff to simultaneously engage in both surveillance and counter-surveillance strategies in their use of social media as a policing tool. Introduction The use of social media by UK police forces falls into two broad categories: communication (or engagement) and investigation (or operational use). UK police forces began registering corporate accounts on Twitter and Facebook for communication purposes for the first time in 2008. However, UK police forces’ use of the internet for investigative purposes dates back to April 2001 with the creation of the National Hi-Tech Crime Unit (NHTCU) to “investigate attacks on the Critical National Infrastructure; major internet based offences of paedophilia, fraud or extortion; information from seized electronic media and gather intelligence on cybercrime and cybercriminals” (Corbitt 2001: 29). Prior to 2001, most of the responsibility for using social networking sites to investigate crime fell to a small number of digital evidence recovery officers who were “swamped and learning on the job” (Thomas 2005) resulting in a reportedly “huge workload” (Goodwin 2005). This suggests that the use of social media in UK policing began in an unstructured way and “on the basis of initiatives by individual officers and subsequently with varying degrees of official support” (Crump 2011: 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Warwickshire Police Property Schedule - Entire Estate (Includes Leases, Licences & Tenancies at Will)
    Warwickshire Police Property Schedule - Entire Estate (Includes Leases, Licences & Tenancies at Will) Property Name Address Postcode Unit Name Use Tenure - occupational Comment re disposal Police: Safer Alcester Police SNO Birmingham Road, ALCESTER B49 5DZ Alcester Police SNO Neighbourhood Freehold - occupied by the authority Office Police: Safer Leasehold - occupied by the Atherstone Police SNO Long Street, ATHERSTONE CV9 1AB Atherstone Police SNO Neighbourhood authority Office Barford Exchange Wellesbourne Road, Barford CV35 8AQ Barford Exchange Office Agreement Police: Safer Bedworth Police SNO High Street, BEDWORTH CV12 8NH Bedworth Police SNO Neighbourhood Freehold - occupied by the authority Office Police: Safer Leasehold - occupied by the Coleshill Police SNO 19 Parkfield Road, COLESHILL B46 3LD Coleshill Police SNO Neighbourhood authority Office M6 Southbound, Bennetts Road North, Corley, M6 Services Police Leasehold - occupied by the Corley, M6 Services Police Post CV7 8BG Police post Corley, COVENTRY Post authority Hatton Police Post 12 Crimscote Square, HATTON CV35 7TS Hatton Police Post Police post Other - licence Police: Safer Leasehold - occupied by the Kenilworth Police SNO Smalley Place, KENILWORTH CV8 1QG Kenilworth Police SNO Neighbourhood authority Office Keresley Community Centre Leasehold - occupied by the Keys handed back - not Keresley Community Centre Police Post Howat Road, Keresley End, COVENTRY CV7 8JP Police post Police Post authority in use Leamington Spa, M40 Barnhill Services Police Leamington Spa, M40 Leasehold
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Policing 97
    THE HISTORY 4 OF POLICING distribute or post, copy, not Do Copyright ©2015 by SAGE Publications, Inc. This work may not be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means without express written permission of the publisher. “The myth of the unchanging police “You never can tell what a man is able dominates much of our thinking about to do, but even though I recommend the American police. In both popular ten, and nine of them may disappoint discourse and academic scholarship one me and fail, the tenth one may surprise continually encounters references to the me. That percentage is good enough for ‘tradition-bound’ police who are resistant me, because it is in developing people to change. Nothing could be further from that we make real progress in our own the truth. The history of the American society.” police over the past one hundred years is —August Vollmer (n.d.) a story of drastic, if not radical change.” —Samuel Walker (1977) distribute INTRODUCTION: POLICING LEARNING OBJECTIVES or After finishing this chapter, you should be able to: AS A DYNAMIC ENTITY Policing as we know it today is relatively new. 4.1 Summarize the influence of early The notion of a professional uniformed police officer English policing on policing and the receiving specialized training on the law, weapon use, increasing professionalization of policing and self-defense is taken for granted. In fact, polic- in the United States over time. post,ing has evolved from a system in which officers ini- tially were appointed by friends, given no training, 4.2 Identify how the nature of policing in the provided power to arrest without warrants, engaged United States has changed over time.
    [Show full text]
  • BRADWELL PARISH COUNCIL Minutes of the Meeting of the Parish Council Held at 7:30 P.M
    BRADWELL PARISH COUNCIL Minutes of the Meeting of the Parish Council held at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday 1st July 2008 Present: Cllr J Byrne, Cllr R Davies, Cllr S Eyre (Chair), Cllr C Furness, Cllr B Hardy, Cllr A Nash, Cllr A Slater Mr S Lawless (Clerk), Mr B Nicols (from 21:00) Members of the public DDDC Cllr J Goodison, Mrs J Jewel, Mr & Mrs Morgan, Mr Senior, Mr J Walker PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Mr & Mrs Morgan, together with Mrs J Jewel, raised a concern about the events following the damage inflicted to the fencing at Town Bottom Playing Field, particularly to what they described as the disproportionate reaction of the Derbyshire Constabulary to the perpetrator. 089/2008 Apologies for Absence Apologies were received from Cllr P Downing, Cllr J Lawson, Mr R Jarman (RFO) & PC D Eyre. 090/2008 Declaration of Members’ Interests Cllrs Byrne and Eyre (& later Cllr Walker) declared an interest in the letter from Netherwater Environmental Ltd (Item 10 part 2). 091/2008 Acceptance & Signing of Previous Minutes and Matters Arising It was resolved to accept the minutes of the Parish Council meeting of 3rd June 2008 subject to a clerical change. It was resolved to accept the minutes of the Finance committee of 9 th June 2008 subject to a clerical change. There were no matters arising. 092/2008 Clerk’s Report & Matters Arising Item Description 1 Co-option of a new member to the council Mr J Walker made the only application for the vacancy on the council. Mr Walker left the room while his application was discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Successful Bids to the Police Innovation Fund 2016 to 2017
    SUCCESSFUL BIDS TO THE POLICE INNOVATION FUND 2016/17 Bid 2016/17 Lead Force Other partners Bid Name / Details No. Award National Centre for Cyberstalking Research (NCCR) – University of Bedfordshire Cyberharassment: University of Liverpool Bedfordshire Platform for Evidence Nottingham Trent University £461,684.00 47 Gathering, Assessing Police Victim Support Risk & Managing Hampshire Stalking Policing Consultancy Clinic Paladin Greater Manchester Police Dyfed-Powys PCC Cambridgeshire Constabulary University of Cambridge BeNCH Community Rehabilitation Company Crown Prosecution Service Evidence-based Local authorities Cambridgeshire approach to deferred Health system £250,000.00 36 prosecution linked to Constabulary Criminal Justice Board devolution in West Midlands Police Cambridgeshire. Hampshire Constabulary Hertfordshire Constabulary Leicestershire Police Staffordshire Police West Yorkshire Police Ministry of Justice/NOMS Warwickshire Police Cheshire Integrated Force West Mercia Police £303,000.00 122 Communications Constabulary West Mercia Fire and Rescue Solution Cheshire Fire and Rescue Fire and Rescue Services Cheshire (FRS) through the Chief Fire National Air Service for 140 £120,100.00 Constabulary Officers’ Association (CFOA) emergency services Association of Ambulance (Category 1 and 2) Chief Executives (AACE) City of London Metropolitan Police Service False identity data £525,000.00 62 Warwickshire Police Police capture and sharing Barclays Bank Metropolitan Police Service Serious Fraud Office Public/private Crown Prosecution
    [Show full text]
  • Candidates for the Lincolnshire Police Force Area
    Candidates for the Lincolnshire Police Force Area On 6th May, you will be able to vote for your police and crime commissioner. Find out who your local candidates are and how to vote Contents About Police and Crime Commissioners 02 Peter Anthony Escreet Reform UK 04 Marc Stuart Jones Conservative Candidate – More Police, Safer Streets 06 Rosanne Christina Kirk Labour and Co-operative Party 08 Ross David Pepper Liberal Democrat 10 David Vaughan Williams Lincolnshire Independents 12 Statement by the Police Area Returning Officer for Lincolnshire 14 About Police and Crime Commissioners On 6th May, you will be able to vote for your Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC). The role of the PCC is to be the voice of the people and hold the police to account. Elections will be taking place in England and Wales. In London, Greater Manchester and West Yorkshire, there will be elections at the same time for Mayors who exercise PCC functions. PCCs are responsible for the totality of policing in their force area and aim to cut crime and deliver an effective and efficient police service. 39 PCCs will be elected across England and Wales, of which 4 are also responsible for overseeing the fire and rescue authority for their area and are called Police, Fire and Crime Commissioners (PFCC) – these PFCCs are found in Essex, Staffordshire, North Yorkshire and Northamptonshire). There will also be 3 Mayors with PCC functions elected in London, Greater Manchester and West Yorkshire. PCCs are elected by you and aim to cut crime and hold the force to account on behalf of the public.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Police, Prison & Court Personnel Charged Or Convicted Of
    List of Police, Prison & Court Personnel charged or convicted of an offence 2009 to 2021 – V40 16/03/2021 - (Discard all previous versions) Please only share this original version. Consent is not given to edit or change this document in any way. - [email protected] © Date Name Police Force Offence Result Source 16th March 2021 PC Wayne Couzens Metropolitan Police Charged with murder Proceeding Source: 15th March 2021 Sgt Ben Lister West Yorkshire Police Charged with rape Proceeding Source: 9th March 2021 PC Jonathan Finch Hampshire Police Gross Misconduct (sexual exposure) Sacked Source: 2nd March 2021 PC Olivia Lucas Hampshire Police Gross Misconduct (Lying) Resigned Source: 22nd Feb 2021 PC Tasia Stephens South Wales Police Drink Driving Banned for 15 months Source: 17th Feb 2021 Ursula Collins Metropolitan Police Charged - 8 counts of misconduct Proceeding Source: 15th Feb 2021 PO Paul Albertsen HMP Salford Theft from prisons Jailedfor 15 months Source: 15th Feb 2021 PO Paul Hewitt HMP Salford Theft from prisons Jailed for 15 months Source: 10th Feb 2021 PC Andrew Sollars Hampshire Police Sexual assault Three months suspended Source: 2nd Feb 2021 PC Alan Friday Cheshire Police Harassment Two year community order Source: 5th Jan 2021 PC Stuart Clarke Nottinghamshire Police Gross Misconduct Resigned Source: 17th Dec 2020 DC Darryl Hart Leicestershire Police Gross Misconduct Final Written Warning Source: 7th Dec 2020 Sgt Rob Adams Sussex Police Gross Misconduct Final Written Warning Source: 2nd Dec 2020 PC William Sampson South
    [Show full text]
  • 078 15 FOI Advice on Sex Offenders
    PROTECT – PRIVATE POLICE EYES ONLY. Not to be distributed outside of the Police network or other agencies without prior authorisation from the CRU. From: POLICE FOI REFERRAL Mailbox Sent: 23 October 2014 11:31 Subject: *** ALL TO READ *** RIPA REQUESTS Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Dear All Case Nos 1578/14; 1606/14; 1613/14/ 1629/14; 1631/14; 1636/14; 1638/14; 1672/14; 1690/14 By way of update I am currently compiling the result advice for the RIPA requests which should be circulated tomorrow morning, after the National Policing Lead has confirmed they are content with the advice. For requests submitted by the same applicant these can be aggregated together for cost purposes. For any force where Section 12 is relevant we are happy for you to issue a refusal notice and provide an explanation as to why cost is relevant. However, if a request just relates to comms data (e.g. case no 1440/14) there is no harm in including the number of RIPA applications that would require a manual search as the total number of comms data only by force has been disclosed previously and is published. With regard to requests asking for ALL RIPA APPLICATIONS, if it relates to several years of information, we can see no harm in stating how many RIPA applications you would have to search through in that time period for excess costs to apply. However, care should be taken for any requests which are asking for annualised financial year information for ALL RIPA requests which includes, comms data; directed surveillance and intrusive surveillance *************************************************************************** **************S31(1)(a)(b) within your explanation as to why cost is a factor.
    [Show full text]