DOCSLIB.ORG

A Fuel Cell System for Railbus Application

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

HydRail Conference Birmingham, 3 & 4 July 2012 A Fuel Cell System for Railbus Application Robert Steinberger-Wilckens, Arvin Mossadegh Pour Hydrogen & Fuel Cells The Hydrogen & Doctoral Training Centre & Fuel Cell Research Centre Hydrogen production, PEFC & HT-PEFC storage & handling SOFC Systems & Modelling Slide 2 RSt, July 2012 Introduction • hydrogen storage on board vehicles remains sub-optimal • increase of storage pressure to 70 MPa to reduce size and/or extend range • metal hydrides can offer an alternative – the tank is practically pressure-less, H2 losses are low and handling simple • high weight of metal hydride tank itself and low adsorption figures (~5% hydrogen) are a problem for mobile applications • new materials allow loading up to 14% but require high temperatures in desorption process Slide 3 RSt, July 2012 The Project Idea • combine high-performance metal hydride tank with SOFC system and use the exhaust heat for discharging the tank • possible applications: - rail transport - marine vessels • in both applications weight is of minor importance or even welcomed • preferably (in first instance) aplication to Auxiliary Power Units for on-board electricity production • test objects: - APU for diesel rail buses - APU for harbour vessels, service vessels, marine research vessels Slide 4 RSt, July 2012 Application Rail Bus • diesel-driven vehicles • travel medium distances in shuttle service • i.e. hydrogen supply easily accomplished • energy demand suitable for metal hydride tank • environmental benefit through reduction of diesel exhaust gases in stations etc. • possibility to extend functions from APU to diesel-electric drive or hybrid drive train Slide 5 RSt, July 2012 Mid-Range Rail Transport • Wilhelmshaven – Osnabrueck approx. 200 km single distance • sufficient time at terminals to refill • replacement of on-board electricity generation by APU • optional combination with diesel-electric drive to avoid fumes when accelerating Slide 6 RSt, July 2012 Travel Requirements • re: Siemens Desiro • total electric power on- baord: 15 kW • SOFC system net efficiency 50% • 75 kWh of hydrogen for 2 hours travel + ½ hour of stops • 2,5 kg of H2 Slide 7 RSt, July 2012 Solid Oxide Fuel Cell - Principle characteristics: - 700 deg.C operating temperature advantages: - high electrical efficiency - high value heat - relatively insensitive to fuel impurities Slide 8 RSt, July 2012 Metal Hydride Concepts Sodium Alanate: T ~ 125 °C 6 NaH + 6 Al + 9 H 2 Na AlH + 4 Al + 6 H 6 NaAlH 2 3 6 2 4 5.6 wt% Reactive Hydride Composite: T ~ 350 °C – 400 °C MgH2 + 2 LiBH4 MgB2 + 2 LiH + 4H2 7.8 – 11.4 wt% MgH2 + 2 NaBH4 MgB2 + 2 NaH + 4H2 MgH2 + Ca(BH4)2 MgB2 + CaH2 + 4H2 G. Barkhordarian et al. (GKSS, EP1824780, Dec.2004, Deutschland 10 2004 061286.9) Slide 9 RSt, July 2012 Storage Alternatives Tank weight and volume for 500 km range (6 kg H2 = 200 kWh) H2-gas 700 bar Weight 133 kg Composite shell Volume 260 litre 92 kg liquid H 2 167 l 130 kg LiBH / MgH metal hydrides 4 2 92,9 l 285 kg NaAlH 4 167 l 175 kg MgH 2 73 l Hydralloy C® 462 kg (GKSS Tank f. SAX3) 200 l (compact vehicle: 9 l petrol or 1.2 kg H2 for 100 km) Status: 22.1.2009 Slide 10 RSt, July 2012 Hydrogen Sorption of a Reactive Hydride Composite 2LiBH4+MgH2 2LiH+MgB2 loading, 350°C, 50 bar H2 unloading, 400°C, 5 bar H2 Slide 11 RSt, July 2012 Metal Hydride Tanks (Sodium Alanate) Absorption Desorption Slide 12 RSt, July 2012 Metal Hydride Tanks (Sodium Alanate) (2) Internal Hull External Hull Improvements with respect to the previous model: . Weight: 1,58 (up to 2.4 possible) instead of 0,865 wt. %; + 83 % ( up to +178 %) by light weight hull materials 3 . Volumen: 31,2 instead of 21 kgH2/m ; + 49 % by compaction of the storage material Slide 13 RSt, July 2012 System Concept start up Aux. Hydrogen Tank heat via burner H2 Anode MH Tank heat Cathode 400°C questions: - balance700°C of heat flow - balance of gas flows SOFC - sizing of tank for application during start up phase Slide 14 RSt, July 2012 Start Up Phase Aux. Hydrogen Tank Air 800°C 27 m^3/h Air 20ºC Anode λ=8 MH Tank Cathode 800ºC +50 mbar Slide 15 RSt, July 2012 Operational Phase Aux. Hydrogen Tank Air 20ºC Anode λ=8 MH Tank Cathode 400ºC, 5 bar 700ºC 600ºC +30 mbar +50 mbar Air Slide 16 RSt, July 2012 Stack and Tank Modelling stack considered as heat exchanger during start-up tank is heated by air in the outer hull and releases H2 when heated to core • zero-dimensional SOFC model during operation • no flow fields • no transient behaviour, apart from temperature dependance Slide 17 RSt, July 2012 Start-up of Metal Hydride Tank Slide 18 RSt, July 2012 Start-up of SOFC Stack Slide 19 RSt, July 2012 Conclusions and Outlook • system can be started within one hour • heat flux and gas flows can be balanced • hydrogen release rate is in balance with stack fuel requirements • design needs further refinement - reduction of start-up time - proper temperature control • further work to be done on - system transients - adaptatoin to application requirements Slide 20 RSt, July 2012 Acknowledgments go to: IEK-PBZ – Fuel Cell Project at Forschungszentrum Juelich Klaus Taube, Jose Bellosta von Colbe Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht Thank you for your attention! Slide 21 RSt, July 2012.
Recommended publications
  • TCRP Report 52: Joint Operation of Light Rail Transit Or Diesel Multiple

    TCRP Report 52: Joint Operation of Light Rail Transit Or Diesel Multiple

    APPENDIX A Key FRA Regulations (Affecting Joint Use) The following is a listing of key FRA specifications. This listing is intended as a regulations taken from the Code of Federal general identification of the operative code Regulations (49 CFR 200-299), Federal sections, along with a general description Railroad Administration, that may affect of the requirements. This identification joint operation of light rail transit or diesel code section should not imply or impute multiple unit vehicles with railroads. The that the code provision will need to be selected regulations concern operational modified to operate light rail transit or procedures, standards, and certain design DMU with railroads. Regulation Number and Section Comment §209: Railroad Safety Enforcement Policy procedures for assessing Procedures penalties and for appealing penalties. Also includes, fitness-for-duty and follow-up on FRA recommendations. §210: Railroad Noise Emission Covers total sound emitted by moving Compliance Regulations rail cars and locomotives. Does not apply to: • Steam engines; • Street, suburban, or interurban electric railways, unless operated as a part of the general railroad system of transportation; • Sound emitted by warning devices such as horns, whistles, or bells when operated for the purpose of safety; • Special-purpose equipment that may be located on or operated from rail cars. §211: Rules of Practice Subpart C - Rules of practice that apply to Waivers rulemaking and waiver proceedings, review of emergency orders issued §211.41: Processing of petitions for under 45 U.S.C. 432, and miscellaneous waiver of safety rules safety-related proceedings and informal safety inquiries. Page A-1 Regulation Number and Section Comment §212: State Safety Participation Establishes standards and procedures for Regulations State participation in investigative and surveillance activities under Federal railroad safety laws and regulations.
  • Circulator Bus Transit Cost

    Circulator Bus Transit Cost

    Transit CIRCULATOR BUS TRANSIT COST DowntownDC, www.downtowndc.org TI SORT STATE ON REGI AL IPACT LOCAL RID OR OR C SPOT WO URDLS CITPRIAT FUNDIN TRANSIT ANCY More Information: tti.tamu.edu/policy/how-to-fix-congestion SUCCESS STORIES Description How Will This Help? Washington, D.C. Circulator bus transit is a short-distance, • Improves mobility and The DC Circulator is a circular, fixed-route transit mode that circulation in target areas. cooperative effort of the District takes riders around a specific area with • Fosters the redevelopment of Columbia Department of major destinations. It may include street- of urban spaces into walk- Transportation, the Washington cars, rubber-tire trolleys, electric buses, able, mixed-use, high-density Metropolitan Area Transit or compressed natural gas buses. environments. Authority, DC Surface Transit, and First Transit. The DC Two common types of circulator bus • Improves parking availability in transit are downtown circulators and areas with shortages. Circulator began service in neighborhood circulators. A circulator • Reduces environmental 2005 and has bus system targeted at tourists/visitors impacts from private/individual experienced is more likely to use vehicle colors to be transportation. increasing clearly identifiable. ridership each Implementation Issues year. Target Market There are many barriers, constraints, and Most downtown circulators are orient- obstacles to successfully implement, ed toward employee and tourist/visi- Philadelphia, Pennsylvania operate, and maintain a circulator bus. tor markets. Neighborhood circulators The Independence Visitor However, funding is the major constraint meet the mobility needs of transit-reliant Center Corporation manages in most programs. Inadequate funding populations, such as low-income and the downtown circulator, and costs were the most common mobility-challenged people.
  • Bus Schedules and Routes

    Bus Schedules and Routes

    City of Simi Valley Transit City of Simi Valley Transit provides a convenient We’ve Got Connections! and inexpensive way to travel in and around City of Simi Valley Transit is pleased to provide the City. Modern air-conditioned buses transport connections with other major transit systems: you in comfort to most major points of interest: ADA/Dial-A-Ride. 805-583-6464 shopping, schools, parks, public buildings and more! Amtrak Info: . 800-872-7245 LA Metro Information: ......323-466-3876 To fully enjoy the benefits of using the Metrolink: . 800-371-5465 buses, please remember: Moorpark City Transit: . .805-517-6315 • Food an beverages are not allowed on the TDD Information ...........800-735-2929 buses. Thousand Oaks Transit ......805-375-5467 • Please extinguish all smoking materials before VCTC:. 800-438-1112 boarding a bus. Free transfers are available upon request to L A • Radios, tape recorders, and electronic devices Metro and VCTC. must be turned off when boarding a bus. Headphones are allowed. All buses are wheelchair accessible. It is recommended that passengers call prior to • Drivers cannot make change. Please be starting a trip to confirm the closest bus stop prepared to pay the EXACT FARE. location. All buses are equipped with bike racks. • For Lost & Found items, call City of Simi Valley Transit at (805) 583-6456. Items may Fares be retrieved from the Simi Valley Police Full Fare Department Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. Single Trip. $1.50 to 4:00 p.m. Unlimited Day Pass . $5.00 • Bus Stops are located approximately ¼ to ½ 21-Ride Pass .....................$25.00 mile apart along routes within Simi Valley.
  • The Influence of Passenger Load, Driving Cycle, Fuel Price and Different

    The Influence of Passenger Load, Driving Cycle, Fuel Price and Different

    Transportation https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9925-0 The infuence of passenger load, driving cycle, fuel price and diferent types of buses on the cost of transport service in the BRT system in Curitiba, Brazil Dennis Dreier1 · Semida Silveira1 · Dilip Khatiwada1 · Keiko V. O. Fonseca2 · Rafael Nieweglowski3 · Renan Schepanski3 © The Author(s) 2018 Abstract This study analyses the infuence of passenger load, driving cycle, fuel price and four diferent types of buses on the cost of transport service for one bus rapid transit (BRT) route in Curitiba, Brazil. First, the energy use is estimated for diferent passenger loads and driving cycles for a conventional bi-articulated bus (ConvBi), a hybrid-electric two- axle bus (HybTw), a hybrid-electric articulated bus (HybAr) and a plug-in hybrid-electric two-axle bus (PlugTw). Then, the fuel cost and uncertainty are estimated considering the fuel price trends in the past. Based on this and additional cost data, replacement scenarios for the currently operated ConvBi feet are determined using a techno-economic optimisa- tion model. The lowest fuel cost ranges for the passenger load are estimated for PlugTw amounting to (0.198–0.289) USD/km, followed by (0.255–0.315) USD/km for HybTw, (0.298–0.375) USD/km for HybAr and (0.552–0.809) USD/km for ConvBi. In contrast, C the coefcient of variation ( v ) of the combined standard uncertainty is the highest for C PlugTw ( v : 15–17%) due to stronger sensitivity to varying bus driver behaviour, whereas C it is the least for ConvBi ( v : 8%).
  • Skopje Tram-Bus Project

    Skopje Tram-Bus Project

    Skopje Tram-Bus Project Non-Technical Summary July 2020 1 Table of Contents 1. Background ................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 Overview of the Project ......................................................................................................... 1 Project Timeline and Stages ................................................................................................. 4 2. Key Environmental, Health & Safety and Social Findings ........................................ 4 Overview ............................................................................................................................... 4 Project Benefits and Impacts ................................................................................................. 5 Project Benefits ..................................................................................................................... 5 Project Impacts and Risks ..................................................................................................... 5 3. How will Stakeholders be Engaged in the Project? .................................................. 7 What is the Stakeholder Engagement Plan? ......................................................................... 7 Who are the Key Stakeholders? ...........................................................................................
  • Bi-Articulated Bi-Articulated

    Bi-Articulated Bi-Articulated

    Bi-articulated Bus AGG 300 Handbuch_121x175_Doppel-Gelenkbus_en.indd 1 22.11.16 12:14 OMSI 2 Bi-articulated bus AGG 300 Developed by: Darius Bode Manual: Darius Bode, Aerosoft OMSI 2 Bi-articulated bus AGG 300 Manual Copyright: © 2016 / Aerosoft GmbH Airport Paderborn/Lippstadt D-33142 Bueren, Germany Tel: +49 (0) 29 55 / 76 03-10 Fax: +49 (0) 29 55 / 76 03-33 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.aerosoft.de Add-on for www.aerosoft.com All trademarks and brand names are trademarks or registered of their respective owners. All rights reserved. OMSI 2 - The Omnibus simulator 2 3 Aerosoft GmbH 2016 OMSI 2 Bi-articulated bus AGG 300 Inhalt Introduction ...............................................................6 Bi-articulated AGG 300 and city bus A 330 ................. 6 Vehicle operation ......................................................8 Dashboard .................................................................. 8 Window console ....................................................... 10 Control lights ............................................................ 11 Main information display ........................................... 12 Ticket printer ............................................................. 13 Door controls ............................................................ 16 Stop display .............................................................. 16 Level control .............................................................. 16 Lights, energy-save and schoolbus function ............... 17 Air conditioning

  • Getting to Royal Papworth Hospital Information for Patients Welcome Royal Papworth Hospital – a Brand New Heart and Lung Hospital on the Cambridge Biomedical Campus

    Getting to Royal Papworth Hospital Information for patients Welcome Royal Papworth Hospital – a brand new heart and lung hospital on the Cambridge Biomedical Campus. This leafl et gives you some important information about how to get to the hospital and the location of key departments inside the new hospital building. If you have any questions about the new hospital, please don’t hesitate to contact our Patient Advice and Liaison Service on 01223 638896. We look forward to welcoming you to the hospital soon. About our new hospital Royal Papworth Hospital has been designed by our clinicians with patients in mind. It includes: • Five operating theatres, five catheter laboratories (for non-surgical procedures) and two hybrid theatres • Six inpatient wards • 310 beds, including a 46-bed critical care unit and 24 day beds • Mostly en-suite, individual rooms for inpatients • A centrally-located Outpatients unit offering a wide range of diagnostic and treatment facilities • An atrium on the ground floor with a restaurant, coffee shop and convenience store Getting to the new hospital The new hospital is located on the Cambridge Biomedical Campus, near to Addenbrooke’s Hospital, to the south of the city of Cambridge. Travelling by car If you are travelling to the new hospital by car, it may be quicker (and cheaper) to park at Trumpington Park & Ride (postcode CB2 9FT) and take the Guided Bus A directly to the new hospital (a 5-minute journey). Alternatively, you could park at the Babraham Park & Ride site (postcode CB22 3AB) and take the bus to the Addenbrooke’s Hospital bus stop.
  • SUBJECT: On-Time Performance Improvement Action Plan FROM

    SUBJECT: On-Time Performance Improvement Action Plan FROM

    SUBJECT: On-Time Performance Improvement Action Plan FROM: Christy Wegener, Director of Planning and Communications DATE: September 28, 2015 Action Requested None – Information only Background This staff report is an update of efforts to improve On-Time Performance (OTP) Discussion In April 2015, staff presented an OTP Action Plan to the Board (Attachment 1), which included an outline of actions to immediately improve OTP. Since that time, several adjustments have been made to route schedules and alignments, as well as improvements to the software that monitors OTP. 1) Fine tuning of software: Over the past five months, staff has worked to adjust the Transit Master software so that it more accurately records OTP. This has included adjusting the stop interval distances, re-geocoding stops, and adjusting the arrival and departure zones for each stop. This process typically takes several attempts in order to achieve the desired results. This involves inputting the data into the system, exporting it to the database, pushing it out to the buses, and finally analyzing the data over several days. 2) Improve the OTP of the Route 10 and the Rapid by 3%: Adjustments have been made to the Route 10 afternoon schedule to better time with the bell at Amador High School. Additional schedule adjustments were made to early morning trips as part of the February 2015 signup. However, achieving a 3% improvement in OTP has not been attained at this point. Improvement in OTP for these routes has been negligible. 3) Identify the top two worst performing routes (Route 3 and Route 54) and make adjustments to schedules to improve respective OTP by 10%.
  • Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual (Part B)

    Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual (Part B)

    7UDQVLW&DSDFLW\DQG4XDOLW\RI6HUYLFH0DQXDO PART 2 BUS TRANSIT CAPACITY CONTENTS 1. BUS CAPACITY BASICS ....................................................................................... 2-1 Overview..................................................................................................................... 2-1 Definitions............................................................................................................... 2-1 Types of Bus Facilities and Service ............................................................................ 2-3 Factors Influencing Bus Capacity ............................................................................... 2-5 Vehicle Capacity..................................................................................................... 2-5 Person Capacity..................................................................................................... 2-13 Fundamental Capacity Calculations .......................................................................... 2-15 Vehicle Capacity................................................................................................... 2-15 Person Capacity..................................................................................................... 2-22 Planning Applications ............................................................................................... 2-23 2. OPERATING ISSUES............................................................................................ 2-25 Introduction..............................................................................................................
  • School Bus Transportation

    School Bus Transportation

    INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 728 School Bus Transportation Information for parents, guardians & students General Information ISD 728 & Vision Transportation Mission Statement ISD 728 contracts with Vision Transportation to provide transportation to area students. The mission of ISD 728 and Vision of Elk River is to support the education process by transporting students safely, securely, reliably and in a timely manner to and from school and school events. Our goal is to operate safe, dependable and cost-effective transportation services for our students. We want the student’s ride to be part of a positive educational experience. In spite of our best efforts, occasionally buses will be late due to traffic, weather, vehicle breakdowns and student management issues. We are committed to making every effort to reduce these problems. Vision Transportation Contact Information Buses are on the road from 6 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. and 1:50 p.m. to 5 p.m. Late or missed buses, cancellations and special program busing are priority calls during these hours. If you have questions or comments that are not urgent, please call when the buses are not operating. Address Bus Route Questions & Student Conduct Concerns 12508 Elk Lake Road, Elk River, MN 55330 763-441-4420 [email protected] Website www.visionofelkriver.com Field Trips 763-230-6023 General Information 763-441-4420 Fax 763-241-0896 Special Education Bus Routes 763-230-6027 763-230-6022 Title IX Statement ISD 728 does not engage in unlawful discrimination on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, disability, status with regard to public assistance, sexual orientation, membership or activity in a human rights commission, or age.
  • Electric Trolleybuses for the Lacmta's Bus System

    Electric Trolleybuses for the Lacmta's Bus System

    ARIELI ASSOCIATES MANAGEMENT, OPERATIONS AND ENGINEERING CONSULTING Report No. 1302 ELECTRIC TROLLEYBUSES FOR THE LACMTA’S BUS SYSTEM PREPARED FOR THE ADVANCED TRANSIT VEHICLE CONSORTIUM UNDER CONTRACT NO. OP 3320661 - 2 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY California Air Resources Board (CARB) Adopted Urban Bus Transit Rule for 2010 Emission Standards requires that MTA, starting in 2010, set aside 15% of all bus purchases to acquire Zero Emission Vehicles (ZEVs). Currently, none of the buses in the MTA’s inventory can be classified as ZEV, nor there are any transit buses [defined as propelled by an internal combustion engine (ICE) powered by either diesel or alternate fuels] available on the market that can be classified as ZEV. The California emission standards are well ahead of those for the rest of the United States and the manufacturers will not develop suitable vehicles on their own unless incentivized by large customers such as LACMTA. Failure to meet the 2010 Emission Standards will result in regulatory punitive fines and potentially litigation. It is important to note here that this is not the first time that the subject of incorporating electric trolleybuses into the MTA’s bus system comes before the MTA Board of Directors. In the 1992 30-Year Integrated Transportation Plan, electric trolleybuses were the preferred solution to meet CARB air regulations. The Plan provided for 18 routes, 300 miles of overhead wires and 400 peak electric trolleybuses by 2004 to be increased to 1,100 peak electric trolleybuses by 2010. Eventually, the Board voted to terminate the project. After reviewing the various technologies that might qualify as zero emissions under CARB rule, the report focuses on electric trolleybuses as the technology of choice.
  • Public Transport Act

    Public Transport Act

    Issuer: Riigikogu Type: act In force from: 01.01.2021 In force until: 30.03.2021 Translation published: 14.12.2020 Public Transport Act Passed 18.02.2015 RT I, 23.03.2015, 2 Entry into force 01.10.2015 Amended by the following acts Passed Published Entry into force 11.11.2015 RT I, 25.11.2015, 1 01.01.2016 09.12.2015 RT I, 30.12.2015, 1 18.01.2016 09.12.2015 RT I, 31.12.2015, 1 01.03.2016 17.03.2016 RT I, 22.03.2016, 10 23.03.2016 09.03.2016 RT I, 24.03.2016, 1 01.04.2016 08.02.2017 RT I, 03.03.2017, 1 01.07.2017 03.05.2017 RT I, 16.05.2017, 1 19.05.2017 14.06.2017 RT I, 04.07.2017, 2 01.01.2018, partially 05.07.2017 14.06.2017 RT I, 04.07.2017, 8 01.11.2017 19.12.2017 RT I, 11.01.2018, 1 01.06.2018, partially 21.01.2018 10.01.2018 RT I, 22.01.2018, 1 01.02.2018 09.05.2018 RT I, 31.05.2018, 1 01.01.2019 21.11.2018 RT I, 12.12.2018, 3 01.01.2019 17.06.2020 RT I, 30.06.2020, 8 01.07.2020 25.11.2020 RT I, 10.12.2020, 1 01.01.2021, the name ‘Road Administration’ (Maanteeamet) has been replaced with the name ‘Transport Administration’ (Transpordiamet) throughout the Act. Chapter 1 General Provisions § 1.