DOCSLIB.ORG

Flood Control

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

o LC V).S. Oajtiil Cj5iiy>5L (tfiOAjrmAZ> ( b ) ^ Coe U jd ilA JUJbOUAjCO^ ‘VfXOuMUJ) lW h&MCLb aV§- \Ottbj. EU&Aj a ^ijilo WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT by the US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS in KANSAS US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION DALLAS, TEXAS JANUARY 1977 U S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS FOR YOUR INFORMATION This publication is a revised edition of a similar Several Division and District Engineers are pamphlet published in January 1975. responsible for the projects and activities of the Corps of Engineers as described in this pamphlet. Division It has been prepared to provide current information and District boundaries are shown on the fold-out map about the water resources development program of the at the end of the brochure and further information on US Army Corps of Engineers in Kanas. particular projects and activities may be obtained by addressing the appropriate office as follows: ADDRESS INQUIRIES TO Division Engineer Division Engineer US Army Engineer Division, Southwestern US Army Engineer Division, Missouri River Main Tower Bldg 1200, Main Street PO Box 103 Dallas, TX 75202 Omaha, NB 68101 District Engineer District Engineer US Army Engineer District, Tulsa US Army Engineer District, Kansas City PO B ox 61 700 Federal Building Tulsa, OK 74102 Kansas City, MO 64106 District Engineer US Army Engineer District, Albuquerque PO Box 1580 Albuquerque, NM 87103 (sorf 766-27#/ TO OUR READERS: Throughout history, water has played a dominant role in shaping the destinies of nations and entire civilizations. The early settlement and development of our country occurred along our coasts and watercourses. The management of our land and water resources was the catalyst which enabled us to progress from a basically rural and agrarian economy to the urban and industrialized nation we are today. Since the General Survey Act of 1824, the US Army Corps of Engineers has played a vital role in the development and management of our national water resources. At the direction of Presidentsand with Congressional authorization and funding, the Corps of Engineers has planned and executed major national programs for navigation, flood control, water supply, hydroelectric power, recreation, and water conservation which have been responsive to the changing needs and demands of the American people for 152 years. These programs have contributed significantly to the economic growth of our country and to the well-being of the American people. Today, the activities of the Corps of Engineers in water resources management, under the direction of the executive and legislative branches of the Federal Government, continue to support national goals and objectives. These include conservation of our water resources, protection of our wetlands, nonstructural solutions to flood-damage control problems, total water management in metropolitan areas, flood plain management, and the preservation and enhancement of the quality of our environment for future generations. This booklet describes the past, current, and proposed activities of the Corps of Engineers in your State. I trust that you will find it informative, interesting, and useful. Lieutenant General, USA Chief of Engineers t TOMORROW TODAY HOW CORPS OF ENGINEERS’ PROJECTS L0CA17URBAN/REGIONAL PROBLEMS I | M PEOPLE ASK SURFACE: CONGRESSIONAL REPRESENTATIVES TO AUTHORIZE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ASSISTANCE IN PROBLEM SOLVING t SECRETARY OF FOLLOWING APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS, DE CONDUCTS DE THE ARMY INITIAL PUBLIC MEETING: • INVESTIGATES ALL ALTERNATIVES • PERFORMS LIMITED DIRECTS -TECHNICAL FEASI­ BILITY STUDIES -ENVIRONMENTAL IDENTIFY AND DISCUSS ASSESSMENTS CONGRESS CHIEF OF ENGINEERS LOCAL PROBLEMS & A LT E R N ­ • PROPOSES MOST DIVISION ENGINEER ATIVES EMPHASIZING AUTHORIZES NATIONAL ECONOMIC FEASIBLE DISTRICT ENGINEER EFFICIENCY V ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS STUDY IDE) QUALITY 3 4 5 FORMULATION DE LATE STAGE DE STAGE PUBLIC • INVESTIGATES FORMULATION FORWARDS TO STATES/ STAGE ALTERNATIVES PUBLIC MEETING AGENCIES MEETING • PERFORMS OETAILEO - TECHNICAL FEASIBIUTY *3 STUDIES - ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS­ MENTS • SELECTS PLAN FOR PROPOSAL • DISTRIBUTES DRAFT ENVIRON­ MENTAL IMPACT STATE­ MENT (EIS) (15 DAYS PRIOR TO LATE STAGE PUBLIC DISCUSS MOST MEETING) TENTATIVE PLAN FEASIBLE • MAKES DRAFT FEASIBILITY PROPOSED AND REPORT AVAILABLE ALTERNATIVES DISCUSSED l^R) 9 DE PUBLIC: • REVIEWS COMMENTS TO DRAFT RESPONDS TO EIS ANDFR • PREPARES RECOMMENDED DRAFT EIS AND - REVISED DRAFT EIS DRAFT FR - f in a l f r - s t a t e m e n t OF FINDING (SOF) • REVIEWS REQUESTING PUBLIC FORWARDS TO • MODIFIES AS APPRO­ VIEWS BE SENT TO PRIATE BOARD OF ENGINEERS FOR RIVERS AND HARBORS - FINALFR (BERH) - REVISED DRAFT EIS • FORWARDS RECOMMENDA­ • INDORSES SOF TIONS TO BEPH • ISSUES PUBLIC NOTICE II FIGURE 1 ARE STARTED, AUTHORIZED AND BUILT BERH CONSIDERS VIEWS OP - PUBLIC AW) W m l^\ - STATES REVIEWS BOARD REPORT PREPARES HIS DRAFT RECOMMEN­ - AGENCIES DATIONS REVIEWS AND PROVIDES DISTRIBUTES FOR OUTSIDE RECOMMENDATIONS REVIEW - REVISED DRAFT EIS (PUBLIC, - REVISED DRAFT EIS STATES, FEDERAL DEPARTMENTS) - FINAL FR (4 5 -DAY REVIEW PERIOD) - FR (GOVERNORS, FEDERAL DEPARTMENTS) TRANSMITS TO CHIEF OF ENGINEERS 13 (90-DAY REVIEW PERIOD) |4 CHIEF CHIEF SECRETARY OF THE ARMY REVIEWS RECEIVED FORWARDS RECOMMEN­ COMMENTS DATIONS TO SECRETARY MODIFIES REPORT OF THE ARMY FOR CONSIDERATION AS APPROPRIATE REVIEW S PREPARES FINAL EIS COORDINATES WITH 0M8 - FINAL REPORT PREPARES HIS RECOMMENDATIONS - FINAL EIS FORWARDS -SOF -F IN A L EIS. SOF (CEQ, PUBLIC) - FINAL FR, FINAL EIS, SOF 15 16 (CONGRESS) 17 PROJECT OMB PROJECT FUNDING AUTHORIZATION REVIEWS CORPS BUDGET CONGRESS INCLUDES IN HOLDS SUBMITS TO CONGRESS APPROPRIATIONS BILL HEARINGS PRESIDENT SIGNS INCLUDES IN WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT BILL OR OTHER LEGISLATION PRESIDENT SIGNS 16 LOCAL INTERESTS DE GUARANTEE TO FULFILL FORMULATES PRE-CONSTRUCTION l ' / ' - / / OBLIGATIONS REQUIRED PLANNING GENERAL DESIGN BY LAW le.g., REAL ESTATE, MEMORANDA (GDM) 11.J i j l “ COST SHARING, MAINTENANCE, -UPDATES EIS AS REQUIRED OPERATION. FLOOD ZONING) - ISSUES PUBLIC NOTICE AND CONDUCTS AT LEAST ONE ‘ W n 'i PUBLIC MEETING OBTAINS ADDITIONAL CONGRESSIONAL AUTHORIZATION AS APPROPRIATE V INITIATES AND COMPLETES CONSTRUCTION OPERATES AND MAINTAINS zi CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN 9 Dodge City Local Protection 9 Great Bend Local Protection 10 Cow Creek Channel Improvement 10 Hutchinson Local Protection 12 Wichita & Valley Center Local Protection 12 El Dorado Lake 15 Towanda Lake 16 El Dorado Local Protection 16 Douglass Lake 16 Winfield Local Protection 16 Fall River Lake 20 Toronto Lake 20 Neodesha Lake 22 Elk City Lake 22 Big Hill Lake 24 Marion Lake • 26 Marion Local Protection 27 Cedar Point Lake 27 Council Grove Lake 27 John Redmond Dam and Reservoir 29 lola Local Protection 29 Arkansas-Red River Basins Water Quality Control Study Texas, Oklahoma, & Kansas 30 MISSOURI RIVER BASIN 33 Comprehensive Plan, Missouri River Basin 34 Abilene Local Protection 35 Atchison Local Protection 35 Clinton Lake 37 Fort Scott Lake 37 Frankfort Local Protection 38 Garnett Lake 38 Grove Lake 39 Hays Local Protection 39 Hillsdale Lake 40 Kanopolis Lake 41 Kansas City Local Protection 43 Lawrence Local Protection 43 Manhattan Local Protection 44 Melvern Lake 44 Milford Lake 46 Missouri River Levee System— Sioux City, Iowa, to the Mouth 47 Missouri River Stabilization and Navigation Project 47 Onaga Lake 49 Osawatomie Local Protection 49 Ottawa Local Protection 49 i CONTENTS (CONT) MISSOURI RIVER BASIN (CONT) Perry Lake 51 Pioneer Lake 51 Pomona Lake 52 Salina Local Protection 53 The Kansas Citys, Missouri and Kansas Local Protection 54 Topeka Local Protection 56 Tuttle Creek Lake 58 Wilson Lake 60 Indian Lake 62 Tomahawk Lake 62 Wolf-Coffee Lake 62 Kansas River Navigation 62 EMERGENCY WORK 66 Snagging and Clearing Operations (Public Law 780) 66 Emergency Bank Protection (Public Law 526) 66 Emergency Repairs (Public Law 99) 66 Disaster Assistance (Public Law 93-288) ' 66 FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES 69 SMALL PROJECTS FOR FLOOD CONTROL AND RELATED PURPOSES 75 Kinsley Local Protection 75 Larned Local Protection 75 Florence Local Protection 75 Newton Local Protection 75 Sedgwick Local Protection 76 West Branch of Chisholm Creek Local Protection 76 Nickerson Local Protection 76 Parsons Local Protection 76 Arkansas City Local Protection 76 Park City Kansas 76 Barnard Local Protection 76 Clyde Local Protection 77 Gypsum Local Protection 77 Stranger Creek Channel Improvement 78 Stonehouse Creek Local Protection 78 STUDIES AND INVESTIGATIONS 79 PROJECTS OF OTHER AGENCIES 81 Augusta Local Protection 81 Winfield Local Protection 81 Cheney Reservoir 81 Cedar Bluff Reservoir 81 Glen Elder Reservoir 82 Kirwin Reservoir 82 Lovewell Reservoir 82 ii CONTENTS (CONT) PROJECTS OF OTHER AGENCIES (CONT) Norton Reservoir 82 Webster Reservoir 82 Figure 1— How Corps of Engineers Projects Are Started, Faces Authorized And Built Contents Figure 2— Storage Space Allocation in a Multipurpose Lake 14 Figure 3—Flood Plain Management Services 68 Maps— Arkansas River Basin 8 Verdigris— Grand (Neosho) River Basin 19 Missouri River Basin 32 Flood Plain Management Studies Between 74-75 Water Resources Development in Kansas Follows Index INDEX 83 in INTRODUCTION Under a large body of law beginning with the Act of April 30, 1824, and extending through a series of flood control acts and other Federal water resources legislation, the Army Corps of Engineers has been authorized by the Congress to investigate, develop, conserve, and
Recommended publications
  • Kansas Fishing Regulations Summary

    Kansas Fishing Regulations Summary

    2 Kansas Fishing 0 Regulations 0 5 Summary The new Community Fisheries Assistance Program (CFAP) promises to increase opportunities for anglers to fish close to home. For detailed information, see Page 16. PURCHASE FISHING LICENSES AND VIEW WEEKLY FISHING REPORTS ONLINE AT THE DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE AND PARKS' WEBSITE, WWW.KDWP.STATE.KS.US TABLE OF CONTENTS Wildlife and Parks Offices, e-mail . Zebra Mussel, White Perch Alerts . State Record Fish . Lawful Fishing . Reservoirs, Lakes, and River Access . Are Fish Safe To Eat? . Definitions . Fish Identification . Urban Fishing, Trout, Fishing Clinics . License Information and Fees . Special Event Permits, Boats . FISH Access . Length and Creel Limits . Community Fisheries Assistance . Becoming An Outdoors-Woman (BOW) . Common Concerns, Missouri River Rules . Master Angler Award . State Park Fees . WILDLIFE & PARKS OFFICES KANSAS WILDLIFE & Maps and area brochures are available through offices listed on this page and from the PARKS COMMISSION department website, www.kdwp.state.ks.us. As a cabinet-level agency, the Kansas Office of the Secretary AREA & STATE PARK OFFICES Department of Wildlife and Parks is adminis- 1020 S Kansas Ave., Rm 200 tered by a secretary of Wildlife and Parks Topeka, KS 66612-1327.....(785) 296-2281 Cedar Bluff SP....................(785) 726-3212 and is advised by a seven-member Wildlife Cheney SP .........................(316) 542-3664 and Parks Commission. All positions are Pratt Operations Office Cheyenne Bottoms WA ......(620) 793-7730 appointed by the governor with the commis- 512 SE 25th Ave. Clinton SP ..........................(785) 842-8562 sioners serving staggered four-year terms. Pratt, KS 67124-8174 ........(620) 672-5911 Council Grove WA..............(620) 767-5900 Serving as a regulatory body for the depart- Crawford SP .......................(620) 362-3671 ment, the commission is a non-partisan Region 1 Office Cross Timbers SP ..............(620) 637-2213 board, made up of no more than four mem- 1426 Hwy 183 Alt., P.O.
  • Discovery Report Lower Republican Watershed, HUC 10250017

    Discovery Report Lower Republican Watershed, HUC 10250017

    Discovery Report Lower Republican Watershed, HUC 10250017 Clay, Cloud, Dickinson, Geary, Jewell, Mitchell, Republic, Riley, and Washington Counties, KS Report Number 01 2/1/2012 i Project Area Community List Community Name City of Agenda City of Aurora City of Belleville City of Clay Center City of Clifton City of Clyde City of Concordia City of Courtland City of Formoso Fort Riley North City of Green City of Jamestown City of Jewell City of Junction City City of Linn City of Mankato City of Milford City of Morganville City of Palmer City of Randall City of Scottsville City of Vining City of Wakefield ii Table of Contents I. General Information ............................................................................................ 1 II. Watershed Stakeholder Coordination ................................................................ 22 III. Data Analysis ....................................................................................................... 2 i. Data that can be used for Flood Risk Products .................................................... 7 ii. Other Data and Information ................................................................................. 8 IV. Discovery Meeting ............................................................................................ 21 V. Appendix and Tables ......................................................................................... 23 iii I. General Information The purpose of this Discovery Report is to provide a foundation for the proposed Federal Emergency Management
  • Hillsdale Lake Water Quality Impairment: Eutrophication Revision to Eutrophication TMDL Originally Approved August 28, 2001

    Hillsdale Lake Water Quality Impairment: Eutrophication Revision to Eutrophication TMDL Originally Approved August 28, 2001

    MARAIS DES CYGNES RIVER BASIN TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD Waterbody: Hillsdale Lake Water Quality Impairment: Eutrophication Revision to Eutrophication TMDL originally approved August 28, 2001 1. INTRODUCTION AND PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION Subbasin: Lower Marais des Cygnes Counties: Douglas, Franklin, Johnson, Miami HUC 8: 10290102 HUC 10 (12): 01 (01, 02, 03) Ecoregion: Central Irregular Plains, Osage Cuestas (40b) Drainage Area: 144 square miles Conservation Pool: Surface Area = 4,355 acres Watershed/Lake Ratio: 21:1 Maximum Depth = 14 meters Mean Depth = 5.7 meters Storage Volume = 77,665 acre-feet Estimated Retention Time = 1.15 years Mean Annual Inflow (2007-2012) = 90,509 acre-feet Mean Annual Discharge (2007-2012) = 76,598 acre-feet Constructed: 1981 Designated Uses: Primary Contact Recreation Class A; Special Aquatic Life Support; Domestic Water Supply; Food Procurement; Groundwater Recharge; Industrial Water Supply; Irrigation Use; Livestock Watering Use. 303(d) Listings: 2002, 2004, 2008, 2010 & 2012 Marais Des Cygnes River Basin Lakes Impaired Use: All uses in Hillsdale Lake are impaired to a degree by eutrophication. Water Quality Criteria: General – Narrative: Taste-producing and odor-producing substances of artificial origin shall not occur in surface waters at concentrations that interfere with the production of potable water by conventional water treatment processes, that impart an unpalatable flavor to edible aquatic or semiaquatic life or terrestrial wildlife, or that result in noticeable odors in the vicinity of surface waters (KAR 28-16-28e(b)(7)). 1 Nutrients - Narrative: The introduction of plant nutrients into streams, lakes, or wetlands from artificial sources shall be controlled to prevent the accelerated succession or replacement of aquatic biota or the production of undesirable quantities or kinds of aquatic life (KAR 28-16- 28e(c)(2)(A)).
  • Assessing the Potential of Reservoir Outflow Management to Reduce

    Assessing the Potential of Reservoir Outflow Management to Reduce

    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES Hydrol. Process. 27, 1426–1439 (2013) Published online 23 April 2012 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9284 Assessing the potential of reservoir outflow management to reduce sedimentation using continuous turbidity monitoring and reservoir modelling† Casey Lee* and Guy Foster US Geological Survey, Lawrence, KS, 66049, USA Abstract: In-stream sensors are increasingly deployed as part of ambient water quality-monitoring networks. Temporally dense data from these networks can be used to better understand the transport of constituents through streams, lakes or reservoirs. Data from existing, continuously recording in-stream flow and water quality monitoring stations were coupled with the two-dimensional hydrodynamic CE-QUAL-W2 model to assess the potential of altered reservoir outflow management to reduce sediment trapping in John Redmond Reservoir, located in east-central Kansas. Monitoring stations upstream and downstream from the reservoir were used to estimate 5.6 million metric tons of sediment transported to John Redmond Reservoir from 2007 through 2010, 88% of which was trapped within the reservoir. The two-dimensional model was used to estimate the residence time of 55 equal- volume releases from the reservoir; sediment trapping for these releases varied from 48% to 97%. Smaller trapping efficiencies were observed when the reservoir was maintained near the normal operating capacity (relative to higher flood pool levels) and when average residence times were relatively short. An idealized, alternative outflow management scenario was constructed, which minimized reservoir elevations and the length of time water was in the reservoir, while continuing to meet downstream flood control end points identified in the reservoir water control manual.
  • Kansas Resource Management Plan and Record of Decision

    Kansas Resource Management Plan and Record of Decision

    United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Tulsa District Oklahoma Resource Area September 1991 KANSAS RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN Dear Reader: This doCument contains the combined Kansas Record of Decision (ROD) and Resource Management Plan (RMP). The ROD and RMP are combined to streamline our mandated land-use-planning requirements and to provide the reader with a useable finished product. The ROD records the decisions of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for administration of approximately 744,000 acres of Federal mineral estate within the Kansas Planning Area. The Planning Area encompasses BLM adm in i sterad sp 1 it-estate mi nera 1 s and Federa 1 minerals under Federal surface administered by other Federal Agencies within the State of Kansas. The Kansas RMP and appendices provide direction and guidance to BLM Managers in the formulation of decisions effecting the management of Federal mineral estate within the planning area for the next 15 years. The Kansas RMP was extracted from the Proposed Kansas RMP/FIES. The issuance of this ROD and RMP completes the BLM land use planning process for the State of Kansas. We now move to implementation of the plan. We wish to thank all the individuals and groups who participated in this effort these past two years, without their help we could not have completed this process. er~ 1_' Area Manager Oklahoma Resource Area RECORD OF DECISION on the Proposed Kansas Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement September 1991 RECORD OF DECISION The decision is hereby made to approve the proposed decision as described in the Proposed Kansas Resource Management Plan/Final Env ironmental Impact Statement (RMP/FEIS July 1991), MANAGEMENT CONSZOERATXONS The decision to approve the Proposed Plan is based on: (1) the input received from the public, other Federal and state agencies; (2) the environmental analysis for the alternatives considered in the Draft RMP/Oraft EIS, as we11 as the Proposed Kansas RMP/FEIS.
  • FLINT HILLS MTIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Hartford, Kansas

    FLINT HILLS MTIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Hartford, Kansas

    FLINT HILLS MTIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Hartford, Kansas ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1977 NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE SYSTEM Pish and Wildlife Service U.S. DEPARTMENT OP THE INTERIOR yr^mr ETLI^ fatioml I Bartfocpd, Ktosaa AHSDJIL HAHRimrg hspght CaOondar Tear 1977 mmOML WIWUM BBPUQ3 STE™ Flah and Wildlife Servloe 0,3, 0^ THB UfffiHIOK Bsraciunol 1. Harold B. Sbdpbard Tractor Operator WG-06-433 (Career Ssasoml) 2. 7, Amdt Clerk Typist GS-03-02 (CC-PPT) 3* Carltoil IU Freoburg Asst. Bsfugs mmm* GS-09-01 (P?T) U. Hon £• Thum l&lntsnaras Worker WG~07-01 {CC-OT?) - Hot Pictured - Iltohael J. Long Mfvim Manager (^-11-02(m) Joseph L. PXusisr Bio, Iteoh. 03-05-03 (TT) Bsslgnsd 10/27/77 Joseph J. Conrad Traotor Operator WG-0&-03 (FT} Betired 10/18/77 Berioi# and As/fif} £u.i' Kotfo $J? 7// y Bats FLINT HILLS Flint Hills National Wildlife Refuge NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE was established under the authority of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act on a part of the area acquired by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for the John Redmond Dam and Reservoir. This flood control project is administered by the District Engineer, Tulsa, Oklahoma. PUBLIC ROADS SPECIAL RECREATION AREAS - NO HUNTING STRAWN HUNTING AREA FISHING ACCESS POINTS (1) DESIGNATED FIREARM TRAVEL ROUTE (During waterfowl hunting season. TABLES OF CCMSSTS I* GgKBaAL 3&ge A. Introduotlon 1 B. dim tic and Habitat Ccaiditiona 1 C. Land Acquisition. 2 B. System Status • 2 n* ocmmxiTim MD mnmmim A. Conatruotion k B. Maintenance 6 C. Wildfire .
  • Suspended-Sediment Loads, Reservoir Sediment Trap Efficiency, and Upstream and Downstream Channel Stability for Kanopolis and Tuttle Creek Lakes, Kansas, 2008–10

    Suspended-Sediment Loads, Reservoir Sediment Trap Efficiency, and Upstream and Downstream Channel Stability for Kanopolis and Tuttle Creek Lakes, Kansas, 2008–10

    Prepared in cooperation with the Kansas Water Office Suspended-Sediment Loads, Reservoir Sediment Trap Efficiency, and Upstream and Downstream Channel Stability for Kanopolis and Tuttle Creek Lakes, Kansas, 2008–10 Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5187 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Front cover. Upper left: Tuttle Creek Lake upstream from highway 16 bridge, May 16, 2011 (photograph by Dirk Hargadine, USGS). Lower right: Tuttle Creek Lake downstream from highway 16 bridge, May 16, 2011 (photograph by Dirk Hargadine, USGS). Note: On May 16, 2011, the water-surface elevation for Tuttle Creek Lake was 1,075.1 feet. The normal elevation for the multi-purpose pool of the reservoir is 1,075.0 feet. Back cover. Water-quality monitor in Little Blue River near Barnes, Kansas. Note active channel-bank erosion at upper right (photograph by Bill Holladay, USGS). Suspended-Sediment Loads, Reservoir Sediment Trap Efficiency, and Upstream and Downstream Channel Stability for Kanopolis and Tuttle Creek Lakes, Kansas, 2008–10 By Kyle E. Juracek Prepared in cooperation with the Kansas Water Office Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5187 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2011 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
  • Marais Des Cygnes National Wildlife Refuge

    Marais Des Cygnes National Wildlife Refuge

    Marais des Cygnes National Wildlife Refuge COMPREHENSIVE CONSERVATION PLAN March 1998 Prepared by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Flint Hills NWR PO Box 128 Hartford, KS 66854 Marais des Cvanes National Wildlife Refuge COMPREHENS1\71: CONSERVATION PLAN APPROVAL U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, REGION 6 SUBMITTED BY: erreGamble YRefuge Manager CONCUR: :2-.20-92 Date Associate Manager, Kansas/Nebraska ~hWebster Geographic Assistant Regional Director Colorado/Kansas/Nebraska/Utah -I- Wilbur LaCid Programmatic Assistant Regional Director Refuges and Wildlife APPROVE: RalP ~genweck 1 Date Regional Director, Re~ion 6 Table of Contents INTRODUCTIONLBACKGRQUND Purpose and Need for a Plan ..................................................... I National Wildlife Refuge System Mission .......................................... 2 National Wildlife Refuge System Policies .......................................... 2 Key Mandates ................................................................ 3 Guiding Principles ............................................................. 5 Refuge Establishment and History ................................................. 6 Planning Issues and Opportunities ................................................. 7 RESOURCE/REFUGE DESCRIPTION Geographic Ecosystem Setting .................................................. 10 Location .................................................................... 10 Climate ..................................................................... 10 Minerals ...................................................................
  • Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks

    Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks

    Kansas Department of Wildlife, Parks, and Tourism Kansas Special Size Limits, Creel Limits, and Bait Restriction Tables Dated: July 1, 2018 Blue Catfish Creel Limits 5 fish daily creel limit Cheney Reservoir, Clinton Reservoir, El Dorado Reservoir, Elk City Reservoir, Glen Elder Reservoir, John Redmond Reservoir, Kanopolis Reservoir, LaCygne Reservoir, Lovewell Reservoir, Melvern Reservoir, Perry Reservoir, Pomona Reservoir, Tuttle Creek Reservoir, Wilson Reservoir Blue Catfish Length Limits 25 - 40 inch slot limit with no more than 1 fish 40-inch or larger. Blue Catfish between the lengths of twenty-five (25) and forty (40) inches are protected and must be returned to the water immediately when taken from the following waters: Milford Reservoir 25 - 35 inch slot limit with no more than 2 fish 35-inch or larger. Blue Catfish between the lengths of twenty-five (25) and thirty-five (35) inches are protected and must be returned to the water immediately when taken from the following waters: El Dorado Reservoir 35 inch minimum. Blue catfish of a length less than thirty-five (35) inches are protected and must be returned to the water immediately when taken from the following waters: Cheney Reservoir, Clinton Reservoir, Elk City Reservoir, Glen Elder Reservoir, Kanopolis Reservoir, Lovewell Reservoir, Melvern Reservoir, Perry Reservoir, Tuttle Creek Reservoir, Wilson Reservoir Channel Catfish Creel Limits 2 fish daily creel limit Andale-Renwick USD 267 Pond, Andover - Lake George, Arma City Lake, Atchison State Fishing Lake, Blue Mound City
  • 2021 Kansas Water Authority Annual Report to The

    2021 Kansas Water Authority Annual Report to The

    KANSAS WATER AUTHORITY ANNUAL REPORT TO THE GOVERNOR & LEGISLATURE 2021 www.kwo.ks.gov Table of Contents 01 Letter from the Chair 02 State Water Plan Fund Recommendations 04 Summary of Request for SGF/EDIF Transfer Restoration 04 Kansas Water Plan 5-Year Update 05 KWA Performance-Based Budget Task Force Ogallala Aquifer Initiatives 06 Water Conservation Areas/Local Enhanced Management Areas 07 KWO Water Technology Farms 07 KDA Irrigation Technology 08 KDA Water Transition Assistance Program/Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program 08 Index Well Network & Modeling Reservoir Water Supply & Sediment Management 09 KWO Bathymetric Survey Program 10 KWO Water Injection Dredging 10 KDA Streambank Stabilization 11 KWO Watershed Conservation Practice Implementation 11 KDA Watershed Dam Construction 12 KWO Unfunded Liability & Capital Development Plan Update Water Quality Initiatives 14 KWO Milford Lake Watershed Regional Conservation Partnership Program 14 KDHE Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (WRAPS) 15 KDHE Harmful Algal Bloom Pilot Project 16 KDHE Drinking Water Protection Program 16 KDHE Contamination Remediation 16 KDA Water Resources Cost-Share 17 KWO Equus Beds Chloride Plume Project 17 KWO Produced Water Pilot Project 18 KDA Non-Point Source Pollution Assistance 18 KDA State Aid to Conservation Districts 19 KWO Arbuckle Study 19 Upper Arkansas Mineralization Study 20 KDHE Total Maximum Daily Load Program 20 KDWPT Aquatic Nuisance Species Program Statewide Water Issues 21 Quivira/Rattlesnake Creek 22 Hays/Russell – R9 Ranch
  • Kansas River Basin Model

    Kansas River Basin Model

    Kansas River Basin Model Edward Parker, P.E. US Army Corps of Engineers Kansas City District KANSAS CITY DISTRICT NEBRASKA IOWA RATHBUN M I HARLAN COUNTY S S I LONG S S I SMITHVILLE BRANCH P TUTTLE P CREEK I URI PERRY SSO K MI ANS AS R I MILFORD R. V CLINTON E WILSON BLUE SPRINGS R POMONA LONGVIEW HARRY S. TRUMAN R COLO. KANOPOLIS MELVERN HILLSDALE IV ER Lake of the Ozarks STOCKTON KANSAS POMME DE TERRE MISSOURI US Army Corps of Engineers Kansas City District Kansas River Basin Operation Challenges • Protect nesting Least Terns and Piping Plovers that have taken residence along the Kansas River. • Supply navigation water support for the Missouri River. • Reviewing requests from the State of Kansas and the USBR to alter the standard operation to improve support for recreation, irrigation, fish & wildlife. US Army Corps of Engineers Kansas City District Model Requirements • Model Period 1/1/1920 through 12/31/2000 • Six-Hour routing period • Forecast local inflow using recession • Use historic pan evaporation – Monthly vary pan coefficient • Parallel and tandem operation • Consider all authorized puposes • Use current method of flood control US Army Corps of Engineers Kansas City District Model PMP Revisions • Model period from 1/1/1929 through 12/30/2001 • Mean daily flows for modeling rather than 6-hour data derived from mean daily flow values. • Delete the requirement to forecast future hydrologic conditions. • Average monthly lake evaporation rather than daily • Utilize a standard pan evaporation coefficient of 0.7 rather than a monthly varying value. • Separate the study basin between the Smoky River Basin and the Republican/Kansas River Basin.
  • KANSAS CLIMATE UPDATE July 2019 Summary

    KANSAS CLIMATE UPDATE July 2019 Summary

    KANSAS CLIMATE UPDATE July 2019 Summary Highlights July ended with a return to of abnormally dry conditions, mostly in the central part of the state where the largest precipitation deficits occurred. July flooding occurred at 31 USGS stream gages on at least 14 streams for one to as much as 31 days. USDA issued agricultural disaster declarations due to flooding since mid-March for three Kansas Counties on July 11. 2019. Producers in Atchison, Leavenworth and Wyandotte counties may be eligible for emergency loans. July 25, FEMA added Bourbon, Comanche, Crawford, Dickinson, Douglas, Edwards, Ford, Gray and Riley counties to those eligible for public assistance under DR-4449 on June 20th. The incident period for the Kansas Multi-Hazard Event is April 28-July 12, 2019. Federal presidential declarations remain in place for 33 counties. FEMA-3412-EM allows for federal assistance to supplement state and local efforts. July 31, 2019 U.S. Small Business Administration made an administrative declaration of disaster due to flooding June 22 –July 6, 2019 making loans available to those affected in Marion County and contiguous counties of Butler, Chase, Dickinson, Harvey, McPherson, Morris and Saline. 1 General Drought Conditions Kansas became drought free by the U.S. Drought Monitor in January 2019 but began to see dry conditions the last week in July. Changes in drought classification over the month for the High Plains area is also shown. Figure 1. U.S. Drought Monitor Maps of Drought status More information can be found on the U.S. Drought Monitor web site https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/ .