sign in sign up
<<
Home , Haikouichthys

Perspectives

Origin of would also be soft bodied and unable confirmed in the to be fossilized. Evolutionists have Early used this strange little organism to Michael J Oard dodge the impli- cations of this tre- It was not that long ago when the mendous gap in origin of the first () was the fossil record pushed back into the Late Cambrian and to provide a 1–3 within the evolutionary time scale. reason for the lack Then several years ago, two fish-like of transitional fos- fossils and Haik- sils (due to their ouichthys, with some surprisingly lack of preserva- advanced features were discovered tion). In answer 4,5 from the Early Cambrian in China. to the evolution- Recently, more than 500 fossils of ary problem, that Haikouichthys have been unearthed Branchiostoma is UK. Department of Biological Sciences, University Paisley, in Early Cambrian strata in China.6 a living organism Figure 1. Branchiostoma, commonly known as Amphioxus. These fish somewhat resemble the and not a fossil larva of modern lampreys, a jawless from way back; evolutionists have now the cynosure of Cambrian fish (class ). presented as a transitional , is peripheral to the line- The upshot of this discovery is to fossil.10 Pikaia is an exotic verte- age leading to the vertebrates.’15 push back the supposed evolution of brate-like organism from the Middle Furthermore, the 500 plus fish to a very short period during the Cambrian Burgess shale of southern fish are soft bodied, as is Pikaia. This very beginning of the Cambrian. Ver- British Columbia, Canada11 and pos- diminishes their ‘soft bodies’ excuse tebrates join other existing phyla, as sibly also from the Early Cambrian for the lack of a vertebrate ancestor. 12 well as many extinct phyla, in the great of China. Thus, the discovery of these new and mysterious Cambrian ‘big bang’ Haikouichthys and likely Myl- Early Cambrian fish should remove in the evolutionary story—the sudden lokunmingia carry a number of puz- both Branchiostoma and Pikaia as existence of so many different types zling features contrary to previous representing a living analogue and a of fossils with few if any supposed expectations. They possess eyes and supposed transition, respectively, be- ancestors. This is clear evidence that possibly olfactory organs, which are tween invertebrates and vertebrates. evolution never happened. ahead of their time in the evolution- ary story: Fish buried in a flood Elimination of possible transitional ‘The possession of eyes (and prob- species ably nasal sacs) is consistent with Haikouichthys being a , Although the paleontologists do It is well known that a major indicating that vertebrate evolu- not provide a great deal of informa- gap exists between invertebrates and tion was well advanced by the tion on the geological setting, it is vertebrates.7 Supposedly, some inver- Early Cambrian.’13 interesting that they conclude that the tebrate had to evolve into a vertebrate The discovery of sense or- fish were buried rapidly in a storm: in the late or very Early gans in fish so Early in the supposed ‘The specimens may have been buried Cambrian. For a long time evolution- evolution of life seems to knock out alive, possibly as a result of storm- ists had no candidate for a transitional Branchiostoma as a model for the induced burial.’16 How about burial fossil. However, in recent years they evolution of the vertebrates since in a giant global Flood? have consider Branchiostoma (pre- this living creature has neither eyes viously known as Amphioxus) as a nor a sense of smell. In referring to Acknowledgement living representative of a transitional the two earlier discoveries in China, organism to the first vertebrate.8 Bran- Shu et al. state: ‘… they seem to be I thank Dr. Duane Gish for calling chiostoma is a with a noto- significantly different from the Recent my attention to the article on 500 Early chord, no brain, no eyes and no sense amphioxus.’14 They further state that Cambrian fish. of smell (see figure 1).9 It is soft bod- Pikaia probably should be eliminated ied and, therefore, the evolutionists from the supposed ancestral line: believed that its vertebrate ancestors ‘It is possible that Pikaia, until

10 TJ 18(1) 2004 Perspectives

References

1. Carroll, R.L., Vertebrate and Evolution, W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, pp. 26–39, 1988. 2. Oard, M.J., Evolution pushed further into the past, TJ 10(2):171–172, 1996. 3. Young, G.C., Karatajute-Talimaa, V.N. and Smith, M.M., A possible Late Cambrian ver- tebrate from Australia, Nature 383:810–812, 1996. 4. Shu, D.-G., Conway Morris, S., Zhang, X.-L., Hu, S.-X., Chen, L., Han, J., Zhu, M., Li, Y. and Chen, L.-Z., Lower Cambrian vertebrates from south China, Nature 402:42–46, 1999. 5. Janvier, P., Catching the first fish, Nature 402:21–22, 1999. 6. Shu, D.-G., Conway Morris, S., Han, J., Zhang, Z.-F., Yasui, K., Janvier, P., Chen, L., Zhang, X.-L., Liu, J.-N., Li, Y. and Liu, H.-Q., Head and backbone of the Early Cambrian vertebrate Haikouichthys, Nature 421:526–529, 2003. 7. Gish, D.T., Evolution: The Fossils Still Say No! Institute for Creation Research, El Cajon, pp. 74–76, 1995. 8. Strahler, A.N., Science and Earth History: The Evolutionary/Creation Controversy, Prometh- eus Books, Buffalo, New York, pp. 404–406, 1987. 9. Carroll, ref. 1, pp. 18–19. 10. Strahler, ref. 8, pp. 405–406. 11. Gould, S.J., Wonderful Life—The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History, W.W. Norton & Company, New York, pp. 321–323, 1989. 12. Shu, D.-G., Conway Morris, S. and Zhang, X.-L., A Pikaia-like from the Lower Cambrian of China, Nature 384:157–158, 1996. 13. Shu et al., ref. 6, p. 529. 14. Shu et al., ref. 4, p. 42. 15. Shu et al., ref. 4, p. 46. 16. Shu et al., ref. 6, p. 527.

TJ 18(1) 2004 11