Long Island Sound Crossing Feasibility Study Final Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Long Island Sound Crossing Feasibility Study Final Report Long Island Sound Crossing Feasibility Study Final Report December 2017 Version 1.0 Submitted to: Submitted by: Long Island Sound Crossing Feasibility Study CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 PROJECT PURPOSE AND BENEFITS ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.3 ALIGNMENT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT ..................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 STUDY FINDINGS ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 2 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 2.1 PROJECT HISTORY .................................................................................................................................................... 6 3 ALIGNMENT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS ................................................................................................................... 9 3.1 STUDY AREA ............................................................................................................................................................ 9 3.2 PURPOSE AND NEED ............................................................................................................................................. 10 3.3 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ...................................................................................................................................... 10 3.4 ALIGNMENT CONCEPTS CONSIDERED ................................................................................................................... 10 4 REPRESENTATIVE ALIGNMENT CONCEPTS .......................................................................................................... 13 4.1 WESTERN ALIGNMENT .......................................................................................................................................... 13 4.2 CENTRAL ALIGNMENT ........................................................................................................................................... 17 4.3 EASTERN ALIGNMENT ............................................................................................................................................ 22 5 ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS ......................................................................................................................... 27 5.1 DESIGN STANDARDS ............................................................................................................................................. 27 5.2 ROADWAY/CIVIL DESIGN .................................................................................................................................... 28 5.3 BRIDGE DESIGN .................................................................................................................................................... 29 5.4 TUNNEL DESIGN .................................................................................................................................................... 29 5.5 OPTIMIZED CONSTRUCTION METHODS FOR EACH ALIGNMENT ............................................................................ 31 5.6 UTILITIES ................................................................................................................................................................ 31 5.7 GEOTECHNICAL..................................................................................................................................................... 32 5.8 PROPERTY IMPACTS ............................................................................................................................................... 32 6 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS ................................................................................................................... 40 6.1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................... 40 6.2 WETLANDS ........................................................................................................................................................... 40 6.3 SURFACE WATERBODIES AND WATERCOURSES .................................................................................................... 43 6.4 WILD, SCENIC, AND RECREATIONAL RIVERS .......................................................................................................... 44 6.5 NAVIGABLE WATERS ............................................................................................................................................ 44 6.6 FLOODPLAINS ....................................................................................................................................................... 45 6.7 COASTAL RESOURCES ........................................................................................................................................... 46 6.8 GROUNDWATER RESOURCES, AQUIFERS, AND RESERVOIRS ................................................................................. 47 6.9 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT .............................................................................................................................. 47 6.10 GENERAL ECOLOGY AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES .................................................................................................. 47 6.11 CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS (CEAS) ........................................................................................................... 49 6.12 HISTORIC AND CULTURAL RESOURCES .................................................................................................................. 50 6.13 PARKS AND RECREATIONAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................................... 51 6.14 VISUAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................................................................... 52 6.15 FARMLANDS .......................................................................................................................................................... 52 6.16 AIR QUALITY ......................................................................................................................................................... 53 6.17 ENERGY ................................................................................................................................................................. 53 6.18 CLIMATE CHANGE ................................................................................................................................................. 53 6.19 NOISE ................................................................................................................................................................... 53 6.20 ASBESTOS ............................................................................................................................................................. 54 Final Report December 2017, Version 1.0 i 6.21 HAZARDOUS WASTE AND CONTAMINATED MATERIALS ....................................................................................... 54 6.22 SOCIAL .................................................................................................................................................................. 54 6.23 ECONOMIC ........................................................................................................................................................... 54 6.24 CONSTRUCTION EFFECTS ...................................................................................................................................... 55 6.25 INDIRECT AND SECONDARY EFFECTS ..................................................................................................................... 55 6.26 CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ............................................................................................................................................ 55 6.27 SHORT-TERM USES OF MAN’S ENVIRONMENT AND THE MAINTENANCE AND ENHANCEMENT OF LONG-TERM PRODUCTIVITY ................................................................................................................................................................. 55 6.28 IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENTS OF RESOURCES ......................................................................... 55 6.29 ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS THAT CANNOT BE AVOIDED OR ADEQUATELY MITIGATED ........................... 55 7 CAPITAL COST ............................................................................................................................................................ 56 7.1 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................................... 56 7.2 RESULTS................................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • S T a T E O F N E W Y O R K 3695--A 2009-2010
    S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 3695--A 2009-2010 Regular Sessions I N A S S E M B L Y January 28, 2009 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. ENGLEBRIGHT -- Multi-Sponsored by -- M. of A. KOON, McENENY -- read once and referred to the Committee on Tourism, Arts and Sports Development -- recommitted to the Committee on Tour- ism, Arts and Sports Development in accordance with Assembly Rule 3, sec. 2 -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee AN ACT to amend the parks, recreation and historic preservation law, in relation to the protection and management of the state park system THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: 1 Section 1. Legislative findings and purpose. The legislature finds the 2 New York state parks, and natural and cultural lands under state manage- 3 ment which began with the Niagara Reservation in 1885 embrace unique, 4 superlative and significant resources. They constitute a major source of 5 pride, inspiration and enjoyment of the people of the state, and have 6 gained international recognition and acclaim. 7 Establishment of the State Council of Parks by the legislature in 1924 8 was an act that created the first unified state parks system in the 9 country. By this act and other means the legislature and the people of 10 the state have repeatedly expressed their desire that the natural and 11 cultural state park resources of the state be accorded the highest 12 degree of protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Saturday, September 7, 2019 10 Am
    Saturday, September 7, 2019 10 a.m. - 2 p.m. Bring your family and friends – and a picnic lunch, games and/or sporting equipment. All are invited to this inclusive day of fun with accessible activities for people with and without disabilities. Free events are planned at these State Parks. Visit parks.ny.gov or opwdd.ny.gov for details. Long Island - Sunken Meadow State Park, 25A and Sunken Meadow Parkway, Kings Park, NY. Meet at Field 1/Main Bathhouse area for nature programs, a Special Olympics New York bocce experience and more. Guarded swimming will be available at the beach. New York City - Denny Farrell Riverbank State Park, 679 Riverside Drive, New York City. Meet at the Main Stage for park tours and a Special Olympics New York bocce experience. Hudson Valley - Franklin D. Roosevelt State Park, 2957 Crompond Road, Yorktown Heights. Meet at Picnic Area 1 for nature programs, park tours and health and fitness activities with Special Olympics New York. Capital District - John Boyd Thacher State Park, 830 Thacher Park Road, Voorheesville. Meet at the Visitor Center for tours and activities. A hawk watch and Birds of Prey program will be held from 10-2 p.m. in the Upper Overlook area. Central New York - Green Lakes State Park, 7900 Green Lakes Road, Fayetteville. Meet at the Environmental Education Center for nature programs and a demonstration of the accessible kayak launch. Genesee Region (Rochester area) - Letchworth State Park, 1 Letchworth State Park, Castile. Please Note: the event begins at 11:00. Meet at the Humphrey Nature Center for activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices Section
    APPENDIX 1. A Selection of Biodiversity Conservation Agencies & Programs A variety of state agencies and programs, in addition to the NY Natural Heritage Program, partner with OPRHP on biodiversity conservation and planning. This appendix also describes a variety of statewide and regional biodiversity conservation efforts that complement OPRHP’s work. NYS BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE The New York State Biodiversity Research Institute is a state-chartered organization based in the New York State Museum who promotes the understanding and conservation of New York’s biological diversity. They administer a broad range of research, education, and information transfer programs, and oversee a competitive grants program for projects that further biodiversity stewardship and research. In 1996, the Biodiversity Research Institute approved funding for the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to undertake an ambitious inventory of its lands for rare species, rare natural communities, and the state’s best examples of common communities. The majority of inventory in state parks occurred over a five-year period, beginning in 1998 and concluding in the spring of 2003. Funding was also approved for a sixth year, which included all newly acquired state parks and several state parks that required additional attention beyond the initial inventory. Telephone: (518) 486-4845 Website: www.nysm.nysed.gov/bri/ NYS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION The Department of Environmental Conservation’s (DEC) biodiversity conservation efforts are handled by a variety of offices with the department. Of particular note for this project are the NY Natural Heritage Program, Endangered Species Unit, and Nongame Unit (all of which are in the Division of Fish, Wildlife, & Marine Resources), and the Division of Lands & Forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to Schiff Scout Reservation, Wading River, NY
    TROOP 409 DIRECTIONS Directions to St Matthew RC Church, Dix Hills, NY 35 North Service Road, Dix Hills, NY 11746 x St Mathew is off the LIE North Service Road. x From LIE x51, take the South Service Road East until you hit Carl's Straight Path. \ x Make a Left on Carl's Straight Path, cross over the LIE and make another left on to LIE North Service Road. x St Matthew will be on the Right Side. x We typically meet in one of the rooms on the 2nd floor. x Some activities are held in Monsignor Goggin Hall, in the Basement Directions to Paumanok Elementary School, Dix Hills, NY 1 Seaman Neck Road, Dix Hills, NY 11746 x Paumanok Elementary School is on Straight Path Road / Seaman Neck Road x Take LIE x51 South. x Travel South on Deer Park Avenue until the Fork in the Road. Stay to your Right on to Straight Path Road. x Paumanok will be on the Right Side. x We typically meet in the cafeteria. Directions to Orient Point Ferry x Take LIE to Exit 71. x At the bottom of the ramp, turn left (north) onto Edwards Ave. x Continue north for about 5.5 miles until you come to Sound Ave. x Turn right (east) and continue for about 30 miles on Sound Ave o (when you reach Mattituck, Sound Ave becomes Route 25). x The Orient Point Ferry is located at the end of Route 25, at the end of the North Fork of LI. x Allow at least 1.5 hours driving time.
    [Show full text]
  • Kayak & Canoe Guide to Long Island State Parks (Pdf)
    KKKAYAKAYAKAYAK & C ANOEANOEANOE G GGUIDEUIDEUIDE TOTOTO L LLONGONGONG I IISLANDSLANDSLAND S SSTATETATETATE P PPARKSARKSARKS NEW YORK STATE George E. Pataki, Governor NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF PARKS, RECREATION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION Bernadette Castro, Commissioner LONG ISLAND STATE PARK REGION John Norbeck, Regional Director An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Program Some of the best kayak and canoeing waters in New York State are Orient Beach State Park located on Long Island. Parks featuring kayak and canoe access include: (631) 323 2440 4 5 9 8 ✫ 6 7 3 1 2 Great South Bay 1. Jones Beach State Park 2. Captree State Park 3. Heckscher State Park North Shore 4. Sunken Meadow State Park 5. Nissequogue River State Park ` Lakes 6. Hempstead Lake State Park 7. Belmont Lake State Park Directions: Park located 118 miles from Manhattan at the end of Long Island’s North Fork. Take LIE (495) east to the East End 8. Hither Hills State Park (South Fork) end, then Rt. 25 east to the Park. 9. Orient Beach State Park (North Fork) Launch site access Gardiners Bay to the south and Long Saftey Tips: Beach (Hallock’s) Bay to the north. • Always wear an approved life jacket. • Use common sense. • Be aware of weather, tides and currents. Kayak drop-off is approximately halfway around the circle • Leave a float plan on your dashboard (for example: Kayaking adjacent to the parking lot. Hallock’s Bay is a 30 yard carry into Great South Bay, back around 4). and Gardiners Bay requires a 50 yard carry. • Avoid marked swimming areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Trip Database (.Pdf)
    LIBS Field Trips (Published 2/18/2012) An updated version may be available at www.libotanical.org PAGE 1 of 12 Plant list Date Location (as listed in newsletter) Leader Description Co sponsored by availability To see Arethusa bulbosa and Helianthemum dumosum in flower. A later-reported highlight: found a new 6/8/1986 Montauk Bob Zaremba population of Schizaea,which had not been seen on Long Island since about 1981. 7/13/1986 Sunken Forest, Fire Island 8/3/1986 North Fork and South Fork Joe Beitel Orchid tour (north and south fork) Canoe trip. Follow-up report: The most interesting aspect of this trip is in observing the rather small but continuous change in ecological zonation (that is, the transition from fresh to salt water) and the very tidal nature of the river. Among the plants seen were Chelone glabra, Lobelia cardinalis, Vernonia noveboracensis, Lilium superbum, Sagittaria latifolia, Peltandra virginica, Pluchea purpurascens, 9/13/1986 Caleb Smith State Park, Smithtown Jim Romansky Samolus parviflora, Mikania scandens, Acnida cannabina, Acorus calamus, Spartina cynosuroides and Scirpus validus. In addition we saw two species known historically from the area but now considered rare: Lilaeopsis chinensis and Hydrocotyle sp. Fern walk. Follow-up observation: Our fall trip to Smithtown located the second extant population of SB 10/26/1986 Caleb Smith State Park Joe Beitel Botrychium oneidense in New York State. (fern/allies only) 11/22/1986 Blydenburgh Park, Smithtown Ray Welch nature ramble 2/22/1987 Cathedral Pines east, Brookhaven Louise Harrison, Betty Winter twig identification. 5/16/1987 Montauk Point Joe Beitel collecting trip A walk in the Long Island wet pine barrens, looking for sedges (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Ticket/Accident Reporting Specifications
    Appendix I – NYS DMV Requirements New York State Law Enforcement Records Management System Electronic Ticket/Accident Reporting Specifications (Sept. 2007) New York State Department of Motor Vehicles New York State Police New York State Office of Court Administration RFP22798 Page 1 of 207 Electronic Ticket/Accident Reporting Specifications Table of Contents Policy For Electronic Tickets and Accident Reports 3 New York State Police TraCs User Agreement 6 Certification Process 9 Post-Certification 10 Tickets 11 Ticket Algorithm 11 Data Input Schema 12 Sample TSLED XML File 15 TSLED Data Elements 20 Sample Adjudication XML File 81 Adjudication Data Elements 86 Accidents 149 Accident Report Case Number 149 Data Input Schema 150 Sample XML File 156 Accident Report Data Elements 161 Exceptions Handling 186 New York Driving License 2D Barcode Format 187 New York State Registration Barcode Format 195 Attachment A- Context Diagram 202 Attachment B- Agency and Vendor Contact Information 203 Attachment C- TraCS Local Lead Agencies 205 Page 2 of 207 Electronic Ticket/Accident Reporting Specifications Policy For Electronic Tickets and Accident Reports From New York State Police Agencies To New York State Police New York State Department of Motor Vehicles and New York State Office of Court Administration The New York State Police (NYSP), the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), the Office of Court Administration (OCA) and other state and federal agencies, have developed a system for the electronic transmission of ticket and accident report data from law enforcement agencies to DMV and the courts. Data standards for ticket and accident report data have been agreed to between agencies for the electronic transfer of data and are available to participating agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • National List of Beaches 2004 (PDF)
    National List of Beaches March 2004 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington DC 20460 EPA-823-R-04-004 i Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 States Alabama ............................................................................................................... 3 Alaska................................................................................................................... 6 California .............................................................................................................. 9 Connecticut .......................................................................................................... 17 Delaware .............................................................................................................. 21 Florida .................................................................................................................. 22 Georgia................................................................................................................. 36 Hawaii................................................................................................................... 38 Illinois ................................................................................................................... 45 Indiana.................................................................................................................. 47 Louisiana
    [Show full text]
  • July/August 2006
    RAILWALKER TNEW YORK/NEW JERSEY TRAIL CONFERENCE — MAINTAINING 1,669 MILES OF FOOT TRAILS JULY/AUGUST 2006 In this issue: Hikers + ATVers = Progress...pg 5 • Trail Gardeners Wanted...pg 5 • How to Lead a Hike...pg 9 • Cool Spot for a Hot Day...pg 10 LONG PATH REACHES 75YEARS&347MILES Seventy-five years ago, Vincent J. Schaefer, a 25-year-old cofounder and hike leader of the Mohawk Valley Hiking Club in upstate New York, had a big idea: an unblazed north-south walking route in ness paths, woods roads, and paved walks. New York linking downstate urban areas to It included urban, suburban, rural, and the Adirondack High Peaks. “In 1931, my wild areas. It crossed public lands and pri- Dad drew the route on topo maps,” recalls vate property. And it wasn’t long before it his son Jim. “His original idea was to start at was vulnerable to the forces that threaten it Bear Mountain and include high lands that today: development, traffic, and loss of more or less paralleled the Hudson River. He rights-of-way. included the Shawangunks, the Catskills, the The economic boom that followed the Helderbergs, and the eastern Adirondacks to end of World War II began to transform the top of Whiteface Mountain.” the New York landscape. Forests and farms Schaefer brought his idea to other hike became residential subdivisions; once quiet leaders, including Raymond Torrey, a country lanes whizzed with traffic. Though cofounder of the New York/New Jersey the uncertainty of an unmarked trail Trail Conference. Torrey wrote a hiking appealed to Schaefer’s explorer sensibility, G N O H C N A B R M E B I H E Y R B H C S S O T D O D H O P T LP views include (left to right): cityscapes (George Washington Bridge), column in the New York Post (“The Long the biggest uncertainty in the years since farmland (Vroman’s Nose near Albany), and mountain streams (Kaaterskill Falls).
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Proposed Capital Program 1
    SUFFOLK COUNTY LEGISLATURE Robert Lipp BUDGET REVIEW OFFICE Director May 10, 2013 William J. Lindsay, Presiding Officer and Members of the Suffolk County Legislature Dear Legislators: Accompanying this letter is the Budget Review Office Review of the 2014-2016 Proposed Capital Program and 2014 Capital Budget. We have maintained the same format as last year’s report. One new front end write up was added that summarizes a new funding source, FEMA aid, in the Proposed 2014-2016 Capital Program. Highlights of this report can be found in the Introduction immediately following the Table of Contents. Among other things, recommendations made in this report reflect what the Budget Review Office believes are needed changes, but exclude additional funding we would want to recommend in better times. On a personal note, this is the first Budget Review Office report following my permanent appointment as Director. I would like to thank each and every Legislator for your vote of confidence in appointing me. I promise to work hard to maintain that trust and confidence. I would also like to thank the entire staff of the Budget Review Office for their hard work and long hours in preparation of this report. I am confident you will find the quality of this report up to Budget Review Office standards. The credit for our work effort goes to each and every member of the Budget Review Office. My staff and I remain ready to provide whatever assistance the Legislature may require during the capital program and budget evaluation and amending process. Sincerely, Robert Lipp, Director Mailing Address: P.
    [Show full text]
  • Protect Their Future: New York's State Parks in Crisis
    Protect Their Future: november 2010 New York’s State Parks in Crisis BAYARD CUTTING BAYARD CUTTING ALLAN H. TREMAN ALLEGANY BATTLE ISLAND BAYSWATER POINT BEAR MOUNTAIN BEAVER ISLAND BEAVER ISLAND ALLAN H. TREMAN ALLEGANY BATTLE ISLAND BAYSWATER POINT BEAR MOUNTAIN ARBORETUM ARBORETUM STATE MARINE PARK STATE PARK STATE PARK STATE PARK STATE PARK STATE PARK STATE PARK STATE MARINE PARK STATE PARK STATE PARK STATE PARK STATE PARK STATE PARK STATE PARK BETTY AND WILBUR BIG SIX MILE CREEK BLAUVELT BONAVISTA STATE BOWMAN LAKE BROOKHAVEN BUCKHORN ISLAND BETHPAGE STATE PARK BETTY AND WILBUR BIG SIX MILE CREEK BLAUVELT BONAVISTA STATE BOWMAN LAKE DAVIS STATE PARK MARINA STATE PARK PARK GOLF COURSE STATE PARK STATE PARK STATE PARK DAVIS STATE PARK MARINA STATE PARK PARK GOLF COURSE STATE PARK CALEB SMITH STATE CAMP HERO CANANDAIGUA LAKE CANOE-PICNIC CAPTREE CAYUGA LAKE STATE CAUMSETT STATE CEDAR ISLAND CALEB SMITH STATE CAMP HERO CANANDAIGUA LAKE CANOE-PICNIC CAPTREE CAYUGA LAKE STATE PARK PRESERVE STATE PARK STATE MARINE PARK POINT STATE PARK STATE PARK PARK HISTORIC PARK STATE PARK PARK PRESERVE IntroductionSTATE PARK STATE MARINE PARK POINT STATE PARK STATE PARK PARK CLARENCE CLARK CLAY PIT PONDS This report is a joint publication of the Alliance for New York StateCLARENCE Parks CLARK CHERRY PLAIN CHIMNEY BLUFFS CHITTENANGO COLD SPRING HARBOR CHENANGO VALLEY CHERRY PLAIN CHIMNEY BLUFFS CHITTENANGO FAHNESTOCK RESERVATION STATE PARK and Parks & Trails New York. FAHNESTOCK RESERVATION STATE PARK STATE PARK FALLS STATE PARK STATE PARK STATE PARK STATE PARK STATE PARK FALLS STATE PARK STATE PARK STATE PARK PRESERVE STATE PARK STATE PARK The Alliance is a new initiative founded in 2010 with the mission of protecting and enhancing New York’s state parks and historic sites for present and future EARL W.
    [Show full text]
  • Section III. Waterfront Revitalization Program Policies
    / SECTION III - WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM POLICIES The Town of Smithtown Local Waterfront Revitalization Program has been de­ signed to be consistent with the State program and to emphasize and describe local conditions, policies, plans and projects. The section on Waterfront Revitalization Program Policies is divided according to State designated policy areas and State policies within each policy area. Each policy may be followed by a statement or statements of additional policies that are relevant to local conditions and/or can strengthen the policies by local actions (indicated by a capital letter following the arabic number, e.g. 2A, 2B, 2C). Following the policy statements are explanations of the policies and descrip­ tions of criteria, standards or guidelines, all of which will be used to evaluate consistency with a particular policy or policies. In general, decisions on public expenditures, land use, and review of private development plans will be measured in terms of compliance with these policies. A. Development Policies Policy 1 RESTORE, REVITALIZE, AND REDEVELOP DETERIORATED AND UNDER­ UTILIZED WATERFRONT AREAS FOR COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, CULTURAL, RECREATIONAL, AND OTHER COMPATIBLE USES. Policy lA REHABILITATE DETERIORATING RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES IN SAN REMO AND IN THE VICINITY OF THE KINGS PARK BLUFF. Policy IB REDEVELOP THE WEST END OF THE SMITHTOWN CBD TO A HUB OF WATER DEPENDENT AND WATER ENHANCED, LOW KEY RECREATIONAL USES WITH A MIX OF WATER ENHANCED RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL USES. Policy lC WHEN THE KINGS PARK PSYCHIATRIC CENTER IS NO LONGER NEEDED FOR rTS ORIGINAL PURPOSE, RESTORE AND REVITALIZE THE CORE ARFA OF THE CENTER FOR INSTITUTIONAL AND RESIDENTIAL USES AND REDEVELOP THE PERIPHERY OF THE CENTER FOR A MIX OF RECREATIONAL, CONSERVATION AND AGRICULTURAL USES.
    [Show full text]