DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Report No. JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY (JICA) JAMUNA MULTIPURPOSE BRIDGE AUTHORITY (JMBA) The Feasibility Study of Padma Bridge in The People's Republic of BANGLADESH FINAL REPORT Volume 6 HIGHWAY, BRIDGE AND OTHER ENGINEERING STUDIES MARCH, 2005 NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. in association with CONSTRUCTION PROJECT CONSULTANTS, INC. S D J R 05-017 THE FEASIBILITY STUDY OF PADMA BRIDGE FINAL REPORT (VOLUME VI) MARCH 2005 STRUCTURE OF FINAL REPORT VOLUME I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY VOLUME II MAIN REPORT VOLUME III SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND TRANSPORT STUDIES APPENDIX-1: ECONOMIC FEATURE OF BANGLADESH APPENDIX-2: TRANSPORT STUDIES VOLUME IV TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION APPENDIX-3: TOPOGRAPHIC AND BATHYMETRIC SURVEYS APPENDIX-4: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION VOLUME V RIVER STUDIES APPENDIX-5: RIVER AND RIVER MORPHOLOGY APPENDIX-6: HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULICS APPENDIX-7: RIVER ENGINEERING VOLUME VI HIGHWAY, BRIDGE AND OTHER ENGINEERING STUDIES APPENDIX-8: BRIDGE ENGINEERING APPENDIX-9: HIGHWAY ENGINEERING APPENDIX-10: RAILWAY PROVISION VOLUME VII ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL/RESETTLEMENT STUDIES APPENDIX-11: ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES APPENDIX-12: SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND RESETTLEMENT FRAMEWORK VOLUME VIII DRAWINGS OF PRELIMINARY FACILITY DESIGN VOLUME IX SUPPORTING STUDIES (Provided by electric files. Original copies are kept by JMBA and JICA Tokyo.) THE FEASIBILITY STUDY OF PADMA BRIDGE FINAL REPORT (VOLUME VI) MARCH 2005 The Feasibility Study of Padma Bridge Final Report (Vol. 4 Topographic Survey and Geotechnical Investigation) Table of Contents Appendix 8 Bridge Engineering.................................................................................A8-1 Chapter 1 Preliminary Technical Considerations for Bridge Planning.................A8-1 1.1 Introduction.............................................................................................................. A8-1 1.2 Configuration of the Bridge at the Alternative Locations........................................... A8-1 1.2.1 Bridge Length ................................................................................................. A8-1 1.2.2 Subsoil Conditions along the Padma River ...................................................... A8-4 1.2.3 Possible Foundations of the Padma Bridge......................................................A8-5 1.3 Utilities to be Installed..............................................................................................A8-5 1.4 Evaluation of Alternative Bridge Crossings............................................................... A8-6 Chapter 2 Preparatory Study for Preliminary Design of Bridge and Highway..................................................................................................A8-7 2.1 General..................................................................................................................... A8-7 2.2 Basic Condition Analysis for Preliminary Bridge Design .......................................... A8-7 2.2.1 Preconditions for Preliminary Design of Bridge............................................... A8-7 2.2.2 Policy for Preliminary Bridge Design.............................................................. A8-9 2.2.3 Methodology for Preparatory Study................................................................. A8-9 2.2.4 Selection of Target Ranges of Span Lengths .................................................. A8-21 2.3 Basic Condition Analysis for Highway Design........................................................ A8-26 2.3.1 Connecting Roads ......................................................................................... A8-26 2.3.2 Control Points ............................................................................................... A8-26 2.3.3 Future Traffic ................................................................................................ A8-27 2.3.4 Height of Project Highway............................................................................ A8-27 2.3.5 Geometric Design Conditions........................................................................ A8-28 2.3.6 Land Acquisition Area................................................................................... A8-29 2.3.7 Initial Inventory Study................................................................................... A8-29 2.3.8 Potential Highway Route for Alternatives Project Locations .......................... A8-31 2.3.9 Initial Pavement Design ................................................................................ A8-32 Chapter 3 Preliminary Design of Padma Bridge..................................................A8-34 3.1 Introduction............................................................................................................ A8-34 3.2 Design Criteria and Standards adopted in Preliminary Design ................................. A8-34 3.2.1 Pre-condition of Preliminary Design.............................................................. A8-34 i THE FEASIBILITY STUDY OF PADMA BRIDGE FINAL REPORT (VOLUME VI) MARCH 2005 3.2.2 Design Criteria and Standards ....................................................................... A8-36 3.2.3 Review on Bridge Types, Span-Cost Relation of Interim Report .................... A8-40 3.2.4 Bridge Type Alternatives ............................................................................... A8-41 3.3 Study on Superstructure and Foundation Types and Preferable Span Length............ A8-44 3.3.1 Superstructure Study ..................................................................................... A8-44 3.3.2 Substructure Study ........................................................................................ A8-65 3.3.3 Preferable Span Length ................................................................................. A8-74 3.3.4 Preliminary Design of Extradosed Bridges .................................................... A8-78 3.3.5 Preliminary Design of Substructures............................................................ A8-110 3.3.6 Construction and Maintenance of Extradosed Bridges ................................. A8-133 3.4 Bridge Design Options.......................................................................................... A8-136 3.4.1 Alternative –H1: PC Extradosed Girder Bridge without Railway Provision..................................................................................................... A8-137 3.4.2 Alternative –H2: PC Extradosed Girder Bridge and PC Cable Stayed Girder without Railway Provision ............................................................... A8-144 3.4.3 Alternative –HR: PC Extradosed Girder Bridge with Railway Provision..................................................................................................... A8-148 3.4.4 Alternative –HR2: PC Extradosed Girder Bridge and PC Cable Stayed Girder with Railway Provision .................................................................... A8-154 3.4.5 Alternative –H3: PC Extradosed Girder Bridge with Railway Provision (Minimum width)........................................................................................ A8-158 3.5 Summary of Quantities ......................................................................................... A8-162 Appendix-9 Highway Engineering.............................................................................A9-1 9.1 Introduction.............................................................................................................. A9-1 9.2 Objectives of Padma Project from Highway Planning Aspect .................................... A9-1 9.3 Road System of Bangladesh and Functional Requirement for Project Highway................................................................................................................... A9-3 9.4 Highway Development in Area Associated with Padma Project................................. A9-8 9.5 Characters of Initial Project Location Alternatives from Highway Planning Aspects................................................................................................................... A9-18 9.6 Evaluation of Initial Project Location Alternatives from Highway Planning Aspects................................................................................................................... A9-23 9.7 Basic Highway Condition Analysis for Final Selection of Project Location ............. A9-25 9.7.1 Connecting Roads ......................................................................................... A9-25 9.7.2 Traffic Demand Forecasts.............................................................................. A9-25 9.7.3 Heights of Project Highway........................................................................... A9-26 9.7.4 Potential Highway Routes for Second-Stage Project Location Alternatives................................................................................................... A9-26 9.7.5 Evaluation of Second-Stage Project Location Alternatives ............................. A9-26 ii THE FEASIBILITY STUDY OF PADMA BRIDGE FINAL REPORT (VOLUME VI) MARCH 2005 9.8 Design Standard and Criteria for Preliminary Highway Design.............................. A9-29 9.9 Geometric Design of Project Highway ................................................................. A9-32 9.9.1 Route Selection for Project Highway .......................................................... A9-32 9.9.2 Horizontal Alignment ...............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Design and Construction of Extradosed Bridges in Cold Temperature and Seismic Zones
    Design and Construction of Extradosed Bridges in Cold Temperature and Seismic Zones Dr. Matthias Schueller, P.Eng. Vice President Parsons Structures Session 2020 TAC Conference & Exhibition Abstract Extradosed bridges are often described as a cross of a conventional prestressed concrete girder bridge and a traditional cable-stayed bridge because most extradosed bridges built combine a prestressed concrete superstructure with stay-cable technologies. However, this simple definition does not capture the various possible structural systems and different materials that can be found and used for extradosed bridges. Extradosed bridge technology is much more than a prestressed concrete girder with external tendons. The Deh Cho Bridge in the Northwest Territories and the Canal Lachine Bridge in Montréal are two Canadian extradosed bridges featuring steel superstructures with slender composite concrete decks using full-depth precast panels. Although both bridges are very different, they share one important design aspect which governed the design of their superstructures: Both bridges are located in regions with prolonged extreme cold winter periods. Temperatures below 0 °C and cold weather periods lasting up to five months can be a major hindrance when erecting long bridges with conventional concrete superstructures. On the contrary, steel superstructures are light and can be quickly erected, even at cold temperatures without heating and hording given that field welding is avoided. To avoid delays along the critical path in the erection of major superstructures in extreme cold temperature zones, designers should consider erection schemes which make best use of short warm weather periods and reduce negative impacts related to harsh weather conditions as best as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Roads & Bridges November 2012
    BRIDGE DESIGN By Jamie Farris, P.E., Dan Carlson, P.E., and Eric Nelson, P.E. Contributing Authors Proper frame work Waco, TxDOT come up with right solution for IH-35 ruce Jackson, a noted professor of inspirational, in many ways bridges define their surroundings. Needing to expand I-35 American culture, said, “Bridges (IH-35), representatives from the city of Waco B are perhaps the most invisible form wanted signature bridges with an “art deco” look to complement other recent downtown of public architecture; they become frames economic revitalization projects. Because for looking at the world around us.” the frontage road bridges were going to be constructed first—the mainline bridges will be Taking that philosophy out of academia and replaced later—TxDOT and Waco representa- putting it into practice, the Waco District of the tives decided to create signature twin frontage Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) road bridges on each side of the mainline has initiated a unique bridge project spanning bridges. Though aesthetics was certainly a the Brazos River. Though only two frontage driving force behind the new bridge design, the road bridges are involved, the $17.3 million initial defining characteristic of the project was IH-35 Extradosed Bridge Project will pioneer a functional need. bridge technique in the U.S. As part of the American infrastructure, Brazos bravado bridges often become treasured landmarks IH-35 runs north-south through the heart in their communities. Majestic, grand and of Texas. A major transportation artery for the 42 November 2012 • ROADS&BRIDGES Debate rages over the boundary some 60 ft from the corresponding between extradosed and traditional mainline bridges.
    [Show full text]
  • A Look at Bridges: a Study of Types, Histories, and the Marriage of Engineering and Architecture Cody Chase Connecticut College
    Connecticut College Digital Commons @ Connecticut College Architectural Studies Integrative Projects Art History and Architectural Studies 2015 A Look at Bridges: A Study of Types, Histories, and the Marriage of Engineering and Architecture Cody Chase Connecticut College Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/archstudintproj Recommended Citation Chase, Cody, "A Look at Bridges: A Study of Types, Histories, and the Marriage of Engineering and Architecture" (2015). Architectural Studies Integrative Projects. Paper 73. http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/archstudintproj/73 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Art History and Architectural Studies at Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Architectural Studies Integrative Projects by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author. CODY CHASE SENIOR INTEGRATIVE PROJECT: INDEPENDENT STUDY ARCHITECTURAL STUDIES CONNECTICUT COLLEGE 2015 A"LOOK"INTO"BRIDGES" A"Study"of"Types,"Histories,"and"the"Marriage"of" Engineering"and"Architecture" " Cody"Chase"‘15" Architectural"Studies"Major,"Art"History"Minor" Senior"IntegraHve"Project" " Why Bridges? Where to begin? TYPES OTHER • Arch • Glossary • Beam/Girder/Stringer • Materials • Truss • History of Failures • Suspension • Models • Cable-Stayed • Moveable Span What makes a bridge stand up? FORCES ***Compression:
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Historic Bridge Inventory | Pages 164-191
    NPS Form 10-900-a OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet section number G, H page 156 V E H I C U L A R B R I D G E S I N A R I Z O N A Geographic Data: State of Arizona Summary of Identification and Evaluation Methods The Arizona Historic Bridge Inventory, which forms the basis for this Multiple Property Documentation Form [MPDF], is a sequel to an earlier study completed in 1987. The original study employed 1945 as a cut-off date. This study inventories and evaluates all of the pre-1964 vehicular bridges and grade separations currently maintained in ADOT’s Structure Inventory and Appraisal [SI&A] listing. It includes all structures of all struc- tural types in current use on the state, county and city road systems. Additionally it includes bridges on selected federal lands (e.g., National Forests, Davis-Monthan Air Force Base) that have been included in the SI&A list. Generally not included are railroad bridges other than highway underpasses; structures maintained by federal agencies (e.g., National Park Service) other than those included in the SI&A; structures in private ownership; and structures that have been dismantled or permanently closed to vehicular traffic. There are exceptions to this, however, and several abandoned and/or privately owned structures of particular impor- tance have been included at the discretion of the consultant. The bridges included in this Inventory have not been evaluated as parts of larger road structures or historic highway districts, although they are clearly integral parts of larger highway resources.
    [Show full text]
  • BRIDGE INSPECTION and INTERFEROMETRY by JOSEPH E. KRAJEWSKI a Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INST
    BRIDGE INSPECTION AND INTERFEROMETRY by JOSEPH E. KRAJEWSKI A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering May 2006 APPROVED: Professor Leonard D. Albano, Advisor ________________________________ Professor Cosme Furlong __________________________________________ Professor Malcolm Ray ____________________________________________ Professor Frederick Hart___________________________________________ ABSTRACT With the majority of bridges in the country aging, over capacity and costly to rehabilitate or replace, it is essential that engineers refine their inspection and evaluation techniques. Over the past 130 years the information gathering techniques and methods used by engineers to inspect bridges have changed little. All of the available methods rely on one technique, visual inspection. In addition, over the past 40 years individual bridge inspectors have gone from being information gathers to being solely responsible for the condition rating of bridges they inspect. The reliance on the visual abilities of a single individual to determine the health of a particular bridge has led to inconsistent and sometimes erroneous results. In an effort to provide bridge inspectors and engineers with more reliable inspection and evaluation techniques, this thesis will detail the case for development of a new inspection tool, and the assembly and use of one new tool called Fringe Interferometry. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to sincerely thank my advisor, Professor Leonard D. Albano, for his encouragement, suggestions, patience and help in writing this thesis. His willingness to let me go beyond the realm of Civil Engineer and into the far away world of Interferometry (where few if any Civil Engineers have been) is something I will never forget.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction & Design Services
    CONSTRUCTION & DESIGN SERVICES UTTAR PRADESH JAL MGAIVI (A Govt. of U.P.Undertaking) Head Office: TC-38V, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow-226010 HG Ph.: +915222728985 Fax: +91 5222728988 Vlsll us: www. cd su pj n. org e -m ai I : di rector@cd s u pjn. o rg Ref. 2, ..2[.-.8-( I l6f pate./..?. Construction of a Dedicated corridor (4 Lane including Extradosed Bridge across river Ganga) for old, differently abled persons during Kumbh and Magh Mela at Sangam, Allahabad (U.P.) India Replies/Clarifications to the Oueries raised on RFO cum RFP & Bid Documents by various firms in Pre-Bid Meetine flD on dated 25.06.2016 Regarding NIT No. 496|CGM-U Dedi.Coni.All.116 dated 06.04.2016 and subsequent corrigendum issued vide letter no. 556/CGM-IiDedi.Corri.All./16 dated 05.05.2016, a Pre-Bid Meeting (II) was held at Head Quarter of C&DS, UP Jal Nigam, Lucknow on dated 25.06.2016. Some of the firms participating in meeting raised some queries in person as well as through correspondence (electronic or otherwise) regarding the pre-qualification criteria mentioned in RFQ cum RFQ document and draft EPC Agreement. The Bid clarifications and amendments in RFQ cum RFP document and draft EPC agreement are attached herewith. Enclosure: As above. I (A K Rai) Chief General Manager (I) Copy to the following for information and necessarv action nlease:- l. Managing Director, U.P. Jal Nigam, Lucknow with enclosures. 2. Director, C&DS, U.P. Jal Nigam, Lucknow. J. General Manager (Ganga Bridge), C&DS, U.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Thesis on Network Arches 2013 by Per Tveit, Dr. Ing. Uia, Norway
    Systematic Thesis on Network Arches 2013 By Per Tveit, dr. ing. UiA, Norway Co-authors: B. Brunn, M. Chan, W. Graße, F. Millanes, M. Ortega, R. Presland, R. Lee, L. Šašek, F. Schanack, P. Steere, G. Wollmann, T. Zoli. The author prefers network arches with concrete ties and H profiles in the arch. A network arch of this type normally saves around ⅔ of the steel weight needed for other steel bridges. If there are steel beams in the tie, around 1/3 of the steel weight is likely to be saved. Network arches look nice. Network arches have been designed in many different ways. See chapter H: Network arches built or planned. My main publication: “The Network Arch” can be found on my homepage: http://home.uia.no/pert/ under the button “The Network Arch”. It was started in 2000 and is the result of an organic growth. Thus readers will often have a hard time if they are seeking information on specific items. The present publication should be more readable and should lead interested readers more directly to what they are looking for. This publication can only be found on the internet. It will be updated at least till 2014. There are many references in the text. They are supposed to lead to more information on the same subject. Thus the system of references at the bottom of the page is important. Contents Chapter A is a general chapter. The network arch is an arch bridge where some hangers cross each other at least twice. The hangers give the arches efficient support and high buckling strength.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 VI June 2018
    6 VI June 2018 http://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2018.6289 International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET) ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 6.887 Volume 6 Issue VI, June 2018- Available at www.ijraset.com Characteristic Study on Cable-Stayed and Extradosed Bridge Rohini R. Kavathekar1, Dr. N.K.Patil2 1Student of P.G., M.E. Civil,-Structure Sanjay Ghodawat Institutions, Atigre, Shivaji University, Kolhapur, India 2 Professor & Head , Civil Engg. Department, Sanjay Ghodawat Institutions, Atigre, Shivaji University, Kolhapur, India Abstract: This paper presents study of cable-stayed bridge and extradosed bridge. For analysis 100m, 150m, 200m, 250m and 300m spans are considered. Extradosed bridge is a novel idea bridge between Girder Bridge and cable-stayed bridge. This paper is concluded with study of various parameters of these types of bridges. The parametric study includes response of deck, deck moment, study of pylon, how the response of bridge varies span wise, from aesthetics point of view feasible bridge structure, pylon height and span length to thickness of girder ratio. The parameters of extradosed bridge are compared with cable-stayed bridge. Keywords: CSI Bridge, cable-stayed bridge, extradosed bridge, bending moment, shear force, pylon height, girder depth, aesthetic view. I. INTRODUCTION During XIX century, one of the most relevant contributions to bridge engineering has been the introduction of prestressed technique, which is a solution to the need of controlling stress on elements in bridges. Initially this technique was employed by means of internal and external prestressed tendons, until 1925 when modern cable-stayed bridges appeared –the Tempul Aqueduct, which was developed and built by Eduardo Torroja (Torroja, 1927).
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying and Preserving Historic Bridges
    Appendix B—State Departments of Transportation Alabama Department of Transportation Florida Department of Transportation 1409 Coliseum Boulevard 605 Suwannee Street Montgomery, AL 36130 Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 (334) 242-6311 (850) 488-8541 (334) 262-8041 (fax) (850) 277-3403 (fax) Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities Georgia Department of Transportation 3132 Channel Drive 2 Capital Square Juneau, AK 99801-7898 Atlanta, GA 30334 (907) 465-3900 (404) 656-5206 (907) 586-8365 (fax) (404) 657-8389 (fax) Internet address: [email protected] Arizona Department of Transportation 206 S. 17th Avenue Hawaii Department of Transportation Phoenix, AZ 85007 869 Punchbowl Street (602) 255-7011 Honolulu, HI 96813-5097 (602) 256-7659 (fax) (808) 587-2150 (808) 587-2167 (fax) Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department State Highway Department Building Idaho Transportation Department P.O. Box 2261, 10324 Interstate 30 3311 W. State Street Little Rock, AR 72203 P.O. Box 7129 (501) 569-2000 Boise, ID 83707 (501) 569-2400 (fax) (208) 334-8000 (208) 334-3858 (fax) California Department of Transportation 1120 N Street Illinois Department of Transportation P.O. Box 942673 2300 S. Dirksen Parkway Sacramento, CA 94273-0001 Springfield, IL 62764 (916) 654-5266 (217) 782-5597 (217) 782-6828 (fax) Colorado Department of Transportation 4201 East Arkansas Avenue Indiana Department of Transportation Denver, CO 80222 Indiana Government Center North (303) 757-9201 100 North Senate Avenue (303) 757-9149 (fax) Indianapolis, IN 46204-2249 (317) 232-5533 Connecticut Department of Transportation (317) 232-0238 (fax) P.O. Box 317546 / 2800 Berlin Turnpike Newington, CT 06131-7546 Iowa Department of Transportation (860) 594-3000 800 Lincoln Way Ames, IA 50010 Delaware Department of Transportation (515) 239-1101 Bay Road, Route 113, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Bricks and Bridges-2
    Subject: Social Science Topic : Bricks and Bridges Standard: IV No. of periods: 10 Teaching Aids : Images of stilt house, tent, bungalow, building, images of bridges- suspension, truss, cable stayed, movable bridge, cantilever bridge, text book, smart board, PPT, Crafts,Music,Sports and Computer. Message: This lesson makes the student aware about the scientific development in construction of bridges. Value : Science teaches us about how technology is developed and used. Social Science helps us to understand the impact of technology on common man’s life. It shows the extent of his dependence on modern technology and also his dependence on them like modern houses and bridges. Learning Objectives: 1. Students will be able to identify different types of materials used in constructing the house. 2. They will also be able to tell about different steps involved in brick making and thus understand the importance of using strong materials in constructing houses as well as bridges. 3. Students can easily tell about different types of bridges and their uses. Period 1: Warm up session: The teacher starts the session by showing some pictures of houses like stilt house, tent, bungalow and buildings. The teacher asks the students, 1. Identify the different types of houses? 2. Are all these houses made up of same material? 3. Which materials do you think we use to build them? Expected answers: 1. Stilt house, tent, bungalow and buildings. 2. No, they are made of different materials. 3. Mud, cloth, bricks, cement, steel, glass, cement, wood etc. The teacher tells students that different types of materials are used for building houses, in olden days as well as in modern times.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review on Comparative Study Between Girder Bridge and Extradosed Bridge by Using Staad.Pro Software
    International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 06 Issue: 11 | Nov 2019 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 A Review on Comparative Study between Girder Bridge and Extradosed Bridge by using Staad.pro Software Aware Satish1, Gaidhankar Karan2, Kale Vaishnavi3, Fulari Kedar4, Arab Abubakar5 1Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, N. B. Navale Sinhgad College of Engineering, Solapur, India 2,3,4,5Student, Department of Civil Engineering, N. B. Navale Sinhgad College of Engineering, Solapur, India ---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract - Extra dosed bridges are similar to cable stayed 1.1 Stability bridges. The stay cables are used for strengthening. This new type of bridges has been constructed in Japan. This concept is Stability of cable stayed bridges have been carries out introduced by J.Mathivat. This paper shows some example and many researchers .SHU and WANG investigated the stability difference between Extra dosed and cable stayed bridges in characteristics of cable stayed bridge by studying 3 structural aspects. The structural behavior of Extra dosed dimensional finite elements method. They contain design bridge differs from that of cable stayed bridge. The paper parameters such as main span length, cable arrangement, shows the free vibration and forced vibration behavior of types of pylon. The excessively large buckling length in some Extra dosed bridge. girders members can be minimized by introducing concept of fictitious, axial force to obtain buckling length of steel girder There are various types of girder bridges like box- members in cable stayed bridges. girder, plate girder, I-beam, T-beam etc. Plate girder bridges are the most common type of steel bridges generally used for 1.2 Safety Factors railway crossing of streams and rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Extradosed/Cable-Stayed
    CHAPTER 6: ENGINEERING CONCEPTS Image 6.5: Extradosed/ Cable Stayed Image 6.6: Extradosed/ Cable Stayed Extradosed/Cable-Stayed Enlargement The extradosed/cable-stayed bridge uses a series of cable-supported spans to cross the river with equal span lengths of approximately 300 feet, as shown in Figure 6.7. The superstructure would be supported by cables above the deck anchored at one end to a central pylon and at the other end to the edge of the deck. The towers or pylons would extend 48 feet above the deck. The deck elements could consist of either steel or concrete edge girders or concrete box girders. With a span length of 300 feet, it is anticipated that variable depth (haunched) girder elements would be practical and would provide optimal aesthetics, as shown in Figures 6.8 and 6.9. Figure 6.9 presents a full build concept that is designed to accommodate the widest cross section in the study, Alternative 8. The towers would consist of concrete elements located on the outside of the deck at the ends of each span. A variety of options are available for the arrangement of the superstructure cables. One advantage of extradosed or cable-stayed construction is that it is possible to perform the construction in a top-down fashion using balanced-cantilever erection. In this scenario, few if any temporary supports would be required in the Potomac River during construction. However, balanced cantilever construction results in significant unbalanced loads on the piers and foundations during construction, potentially resulting in larger and more expensive foundations.
    [Show full text]