DOCSLIB.ORG

UNITARY SPINOR METHODS in GENERAL RELATIVITY Hungarian

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UNITARY SPINOR METHODS in GENERAL RELATIVITY Hungarian KFKI-1989-09/B Z. PERJÉS UNITARY SPINOR METHODS IN GENERAL RELATIVITY Hungarian Academy of Sciences CENTRAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR PHYSICS BUDAPEST KFKI-1989-09/B PREPRINT UNITARY SPINOR METHODS IN GENERAL RELATIVITY Z. PERJES Central Research Institute for Physics H 1526 Budapest 114, P.OB.49, Hungary Mathematical Relativity miniconference, Australian National University. 1988. HU ISSN 0368 5330 Z. Perjés: Unitary spinor methods in general relativity KFKI 1989 09/B ABSTRACT A survey is given of the structure and applications of spinor fields in three dimensional (pseudo ) Riemannian manifolds. A systematic treatment, independent of the metric signature, is possible since there exists a fairly general structure, to be associated with unitary splnnors, which encompasses all but the reality properties. The discussion begins with the algebraic and analytic properties of unitary splnors, the Ricci identities and curvature spinor, followed by the spinor adjungation as space reflection, and 'he SUÍ2) and SU(1.1) spin coefficients with some applications. The rapidly increasing range of applications includes space times with Killing symmetries, the initial value formulation, positivity theorems on gravitational energy and topotogically massive gauge theories. 3. Перьеш: Унитарные спиномые методы в общей теории относительности. KFKI-1989-09/B АННОТАЦИЯ Рассматривается структура спинорных полей и их применение в трехмерных (псевдо-) римановских множествах. Независимо от сигнатуры метрики имеется воз­ можность систематического, независимого приближения, поскольку существует об­ щая структура, охватывающая, кроме действительности, все другие свойства. Об­ суждение начинается с рассмотрения алгебраических и аналитических свойств уни­ тарных спиноров, затем дается ознакомление с тождественностью Риччи и спинором кривизны, обратимостью спиноров, как пространственное отражение, а также со спиновыми коэффициентами SU(2) и SU(1,1). Количество применений быстро растет, в их числе: пространства-времена, допускающие симметрию Киллинга, задача с на­ чальными условиями, положительность гравитационной энергии и калибровочные по­ ля с топологической массой. I Perjós Z.: Unitér spinormodszerek az általános relativitáselméletben. KFKI 1989 09/B KIVONAT Áttekintjük a splnormezők szerkezetét és alkalmazásait háromdimenziós (pszeudo ) Ríemann sokaságokban A metrika szignatúrájától független rendszeres megközelítés lehetséges, mert létezik a valósságon kívül minden más tulajdonságot felölelő általános struktúra. A tárgyalást a spinorok algebrai és analitikus tulajdonságaival kezdjük, majd a Ricci azonosságokat, a görbületi spinort, spinorok adjungáltját, mint térbeli tükrőzöttet, az SU(2) ós SU(1,1) splnegyütthatókat ismertetjük Az alkalmazások száma gyorsan nő, közöttük: a Killing szimmetriát megengedő téridők, a kezdőértékprobléma, a gravitációs energia pozitivitása ós a mértékterek topológiai tömeggel 1. A LITTLE HISTORY One of the earliest successes of spinor techniques in general relativity is Witten's [l] version of the Petrov classification which was later perfected by Penrose [2] and complemented by the spin coefficient techniques of Newman and Penrose [3]. In the following years, the SL(2, C) spinors have gradually been accepted as a useful mathe­ matical working tool in relativity, even though they never ranked to the straightforward physical utility which spinors in particle physics enjoy. The prevailing view as to why spinors sail so well in curved space-time is that they are seen closely related to null and causal structures. Other insights of more physical nature have only recently been provided by the supersymmetric theories [4]. The applications of the spinors of unitary and pseudo-unitary subgroups of the Lorentz group escaped the attention of relativists until as late as 1970. Then, in an at­ tempt to establish a spinor approach to stationary space-times, the present author has worked out an SU(2) spinor formalism [5]. These technique* have been used for obtain­ ing exact solutions of the gravitational field equations [6]. A corresponding formalism for the non-compact group SU(1,1) has also been developed [7]. It hau been 2 shown possible to formulát» the stationary axisymmetric vacuum gravitational equations such that the complete description is carried by a set of SU(1,1) spin coefficients, and with no curvature quantities appearing. In 1980, Sommers [8] introduced the notion of 'space spinors' in connection with SU(2) spinors relative to a space-like foliation of the space-time. This approach has been taken up by Sen [9] for quantizing the spin-3/2 massless field in a curved background. Recently, the pace of applications has increased, due partly to the SU(2) spinorial nature of many supergravity models [4]. But SU(2) spinors enter Witten's expression for the gravitational energy [10], as well as the theory of topologically massive gauge fields [11]. A new spate of works followed Ashtekar's discovery of new canonical variables for the quantization of the gravitational degrees of freedom [12]. His configuration space is coordinatized essentially by the soldering forms of SU(2) spinors. Unitary spinors have been introduced on manifolds of arbitrary non-null congruences [13]. The ensuing description of space-time contains both the spinors in hypersurfaces and in the manifolds of Killing trajectories as special cases. It has already been noted by Barut [14] that SU(2) and SU(1,1) spinors can be treated in a unified formalism in which one does not specify the signature of the 3- metric. The signature-independent properties, characterizing what will be called uni­ tary spinors, embrace all spinorial relations but those involving adjunction. In the present note we shall show that there exists a remarkably elaborate structure shared by both genres of spinor fields in (pseudo-) Riemannian З-врасев. Adjoining of spinors is relegated to Sec. 5. Applications in general relativity will be discussed at the end of •ach section. s '{"* t )~% 4É* 3 2. UNITARY SPINORS The algebra of unitary spinors encompasses those properties of the SU(2) and SU(1,1) spinors which do not depend on the signature of the associated metric. 2.0 DEFINITION [15] Spin apace is a pair (E,c) where Б is a two-dimensional vector space over the field of complex (or real) numbers and с a symplectic structure on E. Note that с provides an ismorphism (2.1) £ : E -» E between E and the dual space E*. We shall use an index notation such that £д € E is an element of the vector space E and £A € E* an element of the dual space. Capital Roman spinor indices A, B,... may take the values 0 and 1. Then (2.1) can be written A д £ -» £в = £ «лв where {еАв) = ( « ft )• Note that cAB = -€вл- The inverse map employe the spinor tAB satisfying (2.2) елв*св=6* where 6£ is the identity map on E. 2.1 DEFINITION A spinor nfd0- of p upstairs and q downstairs indices is a (p, q) tensor over E. 2.2 PROPOSITION The linear map L: E -» E preserving the spinor eAB has the determinant 1. The group of the maps L is SL(2,C). The proof is all too easy. 2.3 DEFINITION The spinor (2.3) QABCD — *л[с*о)в> 4 called the metric, yields a bilinear map V ® V —» С where V is the vector space (2.4) V = {Ив № = 0}. The inclusion of V in E ® E* defines the map a : E ® E* -»V rendering to each v* e E ® E* its trace-free part. This map is sometimes called a soldering form and has the index structure o\ B where (2.5) о\в=<ГВА. Lower case Roman indices refer concisely to the vector space V. 2.4 DEFINITION Unitary spin space is the triplet (E,«, o) where a : E®E" -• V is the map satisfying i A i C i A i C ii (2.6) °c ° B +<>c <>B =9 6E Í ADCD andíT =<BO OD9 - The vector space V is oriented because Trvx (v3, v3] defines canonically a three-form e(v1,V2,v3) on V [16]. In the index notation we have tijk = е^ыу/д where eijk is the skew numerical Levi-Civita symbol and g = det[gik]. (Thus с<>* is imaginary when the signature of the metric is negative.) A 2.5 COROLLARY [5] The soldering forms oB satisfy the Lie product rule J (2.7) O~ÍACO% ~°ÍAO^ÍB — v2ieiiho AB. Here the right-hand side changes sign under reversal of the orientation of V. 2.6 PROPOSITION Let F<» = F{ih] be a bivector. Then the spinor FABCD = F**aABacD has the decomposition (2.8) FABOD — ЖвоФло -гСлсФво)- Proof. In three dimensions, the tensor Fik can be written equivalently ik (2.9) Fi = y/TfitiikF . 5 The (axial) vector Fi has the spinor components Флв = алвЪ- в в Using the identity <^ <т*в = -Í*, we have £ = -о? ФАв- Substitution of (2.9) in флв yields Флв=у/Що*лви,шР**. This contains the terms on the right hand side of Eq. (2.7), hence С (2.10) Флв=-%РАО в- Now adding the terms %(FADCB - FADCB) to FABCD, it can be written identically as FABCD = FA\B\C\D\ + F\A\D\C)B • For an arbitrary spinor 17 with a pair of skew indices R we have ibis -riBA = €ABnR . Thus FABCD = \(*BDFARC * + eAcFRD*B). Inserting here (2.10), the decomposition (2.8) follows. 2.7 DIGRESSION TO SL(2,C) The algebraic properties of unitary spinors can be derived [5] from the 5L(2, C) spinor algebra in the presence of a preferred non-null four-vector a. The soldering forms a of 5L(2, C) satisfy the defining relation [3] (211) a»AC'°vB +аиВС'°цА =9**еЛВ where Greek indices /1,1/,... range through the values 0, 1, 2 and 3 and primed spinor indices refer to the complex conjugate representation. A hat will signify that the entity refers to the 4-space-time whenever such an emphasis is necessary. Choose coordinates adapted to the non-null vector a such that the metric $M„ is independent of x° = t.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arxiv:Math/0212058V2 [Math.DG] 18 Nov 2003 Nosbrusof Subgroups Into Rdc C.[Oc 00 Et .].Eape O Uhsae a Spaces Such for Examples 3.2])
    THE SPINOR BUNDLE OF RIEMANNIAN PRODUCTS FRANK KLINKER Abstract. In this note we compare the spinor bundle of a Riemannian mani- fold (M = M1 ×···×MN ,g) with the spinor bundles of the Riemannian factors (Mi,gi). We show that - without any holonomy conditions - the spinor bundle of (M,g) for a special class of metrics is isomorphic to a bundle obtained by tensoring the spinor bundles of (Mi,gi) in an appropriate way. For N = 2 and an one dimensional factor this construction was developed in [Baum 1989a]. Although the fact for general factors is frequently used in (at least physics) literature, a proof was missing. I would like to thank Shahram Biglari, Mario Listing, Marc Nardmann and Hans-Bert Rademacher for helpful comments. Special thanks go to Helga Baum, who pointed out some difficulties arising in the pseudo-Riemannian case. We consider a Riemannian manifold (M = M MN ,g), which is a product 1 ×···× of Riemannian spin manifolds (Mi,gi) and denote the projections on the respective factors by pi. Furthermore the dimension of Mi is Di such that the dimension of N M is given by D = i=1 Di. The tangent bundle of M is decomposed as P ∗ ∗ (1) T M = p Tx1 M p Tx MN . (x0,...,xN ) 1 1 ⊕···⊕ N N N We omit the projections and write TM = i=1 TMi. The metric g of M need not be the product metric of the metrics g on M , but L i i is assumed to be of the form c d (2) gab(x) = Ai (x)gi (xi)Ai (x), T Mi a cd b for D1 + + Di−1 +1 a,b D1 + + Di, 1 i N ··· ≤ ≤ ··· ≤ ≤ In particular, for those metrics the splitting (1) is orthogonal, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Spinor Representation
    Eur. Phys. J. C (2017) 77:487 DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5035-y Regular Article - Theoretical Physics On the spinor representation J. M. Hoff da Silva1,a, C. H. Coronado Villalobos1,2,b, Roldão da Rocha3,c, R. J. Bueno Rogerio1,d 1 Departamento de Física e Química, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Guaratinguetá, SP, Brazil 2 Instituto de Física, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Av. Gal. Milton Tavares de Souza s/n, Gragoatá, Niterói, RJ 24210-346, Brazil 3 Centro de Matemática, Computação e Cognição, Universidade Federal do ABC-UFABC, Santo André 09210-580, Brazil Received: 16 February 2017 / Accepted: 30 June 2017 / Published online: 21 July 2017 © The Author(s) 2017. This article is an open access publication Abstract A systematic study of the spinor representation at least in principle, related to a set of fermionic observ- by means of the fermionic physical space is accomplished ables. Our aim in this paper is to delineate the importance and implemented. The spinor representation space is shown of the representation space, by studying its properties, and to be constrained by the Fierz–Pauli–Kofink identities among then relating them to their physical consequences. As one the spinor bilinear covariants. A robust geometric and topo- will realize, the representation space is quite complicated due logical structure can be manifested from the spinor space, to the constraints coming out the Fierz–Pauli–Kofink iden- wherein the first and second homotopy groups play promi- tities. However, a systematic study of the space properties nent roles on the underlying physical properties, associated ends up being useful to relate different domains (subspaces) to fermionic fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Majorana Spinors
    MAJORANA SPINORS JOSE´ FIGUEROA-O'FARRILL Contents 1. Complex, real and quaternionic representations 2 2. Some basis-dependent formulae 5 3. Clifford algebras and their spinors 6 4. Complex Clifford algebras and the Majorana condition 10 5. Examples 13 One dimension 13 Two dimensions 13 Three dimensions 14 Four dimensions 14 Six dimensions 15 Ten dimensions 16 Eleven dimensions 16 Twelve dimensions 16 ...and back! 16 Summary 19 References 19 These notes arose as an attempt to conceptualise the `symplectic Majorana{Weyl condition' in 5+1 dimensions; but have turned into a general discussion of spinors. Spinors play a crucial role in supersymmetry. Part of their versatility is that they come in many guises: `Dirac', `Majorana', `Weyl', `Majorana{Weyl', `symplectic Majorana', `symplectic Majorana{Weyl', and their `pseudo' counterparts. The tra- ditional physics approach to this topic is a mixed bag of tricks using disparate aspects of representation theory of finite groups. In these notes we will attempt to provide a uniform treatment based on the classification of Clifford algebras, a work dating back to the early 60s and all but ignored by the theoretical physics com- munity. Recent developments in superstring theory have made us re-examine the conditions for the existence of different kinds of spinors in spacetimes of arbitrary signature, and we believe that a discussion of this more uniform approach is timely and could be useful to the student meeting this topic for the first time or to the practitioner who has difficulty remembering the answer to questions like \when do symplectic Majorana{Weyl spinors exist?" The notes are organised as follows.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2004.02090V2 [Math.NT]
    ON INDEFINITE AND POTENTIALLY UNIVERSAL QUADRATIC FORMS OVER NUMBER FIELDS FEI XU AND YANG ZHANG Abstract. A number field k admits a binary integral quadratic form which represents all integers locally but not globally if and only if the class number of k is bigger than one. In this case, there are only finitely many classes of such binary integral quadratic forms over k. A number field k admits a ternary integral quadratic form which represents all integers locally but not globally if and only if the class number of k is even. In this case, there are infinitely many classes of such ternary integral quadratic forms over k. An integral quadratic form over a number field k with more than one variables represents all integers of k over the ring of integers of a finite extension of k if and only if this quadratic form represents 1 over the ring of integers of a finite extension of k. 1. Introduction Universal integral quadratic forms over Z have been studied extensively by Dickson [7] and Ross [24] for both positive definite and indefinite cases in the 1930s. A positive definite integral quadratic form is called universal if it represents all positive integers. Ross pointed out that there is no ternary positive definite universal form over Z in [24] (see a more conceptual proof in [9, Lemma 3]). However, this result is not true over totally real number fields. In [20], Maass proved that x2 + y2 + z2 is a positive definite universal quadratic form over the ring of integers of Q(√5).
    [Show full text]
  • SPINORS and SPACE–TIME ANISOTROPY
    Sergiu Vacaru and Panayiotis Stavrinos SPINORS and SPACE{TIME ANISOTROPY University of Athens ————————————————— c Sergiu Vacaru and Panyiotis Stavrinos ii - i ABOUT THE BOOK This is the first monograph on the geometry of anisotropic spinor spaces and its applications in modern physics. The main subjects are the theory of grav- ity and matter fields in spaces provided with off–diagonal metrics and asso- ciated anholonomic frames and nonlinear connection structures, the algebra and geometry of distinguished anisotropic Clifford and spinor spaces, their extension to spaces of higher order anisotropy and the geometry of gravity and gauge theories with anisotropic spinor variables. The book summarizes the authors’ results and can be also considered as a pedagogical survey on the mentioned subjects. ii - iii ABOUT THE AUTHORS Sergiu Ion Vacaru was born in 1958 in the Republic of Moldova. He was educated at the Universities of the former URSS (in Tomsk, Moscow, Dubna and Kiev) and reveived his PhD in theoretical physics in 1994 at ”Al. I. Cuza” University, Ia¸si, Romania. He was employed as principal senior researcher, as- sociate and full professor and obtained a number of NATO/UNESCO grants and fellowships at various academic institutions in R. Moldova, Romania, Germany, United Kingdom, Italy, Portugal and USA. He has published in English two scientific monographs, a university text–book and more than hundred scientific works (in English, Russian and Romanian) on (super) gravity and string theories, extra–dimension and brane gravity, black hole physics and cosmolgy, exact solutions of Einstein equations, spinors and twistors, anistoropic stochastic and kinetic processes and thermodynamics in curved spaces, generalized Finsler (super) geometry and gauge gravity, quantum field and geometric methods in condensed matter physics.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 the Dirac Equation and Spinors
    5 The Dirac Equation and Spinors In this section we develop the appropriate wavefunctions for fundamental fermions and bosons. 5.1 Notation Review The three dimension differential operator is : ∂ ∂ ∂ = , , (5.1) ∂x ∂y ∂z We can generalise this to four dimensions ∂µ: 1 ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ = , , , (5.2) µ c ∂t ∂x ∂y ∂z 5.2 The Schr¨odinger Equation First consider a classical non-relativistic particle of mass m in a potential U. The energy-momentum relationship is: p2 E = + U (5.3) 2m we can substitute the differential operators: ∂ Eˆ i pˆ i (5.4) → ∂t →− to obtain the non-relativistic Schr¨odinger Equation (with = 1): ∂ψ 1 i = 2 + U ψ (5.5) ∂t −2m For U = 0, the free particle solutions are: iEt ψ(x, t) e− ψ(x) (5.6) ∝ and the probability density ρ and current j are given by: 2 i ρ = ψ(x) j = ψ∗ ψ ψ ψ∗ (5.7) | | −2m − with conservation of probability giving the continuity equation: ∂ρ + j =0, (5.8) ∂t · Or in Covariant notation: µ µ ∂µj = 0 with j =(ρ,j) (5.9) The Schr¨odinger equation is 1st order in ∂/∂t but second order in ∂/∂x. However, as we are going to be dealing with relativistic particles, space and time should be treated equally. 25 5.3 The Klein-Gordon Equation For a relativistic particle the energy-momentum relationship is: p p = p pµ = E2 p 2 = m2 (5.10) · µ − | | Substituting the equation (5.4), leads to the relativistic Klein-Gordon equation: ∂2 + 2 ψ = m2ψ (5.11) −∂t2 The free particle solutions are plane waves: ip x i(Et p x) ψ e− · = e− − · (5.12) ∝ The Klein-Gordon equation successfully describes spin 0 particles in relativistic quan- tum field theory.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Lecture 1: Spinors, Their Properties and Spinor Prodcuts
    2 Lecture 1: spinors, their properties and spinor prodcuts Consider a theory of a single massless Dirac fermion . The Lagrangian is = ¯ i@ˆ . (2.1) L ⇣ ⌘ The Dirac equation is i@ˆ =0, (2.2) which, in momentum space becomes pUˆ (p)=0, pVˆ (p)=0, (2.3) depending on whether we take positive-energy(particle) or negative-energy (anti-particle) solutions of the Dirac equation. Therefore, in the massless case no di↵erence appears in equations for paprticles and anti-particles. Finding one solution is therefore sufficient. The algebra is simplified if we take γ matrices in Weyl repreentation where µ µ 0 σ γ = µ . (2.4) " σ¯ 0 # and σµ =(1,~σ) andσ ¯µ =(1, ~ ). The Pauli matrices are − 01 0 i 10 σ = ,σ= − ,σ= . (2.5) 1 10 2 i 0 3 0 1 " # " # " − # The matrix γ5 is taken to be 10 γ5 = − . (2.6) " 01# We can use the matrix γ5 to construct projection operators on to upper and lower parts of the four-component spinors U and V . The projection operators are 1 γ 1+γ Pˆ = − 5 , Pˆ = 5 . (2.7) L 2 R 2 Let us write u (p) U(p)= L , (2.8) uR(p) ! where uL(p) and uR(p) are two-component spinors. Since µ 0 pµσ pˆ = µ , (2.9) " pµσ¯ 0(p) # andpU ˆ (p) = 0, the two-component spinors satisfy the following (Weyl) equations µ µ pµσ uR(p)=0,pµσ¯ uL(p)=0. (2.10) –3– Suppose that we have a left handed spinor uL(p) that satisfies the Weyl equation.
    [Show full text]
  • SEMISIMPLE WEAKLY SYMMETRIC PSEUDO–RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS 1. Introduction There Have Been a Number of Important Extensions of Th
    SEMISIMPLE WEAKLY SYMMETRIC PSEUDO{RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS ZHIQI CHEN AND JOSEPH A. WOLF Abstract. We develop the classification of weakly symmetric pseudo{riemannian manifolds G=H where G is a semisimple Lie group and H is a reductive subgroup. We derive the classification from the cases where G is compact, and then we discuss the (isotropy) representation of H on the tangent space of G=H and the signature of the invariant pseudo{riemannian metric. As a consequence we obtain the classification of semisimple weakly symmetric manifolds of Lorentz signature (n − 1; 1) and trans{lorentzian signature (n − 2; 2). 1. Introduction There have been a number of important extensions of the theory of riemannian symmetric spaces. Weakly symmetric spaces, introduced by A. Selberg [8], play key roles in number theory, riemannian geometry and harmonic analysis. See [11]. Pseudo{riemannian symmetric spaces, including semisimple symmetric spaces, play central but complementary roles in number theory, differential geometry and relativity, Lie group representation theory and harmonic analysis. Much of the activity there has been on the Lorentz cases, which are of particular interest in physics. Here we study the classification of weakly symmetric pseudo{ riemannian manifolds G=H where G is a semisimple Lie group and H is a reductive subgroup. We apply the result to obtain explicit listings for metrics of riemannian (Table 5.1), lorentzian (Table 5.2) and trans{ lorentzian (Table 5.3) signature. The pseudo{riemannian symmetric case was analyzed extensively in the classical paper of M. Berger [1]. Our analysis in the weakly symmetric setting starts with the classifications of Kr¨amer[6], Brion [2], Mikityuk [7] and Yakimova [16, 17] for the weakly symmetric riemannian manifolds.
    [Show full text]
  • 13 the Dirac Equation
    13 The Dirac Equation A two-component spinor a χ = b transforms under rotations as iθn J χ e− · χ; ! with the angular momentum operators, Ji given by: 1 Ji = σi; 2 where σ are the Pauli matrices, n is the unit vector along the axis of rotation and θ is the angle of rotation. For a relativistic description we must also describe Lorentz boosts generated by the operators Ki. Together Ji and Ki form the algebra (set of commutation relations) Ki;Kj = iεi jkJk − ε Ji;Kj = i i jkKk ε Ji;Jj = i i jkJk 1 For a spin- 2 particle Ki are represented as i Ki = σi; 2 giving us two inequivalent representations. 1 χ Starting with a spin- 2 particle at rest, described by a spinor (0), we can boost to give two possible spinors α=2n σ χR(p) = e · χ(0) = (cosh(α=2) + n σsinh(α=2))χ(0) · or α=2n σ χL(p) = e− · χ(0) = (cosh(α=2) n σsinh(α=2))χ(0) − · where p sinh(α) = j j m and Ep cosh(α) = m so that (Ep + m + σ p) χR(p) = · χ(0) 2m(Ep + m) σ (pEp + m p) χL(p) = − · χ(0) 2m(Ep + m) p 57 Under the parity operator the three-moment is reversed p p so that χL χR. Therefore if we 1 $ − $ require a Lorentz description of a spin- 2 particles to be a proper representation of parity, we must include both χL and χR in one spinor (note that for massive particles the transformation p p $ − can be achieved by a Lorentz boost).
    [Show full text]
  • Tensor-Spinor Theory of Gravitation in General Even Space-Time Dimensions
    Physics Letters B 817 (2021) 136288 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Physics Letters B www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb Tensor-spinor theory of gravitation in general even space-time dimensions ∗ Hitoshi Nishino a, ,1, Subhash Rajpoot b a Department of Physics, College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, California State University, 2345 E. San Ramon Avenue, M/S ST90, Fresno, CA 93740, United States of America b Department of Physics & Astronomy, California State University, 1250 Bellflower Boulevard, Long Beach, CA 90840, United States of America a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: We present a purely tensor-spinor theory of gravity in arbitrary even D = 2n space-time dimensions. Received 18 March 2021 This is a generalization of the purely vector-spinor theory of gravitation by Bars and MacDowell (BM) in Accepted 9 April 2021 4D to general even dimensions with the signature (2n − 1, 1). In the original BM-theory in D = (3, 1), Available online 21 April 2021 the conventional Einstein equation emerges from a theory based on the vector-spinor field ψμ from a Editor: N. Lambert m lagrangian free of both the fundamental metric gμν and the vierbein eμ . We first improve the original Keywords: BM-formulation by introducing a compensator χ, so that the resulting theory has manifest invariance = =− = Bars-MacDowell theory under the nilpotent local fermionic symmetry: δψ Dμ and δ χ . We next generalize it to D Vector-spinor (2n − 1, 1), following the same principle based on a lagrangian free of fundamental metric or vielbein Tensors-spinors rs − now with the field content (ψμ1···μn−1 , ωμ , χμ1···μn−2 ), where ψμ1···μn−1 (or χμ1···μn−2 ) is a (n 1) (or Metric-less formulation (n − 2)) rank tensor-spinor.
    [Show full text]
  • The Construction of Spinors in Geometric Algebra
    The Construction of Spinors in Geometric Algebra Matthew R. Francis∗ and Arthur Kosowsky† Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University 136 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854 (Dated: February 4, 2008) The relationship between spinors and Clifford (or geometric) algebra has long been studied, but little consistency may be found between the various approaches. However, when spinors are defined to be elements of the even subalgebra of some real geometric algebra, the gap between algebraic, geometric, and physical methods is closed. Spinors are developed in any number of dimensions from a discussion of spin groups, followed by the specific cases of U(1), SU(2), and SL(2, C) spinors. The physical observables in Schr¨odinger-Pauli theory and Dirac theory are found, and the relationship between Dirac, Lorentz, Weyl, and Majorana spinors is made explicit. The use of a real geometric algebra, as opposed to one defined over the complex numbers, provides a simpler construction and advantages of conceptual and theoretical clarity not available in other approaches. I. INTRODUCTION Spinors are used in a wide range of fields, from the quantum physics of fermions and general relativity, to fairly abstract areas of algebra and geometry. Independent of the particular application, the defining characteristic of spinors is their behavior under rotations: for a given angle θ that a vector or tensorial object rotates, a spinor rotates by θ/2, and hence takes two full rotations to return to its original configuration. The spin groups, which are universal coverings of the rotation groups, govern this behavior, and are frequently defined in the language of geometric (Clifford) algebras [1, 2].
    [Show full text]
  • On Certain Identities Involving Basic Spinors and Curvature Spinors
    ON CERTAIN IDENTITIES INVOLVING BASIC SPINORS AND CURVATURE SPINORS H. A. BUCHDAHL (received 22 May 1961) 1. Introduction The spinor analysis of Infeld and van der Waerden [1] is particularly well suited to the transcription of given flat space wave equations into forms which'constitute possible generalizations appropriate to Riemann spaces [2]. The basic elements of this calculus are (i) the skew-symmetric spinor y^, (ii) the hermitian tensor-spinor a*** (generalized Pauli matrices), and (iii) M the curvature spinor P ykl. When one deals with wave equations in Riemann spaces F4 one is apt to be confronted with expressions of somewhat be- wildering appearance in so far as they may involve products of a large number of <r-symbols many of the indices of which may be paired in all sorts of ways either with each other or with the indices of the components of the curvature spinors. Such expressions are generally capable of great simplifi- cation, but how the latter may be achieved is often far from obvious. It is the purpose of this paper to present a number of useful relations between basic tensors and spinors, commonly known relations being taken for gran- ted [3], [4], [5]. That some of these new relations appear as more or less trivial consequences of elementary identities is largely the result of a diligent search for their simplest derivation, once they had been obtained in more roundabout ways. Certain relations take a particularly simple form when the Vt is an Einstein space, and some necessary and sufficient conditions relating to Ein- stein spaces and to spaces of constant Riemannian curvature are considered in the last section.
    [Show full text]