DOCSLIB.ORG

Schlumberger, Source Abandonment in Westport Resources Corporation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Schlumberger, Source Abandonment in Westport Resources Corporation Raymond N. Dickes Radiation Safety Officer Schlumberger Explosives Safety Officer Oilfield Services January 15, 2003 Nuclear Regulatory Commission 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011-8064 RE: Source Abandonment in Westport Resources Corporation Well - OSCG 763 #11 Dear Sir or Madam: This is letter is to confirm the abandonment of irretrievable sources in a well in accordance with Part 39, Section 39.77(d). The original abandonment plan for this well included placing a 9 5/8" casing liner in Sidetrack #1. The casing liner for the new borehole would become the mechanical deflection device for the abandoned borehole. However, after drilling Sidetrack #1 the decision was made to plug and abandon the well in its entirety. Unbeknownst to Schlumberger, the operator of the well contacted MMS on January 10, 2003 to alter their plan to include plug and abandonment procedures. Approval for plug and abandonment of the well was granted by Mr. David Moore of the MMS as shown in the attached well schematic. You will note the cement plug dressed off from 11,980'to 12,014' has taken up the function of the original deflection device. In addition to the 567 feet of cement spotted on top of the logging tool, four additional cement plugs and a cement retainer where placed in the original borehole as shown in the well schematic. Additional information for this abandonment is attached. Please let me know if you require any further information. Sincerely, CN ,N. Dickes 200 Gillingham Lane, Sugar Land, Texas 77478, Telo(281) 285-8775, Fax (281) 285-8526 Source Abandonment - Westport Resources Corporation Well: OCSG 763 #11 Date of Occurrence: 12/29/2002 16 Ci, Am241 Be, Neutron Source, Serial #A1342 Source Identification: 16 Ci, Am241Be, Neutron Source, Serial #G5012 1.7 Ci, Cs137, Density Source, Serial #A2023 Westport Resources Corporation Well: OCS-G 763 #11 Well Identification: Field: West Cameron Block180 API#: 17-700-41150-00 Offshore Louisiana 567' of cement on top of the tool at 12,014', dressed from 11,776'. Additional cement Seal Results: plugs were set for P&A at the following depths: 6030' - 5800', 5685'-5360', 5360'- 5210', 450'- 250'. Total of 1,478' of cement. Recovery Attempts: Multiple attempts from 12/23/2002 to 12/29/2002 16 Ci, Am241 Be, Neutron Source, Serial #A1342 @ 12,623 ft Depth of Sources: 16 Ci, Am241Be, Neutron Source, Serial #G5012 @ 12,611 ft 1.7 Ci, Cs137, Density Source, Serial #A2023 @ 12,636 ft 12,720' MD Depth of Well: 11,650' TVD Identification: Plaque as required by Part 39 has been ordered and will be attached to the well. Reports: No other agency will receive a copy of this report. Initial Telephone NRC (Tom Andrews, Fred Brown & Ken Brockman) at 10:27 a.m. on Contact: December 27, 2002. Schlumberger RADIATION FISHING & ABANDONMENT REPORT ý Offshore (OCS Waters) E] Land or State Lease Waters Date 12/23/2002 Time 19:30 Company Name (Full Name) Westport Resources Corporation Well Name or (OCS-G No. or State Lease No.) OCSG 763 #11 Offshore State of Louisiana Rig Name Ocean Crusader API Number (If Available or CLSD) 17-700-41150-00 Location of Lease West Cameron 180 County or Parish Cameron State Louisiana District Houston Offshore Sales Engr John Crawford TD 12720' Hole Size 12.25" Deviation 36 degrees Casing Depth 5435' Casing Size 13.375" Depth of Fish (Top) 12582' (Bottom) 12709' Source Type (1) x 2 Two NSR-F Source Type (2) GSR-J Source Activity (1) 592 GBq each Source Activity (2) 63 GBq SerialNo. (1) G5012, A1342 SerialNo. (2) A2023 Isotope (1) Am24lBe Isotope (2) Ce 137 Depth (1) 12611',12623' Depth (2) 12636' Leak Test Date (1) (5012) 11/6/02 (1342) 9/15/02 Leak Test Date (2) 9/5/02 Leak Test Results (1) (5012) 6.83E-06 (1342)9.56E-06 Leak Test Results (2) <1.OE-07 Tool String (Head to Bottom LEHQT/DPTC/DTCH/HNGSiNPLC/ECS/HGNS/HRCC/HRMS/ AH 184/AH 184/DSST/AITH Date and Time Stuck 12/23/2002 19:00 Date and Time Cement Pumped 12/29/02 @ 09:00 a.m. Hole Conditions Driller had problems at this depth, reamed, went back to bottom and came out slick. Fishing Attempts See attached. Comments (what happened to get stuck?, etc.,): Sat down at 12,250', 12,360', 12,370' briefly. Logged up at 1800 ft/hr. Became stuck at 12412'. Worked the tool for 30 minutes and began fishing. Wireline Engineer: Damian Ferguson, Houston Offshore, 281.480.2000 ADTI Company Reps: Bruce Henson and Jimmy Craft, Rig Ph#: 832.461.0611 NOTE: Regulatory agencies should be contacted ONLY by the Schlumberger Technology Corporation (STC) Radiation Safety Officer or, if unavailable, his designee. Notified: NRC or State of: Name: Tom Andrews NRC Name: Fred Brown Ken Brockman Date: 12/27/02 Date: Time: 10:27 a.m. CST Time: ABANDONMENT The following is a summary of NRC and/or Agreement States regulations that must be followed when abandoning an irretrievable well logging source(s). The specific regulations are found in 10 CFR 39.15 and equivalent regulations in Agreement States. An irretrievablewell logging source means any licensed radioactive sealed source that becomes lodged in a well and cannot be retrieved after reasonable efforts have been made to recover the source(s). 1. If a well logging source is irretrievable, the following requirements must be implemented. a) The source(s) must be immobilized and sealed in place with a cement plug. The cement has to be dyed red in Texas as a condition of the Texas Railroad Commission (others occasionally). b) A mechanical deflection device must be set at some point in the well above the cement plug to prevent inadvertent intrusion on the source, unless the cement plug and sources(s) are not accessible to any subsequent drilling operations. The mechanical device can be devices such as a whipstock, old drill bit, etc. For LWD, drillpipe and/or collars left on top of the BHA usually are approved as a deflection device. c) A permanent identification plaque, (supplied by your QHSE Manager) made of stainless steel (or brass, bronze and monel), must be mounted at the surface of the well unless the mounting of the plaque is not practical (i.e. subsea completion). 2. The STC RSO (or his designee) will notify the NRC or Agreement State of the abandonment plan developed by/with the client. The NRC or Agreement State must approve the abandonment plan prior to implementation. The federal and/or state oil and gas well permitting agency normally will also require that they approve the abandonment plan. The contact with the well permitting agency is the responsibility of the well owner/client but we should advise him/her of that fact as a courtesy. 3. If any changes must be made to the abandonment plan submitted to the NRC or Agreement State, the STC RSO must be informed so that he/she can get approval of the modification, as appropriate. The actual abandonment must not begin until any abandonment plan or modification to that plan is approved by the appropriate agency. 4. The STC Radiation Safety Officer must file a written report with the NRC or Agreement State within 30 days after the abandonment. The facility management should file a written report within 10 days to the STC Radiation Safety Officer via the Health, Safety and Environment Manager. The facility report should cover the final abandonment details such as: a) Actual date of abandonment. b) Any changes in the data sent with the approved abandonment plan. c) A new well diagram if different from the that submitted with the approved abandonment plan. d) Any information pertinent to the abandonment that the STC RSO may not have for his/her final report. e) If all data sent to the STC RSO is still applicable for the final report, an e-mail or fax is to be sent to the STC RSO confirming that fact so that he/she can be ensured that the data sent to the appropriate agency is totally accurate. Most facilities send a completely new report since many these documents often are incomplete or are poor quality fax reproductions. If there are any questions regarding these procedures, discuss them with your Operations Manager. FACILITY MANAGEMENT MUST ENSURE THAT THE FINAL ABANDONMENT REPORT IS SUBMITTED TO THE STC RADIATION SAFETY OFFICER. Fishing Summary for Westport Resources Corp - OCSG-763 First attempt using a 5" OD overshot and 3 3/8" grapple fumished by STS, run by Smith International fishinig hand. After engaging the fish, fish became struck, jars wentf'off and driller moved 16' up and pipe became stuck for 1.5 hours, pipe came free, POOH and found grapple was cracked and no fish. Second attempt using a Bowen 3 3/8" Basket Grapple with 11 ¾' OD overshot. RIH circulated through overshot for 3 1/ hours trying to get down. Came 11' form TOF and could not make additional footage. POOH and found overshot broken. 12.3" piece of the 11 ¾' overshot broke down hole. Currently attempting to fish this piece of the overshot out of the hole using a tapered-screw spear. Cement has been ordered as per ADTJ. OIL t7 44 wr -*1 IN SCHLUMBERGER FISHING REPORT l•oniaential Open Hole WAS FISH RETRIEVED ON FIRST DESCENT? DYes WINo Customer Elected to: Cut & Thread LII Pull Off [] Other - What Changes Followed? Release ECRD [ LWF Abandonment Company Date ADTI/Westport December 23, 2002 Ustnct Well Service rder rnumber County Houston OS / 6250 OCS 763 #11 ST00 BP00 9E+06 9105863 Offshore Uivision Feld unit Number =ae REW West Cameron 180 733 TX Rig Name Company man Ocean Crusader Sonny Cambell IOOlstring I otaT Deptn Hole Size Englneer PEX/DSIIECS/HNGS/DTC/DTPC 12285 12 Damian Ferguson 7able Iype Head Type Casing Depth Casing Size Operator 7-46 PXS LEH-QT 5435 7.6 Randy Watson Mud I ype Mud Weight viscosity BHT Oi•SolidS uperator Fresh 13 46 225 34 Ken Stewart Drag on unlipipe Before Logging Dev Stuck Depth Weight Indicator Reading Witn 001 lbs 1 12285 Free &Moving up Just Before Sticking 6100 Stuck Moving Up m Speed Stopped Stuck Moving Down 1800 ft/hr Reason for Stopping: Stopped tor OW ong.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Final 2000 (1 Parte).Pdf
    “MEDITERRANEAN - SEA OF OPPORTUNITIES” have the pleasure of inviting you to attend the fifth Offshore Mediterranean Conference and Exhibition that will take place in IRavenna, Italy, on March 28-30, 2001. OMC 2001 will be the first important petroleum event in the Mediterranean area of the Third Millennium, the first decades of which will undoubtedly be of dramatical importance for the oil industry dedicating huge efforts and funds in innovation and new technologies, as well as inve- sting in the construction of infrastructures for the transfer of energy. In fact the boiling projects and ideas where to ship the huge reserves of oil and gas from North Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia are converging into the Mediterranean. That is why the general theme of the forthcoming OMC 2001 is: “Mediterranean – Sea of Opportunities” Eminent keynote speakers will discuss “The Evolving Geo-economics of the Oil & Gas in the Mediterranean” during the Opening Plenary Session on March 28, 2001 while the programme of the closing day includes a Round Table on E-Business. Moreover a Panel Session on “Environmental Issues Related to Exploitation and Decommissioning of Offshore Platforms” is scheduled on Thursday morning. Representatives from the involved countries, like Egypt, Libya, Algeria, Tunisia, Iraq, Europe and Central Asia Countries will highlight their view- points offering the international oil industry convened at OMC 2001 the chance to better plan and monitor future investments in the Mediterranean area. The conference programme will comprise three parallel sessions covering all aspects of the Exploration and Production activities, as well as special session dedicated to Instrumentation and Automation Systems applied to Offshore industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report on the Investigation of the Macondo Well Blowout
    Final Report on the Investigation of the Macondo Well Blowout Deepwater Horizon Study Group March 1, 2011 The Deepwater Horizon Study Group (DHSG) was formed by members of the Center for Catastrophic Risk Management (CCRM) in May 2010 in response to the blowout of the Macondo well on April 20, 2010. A fundamental premise in the DHSG work is: we look back to understand the why‘s and how‘s of this disaster so we can better understand how best to go forward. The goal of the DHSG work is defining how to best move forward – assessing what major steps are needed to develop our national oil and gas resources in a reliable, responsible, and accountable manner. Deepwater Horizon Study Group Investigation of the Macondo Well Blowout Disaster This Page Intentionally Left Blank Deepwater Horizon Study Group Investigation of the Macondo Well Blowout Disaster In Memoriam Karl Kleppinger Jason Anderson Roughneck Senior tool pusher Adam Weise Dewey Revette Roughneck Driller Shane Roshto Stephen Curtis Roughneck Assistant driller Wyatt Kemp Donald Clark Derrick man Assistant driller Gordon Jones Dale Burkeen Mud engineer Crane operator Blair Manuel Mud engineer 1 Deepwater Horizon Study Group Investigation of the Macondo Well Blowout Disaster In Memoriam The Environment 2 Deepwater Horizon Study Group Investigation of the Macondo Well Blowout Disaster Table of Contents In Memoriam...............................................................................................................................................1 Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Oil and Gas Well Drilling and Servicing Etool
    U.S. Department of Labor Occupational Safety & Health Administration www.osha.gov [skip navigational links] Search Advanced Search | A-Z Index Home General Safety Site Preparation Drilling Well Completion Servicing Plug and Abandon the Well Illustrated Glossary Drilling Rig Components Click on the name below or a number on the graphic to see a definition and a more detailed photo of the object. 1. Crown Block and Water Table 2. Catline Boom and Hoist Line 3. Drilling Line 4. Monkeyboard 5. Traveling Block 6. Top Drive 7. Mast 8. Drill Pipe 9. Doghouse 10. Blowout Preventer 11. Water Tank 12. Electric Cable Tray 13. Engine Generator Sets 14. Fuel Tank 15. Electrical Control House 16. Mud Pumps 17. Bulk Mud Component Tanks 18. Mud Tanks (Pits) 19. Reserve Pit 20. Mud-Gas Separator 21. Shale Shakers 22. Choke Manifold 23. Pipe Ramp 24. Pipe Racks 25. Accumulator Additional rig components not illustrated at right. 26. Annulus 27. Brake 28. Casing Head 29. Cathead 30. Catwalk 31. Cellar 32. Conductor Pipe Equipment used in drilling 33. Degasser 34. Desander 48. Ram BOP 35. Desilter 49. Rathole 36. Drawworks 50. Rotary Hose 37. Drill Bit 51. Rotary Table 38. Drill Collars 52. Slips 39. Driller's Console 53. Spinning chain 40. Elevators 54. Stairways 41. Hoisting Line 55. Standpipe 42. Hook 56. Surface Casing 43. Kelly 57. Substructure 44. Kelly Bushing 58. Swivel 45. Kelly Spinner 59. Tongs 46. Mousehole 60. Walkways 47. Mud Return Line 61. Weight Indicator eTool Home | Site Preparation | Drilling | Well Completion | Servicing | Plug & Abandon Well General Safety | Additional References | Viewing/Printing Instructions | Credits | JSA Safety and Health Topic | Site Map | Illustrated Glossary | Glossary of Terms www.osha.gov www.dol.gov Back to Top Contact Us | Freedom of Information Act | Information Quality | Customer Survey Privacy and Security Statement | Disclaimers Occupational Safety & Health Administration 200 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20210 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Pryor Trust Final Investigation Report
    Gas Well Blowout and Fire at U.S. Chemical Safety and Pryor Trust Well 1H-9 Hazard Investigation Board Pittsburg County, Oklahoma | Incident Date: January 22, 2018 | No. 2018-01-I-OK Investigation Report Published: June 12, 2019 KEY ISSUES: • Poor Barrier Management • Underbalanced Operations Performed Without Proper Planning, Procedures, or Needed Equipment • Signs of Influx Either Not Identified or Inadequately Responded To • Alarm System Off • Flow Checks Not Conducted • Gaps in Safety Management System • Driller’s Cabin Design • BOP Could Not Close Due to Burned Hydraulic Hoses • Lack of Safety Requirements by Regulation Page 1 Gas Well Blowout and Fire at U.S. Chemical Safety and Pryor Trust Well 1H-9 Hazard Investigation Board Pittsburg County, Oklahoma | Incident Date: January 22, 2018 | No. 2018-01-I-OK The U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) is an independent Federal agency whose mission is to drive chemical safety change through independent investigations to protect people and the environment. The CSB is a scientific investigative organization, not an enforcement or regulatory body. Established by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, the CSB is responsible for determining accident causes, issuing safety recommendations, studying chemical safety issues, and evaluating the effectiveness of other government agencies involved in chemical safety. More information about the CSB is available at www.csb.gov. The CSB makes public its actions and decisions through investigative publications, all of which may include safety recommendations when appropriate. Types of publications include: Investigation Reports: formal, detailed reports on significant chemical incidents that include key findings, root causes, and safety recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Pegasus Vertex, Inc. Drilling Software | Sophisticated Yet Simple
    Pegasus Vertex, Inc. Drilling Software | Sophisticated Yet Simple Drilling Industry Glossary www.pvisoftware.com/drilling-industry-glossary.html A Abandon: To temporarily or permanently cease production from a well or to cease further drilling operations. Abnormal Pressure: Pressure outside the normal or expected range. Ambient: A term generally used to describe surrounding temperatures or environments. Annular Blowout Preventer (Annular BOP): An annular blowout preventer is a large, specialized valve used to seal, control and monitor oil and gas wells. It is usually installed above the ram preventers that forms a seal in the annular space between the pipe and wellbore or, if no pipe is present, over the wellbore itself. Annular Pressure: Pressure in an annular space. Annulus: The annulus is the area between two concentric objects, such as, between the wellbore and casing or between casing and tubing, where fluid can flow. Axial Load: A load applied along the axis of a drill string, casing or tubing string. Azimuth: The compass direction of a directional survey or of the wellbore as planned or measured by a directional survey. The azimuth is usually specified in degree with respect to North Pole. For example, a well that goes east has an azimuth of 90 degrees. Azimuth Angle: This is the angle between the plane determined by the vertical and true North directions and the plane containing the wellbore direction and the true vertical. 1 B Back Off/Backoff: To unscrew one threaded piece, e.g. a section of pipe, from another. Balanced Cement Plug: Cement plugs for sidetracking wells are frequently set using the balanced cement plug method.
    [Show full text]
  • The Open Petroleum Engineering Journal
    Send Orders for Reprints to [email protected] 98 The Open Petroleum Engineering Journal Content list available at: www.benthamopen.com/TOPEJ/ DOI: 10.2174/1874834101811010098, 2018, 11, 98-106 RESEARCH ARTICLE Evaluating the Effects of Monovalent and Divalent Salts on the Rheological Properties of Water Based Mud Ohenewaa K. Dankwa1,*, Prince Opoku Appau2 and Eric Broni-Bediako1 1Department of Petroleum Engineering, University of Mines and Technology, Tarkwa, Ghana 2Research Institute of Enhanced Oil Recovery, China University of Petroleum Beijing, P.R. China Received: January 15, 2018 Revised: May 15, 2018 Accepted: September 11, 2018 Abstract: Introduction: Drilling fluid selection plays a key role in preventing major problems encountered during drilling operations such as hole pack-off, stuck pipe and loss circulation. Mud contamination which results from the overtreatment of the mud system with additives or foreign material entering the mud system during drilling operations causes unwanted changes in the properties of the mud. This makes the mud system inefficient in performing its major roles. This research studies the effects of monovalent and divalent salts namely Potassium Chloride, Calcium Chloride, and Magnesium Chloride on the rheological properties of water-based mud system which is most vulnerable to contamination. Methods: Sixteen mud samples were formulated of which fifteen were contaminated each with different concentrations (0.75 g, 1.50 g, 2.50 g, 3.50 g, and 5.0 g) of the various salts at ambient temperature. Results: The results showed that the rheological properties such as plastic viscosity, apparent viscosity and yield point of the mud samples decreased as the concentrations of various salts increase.
    [Show full text]
  • Specified Oil and Gas Well Activities Emissions Inventory Update
    www.erg.com SPECIFIED OIL & GAS WELL ACTIVITIES EMISSIONS INVENTORY UPDATE FINAL REPORT Prepared for: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Air Quality Division Prepared by: Eastern Research Group, Inc. August 1, 2014 ERG N0. 0292.03.026.001 Specified Oil & Gas Well Activities Emissions Inventory Update FINAL REPORT Prepared for: Michael Ege Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Air Quality Division Building E, Room 245 S Austin, TX 78711-3087 Prepared by: Bryan Lange Mike Pring Stephen Treimel Eastern Research Group, Inc. 1600 Perimeter Park Dr., Suite 200 Morrisville, NC 27560 August 1, 2014 Table of Contents List of Acronyms .............................................................................................................. iii Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... iv 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1-1 Purpose of This Study ......................................................................................... 1-1 2. Oil and Gas Producing Regions in Texas ........................................................... 2-1 3. Hydraulic Pump Engines ................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Literature Review .................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Oil and Gas Emission Inventory, Eagle Ford Shale – Technical Report ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • AADE Template
    AADE-20-FTCE-111 Field Operations Results and Experience with Inline Drilling Fluid Property Measurement S. Zafar Kamal Ph.D., Richard Frazier, Doanh B. Ho, Lauren Miller, OFI Testing Equipment, Inc.; Paul Scott ConocoPhillips E&P Co.; Pradipto K. Bhattacharya Ph.D., Rheology Solutions Copyright 2020, AADE This paper was prepared for presentation at the 2020 AADE Fluids Technical Conference and Exhibition held at the Marriott Marquis, Houston, Texas, April 14-15, 2020. This conference is sponsored by the American Association of Drilling Engineers. The information presented in this paper does not reflect any position, claim or endorsement made or implied by the American Association of Drilling Engineers, their officers or members. Questions concerning the content of this paper should be directed to the individual(s) listed as author(s) of this work. Abstract monitoring system on an active land drilling rig deployed on Drilling fluids are key to ensuring safe drilling operations multiple multi-well pads, over a six-month period. We start by and the quality of wells during construction and completion. As describing the deployed system, sharing data and results, such, drilling fluid properties are critical control parameters of providing a discussion of inline and near line measurement of the drilling and completions process. Moreover, digital the rheological profile. This paper is concluded by sharing advances in drilling, e.g., remote operations centers, lessons learned and thoughts on future developments. automation, real-time hydraulics, and optimization, depend on Drilling mud has several key roles during the drilling and frequent measurement of physical and compositional properties completion of oil and gas wells, e.g., circulate cuttings from the of drilling fluids.
    [Show full text]
  • Different Types of Logging
    Types of Logging Well Logging Mud logging, also known as hydrocarbon well logging, is the creation of a detailed record (well log) of a borehole by examining the bits of rock or sediment brought to the surface by the circulating drilling medium (most commonly mud). Mud logging is usually performed by a third-party mud logging company. This provides well owners and producers with information about the lithology and fluid content of the borehole while drilling. Historically it is the earliest type of well log. Under some circumstances compressed air is employed as a circulating fluid, rather than mud. Although most commonly used in petroleum exploration, mud logging is also sometimes used when drilling water wells and in other mineral exploration, where drilling fluid is the circulating medium used to lift cuttings out of the hole. In hydrocarbon exploration, hydrocarbon surface gas detectors record the level of natural gas brought up in the mud. A mobile laboratory is situated by the mud logging company near the drilling rig or on deck of an offshore drilling rig, or on a drill ship. A mud logging technician in the modern oil field drilling operation determines positions of hydrocarbons with respect to depth, identifies downhole lithology, monitors natural gas entering the drilling mud stream, and draws well logs for use by oil company geologists. Rock cuttings circulated to the surface in drilling mud are sampled and analyzed. © 2012 All Star Training, Inc. 1 The mud logging company is normally contracted by the Oil Company (or operator). They then organize this information in the form of a graphic log, showing the data charted on a representation of the wellbore.
    [Show full text]
  • Drilling Costs Estimation for Hydrocarbon Wells
    Drilling Costs Estimation for Hydrocarbon Wells M. Enamul Hossain* Department of Petroleum Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals Dhahran, Saudi Arabia Received September 04, 2014; Accepted June 12, 2015 Abstract: Worldwide drilling activities are signifi cantly raised by the oil industry due to the increased global demand of hydrocarbon. The addition of new and sophisticated equipment, tools, and technologies in drilling a well are adding more costs in terms of new technology and equipment. In contrast, the reduction of drilling time due to the addition of those facilities has signifi cantly reduced the drilling costs. As a result, there is a cost analysis dilemma faced by the drilling industry. In addition, shale gas wells are drilled using drilling technology very similar to that used in the drilling of conventional hydrocarbon wells. This causes the drill bit to wear out which signifi cantly reduces the net penetration rate with the longer trip time. This scenario causes new challenges for the estimation of shale drilling cost in general. The overall cost estimation and analysis creates new challenges and responsibilities for the industry people. Moreover, cost effective drilling is one of the focal points for the industry toward a successful and sustainable drilling because by defi nition, sustainability covers the parameter, cost. The lack of proper training in handling fi nancial sustainability has caused tremendous frustration in the current energy management sector. While everyone seems to have a solution, it is increasingly becoming clear that these options are not moving our drilling environment to any sustainable state. This article evaluates current and historical drilling and completion costs of oil and gas wells.
    [Show full text]
  • MUD ENGINEERING by A
    MUD ENGINEERING By A. C. NESTLE UD engineering, a comparatively new specializa- tion, is of increasing significance as diminishing M oil reserves emphasize the need for more drilling. Application of this particular technology is typical of many that are found in the nation's fourth industry, now of even greater importance in our present oil war. An understanding of how chemical engineering aids in the search for oil requires some explanation of the process of rotary drilling. DRILLING OPERATIONS Two principal methods have been used in drilling for oil and gas. In the older standard, cable-tool or churn- type method percussion tools are employed; however, for the most part this method has been superseded by the use of rotating bits. These bits are screwed on the ends of lengths of hollow pipe as needed. At the surface end of the assembly, torque is applied and rotation estab- lished through a bushing in which a special square, hexagonal. or octagonal member slides. In effect. the machine is a huge drill press driving a bit through a hollow shaft. Cutting force is applied to the hit by the weight of the string of pipe itself, althougli only a small fraction of this weight usually is needed. A lifting mech- anism is required to control this force and to pull the pipe from the hole. Each time a bit becomes dull the entire length of pipe must be removed from the bore and stacked in the derrick in sections, the bit replaced, and then re-run back to the previous depth. A large proportion of the time required to drill a well is consumed in making round trips into and out of the hole, at which time a dull bit is replaced by a sharp one.
    [Show full text]