TEXAS 2020-2022 NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR CSBG CARES ACT FUNDING
COVER PAGE AND CERTIFICATION
CSBG Eligible Entity: Concho Valley Community Action Agency
Primary Agency Contact Information:
Contact Name: Mark Bethune Title: Executive Director Phone 325-653-2411 Email: [email protected]
Secondary Agency Contact Information (could be a planner or program director): Contact Name: Tracey Dishon Title: Community Programs Director Phone #: 325-653-2411 ext 28 Email: [email protected]
Was the Needs Assessment completed utilizing a subcontractor? Yes No X
Certification of 2020-2021 of Needs Assessment
The undersigned hereby certifies that the needs assessment information submitted for CSBG CARES Act Funding is correct and has been authorized by the governing body of this organization. If not approved by the board, it will be presented to the board on June 10, 2020 for approval and at that time this certification page will be re-submitted to the Department.
______Board Chair (printed name) Board Chair (signature) Date
______Executive Director (printed name) Executive Director (signature) Date
Submission Date: Month/Day/Year
Page 1 of 24
TEXAS 2020-2022 NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR CSBG CARES ACT FUNDING
1. Describe the area and individuals impacted by this COVID-19 pandemic. Provide information and data (quantitative and qualitative) on the estimated number of persons and households impacted by this COVID-19 pandemic and on the impact of the pandemic to the families and the community by city and county. Types of information to include, but not be limited to, the following: city/cities, zip codes, description of the neighborhoods (e.g., primarily low-income, availability of public facilities and social service agencies, etc.), and demographic information on the households/individuals (e.g., income, racial make-up, indirect damage such as loss of job, education, housing etc.). Data and information gathered can include statistics, newspaper articles, news stories, surveys, interviews, data from 211 or other organization’s data on COVID- 19 needs. Eligible entities will be required to maintain documentation for monitoring purposes.
Concho Valley Community Action Agency (CVCAA) is conducting a Needs Assessment in accordance with the National Health Crisis resulting from COVID-19 (Organizational Standard 3.1-The organization conducted a Community assessment and issued a report within the last 3 years-last one done in 2018.) The Community Action Network is seeing a major increase in funding due to this crisis that is not only health related, but also affecting every aspect of life with a global impact. CVCAA is an essential resource in our community to those in need during these difficult times. This Needs Assessment will include data on the background of the disease, a background on Concho Valley Community Action Agency, demographics of our service area, and impacts to our service area both economical and socio-economic factors. CVCAA is a public 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation established in 1966 under the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 to fight America's War on Poverty. CVCAA’s mission statement is “We provide a variety of services in partnership with community resources to improve lives and empower people in the Concho Valley Area.” CVCAA is governed by a tripartite 15 member volunteer Board of Directors (five members from each of the three sectors – public, private, and low income). CVCAA’s office and all records are located in Tom Green County at 36 E. Twohig, Ste. B2, San Angelo, Texas.
Page 2 of 24
TEXAS 2020-2022 NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR CSBG CARES ACT FUNDING
CVCAA currently provides utility assistance and home weatherization to low-income residents of the Concho Valley counties of Coke, Concho, Crockett, Irion, Kimble, Menard, Reagan, Schleicher, Sterling, Sutton, and Tom Green. CVCAA also administers a Case Management/Transition Out of Poverty (TOPS) program. This program is designed to assist those that are below 125% of Federal Poverty Level to obtain employment above 125% for 90 consecutive days. CVCAA has assisted over 30 families in the last 10 years with TOP’s. CVCAA also administers home weatherization in Runnels, McCullough, and Coleman counties. CVCAA also participates in the Internal Revenue Service sponsored Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA) program. This Assessment was in large part completed by a Certified Results Oriented Management Accountability (ROMA) Implementer, Community Programs Director, Tracey Dishon. Also, by our Executive Director, Mark Bethune and CFO, Lyla Martinez who is also a Certified ROMA Implementer. The ROMA cycle is being utilized throughout this process and has been a vital part of planning for our agency as we determine how to best serve our communities during this global pandemic. The ROMA Cycle consists of these five phases: Assessment, Planning, Implementation, Achievement of Results, and Evaluation. We are consistently using all phases of the ROMA cycle. In order to plan properly and to implement new processes, we must assess and revise on a consistent basis. The COVID-19 situation is fluid and changes are being made to adjust accordingly for our service delivery to the public. We need to assess, plan, implement, and adjust since the pandemic began to affect everyone in March 2020.
A description of our area here in the Concho Valley includes: We are located on the edge of the Chihuahua Desert, the Concho Valley experiences climates ranging from moderate and lush on the northern and eastern edges to arid on the southwestern side. Rivers run through the Concho Valley, however, water can become a scarce commodity as periods of drought often creep into the region. The Cline Shale lies underneath the southwestern portion of the Concho Valley greatly affecting jobs, the economy, and housing stock. Given the region’s abundance of open land, agriculture also plays a vital part in the economy. Cattle, sheep, goats, cotton, wheat, and hay figure prominently. The region is dissected by several highways, including 87, 83, 277, and 67. No interstate runs though the Concho Valley, however, Interstate 10 borders the south.
The City of San Angelo is the region’s largest, most influential city. In fact, the population of San Angelo alone is nearly double that of the remainder of the Concho Valley. The population in San Angelo has seen some growth from 2010 data (96,625) to the data collected in 2018 (100,218). This growth has been tied to the oil boom prior to this event, in the western parts of our SDA.
Page 3 of 24
TEXAS 2020-2022 NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR CSBG CARES ACT FUNDING
Many social services accessed in San Angelo are not available or may be difficult to obtain in the remainder of the SDA. The Concho Valley Transit District provides intra-city transit and inter-county travel opportunities. San Angelo is home to Goodfellow Air Force Base which specializes in military intelligence and firefighting. Angelo State University, located in San Angelo, is aligned with the Texas Tech University system.
Due to its proximity to Mexico, the Concho Valley has a high Hispanic population. Many Hispanics work in the agricultural industry. Increased efficiency in agricultural techniques means that there are less opportunities for young people living in the rural areas. Youth flight is a growing concern in our service area.
CVCAA has had to consider the effects on how we offer services to our communities. Due to social distancing, and rules set forth by our state and local officials, we have seen a big impact to our service area and even to the clients that we serve. We had already put in place a mail-in, fax, email or drop off for applications to be submitted for assistance. This was very beneficial to already having this process in place when it comes to this pandemic and social distancing. We did adjust our drop off box to be put outside the building so that we would not have direct contact with the public during the last few weeks. We are able to do phone interviews now with those that are in immediate need of help due to disconnect crisis/ or other emergency needs. The waivers put forth to be used by TDHCA have been very beneficial in us being able to continue to assist our clients during this time. The Weatherization Program that we have here at CVCAA has also been greatly affected due to this virus. Our Weatherization program, along with others in the state and across the nation, is at a standstill and home visits and assessments cannot be done at the time of this pandemic. Home visits were suspended from the middle of March to the end of May for Weatherization applications. We are beginning to encounter an increase in calls for assistance with utility bills, rent, water bills, and food. The effects of this virus are going to be long–lasting and it will take many years for our nation and the entire world to get back on our feet again. Demographic information as it relates to current poverty data and its prevalence related to gender, age, and race/ethnicity is attached at the end of the Community Needs Assessment as a PDF document. (Organizational Standard 3.2). The National Community Action Network describes the need for this Community Needs Assessment as follows and subsequently the background on COVID 19 and the current impact on our world: “This Community Assessment Update is in response to a global health pandemic that has not only affected every community in the United States but has also led to the most significant economic disruption since the Great Depression. This assessment is an initial effort to capture some of the emerging needs in the community as well as to forecast how those needs may evolve over the coming weeks and months.” “ In December 2019, the novel coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) was discovered to be the causative agent for acute respiratory and flu-like symptoms and began infecting increasing numbers of people in the Wuhan Province of China. The first case in the United States was confirmed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on January 22, 2020. Despite efforts to contain the virus, by March 11, 2020, the
Page 4 of 24
TEXAS 2020-2022 NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR CSBG CARES ACT FUNDING
World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic. By March 17, 2020, all 50 US States had confirmed cases of the virus. Because of the highly contagious nature of COVID-19, the alarmingly high rate of fatalities associated with it and the lack of a vaccine or treatment, the only effective way to prevent mass illness is through restricted travel, physical distancing, frequent hand washing, coughing in elbows, not touching the face, and staying at home. By mid-March 2020, with the virus clearly past the stage of effective isolation and contact tracing, local, state and federal public health officials recommend extreme measures to minimize a public health catastrophe: mass quarantine, physical distancing, and a virtual lockdown of all public gatherings and economic activity. “ “While all types of people are getting sick from the disease, older adults and people of any age who experience serious underlying medical conditions, many which are more prevalent in African American communities, and, to some extent, Latin and Native American communities, are at increased risk for severe symptoms from COVID-19. Persons of color, immigrants, and women are also disproportionately impacted by underlying health conditions linked to poverty, face discrimination in medical care, and are more likely to work jobs that require them to leave their homes. Also, persons with disabilities or chronic conditions are more vulnerable to COVID19 due to their inability to thoroughly isolate themselves (need for hands-on care), physical impairments, environmental barriers, or interrupted services. The following additional populations experience differential exposure and extensive corresponding implications as a result of the pandemic: frontline workers, persons experiencing homelessness, gig-economy workers, low-income communities under quarantine, especially in urban settings, rural communities, tribal communities, incarcerated persons and returning citizens.” This was cited from the National Community Action Network Needs Assessment Template. Data on the positive cases of Covid-19 virus were readily available every day and posted publically to our local Tom Green/City of San Angelo Health Department website and on public/social media outlets. Even though our numbers in this service area are not large, we have still felt the effects of this virus on our entire service area. The charts below are the most recent data on cases of Covid-19 in our service are as provided by our local City of San Angelo/Tom Green County Health department:
Page 5 of 24
TEXAS 2020-2022 NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR CSBG CARES ACT FUNDING
Page 6 of 24
TEXAS 2020-2022 NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR CSBG CARES ACT FUNDING
These charts above were obtained using the City of San Angelo Public Information Page from Facebook.
Page 7 of 24
TEXAS 2020-2022 NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR CSBG CARES ACT FUNDING
Most of the cases in our area not due to community spread. Our local health department feels like that number is low due to enforcing the social distancing and essential travel and work only to our City and some of our service area. Over half of the positive cases are resulting from known exposure to a confirmed Case of COVID-19. This situation is fluid and does change daily. The counties in our service area with confirmed cases are (as of June 5, 2020) as follows: Tom Green with 78 confirmed cases and Concho, Crockett, and Irion counties all have 1 confirmed case. The Concho Valley area had very low positive numbers considering nearby Abilene has currently over 224 cases according to Center for Disease Control website data. City officials from San Angelo are surrounding counties also believe our area had lower cases than other areas which were closer to the interstates in Texas which allows for more individuals to have access to their cities with the virus and the chances of spreading the virus are much higher. Even though the numbers for our area have been relatively low compared to other areas of Texas, the economic and social fallout of this pandemic are far reaching to our entire service area. In order to obtain data on the most important needs in our service area, CVCAA conducted interviews of our board members, several social service agencies and coalitions, and personal interviews. We also included a survey monkey link on our application, on our website (www.cvcaa.org) and on our Facebook page with questions regarding the needs resulting from the impact of the virus on our service area. We also gathered information in the form of articles written on how COVID-19 has affected our counties. We are compiling all of this data to surmise what our greatest needs are in our communities that we serve in the Concho Valley Area. We have gathered important information from 211 and also Texas Workforce Commission to show the increase in calls from 2019-2020. We also took into account the increase in calls for our agency and the type of assistance individuals were calling about. Some of the data is included below in qualitative and quantitative form. (Organizational Standard 3.3-The organization collects and analyzes both qualitative and quantitative data). Qualitative data in the form of interview of board members, representing several counties of the Concho Valley, provided anecdotal information that housing/rental assistance, utility assistance (including phone bills to keep families connected), food security, and access to livable wage employment are vital concerns for low-income, and newly low-income persons living in the Concho Valley. Input from low-come persons via social media confirm board opinion while adding transportation and childcare. The preceding items of needs are ongoing concerns that have become exacerbated by COVID-19 and the attendant economic crisis. The San Angelo Standard-Times recently published an article highlighting our regional plight: (Three attacks that are currently impacting the Concho Valley): the degradation of the price of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil triggered by the Russia-Saudi supply duel, the potential predicted casualties from the COVID-19 pandemic, and the severe economic impacts caused by the government-mandated closure of many businesses, schools, conferences, travel, and social events.
The economic and social fabric of San Angelo and the Concho Valley are inextricably tied to the global economy. As isolated as San Angelo may sometimes appear, it is, in fact, a city that is heavily linked with people, nations, and corporations around the globe. The Concho Valley has been hit simultaneously by
Page 8 of 24
TEXAS 2020-2022 NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR CSBG CARES ACT FUNDING
global challenges that emanated from other continents — the collapse of oil prices and the rapid spread of the virus that ravaged the Far East, Europe, and several cities in North America. It is broadly recognized that the San Angelo economic ecosystem will only withstand these unprecedented global biologic and market forces if we, as a community, stand together to explore, create, and deploy methods of assisting local retail, service-related, and industrial businesses. (Economic Response and Recovery Task Force formed in San Angelo due to COVID-19. www.gosanangelo.com. April 18, 2020.)
Local newspapers, such as the Junction Eagle and Ozona Stockman concur with the Standard-Times article. The situation is fluid, requiring a nearly daily update. On Monday, April 20, 2020, West Texas Intermediate May futures ended the day below negative $30 per barrel. One of our counties includes Irion County and the effects of the oil prices will have long-lasting effects. We have an article that states that Irion County will be one of the 5 most affected counties in the nation. Irion County ranked No. 5 on a list of the 30 counties and parishes across the US expected to be most impacted. The county received its rank due to a 47.5% workforce in high-risk industries, which includes oil and hospitality services, according to the study. (Irion County Listed as Likely to be Hit Hardest in Texas by COVID-19. www.gosanangelo.com. Published April 7, 2020. Accessed April 23, 2020.)
This image below shows our service area for CVCAA:
Page 9 of 24
TEXAS 2020-2022 NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR CSBG CARES ACT FUNDING
One of the major areas impacted by COVID-19 is employment. With only essential work being allowed in the state of Texas, everything from retail, restaurants, nail salons, hairdressers, private businesses and those that are self-employed. There has been a significant increase in those who have been laid off or furloughed due to this global pandemic. We have figures from the Texas Workforce Commission on data concerning calls for unemployment comparing the same week in 2019 to current year data in 2020.
TEXAS 2020, Claims for Week Ending County 5/9/2020 5/2/2020 4/25/2020 4/18/2020 4/11/2020 4/4/2020 3/28/2020 3/21/2020 3/14/2020 3/7/2020 Coke 11 14 6 12 9 11 11 8 Concho 5 3 4 7 7 7 3 8 1 Crockett 19 13 18 16 16 16 17 6 4 3 Irion 8 7 10 6 4 4 6 2 2 1 Kimble 4 14 8 6 4 8 8 7 1 Menard 5 3 5 7 6 5 10 2 Reagan 22 25 24 19 25 22 18 21 2 Schleicher 10 7 11 13 8 8 4 4 2 Sterling 6 4 2 3 2 6 3 1 Sutton 9 9 15 20 9 12 16 12 2 2 Tom Green 410 590 489 613 710 902 800 370 40 43
TEXAS 2019, Claims for Week Ending County 5/2/2019 5/2/2020 4/25/2019 4/18/2019 4/11/2019 4/4/2019 3/28/2019 3/21/2019 3/14/2019 3/7/2019 Coke 1 8 1 1 4 10 7 8 Concho 3 7 2 3 7 8 11 2 Crockett 3 1 7 2 2 4 8 7 5 Irion 1 1 Kimble 1 3 1 2 2 Menard 2 3 1 3 1 Reagan 1 3 3 1 3 1 Schleicher 1 2 1 1 2 Sterling 1 1 Sutton 1 3 1 3 1 1 Tom Green 48 37 35 31 38 34 38 33 40 37 Source: LMCI Local Area Unemployment Statistics Program, PROMIS UI Claims March 1-28, 2020 Please note numbers are subject to revisions.
Page 10 of 24
TEXAS 2020-2022 NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR CSBG CARES ACT FUNDING
The Texas Workforce Commission UI Claimant dashboard for March 18-April 18th shows that the Concho Valley area has had 4, 602 Unemployment claims filed. Males: 2,334 and Females: 2,268. The top 5 UI Claim Industries in our area were: 1. Full service restaurants 2. Support activities for oil and gas operations 3. Offices of dentists 4. Collection agencies 5. General medical and surgical hospitals The Texas Workforce Commission UI Claimant dashboard for April 15-May 16 shows that the Concho Valley area has had 3,384 UI claims. Males: 1,988 and Females: 1396. The top 5 UI Claim Industries in our area were: 1. Support activities for oil and gas operations 2. Full-service restaurants 3. Collection agencies 4. Drilling oil and gas wells 5. General medical and surgical hospitals
After looking at claims by unemployment and the effect it has on our area, we can see that there is a great need for assistance due to the pandemic reaching far into all areas of the nation. Restaurants are the number one affected in the Tom Green County Area for the first report. The next affected area of employment is the oil and gas industry which is also a large part of our service area affecting several of our rural counties including: Reagan, Crockett, Irion, Sonora, Schleicher, Coke, and Tom Green counties primarily. It is evident that a large portion of our service area has been affected by the drop in oil prices over the last several months.
The availability of public and social service agencies differs by county in our service area. Agencies in the Concho Valley Area that are able to assist clients with various needs and also those that provided vital information during our Needs Assessment are as follows: Rust St. Ministries serves the entire Concho Valley area and offers food boxes, household supplies, clothing and referrals, Christians in Action serves our entire service area they assist with (has been in the process of moving and due to COVID-19, they have not been able to open back up which has had an impact on the number of households needing assistance). 211 is a great resource and we have been in direct contact with their employees to let them know about our services and update on changes that we have made to our service delivery. Area Agency on Aging is also a resource in this area to assist those with needs that are homebound. We do have Meals for the Elderly who recently closed their offices, but are still ensuring that meals are delivered to those in need. We also have Galilee Development Corp. who assists with household repairs they help anyone in San Angelo and rural counties that are within 60 miles of San Angelo. Texas Workforce Commission which assists with employment and unemployment related needs.
Page 11 of 24
TEXAS 2020-2022 NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR CSBG CARES ACT FUNDING
In Schleicher county, there is also a service center, Eldorado Service Center, to serve the people in Eldorado and the rest of that area with food. They have been giving away food boxes during this entire pandemic. Public Housing-HUD is also available in all of our 11 counties. However, there is currently a wait-list for housing in our entire service area. The Concho Valley Transit Authority also serves our entire service area and provides reduced rates in Tom Green County, and free rates to those in rural areas with appointments in San Angelo urban area. We have many large churches also in our local area that we have contacted to see what the most requested needs are for 2020 during this pandemic. We are also a part of several coalitions that are addressing the homeless needs and hunger needs in our service area: The Concho Valley Homeless Planning Coalition and the Texas Hunger Initiative. The Hunger Initiative has been providing food boxes during this time along with the St. Paul Presbyterian Church. We have several churches in our rural areas that also have food banks for people in their communities.
Page 12 of 24
TEXAS 2020-2022 NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR CSBG CARES ACT FUNDING
Statistics provided by 211 of inquiries to show the top 10 inquiries for assistance in the Concho Valley Area:
Page 13 of 24
TEXAS 2020-2022 NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR CSBG CARES ACT FUNDING
An email from 211 further explained how they collect this data and the difficulty with getting a completely accurate picture of data they can provide:
“I just want to explain how collecting this data works. All calls are handled statewide by call specialist around the state. Concho Valley doesn't necessarily handle all the calls that come in for the Concho Valley. I am not convinced this report depicts a true number to unmet needs for two reason. In the documenting portion of referrals this is an extra step in the process that is often not captured and often times over looked. Secondly, Christians in Action had originally given the date of the 6th to open back up for utility and rent assistance so this was a referral that was being given with that information so the system would have recorded it as a met need instead of an unmet need. Therefore, the numbers for unmet need under utility and rent assistance would be significantly higher.” (Erin Hernandez-211 of the Concho Valley Director)
Top Five Needs organized by County from qualitative data in the form emails, personal interviews, news articles, and board members representing their prospective counties and from qualitative data from 211 and our survey (CVCAA created a Survey Monkey with questions regarding needs for our clients and others in our service area to complete. Questions were asked regarding housing, water, utility assistance, food, transportation, educational expenses, employment related expenses, prescription assistance, health insurance and any other needs they may have.) Top Five Needs for Entire 11 County Service Delivery Area Categorized by Domain: Domain: FNPI 3 Income and Asset Building
Families lack financial assistance for transportation. Domain: FNPI 4 Housing
Families lack Rental Assistance. Families are in need of Utility Assistance. Individuals are in need of Water Payment Assistance. Domain: FNPI 5 Health/Social Behavior Development.
Individuals are in need of assistance with obtaining food. In Tom Green County the top five needs Categorized by Domain are: Domain: FNPI 1 Employment
Individuals are in need of assistance with finding a job. Domain: FNPI 4 Housing
Families lack rental assistance. Families are in need of Utility Assistance. Individuals are in need of water payment assistance. (City Of San Angelo Water) Page 14 of 24
TEXAS 2020-2022 NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR CSBG CARES ACT FUNDING
Domain: FNPI 5 Health/Social Behavior Development
Individuals are in need of assistance with obtaining food.
Top Five Needs by domain for the rest of our service area including Coke, Concho, Crockett, Kimble, Irion, Menard, Reagan, Schleicher, Sterling and Sutton counties are as follows: Domain: FNPI 1 Employment
Individuals are in need of assistance with finding a job Domain: FNPI 3 Income and Asset Building
Families lack financial assistance for transportation. Domain: FNPI 4 Housing
Families are in need of Utility Assistance. Families lack rental assistance. Domain: FNPI 5 Health/Social Behavioral Development
Individuals are in need of assistance with obtaining food.
Page 15 of 24
TEXAS 2020-2022 NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR CSBG CARES ACT FUNDING
2. Describe any gaps in services, related to the identified needs. It may be helpful to reach out to churches, other social service providers/agencies, and city and county governments to gather this information. Organize your answer in terms of the cities and counties impacted if the gaps in services differ.
Gaps in rental assistance are present in all of our counties that we serve. If a one-time rental payment can be given from one of our area agencies, there is not one specific agency that can provide more than one time of assistance with rent. After contacting the local HUD office, they also said that they have a waiting list of up to 6-12 months and do not currently have an emergency rent fund to help those affected by COVID. We are partnering with City Of San Angelo Community Development/Family Services to provide a one-time assistance with rent and they can apply with the City in order to obtain up to 3 months of rental assistance. The assistance for rent through the City of San Angelo Community Development, will be available to only those living within San Angelo City limits. We will provide a referral to them when we provide the service, and they will refer to us until they can determine if that household is eligible. We also will begin assisting with the Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program (TBRA) for those that qualify in our surrounding rural counties while they are on the waiting list for HUD. This type of assistance is greatly needed and we project that we can fill some of the gap that is presently there due to lack of rental assistance in our area.
Assistance with utilities is another one of the areas that we have a gap in services. Christians in Action, Area Agency on Aging, and Adult Protective Services can provide a one-time utility payment assistance. Utilities can be assisted through one time from one of our partner agencies and then CVCAA can provide longer term utility assistance to those in need based on income and eligibility requirements. Some households may be eligible for payments up to 1400-1600 per year or 6-12 payments whichever comes first. This type of assistance allows our clients to get caught up on other bills due to the monthly assistance with their projected utility bills. CVCAA plans to primarily help clients out of our Comprehensive Energy Assistance Program (CEAP) so that they can be set up on payments for the remainder of program year. If they do not qualify for CEAP, we can do a one-time payment from CSBG CARES funds.
Water bill payments are another need expressed through our surveys, as they cannot be paid through our CEAP Program. The largest water department on our service area is the City of San Angelo Water Department. We had the most requests for this service. We plan to utilize CSBG CARES funds to help fill this gap in our entire service area.
Page 16 of 24
TEXAS 2020-2022 NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR CSBG CARES ACT FUNDING
Needs where gaps exist primarily to our rural counties to include: Coke, Concho, Crockett, Kimble, Irion, Menard, Reagan, Schleicher, Sterling and Sutton.
Assistance with transportation is more prevalent in our rural counties due to access to transportation services. We have found that most of the clients in our rural area need assistance with paying for transportation, or they do not know that the Concho Valley Transit (CVT) offers free rides to those in need in our rural areas. We have been working on educating the public in our service area about the services that CVT provides. Assistance with food is also more prevalent in our rural counties due to accessibility to services. There has been an increased need due to COVID and social distancing and decreased hours at the large grocery stores. This has affected our elderly community because they are of the most vulnerable population during this pandemic. As underlying health issues contribute to contracting the virus and the mortality rate, the elderly are at risk. As stated before, there are some food pantries in our rural areas but the need is greater than what is available.
3. Describe what outreach has been done or will be done to identify potentially eligible households/individuals that have been or continue to be impacted by this COVID-19 pandemic. Discuss which entities (schools, city government, non-profits, churches, etc.) will be contacted to do outreach and where outreach has or will occur. If intake has occurred during outreach, please provide information on the number of applications taken. Organize your answer in terms of the cities and counties impacted.
Outreach will be conducted to our entire service area including our rural counties through the methods listed below:
Concho Valley Community Action Agency has conducted outreach with our local Social Service Coalitions, with our board members who can disseminate information to their perspective counties, 211 of the Concho Valley, Area Agency on Aging, Salvation Army, Rust St, Christians in Action, Galilee Development Corporation, City of San Angelo Water Department, and City Of San Angelo Community Development Department. We have also done outreach via our social media outlets on Facebook and Instagram. We have also been providing updates on Utility Assistance and funding via our website at www.cvcaa.org. We also will be conducting in-person outreach, as social distancing measures allow, in the form of flyers and applications to our area partners and churches. We will be mailing and emailing flyers and applications to our partners in our rural areas. We also had a zoom interview with Fox West Texas televised on May 28th. We also advertised on the internet and on Facebook and Instagram on May 28th to promote this assistance that will be available through the CARES funds to our entire service area. We will be contacting our local school districts to promote the CARES assistance that is available. We advertised through this avenue Page 17 of 24
TEXAS 2020-2022 NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR CSBG CARES ACT FUNDING
before and it was very effective. We are still receiving applications from the time this entire pandemic has been going on. Since March 15th- May 28th, we have received and processed 359 household applications with utility assistance and assisted over 776 individuals.
Our flyer that will be used for outreach is attached here:
Page 18 of 24
TEXAS 2020-2022 NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR CSBG CARES ACT FUNDING
4. Describe the need for funds to assist persons impacted? Types of information to include, but not limited to: a. an estimate of how many households and/or individuals still in need of assistance b. the type of assistance these households need,
As stated previously, the needs must be as a result of COVID-19. If needs differ across your service area, organize your answer in terms of cities and counties impacted. Consider households who may have lost their job or have been temporarily unemployed for a period of time due to this pandemic. It may be helpful to reach out to churches, other social service providers/agencies, and county governments to gather this information.
Below is a chart that we used in order to provide an estimated number of persons in need in our rural and urban counties. Some of our rural counties did not have enough responses, so we combined them for data purposes. We used current poverty data from our demographic report attached to the end of this document to see how many persons in poverty we had in each county, and then used results from our surveys that we conducted.
Total Responses Food Gas/Trans Water Utilities Rent Employment Job Tuition Prescriptions Health Ins Other Poverty Pop
Coke 6 4 2 1 4 1 1 2 2 1 500 Crockett 9 3 2 7 2 1 1 1 1 1 739 Kimble 5 3 3 4 4 1 1 4 1 3 928 Menard 7 1 1 3 1 1 2 205 Reagan 1 1 1 1 549 Schleicher 4 1 1 1 1 452 Sterling 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 39 Sutton 7 2 4 5 2 2 1 1 320 Total 41 16 16 1 27 11 4 7 4 12 1 10 3,732 % needing assistance 39% 39% 2% 66% 27% 10% 17% 10% 29% 2% 24% # persons in need 1,456 1,456 91 2,458 1,001 364 637 364 1,092 91 910
Concho 11 3 2 6 4 1 3 1 1 4 223 % needing assistance 27% 18% 0% 55% 36% 9% 27% 0% 9% 9% 36% # persons in need 61 41 - 122 81 20 61 - 20 20 81
Irion 11 3 5 2 1 4 1 2 1 226 % needing assistance 27% 0% 0% 45% 18% 9% 36% 9% 18% 9% 0% # persons in need 62 - - 103 41 21 82 21 41 21 -
Tom Green 197 69 47 72 106 67 9 47 10 14 9 8 15,104 % needing assistance 35% 24% 37% 54% 34% 5% 24% 5% 7% 5% 4% # persons in need 5,290 3,603 5,520 8,127 5,137 690 3,603 767 1,073 690 613
Page 19 of 24
TEXAS 2020-2022 NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR CSBG CARES ACT FUNDING
CVCAA is basing our estimated number of persons in need to our Top 5 needs only, for our entire service area. NEED Estimated Number of individuals Families lack rental assistance. 6,260 in our entire service area Families are in need of Utility Assistance. 10,810 in our entire service area Individuals are in need of food assistance. 6, 869 in our entire service area Individuals are in need of water payment assistance. 5,611 in our entire service area Families lack financial assistance for transportation. 5,100 in our entire service area
This is an estimated number as we used both qualitative and quantitative data for our top 5 needs for entire service area, and not just the data on this spreadsheet to determine the top 5 needs.
As you can see by the above estimations, it will be very difficult to serve the amount of individuals and/or families that are in need in all of the above areas. Even with partnerships in our rural and urban counties, there is not enough funding to assist all of them. We also would have to include some of the data on unemployment that was referenced in Section 1. A total of 7,986 individuals have filed for unemployment insurance in the Concho Valley area in last 2 months. Some of these individuals would not normally be considered in poverty due to having gainful employment before the Corona Virus Pandemic. Thus, our estimated numbers would be even higher.
CVCAA is working to develop better referral systems with area agencies (such as TWC and Goodwill Career Center) in order to have more individuals referred to us that have been affected by COIVD economically due to job loss. We have been sharing emails and referrals of clients that would be in need due to this pandemic. We are working to better serve those individuals that are between 125% and 200% of federal poverty level, due to guidelines being increased in our CARES Community Service Block Grant contracts. We are working with Ms. Bernie Coffee, who is the Operations Manager at Texas Workforce Commission of the Concho Valley, to refer clients in need of employment services, and they in turn refer to our office. Ms. Coffee is also on our board of directors here at CVCAA.
Page 20 of 24
TEXAS 2020-2022 NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR CSBG CARES ACT FUNDING
5. Identify the top needs determined from your Needs Assessment. Consider all the data (qualitative and quantitative) and information that was gathered in this process. If the plan is to not address one of the needs, provide a brief explanation as to why not in column five; such as lack of capacity/resources or that another organization is addressing the need.
Top Needs Currently Plan to address How will need be If not addressing, Identified addressing the need with addressed with CSBG explain why. the need CSBG CARES CARES Act Funds Act Funds 1. Families lack Yes No Yes No Rent will be paid for We are currently assistance X one month (possibly 2 helping limited Rental X months as funding households Assistance. allows) for those that through CSBG-D have a qualified Covid funds until need. CARES funds are received. We will be partnering with City of San Angelo to assist clients with future rental payments. 2. Families are Yes No Yes No Utility Assistance for in need of X X those above 150% Utility that do not qualify for Assistance. CEAP will receive a one -time payment assistance through Cares Funds. 3. Individuals Yes No Yes No We will be giving out Using limited are in need of X X food gift cards for CSBG-D funds assistance with qualified households until Cares funds obtaining food. based on need. are received. 4. Individuals Yes No Yes No We will be assisting Using limited are in need of X X with water bills for CSBG-D funds water payment qualified households until Cares funds assistance. based on need. are received 5. Families lack Yes No Yes No CVCAA will begin We have already financial X X giving out gas cards for purchased gas assistance for qualified households cards and will Transportation. based on need. begin using. 6 Yes No Yes No 7 Yes No Yes No
Page 21 of 24
TEXAS 2020-2022 NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR CSBG CARES ACT FUNDING
8 Yes No Yes No 9 Yes No Yes No 10 Yes No Yes No
6. Describe the plan to coordinate services and/or funding with other organizations/entities (e.g., churches, local governments, schools, non-profits, etc.) to meet the needs of individuals impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Also, describe any efforts that will be undertaken with coordinating partners to avoid duplication of services. Organize your answer in terms of the cities and counties impacted if they differ in coordination of services.
Because all of our Top needs have affected our entire service area, the coordination of services below is listed by Top 5 needs only, and not by counties and cities.
Families lack rental assistance. We plan to assist households with rental assistance as a one time or possibly two months of rental assistance based on need. We will be receiving additional Tenant Based Rental Assistance-TBRA emergency funds to also use for rental assistance for those qualified households in our service area. We will also be receiving supplemental rental funds through United Way Emergency Food and Shelter Programs for rental assistance. We have also met with our City of San Angelo Community Development office to coordinate services with them and refer clients in need of additional rental help. We will also coordinate referrals to ensure that we do not duplicate the service, but rather provide continuity of services.
Families are in need of Utility Assistance. We plan to assist with Utility Payments for qualified households. We should be able to help the majority of qualified households with our CEAP contract, both the Cares and the regular contract. Most households would be eligible for a monetary amount of up to $1,400 to $1,600 or a maximum number of payments through our CEAP contract so they would qualify for more than one payment. If we are unable to assist a household with utilities through CEAP, then we would possibly assist a one-time payment out of CARES for those above 150% of Federal Poverty Guidelines. We would then refer them to Christians in Action or Area Agency on Aging for additional assistance with utilities if needed.
Individuals are in need of food. We plan to offer food gift cards to qualified households. We would meet the emergency food need with an HEB gift card for either $50.00 for household of one-two individuals, or with a $100.00 gift card for those with a household of three or more individuals. If they have additional needs for help with food, we could also refer to Rust St Ministries for food boxes. We will then refer to the food stamp office at HHS for future food assistance for continuity of services. For those in rural areas that are in need of additional emergency assistance, we could refer to local churches or food pantries available in their county of residence.
Page 22 of 24
TEXAS 2020-2022 NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR CSBG CARES ACT FUNDING
Individuals are in need of water assistance. Households that are in need of water bill assistance will be assisted with a one-time payment of their water bill. The City of San Angelo Water Department is working with us on daily pledges and protecting the accounts of those that payments are to be sent for. They will also waive late fees for those customers that receive a pledge from CVCAA. We are working on developing water assistance with some of our rural water companies to be sure they can guarantee service to continue while they wait on our payment after a pledge has been made. If additional assistance is needed, we will refer to Christians in Action and Area Agency on Aging and Paul Ann Church.
Families lack resources to pay for transportation. Families in our rural areas expressed a need for transportation. Even with gas prices dropping in our area, there is still a need. We will assist with a $25.00 gas card to use at Stripes, which we have one in each of our rural counties. We will also refer to Concho Valley Transit District for further assistance. We will educate the clients about the free transport services that Transit offers.
7. Describe how you plan to provide the proposed CSBG CARES services through your current service delivery system or through partner organizations or subcontractors. Organize your answers in terms of the cities and counties impacted if they differ.
We plan to continue to accept applications by mail, email, fax, and drop off for all of the services that offer. We will continue to provide Utility Assistance and Weatherization to qualified families and assist with additional needs through CARES funding. We have added a page to the front of our application to include those who have been affected by the Corona Virus financially or otherwise. We have dropped off applications to partner organizations, and have provided our application process to those agencies. We have sent out mass emails to our partners that go to all of the social service agencies in our area. We have our application readily available for download on our website at www.cvcaa.org. We also have phone interview for those who have an emergency need, disconnect notice for water, gas or electric to ensure that they can receive assistance as soon as possible usually the same day if they have all their documentation and eligible for services. We have worked with our software provider in order to be able to report the demographics and additional information needed for the CARES contracts
We will provide services and work with our partners as listed under section 5 and 6 above of the Community Needs Assessment. We will work to bridge the gaps in services and also provide referrals and contact information of the agencies who may be able to provide.
Page 23 of 24
TEXAS 2020-2022 NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR CSBG CARES ACT FUNDING
Concho Valley Community Action Agency is very grateful that we will have the additional funds available to help those in our communities in need due to this Covid-19 pandemic. We are also excited at the opportunities that we will have to reach more individuals in need in our area due to increased income guidelines with the CARES act funding.
Page 24 of 24
Health Indicators Report Location
Coke County, TX Concho County, TX Irion County, TX Kimble County, TX Crockett County, TX Menard County, TX Reagan County, TX Schleicher County, TX Sterling County, TX Sutton County, TX Tom Green County, TX Demographics
Current population demographics and changes in demographic composition over time play a determining role in the types of health and social services needed by communities.
Total Population
A total of 148,481 people live in the 14,292.61 square mile report area defined for this assessment according to the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 2014‐18 5‐year estimates. The population density for this area, estimated at 10.39 persons per square mile, is less than the national average population density of 91.42 persons per square mile.
Total Land Area Population Density Report Area Total Population (Square Miles) (Per Square Mile)
Report Location 148,481 14,292.61 10.39 Coke County, TX 3,275 911.64 3.59 Concho County, TX 4,233 983.76 4.30 Crockett County, TX 3,633 2,807.32 1.29 Irion County, TX 1,524 1,051.54 1.45 Kimble County, TX 4,408 1,250.98 3.52 Menard County, TX 2,123 902.03 2.35 Reagan County, TX 3,752 1,175.31 3.19 Schleicher County, TX 3,061 1,310.64 2.34 Sterling County, TX 1,141 923.45 1.24 Sutton County, TX 3,865 1,453.94 2.66 Tom Green County, TX 117,466 1,522.00 77.18 Texas 27,885,195 261,249.64 106.74 United States 322,903,030 3,532,068.58 91.42
Data Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey. 2014‐18. Source geography: Tract
Page 1 / 95 Population, Density (Persons per Sq Mile) by Tract, ACS 2014‐18
Over 5,000 1,001 ‐ 5,000 501 ‐ 1,000 51 ‐ 500 Under 51 No Data or Data Suppressed Report Location View larger map
Total Population by Gender
Report Area Male Female Percent Male Percent Female
Report Location 74,860 73,621 50.42% 49.58% Coke County, TX 1,606 1,669 49.04% 50.96% Concho County, TX 2,802 1,431 66.19% 33.81% Crockett County, TX 1,771 1,862 48.75% 51.25% Irion County, TX 836 688 54.86% 45.14% Kimble County, TX 2,154 2,254 48.87% 51.13% Menard County, TX 1,117 1,006 52.61% 47.39% Reagan County, TX 1,951 1,801 52.00% 48.00% Schleicher County, TX 1,542 1,519 50.38% 49.62% Sterling County, TX 622 519 54.51% 45.49% Sutton County, TX 2,116 1,749 54.75% 45.25% Tom Green County, TX 58,343 59,123 49.67% 50.33% Texas 13,849,775 14,035,420 49.67% 50.33% United States 158,984,190 163,918,840 49.24% 50.76%
Total Population by Gender
Report Location
Female: 49.6% Male: 50.4%
Total Population by Age Groups, Total
Page 2 / 95 Report Area Age 0‐4 Age 5‐17 Age 18‐24 Age 25‐34 Age 35‐44 Age 45‐54 Age 55‐64 Age 65+
Report Location 9,701 25,174 16,936 22,049 16,459 16,658 18,084 23,420 Coke County, TX 103 576 129 212 426 465 472 892 Concho County, TX 121 420 702 502 588 643 502 755 Crockett County, TX 303 681 250 528 364 513 455 539 Irion County, TX 60 296 161 122 140 214 242 289 Kimble County, TX 270 619 279 247 432 440 848 1,273 Menard County, TX 26 278 103 298 177 352 325 564 Reagan County, TX 264 848 357 559 552 375 447 350 Schleicher County, TX 187 655 218 471 290 344 411 485 Sterling County, TX 69 258 32 106 109 205 203 159 Sutton County, TX 253 701 252 575 486 373 572 653 Tom Green County, TX 8,045 19,842 14,453 18,429 12,895 12,734 13,607 17,461 Texas 1,998,869 5,293,817 2,777,150 4,094,297 3,767,582 3,511,040 3,104,626 3,337,814 United States 19,836,850 53,716,390 30,903,719 44,567,976 40,763,210 42,589,573 41,286,731 49,238,581
Total Population by Age Groups, Total
Report Location
Age 0-4: 6.5% Age 65+: 15.8%
Age 5-17: 17.0%
Age 55-64: 12.2%
Age 18-24: 11.4%
Age 45-54: 11.2%
Age 25-34: 14.8% Age 35-44: 11.1%
Total Population by Age Groups, Percent
Report Area Age 0‐4 Age 5‐17 Age 18‐24 Age 25‐34 Age 35‐44 Age 45‐54 Age 55‐64 Age 65+
Report Location 6.53% 16.95% 11.41% 14.85% 11.08% 11.22% 12.18% 15.77% Coke County, TX 3.15% 17.59% 3.94% 6.47% 13.01% 14.20% 14.41% 27.24% Concho County, TX 2.86% 9.92% 16.58% 11.86% 13.89% 15.19% 11.86% 17.84% Crockett County, TX 8.34% 18.74% 6.88% 14.53% 10.02% 14.12% 12.52% 14.84% Irion County, TX 3.94% 19.42% 10.56% 8.01% 9.19% 14.04% 15.88% 18.96% Kimble County, TX 6.13% 14.04% 6.33% 5.60% 9.80% 9.98% 19.24% 28.88% Menard County, TX 1.22% 13.09% 4.85% 14.04% 8.34% 16.58% 15.31% 26.57% Reagan County, TX 7.04% 22.60% 9.51% 14.90% 14.71% 9.99% 11.91% 9.33% Schleicher County, TX 6.11% 21.40% 7.12% 15.39% 9.47% 11.24% 13.43% 15.84% Sterling County, TX 6.05% 22.61% 2.80% 9.29% 9.55% 17.97% 17.79% 13.94% Sutton County, TX 6.55% 18.14% 6.52% 14.88% 12.57% 9.65% 14.80% 16.90% Tom Green County, TX 6.85% 16.89% 12.30% 15.69% 10.98% 10.84% 11.58% 14.86% Texas 7.17% 18.98% 9.96% 14.68% 13.51% 12.59% 11.13% 11.97% United States 6.14% 16.64% 9.57% 13.80% 12.62% 13.19% 12.79% 15.25%
Page 3 / 95 Total Population by Race Alone, Total
Native American / Alaska Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Multiple Report Area White Black Asian Native Islander Race Races
Report Location 123,375 5,291 1,524 571 55 15,009 2,656 Coke County, TX 2,928 20 6 44 0 241 36 Concho County, TX 3,999 94 48 10 0 65 17 Crockett County, 1,520 32 0 0 0 2,056 25 TX Irion County, TX 1,259 54 0 0 0 199 12 Kimble County, TX 3,929 1 0 36 5 300 137 Menard County, TX 1,727 15 0 25 0 198 158 Reagan County, TX 1,538 27 0 0 0 2,139 48 Schleicher County, 1,871 13 0 0 0 1,176 1 TX Sterling County, TX 1,037 3 0 0 0 85 16 Sutton County, TX 2,501 21 0 12 0 1,324 7 Tom Green 101,066 5,011 1,470 444 50 7,226 2,199 County, TX Texas 20,720,689 3,365,783 1,308,257 136,061 23,672 1,600,234 730,499 United States 234,904,818 40,916,113 17,574,550 2,699,073 582,718 15,789,961 10,435,797
Total Population by Race Alone, Total
Report Location
Multiple Races: 1.8%
Some Other Race: 10.1%
Native American / Alaska Native: 0.4%
Asian: 1.0%
Black: 3.6%
White: 83.1%
Total Population by Race Alone, Percent
Page 4 / 95 Native American / Alaska Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Multiple Report Area White Black Asian Native Islander Race Races
Report Location 83.09% 3.56% 1.03% 0.38% 0.04% 10.11% 1.79% Coke County, TX 89.40% 0.61% 0.18% 1.34% 0.00% 7.36% 1.10% Concho County, TX 94.47% 2.22% 1.13% 0.24% 0.00% 1.54% 0.40% Crockett County, TX 41.84% 0.88% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 56.59% 0.69% Irion County, TX 82.61% 3.54% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 13.06% 0.79% Kimble County, TX 89.13% 0.02% 0.00% 0.82% 0.11% 6.81% 3.11% Menard County, TX 81.35% 0.71% 0.00% 1.18% 0.00% 9.33% 7.44% Reagan County, TX 40.99% 0.72% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 57.01% 1.28% Schleicher County, 61.12% 0.42% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 38.42% 0.03% TX Sterling County, TX 90.89% 0.26% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 7.45% 1.40% Sutton County, TX 64.71% 0.54% 0.00% 0.31% 0.00% 34.26% 0.18% Tom Green County, 86.04% 4.27% 1.25% 0.38% 0.04% 6.15% 1.87% TX Texas 74.31% 12.07% 4.69% 0.49% 0.08% 5.74% 2.62% United States 72.75% 12.67% 5.44% 0.84% 0.18% 4.89% 3.23%
Total Population by Ethnicity Alone
Total Hispanic or Latino Percent Population Hispanic or Non‐Hispanic Percent Population Non‐ Report Area Population Population Latino Population Hispanic
Report Location 148,481 61,067 41.13% 87,414 58.87% Coke County, TX 3,275 698 21.31% 2,577 78.69% Concho County, 4,233 2,372 56.04% 1,861 43.96% TX Crockett County, 3,633 2,306 63.47% 1,327 36.53% TX Irion County, TX 1,524 374 24.54% 1,150 75.46% Kimble County, TX 4,408 1,114 25.27% 3,294 74.73% Menard County, 2,123 728 34.29% 1,395 65.71% TX Reagan County, TX 3,752 2,652 70.68% 1,100 29.32% Schleicher County, 3,061 1,603 52.37% 1,458 47.63% TX Sterling County, 1,141 516 45.22% 625 54.78% TX Sutton County, TX 3,865 2,385 61.71% 1,480 38.29% Tom Green 117,466 46,319 39.43% 71,147 60.57% County, TX Texas 27,885,195 10,921,556 39.17% 16,963,639 60.83% United States 322,903,030 57,517,935 17.81% 265,385,095 82.19%
Page 5 / 95 Total Population by Ethnicity Alone
Report Location
Hispanic or Latino Population: 41.1%
Non-Hispanic Population: 58.9%
Hispanic Population by Race Alone, Total
Native American / Alaska Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Multiple Report Area White Black Asian Native Islander Race Races
Report Location 44,522 333 121 244 5 14,879 963 Coke County, TX 453 0 0 0 0 241 4 Concho County, TX 2,293 5 0 4 0 65 5 Crockett County, TX 225 0 0 0 0 2,056 25 Irion County, TX 173 0 0 0 0 199 2 Kimble County, TX 736 0 0 19 5 284 70 Menard County, TX 408 1 0 13 0 198 108 Reagan County, TX 474 0 0 0 0 2,139 39 Schleicher County, 427 0 0 0 0 1,176 0 TX Sterling County, TX 431 0 0 0 0 85 0 Sutton County, TX 1,031 18 0 12 0 1,324 0 Tom Green County, 37,871 309 121 196 0 7,112 710 TX Texas 8,913,426 96,530 15,444 67,609 3,291 1,557,880 267,376 United States 37,723,641 1,200,196 207,381 563,594 57,616 15,035,465 2,730,042
Hispanic Population by Race Alone, Total
Report Location
Multiple Races: 1.6%
Some Other Race: 24.4%
Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 0.0%
Native American / Alaska Native: 0.4%
Asian: 0.2%
Black: 0.5%
White: 72.9%
Hispanic Population by Race Alone, Percent
Page 6 / 95 Native American / Alaska Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Multiple Report Area White Black Asian Native Islander Race Races
Report Location 72.91% 0.55% 0.20% 0.40% 0.01% 24.37% 1.58% Coke County, TX 64.90% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 34.53% 0.57% Concho County, TX 96.67% 0.21% 0.00% 0.17% 0.00% 2.74% 0.21% Crockett County, TX 9.76% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 89.16% 1.08% Irion County, TX 46.26% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 53.21% 0.53% Kimble County, TX 66.07% 0.00% 0.00% 1.71% 0.45% 25.49% 6.28% Menard County, TX 56.04% 0.14% 0.00% 1.79% 0.00% 27.20% 14.84% Reagan County, TX 17.87% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 80.66% 1.47% Schleicher County, 26.64% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 73.36% 0.00% TX Sterling County, TX 83.53% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 16.47% 0.00% Sutton County, TX 43.23% 0.75% 0.00% 0.50% 0.00% 55.51% 0.00% Tom Green County, 81.76% 0.67% 0.26% 0.42% 0.00% 15.35% 1.53% TX Texas 81.61% 0.88% 0.14% 0.62% 0.03% 14.26% 2.45% United States 65.59% 2.09% 0.36% 0.98% 0.10% 26.14% 4.75%
Non‐Hispanic Population by Race Alone, Total
Native American / Alaska Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Multiple Report Area White Black Asian Native Islander Race Races
Report Location 78,853 4,958 1,403 327 50 130 1,693 Coke County, TX 2,475 20 6 44 0 0 32 Concho County, TX 1,706 89 48 6 0 0 12 Crockett County, 1,295 32 0 0 0 0 0 TX Irion County, TX 1,086 54 0 0 0 0 10 Kimble County, TX 3,193 1 0 17 0 16 67 Menard County, TX 1,319 14 0 12 0 0 50 Reagan County, TX 1,064 27 0 0 0 0 9 Schleicher County, 1,444 13 0 0 0 0 1 TX Sterling County, TX 606 3 0 0 0 0 16 Sutton County, TX 1,470 3 0 0 0 0 7 Tom Green 63,195 4,702 1,349 248 50 114 1,489 County, TX Texas 11,807,263 3,269,253 1,292,813 68,452 20,381 42,354 463,123 United States 197,181,177 39,715,917 17,367,169 2,135,479 525,102 754,496 7,705,755
Page 7 / 95 Non-Hispanic Population by Race Alone, Total
Report Location
Multiple Races: 1.9%
Native American / Alaska Native: 0.4%
Asian: 1.6%
Black: 5.7%
White: 90.2%
Non‐Hispanic Population by Race Alone, Percent
Native American / Alaska Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Multiple Report Area White Black Asian Native Islander Race Races
Report Location 90.21% 5.67% 1.61% 0.37% 0.06% 0.15% 1.94% Coke County, TX 96.04% 0.78% 0.23% 1.71% 0.00% 0.00% 1.24% Concho County, TX 91.67% 4.78% 2.58% 0.32% 0.00% 0.00% 0.64% Crockett County, TX 97.59% 2.41% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Irion County, TX 94.43% 4.70% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.87% Kimble County, TX 96.93% 0.03% 0.00% 0.52% 0.00% 0.49% 2.03% Menard County, TX 94.55% 1.00% 0.00% 0.86% 0.00% 0.00% 3.58% Reagan County, TX 96.73% 2.45% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.82% Schleicher County, 99.04% 0.89% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.07% TX Sterling County, TX 96.96% 0.48% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 2.56% Sutton County, TX 99.32% 0.20% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.47% Tom Green County, 88.82% 6.61% 1.90% 0.35% 0.07% 0.16% 2.09% TX Texas 69.60% 19.27% 7.62% 0.40% 0.12% 0.25% 2.73% United States 74.30% 14.97% 6.54% 0.80% 0.20% 0.28% 2.90%
Change in Total Population
According to the United States Census Bureau Decennial Census, between 2000 and 2010 the population in the report area grew by 5,628 persons, a change of 4.13%. A significant positive or negative shift in total population over time impacts healthcare providers and the utilization of community resources.
Page 8 / 95 Total Population, Total Population, Report Area Population Change, 2000‐2010 Population Change, 2000‐2010, Percent 2000 Census 2010 Census
Report Location 136,269 141,897 5,628 4.13% Coke County, TX 3,864 3,320 ‐544 ‐14.08% Concho County, TX 3,966 4,087 121 3.05% Crockett County, TX 4,099 3,719 ‐380 ‐9.27% Irion County, TX 1,771 1,599 ‐172 ‐9.71% Kimble County, TX 4,468 4,607 139 3.11% Menard County, TX 2,360 2,242 ‐118 ‐5.00% Reagan County, TX 3,326 3,367 41 1.23% Schleicher County, TX 2,935 3,461 526 17.92% Sterling County, TX 1,393 1,143 ‐250 ‐17.95% Sutton County, TX 4,077 4,128 51 1.25% Tom Green County, TX 104,010 110,224 6,214 5.97% Texas 20,851,666 25,145,561 4,293,895 20.59% United States 280,405,781 307,745,539 27,339,758 9.75%
Data Source: US Census Bureau, Decennial Census. 2000 ‐ 2010. Source geography: Tract
Population Change, Percent by Tract, US Census 2000 ‐ 2010
Over 10.0% Increase ( + ) 1.0 ‐ 10.0% Increase ( + ) Less Than 1.0% Change ( +/‐ ) 1.0 ‐ 10.0% Decrease ( ‐ ) Over 10.0% Decrease ( ‐ ) No Population or No Data Report Location View larger map
Population Change (2000‐2010) by Gender
Page 9 / 95 Male Population Change, Male Population Change, Female Population Change, Female Population Change, Report Area Total Percent Total Percent
Report Location 3,627 5.42 2,001 2.88 Coke County, TX ‐306 ‐15.84 ‐238 ‐12.32 Concho County, TX 237 9.27 ‐116 ‐8.23 Crockett County, TX ‐200 ‐9.85 ‐180 ‐8.70 Irion County, TX ‐80 ‐9.02 ‐92 ‐10.41 Kimble County, TX 132 6.14 7 0.30 Menard County, TX ‐45 ‐3.82 ‐73 ‐6.18 Reagan County, TX 81 4.86 ‐40 ‐2.41 Schleicher County, 267 18.30 259 17.55 TX Sterling County, TX ‐108 ‐15.79 ‐142 ‐20.03 Sutton County, TX ‐4 ‐0.20 55 2.69 Tom Green County, 3,653 7.26 2,561 4.77 TX Texas 2,119,448 20.47 2,174,443 20.71 United States 13,738,020 10.02 13,601,733 9.55
Population Change (2000-2010) by Gender
25
20
15
10
5
0 Male Population Change, Percent Female Population Change, Percent
Report Location Texas United States
Population Change (2000‐2010) by Hispanic Origin
Page 10 / 95 Hispanic Population Hispanic Population Change, Non‐Hispanic Population Non‐Hispanic Population Change, Report Area Change, Total Percent Change, Total Percent
Report Location 9,075 20.60% ‐3,447 ‐3.74% Coke County, TX ‐51 ‐7.81% ‐493 ‐15.35% Concho County, 534 32.58% ‐413 ‐17.75% TX Crockett County, 110 4.91% ‐490 ‐26.39% TX Irion County, TX ‐29 ‐6.65% ‐143 ‐10.71% Kimble County, 151 16.31% ‐12 ‐0.34% TX Menard County, 42 5.61% ‐160 ‐9.93% TX Reagan County, 405 24.61% ‐364 ‐21.67% TX Schleicher 258 20.19% 268 16.17% County, TX Sterling County, ‐67 ‐15.51% ‐183 ‐19.04% TX Sutton County, 353 16.76% ‐302 ‐15.32% TX Tom Green 7,369 23.07% ‐1,155 ‐1.60% County, TX Texas 2,790,749 41.84% 1,497,157 10.56% United States 15,152,943 42.93% 12,099,099 4.92%
Population Change (2000-2010) by Hispanic Origin
60
40
% 20
0
-20 Hispanic Population Change, Percent Non-Hispanic Population Change, Percent
Report Location Texas United States
Total Population Change (2000‐2010) by Race
Page 11 / 95 American Indian / Alaska Native Hawaiian / Pacific Other Multiple Report Area White Black Asian Native Islander Race Race
Report Location 8,655 122 266 234 29 ‐4,324 646 Coke County, TX ‐397 ‐67 7 2 0 No data 10 Concho County, TX 55 38 ‐3 11 1 ‐9 28 Crockett County, TX ‐37 2 10 2 2 ‐325 ‐34 Irion County, TX ‐142 4 ‐7 3 0 ‐36 6 Kimble County, TX 182 14 23 ‐1 2 ‐60 ‐21 Menard County, TX ‐219 1 3 ‐5 ‐1 93 10 Reagan County, TX 446 ‐30 2 ‐3 0 ‐370 ‐4 Schleicher County, 532 ‐7 14 ‐1 ‐1 ‐30 19 TX Sterling County, TX ‐181 13 19 0 ‐1 ‐94 ‐6 Sutton County, TX 593 7 0 1 0 ‐547 ‐3 Tom Green County, 7,823 147 198 225 27 ‐2,847 641 TX Texas 2,902,142 575,042 52,610 402,277 7,222 190,225 164,374 United States 12,199,518 5,189,316 521,420 4,433,864 141,446 3,703,567 2,190,889
Percent Population Change (2000‐2010) by Race
American Indian / Alaska Native Hawaiian / Pacific Other Multiple Report Area White Black Asian Native Islander Race Race
Report Location 7.96% 2.64% 31.78% 24.4% 34.94% ‐23.95% 21.23% Coke County, TX ‐11.56% ‐89.33% 23.33% 66.67% 0% ‐36.94% 18.52% Concho County, TX 1.57% 97.44% ‐15.79% 366.67% 25% ‐2.54% 57.14% Crockett County, TX ‐1.18% 7.14% 41.67% 18.18% 200% ‐40.22% ‐34.69% Irion County, TX ‐8.84% 57.14% ‐50% No data No data ‐31.03% 21.43% Kimble County, TX 4.51% 350% 153.33% ‐5% 200% ‐17.96% ‐35% Menard County, TX ‐10.6% 8.33% 20% ‐62.5% ‐100% 40.26% 37.04% Reagan County, TX 20.74% ‐30% 11.11% ‐33.33% No data ‐37.64% ‐6.06% Schleicher County, TX 23.67% ‐15.56% 700% ‐20% ‐100% ‐5.39% 24.68% Sterling County, TX ‐15.16% 1,300% 475% No data ‐100% ‐56.97% ‐21.43% Sutton County, TX 19.32% 70% 0% 14.29% No data ‐60.24% ‐4.55% Tom Green County, 9.51% 3.42% 29.16% 25.2% 36.99% ‐21.36% 25.74% TX Texas 19.61% 23.91% 44.45% 71.54% 50.03% 7.8% 31.94% United States 5.8% 15.43% 22.56% 43.72% 47.37% 24.2% 32.61%
Page 12 / 95 Percent Population Change (2000-2010) by Race
100
50 %
0
-50 White Black American Indian / Alaska Asian Native Hawaiian / Pacific Other Race Multiple Race Native Islander
Report Location Texas United States
Population Under Age 18
An estimated 23.49% of the population in the report area is under the age of 18 according to the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 2014‐18 5‐year estimates. An estimated total of 34,875 youths resided in the area during this time period. The number of persons under age 18 is relevant because this population has unique health needs which should be considered separately from other age groups.
Report Area Total Population Population Age 0‐17 Population Age 0‐17, Percent
Report Location 148,481 34,875 23.49% Coke County, TX 3,275 679 20.73% Concho County, TX 4,233 541 12.78% Crockett County, TX 3,633 984 27.09% Irion County, TX 1,524 356 23.36% Kimble County, TX 4,408 889 20.17% Menard County, TX 2,123 304 14.32% Reagan County, TX 3,752 1,112 29.64% Schleicher County, TX 3,061 842 27.51% Sterling County, TX 1,141 327 28.66% Sutton County, TX 3,865 954 24.68% Tom Green County, TX 117,466 27,887 23.74% Texas 27,885,195 7,292,686 26.15% United States 322,903,030 73,553,240 22.78%
Data Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey. 2014‐18. Source geography: Tract
Population Age 0‐17, Percent by Tract, ACS 2014‐18
Over 26.0% 23.1 ‐ 26.0% 20.1 ‐ 23.0% Under 20.1% No Data or Data Suppressed Report Location View larger map
Population Under Age 18 by Gender
This indicator reports the percentage of population that is under age 18 by gender.
Page 13 / 95 Report Area Total Male Total Female Percent Male Percent Female
Report Location 17,942 16,933 23.97% 23.00% Coke County, TX 363 316 22.60% 18.93% Concho County, TX 367 174 13.10% 12.16% Crockett County, TX 468 516 26.43% 27.71% Irion County, TX 202 154 24.16% 22.38% Kimble County, TX 523 366 24.28% 16.24% Menard County, TX 163 141 14.59% 14.02% Reagan County, TX 591 521 30.29% 28.93% Schleicher County, TX 432 410 28.02% 26.99% Sterling County, TX 213 114 34.24% 21.97% Sutton County, TX 592 362 27.98% 20.70% Tom Green County, TX 14,028 13,859 24.04% 23.44% Texas 3,719,941 3,572,745 26.86% 25.46% United States 37,585,573 35,967,667 23.64% 21.94%
Population Under Age 18 by Gender
30
20 %
10
0 Percent Male Percent Female
Report Location Texas United States
Population Under Age 18 by Ethnicity Alone
This indicator reports the percentage of population that is under age 18 by ethnicity alone.
Page 14 / 95 Report Area Total Hispanic / Latino Total Not Hispanic / Latino Percent Hispanic / Latino Percent Not Hispanic / Latino
Report Location 18,347 16,528 30.04% 18.91% Coke County, TX 211 468 30.23% 18.16% Concho County, TX 243 298 10.24% 16.01% Crockett County, TX 728 256 31.57% 19.29% Irion County, TX 121 235 32.35% 20.43% Kimble County, TX 371 518 33.30% 15.73% Menard County, TX 114 190 15.66% 13.62% Reagan County, TX 942 170 35.52% 15.45% Schleicher County, TX 502 340 31.32% 23.32% Sterling County, TX 193 134 37.40% 21.44% Sutton County, TX 678 276 28.43% 18.65% Tom Green County, TX 14,244 13,643 30.75% 19.18% Texas 3,598,009 3,694,677 49.34% 50.66% United States 18,347,823 55,205,417 31.90% 20.80%
Population Under Age 18 by Ethnicity Alone
60
40 %
20
0 Percent Hispanic / Latino Percent Not Hispanic / Latino
Report Location Texas United States
Population Under Age 18 by Ethnicity Alone
This indicator reports the proportion of the population aged 0 to 17 that is Hispanic or Latino.
Page 15 / 95 Report Area Total Hispanic / Latino Total Not Hispanic / Latino Percent Hispanic / Latino Percent Not Hispanic / Latino
Report Location 18,347 16,528 52.61% 47.39% Coke County, TX 211 468 31.08% 68.92% Concho County, TX 243 298 44.92% 55.08% Crockett County, TX 728 256 73.98% 26.02% Irion County, TX 121 235 33.99% 66.01% Kimble County, TX 371 518 41.73% 58.27% Menard County, TX 114 190 37.50% 62.50% Reagan County, TX 942 170 84.71% 15.29% Schleicher County, TX 502 340 59.62% 40.38% Sterling County, TX 193 134 59.02% 40.98% Sutton County, TX 678 276 71.07% 28.93% Tom Green County, TX 14,244 13,643 51.08% 48.92% Texas 3,598,009 3,694,677 49.34% 50.66% United States 18,347,823 55,205,417 24.94% 75.06%
Population Under Age 18 by Ethnicity Alone
Report Location
Not Hispanic / Latino: 47.4%
Hispanic / Latino: 52.6%
Population Under Age 18 by Race Alone, Percent
This indicator reports the percentage of population that is under age 18 by race alone.
Page 16 / 95 Black or African Native American / Alaska Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Multiple Report Area White Asian American Native Islander Race Race
Report Location 22.45% 24.91% 6.11% 17.21% No data 31.30% 38.53% No Coke County, TX 19.33% 90.00% 2.27% No data 38.17% 5.56% data Concho County, No 13.53% No data No data No data No data No data TX data Crockett County, No 23.03% No data No data No data 29.62% 100.00% TX data No Irion County, TX 23.11% 24.07% No data No data 26.13% No data data No Kimble County, TX 18.99% No data 33.33% No data 21.33% 48.91% data Menard County, No 15.69% No data No data No data No data 20.89% TX data No Reagan County, TX 21.98% No data No data No data 35.95% 10.42% data Schleicher County, No 26.30% No data No data No data 29.76% No data TX data Sterling County, No 30.47% No data No data No data 12.94% No data TX data No Sutton County, TX 23.87% 85.71% No data No data 25.60% No data data Tom Green 22.95% 24.41% 4.28% 17.21% No data 32.24% 39.61% County, TX Texas 25.38% 26.25% 25.63% 22.91% 23.31% 29.56% 46.12% United States 21.00% 25.26% 27.15% 19.97% 25.25% 29.83% 45.98%
Population Under Age 18 by Race Alone, Percent
60
40 %
20
0 White Black or African American Native American / Alaska Asian Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Race Multiple Race Native Islander
Report Location Texas United States
Population Under Age 18 by Race Alone, Total
This indicator reports the proportion of each race (alone) making up the population under age 18.
Page 17 / 95 Black or African Native American / Alaska Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Multiple Report Area White Asian American Native Islander Race Race
Report Location 27,699 1,272 32 253 0 4,616 1,003 Coke County, TX 566 18 1 0 0 92 2 Concho County, 541 0 0 0 0 0 0 TX Crockett County, 350 0 0 0 0 609 25 TX Irion County, TX 291 13 0 0 0 52 0 Kimble County, 746 0 12 0 0 64 67 TX Menard County, 271 0 0 0 0 0 33 TX Reagan County, 338 0 0 0 0 769 5 TX Schleicher 492 0 0 0 0 350 0 County, TX Sterling County, 316 0 0 0 0 11 0 TX Sutton County, TX 597 18 0 0 0 339 0 Tom Green 23,191 1,223 19 253 0 2,330 871 County, TX Texas 5,259,148 883,440 34,879 299,719 5,518 473,107 336,875 United States 49,319,083 10,335,967 732,763 3,509,294 147,127 4,710,700 4,798,306
Population Under Age 18 by Race Alone, Total
Report Location
Multiple Race: 2.9%
Some Other Race: 13.2%
Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 0.0%
Asian: 0.7%
Native American / Alaska Native: 0.1%
Black or African American: 3.6%
White: 79.4%
Median Age
This indicator reports population median age based on the 5‐year American Community Survey estimate.
Page 18 / 95 Report Area Total Population Median Age
Report Location 148,481 No data Coke County, TX 3,275 50.30 Concho County, TX 4,233 41.90 Crockett County, TX 3,633 35.90 Irion County, TX 1,524 44.10 Kimble County, TX 4,408 52.90 Menard County, TX 2,123 49.10 Reagan County, TX 3,752 31.40 Schleicher County, TX 3,061 35.00 Sterling County, TX 1,141 44.90 Sutton County, TX 3,865 38.40 Tom Green County, TX 117,466 33.90 Texas 27,885,195 34.40 United States 322,903,030 37.90
Data Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey. 2014‐18. Source geography: Tract
Median Age by Tract, ACS 2014‐18
Over 45.0 40.1 ‐ 45.0 35.1 ‐ 40.0 Under 35.1 No Data or Data Suppressed Report Location View larger map
Population Median Age by Gender
Report Area Male Female
Report Location No data No data Coke County, TX 48.9 51.2 Concho County, TX 38.0 49.6 Crockett County, TX 35.7 38.1 Irion County, TX 40.8 45.7 Kimble County, TX 50.7 56.0 Menard County, TX 47.6 52.2 Reagan County, TX 30.8 31.7 Schleicher County, TX 36.0 33.9 Sterling County, TX 39.0 45.4 Sutton County, TX 34.8 40.7 Tom Green County, TX 32.5 35.5 Texas 33.5 35.4 United States 36.6 39.3
Page 19 / 95 Population Median Age by Gender
50
40
30
20
10
0 Male Female
Texas United States
Population Median Age by Race Alone
Black or African Native American / Alaska Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Multiple Report Area White Asian American Native Islander Race Race
No No Report Location No data No data No data No data No data data data No Coke County, TX 51.3 16.1 56.2 No data 42.6 50.3 data Concho County, 40.3 65.3 No data 51.2 No data 30.9 83.1 TX Crockett County, No 44.9 51.5 No data No data 33.2 No data TX data No Irion County, TX 45.0 20.5 No data No data 47.6 65.8 data No Kimble County, TX 54.5 No data 61.1 No data 44.6 49.2 data Menard County, No 50.3 45.4 65.4 No data 46.5 54.8 TX data No Reagan County, TX 39.9 64.1 No data No data 27.4 35.1 data Schleicher County, No 40.3 No data No data No data 30.6 No data TX data Sterling County, No 44.3 No data No data No data 48.7 68.3 TX data No Sutton County, TX 38.1 6.6 No data No data 40.0 No data data Tom Green 34.9 27.1 39.1 29.6 32.2 30.7 21.0 County, TX Texas 35.6 32.9 33.9 35.2 32.3 30.1 20.1 United States 40.6 33.9 32.8 36.8 31.9 29.6 20.1
Page 20 / 95 Population Median Age by Race Alone
60
40
20
0 White Black or African American Native American / Alaska Asian Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Race Multiple Race Native Islander
Texas United States
Population Median Age by Ethnicity
Report Area Hispanic / Latino Not Hispanic / Latino
Report Location No data No data Coke County, TX 42.7 52.8 Concho County, TX 34.7 51.5 Crockett County, TX 30.9 52.6 Irion County, TX 26.5 47.9 Kimble County, TX 36.3 58.2 Menard County, TX 37.2 54.9 Reagan County, TX 27.3 52.1 Schleicher County, TX 31.0 46.3 Sterling County, TX 33.8 48.6 Sutton County, TX 36.4 45.3 Tom Green County, TX 28.8 39.7 Texas 28.4 42.0 United States 28.9 43.4
Population Median Age by Ethnicity
60
40
20
0 Hispanic / Latino Not Hispanic / Latino
Texas United States
Migration Patterns
This indicator reports the net migration rate of the total population between 2000 and 2010.
Page 21 / 95 Net Migration Rate, 2000 to 2010 Starting Population Ending Population Natural Net Migration Report Area (2000) (2010) Change Migration Rate
Report Location 130,631 142,738 12,514 ‐401 ‐0.28% Coke County, TX 3,816 3,306 ‐203 ‐307 ‐8.50% -40% 40% Concho County, TX 3,994 4,147 ‐17 169 4.25% Report Location (-0.28%) Texas (8.94%) Crockett County, TX 3,915 3,754 438 ‐594 ‐13.65% United States (3.60%) Irion County, TX 1,742 1,591 20 ‐169 ‐9.59% Kimble County, TX 4,322 4,601 13 266 6.14% Menard County, TX 2,341 2,242 ‐89 ‐13 ‐0.58% Reagan County, TX 3,116 3,404 476 ‐187 ‐5.21% Schleicher County, 2,833 3,484 207 439 14.44% TX Sterling County, TX 1,360 1,140 36 ‐252 ‐18.05% Sutton County, TX 3,891 4,165 526 ‐249 ‐5.64% Tom Green County, 99,301 110,904 11,107 496 0.45% TX Texas 19,631,623 25,375,447 3,661,884 2,081,930 8.94% United States 267,981,052 309,745,042 30,987,709 10,776,072 3.60%
Note: This indicator is compared to the state average. Data Source: University of Wisconsin Net Migration Patterns for US Counties. 2000 to 2010. Source geography: County
Net Migration, Rate per 100 Population by County, Uni. of Wisconsin 2000 to 2010
Over 10.0% Increase ( + ) 2.0 ‐ 10.0% Increase ( + ) Less Than 2.0% Change ( +/‐ ) 2.0 ‐ 10.0% Decrease ( ‐ ) Over 10.0% Decrease ( ‐ ) No Population or No Data View larger map Report Location
Net Migration Rate by Age Groups, 2000 to 2010
Page 22 / 95 Report Area Age 0 to 9 Age 10 to 19 Age 20 to 29 Age 30 to 39 Age 40 to 49 Age 50 to 59 Age 60 to 69 Age 70 and Up
Report Location 0.50 3.54 3.33 ‐14.31 ‐2.79 0.39 9.53 0.32 Coke County, TX 20.79 ‐4.35 ‐59.82 12.61 9.02 1.28 23.72 ‐15.60 Concho County, TX 13.31 1.24 45.45 ‐3.48 2.94 ‐7.24 18.85 ‐17.87 Crockett County, TX ‐0.84 ‐13.83 ‐44.95 14.50 ‐6.05 ‐11.33 ‐14.29 ‐17.61 Irion County, TX 44.14 16.59 ‐53.55 19.84 ‐3.86 ‐6.82 ‐0.89 ‐35.13 Kimble County, TX ‐1.21 ‐0.36 ‐39.64 24.05 10.26 27.63 42.75 ‐0.56 Menard County, TX ‐2.01 ‐2.02 ‐46.67 10.81 ‐3.62 15.89 27.87 10.35 Reagan County, TX 15.52 ‐3.18 ‐34.72 23.65 ‐5.20 ‐9.02 ‐5.45 ‐2.33 Schleicher County, TX 52.33 34.29 ‐22.68 65.43 12.75 1.63 12.25 ‐16.00 Sterling County, TX 37.70 ‐24.31 ‐49.03 5.61 ‐22.27 ‐24.77 ‐4.55 ‐15.43 Sutton County, TX ‐2.60 0.00 ‐33.91 14.01 5.73 ‐9.97 ‐0.24 ‐8.78 Tom Green County, TX ‐2.38 4.50 15.21 ‐20.33 ‐4.14 1.13 8.58 4.81 Texas 3.90 11.30 16.31 14.15 7.28 4.69 7.43 4.27 United States 1.23 4.26 8.04 6.33 2.10 1.67 3.88 0.89
Net Migration Rate by Age Groups, 2000 to 2010
20
10
0
-10
-20 Age 0 to 9 Age 10 to 19 Age 20 to 29 Age 30 to 39 Age 40 to 49 Age 50 to 59 Age 60 to 69 Age 70 and Up
Report Location Texas United States
Age Groups with Net In‐Migration, 2000 to 2010
Report Area Age 0 to 9 Age 10 to 19 Age 20 to 29 Age 30 to 39 Age 40 to 49 Age 50 to 59 Age 60 to 69 Age 70 and Up
Report Location 99 671 726 0 0 73 1,193 47 Coke County, TX 63 0 0 30 37 6 93 0 Concho County, TX 39 4 180 0 24 0 69 0 Crockett County, TX 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 0 Irion County, TX 49 36 0 25 0 0 0 0 Kimble County, TX 0 0 0 89 52 160 218 0 Menard County, TX 0 0 0 16 0 48 80 38 Reagan County, TX 77 0 0 79 0 0 0 0 Schleicher County, TX 236 131 0 159 45 7 37 0 Sterling County, TX 46 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 Sutton County, TX 0 0 0 59 31 0 0 0 Tom Green County, TX 0 669 2,531 0 0 156 786 500 Texas 149,672 380,621 522,870 443,565 236,575 138,616 138,740 71,271 United States 505,229 1,735,379 3,210,126 2,413,570 901,350 686,141 1,078,942 245,335
Page 23 / 95 Age Groups with Net In-Migration, 2000 to 2010
Report Location
Age 70 and Up: 1.7% Age 0 to 9: 3.5%
Age 10 to 19: 23.9%
Age 60 to 69: 42.5%
Age 50 to 59: 2.6% Age 20 to 29: 25.8% Age 30 to 39: 0.0%
Age Groups with Net Out‐Migration, 2000 to 2010
Report Area Age 0 to 9 Age 10 to 19 Age 20 to 29 Age 30 to 39 Age 40 to 49 Age 50 to 59 Age 60 to 69 Age 70 and Up
Report Location 0 0 0 2,700 510 0 0 0 Coke County, TX 0 18 408 0 0 0 0 110 Concho County, TX 0 0 0 27 0 41 0 79 Crockett County, TX 5 82 316 0 31 75 67 75 Irion County, TX 0 0 151 0 10 18 2 98 Kimble County, TX 6 2 241 0 0 0 0 4 Menard County, TX 5 5 175 0 10 0 0 0 Reagan County, TX 0 18 233 0 26 46 14 6 Schleicher County, TX 0 0 120 0 0 0 0 56 Sterling County, TX 0 44 127 0 47 55 6 25 Sutton County, TX 17 0 214 0 0 69 1 38 Tom Green County, TX 378 0 0 3,193 575 0 0 0 Texas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 United States 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Age Groups with Net Out-Migration, 2000 to 2010
Report Location
Age 50 to 59: 0.0% Age 0 to 9: 0.0%
Age 60 to 69: 0.0% Age 10 to 19: 0.0%
Age 70 and Up: 0.0% Age 20 to 29: 0.0%
Age 40 to 49: 15.9%
Age 30 to 39: 84.1%
Population Age 18‐64
This indicator reports the percentage of population age 18‐64 in the designated geographic area. This indicator is relevant because it is important to understand the percentage of adults in the community, as this population has unique health needs
Page 24 / 95 which should be considered separately from other age groups.
Report Area Total Population Population Age 18‐64 Population Age 18‐64, Percent
Report Location 148,481 90,186 60.74% Coke County, TX 3,275 1,704 52.03% Concho County, TX 4,233 2,937 69.38% Crockett County, TX 3,633 2,110 58.08% Irion County, TX 1,524 879 57.68% Kimble County, TX 4,408 2,246 50.95% Menard County, TX 2,123 1,255 59.11% Reagan County, TX 3,752 2,290 61.03% Schleicher County, TX 3,061 1,734 56.65% Sterling County, TX 1,141 655 57.41% Sutton County, TX 3,865 2,258 58.42% Tom Green County, TX 117,466 72,118 61.39% Texas 27,885,195 17,254,695 61.88% United States 322,903,030 200,111,209 61.97%
Data Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey. 2014‐18. Source geography: Tract
Population Age 18‐64, Percent by Tract, ACS 2014‐18
Over 63.0% 60.1 ‐ 63.0% 57.1 ‐ 60.0% Under 57.1% No Data or Data Suppressed Report Location View larger map
Population Age 18‐64 by Gender
This indicator reports the percentage of population that are at age 18 to 64 by gender. In the report area, 61.84% of male population are at age 18‐64, and 59.62% of female population are at age 18‐64.
Page 25 / 95 Males Females Percent of Males Percent of Females Report Area Age 18‐64 Age 18‐64 Age 18‐64 Age 18‐64
Report Location 46,295 43,891 61.84% 59.62% Coke County, TX 844 860 52.55% 51.53% Concho County, TX 2,043 894 72.91% 62.47% Crockett County, TX 1,064 1,046 60.08% 56.18% Irion County, TX 495 384 59.21% 55.81% Kimble County, TX 1,080 1,166 50.14% 51.73% Menard County, TX 683 572 61.15% 56.86% Reagan County, TX 1,164 1,126 59.66% 62.52% Schleicher County, TX 893 841 57.91% 55.37% Sterling County, TX 356 299 57.23% 57.61% Sutton County, TX 1,194 1,064 56.43% 60.83% Tom Green County, TX 36,479 35,639 62.53% 60.28% Texas 8,644,460 8,610,235 62.42% 61.35% United States 99,617,317 100,493,892 62.66% 61.31%
Population Age 18-64 by Gender
80
60
% 40
20
0 Percent of Males Percent of Female
Report Location Texas United States
Population Age 18‐64 by Ethnicity Alone
This indicator reports the percentage of population that are at age 18 to 64 by ethnicity alone. In the report area, 61.33% of Hispanic / Latino population are at age 18‐64, and 60.33% of non Hispanic / Latino population are at age 18‐64.
Page 26 / 95 Hispanic / Latino Not Hispanic / Latino Percent Hispanic / Latino Report Area Percent Not Hispanic / Latino Age 18‐64 Age 18‐64 Age 18‐64 Age 18‐64
Report Location 37,452 52,734 61.33% 60.33% Coke County, TX 391 1,313 56.02% 50.95% Concho County, TX 1,927 1,010 81.24% 54.27% Crockett County, TX 1,319 791 57.20% 59.61% Irion County, TX 228 651 60.96% 56.61% Kimble County, TX 644 1,602 57.81% 48.63% Menard County, TX 535 720 73.49% 51.61% Reagan County, TX 1,595 695 60.14% 63.18% Schleicher County, TX 966 768 60.26% 52.67% Sterling County, TX 302 353 58.53% 56.48% Sutton County, TX 1,390 868 58.28% 58.65% Tom Green County, TX 28,155 43,963 60.78% 61.79% Texas 6,570,947 10,683,748 60.16% 62.98% United States 35,214,538 164,896,671 61.22% 62.13%
Population Age 18-64 by Ethnicity Alone
80
60
% 40
20
0 Hispanic / Latino Not Hispanic / Latino
Report Location Texas United States
Population Age 18‐64 by Ethnicity Alone
This indicator reports the proportion of the adult population aged 18 to 64 that is Hispanic or Latino.
Page 27 / 95 Hispanic / Latino Not Hispanic / Latino Percent Hispanic / Latino Report Area Percent Not Hispanic / Latino Age 18+ Age 18+ Age 18+ Age 18+
Report Location 37,452 52,734 41.53% 58.47% Coke County, TX 391 1,313 22.95% 77.05% Concho County, TX 1,927 1,010 65.61% 34.39% Crockett County, TX 1,319 791 62.51% 37.49% Irion County, TX 228 651 25.94% 74.06% Kimble County, TX 644 1,602 28.67% 71.33% Menard County, TX 535 720 42.63% 57.37% Reagan County, TX 1,595 695 69.65% 30.35% Schleicher County, TX 966 768 55.71% 44.29% Sterling County, TX 302 353 46.11% 53.89% Sutton County, TX 1,390 868 61.56% 38.44% Tom Green County, TX 28,155 43,963 39.04% 60.96% Texas 6,570,947 10,683,748 38.08% 61.92% United States 35,214,538 164,896,671 17.60% 82.40%
Population Age 18-64 by Ethnicity Alone
Report Location
Hispanic / Latino: 41.5%
Not Hispanic / Latino: 58.5%
Population Age 18‐64 by Race Alone, Percent
This indicator reports the percentage of population that are at age 18 to 64 by race alone.
Page 28 / 95 White Black or African Native American / Alaska Asian Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Multiple Report Area Age 18‐ American Native Age 18‐ Islander Race Race 64 Age 18‐64 Age 18‐64 64 Age 18‐64 Age 18‐64 Age 18‐64
Report Location 60.41% 64.18% 78.28% 70.67% 90.91% 61.97% 51.92% Coke County, TX 51.67% 10.00% 84.09% 0.00% No data 52.28% 72.22% Concho County, 69.37% 37.23% 100.00% 100.00% No data 100.00% 29.41% TX Crockett County, 57.63% 100.00% No data No data No data 58.46% 0.00% TX Irion County, TX 56.00% 75.93% No data No data No data 65.83% 16.67% Kimble County, TX 50.80% 100.00% 66.67% No data 100.00% 67.00% 13.87% Menard County, 56.69% 100.00% 28.00% No data No data 96.97% 39.24% TX Reagan County, 60.40% 85.19% No data No data No data 61.01% 68.75% TX Schleicher 53.50% 0.00% No data No data No data 62.24% 100.00% County, TX Sterling County, 55.35% 100.00% No data No data No data 84.71% 37.50% TX Sutton County, TX 56.42% 14.29% 100.00% No data No data 62.84% 0.00% Tom Green 61.13% 64.68% 80.41% 70.00% 90.00% 61.49% 55.71% County, TX Texas 61.27% 64.77% 64.45% 67.89% 69.84% 64.32% 48.81% United States 61.57% 63.86% 62.96% 68.03% 66.38% 64.63% 48.96%
Population Age 18-64 by Race Alone, Percent
100
75
% 50
25
0 White Black or African American Native American / Alaska Asian Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Race Multiple Race Native Islander
Report Location Texas United States
Population Age 18‐64 by Race Alone, Total
This indicator reports the proportion of each race (alone) making up the population aged 18 to 64.
Page 29 / 95 Black or African Native American / Alaska Native Hawaiian / Some Other Multiple White Asian Report Area American Native Pacific Islander Race Race Age 18‐64 Age 18‐64 Age 18‐64 Age 18‐64 Age 18‐64 Age 18‐64 Age 18‐64
Report Location 74,536 3,396 447 1,077 50 9,301 1,379 Coke County, TX 1,513 2 37 0 0 126 26 Concho County, 2,774 35 10 48 0 65 5 TX Crockett County, 876 32 0 0 0 1,202 0 TX Irion County, TX 705 41 0 0 0 131 2 Kimble County, 1,996 1 24 0 5 201 19 TX Menard County, 979 15 7 0 0 192 62 TX Reagan County, 929 23 0 0 0 1,305 33 TX Schleicher 1,001 0 0 0 0 732 1 County, TX Sterling County, 574 3 0 0 0 72 6 TX Sutton County, 1,411 3 12 0 0 832 0 TX Tom Green 61,778 3,241 357 1,029 45 4,443 1,225 County, TX Texas 12,696,388 2,180,123 87,697 888,136 16,533 1,029,252 356,566 United States 144,625,680 26,128,386 1,699,376 11,956,623 386,792 10,205,157 5,109,195
Population Age 18-64 by Race Alone, Total
Report Location
Multiple Race: 1.5%
Some Other Race: 10.3%
Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 0.1%
Asian: 1.2%
Native American / Alaska Native: 0.5%
Black or African American: 3.8%
White: 82.6%
Population Age 65+
An estimated 15.77% of the population in the report area is age 65 or older according to the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 2014‐18 5‐year estimates. An estimated total of 23,420 older adults resided in the area during this time period. The number of persons age 65 or older is relevant because this population has unique health needs which should be considered separately from other age groups.
Page 30 / 95 Report Area Total Population Population Age 65+ Population Age 65+, Percent
Report Location 148,481 23,420 15.77% Coke County, TX 3,275 892 27.24% Concho County, TX 4,233 755 17.84% Crockett County, TX 3,633 539 14.84% Irion County, TX 1,524 289 18.96% Kimble County, TX 4,408 1,273 28.88% Menard County, TX 2,123 564 26.57% Reagan County, TX 3,752 350 9.33% Schleicher County, TX 3,061 485 15.84% Sterling County, TX 1,141 159 13.94% Sutton County, TX 3,865 653 16.90% Tom Green County, TX 117,466 17,461 14.86% Texas 27,885,195 3,337,814 11.97% United States 322,903,030 49,238,581 15.25%
Data Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey. 2014‐18. Source geography: Tract
Population Age 65+, Percent by Tract, ACS 2014‐18
Over 20.0% 16.1 ‐ 20.0% 12.1 ‐ 16.0% Under 12.1% No Data or Data Suppressed Report Location View larger map
Population Age 65+ by Gender
This indicator reports the percentage of population that are at age 65+ by gender. In the report area, 12.49% of male population are at age 65+, and 17.38% of female population are at age 65+.
Report Area Total Male Total Female Percent Male Percent Female
Report Location 9,349 12,797 12.49% 17.38% Coke County, TX 356 493 22.17% 29.54% Concho County, TX 384 363 13.70% 25.37% Crockett County, TX 235 300 13.27% 16.11% Irion County, TX 119 150 14.23% 21.80% Kimble County, TX 520 722 24.14% 32.03% Menard County, TX 246 293 22.02% 29.13% Reagan County, TX 156 154 8.00% 8.55% Schleicher County, TX 201 268 13.04% 17.64% Sterling County, TX 48 106 7.72% 20.42% Sutton County, TX 272 323 12.85% 18.47% Tom Green County, TX 6,812 9,625 11.68% 16.28% Texas 1,356,591 1,852,440 9.80% 13.20% United States 19,630,586 27,457,281 12.35% 16.75%
Page 31 / 95 Population Age 65+ by Gender
20
15
% 10
5
0 Percent Male Percent Female
Report Location Texas United States
Population Age 65+ by Ethnicity Alone
This indicator reports the percentage of population that are at age 65+ by ethnicity alone. In the report area, 8.63% of Hispanic / Latino population are at age 65+, and 20.77% of non Hispanic / Latino population are at age 65+.
Report Area Total Hispanic / Latino Total Not Hispanic / Latino Percent Hispanic / Latino Percent Not Hispanic / Latino
Report Location 5,268 18,152 8.63% 20.77% Coke County, TX 96 796 13.75% 30.89% Concho County, TX 202 553 8.52% 29.72% Crockett County, TX 259 280 11.23% 21.10% Irion County, TX 25 264 6.68% 22.96% Kimble County, TX 99 1,174 8.89% 35.64% Menard County, TX 79 485 10.85% 34.77% Reagan County, TX 115 235 4.34% 21.36% Schleicher County, TX 135 350 8.42% 24.01% Sterling County, TX 21 138 4.07% 22.08% Sutton County, TX 317 336 13.29% 22.70% Tom Green County, TX 3,920 13,541 8.46% 19.03% Texas 752,600 2,585,214 6.89% 15.24% United States 3,955,574 45,283,007 6.88% 17.06%
Population Age 65+ by Ethnicity Alone
25
20
15 %
10
5
0 Percent Hispanic / Latino Percent Not Hispanic / Latino
Report Location Texas United States
Population Age 65+ by Race Alone, Percent
Page 32 / 95 Black or African Native American / Alaska Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Multiple Report Area White Asian American Native Islander Race Race
Report Location 17.13% 12.11% 17.93% 13.14% 10.00% 7.31% 10.42% Coke County, TX 29.00% 0.00% 13.64% 100.00% No data 9.54% 22.22% Concho County, 17.10% 62.77% 0.00% 0.00% No data 0.00% 70.59% TX Crockett County, 19.34% 0.00% No data No data No data 11.92% 0.00% TX Irion County, TX 20.89% 0.00% No data No data No data 8.04% 83.33% Kimble County, TX 30.21% 0.00% 0.00% No data 0.00% 11.67% 37.23% Menard County, 27.62% 0.00% 72.00% No data No data 3.03% 39.87% TX Reagan County, TX 17.62% 14.81% No data No data No data 3.04% 20.83% Schleicher County, 20.20% 100.00% No data No data No data 7.99% 0.00% TX Sterling County, 14.18% 0.00% No data No data No data 2.35% 62.50% TX Sutton County, TX 19.71% 0.00% 0.00% No data No data 11.56% 100.00% Tom Green 15.93% 10.92% 15.32% 12.79% 10.00% 6.27% 4.68% County, TX Texas 13.34% 8.98% 9.91% 9.20% 6.85% 6.12% 5.07% United States 17.44% 10.88% 9.89% 12.00% 8.37% 5.54% 5.06%
Population Age 65+ by Race Alone, Percent
20
15
% 10
5
0 White Black or African American Native American / Alaska Asian Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Race Multiple Race Native Islander
Report Location Texas United States
Population Age 65+ by Race Alone, Total
Page 33 / 95 Black or African Native American / Alaska Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Multiple Report Area White Asian American Native Islander Race Race
Report Location 21,140 623 92 194 5 1,092 274 Coke County, TX 849 0 6 6 0 23 8 Concho County, 684 59 0 0 0 0 12 TX Crockett County, 294 0 0 0 0 245 0 TX Irion County, TX 263 0 0 0 0 16 10 Kimble County, 1,187 0 0 0 0 35 51 TX Menard County, 477 0 18 0 0 6 63 TX Reagan County, 271 4 0 0 0 65 10 TX Schleicher 378 13 0 0 0 94 0 County, TX Sterling County, 147 0 0 0 0 2 10 TX Sutton County, TX 493 0 0 0 0 153 7 Tom Green 16,097 547 68 188 5 453 103 County, TX Texas 2,765,153 302,220 13,485 120,402 1,621 97,875 37,058 United States 40,960,055 4,451,760 266,934 2,108,633 48,799 874,104 528,296
Population Age 65+ by Race Alone, Total
Report Location
Multiple Race: 1.2%
Some Other Race: 4.7%
Asian: 0.8%
Black or African American: 2.7%
White: 90.3%
Population with Any Disability
This indicator reports the percentage of the total civilian non‐institutionalized population with a disability. This indicator is relevant because disabled individuals comprise a vulnerable population that requires targeted services and outreach by providers.
Page 34 / 95 Population with a Disability, Total Population Percent Population with a Population with a Disability, Report Area (For Whom Disability Status Is Disability Percent Determined)
Report Location 142,118 19,677 13.85% 0% 20% Coke County, TX 3,177 559 17.60% Report Location (13.85%) Texas (11.50%) Concho County, TX 3,068 294 9.58% United States (12.60%) Crockett County, 3,559 299 8.40% TX Irion County, TX 1,508 183 12.14% Kimble County, TX 4,356 964 22.13% Menard County, 2,074 466 22.47% TX Reagan County, TX 3,716 350 9.42% Schleicher County, 3,061 289 9.44% TX Sterling County, TX 1,103 181 16.41% Sutton County, TX 3,844 389 10.12% Tom Green 112,652 15,703 13.94% County, TX Texas 27,417,645 3,152,865 11.50% United States 317,941,631 40,071,666 12.60%
Note: This indicator is compared to the state average. Data Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey. 2014‐18. Source geography: Tract
Disabled Population, Percent by Tract, ACS 2014‐18
Over 18.0% 15.1 ‐ 18.0% 12.1 ‐ 15.0% Under 12.1% No Data or Data Suppressed Report Location View larger map
Population with Any Disability by Gender
Page 35 / 95 Report Area Total Male Total Female Percent Male Percent Female
Report Location 9,888 9,789 14.11% 13.58% Coke County, TX 258 301 16.81% 18.33% Concho County, TX 116 178 6.90% 12.82% Crockett County, TX 150 149 8.64% 8.17% Irion County, TX 106 77 12.68% 11.46% Kimble County, TX 512 452 24.09% 20.26% Menard County, TX 262 204 23.91% 20.86% Reagan County, TX 204 146 10.53% 8.21% Schleicher County, TX 172 117 11.15% 7.70% Sterling County, TX 89 92 14.83% 18.29% Sutton County, TX 149 240 7.11% 13.72% Tom Green County, TX 7,870 7,833 14.34% 13.56% Texas 1,539,701 1,613,164 11.42% 11.58% United States 19,374,640 20,697,026 12.47% 12.73%
Population with Any Disability by Gender
15
10 %
5
0 Percent Male Percent Female
Report Location Texas United States
Population with Any Disability by Age Group, Percent
Report Area Under Age 18 Age 18 ‐ 64 Age 65 +
Report Location 5.52% 10.67% 38.42% Coke County, TX 2.09% 10.18% 43.68% Concho County, TX 2.77% 4.95% 27.29% Crockett County, TX 0.00% 8.57% 24.30% Irion County, TX 0.00% 8.92% 36.68% Kimble County, TX 10.80% 15.63% 41.78% Menard County, TX 3.62% 16.84% 46.17% Reagan County, TX 0.36% 5.90% 66.56% Schleicher County, TX 0.00% 8.30% 29.90% Sterling County, TX 0.00% 19.09% 43.07% Sutton County, TX 4.19% 6.53% 31.09% Tom Green County, TX 6.25% 10.93% 38.52% Texas 4.08% 9.59% 38.03% United States 4.17% 10.30% 34.97%
Page 36 / 95 Population with Any Disability by Age Group, Percent
50
40
30 %
20
10
0 Under Age 18 Age 18 - 64 Age 65 +
Report Location Texas United States
Population with Any Disability by Age Group, Total
Report Area Under Age 18 Age 18 ‐ 64 Age 65 +
Report Location 1,915 9,033 8,729 Coke County, TX 13 173 373 Concho County, TX 15 91 188 Crockett County, TX 0 178 121 Irion County, TX 0 77 106 Kimble County, TX 96 347 521 Menard County, TX 11 208 247 Reagan County, TX 4 135 211 Schleicher County, TX 0 144 145 Sterling County, TX 0 122 59 Sutton County, TX 40 146 203 Tom Green County, TX 1,736 7,412 6,555 Texas 296,876 1,618,704 1,237,285 United States 3,065,179 20,240,504 16,765,983
Population with Any Disability by Age Group, Total
Report Location
Under Age 18: 9.7%
Age 65 +: 44.4%
Age 18 - 64: 45.9%
Population with Any Disability by Ethnicity Alone
Page 37 / 95 Report Area Total Hispanic / Latino Total Not Hispanic / Latino Percent Hispanic / Latino Percent Not Hispanic / Latino
Report Location 6,147 13,530 8.53% 16.28% Coke County, TX 77 482 11.54% 19.20% Concho County, TX 83 211 6.07% 12.41% Crockett County, TX 108 191 4.74% 14.91% Irion County, TX 25 158 6.68% 13.93% Kimble County, TX 182 782 16.59% 24.00% Menard County, TX 127 339 17.71% 24.98% Reagan County, TX 147 203 5.59% 18.73% Schleicher County, TX 81 208 5.05% 14.27% Sterling County, TX 91 90 18.06% 15.03% Sutton County, TX 218 171 9.19% 11.62% Tom Green County, TX 5,008 10,695 11.04% 15.90% Texas 1,013,870 2,138,995 7.28% 12.86% United States 5,067,077 35,004,589 3.12% 13.40%
Population with Any Disability by Ethnicity Alone
20
15
% 10
5
0 Hispanic / Latino Not Hispanic / Latino
Report Location Texas United States
Population with Any Disability by Race Alone, Percent
Page 38 / 95 Black or African Native American / Alaska Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Multiple Report Area White Asian American Native Islander Race Race
Report Location 14.31% 18.76% 16.73% 2.64% 14.71% 8.72% 17.87% Coke County, TX 18.39% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% No data 8.19% 43.75% Concho County, No 9.28% 23.94% 0.00% No data 0.00% 60.00% TX data Crockett County, No 12.99% 0.00% No data No data 5.27% 0.00% TX data No Irion County, TX 13.27% 0.00% No data No data 4.02% 83.33% data No Kimble County, TX 19.98% No data 0.00% 0.00% 37.33% 56.20% data Menard County, No 23.27% 100.00% 0.00% No data 0.00% 39.74% TX data No Reagan County, TX 15.02% 0.00% No data No data 5.80% 0.00% data Schleicher County, No 12.93% 46.15% No data No data 3.49% 0.00% TX data Sterling County, No 15.02% No data No data No data 27.06% 53.85% TX data No Sutton County, TX 11.29% 5.00% 50.00% No data 7.18% 100.00% data Tom Green 14.07% 18.87% 20.10% 2.65% 17.24% 10.73% 12.73% County, TX Texas 11.83% 13.08% 16.45% 5.54% 9.70% 8.97% 10.50% United States 13.12% 13.95% 16.83% 6.98% 10.73% 8.23% 10.93%
Population with Any Disability by Race Alone, Percent
20
15
% 10
5
0 White Black or African American Native American / Alaska Asian Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Race Multiple Race Native Islander
Report Location Texas United States
Population with Any Disability by Race Alone, Total
Page 39 / 95 Black or African Native American / Alaska Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Multiple Report Area White Asian American Native Islander Race Race
Report Location 16,922 896 88 30 5 1,303 433 Coke County, TX 526 0 0 0 0 19 14 Concho County, 274 17 0 0 0 0 3 TX Crockett County, 191 0 0 0 0 108 0 TX Irion County, TX 165 0 0 0 0 8 10 Kimble County, 775 0 0 0 0 112 77 TX Menard County, 393 11 0 0 0 0 62 TX Reagan County, 226 0 0 0 0 124 0 TX Schleicher 242 6 0 0 0 41 0 County, TX Sterling County, 151 0 0 0 0 23 7 TX Sutton County, TX 280 1 6 0 0 95 7 Tom Green 13,699 861 82 30 5 773 253 County, TX Texas 2,414,207 425,782 21,767 72,133 2,219 141,599 75,158 United States 30,406,200 5,535,003 443,140 1,219,941 61,092 1,283,869 1,122,421
Population with Any Disability by Race Alone, Total
Report Location
Multiple Race: 2.2%
Some Other Race: 6.6%
Asian: 0.2%
Native American / Alaska Native: 0.4%
Black or African American: 4.6%
White: 86.0%
Population in Limited English Households
This indicator reports the percentage of the population aged 5 and older living in Limited English speaking households. A “Limited English speaking household” is one in which no member 14 years old and over (1) speaks only English at home or (2) speaks a language other than English at home and speaks English “Very well.” This indicator is significant as it identifies households and populations that may need English‐language assistance.
Page 40 / 95 Linguistically Isolated Population, Total Population Age Linguistically Isolated Linguistically Isolated Population, Percent Report Area 5+ Population Percent
Report Location 138,780 3,849 2.77% Coke County, TX 3,172 71 2.24% 0% 15% Concho County, TX 4,112 101 2.46% Report Location (2.77%) Texas (7.62%) Crockett County, TX 3,330 0 0.00% United States (4.35%) Irion County, TX 1,464 0 0.00% Kimble County, TX 4,138 152 3.67% Menard County, TX 2,097 179 8.54% Reagan County, TX 3,488 498 14.28% Schleicher County, 2,874 176 6.12% TX Sterling County, TX 1,072 61 5.69% Sutton County, TX 3,612 228 6.31% Tom Green County, 109,421 2,383 2.18% TX Texas 25,886,326 1,973,662 7.62% United States 303,066,180 13,181,780 4.35%
Note: This indicator is compared to the state average. Data Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey. 2014‐18. Source geography: Tract
Population in Linguistically Isolated Households, Percent by Tract, ACS 2014‐18
Over 3.0% 1.1 ‐ 3.0% 0.1 ‐ 1.1% No Population in Linguistically Isolated Households No Data or Data Suppressed Report Location View larger map
Renter‐Occupied Housing
Tenure provides a measurement of home ownership, which has served as an indicator of the nation’s economy for decades. This data covers all occupied housing units, which are classified as either owner occupied or renter occupied. These data are used to aid in the distribution of funds for programs such as those involving mortgage insurance, rental housing, and national defense housing. Data on tenure allows planners to evaluate the overall viability of housing markets and to assess the stability of neighborhoods. The data also serve in understanding the characteristics of owner occupied and renter occupied units to aid builders, mortgage lenders, planning officials, government agencies, etc., in the planning of housing programs and services.3
Renter‐Occupied Housing
All occupied housing units that are not owner occupied, whether they are rented or occupied without payment of rent, are classified as renter occupied.
Page 41 / 95 Report Area Total Occupied Housing Units Renter‐Occupied Housing Units Percent Renter‐Occupied Housing Units
Report Location 54,781 19,323 35.27% Coke County, TX 1,617 407 25.17% Concho County, TX 873 257 29.44% Crockett County, TX 1,388 399 28.75% Irion County, TX 634 135 21.29% Kimble County, TX 1,948 468 24.02% Menard County, TX 992 358 36.09% Reagan County, TX 1,147 346 30.17% Schleicher County, TX 1,105 234 21.18% Sterling County, TX 462 64 13.85% Sutton County, TX 1,484 485 32.68% Tom Green County, TX 43,131 16,170 37.49% Texas 9,553,046 3,635,275 38.05% United States 119,730,128 43,285,318 36.15%
Data Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey. 2014‐18. Source geography: Tract
Renter‐Occupied Housing Units, Percent by Tract, ACS 2014‐18
Over 38.0% 30.1 ‐ 38.0% 22.1 ‐ 30.0% Under 22.1% No Data or Data Suppressed Report Location View larger map
Renter‐Occupied Households by Race Alone, Percent
Report Area White Black Asian Native American / Alaska Native Some Other Race Multiple Races
Report Location 33.96% 66.67% 52.25% 36.98% 33.76% 44.06% Coke County, TX 26.79% No data 0.00% 0.00% 13.10% 0.00% Concho County, TX 29.36% 0.00% No data 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% Crockett County, TX 22.47% 0.00% No data No data 34.73% No data Irion County, TX 20.61% 100.00% No data No data 11.29% 0.00% Kimble County, TX 23.19% No data No data 0.00% 22.05% 54.10% Menard County, TX 29.60% 100.00% No data 65.00% 59.76% 58.82% Reagan County, TX 21.45% 0.00% No data No data 40.14% 0.00% Schleicher County, TX 25.14% 100.00% No data No data 11.37% 0.00% Sterling County, TX 12.86% No data No data No data 28.57% 0.00% Sutton County, TX 30.22% No data No data 0.00% 38.56% 0.00% Tom Green County, TX 35.98% 67.27% 53.05% 38.69% 35.97% 46.06% Texas 33.71% 58.95% 37.71% 41.22% 47.82% 47.59% United States 30.67% 58.24% 41.04% 45.99% 60.69% 51.32%
Page 42 / 95 Renter-Occupied Households by Race Alone, Percent
75
50 %
25
0 White Black Asian Native American / Alaska Native Some Other Race Multiple Races
Report Location Texas United States
Renter‐Occupied Households by Race Alone, Total
Report Area White Black Asian Native American / Alaska Native Some Other Race Multiple Races
Report Location 15,933 1,156 209 125 1,594 282 Coke County, TX 396 0 0 0 11 0 Concho County, TX 251 0 0 6 0 0 Crockett County, TX 142 0 0 0 257 0 Irion County, TX 114 14 0 0 7 0 Kimble County, TX 407 0 0 0 28 33 Menard County, TX 235 11 0 13 49 50 Reagan County, TX 118 0 0 0 228 0 Schleicher County, TX 177 13 0 0 44 0 Sterling County, TX 54 0 0 0 10 0 Sutton County, TX 298 0 0 0 187 0 Tom Green County, TX 13,741 1,118 209 106 773 199 Texas 2,444,809 712,768 155,281 18,924 215,803 83,594 United States 28,161,955 8,552,346 2,284,604 400,111 2,558,150 1,235,442
Renter-Occupied Households by Race Alone, Total
Report Location
Multiple Races: 1.5%
Some Other Race: 8.3%
Native American / Alaska Native: 0.6%
Asian: 1.1%
Black: 6.0%
White: 82.6%
Renter‐Occupied Households by Age Group, Percent
Page 43 / 95 Report Area Age 15‐24 Age 25‐34 Age 35‐44 Age 45‐54 Age 55‐64 Age 65‐74 Age 75‐84 Age 85+
Report Location 85.70% 55.80% 43.51% 25.91% 20.88% 20.37% 18.11% 30.46% Coke County, TX 90.63% 58.87% 49.57% 13.16% 15.61% 9.06% 11.11% 22.81% Concho County, TX 71.43% 84.62% 48.89% 43.78% 7.92% 6.00% 5.61% 58.06% Crockett County, TX 60.00% 54.47% 46.19% 13.13% 25.48% 0.00% 18.10% 53.85% Irion County, TX 100.00% 38.27% 32.05% 6.14% 12.68% 0.00% 8.62% 0.00% Kimble County, TX 90.00% 38.60% 27.62% 30.08% 22.48% 9.82% 11.68% 17.89% Menard County, TX 100.00% 45.74% 67.37% 24.02% 49.22% 29.41% 0.00% 33.33% Reagan County, TX 33.33% 48.38% 36.96% 27.32% 8.06% 19.18% 25.00% 0.00% Schleicher County, TX 100.00% 22.22% 31.03% 27.22% 8.24% 22.58% 4.40% 27.78% Sterling County, TX 0.00% 26.76% 14.55% 10.83% 21.62% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Sutton County, TX 11.63% 51.24% 38.43% 48.83% 25.48% 12.40% 0.00% 47.73% Tom Green County, TX 86.95% 57.74% 44.34% 26.26% 21.18% 22.98% 21.08% 31.28% Texas 87.94% 63.83% 42.17% 30.80% 24.15% 19.52% 18.96% 28.66% United States 86.41% 61.95% 42.09% 31.14% 24.65% 20.22% 20.72% 30.76%
Renter-Occupied Households by Age Group, Percent
100
75
% 50
25
0 Age 15-24 Age 25-34 Age 35-44 Age 45-54 Age 55-64 Age 65-74 Age 75-84 Age 85+
Report Location Texas United States
Renter‐Occupied Households by Age Group, Total
Report Area Age 15‐24 Age 25‐34 Age 35‐44 Age 45‐54 Age 55‐64 Age 65‐74 Age 75‐84 Age 85+
Report Location 2,799 5,472 3,601 2,315 2,137 1,634 785 580 Coke County, TX 58 83 114 40 49 28 22 13 Concho County, TX 10 66 44 88 16 9 6 18 Crockett County, TX 27 140 97 42 67 0 19 7 Irion County, TX 49 31 25 7 18 0 5 0 Kimble County, TX 90 44 58 77 105 38 34 22 Menard County, TX 22 43 64 49 95 75 0 10 Reagan County, TX 3 149 95 50 17 14 18 0 Schleicher County, TX 24 56 36 43 21 35 4 15 Sterling County, TX 0 19 8 13 24 0 0 0 Sutton County, TX 5 124 98 104 80 32 0 42 Tom Green County, TX 2,511 4,717 2,962 1,802 1,645 1,403 677 453 Texas 372,811 1,077,841 793,561 573,531 415,463 228,659 111,672 61,737 United States 3,862,720 11,308,267 8,669,582 7,153,044 5,763,693 3,471,817 1,876,192 1,180,003
Page 44 / 95 Renter-Occupied Households by Age Group, Total
Report Location
Age 85+: 3.0% Age 15-24: 14.5% Age 75-84: 4.1%
Age 65-74: 8.5%
Age 55-64: 11.1%
Age 25-34: 28.3%
Age 45-54: 12.0%
Age 35-44: 18.6%
Household Composition
This indicator reports the total number and percentage of households by composition (married couple family, nonfamily, etc.). According to the American Community Survey subject definitions, a family household is any housing unit in which the householder is living with one or more individuals related to him or her by birth, marriage, or adoption*. A non‐family households is any household occupied by the householder alone, or by the householder and one or more unrelated individuals. *Family households and married‐couple families do not include same‐sex married couples even if the marriage was performed in a state issuing marriage certificates for same‐sex couples. Same sex couple households are included in the family households category if there is at least one additional person related to the householder by birth or adoption.
Total Family Family Households, Non‐Family Non‐Family Households, Report Area Households Households Percent Households Percent
Report Location 54,781 35,441 64.70% 19,340 35.30% Coke County, TX 1,617 1,024 63.33% 593 36.67% Concho County, TX 873 594 68.04% 279 31.96% Crockett County, TX 1,388 989 71.25% 399 28.75% Irion County, TX 634 430 67.82% 204 32.18% Kimble County, TX 1,948 1,350 69.30% 598 30.70% Menard County, TX 992 583 58.77% 409 41.23% Reagan County, TX 1,147 883 76.98% 264 23.02% Schleicher County, TX 1,105 753 68.14% 352 31.86% Sterling County, TX 462 343 74.24% 119 25.76% Sutton County, TX 1,484 1,039 70.01% 445 29.99% Tom Green County, 43,131 27,453 63.65% 15,678 36.35% TX Texas 9,553,046 6,629,325 69.39% 2,923,721 30.61% United States 119,730,128 78,697,103 65.73% 41,033,025 34.27%
Data Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey. 2014‐18. Source geography: Tract
Page 45 / 95 Family Households, Percent by Tract, ACS 2014‐18
Over 72.0% 68.1 ‐ 72.0% 65.1 ‐ 68.0% Under 65.1% No Data or Data Suppressed Report Location View larger map
Households by Composition and Relationship to Householder
Total Married Family Single Male Family Single Female Family Non‐Family Report Area Households Households Households Households Households
Report Location 54,781 26,630 2,835 5,976 19,340 Coke County, TX 1,617 838 52 134 593 Concho County, TX 873 497 7 90 279 Crockett County, TX 1,388 790 62 137 399 Irion County, TX 634 362 20 48 204 Kimble County, TX 1,948 1,036 131 183 598 Menard County, TX 992 484 35 64 409 Reagan County, TX 1,147 662 118 103 264 Schleicher County, 1,105 671 0 82 352 TX Sterling County, TX 462 203 106 34 119 Sutton County, TX 1,484 818 46 175 445 Tom Green County, 43,131 20,269 2,258 4,926 15,678 TX Texas 9,553,046 4,812,972 488,202 1,328,151 2,923,721 United States 119,730,128 57,816,948 5,821,975 15,058,180 41,033,025
Households by Composition and Relationship to Householder
Report Location
Non-Family Households: 35.3%
Married Family Households: 48.6%
Single Female Family Households: 10.9%
Single Male Family Households: 5.2%
Households with Children by Composition and Relationship to Householder, Percentage of Total Households
Page 46 / 95 All Household Married Family Single‐Male Family Single‐Female Family Non‐Family Report Area Types Households Households Households Households
Report Location 30.42% 19.88% 2.92% 7.47% 0.14% Coke County, TX 24.06% 15.46% 2.10% 6.31% 0.19% Concho County, TX 21.99% 16.61% 0.00% 5.38% 0.00% Crockett County, 37.90% 23.56% 4.47% 9.87% 0.00% TX Irion County, TX 23.50% 14.35% 3.15% 5.99% 0.00% Kimble County, TX 26.49% 16.74% 2.21% 7.55% 0.00% Menard County, TX 22.38% 15.63% 2.52% 4.23% 0.00% Reagan County, TX 42.20% 30.69% 4.62% 6.89% 0.00% Schleicher County, 30.14% 27.69% 0.00% 2.44% 0.00% TX Sterling County, TX 32.03% 7.58% 17.97% 6.49% 0.00% Sutton County, TX 32.88% 20.01% 2.36% 10.51% 0.00% Tom Green 30.64% 19.96% 2.89% 7.62% 0.17% County, TX Texas 37.08% 24.48% 2.87% 9.46% 0.27% United States 31.38% 20.43% 2.70% 7.96% 0.29%
Households with Children by Composition and Relationship to Householder, Percentage of Total Households
40
30
% 20
10
0 All Household Types:% Married Family Households:% Single-Male Family Households:% Single-Female Family Households:% Non-Family Households:%
Report Location Texas United States
Households with Children by Composition and Relationship to Householder, Total
Page 47 / 95 All Household Married Family Single‐Male Family Single‐Female Family Non‐Family Report Area Types Households Households Households Households
Report Location 16,662 10,893 1,602 4,091 76 Coke County, TX 389 250 34 102 3 Concho County, TX 192 145 0 47 0 Crockett County, 526 327 62 137 0 TX Irion County, TX 149 91 20 38 0 Kimble County, TX 516 326 43 147 0 Menard County, TX 222 155 25 42 0 Reagan County, TX 484 352 53 79 0 Schleicher County, 333 306 0 27 0 TX Sterling County, TX 148 35 83 30 0 Sutton County, TX 488 297 35 156 0 Tom Green 13,215 8,609 1,247 3,286 73 County, TX Texas 3,542,083 2,339,020 274,186 903,561 25,316 United States 37,574,321 24,459,152 3,235,764 9,534,082 345,323
Households with Children by Composition and Relationship to Householder, Total
Report Location
Non-Family Households: 0.5%
Single-Female Family Households: 24.6%
Single-Male Family Households: 9.6%
Married Family Households: 65.4%
Urban and Rural Population
This indicator reports the percentage of population living in urban and rural areas. Urban areas are identified using population density, count, and size thresholds. Urban areas also include territory with a high degree of impervious surface (development). Rural areas are all areas that are not urban.
Page 48 / 95 Report Area Total Population Urban Population Rural Population Urban Population, Percent Rural Population, Percent
Report Location 141,897 104,694 37,203 73.78% 26.22% Coke County, TX 3,320 0 3,320 0.00% 100.00% Concho County, TX 4,087 0 4,087 0.00% 100.00% Crockett County, TX 3,719 2,873 846 77.25% 22.75% Irion County, TX 1,599 0 1,599 0.00% 100.00% Kimble County, TX 4,607 2,566 2,041 55.70% 44.30% Menard County, TX 2,242 0 2,242 0.00% 100.00% Reagan County, TX 3,367 2,919 448 86.69% 13.31% Schleicher County, TX 3,461 0 3,461 0.00% 100.00% Sterling County, TX 1,143 0 1,143 0.00% 100.00% Sutton County, TX 4,128 3,352 776 81.20% 18.80% Tom Green County, TX 110,224 92,984 17,240 84.36% 15.64% Texas 25,145,561 21,298,039 3,847,522 84.70% 15.30% United States 312,471,327 252,746,527 59,724,800 80.89% 19.11%
Data Source: US Census Bureau, Decennial Census. 2010. Source geography: Tract
Urban Population, Percent by Tract, US Census 2010
100% Urban Population 90.1 ‐ 99.9% 50.1 ‐ 90.0% Under 50.1% No Urban Population No Data or Data Suppressed Report Location View larger map
Rural Population, Total by Age Group
Report Area Population Under Age 18 Population Age 18‐64 Population Age 65 +
Report Location 8,498 22,444 6,261 Coke County, TX 699 1,759 862 Concho County, TX 577 2,950 560 Crockett County, TX 198 522 126 Irion County, TX 368 940 291 Kimble County, TX 296 1,158 587 Menard County, TX 439 1,201 602 Reagan County, TX 108 286 54 Schleicher County, TX 1,103 1,918 440 Sterling County, TX 279 677 187 Sutton County, TX 155 476 145 Tom Green County, TX 4,276 10,557 2,407 Texas 945,476 2,334,524 567,522 United States 13,907,394 36,734,957 9,082,449
Page 49 / 95 Rural Population, Total by Age Group
Report Location
Population Age 65 +: 16.8% Population Under Age 18: 22.8%
Population Age 18-64: 60.3%
Rural Population, Percent by Age Group
Report Area Population Under Age 18 Population Age 18‐64 Population Age 65 +
Report Location 25.39% 25.59% 30.21% Coke County, TX 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% Concho County, TX 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% Crockett County, TX 19.92% 23.94% 23.12% Irion County, TX 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% Kimble County, TX 31.52% 44.25% 55.85% Menard County, TX 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% Reagan County, TX 10.69% 14.24% 15.47% Schleicher County, TX 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% Sterling County, TX 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% Sutton County, TX 13.67% 19.66% 25.31% Tom Green County, TX 16.49% 15.29% 15.77% Texas 13.77% 14.89% 21.81% United States 18.52% 18.69% 22.26%
Rural Population, Percent by Age Group
40
30
% 20
10
0 Population Under Age 18 Population Age 18-64 Population Age 65 +
Report Location Texas United States
Rural Population, Total by Race Alone
Page 50 / 95 Black or African Native American / Alaska Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Multiple Report Area White Asian American Native Islander Race Race
Report Location 32,667 332 254 128 19 3,049 754 Coke County, TX 3,036 8 37 5 1 169 64 Concho County, 3,553 77 16 14 5 345 77 TX Crockett County, 751 14 1 3 0 71 6 TX Irion County, TX 1,464 11 7 3 0 80 34 Kimble County, TX 1,922 14 15 14 2 65 9 Menard County, 1,847 13 18 3 0 324 37 TX Reagan County, 365 7 2 0 0 67 7 TX Schleicher 2,780 38 16 4 0 527 96 County, TX Sterling County, 1,013 14 23 0 0 71 22 TX Sutton County, TX 693 1 7 1 0 57 17 Tom Green 15,243 135 112 81 11 1,273 385 County, TX Texas 3,261,978 204,420 27,041 22,099 1,782 257,799 72,403 United States 52,457,879 3,533,008 1,043,048 399,200 40,683 1,242,870 1,008,112
Rural Population, Total by Race Alone
Report Location
Multiple Race: 2.0%
Some Other Race: 8.2%
Asian: 0.3%
Native American / Alaska Native: 0.7%
Black or African American: 0.9%
White: 87.8%
Rural Population, Percent by Race Alone
Page 51 / 95 Black or African Native American / Alaska Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Multiple Report Area White Asian American Native Islander Race Race
Report Location 27.84% 7.00% 23.03% 10.73% 16.96% 22.21% 20.44% Coke County, TX 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% Concho County, 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% TX Crockett County, 24.29% 46.67% 2.94% 23.08% 0.00% 14.70% 9.38% TX Irion County, TX 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% No data 100.00% 100.00% Kimble County, TX 45.59% 77.78% 39.47% 73.68% 66.67% 23.72% 23.08% Menard County, 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% No data 100.00% 100.00% TX Reagan County, 14.06% 10.00% 10.00% 0.00% No data 10.93% 11.29% TX Schleicher County, 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% No data 100.00% 100.00% TX Sterling County, 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% No data No data 100.00% 100.00% TX Sutton County, TX 18.92% 5.88% 41.18% 12.50% No data 15.79% 26.98% Tom Green 16.92% 3.04% 12.77% 7.25% 11.00% 12.14% 12.30% County, TX Texas 18.43% 6.86% 15.82% 2.29% 8.23% 9.81% 10.66% United States 23.17% 8.97% 35.33% 2.72% 7.53% 6.41% 11.04%
Rural Population, Percent by Race Alone
40
30
% 20
10
0 White Black or African American Native American / Alaska Asian Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Race Multiple Race Native Islander
Report Location Texas United States
Social & Economic Factors
Economic and social insecurity often are associated with poor health. Poverty, unemployment, and lack of educational achievement affect access to care and a community’s ability to engage in healthy behaviors. Without a network of support and a safe community, families cannot thrive. Ensuring access to social and economic resources provides a foundation for a healthy community.
Children Eligible for Free/Reduced Price Lunch
Within the report area 13,800 public school students or 54.65% are eligible for Free/Reduced Price lunch out of 25,250 total students enrolled. This indicator is relevant because it assesses vulnerable populations which are more likely to have multiple health access, health status, and social support needs. Additionally, when combined with poverty data, providers can use this measure to identify gaps in eligibility and enrollment.
Page 52 / 95 Percent Students Eligible for Free Total Students Eligible for Free/Reduced Students Eligible for Free/Reduced Price or Reduced Price Lunch Report Area Students Price Lunch Lunch, Percent
Report Location 25,250 13,800 54.65% Coke County, TX 538 294 54.65% 0% 100% Concho County, Report Location (54.65%) 477 325 68.13% TX Texas (58.94%) United States (49.21%) Crockett County, 791 468 59.17% TX Irion County, TX 260 82 31.54% Kimble County, 633 437 69.04% TX Menard County, 294 214 72.79% TX Reagan County, 851 516 60.63% TX Schleicher 570 339 59.47% County, TX Sterling County, 291 122 41.92% TX Sutton County, 834 488 58.51% TX Tom Green 19,711 10,515 53.35% County, TX Texas 5,360,756 3,159,896 58.94% United States 50,737,716 24,970,187 49.21%
Note: This indicator is compared to the state average. Data Source: National Center for Education Statistics, NCES ‐ Common Core of Data. 2016‐17. Source geography: Address
Students Eligible for Free or Reduced‐Price Lunch, NCES CCD 2016‐17
Over 90.0% 75.1% ‐ 90.0% 50.1% ‐ 75.0% 20.1% ‐ 50.0% Under 20.1% Not Reported Report Location View larger map
Children Eligible for Free Lunch (Alone) by Year, 2010‐11 through 2016‐17
The table below shows local, state, and National trends in student free and reduced lunch eligibility. Note: Data for the 2011‐12 school year are omitted due to lack of data for some states.
Page 53 / 95 Report Area 2010‐11 2012‐13 2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16 2016‐17
Report Location 54.53% 54.06% 54.05% 52.10% 54.84% 54.65% Coke County, TX 53.22% 47.69% 54.73% 53.45% 54.46% 54.65% Concho County, TX 63.05% 61.20% 66.88% 71.62% 73.31% 68.13% Crockett County, TX 59.39% 52.06% 60.49% 61.89% 50.85% 59.17% Irion County, TX 37.69% 37.21% 35.71% 36.42% 41.72% 31.54% Kimble County, TX 56.12% 61.50% 60.66% 61.40% 64.21% 69.04% Menard County, TX 73.33% 67.94% 67.82% 65.25% 68.15% 72.79% Reagan County, TX 55.16% 47.58% 48.58% 34.91% 51.82% 60.63% Schleicher County, TX 28.24% 45.47% 46.10% 44.48% 61.90% 59.47% Sterling County, TX 50.93% 46.54% 45.48% 37.89% 39.76% 41.92% Sutton County, TX 52.40% 49.14% 52.32% 47.77% 54.01% 58.51% Tom Green County, TX 55.06% 54.80% 54.04% 52.38% 54.49% 53.35% Texas 50.26% 60.26% 60.08% 58.75% 58.94% 58.94% United States 48.15% 51.31% 51.99% 51.79% 52.30% 48.88%
Children Eligible for Free Lunch (Alone) by Year, 2010-11 through 2016-17
80
70
60
% 50
40
30
20 2010-11 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Coke County, TX Concho County, TX Crockett County, TX Irion County, TX Kimble County, TX Menard County, TX Reagan County, TX Schleicher County, TX Sterling County, TX Sutton County, TX Tom Green County, TX Texas United States
Education ‐ Bachelor's Degree or Higher
22.38% of the population aged 25 and older, or 21,635 have obtained an Bachelor's level degree or higher. This indicator is relevant because educational attainment has been linked to positive health outcomes.
Page 54 / 95 Population Age 25+ with Total Population Population Age 25+ with Bachelor's Population Age 25+ with Bachelor's Bachelor's Degree or Higher, Report Area Percent Age 25+ Degree or Higher Degree or Higher, Percent
Report 96,670 21,635 22.38% Location Coke County, 0% 100% 2,467 422 17.11% Report Location (22.38%) TX Texas (29.30%) Concho United States (31.53%) 2,990 357 11.94% County, TX Crockett 2,399 338 14.09% County, TX Irion County, 1,007 170 16.88% TX Kimble County, 3,240 715 22.07% TX Menard 1,716 305 17.77% County, TX Reagan 2,283 242 10.60% County, TX Schleicher 2,001 330 16.49% County, TX Sterling 782 124 15.86% County, TX Sutton County, 2,659 470 17.68% TX Tom Green 75,126 18,162 24.18% County, TX Texas 17,815,359 5,219,469 29.30% United States 218,446,071 68,867,051 31.53%
Note: This indicator is compared to the state average. Data Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey. 2014‐18. Source geography: Tract
Population with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher, Percent by Tract, ACS 2014‐18
Over 23.0% 18.1 ‐ 23.0% 13.1 ‐ 18.0% Under 13.1% No Data or Data Suppressed Report Location View larger map
Education ‐ Head Start
Head Start is a program designed to help children from birth to age five who come from families with poverty level and below incomes, with the goal to help children become ready for kindergarten while also providing needed requirements like health care and food support. This indicator reports the number and rate of Head Start program facilities per 10,000 children under age 5. Head Start facility data is acquired from the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) 2018 Head Start locator. Population data is from the 2010 US Decennial Census.
Page 55 / 95 Head Start Programs Rate (Per Children Under Age Total Head Start Head Start Programs, Rate (Per 10,000 10,000 Children Under Age 5) Report Area 5 Programs Children)
Report Location 9,799 12 12.25 Coke County, TX 166 1 60.24 0 50 Concho County, TX 161 1 62.11 Report Location (12.25) Texas (6.32) Crockett County, TX 297 1 33.67 United States (9.25) Irion County, TX 68 1 147.06 Kimble County, TX 235 1 42.55 Menard County, TX 128 1 78.13 Reagan County, TX 277 1 36.1 Schleicher County, 344 2 58.14 TX Sterling County, TX 88 0 0 Sutton County, TX 309 0 0 Tom Green County, 7,726 3 3.88 TX Texas 1,928,473 1,219 6.32 United States 20,426,118 18,886 9.25
Note: This indicator is compared to the state average. Data Source: US Department of Health & Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. 2019. Source geography: Point
Head Start Facilities, All Facilities, ACF 2019
Head Start Facilities, All Facilities, ACF 2019 Report Location
View larger map
Education ‐ High School Graduation Rate
Within the report area 92.30% of students are receiving their high school diploma within four years. Data represents the 2016‐ 17 school year.
This indicator is relevant because research suggests education is one the strongest predictors of health (Freudenberg & Ruglis, 2007).
Page 56 / 95 Cohort Graduation Rate Report Area Total Student Cohort Estimated Number of Diplomas Issued Cohort Graduation Rate
Report Location 1,714 1,582 92.30% Coke County, TX 52 46 88.50%
Concho County, TX 29 22 75.90% 0% 100% Crockett County, TX 60 57 95.00% Report Location (92.30%) Texas (91.00%) Irion County, TX 24 22 91.70% United States (86.80%) Kimble County, TX 54 52 96.30% Menard County, TX 21 19 90.50% Reagan County, TX 59 50 84.70% Schleicher County, TX 47 45 95.70% Sterling County, TX 16 14 87.50% Sutton County, TX 80 78 97.50% Tom Green County, TX 1,272 1,177 92.50% Texas 341,738 310,987 91.00% United States 3,095,906 2,688,701 86.80%
Note: This indicator is compared to the state average. Data Source: US Department of Education, EDFacts. Accessed via DATA.GOV. Additional data analysis by CARES. 2016‐17. Source geography: School District
On‐Time Graduation, Rate by School District (Secondary), EDFacts 2016‐17
Over 94.0% 85.1 ‐ 94.0% 75.1 ‐ 85.0% Under 75.1% No Data or Data Suppressed Report Location View larger map
High School Graduation Rate by Year, 2011‐12 through 2016‐17
The table below shows local, state, and National trends in cohort graduation rates. Note: Data for some states are omitted each year when they fail to meet federal reporting standards or deadlines. Use caution when comparing national trends as the "universe" population may differ over time.
Page 57 / 95 Report Area 2011‐12 2012‐13 2013‐14 2014‐15 2015‐16 2016‐17
Report Location 88.80% 89.30% 89.90% No data 89.90% 92.30% Coke County, TX 89.50% 89.40% 90.00% No data 84.60% 89.40% Concho County, TX 86.00% 90.10% 75.70% No data 90.20% 75.80% Crockett County, TX 95.00% 95.00% 95.00% No data 84.50% 95.00% Irion County, TX 90.00% 90.00% 90.00% No data 90.00% 90.00% Kimble County, TX 95.00% 95.00% 97.40% No data 95.00% 95.00% Menard County, TX 90.10% 90.10% 90.10% No data 90.10% 90.10% Reagan County, TX 95.00% 74.50% 92.00% No data 97.50% 84.50% Schleicher County, TX 95.00% 95.00% 90.00% No data 95.00% 95.00% Sterling County, TX 75.00% 90.00% 90.00% No data 90.00% 90.00% Sutton County, TX 97.50% 95.00% 92.00% No data 95.00% 97.50% Tom Green County, TX 87.60% 88.90% 89.50% No data 89.20% 92.50% Texas 89.00% 89.50% 89.60% No data 90.50% 91.00% United States 81.80% 83.20% 84.30% 84.30% 86.10% 86.80%
High School Graduation Rate by Year, 2011-12 through 2016-17
100
95
90
% 85
80
75
70 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Coke County, TX Concho County, TX Crockett County, TX Irion County, TX Kimble County, TX Menard County, TX Reagan County, TX Schleicher County, TX Sterling County, TX Sutton County, TX Tom Green County, TX Texas United States
Education ‐ No High School Diploma
Within the report area there are 15,362 persons aged 25 and older without a high school diploma (or equivalency) or higher. This represents 15.89% of the total population aged 25 and older. This indicator is relevant because educational attainment is linked to positive health outcomes (Freudenberg & Ruglis, 2007).
Page 58 / 95 Population Age 25+ with No High Total Population Population Age 25+ with No High Population Age 25+ with No High School School Diploma, Percent Report Area Age 25+ School Diploma Diploma, Percent
Report Location 96,670 15,362 15.89% Coke County, 2,467 396 16.05% 0% 50% TX Report Location (15.89%) Concho County, Texas (16.80%) 2,990 1,133 37.89% TX United States (12.34%) Crockett 2,399 508 21.18% County, TX Irion County, 1,007 73 7.25% TX Kimble County, 3,240 509 15.71% TX Menard 1,716 315 18.36% County, TX Reagan County, 2,283 462 20.24% TX Schleicher 2,001 430 21.49% County, TX Sterling County, 782 110 14.07% TX Sutton County, 2,659 658 24.75% TX Tom Green 75,126 10,768 14.33% County, TX Texas 17,815,359 2,993,432 16.80% United States 218,446,071 26,948,057 12.34%
Note: This indicator is compared to the state average. Data Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey. 2014‐18. Source geography: Tract
Population with No High School Diploma (Age 25+), Percent by Tract, ACS 2014‐18
Over 21.0% 16.1 ‐ 21.0% 11.1 ‐ 16.0% Under 11.1% No Data or Data Suppressed Report Location View larger map
Population with No High School Diploma by Gender
Page 59 / 95 Report Area Total Male Total Female Percent Male Percent Female
Report Location 8,174 7,188 17.12% 14.69% Coke County, TX 161 235 13.50% 18.45% Concho County, TX 968 165 49.31% 16.07% Crockett County, TX 256 252 22.20% 20.22% Irion County, TX 39 34 7.28% 7.22% Kimble County, TX 260 249 17.14% 14.45% Menard County, TX 179 136 20.09% 16.48% Reagan County, TX 261 201 21.73% 18.58% Schleicher County, TX 213 217 20.68% 22.35% Sterling County, TX 73 37 18.62% 9.49% Sutton County, TX 447 211 32.46% 16.46% Tom Green County, TX 5,317 5,451 14.57% 14.11% Texas 1,518,879 1,474,553 17.47% 16.17% United States 13,752,210 13,195,847 13.03% 11.69%
Population with No High School Diploma by Gender
20
15
% 10
5
0 Male Female
Report Location Texas United States
Population with No High School Diploma by Ethnicity Alone
Report Area Total Hispanic / Latino Total Not Hispanic / Latino Percent Hispanic / Latino Percent Not Hispanic / Latino
Report Location 11,106 4,256 31.44% 6.94% Coke County, TX 182 214 38.81% 10.71% Concho County, TX 931 202 59.34% 14.22% Crockett County, TX 418 90 29.48% 9.17% Irion County, TX 20 53 10.05% 6.56% Kimble County, TX 210 299 33.71% 11.43% Menard County, TX 231 84 40.31% 7.35% Reagan County, TX 412 50 29.20% 5.73% Schleicher County, TX 381 49 39.32% 4.75% Sterling County, TX 84 26 27.36% 5.47% Sutton County, TX 616 42 40.18% 3.73% Tom Green County, TX 7,621 3,147 29.03% 6.44% Texas 2,105,354 888,078 34.76% 7.55% United States 10,485,405 16,462,652 32.30% 8.85%
Page 60 / 95 Population with No High School Diploma by Ethnicity Alone
40
30
% 20
10
0 Hispanic / Latino Not Hispanic / Latino
Report Location Texas United States
Population with No High School Diploma by Race Alone, Percent
Black or African Native American / Alaska Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Multiple Report Area White Asian American Native Islander Race Race
Report Location 14.21% 14.62% 15.77% 22.85% 0.00% 30.54% 16.43% Coke County, TX 14.96% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% No data 30.61% 46.67% Concho County, 36.07% 47.87% 60.00% 62.50% No data 67.69% 82.35% TX Crockett County, No 15.20% 0.00% No data No data 26.71% No data TX data No Irion County, TX 7.25% 0.00% No data No data 8.73% 0.00% data No Kimble County, TX 14.93% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 33.85% 5.71% data Menard County, No 12.09% 0.00% 88.00% No data 38.89% 41.60% TX data No Reagan County, TX 12.00% 0.00% No data No data 28.74% 18.18% data Schleicher County, No 8.55% 46.15% No data No data 44.24% 0.00% TX data Sterling County, No 11.32% 100.00% No data No data 39.19% 0.00% TX data No Sutton County, TX 16.67% 33.33% 0.00% No data 41.08% 0.00% data Tom Green 13.47% 13.56% 12.89% 20.77% 0.00% 27.18% 11.95% County, TX Texas 16.47% 10.90% 21.07% 12.30% 11.50% 39.96% 12.91% United States 10.41% 14.58% 20.02% 13.18% 13.10% 38.05% 12.02%
Page 61 / 95 Population with No High School Diploma by Race Alone, Percent
60
40 %
20
0 White Black or African American Native American / Alaska Asian Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Race Multiple Race Native Islander
Report Location Texas United States
Population with No High School Diploma by Race Alone, Total
Native American / Alaska Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Multiple Report Area White Black Asian Native Islander Race Races
Report Location 11,658 410 207 73 0 2,820 194 Coke County, TX 335 2 0 0 0 45 14 Concho County, TX 994 45 30 6 0 44 14 Crockett County, TX 164 0 0 0 0 344 0 Irion County, TX 62 0 0 0 0 11 0 Kimble County, TX 440 0 0 0 0 65 4 Menard County, TX 164 0 0 22 0 77 52 Reagan County, TX 131 0 0 0 0 325 6 Schleicher County, 109 6 0 0 0 315 0 TX Sterling County, TX 78 3 0 0 0 29 0 Sutton County, TX 291 1 0 0 0 366 0 Tom Green County, 8,890 353 177 45 0 1,199 104 TX Texas 2,217,551 229,863 109,463 18,110 1,722 376,828 39,895 United States 17,139,502 3,784,442 1,629,131 333,586 47,861 3,491,195 522,340
Population with No High School Diploma by Race Alone, Total
Report Location
Multiple Races: 1.3%
Some Other Race: 18.4%
Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 0.0%
Native American / Alaska Native: 0.5%
Asian: 1.3%
Black: 2.7%
White: 75.9%
Education ‐ Student Reading Proficiency (4th Grade)
Page 62 / 95 Information about student performance in the grade 4 English Language Arts portion of the state‐specific standardized tests are displayed in the table below. Of 1,874 students tested, 40.72% of 4th graders performed at or aboe the "proficient" level, and 59.28% tested below the "proficient" level according to the data. Students in the report area tested worse than the statewide rate of 45.13%. This indicator is relevant because an inability to read English well is linked to poverty, unemployment, and barriers to healthcare access, provider communications, and health literacy/education.
Students Scoring 'Not Proficient' Students with Valid Students Scoring 'Proficient' or Students Scoring 'Not Proficient' or or Worse, Percent Report Area Test Scores Better, Percent Worse, Percent
Report Location 1,874 40.72% 59.28% Coke County, TX 44 58.04% 41.96% 0% 80% Concho County, Report Location (59.28%) 40 28.15% 71.85% TX Texas (54.87%) United States (49.20%) Crockett 56 34.50% 65.50% County, TX Irion County, TX 23 30.00% 70.00% Kimble County, 39 45.34% 54.66% TX Menard County, 30 50.15% 49.85% TX Reagan County, 65 32.00% 68.00% TX Schleicher 49 44.50% 55.50% County, TX Sterling County, 20 69.50% 30.50% TX Sutton County, 54 44.50% 55.50% TX Tom Green 1,454 40.27% 59.73% County, TX Texas 384,067 45.13% 54.87% United States 3,439,052 50.80% 49.20%
Note: This indicator is compared to the state average. Data Source: US Department of Education, EDFacts. Accessed via DATA.GOV. 2017‐18. Source geography: School District
Language Arts Test Scores, Grade 4, Percent Not Proficient by School District (Elementary), EDFacts 2017‐18
Over 50.0% 30.1 ‐ 50.0% 20.1 ‐ 30.0% Under 20.1% No Data or Data Suppressed Report Location View larger map
Households with No Motor Vehicle
This indicator reports the number and percentage of households with no motor vehicle based on the latest 5‐year American Community Survey estimates.
Page 63 / 95 Percentage of Households with Total Occupied Households with No Motor Households with No Motor Vehicle, No Motor Vehicle Report Area Households Vehicle Percent
Report Location 54,781 3,128 5.71% Coke County, TX 1,617 62 3.83% 0% 20% Concho County, TX 873 64 7.33% Report Location (5.71%) Texas (5.37%) Crockett County, 1,388 39 2.81% United States (8.71%) TX Irion County, TX 634 6 0.95% Kimble County, TX 1,948 89 4.57% Menard County, TX 992 69 6.96% Reagan County, TX 1,147 43 3.75% Schleicher County, 1,105 42 3.80% TX Sterling County, TX 462 3 0.65% Sutton County, TX 1,484 59 3.98% Tom Green 43,131 2,652 6.15% County, TX Texas 9,553,046 512,772 5.37% United States 119,730,128 10,424,934 8.71%
Note: This indicator is compared to the state average. Data Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey. 2014‐18. Source geography: Tract
Households with No Vehicle, Percent by Tract, ACS 2014‐18
Over 8.0% 6.1 ‐ 8.0% 4.1 ‐ 6.0% Under 4.1% No Data or Data Suppressed Report Location View larger map
Households with No Motor Vehicle by Tenure
Page 64 / 95 Owner‐Occupied Renter‐Occupied Percentage of Owner‐Occupied Percentage of Renter‐Occupied Report Area Households with No Households with No Households with No Vehicle Households with No Vehicle Vehicle Vehicle
Report 806 2.27% 2,322 6.55% Location Coke 31 2.56% 31 2.56% County, TX Concho 32 5.19% 32 5.19% County, TX Crockett 20 2.02% 19 1.92% County, TX Irion 6 1.20% 0 0.00% County, TX Kimble 51 3.45% 38 2.57% County, TX Menard 11 1.74% 58 9.15% County, TX Reagan 0 0.00% 43 5.37% County, TX Schleicher 26 2.99% 16 1.84% County, TX Sterling 3 0.75% 0 0.00% County, TX Sutton 33 3.30% 26 2.60% County, TX Tom Green 593 2.20% 2,059 7.64% County, TX Texas 127,177 2.15% 385,595 6.52% United 2,430,345 3.18% 7,994,589 10.46% States
Households with No Motor Vehicle by Tenure
12.5
10
7.5 %
5
2.5
0 Percentage of Owner-Occupied Households with No Vehicle Percentage of Renter-Occupied Households with No Vehicle
Report Location Texas United States
Income ‐ Inequality (GINI Index)
This indicator reports income inequality using the Gini coefficient. Gini index values range between zero and one. A value of one indicates perfect inequality where only one house‐hold has any income. A value of zero indicates perfect equality, where all households have equal income. Index values are acquired from the 2014‐18 American Community Survey and are not available for custom report areas or multi‐county areas.
Page 65 / 95 Gini Index Value Report Area Total Households Gini Index Value
Report Location 54,781 No data Coke County, TX 1,617 0.40 Concho County, TX 873 0.49 0 1 Crockett County, TX 1,388 0.42 Texas (0.48) Irion County, TX 634 0.47 United States (0.48) Kimble County, TX 1,948 0.49 Menard County, TX 992 0.44 Reagan County, TX 1,147 0.37 Schleicher County, TX 1,105 0.40 Sterling County, TX 462 0.34 Sutton County, TX 1,484 0.40 Tom Green County, TX 43,131 0.47 Texas 9,553,046 0.48 United States 119,730,128 0.48
Note: This indicator is compared to the state average. Data Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey. 2014‐18. Source geography: Tract
Income Inequality (GINI), Index Value by Tract, ACS 2014‐18
Over 0.460 0.431 ‐ 0.460 0.401 ‐ 0.430 Under 0.401 No Data or Data Suppressed Report Location View larger map
Income ‐ Median Household Income
This indicator reports median household income based on the latest 5‐year American Community Survey estimates. This includes the income of the householder and all other individuals 15 years old and over in the household, whether they are related to the householder or not. Because many households consist of only one person, average household income is usually less than average family income.
Page 66 / 95 Median Household Income Report Area Total Households Average Household Income Median Household Income
Report Location 54,781 $70,632.00 No data Coke County, TX 1,617 $53,056.00 $45,551.00 Concho County, TX 873 $61,808.00 $43,355.00 0 100000 Crockett County, TX 1,388 $63,225.00 $51,152.00 Texas ($59,570.00) Irion County, TX 634 $75,706.00 $54,706.00 United ($60,293.00) Kimble County, TX 1,948 $64,992.00 $42,500.00 Menard County, TX 992 $51,494.00 $40,606.00 Reagan County, TX 1,147 $75,412.00 $70,478.00 Schleicher County, TX 1,105 $61,014.00 $55,677.00 Sterling County, TX 462 $66,108.00 $59,286.00 Sutton County, TX 1,484 $71,175.00 $60,543.00 Tom Green County, TX 43,131 $72,478.00 $51,675.00 Texas 9,553,046 $84,221.00 $59,570.00 United States 119,730,128 $84,938.00 $60,293.00
Note: This indicator is compared to the state average. Data Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey. 2014‐18. Source geography: Tract
Median Household Income by Tract, ACS 2014‐18
Over 55,000 45,001 ‐ 55,000 35,001 ‐ 45,000 Under 35,001 No Data or Data Suppressed Report Location View larger map
Median Household Income by Household Size
Page 67 / 95 1‐Person 2‐Person 3‐Person 4‐Person 5‐Person 6‐Person 7‐or‐More‐Person Report Area Households Households Households Households Households Households Households
Report Location No data No data No data No data No data No data No data Coke County, TX $21,250.00 $56,429.00 $80,167.00 $51,333.00 $92,574.00 No data No data Concho County, $23,125.00 $60,134.00 $36,417.00 $103,750.00 $51,250.00 No data No data TX Crockett $20,099.00 $57,278.00 No data $78,929.00 No data No data No data County, TX Irion County, TX $28,194.00 $74,688.00 $95,667.00 $113,750.00 No data No data No data Kimble County, $23,490.00 $61,250.00 $45,781.00 $52,269.00 $56,985.00 $30,938.00 No data TX Menard County, $20,474.00 $46,797.00 No data $78,750.00 No data No data No data TX Reagan County, $53,007.00 $81,875.00 $71,667.00 $100,515.00 $61,438.00 No data No data TX Schleicher $25,758.00 $64,688.00 $65,724.00 $72,969.00 $105,952.00 $90,938.00 No data County, TX Sterling County, $26,759.00 $68,268.00 $101,250.00 No data No data No data No data TX Sutton County, $31,167.00 $56,786.00 $63,125.00 $74,821.00 $78,750.00 $65,481.00 No data TX Tom Green $27,049.00 $61,237.00 $65,517.00 $81,344.00 $67,087.00 $79,313.00 $92,316.00 County, TX Texas $32,463.00 $66,316.00 $72,914.00 $82,135.00 $73,774.00 $70,614.00 $73,261.00 United States $31,027.00 $67,304.00 $77,463.00 $89,780.00 $82,776.00 $79,540.00 $83,321.00
Median Household Income by Household Size
100k
75k
50k
25k
0 1-Person Households 2-Person Households 3-Person Households 4-Person Households 5-Person Households 6-Person Households 7-or-More-Person Households
Texas United States
Median Household Income by Race / Ethnicity of Householder
Page 68 / 95 Non‐Hispanic American Indian / Native Hawaiian / Multiple Hispanic / Report Area Black Asian Other Race White Alaska Native Pacific Islander Race Latino
Report Location No data No data No data No data No data No data No data No data Coke County, TX $46,099.00 No data No data No data No data $46,053.00 No data $44,688.00 Concho County, $49,167.00 No data No data No data No data No data No data $34,559.00 TX Crockett $61,250.00 No data No data No data No data $48,581.00 No data $49,932.00 County, TX Irion County, TX $54,375.00 No data No data No data No data $76,111.00 No data $67,222.00 Kimble County, $43,358.00 No data No data No data No data $30,365.00 $43,910.00 $31,725.00 TX Menard County, $50,563.00 No data No data No data No data $40,385.00 $36,375.00 $24,490.00 TX Reagan County, $92,250.00 No data No data No data No data $54,960.00 No data $56,964.00 TX Schleicher $62,841.00 No data No data No data No data $42,604.00 No data $43,750.00 County, TX Sterling County, $49,464.00 No data No data No data No data $67,386.00 No data $68,286.00 TX Sutton County, $54,634.00 No data No data No data No data $60,188.00 No data $62,232.00 TX Tom Green $58,583.00 $33,261.00 $78,827.00 $75,185.00 No data $39,884.00 $81,146.00 $42,810.00 County, TX Texas $73,059.00 $44,688.00 $84,851.00 $52,094.00 $53,659.00 $44,048.00 $58,037.00 $46,893.00 United States $65,912.00 $40,155.00 $83,898.00 $41,879.00 $61,354.00 $46,650.00 $56,060.00 $49,225.00
Median Household Income by Race / Ethnicity of Householder
100k
75k
50k
25k
0 Non-Hispanic White Black Asian American Indian / Native Hawaiian / Other Race Multiple Race Hispanic / Latino Alaska Native Pacific Islander
Texas United States
Insurance ‐ Uninsured Population
The lack of health insurance is considered a key driver of health status.
In the report area 16.05% of the total civilian non‐institutionalized population are without health insurance coverage. The rate of uninsured persons in the report area is less than the state average of 17.38%. This indicator is relevant because lack of insurance is a primary barrier to healthcare access including regular primary care, specialty care, and other health services that contributes to poor health status.
Page 69 / 95 Uninsured Population, Percent Total Population Uninsured Uninsured Population, Report Area (For Whom Insurance Status is Population Percent Determined)
Report Location 142,118 22,808 16.05% 0% 25%
Coke County, TX 3,177 412 12.97% Report Location (16.05%) Texas (17.38%) Concho County, TX 3,068 524 17.08% United States (9.36%) Crockett County, TX 3,559 541 15.20% Irion County, TX 1,508 210 13.93% Kimble County, TX 4,356 1,001 22.98% Menard County, TX 2,074 652 31.44% Reagan County, TX 3,716 916 24.65% Schleicher County, 3,061 647 21.14% TX Sterling County, TX 1,103 223 20.22% Sutton County, TX 3,844 675 17.56% Tom Green County, 112,652 17,007 15.10% TX Texas 27,417,645 4,764,897 17.38% United States 317,941,631 29,752,767 9.36%
Note: This indicator is compared to the state average. Data Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey. 2014‐18. Source geography: Tract
Uninsured Population, Percent by Tract, ACS 2014‐18
Over 20.0% 15.1 ‐ 20.0% 10.1 ‐ 15.0% Under 10.1% No Data or Data Suppressed Report Location View larger map
Uninsured Population by Gender
Page 70 / 95 Report Area Total Male Total Female Percent Male Percent Female
Report Location 11,755 11,053 16.78% 15.34% Coke County, TX 217 195 14.14% 11.88% Concho County, TX 267 257 15.89% 18.52% Crockett County, TX 302 239 17.40% 13.11% Irion County, TX 105 105 12.56% 15.63% Kimble County, TX 542 459 25.51% 20.57% Menard County, TX 447 205 40.78% 20.96% Reagan County, TX 404 512 20.86% 28.78% Schleicher County, TX 325 322 21.08% 21.20% Sterling County, TX 166 57 27.67% 11.33% Sutton County, TX 390 285 18.62% 16.30% Tom Green County, TX 8,590 8,417 15.65% 14.57% Texas 2,447,372 2,317,525 18.15% 16.64% United States 16,190,262 13,562,505 10.42% 8.34%
Uninsured Population by Gender
20
15
% 10
5
0 Percent Male Percent Female
Report Location Texas United States
Uninsured Population by Age Group, Percent
Report Area Under Age 18 Age 18 ‐ 64 Age 65 +
Report Location 11.93% 22.29% 0.29% Coke County, TX 12.96% 19.52% 0.12% Concho County, TX 12.24% 29.06% 0.44% Crockett County, TX 6.10% 23.16% 0.00% Irion County, TX 18.97% 16.41% 0.00% Kimble County, TX 19.60% 37.81% 0.00% Menard County, TX 16.77% 49.46% 0.00% Reagan County, TX 17.07% 32.30% 0.00% Schleicher County, TX 30.83% 22.22% 0.00% Sterling County, TX 17.74% 24.41% 6.57% Sutton County, TX 11.29% 24.90% 1.99% Tom Green County, TX 10.89% 20.82% 0.24% Texas 10.59% 23.60% 1.89% United States 5.22% 13.16% 0.82%
Page 71 / 95 Uninsured Population by Age Group, Percent
30
20 %
10
0 Under Age 18 Age 18 - 64 Age 65 +
Report Location Texas United States
Uninsured Population by Age Group, Total
Report Area Under Age 18 Age 18 ‐ 64 Age 65 +
Report Location 4,456 18,286 66 Coke County, TX 84 327 1 Concho County, TX 124 397 3 Crockett County, TX 60 481 0 Irion County, TX 74 136 0 Kimble County, TX 188 813 0 Menard County, TX 56 596 0 Reagan County, TX 204 712 0 Schleicher County, TX 267 380 0 Sterling County, TX 58 156 9 Sutton County, TX 110 552 13 Tom Green County, TX 3,231 13,736 40 Texas 814,530 3,888,887 61,480 United States 4,062,804 25,296,642 393,321
Uninsured Population by Age Group, Total
Report Location
Age 65 +: 0.3%
Under Age 18: 19.5%
Age 18 - 64: 80.2%
Uninsured Population by Ethnicity Alone
Page 72 / 95 Report Area Total Hispanic / Latino Total Not Hispanic / Latino Percent Hispanic / Latino Percent Not Hispanic or Latino
Report Location 12,166 10,642 20.62% 12.80% Coke County, TX 109 303 16.34% 12.07% Concho County, TX 226 298 16.52% 17.53% Crockett County, TX 459 82 20.15% 6.40% Irion County, TX 49 161 13.10% 14.20% Kimble County, TX 200 801 18.23% 24.58% Menard County, TX 403 249 56.21% 18.35% Reagan County, TX 718 198 27.28% 18.27% Schleicher County, TX 490 157 30.57% 10.77% Sterling County, TX 181 42 35.91% 7.01% Sutton County, TX 469 206 19.77% 13.99% Tom Green County, TX 8,862 8,145 19.53% 12.11% Texas 2,940,500 1,824,397 27.28% 10.97% United States 10,886,179 18,866,588 19.17% 7.22%
Uninsured Population by Ethnicity Alone
30
20 %
10
0 Percent Hispanic / Latino Percent Not Hispanic or Latino
Report Location Texas United States
Uninsured Population by Race Alone, Percent
Page 73 / 95 Non‐Hispanic Black or African Native American / Alaska Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Multiple Report Area Asian White American Native Islander Race Race
Report Location 13.00% 11.98% 11.03% 12.15% 14.71% 29.20% 8.05% Coke County, TX 11.18% 66.67% 36.36% 0.00% No data 17.67% 43.75% Concho County, No 18.42% 0.00% 0.00% No data 100.00% 0.00% TX data Crockett County, No 6.48% 0.00% No data No data 20.56% 0.00% TX data No Irion County, TX 12.43% 51.85% No data No data 7.04% 0.00% data Kimble County, No 25.36% No data 0.00% 100.00% 27.33% 0.00% TX data Menard County, No 19.29% 0.00% 0.00% No data 85.86% 25.00% TX data Reagan County, No 17.89% 41.67% No data No data 30.34% 16.67% TX data Schleicher No 10.87% 0.00% No data No data 34.69% 0.00% County, TX data Sterling County, No 7.17% No data No data No data 27.06% 0.00% TX data Sutton County, No 14.01% 5.00% 0.00% No data 25.83% 0.00% TX data Tom Green 12.29% 11.63% 10.29% 12.21% 0.00% 30.24% 6.74% County, TX Texas 9.77% 14.81% 21.10% 11.90% 16.48% 31.77% 12.73% United States 6.31% 10.82% 20.12% 7.53% 10.61% 21.31% 8.13%
Uninsured Population by Race Alone, Percent
40
30
% 20
10
0 Non-Hispanic White Black or African American Native American / Alaska Asian Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Race Multiple Race Native Islander
Report Location Texas United States
Uninsured Population by Race Alone, Total
Page 74 / 95 Non‐Hispanic Black or African Native American / Native Hawaiian / Some Other Multiple Report Area Asian White American Alaska Native Pacific Islander Race Race
Report Location 9,826 572 58 138 5 4,361 195 Coke County, TX 271 2 16 0 0 41 14 Concho County, 298 0 0 0 0 33 0 TX Crockett County, 82 0 0 0 0 421 0 TX Irion County, TX 133 28 0 0 0 14 0 Kimble County, 801 0 0 0 5 82 0 TX Menard County, 249 0 0 0 0 170 39 TX Reagan County, 188 10 0 0 0 649 8 TX Schleicher 157 0 0 0 0 408 0 County, TX Sterling County, 42 0 0 0 0 23 0 TX Sutton County, 205 1 0 0 0 342 0 TX Tom Green 7,400 531 42 138 0 2,178 134 County, TX Texas 1,134,324 482,010 27,909 154,863 3,771 501,480 91,131 United States 12,272,640 4,292,174 529,847 1,315,879 60,430 3,324,190 834,741
Uninsured Population by Race Alone, Total
Report Location
Multiple Race: 1.3%
Some Other Race: 28.8%
Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 0.0%
Asian: 0.9% Non-Hispanic White: 64.8% Native American / Alaska Native: 0.4%
Black or African American: 3.8%
Population Commuting to Work Over 60 Minutes
This indicator reports the percentage of the population that commutes to work for over 60 minutes each direction.
Page 75 / 95 Percentage of Workers Population Age 16+ that Population Commuting More Population Commuting More than 60 Commuting More than 60 Report Area Minutes Commutes to Work than 60 Minutes Minutes, Percent
Report 67,154 4,564 6.80% Location Coke County, 0% 50% 1,312 180 13.72% Report Location (6.80%) TX Texas (8.30%) Concho United States (9.11%) 1,143 111 9.71% County, TX Crockett 1,680 259 15.42% County, TX Irion County, 594 52 8.75% TX Kimble 1,969 269 13.66% County, TX Menard 1,038 220 21.19% County, TX Reagan 1,604 199 12.41% County, TX Schleicher 1,371 200 14.59% County, TX Sterling 555 60 10.81% County, TX Sutton 1,788 79 4.42% County, TX Tom Green 54,100 2,935 5.43% County, TX Texas 12,238,768 1,015,450 8.30% United States 143,148,111 13,033,642 9.11%
Note: This indicator is compared to the state average. Data Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey. 2014‐18. Source geography: Tract
Workers Commuting Over 60 Minutes, Percent by Tract, ACS 2014‐18
Over 10.0% 6.1 ‐ 10.0% 3.1 ‐ 6.0% Under 3.1% No Data or Data Suppressed Report Location View larger map
Population Receiving SNAP Benefits (SAIPE)
This indicator reports the average percentage of the population receiving the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits between the months of July 2014 and July 2015. This indicator is relevant because it assesses vulnerable populations which are more likely to have multiple health access, health status, and social support needs; when combined with poverty data, providers can use this measure to identify gaps in eligibility and enrollment.
Page 76 / 95 Percent Population Receiving Total Population Receiving SNAP Percent Population Receiving SNAP SNAP Benefits Report Area Population Benefits Benefits
Report Location 149,508.00 14,806 9.9% Coke County, TX 3,238.00 251 7.80% 0% 25% Concho County, TX 4,081.00 314 7.70% Report Location (9.9%) Texas (13.60%) Crockett County, TX 3,710.00 300 8.10% United States (13.90%) Irion County, TX 1,554.00 68 4.40% Kimble County, TX 4,388.00 476 10.90% Menard County, TX 2,164.00 222 10.30% Reagan County, TX 3,792.00 265 7.00% Schleicher County, 3,211.00 240 7.50% TX Sterling County, TX 1,352.00 63 4.70% Sutton County, TX 3,913.00 340 8.70% Tom Green County, 118,105.00 12,267 10.40% TX Texas 27,469,114.00 3,745,784 13.60% United States 321,396,328.00 44,567,069 13.90%
Note: This indicator is compared to the state average. Data Source: US Census Bureau, Small Area Income & Poverty Estimates. 2015. Source geography: County
Population Receiving SNAP Benefits, Percent by County, SAIPE 2015
Over 22.0% 14.1 ‐ 22.0% 6.1 ‐ 14.0% Under 6.1% No Data or Data Suppressed Report Location View larger map
Percent Population Receiving SNAP Benefits by Year, 2006 through 2015
Page 77 / 95 Report Area 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Report Location 9.93% 9.89% 11.45% 13.01% 13.6% 13.55% 12.45% 11.05% 9.64% 9.9% Coke County, TX 3.38% 3.50% 8.90% 3.66% 4.54% 8.38% 7.73% 7.39% 6.54% 7.75% Concho County, TX 5.71% 5.23% 6.18% 7.24% 7.43% 8.65% 7.50% 6.69% 6.30% 7.69% Crockett County, TX 5.62% 4.74% 9.17% 10.51% 14.07% 12.39% 11.16% 8.58% 6.45% 8.09% Irion County, TX 1.09% 2.92% 5.73% 3.47% 5.67% 8.15% 4.32% 5.00% 3.13% 4.38% Kimble County, TX 9.22% 9.74% 11.57% 12.26% 10.98% 13.69% 14.01% 10.50% 10.39% 10.85% Menard County, TX 9.96% 12.55% 11.59% 12.39% 13.24% 14.05% 13.75% 12.80% 9.67% 10.26% Reagan County, TX 3.01% 2.82% 6.26% 8.53% 7.13% 7.58% 6.23% 6.80% 5.34% 6.99% Schleicher County, TX 5.02% 6.16% 8.26% 9.69% 7.33% 9.55% 9.44% 6.91% 5.38% 7.47% Sterling County, TX 2.94% 1.91% 4.53% 3.62% 3.34% 6.91% 5.55% 7.71% 4.59% 4.66% Sutton County, TX 8.56% 5.45% 7.54% 9.74% 9.58% 10.26% 10.28% 10.50% 8.89% 8.69% Tom Green County, TX 11.10% 11.10% 12.37% 14.24% 14.96% 14.47% 13.25% 11.76% 10.34% 10.39% Texas 10.32% 10.31% 11.78% 13.55% 15.44% 15.84% 15.48% 14.73% 14.73% 13.64% United States 8.79% 9.14% 10.4% 12.62% 14.13% 14.81% 15.09% 14.77% 14.4% 13.87%
Percent Population Receiving SNAP Benefits by Year, 2006 through 2015
20
15
% 10
5
0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Coke County, TX Concho County, TX Crockett County, TX Irion County, TX Kimble County, TX Menard County, TX Reagan County, TX Schleicher County, TX Sterling County, TX Sutton County, TX Tom Green County, TX Texas United States
Poverty ‐ Children Below 100% FPL
In the report area 19.41% or 6,716 children aged 0‐17 are living in households with income below the Federal Poverty Level (FPL). This indicator is relevant because poverty creates barriers to access including health services, healthy food, and other necessities that contribute to poor health status.
Page 78 / 95 Percent Population Under Age 18 Population Population in Poverty Total Percent Population Under Age 18 in Report Area Under Age Under Age 18 in Population Poverty 18 Poverty
Report Location 141,108 34,594 6,716 19.41% 0% 50% Coke County, TX 3,159 605 118 19.50% Report Location (19.41%) Texas (22.05%) Concho County, TX 3,068 541 71 13.12% United States (19.50%) Crockett County, TX 3,559 984 364 36.99% Irion County, TX 1,524 356 64 17.98% Kimble County, TX 4,353 886 302 34.09% Menard County, TX 2,074 304 12 3.95% Reagan County, TX 3,716 1,112 239 21.49% Schleicher County, 3,061 842 124 14.73% TX Sterling County, TX 1,103 327 15 4.59% Sutton County, TX 3,843 953 103 10.81% Tom Green County, 111,648 27,684 5,304 19.16% TX Texas 27,264,694 7,210,320 1,589,798 22.05% United States 314,943,184 72,382,641 14,117,014 19.50%
Note: This indicator is compared to the state average. Data Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey. 2014‐18. Source geography: Tract
Population Below the Poverty Level, Children (Age 0‐17), Percent by Tract, ACS 2014‐18
Over 30.0% 22.6 ‐ 30.0% 15.1 ‐ 22.5% Under 15.1% No Population Age 0‐17 Reported No Data or Data Suppressed View larger map Report Location
Children in Poverty by Gender
Page 79 / 95 Report Area Total Male Total Female Percent Male Percent Female
Report Location 3,497 3,219 19.68% 19.13% Coke County, TX 95 23 32.09% 7.44% Concho County, TX 24 47 6.54% 27.01% Crockett County, TX 150 214 32.05% 41.47% Irion County, TX 24 40 11.88% 25.97% Kimble County, TX 216 86 41.30% 23.69% Menard County, TX 0 12 0.00% 8.51% Reagan County, TX 151 88 25.55% 16.89% Schleicher County, TX 75 49 17.36% 11.95% Sterling County, TX 4 11 1.88% 9.65% Sutton County, TX 71 32 12.01% 8.84% Tom Green County, TX 2,687 2,617 19.30% 19.02% Texas 812,311 777,487 22.10% 22.00% United States 7,173,125 6,943,889 19.41% 19.60%
Children in Poverty by Gender
30
20 %
10
0 Percent Male Percent Female
Report Location Texas United States
Children in Poverty by Ethnicity Alone
Report Area Total Hispanic / Latino Total Not Hispanic / Latino Percent Hispanic / Latino Percent Not Hispanic or Latino
Report Location 4,610 2,106 25.29% 12.87% Coke County, TX 62 56 34.64% 13.15% Concho County, TX 24 47 9.88% 15.77% Crockett County, TX 343 21 47.12% 8.20% Irion County, TX 22 42 18.18% 17.87% Kimble County, TX 136 166 36.66% 32.23% Menard County, TX 12 0 10.53% 0.00% Reagan County, TX 239 0 25.37% 0.00% Schleicher County, TX 124 0 24.70% 0.00% Sterling County, TX 15 0 7.77% 0.00% Sutton County, TX 103 0 15.19% 0.00% Tom Green County, TX 3,530 1,774 24.93% 13.11% Texas 1,075,720 514,078 30.19% 14.09% United States 5,127,592 8,989,422 28.36% 16.55%
Page 80 / 95 Children in Poverty by Ethnicity Alone
40
30
% 20
10
0 Percent Hispanic / Latino Percent Not Hispanic or Latino
Report Location Texas United States
Children in Poverty by Race Alone, Percent
Non‐Hispanic Black or African Native American / Alaska Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Multiple Report Area Asian White American Native Islander Race Race
Report Location 12.64% 26.49% 0.00% 0.00% No data 26.26% 6.88% No Coke County, TX 13.24% No data 0.00% No data 56.63% 0.00% data Concho County, No 15.77% No data No data No data No data No data TX data Crockett County, No 8.20% No data No data No data 56.32% 0.00% TX data No Irion County, TX 13.06% 100.00% No data No data 0.00% No data data Kimble County, No 34.16% No data 0.00% No data 25.00% 0.00% TX data Menard County, No 0.00% No data No data No data No data 36.36% TX data Reagan County, No 0.00% No data No data No data 26.92% 0.00% TX data Schleicher No 0.00% No data No data No data 28.86% No data County, TX data Sterling County, No 0.00% No data No data No data 36.36% No data TX data Sutton County, No 0.00% 0.00% No data No data 14.75% No data TX data Tom Green 12.92% 26.09% 0.00% 0.00% No data 18.86% 6.54% County, TX Texas 9.44% 28.40% 21.80% 9.90% 23.62% 30.87% 16.97% United States 11.69% 34.79% 33.21% 11.29% 24.79% 31.16% 19.64%
Page 81 / 95 Children in Poverty by Race Alone, Percent
40
30
% 20
10
0 Non-Hispanic White Black or African American Native American / Alaska Asian Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Race Multiple Race Native Islander
Report Location Texas United States
Children in Poverty by Race Alone, Total
Non‐Hispanic Black or African Native American / Alaska Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Multiple Report Area Asian White American Native Islander Race Race
Report Location 1,833 325 0 0 0 1,201 69 Coke County, TX 56 0 0 0 0 47 0 Concho County, 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 TX Crockett County, 21 0 0 0 0 343 0 TX Irion County, TX 29 13 0 0 0 0 0 Kimble County, 166 0 0 0 0 16 0 TX Menard County, 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 TX Reagan County, 0 0 0 0 0 207 0 TX Schleicher 0 0 0 0 0 101 0 County, TX Sterling County, 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 TX Sutton County, 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 TX Tom Green 1,514 312 0 0 0 433 57 County, TX Texas 216,522 246,655 7,504 29,490 1,276 144,630 56,522 United States 4,306,236 3,522,808 236,154 392,859 35,459 1,442,736 926,442
Page 82 / 95 Children in Poverty by Race Alone, Total
Report Location
Multiple Race: 2.0%
Some Other Race: 35.0%
Non-Hispanic White: 53.5%
Native American / Alaska Native: 0.0%
Asian: 0.0%
Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 0.0%
Black or African American: 9.5%
Poverty ‐ Population Below 100% FPL
Poverty is considered a key driver of health status.
Within the report area 13.67% or 19,285 individuals are living in households with income below the Federal Poverty Level (FPL). This indicator is relevant because poverty creates barriers to access including health services, healthy food, and other necessities that contribute to poor health status.
Population in Poverty, Percent Report Area Total Population Population in Poverty Population in Poverty, Percent
Report Location 141,108 19,285 13.67% Coke County, TX 3,159 500 15.83%
Concho County, TX 3,068 223 7.27% 0% 25% Crockett County, TX 3,559 739 20.76% Report Location (13.67%) Texas (15.46%) Irion County, TX 1,524 226 14.83% United States (14.05%) Kimble County, TX 4,353 928 21.32% Menard County, TX 2,074 205 9.88% Reagan County, TX 3,716 549 14.77% Schleicher County, TX 3,061 452 14.77% Sterling County, TX 1,103 39 3.54% Sutton County, TX 3,843 320 8.33% Tom Green County, TX 111,648 15,104 13.53% Texas 27,264,694 4,213,938 15.46% United States 314,943,184 44,257,979 14.05%
Note: This indicator is compared to the state average. Data Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey. 2014‐18. Source geography: Tract
Population Below the Poverty Level, Percent by Tract, ACS 2014‐18
Over 20.0% 15.1 ‐ 20.0% 10.1 ‐ 15.0% Under 10.1% No Data or Data Suppressed Report Location View larger map
Page 83 / 95 Population in Poverty by Gender
Report Area Total Male Total Female Percent Male Percent Female
Report Location 8,216 11,069 11.77% 15.53% Coke County, TX 239 261 15.72% 15.92% Concho County, TX 75 148 4.46% 10.66% Crockett County, TX 292 447 16.82% 24.52% Irion County, TX 131 95 15.67% 13.81% Kimble County, TX 451 477 21.22% 21.41% Menard County, TX 60 145 5.47% 14.83% Reagan County, TX 340 209 17.55% 11.75% Schleicher County, TX 201 251 13.04% 16.52% Sterling County, TX 19 20 3.17% 3.98% Sutton County, TX 123 197 5.87% 11.26% Tom Green County, TX 6,285 8,819 11.50% 15.47% Texas 1,881,992 2,331,946 14.01% 16.86% United States 19,737,150 24,520,829 12.80% 15.26%
Population in Poverty by Gender
20
15
% 10
5
0 Percent Male Percent Female
Report Location Texas United States
Population in Poverty by Ethnicity Alone
Page 84 / 95 Report Area Total Hispanic / Latino Total Not Hispanic / Latino Percent Hispanic / Latino Percent Not Hispanic / Latino
Report Location 10,161 9,124 17.40% 11.03% Coke County, TX 148 352 22.60% 14.06% Concho County, TX 96 127 7.02% 7.47% Crockett County, TX 602 137 26.43% 10.69% Irion County, TX 54 172 14.44% 14.96% Kimble County, TX 414 514 37.74% 15.79% Menard County, TX 142 63 19.80% 4.64% Reagan County, TX 535 14 20.33% 1.29% Schleicher County, TX 288 164 17.97% 11.25% Sterling County, TX 34 5 6.75% 0.83% Sutton County, TX 271 49 11.42% 3.33% Tom Green County, TX 7,577 7,527 16.91% 11.26% Texas 2,365,585 1,848,353 22.05% 11.18% United States 11,849,315 32,408,664 21.02% 12.53%
Population in Poverty by Ethnicity Alone
30
20 %
10
0 Hispanic / Latino Not Hispanic / Latino
Report Location Texas United States
Population in Poverty Race Alone, Percent
Page 85 / 95 Black or African Native American / Alaska Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Multiple Report Area White Asian American Native Islander Race Race
Report Location 13.00% 21.31% 20.58% 0.63% 14.71% 18.33% 7.91% Coke County, TX 13.86% 100.00% 36.36% 0.00% No data 31.90% 43.75% Concho County, No 7.48% 0.00% 0.00% No data 0.00% 40.00% TX data Crockett County, No 9.32% 0.00% No data No data 29.39% 0.00% TX data No Irion County, TX 12.47% 100.00% No data No data 7.54% 0.00% data No Kimble County, TX 20.93% No data 0.00% 100.00% 37.33% 0.00% data Menard County, No 9.95% 0.00% 0.00% No data 0.00% 23.72% TX data No Reagan County, TX 6.18% 0.00% No data No data 21.32% 0.00% data Schleicher County, No 10.64% 46.15% No data No data 21.00% 0.00% TX data Sterling County, No 2.99% No data No data No data 10.59% 0.00% TX data No Sutton County, TX 7.18% 10.00% 0.00% No data 10.57% 0.00% data Tom Green 13.34% 20.87% 22.64% 0.64% 0.00% 15.03% 7.02% County, TX Texas 14.46% 20.29% 17.89% 10.51% 16.15% 22.29% 15.34% United States 11.64% 24.19% 25.84% 11.55% 18.29% 22.58% 17.51%
Population in Poverty Race Alone, Percent
30
20 %
10
0 White Black or African American Native American / Alaska Asian Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Race Multiple Race Native Islander
Report Location Texas United States
Population in Poverty by Race Alone, Total
Page 86 / 95 Black or African Native American / Alaska Native Hawaiian / Pacific Some Other Multiple Report Area White Asian American Native Islander Race Race
Report Location 15,275 956 107 7 5 2,736 199 Coke County, TX 394 2 16 0 0 74 14 Concho County, 221 0 0 0 0 0 2 TX Crockett County, 137 0 0 0 0 602 0 TX Irion County, TX 157 54 0 0 0 15 0 Kimble County, 811 0 0 0 5 112 0 TX Menard County, 168 0 0 0 0 0 37 TX Reagan County, 93 0 0 0 0 456 0 TX Schleicher 199 6 0 0 0 247 0 County, TX Sterling County, 30 0 0 0 0 9 0 TX Sutton County, TX 178 2 0 0 0 140 0 Tom Green 12,887 892 91 7 0 1,081 146 County, TX Texas 2,936,874 654,449 23,587 135,831 3,722 350,467 109,008 United States 26,730,734 9,490,587 673,665 1,989,768 103,304 3,497,625 1,772,296
Population in Poverty by Race Alone, Total
Report Location
Multiple Race: 1.0%
Some Other Race: 14.2%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander: 0.0%
Asian: 0.0%
Native American/Alaska Native: 0.6%
Black or African American: 5.0%
White: 79.2%
Teen Births
This indicator reports the rate of total births to women age of 15 ‐ 19 per 1,000 female population age 15 ‐ 19. This indicator is relevant because in many cases, teen parents have unique social, economic, and health support services. Additionally, high rates of teen pregnancy may indicate the prevalence of unsafe sex practices.
Page 87 / 95 Teen Births, Rate (Per 1,000 Female Population, Population) Report Area Births to Mothers Age 15 ‐ 19 Teen Births, Rate (Per 1,000 Population) Age 15 ‐ 19
Report Location 5,276 295 55.91 Coke County, TX 81 3 32.30 0 100 Concho County, TX 82 5 66.00 Report Location (55.91) Texas (55.00) Crockett County, TX 137 13 94.70 United States (36.60) Irion County, TX 64 No data No data Kimble County, TX 122 7 56.30 Menard County, TX 55 3 51.50 Reagan County, TX 119 8 70.10 Schleicher County, TX 117 7 57.70 Sterling County, TX 26 No data No data Sutton County, TX 161 11 70.50 Tom Green County, 4,312 238 55.10 TX Texas 914,438 50,294 55.00 United States 10,736,677 392,962 36.60
Note: This indicator is compared to the state average. Data Source: US Department of Health & Human Services, Health Indicators Warehouse. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Vital Statistics System. Accessed via CDC WONDER. 2006‐12. Source geography: County
Births to Females Age 15‐19, Rate (Per 1,000 Pop.) by County, NVSS 2006‐12
Over 60.0 45.1 ‐ 60.0 30.1 ‐ 45.0 Under 30.1 No Data or Data Suppressed Report Location View larger map
Births to Women Age 15‐19, Rate (per 1,000 Pop.) by Race / Ethnicity
Page 88 / 95 Report Area Non‐Hispanic White Non‐Hispanic Black Hispanic or Latino
Report Location No data No data No data Coke County, TX No data No data No data Concho County, TX No data No data 113.40 Crockett County, TX 74.80 No data 103.60 Irion County, TX No data No data No data Kimble County, TX 53.20 No data 63.10 Menard County, TX No data No data No data Reagan County, TX No data No data 83.50 Schleicher County, TX No data No data 79.70 Sterling County, TX No data No data No data Sutton County, TX No data No data 88.90 Tom Green County, TX 34.70 30.80 83.20 Texas 31.40 56.20 79.10 United States 24.60 54.90 62.00
Births to Women Age 15-19, Rate (per 1,000 Pop.) by Race / Ethnicity
100
75
50
25
0 Non-Hispanic White Non-Hispanic Black Hispanic or Latino
Texas United States
Births to Women Age 15‐19, Rate (per 1,000 Pop.) by Time Period, 2002‐2008 through 2006‐2012
Page 89 / 95 Report Area 2002‐2008 2003‐2009 2004‐2010 2005‐2011 2006‐2012
Report Location No data No data No data No data No data Coke County, TX 32.70 33.70 35.50 35.40 32.30 Concho County, TX 66.20 68.50 67.70 68.60 66.00 Crockett County, TX 72.20 85.60 93.10 96.70 94.70 Irion County, TX No data No data No data No data No data Kimble County, TX 79.50 71.30 56.90 55.90 56.30 Menard County, TX 75.30 73.20 65.10 51.80 51.50 Reagan County, TX 76.40 72.40 78.40 75.10 70.10 Schleicher County, TX 69.60 68.90 67.20 64.10 57.70 Sterling County, TX No data No data No data No data No data Sutton County, TX 59.30 60.90 64.10 67.10 70.50 Tom Green County, TX 60.90 60.70 58.00 57.00 55.10 Texas 62.00 61.00 59.50 57.30 55.00 United States 41.00 40.30 39.30 38.00 36.60
Births to Women Age 15-19, Rate (per 1,000 Pop.) by Time Period, 2002-2008 through 2006-2012
70
60
50
40
30 2002-2008 2003-2009 2004-2010 2005-2011 2006-2012
Texas United States
Unemployment Rate
Total unemployment in the report area for the current month equals 2,725, or 4.1% of the civilian non‐institutionalized population age 16 and older (non‐seasonally adjusted). This indicator is relevant because unemployment creates financial instability and barriers to access including insurance coverage, health services, healthy food, and other necessities that contribute to poor health status.
Page 90 / 95 Unemployment Rate Report Area Labor Force Number Employed Number Unemployed Unemployment Rate
Report Location 67,055 64,330 2,725 4.1% Coke County, TX 1,447 1,392 55 3.80%
Concho County, TX 1,358 1,308 50 3.70% 0% 15% Crockett County, TX 1,644 1,550 94 5.70% Report Location (4.1%) Texas (4.7%) Irion County, TX 760 732 28 3.70% United States (4.5%) Kimble County, TX 1,823 1,743 80 4.40% Menard County, TX 860 825 35 4.10% Reagan County, TX 1,919 1,845 74 3.90% Schleicher County, TX 1,307 1,250 57 4.40% Sterling County, TX 580 554 26 4.50% Sutton County, TX 1,339 1,268 71 5.30% Tom Green County, TX 54,018 51,863 2,155 4.00% Texas 14,075,576 13,409,275 666,301 4.7% United States 162,537,084 155,167,187 7,369,897 4.5%
Note: This indicator is compared to the state average. Data Source: US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2020 ‐ March. Source geography: County
Unemployment, Rate by County, BLS 2020 ‐ March
Over 12.0% 9.1 ‐ 12.0% 6.1 ‐ 9.0% 3.1 ‐ 6.0% Under 3.1% Report Location View larger map
Average Monthly Unemployment Rate, March 2019 ‐ March 2020
Page 91 / 95 Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Report Area 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 2019 2020 2020 2020
Report Location 3.0% 2.5% 2.7% 3.3% 3.4% 3.2% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 2.9% 3.3% 3.0% 4.1% Coke County, TX 3.50% 2.70% 3.10% 3.60% 3.60% 3.40% 3.00% 3.20% 3.10% 2.50% 2.80% 2.90% 3.80% Concho County, TX 3.40% 3.30% 3.40% 3.60% 3.70% 3.30% 3.10% 2.90% 2.90% 2.60% 2.90% 2.70% 3.70% Crockett County, 2.60% 2.10% 2.30% 2.80% 2.90% 3.20% 3.30% 3.50% 3.50% 3.80% 4.40% 4.20% 5.70% TX Irion County, TX 2.50% 2.00% 2.20% 2.50% 2.90% 2.50% 2.40% 2.40% 2.10% 2.10% 2.50% 2.50% 3.70% Kimble County, TX 3.10% 2.50% 2.70% 3.20% 3.40% 3.10% 3.20% 2.90% 3.10% 2.80% 3.40% 3.40% 4.40% Menard County, 3.60% 3.10% 3.00% 3.70% 3.80% 3.60% 3.40% 3.20% 3.30% 3.10% 3.40% 3.40% 4.10% TX Reagan County, TX 2.20% 1.90% 2.10% 2.70% 2.60% 2.60% 2.70% 2.80% 2.70% 3.20% 3.20% 2.80% 3.90% Schleicher County, 2.60% 2.10% 2.60% 2.90% 3.60% 3.20% 3.10% 3.10% 3.20% 2.90% 3.10% 3.00% 4.40% TX Sterling County, TX 2.70% 3.10% 2.90% 2.90% 3.10% 3.10% 2.90% 3.00% 3.40% 2.80% 3.70% 3.30% 4.50% Sutton County, TX 3.30% 3.00% 3.10% 3.70% 4.10% 4.40% 3.90% 4.20% 4.40% 4.10% 4.50% 3.90% 5.30% Tom Green 3.00% 2.50% 2.70% 3.30% 3.40% 3.20% 2.90% 2.90% 2.90% 2.80% 3.20% 3.00% 4.00% County, TX Texas 3.5% 3.0% 3.1% 3.7% 3.8% 3.7% 3.4% 3.3% 3.4% 3.3% 3.8% 3.6% 4.7% United States 4.0% 3.4% 3.4% 3.9% 4.0% 3.8% 3.4% 3.4% 3.3% 3.4% 4.0% 3.8% 4.5%
Average Monthly Unemployment Rate, March 2019 - March 2020
5
4 %
3
2 Mar. 2019 Apr. 2019 May 2019 Jun. 2019 Jul. 2019 Aug. 2019 Sep. 2019 Oct. 2019 Nov. 2019 Dec. 2019 Jan. 2020 Feb. 2020 Mar. 2020
Report Location Texas United States
Average Annual Unemployment Rate, 2009‐2019
Page 92 / 95 Report Area 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Report Location 6.5% 6.6% 6.1% 5.2% 5.0% 3.9% 4.2% 4.6% 3.7% 3.1% 3.0 Coke County, TX 8.10% 6.10% 5.70% 5.10% 5.10% 4.30% 4.10% 4.20% 3.70% 3.40% 3.20 Concho County, TX 7.10% 5.70% 4.60% 4.20% 4.00% 3.00% 3.30% 3.40% 4.20% 3.60% 3.20 Crockett County, TX 8.50% 8.50% 6.60% 5.00% 5.10% 3.80% 6.00% 7.50% 4.10% 2.90% 2.90 Irion County, TX 5.20% 5.30% 5.40% 4.60% 4.20% 3.70% 3.60% 3.20% 3.00% 3.00% 2.40 Kimble County, TX 5.20% 6.00% 6.20% 4.90% 4.90% 3.90% 3.70% 3.80% 3.50% 3.00% 3.10 Menard County, TX 6.60% 7.40% 7.20% 6.30% 5.90% 4.70% 5.10% 4.40% 4.80% 4.00% 3.50 Reagan County, TX 6.00% 5.50% 4.40% 3.40% 4.00% 3.20% 4.50% 6.20% 3.80% 2.50% 2.50 Schleicher County, TX 9.30% 7.60% 5.70% 4.00% 3.50% 3.00% 5.30% 5.20% 3.70% 2.80% 2.90 Sterling County, TX 4.20% 4.70% 4.80% 3.50% 3.90% 3.00% 3.30% 3.90% 3.70% 3.30% 3.10 Sutton County, TX 7.10% 9.60% 6.80% 4.70% 4.60% 3.60% 6.10% 7.90% 5.10% 3.80% 3.70 Tom Green County, TX 6.30% 6.60% 6.30% 5.30% 5.20% 4.00% 4.10% 4.50% 3.70% 3.10% 3.00 Texas 7.60% 8.10% 7.80% 6.70% 6.30% 5.10% 4.40% 4.60% 4.30% 3.80% 3.50
Average Annual Unemployment Rate, 2009-2019
10
8
% 6
4
2 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Report Location Texas
Violent Crime
This indicator reports information about violent crime offenses reported by law enforcement. In the report area, 156,571 violent crimes occurred during the 2014‐16 three year period. The violent crime rate of 1,299 which is lower than the statewide rate of 359,196. Violent crime includes homicide, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault.
Page 93 / 95 Violent Crimes, Annual Rate (Per Total Violent Crimes, 3‐year Violent Crimes, Annual Rate (Per 100,000 100,000 Pop.) Report Area Population Total Pop.)
Report Location 156,571 1,299 276.50 Coke County, TX 3,236 6 61.80 0 1000 Concho County, TX 6,957 59 282.60 Report Location (276.50) Texas (428.50) Crockett County, TX 3,737 20 178.30 United States (416.00) Irion County, TX 1,550 3 64.40 Kimble County, TX 4,380 13 98.90 Menard County, TX 2,126 1 15.60 Reagan County, TX 7,122 68 318.20 Schleicher County, TX 3,075 6 65.00 Sterling County, TX 1,401 3 71.30 Sutton County, TX 3,889 14 119.90 Tom Green County, 119,097 1,106 309.50 TX Texas 27,937,316 359,196 428.50 United States 366,886,849 4,579,031 416.00
Note: This indicator is compared to the state average. Data Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation, FBI Uniform Crime Reports. Additional analysis by the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data. Accessed via the Inter‐university Consortium for Political and Social Research. 2015‐17. Source geography: County
Violent Crimes, All, Rate (Per 100,000 Pop.) by County, FBI UCR 2015‐ 17
Over 380.0 260.1 ‐ 380.0 180.1 ‐ 260.0 100.1 ‐ 180.0 Under 100.1 No Data or Data Suppressed View larger map Report Location
Young People Not in School and Not Working
This indicator reports the percentage of youth age 16‐19 who are not currently enrolled in school and who are not employed.
Page 94 / 95 Population Age 16-19 Not in Report Area Population Age 16‐19 Population Age 16‐19 Not in School and Not Employed, Percent School and Not Employed, Percent
Report Location 9,265 7.44% Coke County, TX 141 14.18% Concho County, TX 539 29.13% 0% 25% Crockett County, TX 305 0.00% Report Location (7.44%) Texas (7.90%) Irion County, TX 104 13.46% United States (6.78%) Kimble County, TX 249 11.65% Menard County, TX 59 15.25% Reagan County, TX 226 29.20% Schleicher County, TX 95 10.53% Sterling County, TX 86 0.00% Sutton County, TX 124 0.00% Tom Green County, TX 7,337 5.23% Texas 1,580,551 7.90% United States 17,021,831 6.78%
Note: This indicator is compared to the state average. Data Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey. 2014‐18. Source geography: Tract
Youth Not Enrolled in School and Not Employed, Percent by Tract, ACS 2014‐18
Youth Not Enrolled in School and Not Employed, Percent by Tract, ACS 2014‐18 Report Location
View larger map
https://engagementnetwork.org, 5/27/2020
Page 95 / 95