DOCSLIB.ORG

Fossil Fueled Foolery an Illustrated Primer on the Fossil Fuel Industry’S Deceptive Tactics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fossil Fueled Foolery an Illustrated Primer on the Fossil Fuel Industry’S Deceptive Tactics Fossil Fueled Foolery An Illustrated Primer on the Fossil Fuel Industry’s Deceptive Tactics SECOND EDITION NAACP ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE JUSTICE PROGRAM APRIL 2021 1 Table of Contents Overview ...................................................................................................................... 4 Top 10 Fossil Fuel Industry Tactics .......................................................................... 8 Invest in Efforts that Undermine Democracy ....................................................... 9 Finance Political Campaigns and Pressure Politicians ..................................... 11 Fund Scientists and Scientific Research Institutions to Publish Biased Research Studies .................................................................................................. 12 Say Government Regulations Hurt the Economy and Low-Income Communities .......................................................................................................... 14 Deny or Understate the Harms Polluting Facilities Cause to People and the Environment ........................................................................................................... 15 Deflect Responsibility – Shift Blame to Communities They Pollute ................ 19 Exaggerate the Level of Job Creation and Downplay the Lack of Quality and Safety in Jobs ........................................................................................................ 21 Co-opt Community Leaders and Organizations and Misrepresent the Interests and Opinions of Communities .............................................................................. 22 Praise False Solutions While Claiming that Real Solutions are Impractical, Impossible, or Harmful for BIPOC and Poor Communities .............................. 26 “Embrace” Renewables to Control the New Energy Economy ........................ 28 The Real Facts About the Imperative to Transition to A New Energy Economy 29 Fossil Fuel Emissions Kill – Disproportionately Killing Residents of BIPOC and Low-Income Communities ............................................................................ 29 Fossil Fuel Pollution Affects Communities Differently: BIPOC Communities Carry Burdens & Harms, with Few Economic Benefits ..................................... 32 Clean Energy Can Power Our Nation ................................................................. 35 Clean Energy Makes Sense: Health, Economic, and Environmental Benefits ................................................................................................................................. 36 The New Energy Economy Creates Better, Safer Jobs with Less Investment ................................................................................................................................. 37 Transitioning to a New Energy Economy is the Only Real Solution................ 38 2 Climate Justice Advocacy: 10 Ways Communities Can Advance the Shift to Energy Efficiency and Renewable Resources ....................................................... 39 Leverage Residents’ Solidarities within Communities to Ground Resistance Against Climate Injustices and Fossil Fuel Manipulation ................................. 41 Shift the Narrative Towards Justice: Renewable Resources Support Equity and Community Resiliency ................................................................................... 43 Seed Education in Communities for Sustainable Change: Public Learning Practices and Community-Based Participatory Action Research .................... 44 Expand Networks of Support at the Local, Regional, and National Level ...... 47 Support and Advance Just and Equitable Policies ............................................ 48 Participate in the Process..................................................................................... 50 Take Legal Action ................................................................................................. 52 Reverse Citizens United ....................................................................................... 52 Support Campaign Finance Reform ................................................................... 53 List of Technical Resources ..................................................................................... 54 Glossary of Terms ..................................................................................................... 55 Image Credits ............................................................................................................ 57 3 Overview On September 17th, 2020, the public art piece, “Metronome,” installed ten stories high in Manhattan’s Union Square, was reprogrammed to countdown Earth's life. The Climate Clock1 now displays the remaining time until climate conditions become irreversible – if we do not make the critical shifts necessary to save our environment, health and wellbeing. With each tick, we are reminded that if greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise, global temperatures will lead to devastating climate effects. The Climate Clock in Manhattan began its countdown from seven years, 103 days, 15 hours, 40 minutes, and seven seconds. At the time of this primer’s release, April 1st 2021, the virtual climate clock (Climate Clock2) reads approximately six years, 309 days, 19 hours, 58 minutes, and four seconds. Between the Climate Clock’s first tick and now, less than a year has passed and we have experienced: Record-breaking storms3 making landfall and reaching "hurricane" status in the U.S.; GOP representatives continuing to push skewed climate agendas that protect fossil fuels companies4 that contribute to greenhouse gas emissions; and A massive snowstorm5 in Texas that left millions without water and power during below- freezing temperatures. Although it is April Fools' Day, indeed, this is no joke. Yet, the conservative-based, American Legislative Exchange Council's (ALEC) position on Environmental Stewardship6 openly states on their website, "The reality of the situation, 1 Machemer, T. (2020, September 22). Clock in New York counts down the time remaining to avert climate disaster. Retrieved from https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/clock-new-york-counts-down-time-remaining-avert-climate-disaster-180975881/ 2 The climate clock. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://climateclock.world/. 3 Chinchar, A., & Miller, B. (2020, August 30). Climate change didn't cause Hurricane Laura but it did make the storm worse. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/30/weather/weather-hurricane-laura-climate-impacts-scope/index.html 4 Siegel, J. (2020, February 12). House Republicans unveil 'realistic' climate plan focused on capturing carbon from fossil fuels. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/energy/house-republicans-unveil-realistic-climate-plan-focused-on-capturing-carbon-from- fossil-fuels 5 Texas' frozen power grid is a preview of climate Change disasters to come. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/texas- power-outage-storm-climate-change/ 6 Environmental stewardship. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.alec.org/issue/environmental-stewardship/ 4 however, is that it is an amazing time to be living in the U.S. and environmental quality has hardly ever been better than it is today." Yep. You’d expect to see “April Fools!” but they manage to make such ridiculous claims with a straight face! The NAACP’s inaugural edition of the Fossil Fueled Foolery primer, 2019, shed light on the deceptive tactics used by fossil fuel conglomerates and their supporters at the expense of communities most affected by their pollution. They will deny any responsibility, but we’re not fooled, they are responsible for the dire climate conditions. Communities already fraught with decades of disenfranchisement, disinvestment, and displacement are now also subject to the worst effects of climate change. Not to mention the observed health-related risks due to increased toxins in the environment within Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) and low-income communities. In 2021, the effects of a respiratory-based pandemic have intensified these inequities, ravaged the economy, and accelerated the need for environmental and healthcare solutions. 5 You would think this would be enough of a call to action. Instead some of the world's largest banks7 still funnel trillions of dollars into fossil fuels ($2.7 trillion since the Paris Agreement). This is going on even after the adoption of the Paris Agreement (Dec. 2015), and the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) requirement for urgent and aggressive action on eliminating greenhouse gas emissions. Reports published by the NAACP such as -- Coal Blooded: Putting Profits Before People, Fumes Across the Fenceline, and Lights Out in the Cold: Reforming Utility Shut Off Policies as if Human Rights Matter – highlight fossil fuel companies’ exploitative tactics that conceal their environmental destruction and diminish their social and economic harm. Climate effects are not always what meets the eye. There are invisible effects on community cohesion and emotional support systems that pose deep, visceral threats to a community's internal resilience.8 So, no - environmental quality is not "hardly ever been better than it is today." The more they deny, the more communities suffer. Yet, there’s hope. Next to the virtual Climate Clock, there is a "lifeline" - a percentage of the world's energy from renewable resources. At the time of this primer’s release, we are at 28%
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sports Drinks: the Myths Busted August 5, 2012
    Sports drinks: the myths busted August 5, 2012 The Coca-Cola and McDonald's sponsorships for the London Olympics are creating outcry from health advocates, but there's one sponsorship they may be overlooking: Powerade. Powerade, the official drink for athletes at the 2012 Olympic Games (as well as the EUFA 2012), is the sister drink of the other official Olympic drink: Coca-Cola. Is it that surprising? The most common beliefs about sports drinks are that they rehydrate athletes, that all athletes (Olympic or not) can benefit from sports drinks, and that all sports drinks are created equal. Right? Wrong. Reaching for a neon-green Gatorade after your oh-so-grueling spin class may seem like a good idea, but the truth might surprise you. Sports drinks contain electrolytes (mostly potassium and sodium) and sugars to replenish what the body has lost through sweating that water alone can’t replace. The purpose of these beverages is to bring the levels of minerals in your blood closer to their normal levels, so you can continue your workout as if you just started. Sounds great, right? But don’t go reaching for the nearest bottle just yet. Not all sports drinks are created equal, and not every sports drink works the same for every athlete. Most nutritionists agree that sports drinks only become beneficial once your workout extends past 60 minutes. For Olympians, sports drinks might actually do the trick; one study from the University of Bath found that sipping on a carbohydrate-based drink helped athletes’ performances. But that doesn’t mean that drinking water ceases to be essential.
    [Show full text]
  • Mexico Is the Number One Consumer of Coca-Cola in the World, with an Average of 225 Litres Per Person
    Arca. Mexico is the number one Company. consumer of Coca-Cola in the On the whole, the CSD industry in world, with an average of 225 litres Mexico has recently become aware per person; a disproportionate of a consolidation process destined number which has surpassed the not to end, characterised by inventors. The consumption in the mergers and acquisitions amongst USA is “only” 200 litres per person. the main bottlers. The producers WATER & CSD This fizzy drink is considered an have widened their product Embotelladoras Arca essential part of the Mexican portfolio by also offering isotonic Coca-Cola Group people’s diet and can be found even drinks, mineral water, juice-based Monterrey, Mexico where there is no drinking water. drinks and products deriving from >> 4 shrinkwrappers Such trend on the Mexican market milk. Coca Cola Femsa, one of the SMI LSK 35 F is also evident in economical terms main subsidiaries of The Coca-Cola >> conveyor belts as it represents about 11% of Company in the world, operates in the global sales of The Coca Cola this context, as well as important 4 installation. local bottlers such as ARCA, CIMSA, BEPENSA and TIJUANA. The Coca-Cola Company These businesses, in addition to distributes 4 out of the the products from Atlanta, also 5 top beverage brands in produce their own label beverages. the world: Coca-Cola, Diet SMI has, to date, supplied the Coke, Sprite and Fanta. Coca Cola Group with about 300 During 2007, the company secondary packaging machines, a worked with over 400 brands and over 2,600 different third of which is installed in the beverages.
    [Show full text]
  • The Coca-Cola Company and Monster Beverage Corporation Close on Previously Announced Strategic Partnership
    June 12, 2015 The Coca-Cola Company and Monster Beverage Corporation Close on Previously Announced Strategic Partnership ATLANTA & CORONA, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- The Coca-Cola Company (NYSE: KO) and Monster Beverage Corporation (NASDAQ: MNST) announced today the closing of the previously announced strategic partnership related to an equity investment, business transfers and expanded distribution in the global energy drink category. As a result of the transaction, The Coca-Cola Company now owns an approximate 16.7% stake in Monster. The Coca-Cola Company transferred ownership of its worldwide energy business, including NOS, Full Throttle, Burn, Mother, BU, Gladiator, Samurai, Nalu, BPM, Play and Power Play, Ultra and Relentless, to Monster, and Monster transferred its non-energy business, including Hansen’s Natural Sodas, Peace Tea, Hubert’s Lemonade and Hansen’s Juice Products, to The Coca-Cola Company. Since the transaction was announced, Monster and The Coca-Cola Company and its bottlers have amended their distribution arrangements in the U.S. and Canada by expanding into additional territories and entering into long-term agreements. The Coca-Cola Company also has become Monster’s preferred global distribution partner with new international distribution commitments already in place with bottlers in Germany and Norway. In connection with the closing, The Coca-Cola Company made a net cash payment of approximately $2.15 billion to Monster. About The Coca-Cola Company The Coca-Cola Company (NYSE: KO) is the world’s largest beverage company, refreshing consumers with more than 500 sparkling and still brands. Led by Coca-Cola, one of the world’s most valuable and recognizable brands, our Company’s portfolio features 20 billion- dollar brands including, Diet Coke, Fanta, Sprite, Coca-Cola Zero, vitaminwater, POWERADE, Minute Maid, Simply, Georgia, Dasani, FUZE TEA and Del Valle.
    [Show full text]
  • How Smart Metering and Smart Charging May Help a Local Energy Community in Collective Self-Consumption in Presence of Electric Vehicles
    energies Article How Smart Metering and Smart Charging may Help a Local Energy Community in Collective Self-Consumption in Presence of Electric Vehicles Giuseppe Barone 1 , Giovanni Brusco 1 , Daniele Menniti 1 , Anna Pinnarelli 1 , Gaetano Polizzi 1, Nicola Sorrentino 1, Pasquale Vizza 1 and Alessandro Burgio 2,* 1 Department of Mechanical, Energy and Management Engineering, University of Calabria, 87036 Rende, Italy; [email protected] (G.B.); [email protected] (G.B.); [email protected] (D.M.); [email protected] (A.P.); [email protected] (G.P.); [email protected] (N.S.); [email protected] (P.V.) 2 Independent Researcher, 87036 Rende, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 11 July 2020; Accepted: 4 August 2020; Published: 12 August 2020 Abstract: The 2018/2001/EU renewable energy directive (RED II) underlined the strategic role of energy communities in the EU transition process towards sustainable and renewable energy. In line with the path traced by RED II, this paper proposes a solution that may help local energy communities in increasing self-consumption. The proposed solution is based on the combination of smart metering and smart charging. A set of smart meters returns the profile of each member of the community with a time resolution of 5 s; the aggregator calculates the community profile and regulates the charging of electric vehicles accordingly. An experimental test is performed on a local community composed of four users, where the first is a consumer with a Nissan Leaf, whereas the remaining three users are prosumers with a photovoltaic generator mounted on the roof of their home.
    [Show full text]
  • Italy's Effort to Phase out and Rationalise Its Fossil Fuel Subsidies
    ITALY’S EFFORT TO PHASE OUT AND RATIONALISE ITS FOSSIL-FUEL SUBSIDIES A REPORT ON THE G20 PEER-REVIEW OF INEFFICIENT FOSSIL-FUEL SUBSIDIES THAT ENCOURAGE WASTEFUL CONSUMPTION IN ITALY PREPARED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE PEER-REVIEW TEAM: ARGENTINA, CANADA, CHILE, CHINA, FRANCE, GERMANY, INDONESIA, NETHERLANDS, NEW ZEALAND, IEA, UN ENVIRONMENT, IISD, EUROPEAN ENERGY RETAILERS, GREEN BUDGET EUROPE, THE OECD (CHAIR OF THE PEER-REVIEW) AND SELECTED EXPERTS APRIL 2019 1 │ Italy’s effort to phase out and rationalise its fossil-fuel subsidies A report on the G20 peer-review of inefficient fossil-fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful consumption in Italy Prepared by the members of the peer-review team: Argentina, Canada, Chile, China, France, Germany, Indonesia, Netherlands, New Zealand, IEA, UN Environment, IISD, European Energy Retailers, Green Budget Europe, the OECD (Chair of the peer-review) and selected experts ITALY’S EFFORT TO PHASE OUT AND RATIONALISE ITS FOSSIL FUEL SUBSIDIES 2 │ Table of contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 5 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1. Background and context ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Propane & Net Zero
    PROPANE & NET ZERO WHY NET ZERO IS IMPORTANT “Net zero” refers to achieving an overall balance between emissions produced and emissions taken out of the atmosphere. Propane can help reduce CO2 emissions by replacing heavy carbons like coal, oil and even wood. Its affordability also ensures every consumer can share equitably in the benefits propane brings. PROPANE DECARBONIZES PROPANE ENSURES EQUITY Clean and renewable energy like propane Access to clean, affordable and renewable energy accelerates decarbonization. like propane ensures equity on the path to zero. Δ Decarbonization requires more cleaner energy options. The Δ Urban and rural low-income households, especially U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Office of Scientific and African American and Latinx households, spend roughly Technical Information says that large emissions reductions three times as much of their income on energy costs are achievable through a broad range of opportunities, as non-low-income households. In February 2021, EIA including the use of low- or zero-carbon alternatives. reported that electricity was 68% more expensive per million BTUs than propane. Δ The electric grid isn’t always the cleanest answer. Currently, propane-fueled medium- and heavy-duty Δ Energy should be affordable, so that no one has to vehicles provide a lower carbon footprint solution in 38 go without, but the share of income that low-income U.S. states when compared to medium- and heavy-duty households spent on electricity rose by 1/3 in the last EVs charged from the electrical grid. decade. Δ Propane is innovating everyday. It is, in fact, the new Δ Everyone should have access to clean energy and home diesel.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Behind-The-Meter Solar-Plus-Storage
    AN OVERVIEW OF BEHIND-THE- METER SOLAR-PLUS-STORAGE REGULATORY DESIGN Approaches and Case Studies to Inform International Applications Owen Zinaman, Thomas Bowen, and Alexandra Aznar National Renewable Energy Laboratory March 2020 A product of the USAID-NREL partnership Contract No. IAG-17-2050 NOTICE This work was authored, in part, by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE- AC36-08GO28308. Funding provided by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under Contract No. IAG-17-2050. The views expressed in this report do not necessarily represent the views of the DOE or the U.S. Government, or any agency thereof, including USAID. This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) reports produced after 1991 and a growing number of pre-1991 documents are available free via www.OSTI.gov. Cover photo from iStock 471670114. NREL prints on paper that contains recycled content. Acknowledgments The authors thank Anurag Mishra and Sarah Lawson from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) Office of Energy and Infrastructure for their support of this work. We also wish to thank the following individuals for their detailed review comments, insights, and contributions to this report (names listed alphabetically by organization and last name). Clean Energy Group—Seth Mullendore E3 Analytics—Toby
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Net Metering Report for 2019
    ANNUAL NET METERING REPORT FOR 2019 April 3, 2020 Manager, Energy Department Missouri Public Service Commission Pursuant to 20 CSR 4240-20.065 (10)(A), Evergy Missouri Metro and Evergy Missouri West submits the following Annual Net Metering Report for 2019. Item (A) 1 of the following table represents the total number of customer-generator facilities connected to our distribution system at year end. Item (A) 2 represents the total estimated generating capacity of customer-generators that are connected to our distribution system. Item (A) 3 represents the total estimated net kilowatt-hours received from customer- generators. Generating Net kWhs Customers Capacity (kW) Received (A) 1 (A) 2 (A) 3 Evergy Missouri Metro 2,107 31,804.21 10,961,098 Evergy Missouri West 2,560 45,282.12 20,302,687 Total 4,667 77,086.32 31,263,876 Also, pursuant to 20 CSR 4240-20.065 (10)(B), please find enclosed a copy of the standard information, Attachment A, regarding net metering and interconnection requirements provided to customers or posted on the Company’s website. This information can also be found at the following link: https://www.evergy.com/smart-energy/renewable-resources/private-solar-and-net-metering Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Lisa Casteel Regulatory Affairs 816-556-2705 Public Attachment A Public FILED Missouri Public Service Commission EE-2019-0056; JE-2019-0028 FILED Missouri Public Service Commission EE-2019-0056; JE-2019-0028 FILED Missouri Public Service Commission EE-2019-0056; JE-2019-0028 KCP&L GREATER MISSOURI OPERATIONS COMPANY P.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance
    GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance An amendment to the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard AUTHOR Mary Sotos GHG PROTOCOL TEAM Pankaj Bhatia, World Resources Institute Cynthia Cummis, World Resources Institute Mark Didden, World Business Council for Sustainable Development Alex Kovac, World Resources Institute Josh Ryor, World Resources Institute Amanda Stevens, World Resources Institute Table of Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Business Goals 14 3 Accounting and Reporting Principles 20 4 Scope 2 Accounting Methods 24 5 Identifying Scope 2 Emissions and Setting the Scope 2 Boundary 32 6 Calculating Emissions 42 7 Accounting and Reporting Requirements 58 8 Recommended Reporting on Instrument Features and Policy Context 66 9 Setting Reduction Targets and Tracking Emissions Over Time 74 BACKGROUND READING 10 Key Concepts and Background in Energy Attribute Certificates and Claims 78 11 How Companies Can Drive Electricity Supply Changes with the Market-Based Method 88 AppENDICES A Accounting for Steam, Heat, and Cooling 94 B Accounting for Energy-Related Emissions Throughout the Value Chain 96 Abbreviations 98 Glossary 99 References 108 Recognitions 111 1 Detailed Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 4 4 SCOPE 2 ACCOUNTING METHODS 24 1.1 The GHG Protocol 5 4.1 Approaches to accounting scope 2 25 1.2 The Corporate Standard’s 4.2 Emission rate approach 27 approach to scope 2 emissions 5 4.3 The decision-making value of each 1.3 Key questions on scope 2 accounting method’s results 28 and reporting 6 1.4 Purpose of this Guidance 7 5 IDENTIFYING SCOPE 2 EMISSIONS
    [Show full text]
  • USAID Energy Storage Decision Guide for Policymakers
    USAID ENERGY STORAGE FOR DECISION GUIDE POLICYMAKERS www.greeningthegrid.org | www.nrel.gov/usaid-partnership USAID ENERGY STORAGE FO R DECISION GUIDE P OLICYMAKERS Authors Ilya Chernyakhovskiy, Thomas Bowen, Carishma Gokhale-Welch, Owen Zinaman National Renewable Energy Laboratory July 2021 View the companion report: USAID Grid-Scale Energy Storage Technologies Primer www.greeningthegrid.org | www.nrel.gov/usaid-partnership Prepared by NOTICE This work was authored, in part, by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308. Funding provided by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under Contract No. IAG-17-2050. The views expressed in this report do not necessarily represent the views of the DOE or the U.S. Government, or any agency thereof, including USAID. This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) reports produced after 1991 and a growing number of pre-1991 documents are available free via www.OSTI.gov. Front cover: photo from iStock 506609532; Back cover: photo from iStock 506611252 NREL prints on paper that contains recycled content. Acknowledgments The authors are greatly indebted to several individuals for their support and guidance. We wish to thank Sarah Lawson, Andrew Fang, and Sarah Dimson at the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) for their thoughtful reviews. We also wish to thank Peerapat Vithayasrichareon, Jacques Warichet, Enrique Gutierrez Tavarez, and Luis Lopez at the International Energy Agency, and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Net Metering: in Brief
    Net Metering: In Brief November 14, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46010 SUMMARY R46010 Net Metering: In Brief November 14, 2019 Net metering is a policy that allows electricity customers with their own generation capacity to be financially compensated for the energy they produce. Net metering is widely regarded as having Ashley J. Lawson an important role in deployment of distributed generation (DG), especially solar energy. State Analyst in Energy Policy and local governments have authority to establish net metering policies, and some have done so for many years. Congress took action to encourage net metering in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT05), and the policy now exists, in some form, in 45 states. Recent state net metering policy modifications, and potential effects on solar energy deployment, may be relevant to congressional discussions regarding the role of renewable energy sources in the nation’s electricity system. Solar photovoltaic panels (e.g., rooftop solar) accounted for 97% of the generation capacity participating in net metering programs in 2018. Net metering participation roughly quadrupled from 2013 to 2018, according to data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Hawaii has the highest participation rate of any state, with 15% of electricity customers participating in net metering in 2018. In a majority of states, however, net metering customers account for less than 1% of total electricity customers. States differ in the way net metering customers are compensated. A common method is the retail rate, under which energy from net metering capacity offsets energy consumed from the grid in a one-to-one fashion.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Analysis of Net Metering and Feed in Tariff Schemes for 50Kw Solar Photovoltaic Distributed Generation System at Mahad Ganesh Dahale*, Prof
    IJRECE VOL. 6 ISSUE 2 APR.-JUNE 2018 ISSN: 2393-9028 (PRINT) | ISSN: 2348-2281 (ONLINE) Comparative Analysis of Net Metering and Feed in Tariff Schemes for 50kw Solar Photovoltaic Distributed Generation System at Mahad Ganesh Dahale*, Prof. Sunil Gaikwad and Prof. Dr. Y.P. Nerkar Department of Electrical Engineering, PVG's COET, Pune, India Abstract: Solar Photovoltaic (PV) system compared to its takes place through grid. Feed in tariff (FiT) or renewable scenario a decade ago has made a great impact in energy energy payment method is applied to those distributed energy production. Government provides several benefits to the systems producing electricity by their own. FiT has two tariffs customers in terms of subsidies, benefits in income-taxes and i.e. for its generation and its own consumption.Both methods many other such benefits. Tariff by Net metering i.e. Net metering and FiT prove to be cost and energy effective schemeregulated by the Government provides benefits to the and provide reduction in CO2 emission. However, the latter consumer applicable for various distributed generation system. provides more effective result in terms of cost and energy. In this paper, a new scheme of Feed in Tariff (FiT) for metering the total amount of energy generated has been This paper provides the statistical analysis between Net metering and Feed in Tariff applied on a 50kWp solar roof top discussed. A case study on 50 kW Laxmi Ice factory at Mahad, Maharashtra is considered in this paper. A PV application. This is applied at Laxmi Ice Factory in Mahad, Maharashtra at an altitude 11m and latitude 18.1N and MATLAB/Simulink model consisting 50 kW solar PV system, FiT& Net metering, solar radiance value is simulated.
    [Show full text]