The Columbia River Estuary Ecosystem Classification

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

The Columbia River Estuary Ecosystem Classification Supplying comprehensive information on landforms, vegetation, and manmade features in the Columbia River estuary THE COLUMBIA RIVER ESTUARY ECOSYSTEM CLASSIFICATION inventories Photo credits: All photos in this document were taken by a highly diverse set of natural and manmade features—and the wide Charles Cannon (United States Geological Survey) unless otherwise noted. variety of processes that formed them—making it a valuable tool for Photo locations: Cover and frontispiece: Cunningham Slough on research, monitoring, resource management, and restoration planning. Sauvie Island, OR. Back Cover: Marsh, Karlson, and Russian Islands. Features key: Cathlamet Bay, OR. ID Complex Catena Biocatena Anthropogenic 1 Crevasse Splay Tie Channel Tidal Deciduous Wetland --- 2 Crevasse Splay Wetland Tidal Herbaceous Wetland --- 3 Crevasse Splay Wetland Tidal Deciduous Wetland --- 4 Crevasse Splay Floodplain Channel Water --- 5 Crevasse Splay Natural Levee Tidal Deciduous Wetland --- 6 Floodplain Ridge and Swale Natural Levee Non-Tidal Deciduous Wetland --- 7 Floodplain Ridge and Swale Natural Levee Agricultural --- 8 Floodplain Backswamp Lake Bed Agricultural --- 9 Floodplain Backswamp Wetland Tidal Herbaceous Wetland --- 10 Floodplain Backswamp Lake/Pond Water --- 11 Floodplain Floodplain Channel Water --- 12 Tributary Secondary Channel Permanently Flooded Water --- 13 --- --- --- Levee Acknowledgments The Estuary Partnership acknowledges the following people for their significant contributions to the Columbia River Estuary Ecosystem Classification: Keith Marcoe and Krista L. Jones — Lower Columbia Estuary Partnership Charles A. Simenstad, Jennifer L. Burke, Mary F. Ramirez, and Danelle W. Heatwole — University of Washington Jim E. O’Connor, Charles Cannon, Ian R. Waite, and Timothy D. Counihan — United States Geological Survey WETLAND ECOSYSTEM TEAM This document was created with the help of Ann Sihler, technical writer, and Vickie Nissen, NISSEN Design/Graphics. UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON The Columbia River Estuary Ecosystem Classification What is the ecosystem classification? The Columbia River Estuary Ecosystem Classification is a For more information GIS-based system for classifying and mapping landforms and land cover For more information or to access the types in the Columbia River estuary. Combining previously collected classification, go to www.estuarypartnership. 1 information and new data the classification represents the most org/columbia-river-estuary-ecosystem- comprehensive, up-to-date inventory yet of the estuary’s natural and classification. manmade features and is suitable for use in research, monitoring, resource management, and restoration planning. The products of the classification— its high-resolution data and maps—are freely available to anyone seeking to better understand this unique landscape’s physical features and ecosystems, Inside: how they formed, and what their future might be. Key aspects Quantify baseline conditions and monitor changes Locate ecosystems of interest More about the Columbia River Ecosystem Classification Understand spatial distributions How can we use the classification? Evaluate ecological metrics related to the amount, diversity, and fragmentation of ecosystems2 What is the classification Distinguish between ecosystems created by relatively infrequent telling us so far? geological events and those formed by more common processes A tool for considering the Predict the ecological development of a site estuary’s future The classification organizes and describes features large and small, created Complexes and catenae summarized by forces ranging from tectonic to tidal. In many cases the classification links Features of special interest features to historical geologic events or to ongoing processes that continue to shape the modern estuary. Selected classification output: maps and tables Who created the classification? The Lower Columbia Estuary Partnership collaborated with geologists, wetland scientists, and GIS experts at the U.S. Geological Survey and University of Washington in developing the classification. Funding came from the Bonneville Power Administration and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1 Data newly collected or compiled for the ecosystem classification include land cover, land elevation, shallow- water bathymetry, agricultural ditches, wastewater treatment ponds, road fill, and general fill. 2 Ecological metrics include the number, area, edge density, patch richness, and diversity of different ecosystems in the estuary, plus the distance and degree of connection between ecosystem patches. The Columbia River Estuary Ecosystem Classification 1 Key aspects of the classification A complete study area. The ecosystem classification covers the entire Columbia River estuary and its floodplain, from the mouth of the Columbia River to Bonneville Dam, 146 miles upstream. By analyzing the entire estuary, the classification supports comprehensive, informed study of the full continuum of estuarine ecosystems. High-resolution GIS-based system. All information in the classification is digital, which allows for easy quantification and analysis. The classification can quickly answer questions about how extensive different ecosystems are in the estuary, where they are located, and what important ecological attributes they display, such as shape, LOCATION AND STUDY AREA. The approximate vegetation characteristics, and proximity to similar ecosystems. historical floodplain of the lower Columbia River defines . In creating the ecosystem classification, the lateral extent of mapping for the classification. Current, comprehensive data Lengthwise, the study area extends from the Pacific geologists and wetland scientists integrated the most current data Ocean 146 miles upstream to Bonneville Dam. available—in some cases compiling new data sets—to map features of interest. The resulting data and maps reflect current understanding of the dominant physical and biological characteristics of the estuary’s ecosystems, and how they formed. New vocabulary for better understanding. The classification uses terminology that brings a new level of precision to discussion of the estuary’s natural features. For example, the classification maps surge plains (which are formed by tidal flooding), tie channels (which connect floodplain lakes to the main river), and floodplain features such as backswamps, crevasse splays, and ridge and swale topography. By precisely defining and inventorying these features, the classification documents important formative processes that have not necessarily been described and measured before in the estuary. Detailed narrative. Creators of the ecosystem classification wrote in- depth descriptions of the natural and manmade features inventoried in the classification and notable occurrences in the estuary.3 National Agricultural Inventory(NAIP) (2009) Program Non-proprietary. The classification’s maps and data are non- proprietary, so they are available free of charge to anyone wanting to analyze the estuary for research, monitoring, resource management, or restoration planning. In addition, although the classification was developed specifically for the Columbia River estuary, its methods are comprehensive enough that they can be applied to other large, freshwater-dominated estuaries around the world.4 HIGH-RESOLUTION MAPPING. The classification turns aerial photos and other landscape data into 3 These narrative descriptions are as yet unpublished. For interim descriptions of ecosystem complexes and high-resolution digital maps that show features as geomorphic catenae, contact Jim O’Connor of the U.S. Geological Survey ([email protected]). small as ¼ acre. This example illustrates the detail 4 At the time of this writing, developers of the ecosystem classification were in the process of fully of land cover mapping around the Astoria airport, documenting their methods and results. For more information, contact the Lower Columbia Estuary near Warrenton, Oregon. Partnership. For interim descriptions, see U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 2011-1228, Columbia River Estuary Ecosystem Classification—Concept and Application (C.A. Simenstad et al., 2011), available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2011/1228/. 2 The Columbia River Estuary Ecosystem Classification More about the Columbia River Ecosystem Classification5 Ecosystem classifications are tools for organizing information. They provide Key physical processes a framework for identifying the different components of complex natural in the estuary systems and specifying the relationships among those components. In this, Tides the Columbia River Ecosystem Classification is no different from other classifications. It identifies and maps the ecosystems in the Columbia River Floods and fluvial sediment transport estuary, using an organizational structure that reflects the various geologic, Wind-driven sediment transport hydrologic, and biological processes that drive the evolution of estuarine Landslides and debris flows ecosystems. Late Holocene sea-level changes An inventory of ecosystems Volcanism At one level, the classification is simply an inventory of the current Subduction zone earthquake cycle ecosystems in the estuary. It tallies how many there are of each type, their size and shape, their location, and where they are situated in relationship Erosion to each other. How much surge plain has been isolated from tidal influence, and how much of this is being used
Recommended publications
  • Taphonomy of the Sun River Bonebed, Late Cretaceous

    Taphonomy of the Sun River Bonebed, Late Cretaceous

    TAPHONOMY OF THE SUN RIVER BONEBED, LATE CRETACEOUS (CAMPANIAN) TWO MEDICINE FORMATION OF MONTANA by Benjamin Andrew Scherzer A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Earth Sciences MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY-BOZEMAN Bozeman, Montana April 2008 © COPYRIGHT by Benjamin Andrew Scherzer 2008 All Rights Reserved ii APPROVAL of a thesis submitted by Benjamin Andrew Scherzer This thesis has been read by each member of the thesis committee and has been found to be satisfactory regarding content, English usage, format, citations, bibliographic style, and consistency, and is ready for submission to the Division of Graduate Education. Dr. David J. Varricchio Approved for the Department of Earth Sciences Dr. Stephan G. Custer Approved for the Division of Graduate Education Dr. Carl A. Fox iii STATEMENT OF PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment for the requirements for a master’s degree at Montana State University, I agree that the Library shall make it available to borrowers under rules of the Library. If I have indicated my intention to copyright this thesis by including a copyright notice page, copying is allowed only for scholarly purposes, consistent with “fair use” as prescribed in the U.S. Copyright Law. Request for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this thesis in whole or in parts may be granted only by the copyright holder. Benjamin Andrew Scherzer April 2008 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not have come to completion without the help of each member of my committee: Dave Varricchio, Jack Horner, and Jim Schmitt.
  • Missouri River Floodplain from River Mile (RM) 670 South of Decatur, Nebraska to RM 0 at St

    Missouri River Floodplain from River Mile (RM) 670 South of Decatur, Nebraska to RM 0 at St

    Hydrogeomorphic Evaluation of Ecosystem Restoration Options For The Missouri River Floodplain From River Mile (RM) 670 South of Decatur, Nebraska to RM 0 at St. Louis, Missouri Prepared For: U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 3 Minneapolis, Minnesota Greenbrier Wetland Services Report 15-02 Mickey E. Heitmeyer Joseph L. Bartletti Josh D. Eash December 2015 HYDROGEOMORPHIC EVALUATION OF ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION OPTIONS FOR THE MISSOURI RIVER FLOODPLAIN FROM RIVER MILE (RM) 670 SOUTH OF DECATUR, NEBRASKA TO RM 0 AT ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI Prepared For: U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 3 Refuges and Wildlife Minneapolis, Minnesota By: Mickey E. Heitmeyer Greenbrier Wetland Services Advance, MO 63730 Joseph L. Bartletti Prairie Engineers of Illinois, P.C. Springfield, IL 62703 And Josh D. Eash U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 3 Water Resources Branch Bloomington, MN 55437 Greenbrier Wetland Services Report No. 15-02 December 2015 Mickey E. Heitmeyer, PhD Greenbrier Wetland Services Route 2, Box 2735 Advance, MO 63730 www.GreenbrierWetland.com Publication No. 15-02 Suggested citation: Heitmeyer, M. E., J. L. Bartletti, and J. D. Eash. 2015. Hydrogeomorphic evaluation of ecosystem restoration options for the Missouri River Flood- plain from River Mile (RM) 670 south of Decatur, Nebraska to RM 0 at St. Louis, Missouri. Prepared for U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 3, Min- neapolis, MN. Greenbrier Wetland Services Report 15-02, Blue Heron Conservation Design and Print- ing LLC, Bloomfield, MO. Photo credits: USACE; http://statehistoricalsocietyofmissouri.org/; Karen Kyle; USFWS http://digitalmedia.fws.gov/cdm/; Cary Aloia This publication printed on recycled paper by ii Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................
  • Chapter 5 Groundwater Quality and Hydrodynamics of an Acid Sulfate Soil Backswamp

    Chapter 5 Groundwater Quality and Hydrodynamics of an Acid Sulfate Soil Backswamp

    Chapter 5 Groundwater Quality and Hydrodynamics of an Acid Sulfate Soil Backswamp 5.1 Introduction Intensive drainage of coastal floodplains has been the main factor contributing to the oxidation of acid sulfate soils (ASS) (Indraratna, Blunden & Nethery 1999; Sammut, White & Melville 1996). Drainage of backswamps removes surface water, thereby increasing the effect of evapotranspiration on watertable drawdown (Blunden & Indraratna 2000) and transportation of acidic salts to the soil surface through capillary action (Lin, Melville & Hafer 1995; Rosicky et al. 2006). During high rainfall events the oxidation products (i.e. metals and acid) are mobilised into the groundwater, and acid salts at the sediment surface are dissolved directly into the surface water (Green et al. 2006). The high efficiency of drains readily transports the acidic groundwater and surface water into the estuary and can have a detrimental impact on downstream habitats (Cook et al. 2000). The quality of water discharged from a degraded ASS wetland is controlled by the water balance, which over a given time period is: P + I + Li = E + Lo + D + S (Equation 5.1) where P is precipitation, I is irrigation, Li is the lateral inflow of water, E is evapotranspiration, Lo is surface and subsurface lateral outflow of water, D is the drainage to the watertable and S is the change in soil moisture storage above the watertable (Indraratna, Tularam & Blunden 2001; Sammut, White & Melville 1996; White et al. 1997). While this equation may give a general overview of sulfidic floodplain hydrology, an understanding of site-specific details is required for effective remediation and management of degraded ASS wetlands.
  • Variable Hydrologic and Geomorphic Responses to Intentional Levee Breaches Along the Lower Cosumnes River, California

    Variable Hydrologic and Geomorphic Responses to Intentional Levee Breaches Along the Lower Cosumnes River, California

    Received: 21 April 2016 Revised: 29 March 2017 Accepted: 30 March 2017 DOI: 10.1002/rra.3159 RESEARCH ARTICLE Not all breaks are equal: Variable hydrologic and geomorphic responses to intentional levee breaches along the lower Cosumnes River, California A. L. Nichols1 | J. H. Viers1,2 1 Center for Watershed Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, USA Abstract 2 School of Engineering, University of The transport of water and sediment from rivers to adjacent floodplains helps generate complex California, Merced, California, USA floodplain, wetland, and riparian ecosystems. However, riverside levees restrict lateral connectiv- Correspondence ity of water and sediment during flood pulses, making the re‐introduction of floodplain hydrogeo- A. L. Nichols, Center for Watershed Sciences, morphic processes through intentional levee breaching and removal an emerging floodplain University of California, Davis, California, USA. restoration practice. Repeated topographic observations from levee breach sites along the lower Email: [email protected] Cosumnes River (USA) indicated that breach architecture influences floodplain and channel hydrogeomorphic processes. Where narrow breaches (<75 m) open onto graded floodplains, Funding information California Department of Fish and Wildlife archetypal crevasse splays developed along a single dominant flowpath, with floodplain erosion (CDFW) Ecosystem Restoration Program in near‐bank areas and lobate splay deposition in distal floodplain regions. Narrow breaches (ERP), Grant/Award Number: E1120001; The opening into excavated floodplain channels promoted both transverse advection and turbulent Nature Concervancy (TNC); Consumnes River Preserve diffusion of sediment into the floodplain channel, facilitating near‐bank deposition and potential breach closure. Wide breaches (>250 m) enabled multiple modes of water and sediment transport onto graded floodplains.
  • Cypress Creek National Wildlife Refuge, Illinois

    Cypress Creek National Wildlife Refuge, Illinois

    Hydrogeomorphic Evaluation of Ecosystem Restoration Options for Cypress Creek National Wildlife Refuge, Illinois Prepared For: U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Division of Refuges, Region 3 Minneapolis, Minnesota Greenbrier Wetland Services Report 12-05 Mickey E. Heitmeyer Karen E. Mangan July 2012 HYDROGEOMORPHIC EVALUATION OF ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION OPTIONS FOR CYPRESS CREEK NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE, ILLINOIS Prepared For: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wildlife Refuge System, Region 3 Minneapolis, MN and Cypress Creek National Wildlife Refuge Ullin, IL By: Mickey E. Heitmeyer, PhD Greenbrier Wetland Services Rt. 2, Box 2735 Advance, MO 63730 and Karen E. Mangan U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Cypress Creek National Wildlife Refuge 0137 Rustic Campus Drive Ullin, IL 62992 Greenbrier Wetland Services Report 12-05 July 2012 Mickey E Heitmeyer, PhD Greenbrier Wetland Services Route 2, box 2735 Advance, MO. 63730 Publication No. 12-05 Suggested citation: Heitmeyer, M. E., K. E. Mangan. 2012. Hy- drogeomorphic evaluation of ecosystem restora- tion and management options for Cypress Creek National Wildlife Refuge,Ullin Il.. Prepared for U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 3, Minne- apolis, MN and Cypress Creek National Wildlife Refuge,Ullin,Il. Greenbrier Wetland Services Report 12-05, Blue Heron Conservation Design and Printing LLC, Bloomfield, MO. Photo credits: COVER: Limekiln Slough by Michael Jeffords Michael Jeffords, Jan Sundberg, Cary Aloia (Gardners- Gallery.com), Karen Kyle This publication printed on recycled paper by ii
  • Floodplain Geomorphic Processes and Environmental Impacts of Human Alteration Along Coastal Plain Rivers, Usa

    Floodplain Geomorphic Processes and Environmental Impacts of Human Alteration Along Coastal Plain Rivers, Usa

    WETLANDS, Vol. 29, No. 2, June 2009, pp. 413–429 ’ 2009, The Society of Wetland Scientists FLOODPLAIN GEOMORPHIC PROCESSES AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF HUMAN ALTERATION ALONG COASTAL PLAIN RIVERS, USA Cliff R. Hupp1, Aaron R. Pierce2, and Gregory B. Noe1 1U.S. Geological Survey 430 National Center, Reston, Virginia, USA 20192 E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Biological Sciences, Nicholls State University Thibodaux, Louisiana, USA 70310 Abstract: Human alterations along stream channels and within catchments have affected fluvial geomorphic processes worldwide. Typically these alterations reduce the ecosystem services that functioning floodplains provide; in this paper we are concerned with the sediment and associated material trapping service. Similarly, these alterations may negatively impact the natural ecology of floodplains through reductions in suitable habitats, biodiversity, and nutrient cycling. Dams, stream channelization, and levee/canal construction are common human alterations along Coastal Plain fluvial systems. We use three case studies to illustrate these alterations and their impacts on floodplain geomorphic and ecological processes. They include: 1) dams along the lower Roanoke River, North Carolina, 2) stream channelization in west Tennessee, and 3) multiple impacts including canal and artificial levee construction in the central Atchafalaya Basin, Louisiana. Human alterations typically shift affected streams away from natural dynamic equilibrium where net sediment deposition is, approximately, in balance with net
  • EARTH SCIENCES RESEARCH JOURNAL Development of Tropical

    EARTH SCIENCES RESEARCH JOURNAL Development of Tropical

    EARTH SCIENCES RESEARCH JOURNAL Earth Sci. Res. J. Vol. 20, No. 1 (March, 2016): O1 - O10 GEOLOGY ENGINEERING Development of Tropical Lowland Peat Forest Phasic Community Zonations in the Kota Samarahan-Asajaya area, West Sarawak, Malaysia Mohamad Tarmizi Mohamad Zulkifley1, Ng Tham Fatt1, Zainey Konjing2, Muhammad Aqeel Ashraf3,4* 1. Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 2. Biostratex Sendirian Berhad, Batu Caves, Gombak, Malaysia. 3. Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, 430074 Wuhan, P. R. China 4. Faculty of Science & Natural Resources, University Malaysia Sabah88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia. Corresponding authors: Muhammad Aqeel Ashraf- Faculty of Science & Natural Resources University Malaysia Sabah, 88400, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah. ([email protected]) ABSTRACT Keywords: Lowland peat swamp, Phasic community, Logging observations of auger profiles (Tarmizi, 2014) indicate a vertical, downwards, general decrease of Mangrove swamp, Riparian environment, Pollen peat humification levels with depth in a tropical lowland peat forest in the Kota Samarahan-Asajaya área in the diagram, Vegetation Succession. región of West Sarawak (Malaysia). Based on pollen analyses and field observations, the studied peat profiles can be interpreted as part of a progradation deltaic succession. Continued regression of sea levels, gave rise Record to the development of peat in a transitional mangrove to floodplain/floodbasin environment, followed by a shallow, topogenic peat depositional environment with riparian influence at approximately 2420 ± 30 years B.P. Manuscript received: 20/10/2015 (until present time). The inferred peat vegetational succession reached Phasic Community I at approximately Accepted for publication: 12/02/2016 2380 ± 30 years B.P.
  • Glossary Ablation Till: Till Carried on Or Near the Surface of a Glacial Ice Column and Let Down As the Glacier Melted and Retreated

    Glossary Ablation Till: Till Carried on Or Near the Surface of a Glacial Ice Column and Let Down As the Glacier Melted and Retreated

    Glossary ablation till: till carried on or near the surface of a glacial ice column and let down as the glacier melted and retreated. alluvium: any mineral or detrital sediment that is transported and deposited by the flowing water of a river or stream. Riverbeds, floodplains, and deltas are all made up of alluvium. backswamp: low-lying wet areas on river floodplains, located away from the active river channel. basal till: till carried in the base of a glacial ice column and deposited under the glacier. Basal till is therefore very dense and typically forms a layer that impedes drainage. biological diversity (biodiversity): the complexity of all life at all its levels of organization, including genetic variability within species, species and species interac- tions, ecological processes, and the distribution of species and natural communities across the landscape. bog: an acidic, peat-accumulating wetland that is isolated from mineral-rich water sources by deep peat accumulation and therefore receives most of its water and nutri- ents from precipitation. Bogs are dominated by sphagnum moss and heath family shrubs. boreal forest: a circumpolar band of northern forests bordered to the north by open tundra and to the south by more transitional forests. Boreal forests are characterized by species of pine, spruce, fir, tamarack, birch, and poplar that are adapted to the extreme cold of this region. bryophyte: a division of plants including the mosses, liverworts, and hornworts. calciphile: a plant that thrives in calcium-rich soils. circumneutral: having a pH near 7.0 and therefore neither strongly acidic nor basic. cliff: an exposed, steep face of rock.
  • The Thick-Splay Depositional Style of the Crevasse Canyon Formation, Cretaceous of West-Central New Mexico Steven J

    The Thick-Splay Depositional Style of the Crevasse Canyon Formation, Cretaceous of West-Central New Mexico Steven J

    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/34 The thick-splay depositional style of the Crevasse Canyon Formation, Cretaceous of west-central New Mexico Steven J. Johansen, 1983, pp. 173-178 in: Socorro Region II, Chapin, C. E.; Callender, J. F.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 34th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 344 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1983 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
  • La Mare a Bore at Center Left

    La Mare a Bore at Center Left

    Geographies of New Orleans A 'Lake' in Broadmoor? Natural Paradise Once Graced Uptown's Last Open Tract Richard Campanella Contributing writer, GEOGRAPHIES OF NEW ORLEANS Published in the Times-Picayune/New Orleans Advocate, November 1, 2020, page A1 Conversations with older residents of the Broadmoor and Fontainebleau neighborhoods often prompt recollections of a “lake” in that vicinity prior to its urbanization. Indeed, a 1922 aerial photograph shows a large undeveloped tract—the last in the area—between Jefferson and Nashville avenues, going back from South Claiborne Avenue to Gert Town. Having subsided to a few feet below sea level, those open fields probably accumulated runoff after heavy rains, creating what looked like what many secondary sources describe as a “twelve-acre lake” in Broadmoor. But if we go back a century earlier, there turns out to be more to the story than a muddy field. Descriptive evidence comes from the pen of famed lawyer and narrative historian Charles Gayarré, who grew up on the plantation encompassing that low spot, and wrote of his memories in an 1886 Harper’s New Monthly Magazine article titled “A Louisiana Sugar Plantation of the Old Regime.” Gayarré was the grandson of Etienne de Boré, the man widely credited—thanks in part to Gayarré’s own dramatized recounting—with figuring out how to granulate locally grown sugarcane juice. That 1795 breakthrough led to a massive expansion of sugar cultivation in lower Louisiana, and of the institution of slavery on which it depended. De Bore’s plantation extended from the present-day 6000 to 6300 blocks of Tchoupitoulas Street straight back to what is now the intersection of Nashville Avenue and Earhart Expressway, an area that includes the aforementioned tract that was still undeveloped as of 1922.
  • Coastal Backswamps: Restoring Their Values…

    Coastal Backswamps: Restoring Their Values…

    Note This document contains information from sources other than NSW Agriculture. To preserve the original text no editing has been performed and no alterations to the original format have been made. Recognising that the information is provided by third parties, the State of New South Wales and the publisher take no responsibility for the accuracy, currency, reliability and correctness of any information included in the document. Coastal Backswamps: Restoring their values… Backswamps - before drainage Fauna and flora When the Europeans first settled the east coast of Backswamps were important habitat and nutrient Australia, they found many backswamps along the sources for aquatic life, both within the swamp and in floodplains. Coastal backswamps are the lowest the channels that linked them to the estuary at higher lying areas of a coastal floodplain, generally below flows. Backswamps were major habitat and nursery mean high tide. areas for many fish species. Water cycle Backswamps were also prolific areas for duck and other water birds. Landholders enjoyed the abundant Wet/dry cycle waterfowl and fish that provided food for the table as well as employment for professional duck hunters In most years, backswamps experienced a natural and fishermen. wet/dry cycle according to seasonal rainfall and evaporation. The ecology of backswamps has evolved to cope with these conditions, with wetland Management then or dryland plant species colonising the backswamp margins according to longer-term seasonal Burning conditions. Backswamps did burn pre European occupation, but at frequencies which left them with their natural Natural Drainage vegetation cover of reed and rush largely intact. Backswamps generally held waters for 3-6 months Because back-swamps were wet beneath the surface during and following the wet season.
  • Thinking Like a Floodplain: Water, Work, and Time in the Connecticut River Valley, 1790-1870 by (C) 2016 Jared S

    Thinking Like a Floodplain: Water, Work, and Time in the Connecticut River Valley, 1790-1870 by (C) 2016 Jared S

    Thinking Like a Floodplain: Water, Work, and Time in the Connecticut River Valley, 1790-1870 By (c) 2016 Jared S. Taber Submitted to the graduate degree program in History and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________ Chairperson Sara M. Gregg ________________________________ Gregory T. Cushman ________________________________ Edmund P. Russell ________________________________ Robert J. Gamble ________________________________ Peggy A. Schultz ________________________________ Dorothy M. Daley Date Defended: 28 April 2016 The Dissertation Committee for Jared S. Taber certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Thinking Like a Floodplain: Water, Work, and Time in the Nineteenth Century Connecticut River Valley ________________________________ Chairperson Sara M. Gregg Date approved: 28 April 2016 ii Abstract Residents of the nineteenth-century Connecticut River Valley learned the character of the river, and water more broadly, through their labor. Whether they encountered water in the process of farming, shipping, industrial production, or land reclamation, it challenged them to understand its power as both an object outside their control and a tool that facilitated their work. This awareness of water's autonomy and agency necessitated attention to how water's flow varied across timescales ranging from seasons, through historical precedents in working with water, and into the geological processes whereby the river shaped the contours of the Connecticut River floodplain and the valley as a whole. Communities mobilized this knowledge when explaining the limitations that ought to circumscribe novel water uses and trying to maintain the river's status as a common tool shared among diverse bodies of users.