DOCSLIB.ORG

Little Corella Project Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Little Corella Project Report Scanlon, A., Roetman, P., Stead, M., Gray, S., Lethbridge, M. (2017) Little Corellas: social and ecological research for management in South Australia. Discovery Circle Initiative, University of South Australia, Adelaide. Acknowledgements The Little Corellas project has been run in South Australia by the Discovery Circle (www.discoverycircle.org.au), a citizen science initiative at the University of South Australia. We thank all the contributors to this project, in particular the members of the South Australian community who contributed time completing surveys, participating in workshops, and showing us around their towns during 2015 and 2016. The Little Corellas project was approved by the University of South Australia’s Human Research Ethics Committee (34915) and Animal Ethics Committee (U22-15). The project was conducted with the support of: University of South Australia Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources Local Government Association of South Australia As well as six local government areas: Alexandrina Council City of Marion City of Salisbury District Council of Mount Barker The Flinders Ranges Council Town of Gawler Project team Discovery Circle, University of South Australia: Dr Annette Scanlon is an environmental scientist and works as a research assistant at the Discovery Circle at the University of South Australia. For this project, she was particularly involved in developing and conducting the social survey, Mental-Modeler workshops, field data collection, data analysis and contributed to project design. Annette also led the writing of this report. Dr Philip Roetman is the research leader of the Discovery Circle initiative; he is particularly interested in citizen science – actively involving the wider community in research projects. Philip was the overall project leader for the Little Corellas project and was particularly involved in developing the research design of the project as well as developing and conducting the social survey, Mental-Modeler workshops and data analysis, and he also contributed to the writing of this report. Michael Stead is an applied ecologist and professional scientist with experience and expertise relating to: ecological and mathematical modelling; pest and overabundant species management; survey and monitoring design; landscape ecology and restoration; aerial surveys. He was employed at the Discovery Circle to contribute to the Little Corellas project. Michael undertook the habitat modelling and wrote the habitat modelling section of this report. Michigan State University and Mental Modeler: Dr Steven Gray is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Community Sustainability at Michigan State University and lead developer on the Mental Modeler software. Steven provided research planning support for designing the modelling workshops, including analysis of the models and scenario building. Flinders University: Dr Mark Lethbridge has research interests in vegetation condition monitoring using field and remote sensing, optimization algorithms, decision support tools in production and natural resource management and ecological, movement and spatial modelling. Mark oversaw the habitat modelling and contributed to project design. Table of Contents List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................ i List of Figures ....................................................................................................................................... i List of Photos ....................................................................................................................................... ii List of Photo panels ............................................................................................................................. ii Key results and recommendations ................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 1 What’s in this report ........................................................................................................................... 2 Key results ........................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Social factors ......................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Environmental factors ........................................................................................................................... 4 Recommendations .............................................................................................................................. 5 Long-term actions and considerations ........................................................................................................... 5 Medium-term actions and considerations ..................................................................................................... 7 Short-term actions and considerations .......................................................................................................... 8 Responsibility for management actions ......................................................................................................... 8 Glossary of Terms (relative to little corellas) .................................................................................................. 11 Acronyms .......................................................................................................................................... 13 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 14 Scope and purpose of the report ...................................................................................................... 14 Legislation, Permits and codes ......................................................................................................... 15 Background to little corella problem sites in South Australia .......................................................... 16 A mixed-methods approach to investigate a contentious environmental issue .............................. 17 Human-wildlife conflict ..................................................................................................................... 17 Human-bird conflict .......................................................................................................................... 18 Biology and ecology of little corellas ................................................................................................ 20 Description ................................................................................................................................................... 20 Distribution .................................................................................................................................................. 20 Reproduction ................................................................................................................................................ 20 Food, water and roosting resources............................................................................................................. 21 History of little corella problems .................................................................................................................. 21 Our mixed-methods approach ....................................................................................................................... 22 Phase 1: Online survey ................................................................................................................................. 22 Phase 2: Community workshops – creating interactive “Mental Models” ................................................... 22 Phase 3: Field data collection at little corella sites ...................................................................................... 22 Phase 4: Little corella habitat suitability models ......................................................................................... 24 Phase 5: Data synthesis - creating the master model .................................................................................. 24 Phase 6: Sharing results ............................................................................................................................... 25 Results ................................................................................................................................................ 26 The Little Corella Survey ................................................................................................................... 26 Broad community engagement ................................................................................................................... 26 Participant opinions of and experiences with little corellas ......................................................................... 26 What do you LIKE about little corellas? ....................................................................................................... 28 What do you NOT like about little corellas? ...............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In This Issue Birds SA Aims To: • Promote the Conservation of a SPECIAL BUMPER CHRISTMAS Australian Birds and Their Habitats
    Linking people with birds in South Australia The Birder No 240 November 2016 In this Issue Birds SA aims to: • Promote the conservation of A SPECIAL BUMPER CHRISTMAS Australian birds and their habitats. ISSUE — LOTS OF PHOTOS • Encourage interest in, and develop knowledge of, the birds of South Australia. PLEASE VOLUNTEER — THE BIRDS • Record the results of research into NEED YOUR HELP! all aspects of bird life. • Maintain a public fund called the A NATIONAL PARK IN THE “Birds SA Conservation Fund” for INTERNATIONAL BIRD SANCTUARY the specific purpose of supporting the Association’s environmental objectives. CO N T E N T S N.B. ‘THE BIRDER’ will not be President’s Message 3 published in February 2017. The Birds SA Notes & News 4 next issue of this newsletter will be The Laratinga Birdfair 8 distributed at the March General Kangaroos at Sandy Creek CP. 9 Meeting, on 31 March 2017. Return of the Adelaide Rosella 10 Giving them wings 11 Cover photo Past General Meetings 13 Emu, photographed by Barbara Bansemer in Future General Meetings 15 Brachina Gorge, Flinders Ranges, on 26th Past Excursions 16 October 2016. Future Excursions 23 Bird Records 25 New Members From the Library 28 We welcome 25 new members who have About our Association 30 recently joined the Association. Their names are listed on p29. Photos from Members 31 CENTRE INSERT: SAOA HISTORICAL SERIES No: 58, JOHN SUTTON’S OUTER HARBOR NOTES, PART 8 DIARY The following is a list of Birds SA activities for the next few months. Further details of all these activities can be found later in ‘The Birder’.
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCED CORELLA ISSUES PAPER April 2014
    INTRODUCED CORELLA ISSUES PAPER April 2014 City of Bunbury Page 1 of 35 Disclaimer: This document has been published by the City of Bunbury. Any representation, statement, opinion or advice expressed or implied in this document is made in good faith and on the basis that the City of Bunbury, its employees and agents are not liable for any damage or loss whatsoever which may occur as a result of action taken or not taken, as the case may be, in respect of any representation, statement, opinion or advice referred to herein. Information pertaining to this document may be subject to change, and should be checked against any modifications or amendments subsequent to the document’s publication. Acknowledgements: The City of Bunbury thanks the following stakeholders for providing information during the drafting of this paper: Mark Blythman – Department of Parks and Wildlife Clinton Charles – Feral Pest Services Pia Courtis – Department of Parks and Wildlife (WA - Bunbury Branch Office) Carl Grondal – City of Mandurah Grant MacKinnon – City of Swan Peter Mawson – Perth Zoo Samantha Pickering – Shire of Harvey Andrew Reeves – Department of Agriculture and Food (WA) Bill Rutherford – Ornithological Technical Services Publication Details: Published by the City of Bunbury. Copyright © the City of Bunbury 2013. Recommended Citation: Strang, M., Bennett, T., Deeley, B., Barton, J. and Klunzinger, M. (2014). Introduced Corella Issues Paper. City of Bunbury: Bunbury, Western Australia. Edition Details: Title: Introduced Corella Issues Paper Production Date: 15 July 2013 Author: M. Strang, T. Bennett Editor: M. Strang, B. Deeley Modifications List: Version Date Amendments Prepared by Final Draft 15 July 2013 M.
    [Show full text]
  • Visualising Cohousing for Ageing Well
    Cohousing for Ageing Well a collaborative design research project Part 4: Visualising Cohousing for Ageing Well Design Research Report, August 2020 Dr Damian Madigan prepared for Office for Ageing Well, SA Health South Australian State Planning Commission Department of Planning, Transport & Infrastructure City of Unley City of Burnside Town of Walkerville City of Prospect Part 1: A background to ageing well together 5 Contents 8 What is ‘ageing well’? 9 What is ‘cohousing’? 11 The Codesign Workshop 12 What we heard Cohousing for Ageing Well 13 Why one bedroom? 13 So they’re tiny houses? 18 A new housing definition Part 2: Design Tactics 21 22 Adaptability 24 Memories 25 Storage 26 Accessibility 28 Private and Public 29 Finding Space 29 Getting Along 30 Shared Gardens 30 8m Zones 31 Pets Part 3_1: Small - 325m2 33 Part 3_2: Medium - 530m2 45 Part 3_3: Large - 675m2 57 Part 3_4: Extra Large - 920m2 69 Part 4: Visualising Cohousing 83 85 Next steps 88 Visualisations 100 Bibliography and suggested reading 3 Part 4: Visualising Cohousing 83 the garden as a fulcrum around which the housing is sited 84 Although obstacles currently prohibit the housing presented by this research to be realised immediately, none of them are considered Next steps ‘trump cards’ that cannot be overcome. Each has potential answers in existing models that can be tailored to navigate the statutory, financial and operational issues of this small-scale single allotment model. To progress infill housing such as that demonstrated by this Cohousing for Ageing Well project,
    [Show full text]
  • East Waste Chairperson's Report
    East Waste provides helpful customer service to the operational staff at Member Councils, thinks in a future-focused ANNUAL and proactive manner, keeps costs at a minimum REPORT and achieves operational efficiency. 2016-2017 East Waste Corporate Customer Survey Response May 2017 THE EAST WASTE BOARD SAY THANK YOU TO ALL STAFF AND WELL DONE ON PROVIDING OUR MEMBER COUNCILS WITH EXCELLENT SERVICE, IMPROVING OUR EFFICIENCIES AND COMPLEMENTING THE MEMBER COUNCILS’ REPUTATIONS IN EACH OF THEIR COMMUNITIES. % COMPLIANCE100 TEXT WITH THE 2016-2017 WHS AUDIT REQUIREMENTS ANNUAL REPORT 2016-2017 CONTENTS 2 THE YEAR IN REVIEW 4 EAST WASTE SERVICE AREA 5 ABOUT EAST WASTE 7 CHAIRPERSON’S REPORT 11 GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT 17 TONNAGE DATA 18 EAST WASTE GOVERNANCE 21 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS EASTERN WASTE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY ANNUAL REPORT 2016-2017 MORE THAN % THE YEAR IN 97OF BINS WERE RETURNED UPRIGHT TO KERB REVIEW WITH LIDS CLOSED 2016-2017 at a glance... % 55OF WASTE DIVERTED FROM LANDFILL 102,107 TONNES WAS COLLECTED , , 2TONNES513 200BINS000 OF HARD WASTE COLLECTED COLLECTED EACH WEEK EASTERN WASTE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY 2 ANNUAL REPORT 2016-2017 OVER LAUNCH OF Why Waste It? , CAMPAIGN WHICHBIN.COM.AU6000 PAGE VIEWS SINCE WEBSITE LAUNCH IN DECEMBER 2016 % % SATISFACTION95 SATISFACTION95 RATING AMONGST RATING AMONGST THE COMMUNITY WITHIN OUR CORPORATE OUR MEMBER COUNCILS PARTNERS BASED ON FINANCIAL THAT’S A PERFORMANCE THROUGHOUT THE 2016-2017 FINANCIAL YEAR THE EAST WASTE % BOARD RESOLVED NOT TO INCREASE MEMBER COUNCIL FEES FOR THE 2017/18 FINANCIAL
    [Show full text]
  • Rban Aborigines
    RBAN ABORIGINES guFay Gälc assisted by Alison Brookman brt This book concerns the re-entry of Aborigines into Australian life—specifically the life of urban Adelaide—after generations of restriction to isolated rural areas. Aborigines are moving into Australian cities in increasing numbers—in 1957 one in sixteen of South Australia’s Aborigines lived in Adelaide, by 1966 one in four did so. Some adjust easily to city life, others face seemingly insoluble problems of housing and employment, social tensions, health and welfare, education and law. Often their experience on reserves and the fringes of small towns has in no way prepared them for urban life. The physical confrontation involved in this re-entry is already leading to legislative and social changes for Aborigines. It is beginning to arouse public conscience about Aboriginal conditions, and the voice of the Aboriginal is beginning to be heard. This study is a representative picture of Aborigines in Australian cities today, and it speaks for the future of Australia, black and white. This book was published by ANU Press between 1965–1991. This republication is part of the digitisation project being carried out by Scholarly Information Services/Library and ANU Press. This project aims to make past scholarly works published by The Australian National University available to a global audience under its open-access policy. URBAN ABORIGINES I fa ;• "k e t 'tourn > i Eu< I O R IA L DEPARTMENT Immim national un ivebsitt RECOMMENDED RETAIL PRICE ^ f ' S o PUBLiCATiON DATE n Aborigines in Australian Society 8 A series sponsored by The Social Science Research Council of Australia URBAN ABORIGINES Fay Gale Assisted by Alison Brookman AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY PRESS CANBERRA 1 9 7 2 © Social Science Research Council oj Australia 1972 This hook is copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • MINUTES of the MEETING of the BAROSSA COUNCIL Held on Tuesday 15 October 2019 Commencing at 9.00Am in the Council Chambers, 43-51 Tanunda Road, Nuriootpa
    2019/418 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE BAROSSA COUNCIL held on Tuesday 15 October 2019 commencing at 9.00am in the Council Chambers, 43-51 Tanunda Road, Nuriootpa 1.1 WELCOME Mayor Bim Lange declared the meeting open at 9.00am. 1.2 MEMBERS PRESENT Mayor Bim Lange, Deputy Mayor, Cr John Angas, Crs Tony Hurn, David Haebich, Russell Johnstone, Don Barrett, Leonie Boothby, Dave de Vries, Cathy Troup, Kathryn Schilling, Richard Miller and Carla Wiese-Smith 1.3 LEAVE OF ABSENCE Nil 1.4 APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Nil 1.5 MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS – FOR CONFIRMATION MOVED Cr Johnstone that the Minutes of the Council meeting held on Tuesday 17 September 2019 at 9.00am, as circulated, be confirmed as a true and correct record of the proceedings of that meeting. Seconded Cr Hurn CARRIED 2018-22/331 1.6 MATTERS ARISING FROM PREVIOUS MINUTES Nil 1.7 PETITIONS Nil 1.8 DEPUTATIONS Nil 1.9 NOTICE OF MOTION Nil 1.10 QUESTIONS – WITH OR WITHOUT NOTICE Questions on Notice – Cr Don Barrett The Barossa Council 19/60623 Minutes of Council Meeting held on Tuesday 15 October 2019 2019/419 Question 1 The Barossa Council Transport Infrastructure Management Plan and associated 10 year maintenance plan clearly sets out what Council will do in relation to roads and footpaths. The footpath and kerbing in Saleyard Road, Mount Pleasant between Showground Road and Hocknull Place is neither safe or functional, Asset number 27654, the kerbing is 10 years beyond its useful life expectancy. Why hasn’t this asset received attention in the last 10 years in line with policy?, when a road such as Neldner Road, Asset numbers 9193 (surface) and 58207 (Sub-base) is being considered for a major upgrade in the vicinity of $600,000 when the asset is already safe, functional has approximately 23 years of remaining useful life? Response Asset Management Plans are an estimate of future replacement and renewal (not upgrade or new) activity based on three key factors: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Lgfa
    2 013 ANNUAL REPORT LGFA Your Local Government Finance Authority of South Australia Member Councils as at June 30 2013 Adelaide City Council District Council of Karoonda East Murray City of Port Lincoln Adelaide Hills Council District Council of Kimba Port Pirie Regional Council Alexandrina Council Kingston District Council City of Prospect The Barossa Council Light Regional Council Renmark Paringa Council District Council of Barunga West District Council of Lower Eyre Peninsula District Council of Robe Berri Barmera Council District Council of Loxton Waikerie Municipal Council of Roxby Downs City of Burnside District Council of Mallala City of Salisbury Campbelltown City Council Corporation of the City of Marion Southern Mallee District Council District Council of Ceduna Mid Murray Council District Council of Streaky Bay City of Charles Sturt City of Mitcham Tatiara District Council Clare and Gilbert Valleys Council District Council of Mount Barker City of Tea Tree Gully District Council of Cleve City of Mount Gambier District Council of Tumby Bay District Council of Coober Pedy District Council of Mount Remarkable Corporation of the City of Unley Coorong District Council Rural City of Murray Bridge City of Victor Harbor District Council of Copper Coast Naracoorte Lucindale Council Wakefield Regional Council District Council of Elliston Northern Areas Council Corporation of the Town of Walkerville The Flinders Ranges Council City of Norwood, Payneham and St. Peters Wattle Range Council District Council of Franklin Harbour City of Onkaparinga
    [Show full text]
  • Cockatiels Free
    FREE COCKATIELS PDF Thomas Haupt,Julie Rach Mancini | 96 pages | 05 Aug 2008 | Barron's Educational Series Inc.,U.S. | 9780764138966 | English | Hauppauge, United States How to Take Care of a Cockatiel (with Pictures) - wikiHow A cockatiel is a popular choice for a pet bird. It is a small parrot with a variety of color patterns and a head crest. They are attractive as well as friendly. They are capable of mimicking speech, although they can be difficult to understand. These birds are good at whistling and you can teach them to sing along to tunes. Life Expectancy: 15 to 20 years with proper care, and sometimes as Cockatiels as 30 years though this is rare. In their native Australia, cockatiels are Cockatiels quarrions or weiros. They primarily live in the Cockatiels, a region of the northern part of the Cockatiels. Discovered inthey are the smallest members of the cockatoo family. They exhibit many of the Cockatiels features and habits as the larger Cockatiels. In the wild, they live in large flocks. Cockatiels became Cockatiels as pets during the s. They are easy to breed in captivity and their docile, friendly personalities make them a natural fit for Cockatiels life. These birds can Cockatiels longer be trapped and exported from Australia. These little birds are gentle, affectionate, and often like to be petted and held. Cockatiels are not necessarily fond of cuddling. They simply want to be near you and will be very happy to see you. Cockatiels are generally friendly; however, an untamed bird might nip. You can prevent bad Cockatiels at an early age Cockatiels ignoring bad behavior as these birds aim to please.
    [Show full text]
  • Whyalla and Eyre Peninsula
    SOUTH AUSTRALIAN CENTRE FOR ECONOMIC STUDIES ADELAIDE & FLINDERS UNIVERSITIES Regional Development Australia Whyalla and Eyre Peninsula Overview Geography RDA Whyalla and Eyre Peninsula covers an area of 170,500 square kilometres or 17.3 per cent of the State’s land mass. Population As at 30th June 2010 the region’s population was 58,700 persons or 3.6 per cent of the State’s population. The Indigenous population was estimated at 2,500 persons or 4.4 per cent of the region’s population. Economy and Labour force The region contributed $2,297 million to the State economy in 2006/07 or 3.4 per cent of gross state product. The four largest employing industries in the Whyalla Eyre Peninsula region were agriculture and fisheries (18.2 per cent), retail trade (14.3 per cent), manufacturing (11.9 per cent) and health and community services (10.9 per cent). Mining was relatively small at 1.4 per cent but is likely to show strong growth in the median term. The labour market is relatively strong with a participation rate above the State average and lower unemployment than the State average. Participation in VET courses is well above that for the State as a whole, while full-time participation in secondary school at age 16 is 71.4 per cent compared to South Australia at 78.4 per cent. NAPLAN reading results at year 3 are 15 percentage points lower than the State average but by year 7 they are 4.5 percentage points below the State average which indicates stronger school attendance over primary years of schooling.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORIC AREA STATEMENTS and CHARACTER AREA STATEMENTS PROPOSAL to AMEND PHASE 3 (URBAN AREAS) PLANNING and DESIGN CODE AMENDMENT City of Whyalla
    HISTORIC AREA STATEMENTS AND CHARACTER AREA STATEMENTS PROPOSAL TO AMEND PHASE 3 (URBAN AREAS) PLANNING AND DESIGN CODE AMENDMENT City of Whyalla Purpose The State Planning Commission has released for public consultation the Urban Areas Planning and Design Code Amendment that applies to metropolitan Adelaide, regional cities and larger towns. This new Code is the cornerstone of South Australia’s new planning system and will become the state’s single source of all planning zones and rules for assessing development applications. It will replace all 72 Development Plans by 1 July 2020. The Code aims to make the development application process quicker, simpler and more equitable, giving people greater access to planning information that is consistent and clear, and available online. With the introduction of the Code, some changes are proposed to the way we manage heritage in this State. This documents sets out what’s new, and seeks your feedback on new historic area and character statements that will help guide development in areas of historic or character importance in South Australia. What is proposed? The State Planning Commission is required by legislation to set up a new planning system that makes heritage policy and rules clearer, fairer and easier for all. Heritage in South Australia is protected by heritage specific legislation (the Heritage Places Act 1993) and through the planning legislation (the Development Act 1993 and its successor, the Planning, Development and Infrastructure Act 2016). The Heritage Places Act 1993 provides for a listing process for heritage that is judged to be of state significance. The planning legislation provides for a parallel system to list heritage that is deemed to be of local significance.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Impacts of Corellas Ian Temby Report
    Managing Impacts of the Little Corella on the Fleurieu Peninsula Ian Temby, M App Sc, Churchill Fellow 1999. Little Corella Management – Fleurieu Peninsula Autumn 2010 Contents Page 1. Summary 3 2. Background 3 2.1 Legal status of the Little Corella 5 3. Little Corella ecology and behaviour 5 3.1 Description 5 3.2 Range and habitats of sub-species gymnopis 5 3.3 Diet of the Little Corella 6 3.4 Breeding 7 3.5 Activity patterns 8 4. Aspects of Little Corella behaviour that contribute to nuisance problems in Old Noarlunga and Strathalbyn 9 5. Options for managing Little Corellas and their applicability on the Fleurieu Peninsula 12 5.1 Bird damage control principles 12 5.2 A strategic approach 13 5.3 Environmental management 14 5.4 Scaring methods 14 5.4.1 Noise makers and scaring sounds 15 5.4.1.1 Bioacoustic sounds 16 5.4.1.2 Gas guns 17 5.4.1.3 Bird Frite® cartridges 17 5.4.2 Visual deterrents 18 5.4.2.1 Objects 18 5.4.2.2 Movement 19 5.4.2.3 Birds of Prey 19 5.5 Chemical controls 20 5.5.1 Bird deterrent chemicals 20 5.5.2 Ingested poisons 21 5.5.3 Toxic perches 22 5.5.4 Surfactants 22 5.5.5 Alpha chloralose 22 5.6 Tactile deterrents 23 5.7 Decoy models 23 5.8 Lethal control to reduce populations 24 5.8.1 Shooting 24 5.8.2 Trapping and gassing 25 5.8.2.1 Trapping and human health 25 5.9 Fertility control 26 5.10 Destruction of eggs 26 5.11 Decoy food sources 26 5.12 Visual screens 26 5.13 Exclusion 27 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Reducing Cockatoo Damage(PDF, 973.6
    Guidelines for Reducing Cockatoo Damage Wildlife Management Methods Photo and Figure credits Cover photograph: Sulphur Crested Cockatoo – Nick Talbot Figure 1: Long-billed Corella – Drawing courtesy of Jess Davies Sulphur-crested Cockatoo and Galah – Drawings courtesy of Nic Day Figure 2: Kite to simulate bird of prey – Zoe Elliott Figure 3: Galah – Nick Talbot Figure 4: Long-billed Corella – Ian Temby Figure 5: Cockatoo damage to timber frames – Jim O’Brien Figure 6: Cockatoo damage to outdoor furniture – Ian Temby Figure 7: Cockatoo damage to sporting ground – Mark Breguet Figure 8: Corellas feeding on grain – Mark Breguet Figure 9: Cockatoo damage to crops – Ian Temby © The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2018 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. You are free to re-use the work under that licence, on the condition that you credit the State of Victoria as author. The licence does not apply to any images, photographs or branding, including the Victorian Coat of Arms, the Victorian Government logo and the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) logo. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ISBN 978-1-76047-876-6 pdf/online Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication.
    [Show full text]