Moffat Collection System Project Final Environmental Impact Statement

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Moffat Collection System Project Final Environmental Impact Statement MOFFAT COLLECTION SYSTEM PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Appendix N: Comments Received on the Draft EIS and Responses Photo provided courtesy of Denver Water. MOFFAT COLLECTION SYSTEM PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Appendix N: Comments Received on the Draft EIS and Responses Photo provided courtesy of Denver Water. Appendix N Comments Received on the Draft EIS and Responses Table of Contents Introduction Comment-Response Reports Angling Community Form Letters Boating Petition Form Letters Boulder County Form Letters Coal Creek Canyon Form Letters Colorado Resident Form Letters Crown Jewel Form Letters Federal Grand County Board of Realtors #1 Form Letters Grand County Board of Realtors #2 Form Letters Gross Reservoir Expansion Form Letters Gross Reservoir Form Letters Jurisdictions/Municipalities Part A Jurisdictions/Municipalities Part B Jurisdictions/Municipalities Part C Jurisdictions/Municipalities Part D Jurisdictions/Municipalities Part E Not Adequately Form Letters Not Adequately Modified Form Letters Online Petition Form Letters Organizations/Stakeholders Part A Organizations/Stakeholders Part B Protest Family Form Letters Public Part A Public Part B Public Part C Public Part D Public Part E N-i Appendix N Comments Received on the Draft EIS and Responses Table of Contents (Continued) Save the Fraser River Form Letters State Strong Support Form Letters Urge You Form Letters Urge You Modified Form Letters List of Tables Table N-1 Index of Moffat Project Commenters on the Draft EIS N-ii Appendix N Comments Received on the Draft EIS and Responses List of Acronyms % percent AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials ACI air curtain incinerator AF acre-feet AF/yr acre-feet per year ANFO Ammonium Nitrate Fuel Oil APCD Air Pollution Control Division APEN Air Pollutant Emission Notice ARNF Arapaho & Roosevelt National Forests ARNI aquatic resource of national importance ASR aquifer storage and recovery AWTP Advanced Water Treatment Plant BA Biological Assessment BBA Bishop-Brogden Associates, Inc. Bi-City Littleton-Englewood BLM Bureau of Land Management BO Biological Opinion C-BT Colorado-Big Thompson CAA Clean Air Act CDNR Colorado Department of Natural Resources CDOT Colorado Department of Transportation CDOW Colorado Division of Wildlife CDPHE Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment CDWR Colorado Division of Water Resources CEQ Council on Environmental Quality CFR Code of Federal Regulations cfs cubic feet per second CNHP Colorado Natural Heritage Program N-iii Appendix N Comments Received on the Draft EIS and Responses List of Acronyms (continued) CO carbon monoxide Corps U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CPW Colorado Parks and Wildlife CR County Road CRCA Colorado River Cooperative Agreement C.R.S. Colorado Revised Statute CSA Combined Service Area CWA Clean Water Act CWCB Colorado Water Conservation Board cy cubic yard dB decibel dBA A-weighted decibel scale DEIS Draft Environmental Impact Statement Denver Water Board of Water Commissioners DOLA Colorado Department of Local Affairs DRCOG Denver Regional Council of Governments DWR Division of Water Resources EAP Emergency Action Plan EIS Environmental Impact Statement EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPT Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera ESA Endangered Species Act FEIS Final Environmental Impact Statement FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission FR Forest Road FWCA Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act GB greenback GCSMP Grand County Stream Management Plan N-iv Appendix N Comments Received on the Draft EIS and Responses List of Acronyms (continued) GCWIN Grand County Water Information Network GCWSD Grand County Water and Sanitation District GHG greenhouse gas GWdb groundwater discharge GWua groundwater underflow HDR HDR Engineering, Inc. ID Identification IFIM Instream Flow Incremental Methodology IGA Intergovernmental Agreement IHA Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration IRP Integrated Resources Plan JSA Joint Sewer Authority LBD Learning by Doing LEDPA least environmentally damaging practicable alternative LG logistics LIRF lawn irrigation return flows M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MEPP Magnolia Environmental Preservation Plan Metro WWTP Metro Reclamation District Wastewater Treatment Plant mgd million gallons per day mg/L milligrams per liter MIS Management Indicator Species Moffat Project Moffat Collection System Project or Project MW megawatt MWAT maximum weekly average temperature NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NCWCD Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District NDIS Natural Diversity Information System NEPA National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended N-v Appendix N Comments Received on the Draft EIS and Responses List of Acronyms (continued) NGO non-governmental organization NISP Northern Integrated Supply Project NOA Notice of Availability NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NPS National Park Service NWCD Northern Water Conservancy District NWSRS National Wild and Scenic Rivers System O&M operations and maintenance ORV Outstandingly Remarkable Value PACSM Platte and Colorado Simulation Model PAOT persons at one time PBO Programmatic Biological Opinion PCA Potential Conservation Area PHABSIM Physical Habitat Simulation PM2.5 particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter PM10 particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter PMSA Primary Metropolitan Statistical Area PRRIP Platte River Recovery Implementation Program RDC relative development cost Reclamation U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation RFFA reasonably foreseeable future action RMP Resource Management Plan ROD Record of Decision ROM rough order-of-magnitude ROW right-of-way SDS Southern Delivery System SEO State Engineer’s Office SH State Highway SHPO State Historic Preservation Officer SMWSA South Metro Water Supply Authority N-vi Appendix N Comments Received on the Draft EIS and Responses List of Acronyms (continued) SPPP South Platte Protection Plan SRI/CSE Stream Reach Inventory and Channel Stability Evaluation SWA State Wildlife Area SWR Strategic Water Reserve TDS total dissolved solids TMDL total maximum daily load UPCO Upper Colorado River Basin Study UPRR Union Pacific Railroad URS URS Corporation US # U.S. Highway # U.S. United States USFS U.S. Forest Service USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service USGS U.S. Geological Survey WFET Watershed Flow Evaluation Tool WGFP Windy Gap Firming Project WISE Water Infrastructure and Supply Efficiency WPW&SD Winter Park Water and Sanitation District WQCD Water Quality Control Division WTP Water Treatment Plant WUA weighted usable area WWTP Wastewater Treatment Plant N-vii Appendix N Comments Received on the Draft EIS and Responses This page intentionally left blank N-viii Appendix N Comments Received on the Draft EIS and Responses Appendix N presents the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ (Corps’) responses to the comments received on the Moffat Collection System Project (Moffat Project or Project) Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS). Comments received on the DEIS during the public comment period were reviewed and considered in preparation of the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS). The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), in its role as a Cooperating Agency in the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA) process, reviewed the comments received on the DEIS related to Gross Reservoir, which is part of the Gross Reservoir Project, a hydroelectric project (P-2035) licensed by FERC. FERC then provided input to the Corps on comments that involved Gross Reservoir. The majority of FERC’s input was provided to keep clear FERC’s jurisdiction and its role in the review of the proposed Moffat Project. Prior to beginning any construction activities at Gross Reservoir associated with the Moffat Project, the Board of Water Commissioners (Denver Water) would need to receive construction authorization from FERC. Denver Water would also need to receive prior FERC approval of certain construction plans, and plans for protection and mitigation of values such as recreation and cultural resources at Gross Reservoir. Additionally, Denver Water would need to receive FERC approval to temporarily or permanently amend any plans that have already received approval or would need to be developed under the FERC license, such as plans involving recreation and cultural resources protection. As part of the overall license amendment process, Denver Water will be responding to comments received on the Draft License Amendment Application for the Gross Reservoir Hydroelectric Project. Denver Water will submit a Final License Amendment Application to FERC sometime after the release of the Moffat Project FEIS. For responses that reference the proposed dam elevation, maximum reservoir water level, volume, surface area, and shoreline length at Gross Reservoir, readers are reminded that Table 2-11 in Chapter 2 of the Moffat Project FEIS contains a comparison of Gross Dam and Reservoir features by alternative. Chapter 2 and Appendices H-22 and M-2 of the Moffat Project FEIS contain information about the Environmental Pool. The environmental effects discussed in Chapter 5 of the Moffat Project FEIS for surface water correspond with the 72,000-acre-foot (AF) enlargement, whereas the operations and effects associated with the 5,000-AF Environmental Pool, as independently evaluated by the Corps, are discussed in Appendices H-22 and M-2, as are additional analyses conducted by the Corps
Recommended publications
  • Final Biological Opinion Concerning the Operation of the Missouri River
    United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Mountain-Prairie Region IN REPLY REFER TO: rWS/R6/ MAILING ADDRESS: STREET LOCATION: Post Office Box 25486 134 Union Boulevard TAILS Ref: Denver Federal Center Lakewood, Colorado 80228-1807 06E00000-2018-F-O Denver, Colorado 80225-0486 APR 1 3 2018 Mr. David J. Ponganis Director of Programs Directorate U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Northwest Division P.O. Box 2870 Portland, Oregon 97208~2870 Oc~ve,.- Dear.... Mr . ..Ponga ms: Please find enclosed the Final Biological Opinion concerning the Operation of the Missouri River Mainstem Reservoir System, the Operation and Maintenance of the Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project, the Operation of Kansas River Reservoir System, and the Implementation of the Missouri River Recovery Management Plan. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) transmitted the draft to the USACE on February 8, 2018 and the USACE subsequently transmitted the draft BiOp to the Independent Science Advisory Panel (ISAP) of the Missouri River Recovery Implementation Committee (MRRIC). The ISAP presented the results of their review to the MRRIC plenary session March 27, 2018 and the USACE formally transmitted the ISAP response along with USACE supporting information to the Service on April 3, 2018. The Service wants to thank the lJSACE for their continued collaborative approach to what is a ground breaking process of evaluating a highly complex adaptive management process through section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. The Service has taken the ISAP and USACE comments under advisement and have made numerous improvements to the document as a result.
    [Show full text]
  • Denver Area Post-World War Ii Suburbs
    Report No. CDOT-2011- 6 Final Report DENVER AREA POST-WORLD WAR II SUBURBS Bunyak Research Associates Front Range Research Associates, Inc. April 2011 COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION APPLIED RESEARCH AND INNOVATION BRANCH The contents of this report reflect the views of the author(s), who is(are) responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Colorado Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. CDOT-2011-6 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date DENVER AREA POST-WORLD WAR II SUBURBS February 2011 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Dawn Bunyak, Thomas H. and R. Laurie Simmons CDOT-2011-6 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Bunyak Research Associates 10628 W. Roxbury Ave. 11. Contract or Grant No. 34.72 Littleton, CO 80127 Front Range Research Associates, Inc. 3635 W. 46th Ave. Denver, CO 80211 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Colorado Department of Transportation - Research Final 4201 E. Arkansas Ave. Denver, CO 80222 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Also funded in part by a grant from the Colorado Historical Society 15. Supplementary Notes Prepared in cooperation with the US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration 16. Abstract Historic Residential Subdivisions of Metropolitan Denver, 1940-1965, documents the development of mid-century suburbs in CDOT Region 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Resources Survey US 6 and Wadsworth Boulevard, Lakewood, Colorado
    Historic Resources Survey US 6 and Wadsworth Boulevard, Lakewood, Colorado FINAL Prepared for: CH2M Hill 9193 S. Jamaica Street Englewood, CO 80112 In Association With: Colorado Department of Transportation, Region 6 2000 S. Holly Denver, CO 80222 October 2008 Historic Resources Survey, US 6 and Wadsworth Boulevard, Lakewood, CO ABSTRACT In November 2007, and February and March 2008, personnel from TEC Inc. (TEC) conducted a Class III cultural resources inventory of approximately 238 acres in Sections 2, 3, 10, and 11 of Township 4 South, Range 69 West for Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Region 6, in connection with proposed road improvements at US 6 and Wadsworth Boulevard in Lakewood, Jefferson County, Colorado. The inventory was conducted to identify, document, and evaluate cultural resources within the project area with regard to their potential eligibility for nomination to the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) as outlined by the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). A total of 275 cultural resources are located within the boundaries of the project area. Of these, 156 resources were constructed in or before 1965. The date 1965 was chosen because it is CDOT’s standard practice to evaluate historic resources that are 45 years or older in order to allow for a period for completion of final design and construction for the proposed project. Eighteen of the 156 pre-1966 historic resources have been previously surveyed and evaluated. Due to changes to the resources, or to augment or correct existing inventory forms, 13 of these 18 historic resources were resurveyed in this inventory. The remaining 5 resources not resurveyed have previously received official determinations of eligibility and did not warrant additional survey.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx
    United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Mountain-Prairie Region IN REPLY R EFER TO: FWS/R6/Cuitural Resources MAILING ADDRESS: STREET LOCATION: Mail Stop 60130 Post Office Box 25486 134 Union Boulevard Denver Federal Center Lakewood, Colorado 80228-1807 Denver, Colorado 80225-0486 xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx Dear XXXXXXXX: Dakota Access, LEG., (Applicant) proposes to construct the Dakota Access Pipeline (Project), an approximate 1,168-mile crude oil pipeline extending from the Bakken and Three Forks production areas of North Dakota through South Dakota, Iowa,terminating and near Patoka, Illinois. The Applicant is seeking a Special Use Permit (SUP) to cross five U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) wetland easements and one grassland easement in North Dakota and 109 wetland and three grassland easements in South Dakota. The easements are on private lands and afford the Service jurisdiction limited to wildlife habitat protection. No Service easements will be crossed in the Iowa or Illinois portions of the Project. The total length of the proposed route through Service easements is about 4.7 miles, amounting to about 0.4% of the Project’s total length and about 71.7 acres or less than 0.6% of the total Project footprint in North Dakota and South Dakota. The Applicant conducted intensive surveys for cultural resources in 2014 and 2015 along the length o f the Project in North and South Dakota, including all of the Service easements. Each easement was examined for the presence of archaeological and historic sites that may qualify for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP).
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR 1849 C Street NW., Washington, DC 20240 Phone, 202–208–3171
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 1849 C Street NW., Washington, DC 20240 Phone, 202±208±3171 SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT Deputy Secretary (VACANCY) Associate Deputy Secretary (VACANCY) Chief of Staff (VACANCY) Deputy Chief of Staff B.J. THORNBERRY Director of Congressional Affairs MELANIE BELLER Special Assistants and Counselors to the JAMES H. PIPKIN, JOHN J. DUFFY,E Secretary DWARD B. COHEN Special Assistant to the Secretary and White ROBERT K. HATTOY House Liaison Assistant to the Secretary and Director, (VACANCY) Office of Communications Director of External Affairs LUCIA A. WYMAN Special Assistant to the Secretary and NANCY K. HAYES Director, Executive Secretariat Assistant to the Secretary MOLLY POAG Director, Office of Regulatory Affairs JULIE FALKNER Executive Director (President's Commission MOLLY H. OLSON on Sustainable Development) Special Assistant to the Secretary for Alaska DEBORAH L. WILLIAMS Special Assistant to the Secretary FAITH R. ROESSEL Solicitor JOHN D. LESHY Deputy Solicitor ANNE H. SHIELDS Associate Solicitor (General Law) (VACANCY) Associate Solicitor (Conservation and ROBERT L. BAUM Wildlife) Associate Solicitor (Indian Affairs) (VACANCY) Associate Solicitor (Energy and Resources) PATRICIA J. BENEKE Associate Solicitor (Surface Mining) KAY HENRY Inspector General WILMA A. LEWIS Deputy Inspector General JOYCE N. FLEISCHMAN Assistant Inspector General (Administration) SHIRLEY E. LLOYD Assistant Inspector General (Investigations) THOMAS I. SHEEHAN Deputy Assistant Inspector General (Audits) MARVIN E. PIERCE General Counsel THOMAS E. ROBINSON Assistant SecretaryÐWater and Science (VACANCY) Deputy Assistant Secretary (VACANCY) Director, U.S. Bureau of Mines RHEA GRAHAM Director, U.S. Geological Survey GORDON P. EATON Commissioner, Bureau of Reclamation DANIEL P. BEARD Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and GEORGE T.
    [Show full text]
  • Bureau of Reclamation Records Regarding Efficiency And
    Description of document: Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) records regarding efficiency and optimization projects at Reclamation facilities, 2016 Requested date: March 2016 Released date: 22-March-2016 Posted date: 12-December-2016 Source of document: Bureau of Reclamation DFOIA Officer PO Box 25007, 84-21300 Denver CO 80225-0007 Fax: (303) 445-6575 or (888) 808-5104 The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. From: "Bishop, Clark" Date: Mar 22, 2016 3:33:07 PM Subject: Reclamation Optimization Cc: Max Spiker, Michael Pulskamp I received your request through my manager, Max Spiker regarding efficiency and optimization projects at Reclamation facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Permeable Reactive Barrier Performance: Revised Report
    Evaluation of Permeable Reactive Barrier Performance Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable <www.frtr.gov> Prepared by the Member Agencies of the Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable Evaluation of Permeable Reactive Barrier Performance Prepared for the Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable (FRTR) by the Tri-Agency Permeable Reactive Barrier Initiative Members: U.S. Department of Defense U.S. Department of Energy U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council December 9, 2002 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report on the performance of permeable reactive barriers (PRB) for groundwater remediation was prepared under the auspices of the Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable, a collaborative effort among federal agencies involved in hazardous waste site cleanup. Three United States (U.S.) government agencies, the Department of Defense (DoD), Department of Energy (DOE), and United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), as well as the Interstate Technologies and Regulatory Council (ITRC) contributed to the report, which is a concise summary of the conclusions and recommendations of the three agencies’ individual studies at different sites. Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center (NFESC), Port Hueneme, California and Battelle, Columbus, Ohio are the coordinating partners for the DoD study. Battelle coordinated the preparation of this report for the Tri-Agency PRB Initiative, a consortium that was formed to leverage the resources, expertise, and site experience of the three agencies. The Tri-Agency PRB Initiative operates under the umbrella of the Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable. Charles Reeter is the project officer at NFESC for this study. Arun Gavaskar (Project Manager), Bruce Sass, Neeraj Gupta, Eric Drescher, Woong-Sang Yoon, Joel Sminchak, James Hicks, and Wendy Condit from Battelle conducted the investigation of PRB performance at DoD sites.
    [Show full text]
  • LCD-80-33 GSA's Actions to Acquire Leased Space for the Western Area
    * 18 y COMPTROLLER QLNERAL OF THE UNlThD rrAIpI l//4/65 WASNIN5TDN. D.G. tow FEBRUARY 5,1980 B-196966 The Honorable John L. Burton Chairman, Subcommittee on Government -a3 Activities and Transportation a'3 Committee on Government Operations $Y- House of Representatives Subject: GSA's Actions to Acquire Leased Space for the Western Area Power Administration (LCD-80-33) Dear !4r. Chairman: On June 6, 1979, you asked us to review the actions taken by the General Services Administration (GSA) in 17 obtaining office and other space for the \d$stern Area Powerwd3lfi Administration's (WAPA's) headquarters in Denver C&urxdW Thou specifically asked us to determine (1) what Additional' lease and remodeling costs, if any, would be incurred by locating WAPA headquarters downtown rather than near the Denver Federal Center, (2) the impact on training and "research and development missions if WAPA is moved to the downtown area, and (3) whether GSA, followed policy, statutory, and regulatory requirements in handling WAPA's DGo3zr'b request for space. During our review, we looked at GSA region 8 files and discussed the actions and progress on WAPA's request with GSA regional officials and WAPA officials who were directly involved in the space request. In September 1979, GSA's central offic$ initiated a reevaluation of the steps taken to provide space for WAPA. As suggested in your October 29, 1979, letter, we waited for the outcome of this reevaluation so that we could include these new developments in our report. GSA has not yet decided where WAPA will be located.
    [Show full text]