DOCSLIB.ORG

Capital Project Business Case Marks Farm Roundabout

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Capital Project Business Case Marks Farm Roundabout Capital Project Business Case Marks Farm Roundabout The template This document provides the business case template for projects seeking funding which is made available through the South East Local Enterprise Partnership. It is therefore designed to satisfy all SELEP governance processes, approvals by the Strategic Board, the Accountability Board and also the early requirements of the Independent Technical Evaluation process where applied. It is also designed to be applicable across all funding streams made available by Government through SELEP. It should be filled in by the scheme promoter – defined as the final beneficiary of funding. In most cases, this is the local authority; but in some cases the local authority acts as Accountable Body for a private sector final beneficiary. In those circumstances, the private sector beneficiary would complete this application and the SELEP team would be on hand, with local partners in the federated boards, to support the promoter. Please note that this template should be completed in accordance with the guidelines laid down in the HM Treasury’s Green Book. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-green-book- appraisal-and-evaluation-in-central-governent As described below, there are likely to be two phases of completion of this template. The first, an ‘outline business case’ stage, should see the promoter include as much information as would be appropriate for submission though SELEP to Government calls for projects where the amount awarded to the project is not yet known. If successful, the second stage of filling this template in would be informed by clarity around funding and would therefore require a fully completed business case, inclusive of the economic appraisal which is sought below. At this juncture, the business case would therefore dovetail with SELEP’s Independent Technical Evaluation process and be taken forward to funding and delivery. Marks Farm Roundabout Business Case Page 1 of 31 The process This document forms the initial SELEP part of a normal project development process. The four steps in the process are defined below in simplified terms as they relate specifically to the LGF process. Note – this does not illustrate background work undertaken locally, such as evidence base development, baselining and local management of the project pool and reflects the working reality of submitting funding bids to Government. In the form that follows: •Consideration of long list of projects, submitted with a short strategic level business case •Sifting/shortlisting process using a common assessment framework agreed by SELEP Strategic Board, with projects either discounted, sent back for further development, directed Local Board to other funding routes or agreed for submission to SELEP Decision •Pipeline of locally assessed projects submitted to SELEP, with projects supported by strategic outline business cases - i.e., partial completion of this template •Prioritisation of projects across SELEP, following a common assessment framework agreed by Strategic Board. SELEP •Single priorisited list of projects is submitted by SELEP to Government once agreed with SELEP Strategic Board. •Following the allocation of LGF to a project, scheme promoters are required to prepare an outline business case, using this template together with appropriate annexes. •Outline Business Case assessed through ITE gate process. •Recommendations are made by SELEP ITE to SELEP Accountability Board for the SELEP ITE award of funding. •Lead delivery partner to commence internal project management, governance and reporting, ensuring exception reporting mechanism back to SELEP Accountability Board and working arrangements with SELEP Capital Programme Manager. Funding & •Full Business Case is required following the procurement stage for projects with an LGF Delivery allocation over £8m. Version control Document ID Marks Farm Roundabout Business Case Version Gate 1 Version 1 – 190705 Author Dave Joy Document status Final Authorised by Date authorised Marks Farm Roundabout Business Case Page 2 of 31 1. PROJECT OVERVIEW 1.1. Project name: Marks Farm Roundabout Business Case 1.2. Project type: Improvements to a key network junction where the A131 meets the A120 to the east of Braintree. 1.3. Federated Board Area: Essex 1.4. Lead County Council / Unitary Authority: Essex County Council 1.5. Development location: The junction where the A131 meets the A120 to the east of Braintree as shown in Figure 1 below. Figure 1: Marks Farm Roundabout 1.6. Project Summary: The purpose of this bid is to deliver major improvements to the roundabout where the A131 meets the A120 and to significantly reduce delays at this location. The A131 is the primary route from Braintree to Sudbury and the A120 is the primary east / west route from Puckeridge, Hertfordshire to Harwich, Essex. The A120 circumvents the south and east of Braintree, running from the direction of Stansted along the south of Braintree to Galleys Corner, Marks Farm Roundabout Business Case Page 3 of 31 from where it turns north for 0.9 miles to Marks Farm Roundabout, before heading east again towards Colchester and the port of Harwich. Braintree is undergoing significant growth and there is the potential for exponential growth in the area with the adoption of a new garden community to the west of Braintree. Marks Farm roundabout is an important four-arm junction which provides a key link on the eastern side of Braintree, to the A131 northwards to Halstead and Sudbury, to the A120 southwards to Chelmsford, westwards to Bishops Stortford and Stansted, the A120 eastwards towards Coggeshall, Marks Tey and the A12, and the B1256 into Braintree. Following an A131 Route Based Strategy review, that was conducted during 2015, a workshop was held with stakeholders in early 2016, from which twenty potential improvement schemes for the whole route were identified. After a sifting exercise, conducted using a tool based on the DfT East sifting tool, the options were prioritised and resulted in the following recommended improvements to Marks Farm Roundabout:- Widening of the entry flare and addition of a left turn slip for traffic travelling south and then heading east to Colchester along the A120. During 2017, and after further, more detailed discussions with the client and with Essex County Council’s Network Management, the content was modified to the following:- Widening of all four entry flares, introduction of a left turn slip from the A120 heading south and general improvements to the roundabout. Particularly at this junction, there are serious capacity issues, which if not addressed, will only get worse with the impending local developments that are scheduled. It should be noted that there is a strong link between this scheme and the Millennium Way Slips scheme approved through NPIF. This scheme will reduce traffic at Galleys Corner, although traffic approaching Braintree from the east or north will still have to pass through Marks Farm. It is expected that the Millennium Way Slips scheme will be completed before the Mark Farm junction improvements. Drawings of the proposed improvements to the junction can be found at Appendix F. 1.7. Delivery partners: Nature and / or value of involvement Partner (financial, operational etc) Financial, operational, programme management and Essex County Council project direction Responsible for design, management and coordinating Essex Highways delivery of schemes Ringway Jacobs Responsible for constructing schemes 1.8. Promoting Body: Essex County Council 1.9. Senior Responsible Owner (SRO): Andrew Cook, Director, Highways & Transportation, ECC Marks Farm Roundabout Business Case Page 4 of 31 1.10. Total project value and funding sources: Funding source Amount (£m) Constraints, dependencies or risks and mitigation SELEP £1.800 Dependent on this bid S106 Monies £1.334 Agreed in principle ECC £0.009 Provisional agreement Total project value £3.143 1.11. SELEP funding request, including type (LGF, GPF etc.): £1.8m capital funding is requested from SELEP in the form of a financial contribution. The funding will not constitute State Aid. 1.12. Exemptions: This scheme, as defined, is not subject to any Value for Money exemptions. 1.13. Key dates: Project milestone Indicative date Preliminary design Now Detailed design October 2019 Tender December 2019 Start construction April 2020 End construction March 2021 1.14. Project development stage: Project development stages completed to date (for the Route Based Strategy) Task Description Outputs achieved Timescale Route Based Strategy Detailed study Completed – paper issued Feb 2016 Workshop Develop options Completed – options identified Feb 2016 Options Assessment Report Detailed report Completed – report issued Mar 2018 Project development stages to be completed Task Description Timescale Business Case Full Business Case – this bid Jun to Sep 2019 Design Detailed design Oct 2019 1.15. Proposed completion of outputs: Other geographically related projects funded by SELEP:- Chelmsford to Braintree RBS – £3.7m funding, approved at the November 2016 Accountability Board – preliminary work commenced in January 2018. Marks Farm Roundabout Business Case Page 5 of 31 2. STRATEGIC CASE 2.1. Scope / Scheme Description: Significant growth is occurring in the south east region and Essex, and the town of Braintree, in particular. The section of road between Galley’s Corner and Marks Farm Roundabout sees annual average daily flows of over 40,000. The A120 heading east from Marks Farm has flows up to 25,000
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Our Counties Connected a Rail Prospectus for East Anglia Our Counties Connected a Rail Prospectus for East Anglia
    Our Counties Connected A rail prospectus for East Anglia Our Counties Connected A rail prospectus for East Anglia Contents Foreword 3 Looking Ahead 5 Priorities in Detail • Great Eastern Main Line 6 • West Anglia Main Line 6 • Great Northern Route 7 • Essex Thameside 8 • Branch Lines 8 • Freight 9 A five county alliance • Norfolk 10 • Suffolk 11 • Essex 11 • Cambridgeshire 12 • Hertfordshire 13 • Connecting East Anglia 14 Our counties connected 15 Foreword Our vision is to release the industry, entrepreneurship and talent investment in rail connectivity and the introduction of the Essex of our region through a modern, customer-focused and efficient Thameside service has transformed ‘the misery line’ into the most railway system. reliable in the country, where passenger numbers have increased by 26% between 2005 and 2011. With focussed infrastructure We have the skills and enterprise to be an Eastern Economic and rolling stock investment to develop a high-quality service, Powerhouse. Our growing economy is built on the successes of East Anglia can deliver so much more. innovative and dynamic businesses, education institutions that are world-leading and internationally connected airports and We want to create a rail network that sets the standard for container ports. what others can achieve elsewhere. We want to attract new businesses, draw in millions of visitors and make the case for The railways are integral to our region’s economy - carrying more investment. To do this we need a modern, customer- almost 160 million passengers during 2012-2013, an increase focused and efficient railway system. This prospectus sets out of 4% on the previous year.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Tuesday Volume 551 23 October 2012 No. 54 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Tuesday 23 October 2012 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2012 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 813 23 OCTOBER 2012 814 Mr Bone: The Conservative-led coalition Government House of Commons are increasing spending on the NHS, unlike what Labour would do. In my constituency, we will get an urgent care Tuesday 23 October 2012 centre in a few months as a result of Tory health reforms. People in Corby already have an urgent care centre as a result of Tory reforms. Does the Secretary of The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock State agree that, while Labour talks about the NHS, Conservatives deliver on the NHS? PRAYERS Mr Hunt: I absolutely agree with my hon. Friend. Indeed, last week we announced that waiting times are [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] at near-record lows. The number of hospital-acquired infections continues to go down and mixed-sex wards have been virtually eliminated. I am very pleased that BUSINESS BEFORE QUESTIONS my hon. Friend has an urgent care centre, and am sure that Mrs Bone will appreciate it even more than he does. NEW WRITs Ordered, Grahame M. Morris (Easington) (Lab): Does the That the Speaker do issue his Warrant to the Clerk of the Secretary of State recognise that the Office for National Crown to make out a new Writ for the electing of a Member to Statistics survey shows that the
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Strategy 2006-2011 and Beyond Now We’Removing Informing, Engaging and Inspiring Foreword Essex Rail Strategy – 2006-2011 and Beyond
    Essex Rail Strategy 2006-2011 and Beyond now we’removing informing, engaging and inspiring Foreword Essex Rail Strategy – 2006-2011 and Beyond ‘I cannot think of a higher priority for the County Council than for it to strive to achieve a first class highways and transportation system for all who live in, work in or visit the county of Essex. The challenges in front of us are enormous. Over 130,000 new homes are being proposed for Essex and its borders with surrounding authorities, the travel needs of which will have a direct impact on the transport network in Essex. All aspects of passenger transport will play a key role in delivering this vision. The County Council has therefore produced three daughter strategies to support the Local Transport Plan, focusing on how passenger transport will contribute towards a fully integrated transport network. The Road Passenger Transport, Bus Information and Rail Strategies outline the ways in which we intend to improve the lives of Essex people by addressing traffic growth, road congestion and improving public transport. They contain measures aimed at improving options for travel and access to services to develop a more effective transport network. To produce the strategies the County Council has consulted widely at regional, district and parish level, with key service providers, a wide range of user groups and the general public so that collectively they represent a tangible commitment by Essex County Council to make our County a better place to live and work and to support a decent public transport network. I am committed to delivering a transport system that meets the challenges we face in Essex and look forward to working in partnership with stakeholders to bring about the transformation we now need.’ Councillor Rodney L.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard
    Wednesday Volume 655 6 March 2019 No. 264 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 6 March 2019 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2019 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 939 6 MARCH 2019 940 Nigel Dodds (Belfast North) (DUP): The Secretary of House of Commons State knows, and the whole House knows, that there was violence on the part of dissident republicans even when we had devolution. However, given yesterday’s Wednesday 6 March 2019 improvised explosive devices and the link to dissident republicans, can she tell the House whether there is any The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock prospect of the security threat level being raised, and does she have any more information about the origins PRAYERS of those devices? Karen Bradley: The threat level in Northern Ireland—the [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] level of threat from Northern Ireland-related terrorism—is “severe”, and there is currently no suggestion that it will change. I had a conversation with the Chief Constable Oral Answers to Questions this morning. In respect of the specific incident to which the right hon. Gentleman has referred, these are the early days of an ongoing investigation, and it would NORTHERN IRELAND not be appropriate for me to say anything further at this stage. The Secretary of State was asked— Nigel Dodds: I thank the Secretary of State for that Devolved Government information, but she will understand the concern that is out there about those devices being sent through the 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Essex County Fire & Rescue Service
    Essex County Fire & Rescue Service Our Values: Respect, Accountability, Openness and Involvement Strategic Risk Assessment of the Medium to Longer-Term Service Operating Environment 2009 – 2010 2 Countywide Review 2009 Contents 1. Foreword .......................................................................................................................................4 2. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................5 3. Executive Summary .................................................................................................................6 4. Climate Change in East of England ................................................................................10 5. Demographics of Essex ......................................................................................................22 6. Diversity .......................................................................................................................................26 7. Older People in Essex ...........................................................................................................32 8. County Development and Transport Infrastructure ...............................................40 9. The Changing Face of Technology ................................................................................57 10. Terrorism .....................................................................................................................................62
    [Show full text]
  • North Essex Garden Communities EB/014
    EB/014 Sustainable Solutions | Connectivity North Essex Garden Communities Movement and Access Study – 23 May 2017 2 Garden Communities – Movement & Access Study – May 2017 Disclaimer These plans reflect a point in time reached during the evolution of the related Concept Frameworks for each of the Garden Communities. It must be noted that these plans will change as the Concept Frameworks evolve and develop further. 3 Garden Communities – Movement & Access Study – May 2017 Contents 1. Headlines 2. Transport Ambition and Objectives 3. Methodology & Key Assumptions 4. Rapid Transit Services 5. Definition of Scheme and Policy Interventions 6. Menu of Policy Interventions (all sites) 7. Menu of Scheme Interventions – West Braintree / Uttlesford Borders 8. Menu of Scheme Interventions – Colchester / Braintree Borders 9. Menu of Scheme Interventions – West Tendring / Colchester Borders 4 1 Headlines 5 Garden Communities – Movement & Access Study – May 2017 1.1 Purpose Jacobs and Ringway Jacobs are supporting Essex County Council, Braintree District Council, Colchester Borough Council and Tendring District Council with the analysis of the concept of ‘Garden Communities’ for their emerging Local Plans. These are settlements based on the ethos of ‘Garden Cities’ promoted by the Town and Country Planning Association (https://www.tcpa.org.uk/garden-city-principles) and Government but tailored to the needs and character of North Essex. AECOM has undertaken a detailed baseline review and multi-criteria analysis of various options, identifying three broad locations at West of Braintree, Marks Tey and East of Colchester in Tendring District for further master planning (https://www.braintree.gov.uk/info/200130/about_braintree_district/992/north_essex_garden_communities). These locations are considered to be the most sustainable option for the future development of Garden Communities in North Essex and provide a major opportunity for high quality, cohesive and distinctive mixed use development.
    [Show full text]
  • A120 Braintree to A12
    A120 BRAINTREE TO A12 Essex County Council TECHNICAL APPRAISAL REPORT B3553T41-JAC-HGN-00-REP-C-0002 | P01 11/1/17 TECHNIC AL A PPR AISAL R EPORT Ess ex C ounty Council A120 Braintree to A12 Technical Appraisal Report Contents Contents ................................................................................................................................................................. 3 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Document purpose and structure ................................................................................................................ 8 1.2 Scheme Description .................................................................................................................................... 9 2. PLANNING BRIEF .................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Study Area ................................................................................................................................................. 10 2.2 Justification for the scheme ....................................................................................................................... 11 2.3 Scheme Objectives .................................................................................................................................... 12 2.4 Previous Work and Studies ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Braintree District Council Local Development Framework Core Strategy
    Braintree District Council Local Development Framework Core Strategy Adopted September 2011 Amended February 2021 Following Adoption of Local Plan Section 1 Contents Commitment to this Strategy . 4 Executive Summary . 5 1 Introduction and Background . 9 The Local Development Framework . 9 Conformity with Other Policies and Strategies . 12 2 A Spatial Portrait of Braintree District . 17 Population and Housing. 17 Economy . 19 CORE STRATEGY Deprivation. 21 Transport . 21 1 Communities and Services . 22 Environment . 23 3 Vision, Aims and Objectives . 25 The Vision for Braintree District . 25 The Aims of the Core Strategy. 26 Delivering the Vision - The Key Objectives . 26 4 Spatial Strategy . 29 The ‘Hierarchy of Place’ in the Braintree District . 31 Development at Growth Locations . 32 Development and Growth in the District in more detail . 33 Selection of Strategic Growth Location Sites in Braintree and Witham. 36 The Proposed Growth Locations . 37 5 Housing . 45 Creating high quality places to live . 46 Affordable Housing . 49 Gypsies and Travellers and Travelling Showpeople. 52 LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 6 Economy . 55 __________________Provision of Employment . 57 Rural Area . 64 Town Centre Regeneration and Retailing. 65 7 Transport . 69 8 Environment . 75 Built____________ Environment. 75 Open Spaces . 83 Contents 9 Delivering the Strategy . 85 Infrastructure_________ . 85 Housing . 87 Economy . 88 Environment . 89 Other Resources . 90 10 Monitoring Framework . 103 11 Glossary . 109 2 Appendices Appendix 1 List of Braintree Local Plan Review (RLP) Policies superseded by Core Strategy Policies . 117 Appendix 2 Housing Trajectory Information. 119 Appendix 3 Settlement Hierarchy. 125 Appendix 4 Infrastructure Trajectory . 129 Appendix 5 Evidence Base . 145 Proposals Map .
    [Show full text]
  • The Proposed Network Rail (Essex and Others Level Crossing Reduction) Order ______Closing Submissions on Behalf of Network Rail ______
    THE PROPOSED NETWORK RAIL (ESSEX AND OTHERS LEVEL CROSSING REDUCTION) ORDER _________________________________________ CLOSING SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF NETWORK RAIL ________________________________________ 1. By this application, Network Rail seeks powers to close or downgrade rights over 561 level crossings within Essex, Hertfordshire, Thurrock, the London Borough of Havering, and Southend-on-Sea, together with associated powers, (including the acquisition of rights over land, and, to the extent necessary, deemed planning permission) to allow for the provision of diversionary routes for existing users of those crossings. 2. These closing submissions are structured as follows: a. Part 1: Overarching issues i. The case for the Order: Network Rail’s ‘strategic case’; ii. The development of the Order proposals, including alternatives; iii. The position of objectors on strategic issues, including the use of the TWAO procedure; iv. The general approach to public rights of way; v. Planning policy; vi. Road safety issues; vii. Environmental appraisal; viii. The general approach to matters relating to land acquisition ix. Funding b. Part 2: Considerations relating to individual crossings 1 Originally 60. E42 and E57 were removed from the draft Order before the inquiry opened. H03 (Slipe Lane) and E12 (Wallaces / Wallis’s) were withdrawn during the course of the inquiry. 1 c. Part 3: The Order, planning conditions, and other consequential matters; d. Part 4: Conclusion Part 1: Overarching issues (i) Network Rail’s ‘strategic case’ 3. As set out in Opening, the case for pursuing this Order is a strategic one. Through the Order, Network Rail is looking to reduce and rationalise level crossings across the Anglia route.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Document for Consultation Plan
    Braintree District LOCAL Council PLAN Shape your district Braintree District LOCAL Council 2017-33 PLAN Shape your district LOCAL DRAFT DOCUMENT PLAN FOR CONSULTATION 27th June 2016 1 Index of Policies 8 2 Introduction and Background 14 3 Shared Strategic Plan 22 4 Vision & Objectives 56 5 The Spatial Strategy 60 6 A Prosperous District 64 A Strong Economy 64 Shops and Services 73 Primary Shopping Areas 75 District and Local Centres 76 Out of Town Retailing 78 Retail Allocations 79 Homes 82 Housing Allocations 82 Affordable Housing Rural Exception Sites 91 Specialist Housing and Care Homes 94 Gypsy and Traveller and Travelling Showpersons Accommodation 96 Housing Mix and Density 97 Extensions, Alterations and Outbuildings 99 Replacement Dwellings 101 Rural Workers Dwellings 103 Hamlets 105 Transport & Infrastructure 108 Sustainable Access for All 108 Parking Provision 111 Transport Related Road Areas 113 Broadband 115 7 Creating Better Places 118 A Healthy and Active District 118 | Draft Local Plan June 2016 Creating High Quality Spaces 127 Conservation Areas 129 Heritage Assets 132 Demolition of Listed Buildings or Structures 134 Enabling Development 134 Sites of Archaeological Importance 135 Community Facilities 136 8 The District's Natural Environment 142 Biodiversity, Landscape Character and Agriculture 143 Land, Water and Air Quality 149 Climate Change & Energy 152 Flood Risk & Surface Water Drainage 156 External Lighting 160 9 Delivery & Implementation 164 Glossary 176 Appendix 1 Housing Trajectory 190 Appendix 2 List of Braintree
    [Show full text]
  • North Essex Garden Communities Eb/008/3/4
    EB/008/3/4 NORTH ESSEX GARDEN COMMUNITIES CONCEPT FEASIBILITY STUDY VOLUME 2 - OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS JUNE 2016 North Essex Garden Communities Concept Feasibility Study - Opportunities and Constraints Colchester Borough Council, Braintree District Council, Tendring District Council and Essex County Council NORTH ESSEX GARDEN COMMUNITIES CONCEPT FEASIBILITY STUDY OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS Quality information Document name Ref Prepared for Prepared by Date Reviewed by Opps + Cons 01 CBC, TDC, BDC, ECC AECOM May 2016 JS / TV Revision history Revision Revision date Authorised Position Draft 1 22/03/2016 JS / TV Project Manager / Project Director Draft 2 25/05/2016 JS/TV Project Manager / Project Director Draft 3 16/06/2016 JS/TV Project Manager / Project Director FV 24/06/2016 JS/TV Project Manager / Project Director This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited for the sole use of our client (the “Client”) and in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM Limited and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM Limited, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM Limited. 2 AECOM Colchester Borough Council, Braintree District Council, Tendring District Council and Essex County Council North Essex Garden Communities Concept Feasibility Study - Opportunities and Constraints
    [Show full text]
  • Title Braintree District Cycling Action Plan
    BraintreeTitle District Cycling Highways/Name of Department Action Plan Date Highways/ Transport Planning Title January 2018 Sub title (inc Bridge no.) Date Cycling Action Plan Braintree District Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................ 1 1.1 Preamble ............................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background ........................................................................................... 2 1.3 Aims of the Cycling Action Plan ............................................................ 4 1.4 Report Structure .................................................................................... 4 2 Policy Review ............................................................................ 9 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................... 9 2.2 National Policy Context ....................................................................... 10 2.3 Regional Policy Context ...................................................................... 12 2.4 Local Policy Context ............................................................................ 15 3 Data Analysis ........................................................................... 19 3.1 Introduction ......................................................................................... 19 3.2 Census Data ....................................................................................... 19 3.3
    [Show full text]