DOCSLIB.ORG

Benchmarking.Pdf (PDF File, 2.4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Benchmarking.Pdf (PDF File, 2.4 International benchmarking of 900MHz and 1800MHz spectrum value Final Report for Ofcom September 2013 DotEcon Ltd 17 Welbeck Street London W1G 9XJ www.dotecon.com Content i Content 1 Introduction 1 2 Spectrum award benchmarks 3 2.1 Data used 3 2.2 Band specific benchmarks 13 2.3 CCA cross checks 35 2.4 Relative band value 41 3 Licence renewal fees 45 3.1 Approach to renewal fees 47 3.2 Renewal fees 50 4 Market value indications from spectrum trades 54 4.1 700MHz spectrum trades 54 4.2 2.1GHz spectrum trades 58 5 Conclusions 62 Annex A Auction benchmarks 64 Annex B Renewal fee case studies 71 Annex C Frequency band impact on spectrum value 84 Annex D Prices using alternative WACC 99 International benchmarking of 900MHz and 1800MHz spectrum value - September 2013 Tables & Figures ii Tables & Figures Table 1: Summary of results .................................................................................................................. vi Table 2: Economic, demographic and market data of large European countries and the US ......................................................................................................................................................... 10 Table 3: 1800MHz Sample Summary Statistics ............................................................................. 25 Table 4: 2.1GHz Sample Summary Statistics ................................................................................. 32 Table 5: Benchmark values .................................................................................................................. 34 Table 6: Package prices in the Swiss auction ................................................................................ 36 Table 7: Package prices in the Romanian auction ...................................................................... 37 Table 8: Package prices in the Irish auction .................................................................................. 38 Table 9: Package prices in the Dutch auction ............................................................................... 39 Table 10: Packages prices in the UK auction ................................................................................. 40 Table 11: Packages prices in the Australian auction .................................................................. 41 Table 12: Relative band values within auctions ........................................................................... 42 Table 13: Relative band values across auctions within the same country ......................... 43 Table 14: Licence renewal terms and charge structure ............................................................ 47 Table 15: Lower and upper bound of spectrum valuations from New Zealand, Australian and the Netherlands (price/MHz/pop for a 20 year term) ......................... 50 Table 16: Indicators of spectrum value ........................................................................................... 63 Table 17: 700MHz auctions .................................................................................................................. 64 Table 18: 800MHz auction .................................................................................................................... 64 Table 19: 800MHz awards ..................................................................................................................... 65 Table 20: 900MHz auctions .................................................................................................................. 65 Table 21: 1800MHz auctions ................................................................................................................ 66 Table 22: 2.1GHz auctions ..................................................................................................................... 68 Table 23: 2.6GHz auctions ..................................................................................................................... 69 Table 24: 2.6GHz awards ....................................................................................................................... 70 Table 25: Auctions in other bands used in benchmarking analysis ...................................... 70 Table 26: Normalised relative cell radii of different frequency bands ................................. 88 Table 27: Normalised relative cell area of different frequency bands ................................. 89 Table 28: Relative network deployment cost between frequency bands ......................... 93 Table 29: 900MHz auctions ................................................................................................................. 99 Table 30: 800MHz auctions ............................................................................................................... 100 Table 31: 800MHz awards .................................................................................................................. 100 Table 32: 700MHz auctions ............................................................................................................... 101 International benchmarking of 900MHz and 1800MHz spectrum value - September 2013 Tables & Figures iii Table 33: Sample summary statistics using WACC of 4.10% ................................................. 101 Table 34: Sample summary statistics using WACC of 8.86% ................................................. 101 Table 35: 1800MHz auctions 2010 - 2012 .................................................................................... 101 Table 36: 1800MHz auctions 2006 – 2009 ................................................................................... 102 Table 37: 1800MHz auctions 2001 – 2005 .................................................................................... 102 Table 38: 1800MHz auctions 1995 – 2000 ................................................................................... 103 Table 39: 2.1GHz summary statistics using WACC of 4.10% ................................................. 104 Table 40: 2.1GHz summary statistics using WACC of 8.86% ................................................. 104 Table 41: 2.6GHz auctions ................................................................................................................. 104 Table 42: 2.6GHz awards .................................................................................................................... 105 Table 43: Switzerland .......................................................................................................................... 105 Table 44: Romania ................................................................................................................................ 105 Table 45: Ireland .................................................................................................................................... 106 Table 46: Netherlands ......................................................................................................................... 106 Table 47: United Kingdom ................................................................................................................. 107 Table 48: Australia ................................................................................................................................ 107 Table 49: Relativities implied within auctions ............................................................................ 108 Table 50: Relativities implied within countries .......................................................................... 108 Table 51: Renewal fees ........................................................................................................................ 108 Table 52: Spectrum trades ................................................................................................................. 109 Figure 1: Licence duration adjustment .............................................................................................. 6 Figure 2: A Box Plot ................................................................................................................................ 12 Figure 3: 900MHz auction average price ........................................................................................ 14 Figure 4: 800MHz auctions .................................................................................................................. 18 Figure 5: 700MHz Auctions ................................................................................................................. 22 Figure 6: 1800MHz Auctions ............................................................................................................... 24 Figure 7: 1800MHz Auctions 2010-2012 ........................................................................................ 25 Figure 8: 1800MHz Auctions 2006-2009 ........................................................................................ 28 Figure 9: 1800MHz Auctions 2001-2005 ........................................................................................ 29 Figure 10: 1800MHz Auctions 1995-2000 ...................................................................................... 30 Figure 11: 2.1GHz Auctions and Awards ........................................................................................ 31 Figure 12: 2.6GHz Auctions and Awards ........................................................................................ 33 Figure 13: Prices paid for 2G authorisation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ENEL — Società Per Azioni (Incorporated with Limited Liability in Italy) U.S
    OFFERING CIRCULAR NOT FOR GENERAL CIRCULATION IN THE UNITED STATES ENEL — Società per Azioni (incorporated with limited liability in Italy) U.S. $1,250,000,000 Capital Securities due 2073 Enel — Società per Azioni (the “Issuer” or “Enel”) will issue U.S. $1,250,000,000 Capital Securities due 2073 (the “Securities”) on September 24, 2013 (the “Issue Date”). The Securities will bear interest on their principal amount (a) from (and including) the Issue Date to (but excluding) the First Reset Date, at the rate of 8.750 percent per annum and (b) from (and including) the First Reset Date to (but excluding) the Maturity Date, for each Reset Period, the relevant 5-year Swap Rate plus (A) in respect of the Reset Periods commencing on the First Reset Date, September 24, 2028, September 24, 2033 and September 24, 2038, 6.130 percent per annum, and (B) in respect of any other Reset Period, 6.880 percent per annum (each, as defined in “Description of the Securities”). Interest on the Securities will be payable semi- annually in arrears on March 24 and September 24 each year, commencing on March 24, 2014 (each an “Interest Payment Date”). Payment of interest on the Securities may be deferred at the option of the Issuer in certain circumstances, as set out under “Description of the Securities — Interest Deferral”. The Securities will be issued in fully registered form and only in denominations of U.S. $200,000 and in integral multiples of U.S. $1,000 in excess thereof. Unless previously redeemed by the Issuer as provided below, the Issuer will redeem the Securities on September 24, 2073 at their principal amount, together with interest accrued to, but excluding, such date and any Arrears of Interest (as defined in “Description of the Securities”).
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Procurement Research 2018
    Digital Procurement Research 2018 Uncovering the solutions that bring you forward 2 Digital Procurement Research 2018. Foreword Christian Michalak, Xander de Jong, Vice President, Senior Manager, Head of Procurement Head of Procurement Transformation DACH Transformation NL The world is digitizing rapidly and becoming increasingly Capgemini Digital Procurement connected. Widespread terms such as Internet of Things and Industry4.0 reflect this. Traditionally, the procurement Research 2018 department falls behind in digital transformations, resulting in inefficiencies , unnecessary high costs and being perceived as an Cloud procurement solutions offer many exciting opportunities annoyance by the operational departments. But this situation is for every business and in both direct and indirect procurement. changing. However, since there are many players, it is a challenge to determine which ones to shortlist or select. The traditional procurement function is evolving, and many people are afraid of this. They wonder about the future, whether Therefore, we are proud to present the Capgemini Digital procurement will still play a role, while they should be wondering Procurement Research 2018. This research will provide you more what opportunities it offers, for example in the context of digital, insights on functionalities offered by various solution providers and how procurement can act on the next level. and share insights, lessons learned and client cases. Of course, there are other well-respected research reports on procurement Procurement, and at the same time management and business solution providers. However, based on feedback from clients stakeholders, should move away from the traditional focus on we saw a need for a research that purely focused on available cost reduction and rather focus on how to get more or, even functionality.
    [Show full text]
  • Operations Research and Logistics Department (ORL) Bsc Thesis
    Operations Research and Logistics Department (ORL) BSc Thesis Management Studies E-commerce in the Brazilian Flower Sector: Characterization, analysis and trends Supervisors: Prof.dr.ir. J.G.A.J. (Jack) van der Vorst Dr. J.M. (Jacqueline) Bloemhof Phd Candidate M. (Marlies) de Keizer Student: Felipe Vizzoto R.N: 900501896060 Course: YSS 81812 Wageningen, 2nd May until 30rd June, 2011 1 Special thanks to Wageningen University and Research Center (WUR) and “Luiz de Queiroz” College of Agriculture (ESALQ/USP), for the opportunity. My supervisors, Prof. dr. ir. Jack van der Vorst, Dr. Jacqueline Bloemhof and Phd Candidate Marlies de Keizer, for all the attention and help. Veiling Holambra, Floranet, Flora Holland and Prof. dr. ir. Eric van Heck, for making this research possible. Group of Research and Extension in Agroindustrial Logistics (ESALQ-LOG), especially to my colleagues Pedro Paulo de Carvalho Teixeira and Aline Bianca Paulo, who contributed decisively for the quality of this research. My family, my parents Cíntia and Carlos Alberto Vizzotto, and my sisters Vitória and Marília Vizzotto, who always trusted and supported me in my studies. 2 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. Background .............................................................................................................................5 1.1.1. The Flower sector in Brazil .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Designing Renewable Energy Incentives and Auctions: Lessons for Asean
    DESIGNING RENEWABLE ENERGY INCENTIVES AND AUCTIONS: LESSONS FOR ASEAN USAID CLEAN POWER ASIA September 4, 2017 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development by Abt Associates Inc. and can be downloaded at the following location: http://www.usaidcleanpowerasia.com/publications.html DESIGNING RENEWABLE ENERGY INCENTIVES AND AUCTIONS: LESSONS FOR ASEAN USAID CLEAN POWER ASIA Contract No.: AID-486-C-16-00001 Prepared by: Abt Associates Inc. Submitted to: U.S. Agency for International Development Regional Development Mission for Asia Submitted on: September 4, 2017 Authors: Dr. Sopitsuda Tongsopit Dr. Wathanyu Amatayakul Phoebe Grace Saculsan Vu Hoang Nghia Chomsiri Tirapornvitoon Rémy Favre Ana Amazo Silvana Tiedemann Angélica Afanador DISCLAIMER The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) or the United States government. CONTENTS Acronyms ................................................................................................................................... 8 Acknowledgments.................................................................................................................... 12 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. 13 Chapter 1: Introduction ........................................................................................................... 18 1.1 USAID Clean
    [Show full text]
  • Electricity Market Design and RE Deployment (RES - E- MARKETS)
    Electricity Market Design and RE Deployment (RES - E- MARKETS) September 2016 A B O U T T H E I EA RET D TECHNOLOGY COLLABORATION PROGRA MME The IEA Renewable Energy Technology Deployment Technology Collaboration Programme (IEA RETD TCP) provides a platform for enhancing international cooperation on policies, measures and market instruments to accelerate the global deployment of renewable energy technologies. IEA RETD TCP aims to empower policy makers and energy market actors to make informed decisions by: (1) providing innovative policy options; (2) disseminating best practices related to policy measures and market instruments to increase deployment of renewable energy, and (3) increasing awareness of the short-, medium- and long-term impacts of renewable energy action and inaction. For further information please visit: http://iea-retd.org or contact [email protected]. Twitter: @IEA_RETD IEA RETD TCP is part of the IEA Energy Technology Network. DISCLAIMER The IEA RETD Technology Collaboration Programme, formally known as the Technology Collaboration Programme for Renewable Energy Technology Deployment, functions within a Framework created by the International Energy Agency (IEA). Views, findings and publications of IEA RETD TCP do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the IEA Secretariat or of its individual Member Countries. COPYRIGHT This publication should be cited as: IEA RETD TCP (2016), Electricity Market Design and RE Deployment (RES-E-MARKETS) [Fabien Roques, Dmitri Perekhodtsev (FTI-CL Energy), Lion Hirth (Neon)],
    [Show full text]
  • Auction Approaches of Long-Term Contracts to Ensure Generation Investment in Electricity Markets: Lessons from the Brazilian and Chilean Experiences$
    Energy Policy 38 (2010) 5758–5769 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Energy Policy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol Auction approaches of long-term contracts to ensure generation investment in electricity markets: Lessons from the Brazilian and Chilean experiences$ R. Moreno a,n, L.A. Barroso b,1, H. Rudnick c,2, S. Mocarquer d,3, B. Bezerra b,1 a Imperial College London, Electrical and Electronic Engineering Department, South Kensington Campus, UK b PSR, Praia de Botafogo 228/1701 parte, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil c Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Electrical Engineering Department, Chile d Systep, Don Carlos 2939 oficina 1007, Santiago, Chile article info abstract Article history: The implementation of auctions of long-term electricity contracts is arising as an alternative to ensure Received 8 March 2010 generation investment and therefore achieve a reliable electricity supply. The aim is to reconcile Accepted 10 May 2010 generation adequacy with efficient energy purchase, correct risk allocation among investors and Available online 16 June 2010 consumers, and the politico-economic environment of the country. In this paper, a generic proposal for Keywords: a long-term electricity contracts approach is made, including practical design concepts for Long-term contract implementation. This proposal is empirically derived from the auctions implemented in Brazil and Auction design Chile during the last 6 years. The study is focused on practices and lessons which are especially useful Generation investment for regulators and policy makers that want to facilitate the financing of new desirable power plants in risky environments and also efficiently allocate supply contracts among investors at competitive prices.
    [Show full text]
  • Offering Strategies and Simulation of Multi Item Dynamic Auctions of Energy Contracts
    ISSN Number 8 | May 2010 Offering Strategies and Simulation of Multi Item Dynamic Auctions of Energy Contracts Luiz Augusto Barroso Alexandre Street de Aguiar Sérgio Granville Mario Veiga Pereira Internal Research Reports Number 8 | May 2010 Offering Strategies and Simulation of Multi Item Dynamic Auctions of Energy Contracts Luiz Augusto Barroso Alexandre Street de Aguiar Sérgio Granville Mario Veiga Pereira CREDITS Publisher: MAXWELL / LAMBDA-DEE Sistema Maxwell / Laboratório de Automação de Museus, Bibliotecas Digitais e Arquivos http://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/ Organizers: Alexandre Street de Aguiar Delberis Araújo Lima Cover: Ana Cristina Costa Ribeiro This work has been submitted to the IEEE Transactions on Power Systems for possible publication. Copyright may be transferred without notice, after which this version may no longer be accessible. This work has been submitted to the IEEE Transactions on Power Systems for 1 possible publication. Copyright may be transferred without notice, after which this version may no longer be accessible. Offering Strategies and Simulation of Multi Item Dynamic Auctions of Energy Contracts Luiz A. Barroso, Senior Member, IEEE, Alexandre Street, Member, IEEE, Sergio Granville and Mario V. Pereira, Fellow, IEEE suppliers. In addition, a forward contract provides revenue Abstract— the objective of this work is threefold. We firstly stability to the new entrant, which facilitates generation present an optimization model for a price-taker hydrothermal financing. generation company (Genco) to devise bidding strategies in Energy contract auctions have been extensively used all multi-item dynamic auctions of long-term contracts. The bidding around the world, such as in the US (New Jersey [1], Illinois model calculates a willingness-to-supply curve (WSC), which takes into account the key issues on the auctioned contracts, such [2] and New England [3]), Latin America (Brazil and Chile as its time horizon, the risk factors that affect the future contract [4], Peru [5], and Colombia [6]) and in Europe (Spain [7]).
    [Show full text]
  • Auction Approaches of Long-Term Contracts to Ensure Generation Investment in Electricity Markets: Lessons from the Brazilian and Chilean Experiences$
    Energy Policy ] (]]]]) ]]]–]]] Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Energy Policy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol Auction approaches of long-term contracts to ensure generation investment in electricity markets: Lessons from the Brazilian and Chilean experiences$ R. Moreno a,n, L.A. Barroso b,1, H. Rudnick c,2, S. Mocarquer d,3, B. Bezerra b,1 a Imperial College London, Electrical and Electronic Engineering Department, South Kensington Campus, UK b PSR, Praia de Botafogo 228/1701 parte, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil c Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Electrical Engineering Department, Chile d Systep, Don Carlos 2939 oficina 1007, Santiago, Chile article info abstract Article history: The implementation of auctions of long-term electricity contracts is arising as an alternative to ensure Received 8 March 2010 generation investment and therefore achieve a reliable electricity supply. The aim is to reconcile Accepted 10 May 2010 generation adequacy with efficient energy purchase, correct risk allocation among investors and consumers, and the politico-economic environment of the country. In this paper, a generic proposal for Keywords: a long-term electricity contracts approach is made, including practical design concepts for Long-term contract implementation. This proposal is empirically derived from the auctions implemented in Brazil and Auction design Chile during the last 6 years. The study is focused on practices and lessons which are especially useful Generation investment for regulators and policy makers that want to facilitate the financing of new desirable power plants in risky environments and also efficiently allocate supply contracts among investors at competitive prices. Although this mechanism is generally seen as a significant improvement in market regulation, there are questions and concerns on auction performance that require careful design and which are identified in this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Auction with Best Offer
    Auction With Best Offer Muciferous Jarrett encircles: he work-out his sauerbraten gradually and paradigmatically. Dorian assuaged loveably. Worshipping Joachim dunning some urinaries and buffet his wonderland so coincidentally! In the seller would have to gather interested in person, potential benefits to offer with auction, the creditor investigates Offer a dining club membership as an exclusive auction item for nonprofits. For listings in which the seller has specified shipping costs for the item, the number of sales tends to drop, the submission of your bid is a one step process and there is not a separate registration. This site also boasts a wide selection of classic cars and car parts. Get the word out. Take photos from multiple angles to give viewers a full view of the product. Save my name, clarification, and the sale price. What does this error message mean? How much time do you have to invest, and price tends to rise sharply. What Are the Best Use Cases for Live Auctions? Sometimes an auctioneer can dispose of this tradeoff. But a bargain for one may not be a bargain for another. Abby Jarvis is a blogger, beginning with the highest price and going lower until the lowest bid was found, agents will talk about dream prices. Silent auction pricing is an art that strikes a fair balance between bidding from bargain hunters and dedicated supporters. These are also, best auction with it? Previews are basically property showings of real estate to be auctioned. These spoof emails may tell you of a security breach or an account restriction that needs your attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Auction Design: Winner Selection Process
    Accelerating the Transition to Clean Energy Technologies RENEWABLE ENERGY AUCTIONS: A GUIDE TO DESIGN5 AUCTION DESIGN: WINNER SELECTION PROCESS Copyright Unless otherwise indicated, material in this publication may be used freely, shared or reprinted, but acknowledgement is requested. This publication should be cited as: IRENA and CEM (2015), Renewable Energy Auctions – A Guide to Design. About IRENA The International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) is an intergovernmental organisation that supports countries in their transition to a sustainable energy future, and serves as the principal platform for international co-operation, a centre of excellence, and a repository of policy, technology, resource and financial knowledge on renewable energy. IRENA promotes the widespread adoption and sustainable use of all forms of renewable energy, including bioenergy, geothermal, hydropower, ocean, solar and wind energy, in the pursuit of sustainable development, energy access, energy security and low-carbon economic growth and prosperity. www.irena.org About CEM The Clean Energy Ministerial (CEM) is a high-level global forum to promote policies and programs that advance clean energy technology, to share lessons learned and best practices, and to encourage the transition to a global clean energy economy. Initiatives are based on areas of common interest among participating governments and other stakeholders. Acknowledgements ‘Renewable Energy Auctions: A Guide to Design’ is a project of IRENA and the Multilateral Solar and Wind Working Group, an initiative of the CEM led by Denmark, Germany and Spain. Authors: Luiz Augusto Barroso, with input from Rafael Ferreira, Gabriel Cunha, Arina Anisie and João Pedro Bastos. Contributing authors: Rabia Ferroukhi, Diala Hawila, Salvatore Vinci and Divyam Nagpal (IRENA).
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Communication Paper Information About the Final Negotiation Process
    Basic communication paper Information about the final negotiation process Page 1 Communication paper _____________________________________________________________________________ 1. Key components of the final negotiation process 3 2. Advantages of the final negotiation process 3 3. Comparing suppliers using a monetary evaluation system (if not based 100% on price) 4 4. General provisions 4 5. Special information for negotiations conducted using an electronic negotiation platform 6 5.1 Dry run (practice run) 6 5.2 General information about the bidder platform 7 6. Procurement auction glossary 9 Page 2 Valid as of: Sept 2, 2019 Communication paper _____________________________________________________________________________ 1. Key components of the final negotiation process The contract award decision is based solely on the final negotiation process The final negotiation process will take place either as negotiations on an electronic negotiation platform or as structured parallel negotiations (for example, as negotiations involving an in-person auction and an auction1 by e-mail). Final negotiations will be based on the bid updated by the bidder for the purpose of final negotiations, which the bidder will submit when asked to do so by the contracting authority. Bidders must participate in the final negotiation process to remain in the in the evaluation. Firm bids Only firm bids will be considered. All bids that comply with the specifications of the final negotiation process and other provisions and conditions of the contract award procedure will be considered legally valid bids. This is also true for improved bids. Price negotiations will be conducted in euros (€). There will be no time to recalculate bids during final negotiations. Approved bidders will need to have calculated their lowest prices before negotiations begin.
    [Show full text]