I FEB 1 4 2008

*", ,-

y b I;y"' =:-

Geochemical Survey Assessment Report Q I 2% If Mineral Tenure 544707 L-"; I '1 '1 Telegraph Creek Property Yh i Q4 .I Liard Mining Division 43 '

br ,' I' i British Columbia, Canada sj.j f k LI.-> Y'' (1.

.. .- .>!. ,,.

* 14 Author: J. Michael Wark B.Sc. (Hons) Aurora Geosciences Ltd 34A LaBerge Road --$ Whitehorse, Yukon

Location: NTS Map Sheet 104 GI14 BCGS: 1046074 UTM Center: 6409425N/358375EI Zone 9, NAD 83 LATILONG Center: 57*48*00*N 131 23*00*W Claim Owner: Golden Hat Resources Inc. Operator: Golden Hat Resources Inc. Work performed by: Aurora Geosciences Ltd Work done: Sept 1I* and Sept 12*, 2007

Report submitted: February 11, 2008 SUMMARY

The Telegraph Creek Property is located about 100 km from Dease Lake, B.C. and consists of 17 claims. The property was purchased by Golden Hat Resources Inc. from Ram Exploration Ltd. in June 2005. The claims, referred to as Block 2A by Golden Hat, are centered at approximate coordinates of 57.484, 131.23.W on NTS Map Sheet 104 G/14. The claims are accessible by helicopter from Dease Lake, or alternatively, from the community of Telegraph Creek which is situated about 15 km North of the property. Telegraph Creek is accessible from Dease Lake via an all-weather road.

Based on available and published information, the property has been subjected to only very limited exploration. No accounts of work exist on the immediate property prior to the claims being staked in 2005.

This report documents results of a soil sampling program conducted on September 12th, 2007, by Aurora Geosciences Ltd. of Whitehorse, Yukon, on behalf of Golden Hat Resources Inc.

The soil geochemical survey was conducted on mineral tenure (claim) 544707. A total of 19 soil samples were collected and analyzed by SGS Mineral Services of Toronto, Ontario. These data were analyzed and anomalous values were identified by arbitrarily establishing a value of two standard deviations above the arithmetic mean for each element analyzed. In addition, MMI data were also evaluated using their recommended determination of background levels (25* percentile) and response ratios. TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION ...... 1

2.0 LOCATION AND ACCESS ...... 1

3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ...... 1

4.0 EXPLORATION HISTORY ...... 3

5.0 DESCRIPTION OF WORK PROGRAM ...... 4 5.1 Personnel & equipment...... 4 5.2 Specifications...... 5 5.3 Sampleanalysis...... 6 5.4 Data...... 6

6.0 REGIONAL GEOLOGY ...... 6

7.0 PROPERTYGEOLOGY ...... 8

8.0 MINERALIZATION ...... 9

9.0 GEOCHEMICAL SURVEYS ...... 9

10.0 RESULTS ...... 10

I1 . 0 CONCLUSIONS and RECOMMENDATIONS ...... 12

REFERENCES CITED ...... 14

APPENDIX A . STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS ...... 16

APPENDIX B. STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES ...... 17

APPENDIX C . CREW LOG ...... 20

APPENDIX D. CERTIFICATES OF ANALYSES ...... 22

APPENDIX E. SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS ...... 24

APPENDIX F. GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY ANALYSES ...... 26

APPENDIX G. ANALYTICAL METHODS ...... 28 c

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. Property location ...... Following page 1

Figure 2. Claim location ...... Following page 1

Figure 3. Regional geology ...... Following page 1 I.O INTRODUCTION

This report documents results of a geochemical soil sampling survey completed during September, 2007, on the Telegraph Creek Property within the Liard Mining District in north-western British Columbia. The mineral claims are currently owned by Golden Hat Resources Inc. of Vancouver, B.C. Aurora Geosciences Ltd. of Whitehorse, Yukon Territory, was retained by Golden Hat to conduct the soil sampling program. This work was performed to follow up on an anomaly identified by an IRIS Remote Sensing survey conducted on behalf of Hamilton Hycroft Energy Inc. in the summer of 2007; a summary of the results of this survey are reported in a Golden Hat news release dated July 6, 2007.

2.0 LOCATION AND ACCESS

The Telegraph Creek Property is located about 100 km southeast from Dease Lake, B.C. and 15 km south from the community of Telegraph Creek, B.C. The claims straddle the Stikine River in the Liard Mining District and are centred at approximate coordinates of 57" 48' N, 131" 24' W (Figure I). The property is accessible by helicopter from the community of Dease Lake. Published topographic maps indicate an access road from the community of Telegraph Creek to the western part of the claim area, however, the present condition of this road is unknown. The community of Telegraph Creek is accessible by all-weather road from Dease Lake. Pearse (1974), states that the KIT property is accessible by foot along pack trails from Telegraph Creek. The KIT property is located at Winter Creek, approximately 7 km north of the Telegraph Creek property.

3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION

The Telegraph Creek Property consists of 17 claims, referred to as Block 2A by Golden Hat Resources Inc. The claims, totaling 6966.55 ha., were staked by Carl von Einsiedel of Ram Exploration Ltd. on May 1 and May 11, 2005. The claims were subsequently recorded in the Liard Mining District of northwestern British Columbia. Claim information is summarized below':

1 Claim information as of Feb. 5, 2008 as posted on the Government of British Columbia Ministry of Energy, Mines, and Petroleum Resources web site (www.empr.gov.bc.ca) Claim expiry dates do not reflect the value of work documented in this report.

Telegraph Creek Property report- page 1 I ' :--

GOLDEN HAT EXPLORATION INC. TELEGRAPH CREEK PROJECT PROPERTY LocATK)111MAP Figure 1 NTS 1MG/I4 Mining Dmhct Lmrd Dptum NIA Pm)ecbon ~lbn Job' oHMsu1-Bc Date MFebOB AURORA GEOSCKNCES LTD '3

8 6 x P

rci i 544707

L------

I I Record Number Expiry date 544704 October 31 , 2008 r- 544705 7- October 31 , 2008 r 544706 7- October 31, 2008 I 544707 I--October 31 , 2008

I 544708 I October 31, 2008 544709 October 31 , 2008 544710 October 31 , 2008 I 54471 1 I October 31 , 2008 I 544712 I October 31,2008 - - I 544713 October 31, 2008 I 544714 October 31, 2008 I 544715 I October 31 , 2008 544716 October 31 , 2008 544717 October 31 , 2008 544718 I October 31 , 2008 I -

544719 I-- - October 31, 2008 544720 October 31, 2008

During June of 2005, Golden Hat Resources Inc. entered into a sale agreement with Mr. Carl von Einsiedel, an arms length individual, for the purchase of a 100% interest in these 17 claims. (Block 2A). The consideration consisted of $5,000.00 cash and the issuance of 1 million shares. The property is subject to a 1% Net Smelter Royalty. (Golden Hat Resources Inc. MD&A for the Year Ended June 30, 2005)

THE claim group is about 6 to 7 km in length from north to south and varies from 9 to 12 km east to west (Figure 2).

Telegraph Creek Property report- page 2 4.0 EXPLORATION HISTORY

In 1917, a small massive sulphide body containing varying amounts of pyrrhotite and pyrite was discovered on the south-facing slope of the Winter Creek valley. A sample from this material reportedly returned assays of 0.12 oz/ton Au, 0.92 oz/ton Ag, and 5.8% Cu. A description of this occurrence is given by J.D. Mandy in G.S.C. Memoir 246, Lower Stikine and Western lskut Areas, British Columbia, p. 75. (PearseJ974). The Winter Creek valley is about 7 km northwest of the Telegraph claims.

Placer gold was discovered and mined from the Stikine River in the 1860's. The past producing Buck Bar, a few kilometres from the community of Telegraph Creek, was reported to have yielded $100.00 per day, per rocker (in 1860's dollar value). Work was done over an extended period of time but total production is unknown. (BC Minfile 104G 004). The placer gold is thought to have been derived from sources within the Coast Mountains and originated in post-glacial time.

Mineral claims covering various portions of the area have been subsequently staked and abandoned several times, and include for example, the Glenora and King Groups of 1929 (BC Minfile 104G 003) and the NP Group of 1962.

The region has been explored in the past by various companies. A major focus was the search for copper-gold-molybdenum mineralization hosted within alkalic or calc-alkaline porphyry systems.

The Telegraph claims are situated about 60 km north of the Galore Creek deposit. The Galore Creek porphyry deposit was initially discovered in the 1950's. In August 2005, NovaGold Resources Inc. announced an updated resource estimate for the Galore Creek Project, which estimate included a total of 13 million ounces of gold, 156 million ounces of silver and 12.0 billion pounds of copper. won Einsiedel, Carl A. ,2006).

In May 2007, Nova Gold Resources Inc. and Teck Cominco announced they had negotiated a Joint Venture agreement to develop the mine at a cost of $2-billion. (Morton, Mike. Press Release dated May, 23, 2007).

In November 2007, NovaGold and Teck Cominco announced they were suspending construction at the Galore Creek copper-gold mine due to a revised engineering study that indicated there would be significant cost overruns in the mine construction plan.

In July 2007, Iris Remote Sensing Systems Ltd. reported that initial results of a remote sensing survey over Block 2A outlined an "anomaly of mineralization" located within the

Telegraph Creek Property report- page 3 boundary of Mineral Tenure Number 554707. Details of the reported results are found in a Golden Hat Resources Inc. press release dated July 6, 2007.

5.0 DESCRIPTION OF WORK PROGRAM

In August 2007, Golden Hat Resources Inc. contracted Aurora Geosciences Ltd. of Whitehorse, Yukon, to conduct a small-scale soil geochemical sampling program on the Telegraph Creek property.(Figure 3). Soil samples were bagged and labeled in the field by a two-man sampling crew. All soil samples collected were personally delivered to the Aurora Geosciences Ltd. office in Whitehorse by the sampling crew. All soil samples were sent to the SGS Mineral Services laboratory in Toronto to be analysed by Mobile Metal Ion (MMI) techniques, fire assay for gold and ICP geochemistry for silver and copper.

A two-man sampling crew mobilized from Whitehorse by truck on September 1I* and collected the soil samples on September 12*. The crew was based from the North Way Motor Inn in Dease Lake, B.C. Access to the property was provided by Pacific Western Helicopters from Dease Lake.

A total of 19 soil samples were collected; all within the boundaries of Mineral Tenure number 544707. Seven samples were collected along an east-west traverse and 12 samples were collected along a north-south traverse (Figure 3). Samples were collected at 100-metre intervals and each sample site was marked in the field with both orange and blue flagging tape. Soil sample location sites and sample numbers were pre-loaded into non-differential, hand-held, Garmin GPS 72 receivers to facilitate in locating each desired sample site in the field.

No sample material was collected from pre-designated sample site GHN 3.

5.1 Personnel & equipment.

The work program was conducted by the following personnel:

Crew chief: Matt Olsen

Field assistants: JP Tremblay

Telegraph Creek Property eport- page 4 The crew was equipped with the following instruments and equipment:

Instruments: 3 - Garmin GPS receivers Equipment: 1 - Satellite Phone 2 - Radios 2 - Mattocks (Grub hoes) 2 - Axes 2 - Compass 150 - Soil Sample Bags 75 - Tyvek Tags 12 - Rice Bags 12 - Permanent Markers Flagging Safety Equipment including Survival Gear

Vehicles: 1 - 1 Ton truck

A statement of expenditures is included as Appendix B. The crew survey log, Appendix C, includes the names of all persons employed and a description of daily operations.

5.2 Spec ifications .

Geochemical surveys were conducted according to the following specifications:

MaDpina datum: NAD83 Zone 9N UTM (metric)

Station location: WAAS corrected (where available) GPS positioning with each reading averaged at least 20 times.

Samplina: For each sample collected, where a soil profile horizon was present and accessible, samples were taken from below organic layer.

Telegraph Creek Property report- page 5 SamDle markina: All samples were marked with flagging tape and white Tyvek tags, on which the line and station were written. Sample names were abbreviations of the line and station where the sample was collected.

5.3 Sample analysis.

Soil geochemical samples were analyzed by SGS Mineral Services of Toronto, Ontario under package MMI-M. They were also analyzed for gold by fire assay and for silver and copper by ICP methods. Certificates of Analysis are included in Appendix D.

5.4 Data.

UTM coordinates for each soil sample site are contained in Appendix E. A tabulation of the soil geochemical results and statistical analysis are contained in Appendix F. Analytical methods are included as Appendix G. Results of the geochemical survey are discussed in Section 9.0.

6.0 REGIONAL GEOLOGY

Much of the regional geology description that follows has been heavily excerpted from Bulletin 104, published by the Government of British Columbia Ministry of Energy and Mines in October 2000, and summarized in a 2006 British Columbia Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources Assessment report authored by Carl von Einsiedel (Number 28566).

The area described in Bulletin 104 overlaps the boundary between the Intermontane Belt and the Coast Belt and is underlain mainly by rocks of the Stikine Terrane (Stikinia). Stikinia is the largest of the allochthonous terranes accreted to the western margin of ancestral North America. Like other accreted terranes of the Canadian Cordillera, the pre-Jurassic geological history, paleontological and paleomagnetic signatures of Stikinia are unique.

These features have been interpreted in support of the concept that Stikinia was once far removed from its present location and has been accreted to and amalgamated with

Telegraph Creek Property report- page 6 c

the Cache Creek, Quesnel, and Slide Mountain terranes prior to accretion to the North American craton.

In the latitude of the study area, Stikinia consists of well stratified middle Paleozoic to Mesozoic sedimentary rocks and volcanic and comagmatic plutonic rocks of probable Island Arc affinity which include: the Paleozoic Stikine assemblage, the Late Triassic Stuhini Group and the Early Jurassic Hazelton Group. These are overlapped by Middle Jurassic to early Tertiary successor-basin sediments of the Bowser Lake and Sustut Groups, Late Cretaceous to Tertiary continental volcanic rocks of the Sioko Group, and Late Tertiary to Recent bimodal shield volcanic rocks belonging to the Edziza and Spectrum ranges.

The Coast Plutonic Complex intrudes the western boundary of the Stikine Terrane. This complex is a long and narrow magmatic belt that extends the length of the Canadian Cordillera and is composed predominantly of calcalkaline granitoid rocks of Jurassic to Paleogene age. The history of the belt is complex but plutonic rocks of the Coast Belt on its western margin are mid-Cretaceous and on the eastern margin, they are mainly Late Cretaceous to Tertiary age.

In the area described in Bulletin 104, which lies along the east side of the Coast Belt complex, the western margin of Stikinia has been obscured by voluminous post orogenic Tertiary bodies. Continental volcanic rocks of Eocene age (Sioko Group) erupted from local centres north and northwest of the area. Late Triassic to Early Jurassic intrusive rocks of the Copper Mountain Plutonic Suite typically comprise small alkaline bodies that range in composition from monzodiorite to monzonite to syenite. The intrusions are lithologically complex with multiple intrusive phases. These intrusive bodies are metallogenically important because they are associated with copper-gold mineralization in both Stikinia and Quesnellia. The U-Pb ages are similar (c. 200 to 210 Ma) for intrusions associated with porphyry copper-gold deposits in both terranes. Multiple alkaline intrusions and associated ultramafic phases are also present at Galore Creek.

A late Triassic alkaline magmatic centre comprising Stuhini Group volcanic rocks and associated comagmatic intrusive rocks is present in the Galore Creek camp. The camp hosts more than ten synvolcanic, fracture-controlled, copper-gold deposits.

Alkalic porphyry deposits of the Canadian Cordillera appear to have formed in a narrow interval of time between 205 and 170 Ma and comagmatic volcanic rocks invariably appear with the mineralized plutons (Ney and Hollister, 1976). During the Vancouver metallogenic epoch (Triassic and Lower Jurassic), the Nicola, Takla, Hazelton, Bonanza

Telegraph Creek Pmperty report- page 7 and Lewes River groups were deposited and are the host rocks for all of the known alkalic porphyry deposits of the Canadian Cordillera. The mineralized plutons associated with these rocks are intrusive into at least some of the comagmatic volca nics .

Some of the alkalic porphyry deposits in the Cordillera appear to be related to separate north and northeast trending structures that are interpreted as possible zones of continental rifting. Several of these breaks or lineaments are accompanied by linear belts that host numerous, lithologically similar syenite porphyries. (Seraphim and Hollister, 1976)

The association of magnetite with alkalic intrusions suggests that magnetic surveys may be a useful exploration tool in searching for and locating target areas. In addition, delineating the linear distribution of alkalic intrusions, regional faults and zones of brecciation might prove useful in defining areas for follow-up exploration work (Barr, D. E. et. al. ,1976).

7.0 PROPERTY GEOLOGY

A search through the British Columbia Ministry of Energy, Mines, and Petroleum Resources’ ARlS Assessment Report Database turned up only one assessment file that remotely discusses the property geology. The property geology is unfamiliar to the author. The following description of the property geology is excerpted from B.C. Assessment report number 28566.

Regional geological maps available from the BC Department of Mines indicate that the Telegraph claim group is underlain by a sequence of Triassic age volcanic rocks (Stuhini Group) associated with regionally extensive, northeast-oriented shear zones.

The claims were originally acquired to cover possible northeast structural zones and possible small alkalic intrusions which may be prospective for alkalic porphyry copper mineralization (Von Einsiedel, C.A. 2006).

8.0 MINERALIZATION

The author is unaware of any known or documented occurrences of mineralization of any type on the property.

Telegraph Creek Property report- page 8 9.0 GEOCHEMICAL SURVEYS

The soil samples collected in September 2007 were bagged and labeled in the field and returned to Aurora Geosciences’ warehouse to prepare for shipping. The chain of custody of the samples remained under care of Aurora Geosciences Ltd. personnel at all times while the samples were under Aurora’s care. The samples were treated in a safe and secure manner. Individual soil samples were placed in a polyweave bag (rice bag) and sealed with a security tag prior to shipment.

The samples were shipped by Greyhound bus lines to SGS Minerals in Toronto, Canada for analyses.

SGS Minerals analyzed all the samples for various elements using three different techniques:

I)Proprietary Mobile Metal Ion technology for 46 elements (including Au, Ag & Cu).

2) Traditional fire assay for gold.

3) ICP geochemical analysis for silver and copper.

The theory and technique behind the MMI Technology methods can be found on their website at www.mmigeochem.com. An MMI Manual is also available online that outlines the theory of the process, provides data handling and analyses guidelines, and offers advice on the data interpretation. None of the downloadable material is available in PDF Format and there is a provision that the manual should not be copied or duplicated or parts taken from it in any way or form whatsoever without prior written consent of Wamtech Pty. Ltd. The names Mobile Metal Ion Process, Mobile Metal Ion Analysis and Mobile Metal Ion Technology are registered business names of Wamtech Pty. Ltd. Wamtech Pty. Ltd. is the owner of the MMI Process.

The data from the fire assay and ICP-OEM analysis were manipulated to determine the quartiles, means, and standard deviations for each data set (element). Anomalous values were arbitrarily set to be greater than or equal to the arithmetic mean (background) plus two standard deviations. (M+2).

The MMI data were evaluated using two different procedures. In the first instance, the “raw” MMI data were treated exactly as described above for each element.

Telegraph Creek Property report- page 9 In the second instance, the analyses were performed as follows:

For each element the number of samples falling in the 25 percentile was determined. As the number of data points was odd (19), the 25 percentile was selected as five (5). Any values below the detection limit need to be included and a value half of the detection limit has been substituted as an estimate value.

After determining the values in the 25 percentile of the data, these values were then averaged (dividing by 5). The average value was taken to represent BACKGROUND for that element within the specific data set.

Response ratios were then calculated by dividing each sample value by the predetermined background value for that element. The calculated numbers were then rounded up or down to the nearest whole integer greater than or equal to one (1).

A sample with a response ratio of 2, or less, is considered low and is a background sample. Samples with response ratios greater than 5 could be considered significant depending upon the regolith/landform characteristics of the area and the sample spacing used for the survey. MMI Technology does caution that due to the greater contrast inherent in the MMI technique, response ratios, in general need to be greater than 2-5 times background before being considered anomalous.

The effective application of MMI Response ratios relies upon the correct determination of the background for the survey area. It is important that the survey area covers sufficient ground and has not just been conducted over a mineralized sequence. Correct determination of the background and ratioing of all the data to that value helps distinguish between those samples which are anomalous and those which are not.

10.0 RESULTS

The analytical results and assay certificates are given in Appendix D. The geochemical statistical analyses are presented in Appendix F.

The soil samples were collected along two intersecting, perpendicular lines and these data cannot meaningfully be contoured. At best, this survey might be considered as an orientation survey, however, as there is no documented mineralization on the property, and the underlying geology is not documented, it is difficult to interpret the results. Sample spacing was also at 100 metres. Although the sample spacing is very wide, it is probably sufficient given that the target mineralization for the claim is porphyry-hosted.

Telegraph Creek Property report- page 10 Despite these constraints and limitations, there are a few observations that deserve com me nt .

Firstly, all samples were analyzed for Au by both the fire assay technique and the MMI technique. All but one of the samples analyzed by fire assay were at or below the detection limit of 1 ppb Au. GHEI returned a value of 16 ppb Au. For the samples analyzed for Au by the MMI process, the detection limit was substantially lower at 0.1 ppb Au and sample GHEI returned a value of 0.3 ppb Au.

The highest gold values returned from the MMI analyses were 0.5 ppb from GHN5 and GHN9. These value translates to a response ratio of less than twice background and this is not considered to be anomalous. In general, Au values of 10-12 x background are interesting and 20x background is significant. (Grondin, Walter. Personal communication. February 7, 2008).

When the raw data from the MMI analyses were evaluated using standard statistical methods, sample GHEI returned anomalous values for a substantial number of other elements. Utilizing M+2 to define anomalous values, GHEI was anomalous for As, Ce, Cr, Fe, La, Nb, Pd, Th , Ti ,W, and Zr. In the case of As and Ti, the values were greater than three standard deviations from the mean.

When the MMI response ratios are examined for GHEI, it can be seen that this sample was 5-10 times background for As, Ce, Cr, Fe, La, Nd, Pr, Sc, Ti, and Zr. This is in reasonable agreement with the raw data interpretations.

Secondly, all samples were analyzed for both Ag and Cu using the MMI technique as well as the ICP-OES method. The ICP detection limit for Ag is 0.50 ppm and for Cu, the detection limit is 2.7 ppm. MMI detection limits for Ag and Cu are respectively, 1 ppb and 10 ppb.

None of the samples analyzed for Ag by the ICP-OES method were above background. A comparison to the MMI results for Ag shows that for the raw data, none of the samples returned a value greater than M+2. Additionally, none of the Ag response ratios reached as high as 2 x background.

For Cu, the ICP-OES values ranged from a low of 16.2 ppm to a high of 78.5 ppm; the high being for sample GHE3. This value is very slightly anomalous if M+2 (74.8 ppm) defines anomalous. A comparison to the MMI results shows that for the Cu raw data, two of the samples returned a value greater than M+2. Sample GHN9 returned a value

Telegraph Creek Property report- page 7 1 of 4050 ppb and sample GHN13 returned a high of 4850 ppb Cu. The MMI response ratios for both samples are just under twice background and not considered to be anomalous.

For the MMI raw data, sample GHN9 returned anomalous values for both Mg and Mo (>M+2). The values for U and Au were equal to the M+2 values, which puts them on the threshold of being anomalous for these elements. The MMI response ratios for Mo was 2-5 times background ( 9 ppb,). For Mg, the response ratio was less than twice the background.

Sample GHN7 returned anomalous values for As, Mo, Rb, and TI when the raw MMI data were considered. As was slightly greater than M+2 and the response ratio was just greater than 5 x background. Mo response ratio was between 2 and 5 x background. For Rb, the response ratio, at 14, was slightly less than 5 x background.

Sample GHN12 was below the ICP-OES detection limit for Ag but returned a value of 47 ppb when analyzed by MMI. This is slightly anomalous at M+2, however, the response ratio for this sample was just under 2 x background; not considered to be anomalous.

The raw MMI data for GHN 13 showed M+2 anomalous values for both Cu, and Sb. Response ratio for Cu was less than 2 x background and Sb was just greater than 2 x background.

II .O CONCLUSIONS and RECOMMENDATIONS

Sample GHEI returned a value of 16 ppb Au when analyzed by fire assay and the MMI data indicate this sample was also anomalous for a number of other elements. The location of this sample is at the extreme, uphill, east end of an east-west line that runs downhill roughly perpendicular to the topographic contours in the area. The significance of this sample is difficult to assess, however, it is the only sample that returned a value greater than the detection limit for Au when analyzed by fire assay. If the calculated anomalous values represent material that has been transported downhill, it would be logical to extend this line further to the east (probably to the ridge or break in slope) and collect additional soil samples.

As the target type being sought is porphyry style mineralization a 100 metre sample spacing on an expanded grid might be adequate to provide additional background

Telegraph Creek Property report- page 72 information through soil samples and evaluate the background levels more completely.

The current soil sampling program was completed in one day by a two-man crew. If a wider area is to be evaluated, this could be done with a four-man crew and the marginal cost would be the salaries of two additional persons plus the assay costs. It is not anticipated that additional helicopter time would be required.

It is also significant that the ICP-OES method of determining copper and the fire assay technique for gold both appear to have "worked". A future soil sampling program is recommended on an expanded grid with the samples being analyzed with the more traditional ICP method. This would be less costly than MMI assaying and expanded grid sampling could provide a better understanding of the relevant background and anomalous values for the property. Enough material could be collected and stored that it could later be sent for MMI analyses, if warranted.

It is also recommended that a prospecting and lithogeochemical sampling program be conducted and a geological base map of the property produced. The sampler did not record the reason why there was no sample collected at the site for GHN3. This suggests possible outcrop or subcrop may be exposed on the property.

Respectfully submitted,

M: CN = J MiadWark. C = Cq 0 =Aurora Oeosdences ud , J. Michael Wark ~AYZE~~~~~~ Dde: 2008.02.13 I1:00:52 08W AURORA GEOSCIENCES LTD.

REFERENCES CITED

Barr, D.E., Fox, P.E., Northcote, K.E., and Preto, V.A. (1976). The Alkaline Suite of Porphry Copper Deposits - A Summary.h Porphyry Deposits of the Canadian Cordillera. Special Volume 15.pp 359-367. Published by the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy

Golden Hat Resources lnc. (2005).Management Discussion and Analysis for the Year Ended June 30,2005.Filed November 22,2005. www.sedar.com

Golden Hat Resources Inc. (2007). Press Release dated July 6, 2007. Results of

Telegraph Creek Property report- page 13 Survey at Telegraph Creek. www.sedar.com

Government of British Columbia Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources. Mineral Titles Online Viewer. Mineral Tenure Maps. February 2008. www. em pr.aov. bc. ca

Morton, Mike. (2007) Government of British Columbia, Office of the Premier and Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources. Press Release dated May 23, 2007. Galore Creek Mining Project to Boost Northwest Economy. www2. news .g ov .b c .ca/n e w s-re1 ea ses

Ney, C.S. and Hollister, V.F. (1976). Geological Setting Of Porphyry Copper Deposits Of The Canadian Cordillera. In Porphyry Deposits of the Canadian Cordillera. Special Volume 15.pp 21-29. Published by the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy

Pearse, T.D. (1 974). Geological, Geochemical, and Topographical mapping report on the KIT claim group, Winter Creek, Telegraph Creek area. British Columbia Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources Assessment Report 05509.

Reedman, J.H. (1979). Techniques in Mineral Exploration. p 97. Applied Science Publishers Ltd., London. Seraphim, R.H. and Hollister, V.F. (1976). Structural Settings. In Porphyry Deposits of the Canadian Cordillera. Special Volume 15.pp 30-43. Published by the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.

Vanderklippe, N. (2007). Financial Post. Published online November 26,2007. NovaGold Shares Plunge As Work Halted On Galore Creek Mine. www.financialpost.com

Von Einsiedel, Carl A. (2006). Structural Analysis using Gretscale “Hillshaded Imagery” on the Telegraph Claims. British Columbia Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources Assessment Report 28566.

Telegraph Creek Property report- page 74 APPENDIX A. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS

Telegraph Creek Property report- page 75 Statement of Qualifications

I, J. Michael Wark, B.Sc. (Hons), certify that:

I) I currently reside at 19 Turner Crescent, Whitehorse, Yukon Territory, YIA 5R2

2) I am a graduate geologist currently employed by Aurora Geosciences Ltd. of Whitehorse, Yukon Territory.

3) I graduated from Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia in 1980 with a Bachelor of Science Honours Degree in Geology.

4) Since my graduation I have practiced my profession continually.

5) I am currently a member in good standing with the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada.

6) I have prepared this report based upon data collected by Aurora Geoscience employees from the Telegraph Creek Property (Mineral Tenure 544707), in addition to other third party sources.

7) I have not personally visited the Telegraph Creek Property, which is 100% owned by Golden Hat Resources Inc.

8) I do not hold any shares or other interests of any type in Golden Hat Resources Inc.

9) I have limited experience and knowledge of the techniques employed by SGS Minerals Services and their applications for Mobile Metal Ion technology.

1O)I have no personal knowledge of, or experience with, the technology employed by Iris Remote Sensing Systems Ltd. As a consequence, I am unable to offer an informed opinion or assessment of the reported findings of their survey, results for which have been reported in a Golden Hat Resources Inc. Press Release dated July 6, 2007.

11)l am a past member of NAPEGG (Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of the NW) and served the association as a counsellor and member of the disciplinary committee.

12)l am unaware of any material fact or change with respect to the subject matter of this assessment report that is not reflected in the report, and the omission of which would cause this report to be misleading.

Dated this 1I* day of F-, 2008, at Whitehorse, Yukon Territory

J. Michael Wark, BSc. (Hons)

Diaitalb sianed by J. Michael Wark

Date: 2008.02.1 3 1 1:01:28 -08'00' APPENDIX B. STATEMENT OF EXPENDITURES

Telegraph Creek Property report- page 76 Statement of Expenditures - Telegraph Creek Property

Matt Olsen, Sampling Crew Chief Sept. 11" & 12" $512.50 J.P. Tremblay, Field assistant Sept. I?'"'' 12" $512.50 $1 025.00 Note: Sampling crew charged on a flat rate of $1025.00/day

Meals Sept. IP& 12* $98.02 Taxable food items sept 11% 12" $53.68 $1 51.70

Mobilization wenses; Fuel Sept. 1I" $222.46 Flat Rate mobilizationcharges $855.00 $1 077.46 b PreDmon em Flat rate charges $350.00 GPS Data Processing LUQ $447.50

HelicoDter SU0DOf-L Flight Charges 3.7 hrs @ $860.00 Sept. 12" $3182.00 Fuel surcharges422 L @ $1.40/L Sept. m $3772.80

Sample freight charges Sept. 20" $ 19.10 SGS MMI geochem charges Oct. 3lS' $704.90 SGS Fire Assay & ICP charges uxL!% $1259.66

Initial field report Sept 20" u2sQQQ $500.00 Final report charges: Gabe Fortin, Geologist. Data processing and drafting Nov. 8" to 20" 4 hrs @ 65.00 $ 260.00 Gabe Fortin, Geologist. Research and report prep Nov. 8" to 20fh 22.75 hrs @ 90.00 $2047.50 Mike Wark, Senior Geologist. Repoa writing and data interpretation Nov. la 0.25 hrs @ $90.00 $ 22.50 Feb. 5" to 7" 40.75 hrs @ $90.00 $3667.50 Holly Stirling, Draftsperson. Maps and plotting Feb. 7" 4.0 hrs @ $65.00 uauu $6257.50

Total expenditure claimed for Application for Certificate of Work $14,491.62

I, J. Michael Wark, does hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge, these expenditures are a true and accurate account of the exploration costs on the Telegraph Creek Property. APPENDIX C. CREW LOG

Telegraph Creek Pmperty report- page 17 Mobilized from Whdehorse to Dease Lake, BC. 9/11/2007 Stayed at Dease Lake NolM Way Motor Inn. Completed the Golden Hat Telegraph Creek Grid. JP sampled the E-W line, Matt sampled the N-S line. Matt and JP each sampled of E-W line. 9/12/2007 Weather: Sunny 9/13/2007 Moved onto other project out of Dease Lake. APPENDIX D. CERTIFICATES OF ANALYSES

Telegraph Creek Property report- page 78 -sGsl CeMkateofAnalysk .. ,.~,;, Paga2d2

aa &I rb cu YemOQ FADm WtZB lCPIzB Ddm. 1 2 0.5 PPBPPMPPM IJMS ...... 16 Q 18.8 GHE 1 ...... OHE2 ...... 1 a ~. 32.3 GHE3 4 Q 785 ...... ,~ . ... 4 4 Q 59.6 GHE ...... st GHE5 ...... Q 16.2 GHEB 4 Q 19.0 ...... 4 Q OM7 ...... 222 oHN1 4 Q 32.1 ...... 4 Q M.5 GHNZ ...... 4 Q 34.9 GHN4 ...... GHN5 4 Q M.0 34.7 me ...... 4 a ... 7' 4 Q 1S.l GHN . ,.,...... GHN8 4 Q M.6 ...... ,, .. .,. OHN9 Q 62.4 ...... , 4 GHN10-. 4 Q 83.9 , ,. 4 GHNl1 ...... Q 62.4 OHN12 21.3 ...... 4 , .. Q 4 Q ~aiim13 ...... 403 1.6 Q 17.4 ...... -~ 4 Q 18.4 ,,- -b(Yhli . ~. , .SM OXLW ...... m ..... 4 *BUN( ...... , .. Q 88.8 5M XRALO1A ...... Q Q.5 gwrelAN( ... .. ,/- rg *I uoy5 yw 1 0.1 pw pw pw 17 0.3 4 13 16 02 -1 7 8 02 4 al P Q.l .I 7 14 0.1 0 6 5 02 0 n n 0.1 0 32 la 0.1 4 o? 14 0.1 4 47 ZI 02 a 18 0.5 0 1s la 02 0 23 3s Q.l 4 la 11 0.4 4 1. 3014 05 4 10 0.4 4 m 24 02 4 n 47 02 '1 12 4 0.1 4 n 11 41.i cl U Q.l 0 17 41.0 4 a Q.1 0 4 -3d6 a Fe U 1* YrYI YUlJ Ylw 05 -I 1 Pm PPB PmpRI 81 ws 0 1m 73 140 6 53 m 14 7 6 104 45 110 6 1a 92 227 Q m 118 242 6 4I 80 6 137 1. 1. 237 0 1.5 120 240 7 1w 174 =I 10 14 117 250 4 153 174 JZ go 14 145 a1 6 113 om 393 6 BD n 44 6 4m 3e 53 7 4F2 31 7) 7 eo s 73 4 ca Q 104 8 im en 1me B 112 140 ZaO 9 118 2 10 6 47 .1 -5 6 -1 5 05 1 10 1 1 S Pmw Fm Fm Re Pm Ra Ffe pw QFB (0.2 p. m 2 n 4 2m .1 a 2.1 ins a Cl a? 4 1s 4 6 1.4 1K4 10 ‘l 31 -1 182 n 6 4)d 110 40 4 18 4 ia .1 4 07 M P ‘1 51 .1 91 4 4 1.4 273 E4 * 54 ‘1 w -1 ,8 tm 62 a 4 18 -1 n ‘l a 15 m a ‘l u 4 a ‘l 4 IS 251 W 1 47 ‘l E4 1 10 1.4 w m -1 e3 ‘l 4 B Qd a3 W 4 4r 4 47 4 6 Q.5 412 W 4 n rt Is .I n 32 483 so 1 M r( 256 4 4 dd 412 so ‘l m 4 11 .1 P 10 34 40 rl s 4 7 Cl a 0.8 s 40 ‘1 I 4 16 4 4 09 m W -1 17 ‘l 47 rl 0 9.5 n W ‘l 15 4 (8 rl L 12 a 40 4 m -1 P 2 U 8) 314 m 1 72 -1 lsl r1 an at 4s m 1 05 ‘1 ns 1 a -0.5 17 1W 4s 3 .1 .m 4 a Q.5 -9 -10 ‘l 4 .1 6 4

, /- SGSl (* h R lMLM6uMlsykus 5 1 03 PFn RB pw m 15 0.5 m 12 Q.5 4s 11 41.5 161 8 Q.5 1M 11 Q.5 lm 20 4.5 74 1 4.5 so a0 Q.5 14 21 41~5 167 I0 Q.5 118 za Q.6 1% 50 41.5 in n 0.9 1m W Q.5 14 4 41.5 10 5 -0.5 I3 s Q.5 m 8 416 41 8 41.5 2m 1s Q.8 1#7 27 09 0 <1 4.5 4 rl 41.5

c 1 20 P!%m Rs PPB % 2 20 31 -1 31 10 4 Y 19 4 1I 31 .1 32 n * u n d 1s Q .I a el r1 E4 31 4 IS 47 8l ul a rl m 40 a1 a % -4 68 @s -1 11 12 d al 13 -1 12 11 ‘1 15 n

Telegraph Creek Property report- page 79 Golden Hat Resources Inc. Telegraph Creek Soil Sampling Sampled GPS Locations NAME UTMNAD83-E UTMNAD83-N GHEl 356950 6408485 GHE2 357050 6408482 GHE3 357150 6408478 GHE4 357250 6408475 GHES 357350 6408471 GHE6 357550 6408464 GHE7 357650 6408461 GHE8 no sample GHES no sample GHElO no sample GHNI 357427 6407860 GHNlO 357459 6408760 GHNll 357463 6408860 GHN12 357466 6408960 GHN13 357470 6409060 GHN2 35743 1 6407960 GHN3 no sample GHN4 357438 6408160 GHNS 357441 6408260 GHN6 357445 6408360 GHN7 357449 6408460 GHN8 357452 6408560 GHNS 357456 6408660 APPENDIX F. GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY ANALYSES

Telegraph Creek Property report- page 20 Appendix F: Geostatistical Analysis

ANALYTE Au Ag cu METHOD FA1303 ICP12B ICP12B DETECTION 1 2 0.5 UNITS PPB PPM PPM GHE 1 16 <2 18.8 GHE 2 1 <2 32.3 GHE 3 <1 <2 78.5 GHE 4 <1 <2 59.6 GHE 5

GHE 1 16 1 18.8 GHE 2 1 1 32.3 GHE 3 0.5 1 78.5 GHE 4 0.5 1 59.6 GHE 5 0.5 1 16.2 GHE 6 0.5 1 19 GHE 7 0.5 1 22.2 GHN 1 0.5 1 32.1 GHN 2 0.5 I 30.5 GHN 4 0.5 1 34.9 GHN 5 0.5 1 30 GHN 6 0.5 1 34.7 GHN 7 0.5 1 19.1 GHN a 0.5 1 30.6 GHN 9 0.5 1 62.4 GHN 10 0.5 1 63.9 GHN 11 0.5 1 62.4 GHN 12 0.5 1 21-3 GHN 13 0.5 1 40.3 DUP-GHE 1 I.S. <2 17.4 DUP-GHN 7

Limits Q 1-3(Q3-Q1) 0.5 1 -62.9 Q1-1.5(Q3-Q1) 0.5 1 -20.6 Q1 0.5 1 21.8 Q2 0.5 1 32.1 Q3 0.5 1 50 Q3+1.5*(Q3-Q1) 0.5 1 92.3 Q3+3*(Q3-Q1 ) 0.5 1 134.6

Median 0.5 1 32.1 Mean 1.342105 1 37.30526 Standard deviation 3.551418 o 18.73483 M-1 -2.2 1 18.6 M 1.3 1 37.3 M+l 4.9 1 56 M+2 8.4 1 74.8 M+3 12 1 93.5

N 19 19 19 1

Smrnpb WE i GHE2 ...... GHE 3 1 5 0.2 4CSO 0.5 I iea i18 3w irm (18 GHE 4 mm MOM75 22 5 0.05 1m as 7 94 id 1m I3m 45 GM5 357350 MOM71 14 5 0.i 3910 0.5 5 ffl in 50 4% 02 WE8 357550 WOE44 5 140 5 0.2 ,150 310~~~ 21 313 i47 50 Ea 118 GHE 7 357850 84oK41 19 W 5 0.1 2820 0.6 510 3l 1I u 50 SII) 4i Gw1 357427 847m 16 I".. 5 0.1 MOO 0.5 810 17 iw im 1250 I14 GUN 2 357431 14 77 5 0.1 m0 0.5 Mo 47 254 240 100 1220 129 GUN4 3574% 27 97 5 0.2 3330 0.5 (uo 37 215 140 50 14iO 174 GHN 5 357ui 18 55 5 0.5 4570 0.5 570 is 292 174 50 $7110 117 GHN 1 357445 13 73 5 0.2 a40 0.5 sm u 420 lea rm ISM i74 GUN 7 35749 32 145 M 0.05 53io 0.5 550 i8 81 2m 200 Em (45 GUN 8 357452 11 6B 5 0.4 45io 0.5 610 19 3M 43s 50 1040 in GUN 9 357- 30 15 5 0.5 2110 0.5 sm m 22 24a 50 4En 29 GUN 10 357469 14 33 5 0.4 imo 0.5 820 10 d 1R1 50 1Mo 38 GUN ti 357uu 24 40 5 0.2 w 0.5 ea n 78 8s 50 UDO 3i GUN 12 357w 47 05 5 0.2 smo 0.5 4M 12 159 M 50 (110 35 GUN 13 357470 U 37 5 0.1 3Joo 0.5 610 2i M ea 50 rn 43 i4 53.5 5 0.1 2500 05 4M 14 112 103.5 M em 42 (7 75 5 0.2 WM 0.5 sm 2i 215 iea 50 1210 8i 25.5 1m.s 5 025 Us0 0.5 630 29.5 uJ.5 IR1.5 1m 15OS 123.5

ao.5 08.5 5.0 0.4 m.0 0.5 d0.0 42.5 612.5 4755 -1m.0 3075.0 a25 5.3 -21.5 5.0 0.1 a.0 0.5 205.0 a.3 -250.3 .39.0 -25.0 -?02.5 60.3 4.d. 53.5 5.0 0.1 2503.0 0.5 yxI.0 14.0 112.0 im.s 50.0 870.0 42.0 17.0 78.0 5.0 0.2 WM.0 0.5 570.0 21.0 215.0 iea.0 50.0 lpo.O 81.0 25.5 103.5 5.0 0.3 4290.0 0.5 810.0 29.5 3u.5 is.5 100.0 1y)s.O iu.5 u.8 14.5 5.0 0.5 W.0 0.5 ea5.0 52.8 715.8 W.0 175.0 2s67.5 245.1 50.0 253.5 5.0 0.7 wo.0 0.5 1140.0 78.0 1m.0 475% 250.0 4330.0 m.0

mn 17 78 5 0.2 Jam L*n 20,421wO 92157W7 8.15789474 0.2i578947 32d210626 Sbndud&MmKon 11.0187337 (u.WB453 0.801111144 0.144473M 1isO.WIo

M-1 9.4 29.5 -1.4 0.1 1201.1 .. .. ~~.~ ~~~ M 20.4 92.2 8.2 0.2 uD2.i 0.5 Yi.l 23:& 274.0 1M.L) 92.i 148.4 0o.i wi 31,4 m.8 17.1 0.4 -2.4 0.5 Sm.9 39.38 491.7 252.7 174.2 W2.3 141.9 M.2 U.5 2i7.5 27.4 0.5 snz.8 0.5 820.7 54.82 709.3 24.8 259.3 3918.1 193.8 M.3 53.5 2w.2 37.0 0.8 m3.i 0.5 m.8 70.1 927.0 4~8.8 33t4 4ow.o 215.4

N 19 10 1s I9 I9 19 19 1s 19 i9 IS (9 19

cum cas9pb ca-m coM 439Cr~~b CUJ* Wgpb i74 WP~ 47 urnm *cp*40 0.5 w*5310 0.5 MO 87 735 300 4am U 157 M 0.5 4750 0.5 eao 47 246 3004En i74 32 145 5 0.4 45M 0.5 eao 40 ffl 240 Uam iM 30 i10 5 0.4 4510 0.5 MO 37 420 zm im im i45 27 110 5 0.3 4240 0.5 YO 32 394 is7 im (rn (28 24 97 5 0.2 4M 0.5 820 27 313 1s im 1410 118 22 85 5 0.2 4DM 0.5 810 28 292 lea 50 13w 117 is W 5 0.2 3910 0.5 570 23 mi 179 50 1SM 1i4 11 (I0 5 0.2 3820 0.5 570 21 254 174 so 1250 92 17 78 5 0.2 3400 0.5 570 21 215 lea 50 ipo 81 15 n 5 0.2 3330 0.5 550 20 rse 148 50 iim n 15 n 5 02 ssw 0.5 YO 10 1M 147 50 1w 511 I4 Be 5 0.1 3u30 0.5 510 i8 159 140 50 81yI 45 i4 55 5 0.1 2820 0.5 dB0 15 130 118 50 800 43 14 52 5 0.1 2180 0.5 en 13 84 8s M 850 41 (3 40 5 0.1 IS0 0.5 440 12 78 Y M 8iO Jo 11 37 5 0.1 1900 0.5 ow 7 50 W 50 510 35 8 33 5 0.05 1m 0.5 330 7 4a 58 50 4% 31 5 1s 5 0.05 850 0.5 240 5 z? u 50 MO u 3 1

ELPN EUN ~n~mGeppb tam u-w MePPm uewb 15Nb20b WPb Nbpb 5np4996 P~-W msm gppa Repub sm- wb 37.9 20.5 2u m 251 (I 103 10.2 328 2 78 0.5 200 0.5 277 41.1 14.8 89 74 102 2.5 53 2.5 2.1 185 180 40 0.5 37 0.5 18 0.5 200 41 14.7 Ed w el 2.5 194 2.5 1.4 1% 1140 30 0.5 31 0.5 11 0.5 439 24.5 11 28 56 40 2.5 1w 2.5 0.25 110 481 5 0.5 in 0.5 211 0.5 157 45 2x7 30 101 12e 2.5 86 2.5 0.7 2% ms 50 0.5 51 0.5 91 0.5 17e w.e 24.2 I 120 140 2.5 101 2.5 1.4 273 794 50 1 Y 0.6 I@ 0.5 m7 20.5 8 52 41 I 2.5 137 in 1.8 62 882 40 0.5 in 0.5 n 0.5 74 M.7 w.7 5e 121 ge 9 145 2.5 1.5 233 1350 40 0.5 43 0.5 48 0.5 m 73 24.9 73 129 114 7 130 2.5 1.5 251 13m 30 1 47 0.5 50 1 148 97.3 8.5 55 163 142 in 140 10 1.1 w (em M 0.5 83 0.5 8 0.5 187 (ue 25.e 28 12a 117 2.5 153 2.5 025 260 iMO 20 0.5 47 0,s CI 0.5 111 101 38.2 42 192 1w 19 146 2.5 0.25 412 2150 XI 0.5 n 0.5 75 0.5 152 87.9 I.1 n 111 21s 2.5 113 27 3.2 483 1210 80 1 M 0.5 235 0.5 17e 93.8 39.3 28 1w 177 2.5 202 2.5 025 412 1WU 30 0.5 75 0.5 11 0.5 im 15.2 4A 7 25 12 2.5 4% 22 1 51 4M 5 0.5 5 0.5 7 0.5 14 35.3 5.3 5 29 14 7 452 25 OR 56 1730 5 0.5 8 0.5 15 0.5 10 15.8 7.9 m 39 39 7 so 2.5 0.8 w 143n m 0.5 17 0.5 47 0.5 15 in 7.3 I I 39 2.5 e5 5 025 n se 30 0.5 15 0.5 189 0.5 83 22.8 10.4 30 50 35 8 1M 9 1.2 8s rmo 5 0.5 15 0.5 W 2 41 23.55 9.2 25 45.5 39 2.5 102 2.5 0.425 en (L90 20 0.5 18.5 0.5 33 0.5 71.5 41.1 20.5 42 m 102 2.5 140 2.5 1.1 w 1MO 30 0.5 43 0.5 50 0.5 152 e7.25 25.35 71 128.5 141 7 174.5 9.5 1.5 301 i3m 45 0.5 58.5 0.5 150 0.5 in

-107.8 58.3 -101.0 -203.5 -7.0 -11.0 -115.5 -18.5 -2.11 .M~.o -iem.o .%.a 0.5 -100.5 0.5 41e.o 0.5 317.0 42.0 -15.0 JI1.5 -79.0 -114.0 d.3 +.e -3.0 -1.2 .m.o d10.0 m.5 0.5 49.5 0.5 -142.5 0.5 69.3 w.e 9.2 2e.o 45.5 38.0 2.5 102.0 2.5 0.4 i.0 ey1.o 20.0 0.5 18.5 0.5 33.0 0.5 76.5 41.1 20.5 42.0 86.0 102.0 2.5 140.0 2.5 1.1 233.0 lMO.0 30.0 0.5 43.0 0.5 50.0 0.5 152.0 67.3 25.4 71.0 121.5 141.0 1.0 174.5 9.5 1.5 301.0 1W.O 45.0 0.5 bo.5 0.5 1m.o 0.5 177.0 132.8 49.8 135.5 253.0 291.0 i3.e m3.3 20.0 3.1 819.0 2530.0 1.5 0.5 121.5 0.5 325.5 0.5 324.1 lm.4 73.8 2m.o 377.5 u7.0 20.5 392.0 30.5 4.7 w.0 wu.o 120.0 05 1M.5 0.5 501.0 0.5 472.5

41.1 20.5 42 m 102 2.5 140 2.5 1.1 233 1MO 30 0.5 43 0.5 50 0.5 152 49.W1579 19.9315780 555789474 I.3157880 102.842105 5.71052W lBS.lOM3 7.W105 l.S(DM51 218 1103.05285 Yd3157W 0.857W74 41.4- 0.5 ~)6.3imrnO.(YYM~I(I 148 2(1.ya1072 wwwe 4m74wa 8.4577818 w.37mii 5.~470937111.me 7.751~410~zmnam m.ww ev.mam 19.81e4ces 0.~7~ 28- 0 m.mls$zs o.xwd4125 los.851435 21.3 11.0 5.70 39.9 33.5 0.8 53.8 4.4 4.7 79.5 487.5 12.8 0.3 i4.e 0.5 14.8 02 40.4 40.7 i9.0 (15.111 m.3 tm.8 5.7 11.1 7.4 1.5 2111.0 1lrn.l 511 0.7 41.5 0.5 I.3 od 11.0 7e.o 31.9 io5.e 150.0 in2 10.8 2781 15.1 3.8 W.5 1711.8 U.4 in 1.3 0.5 155.1 1.0 ma lM,4 43.9 1I.P 215.2 241d 15.8 W,l 22.9 0.0 u0.0 m.1 72.3 1.4 952 0.5 m.3 1.3 357.3 151.7 55.11 m.20 273.7 311.0 20.9 4Wd 30d 8.2 625.4 2o*o.e s2.1 1.8 1P.O 0.5 M.8 1.7 42.9

19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 1s 1s 19 19 18 19 19

Ergpb Eupb Fe-OOm Odgpb La-wb UJpb lswm uoppb 27Nbd102 Md t4gpbPm Wspb P4ppb I! %Pb WPb RbJN SbJpO Scgpb 101 39.3 251 1M 251 4% 91 0.5 235 2 435 97.3 392 I 11 219 18 452 22 3.2 412 1WU M 1 77 0.5 2m 1 277 93.8 8.1 I 181 in 9 2m 1e 2.1 412 1M no 1 7e 0.5 1m 0.5 287 73 56.5 n 111) ins 8 194 in 1.6 w i8m M 1 75 0.5 185 0.5 zw e7.9 25.8 73 128 142 7 1M 10 1.5 3a 1Uo 60 0.5 65 0.5 11 0.5 178 m.8 24.9 8s 121 140 7 189 9 1.5 273 138 40 0.5 54 0.5 II 0.5 17u M.7 24.2 se 121 1m 7 133 e 1.4 255 13W 40 0.5 51 0.5 81 0.5 rm m.e 23.7 % 120 117 e 145 2.5 1.4 253 1210 40 0.5 47 0.6 75 0.5 187 45 22.7 52 101 114 2.5 145 2.5 1.2 251 1140 30 0.5 47 0.5 n 0.5 157 41.1 20.5 42 80 102 25 140 2.5 1.1 233 30 0.5 43 0.5 50 0.5 152 41 14.1 8 74 gs 2.5 137 2.5 1 185 1090 30 0.5 37 0.5 48 0.5 148 37.0 14.7 30 w et 2.5 130 2.5 0.9 1bo ?84 30 0.5 31 0.5 47 0.5 118 35.3 11 30 56 40 2.5 113 2.5 0.7 110 %I30 0.5 in 0.5 47 0.5 m 24.5 10.4 211 HI 39 2.5 103 2.5 0.e 89 em 20 0.5 17 0.5 31 0.5 W 22.11 (I 25 41 39 a5 101 2.5 025 Ba ma 10 0.5 to 0.5 29 0.5 74 m5 7.9 28 38 31 2.5 m 2.5 0.25 82 573 5 0.5 18 0.5 n 0.5 41 15 7.3 26 56 35 25 m 2.5 0.25 77 UYI 5 0.5 15 0.5 15 0.5 15 15.8 5.3 7 29 14 2.5 85 2.5 0.25 3(1 451 5 0.5 B 0.5 11 0.5 14 15.2 4.4 5 25 12 2.5 53 2.5 0.25 51 1s 5 0.5 5 0.5 7 0.5 10 D

55 0.5 1m 5 12 5 lR2 324 025 31 0.5 ..I, 80 1I 48 0.5 1410 5 11 5 14.3 57 025 18 0.5 417 34 XHI 150 911 0.5 1170 5 8 5 3.7 15 0.25 19 0.5 2W 3, M 50 78 0.5 1- 5 17 5 13 143 025 31 0.5 422 52 40 in I 0.5 1m (1.5 20 5 18.8 im 025 27 0.5 875 52 om 211 2s 0.5 2070 0.5 7 5 8.3 21 0.25 27 0.5 2w 15 270 103 81 0.5 3010 05 20 5 8.8 22 0.25 U 0.5 w7 a 710 In I 0.5 3340 0.5 21 5 8.7 29 0.25 87 0.5 752 I 4M 224 121 0.5 SOH) 0.5 29 5 10.2 21 0.25 31 0.5 1010 75 11M 1M ea 0.5 2750 0s 20 5 8.9 8 0.25 47 0.5 em 48 100 I7 1% 0.5 2330 0.5 30 5 9.S 19 0.25 48 0.5 sm M iw 163 1U 0.5 1mo 0.5 27 5 21.8 453 0.0 48 0.5 748 40 210 308 1% 0.5 Zsn 0.5 m 5 5.3 17 025 55 0.5 913 e3 310 S3 13 0.5 5240 0.5 4 5 1.9 15 0.25 e3 0.5 im 11 470 33 14 0.5 2420 0.5 5 5 1 1.5 0.25 12 0.5 122 32 250 47 m 0.5 1500 0.5 8 5 9 19 0.21 13 0.5 1s 12 1M 81 m 0.5 3230 0.5 e 5 4.8 24 025 21 0.5 1I 13 80 I 33 0.5 33m 0.5 8 5 12.1 8 0.1 27 0.5 290 17 250 W 3* 0.5 IS30 0.5 7.5 5 5.8 16 0.25 24 0.5 252.5 17 145 74.5 79 0.5 2330 0.5 15 5 9 n 0.21 31 0.5 422 32 280 130 I 0.5 9MO 0.5 M.5 5 13.m m 0.25 Is 0.5 7M s(L5 475 1m.s

-1Y.O 0.5 -257Q.O 0.5 -31.5 5.0 -17.8 -115.0 0.3 3.0 0.5 .1101.0 d3.5 445.0 237.5 -51.5 0.5 -no.o 0.5 -12.0 5.0 4.0 99.5 0.3 -7.5 0.5 424.0 a3 -330.0 41.5 31.0 0.5 1Bso.O 0.5 7.5 5.0 5.8 18.0 0.3 24.0 0.5 212.5 179 145.0 74.5 79.0 0.5 m.0 0.5 15.0 5.0 9.0 22.0 0.3 31.0 0.5 422.0 32.0 m.0 130.0 I.0 0.5 m.0 0.5 20.5 5.0 13.7 M.0 0.3 45.0 0.5 7M.0 50.5 475.0 178.5 1m.5 0.5 5130.0 0.5 4.0 5.0 25.4 200.5 0.3 78.5 0.5 19111.3 100.8 9m0 324.5 251.0 0.5 7250.0 0.5 59.5 5.0 37.2 SU.0 0.3 101.0 0.5 m.5 151.0 1w.o 4w.5

79 0.5 2330 0.5 15 5 9 22 0.25 31 0.5 422 32 280 150 89.3157€35 0.5 2270.47368 0.5 15.S2031M 5 11.5 1oe.u(u1 0.207W ~.MU~IOSo.smn7 511.473~37.~~1103 357.~737 1u.7~74 42.24M148 0 112.W8 0 8.846.35999 o 10.7551021 555.~1~010.156m7u ts.mi 0.~123621.70~ 2i.sumw SO~.JDS(US s.mmw 27.1 0.5 140&9 0.5 8.8 5.0 0.7 457.4 0.1 18.0 0.2 214.8 18.1 50.3 49.8 89.3 0.5 nm.5 0.5 15.5 5.0 11.5 11.4 0.3 u.7 0.8 511.5 37.7 557.9 1448 111.8 0.5 -2.1 0.5 24.5 5.0 22.3 754 0.5 a.4 0.9 7m.2 59.3 Ms.5 uo.0 153.8 0.5 Wd 0.5 33A 5.0 33.0 1310.1 0.1 S.2 1.3 IW4.0 M.0 913.1 335.2 1W.l 0.5 47172 0.5 42.4 5.0 U.8 1m.9 0.1 M.O 1.8 1371.8 im.5 120.7 w.3

19 19 1s 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19

Sm-W SngPd SCWQ TwPd Tegpb ThJPd 50 TI& 2uo TCWQ US@ WgpD Ym veppb 144 0.5 3340 0.5 30 5 0.9 87 2 1010 403 134 0.5 3900 0.5 29 5 21.8 453 0.5 85 0.5 978 3m 134 0.6 3240 0.5 29 5 18.8 324 025 48 0.5 913 0 710 224 121 0.5 3230 0.5 27 5 18.2 1U 025 48 0.5 748 58 yo 211 I 0.5 3054 0.5 21 5 14.3 tm 025 47 0.5 752 52 4M 1Bo I 0.5 3010 0.5 20 5 13 57 025 43 0.5 878 48 470 1n 85 0.5 2m 0.5 20 5 12.1 29 025 35 0.5 875 49 ?an in P 0.5 2750 0.5 M 5 102 28 025 31 0.5 w7 48 310 163 81 0.5 2uO 0.5 17 5 0.9 24 0.25 31 0.5 435 Y 270 158 79 0.5 2330 0.5 15 5 9 22 0.25 31 0.5 422 32 250 150 55 0.5 2070 0.5 12 5 8.7 21 0.25 30 0.5 417 32 250 rm 48 05 1DBD 0.6 11 5 6.9 19 025 27 0.5 418 31 240 W 911 0.5 1780 0.5 8 5 8.8 19 0.25 27 0.5 2m 29 250 87 33 0.5 imo 0.5 8 5 6.3 17 0.25 27 0.5 2115 17 1w W 29 0.5 1% 0.5 7 5 5.3 15 0.25 21 0.5 222 17 100 ea 29 0.5 1420 0.5 8 5 4.8 15 0.25 10 0.5 XI0 15 M 81 m 0.5 1170 0.5 8 5 3.7 8 0.25 18 0.5 1W 13 M 50 14 0.5 1110 0.5 5 5 1.9 8 0.25 13 0.5 1I Bo 47 13 0.5 1010 0.5 4 5 1 1.5 025 12 0.: im 11 39 Ag-ppb Algpm As-@ Augpb Ba-ppb Bispb Ca-ppm Cd-ppb Ce-ppb Co-ppb Crgpb Cugpb Dygpb CalculatedBackground 10.2 35.4 5 0.08 1750 0.5 364 8.8 60 69.8 50 520 33.8 2 x Background 20.4 70.8 10 0.16 3500 1 728 17.6 120 139.6 100 1040 67.6 5 x Background 51 177 25 0.4 8750 2.5 1820 44 300 349 250 2600 169 10 x Background 102 354 50 0.8 17500 5 3640 88 600 698 500 5200 338 Response Ratios

Sample UTMNADB3-E UTMNAD83-N Statistics A-pb Algpm Asgpb Augpb Ba-ppb Bigpb Ca-ppm Cdgpb Ce-ppb Cogpb Crgpb Cugpb Dy-ppb GHE 1 356950 6406485 1.667 8.362 8.000 3.750 2.411 1.000 0.907 1.477 12.250 2.822 6.000 1.327 2.396 GHE 2 357050 6408482 1.471 4.435 1.000 2.500 1.120 1.000 0.659 0.795 4.350 0.802 1.000 0.981 2.160 GHE 3 357150 6408478 0.784 3.107 1.000 2.500 2.320 1.000 1.209 2.955 3.133 1.691 6.000 2.250 2.012 GHE 4 357250 6408475 2.157 1.469 1.000 0.625 1.086 1.000 1.484 0.795 1.567 2.120 2.000 2.673 1.331 GHE 5 357350 6408471 1.373 2.514 1.000 1.250 2.251 1.000 1.264 0.568 10.800 2.564 1.OOO 0.865 2.722 GHE 6 357550 6408464 0.490 3.955 1.000 2.500 2.714 1.000 0.962 2.386 5.217 2.106 1.000 1.250 3.491 GHE 7 357650 6408461 1.863 2.627 1.000 1.250 1.611 1.000 1.401 3.636 2.167 0.745 1.000 0.731 1.213 GHN 1 357427 6407060 1.569 2.203 1.000 1.250 2.171 1.000 1.676 7.614 3.317 2.378 1.000 2.404 3.373 GHN 2 357431 6407960 1.373 2.175 1.000 1.250 2.183 1.000 1.868 5.341 4.233 3.438 2.000 2.346 3.817 GHN 4 357438 6408160 2.647 2.740 1.000 2.500 1.903 1.000 1.758 4.205 3.583 2.006 1.000 2.712 5.148 GHN 5 357441 640a260 1.765 1.554 1.000 6.250 2.611 1.000 1.586 1.705 4.867 2.493 1.OOO 3.385 3.462 GHN 6 357445 6408360 1.275 2.062 1.000 2.500 2.423 1.000 1.566 2.614 7.000 2.693 2.000 2.596 5.148 GHN 7 357449 6408460 3.137 4.096 6.000 0.625 3.034 1.000 1.511 1.818 11.633 2.908 4.000 1.885 4.290 GHN 8 357452 6408560 1.078 1.949 1.000 5.000 2.577 1.000 1.758 2.159 6.567 6.246 1.000 2.000 5.030 GHN 9 357456 6400660 2.941 0.424 1,000 6.250 1.246 1.000 1.566 2.273 0.367 3,524 1.000 7.788 0.680 GHN 10 357459 6408760 1.373 0.932 1.000 5.000 1.006 1.000 1.703 4.545 0.800 2.808 1.000 3.558 1.154 GHN 11 357463 6400860 2.353 1.130 1.000 2.500 0.543 1.000 1.813 3.068 1.267 1.275 1.000 4.404 0.917 GHN 12 357466 6408960 4.608 2.684 1.000 2.500 1.731 1.000 1.264 1.364 2.650 1.203 1.000 1.173 1.036 GHN 13 357470 6409060 4.118 1.045 1.000 1.250 1.886 1.000 2.308 2.386 1.000 0.974 1.000 9.327 1.272 mse Ratio Values

Sample UTMNAD83-E UTMNAD83-N Statistics Aappb Al-ppm Asmb kPPb Ba-ppb Bi-ppb Ca-ppm Cdmb Cegpb COSPb CLPPb Cupb WPPb GHE 1 356950 6408485 2 8 8 4 2 I 1 1 12 3 6 1 2 GHE 2 357050 6408482 1 4 1 3 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 2 GHE 3 357150 6408478 1 3 1 3 2 1 1 3 3 2 6 2 2 GHE 4 357250 6408475 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 1 GHE 5 357350 6408471 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 11 3 1 1 3 GHE 6 357550 6408464 1 4 3 3 3 1 1 2 5 2 1 1 3 GHE 7 357650 6408461 2 3 1 1 2 1 1 4 2 1 1 1 1 GHN 1 357427 6407060 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 8 3 2 1 2 3 GHN 2 357431 6407960 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 5 4 3 2 2 4 GHN 4 357438 6408160 3 3 1 3 2 1 2 4 4 2 1 3 5 GHN 5 357441 6400260 2 2 1 6 3 1 2 2 5 2 1 3 3 GHN 6 357445 6408360 1 2 1 3 2 1 2 3 7 3 2 3 5 GHN 7 357449 640~0 3 4 6 1 3 1 2 2 12 3 4 2 4 GHN 8 357452 640a560 1 2 1 5 3 1 2 2 7 6 1 2 5 GHN 9 357456 6408660 3 1 1 6 1 1 2 2 1 4 1 8 1 GHN 10 357459 6408760 1 1 1 5 1 1 2 5 1 3 1 4 1 GHN 11 357463 640a860 2 1 1 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 4 1 GHN 12 357466 6408960 5 3 1 3 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 GHN 13 357470 6409060 4 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 9 1

CalculatedBackground 3 1.4 1 3.6 1.4 1 1.8 2.6 1.4 2 1 5.2 1 2 x Background 6 2.8 2 7.2 2.8 2 3.6 5.2 2.8 4 2 10.4 2 5 x Background 15 7 5 18 7 5 9 13 7 10 5 26 5 10 x Background 30 14 10 36 14 10 18 26 14 20 10 52 10 Er-ppb Eujpb Fe-ppm Gdjpb Lagpb Li_ppb Mg-ppm Mo-ppb Nb-ppb Ndgpb Nijpb Pb-ppb Pd-ppb Pr-ppb Ptjpb Rbjpb Sb-ppb Sc-ppb 18.38 6.58 18.8 34 27.6 2.5 81 2.5 0.25 63.6 461.4 8 0.5 11.6 0.5 16.8 0.5 30.8 36.76 13.16 37.6 68 55.2 5 162 5 0.5 127.2 922.8 16 1 23.2 1 33.6 1 61.6 91.9 32.9 94 170 138 12.5 405 12.5 1.25 318 2307 40 2.5 58 2.5 84 2.5 154 183.8 65.8 188 340 276 25 810 25 2.5 636 4614 80 5 118 5 168 5 308

Er-ppb Eugpb Fejpm Gdjpb Laspb Li-ppb Mg-ppm Mo-ppb Nbjpb Ndjpb Ni-ppb Pb-ppb Pdjpb Pr-ppb Ptjpb Rbgpb Sbjpb Sc-ppb 2.062 3.116 12.447 2.824 9.094 2.400 1.272 6.400 40.800 5.173 1.242 8.750 4.000 6.552 1.000 11.905 1,000 8.994 2.236 2.249 3.870 2.176 3.696 1.000 0.654 1.000 8.400 2.909 0.423 5.000 1.OOO 3.190 1.OOO 8.214 1.OOO 6.494 2.231 2.234 4.681 2.029 2.935 1.000 2.395 1.000 5.600 2.484 2.471 3.750 1.000 2.672 1.000 9.643 1.000 14.253 1.333 1.672 1.489 1.647 1.449 1.000 2.086 1.000 1.000 1.730 0.999 0.625 1.000 1.552 1.OOO 1.667 1.000 5.097 2.448 3.450 1.596 3.059 4.565 1.000 1.185 1.OOO 2.800 4.009 1.485 6.250 1.000 4.397 1.000 5.417 1.000 5.714 3.624 3.678 4.681 3.529 5.072 1.000 1.247 1.000 5.600 4.292 1.721 6.250 2.000 4.655 1.000 9.821 1.OOO 8.669 1.115 1.216 2.766 1.206 1.377 1.OOO 1.691 7.200 6.400 1.289 1.435 5.000 1.000 1.379 1.000 4.286 1.000 2.403 3.520 3.602 3.085 3.559 3.587 3.600 1.790 1.000 6.000 3.684 2.926 5.000 1.000 3.707 1.000 2.857 1.000 2.922 3.972 3.784 3.883 3,794 4.130 2.800 1.605 1.000 6.000 3.947 2.818 3.750 2.000 4.052 1.OOO 2.976 2.000 4.740 5.294 5.547 2.926 5.294 5.145 7.200 1.728 4.000 4.400 5.393 3.619 7.500 1.000 5.431 1.000 2.262 1.000 5.422 3.417 3.921 1.489 3.765 4.239 1.OOO 1.889 1.000 1.000 3.978 2.254 2.500 1.000 4.052 1.000 2.798 1.000 3.831 5.495 5.957 2.234 5.647 6.123 7.600 1.802 1.000 1.OOO 6.478 5.917 3.750 1.000 6.638 1.000 4.464 1.000 4.935 3.694 5.790 4.096 5.324 7.935 1.000 1.395 10.800 12.800 7.594 2.622 7.500 2.000 8.103 1.000 13.988 1.000 5.779 5.092 5.973 1.489 5.824 6.413 1.000 2.494 1.000 1.000 6.478 4.075 3.750 1.000 6.466 1.OOO 0.655 1.000 5.519 0.827 0.669 0.372 0.735 0.435 1.000 5.778 8.800 4.000 0.535 1.040 0.625 1.000 0.431 1.OOO 0.417 1.000 0.455 1.921 0.805 0.266 0.853 0.507 2.800 5.580 1.000 2.400 0.566 3.749 0.825 1.000 0.517 1.000 0.893 1.OOO 0.325 0.849 1.201 1.383 1.147 1.413 2.800 1.111 1.000 3.800 1.399 3.099 2.500 1.000 1.466 1.000 2.798 1.000 0.487 0.979 1.109 2.021 1.059 1.413 1.000 0.802 3.200 1.000 1.211 1.296 3.750 1.000 1.293 1.OOO 10.060 1.000 2.695 1.230 1.581 1.596 1.471 1.268 3.200 2.222 3.600 4.800 1.399 2.232 0.625 1.OOO 1.379 1.OOO 1.369 4.000 1.331

Ergpb Eujpb Fe-ppm Gdspb LaJpb Mg-ppm MO-PPb NbJPb Wspb NCppb W-PPb WPPb %PPb PLPPb RUPb Sb-PPb SC-PPb 2 3 12 3 2 1 6 41 5 1 9 4 7 1 12 1 9 2 2 4 2 4 1 1 1 8 3 1 5 1 3 1 8 1 6 2 2 5 2 3 1 2 1 6 2 2 4 1 3 1 10 1 14 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 5 2 3 2 3 5 1 1 1 3 4 1 6 1 4 1 5 1 6 4 4 5 4 5 1 1 1 6 4 2 6 2 5 1 10 1 9 1 1 3 1 1 1 2 7 6 1 1 5 1 1 1 4 1 2 4 4 3 4 4 4 2 1 6 4 3 5 1 4 1 3 1 3 4 4 3 4 4 3 2 1 6 4 3 4 2 4 1 3 2 5 5 6 3 5 5 7 2 4 4 5 4 8 1 5 1 2 1 5 3 4 1 4 4 1 2 1 1 4 2 3 1 4 1 3 1 4 5 6 2 6 6 8 2 1 1 6 6 4 1 7 1 4 1 5 4 6 4 5 8 1 1 11 13 8 3 8 2 8 1 14 1 6 5 6 1 6 6 1 2 1 1 6 4 4 1 6 1 1 1 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 9 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 3 6 1 2 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 4 1 3 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 10 1 3 I 2 2 1 1 3 2 4 5 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 4 1

1.2 1.2 1.4 1 1 2.2 3.2 3.6 3.2 1 2.2 2 1 1 1 3.2 1.6 1.4 2.4 2.4 2.8 2 2 4.4 6.4 7.2 6.4 2 4.4 4 2 2 2 6.4 3.2 2.8 6 6 7 5 5 11 16 18 16 5 11 10 5 5 5 16 8 7 12 12 14 10 10 22 32 36 32 10 22 20 10 10 10 32 16 14 Sm-ppb Sngpb Srgpb Tagpb Tbgpb Te-ppb Thjpb Tigpb Tlgpb Ujpb W-ppb Ygpb Yb-ppb Zn-ppb agpb 22.2 0.5 1244 0.5 5.6 5 3.34 9.1 0.25 16.6 0.5 198.8 13.6 72 51.4 44.4 1 2408 1 11.2 10 6.68 18.2 0.5 33.2 1 397.6 27.2 144 102.8 111 2.5 6220 2.5 28 25 16.7 45.5 1.25 83 2.5 994 68 360 257 222 5 12440 5 56 50 33.4 91 2.5 166 5 1988 136 720 514

14.970 268.132 2.000 1.807 4.000 2.093 2.132 7.500 7.840 2.477 1.om 0.820 1.om 2.143 1.OOo 4.850 35.604 1.om 1.867 1.OOo 2.188 2.279 1.111 3.035 2.162 1 .ooo 1.141 1.OOo 1.964 1.Ooo 4.281 6.264 1.om 1.OM 1.ooo 2.098 2.500 5.000 2.529 1.712 1.ooo 0.941 1.000 1.429 1.om 1.108 1.648 1.om 1.145 1.000 1.424 1.250 1.111 0.973 3.559 1.om 1.576 1.om 3.036 1.000 3.892 15.714 1.om 1.867 1.OOO 2.123 2.353 0.556 3.444 3.874 1.om 1.431 1.MM 3.571 1.000 4.970 14.176 1.Ooo 1.627 1.ooo 3.3% 3.824 13.472 4.105 1.306 1.om 1.664 1.000 1.250 1.om 1.886 3.077 1.000 1.627 1.MM 1.051 1.103 3.750 2.004 3.649 1.ooo 2.420 1.ooo 3.571 1.om 2.036 2.418 1.Ooo 2.590 1.000 3.355 3.603 9.861 3.444 3.874 1.000 2.685 1.om 3.750 1.000 2.605 3.187 1.000 4.036 1.000 3.682 4.118 6.667 4.358 5.450 1.000 2.452 1.ooo 5.179 1.OM) 3.054 2.308 1 .Ooo 1.867 1.000 5.080 5.515 16.111 3.502 3.829 1.OOo 2.21 I 1.000 3.571 1.om 2.066 0.879 1 .ooo 2.831 1.000 3.400 3.382 1.389 1.693 6.036 1.OM1 1.873 1.000 5.357 1.om 2.964 2.088 1.om 2.892 1.ooo 4,909 5.882 2.639 3.171 6.486 1.ooo 1.415 1.MM 4.821 1.000 6.527 49.780 3.800 2.892 1.ooo 3.753 3.603 3.333 5.953 6.036 1.ooo 2.291 1.000 5.179 1.OM) 1.587 1.868 1.om 2.108 1.000 4.894 4.853 4.306 1.815 0.586 1.ooo 2.605 1.ooo 0.714 1.om 0.569 1.648 1.ooo 3.916 1.ooo 0.885 0.809 8.528 0.642 0.631 1 .000 1.945 1.000 0.893 1.ooo 0.299 0.165 1.ooo 0.723 1.000 1.117 2.353 3.472 0,914 1.306 1 ,000 1.206 1.000 1.071 1.Ooo 2.695 2.088 1.om 0.783 1.000 1.001 0.882 3.611 1.187 1.171 1.ooo 2.596 1 .ooo 1.071 1.m 1 A37 2.637 1.000 1.265 1.ooo 0.946 0.956 0.833 1.284 1.486 1.m 2.653 1.000 1.429 1.MM 3.623 0.659 1.000 1.627 1.000 1.489 1.250 3.194 1.829

Smgpb Sngpb SrJJpb TaJPb TbSPb Te-PPb 7h-W Ti-ppb Tljpb USPb WPPb YJPb Ybmb RPPb 4 1 1 1 3 1 15 268 2 2 4 2 2 8 8 2 1 1 1 2 1 5 36 1 2 1 2 2 1 3 2 1 1 1 2 1 4 6 1 1 1 2 3 5 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 2 1 3 1 4 16 1 2 1 2 2 1 3 4 1 1 1 4 1 5 14 1 2 1 3 4 13 4 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 3 1 2 1 1 1 4 2 4 1 2 1 4 1 2 2 1 3 1 3 4 10 3 4 1 3 1 4 1 3 3 1 4 1 4 4 7 4 5 1 2 1 5 1 3 2 1 2 1 5 6 16 4 4 1 2 1 4 1 2 1 1 3 1 3 3 1 2 6 1 2 1 5 1 3 2 1 3 1 5 6 3 3 6 1 1 1 5 1 7 50 4 3 1 4 4 3 6 6 1 3 1 5 1 2 2 1 2 1 5 5 4 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 4 1 1 1 7 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 4 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 2

1 1 2.4 1 1 1 2 1.8 1 1.8 1 1 1.2 3.6 1.2 2 2 4.8 2 2 2 4 3.6 2 3.6 2 2 2.4 7.2 2.4 5 5 12 5 5 5 10 9 5 9 5 5 6 18 6 10 10 24 10 10 10 20 18 10 18 10 10 12 36 12 APPENDIX G. ANALYTICAL METHODS

Telegraph Creek Property report- page 27 I

Minerals Services METHOD SUMMARY

s:The Determination of Gold by Fire Assay and ICP-OES. FAI303

1. Parameter(s) measured, unit(s): Gold (Au): ppb

2. Typical sample size: 30.0 g

3. Type of sample applicable (media): Crushed and pulverized rocks.

4. Sample preparation technique used: Crushed and pulverized rock sample are weighed and mixed with flux and fused using lead oxide at 1 100°C, followed by cupellation of the resulting lead button (Dore bead). The bead is digested using 1: 1 HNO3 and HCl and the resulting solution is submitted for analysis.

5. Method of analysis used: The digested sample solution is aspirated into the inductively coupled plasma Optical Emission Spectrometer (ICP-OES) where the atoms in the plasma emit light (photons) with characteristic wavelengths for each element. This light is recorded by optical spectrometers and when calibrated against standards the technique provides a quantitative analysis of the original sample.

6. Data reduction by: The results are exported via computer, on line, data fed to the Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS CCLAS EL) with secure audit trail.

7. Element Reporting Limit ppb Au 1 .o

8. Quality control: The ICP-OES is calibrated with each work order. An instrument blank and calibration check is analyzed with each run. One preparation blank and reference material is analyzed every 46 samples, one duplicate every 12 samples. All QC samples are verified using LIMS. The acceptance criteria are statistically controlled and control charts are used to monitor accuracy and precision. Data that falls outside the control limits is investigated and repeated as necessary.

SGS Minerals Services Toronto Laboratory 1885 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON M3B 2M3 www.sg;s.com Member of SGS Group (Soci6t6 G6nCrale de Surveillance) SGSl Minerals Services METHOD SUMMARY lCPl2B : The Determination of 32 Elements by a Two Acid Digest and ICP-OES.

1. Parameter(s) measured, unit(s): Silver (Ag); Aluminum (Al); Arsenic (As); Barium (Ba); Bismuth (Bi); Calcium (Ca); Cadmium (Cd); Chromium (Cr); Cobalt (Co); Copper (Cu); Iron (Fe); Potassium (K); Lanthanum (La); Lithium (Li); Magnesium (Mg); Manganese (Mn);Molybdenum (Mo); Sodium (Na); Nickel (Ni); Phosphorus (P); Lead (Pb); Antimony (Sb); Scandium (Sc); Tin (Sn); Strontium (Sr); Titanium (Ti); Vanadium (V); Tungsten (w); Yttrium (Y); Zinc (Zn); Zirconium (Zr); (Sulphur (S) and Mercury (Hg) can be added on) : ppm and %

2. Typical sample size: 0.25 g

3. Type of sample applicable (media): Crushed and Pulverized rocks, soils and sediments

4. Sample preparation technique used: Crushed and pulverized rock, soil and /or sediment samples are digested using HN03 and HCI.

5. Method of analysis used: The digested sample solution is aspirated into the inductively coupled plasma Optical Emission Spectrometer (ICP-OES) where the atoms in the plasma emit light (photons) with characteristic wavelengths for each element. This light is recorded by optical spectrometers and when calibrated against standards the technique provides a quantitative analysis of the original sample.

6. Data reduction by: The results are exported via computer, on line, data fed to the Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS CCLAS EL) with secure audit trail.

7. Figures of Merit: (*Sulphur and Mercury can be added on) I Limit of Element Quantification Element Element Element (LOQ) (LOa) ppm PPm PPm PPm Ag 0.50 cu 2.70 P 0.00042(%) Zn 1.79 Al 0.011 (%) Fe 0.001 (%) Pb 1.5 Zr 0.23 As 2.9 K 0.0047 (%) Sb 0.9 *S 0.0015(%) Ba 4.2 La 0.17 sc 0.05 *Hg 1.o Be 0.17 Li 2.4 Sn 1.4 Bi 4.5 Mg 0.0016( %) Sr 0.35 Ca 0.0034 (%) Mn 0.37 Ti 0.00011 (%) Cd 0.10 Mo 0.52 V 0.30 Cr 0.34 Na 0.016(%) W 1.7 co 0.21 Ni 1.8 Y 0.09

SGS Minerals Services Toronto Laboratory 1885 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON M3B 2M3 www.sgs.com Member of SGS Group (Socidtb Gbnerale de Surveillance) I f- SGSl Minerals Services METHOD SUMMARY 8. Quality control: The ICP-OES is calibrated with each work order. An instrument blank and calibration check is analyzed with each run. One preparation blank and reference material is analyzed every 46 samples, one duplicate every 12 samples. All QC samples are verified using LIMS. The acceptance criteria are statistically controlled and control charts are used to monitor accuracy and precision. Data that falls outside the control limits is investigated and repeated as necessary.

9. Accreditation: The Standards Council of Canada has accredited this test in conformance with the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025. See www.scc.ca for scope of accreditation

SGS Minerals Services Toronto Laboratory 1885 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON M3B 2M3 www.sgs.com Member of SGS Group (Soci6t6 Gdndrale de Surveillance) 7 Minerals Services METHOD SUMMARY

~~~ PUL45 :Pulverize 250g in Cr Steel to 85% passing 75 pm

1. Parameter(s) measured, unit(s): All 2. Typical sample size: Max: 250 g

3. Type of sample applicable (media): Geological and metallurgical samples (ores, concentrates, rocks, soils and metallurgical process products)

4. Sample preparation technique used: Pulverizing is done using pots made either hardened chrome steel or mild steel material. Crushed material is transferred into a clean pot and the pot is placed into a vibratory mill. Samples are pulverized to 85% passing 75 micron 200 mesh or otherwise specified by the client.

5. Method of analysis used: This may involve various analyses depending upon the analytes requested and sample type.

6. Data reduction by: Computer, on line, data fed to Laboratory Information Management System with secure audit trail.

7. Figures of Merit: Quality Control

Pulverizing Parameters Frequency Quality Control Requirement Prep. Blank At the start of batch 85% passing 200 mesh (75 um) Prep. Replicates every 50 samples 85% passing 200 mesh (75 um) % Passing Checks Every 50 samples 85% passing 200 mesh (75 um)

SGS Minerals Services Toronto Laboratory 1885 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON M3B 2M3 www.s~s.com Member of SGS Group (Soci6t6 G6nCrale de Surveillance) Report on Spaceborne Hyperspectral Imaging Survey

Hamilton Hycroft Job # 080507

Blocks 544704, 544705, 544706, 544707, 544708, 544709, 544710,54471 1, 544712, 544713, 544714 544715, 544716, 544717,544718,544719, 544720 Telegraph Creek, British Columbia Cassiar Land District Map Center: 57"47' 59 N, 131"22' 59W

/ For +& olden Hat Resources Inc. $4 59 - B Glenmore Drive Q4-k ,F 4 x>p 1 West Vancouver Ch ,> British Columbia a)?+ I' V7S 1A5 % ,'

c? ;'"!

c>. **

By+? TJ Eki P Hamilton Hycroft Ener Suite 21, 285 17'h St West Vancouver, BC V Tel: 778-279-4443 FAX: 604-921-4364 ha miI ton hvcroft@ sha w .ca

Report Date: February 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROJECT INTRODUCTION ...... 3 LIST OF MAPS AND APPENDICES ...... 3 SURVEY AREA ...... 3 TECHNICAL BACKGROUND...... 4 4.1 DATAACQUISITION ...... 4 4.2 DATAPROCESSING ...... 4 4.3 GRIDPATTERN ...... 4 4.4 DATAEXPLOITATION ...... 5 4.5 INTERPRETATION...... 5 4.6 RECOMMENDATIONS...... 5 COST STATEMENT ...... 5 RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY ...... 5 AUTHOR STATEMENT ...... 6 REFERENCES CITED ...... 6 TEAM ROLES ...... 6 I0 REPORT APPROVAL ...... 6 I1 LIST OF MAPS ...... 7 12 APPENDICES ...... 7

#HE .Report on Landsat Hyperspectral imaging Survey page 2 2/11/2008 1 PROJECT INTRODUCTION This report describes the geophysical survey data processed by Hamilton Hycroft Energy Inc., on behalf by Golden Hat Resources Inc., on Blocks 544708, 544705, 544706 544707, 544708, 544709, 544710, 54471 1, 544712, 544713, 544714, 544715, 544716, 544717, 544718, 544719 and 544720 as identified on Golden Hat BC Government Tenure Map identifying map center coordinates as 57” 47’ 59” N, 131” 22’ 59” W (See Map 1) also enclosed is BC Department of Lands and Forest Survey Map 104G/14 WEST of Telegraph Creek, Cassiar Land District, British Columbia (See Map 2). The principal geophysical measurements were made by hyperspectral sensors used to identify surface materials. The total survey coverage presented on the accompanying map was defined to 675 sq km (Map 3).

2 LIST OF MAPS and APPENDICES Map 1: 17 tenure claims at map center point as 62” 47’ 59” N, 131” 22’ 59” W. Map 2: Top0 map with a scale of 1:50,000 of Telegraph Creek, Cassiar Land District. Map 3: Satellite view and overlay of 675 sq km exploration area. Map 4: One mineralized surface anomaly located within Claim Number 544707. Appendix 1: Tabulated map coordinates of the 17 tenure claims. Appendix 2 On November 2007, SGS Canada issued Certificate of Analysis for soil samples collected on Block 544707 confirms the presence of gold, silver and copper at collection points. Appendix 3: Cost Statement. Appendix 4: Authors Statement. Appendix 5: Hamilton Hycroft Survey Report to Golden Hat dated in June 2007. Figure 1 Directional diagram of Northern British Columbia to display the general location of the subject property

Figure I Figure 1 Directional Map of Northern British Columbia shows the general location of the subject property. 3 SURVEY AREA The subject properties are located in Northern British Columbia 2km southwest of the town of Telegraph Creek, Cassiar District. The subject properties are made up of 17 tenure claims that cover 7000 hectares striding both sides of the Stikine River. Map center point is 62” 47’ 59” N, 131” 22’ 59” W (see Map 1 for Tenure Map). For block corner coordinates see (Appendix 1).

HHE - Report on Landsat Hyperspectral imaging Survey Page 3 2/12/2008 /- The survey terrain was relatively flat, elevations range from 500-1300m. The project was accessible by helicopter and there was is a road from Telegraph Creek leading into the vicinity of the blocks on the west side of the river.

The total area surveyed covers 675 sq km and have corner map coordinates as follows:

NW Corner 131O 33’ 34” W 57” 56’ 19” N

NE Corner 131O 10’ 48” W 57” 55’ 40” N

SE Corner 131O 12’ 28” W 57” 39’ 33” N

SW Corner 131O 35’ 16” W 57” 40’ 1I” N

This survey describes the background of remote sensing, data acquisition and processing, objectives, interpretation of data followed with ground-truth soil analysis confirmed by independent lab analysis. 4 TECHNICAL BACKGROUND Spectroscopy for remote sensing, or hyperspectral imaging, was born in 1980s with the Airborne Imaging Spectrometer and later on with the Advanced Visiblellnfrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS). The data product or output of the hyperspectral sensor is a stack of images of a scene, or sample, acquired in contiguous bands over a special range and is often referred to as an image cube. In November 2000, satellite EO-1 Hyperion was launched with wide ranging applications in mining, geology, and forestry etc. , including remote exploration. Its signal-to-noise ratio offers the facility to perform mineral mapping using hyperspectral data. The U.S. Geological Survey has had great success in using the technology and validating results with ground-truth measurements using AVIRIS. Three major processes used to identify ground materials, delineate any mineral anomalies analyze imaging datasets are described in Section 4.1 through 4.2.4.

4.1 Data Acquisition Sensors Hyperion is a pushbroomldiffraction grating spectrometer. This instrument provides a high resolution hyperspectral imager capable of resolving 220 spectral bands (from 0.4 to 2.5 pm) with a 30m spatial resolution and 10nm spectral resolution with high radiometric accuracy. Signal-to-noise ratios are estimated as 1OO:l in the VNlR and 50:l for the SWIR. This spectral range is excellent for detecting electronic transitions in minerals. Our detection process focused on the accuracy of plotting map coordinates, measuring anomaly size and shape, classifying elements by the matching of image spectrum to our spectral Ii brary . 4.2 Data Processing Data processing and management was primarily accomplished with a Geographical Information System using ArcView 9.1, ArcGIS, and Tetracorder, while MS Word 2007 Adobe Photoshop CS3, Acrobat and Google Earth are used for document creation.

4.3 Grid Pattern A virtual grid pattern was layered over the entire anomaly with each cell measuring 100 x 100 meters. Mineral bonding, spectral curves, absorption bands were assessed and reflectance values were calibrated and assigned to each cell to obtain a more accurate assessment ground materials across the domed surface structure. (See Map 4 and Appendix 5)

HHE - Report on Landsat Hyperspectral imaging Survey Page 4 2/12/2008 4.4 Data Exploitation The objectives of data acquisition techniques are to: J classify and segment the image into areas exhibiting similar spectral properties J search for areas that exhibit a particular spectral signature of interest J determine the composition of a mixture of materials with a spatial resolution (an image pixel) J locate signatures of unresolved objects (those that are smaller than a single pixel)

4.5 Interpretation The image cube has two spatial dimensions and the third spectral axis (wavelength) where radiance is measured at each point in the cube. Radiant intensity was recorded in each point of the cube and measurements converted the image data to reflectance values. The recorded values of the data cube were calibrated and converted to radiometric quantities that related to the field characteristics (radiance, reflectance and emissivity, etc). These calibrations enabled analysis of hyperspectral images to be processed more precisely and by matching each image spectrum individually to the reference spectra in our spectral library. The overall shape of the spectral curve, position and strength of absorption bands were used to identify and discriminate different inorganic materials such as, minerals, chemical composition, crystalline structure and ionic charge of certain elements. Wavelength-specific absorption of best-matching reference spectrum had sufficient fit to the image spectrum to classify the targeted ground elements as indications of gold, silver and copper that warranted an in-situ field checking of the anomaly to confirm these interpretations. Only one mineralized anomaly was detected in Block 544707. Its diameter measures 1.1 km along the Northing grid and 0.8 km along the Easting grid.

4.6 Recommendations Our recommendations were submitted to the Golden Hat where to collect soil samples from the anomalous zone and to use geochemical analysis such as Mobile Metal Ion to validate the findings of the remote sensing survey. Golden Hat arranged for the collection of soil samples in September 2007 and submitted them to SGS Canada for analysis. Subsequently, SGS issued a Certificate of Analysis to Golden Hat Resources on November 7, 2007 that confirms the presence of gold, silver and copper among the sampling points taken from the anomaly in Block 544707. (See SGS Appendix 2) and (HHE Survey Report Appendix 5) 5 COST STATEMENT Hamilton Hycroft invoiced Golden Hat for services rendered in the amount of CAD$21, 176.00 equivalent to US$20,000and was duly paid by corporate cheque. (See Invoice under Appendix 3) and (Author Statement Appendix 5) 6 RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY Hamilton Hycroft submitted the results of its Remote Sensing Survey to Golden Hat in June 2007 (see Appendix 5)

HHE - Report on Landsat Hyperspectral imaging Survey Page 5 2/12/2008 I

-- 7 AUTHOR STATEMENT The author has not read the definitions of "Qualified Person" set out in NI 43-101 and hereby state that I am not sure whether I fulfill the requirements as a "Qualified Person" for the purposes of NI 43-101 and therefore this technical report has not been prepared to be in compliance with that instrument and form or NI 430101 FI. This report was to confirm that Hamilton Hycroft Energy Inc. provided data processing services for which were paid promptly by Golden Hat Resources Inc (See details in Appendix 5).

8 REFERENCES CITED A cross section of references where compiled to provide a broad range of technical insights to the the instrumentation that receives imaging data, sensor fundamental processes and the calibration techniques to enable remote sensing technology to identify ground materials effectively. (See Appendix 6) 9 TEAMROLES Loyd Pond Project Leader Andrew Watson Consulting, Map preparation and Data Processing Cory Bevans Data processing Bill Battrum Ad m i nis t rat ion Everett Krohn Information Management I0 REPORT APPROVAL

Prepared by Project Manager

HHE - Report on Landsat Hyperspectral imaging Survey Page 6 2/12/2008 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: General Location Map ...... Page 3 I1LIST OF MAPS Map 1 Tenure Claim Map ...... Following Page 8 Map 2 Top0 scaled at 1.50.000 of Telegraph Creek ...... Following Page 9 Map 3 Satellite view of area surveyed ...... Following Page 10 Map 4 Anomaly in Claim #544707 ...... Following Page 11 12 APPENDICES Appendix 1 Tabulated coordinates tenure claims ...... Following Page 12 Appendix 2 SGS Certificate of Analysis ...... Following Page 13 Appendix 3: Cost Statement ...... Following Page 14 Appendix 4: Author Statement ...... Following Page 15 Appendix 5: Remote Sensing Report ...... Following Page 16 Appendix 6: Cited References...... Following Page 17

HHE .Report on Landsat Hyperspectral imaging Survey Page 7 2/12/2008

. MAP I Golden Hat Tenure Claim Map

HUE - Report on Landsat Hyperspectral imaging Survey Page 8 2/11/2008 .. . 1 1 ;' - GOLDEN HAT TENURE MAP 2 Scale 1:50,000 of Telegraph Creek

HHE - Report on Landsat Hyperspectral imaging Survey Page 9 2/12/2008 NATIONAL TOPOGRAPHIC SYSTEM 1:50,000 CANADA FIRST EDITION SHEET 104'/14 WEST 60 61 63 64 65 66 13fli 57 u' 58 59

'W 1

3

3

s

7

6

5

4

3

ii

1

0

9

.E

7

.E

!i

L1

L: I

i;

1:

11

)I

11

1'

T.N* 0

"Y d~."m",.ml.m ""rn.ll..l"II"". APPROXIMATE MEAN DECLlNAIlON 1958 FORCENTREOFSHEET AnnWI magnetic change 2.8'WnlW

BRITISH COLUMBIA SCALE 1:50.000 1.25 Inches to 1 Mile aPPmltim~1LlY - 2 3 Miles 1 0 1 c---"low 5w 0 1wo 2m 3000 4oiK) Melres I----- , 1000 2000 30420 4000Yards 1000 500 ,? , , , 1 MIYH REFERENCE REFERENCE ..:...... Fonihorc IlatI...... BoYndltiel: ...... intemalien~l,wilh monument...... Wharf or pier; Breakwater ...... pI0YI"ciaI .I_ ...... CONTOUR INTERVAL100 FEET munty ordiritrid ...... Iy ~i-tim$ in Feet st- Mean Sea Level Radio Station...... I..*.". I Taw; Chimney ...... ___ ! township or parish. unwwemd ...... II I I...... dry weathw...... - -:==- .id1 I Univr~lTransram MerulN Projeclion cad 1RCL. 1,aiL...... _.---- intermittent lab. stream ...... &&- '- ___ North Amrriun Datum 1927 RIIIWIYI: normal @urn, multiple trick ... 2!!-'w TELEGRAPH CREEK normil gauge, rinpls Vick ...... copic~may be obtained Imm the .I. contours: ONE THOUSAND METRE abandoned or under mnrlrvdion z- Mag Distribution Ollice...... 104 %4 WEST D~DI.01 Mines and Technical Surveys. UNIVERSAL TRANSVERSE MERCATOR YndeIPISI. OWWIS ...... Wwded am: undar9ilisd. xrub GRID -:'* oss*a. EDITION 1 ASE Tunnel: Drawbridge...... +,..- Mine or open Wt: Qmrw Vineyard: Orchard...... ZONE 9 Sand 01 g'aMl pit. Powerline; Tcliphomlinl ...... -LA- ...... MAP 3

Satellite View of Exploration Area

HHE - Report on Landsat Hyperspectral imaging Survey Page 7 0 2/11/2008 c

..".. 13 Telegraph Creek Cassiar District , British Columbia

NAD83 BC EnvlmMlentAbers Rqecbon %ale 1 :250,000 MAP 4

Anomaly in Claim #544707

HHE - Report on Landsat Hyperspectral imaging Survey Page 11 2A 1/2008 679124 67B624 - I-0 /-

.- .C I f

1 1 1 Qssa, 679124 (Rw24

Block 544707 Satellite View of Anomaly

Scale 1:10,000 0 125 250 500

NAD 83 BC EnvironmentAlbers Projecton APPENDIX I

Tabulated Coordinates of Tenure Claims

HHE - Report on Landsat Hyperspectral imaging Survey Page 12 2/12/2008 ,/- Tabulated Map Coordinates of Golden Hat Tenure Claims

Corner Location Longitude Latitude Southwest 57” 48’ 14.6” N ‘131” 27’ 7.l”W West 57” 47’ 59.S” N 13 1” 28’ 37’’w West 57” 48’ 295” N 13’1”28’ 36.9” w West 57” 49’ 14.S”N 13‘1” 28’ 14.5”w Northwest 57” 49’ 44.0” N 13’1” 27’ 30,O”w North 57” 50’ 14.6”N 13 1” 22’ 59.4’’w North 57” 50’ 30.0” N 13‘1”20’ 22.0” w Northeast 57” 50’ 30.0” N 13 I” 17’ 0.0” w East 57” 49’ 0.0’’ N 13’1”17’ 22.0”W East 57” 47’ 30.0” N 131” 18’ 30.0” w Southeast 57” 45’ 14.4” N 13’1”21’ 53.0” w Southwest 57” 45’ 15.0”N 13’1” 23’ 0.0” w APPENDIX I1 SGS Certificate of Analysis

HHE - Reporl on Landsat Hyperspectral imaging Survey Page 13 ZI 112008 4 Certificate of Analysis Work Order: 095912 To: GOLDEN HAT RESOURCES INC. Date: Nov 07,2007 Attn: Bill Michaluk 59 - B Glenmore Drive West Vancouver BRITISH COLUMBIA V7S 1A5

P.O.No. Project No. DEFAULT No. Of Samples 19 Date Submitted Sep 27,2007 Report Compiises Pages 1 to 6 (Inclusive of Cover Sheet) Distribution of unused material: Discard after 90 days: 19 Soils

Russ Calow, B.Sc., C.Chem. Vice President Global Geochemistry

IS0 17025 Accredited for Specific Tests. SCC No. 456

Report Footer: L.N.R. = Listed not received I.S. = InsufficientSample n.a. = Not applicable -- =NOresult *INF = Composihon of this sample makes detedon impossible by this method M after a result denotes ppb to ppm conversion. !h denotes ppm to [i’o conversion Methods marked wlth an asterisk (e.g ‘NAAOIV) were subcontracted Subject to SGS General Terms and Conditions

The data reported on this certificate of analysis represents the sample submitted to SGS Minerals Servlces Reproductionof this analytical report in full or in part, is prohibited without prior wntten approval

SGS Canada lnc. Mineral Services 1885 Leslle Street Toronto ON M38 2M3 t(416) 445-5755 f(416) 445-4152 www.sgs ca

Y0mb.v el tkPQI Onup (Snctatlr Gmn~~lndu Lm,l(ms.) Page 2 of 6

" _.- ~ I , Element As' Al As Au Ba BI Ca Cd Ce Co Method MMI-M5 MMI-MS MMI-MS. MMI-MS MMI-MS3 MMI-MS MMI-MS MMt-MS MMI-M5 MMI-M5 DetLim. 1 1 10 01 10' 1 10 1 5 5 Un ip PPE PPM PPB PPB PPB' PPB PPM PPB PPB PPB *, I ..., . GHE 1 .17 296 40 03 4220 Cl 330 13 735 197 .. I , ... ,., . GHE 2 15 157 4 0 02 1960 <1 240 7 26 1 56 GHE 3 8 110 40 O2 . . 4060 .. 4 440 26 108 118 .- 1 ~ GHE 4 22 52 *I(Y 1900 4 540 7 94 148 ~ __ GHE 5 14 89' 40 01 3940' c1 460 5 648 179 .I . , GHE 6 5 140 02 4750, c1 350 21 313 147 . .I r , ,. GHE 7 19.- 93

GHN 1 16 78 *I0 0 1' ' 3800%' Cl 610 67 199 166 GHN 2 14 77

GHN 4 27 97 40 02 3330' , Cl 640 37 215' 140 GHN 5 . 18 55 40 05 4570 c1 570 15 292 174 GHN 6 13 73 40 02 4240 <1 570 23 420 188 . I" . GHN 7 32 145 30 COl , 5310% *l 550 16 698 203 "I ,- . "" " GHN 8 11 69 40 04 4510

The data reported on this certnicate of analysis represents the sample submitted to SGS Minerals Services Reproduction of this analytical repott in full or in part, is prohibited without prior written approval

SGS Canada Inc Mineral Services 1885 Leslie Street Toronto ON M3B 2M3 t(416) 445-5755 f(416) 4454152 www sgs ca

L .--

A Page 3 of 6

Element Cr cu DY Er Eu Fe Gd La LI Mg Method MMI-M5 MMI-MS MMI-M5 MMI-MS MMI-MS MMI-MS MMI-MS MMI-MS MMI-M5 MMI-M5 Det.Lim. 100 10 1 0.5 05 1 1 1 5 1 Units PPB PPB PPB PPB PPB PPM PPB PPB PPB PPM GHE 1 300 690 81 37 9 20 5' 234 96 25 1 6 103 GHE 2 88 120 140 <5 101 GHE 7 400 380 41 20.5 8.0 52 41 38 <5 137 GHN i el00 1250 114 647 23 7 58 121 99 9 145 GHN 2 100 1220 129 73 0 24 9 73 129 114 7 130 I ,~ GHN 4 400 1410 174 97.3 365 55 1 80 142 18 140 GHN 5

The data reported on this certtficate of analysis represents the sample submitted to SGS Minerals Services Reproduction of this analytcal report. in full or in part, IS prohibited without pnor written approval

SGS Canada Inc Mineral Services 1885 Leslie Street Toronto ON M3B 2M3 t(416) 445-5755 f(416) 445-4152 www sgs ca ,"--

Page 4 of 6

Element Mo' Nb Nd Ni Pb Pd Pr Pt Rb Sb Method MMI-M5 MMI-M5 MMI-MS MMI-MS MMI-MS. MMI-MS MMI-M5 MMI-M5 MMI-MS MMI-MS DetLim. 5 05 1 5 10 1 1 I 5 1 Units PPB PPB PPB PPB PPB PPB PPB PPB PPB PPB

GHE 1 16 10 2 329 573 70 2 76 el 200 C1 GHE 2 <5 21 185 195 40 Cl 37 c1 138 4

GHE 3 <5 14 158 1140 30 <1 31 Cl 162 c1 4

GHN 7 27 32 483 1210 60 1 94 Cl 235 <1 GHN 8 <5 C0.5 412 1880 30 4 75

GHN 11 <5 09 89 1430 20 <1 17 Cl 47 C1 GHN 12 8

The data reported on this certificate of analysis represents the sample submitted to SGS Minerals Services Reprodudon of this analybcal report. in full or in part. is prohibitedwithout pnor written approval

SGS Canada Inc Mineral Services 1885 Leslie Street Toronto ON M3B 2M3 t(416) 445-5755 f(416) 445-4152 w~lwsgs ca ’. -t Page 5 of 6 .. Element sc Sm Sn Sr Ta Tb Te m TI n Method MMI-M5 MMI-M5 MMI-M5 MMI-M5 MMI-M5 MMI-M5 MMI-M5 MMI-M5 MMI-MS MMI-M5 DetLim. 5 1 1 10 1 1 10 05 3 05 Units PPB PPB we PPB PPB PPB PPB PPB PPB PPB ,GHE 1 277 82 <1 1110 <1 15

GHN 1 90 81 *I 3010 *1 20 ClO , 68 22 co.5 GHN 2 146 86 Cl 3340 . 21 40 8.7 29

‘Std MMISRM14 9 5 *1 630 c1 c1

The data reported on this cemficate of analysis represents the sample submitted to SGS Minerals Services Reproductionof this analytical report, in full or in part. is prohibited without prlor written approval.

SGS Canada Inc Mineral Services 1885 Leslie Street Toronto ON M3B 2M3 t(416) 445-5755 f(416) 445-4152 www sgs ca .-

Page 6 of 6 Element U W Y Yb Zn Zr Method MMI-MS MMI-M5 MMI-MS MMI-M5 MMI-M5 MMI-MS$ Det.Lirn. 1 1 5 1 20 5 Units PPB PPB PPB PPB, PPB PPB GHE 1 30 2 416 29 540 403 GHE 2 31 4 435 31' 80 156 GHE 3 18

GHE 4 19 Cl 283 17 60 50 GHE 5 31 <1 422 32 40 177 GHE 6 27 <1 675 52 970 21 1

GHE 7 27 <1I 209 15 270 103 GHN 1 43 4 667 49 710 177 GHN 2 67 <1 732 56 480 224 GHN 4 31

The data reported on this cemficate of analysts represents the sample submttted to SGS Minerals Services Reproduction of thts analytical report, in full or in part, ISprohibited without prior wntten approval.

SGS Canada Inc Mineral Serv~ces1885 Leslie Street Tomnto ON M3B 2M3 t(416) 445-5755 f(416) 445-4152 www.sgs ca

Mmkrof mm SCS Crmp (59cIW6 Cbn.:r.de dr Sumiiblro) f-

APPENDIX 111 Cost Statement

HHE - Report on Landsat Hyperspectral imaging Survey Page 14 2/11/2008 905 - 1555 Esquimalt Avenue ,--- West Vancouver, BC Canada

Invoice

To: Golden Hat Resources Inc. Attn: Bill Michaluk

I Email: [email protected] Date: May 17, 2007 Phone: 604-341-9638 From: Loyd Pond

Dear Bill: This confirms that Hamilton Hycroft will provide the following services.

Description of Services: To Process and correlate IRIS Remote Sensing survey data on 17 Mineral Title Claims located at Telegraph Creek Property Block 2-A that are registered under Golden Hat Resources Inc,, (#200933)on this 8h day of May 2007. Suwey Area: All 17 mineral claims including an area surrounding the boundary of the claims will be surveyed to cover an effective area of 640 square kilometers, which survey will include services as follows: 1. Transpose remote sensing data onto a topographical map to identify anomalies of mineralization and hydrocarbon microseepage within the survey area by size, shape and location of each anomaly, if any. 2. Specify type of resource for each anomalous area and estimate gross tonnage or capacity of natural resources in-place. 3. Provide reflectance values across each anomalous area to provide relative concentrations of resources to be considered as potential drill targets. 4. Data to estimate thickness of overburden covering each anomalous area. The above services will be accomplished by remote sensing technology and onsite geochemical sampling or geophysical sunrey tools will not be used or included in complete the IRIS survey. We suggest that the results of our survey should be used as a guide to plan onsite geochemical or geophysical survey for independent laboratory analysis. We would be pleased to suggest such a laboratory service if requested. Price of Sewices...... #...... Total USD $20,000.00 Prices quoted are exclusive of all applicable taxes

Terms and Conditions: PRICE The prices in this proposal are valid for 30 days Otherwise prices are subject to change without notrce Federal and Provincial taxes are not included in the quoted price, and will be added as applicable TERMS OF PAYMENT Pre-payment of the full amount is required upon acceptance of the services of the terms, conditions and commissloning for the above Services DELIVERY Services shall be deemed to start upon clearance of your cheque or receipt of funds and delivery of services shall occur within 10 days thereafter Page Iof 1 APPENDIX IV Authors Statement

HHE - Report on Landsat Hyperspectral imaging Survey Page 15 2/11/2008 STATEMENT OF AUTHOR

I, Loyd Pond, of 21- 285 17'h Street, West Vancouver, British Columbia, hereby certify:

1. I am a President of Hamilton Hycroft Energy Inc. an Extra-Provincial company duly registered in the Province of British Columbia. 2. I worked as a Senior Engineer for Ericsson Telephones in their research department and was employed as President of Fairchild Data Systems invotved with research and development for the remote storage of data using satellites. 3. During the past 3 years Hamilton Hycroft has developed proprietary algorithms to process multispectral and Hyperspectral imaging data with an interest in identifying mineral hydrocarbon anomalies.

4. We have been retained by Golden Hat Resources Inc. to process imaging datasets provided by IRIS Remote Sensing Systems Ltd. 5. The processing datasets has provided positive results that a mineralized anomaly exists within the boundaries of Block 544707. Our report was issued in June 2007, prior to SGS Canada of Ontario validating by Certificate of Analysis the presence of gold, silver and copper in soil samples submitted by Golden Hat. 6. We have been duly paid by cheque No. 0591 in the amount of CAD $21,176.00 issued by Golden Hat Resources Inc on May 18,2007 and drawn on the Bank of Nova Scotia.

7. I, nor any member of our organization, had any part in, or fore-knowledge of geophysical or geochemical data related to the subject property prior the issuance of our report dated June 9, 2007. Hamilton Hycroft is not a service organization nor does it intend on becoming a reconnaissance service in the future. Hamilton Hycroft provided data processing services to Golden Hat in order to validate our ability to identify natural resources by remote sensing using our proprietary algorithms. 1 have not read the definitions of "Qualified Person" set out in NI 43-101 and hereby state that I am not sure whether I fulfill the requirements as a "Qualified Person" for the purposes of NI 43-101.

7. 1 am the co-author of this report and have reviewed every section of this report and accept responsibility for the accuracy and the content of the information in this report.

8. 1 have not visited the subject properties. 9. I have had no direct or past involvement with Golden Hat Resources Inc., other than to provide these services. 9. I am not aware of any material fact or material change with respect to the subject matter of the technical report that is not reflected in the technical report, the omission to disclose which makes the technical report misleading.

10. I am independent of Golden Hat Resources Inc.

11. I have not read NI 43-101 and NI 43-101 F I and the technical report has not been prepared in compliance with that instrument and form.

12I This report is not for the purpose of complying with the requirements set out in NI 43-101 for completing a Golden Hat Resources Inc., short form offering financing and application to move to a Tier 1 or 2 listing on the TSX Venture Exchange. For and on behalf of Hamilton Hycroft Energy, Inc. Loyd Pond, President

DATED at Vancouver, British Columbia, this llthday of February, 2008. APPENDIX V Hamilton Hycroft Remote Sensing Survey Report

HHE - Report on Landsat Hyperspectral imaging Survey Page 16 2/12/2008 Hamitkm

. ..,,,--mmv-- .,,.,. ~~..I,...... ,..I...... -.-." ...... l." . -...- lden Hat Resources he., Canada Remote sensing survey of 17 Mineral Claims located in Telqraph Creek, Bntish Columbia by IRIS Remote Sensing Systems Ltd.

-- I

,-

IRIS IRemote Sensing Survey The only natural resource anomaly identified within Golden Hat Resources 17 mineral claims was lmtdwithin the boundary of claim number 544707 located in Cassiar Land District: having the above coordinates as outlined on Energy Mines and Resources Canada reference map Telegraph Creek IWC, BC Topographical Map 104G074, Golden Hat Tenure Map having Center Map coordinates 57" 47' 59" N, 131 22' 59" including the expanded copy of anomalous area with spacing of 100 meter grid pattern.

Reflectance Area: Mineralization indications cover an area approximately 0 8 krn oy 1 1krn (see attached graphic showing ?OO meter grid pattern transposed onto the Top0 Maps itemized above

Type of Mineralization:disserntnatted Cold. Silver and Copper

Indicated Gross Capacity: potential resources-in place ranges between 3 5 to 4.5 MMT

indicated Depth: below 00 feet of over burden. r REFLECTANCE VALUES LOCATED IN MINERAL CLAIM 544707 AT TELEGRAPH CREEK /-

APPENDIX VI List of Cited References

HHE - Report on Landsat Hyperspectral imaging Survey Page 17 Wf?/2008 References Cited

Albers, J. P., and Stewart, J. H., 1972, Geology and mineral deposits of Esmeralda County, Nevada: Nevada Bureau of Mines and GeoloRv Bulletin 78,-80 pages. Boardman, J. W., 1989, Inversion of imaging spectrometry data using singular value decomposition: in Proceedings, IGARSS '89, 12th Canadian Symposium on Remote SensinR. 4, pp. 2069-2072. Boardman, J. W., Kruse, F. A., and Green, R. O., 1995, Mapping target signatures via partial unmixing of AVIRIS data: in Summaries, Fifth JPL Airborne Earth Science Workshop, JPL Publication 9S-l,-v. 1, pp. 23-26. Brauhart, C. W., D.1 Groves, and P. Morant (1998). Regional alteration systems associated with volcanogenic massive sulphide mineralization at Panorama, Pilbara, Western Australia. Economic Geology, 93, 292-302. Clark, R.N. and Swayze, G.A., 1995, Mapping Minerals, Amorphous Materials, Environmental Materials, Vegetation, Water, Ice and Snow, and Other Materials: The USGS Tricorder Algorithm. Summaries of the Fifth Annual .IPL Airborne Earth Science Workshop, January 23-26, R.O. Green, Ed JPL Publication 95-1, pp. 39-40. Clark, R.N., A.J. Gallagher, and G.A. Swayze, 1990, Material Absorption Band Depth Mapping of Imaging Spectrometer Data Using a Complete Band Shape Least-Squares Fit with Library Reference Spectra: in Proceedings of the Second Airborne Visible/lnfrared IrnaginR Spectrometer (AVIRIS) Workshop JPL Publication 90-54,-pp. 176-186, 1990.

Cudahy, T.J., K. Okada, K, Ueda, C.W. Brauhart, P. Morant, 0. Huston, T.D. Cocks, J. Wilson, P. Mason, and J.F. Huntington (1999). Mapping the Panorama VMS-style Alteration and Host Rock Mineralogy, Pilbara Block, Using Airborne Hyperspectral VNIR-SWIR Data. CSlRO Exploration and Mining Report, 661 R, 1999, pp 107. Duke, E.F. (1994). Near infrared spectra of muscovite, Tschermak substitution and metamorphic reaction progress: implications for remote sensing. Geology, 22,621624. Geologic and regolith mapping for mineral exploration in the Gawler Craton of South Australia using Hyperion and other remote sensing techniques. Mahoney, S.; James, P.; Mauger, A.; Heinson, G. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2003. IGARSS apos;03. Proceedings. 2003 IEEE International Volume 3, Issue, 21-25 July 2003 Page(s): 1779 - 1781 Goetz, A. F. ti., Vane, G., Solomon, J. E., and Rock, B. N., 1985, Imaging spectrometry for earth remote sensing: Science,-228, pp. 1147--1153. Harsanyi, 1. C., and Chang, C. L, 1994. Hyperspectral image classification and dimensionality reduction: An orthogonal subspace projection approach: IEEE Trans. Geosci. and Remote Sens.,-v. 32, pp. 779-785. Huntington, J.F., Green, A.A. and Craig, M.D., 1989. Identification - the Goal Beyond Discrimination. The status of mineral and lithological identification from high resolution spectrometer data: Examples and challenges. Invited Keynote paper. In "Remote Sensing: An Economic Tool for the Nineties", IGARSS '99,-12'"' Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing, Vancouver, 10-14 July, 1989, Vol. 1, pp. 6-11. I EEE#89CH2768-0 Huntington, J.F., Green, A.A., and Craig, M.D., 1988, Mineral and Lithological Mapping with the GER 64 Band Scanner: US and Australian Examples. Poster and presented paper, 6th Thematic Conf on "Remote Sensine for Mineral Exploration",-Houston Texas, May 16-19 1988 pp. 39-40. Huntington, J.F., J.W. Boardman, M.D. Craig, T.J. Munday, and A.R. Gabell, (1994). Mineral Mapping with Spectrally Processed Geoscan MK 11 Scanner Data, Copper Gorge, Nullagine Western Australia. CSlRO Division of Exploration and Mining Report 46R, AMIRA Project P382, July 1994.Lia0, L., P. Jarecke, D. Gleichauf and T. Hedman (2000). Performance Characterization of the Hyperion Imaging spectrometer Instrument. PrOC. of SPIE, Vol. 4101, pp. 22-26, July 2000. Kruse, F. A., 1988, Use of Airborne Imaging Spectrometer data to map minerals associated with hydrothermally altered rocks in the northern Grapevine Mountains, Nevada and California: Remote Sensing of Environment,-v. 24, no. I, pp. 31-51. Kruse, F. A., 2000, The effects of spatial resolution, spectral resolution, and SNR on geologic mapping using hyperspectral data, northern Grapevine Mountains, Nevada: a Proceedinas of the 9'h JPL Airborne Earth Science Workshop: Jet Propulsion Laboratory Publication. Kruse, F. A., Boardman, J. W., and Huntington, J. F., 1999, Fifteen Years of Hyperspectral Data: northern Grapevine Mountains, Nevada: in Proceedings of the 8"' JPL Airborne Earth Science Workshop: Jet Propulsion Laboratory Publication, JPL Publication 99-

-I-17 pp. 247-258. Moring, B., 1986, Reconnaissance surficial geologic map of northern Death Valley, California and Nevada; U .S. Geological Survev Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-1770, 1:62,500, 1sheet. Pearlman, J.S., S. Carman, C. Segal, P. Jarecke. P.S. Barry, W. Browne (2001). Overview of the Hyperion Imaging Spectrometer for the NASA EO-1 Mission. lGARSS Special Session 40, SS4OM0, Paper 1775,3pp. Rasmussen, B. 2000. Filamentous microfossils in a 3,235-million-year-old volcanogenic massive sulphide deposit. Nature, 405, pp. 676-679. Thorson, J.P., 1971, Igneous Petrology of the Oatman Mining District, Mohave County, Arizona, Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, Uni. California, Santa BarbaraJ89 pages. Wrucke, C. T., Werschkey, R. S., Raines, G. L., Blakely, R. J., Hoover, D. B, and Miller, M. S., 1984, Mineral resources and mineral resource potential of the Little Sand Spring Wilderness Study Area, inyo County, California: U. S. GeoloEical Survey Open File Report 84-557,-20 pages.