DOCSLIB.ORG

Treasure Act Annual Report 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Treasure Act Annual Report 2015 Treasure Act Annual Report 2015 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Section 12 to the Treasure Act 1996 November 2017 1 ii Treasure Act Annual Report 2015 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Section 12 to the Treasure Act 1996 November 2017 1 © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2017 Edited by J Parol & I Richardson Published by Portable Antiquities and Treasure, Learning and National Partnerships, British Museum 2 Contents Minister’s foreword 5 Introduction 6 Treasure cases 2015 7 Table of Treasure cases 2015 17 Update on 2014 Treasure cases 555 3 4 Minister’s foreword I am pleased to introduce the Treasure Act Annual Report 2015, which provides a report on the operation of the Treasure Act 1996 for that year. The Treasure Act is an enduring success, ensuring that museums are able to acquire the most important archaeological discoveries for the benefit of all. 2015 saw 1,005 potential Treasure finds reported in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Of these discoveries, 341 have been (or are to be) acquired by public collections. Many museum acquisitions have been made possible only through the kind assistance of funding bodies, particularly the Art Fund, Headley Trust, Heritage Lottery Fund, National Heritage Memorial Fund and the V&A Purchase Grant Fund. I am grateful to these organisations for their recognition of the importance of archaeological finds and their support of museums’ efforts to acquire them. I also applaud the large number of interested parties waiving their right to a reward for Treasure cases, with individuals foregoing their share in 78 cases this year. These donations have allowed museums to acquire finds that they may not have otherwise been able to, thereby allowing the public to enjoy and experts to study them. There are many bodies and people who deserve praise for the ongoing success of the Treasure Act, in particular the Portable Antiquities Scheme (PAS) and its local network of 40 Finds Liaison Officers (FLOs) across England and Wales, to whom almost all finds of Treasure are reported. The Scheme is fundamental to the operation of the Act, and on behalf of the Government I would like to thank the British Museum, its local partners, and Amgueddfa Cymru/National Museum Wales for their commitment to the success of the PAS. The role of the FLOs is vital in disseminating information about the Act and archaeological best practice to finders of Treasure and landowners. They are indispensable in facilitating the administration of Treasure cases and providing the logistical means for the Act to function. Together with curators, scientists and conservators at the national museums of England, Wales and Northern Ireland, they also provide expert reports on Treasure finds for Coroners, who, along with their staff, are owed thanks for their diligence in holding Treasure inquests. The British Museum, which manages the PAS in England, also supports coroners in that country and serves as the secretariat for the Treasure Valuation Committee and I am grateful for their continued excellent work. In order to ensure the long-term success of the Act, and that it reflects current practice and works as efficiently as possible, the Government is continuing a process to conduct a Review of the Treasure Act Code of Practice. This will also consider the definition of Treasure, and whether that should be amended. Finally I would like to acknowledge the steadfast contribution of the Treasure Valuation Committee, chaired by Lord Renfrew of Kaimsthorn. I am grateful for the services of all of the Committee members, who voluntarily provide their time and expertise. John Glen Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Arts, Heritage, and Tourism November 2017 5 Introduction Under the Treasure Act 1996, finders have a legal obligation to report all finds of potential Treasure. For a summary see finds.org.uk/treasure or the leaflet Advice for Finders of Archaeological Objects, Including Treasure. The Act allows a national or local museum to acquire Treasure finds for public benefit. If this happens, a reward is paid, which is (normally) shared equally between the finder and landowner, though the interested parties may wish to waive their rights to a reward, enabling museums to acquire such finds at no or reduced cost. Rewards are fixed at the full market value of the find, determined by the Secretary of State on the advice of an independent panel of experts known as the Treasure Valuation Committee. Although Treasure finds account for a relatively small proportion of archaeological items found in England and Wales by the public, finders are encouraged to record all archaeological items with the Portable Antiquities Scheme: this data is published on its online database at finds.org.uk. The Scheme and its network of local archaeologists – experts in recording small finds, known as Finds Liaison Officers – play an important role in the operation of the Treasure Act, advising finders of their legal obligations, providing advice on the process and writing reports on potential Treasure finds for local coroners. Organisation The administration of the Treasure Act is undertaken by the British Museum, which employs a Treasure Registrar and four Assistant Treasure Registrars, one of whom is part-time. This work involves the preparation of Treasure cases for inquest (at a Coroner’s Court), the handling of disclaimed cases, acting as the secretariat of the Treasure Valuation Committee, and the payment of rewards to finders/landowners. Treasure Valuation Committee The Committee’s terms of reference are detailed in the Treasure Act 1996 Code of Practice. In short, it is tasked to recommend to the Secretary of State the value of Treasure finds, to recommend abatements of rewards in the case of misbehaviour on the part of the interested parties, and to recommend an apportionment of the reward when there is a disagreement among the parties. The Committee is made up of independent experts appointed for their knowledge of the antiquities trade; its membership also includes someone to represent the interests of finders, a museums’ representative, and an expert in cultural property law. Membership of the Committee at the time of publication consisted of Lord Renfrew of Kaimsthorn (Chairman), Professor Roger Bland, Dr Tim Pestell, Ms Marian Campbell, Ms Harry Bain, Ms Hetty Gleave, Mr Christopher Martin and Mr Jim Brown. More information on the Treasure Valuation Committee, as well as electronic versions of the minutes of the meetings of the Committee, can be found online at finds.org.uk/treasure Treasure Annual Reports Copies of previous reports can be found at finds.org.uk/news 6 Treasure cases 2015 Number of Treasure cases and geographic distribution The number of Treasure cases reported in 2015 was 1,005 (Table A). This is more than five times the number of cases reported in the first full year of the Act (1998). Table A: Number of Treasure cases reported 1988–2016 (England, Wales and Northern Ireland). Year No. of Treasure cases 1988 19 1989 23 1990 22 1991 16 1992 34 1993 37 1994 36 1995 20 1996 24 1997 79 1998 201 1999 236 2000 233 2001 214 2002 240 2003 427 2004 506 2005 595 2006 673 2007 747 2008 806 2009 778 2010 860 2011 969 2012 990 2013 990 2014 1,011 2015 1,005 2016 1,120 The high level of the reporting of Treasure reflects a wider understanding on the part of finders of their obligations under the Treasure Act, through the education and outreach work of the Portable Antiquities Scheme and its Finds Liaison Officers. 7 Table B: Summary of all Treasure cases 1997–2015 by geographic area (England, Wales and Northern Ireland). - 00 1997 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total 20 Bath & North East 1 2 1 1 4 0 3 12 Somerset Bedfordshire 7 2 3 2 6 7 8 15 6 14 8 11 15 17 12 8 141 Berkshire & 8 2 1 3 4 2 2 4 4 3 11 12 15 16 11 98 Reading Bristol 1 1 2 Buckinghamshire & 10 2 1 10 8 14 13 9 22 14 12 23 18 20 24 30 230 Milton Keynes Cambridgeshire & 12 4 3 6 2 12 22 34 21 8 21 22 28 29 22 22 268 Peterborough Cheshire and 8 3 5 6 3 4 1 9 5 10 11 7 6 10 14 8 110 Merseyside Cornwall 2 1 1 3 4 3 7 1 9 3 3 4 9 14 5 69 Coventry 2 2 1 5 Cumbria 1 4 1 2 3 8 6 6 13 10 9 8 11 10 92 Derbyshire 5 1 3 5 9 3 7 11 9 7 6 12 6 3 6 93 Devon 14 1 2 8 6 15 10 6 12 3 13 8 19 20 25 19 181 Dorset 20 6 8 15 9 10 16 17 18 17 16 23 27 41 35 40 318 Durham 1 1 2 1 1 4 5 1 5 8 1 2 10 6 40 Essex 26 8 9 19 25 44 44 36 57 54 57 91 67 66 80 49 732 Gloucestershire 13 2 2 2 10 12 15 12 12 10 5 14 19 15 15 13 171 Gloucestershire, S. 3 1 1 3 5 2 1 3 4 6 8 4 2 43 Hampshire 26 11 10 18 27 30 33 30 24 22 18 29 19 47 40 42 426 Herefordshire 1 2 2 5 4 2 5 7 7 11 10 4 11 71 Hertfordshire 16 4 3 3 12 4 14 16 9 19 14 11 13 17 25 13 193 Isle of` Wight 4 3 9 15 21 19 30 21 47 30 33 24 30 17 25 328 Kent 50 12 11 36 40 49 39 42 52 41 52 39 52 50 33 38 636 Lancashire 4 1 3 6 3 3 4 2 5 10 6 6 6 13 6 76 Leicestershire & 9 5 6 4 6 14 15 17 17 16 15 17 11 11 14 177 Rutland Lincolnshire 32 13 16 29 18 27 26 34 41 40 67 74 62 62 53 49 643 Lincolnshire, North 6 1 1 5 6 4 3 9 5 5 11 7 5 26 9 6 109 & North East London, Greater 7 1 1 5 2 5 6 14 14 15 11 22 11 8 5 13 140 Manchester, 2 2 1 1 2 1 9 Greater Norfolk 145 43 46 58 78 84 76 77 109 82 65 80 123 107 119 126 1,418 Northamptonshire 11 1 8 3 8 12 12 11 17 21 15 14 17 20 11 181 Northumberland 1 2 1 1 6 2 2 7 8 12 8 8 4 4 7 73 Nottinghamshire 13 3 3 6 6 13 4 14 24 14 20 15 11 9 10 23 188 Oxfordshire 8 4 5 4 7 10 14 12 11 13 12 9 19 19 28 46 221 Shropshire 7 1 3 3 7 8 9 12 12 15 9 11 7 15 9 14 142 Somerset
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Winners Announced for the 18Th Annual Museums + Heritage Awards
    Press Release EMBARGO: NOT FOR PUBLICATION BEFORE 8.30 PM – 22 SEPTEMBER 2020 Winners announced for the 18th annual Museums + Heritage Awards From English Heritage’s Tintagel Castle Bridge & Landscape Project winning Permanent Exhibition of the Year to York Art Gallery and the Kaiser Chiefs winning Partnership of the Year, the 15 winners of the 18th Museums + Heritage Awards were announced this evening (Tuesday 22 September 2020) at a special online ceremony. The awards celebrated the most innovative and ground-breaking initiatives of last year from museums, galleries and heritage visitor attractions across the UK and overseas. Talking about English Heritage’s Tintagel Castle Bridge, recipient of the award for Permanent Exhibitioin of the Year, chair of the awards judging panel Dr Matthew Tanner MBE, chief executive of SS Great Britain, noted: “it is not only brave, it is extraordinary, bewitching and beautiful and has enabled the genuine story of place to be told in an astonishingly original way.” The event’s online format is not the only first for 2020, with this year’s categories having been bolstered by the addition of the new Sustainable Project of the Year award, which was sponsored by National Lottery Heritage Fund. The Museum of Oxford scooped this inaugural prize, for its temporary exhibition Queering Spires: a history of LGBTIQA+ spaces in Oxford. The temporary exhibition opened in September 2019 and was created with an ‘environmentally and socially responsible ethos’. One of its main aims was to reduce the amount of waste a temporary exhibition often creates and the judges were impressed by the Museum of Oxford’s commitment and authenticity in putting sustainability at the very heart of the project, recommending it as a model that could be replicated across the sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Berkhamsted Heritage Network and Hub – Main Report Appendices
    Berkhamsted Heritage Hub and Network Berkhamsted Heritage Network and Hub – Main Report Appendices 1 Destination Audit 78 2 Heritage Groups 87 3 Collections 91 4 Arts Groups in Berkhamsted 94 5 Museums & Heritage Centres 96 6 History Festivals 99 7 “Berkhamsted - Ten Centuries Through Ten Stories” - Worked Example of Events and Performances Proposal 105 8 Increasing Enjoyment of Heritage by Young People and Working with Schools 113 9 The Historic Environment (M Copeman Report) 10 BLHMS Collections Analysis (E. Toettcher report) 11 HKD Digitisation and Digital / Virtual Interpretation 12 Workshop Notes 13 Socio-Demographic Profile – Berkhamsted 14 Socio-Demographic Profile – 30 Minute Drive Time 77 Berkhamsted Heritage Hub and Network 1 Destination Audit 1.1 Access The A4251 runs through the centre of Berkhamsted. It connects to the A41, which runs adjacent to the town. The A41 connects in the east to the M1 and M25. Figure 48: Distance & Drive Time to large towns & cities Name Distance (mi.) Drive Time (mins) Tring 6.7 13 Hemel Hempstead 7.4 15 Watford 12.6 25 Aylesbury 13.8 22 Leighton Buzzard 14.3 31 High Wycombe 15.2 35 Luton 18.2 32 Source: RAC Route Planner There are currently 1,030 parking places around the town. Most are charged. Almost half are at the station, most of which are likely to be used by commuters on weekdays but available for events at weekends. A new multi-storey will open in 2019 to alleviate parking pressures. This is central to the town, next to Waitrose, easy to find, and so it will a good place to locate heritage information.
    [Show full text]
  • Transparency Report
    Transparency Report Transparency Report Government’s land and property disposals in 2015-16 and 2016-17 April 2018 1 Transparency Report 2 Transparency Report Transparency Report Government’s land and property disposals in 2015-16 and 2016-17 April 2018 3 Transparency Report © Crown copyright 2013 Produced by Cabinet Office You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or email: [email protected] Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Alternative format versions of this report are available on request from: [email protected] 4 Transparency Report Contents Introduction 7 Policy context 8 Land sales headlines 9 Details of assets sold 10 Appendix 1: Disposals guidance 82 Appendix 2: Transparency Review 82 Appendix 3: Glossary of terms 83 5 Transparency Report 6 Transparency Report Introduction The disposal of surplus government owned property is an important part of the Government’s drive to improve its estate management and create an efficient, fit-for-purpose and sustainable estate that meets future needs. This means disposing of surplus land and buildings in a way that delivers value for the taxpayer, boosts growth and delivers new homes. The Government has committed to freeing up land with capacity for at least 160,000 homes by 2020 and raising at least £5 billion from land and property disposals by 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Wakefield
    Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Wakefield Report to The Electoral Commission July 2003 © Crown Copyright 2003 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report no. 342 2 Contents Page What is The Boundary Committee For England? 5 Summary 7 1 Introduction 13 2 Current electoral arrangements 15 3 Draft recommendations 19 4 Responses to consultation 21 5 Analysis and final recommendations 23 6 What happens next? 67 Appendices A Final recommendations for Wakefield: Detailed mapping 69 B First draft of electoral change Order for Wakefield 71 C Guide to interpreting the first draft of the electoral Order 76 3 4 What is The Boundary Committee for England? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of The Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. The functions of the Local Government Commission for England were transferred to The Electoral Commission and its Boundary Committee on 1 April 2002 by the Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (SI 2001 no. 3692). The Order also transferred to The Electoral Commission the functions of the Secretary of State in relation to taking decisions on recommendations for changes to local authority electoral arrangements and implementing them.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2021 FOI 2387-21 Drink Spiking
    Our ref: 2387/21 Figures for incidents of drink spiking in your region over the last 5 years (year by year) I would appreciate it if the figures can be broken down to the nearest city/town. Can you also tell me the number of prosecutions there have been for the above offences and how many of those resulted in a conviction? Please see the attached document. West Yorkshire Police receive reports of crimes that have occurred following a victim having their drink spiked, crimes such as rape, sexual assault, violence with or without injury and theft. West Yorkshire Police take all offences seriously and will ensure that all reports are investigated. Specifically for victims of rape and serious sexual offences, depending on when the offence occurred, they would be offered an examination at our Sexual Assault Referral Centre, where forensic samples, including a blood sample for toxicology can be taken, with the victim’s consent, if within the timeframes and guidance from the Faculty for Forensic and Legal Medicine. West Yorkshire Police work with support agencies to ensure that all victims of crime are offered support through the criminal justice process, including specialist support such as from Independent Sexual Violence Advisors. Recorded crime relating to spiked drinks, 01/01/2016 to 31/12/2020 Notes Data represents the number of crimes recorded during the period which: - were not subsequently cancelled - contain the search term %DR_NK%SPIK% or %SPIK%DR_NK% within the crime notes, crime summary and/or MO - specifically related to a drug/poison/other noxious substance having been placed in a drink No restrictions were placed on the type of drink, the type of drug/poison or the motivation behind the act (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxfordshire Local History News
    OXFORDSHIRE LOCAL HISTORY NEWS The Newsletter of the Oxfordshire Local History Association Issue 128 Spring 2014 ISSN 1465-469 Chairman’s Musings gaining not only On the night of 31 March 1974, the inhabitants of the Henley but also south north-western part of the Royal County of Berkshire Buckinghamshire, went to bed as usual. When they awoke the following including High morning, which happened to be April Fools’ Day, they Wycombe, Marlow found themselves in Oxfordshire. It was no joke and, and Slough. forty years later, ‘occupied North Berkshire’ is still firmly part of Oxfordshire. The Royal Commission’s report Today, many of the people who live there have was soon followed by probably forgotten that it was ever part of Berkshire. a Labour government Those under forty years of age, or who moved in after white paper. This the changes, may never have known this. Most broadly accepted the probably don’t care either. But to local historians it is, recommendations of course, important to know about boundaries and apart from deferring a decision on provincial councils. how they have changed and developed. But in the 1970 general election, the Conservatives were elected. Prime Minister Edward Heath appointed The manner in which the 1974 county boundary Peter Walker as the minister responsible for sorting the changes came about is little known but rather matter out. He produced another but very different interesting. Reform of local government had been on white paper. It also deferred a decision on provincial the political agenda since the end of World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • Museums and Galleries of Oxfordshire 2014
    Museums and Galleries of Oxfordshire 2014 includes 2014 Museum and Galleries D of Oxfordshire Competition OR SH F IR X E O O M L U I S C MC E N U U M O S C Soldiers of Oxfodshire Museum, Woodstock www.oxfordshiremuseums.org The SOFO Museum Woodstock By a winning team Architects Structural Project Services CDM Co-ordinators Engineers Management Engineers OXFORD ARCHITECTS FULL PAGE AD museums booklet ad oct10.indd 1 29/10/10 16:04:05 Museums and Galleries of Oxfordshire 2012 Welcome to the 2012 edition of Museums or £50, there is an additional £75 Blackwell andMuseums Galleries of Oxfordshire and Galleries. You will find oftoken Oxfordshire for the most questions answered2014 detailsWelcome of to 39 the Museums 2014 edition from of everyMuseums corner and £75correctly. or £50. There is an additional £75 token for ofGalleries Oxfordshire of Oxfordshire, who are your waiting starting to welcomepoint the most questions answered correctly. Tokens you.for a journeyFrom Banbury of discovery. to Henley-upon-Thames, You will find details areAdditionally generously providedthis year by we Blackwell, thank our Broad St, andof 40 from museums Burford across to Thame,Oxfordshire explore waiting what to Oxford,advertisers and can Bloxham only be redeemed Mill, Bloxham in Blackwell. School, ourwelcome rich heritageyou, from hasBanbury to offer. to Henley-upon- I wouldHook likeNorton to thank Brewery, all our Oxfordadvertisers London whose Thames, all of which are taking part in our new generousAirport, support Smiths has of allowedBloxham us and to bring Stagecoach this Thecompetition, competition supported this yearby Oxfordshire’s has the theme famous guidewhose to you, generous and we supportvery much has hope allowed that us to Photo: K T Bruce Oxfordshirebookseller, Blackwell.
    [Show full text]
  • For Reference Only
    FOR REFERENCE ONLY FRANCIS CLOSE HALL LEARNING CENTRE UNIVERSITY OF GLOUCESTERSHIRE Swindon Road, Cheltenham GLSO 4AZ Tel: 01242 714600 VOLUNTEER - RUN MUSEUMS IN ENGLISH MARKET TOWNS AND VILLAGES BRIDGET ELIZABETH YATES A Thesis submitted to The University of Gloucestershire In accordance with the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In the Faculty of Education, Humanities and Sciences December 2010 ABSTRACT VOLUNTEER-RUN MUSEUMS IN ENGLISH MARKET TOWNS AND VILLAGES Volunteer-run museums in English market towns and villages have been largely over-looked by scholars examining the history and development of museums in England, and work on contemporary museum volunteering or the relations of museums to their communities have not distinguished between volunteer-run and volunteer-involving museums. This thesis attempts to redress the balance by examining a number of volunteer-run museums in Dorset and the characteristics and motivations of the volunteers involved in their development. This element of the project included a survey of museum volunteers in the county and studies of a selected group of museums through interviews and through archival research in museum records. The thesis also presents a historical analysis, through a number of case histories, of the development of volunteer-run museums in English market towns and villages from 1884, demonstrating clearly how the development of these small museums reflects larger changes in the rural community from the paternalism of the late nineteenth century, through growing independence and democracy after 1918, to the counter­ urbanisation of the second half of the twentieth century. 1 Changing perceptions of rural identity are also apparent in the history of these museums.
    [Show full text]
  • North Lincolnshire's Newcomers in 2019
    North Lincolnshire’s newcomers in 2019 A short statistics overview for people who plan or deliver services, and are planning for migrants who are the newest arrivals to North Lincolnshire. Photo credits: Steve Morgan [photographer] and Yorkshire Futures [source]. 1. Introduction Who is this briefing paper for? This document is aimed at people who plan or deliver local services in North Lincolnshire. You might find you are often the first people who meet and respond to newcomers in the local area. You will know that people who have just arrived in an area often need more information and support than those who have had time to adjust and learn about life in the UK. These newcomers might benefit from information about key services for example, in their first language. This briefing paper provides an overview of the numbers and geographical patterns of new migrants who recently have come to live in North Lincolnshire and were issued with a national insurance number [NINO] in 2019. We hope you will find the information presented here useful for planning services and engagement with new communities, making funding applications, or for background research for you or your colleagues to better understand migration in your area. Where has the data come from? This briefing paper was produced by Migration Yorkshire in September 2020. This document uses information from the Department for Work and Pensions [DWP] about non-British nationals who successfully applied for a NINO in 2019. We have used this as a proxy for newcomers, because new arrivals usually need to apply for a NINO in order to work or claim benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Licensed Organisations PDF Created: 29 09 2021
    PAF Licensing Centre PAF® Public Sector Licensees: List of licensed organisations PDF created: 29 09 2021 Licence no. Organisation names Application Confirmed PSL 05710 (Bucks) Nash Parish Council 22 | 10 | 2019 PSL 05419 (Shrop) Nash Parish Council 12 | 11 | 2019 PSL 05407 Ab Kettleby Parish Council 15 | 02 | 2018 PSL 05474 Abberley Parish Council 06 | 08 | 2018 PSL 01030 Abbey Hill Parish Council 02 | 04 | 2014 PSL 01031 Abbeydore & Bacton Group Parish Council 02 | 04 | 2014 PSL 01032 Abbots Langley Parish Council 02 | 04 | 2014 PSL 01033 Abbots Leigh Parish Council 02 | 04 | 2014 PSL 03449 Abbotskerswell Parish Council 23 | 04 | 2014 PSL 06255 Abbotts Ann Parish Council 06 | 07 | 2021 PSL 01034 Abdon & Heath Parish Council 02 | 04 | 2014 PSL 00040 Aberdeen City Council 03 | 04 | 2014 PSL 00029 Aberdeenshire Council 31 | 03 | 2014 PSL 01035 Aberford & District Parish Council 02 | 04 | 2014 PSL 01036 Abergele Town Council 17 | 10 | 2016 PSL 04909 Aberlemno Community Council 25 | 10 | 2016 PSL 04892 Abermule with llandyssil Community Council 11 | 10 | 2016 PSL 04315 Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Board 24 | 02 | 2016 PSL 01037 Aberystwyth Town Council 17 | 10 | 2016 PSL 01038 Abingdon Town Council 17 | 10 | 2016 PSL 03548 Above Derwent Parish Council 20 | 03 | 2015 PSL 05197 Acaster Malbis Parish Council 23 | 10 | 2017 PSL 04423 Ackworth Parish Council 21 | 10 | 2015 PSL 01039 Acle Parish Council 02 | 04 | 2014 PSL 05515 Active Dorset 08 | 10 | 2018 PSL 05067 Active Essex 12 | 05 | 2017 PSL 05071 Active Lincolnshire 12 | 05
    [Show full text]
  • Community Risk Management Strategy 2015-2020
    COMMUNITY RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 2015-2020 West Yorkshire Fire & Rescue Service Making West Yorkshire Safer www.westyorksfire.gov.uk Contents 1. Foreword ............................................................................................................................... 1 2. About Us................................................................................................................................ 3 3. Expectations .......................................................................................................................... 3 4. Demographic Profile .............................................................................................................. 5 4.1. Bradford district .............................................................................................................. 5 4.2. Calderdale District .......................................................................................................... 6 4.3. Kirklees District ............................................................................................................... 6 4.4. Leeds District .................................................................................................................. 6 4.5. Wakefield District ............................................................................................................ 7 4.6. Infrastructure .................................................................................................................. 7 5. The Risk Management Process ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Urgent Care at Pontefract Hospital 2017
    Urgent Care at Pontefract Hospital 2017 Nichola Esmond Chief Executive Officer September 2017 This report and information in it can be used or reproduced however please ensure the information used is credited to Healthwatch Wakefield. Contents Pontefract Hospital emergency care provision since 2011 .......................................................................................... 4 Purpose of the engagement ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Next steps ..................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Key Findings .................................................................................................................................................................. 6 What happens currently across Wakefield District? .................................................................................................... 8 National Guidance about urgent care .......................................................................................................................... 8 The difference between A&E (or Emergency Department) and Urgent Treatment Centre .................................... 8 Responsibilities of the CCG, including legal requirements ........................................................................................... 9 Legal requirements ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]