DOCSLIB.ORG

TERRITORIAL CONSOLIDATION REFORMS in EUROPE Edited by Pawel Swianiewicz

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TERRITORIAL CONSOLIDATION REFORMS in EUROPE Edited by Pawel Swianiewicz TERRITORIAL CONSOLIDATION REFORMS IN EUROPE Edited by Pawel Swianiewicz Territorial Consolidation Reforms in Europe edited by Paweł Swianiewicz Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative Open Society Institute–Budapest Address Október 6 utca 12 H–1051 Budapest, Hungary Mailing address P.O. Box 519 H–1357 Budapest, Hungary Telephone (36-1) 882-3104 Fax (36-1) 882-3105 E-mail [email protected] Web Site http://lgi.osi.hu/ First published in 2010 by the Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative, Open Society Institute–Budapest © OSI/LGI, 2010 TM and Copyright © 2010 Open Society Institute All rights reserved. ISBN: 978 963 9719 16 3 OPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE The publication of these country reports has been funded by the Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative of the Open Society Institute–Budapest. The judgments expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views of LGI. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Copies of the book can be ordered by e-mail or post from LGI. Managing Editor: Tom Bass Cover photo: © Panos l Martin Roemers Printed in Budapest, Hungary, 2010 Design & Layout: Judit Kovács • Createch Ltd. Table of Contents Foreword ............................................................................................................ v List of Contributors ........................................................................................... vii List of Figures and Tables ................................................................................... xi Chapter 1 Territorial Fragmentation As a Problem, Consolidation As a Solution? ......... 1 Paweł Swianiewicz Territorial Consolidation Reforms in ‘Old’ EU Member States .................. 25 Chapter 2 Structural Reform in Denmark: Central Reform Processes in a Decentralized Environment in 2007 ............. 27 Karsten Vrangsbaek Chapter 3 Uncompleted Greek Territorial Consolidation: Two Waves of Reforms ........ 45 Nikos Hlepas Chapter 4 Territorial Local Level Reforms in East German Länder: Phases, Patterns, and Dynamics ................................................................... 75 Hellmut Wollmann Chapter 5 English Local Government: Neither Local Nor Government ........................ 95 Colin Copus Territorial Consolidation Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe ............ 127 Chapter 6 Conceptualizing Territorial Reorganization Policy Interventions in the Republic of Macedonia ...................................................................... 129 Veli Kreci and Bekim Ymeri Chapter 7 Local Government Reform in Georgia ......................................................... 159 David Melua iii Chapter 8 Shadows in a Cave: Georgian Consolidation Reform Seen from a Distance .... 189 Students’ Research Club Spatium Less Than Consolidation Reform, More Than the Status Quo ................... 217 Chapter 9 The Voluntary Union of Municipalites: Bottom-up Territorial Consolidation in the Czech Republic? ....................... 219 Michal Illner Chapter 10 Territorial Consolidation and Intercommunal Cooperation at the Local Level in the Slovak Republic ..................................................... 237 Daniel Klimovský Chapter 11 Hungarian Public Service Reform: Multipurpose Microregional Associations ..................................................... 255 Edit Somlyodyne Pfeil Chapter 12 The Evolution of Ukraine’s Administrative and Territorial Structure: Trends, Issues, and Risks .............................................................................. 265 Kateryna Maynzyuk and Yuriy Dzhygyr Chapter 13 Territorial Consolidation of Municipalities in Armenia ................................ 279 David Tumanyan Territorial Consolidation—Related Issues ..................................................... 283 Chapter 14 Intermunicipal Cooperation: A Viable Alternative to Territorial Amalgamation? ........................................ 285 Robert Hertzog Chapter 15 Municipal Size, Economy, and Democracy .................................................. 309 Kurt Houlberg Index .................................................................................................................. 333 iv Foreword In November 2008, the Local Government and Public Services Reform Initiative (LGI) a program of the Open Society Institute in Budapest supported a major international conference on “Lessons from Territorial Consolidation Reforms—The European Experi- ence.” The conference addressed the issue of territorial organization and local governance. More specifically, it covered how the dynamics of fragmentation and consolidation in Europe shaped different models of governance. The topic is of crucial importance as territorial and subsequent administrative reforms greatly impact relations between central and local level governance, service provision, efficiency and effective use of resources, and local democracy. The present publication is a selection of the best studies presented at the confer- ence in 2008. The logic of the conference was to first address and assess reforms in the “old” EU member states (Denmark, Greece, East Germany, and the United Kingdom) and to then look into the reforms in Eastern Europe. In the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s, old Europe’s reforms were driven by the premise of economic, fiscal, and management efficiency—meaning that larger local government units were better providers of local services. With the launch of the transitional period in Eastern Europe, a tendency of frag- mentation occurred in many countries, perhaps a natural outcome of the stronger need for democracy and more specifically local democracy. However, in many countries such as Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Czech Republic, Hungary, Macedonia, Montenegro, Slovakia, and Ukraine, issues of costs and efficiency of services have risen to the surface and pushed the consolidation debate to a new level. The issue remains a very conten- tious one as consolidation impacts the access of citizens in the smallest units to their basic rights and services. Thus, as the title in the introductory chapter rightly points out, consolidation may not always be the right solution to fragmentation. The solutions are country-specific and recipes from outside may be hard to implement, but the lessons from some implemented reforms may be well-assessed and the mistakes avoided. This, we thought, was our goal. In particular, part three of this volume, Less than Consolidation Reform, More Than Status Quo, looks at Armenia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia, and Ukraine where a variety of intermunicipal structures and associations of small municipalities were de- bated. These cases are a response to the need to provide efficient services and yet keep local democracy intact. The success or failures of these may still remain to be seen. The final two chapters discuss intermunicipal cooperation and the issue of municipal size, economy, and democracy in a more general, theoretical way. v We hope that the current publication will be one of the few systemic views on the consolidation versus fragmentation issues and that it will be a timely contribution to the field. We hope the book will be useful to academics, policymakers, students, and development practitioners from Europe and beyond. LGI and OSI would like to extend its warmest thanks to the major engine behind this tremendous endeavor, Pawel Swianiewicz, Professor and Head of the Department of Local Development and Policy, University of Warsaw and Chair of the European Urban Research Association. Pawel, your energy, dedication, and commitment have fed the inspiration that moved the process going—many thanks! We would also like to thank the University of Warsaw Students’ Research Club “Spatium”—a group of enthusiastic students who have all the energy to tackle many local governance issues and who have made the conference a logistical success and a pleasant event. Special acknowledgment to Paweł Dąbrowski, Anna Górska, Paulina Jurgiel, Aleksandra Kępczyńska, Joanna Kru- kowska, Adam Mielczarek, Ewa Myśliwiec, Marcin Olejnik, Ilona Pohlmann, Weronika Skomorowska, Kinga Stańczuk, Joanna Stryjewska, and Karol Trammer for their excel- lent research on Georgian territorial reforms, and for the persistence and courage and continue the research in the Caucasus despite the recent conflict in Georgia. Numerous thanks to all our contributors who had the will to attend the conference, the courage to think aloud and their patience with the editorial process. Last but not least, thanks to Gabriela Matei and Roberto Fasino at the Council of Europe who made everything possible for our cooperation to manifest itself in this event and publication. Last but not least, we would like to thank the University of Warsaw for offering their hospitality to host us on the beautiful premises of their campus. Irina Faion Senior Program Manager Local Government and Public Services Reform Initiative Open Society Institute Budapest, Hungary vi List of Contributors Colin Copus is a Professor at the Local Governance Research Unit at De Montfort University, Leicester and chief editor of Local Government Studies. His academic spe- cialisms are local party politics, local political decision-making and leadership, and the changing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LOCAL GOVERNMENT Reform in KĀPITI – What Do You Think? 1
    LOCAL GOVERNMENT REFORM IN KĀPITI – WHAT DO YOU THINK? 1 LOCAL GOVERNMENT REFORM IN KĀPITI – WhaT DO YOU THINK? kapiticoast.govt.nz/reform 2 LOCAL GOVERNMENT REFORM IN KĀPITI – WHAT DO YOU THINK? WE WANT TO HEAR FROM AS MANY RESIDENTS AS POSSIBLE LOCAL GOVERNMENT REFORM IN KĀPITI – WHAT DO YOU THINK? 3 Introduction This discussion document has been released by the Kāpiti Coast District Council to help find out how residents want their district to be governed in the future. This document seeks to stimulate discussion and identify whether you want changes to how local government operates in Kāpiti and what you broadly want that change to look like. There are many ways that local government is affected in one way or another by the could be structured in the wider area. However services provided by local government, we in order to have a reasonably focussed debate have described the four options at a fairly high we have identified four options that represent level, without too much detail. We have also different degrees of change. Option 1 contains 2 consciously decided not to express either a sub-options. There is the opportunity for you to preferred option or any views on the advantages discuss other options if you choose. and disadvantages of each option – we are asking the public to do that for us at this stage. Our four options range from keeping the current councils in place but making formal It is not our role to tell other parts of the region arrangements to share services across councils how they should be governed.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief-To-Advise-Frome-Town-Council-In-The-Run-Up-To-And-Establishment-Of-Unitary-Authority.Pdf
    Unitary Adviser Brief Frame Town Council Brief to advise Frame Town Council in the run up to and establishment of unitary authority(ies) in Somerset 1. Scope Frame Town Council is recognised locally, nationally and internationally as a forward thinking and innovative Council. We are renowned for exploring how to expand the remit of town councils. Somerset is about to embark on local government reorganisation. The county council and the district councils will be replaced with one or two unitary councils in April 2023. FTC sees this as an opportunity to change the way local government in Somerset works towards a more community led approach where decisions are made at the appropriate level and with the appropriate engagement. Influencing how the new unitary is established and developed is a key project for the Council. We want to appoint an experienced advisor or small consultancy to work with FTC Cllrs and staff and other relevant organisations in and beyond Fro me. This work is likely to last at least until September or October 2021 and we anticipate 2 to 3 working days per week. We will be interested in someone who understands local government, has worked at a senior level in relevant organisations, who understands large scale change programmes and ideally also has recent experience of local government reorganisation. The ability to build excellent working relationships at all levels of local government and business will be essential. With other Somerset based parish sector organisations, FTC commissioned a report (here) last year which explores the possibilities of reorganisation. Its seven recommendations have been accepted by both proposals presented to the Government: One Somerset (here) promoted by the County Council, and Stronger Somerset (here) promoted by the four district Councils.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Partnerská Krajina, Miesto Realizácie Projektu: Moldavsko 2
    Slovenská agentúra pre medzinárodnú rozvojovú spoluprácu ÚVODNÁ STRANA PROJEKTOVÉHO DOKUMENTU 1. Partnerská krajina, miesto realizácie projektu: 2. Projektové číslo: Moldavsko SAMRS/2016/MD/1/7 3. Názov projektu: Vodovod Bardar – prístup k zdravotne nezávadnej pitnej vode, zlepšenie zdravia občanov a udržateľný manažment vodovodného systému 4. Sektorová priorita: 5. CRS kód (5 miestny): Voda a sanitácia 14021 6. Predpokladaný dátum začiatku: 7. Predpokladaný dátum ukončenia: 1.3.2017 31.5.2018 8 . Požadovaná dotácia z ODA (EUR): 9. Celkové spolufinancovanie žiadateľa (EUR): 99 999.93 20 150 10. Partnerská organizácia v krajine prijímateľa (meno, adresa, kontakty): Partner 1 District Council Ialoveni/ Consiliul raional Ialoveni Adresa: MD-6801, orașul Ialoveni, str. Alexandru cel Bun 33, Tel. 026820007; Fax. 026822650, mob. 0675533525 email: [email protected] www.il.md Partner 2 Regional Development Agency Center / Agenția de Dezvoltare Regională Centru 33 Alexandru cel Bun str., 6801 Ialoveni, Republic of Moldova, Tel/Fax: +373-268-2-6560 Web: www.adrcentru.md 11. Stručná charakteristika projektu (max. 250 slov): Základný problém, k riešeniu ktorého navrhovaný projekt prispieva, je neexistujúci prístup obyvateľov dedín okresu Ialoveni k zdravotne nezávadnej pitnej vode. Okres Ialoveni má rozlohu 783.48 km² a počet obyvateľov je 100 700. Skladá z 25 administratívnych jednotiek, z toho je 1 okresné mesto, 6 komún, a 18 dedín. Prístup k zásobovaniu nezávadnou pitnou vodou má iba okresné mesto Ialoveni. District Council Ialoveni
    [Show full text]
  • The Strong Workforce Program Dashboard Provides Annual Results
    The Strong Workforce Program Dashboard provides annual results, disaggregated data, and benchmarking information for metrics associated with the Strong Workforce Program and students enrolled in career and technical education (CTE) programs. The Office of Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness has included example datasets in this document. Users are highly encouraged to visit the CCCCO and Cal PASS-Plus LaunchBoard Strong Workforce Program Dashboard (located here) to explore the most current data disaggregated by age group, gender, race/ethnicity, and economic status (as available), as well as comparisons between our District and Statewide, Macroregion, and Microregion data. The Strong Workforce Program Dashboard Information is based on students who took one or more courses in the selected CTE program at a community college. You can view detailed comparisons between locales and programs or sectors, and the displayed data can be exported in csv format. You can filter data by selecting from the following criteria: • Locale: You can view data at the college, district, microregion, macroregion, or statewide level • For COS data select District (Sequoias District) or College (College of the Sequoias) • Our Microregion is Southern Central Valley-Mother Lode • Our Macroregion is Central-Mother Lode • Program: You can view data for All CTE programs, individual sectors, or individual programs based on TOP6 or TOP4 codes. • Academic Year: There are 8 years of data (2011-12 through 2018-19) • Using the “Drill Down” filter, you can view
    [Show full text]
  • Case 1:10-Cv-05197 Document 1 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 40
    Case 1:10-cv-05197 Document 1 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 40 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION GENOCIDE VICTIMS ) OF KRAJINA, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No.: 1:10-CV- _____ ) L-3 COMMUNICATIONS ) Corp. and ) MPRI, Inc., ) JURY DEMAND ) Class Action ) Defendants. ) ) COMPLAINT Plaintiffs Genocide Victims of Krajina, including Milena Jovic and Zivka Mijic, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, for their Complaint against Defendants L-3 Communications Corp. (“L-3”) and MPRI, Inc. (“MPRI”), allege the following: Nature of the Action 1. This is a class action brought by ethnic Serbs who resided in the Krajina region of Croatia up to August 1995 and who then became victims of the Croatian military assault known as Operation Storm—an aggressive, systematic military attack and bombardment on a demilitarized civilian population that had been placed under the protection of the United Nations. Operation Storm was designed to kill or forcibly expel the ethnic Serbian residents of the Krajina region -1- Case 1:10-cv-05197 Document 1 Filed 08/17/10 Page 2 of 40 from Croatian territory, just because they were a minority religio-ethnic group. Defendant MPRI, a private military contractor subsequently acquired by Defendant L-3 Communications Inc., trained and equipped the Croatian military for Operation Storm and designed the Operation Storm battle plan. Operation Storm became the largest land offensive in Europe since World War II and resulted in the murder and inhumane treatment of thousands of ethnic Serbs, the forced displacement of approximately 200,000 ethnic Serbs from their ancestral homes in Croatian territory, and the pillaging and destruction of hundreds of millions of dollars worth of Serbian-owned property.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Collaboration in Surrey
    WAVERLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL COUNCIL 23 FEBRUARY 2021 Title: Local Government Collaboration in Surrey Portfolio Holder: Cllr J Ward, Leader Senior Officer: T Horwood, Chief Executive Key decision: No Access: Public 1. Purpose and summary 1.1 The purpose of this report is to update the Council on progress on local government collaboration since the Council and Executive discussions of 22 July and 8 September 2020 respectively, and to allow Council to debate opportunities for future collaboration among local authorities in the light of the KPMG report, and this report. 2. Recommendation The Executive has: 1. Noted the KPMG report on future opportunities for local government in Surrey; 2. Endorsed the development of an initial options appraisal for collaboration with Guildford Borough Council; and 3. Allocated the remaining £15,000 budget previously approved for “a unitary council proposal” to “exploring collaboration opportunities with other councils”. The Executive recommend to the Council that it debate opportunities for future collaboration among local authorities in the light of the KPMG report and this report. 3. Reason for the recommendation 3.1 This report updates councillors and the public on the progress made in the discussions on local government reorganisation and collaboration in Surrey. 3.2 At Executive meetings in 2020, £30,000 was allocated “to support preparatory work for a unitary council proposal”. It is now recommended to allocate the remaining £15,000 to support the development of proposals for council collaboration, to be reported back to the Executive in due course. 4. Background context 4.1 A detailed update was provided to the Executive at its meeting on 8 September 2020,1 and is summarised as follows.
    [Show full text]
  • Daria V. Konior Institute for Linguistic Studies (Russian Academy Of
    Daria V. Konior Institute for Linguistic Studies (Russian Academy of Sciences), Saint Petersburg, Russia E-mail: [email protected] Patterns and mechanisms of lexical change in symbiotic communities: the case of Carașova and Iabalcea (Banat, Romania) The historical region of Banat is known as one of the most diverse multilingual areas on the map of Europe. It has become a true mosaic of multiethnic and multilingual communities mainly due to numerous waves of migrations (first of all, arrival of the Slavic tribes to the Balkans, which started between 5th or 6th centuries), but also due to colonization policy of Habsburg administration. It resulted in mixing of different nations (Romanians, Hungarians, Germans, Serbs, Gypsies, Ukrainians, Bulgarians, Slovaks, Jews, Czechs, Croats, etc.) on a limited territory. One of the most interesting (sometimes even reffered to as “mysterious”) communities of Banat is the Catholic Christian population of the Karashevo microregion in Romania. There, the Krashovani Slavic dialect belonging to the Torlak dialect of Serbo-Croatian language is spoken in the village of Carașova, and the Krashovani Romanian dialect belonging to Banat Romanian continuum is spoken in the village of Iabalcea. This ethnolinguistic situation can be described not just as an intimate language contact, but as a symbiotic interaction, considering that Krashovani from these two villages share religion, identity and traditional values, but use different languages in their everyday communication. Our research focuses on the ways in which lexical and cultural codes interact in this community in 21th century. In order to explore this interaction, I examined the vocabulary of the traditional Krashovani wedding using a specifically elaborated bilingual questionnaire during my fieldwork in the microregion.
    [Show full text]
  • IPPR | Empowering Counties: Unlocking County Devolution Deals ABOUT the AUTHORS
    REPORT EMPOWERING COUNTIES UNLOCKING COUNTY DEVOLUTION DEALS Ed Cox and Jack Hunter November 2015 © IPPR 2015 Institute for Public Policy Research ABOUT IPPR IPPR, the Institute for Public Policy Research, is the UK’s leading progressive thinktank. We are an independent charitable organisation with more than 40 staff members, paid interns and visiting fellows. Our main office is in London, with IPPR North, IPPR’s dedicated thinktank for the North of England, operating out of offices in Newcastle and Manchester. The purpose of our work is to conduct and publish the results of research into and promote public education in the economic, social and political sciences, and in science and technology, including the effect of moral, social, political and scientific factors on public policy and on the living standards of all sections of the community. IPPR 4th Floor 14 Buckingham Street London WC2N 6DF T: +44 (0)20 7470 6100 E: [email protected] www.ippr.org Registered charity no. 800065 This paper was first published in November 2015. © 2015 The contents and opinions in this paper are the authors ’ only. POSITIVE IDEAS for CHANGE CONTENTS Summary ............................................................................................................3 1. Devolution unleashed .....................................................................................9 2. Why devolve to counties? ............................................................................11 2.1 Counties and their economic opportunities ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Serbo-Croatian War, 1991-1995: Vision of Ukrainian Minority in Croatia
    Culture and History; Vol. 1, No. 2; 2021 https://doi.org/10.30560/ch.v1n2p21 The Serbo-Croatian War, 1991-1995: Vision of Ukrainian Minority in Croatia Mykola Nahirnyi1 1 Ahatanhel Krymskyi Volodymyr-Volynskyi Professional Pedagogical College, Volodymyr-Volynskyi, Ukraine Correspondence: Mykola Nahirnyi, Ahatanhel Krymskyi Volodymyr-Volynskyi Professional Pedagogical College, 42 Ustyluzka Street, Volodymyr-Volynskyi, Volyn region, 44700, Ukraine. Tel: 38-03342-35555. E-mail: mykola76 hotmail.com Received: June 28, 2021; Accepted: July 10, 2021; Published: July 17, 2021 Abstract This article considers the situation of the Ruthenian-Ukrainian diaspora in Croatia during the Serbo-Croatian War (1991-1995). The specifics of Rusyn and Ukrainian attitude to opposing parties are covered, an evolution of their sights concerning the War is shown. The policy of the self-proclaimed Republic of Serbian Krajina towards national minorities is characterized. The consequences of the Serbo-Croatian War on the situation of the Ukrainian diaspora in Croatia are analyzed. Keywords: Croatia, Ruthenian-Ukrainian minority, diaspora, Mikluševci, Petrovci, Serbo-Croatian War, terror, ethnic cleansing, deportations 1. Introduction The Serbo-Croatian War (1991-1995), along with Bosnian (1992-1995), marked the collapse of socialist Yugoslavia. Even today both Serbians and Croatians have different sight on the nature and character of this war: the former believe it is civil, and the latter believe it is a national liberation war. Each side sees an aggressor in their opponent and considers themselves as a victim. However, when studying the specifics of this war, researchers usually drop out of their sight national minorities, which lived in Croatian Danube region (Eastern Slavonia) – territory, that became one of the crucial Serbo-Croatian battlefields.
    [Show full text]
  • Closing the Gap Juanda1, Stefan Schwarze2, Stephan Von Cramon-Taubadel3 1
    The Access of Microenterprises to Commercial Microcredit in Aceh Besar: Closing the Gap Juanda1, Stefan Schwarze2, Stephan von Cramon-Taubadel3 1. Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Tropical and International Agriculture, Germany; 2. Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Germany; 3. Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Germany Introduction . Reducing poverty has become an essential part of the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) and need to achieve. Microenterprises (MEs) have played an important role in rural developmental activities and were long recognized as vital in poverty alleviation in Indonesia. The developing world has in fact led the way in promoting the importance of rural finance. Access to commercial services is restricted in rural areas and the services can not meet the demand for financial services by rural households. Many microenterprises belong to poor and they are unable to provide collateral. Objectives Credit Limit There were two objectives formulated in this research: . In Indonesia, the official definition of microcredit covers all loans under IDR 50 million 1. To provide a review for the gap between the number of microenterprises (approximately US$5,500). being assisted and the overall number who might need assistance. Only seven percent of microenterprises have credit limit above IDR 50 million (Figure 4). 2. To determine effect of determinant factors which were found in research Figure 4. Credit limit of MEs area to ownership of standard collateral for access to microcredit. 1% Material and Methods 7% IDR, 1 US$ ≈ IDR9000 Figure 1. Map of Aceh Besar District 10% 0 40% • The Research was >0-10 million conducted in Aceh >10-20 million Besar Dist., Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam 42% >20-50 million Prov., Indonesia.
    [Show full text]
  • Matematika És Természettudományok
    A MAGYAR TUDOMÁNYOS AKADÉMIA KUTATÓHELYEINEK 2008. ÉVI TUDOMÁNYOS EREDMÉNYEI I. Matematika és természettudományok Budapest 2009 A Magyar Tudományos Akadémia matematikai és természettudományi kutatóhelyeinek beszámolói alapján – az intézmények vezet ıinek aktív közrem őködésével – szerkesztették az MTA Titkársága Kutatóintézeti F ıosztályának, valamint a Támogatott Kutatóhelyek Irodájának a munkatársai Banczerowski Januszné f ıosztályvezet ı Heged ős Kisztina Herczeg György Horváth Csaba Redler László Idei Miklós ISSN 2060-680X F.k.: Banczerowski Januszné Akaprint Kft. F.v.: Freier László 2 TARTALOMJEGYZÉK El ıszó ............................................................................................................ 5 A táblázatokkal kapcsolatos megjegyzések .................................................... 7 Matematikai és természettudományi kutatóintézetek Atommagkutató Intézet................................................................................. 11 Földrajztudományi Kutatóintézet.................................................................. 27 Geodéziai és Geofizikai Kutatóintézet.......................................................... 36 Geokémiai Kutatóintézet............................................................................... 46 Izotópkutató Intézet....................................................................................... 56 Kémiai Kutatóközpont .................................................................................. 67 Kémiai Kutatóközpont Anyag- és Környezetkémiai Intézet........................
    [Show full text]
  • Measure Results the Results Are Presented Under Sub Headings Corresponding to the Areas Used for Indicators – Economy, Energy, Environment, Society and Transport
    8.7.O Integration and quality improvements of sustainable modes in Measure title: Odense City: Odense Project: MOBILIS Measure number: 8.7 A Introduction Turning the current trend for the growth of car transport in Denmark at the expense of public transport modes is one of the greatest challenges for mobility planning. By removing the barriers against the positive choice of public transport options, it is hoped that Odense can contribute to charting new ways of turning the tide. One way of turning the tide is to focus on the qualities of the public transport in Odense and through advertising and marketing activities. Objectives • To increase the quality, attractiveness and accessibility of alternative transport modes in Odense (buses, bicycles, taxis and car sharing) through a bus priority scheme and advanced information services. • To execute interrelated innovative activities to promote the use of the new integrated service; these will include marketing and media campaigns. In general promotion of public transport supports certain parts of the citizens as buses in Odense most often are utilized by people who do not have access to a car – in many cases the elderly and students. A2 Description The 1st objective a. The SMS ticket was developed and launched in January 2008. By sending a SMS to a specific number, the user pays for a bus ticket via the cell phone and thereby accepts the amount to be drawn from his mobile phone account. When you buy a ticket via your mobile phone the fare is cheaper than regular tickets. This is a very good incentive for the travellers to shift to this type of ticketing.
    [Show full text]