Multimeric Structure of the Poma/Pomb Channel Complex in the Na+-Driven Flagellar Motor of Vibrio Alginolyticus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Multimeric Structure of the Poma/Pomb Channel Complex in the Na+-Driven Flagellar Motor of Vibrio Alginolyticus J. Biochem. 135, 43–51 (2004) DOI: 10.1093/jb/mvh005 Multimeric Structure of the PomA/PomB Channel Complex in the Na+-Driven Flagellar Motor of Vibrio alginolyticus Tomohiro Yorimitsu*, Masaru Kojima, Toshiharu Yakushi and Michio Homma† Division of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Chikusa-Ku, Nagoya 464-8602 Received October 3, 2003; accepted October 30, 2003 It is known that PomA and PomB form a complex that functions as a Na+ channel and generates the torque of the Na+-driven flagellar motor of Vibrio alginolyticus. It has been suggested that PomA works as a dimer and that the PomA/PomB complex is com- posed of four PomA and two PomB molecules. PomA does not have any Cys residues and PomB has three Cys residues. Therefore, a mutant PomB (PomBcl) whose three Cys residues were replaced by Ala was constructed and found to be motile as well. We carried out gel filtration analysis and examined the effect of cross-linking between the Cys residues of PomB on the formation of the PomA/PomB complex. In the pres- ence of dithiothreitol (DTT), the elution profile of the PomA/PomB complex was shifted to a lower apparent molecular mass fraction similar to that of the complex of the wild-type PomA and PomBcl mutant. Next, to analyze the arrangement of PomA molecules in the complex, we introduced the mutation P172C, which has been shown to cross-link PomA molecules, into tandem PomA dimers (PomA∼PomA). These mutant dimers showed a dominant-negative effect. DTT could restore the function of PomA∼P172C and P172C∼P172C, but not P172C∼PomA. Interdimer and intradimer cross-linked products were observed; the interdimer cross-linked products could be assembled with PomB. The formation of the interdimer cross-link suggests that the channel complex of the Na+-driven flagellar motor is composed of two units of a com- plex consisting of two PomA and one PomB, and that they might interact with each other via not only PomA but also PomB. Key words: electrostatic interaction, energy transduction, flagellar motor, sodium type, Vibrio. Abbreviations: DTT, dithiothreitol; NEM, N-ethylmaleimide; PomBcl, PomB mutant with three Cys residues replaced with Ala. Many bacteria have filamentous organelles called flag- complex is thought to be changed by the H+ flux, and this ella that are used for motility. Bacterial flagella rotate by change is transmitted to FliG, which is a component of means of a motor, which is embedded in the membrane at the rotor or motor/switch complex. This complex is the base of the flagellar filament. The direction of motor formed by three proteins, FliG, FliM and FliN, and is rotation, clockwise or counterclockwise, is reversibly reg- required not only for torque generation, but also for flag- ulated by chemotactic signals. The torque of the motor is ellar assembly and for the regulation of the direction of generated by the electrochemical potential of specific ions rotation of the flagellar motor (17–19). across the cytoplasmic membrane (1, 2). Two types of Some bacteria, such as alkaliphilic Bacillus and Vibrio motors are known, H+-driven (3, 4) and Na+-driven (5, 6). species, use the electrochemical potential of Na+ ions to More than 40 proteins are needed to construct the motor. generate the torque of the flagellar motor (20, 21). Four Genetic and physiological studies of the H+-driven motors proteins—PomA, PomB, MotX, and MotY—have been of Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium have shown to be necessary for the rotation of the polar flagel- identified two proteins, MotA and MotB, which have four lar motor of Vibrio spp., V. alginolyticus, V. parahaemo- and one transmembrane-spanning segments, respec- lyticus, and V. cholerae. V. alginolyticus and V. para- tively (7–10). MotA and MotB form a H+ channel complex haemolyticus also possess H+-driven lateral flagellar from their transmembrane segments (11–13). The MotA/ motors (22, 23). PomA and PomB are orthologous to MotA MotB complex surrounds the rotor part of the motor and and MotB (Fig. 1) and interact functionally with each functions as the stator part by being attached to the pep- other (24, 25). MotX and MotY, which were first charac- tidoglycan layer of the cell via a binding motif in the peri- terized as motor proteins in V. parahaemolyticus (26, 27), plasmic domain of MotB (14–16). To generate the torque are unique to the Na+-driven polar flagellar motor of of the flagellar motor, the conformation of the MotA/MotB Vibrio spp. (28, 29). Although their functions are not yet clear, a recent report showed that they co-fractionate with OmpA upon sucrose gradient centrifugation, which sug- *Present address: Department of Molecular, Cellular and Develop- gests that they are located in the outer membrane (30). + + mental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. The Na -type motor has advantages over the H -type †To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +81-52-789- motor for studying the rotary mechanism in the driving 2991, Fax: +81-52-789-3001, E-mail: [email protected] force is easily manipulated by changing the Na+ concen- Vol. 135, No. 1, 2004 43 © 2004 The Japanese Biochemical Society. 44 T. Yorimitsu et al. tration. Furthermore, Na+-channel blockers such as ami- (recA1, endA1, gyrA96, thi–, hsdR17, relA1, supE44, λ–, loride and phenamil specifically inhibit the rotation of ∆(lac-proAB); [F′, traD36, proAB, lacIq, lacZ∆M15]) was the Na+-type motor (31, 32). Based on several lines of evi- used for DNA manipulations and cultured at 37°C in LB dence obtained using these techniques, a complex of medium. When necessary, kanamycin was added to a PomA and PomB is thought to function as the Na+ chan- final concentration of 100 µg/ml for Vibrio cells, or 50 µg/ nel. The PomA/PomB complex, solubilized by β-octylglu- ml for E. coli cells. Plasmid pKS101, a pSU41-based plas- coside and purified and reconstituted into proteolipo- mid, was constructed to carry his6-pomA under lac pro- + somes, has the ability to conduct Na ions upon the moter control (33). Plasmid pKS101-P172C (His6-P172C) generation of a transmembrane electrical gradient cre- was constructed by inserting a 0.6-kb DraI–EcoRI frag- ated by a diffusion potential of K+ using valinomycin (33). ment of pYA301-P172C (39) into the corresponding site of + The Na -conducting activity in proteoliposomes reconsti- pKS101. Plasmid pKS102 harboring his6-pomA and tuted with the PomA/PomB complex is specifically pomB under lac promoter control, was constructed by in- blocked by phenamil and no activity is detected in prote- serting a 1.0-kb HindIII fragment of pKS101 into the cor- oliposomes reconstituted with only PomA. From studies responding site of pSK602 (40). Plasmid pKS106 encodes of Na+ and H+ hybrid motors, we could convert the E. coli a tandem PomA dimer (PomA∼PomA) under lac promoter H+-driven motor into the Na+-driven motor by exchang- control, and was constructed by linking two pomA open ing the MotA/MotB stator with the PomA/PotB7E stator reading frames in frame with a 22-residue linker, MHY- E (34). PotB7 is a chimera joining the N-terminal trans- PYDVPDYAIEGRM-His6, which comprises a hemaggluti- membrane region of PomB to the extracellular C-termi- nin (HA)-tag and six histidines (His6) (35). Figure 4A nal region of MotB. Based on its apparent molecular shows a schematic diagram indicating the restriction mass as measured by gel filtration chromatography, the sites in the structure of PomA and PomA∼PomA. Plas- isolated PomA/PomB complex retaining Na+ uptake mids encoding mutant tandem PomA dimers were con- activity seems to be composed of four PomA and two structed by inserting fragments into the corresponding PomB molecules (33). However, purified PomA proteins sites of pYA301-P172C as follows: pKS106 (PomA∼P172C), form a stable homodimer when expressed without PomB, 0.8-kb DraI fragment of pKS106 (PomA∼PomA); pKS106 which suggests that PomA may also function as a dimer (P172C∼PomA), 1.0-kb HindIII fragment of pKS106 ∼ within a (PomA)4(PomB)2 complex. This idea is supported (PomA PomA); and pKS106 (P172C~P172C), 0.8-kb DraI by the fact that when a Cys residue is introduced into fragment of pKS106 (P172C∼PomA). Likewise, plasmids PomA, which has no native Cys residues, a cross-link is encoding tandem PomA dimers along with PomB were con- formed at the motor site (25). Also, a tandem PomA structed by inserting fragments into the corresponding dimer, in which two pomA genes are genetically fused sites of pYA303 (40) as follows: pAAB101 (PomA∼PomA/ and produce a single polypeptide when expressed, is PomB), 0.8-kb DraI fragment of pKS106 (PomA∼PomA); functional as a torque generator (35). The introduction of pAAB101 (P172C∼PomA/PomB), 0.8-kb DraI fragment of a mutation into either or both halves of the tandem PomA pKS106 (P172C∼PomA); pAAB101 (PomA∼P172C/PomB), dimer inhibits motor function. In a recent study, Braun 1.0-kb HindIII fragment of pKS106 (PomA∼P172C). and Blair (36) showed that MotB with a Cys substitution Gel Filtration Assay—The PomA/PomB complex was in its sole transmembrane segment forms a specifically purified as previously described (33); except that DTT cross-linked dimer when expressed with MotA, suggest- was not used. Membrane vesicles were prepared from ing that MotB also functions as a dimer in the H+-driven NMB191 cells harboring pKS102 disrupted by a French flagellar motor. press and solubilized by 2.5% β-octylglucoside. From the Here, to obtain topological information about the solubilized extracts, the PomA/PomB complex was puri- PomA/PomB complex, we have carried out gel-filtration fied using a Ni-NTA column (QIAGEN) followed by a analysis of the PomA/PomB complex in the presence and MiniQ column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Recommended publications
  • Functional Dynamics of the Bacterial Flagellar Motor Driven by Fluorescent Protein Tagged Stators and by Evolutionary Modified Foreign Stators Minyoung Heo
    Functional dynamics of the bacterial flagellar motor driven by fluorescent protein tagged stators and by evolutionary modified foreign stators Minyoung Heo To cite this version: Minyoung Heo. Functional dynamics of the bacterial flagellar motor driven by fluorescent protein tagged stators and by evolutionary modified foreign stators. Molecular biology. Université Montpellier, 2016. English. NNT : 2016MONTT080. tel-01972611 HAL Id: tel-01972611 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01972611 Submitted on 7 Jan 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Délivré par l’Université de Montpellier Préparée au sein de l’école doctorale Sciences Chimiques et Biologiques pour la Santé (ED168) Et de l’unité de recherche Centre de Biochimie Structurale (CBS) - CNRS UMR 5048 Spécialité : Biophysique de la molécule unique, la microscopie à fluorescence et évolution expérimentale Présentée par Minyoung HEO Dynamique fonctionnelle du moteur flagellaire bactérien entraîné par des stators marqués par des protéines fluorescentes et par des stators étrangers modifiés par évolution Soutenue le 25 Novembre 2016 devant le jury composé de M. Francesco PEDACI, Directeur de recherche, Directeur de thèse Centre de biochimie Structurale (CNRS INSERM) M. Emmanuel MARGEAT, Directeur de recherche, Directeur de thèse Centre de biochimie Structurale (CNRS INSERM) M.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure and Function of Stator Units of the Bacterial Flagellar Motor
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.15.096610; this version posted May 15, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Structure and function of stator units of the bacterial flagellar motor Authors: Mònica Santiveri1, Aritz Roa-Eguiara1, Caroline Kühne2, Navish Wadhwa3,4, Howard C. Berg3,4, Marc Erhardt2, Nicholas M. I. Taylor1* Affiliations: 5 1Structural Biology of Molecular Machines Group, Protein Structure & Function PrograM, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 2Institut für Biologie/Bakterienphysiologie, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany. 3DepartMent of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, CaMbridge, MA 02138. 10 4Rowland Institute at Harvard, Harvard University, CaMbridge, MA 02142. *Correspondence to: Nicholas M. I. Taylor ([email protected]) Abstract: Many bacteria use the flagellum for locomotion and cheMotaxis. Its bi-directional rotation is driven by the MeMbrane-eMbedded Motor, which uses energy from the transMeMbrane ion gradient to generate torque at the interface between stator units and rotor. The structural 15 organization of the stator unit (MotAB), its conformational changes upon ion transport and how these changes power rotation of the flagellum, reMain unknown. Here we present ~3 Å-resolution cryo-electron Microscopy reconstructions of the stator unit in different functional states. We show that the stator unit consists of a diMer of MotB surrounded by a pentaMer of MotA.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Committee Dr
    BLAST XIV MEETING ROYAL SONESTA HOTEL NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA JANUARY 15-20, 2017 Meeting Chairperson Dr. Alan Wolfe – Loyola University, Chicago, Maywood, IL Meeting Vice-Chairperson Dr. Birgit Scharf – Virginia Tech University, Blacksburg, VA Program Committee Dr. Rasika Harshey (Chairperson) – The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX Dr. Birgit Scharf – Virginia Tech University, Blacksburg, VA Dr. Alan Wolfe – Loyola University, Chicago, Maywood, IL Poster Awards Committee Dr. Gladys Alexandre – The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN Dr. Nyles Charon – West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV Dr. Sean Crosson – The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL Dr. Rasika Harshey – The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX Dr. Mark Johnson - Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA Dr. Michael Miller - West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV Dr. Birgit Pruess – North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND Dr. Thomas Shimizu – AMOLF Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands Dr. Ady Vaknin – Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel Dr. Kylie Watts (Chairperson) – Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA Dr. Roy Welch – Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY Speaker Awards Committee Dr. Birgit Scharf – Virginia Tech University, Blacksburg, VA Dr. Alan Wolfe – Loyola University, Chicago, Maywood, IL Meeting Review Committee Dr. Sonia Bardy – University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI Dr. Arianne Briegel – Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands Dr. Tino Krell (Chairperson) – Estacion Experimental del Zaidin, Granada, Spain Dr. Simon Rainville – Laval University, Quebec, Canada Board of Directors – BLAST, Inc. Dr. Robert Bourret (Chairperson) – University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC Dr. Joe Falke – University of Colorado, Boulder, CO Dr. Rasika Harshey – The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX Dr. Urs Jenal – University of Basel, Basel Switzerland Dr.
    [Show full text]