June 25, 2020 Comments on the Nantahala and Pisgah National Forests Proposed Land Management Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

June 25, 2020 Comments on the Nantahala and Pisgah National Forests Proposed Land Management Plan A lasting voice for innovative management and investment in the public forests of North Carolina’s mountains. [email protected] June 25, 2020 Comments on the Nantahala and Pisgah National Forests Proposed Land Management Plan Attn: Plan Revision Team Leader National Forests in North Carolina 160 Zillicoa St., Suite A Asheville, NC 28801 Submitted to the CARA Online Portal at: https://cara.ecosystem- management.org/Public/CommentInput?Project=43545 List of Partnership Member and Affiliate Organization Endorsement Member Organizations: • Access Fund • American Whitewater • Back Country Horsemen of North Carolina • Carolina Climbers Coalition • Carolina Land & Lakes Resource Conservation & Development Council • Carolina Mountain Club • Columbia Forest Products • Defenders of Wildlife • EcoForesters • Evergreen Packaging • Graham County, NC Government • International Mountain Bicycling Association • MountainTrue • National Wild Turkey Federation of North Carolina • North Carolina Chapter of The Nature Conservancy • North Carolina Council of Trout Unlimited • North Carolina Horse Council • North Carolina Wildlife Federation • Southern Appalachian Mineral Society • Southern Off-Road Bicycle Association • The Wilderness Society • Wild South Affiliate Organizations: • Audubon North Carolina • North Carolina Chapter of The Sierra Club • Southern Environmental Law Center NPFP Draft Plan Comments i | Page TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Partnership Member and Affiliate Organization Endorsement ...................................... i Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 Reader’s Guide.......................................................................................................................... 2 Section 1: Integrated Recommendations, by Issue ................................................................... 5 1. Tiered Objectives for Active Management ................................................................... 7 2. Recreation and Trails .................................................................................................... 9 3. Non-Native Invasive Species (NNIS) ......................................................................... 12 4. Landscape-Level Progress toward NRV (“Condition-based objectives”) .................. 14 5. Existing Old Growth and Patch Network ................................................................... 19 6. Natural Heritage Natural Areas .................................................................................. 22 7. Management Area Allocations ................................................................................... 25 8. Geographic Distribution and Flow of Forest Products ............................................... 31 9. Roads, Soil, and Water................................................................................................ 35 10. Special Use Permits (SUP) ......................................................................................... 41 11. Wild and Scenic Rivers ............................................................................................... 43 12. Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Considerations ................................................................ 46 Section 2: Economic Development ......................................................................................... 52 Section 3: Climate Change ...................................................................................................... 59 Section 4: Discrete Comments on Plan Components ............................................................. 66 Chapter 1: Introduction to the Nantahala & Pisgah National Forests ............................. 66 Chapter 2: Forestwide Plan Components ........................................................................ 67 Chapter 3: Geographic Areas .......................................................................................... 84 Chapter 4: Management Areas ........................................................................................ 88 Chapter 5: Monitoring and Adaptive Management ......................................................... 92 Section 5. External Partnership Agreement to Support Congressional Designations ............ 94 Tier 1 Agreements to Support Congressional Designations ............................................ 94 Tier 2 Agreements to Support Congressional Designations ............................................ 96 Appendix A ........................................................................................................................... A-1 NPFP Draft Plan Comments ii | Page Introduction We, The Nantahala-Pisgah Forest Partnership (“Partnership”) formed in February of 2013 as a collaborative group of more than 30 organizations representing a diverse cross-section of public lands interests, including recreation, forest products, local government, cultural heritage, conservation, wildlife, hunting, angling, and other forest user groups. The Partnership was created with the goal of working collaboratively and in parallel to the US Forest Service planning process. Representing a diverse spectrum of interests, partners have worked to foster civic engagement, generate positive guidance, and develop recommendations for creating the best possible revised management plan for the Nantahala and Pisgah National Forests. Over the last seven years the Partnership has engaged in robust public dialogue in support of the planning process. The Partnership has utilized a variety of sources including national, regional, tribal, and local community expertise with an emphasis on public participation and information sharing in order to reach consensus. Partnership members and affiliates have volunteered thousands of hours to build consensus around and support for recommendations that will facilitate a Forest Plan which best addresses the interests of our many stakeholders as well as the needs of the environment, local communities, and the countless species that call the Nantahala and Pisgah home. Members and affiliate organizations have developed and vetted proposals, shared concerns, built understanding and developed solutions to accommodate all members’ values and interests. Our approach has been to strive to reach community-supported, science-based methods for forest management, interpretation, and investment. The comments that are provided in this document represent the culmination of this painstaking, intentional, and deliberative process. They have been crafted with the intent of creating a lasting voice for the innovative management of and public investment in the future of our beloved National Forest. While the Partnership was created as a collaborative to inform the planning process, we have committed to continuing our work throughout the plan implementation process and at the project level. In addition, the Partnership has been involved, and will continue to be involved, with issues relating to the National Forest system as a whole as well as on the legislative and federal level. The Partnership has always been and will continue to be an open and transparent collaborative, with membership open to all stakeholders of interest in the plan revision and implementation processes. Our charter is posted online and our monthly meetings are open to anyone who would like to observe. NPFP Draft Plan Comments 1 | Page The vision statement of the Nantahala Pisgah Forest Partnership is as follows: We envision a thriving, resilient forest within its natural range of variation, able to support healthy ecosystems, wildlife populations, local economies, and traditional uses. We envision a forest with the connectivity and integrity to remain resilient in the face of the changes and challenges of the future. Reader’s Guide In accordance with the mission of the Partnership, we have actively worked to achieve broad consensus on a robust set of recommendations for the Revised Nantahala Pisgah Forest Plan, that balances all stakeholder needs to the fullest extent possible. Our process was lengthy, and with the relationships and trust that was built over many years of monthly meetings, the recommendations that we are presenting are substantive and cover almost every aspect of the Draft Plan. On some of the issues, partners successfully negotiated and compromised to an unprecedented degree, and the agreement therefore includes pieces that individual members would not support for their own sake. In other words, we attempted to identify the core set of connected agreements that were necessary to create a critical mass of support, which we believe is imperative to working effectively with each other and the Forest Service throughout plan implementation. Like the Forest Plan itself, all of the recommendations in this document are connected to one another and are inseparable from the whole. Members’ full support is conditional upon these interrelated recommendations moving forward together. According to the Partnership’s charter: “Consensus is defined as a decision that all members can live with. Participants may support an idea fully, partially, or not at all.” For the recommendations presented we achieved consensus and everything is within the Partnership's zone of consent. (See illustration below.) Section 1 includes integrated recommendations, presented by issue. The Partnership’s intent is to merge multiple interests’ needs by highlighting the most difficult and
Recommended publications
  • National Forests Non-Motorized Trail Strategy the US Forest Service Is Looking for the 82 People Who Attended
    SECOND QUARTER 2012 Quarterly News Bulletin and Hike Schedule P.O. Box 68, Asheville, NC 28802 • www.carolinamountainclub.org • e-mail: [email protected] National Forests non-motorized trail strategy The US Forest service is looking for the 82 people who attended. Some assistance. I wonder, though, if the group a few good men and women. Since the thoughts by CMC attendees: (bikers, horsemen, hunters, hikers, etc.) that majority of trail work is done by vol- Tish Desjardins, CMC Chair of provides the best grant assistance ends up get- unteers, the Forest Service is conduct- Conservation, said: “I thought it was ting what they want in the forest. With all the ing a number of workshops at various interesting that they are looking to us maintenance that CMC performs, it would be locations in Western North Carolina for possibly applying for grants for destructive if bikes or horses come along on to bring different types of trail users projects that we could apply for. They the hiking trails that we maintain. Hopefully together to provide input on trail plan- sure seem to be desperate for financial continued on page 7 ning. The diverse types of trail users include hikers, bikers, and horsemen. These people were brought together to share trail experiences, identify the types of trails that fit in a recreational context, and help develop a sustainable system of trail management. Initial workshops were held in Morganton, Andrews, Mars Hill, Franklin and Brevard. Several CMC members joined the 264 participants in the five meetings. Seventy diverse organizations were represented. The workshop in Brevard had to be moved to a larger location to accommodate Trail strategy participants at the meeting in Franklin.
    [Show full text]
  • Pisgah Forest, NC, 28769
    OFFERING MEMORANDUM 3578 HENDERSONVILLE HWY | PISGAH FOREST, NC REPRESENTATIVE PHOTO ™ 3578 HENDERSONVILLE HWY | PISGAH FOREST, NC 3 INVESTMENT SUMMARY EXCLUSIVELY LISTED BY: WESLEY CONNOLLY Associate VIce President 4 D: +1 (949) 432-4512 FINANCIAL SUMMARY M: +1 (707) 477-7185 [email protected] License No. 01962332 (CA) 6 KYLE MATTHEWS Broker of Record TENANT PROFILE License No. C27092 (NC) 7 AREA OVERVIEW 2 Dollar General INVESTMENT SUMMARY 3578 Hendersonville Hwy ADDRESS Pisgah Forest, NC 28769 $1,360,780 6.15% $83,688 ±9,100 SF 2017 LIST PRICE CAP RATE ANNUAL RENT GLA YEAR BUILT PRICE $1,360,780 CAP RATE 6.15% NOI $83,688 INVESTMENT HIGHLIGHTS GLA ±9,100 SF Corporate Guaranteed Essential Retailer LOT SIZE ±6.72 AC • Newer construction building with long term absolute NNN Lease; No YEAR BUILT 2017 Landlord Responsibilities • Dollar General has investment grade rated corporate guarantee • Dollar General has been identified as an essential retailer and has maintained business operations throughout the Covid-19 Pandemic DEMOGRAPHICS Prototypical Dollar General Market 3-MILE 5-MILE 10-MILE • Lack of Major competition in immediate vicinity POPULATION 5,225 17,083 61,536 • 33 miles from Asheville, NC HOUSEHOLDS 2,453 7,440 27,369 • 10 Mile Population in excess of 61,615 HH INCOME $68,333 $73,778 $79,155 • Minutes to John Rock, Looking Glass Rock, and Coontree Mountain Dollar General 3 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ANNUALIZED OPERATING DATA LEASE COMMENCE MONTHLY RENT ANNUAL RENT CAP RATE Lease Type NNN Type of Ownership Fee Simple Current
    [Show full text]
  • Pisgah District Trails
    PISGAH RANGER DISTRICT TRAILS Table of Contents: Trail Name Length Rating Trail Use Page # Andy Cove Nature Trail 0.7mi Easy Hiking 3 Art Loeb Spur 0.6mi Difficult Hiking 4 Art Loeb Trail–Section 1 12.3mi Difficult Hiking 5 Art Loeb Trail-Section 2 7.2mi Difficult Hiking 6 Art Loeb Trail-Section 3 6.8mi Difficult Hiking 7 Art Loeb Trail-Section 4 3.8mi Difficult Hiking 8 Avery Creek 3.2mi Medium Hiking/Biking 9 Bad Fork 2.0mi Difficult Hiking 10 Bennett Gap 2.9mi Medium Hiking/Biking(seasonal) 11 Big Creek 4.9mi Difficult Hiking/Sections open to bikes& horses 12 Biltmore Campus 0.9mi Easy Hiking/ wheelchair accessible 13 Black Mountain 9.8mi Difficult Hiking/Biking 14 Boyd Branch 0.7mi Easy Hiking/Biking 15 Bradley Creek 5.1mi Medium Hiking/Biking/Horses 16 Buck Spring 6.2mi Medium Hiking 17 Buckeye Gap 3.1mi Difficult Hiking 18 Buckhorn Gap 5.2mi Medium Hiking/Biking/Horses 19 Buckwheat Knob 1.5mi Medium Hiking/Biking 20 Butter Gap 3.4mi Medium Hiking/Biking 21 Caney Bottom 4.6mi Medium Hiking/Sections open to biking 22 Case Camp Ridge 1.7mi Difficult Hiking 23 Cat Gap Bypass 0.4mi Easy Hiking 24 Cat Gap Loop 4.4mi Medium Hiking/Sections open to biking(seasonal) 25 Chestnut Cove 0.2mi Medium Hiking 26 Clawhammer Cove 1.5mi Medium Hiking 27 Club Gap 0.8mi Medium Hiking/Biking 28 Cold Mountain 1.4mi Difficult Hiking 29 Coontree Loop 3.7mi Medium Hiking/Sections open to biking(seasonal) 30 Courthouse Falls 0.3mi Easy Hiking 31 Cove Creek 0.7mi Easy Hiking/Biking 32 Daniel Ridge Loop 4.0mi Medium Hiking/Biking 33 Deer Lake Lodge 1.4mi Medium
    [Show full text]
  • 1970-2019 TOPIC INDEX for the College Mathematics Journal (Including the Two Year College Mathematics Journal)
    1970-2019 TOPIC INDEX for The College Mathematics Journal (including the Two Year College Mathematics Journal) prepared by Donald E. Hooley Emeriti Professor of Mathematics Bluffton University, Bluffton, Ohio Each item in this index is listed under the topics for which it might be used in the classroom or for enrichment after the topic has been presented. Within each topic entries are listed in chronological order of publication. Each entry is given in the form: Title, author, volume:issue, year, page range, [C or F], [other topic cross-listings] where C indicates a classroom capsule or short note and F indicates a Fallacies, Flaws and Flimflam note. If there is nothing in this position the entry refers to an article unless it is a book review. The topic headings in this index are numbered and grouped as follows: 0 Precalculus Mathematics (also see 9) 0.1 Arithmetic (also see 9.3) 0.2 Algebra 0.3 Synthetic geometry 0.4 Analytic geometry 0.5 Conic sections 0.6 Trigonometry (also see 5.3) 0.7 Elementary theory of equations 0.8 Business mathematics 0.9 Techniques of proof (including mathematical induction 0.10 Software for precalculus mathematics 1 Mathematics Education 1.1 Teaching techniques and research reports 1.2 Courses and programs 2 History of Mathematics 2.1 History of mathematics before 1400 2.2 History of mathematics after 1400 2.3 Interviews 3 Discrete Mathematics 3.1 Graph theory 3.2 Combinatorics 3.3 Other topics in discrete mathematics (also see 6.3) 3.4 Software for discrete mathematics 4 Linear Algebra 4.1 Matrices, systems
    [Show full text]
  • A Spring Social for the Ages by Stuart English Even Before the 2015 CMC Spring Social Began, There Seemed to Be Something Special in the Air
    THIRD QUARTER 2015 Quarterly News Bulletin and Hike Schedule P.O. Box 68, Asheville, NC 28802 • www.carolinamountainclub.org • e-mail: [email protected] A Spring Social for the ages By Stuart English Even before the 2015 CMC Spring Social began, there seemed to be something special in the air. The last two socials had been rainy affairs and judging by the forecast, it seemed this one would be no different. There was an 80% chance of rain and the morning was dark and dreary. But around noon the sky started brightening and the sun appeared to win the battle with the clouds. And by the way, this was our 10th annual Spring Social at the NC Arboretum. Danny Bernstein led a hike around Lake Powhattan and Bobbi Bobbi Powers gathers hikers before the start of the wild- Powers led a wildflower hike around the arboretum trails. More flower hike. Photo by Ann Hendrickson. people began arriving closer to the 5 p.m. social hour. One hundred and seven attended this year. The that her company would donate 1% magic of the day became more and of their profits every year to CMC, more apparent as old friends, new and presented Lenny a check for friends, new members, veterans of $1000. many years hiking with the club, and The main program was on some that could no longer hike at all Scouting in Western North Carolina gathered and reminisced. and was presented by Skip Sheldon, Bubba’s BBQ served their usual Executive Board member of tasty fare and CMC president Lenny Daniel Boone Council and CMC Bernstein started the evening program Maintenance Crew leader.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 2Nd Quarter Lets Go
    SECOND QUARTER 2015 Quarterly News Bulletin and Hike Schedule P.O. Box 68, Asheville, NC 28802 • www.carolinamountainclub.org • e-mail: [email protected] CMC members comment COUNCIL CORNER When I was asked to edit on proposed forest plan the eNews over two years ago, I said yes. I thought it By Ruth Hartzler Comments included the econom- would be a stretch for me. Not only are CMC members ic trade-off of the proposed high My husband Michael and superb hikers and trail builders, level of logging. Jonathan Sackson I were leading hikes and but they can write! The US Forest commented, “It is hard to imag- enjoying hiking with the Service requested input on its pro- ine a compelling economic interest Club nearly every week- posed revision to the Nantahala for authorizing the destruction of end. The newsletter would give me a way to find and Pisgah Forest Management the grand national treasure that is out more about the Club. Two and a half years later, Plan, and CMC members respond- these forests. “ And Jan Onan wrote I have stretched. It takes about 4 hours of my time ed eloquently and passionately. “Many who bike, hike, fish, hunt, each month, and the hikers and maintainers I have Most commented on the planned horseback ride, swim, kayak, etc., read about are inspiring. Late last summer someone designation of 700,000 acres, 70%, who spend their dollars here, will asked via email if I would be interested in joining the of the forests, as suitable for log- not come.” Ken and Carol Deal Council.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life and Times of Lewis Blodgett by Bobbi Powers National Climatic Data Center the Rest of His Wow! Lewis Blodgett Has Been a Mem- Career
    THIRD QUARTER 2013 Quarterly News Bulletin and Hike Schedule P.O. Box 68, Asheville, NC 28802 • www.carolinamountainclub.org • e-mail: [email protected] The Life and Times of Lewis Blodgett By Bobbi Powers National Climatic Data Center the rest of his Wow! Lewis Blodgett has been a mem- career. This was before personal computers, ber of CMC for almost half his life. This although the Center had room-size, state- diminutive nonagenarian with the piping of-the-art computers. My, how times have voice joined CMC in 1972 with his late changed! wife Jane, and is still active. Lewis met the love of his life in 1955. He Lewis turned 90 on May 27 and enjoyed and Jane married in 1956, built the house being part of the CMC’s 90th Birthday in Oakley where he still lives, and had 4 Bash on June 8. Want to know more about children. He has 2 grandsons, one of whom Lewis? (The answer is, “Sure!”) Read on: is serving in Afghanistan. He has lived the Lewis has been a weather guy all his American dream! life. As a child in New York State, he Lewis and Jane traveled abroad twice, to walked everywhere and watched the England and Ireland in 1982 and to Iceland weather, including the 1938 hurricane, in 2000. During the Iceland trip, he caught up which struck without warning near his with several Icelandic buddies he had worked home on eastern Long Island. (Ask Lewis with so many years ago. about his storm tales!) When America Since childhood, and with Jane after they Lewis Blodgett entered World War II, he applied for and met, he has loved to go on long walks, weeds.
    [Show full text]
  • Where to Go Camping Guide 2016
    Where To Go Camping Guide 2016 A Troops Guide to the Outdoors Presented by Croatan Lodge # 117 Included Inside Vice—Chief of Camping Promotions The Ten Essentials + Reasons to Go The OA and the Election Have We Left out Your Favorite Campsite NC Boy Scout Camps Eastern Region State Parks Central Region State Parks Western Region State Parks NC National Seashores Hiking in NC National High Adventure Programs Some Useful Web Pages Dear Scouter, As a young scout, I was taught years ago that one could not take the ‘outing’ out of the word ‘scouting.’ The very heart of the Bo y Scout program lies in the glory of the natural world. For this reason, Croatan Lodge 117 proudly brings to you the 2016 edition of the Where To Go Camping Guide. This booklet was made as a guide for all East Carolina Council Units for finding new and exciting places to camp throughout North Carolina. Also for those who think that camping doesn’t have anything more to offer them, there is information on COASTAL ADVENTURES and some of the various other National High Adventure Bases. Whether you plan on trekking through the Rockies at Philmont Scout Ranch or canoeing with our own Pamlico Sea Base we hope to share with you as much contact information as possible. If you are reading through the book and see that one of Your favorite camps isn’t included, complete the enclosed form. We in the Lodge Camping Promotions Program seek to include camping in all its forms. This includes local/District camping, Council Camps as well as National Programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents 191 Black Balsam Knob
    131 Twin Falls ............................................................ 64 141 Pink Beds Loop .................................................... 66 151 Pilot Cove Loop .................................................... 68 161 Mount Pisgah ...................................................... 70 171 Graveyard Fields .................................................. 72 181 Sam Knob .......................................................... 74 Table of Contents 191 Black Balsam Knob ............................................... 76 202 Devil’s Courthouse ................................................ 78 Overnight Hike Routes Introduction ............................................................... 13 1 Cat Gap via John Rock.......................................... 82 Important Considerations .............................................. 17 2 Butter Gap Shelter ................................................ 84 Planning Your Trip ....................................................... 22 3 Butter Gap–Cove Creek ........................................ 86 Getting to Pisgah & the Trailheads ................................. 26 4 Deep Gap Shelter ................................................ 90 Navigating Pisgah ...................................................... 36 4 5 Caney Bottom ..................................................... 94 6 Clawhammer Mountain ......................................... 96 7 Buckhorn Gap Shelter ........................................... 98 Day Hike Routes 8 Pink Beds–Buckhorn Gap ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 MOUNTAIN BIKE Editors' Choice Awards Ve
    THE VE #GNARVEST2016 MOUNTAIN BIKE EDITORS’ CHOICE AWARDS Photography by MICHAEL DARTER DAMN, MOUNTAIN BIKES ARE GETTING GOOD. But even among so many great 2016 models, some stand out. To find the best, we started with 70 NOMINATIONS, culled 33 FINALISTS, then rallied those over the 300 MILES OF SINGLETRACK OUTSIDE BREVARD, . Out of the dense woods of the Pisgah National Forest and DuPont State NORTH CAROLINA See our EDITORS’ CHOICE Forest, 19 bikes proved to charge harder, boost higher, and generally harvest more gnar— WINNERS and fun—than the rest. HERE ARE SEVEN REASONS 2016 IS (SERIOUSLY) THE YEAR TO BUY on page 72 A NEW MOUNTAIN BIKE—AND THE 19 MODELS THAT CAPTURE THE BEST OF THESE TRENDS. JULY 2016 • BICYCLING.COM 69 Left: On Evil’s The Following, one tester said he “grinned the whole way—prob- ably an evil grin.” Right: The Santa No. Cruz Hightower (in 29er mode). MORE FUN ON DESCENTS, WITH FEWER COMPROMISES EVERYWHERE ELSE. FF WE WERE STRUCK BY HOW GREAT OUR Editors’ Choice winners are not only in the ways we would expect, but also in ways we wouldn’t: long-travel bikes that climb great, XC race bikes that rail descents, mid-travel bikes that give the big bikes serious competition on the descents but climb nearly as well as the XC bikes. This all can be credited to progress in sus- pension, frame, and component designs. Shock technologies like RockShox’s DebonAir (on the Santa Cruz Hightower* and other winning bikes) and Fox’s EVOL air spring (on the Yeti SB5c and others) make rear suspension more sensitive, improving traction and control without adding travel.
    [Show full text]
  • Favorite Trails
    Favorite Trails - by Location Use Workshop Trail Location What makes it special for you? Other use type Brevard All are great bike Pisgah/DuPont/Bent Creek Endless options Nantahala- Standing Indian, Wine Franklin Any horse trail horse Spring Any single track Brevard hike Pisgah and DuPont I enjoy the wilderness experience, wildlife, beautiful views, wild flowers. leading to a waterfall The part I like is at a fairly high elevation. There are expansive views. I like Brevard Art Loeb Trail hike Shining Rock Wilderness the variety of plant life. It is a magical place. Cold Mnt ->Narrows->Shining Rock Franklin Art Loeb Trail hike Gap It was my first multi-day solo backpacking trip as a teenager. Changed my Franklin Art Loeb Trail hike Pisgah RD life. Mars Hill Art Loeb Trail hike Waterside all the way up the ridgeline wilderness, views Mars Hill Art Loeb Trail hike Brevard to Waynesville A mid-range thru hike perfect distance for a day, diverse environment over trail length, Shining Morganton Art Loeb Trail hike Davidson River to Daniel Boone run Rock is highlight Mars Hill AT hike NC-Tenn. Andrews AT hike Clingmans Dome to Icewater Springs views Andrews AT hike Wayah Rd to Wayah Bald terrain and views Beauty, vistas, remoteness, beauty, wilderness, uniqueness, challenge & Brevard AT hike Max Patch to Roan Mnt backpacking beauty! America's first National Scenic Trail, a footpath for those who seek Brevard AT hike GA->ME fellowship with the wilderness; traversing many of the most beautiful parts of the Appalachian Mts. Franklin AT hike Macon Cnty GA line to NOC Franklin AT hike Georgia to Maine views, forest environment, history I've hiked the full length of the AT and am now a member of the ATC Mars Hill AT hike Along NC/TN border Board and a AT trail maintainer.
    [Show full text]
  • Under the Radar Brevard, North Carolina, Is Home to Some of the Best Riding in the Country, but the Miles Don’T Come Easy
    under the radar Brevard, North Carolina, is home to some of the best riding in the country, but the miles don’t come easy By vernon felton i photography By dan Barham Back in 2000, 23-year-old Wes dickson walked into a bank with a brilliant idea: Open a bike shop in Brevard, North Carolina. He just needed a loan to get things rolling. The loan officer thought it over. No dice. Bad idea. No future in that kind of thing around here. Dickson went home and pondered his own future. It was a bike shop or nothing at all. He went back to the bank with a promising proposal: “How about you lend me some money for, um, some new furniture for my apartment?” This sounded like a smart investment to the bank representative, who promptly extended Dickson a loan for $8,000, which Dickson, in turn, promptly used to start a bike shop. On one hand, this story sounds preposterous be- cause, as anyone who’s visited Brevard will tell you, the small town sits on the back porch of one of America’s greatest mountain-biking playgrounds. You couldn’t dream of a better town in which to base a bike shop. Half-a-million acres laced with 400 miles of trail (Pisgah National Forest) stands on one side of Brevard. On the other side sits another 10,000 acres and 90 miles of trail in DuPont State Forest. In this veritable mountain-bike utopia is a bank that wouldn’t give a guy a dime to start a bike shop, but would happily fork over nearly 10 grand to help the same guy pimp his crib.
    [Show full text]