PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA
PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD)
LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY
FIFTY-SEVENTH PARLIAMENT
FIRST SESSION
Book 17 25, 26 and 27 October 2011
Internet: www.parliament.vic.gov.au/downloadhansard
By authority of the Victorian Government Printer
The Governor The Honourable ALEX CHERNOV, AO, QC
The Lieutenant-Governor The Honourable Justice MARILYN WARREN, AC
The ministry
Premier and Minister for the Arts...... The Hon. E. N. Baillieu, MP
Deputy Premier, Minister for Police and Emergency Services, Minister for Bushfire Response, and Minister for Regional and Rural Development...... The Hon. P. J. Ryan, MP
Treasurer...... The Hon. K. A. Wells, MP
Minister for Innovation, Services and Small Business, and Minister for Tourism and Major Events...... The Hon. Louise Asher, MP
Attorney-General and Minister for Finance...... The Hon. R. W. Clark, MP
Minister for Employment and Industrial Relations, and Minister for Manufacturing, Exports and Trade ...... The Hon. R. A. G. Dalla-Riva, MLC
Minister for Health and Minister for Ageing...... The Hon. D. M. Davis, MLC
Minister for Sport and Recreation, and Minister for Veterans’ Affairs . . . . The Hon. H. F. Delahunty, MP
Minister for Education...... The Hon. M. F. Dixon, MP
Minister for Planning...... The Hon. M. J. Guy, MLC
Minister for Higher Education and Skills, and Minister responsible for the Teaching Profession...... The Hon. P. R. Hall, MLC
Minister for Multicultural Affairs and Citizenship...... The Hon. N. Kotsiras, MP
Minister for Housing, and Minister for Children and Early Childhood Development...... The Hon. W. A. Lovell, MLC
Minister for Corrections, Minister for Crime Prevention and Minister responsible for the establishment of an anti-corruption commission . . . The Hon. A. J. McIntosh, MP
Minister for Public Transport and Minister for Roads...... The Hon. T. W. Mulder, MP
Minister for Ports, Minister for Major Projects, Minister for Regional Cities and Minister for Racing...... The Hon. D. V. Napthine, MP
Minister for Gaming, Minister for Consumer Affairs, and Minister for Energy and Resources...... The Hon. M. A. O’Brien, MP
Minister for Local Government and Minister for Aboriginal Affairs...... The Hon. E. J. Powell, MP
Assistant Treasurer, Minister for Technology and Minister responsible for the Aviation Industry...... The Hon. G. K. Rich-Phillips, MLC
Minister for Environment and Climate Change, and Minister for Youth Affairs...... The Hon. R. Smith, MP
Minister for Agriculture and Food Security, and Minister for Water...... The Hon. P. L. Walsh, MP
Minister for Mental Health, Minister for Women’s Affairs and Minister for Community Services...... The Hon. M. L. N. Wooldridge, MP
Cabinet Secretary...... Mr D. J. Hodgett, MP
Legislative Assembly committees
Privileges Committee — Ms Barker, Mr Clark, Ms Green, Mr McIntosh, Mr Morris, Dr Napthine, Mr Nardella, Mr Pandazopoulos and Mr Walsh.
Standing Orders Committee — The Speaker, Ms Allan, Ms Barker, Mr Brooks, Mrs Fyffe, Mr Hodgett, Mr McIntosh and Mrs Powell.
Joint committees
Dispute Resolution Committee — (Assembly): Ms Allan, Mr Clark, Ms Hennessy, Mr Holding, Mr McIntosh, Dr Napthine and Mr Walsh. (Council): Mr D. Davis, Mr Hall, Mr Lenders, Ms Lovell and Ms Pennicuik. Drugs and Crime Prevention Committee — (Assembly): Mr Battin and Mr McCurdy. (Council): Mr Leane, Mr Ramsay and Mr Scheffer. Economic Development and Infrastructure Committee — (Assembly): Mr Burgess, Mr Foley, Mr Noonan and Mr Shaw. (Council): Mrs Peulich. Education and Training Committee — (Assembly): Mr Crisp, Ms Miller and Mr Southwick. (Council): Mr Elasmar and Ms Tierney. Electoral Matters Committee — (Assembly): Ms Ryall and Mrs Victoria. (Council): Mr Finn, Mr Somyurek and Mr Tarlamis. Environment and Natural Resources Committee — (Assembly): Mr Bull, Ms Duncan, Mr Pandazopoulos and Ms Wreford. (Council): Mr Koch. Family and Community Development Committee — (Assembly): Mrs Bauer, Ms Halfpenny, Mr McGuire and Mr Wakeling. (Council): Mrs Coote and Ms Crozier. House Committee — (Assembly): The Speaker (ex officio), Ms Beattie, Ms Campbell, Mrs Fyffe, Ms Graley, Mr Wakeling and Mr Weller. (Council): The President (ex officio), Mr Drum, Mr Eideh, Mr Finn, Ms Hartland, and Mr P. Davis. Law Reform Committee — (Assembly): Mr Carbines, Ms Garrett, Mr Newton-Brown and Mr Northe. (Council): Mrs Petrovich. Outer Suburban/Interface Services and Development Committee — (Assembly): Ms Graley, Ms Hutchins and Ms McLeish. (Council): Mrs Kronberg and Mr Ondarchie. Public Accounts and Estimates Committee — (Assembly): Mr Angus, Ms Hennessey, Mr Morris and Mr Scott. (Council): Mr P. Davis, Mr O’Brien and Mr Pakula. Road Safety Committee — (Assembly): Mr Languiller, Mr Perera, Mr Tilley and Mr Thompson. (Council): Mr Elsbury. Rural and Regional Committee — (Assembly): Mr Howard, Mr Katos, Mr Trezise and Mr Weller. (Council): Mr Drum. Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee — (Assembly): Ms Campbell, Mr Eren, Mr Gidley, Mr Nardella and Mr Watt. (Council): Mr O’Brien and Mr O’Donohue.
Heads of parliamentary departments
Assembly — Clerk of the Parliaments and Clerk of the Legislative Assembly: Mr R. W. Purdey Council — Clerk of the Legislative Council: Mr W. R. Tunnecliffe Parliamentary Services — Secretary: Mr P. Lochert
MEMBERS OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FIFTY-SEVENTH PARLIAMENT — FIRST SESSION Speaker: The Hon. K. M. SMITH Deputy Speaker: Mrs C. A. FYFFE Acting Speakers: Ms Beattie, Mr Blackwood, Mr Burgess, Ms Campbell, Mr Eren, Mr Languiller, Mr Morris, Mr Nardella, Mr Northe, Mr Pandazopoulos, Dr Sykes, Mr Thompson, Mr Tilley, Mrs Victoria and Mr Weller. Leader of the Parliamentary Liberal Party and Premier: The Hon. E. N. BAILLIEU Deputy Leader of the Parliamentary Liberal Party: The Hon. LOUISE ASHER Leader of The Nationals and Deputy Premier: The Hon. P. J. RYAN Deputy Leader of The Nationals: The Hon. P. L. WALSH Leader of the Parliamentary Labor Party and Leader of the Opposition: The Hon. D. M. ANDREWS Deputy Leader of the Parliamentary Labor Party and Deputy Leader of the Opposition: The Hon. R. J. HULLS
Member District Party Member District Party Allan, Ms Jacinta Marie Bendigo East ALP Lim, Mr Muy Hong Clayton ALP Andrews, Mr Daniel Michael Mulgrave ALP McCurdy, Mr Timothy Logan Murray Valley Nats Angus, Mr Neil Andrew Warwick Forest Hill LP McGuire, Mr Frank 2 Broadmeadows ALP Asher, Ms Louise Brighton LP McIntosh, Mr Andrew John Kew LP Baillieu, Mr Edward Norman Hawthorn LP McLeish, Ms Lucinda Gaye Seymour LP Barker, Ms Ann Patricia Oakleigh ALP Madden, Mr Justin Mark Essendon ALP Battin, Mr Bradley William Gembrook LP Merlino, Mr James Anthony Monbulk ALP Bauer, Mrs Donna Jane Carrum LP Miller, Ms Elizabeth Eileen Bentleigh LP Beattie, Ms Elizabeth Jean Yuroke ALP Morris, Mr David Charles Mornington LP Blackwood, Mr Gary John Narracan LP Mulder, Mr Terence Wynn Polwarth LP Brooks, Mr Colin William Bundoora ALP Napthine, Dr Denis Vincent South-West Coast LP Brumby, Mr John Mansfield 1 Broadmeadows ALP Nardella, Mr Donato Antonio Melton ALP Bull, Mr Timothy Owen Gippsland East Nats Neville, Ms Lisa Mary Bellarine ALP Burgess, Mr Neale Ronald Hastings LP Newton-Brown, Mr Clement Arundel Prahran LP Campbell, Ms Christine Mary Pascoe Vale ALP Noonan, Mr Wade Mathew Williamstown ALP Carbines, Mr Anthony Richard Ivanhoe ALP Northe, Mr Russell John Morwell Nats Clark, Mr Robert William Box Hill LP O’Brien, Mr Michael Anthony Malvern LP Crisp, Mr Peter Laurence Mildura Nats Pallas, Mr Timothy Hugh Tarneit ALP D’Ambrosio, Ms Liliana Mill Park ALP Pandazopoulos, Mr John Dandenong ALP Delahunty, Mr Hugh Francis Lowan Nats Perera, Mr Jude Cranbourne ALP Dixon, Mr Martin Francis Nepean LP Pike, Ms Bronwyn Jane Melbourne ALP Donnellan, Mr Luke Anthony Narre Warren North ALP Powell, Mrs Elizabeth Jeanette Shepparton Nats Duncan, Ms Joanne Therese Macedon ALP Richardson, Ms Fiona Catherine Alison Northcote ALP Edwards, Ms Janice Maree Bendigo West ALP Ryall, Ms Deanne Sharon Mitcham LP Eren, Mr John Hamdi Lara ALP Ryan, Mr Peter Julian Gippsland South Nats Foley, Mr Martin Peter Albert Park ALP Scott, Mr Robin David Preston ALP Fyffe, Mrs Christine Ann Evelyn LP Shaw, Mr Geoffrey Page Frankston LP Garrett, Ms Jane Furneaux Brunswick ALP Smith, Mr Kenneth Maurice Bass LP Gidley, Mr Michael Xavier Charles Mount Waverley LP Smith, Mr Ryan Warrandyte LP Graley, Ms Judith Ann Narre Warren South ALP Southwick, Mr David James Caulfield LP Green, Ms Danielle Louise Yan Yean ALP Sykes, Dr William Everett Benalla Nats Halfpenny, Ms Bronwyn Thomastown ALP Thompson, Mr Murray Hamilton Ross Sandringham LP Helper, Mr Jochen Ripon ALP Thomson, Ms Marsha Rose Footscray ALP Hennessy, Ms Jill Altona ALP Tilley, Mr William John Benambra LP Herbert, Mr Steven Ralph Eltham ALP Trezise, Mr Ian Douglas Geelong ALP Hodgett, Mr David John Kilsyth LP Victoria, Mrs Heidi Bayswater LP Holding, Mr Timothy James Lyndhurst ALP Wakeling, Mr Nicholas Ferntree Gully LP Howard, Mr Geoffrey Kemp Ballarat East ALP Walsh, Mr Peter Lindsay Swan Hill Nats Hulls, Mr Rob Justin Niddrie ALP Watt, Mr Graham Travis Burwood LP Hutchins, Ms Natalie Maree Sykes Keilor ALP Weller, Mr Paul Rodney Nats Kairouz, Ms Marlene Kororoit ALP Wells, Mr Kimberley Arthur Scoresby LP Katos, Mr Andrew South Barwon LP Wooldridge, Ms Mary Louise Newling Doncaster LP Knight, Ms Sharon Patricia Ballarat West ALP Wreford, Ms Lorraine Joan Mordialloc LP Kotsiras, Mr Nicholas Bulleen LP Wynne, Mr Richard William Richmond ALP Languiller, Mr Telmo Ramon Derrimut ALP
1 Resigned 21 December 2010 2 Elected 19 February 2011
CONTENTS
TUESDAY, 25 OCTOBER 2011 Robert Ives ...... 4791 Knox Churches Soccer Club: funding...... 4791 ABSENCE OF MINISTER...... 4775 Ferntree Gully electorate: student leaders lunch .... 4791 QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE Tasty Trucks...... 4791 Public sector: government wages policy...... 4775 Newport Gardens Primary School: opening...... 4791 Puppy farms: regulation ...... 4775 Mildura: arts facilities ...... 4792 Police: enterprise bargaining.... 4775, 4777, 4778, 4780 VCA Foundation ...... 4792 Bushfires: royal commission recommendations...... 4776 Country Fire Authority: Bayswater brigade...... 4792 Environment: Communities for Nature grants...... 4777 Melbourne International Arts Festival...... 4792 Water: trading agreement...... 4779 Lyn Swinburne ...... 4792 Honorary justices: government support...... 4780 St Mary’s House of Welcome ...... 4792 Multicultural affairs: Forest Hill electorate ...... 4793 JUSTICE LEGISLATION FURTHER AMENDMENT Nunawading Soccer Club: presentations...... 4793 BILL 2011 Carbon tax: economic impact ...... 4793, 4795 Introduction and first reading...... 4781 Republic of El Salvador: humanitarian PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS AMENDMENT BILL 2011 assistance...... 4793 Introduction and first reading...... 4781 Mildura: home show...... 4793 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT AMENDMENT Red Cliffs Primary School: royal visit outing ...... 4794 (SCHOOLS) BILL 2011 South Asian Community Link Group: Introduction and first reading...... 4781 fundraising...... 4794 DOMESTIC ANIMALS AMENDMENT (PUPPY FARM Water: Tankulator...... 4794 ENFORCEMENT AND OTHER MATTERS) Bill and Ruby Hoskins: 71st wedding BILL 2011 anniversary ...... 4794 Introduction and first reading...... 4781 Keith and Gillian Horlock: 50th wedding MINES (ALUMINIUM AGREEMENT) AMENDMENT anniversary ...... 4794 BILL 2011 Motocross: KTM Ride4Kids...... 4794 Introduction and first reading...... 4782 Marion Blaze...... 4794 STATE TAXATION ACTS FURTHER AMENDMENT Ballarat: parliamentary education visit...... 4794 BILL 2011 Ballarat Outrigger Academy...... 4795 Introduction and first reading...... 4782 Practically Green Festival: Kids Teaching Kids LIQUOR CONTROL REFORM FURTHER conference...... 4795 AMENDMENT BILL 2011 Patterson Lakes Primary School: Cyber Girls Introduction and first reading...... 4782 chess team...... 4796 PARKS AND CROWN LAND LEGISLATION Carrum volunteer coastguard: Kingston AMENDMENT BILL 2011 Guardian...... 4796 Introduction and first reading...... 4783 Mates Day on the Bay...... 4796 SERIOUS SEX OFFENDERS (DETENTION AND Mount Tarrengower: hill climb...... 4796 SUPERVISION) AMENDMENT BILL 2011...... 4783 Maldon Folk Festival...... 4796 BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE Gilad Shalit ...... 4796 Notices of motion: removal...... 4783 Courage to Care: exhibition...... 4796 Program ...... 4785 Glen Eira College: Just BU panel...... 4797 Sukkot in the City ...... 4797 PETITIONS Preston Reservoir Adult Community Education...... 4797 Gisborne Secondary College: funding ...... 4783 Maroondah Prevention and Recovery Care: Medical practitioners: physician associates ...... 4783 opening...... 4797 Planning: green wedge development...... 4784 Mooroolbark Football Club: awards...... 4797 Bacchus Marsh: Avenue of Honour ...... 4784 Wedge–Frankston-Dandenong roads, Carrum SCRUTINY OF ACTS AND REGULATIONS Downs: traffic management ...... 4798 COMMITTEE Frankston: graffiti strategy...... 4798 Alert Digest No. 12...... 4784 Turkey: earthquake...... 4798 DOCUMENTS ...... 4785 TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC ROYAL ASSENT...... 4785 TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011 APPROPRIATION MESSAGES ...... 4785 Second reading ...... 4798 MEMBERS STATEMENTS PUBLIC INTEREST MONITOR BILL 2011 Aboriginals: war service exhibition...... 4790 Doveton: reunion ...... 4790 Statement of compatibility ...... 4832 Ferntree Gully North Primary School: Second reading ...... 4833 production ...... 4791 SENTENCING AMENDMENT (COMMUNITY Friends of Koolunga ...... 4791 CORRECTION REFORM) BILL 2011 Second reading ...... 4836
CONTENTS
ADJOURNMENT Frankston electorate: student leaders ...... 4874 Belgrave-Hallam–Narre Warren North roads, Lakewood child care centre: closure ...... 4874 Narre Warren North: safety...... 4852 Frankston District Tigersharks: presentations ...... 4874 Timber industry: government policy...... 4852 Victorian volunteer small grants program: Youth: Berwick housing ...... 4853 closure...... 4874 Mount Waverley Secondary College: ministerial Relay for Life: Echuca-Moama ...... 4874 visit ...... 4853 Sherbrooke Community School: building Melton Highway: safety ...... 4854 program ...... 4875 Whooping cough: vaccination ...... 4855 Mount Lilydale Mercy College: art show ...... 4875 Canterbury Road Urban Forest: future...... 4855 Alexandra: community reading day ...... 4875 Rail: Southland station...... 4856 Narre Warren South electorate: student Victorian certificate of applied learning: leadership...... 4876 funding...... 4856 Gembrook Primary School: Walk to School day .....4876 Occupational health and safety: national Parliament House: bowls event...... 4876 harmonisation ...... 4857 Emerald Community House...... 4876 Responses ...... 4857 George Harmon ...... 4876 National Bandanna Day ...... 4876 Moreland Bicycle User Group ...... 4876 WEDNESDAY, 26 OCTOBER 2011 Benalla electorate: Advancing Country Towns program ...... 4877 QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE Viewbank College: gala concert...... 4877 Children: protection...... 4861, 4863, 4864 Mornington: Tidy Towns awards ...... 4877 Royal visit: events...... 4862 Mornington: sesquicentenary...... 4878 Bushfires: Marysville recovery ...... 4864 City of Wyndham: employment...... 4878 Women: Australian Institute of Company Monash Volunteer Resource Centre ...... 4878 Directors scholarships...... 4865 Rotary: Monash charity golf day...... 4878 Rooming houses: regulation ...... 4866 St Helena Secondary College: arts and Victorian Indigenous Honour Roll: technology awards...... 4878 establishment...... 4867 St Kilda Primary School: fair...... 4879 Biofuel: Madowla Park project ...... 4868 Prahran Mission: Mullets for the Mission ...... 4879 Racing: Bendigo Cup...... 4868 Safe Schools Coalition Victoria: funding...... 4879 INDEPENDENT BROAD-BASED ANTI-CORRUPTION Fr Bob Maguire ...... 4879 COMMISSION BILL 2011 Prahran: mental health forum...... 4879 Introduction and first reading...... 4869 Sylvia Fahey...... 4879 VICTORIAN INSPECTORATE BILL 2011 Helen Round...... 4879 Introduction and first reading...... 4870 Astor Theatre...... 4879 PETITIONS Victorian certificate of applied learning: Puppy farms: abolition...... 4870 funding ...... 4879 Puffing Billy: funding ...... 4870 ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY AMENDMENT Casey Hospital: funding...... 4870 (TRANSITIONAL FEED-IN TARIFF SCHEME) BILL 2011 Schools: Doreen ...... 4871 Second reading...... 4880 Children: Take a Break program...... 4871 JUSTICE LEGISLATION FURTHER AMENDMENT DOCUMENTS...... 4871 BILL 2011 APPROPRIATION MESSAGES ...... 4872 Statement of compatibility...... 4891 MEMBERS STATEMENTS Second reading...... 4892 Whittlesea City Little Athletics Centre...... 4872 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT AMENDMENT Albury Wodonga Community College: Schools (SCHOOLS) BILL 2011 First funding...... 4872 Statement of compatibility...... 4893 Sergeant Ceryn Campbell...... 4872 Second reading...... 4893 Peter Gelo...... 4872 LIQUOR CONTROL REFORM FURTHER Turkey: earthquake ...... 4873 AMENDMENT BILL 2011 Australian Hellenic Memorial: 10th anniversary ....4873 Statement of compatibility...... 4895 Black Rock House: 155th anniversary ...... 4873 Second reading...... 4895 St Joseph’s Primary School, Brunswick West: MINES (ALUMINIUM AGREEMENT) AMENDMENT centenary ...... 4873 BILL 2011 Melbourne Prayer Breakfast...... 4873 Statement of compatibility...... 4898 Greater Frankston Business Chamber: business Second reading...... 4899 expo ...... 4874 OzChild: nurturing day for carers...... 4874
CONTENTS
STATE TAXATION ACTS FURTHER AMENDMENT Governor of Victoria Export Awards: BILL 2011 Mordialloc electorate ...... 4927 Statement of compatibility...... 4902 Mordialloc Preschool: 50th anniversary...... 4927 Second reading...... 4903 Moorabbin Airport: chamber of commerce...... 4927 SERIOUS SEX OFFENDERS (DETENTION AND Singapore: tourism infrastructure...... 4927 SUPERVISION) AMENDMENT BILL 2011 Langwarrin Park Kindergarten: extension...... 4927 Statement of compatibility...... 4905 Moonlit Sanctuary Wildlife Conservation Park: Second reading...... 4907 10th anniversary...... 4928 ADJOURNMENT Hastings: Tidy Towns awards ...... 4928 Brimbank Gardens estate: air quality ...... 4911 Bushfires: royal commission recommendations ...... 4928 Carbon tax: Bayswater electorate...... 4911 Bairnsdale Boxing Club: tournament ...... 4928 Puffing Billy: funding...... 4912 East Gippsland Business Awards...... 4928 Rodney electorate: flood recovery funding ...... 4913 Mallacoota and District Historical Society: Nicholson–Miller streets, Brunswick East: exhibition ...... 4929 safety...... 4913 Maffra and District Agricultural Pastoral and Healesville freeway reservation: future...... 4914 Horticultural Show ...... 4929 Public transport: fares ...... 4914 Northcote High School: graduation ceremony...... 4929 Cardross: sports equipment...... 4915 St Benedict’s Primary School: art show ...... 4929 Outer Suburban/Interface Services and Rowen Street Kindergarten: family fun day...... 4929 Development Committee: livability inquiry ...... 4915 Our Lady’s Primary School, Wattle Park: fete...... 4929 Moriac Primary School: rebuilding ...... 4916 St Michael’s Parish Primary School: art show ...... 4929 Responses ...... 4916 Ashwood, Ashburton and Chadstone Public Tenants Group: annual general meeting...... 4929 Ashburton Support Services: annual general THURSDAY, 27 OCTOBER 2011 meeting...... 4930 Glendi Dimitria festival ...... 4930 TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT City of Casey: flood protection...... 4930 (MARINE SAFETY AND OTHER AMENDMENTS) Girl guides: Bentleigh electorate ...... 4930 BILL 2011 Jump 4 Toby...... 4930 Introduction and first reading...... 4921 Broadmeadows electorate: government services BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE building ...... 4931 Notices of motion: removal...... 4921 Natimuk Fringe Festival...... 4931 Adjournment...... 4923 VICTORIAN RESPONSIBLE GAMBLING PETITIONS FOUNDATION BILL 2011 Planning: green wedge development...... 4921 Second reading ...... 4931, 4944, 4987 Victorian certificate of applied learning: Third reading ...... 4987 funding...... 4921 PARKS AND CROWN LAND LEGISLATION Lawn bowls: television coverage...... 4922 AMENDMENT BILL 2011 Bacchus Marsh: Avenue of Honour ...... 4922 Statement of compatibility ...... 4938 Whittlesea-Yea Road: safety ...... 4922 Second reading ...... 4939 DOCUMENTS ...... 4922 PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS AMENDMENT BILL 2011 MEMBERS STATEMENTS Statement of compatibility ...... 4941 Floods: small business assistance ...... 4923 Second reading ...... 4942 Roads: truck action plan...... 4923 CHILDREN’S SERVICES AMENDMENT BILL 2011 Tyrell College: community partnership...... 4924 Introduction and first reading ...... 4951 Rotary Club of Ocean Grove: art show...... 4924 WATER LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (WATER St Leonards Community Festival...... 4924 INFRASTRUCTURE CHARGES) BILL 2011 Rail: Doncaster ...... 4924 Second reading ...... 4951, 4970, 4981 Breast Cancer Awareness Month ...... 4925, 4926 Third reading ...... 4986 Turkey: earthquake ...... 4925 PARLIAMENTARY SECRETARIES ...... 4959 Lilydale to Warburton rail trail: bridge ...... 4925 QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE St Mary’s House of Welcome...... 4925 Former deputy commissioner of City of Brimbank: Places of Worship tour ...... 4926 police: meeting...... 4959, 4964 Keep Australia Beautiful Victoria: awards ...... 4926 Victorian Funds Management Corporation: Jenny Bennie and Josie Munro...... 4926 reform...... 4960 Show days: regional and rural Victoria...... 4926 Minister for Police and Emergency Services: Invergordon: closer settlement anniversary...... 4926 former adviser...... 4961 Cobram Community House ...... 4926 Road safety: numberplate messages ...... 4961 Royal Children’s Hospital: opening...... 4926, 4930
CONTENTS
Minister for Police and Emergency Services: 606(ar). Youth affairs: Allygroup...... 4999 ministerial staff...... 4962 606(au). Assistant Treasurer: Allygroup...... 4999 Problem gambling: advertising campaign ...... 4963 607(i). Consumer affairs: AusAccess Unit Desalination plant: progress ...... 4964 Trust...... 5000 Minister for Police and Emergency Services: 607(r). Gaming: AusAccess Unit Trust...... 5000 conduct ...... 4965, 4967, 4970 607(ar). Youth affairs: AusAccess Unit Trust...... 5000 Police: livestock and farm crime ...... 4966 607(au). Assistant Treasurer: AusAccess Unit SUSPENSION OF MEMBER Trust...... 5001 Member for Mulgrave ...... 4968 608(i). Consumer affairs: Australian Public NAMING AND SUSPENSION OF MEMBER Affairs Partnership Ltd...... 5001 Member for Mulgrave ...... 4968 608(r). Gaming: Australian Public Affairs Partnership Ltd...... 5002 DISSENT FROM SPEAKER’S RULING...... 4971 608(ar). Youth affairs: Australian Public Affairs INDEPENDENT BROAD-BASED ANTI-CORRUPTION Partnership Ltd...... 5002 COMMISSION BILL 2011 608(au). Assistant Treasurer: Australian Public Statement of compatibility...... 4972 Affairs Partnership Ltd...... 5002 Second reading...... 4974 609(i). Consumer affairs: Baber Roger Peters .....5003 VICTORIAN INSPECTORATE BILL 2011 609(r). Gaming: Baber Roger Peters...... 5003 Statement of compatibility...... 4976 609(ar). Youth affairs: Baber Roger Peters...... 5003 Second reading...... 4980 609(au). Assistant Treasurer: Baber Roger TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC Peters...... 5004 TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) 610(i). Consumer affairs: Barton Deakin...... 5004 BILL 2011 610(r). Gaming: Barton Deakin...... 5004 Second reading...... 4986 610(ar). Youth affairs: Barton Deakin...... 5005 Third reading...... 4986 610(au). Assistant Treasurer: Barton Deakin ...... 5005 SENTENCING AMENDMENT (COMMUNITY 611(i). Consumer affairs: Berkeley CORRECTION REFORM) BILL 2011 Consultants Pty Ltd ...... 5006 Second reading...... 4986 611(r). Gaming: Berkeley Consultants Pty Ltd .....5006 Third reading...... 4986 611(ar). Youth affairs: Berkeley Consultants Pty ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY AMENDMENT Ltd...... 5006 (TRANSITIONAL FEED-IN TARIFF SCHEME) 611(au). Assistant Treasurer: Berkeley BILL 2011 Consultants Pty Ltd ...... 5007 Second reading...... 4986 612(i). Consumer affairs: Bluegrass Third reading...... 4987 Consulting...... 5007 ADJOURNMENT 612(r). Gaming: Bluegrass Consulting...... 5007 Manufacturing: i-STEP program ...... 4987 612(ar). Youth affairs: Bluegrass Consulting...... 5008 Beach Road, Black Rock: embankment...... 4988 612(au). Assistant Treasurer: Bluegrass Anticorruption commission: opposition briefing...... 4988 Consulting...... 5008 University of the Third Age: Frankston...... 4989 613(i). Consumer affairs: Burson-Marsteller ...... 5008 Wallaby Run, Gisborne: access...... 4989 613(r). Gaming: Burson-Marsteller...... 5009 Gippsland East electorate: sports uniform 613(ar). Youth affairs: Burson-Marsteller...... 5009 grants...... 4990 613(au). Assistant Treasurer: Burson-Marsteller....5010 Preston Reservoir Adult Community Education: 614(i). Consumer affairs: CamCom-Campaign funding...... 4991 Communications...... 5010 Electricity: smart meters ...... 4991 614(r). Gaming: CamCom-Campaign Cycling: Upfield shared pathway ...... 4992 Communications...... 5010 Dining Room mission, Croydon...... 4992 614(ar). Youth affairs: CamCom-Campaign Responses ...... 4993 Communications...... 5011 614(au). Assistant Treasurer: CamCom-Campaign QUESTIONS ON NOTICE Communications...... 5011 615(i). Consumer affairs: Cameron Milner ...... 5011 TUESDAY, 25 OCTOBER 2011 615(r). Gaming: Cameron Milner...... 5012 615(ar). Youth affairs: Cameron Milner...... 5012 479(i). Consumer affairs: Affairs of State...... 4997 615(au). Assistant Treasurer: Cameron Milner...... 5012 479(r). Gaming: Affairs of State ...... 4997 616(i). Consumer affairs: Cannings Corporate 479(ar). Youth affairs: Affairs of State ...... 4998 Communications...... 5013 479(au). Assistant Treasurer: Affairs of State ...... 4998 616(r). Gaming: Cannings Corporate 606(i). Consumer affairs: Allygroup...... 4998 Communications...... 5013 606(r). Gaming: Allygroup...... 4999
CONTENTS
616(ar). Youth affairs: Cannings Corporate 626(r). Gaming: CSR Ltd ...... 5028 Communications...... 5013 626(ar). Youth affairs: CSR Ltd ...... 5028 616(au). Assistant Treasurer: Cannings 626(au). Assistant Treasurer: CSR Ltd ...... 5028 Corporate Communications...... 5014 627(i). Consumer affairs: Dan Cass and 617(i). Consumer affairs: Carney Associates...... 5014 Company...... 5029 617(r). Gaming: Carney Associates...... 5015 627(r). Gaming: Dan Cass and Company...... 5029 617(ar). Youth affairs: Carney Associates ...... 5015 627(ar). Youth affairs: Dan Cass and Company ..... 5029 617(au). Assistant Treasurer: Carney Associates ....5015 627(au). Assistant Treasurer: Dan Cass and 618(i). Consumer affairs: Chris Schacht...... 5016 Company...... 5030 618(r). Gaming: Chris Schacht ...... 5016 628(i). Consumer affairs: Daskay Pty Ltd...... 5030 618(ar). Youth affairs: Chris Schacht ...... 5016 628(r). Gaming: Daskay Pty Ltd...... 5030 618(au). Assistant Treasurer: Chris Schacht...... 5017 628(ar). Youth affairs: Daskay Pty Ltd...... 5031 619(i). Consumer affairs: Clean Economy 628(au). Assistant Treasurer: Daskay Pty Ltd...... 5031 Services...... 5017 629(i). Consumer affairs: Daymark Public 619(r). Gaming: Clean Economy Services...... 5017 Relations Pty Ltd ...... 5032 619(ar). Youth affairs: Clean Economy Services.....5018 629(r). Gaming: Daymark Public Relations 619(au). Assistant Treasurer: Clean Economy Pty Ltd ...... 5032 Services...... 5018 629(ar). Youth affairs: Daymark Public 620(i). Consumer affairs: Clifton Consulting Relations Pty Ltd ...... 5032 Services Pty Ltd ...... 5019 629(au). Assistant Treasurer: Daymark Public 620(r). Gaming: Clifton Consulting Services Relations Pty Ltd ...... 5033 Pty Ltd...... 5019 630(i). Consumer affairs: Diplomacy Pty Ltd...... 5033 620(ar). Youth affairs: Clifton Consulting 630(r). Gaming: Diplomacy Pty Ltd ...... 5033 Services Pty Ltd ...... 5019 630(ar). Youth affairs: Diplomacy Pty Ltd ...... 5034 620(au). Assistant Treasurer: Clifton Consulting 630(au). Assistant Treasurer: Diplomacy Pty Services Pty Ltd ...... 5020 Ltd...... 5034 621(i). Consumer affairs: Corporate Words 631(i). Consumer affairs: EC Strategies Pty Australia Pty Ltd...... 5020 Ltd...... 5034 621(r). Gaming: Corporate Words Australia 631(r). Gaming: EC Strategies Pty Ltd...... 5035 Pty Ltd...... 5020 631(ar). Youth affairs: EC Strategies Pty Ltd...... 5035 621(ar). Youth affairs: Corporate Words 631(au). Assistant Treasurer: EC Strategies Pty Australia Pty Ltd...... 5021 Ltd...... 5036 621(au). Assistant Treasurer: Corporate Words 632(i). Consumer affairs: Edunity...... 5036 Australia Pty Ltd...... 5021 632(r). Gaming: Edunity ...... 5036 622(i). Consumer affairs: Cosway Australia...... 5021 632(ar). Youth affairs: Edunity ...... 5037 622(r). Gaming: Cosway Australia ...... 5022 632(au). Assistant Treasurer: Edunity ...... 5037 622(ar). Youth affairs: Cosway Australia ...... 5022 633(i). Consumer affairs: Embark Worldwide 622(au). Assistant Treasurer: Cosway Australia .....5023 Consulting ...... 5037 623(i). Consumer affairs: Cox Inall 633(r). Gaming: Embark Worldwide Communications...... 5023 Consulting ...... 5038 623(r). Gaming: Cox Inall Communications ...... 5023 633(ar). Youth affairs: Embark Worldwide 623(ar). Youth affairs: Cox Inall Consulting ...... 5038 Communications...... 5024 633(au). Assistant Treasurer: Embark 623(au). Assistant Treasurer: Cox Inall Worldwide Consulting ...... 5038 Communications...... 5024 634(i). Consumer affairs: Endeavour 624(i). Consumer affairs: CPI Strategic...... 5024 Consulting Group Pty Ltd...... 5039 624(r). Gaming: CPI Strategic...... 5025 634(r). Gaming: Endeavour Consulting Group 624(ar). Youth affairs: CPI Strategic...... 5025 Pty Ltd ...... 5039 624(au). Assistant Treasurer: CPI Strategic ...... 5025 634(ar). Youth affairs: Endeavour Consulting 625(i). Consumer affairs: CPR Group Pty Ltd...... 5039 Communications and Public 634(au). Assistant Treasurer: Endeavour Relations Pty Ltd ...... 5026 Consulting Group Pty Ltd...... 5040 625(r). Gaming: CPR Communications and 635(i). Consumer affairs: Enhance Corporate Public Relations Pty Ltd...... 5026 Pty Ltd ...... 5040 625(ar). Youth affairs: CPR Communications 635(r). Gaming: Enhance Corporate Pty Ltd...... 5041 and Public Relations Pty Ltd...... 5026 635(ar). Youth affairs: Enhance Corporate Pty 625(au). Assistant Treasurer: CPR Ltd...... 5041 Communications and Public 635(au). Assistant Treasurer: Enhance Relations Pty Ltd ...... 5027 Corporate Pty Ltd ...... 5041 626(i). Consumer affairs: CSR Ltd ...... 5027
CONTENTS
636(i). Consumer affairs: Essential Media 644(au). Assistant Treasurer: Hawker Britton...... 5054 Communications...... 5042 645(i). Consumer affairs: Hill and Knowlton ...... 5055 636(r). Gaming: Essential Media 645(r). Gaming: Hill and Knowlton...... 5055 Communications...... 5042 645(ar). Youth affairs: Hill and Knowlton...... 5055 636(ar). Youth affairs: Essential Media 645(au). Assistant Treasurer: Hill and Knowlton....5056 Communications...... 5042 646(i). Consumer affairs: HTT Trust...... 5056 636(au). Assistant Treasurer: Essential Media 646(r). Gaming: HTT Trust...... 5056 Communications...... 5043 646(ar). Youth affairs: HTT Trust...... 5057 637(i). Consumer affairs: FIPRA Australia Pty 646(au). Assistant Treasurer: HTT Trust ...... 5057 Ltd ...... 5043 647(i). Consumer affairs: Hugo Halliday Pty 637(r). Gaming: FIPRA Australia Pty Ltd...... 5043 Ltd...... 5058 637(ar). Youth affairs: FIPRA Australia Pty Ltd .....5044 647(r). Gaming: Hugo Halliday Pty Ltd...... 5058 637(au). Assistant Treasurer: FIPRA Australia 647(ar). Youth affairs: Hugo Halliday Pty Ltd...... 5058 Pty Ltd...... 5044 647(au). Assistant Treasurer: Hugo Halliday 638(i). Consumer affairs: G&A Commerical Pty Ltd...... 5059 Services Pty Ltd ...... 5045 648(i). Consumer affairs: InsideOut Strategic ...... 5059 638(r). Gaming: G&A Commerical Services 648(r). Gaming: InsideOut Strategic ...... 5059 Pty Ltd...... 5045 648(ar). Youth affairs: InsideOut Strategic ...... 5060 638(ar). Youth affairs: G&A Commerical 648(au). Assistant Treasurer: InsideOut Services Pty Ltd ...... 5045 Strategic...... 5060 638(au). Assistant Treasurer: G&A Commerical 649(i). Consumer affairs: InterCapital Group Services Pty Ltd ...... 5046 Pty Ltd...... 5060 639(i). Consumer affairs: G. F. Richardson...... 5046 649(r). Gaming: InterCapital Group Pty Ltd ...... 5061 639(r). Gaming: G. F. Richardson...... 5046 649(ar). Youth affairs: InterCapital Group Pty 639(ar). Youth affairs: G. F. Richardson ...... 5047 Ltd...... 5061 639(au). Assistant Treasurer: G. F. Richardson ...... 5047 649(au). Assistant Treasurer: InterCapital 640(i). Consumer affairs: Galbraith and Group Pty Ltd...... 5062 Company Pty Ltd ...... 5047 650(i). Consumer affairs: Intermediary 640(r). Gaming: Galbraith and Company Pty Consulting Pty Ltd...... 5062 Ltd ...... 5048 650(r). Gaming: Intermediary Consulting Pty 640(ar). Youth affairs: Galbraith and Company Ltd...... 5062 Pty Ltd...... 5048 650(ar). Youth affairs: Intermediary Consulting 640(au). Assistant Treasurer: Galbraith and Pty Ltd...... 5063 Company Pty Ltd ...... 5049 650(au). Assistant Treasurer: Intermediary 641(i). Consumer affairs: Gell Southam Group Consulting Pty Ltd...... 5063 Pty Ltd...... 5049 651(i). Consumer affairs: Ivydale Nominees 641(r). Gaming: Gell Southam Group Pty Ltd ...... 5049 Pty Ltd...... 5063 641(ar). Youth affairs: Gell Southam Group Pty 651(r). Gaming: Ivydale Nominees Pty Ltd...... 5064 Ltd ...... 5050 651(ar). Youth affairs: Ivydale Nominees Pty 641(au). Assistant Treasurer: Gell Southam Ltd...... 5064 Group Pty Ltd ...... 5050 651(au). Assistant Treasurer: Ivydale Nominees 642(i). Consumer affairs: Government Pty Ltd...... 5064 Relations Australia Advisory Pty Ltd....5050 652(i). Consumer affairs: Jackson Wells Pty 642(r). Gaming: Government Relations Ltd...... 5065 Australia Advisory Pty Ltd ...... 5051 652(r). Gaming: Jackson Wells Pty Ltd...... 5065 642(ar). Youth affairs: Government Relations 652(ar). Youth affairs: Jackson Wells Pty Ltd ...... 5065 Australia Advisory Pty Ltd ...... 5051 652(au). Assistant Treasurer: Jackson Wells Pty 642(au). Assistant Treasurer: Government Ltd...... 5066 Relations Australia Advisory Pty Ltd....5051 653(i). Consumer affairs: Jeni Coutts and 643(i). Consumer affairs: Government Associates Pty Ltd ...... 5066 Relations Solutions Pty Ltd ...... 5052 653(r). Gaming: Jeni Coutts and Associates 643(r). Gaming: Government Relations Pty Ltd...... 5067 Solutions Pty Ltd...... 5052 653(ar). Youth affairs: Jeni Coutts and 643(ar). Youth affairs: Government Relations Associates Pty Ltd ...... 5067 Solutions Pty Ltd...... 5052 653(au). Assistant Treasurer: Jeni Coutts and 643(au). Assistant Treasurer: Government Associates Pty Ltd ...... 5067 Relations Solutions Pty Ltd ...... 5053 654(i). Consumer affairs: John Connolly and 644(i). Consumer affairs: Hawker Britton...... 5053 Partners Pty Limited ...... 5068 644(r). Gaming: Hawker Britton...... 5054 654(r). Gaming: John Connolly and Partners 644(ar). Youth affairs: Hawker Britton...... 5054 Pty Ltd...... 5068
CONTENTS
654(ar). Youth affairs: John Connolly and 664(au). Assistant Treasurer: Marshall Place Partners Pty Ltd...... 5068 Associates Pty Ltd ...... 5083 654(au). Assistant Treasurer: John Connolly 665(i). Consumer affairs: Martin Jones ...... 5084 and Partners Pty Ltd ...... 5069 665(r). Gaming: Martin Jones ...... 5084 655(i). Consumer affairs: John Cook ...... 5069 665(ar). Youth affairs: Martin Jones ...... 5084 655(r). Gaming: John Cook...... 5069 665(au). Assistant Treasurer: Martin Jones...... 5085 655(ar). Youth affairs: John Cook...... 5070 666(i). Consumer affairs: Max Jackson and 655(au). Assistant Treasurer: John Cook...... 5070 Associates ...... 5085 656(i). Consumer affairs: John Martin 666(r). Gaming: Max Jackson and Associates ...... 5085 McQuilten ...... 5071 666(ar). Youth affairs: Max Jackson and 656(r). Gaming: John Martin McQuilten ...... 5071 Associates ...... 5086 656(ar). Youth affairs: John Martin McQuilten...... 5071 666(au). Assistant Treasurer: Max Jackson and 656(au). Assistant Treasurer: John Martin Associates ...... 5086 McQuilten ...... 5072 667(i). Consumer affairs: Media Affairs ...... 5086 657(i). Consumer affairs: Kenneth Gordon 667(r). Gaming: Media Affairs ...... 5087 Betts...... 5072 667(ar). Youth affairs: Media Affairs...... 5087 657(r). Gaming: Kenneth Gordon Betts...... 5072 667(au). Assistant Treasurer: Media Affairs...... 5088 657(ar). Youth affairs: Kenneth Gordon Betts...... 5073 668(i). Consumer affairs: Melbourne Public 657(au). Assistant Treasurer: Kenneth Gordon Relations Group ...... 5088 Betts...... 5073 668(r). Gaming: Melbourne Public Relations 658(i). Consumer affairs: KPMG ...... 5073 Group...... 5088 658(r). Gaming: KPMG ...... 5074 668(ar). Youth affairs: Melbourne Public 658(ar). Youth affairs: KPMG...... 5074 Relations Group ...... 5089 658(au). Assistant Treasurer: KPMG...... 5075 668(au). Assistant Treasurer: Melbourne Public 659(i). Consumer affairs: Kreab Gavin Relations Group ...... 5089 Anderson (Australia) Ltd...... 5075 669(i). Consumer affairs: Michael Kelly...... 5089 659(r). Gaming: Kreab Gavin Anderson 669(r). Gaming: Michael Kelly...... 5090 (Australia) Ltd ...... 5075 669(ar). Youth affairs: Michael Kelly...... 5090 659(ar). Youth affairs: Kreab Gavin Anderson 669(au). Assistant Treasurer: Michael Kelly ...... 5090 (Australia) Ltd ...... 5076 670(i). Consumer affairs: MPR ...... 5091 659(au). Assistant Treasurer: Kreab Gavin 670(r). Gaming: MPR ...... 5091 Anderson (Australia) Ltd...... 5076 670(ar). Youth affairs: MPR...... 5091 660(i). Consumer affairs: LESL Services Pty 670(au). Assistant Treasurer: MPR...... 5092 Ltd ...... 5076 671(i). Consumer affairs: Next Generation 660(r). Gaming: LESL Services Pty Ltd...... 5077 Thinking...... 5092 660(ar). Youth affairs: LESL Services Pty Ltd...... 5077 671(r). Gaming: Next Generation Thinking ...... 5093 660(au). Assistant Treasurer: LESL Services Pty 671(ar). Youth affairs: Next Generation Ltd ...... 5077 Thinking...... 5093 661(i). Consumer affairs: LK Creative...... 5078 671(au). Assistant Treasurer: Next Generation 661(r). Gaming: LK Creative ...... 5078 Thinking...... 5093 661(ar). Youth affairs: LK Creative ...... 5078 672(i). Consumer affairs: Numbat Consulting...... 5094 661(au). Assistant Treasurer: LK Creative ...... 5079 672(r). Gaming: Numbat Consulting...... 5094 662(i). Consumer affairs: Manallack Pty Ltd...... 5079 672(ar). Youth affairs: Numbat Consulting ...... 5094 662(r). Gaming: Manallack Pty Ltd...... 5080 672(au). Assistant Treasurer: Numbat 662(ar). Youth affairs: Manallack Pty Ltd...... 5080 Consulting ...... 5095 662(au). Assistant Treasurer: Manallack Pty Ltd ....5080 673(i). Consumer affairs: Paris Walter Pty Ltd.... 5095 663(i). Consumer affairs: Markstone Group 673(r). Gaming: Paris Walter Pty Ltd ...... 5095 Pty Ltd...... 5081 673(ar). Youth affairs: Paris Walter Pty Ltd ...... 5096 663(r). Gaming: Markstone Group Pty Ltd ...... 5081 673(au). Assistant Treasurer: Paris Walter Pty 663(ar). Youth affairs: Markstone Group Pty Ltd...... 5096 Ltd ...... 5081 674(i). Consumer affairs: Parker and Partners 663(au). Assistant Treasurer: Markstone Group Pty Ltd ...... 5097 Pty Ltd...... 5082 674(r). Gaming: Parker and Partners Pty Ltd ...... 5097 664(i). Consumer affairs: Marshall Place 674(ar). Youth affairs: Parker and Partners Pty Associates Pty Ltd...... 5082 Ltd...... 5097 664(r). Gaming: Marshall Place Associates 674(au). Assistant Treasurer: Parker and Pty Ltd...... 5082 Partners Pty Ltd ...... 5098 664(ar). Youth affairs: Marshall Place 675(i). Consumer affairs: Pesel and Carr...... 5098 Associates Pty Ltd...... 5083 675(r). Gaming: Pesel and Carr...... 5098 675(ar). Youth affairs: Pesel and Carr ...... 5099
CONTENTS
675(au). Assistant Treasurer: Pesel and Carr...... 5099 684(ar). Youth affairs: Relate Technical 676(i). Consumer affairs: Phoenix Public Communications Pty Ltd...... 5112 Affairs...... 5099 684(au). Assistant Treasurer: Relate Technical 676(r). Gaming: Phoenix Public Affairs ...... 5100 Communications Pty Ltd...... 5112 676(ar). Youth affairs: Phoenix Public Affairs ...... 5100 685(i). Consumer affairs: Reputation Pty Ltd ...... 5112 676(au). Assistant Treasurer: Phoenix Public 685(r). Gaming: Reputation Pty Ltd ...... 5113 Affairs...... 5101 685(ar). Youth affairs: Reputation Pty Ltd ...... 5113 677(i). Consumer affairs: Place Consultancy ...... 5101 685(au). Assistant Treasurer: Reputation Pty 677(r). Gaming: Place Consultancy...... 5101 Ltd...... 5114 677(ar). Youth affairs: Place Consultancy...... 5102 686(i). Consumer affairs: Res Publica ...... 5114 677(au). Assistant Treasurer: Place Consultancy....5102 686(r). Gaming: Res Publica ...... 5114 678(i). Consumer affairs: Porter Novelli...... 5102 686(ar). Youth affairs: Res Publica...... 5115 678(r). Gaming: Porter Novelli...... 5103 686(au). Assistant Treasurer: Res Publica...... 5115 678(ar). Youth affairs: Porter Novelli ...... 5103 687(i). Consumer affairs: Richardson Coutts 678(au). Assistant Treasurer: Porter Novelli ...... 5103 Pty Ltd...... 5115 679(i). Consumer affairs: Primary 687(r). Gaming: Richardson Coutts Pty Ltd...... 5116 Communication Pty Ltd...... 5104 687(ar). Youth affairs: Richardson Coutts Pty 679(r). Gaming: Primary Communication Pty Ltd...... 5116 Ltd ...... 5104 687(au). Assistant Treasurer: Richardson Coutts 679(ar). Youth affairs: Primary Communication Pty Ltd...... 5116 Pty Ltd...... 5104 688(i). Consumer affairs: Royce (Vic) Pty Ltd...... 5117 679(au). Assistant Treasurer: Primary 688(r). Gaming: Royce (Vic) Pty Ltd...... 5117 Communication Pty Ltd...... 5105 688(ar). Youth affairs: Royce (Vic) Pty Ltd ...... 5117 680(i). Consumer affairs: Profile Management 688(au). Assistant Treasurer: Royce (Vic) Pty Consultants Pty Ltd ...... 5105 Ltd...... 5118 680(r). Gaming: Profile Management 689(i). Consumer affairs: SAS Group ...... 5118 Consultants Pty Ltd ...... 5106 689(r). Gaming: SAS Group...... 5119 680(ar). Youth affairs: Profile Management 689(ar). Youth affairs: SAS Group...... 5119 Consultants Pty Ltd ...... 5106 689(au). Assistant Treasurer: SAS Group...... 5119 680(au). Assistant Treasurer: Profile 690(i). Consumer affairs: Shac Pty Ltd...... 5120 Management Consultants Pty Ltd...... 5106 690(r). Gaming: Shac Pty Ltd ...... 5120 681(i). Consumer affairs: Public Affairs 690(ar). Youth affairs: Shac Pty Ltd ...... 5120 Network Pty Ltd...... 5107 690(au). Assistant Treasurer: Shac Pty Ltd ...... 5121 681(r). Gaming: Public Affairs Network Pty 691(i). Consumer affairs: Shelly Freeman Ltd ...... 5107 Consultant...... 5121 681(ar). Youth affairs: Public Affairs Network 691(r). Gaming: Shelly Freeman Consultant ...... 5121 Pty Ltd...... 5107 691(ar). Youth affairs: Shelly Freeman 681(au). Assistant Treasurer: Public Affairs Consultant...... 5122 Network Pty Ltd...... 5108 691(au). Assistant Treasurer: Shelly Freeman 682(i). Consumer affairs: Public Relations Consultant...... 5122 Exchange Pty Ltd...... 5108 692(i). Consumer affairs: Socom Pty Ltd...... 5123 682(r). Gaming: Public Relations Exchange 692(r). Gaming: Socom Pty Ltd ...... 5123 Pty Ltd...... 5108 692(ar). Youth affairs: Socom Pty Ltd ...... 5123 682(ar). Youth affairs: Public Relations 692(au). Assistant Treasurer: Socom Pty Ltd ...... 5124 Exchange Pty Ltd...... 5109 693(i). Consumer affairs: Statecraft Pty Ltd ...... 5124 682(au). Assistant Treasurer: Public Relations 693(r). Gaming: Statecraft Pty Ltd ...... 5124 Exchange Pty Ltd...... 5109 693(ar). Youth affairs: Statecraft Pty Ltd...... 5125 683(i). Consumer affairs: RedStick Strategic 693(au). Assistant Treasurer: Statecraft Pty Ltd...... 5125 Communications...... 5110 694(i). Consumer affairs: Strategic Advice 683(r). Gaming: RedStick Strategic Australia Pty Ltd ...... 5125 Communications...... 5110 694(r). Gaming: Strategic Advice Australia Pty 683(ar). Youth affairs: RedStick Strategic Ltd...... 5126 Communications...... 5110 694(ar). Youth affairs: Strategic Advice 683(au). Assistant Treasurer: RedStick Strategic Australia Pty Ltd ...... 5126 Communications...... 5111 694(au). Assistant Treasurer: Strategic Advice 684(i). Consumer affairs: Relate Technical Australia Pty Ltd ...... 5127 Communications Pty Ltd ...... 5111 695(i). Consumer affairs: Strategic 684(r). Gaming: Relate Technical Partnership Group ...... 5127 Communications Pty Ltd ...... 5111 695(r). Gaming: Strategic Partnership Group ...... 5127
CONTENTS
695(ar). Youth affairs: Strategic Partnership 619(v). Local government: Clean Economy Group...... 5128 Services...... 5142 695(au). Assistant Treasurer: Strategic 620(v). Local government: Clifton Consulting Partnership Group ...... 5128 Services Pty Ltd...... 5142 696(i). Consumer affairs: The Agenda Group 621(v). Local government: Corporate Words Pty Ltd...... 5128 Australia Pty Ltd ...... 5143 696(r). Gaming: The Agenda Group Pty Ltd...... 5129 622(v). Local government: Cosway Australia ...... 5143 696(ar). Youth affairs: The Agenda Group Pty 623(v). Local government: Cox Inall Ltd ...... 5129 Communications...... 5144 696(au). Assistant Treasurer: The Agenda 624(v). Local government: CPI Strategic ...... 5144 Group Pty Ltd ...... 5129 625(v). Local government: CPR 697(i). Consumer affairs: The Civic Group Pty Communications and Public Ltd ...... 5130 Relations Pty Ltd ...... 5144 697(r). Gaming: The Civic Group Pty Ltd...... 5130 626(v). Local government: CSR Ltd...... 5145 697(ar). Youth affairs: The Civic Group Pty Ltd .....5130 627(v). Local government: Dan Cass and 697(au). Assistant Treasurer: The Civic Group Company...... 5145 Pty Ltd...... 5131 628(v). Local government: Daskay Pty Ltd ...... 5145 698(i). Consumer affairs: The Strategic 629(v). Local government: Daymark Public Counsel ...... 5131 Relations Pty Ltd ...... 5146 698(r). Gaming: The Strategic Counsel...... 5132 630(v). Local government: Diplomacy Pty Ltd...... 5146 698(ar). Youth affairs: The Strategic Counsel ...... 5132 631(v). Local government: EC Strategies Pty 698(au). Assistant Treasurer: The Strategic Ltd...... 5147 Counsel ...... 5132 632(v). Local government: Edunity...... 5147 699(i). Consumer affairs: The Trustee for the 633(v). Local government: Embark Worldwide S. and L. Santoro Family Trust ...... 5133 Consulting ...... 5147 699(r). Gaming: The Trustee for the S. and L. 634(v). Local government: Endeavour Santoro Family Trust...... 5133 Consulting Group Pty Ltd...... 5148 699(ar). Youth affairs: The Trustee for the S. 635(v). Local government: Enhance Corporate and L. Santoro Family Trust ...... 5133 Pty Ltd ...... 5148 699(au). Assistant Treasurer: The Trustee for 636(v). Local government: Essential Media the S. and L. Santoro Family Trust ...... 5134 Communications...... 5148 700(i). Consumer affairs: Wilkinson Group...... 5134 637(v). Local government: FIPRA Australia 700(r). Gaming: Wilkinson Group ...... 5134 Pty Ltd ...... 5149 700(ar). Youth affairs: Wilkinson Group ...... 5135 638(v). Local government: G &A Commerical 700(au). Assistant Treasurer: Wilkinson Group ...... 5135 Services Pty Ltd...... 5149 639(v). Local government: G. F. Richardson ...... 5150 640(v). Local government: Galbraith and WEDNESDAY, 26 OCTOBER 2011 Company Pty Ltd...... 5150 641(v). Local government: Gell Southam 479(v). Local government: Affairs of State...... 5137 Group Pty Ltd...... 5150 606(v). Local government: Allygroup...... 5137 642(v). Local government: Government 607(v). Local government: AusAccess Unit Relations Australia Advisory Pty Ltd.... 5151 Trust...... 5138 643(v). Local government: Government 608(v). Local government: Australian Public Relations Solutions Pty Ltd...... 5151 Affairs Partnership Ltd...... 5138 644(v). Local government: Hawker Britton...... 5151 609(v). Local government: Baber Roger Peters ....5138 645(v). Local government: Hill and Knowlton ...... 5152 610(v). Local government: Barton Deakin...... 5139 646(v). Local government: HTT Trust ...... 5152 611(v). Local government: Berkeley 647(v). Local government: Hugo Halliday Pty Consultants Pty Ltd ...... 5139 Ltd...... 5153 612(v). Local government: Bluegrass 648(v). Local government: InsideOut Strategic..... 5153 Consulting...... 5139 649(v). Local government: InterCapital Group 613(v). Local government: Burson-Marsteller...... 5140 Pty Ltd ...... 5153 614(v). Local government: 650(v). Local government: Intermediary CamCom-Campaign Consulting Pty Ltd...... 5154 Communications...... 5140 651(v). Local government: Ivydale Nominees 615(v). Local government: Cameron Milner ...... 5141 Pty Ltd ...... 5154 616(v). Local government: Cannings 652(v). Local government: Jackson Wells Pty Corporate Communications...... 5141 Ltd...... 5154 617(v). Local government: Carney Associates...... 5141 653(v). Local government: Jeni Coutts and 618(v). Local government: Chris Schacht...... 5142 Associates Pty Ltd ...... 5155
CONTENTS
654(v). Local government: John Connolly and 693(v). Local government: Statecraft Pty Ltd ...... 5170 Partners Pty Ltd...... 5155 694(v). Local government: Strategic Advice 655(v). Local government: John Cook ...... 5156 Australia Pty Ltd ...... 5170 656(v). Local government: John Martin 695(v). Local government: Strategic McQuilten ...... 5156 Partnership Group ...... 5171 657(v). Local government: Kenneth Gordon 696(v). Local government: The Agenda Group Betts...... 5156 Pty Ltd...... 5171 658(v). Local government: KPMG ...... 5157 697(v). Local government: The Civic Group 659(v). Local government: Kreab Gavin Pty Ltd...... 5171 Anderson (Australia) Ltd...... 5157 698(v). Local government: The Strategic 660(v). Local government: LESL Services Pty Counsel...... 5172 Ltd ...... 5157 699(v). Local government: The Trustee for the 661(v). Local government: LK Creative...... 5158 S and L Santoro Family Trust...... 5172 662(v). Local government: Manallack Pty Ltd...... 5158 700(v). Local government: Wilkinson Group...... 5172 663(v). Local government: Markstone Group Pty Ltd...... 5159 664(v). Local government: Marshall Place MEMBERS INDEX ...... i Associates Pty Ltd...... 5159 665(v). Local government: Martin Jones ...... 5159 666(v). Local government: Max Jackson and Associates...... 5160 667(v). Local government: Media Affairs ...... 5160 668(v). Local government: Melbourne Public Relations Group...... 5160 669(v). Local government: Michael Kelly...... 5161 670(v). Local government: MPR ...... 5161 671(v). Local government: Next Generation Thinking ...... 5162 672(v). Local government: Numbat Consulting .....5162 673(v). Local government: Paris Walter Pty Ltd ...... 5162 674(v). Local government: Parker and Partners Pty Ltd...... 5163 675(v). Local government: Pesel and Carr...... 5163 676(v). Local government: Phoenix Public Affairs...... 5163 677(v). Local government: Place Consultancy ...... 5164 678(v). Local government: Porter Novelli...... 5164 679(v). Local government: Primary Communication Pty Ltd...... 5165 680(v). Local government: Profile Management Consultants Pty Ltd...... 5165 681(v). Local government: Public Affairs Network Pty Ltd...... 5165 682(v). Local government: Public Relations Exchange Pty Ltd...... 5166 683(v). Local government: RedStick Strategic Communications...... 5166 684(v). Local government: Relate Technical Communications Pty Ltd ...... 5166 685(v). Local government: Reputation Pty Ltd ...... 5167 686(v). Local government: Res Publica ...... 5167 687(v). Local government: Richardson Coutts Pty Ltd...... 5168 688(v). Local government: Royce (Vic) Pty Ltd.....5168 689(v). Local government: SAS Group...... 5168 690(v). Local government: Shac Pty Ltd ...... 5169 691(v). Local government: Shelly Freeman Consultant...... 5169 692(v). Local government: Socom Pty Ltd ...... 5169
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4775
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 Further, the government will shortly introduce legislation to the Parliament seeking in particular to The SPEAKER (Hon. Ken Smith) took the chair at increase penalties. This will implement the coalition 2.04 p.m. and read the prayer. government’s election commitment to increase penalties for and to close down illegal and cruel puppy farms. The bill will increase penalties and powers for ABSENCE OF MINISTER courts and introduce measures for council-authorised officers and RSPCA officers to manage illegal, The SPEAKER — Order! Before I call for substandard or cruel dog breeding enterprises. There questions, I inform the house that the Minister for will be penalties of up to $20 000 for conducting an Education will be absent from question time today unregistered breeding establishment and penalties of up owing to a family bereavement. The Minister for to $30 000 for conducting a cruel breeding Community Services will take questions on behalf of establishment that does not comply with the code of the minister. practice for the operation of breeding and rearing establishments. The bill will include new powers for the QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE seizure and disposal of dogs through animal shelters and foster care networks to improve the opportunity for Public sector: government wages policy these dogs to be successfully re-homed with caring families. Mr ANDREWS (Leader of the Opposition) — My question is directed to the Treasurer. I ask: can the These are tough new provisions, but we believe they Treasurer confirm that the government’s wages policy will ensure an improved standard of welfare for puppies remains 2.5 per cent per annum plus bankable and breeding dogs. The Minister for Agriculture and productivity? Food Security will shortly commence a review of the code of practice with a view to addressing preventive Mr WELLS (Treasurer) — I thank the Leader of measures and to ensuring that animal welfare the Opposition for his question. The government’s requirements for breeding establishments accord with policy is clearly 2.5 per cent plus productivity savings contemporary expectations. The bill will create an and offsets. We have that policy in place, and it is a Animal Welfare Fund, which will provide grants to policy we are sticking to. animal welfare organisations. The government is delivering on an election commitment, and we intend to Puppy farms: regulation ensure that anybody who is operating an illegal and inappropriate breeding establishment will face the full Ms MILLER (Bentleigh) — My question is to the weight of the law. Premier. Can the Premier inform the house of action the government is taking to outlaw illegal puppy farms in I had the opportunity of attending the Lost Dogs Home this state? with Dr Graeme Smith on Sunday, and these measures were widely and warmly welcomed. These measures Mr BAILLIEU (Premier) — I thank the member will increase penalties, there will be tougher for her question and her interest in this subject. I am enforcement and the preventive measures that will sure members would be aware that illegal and accompany the revised code will ensure that this inappropriate puppy breeding has been an intractable practice, which has been distasteful to so many people problem and one that has been very difficult to deal for so long, will be a thing of the past. We look forward with. A code of practice was introduced in 2004, and to these measures being supported by the house. that was intended to deal with this issue. I recognise that efforts were made. Nevertheless the problems of Police: enterprise bargaining overcrowding, cage confinement, sanitation, starvation, dehydration, perpetual pregnancy and totally Mr ANDREWS (Leader of the Opposition) — inappropriate breeding behaviour have continued. We Again my question is directed to the Treasurer. I thank indicated in opposition that we would introduce new him for his answer a moment ago. I refer the Treasurer powers and new penalties and take further preventive to the government’s offer to the Police Association, and measures. That is what we have done. We introduced I ask: what is the recurrent dollar cost to the state’s new regulations to provide additional authority and budget of that offer? How much does the deal cost? powers for RSPCA (Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals ) inspectors. Mr WELLS (Treasurer) — I thank the Leader of the Opposition for his question. There are still a number
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
4776 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011 of processes to go through. We have put an offer on the Bushfires: royal commission recommendations table for TPA (the Police Association) and TPA will put that to a vote of its members. Once it decides, it will Mr McCURDY (Murray Valley) — My question is come back to the government — — to the Deputy Premier and Minister for Bushfire Response. Can the minister update the house on action Mr Andrews — On a point of order, Speaker, the the coalition government is taking to deliver on its question related to the commitment of taxpayers commitment to implement all of the dollars. I know the government does not want to detail 67 recommendations of the bushfires royal the terms of the offer, but there is no prohibition at all commission? on the Treasurer answering the question and letting Victorians know how much this deal costs. Mr RYAN (Minister for Bushfire Response) — I thank the member for his very appropriate question. As The SPEAKER — Order! There is no point of the house knows, the government has committed to the order. The Treasurer was answering the question that implementation of all 67 recommendations of the was asked. bushfires royal commission. This week I have announced the details in relation to our implementation Mr WELLS — As I was saying, there are a couple of recommendation 46 of the commission’s work. In of steps that need to be taken. Firstly, we have an offer essence what this will do is provide a scheme whereby on the table for the Police Association to consider. people who are eligible for the arrangements which we What it will then do is either accept or reject that offer. are putting in place will be able to sell to the government their land under a variety of criteria that I Honourable members interjecting. have outlined to those folk. The SPEAKER — Order! The Leader of the Eligibility for the scheme will be based around those Opposition asked his question. I ask him to be silent owners whose principal place of residence was and listen to the answer. destroyed in the bushfires — in the Gippsland fires and Mr WELLS — Once the Police Association has on Black Saturday 2009. It will be applicable to those made the determination of whether it accepts that deal who are the owners of those properties but who have or not, then it will come back to the government. Once not commenced rebuilding on their land. I make that we have an arrangement — — point because one of the issues that has already arisen is that some of the people who are able to access this Honourable members interjecting. scheme have actually moved away from wherever their location may have been on the day that that terrible The SPEAKER — Order! The member for disaster occurred, and I have been asked whether those Lyndhurst is on a warning. people, having started to rebuild on another parcel of land, are qualified to access this scheme. The answer Mr Andrews — On a point of order, Speaker, the clearly is yes, they certainly can. question related to the cost of this deal to Victorian taxpayers. The Treasurer seems to be refusing to Furthermore, those people who will qualify will be provide any information that is even vaguely relevant. those where there is no site available on the property How much taxpayers money does this deal cost? How that would enable a replacement dwelling to be located much, and where is the money coming from? It is a at a distance greater than 100 metres from a forested very simple question. area. In adopting these eligibility criteria the government has had careful regard to the advice from The SPEAKER — Order! The answer was relevant the commission contained within the report; it has had to the question that was asked. regard to the evidence which was called before the commission; it has had regard to the commentary by Mr WELLS — As I was saying, there is a process. the commission in the course of its findings; and of If, for example, TPA accepts the offer that has been put course it has had careful regard to the recommendation forward by the government, then at that point we will itself. The government has focused, as I say, on those be able to be in a position to release the details of the properties where there were dwellings that were agreement that has been offered to the police. damaged or destroyed by the bushfires in 2009. Honourable members interjecting. I want to highlight to the house that this is an entirely The SPEAKER — Order! The member for voluntary scheme. There is no obligation upon any Lyndhurst is on his second warning. landowner within the eligibility to actually have to sell
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4777 his or her or their property as a result of this scheme. It government’s election commitment of 1700 extra is entirely voluntary, and I make that point because I police plus the 940 protective services officers is that it know that in communities that have been devastated by is about making Victoria safe again after 11 years of the fires there is a sense, a belief in some people’s neglect by the former government. What is important to minds, that there is some sort of compulsory acquisition us is to make sure that we have a flexible workforce on the part of the government. Nothing could be further with Victoria Police. Reforms to rostering is one of from the fact. those areas.
This scheme is structured on the basis of being entirely Other areas include extending operational, tactical and voluntary for those who wish to access it. There will be safety training, more balanced provisions for part-time information sessions which will be conducted in the workers; and a more efficient arrangement when it coming weeks over a dozen locations in the comes to allowances and processes for unexplained fire-affected areas where people who are prospectively absences. We believe we will now have a more flexible able to access the scheme will be able to come along workforce, we will have a more efficient police force. and find out the finer detail and have input in relation to We believe the offer that has been put to TPA is fair: it. we believe it is a fair offer for police and is also good value for the Victorian taxpayer. I can also announce that a bushfire land acquisition panel is being established to oversee the operation of Mr Andrews — On a point of order, Speaker, I the scheme. It will be chaired by Pat McNamara, who is make the point that I asked the Treasurer very clearly known to everybody in the house and has broad for a dollar value and for the nature of the productivity. experience around these issues. Patrick chaired the He has refused to answer yet again. Victorian Bushfire Appeal Fund and did a magnificent job in that role. He will bring his skill and experience to The SPEAKER — Order! The Treasurer has this. We have allocated initially $50 million to this completed his answer. program. If people are eligible for the program and want to access it and more money is needed, we will Environment: Communities for Nature grants have regard to that at the appropriate time. The Labor Mr KATOS (South Barwon) — My question is to government could never do this; it turned its back on the Minister for Environment and Climate Change. these people. We are doing it as part of our role. Will the minister inform the house of how the Victorian Police: enterprise bargaining government is supporting local community groups across Victoria to undertake practical and effective Mr ANDREWS (Leader of the Opposition) — My works to protect and enhance the local environment? question is to the Treasurer. I ask the Treasurer to detail the bankable productivity and offsets central to the offer Honourable members interjecting. made to the Police Association (TPA) — I stress the The SPEAKER — Order! If I hear any further ‘offer’ made by the government. What is the nature of mooing from the members of the opposition I will be those bankable productivities and offsets, and what is herding a few people out the door. the dollar cost of those productivities and offsets? Mr R. SMITH (Minister for Environment and Mr WELLS (Treasurer) — I thank the Leader of Climate Change) — I thank the member for South the Opposition for his question. This police deal is Barwon for his question, and I note his ongoing passion strictly in line — — for maintaining the environmental health and diversity Mr Andrews interjected. of the Geelong region.
Mr WELLS — The police offer is consistent with I am immensely proud to inform the house that the the government’s wages policy — — coalition government is delivering on yet another commitment to provide significant support to Victorian Mr Andrews interjected. communities to undertake important environmental action. Earlier this month I was out with the member The SPEAKER — Order! The Leader of the for Forest Hill and members of one of his local Opposition is on a warning. environment groups at Bellbird Dell, a wonderful public open space in the Forest Hill electorate. It is very Mr WELLS — It is 2.5 per cent plus productivity well used and is a valuable asset to the area. I have to trade-off. What is very important with the say that even though it was a very wet day there were
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
4778 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011 still a number of people out there enjoying the public I encourage all community groups and all land open space. We met with the volunteer group out there, managers to get out and to continue the great work they and the space is a credit to the work it does to ensure are doing with the support of the Victorian that particular area is preserved for generations to come. government’s $20 million community grants program. I encourage them all to apply for those grants and again It gave me great pleasure to launch yet another coalition congratulate them for the work that they do. government commitment with the member for Forest Hill, the $20 million Communities for Nature grant Police: enterprise bargaining program. This program will provide grants of between $10 000 and $150 000 to community groups right Mr ANDREWS (Leader of the Opposition) — My across the state to help them achieve significant question is to the Treasurer. I refer the Treasurer to environmental outcomes in their local areas. These page 56 of budget paper 3, which details the grants will support local communities to protect and $602 million for 1700 additional police, and I ask: can enhance their local environments through activities the wage rise offered by the government to the Police such as biodiversity and habitat preservation, Association be funded and covered by that revegetation, cleaning up the waterways and indeed a $602 million? host of other environmental work. Mr WELLS (Treasurer) — I thank the opposition This program delivers on the coalition government’s leader for his question. It is a pity he is reading the election commitment to provide practical assistance to wrong part of the budget, because if he had gone to help local communities make a positive difference in budget paper 2, on page 26, he would see it has the improving, protecting and conserving the environment. expenses for employees set out for 2010–11, 2011–12, This grants program is specifically targeted to a range 2012–13, 2013–14 and 2014–15. But it goes further. of community groups — not just conservation and Let me read this part to you. environment groups but to schools and sporting clubs, and any groups that want to improve the environment Honourable members interjecting. in which they operate. These grants recognise and Mr WELLS — And I think the member for support the many volunteers across Victoria who value Lyndhurst is trying to shaft you, so let me point this out. their environment, and I acknowledge the many hours On page 28 it states: these volunteers put in to work on the environment within their communities for the benefit of all Employee expenses (including superannuation), which Victorians. account for around 41 per cent of operating expenditure, are projected to grow from $19.2 billion in 2011–12 to This $20 million Communities for Nature grants $21.7 billion in 2014–15 or by 4.1 per cent on average a year. program will support practical community action in the The year on year growth primarily reflects the wages costs associated with growth in services required for a growing environment to create visible and lasting improvements. community, including the delivery of additional police, It will foster greater enjoyment of the natural protective services officers and child protection staff, as environment and will encourage participation of these well — — community groups right across the state. The program Mr Andrews — On a point of order, Speaker, the is all about supporting the work of people in both urban question related to the government’s offer and whether and rural communities who freely give up their time to the government’s offer can be paid for, given the care for Victoria’s land, water and biodiversity. It is a allocations under its wages policy of 2.5 per cent, not real pleasure to travel around this state to meet with and 4.7, and that is the matter that the Treasurer should talk to these people, to hear their stories and to see what account for to this house and to all Victorians. they have achieved. Recently I was in the east of the state with the member for Gippsland East to have a The SPEAKER — Order! I do not uphold the point look at some of the great work that has been done in of order. transforming some of that landscape into a beautiful and diverse wetland. Mr WELLS — Let me make it clear: the last sentence on page 28 of budget paper 2 says, and let me This is a great program that joins the other programs read it: this government has released: the $600 000 to Landcare and the $12 million to support Landcare facilitators. The year on year growth primarily reflects the wages costs Indeed with this program this government is supporting associated with growth in services required for a growing the practical outcomes that we will get from supporting community, including the delivery of additional police, protective services officers and child protection staff, as well these volunteer groups out in their communities.
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4779
as anticipated increases in the cost of wages in line with the would have had to find would have put the price of government’s wages policy. water up for irrigators, depending on where they were Mr Andrews — On a point of order, Speaker, I am in the Goulburn-Murray water footprint, by anywhere not sure if I misheard the Treasurer, there was some between 25 per cent and 45 per cent, which the noise in the chamber, but the Treasurer seemed to irrigators would not have been able to afford. suggest that this outcome — quoting from that The third component of this particular deal that has document, budget paper 2 — was in line with the been signed with the commonwealth is another government’s wages policy, which the Treasurer just $43.7 million for on-farm irrigation efficiency confirmed is 2.5 per cent, not 4.7 per cent. You are a programs. There were more bids than there was money joke! in the last round of commonwealth funding for the The SPEAKER — Order! I do not uphold the point irrigation efficiency program, so this money will of order. hopefully fulfil all the unmet demand for the water irrigation efficiency project. In total this will deliver Mr WELLS — I will repeat the very last section of 216 gigalitres of water to the commonwealth. the last sentence: ‘as well as anticipated increases in the cost of wages in line with the government’s wages The other part of the agreement is in regard to the 4 per policy’. cent cap on irrigation trades out of the Goulburn-Murray irrigation district. There was Water: trading agreement approximately 88 gigalitres of water that the irrigators were offering to the commonwealth that was held up in Dr SYKES (Benalla) — My question is to the that cap. We are going to allow that water trade to go Minister for Water. Can the minister inform the house through. In my discussions with the irrigators and with of the irrigation upgrade deal signed with the Goulburn-Murray Water, they said they believed it was commonwealth last week and the benefits this logical for those trades to go through because to go and agreement will have for the Goulburn-Murray irrigation modernise the system and then have that water traded district? away over the next two to three years meant that we may have ended up with even more stranded assets than Mr WALSH (Minister for Water) — I thank the we are likely to have in the future, so that has generally member for Benalla for his question. After many been welcomed by most people in northern Victoria. months of negotiation with the commonwealth, the Baillieu government has finalised the long-awaited What we have here is a very enhanced deal — agreement on stage 2 of the NVIRP (Northern Victoria something that has been on the table effectively since Irrigation Renewal Project). It has been a very long and 2008. This has been announced a number of times, but drawn out negotiation. I put on the record my thanks to finally we have ink on paper. One of the things that I members of the Department of Sustainability and was very firm about was that I did not want just another Environment staff who have been part of this political announcement; I actually wanted to have ink negotiation; it has been a very complex one. on paper so that people had some surety. Following the signing of the heads of agreement by the Premier and I can inform the house that what was originally on the the Prime Minister, I met in Tatura last Tuesday table has now been enhanced significantly. NVIRP 2 is morning with Tony Burke, the commonwealth Minister now made up of three components. The first component for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and is $953 million from the commonwealth for what was Communities, and we both signed the funding the original funding of NVIRP 2. schedule. There is now certainty for the irrigators in northern Victoria, and there is certainty for the The second component is an additional $219 million in communities that rely on the irrigation industry for their return for the 102 gigalitres in savings that was going to prosperity in northern Victoria. go to the irrigators and which will now be sold to the commonwealth. That money will now go to I would just like to put on the record a quote from the Goulburn-Murray Water to make up for the Country News of 24 October. It states: $100 million contribution the irrigators were going to have to make to food bowl 1 and the $100 million Foodbowl Unlimited chairman Dudley Bryant has contribution the irrigators were going to have to make congratulated Victorian water minister Peter Walsh and said he was delighted Mr Walsh had worked diligently to finally to food bowl 2, something the previous government achieve what had been announced twice before — never accounted for in what it was proposing at that particular time. The contribution that the irrigators and never signed.
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
4780 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Police: enterprise bargaining giving the opening address to the centenary conference of the Royal Victorian Association of Honorary Mr MERLINO (Monbulk) — My question is to the Justices. Since 1910 that association has played an Premier. Is it not a fact that the timing and quantum of important role in delivering justice services here in the offer to the Police Association was less about good Victoria. It provides support and training, and faith bargaining than it was about keeping secret the opportunities, for Victoria’s honorary justices. There recording of his offer to the Police Association before are approximately 4800 justices of the peace in Victoria the election? and 500 bail justices. The Royal Victorian Association of Honorary Justices has branches in many parts of Mr BAILLIEU (Premier) — Can I simply say to regional Victoria and metropolitan Melbourne, and it is the member, ‘Come in spinner!’? The people of the largest and oldest group representing the interests of Victoria remember a certain secret deal done before the honorary justices in Victoria. 2006 election — — As many honourable members would be aware, justices Ms Allan — On a point of order, Speaker, I of the peace have a record of service that stretches back appreciate that it is very early in the Premier’s answer, over centuries, since their establishment in England as but it is pretty clear that he is already starting to debate officers of the Crown charged with securing the peace the question, a question that was very clearly about in their respective districts. While the role of honorary arrangements under his leadership and his government. justices has changed over the years, their important They are the questions that we would like answered in service continues as persons of standing in the this house. community who can witness documents and perform other duties requiring an objective and independent The SPEAKER — Order! I do not uphold the point third party. of order. The Premier was very early into the answer he was giving. Since coming to office the coalition government has been determined to restore the standing, community Mr BAILLIEU — The member making the point recognition and independence of honorary justices, of order is clearly a sensitive member, because, as I say, which regrettably was undermined under the previous Victorians remember that deal. That may have been the government. We are putting in place reforms to ensure way it was done in the past — it may have been the that any termination of the appointment of an honorary way it was done under previous ministers in the justice will only occur on the decision of an previous government — but we have undertaken a fair independent and respected decision-maker. This will and good faith process — — include any non-reappointment of a bail justice who Honourable members interjecting. seeks reappointment.
The SPEAKER — Order! The Leader of the We have also made it clear that we will allow justices Opposition will desist. of the peace to retain the title ‘JP’ without being required to be available for active duty when they can Mr BAILLIEU — The answer to the member’s no longer continue to perform their duties because of question is no, because the commitments that I made to their age, ill health or other good reason. We have the Police Association are the same commitments that I rejected the suggestion made under the previous have made in public and indeed the police minister has government that JPs should be appointed only for made in public. limited terms. However, we have also made it clear that we expect that persons who accept appointment as Honorary justices: government support honorary justices should make themselves available for duty on a reasonable basis, because it is unfair to other Mr NEWTON-BROWN (Prahran) — My question hardworking honorary justices if a minority shirk their is to the Attorney-General. Can the Attorney-General responsibilities. advise the house of recent developments in the government’s support for Victoria’s important honorary Under another reform the Honorary Justice Office will justice community? provide training for all prospective JPs prior to appointment, free of charge. The training package for Mr CLARK (Attorney-General) — I thank the bail justices is also being updated. Under the previous honourable member for his question and for his interest government’s legislation bail justices are appointed for in the institutions of justice in Victoria. His question is a limited term of five years and persons aged over 70 very timely, because on Sunday I had the honour of can only be appointed as acting bail justices. I have
JUSTICE LEGISLATION FURTHER AMENDMENT BILL 2011
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4781 instructed the Honorary Justice Office to invite all bail PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS AMENDMENT justices approaching the age of 70 to indicate if they BILL 2011 would be interested in continuing to serve under an acting appointment, and I have made clear that I intend Introduction and first reading to reappoint as an acting bail justice any serving bail justice who is willing to continue to serve unless there Mr CLARK (Attorney-General) — I move: is clear justification for non-reappointment. This means That I have leave to bring in a bill for an act to amend the that active volunteers reaching 70 years of age, whose Public Prosecutions Act 1994 in relation to the public experience and dedication would otherwise be lost to prosecutions service and the Public Administration Act 2004 the community, are able to continue to serve. and for other purposes.
I am also very pleased to inform the house today of the Ms HENNESSY (Altona) — I ask that the appointment of 22 new justices of the peace, whose Attorney-General provide a brief explanation of the bill. appointment was approved by the Governor in Council Mr CLARK (Attorney-General) — This bill makes this morning. Applications for appointment as a JP are a number of reforms to the structure, operations and now being accepted from across Victoria, and I look role relationships at Victoria’s various public forward to making further appointments of persons who prosecution offices. are willing and able to serve the community in performing the important document-witnessing role and Motion agreed to. other duties undertaken by JPs. After years of mismanagement and neglect by the previous Read first time. government, the Victorian coalition government is proud to actively support and acknowledge the fine work of Victoria’s honorary justices. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT AMENDMENT (SCHOOLS) BILL 2011
JUSTICE LEGISLATION FURTHER Introduction and first reading AMENDMENT BILL 2011 Mr CLARK (Attorney-General) — I move: Introduction and first reading That I have leave to bring in a bill for an act to amend the Mr CLARK (Attorney-General) — I move: Planning and Environment Act 1987 and for other purposes.
That I have leave to bring in a bill for an act to amend the Mr WYNNE (Richmond) — Could we get a brief Criminal Procedure Act 2009, the Major Crime (Investigative explanation of the bill? Powers) Act 2004 and the Road Safety Amendment (Hoon Driving and Other Matters) Act 2011 and for other purposes. Mr CLARK (Attorney-General) — The bill amends the legislation in relation to the growth areas Ms HENNESSY (Altona) — I ask the infrastructure contribution and schools. Attorney-General for a brief explanation of the bill. Motion agreed to. Mr CLARK (Attorney-General) — This bill addresses an expiring sunset clause, an issue in relation Read first time. to the commonwealth government and delays in the introduction of its personal property securities regime and also an issue in relation to protective services DOMESTIC ANIMALS AMENDMENT officers. (PUPPY FARM ENFORCEMENT AND OTHER MATTERS) BILL 2011 Motion agreed to. Introduction and first reading Read first time. Mr WALSH (Minister for Agriculture and Food Security) — I move:
That I have leave to bring in a bill for an act to amend the Domestic Animals Act 1994, the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1986 and the Confiscation Act 1997 and for other purposes.
MINES (ALUMINIUM AGREEMENT) AMENDMENT BILL 2011
4782 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Mr ANDREWS (Leader of the Opposition) — I ask Victoria in relation to the Anglesea coalmine, which for a brief explanation of the bill. feeds the power station there, which is a very important part of Victoria’s infrastructure. It provides 1100 jobs in Mr WALSH (Minister for Agriculture and Food the region. This bill will implement the amended Security) — This is with my agriculture and food agreement, which improves environmental outcomes security portfolio. This bill is colloquially known as the and secures 1100 regional jobs in Victoria. puppy farms bill. Motion agreed to. Motion agreed to. Read first time. Read first time.
STATE TAXATION ACTS FURTHER MINES (ALUMINIUM AGREEMENT) AMENDMENT BILL 2011 AMENDMENT BILL 2011 Introduction and first reading Introduction and first reading Mr WELLS (Treasurer) introduced a bill for an act Mr O’BRIEN (Minister for Energy and to amend the Payroll Tax Act 2007, the Duties Act Resources) — I move: 2000, the Land Tax Act 2005, the Taxation Administration Act 1997, the Livestock Disease That I have leave to bring in a bill for an act to amend the Mines (Aluminium Agreement) Act 1961 to provide for Control Act 1994 and the Valuation of Land Act amendments to the agreement in the schedule to that act, to 1960 and for other purposes. repeal the — — Read first time. Honourable members interjecting.
The SPEAKER — Order! I ask the house to remain LIQUOR CONTROL REFORM FURTHER silent while these bills are introduced into the house. AMENDMENT BILL 2011
Mr O’BRIEN — I move: Introduction and first reading That I have leave to bring in a bill for an act to amend the Mines (Aluminium Agreement) Act 1961 to provide for Mr O’BRIEN (Minister for Consumer Affairs) — I amendments to the agreement in the schedule to that act, to move: repeal the Mines (Aluminium Agreement) (Brown Coal Royalties) Act 2005 and for other purposes. That I have leave to bring in a bill for an act to amend the Liquor Control Reform Act 1998 to introduce a demerit Ms D’AMBROSIO (Mill Park) — If it does not points system for licensees and permittees involved in offend the minister, I ask him to provide a brief non-compliance incidents, to introduce a licence for wine and beer producers, to recognise the importance of live music and explanation of the bill. for other purposes. Mr O’BRIEN (Minister for Energy and Ms D’AMBROSIO (Mill Park) — I request that the Resources) — I think only my intelligence has been minister provide a brief explanation of the purposes of insulted by that comment. This is an important the bill. bill — — Mr O’BRIEN (Minister for Consumer Affairs) — Honourable members interjecting. This bill delivers another coalition government election commitment — that is, to crack down on rogue liquor The SPEAKER — Order! I asked for some silence licensees by introducing a demerit points system to while these bills are being introduced. I would like better protect live music, which languished for years some silence. under the former government’s attacks on it, and to Mr Hulls interjected. ensure that we have better regulation with less red tape and lower fees for important vignerons and beer The SPEAKER — Order! The member for Niddrie producers. is on a warning. Motion agreed to. Mr O’BRIEN — This is an important bill. This bill will ratify the agreement between Alcoa and the state of Read first time.
PARKS AND CROWN LAND LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2011
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4783
PARKS AND CROWN LAND BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2011 Notices of motion: removal Introduction and first reading The SPEAKER — Order! Notices of motion 1 Mr R. SMITH (Minister for Environment and to 10 will be removed from the notice paper unless Climate Change) — I move: members wishing notices to remain advise the Clerk in writing before 6.00 p.m. today. That I have leave to bring in a bill for an act to amend the Crown Land (Reserves) Act 1978, the Forests Act 1958, the National Parks Act 1975 and the Water Industry Act 1994 and for other purposes. PETITIONS Ms NEVILLE (Bellarine) — I ask the minister to Following petitions presented to house: provide a brief explanation of the bill. Gisborne Secondary College: funding Mr R. SMITH (Minister for Environment and Climate Change) — This bill will add additional land to To the Legislative Assembly of Victoria: a number of Victoria’s parks, will change the lease The petition of certain citizens of the state of Victoria draws arrangements to accommodate the future of the Arthurs to the attention of the house the need for significant upgrades Seat chairlift, will streamline the administrative of facilities at Gisborne Secondary College. processes around fire prevention and suppression work In particular we note: in parks, will change the status of the Frankston Natural Features Reserve and will change the name of the 1. the previous Labor government approved and funded the St Arnaud Range National Park. previous stages of the school’s redevelopment; 2. the final stage includes much-needed classrooms and Motion agreed to. amenities for the school;
Read first time. 3. Gisborne families deserve the highest quality education facilities and the lack of funding by Mr Baillieu shows he does not understand the needs of the community. SERIOUS SEX OFFENDERS The petitioners therefore request that the Legislative (DETENTION AND SUPERVISION) Assembly urges the Baillieu government to urgently fund the AMENDMENT BILL 2011 final stage of the Gisborne Secondary College.
Introduction and first reading By Ms DUNCAN (Macedon) (127 signatures).
Mr McINTOSH (Minister for Corrections) — I Medical practitioners: physician associates move: To the Legislative Assembly of Victoria: That I have leave to bring in a bill for an act to amend the The petition of certain citizens of Victoria draws to the Serious Sex Offenders (Detention and Supervision) Act 2009, attention of the house that a group of health professionals to make consequential and related amendments to other acts known as physician associates (assistants) who have been and for other purposes. educated to a medical master level (in a medical school), and Ms HENNESSY (Altona) — I ask that the minister work collaboratively with registered medical practitioners (medical doctors) to provide health services to the provide a brief explanation of the bill. community, cannot practice to their full capabilities in the state of Victoria due to lack of supporting legislation. Mr McINTOSH (Minister for Corrections) — The bill will make a number of amendments to the act to The petitioners therefore request that the Legislative improve its workability and to improve public safety. Assembly of Victoria make amendments to the Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act 1981 and its regulations (and any associated legislation) to allow physician Motion agreed to. associates to prescribe medications to patients and to practice to their full capability. Read first time. Further, the petitioners ask that the Assembly request and support the government through COAG to reach agreement with the commonwealth and other states to achieve access of physician associates to national registration, the medical benefits scheme (MBS) and pharmaceutical benefit scheme (PBS) as a matter of urgency.
SCRUTINY OF ACTS AND REGULATIONS COMMITTEE
4784 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
By Ms DUNCAN (Macedon) (324 signatures). Tabled. Planning: green wedge development Ordered that petitions presented by honourable member for Macedon be considered next day on To the Legislative Assembly of Victoria: motion of Ms DUNCAN (Macedon). This petition of certain citizens of the state of Victoria draws to the attention of the Legislative Assembly the current Ordered that petitions presented by honourable review seeking to turn green wedge land into commercial and member for Yan Yean be considered next day on housing developments. motion of Ms GREEN (Yan Yean). The protection, nurturing and enhancement of green wedge land has been supported by both political parties for over Bacchus Marsh: Avenue of Honour 30 years in recognition of the important role that open space plays in improving the mental and physical health of the Mr KATOS (South Barwon) — I move: community and maintaining the livability of Melbourne. They are the lungs of our city. That the petition tabled in my name on 11 October be made an order of the day on the next day of sitting. We are concerned that the current review of the green wedge, which only looks at opportunities for commercial and housing The SPEAKER — Order! I have been advised that development, does not get the balance right because it does an administrative error has brought about the late not consider the impact that bulldozing green wedges will calling of this motion. I am going to agree to it, but I do have on the environment, the mental and physical health of the community and the livability of Melbourne. not want it to become a habit for people to raise such issues months after the event. We are concerned that once gone the green wedges are gone forever and that future generations will regret the destruction Motion agreed to. of the green wedges.
The petitioners therefore request that the Baillieu government stops the current review which only recognises green wedges SCRUTINY OF ACTS AND REGULATIONS as a development opportunity, agrees to strengthen and grow COMMITTEE rather than reduce green wedge space and works with the community to enhance and improve Melbourne’s green Alert Digest No. 12 wedges. Ms CAMPBELL (Pascoe Vale) presented Alert By Ms GREEN (Yan Yean) (379 signatures). Digest No. 12 of 2011 on: Planning: green wedge development Children’s Services Amendment Bill 2011 To the Legislative Assembly of Victoria: Children, Youth and Families Amendment (Security of Youth Justice Facilities) Bill 2011 This petition of certain citizens of the state of Victoria draws to the attention of the Legislative Assembly the Baillieu Gambling Regulation Amendment (Licensing) government’s plan to turn land zoned rural conservation into Bill 2011 commercial and housing developments. Electricity Industry Amendment (Transitional Feed-in Tariff Scheme) Bill 2011 In particular we note: Resources Legislation Amendment Bill 2011 1. green wedge open space plays an important Sex Work and Other Acts Amendment Bill 2011 environmental role as well as maintaining the livability of Melbourne; Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation Bill 2011 2. it appears that this government only recognises this land Water Legislation Amendment (Water as a development opportunity, this despite bipartisan Infrastructure Charges) Bill 2011 support and protection for green wedges in Parliament for over 30 years; together with appendices. 3. no commitment has been made to provide the infrastructure that new commercial and housing Tabled. developments would need, such as roads and schools. Ordered to be printed. The petitioners therefore request that the Baillieu government immediately stop the current planning review and agree to work with the community to enhance and improve Melbourne’s green wedges. By Ms GREEN (Yan Yean) (544 signatures).
DOCUMENTS
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4785
DOCUMENTS Greater Geelong — C190 Kingston — C122 Tabled by Clerk: Macedon Ranges — C69 Part 2 Confiscation Act 1997 — Asset Confiscation Operations Report 2010–11 Melton — C115
Corangamite Catchment Management Authority — Report Murrindindi — C38 2010–11 Nillumbik — C75 Crown Land (Reserves) Act 1978: Pyrenees — C29 Orders under s 17B granting licences over: Port Phillip and Westernport Catchment Management Bells Beach Surfing and Recreation Reserve Authority — Report 2010–11
Kings Domain Reserve and Alexandra Park Subordinate Legislation Act 1994 — Documents under s 15 in relation to Statutory Rule 111 Orders under s 17D granting leases over: Victorian Coastal Council — Report 2010–11 Kardinia Park Reserve West Gippsland Catchment Management Authority — Lynch’s Bridge Historic Precinct Reserve Report 2010–11
Duties Act 2000 — Reports 2010–11 of exemptions and Wimmera Catchment Management Authority — Report refunds under ss 250B and 250DD (two documents) 2010–11. East Gippsland Catchment Management Authority — Report 2010–11 ROYAL ASSENT Environment Protection Authority — Report 2010–11 Message read advising royal assent on 18 October Glenelg Hopkins Catchment Management Authority — to: Report 2010–11
Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority — Commercial Arbitration Bill 2011 Report 2010–11 Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Amendment (Prohibition of Display and Sale of Interpretation of Legislation Act 1984 — Notice under s 32(3)(a)(iii) in relation to Statutory Rule 110 Cannabis Water Pipes) Bill 2011 Electronic Transactions (Victoria) Amendment Judicial College of Victoria — Report 2010–11 Bill 2011 Mallee Catchment Management Authority — Resources Legislation Amendment Bill 2011. Report 2010–11 Members of Parliament (Register of Interests) Act 1978 — APPROPRIATION MESSAGES Cumulative Summary of Returns as at 30 September 2011 — Ordered to be printed Messages read recommending appropriations for: Metropolitan Waste Management Group — Report 2010–11 Sex Work and Other Acts Amendment Bill 2011 North Central Catchment Management Authority — Report Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation 2010–11 Bill 2011 North East Catchment Management Authority — Report Water Legislation Amendment (Water 2010–11 Infrastructure Charges) Bill 2011. Ombudsman — Whistleblowers Protection Act 2001: Investigation regarding the Department of Human Services Child Protection program (Loddon Mallee Region) — BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE Ordered to be printed Program Parks Victoria — Report 2010–11 Mr McINTOSH (Minister for Corrections) — I Planning and Environment Act 1987 — Notices of approval of amendments to the following Planning Schemes: move:
Ballarat — C128 That, under standing order 94(2), the orders of the day, government business, relating to the following bills be
BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE
4786 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
considered and completed by 4.00 p.m. on Thursday, ministers who have cowardly shied away from the 27 October 2011: opportunity to place their bills under scrutiny. Electricity Industry Amendment (Transitional Feed-in Tariff Scheme) Bill 2011 The other comment I would like to make on the government business program concerns the proceedings Sentencing Amendment (Community Correction tomorrow, which are unusual indeed. The opposition Reform) Bill 2011 was happy to accommodate changed sitting Transport Legislation Amendment (Public Transport arrangements to enable many members of this chamber Development Authority) Bill 2011 to participate in the visit to Melbourne by Her Majesty the Queen of England. We indicated our support for Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation Bill 2011 those changes, and we did so in good faith because we Water Legislation Amendment (Water Infrastructure recognise that it is a great occasion to have the Queen Charges) Bill 2011. opening Labor’s new Royal Children’s Hospital — and what a great opportunity that will be to show the Queen In moving this motion there are a couple of things we and the rest of the world how Labor governments invest should note about this sitting week. As the government in vital infrastructure projects. We also agreed to the indicated in the last sitting week, because of the special changed program in good faith because we were given circumstances tomorrow we will be going on the every indication that the Queen would be here for a adjournment debate at approximately 11.00 p.m. large part of the day. Imagine our surprise when we saw tonight and tomorrow night. in today’s Herald Sun that the Queen will be departing In addition, because members have commitments they Melbourne at 3.15 p.m. tomorrow, yet this house is not need to attend to during the course of the day as a result resuming until 7 o’clock tomorrow night. This is a of the visit of Her Majesty the Queen, the house will significant period of time for people who are involved not sit until 7.00 p.m. tomorrow. We will start with in the Queen’s departure from the airport. To question time and go through until 11.00 p.m. As I accommodate these changed arrangements we are indicated, I expect that we will go on the adjournment sitting an additional hour tonight and tomorrow night, at 4.00 p.m. on Thursday. We will see how the situation which is going to place a strain on staff. pans out, but that is my expectation. Given the When we sit late into the night, an occupational health additional time we are providing for completion of the and safety issue arises, it is true, but the point is that we government’s business program in this sitting week, do not have to sit late. If government members were there will be ample time for all members to make their prepared to put their shoulders to the wheel, if they contributions. were prepared to use a bit of elbow grease and do some Ms ALLAN (Bendigo East) — In rising to speak on hard work, we could be back here at 5 o’clock. That the motion for the government business program, I note time line provides enough time for the Premier to get the range of bills the Leader of the House has indicated back from the airport, have his cup of hot water, brush will be on the program during the week. The only his teeth, wash his face and comb his hair. He could be comment I make on behalf of the opposition is to in this chamber ready to answer questions at 5 o’clock. indicate that we would like to have a But no; to reduce the time that the house has available consideration-in-detail stage on the Transport for scrutiny, the government is not resuming the Legislation Amendment (Public Transport program here until 7.00 p.m. tomorrow. Development Authority) Bill 2011. The shadow We know that holding question time later in the day Minister for Public Transport would like to explore a means that the government is not necessarily under the number of issues relating to this bill, particularly given glare of media scrutiny, that it reduces the opportunity that it is establishing a new authority. Unlike what has for the opposition to scrutinise the government and that happened with every other request the opposition has late sittings put an additional load on the staff. The put to the government, I hope our request to take the Queen will be in Perth by then, having her next cup of bill into a consideration-in-detail stage is granted and tea and round of sherries with government officials. We that we have the opportunity, for the first time under could have well and truly undertaken at least 2 hours of this regime, to give the bill appropriate scrutiny. I am work by then, but it is clear the government is trying to sure the Minister for Public Transport will be tough avoid scrutiny. It is not prepared to do the hard work; it enough to be happy to accommodate this request, does not have a significant legislative agenda. The because he is not afraid to stand up and answer Queen is being used as cover by this government to questions in this place on his legislation, unlike other avoid scrutiny in this place. For those reasons the
BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4787 opposition will not be supporting the government The SPEAKER — Order! The member for business program put forward for this week. Burwood is on a warning.
Mr HODGETT (Kilsyth) — It is a pleasure to rise Mr HULLS — The only difference is that 7-Eleven to speak in support of the motion put by the Leader of stores actually stay open for 24 hours; under this the House and make a brief contribution to the debate government this joint does not. on the proposed government business program for this sitting week. As has been outlined, there are five bills The fact is that the Queen will be here to open Labor’s on the program, two of which will be able to be debated Royal Children’s Hospital. Not just that but, as you, today: the Sentencing Amendment (Community Speaker, would know, the Queen will be here because Correction Reform) Bill 2011 and the Transport the former Premier John Brumby invited her to come Legislation Amendment (Public Transport here. When he met with her at Balmoral he gave her the Development Authority) Bill 2011. Victorian tartan and asked her to come and open the hospital, and she agreed. All those people who are From liaising with the Opposition Whip I understand taking credit for the Queen coming here need to that the opposition has a number of speakers on the understand the facts: it was John Brumby who invited public transport development authority bill and a her and got her to come here. They became mates — — number of speakers on the Sentencing Amendment (Community Correction Reform) Bill 2011, as does the The SPEAKER — Order! Maybe the member for government, so we will spend quite some time this Niddrie would like to return to the motion before the afternoon and this evening on those bills to provide house. adequate scrutiny of them. Then to accommodate Her Majesty’s visit to Melbourne tomorrow there is a Mr HULLS — I am, Speaker. The reason we change to the sitting hours. We believe that, with the oppose this government business program is that, time available today, tomorrow and Thursday, by firstly, there is very little legislation, and secondly, the sitting late tonight and tomorrow night we can give reduced working hours go to show quite clearly that the adequate scrutiny to those five bills before the 4.00 p.m. government does not have a plan. No reason deadline on Thursday. On that note, I encourage all whatsoever has been put forward by the government as members to support the motion put by the Leader of the to why we are starting at 7 o’clock tomorrow with House. question time.
Mr HULLS (Niddrie) — We certainly oppose this Opposition members have ideas as to why that may be government business program. It does not consist of the case. We understand that the Premier will be much hard work at all. I think it was Ronald Reagan, a spending the 2 or 3 hours that the Queen will be here President of the United States of America, who said, with her at the opening of the hospital and then at Government House, but that does not mean that he ‘It’s true hard work never killed anyone, but I figure, 1 why take the chance?’. I think that is the motto of the needs to spend 3 ⁄2 hours having a snooze before he Premier on this occasion, because while it is true that comes in here. Maybe that is not the reason. Maybe it is because the Deputy Leader of the Liberal Party, the Rip Her Royal Highness the Queen will be here tomorrow 1 and I know that many members of this house have been Van Winkle of the Liberal Party, needs 3 ⁄2 hours to invited to meet with her at Government House, she is wake up. actually leaving the jurisdiction at 3.15 p.m. I cannot The SPEAKER — Order! Back to the motion! for the life of me understand why this house is not coming back at 4 o’clock to get on with actually Mr HULLS — It is a very important motion. In governing this state. researching this motion I did come across — you would know him, I am sure, Speaker — Abraham de Moivre. The fact is that the parliamentary sitting hours have He was a very important mathematician who was born been changed to fit in with the Queen’s visit but at the in France in 1667. Not only does he remind me of the time members of the opposition agreed to that change Premier but he actually looks a bit like the Premier. The we had no idea that the Queen would be leaving here at fact is that the older Mr de Moivre grew the longer he 3.15 p.m. The fact is that this government is turning this needed to sleep, and at one stage he was sleeping for Parliament into a 7-Eleven: we start at 7.00 p.m. and we 20 hours a day. finish at 11.00 p.m. The SPEAKER — Order! I do not believe the Mr Watt interjected. sleeping habits of the gentleman the member has mentioned have anything to do with the motion before
BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE
4788 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011 the house. I ask him to return to debating the motion phone and ring the ministers. They can also pick up a before the house, or I will sit him down. phone and speak to people in the departments.
Mr HULLS — I understand that, Speaker, but the Honourable members interjecting. connection is clear. It seems absolutely inappropriate that the business of this house is delayed by some The SPEAKER — Order! The member for 1 3 ⁄4 hours after the Queen leaves here. It will be that Macedon is on a warning. long before we come back to this place and get on with business. The reason I raised Abraham de Moivre is Mrs VICTORIA — They can use emails. We even that it is becoming increasingly apparent to the have telephones in our offices these days. If they have Victorian public and this Parliament that we have a questions that need sorting out, they can pick up a Premier who needs as much rest as possible to get on phone. We also have the ability to debate in this with governing this state. Opposition members are chamber, without a bill going into a opposing this motion because we want to get on with consideration-in-detail stage. Perhaps if members read actually working in this place, unlike those opposite, the second-reading speeches and took a little bit more who just want to throw out the zeds. They just want to interest put on their jammies and go to bed. They should get on in — — with it and do some work! Ms Allan interjected.
Mrs VICTORIA (Bayswater) — What a load of Mrs VICTORIA — Perhaps if they took a little bit claptrap. I think that is the traditional way of putting it. I more interest in what was actually being said in the am standing to speak in support of the legislative chamber, they would actually have an idea of the program as put forward to the house by the Leader of legislation before the house. the House. On the agenda we have some very good legislation that needs to be taken with all seriousness. We also have on the list the Water Legislation The funny thing is — — Amendment (Water Infrastructure Charges) Bill 2011. Again, this is an incredibly important piece of Honourable members interjecting. legislation.
Mrs VICTORIA — Would members opposite like I want to go to the crux of what opposition members are me to read out the list of the legislation? We have the saying is the reason why they are opposing the Electricity Industry Amendment (Transitional Feed-in government business program. They are saying it is Tariff Scheme) Bill 2011. That has been something of about Her Majesty’s visit tomorrow. We should all feel great contention. People are wanting to know more very honoured that she is coming here to open the new about it. How lovely that we get to debate it in full here Royal Children’s Hospital. It will be a great occasion in the house. We have the Sentencing Amendment for Victoria. We will get to show off the new (Community Correction Reform) Bill 2011, which technology in the new hospital, obviously, but also Her contains something that the government promised we Majesty will pay a visit to the Ian Potter Centre of the would do before the election. It is another important National Gallery of Victoria to look at indigenous piece of legislation. Australian and Pacific rim art before meeting the The funny thing is that the opposition is calling for the people in Federation Square and then moving down Transport Legislation Amendment (Public Transport St Kilda Road in the royal tram to Government House. Development Authority) Bill 2011 to go into The nice thing about all that is that this agenda was set consideration in detail. I do not remember going into a by the palace. Those who are attending were in fact consideration-in-detail stage terribly often when we suggested by the palace. were in opposition and had lots of questions on a bill. Mr Noonan interjected. Honourable members interjecting. The SPEAKER — Order! There will be no eye The SPEAKER — Order! Enough, the member for action. The member for Williamstown is on a warning. Yan Yean! Mrs VICTORIA — Her Majesty’s agenda is not Mrs VICTORIA — The lovely thing about this is something set by the government. It is set by the palace, that there are bill briefings for all members to go to if and if those opposite knew anything about royal they wish. They know that they can also pick up a protocol, they would know that is in fact the case. Last
BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4789 sitting week the Leader of the House suggested that we 3.15 p.m., and even if the Premier goes to Tullamarine sit at 7.00 p.m. tomorrow evening to allow for Her airport with her, he would have time to cycle back to Majesty’s visit. the city for a 5.00 p.m. start, to run back for a 5.00 p.m. start and even swim down the Moonee Ponds Creek for Ms Green interjected. a 5.00 p.m. start in this house. It is ludicrous that we are wasting time waiting for the Parliament to begin at The SPEAKER — Order! The member for Yan 7.00 p.m. Yean! Given that I guess we will lose this vote, I suggest that Mrs VICTORIA — When the Leader of the House there are some things that the members of the suggested last sitting week by motion that we sit at international media could look at very carefully whilst 7.00 p.m. not all the final details had been registered by they are in this state. The first is to look at the fact that the palace. If Her Majesty and the Prince were to stay it is Labor that delivers in this state. It is Labor that on for several hours after that, we would have to amend delivers infrastructure projects. When I was driving to that again. What we did was very sensible and allowed Parliament this morning, thinking of all the work we for extra time. would be doing this week if we bothered to sit, I Those opposite are complaining that we are not sitting recognised that magnificent hospital that I drive past until 7.00 p.m. In some weeks we sat for anything from every sitting day: the Labor children’s hospital. It will 12 to 14 hours longer under the previous government. be wonderful to see Labor’s children’s hospital opened. Those opposite are talking about occupational health Honourable members interjecting. and safety (OHS), but I remember sitting until 3.00 a.m. on a Tuesday, 2.00 a.m. on a Wednesday and 1.00 a.m. The SPEAKER — Order! The members for on a Thursday, all in one sitting week, and I do not Bentleigh and Carrum! know that they were terribly worried about OHS then. To sit until 11.00 p.m. is not an issue. If we count Mrs Bauer interjected. 1 backwards and allow 1 ⁄2 hours for dinner, which I think is something that we should be allowed to do in a 12 or The SPEAKER — Order! The member for Carrum 1 13-hour day — have a 1 ⁄2-hour dinner break — that is on a warning. would be 5.30 p.m. Even allowing for going over time if Her Majesty stays on and there is something wrong in Ms CAMPBELL — I also reflected on the fact that the programming, it gives us time to get back to this government is good on spin and poor on delivery. It Parliament before the sitting of the house. This is a very said it wanted to have scrutiny and it would be open good program before the house, and I recommend that and accountable, but the fact is that this Parliament has the house go along with it. curtailed its sitting hours in order to accommodate — what? In fact nothing between 3.15 p.m. and 7.00 p.m. Ms CAMPBELL (Pascoe Vale) — There is one on Wednesday. What are we waiting for? Are we thing that was said by the previous speaker with which waiting for the Queen’s plane to be cancelled? Perhaps I agree, and that is that the palace sets the Queen’s she might like to drive out really slowly to the airport agenda. The fact is that this Parliament sets our agenda. and look at the grey noise walls on the Tullamarine The palace does not set the Victorian Parliament’s tollway. Perhaps she might like to examine all the agenda. It does not set its time lines and it does not spaces on the Tullamarine tollway that have not been identify which bills we are to discuss, but this house filled in by vegetation like they have, for example, on does. I remind the previous speaker that it is in our the Monash Freeway. She might like to examine the hands to decide what time we are going to speak. It is lousy noise walls on the Tullamarine tollway. She important that the facts are recognised. might like to recognise how bad the Tullamarine tollway is as she meanders out to Tullamarine. She The member for Bendigo East highlighted how, when might like to look at how we have got light grey, we agreed to have a change in the sitting dates for this medium grey, dark grey and very dark grey noise week, it was on the understanding that the Queen would walls — prison walls — as she drives out to the airport. be staying all day and that the Premier would need to She might also like to look at how those grey noise accompany the Queen at most official engagements. walls have trellises that do not have any vegetation growing on them, which is a great shame because the Ms Beattie — She did not want that. member for Yuroke and I drive on the Tullamarine tollway every day and we see how bad it is in terms of Ms CAMPBELL — Yes, maybe she did not want that, but the fact is that she will be up, up and away at
MEMBERS STATEMENTS
4790 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011 vegetation. In contrast, Labor’s children’s hospital is MEMBERS STATEMENTS the pride and joy of this state. Aboriginals: war service exhibition The business program before us is an absolute waste of taxpayers money. We oppose it, and the fact is that for Mrs POWELL (Minister for Aboriginal Affairs) — every hour that we sit in this house over and above the On Tuesday, 18 October, I had the honour of designated time it costs an extra $10 000. That $10 000 co-launching a touring exhibition entitled Indigenous could plant up big along the Tullamarine tollway or go Australians at War from the Boer War to the Present in to the Victorian certificate of applied learning Mildura with the federal Minister for Veterans’ Affairs program — anything but delaying the house’s time. and Minister for Indigenous Health, the Honourable Warren Snowdon. This exhibition provides recognition House divided on motion: of the contributions made by indigenous servicemen and women who served their country proudly and Ayes, 43 bravely even though they did not enjoy equal rights in Angus, Mr Napthine, Dr their own country. Asher, Ms Newton-Brown, Mr Baillieu, Mr Northe, Mr Battin, Mr O’Brien, Mr The Victorian government was proud to support the Bauer, Mrs Powell, Mrs Shrine of Remembrance in bringing this important Blackwood, Mr Ryall, Ms exhibition to the people of regional Victoria. Mildura Bull, Mr Ryan, Mr was chosen for the first exhibition because of its vibrant Burgess, Mr Shaw, Mr indigenous community and proud military history. I Clark, Mr Smith, Mr R. Crisp, Mr Southwick, Mr was joined by the member for Mildura; the federal Delahunty, Mr Sykes, Dr member for Mallee, John Forrest; Mildura City Council Fyffe, Mrs Thompson, Mr representatives including Cr Sue Nichols and the CEO; Gidley, Mr Tilley, Mr the chief executive of the shrine, Denis Baguley; Air Hodgett, Mr Victoria, Mrs Katos, Mr Wakeling, Mr Vice Marshal Angus Houston; board members of the Kotsiras, Mr Walsh, Mr Mildura Arts Centre; local elder Janine Wilson, who McCurdy, Mr Watt, Mr gave a warm welcome to country; and other dignitaries. McIntosh, Mr Weller, Mr McLeish, Ms Wells, Mr As the exhibition travels around the state over the next Miller, Ms Wooldridge, Ms two years, many stories of bravery and service to this Morris, Mr Wreford, Ms Mulder, Mr country will emerge, such as that of Private Daniel Hodgekiss, a labourer from Mildura whose bravery in Noes, 42 taking out an enemy machine gun that had been Allan, Ms Howard, Mr preventing his battalion from advancing was noted in Andrews, Mr Hulls, Mr the official history of Australia in the 1914–18 war; and Barker, Ms Hutchins, Ms Beattie, Ms Kairouz, Ms Ron, Cyril and Eric Carter — three brothers born in the Brooks, Mr Knight, Ms region — with Ron and Eric serving 948 days overseas Campbell, Ms Languiller, Mr in the Second World War; Sergeant Ken Stewart, who Carbines, Mr Lim, Mr served in the Second World War, was so highly D’Ambrosio, Ms McGuire, Mr regarded that the Mildura RSL maintains a $2000 Donnellan, Mr Madden, Mr Duncan, Ms Merlino, Mr annual scholarship in his name. These stories need to be Edwards, Ms Nardella, Mr told and recorded for history. Eren, Mr Neville, Ms Foley, Mr Noonan, Mr Doveton: reunion Garrett, Ms Pallas, Mr Graley, Ms Pandazopoulos, Mr Mr PANDAZOPOULOS (Dandenong) — I rise to Green, Ms Perera, Mr Halfpenny, Ms Pike, Ms congratulate a few people who organised the Doveton Helper, Mr Richardson, Ms reunion on 15 October. They are Vicky Alexopoulos, Hennessy, Ms Scott, Mr Karen Dawson and Tony Sampieri, and as a result of Herbert, Mr Trezise, Mr their efforts, the Doveton Cricket Club, which Holding, Mr Wynne, Mr supported us having our reunion at its venue. The Motion agreed to. Doveton reunion was organised through Facebook. There is a Facebook site called ‘I grew up in Doveton and I turned out okay’. The reunion was a celebration of everything Doveton. The reality is that it is a
MEMBERS STATEMENTS
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4791 working-class suburb, built for industrial Australia to Knox Churches Soccer Club: funding service — as many of our parents did — General Motors, Heinz and International Trucks. It is a Mr WAKELING — The member for Scoresby and low-income suburb, rough and tumble at times, with a I recently met with the Knox Churches Soccer Club for lot of immigrants from the United Kingdom, Ireland the announcement of $60 000 to fund new lighting for and southern and eastern Europe, who have all turned this great local club. Knox Churches is a fantastic sports out to be great contributors to society and the club, and I congratulate the committee, which has community. That is what this celebration and raised $100 000 towards this important project. commemoration was all about. Ferntree Gully electorate: student leaders lunch We look forward to hosting it as an annual event on Caulfield Cup night. The Doveton Cricket Club would Mr WAKELING — Last week I hosted a luncheon like to do it as one of its ongoing events. Again, I for primary school leaders from 10 local schools. On commend Vicky Alexopoulos, whose idea it was, for hearing each student individually address the group, the raising the issue on the Facebook site, and then Karen leadership qualities of each student were readily Dawson and Tony Sampieri, who after his great apparent. It was a pleasure to meet them all. Schools cooking that night is known as Doveton Cricket Club’s represented included Fairhills, Ferntree Gully North, master chef! It was fantastic food that night. Everyone Heany Park, Karoo, Lysterfield, Mountain Gate, had a great night. It is good to be proud of a St John the Baptist, St Joseph’s, St Simon the Apostle working-class suburb like Doveton. and Wattleview primary schools.
The DEPUTY SPEAKER — Order! The Tasty Trucks member’s time has expired. Mr WAKELING — I would like to congratulate Ferntree Gully North Primary School: Colin Lear and the staff at Tasty Trucks on the recent production launch of their new ‘vanchise’ model, an important Ferntree Gully rising business. Mr WAKELING (Ferntree Gully) — I recently had the privilege of attending the Ferntree Gully North The DEPUTY SPEAKER — Order! The Primary School biennial school production. The calibre member’s time has expired. of the performances, particularly of some well-known Newport Gardens Primary School: opening political characters, was outstanding. Congratulations to principal Stuart Edwards, staff, parents and students for Mr NOONAN (Williamstown) — I rise to a fantastic performance. congratulate the entire school community of Newport Gardens Primary School on the recent completion and Friends of Koolunga opening of brand-new facilities. Last Friday’s official Mr WAKELING — I had the pleasure of attending opening was the culmination of many years of hard the Friends of Koolunga annual general meeting. I work to merge the former Eastona Park and Hobsons congratulate the group on its work in the last Bay primary schools and deliver a new combined 12 months. The members expressed their willingness to primary school in the emerging suburb of Newport. work with the Knox City Council to determine the In all, the redevelopment provided the school with appropriate use of the $50 000 provided for Koolunga 14 new state-of-the-art classrooms and art and craft Reserve in the May state budget. areas, a new library, an IT area and a music and Robert Ives administration centre, as well as a gymnasium/hall and kitchen and multipurpose outdoor play area. Through Mr WAKELING — Congratulations to Robert this redevelopment the Newport Gardens school Ives, whose Golden Memories karaoke performance I community can proudly offer learning environments attended recently at Amaroo Gardens in Ferntree Gully. which match the quality of its teaching. Robert has established a not-for-profit organisation which visits aged-care homes to perform a range of For my part, I am very proud of the support given to songs from yesteryear. Residents clearly enjoyed this project by the previous state Labor government and themselves and greatly benefited from Robert’s the former education minister, the member for volunteering program. Melbourne, as well as the current Gillard federal Labor government. These governments contributed $7.5 million towards this project. In addition, a mighty
MEMBERS STATEMENTS
4792 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011 effort by the school community saw it raise a further Melbourne International Arts Festival $100 000. Mrs VICTORIA — Congratulations to Brett This truly outstanding project would not have been Sheehy, festival director, on another sensational and possible without the vision and leadership of former diverse Melbourne International Arts Festival. From principals Alan Frost and Denis O’Dowd. These two opening night with the Manganiyar Seduction to the remarkable individuals worked closely with their closing concert, Notes from the Hard Road and school councils to guide this project from concept to Beyond, Melbourne was again home to top Australian construction. Finally, I congratulate the current and international artists, cementing our place as principal, Simon McGlade, who, following the Australia’s cultural capital. retirement of Alan and Denis, has overseen the latest stages of the redevelopment and kept the school Lyn Swinburne operating in what were very challenging circumstances. Ms GREEN (Yan Yean) — Today I was privileged Mildura: arts facilities to attend a pink ribbon luncheon in honour of Lyn Swinburne, the founding CEO of the Breast Cancer Mrs VICTORIA (Bayswater) — Last week I had Awareness Network. Lyn Swinburne was diagnosed the pleasure of touring some of the wonderful arts with breast cancer in 1993 and underwent surgery, facilities in Mildura with its hardworking local member radiotherapy, chemotherapy and hormone therapy. of Parliament. There is a plethora of visual and Since that time, and as a result of her experiences, she performing arts experiences on offer in the north-west has become a committed advocate on behalf of women of our state. Government, council and privately funded with breast cancer and their families. organisations work together to produce works that enlighten and entertain locals and visitors alike. The In 1998 she founded the Breast Cancer Network creative community in regional Victoria is thriving. Australia, which is now the peak national breast cancer consumer organisation representing 294 member VCA Foundation groups and more than 60 000 individuals in all states and territories. It currently has a staff of 30, and a vast Mrs VICTORIA — Yesterday I had the honour of number of volunteers work for the organisation. Lyn is launching the newly formed VCA Foundation. This the creator of the Field of Women concept, which has body will raise funds to ensure that the Victorian now spread to international venues, and of the Beacon College of the Arts can continue to provide the magazine, which has a circulation of over 60 000. A exceptional standard of arts training it is renowned for passionate advocate for consumer input, Lyn has the world over. It is heart warming to see this represented women with breast cancer on a number of foundation established, given the uncertainty that once state, national and international committees. Her work plagued this wonderful institution. With a dedicated will live on, and she will be ably succeeded by my dear group of individuals on the foundation board and a friend and former colleague Maxine Morand. government dedicated to ensuring the future of the arts in Victoria, I am confident that the VCA will continue Yesterday my mother celebrated five years of being to play a major role in arts training for many years to breast cancer free. I certainly wish such a long-term and come. sustained recovery to my dear friends being treated for this dreadful disease: Rachel, who is due to have Country Fire Authority: Bayswater brigade surgery tomorrow; Lyn, undergoing chemotherapy; Maxine and Naomi, who have recently completed their Mrs VICTORIA — On 15 October I helped the treatment; and Michelle, who has battled this for Bayswater Traders Association with a special 20 years. I urge all members to attend Girls Night In fundraiser for the Bayswater Country Fire Authority events across the state and keep up the good work in brigade. Many local businesses and volunteers came fighting this terrible disease. together for a trivia night, and between us all we raised several thousand dollars for our local brigade. The St Mary’s House of Welcome Bayswater CFA brigade has been protecting the local community for generations, and it was wonderful to see Mr ANGUS (Forest Hill) — Last Friday, as part of its cause so strongly supported. Anti-Poverty Week, I had the pleasure of visiting St Mary’s House of Welcome in Fitzroy to assist in the serving of meals. It was a great opportunity to see firsthand some of the work that is being undertaken in
MEMBERS STATEMENTS
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4793
Melbourne to assist residents who may be going until the night of Sunday, 16 October, the rains had through difficult times and also an opportunity to hear caused the unfortunate loss of dozens of lives, with about some of the other services available at the centre. 20 000 people evacuated — the equivalent of I congratulate the staff, directors and volunteers who 5000 families — and they are being treated at work tirelessly to deliver these services to the local 209 operating shelters nationwide. people. Due to the heavy rains, which led to the declaration of a Multicultural affairs: Forest Hill electorate state of national emergency in the country on Friday, 14 October, the government has called for humanitarian Mr ANGUS — Last week I also had the great assistance from the international community to meet the pleasure of hosting a gathering of representatives from emergency needs. In this context the government of El many of the multicultural groups in Forest Hill. We Salvador, and indeed the many thousands of were joined by the Minister for Multicultural Affairs Salvadorians living in Victoria and in Australia, has and Citizenship, who addressed the group and then appealed to the solidarity of the international answered questions. I thank the minister for coming to community in order to receive its support in this Forest Hill and meeting with the representatives from emergency, whether financial or in kind, according to the various groups. the official government list of needs and following the procedures and protocols established in the handbook Nunawading Soccer Club: presentations for international humanitarian assistance in disaster situations. Mr ANGUS — I recently attended the end of season presentations for the Nunawading Soccer Club. It was a I wish to commend the efforts made by the community time to reflect on the season just finished and of El Salvador in Australia and indeed its Consul congratulate all the players, officials and volunteers General, Senor Mauricio Mena. I appeal to all members who have been involved in the club during the year. I and the community to respond generously to the call for especially want to congratulate the president of the international aid. club, Mr Patrick Humbert, and the secretary, Mrs Robyn Bell, as well as the other committee Mildura: home show members and volunteers for the hard work they have put into the club during what has been a very Mr CRISP (Mildura) — It was my pleasure to challenging year. I look forward to seeing the club go open, with the member for Bayswater in her role as the from strength to strength in the years to come. Parliamentary Secretary to the Premier and Assisting the Premier with the Arts, the inaugural Sunraysia Carbon tax: economic impact Daily Mildura Home Show, which transformed the hangar and some of the apron at Mildura Airport into a Mr ANGUS — The ramifications of the illegitimate homeowners mecca. The quality of the exhibitors’ carbon tax that is being forced upon all Australians are presentations to the public was extremely high, still being processed by business operators in Forest indicating considerable effort had been put into the Hill and elsewhere. Business operators I have spoken to preparation and planning to be part of the major event. have expressed their concerns over the extremely negative impact this additional tax will have on their I would like to congratulate Mr Steve Rolton of businesses, particularly in relation to future Hotondo Homes for his vision and persistence in employment decisions. It is not too late for the state making the home show a reality. I also need to Labor members to lobby their federal colleagues and congratulate Sunraysia Daily for taking a key try to stop this antibusiness, anti-employment tax. sponsorship and promotional role, as well as the other sponsors who helped make the vision a reality. Republic of El Salvador: humanitarian assistance The home show was supported by the people of Mildura, with a constant stream of visitors throughout Mr LANGUILLER (Derrimut) — I support the call the three days. I hope the customer traffic transforms for international aid by the community of El Salvador into interest and sales and assists the supporting in Australia. The El Salvador republic is experiencing a businesses. I believe the home show demonstrates the unique situation due to prolonged and heavy rain these resilience and the belief in the future of the housing past weeks which has led to saturation of soils and has sector in Mildura, and I look forward to the event being increased the level of rivers and the volume of water, a regular part of Mildura’s future. causing overflows and human and material losses. Up
MEMBERS STATEMENTS
4794 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Red Cliffs Primary School: royal visit outing Bill and Ruby Hoskins: 71st wedding anniversary Mr CRISP — On another matter, I look forward to participating in the royal visit tomorrow, hopefully with Ms RYALL — I would like to offer my warmest representatives of Red Cliffs Primary School, who have congratulations to Bill and Ruby Hoskins of invited me to join them in St Kilda Road, where they Nunawading, who celebrated their 71st wedding hope to catch a glimpse of the Queen as she passes in a anniversary last month. I am sure that sharing this time tram. Principal Rod Beer is here with his school on a in marriage has provided them with many treasured Melbourne adventure for the week. They will be in memories and much joy. Parliament tomorrow, from where I will follow them to St Kilda Road. Keith and Gillian Horlock: 50th wedding anniversary South Asian Community Link Group: fundraising Ms RYALL — I would like to offer my best wishes and warmest congratulations to Keith and Gillian Ms BEATTIE (Yuroke) — I rise today to Horlock of Vermont on the celebration of their congratulate members of the South Asian Community 50th wedding anniversary on Friday, 4 November. Link Group and the wider multicultural community that supports it in their outstanding fundraising efforts. On Motocross: KTM Ride4Kids Wednesday, 19 October, I had the privilege of assisting founding member Farrukh Hussain in presenting to the Ms RYALL — I would like to acknowledge the Victorian Red Cross a cheque for over $3000. It was a wonderful effort undertaken by Nunawading father and terrific occasion, and the Victorian Red Cross executive son duo Dave and Ryan Doyle who rode in the KTM director, Toni Aslett, was very grateful to receive such a Ride4Kids event on Sunday, 23 October, at the large donation. Victorian state motorcycle sports complex in Broadford. The pair of motocross enthusiasts helped In addition to this presentation, another $3000 has raise money for Challenge, which in turn gives support already been donated to the Queensland Premier’s to children and families battling cancer. disaster relief appeal to assist with the flood recovery in Congratulations to them on a fine effort and their Queensland. All members of the South Asian generosity. Community Link Group should be extremely proud of their fundraising efforts for such worthy causes. I Marion Blaze would especially like to pay tribute to founding members Farrukh Hussain, Deepak Vinayak and the Ms RYALL — I would like to congratulate Marion wider executive, who have built this group into the Blaze of Nunawading, who has been awarded a $5000 vibrant body it is today. Congratulations to them again grant from the McDonald’s Be Your Local Hero on a terrific fundraising effort. I urge the South Asian program. Ms Blaze, who is an education officer at the Community Link Group to keep up the outstanding Statewide Vision Resource Centre, says the money will work it does for South Asian countries. go to fund the centre’s music program and teach blind and visually impaired children how to arrange and Water: Tankulator compose music through the use of braille music technology. Ms RYALL (Mitcham) — Thank you to Narelle Edgar and Justin Whitehead for opening their home for Ballarat: parliamentary education visit the launch of the Tankulator, a new online tool to assist households to select the right water tank for water use Ms KNIGHT (Ballarat West) — It was wonderful in their home. This tool, which is free to the public and to sit in on the regional visit to Ballarat last week of the was developed by the Alternative Technology Parliament of Victoria’s tour guides. What a fantastic Association with funding support through the program. I know that the schools in my electorate — government’s Sustainability Fund, takes the hard work Lumen Christi Primary Achool and St James Parish out of choosing the right rainwater tank for households School — both got a lot out of the presentation and role across Victoria. play. It was apparent sitting in on one of the presentations and then having the opportunity to speak to the students that they loved what they learnt, and this was of course down to the very skilled and talented presenters. Thanks to Mark, Craig and Trevor, whom
MEMBERS STATEMENTS
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4795 we see here when we are in Parliament House, for for closure scheme there are still no plans from the taking their expertise to the students of Ballarat. This is Gillard government as to how local jobs will be a great service to our community and our students, and protected. Already businesses indirectly associated with I cannot recommend it highly enough. Mark, Craig and the energy industry in the Latrobe Valley are feeling the Trevor kept the students engaged and have, I am sure, pinch, whilst Loy Yang Power has offered voluntary left a lasting impression on these future leaders. departure packages to employees as a direct result of the carbon tax legislation. Despite this the Prime Ballarat Outrigger Academy Minister has offered no plan or direct support to the Latrobe Valley community. This is a disgrace, given it Ms KNIGHT — I also had the pleasure of is the Prime Minister’s own legislation that is creating launching the Ballarat Outrigger Academy on such negative impacts for residents and businesses in 17 October. This is a great concept thought up by Kim our region. Halbert-Pere and supported financially by Schools Focused Youth Services and the Highlands Local Practically Green Festival: Kids Teaching Kids Learning and Employment Network. Loreto College is conference generously providing storage facilities. Kim works with young people from the Ballarat Secondary College Mr HERBERT (Eltham) — It gave me great Link Up program, and it was just a delight to see the pleasure last Tuesday to visit the Kids Teaching Kids young men so engaged and so excited by this project. Practically Green conference at Edendale Farm in As Kim stated: Eltham. The conference was part of Nillumbik Shire Council’s Practically Green festival. The conference What’s very critical is teaching others … was on the topic Grow Local, Eat Local. It was a But it won’t just be about learning how to paddle. It is about wonderful event involving and engaging local students personal development and it’s about culture and belonging. in the very practical skill of growing their own veggies. Student activities focused on local food production and Congratulations to Kim and the young people who on reducing our food carbon footprint. It was great to worked so hard to make this dream a reality and on see so many young people becoming more interested in demonstrating how critical it is to provide young people growing their own food and taking a greater interest in with every opportunity to stay engaged in learning. reducing food miles and their overall individual carbon Carbon tax: economic impact footprint. Around 120 students from 12 schools in the Nillumbik and Banyule municipalities participated in Mr NORTHE (Morwell) — I rise today to speak on making presentations and getting involved in hands-on the Gillard Labor government’s proposed carbon tax workshops and activities. and its implications for the Latrobe Valley and the Of course Eltham schools were well represented, with wider Gippsland region. I read with interest some of the Briar Hills Primary School, Eltham Primary School, recent debate in the federal Parliament on the carbon Eltham North Primary School, Montmorency Primary tax legislation and in particular noted the contribution School, Montmorency South Primary School, of the federal member for Gippsland, Darren Chester, St Helena Secondary College and Montmorency who had sought feedback from Gippsland residents on Secondary College all taking an active role. These this contentious legislation. Following that feedback students will take ideas, knowledge and skills back to various quotes were conveyed to the Parliament, their schools, work with fellow students and help boost including that of Natasha from Traralgon who said: their own food garden programs. The students are an It means that my husband may lose his job at Hazelwood inspiration for people to engage in more sustainable power station. We cannot provide to our children the simple living, offering great examples of practical things we things in life like a good education due to rising living can all do to live more sustainably. expenses. Not good enough, Julia. I congratulate Carolyn Pickburn from Edendale Farm Also from Joanne in Tyers. on her dedicated work in organising the Kids Teaching Small business is the backbone of this country and Julia Kids Practically Green conference. It was a great Gillard will destroy this with a carbon tax, especially in the success and a credit to Carolyn and everyone else Latrobe Valley. The Latrobe Valley is a great place to live but involved. without jobs people will go elsewhere. The Greens and Labor are only interested in city people. Despite Yallourn, Hazelwood and Energy Brix expressing interest in the federal government’s contract
MEMBERS STATEMENTS
4796 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Patterson Lakes Primary School: Cyber Girls cars and motorcycles, and racing priceless pieces of chess team history added an interesting element to the event. The winner with the fastest time up the mountain was local Mrs BAUER (Carrum) — I was delighted to visit boy Liam Sales, who claimed the day with a great time Patterson Lakes Primary School to congratulate the of 44.3 seconds in a 1973 Valiant Charger. Cyber Girls chess team on being the Chess Kids champion girls team 2011. The determination of this Congratulations to the organising committee, which wonderful team is a credit to the nine girls and chess consisted of members of the Vintage Sports Car Club coach Christian Bennett. I look forward to hosting the of Victoria and the Bendigo Car Club, and to the many championship team on their upcoming visit to volunteers who once again supported the committee Parliament House. over the two-day event. Carrum volunteer coastguard: Kingston Maldon Folk Festival Guardian Ms EDWARDS — This weekend I will be Mrs BAUER — What a pleasure it was to attend attending the Maldon Folk Festival, an event that was the Carrum volunteer coastguard flotilla and play a part established back in 1974 as a gathering for musicians in the naming and commissioning ceremony for the but which has grown to become a festival that runs over new 9.2-metre vessel Kingston Guardian. Fifty-five four days with over 20 venues and which features up to volunteer coastguards attend approximately 100 assists 300 individual performers. It has evolved into a unique, per year in all weather conditions and work tirelessly to exciting and culturally diverse event that is enormously ensure the safety of our community. I am proud the popular with music lovers across Australia and indeed coalition government has contributed $250 000 towards internationally. This festival continues to be a low-cost, the vessel. family-friendly festival and is run solely by volunteers. All profit from the festival is channelled back into Mates Day on the Bay community organisations and projects.
Mrs BAUER — With perfect boating conditions all Gilad Shalit weekend, a record 186 guests with disabilities and their carers enjoyed Mates Day on the Bay. In its 13th year, Mr SOUTHWICK (Caulfield) — Last Tuesday Mates Day is an inspiring community event, with evening the Jewish community came together at an 70 boats registered to escort guests for a morning’s event organised by the Zionist Council of Victoria to fishing. Boat owners, deckhands and hundreds of watch Gilad Shalit return home to Israel after more than volunteers helped to catch a record number of Port five years held in captivity in a historic prisoner Phillip Bay’s iconic snapper, with Mates Day guests exchange. I want to congratulate the Zionist Council of forging memories to last a lifetime. Victoria and the Jewish community of Melbourne, both of which advocated for Gilad’s release. Welcome Thank you to the Futurefish Foundation, organiser home, Gilad Shalit. David Kramer and the many volunteers who contributed to make the day such a huge success. Once Courage to Care: exhibition again my family loved being involved. The excitement on our guests’ faces when we had a simultaneous triple Mr SOUTHWICK — This week the Parliament is hook up of snapper was priceless. hosting an exhibit by B’nai B’rith, Courage to Care, which seeks to spread the vital message of speaking out Mount Tarrengower: hill climb against hatred and working for respect and acceptance. The exhibit does so much by using the stories of the Ms EDWARDS (Bendigo West) — Once a year a Holocaust to stress how important it is to act when devoted group of racers take to the steep hills and confronted with hate. The exhibit will open tonight, and sweeping turns of Mount Tarrengower at Maldon. This I encourage all members to attend. Those attending the event is the longest running hill climb event in opening will hear remarks from noted businessman and Australia and has become a major event on the calendar philanthropist John Gandel. Congratulations to Courage for car and motorcycle enthusiasts. Last weekend I to Care, Barbara Wolfson, Viv and Tony Weldon, the attended the final stage of the mountain climb. There volunteers and all involved. were a lot of loud vintage cars and motorcycles completing the final climb of the mountain in perfect conditions. Impressive speeds were reached by both
MEMBERS STATEMENTS
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4797
Glen Eira College: Just BU panel training, apprenticeships, traineeships or full-time employment after completing their educational Mr SOUTHWICK — It was my great pleasure to program. No students referred from youth justice have take part in a panel at the Glen Eira College careers and reoffended. PRACE is a fantastic organisation in our planning day that was attended by year 10 and 11 community. students. Other panellists included Cameron Yorke, career development adviser at the Melbourne Rebels, Maroondah Prevention and Recovery Care: and Biggest Loser contestant Sheridan Wright. Lisa opening Donath from the Just BU program does a fantastic job of combating bullying, promoting self-acceptance and Mr HODGETT (Kilsyth) — Last Wednesday ensuring that young people know that it is okay to just morning the Minister for Mental Health visited be you. Ringwood East to officially open the Maroondah Prevention and Recovery Care (PARC) service. The Sukkot in the City $3.2 million centre provides residential support and treatment for people with a mental illness. We know Mr SOUTHWICK — Last week I attended the that mental illness touches almost every Victorian Sukkot in the City event organised by the Chabad of family and that one in five Victorians will suffer from a Melbourne CBD. Sukkot is an important Jewish mental illness at some stage in their life. Eastern Health holiday and is commemorated by the building of a was one of the first clinical services to trial the PARC sukkah, a fragile tent decorated with leaves and model, and Minister Wooldridge recognised the branches. Congratulations to Rabbi Chaim Herzog and commitment to the partnership between Eastern Health all involved in this event. and Mind in the development and planning of this PARC in Ringwood East. Preston Reservoir Adult Community Education The Baillieu government is absolutely committed to Mr SCOTT (Preston) — I rise today to celebrate expanding prevention and recovery care services across the wonderful work being carried out in the community Victoria, and as part of that commitment the minister by Preston Reservoir Adult Community Education. announced that we are in the process of planning and PRACE works with young people who have fallen developing six new adult PARCs and three new youth through the cracks and gets them into the workforce or PARCs, which will specifically cater to the needs of into training. PRACE students have issues with young people aged 16 to 25. We are also committed to homelessness, mental illness, chronic illness and being ensuring that the specific needs of women are met. The victims of crime or various forms of abuse. They often Maroondah PARC, which has the capacity to create have very low literacy and numeracy skills. In many gender-specific areas when required, is a great example cases they have been serial non-attenders at school, and of a gender-sensitive care environment. I congratulate some never went to secondary school at all. Many have both Eastern Health and Mind on a fantastic new parents who are drug or alcohol dependent or in prison. service for our local community, and I again thank the They often do not have supportive homes and do not minister for visiting Ringwood East to officially open eat properly. They are often long-term unemployed and this important centre. essentially unemployable. Mooroolbark Football Club: awards Referrals come from youth justice, child and adolescent mental health services, the Salvation Army’s Mr HODGETT — On another matter, I wish to Crossroads Youth and Family Services, the Department congratulate the Mooroolbark Football Club on a very of Human Services, residential care units, local schools successful night at the Eastern Football League and other services. Chandler Medal Night. Cam Linford won the Kenneth Wright Medal for the division 2 EFL best and fairest. In As well as its educational program, PRACE provides the SEN 2011 Team of the Year, Mooroolbark had breakfasts and lunches every day, care packages, three players named in the EFL division 2 team: Kire combs, soaps, shampoos, pillowcases and take-home Talevski, full forward; Trent Georgiou, half-back flank; food parcels, and where needed it organises emergency and Matt Polkinghorne, ruck rover. Kire Talevski was accommodation and support services. also the goal-kicking winner in division 2. Well done to With this challenging group of students, PRACE Linners, Kid, Trent and Polky on these fantastic produces fantastic results. Eighty-two per cent of individual achievements. PRACE students have engaged in further education and
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
4798 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Wedge–Frankston-Dandenong roads, Carrum TRANSPORT LEGISLATION Downs: traffic management AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011 Mr PERERA (Cranbourne) — The intersection of Wedge Road and Frankston-Dandenong Road, Carrum Second reading Downs, is in dire need of upgrading. Labor knows the importance of installing traffic lights at this intersection, Debate resumed from 14 September; motion of and that is why the previous Labor government made a Mr MULDER (Minister for Public Transport). commitment of $6.6 million to alleviate the safety concerns of local motorists, who, may I say, take on the Opposition amendments circulated by risky traffic and attempt to get over to the other side. Ms RICHARDSON (Northcote) pursuant to Unfortunately the safety of motorists in Carrum Downs, standing orders. Skye, Cranbourne and surrounds is simply not a sexy Ms RICHARDSON (Northcote) — At last here we enough issue for this conservative government. I call on have it: the new authority, the Liberal Party’s answer to the government to allocate funding in the next budget public transport woes in this state — the Transport for this intersection improvement. Legislation Amendment (Public Transport Frankston: graffiti strategy Development Authority) Bill 2011. It is true to say that Victorians have waited a very long time for this Mr PERERA — It was with great pleasure that I moment; I note that in New South Wales a similar recently attended Frankston’s graffiti strategy launch at authority was delivered in about half the time. the Frankston Magistrates Court. The launch detailed a Nevertheless, here we are, nearly 12 months on, and we local graffiti strategy of implementing restorative now have the new authority. justice elements and a therapeutic jurisprudence principle for local youth. This strategy is a collaborative This great policy initiative was announced by the partnership between Frankston Magistrates Court, Liberals prior to the last election. Of course since then Frankston police, the Department of Justice, Frankston there has been nearly 12 months of trying to grapple City Council and the Youth Substance Abuse Service. with what this new authority should look like, and I am very saddened to say that in delivering this election I am of the firm belief that enforcement is not the commitment the Minister for Public Transport has answer. Rather than a tough-on-crime approach, we provided a new public transport authority with two very need a smart-on-crime approach. It is unfortunate that significant and fundamental flaws. However, I am very this is quite to the contrary of what many local pleased to see that the minister has joined us in the community leaders believe. chamber for the debate for a change. These flaws clearly contradict what was promised prior to the last Turkey: earthquake election. They are flaws that will undermine this new authority’s ability to perform its stated role. It is all talk Mr KOTSIRAS (Minister for Multicultural Affairs and no delivery, so it sounds somewhat familiar, does it and Citizenship) — I express my deepest sympathy to not? the people of Turkey who have suffered and are suffering from the recent devastating earthquake. Our While Labor will not be opposing this bill, I have thoughts go to the many victims, the families who have circulated a series of amendments designed to address lost loved ones and all of those whose lives have been the fundamental flaws in this bill. As the manager of changed forever. I will be working closely with the opposition business detailed in the house earlier, we Turkish community in Melbourne to ensure that we do have asked that there be further consideration in detail what we can as a government to assist those who have of this bill, and I am looking forward to the response suffered as a result of this earthquake. from the minister so we can spend some time on the new authority and on the bill.
SO what was promised by the Liberals, and what are the fundamental flaws in this bill? The first flaw concerns the complete lack of independence granted to this new authority. Our amendments 1 and 5 address this particular flaw. It is worth reminding members, particularly those on the government benches, of what was promised prior to the last election. On countless
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4799 occasions the then public transport opposition deliver a toothless tiger subject to the authority and spokesperson, the current Minister for Public Transport, whim of the Minister for Public Transport. Now, who is here in the house, spoke of his plan to rebuild according to the minister, the new authority is no longer Victoria’s public transport network via the creation of required because, as he said during the last sitting week his new independent authority. He said it would plan, of the Parliament, he has fixed all the problems in coordinate and manage our public transport system and public transport in just 11 months. that in order to do that it would be independent of government. Mr Mulder — Nearly all of them!
A media release of 14 November 2010 is typical of the Ms RICHARDSON — Nearly all the problems kind of statements the now minister and other Liberals have been fixed! There you have it again. I am so repeatedly made about this new initiative. That media pleased the minister is here to repeat what he said in the release talks about the coalition’s plan to rebuild last parliamentary sitting week. In 11 months the Victoria’s public transport network, including a new minister has fixed all those problems he was keen to independent public transport authority. It goes on to highlight in opposition. He has gotten on top of it. He say: has come out from under his desk and fearlessly confronted all of those problems and fixed them. What Victoria badly needs a new, independent statutory authority to a legend! I think not. plan, coordinate and manage our public transport system. The minister is damned by his own bill. Let us have a To remind the minister of what he said, I note that the look at proposed section 79O, which is to be inserted by media release finishes on that topic by saying: clause 3 of the bill. In relation to the directions of the The Victorian Public Transport Development Authority will new authority, it says: be independent of government and will report to Parliament twice a year. (1) The Public Transport Development Authority — That is what the now minister said in November last (a) is subject to the general direction and control of the year, and he often repeated those statements, but what minister; and has actually happened with this bill is a complete (b) must comply with any specific direction given by about-face. It is a new authority that is about as the minister. independent of government as a newborn baby is of its mother. There is absolutely no independence there — absolutely none whatsoever. Repeatedly, in clause after clause of the bill, the minister has shackled this new authority to the point Then if you look at the functions of this new authority where he dropped all references in his second-reading the minister is putting in place, which are detailed in speech to the need for independence except in one very new section 79AE(1)(a)(iv), which is inserted by telling instance. He said in his second-reading speech: clause 3, you see that the authority will be:
The PTDA will be governed by an independent board — acting as an advocate and spokesperson for the public transport system in accordance with the Government’s public that is the sole reference to independence, but even then transport policies and priorities and under the Department’s planning framework … the board would be entirely — So anything that the authority does while acting as an appointed by the minister. advocate is done within the government’s public The minister dropped any reference in his transport policies and priorities and within the second-reading speech to the need for this new framework that the department itself has set. authority to be independent of government, as he put it prior to the last election. Why would he not? It goes on. New section 79AE(1)(c) states that any time Repeatedly in this bill, clause by clause, the minister the authority is going to: has ensured that this new authority will be entirely construct or vary public transport infrastructure, including rail constrained by the government and by himself as infrastructure, roads, road-related infrastructure — minister. Looking at the bill one is left in no doubt that the minister has made a very decisive call here. Either level crossings, perhaps — he could deliver what was promised prior to the roadsides and other transport assets — election — a new authority able to fulfil its role independently of government et cetera — or he could all of these things will be done only —
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
4800 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
as directed by the Minister … hundreds of other crossings around the state; let us say that the authority decided that was an imperative worth New section 79AE(1)(e) states that the authority’s pursuing. Again, the authority will get the phone call, function to: the knock on the door or whatever it takes from the plan for the development of public transport networks as part minister to say, ‘That is not in keeping with the of an integrated transport system, including by undertaking decisions I have made, and you are not able to advocate feasibility studies — in that particular way; despite your role being about safety and putting commuters first, you cannot do that again, will be done — under any circumstances’. under the Department’s planning framework … Let us say, for example, that the authority saw indicated on and on it goes. There is clause after clause after in the government’s own budget papers that passenger clause designed to entirely constrain this new authority, rates were going to increase exponentially and so more which is not a new independent authority but just a new rolling stock was needed, and let us say that it was authority. going to revisit the decision of the minister not to purchase any more V/Line carriages. Let us say that the Let us take, for example, an instance where the authority said that based on a survey it had conducted, authority or perhaps its board, which will be appointed there was a desperate need to have more carriages put entirely by the minister, determines that level crossings on the network. Again, under no circumstances could should actually be prioritised on the grounds of safety the authority advocate for additional rolling stock. New rather than politics — that is, on the grounds that we are section 79AE(1)(i)(iv) inserted by clause 3 makes it going to put safety first and not put political interests clear that the minister is in charge of these decisions, first. lock, stock and barrel.
Mr Mulder interjected. Or let us say, for example, that the authority decided that the minister needed to revisit his decision to break Ms RICHARDSON — The minister is trying to an election commitment to purchase 10 more new claim that right here, right now, he is putting safety trams because passenger rates were on the rise. Again, ahead of political interests, but I remind the minister under no circumstances could the authority seek to that in fact what he has decided to do is to prioritise a reverse that decision. Let us say that if the authority crossing in Brighton, in the electorate of the Deputy decided, in relation to timetable changes that were Leader of the Liberal Party, and to prioritise a crossing made, that the minister had other options he could have in his own electorate ahead of hundreds of crossings pursued that would have delivered a better outcome for across the state which are considered more dangerous commuters. Again, under no circumstances could the than those two crossings. That is what he has decided to authority seek to reverse that decision. do. He has put his political interests ahead of the safety of commuters and passengers around the state. The scrapping of the premium station upgrades was another decision made by the minister to pay for the Let us say the authority said, ‘That’s not good enough; bungled protective services officer initiative, which we don’t think that’s a good call’. We on this side of the again under no circumstances could the authority seek house do not believe that is a good call. We believe to reverse. In relation to the need for more buses, we what the general public believes — that the minister has need more buses in growth corridors to deliver for those made the wrong decision in putting politics ahead of communities, given the growth in those areas. There is safety when it comes to level crossings. But what could nothing whatsoever in the budget for new buses in these the authority do in this instance to pursue the interests areas, but under no circumstances could the authority of all Victorians? The truth is that it could do absolutely seek to reverse that decision. nothing, because unless the minister gives the green light for it to advocate and pursue this particular The decision to cut Disability Discrimination Act 1992 objective, it can say and do nothing. compliance funding could also be something the authority may like to look at in the interests of Let us say, for example, that the authority decided that commuters — and again, unless the minister gave it the decisions about level crossings should be taken out of green light, there is nothing it could say, not one word it the hands of politicians, that the priority of upgrades could utter in the interests of commuters. Despite all the should be assessed based on safety — lock, stock and talk before the election of the need for independence for barrel — and that politicians or ministers should not be this new authority, what we have instead is a lame, if allowed to put crossings in their own seats ahead of not dead, duck that has been delivered by the minister.
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4801
I want to go on to the second fundamental flaw of this knowing what information exists, because the new bill, which is the lack of transparency in relation to the authority will not be able to tell them. If the minister’s creation of this new authority, remembering that the overzealous references to openness and accountability new authority was not going to be a sub-branch of the in his second-reading speech were anything more than Department of Transport and that things were going to spin and weasel words, you would expect that he would be very different on Terry Mulder’s watch. The have extended commuters the courtesy of being able to proposed amendments 2, 6 and 7 address the minister’s access the very same information that he will demand fundamental failure to deliver what he promised and from the new authority. what he spun in his second-reading speech. In the minister’s second-reading speech he was as keen as Prior to the last election a Liberal press release stated mustard to stress exactly how open and accountable this that the new authority would be required to report to the new authority was going to be. In that speech he made Parliament twice a year. In a recent press release the no less than five references to the openness and minister is quoted as saying: accountability that would come as a consequence of Establishing the new authority through legislation ensures it this new authority, but unfortunately and perhaps can be properly scrutinised by Parliament … unsurprisingly, the minister’s rhetoric does not match the reality of the bill. The minister is spot on. The authority should be required to report to the Parliament — twice a year Let us imagine that the proposed Public Transport would be great — to ensure that it is doing its job and is Development Authority is monitoring the performance conducting itself properly. The problem is, once again, of the train network only to discover that, as I said that that is not what the bill delivers. It does quite the earlier, the minister’s new timetable was causing a great opposite. Under proposed section 79W, which is deal of grief and extending travel times for many inserted by clause 3, the new authority will be required commuters. While this information would be diligently to report to Parliament twice a year only for the first given to the minister under new section 79AE(1)(k), two years and then once a year from that time forward. that very same section makes it absolutely clear that Obviously the minister has decided to ratchet down the under no circumstances can any of this information accountability of the new authority, contradicting his collected by the authority be made publicly available. It previous commitments and leaving commuters well and is stated quite clearly in the bill. truly in the dark. Ironically Labor’s amendment to this provision — amendment 7, as circulated — by ensuring Let us say that the authority conducts a survey — as the that the authority will be required to report to Metropolitan Transport Forum did recently, asking Parliament twice a year, every year, will do more to commuters about their perceptions of local train deliver on the Liberals’ election commitment than the stations et cetera — and asks what could be improved. minister has. A complete absence of accountability The results may show a strong preference for the seems to be something of a theme for this minister and reinstatement of Labor’s premium station upgrades for this bill. program. The minister could access this information, but under no circumstances is he required to make that Another important series of amendments I want to available to the public. It is clear that this provision touch upon are those to a provision that we on this side contained in the bill is in the minister’s best interests, of the house find troubling. Proposed section 79C(4)(a), but it is difficult to imagine how commuters and also inserted by clause 3, deals with the compulsory members of the public could possibly benefit from acquisition of land, and amendments 3 and 4, as being denied such information. circulated, address our concerns. We recognise the necessity to at times undertake compulsory acquisitions In questioning the wisdom of this closed-shop approach in order to build important new infrastructure — road, during a briefing from the Department of Transport — rail or whatever it may be. It would be almost the department always gives excellent briefings, and I impossible to complete works without these kinds of must thank it for that — I was told that members of the provisions being in place. However, the aspect of the community, if they wanted to access performance data bill that we find concerning is that it enables the new or any other information that is collected by the authority to force property owners who are having their authority, would have to submit an FOI request. That is homes compulsorily acquired to take land owned by the the standard method. Aside from the obvious statement new authority as compensation. I understand that this this response makes about the openness and provision is in two other acts but has never been put accountability of the new Public Transport into practice. Development Authority (PTDA), the other glaring problem is that commuters will have no way of even
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
4802 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
The minister’s response will no doubt be, ‘Just trust including through legislation, regulations, standards, me’. However, in our view, based on the Liberals’ guidelines and practices, for the road system … record, that would be a huge risk to take. Where That is what VicRoads is able to do: It continues: homeowners are subject to compulsory acquisition, every effort must be made to ensure that they are not But the new legislation makes clear that the responsibilities of further traumatised by having land they may not want the PTDA do not extend to development of legislation or forced upon them instead of monetary compensation. regulations regarding public transport. Instead, its role is limited to providing advice to the transport department. Surely the Liberals in government would at this point be arguing for the importance of individuals’ rights In short this bill, despite all the promises for over the rights of the state, so I fully expect them to independence and transparency, has more riders than a leap to their feet for the vote on this amendment to Melbourne Cup field. Clearly the minister is keen to ensure that it is passed through the house and that the appear as though he is handing over his responsibilities bill is improved, as it desperately needs to be. so that he can point the finger at the new authority while he sits at his desk reading the form guide for the While government members are considering the Terang races. However, here is the clincher: here he is, amendments and while we wait to hear from the sitting like a spider — — minister to see whether he is prepared to give the bill greater consideration, it is worth noting that in the Mr Mulder — I didn’t even get there. I was minister’s second-reading speech he claims that he has working. I couldn’t even get to the Terang races. the support of stakeholders. For the record it is worth noting that the Public Transport Users Association, an Ms RICHARDSON — You poor dear, working in important stakeholder, is not cheering wildly from the the interests of all Victorians, having to turn up and do sidelines about this bill. It had high hopes for this new your day job. That must be a really hard ask for authority, but it now says it has serious concerns about someone like you! Here he is, in truth, sitting like a the authority’s lack of independence, openness and spider or a grand puppeteer, checking and blocking this accountability. How could the PTUA not have these new authority’s every single move. It is no wonder that concerns, given all that was promised? The authority he sits here shamefaced about what he has delivered for has clearly been nobbled by the minister. Daniel the people of Victoria. Bowen, on behalf of the PTUA, makes it clear that the association is not happy. An article in the Age of What do we know about this new authority? According 11 October headed ‘Public transport body not so strong to the minister, it will plan, coordinate and manage and independent’ says: Victoria’s public transport system but it will be unable to act contrary in any way, shape or form to the Public Transport Users Association president Daniel Bowen commands of the minister. It will be governed by an said the legislation also failed to ensure transparency, with no independent board, with all its members appointed by obligation to explain decisions and matters of public interest … the minister. On the board there will be only one community representative — again, appointed by the ‘It’s something of a surprise to see its independence is not minister — but that person will not be appointed for enshrined in the legislation’, he said. ‘The danger is that it some considerable period of time. There are teething will limit what this organisation can do and the fact that it’s not obligated to put out its reports publicly … means it’s not problems we have to work through, according to the going to be as open as people would hope. minister. We will have to wait to see who he appoints to the board to represent the public. The PTUA’s newsletter goes into some detail about this and makes it plain that it is very concerned about what The authority will operate as the public face of public was promised prior to the election versus what is transport. We will see new badging, new branding and actually being delivered by the minister. a whole new set of promotional materials. At this stage we do not know what the cost will be or how many new I want to make reference to another important concern buses and trams could have been bought instead of the PTUA has raised. During the briefing from the spending money on promoting the minister’s new lame department we were told that the new authority mirrors duck. According to the minister and the bill before the VicRoads and that the two basically walk hand in hand. house, the authority will also deliver a safe, punctual, However, as the PTUA has pointed out, even VicRoads reliable and clean public transport network. Although, has more powers than the new authority being delivered as the minister confirmed again today, that job has been by the minister through this bill. For example, the latest done in 11 months — — PTUA newsletter states: Mr Mulder — Nearly; not quite. We’re getting … existing legislation cites one of the functions of VicRoads as to ‘develop and implement operational policies and plans, there.
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4803
Ms RICHARDSON — Not quite. We are nearly in opposition — yet again what the government has there — 99 per cent there perhaps, Minister. You do not given us is something far from what all of his rhetoric want to rate yourself down, do you? You want to put and promises would purportedly deliver. He has kept 99 per cent of the jobs — — the status quo. Clearly the minister is now happy being behind the ministerial desk getting his advice from The DEPUTY SPEAKER — Order! Comments DOT officials, and he has gone somewhat mute when it will be addressed through the Chair. comes to major projects, as this bill clearly demonstrates. Ms RICHARDSON — I beg your pardon, Deputy Speaker. It is just irresistible. If you are a commuter perhaps hoping that there will be fundamental changes as promised by the new authority, The DEPUTY SPEAKER — Order! Back to the that it will have teeth and somehow act independently bill. or perhaps competitively with the Department of Mr Mulder — Who, me? I have been called a lot of Transport, then your hopes have been snuffed out with things but never irresistible. the delivery of this bill.
The DEPUTY SPEAKER — Order! Conversation I am so sorry to see the minister leave. Isn’t that across the chamber is inappropriate. Comments will be typical? addressed through the Chair and will be on the bill. Mr Mulder — I’ll be back. Don’t stop. I’ll be back.
Ms RICHARDSON — Deputy Speaker, the Ms RICHARDSON — The minister is not here for minister cannot help putting tickets on himself. He has the entire debate, of course. He is off. solved the problems of public transport, and now he thinks everyone finds him irresistible! The ego of this Ms Asher — He has got a meeting. man knows no bounds. Ms RICHARDSON — He has got a meeting to The other thing that this new authority will do is attend. swallow up Metlink and the Transport Ticketing Authority, which was already scheduled to go once Ms Asher — He has paid you a courtesy. myki was implemented. The director of public transport will also go, and while the director’s functions and staff Ms RICHARDSON — Indeed he has. If, as a transfer over to the new authority, there are no commuter, you were hoping for an independent voice guarantees that the director of public transport will be via the authority — an open and transparent voice at the only person to lose his job with the creation of this that — and something that was independent of the new authority. department and that would fight for your interests, again your hopes have been snuffed out. If you were We also know that $10 million over four years was hoping that the minister would have the strength to allocated for this new authority in the May budget, but deliver what he said he would deliver and create an we could not get answers to questions about whether authority able to test and challenge his decisions, again there will be additional funds needed for this new your hopes have been sadly snuffed out. authority, and we also do not know exactly what this amount will pay for as part of the new arrangements. This is an important opportunity for us to reflect on all that was said by the minister prior to the last election The other part of the new authority that I think is worth about the various projects being conducted by the drawing the house’s attention to is that it is abundantly Department of Transport and all the fundamental root clear that the new authority is a client when it comes to and branch changes that needed to be made. They were delivering major infrastructure projects in the state; the so neatly summed up in what was going to be delivered Department of Transport (DOT) is still responsible for by this new independent, open and transparent delivering these major infrastructure projects. Despite authority. Sadly, what we have instead is nothing like all the criticisms that were made by the minister when an independent authority. It is in a sense a sub-branch he was opposition spokesperson on public transport of the Department of Transport that will be doing what about the Department of Transport’s ability to deliver the director of public transport once did, and all the major infrastructure projects, when the opportunity was staff, all of the functions et cetera will be transferred to presented for the minister to say that the government this new authority. was going to do something different and to directly address his concerns — concerns often repeated while
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
4804 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
In fact when the government announced the head of sides, and to come into this chamber and cast that this new authority, Ian Dobbs, I thought, ‘They’ve got aspersion is just not cricket. their man in place to run this new independent authority’, but the government could not even trust him The opposition circulated some amendments, including to take the phone call from the minister and do the right one on compulsory acquisition. We all remember the thing by the new Liberal government. No. As part of poor residents of Footscray — I think there were about this bill the government had to set about nobbling this 20 of them — who found out on the 6.00 p.m. news new authority and putting every conceivable barrier in that they were going to have their houses compulsorily place to ensure that it will not be able to act in the acquired. When opposition members were in interests of commuters, even if it believes, in the case of government they did not have the decency to go and level crossings, that it needs to advocate in the interests consult with people, to tell them, or to go through a best of safety as opposed to politics. practice process.
I am very pleased to see the deputy Liberal leader here The railways were first opened in Victoria by private in the house, because we did talk at length about a companies back in the 1850s. By 1878 the railways crossing upgrade in her electorate that has been were owned by the Victorian Railways, and it was a prioritised ahead of hundreds of other crossings around principal operator of metropolitan and regional rail the state that desperately need funds to ensure that services. Patronage from those years built up until the safety as opposed to politics is put first. The minister 1940s. With the advent of cars, patronage declined until will no doubt reflect upon the various concerns of the mid-1980s, when it stabilised. Patronage started to commuters around the state and will hopefully take this rise significantly from about 1996. This was due to an opportunity to speak directly to the department and to increase in the population and people wanting to do the the Minister for Public Transport and say that he needs right thing: to minimise congestion on roads and to put safety first. minimise emissions so that we can have a sustainable community. Mr WELLER (Rodney) — It gives me great pleasure to rise this afternoon to speak on the Transport This legislation is the fulfilment of a coalition election Legislation Amendment (Public Transport promise to take away some of the confusion. Currently Development Authority) Bill 2011, and I would like to there are three public transport bodies. They will be respond to a couple of comments made by the lead rolled into one so people will know where to go and speaker for the opposition. One of the statements made there cannot be a blame game. The parliamentary by the lead speaker was that this bill is all talk and no library research brief on this bill states on page 7 that in delivery. Is that not the pot calling the kettle black when 2010 the Legislative Council Select Committee on it comes to public transport? Train Services found:
We all remember the buckling lines and the record … evidence to suggest that poor rail service delivery may be linked to a fragmentation of responsibility and accountability number of cancelled services, and we also remember under the franchise system. The committee stated that: the myki ticketing fiasco. Was that not the biggest embarrassment to the former minister, Lynne Kosky, Responsibility for delivery of Victoria’s train services is when she went to try out her card and the machine fell fragmented across a range of government authorities, private operators and independent statutory bodies. The off the wall? What an embarrassment for the former committee believes this fragmentation of responsibility government that it was meant to deliver a ticketing may result in uncertainty in terms of factors leading to scheme for $350 million and it is now up to about and causes of failures in the provision of train services in $1.4 billion. There is no response. Victoria. The Select Committee on Train Services further found that The lead speaker for the opposition also questioned the evidence suggests that existing public transport governance independence of the new board because its members arrangements in Victoria could be streamlined and improved are appointed by the government. I note that the lead by integration under a single authority. speaker for the opposition did not question the independence of judges appointed by the former In the lead-up to the election the coalition made a government. To come in here and cast aspersions on the commitment. We are delivering on the findings of that independence of people appointed by the government is select committee. It was not just the select committee of a very low act. Opposition members could appoint the Legislative Council that made these findings. In people when they were in government, but now we are 2009 the Senate Standing Committee on Rural and in government they say we cannot appoint people Regional Affairs and Transport References published a because they will not be independent. It works for both report entitled Investment of Commonwealth and State
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4805
Funds in Public Passenger Transport Infrastructure ensure that the public transport system operates as part and Services. Submissions stressed that: of an integrated transport system which seeks to meet the customer service needs of all users. It will manage The key element of — the public transport system in a manner that supports a good government — sustainable Victoria. As I said, if we can get more people onto public transport, there will be fewer cars on was usually said to be a single regional public transport the road, meaning less congestion and less emissions — authority with the power and responsibility to plan and deliver contributing to social wellbeing by providing access to the city’s public transport service in an integrated way under a opportunities and supporting livable communities. The single brand (whether or not service provision is contracted out). less time you spend travelling to and from work, the better your standard of living. The authority will This government is rolling out findings endorsed by the promote economic prosperity through efficient and Legislative Council select committee in 2010 and a reliable movement of public transport users while also Senate committee in 2009. This is an example of the supporting rail infrastructure purposes. coalition listening and acting. Those of us living in regional Victoria understand the The independent board will consist of a chair, a deputy importance of getting freight onto rail and off the roads. chair, a community representative — so that we With another reasonably sized wheat crop this year it maintain in touch with what the community views will be important to have as much of that crop as are — and up to four other directors, who will possible carted to the port by rail. The Public Transport obviously have a broad base of skills needed for a good, Development Authority’s functions include acting as functional board. The Public Transport Development the face of the public transport system, assisting with Authority will be responsible for ensuring that the construction and maintenance of public transport Victorians have access to safe, clean, punctual and infrastructure, managing the operation of public reliable public transport services — again, this was one transport infrastructure, planning for the public of our core election commitments. In the lead-up to the transport system as part of an integrated transport 2010 election the coalition committed to getting the system and managing the coordination of trains, trams basics right: trains that run on time, trains that have and buses so that they are properly linked — they all working air conditioners, trains that are comfortable get there and you can get off one and onto the other. and clean, and the public safety of those passengers, to The authority’s functions also include developing and be delivered through the deployment of PSOs implementing policies and strategies to improve the (protective services officers). safety and security of public transport systems — that is, the deployment of PSOs, which we are on target to The objects and functions of the powers of the Public deliver as promised — and providing and operating the Transport Development Authority go beyond those ticketing system, because obviously the myki ticketing currently applied to the director of public transport. system problems have gone on for too long. Once again They are strengthened to reflect key priorities, we are going to clean up the mess and get on with the including coordinating and integrating transport modes, job. auditing all Victorian public transport assets and reporting publicly on the value and condition of the In conclusion, public transport has been important to assets, along with the cost of reviewing them to bring Victorians since the 1850s, as members have read. We them up to modern standards. Again, it was an election have seen the number of users of public transport grow coalition commitment to advocate for extensions to the until the 1940s and then decline until the 1980s. Since public transport network and promote public transport the 1980s there has been an increase in patronage, with as an alternative to cars so that we could have it taking off in 1996 and ramping up since about 2006. sustainable living here in Victoria. This bill is an election commitment that the Baillieu government is delivering on. We went to the election The primary objective of the Public Transport saying we would get the basics right. Everyone Development Authority is to plan, coordinate, provide, remembers the record numbers of cancelled services. operate and maintain a customer-focused public We have the services back on and running. We all transport system consistent with the vision statement remember that public transport services had no air and the transport system objectives in the Transport conditioning when it was stinking hot. We have the air Integration Act 2010. In other words, the government is conditioning running again. We all remember people putting customers first. Once again the emphasis is on being worried about their safety on public transport. We trains that run on time, trains that actually turn up and have the protective services officers coming back. I trains that are comfortable to ride in. The authority will commend the bill to the house.
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
4806 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Mr BROOKS (Bundoora) — The coalition parties names on the boards outside the elevator shafts. It is went to the last election clearly promising to establish just a reorganisation of people’s titles in a different an independent statutory authority — a new body, the organisation. As I said, the authority will have no Public Transport Development Authority — to plan, independence and the same people will be carrying out manage and coordinate Melbourne’s and Victoria’s the same functions in the same areas other than a public transport system. I think it is fair to say that couple of minor areas which I will talk about in a public transport users and those who passionately moment. support public transport generally supported that concept. There is a fair degree of support for the notion, It is not just members of the parliamentary Labor Party whether or not it is correct, that a single coordinating in opposition saying that the new body will lack authority — and people cite overseas examples — independence. As the shadow Minister for Public would provide a clearer and more centralised way of Transport just pointed out, members of the Public planning and managing a system of many different Transport Users Association, probably one of the most components. vocal groups commentating on public transport issues, have quite clearly stated publicly that this new It is a lot easier, of course, to make promises when in organisation is not what members of the association opposition than it is to deliver such things when in were hoping for. I quote from the Age in which the government. This bill is a classic example of that, with president of the Public Transport Users Association, this government when in opposition promising Daniel Bowen, is reported as saying: something before the last election, coming into government and then, nearly a year later, admitting It’s something of a surprise to see its independence is not enshrined in the legislation … The danger is that it will limit through this bill that it cannot deliver what was what this organisation can do and the fact that it’s not promised. Government members are admitting that the obligated to put out its reports publicly … means it’s not things they said they would achieve through the going to be as open as people would hope. development of the new authority cannot be done. As the opposition’s lead speaker, the member for It is clear that the government is not delivering on what Northcote and shadow Minister for Public Transport, it promised the Victorian people it would. As we have said, this body will be answerable in every way to the seen across a range of areas, the government has Department of Transport and to the Minister for Public wanted to tick off on an election commitment and it has Transport. brought into this place a bill that does not do what the government says it does, but it tries to claim it as a As I said, members of the then opposition made a completed election promise. number of pre-election statements. In a media release dated 14 November 2010, the now Premier said: There are also the interesting arguments that you, Acting Speaker, made in your contribution to the debate Victoria badly needs a new, independent statutory authority to before mine, just before you took the chair. You plan, coordinate and manage our public transport system. mentioned the committee reports commenting on the fragmentation of the public transport system and how a What we see is that the Public Transport Development fragmented system operates. It is quite curious, if that is Authority will have its powers corralled by the the concern of the government, that it would appoint a Department of Transport. It is clear, in black and white Kennett-era person to be the interim head of the new in this bill, that the authority will report to the minister Public Transport Development Authority. I understand and not to this Parliament and indirectly through to the that the same person who helped to break up the system public and that its budgets will be subject to the whims and oversaw many job losses through the 1990s has of the minister of the day. The other revelation is the been brought back in to supposedly reunite and run this existing bodies that the new authority will subsume the central authority. It is a very curious appointment. We office of the director of public transport, Metlink, and will have to wait and see how that all works out. eventually the Transport Ticketing Authority. Thankfully it was confirmed at the government briefing There is also a pattern in terms of independence in this that there will be no job losses in those departments. government. I will not stray from the bill, but in other We are certainly glad that no-one, other than the areas of government the coalition’s rhetoric on director of public transport, will lose their job. If there independence, transparency and open government has are to be no changes to the staffing, the establishment of been shown to be false — — the new authority represents a rearrangement of workstations at 121 Exhibition Street. This bill is about the same people doing the same jobs but with different
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4807
The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Weller) — Order! I with people in my electorate. To think that there is a remind the member that he said he would not stray possibility that the government would rebrand that from the bill. service and that we would bear the cost of rebranding all our trains, trams, V/Line services and SmartBus Mr BROOKS — FOI legislation is one matter I services simply so this government can tick off an would point to particularly, if I were allowed to stray election promise is outrageous, particularly when we from the bill. consider the cost of some of the programs in other areas that this government has cut. We talked about the In public transport, it was not long ago that we saw the Victorian certificate of applied learning earlier today, director of Transport Safety Victoria having to take the and the Take a Break occasional child-care program is extraordinary step of speaking out publicly on concerns another example. The funding that would be required to he has about the impacts of this government’s laws on rebrand all these services would be better spent on his independence and ability to freely go about his work some of those core services where people want to see of ensuring the safety of Melbourne’s and Victoria’s their government take action rather than repainting and travelling public. There is a pattern of this government rebadging our trains, trams and buses. being happy to interfere with independent people who are supposed to look after people’s safety and ensure In summary, the government claims that this authority that the public interest is upheld. will be independent when in fact it will be funded by the minister, it will be controlled by the minister, its There is also the acquisition of land. The shadow powers will be set by the minister and all the members Minister for Public Transport mentioned new of the board of directors will be appointed by the section 79C(4)(a) which is inserted by clause 3 and minister. The bill is obviously a sham, and I can provides that: understand why the Minister for Public Transport … the Public Transport Development Authority may require would be embarrassed by it. The amendments the owner of the land to take any land adjoining it that is foreshadowed by the shadow Minister for Public owned by the Public Transport Development Authority and is Transport, the member for Northcote, would improve no longer required by the Public Transport Development the bill and hold the government to some of its election Authority … commitments. I urge the members of this house to My reading of that provision is that it means that, if the support those amendments. government were to proceed with one of the rail extensions it is currently talking about and planning, a Mrs BAUER (Carrum) — I rise to speak on the property owner could well have their land acquired but Transport Legislation Amendment (Public Transport that instead of, as under the existing arrangements, Development Authority) Bill 2011. It is a pleasure to being compensated in cash — that is, being paid for speak on this bill, and I commend the Minister for their land — so that they could choose where they Public Transport for his great leadership in this area. might want to go, under this legislation they might be The bill is a very important piece of legislation. It is a told to take land from the Public Transport step in the right direction to fix the problems in Development Authority in lieu of a cash payment. I Victoria’s public transport system. I cannot believe consider that to be extraordinary. It is important that some of the hogwash we have heard over the last members consider the amendments that have been 5 minutes or so. This bill establishes a new transport foreshadowed by the shadow Minister for Public legislation authority, the Public Transport Development Transport in terms of protecting people from Authority, to coordinate, manage and plan all inappropriate use of that provision. metropolitan and regional train, tram and bus services. It is great news for all Victorians. It will instil In the government briefing, for which I thank the confidence in the system. departmental officers and the minister’s office, it was mentioned to us that Metro Trains Melbourne, Yarra My electorate of Carrum relies heavily on public Trams, V/Line and the SmartBus were among the transport. It has seven train stations — at Aspendale, sections of the public transport system that would Edithvale, Chelsea, Bonbeach, Carrum, Seaford and possibly be rebranded as part of the establishment of Kananook — and hundreds of bus services each week. the Public Transport Development Authority. It was a I note at this stage that the community has welcomed surprise to me because I know that out my way the the improvements to punctuality on the Frankston line SmartBus is very popular. The branding of that bus that we have witnessed over the last several months. works quite well. People see it as providing a regular, Coordination of these services, along with train, tram reliable and clean service. It is one that is very popular and bus services across Victoria, is a mammoth job, and we recognise this, but paramount to running an efficient
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
4808 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011 and reliable public transport system is the coordination about helping to clarify the authority’s role in of the system by this authority, and we want more coordinating the transport system as a whole, including people to use more public transport more often. freight, road, sports and cycling. Its long-term aim is to establish a means to an efficient, coordinated transport One of the major problems with trying to achieve this system throughout the state which meets not only in the past was the lack of a central body to oversee the immediate needs but also the needs of the state well system. The more authorities that are involved in into the future. The flow-on benefits of this strategy coordinating these services, the more chances there are will be enormous. Not only will commuters feel better that something will go wrong and more problems will off and be better off but so will businesses and arise. This has certainly been an issue in the Carrum industries that rely on rail freight. Savings will be made electorate. There has been poor coordination of train as bureaucracy is reduced and administration and bus services to meet the needs of commuters. streamlined under one body. Gaps in the public Schoolchildren tell me that if they, say, catch a train at transport system will be identified and expansion plans Mentone and disembark at Carrum, when they arrive at will be developed. A better system will attract more Carrum they have to quickly run down the platform, patrons and the benefits of travelling on public transport cross the road and within 1 minute their school bus has will be extolled. taken off. This impacts severely on children in my local community. When they cannot get there they have to The government has listened to the community about wait half an hour for the next bus to take them home. feeling unsafe on public transport, and it will deliver There has just not been enough time allowed for them protective services officers to address this issue. We to get from the platform to the other side of the road, have made the best of the inherited myki system, and and that is a result of a lack of coordination. we are now determined to implement a plan that will place responsibility and accountability for our public It is not only students but also workers who need to transport system in one body, the Public Transport connect to buses to continue their journeys, and they are Development Authority. faced with the same problems. I am told about these problems sometimes every second day or on a weekly As a member of the bipartisan Family and Community basis. It seems to me that common sense should prevail Development Committee I am currently involved in an and the failure to schedule a departure time that is just a inquiry into the participation of senior Victorians. The few minutes later means commuters are not being committee hearings have revealed the importance of provided with the service they deserve. The new Public public transport for senior Victorians. Access to public Transport Development Authority will go a long way transport is an important factor in providing towards sorting out these frustrating and often opportunities for participation and preventing social unnecessary problems. isolation of older people. Many older people depend on public transport services in order to participate in their In my role as the state government representative for family, social and volunteer activities, as well as for Carrum, the establishment of one body will make it access to essential services. The committee is hearing easier for me and my office to deal with constituent this every time it meets. inquiries. The public transport system in this state is one of the few in the country to be managed by three In many cases older people turn to public transport as a different bodies: the Department of Transport, the transition from driving. Alternatives to public Transport Ticketing Authority and Metlink. The transport — for example, community transport and development authority will eliminate many of the taxis — often do not meet the needs of older people. frustrations when trying to find information to resolve The provision of accessible, coordinated and affordable issues on behalf of constituents by providing a one-stop public transport that is safe for Victorian seniors is what shop for customers, operators and agencies. It will also is needed. In Victoria much has been done to improve provide a centrally based source of information and the accessibility of public transport for older people and feedback necessary in the formation of departmental people with a disability, and we are moving towards policy. This plan will go a long way towards solving compliance targets under the national disability the confusion, buck-passing and lack of responsibility standards. that has taken place in years gone by. The buck will now stop with the Public Transport Development Through the committee hearings suggestions have been Authority. made by many organisations that the coordination of these efforts still needs further attention. For example, However, this bill is not just about coordinating local older people who are able to get on a tram at an and regional train, bus and tram services. It is also accessible tram stop might travel along the tram route
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4809 and find there is no accessible tram stop at the other end transport system in a big city. But one of the things that for them to disembark safely at. The committee is we know makes Melbourne the most livable city in the hearing that there is a need to plan adequate world is that we get rated well. Despite what we as infrastructure and safety around public transport, politicians say, and sometimes what commuters say including appropriate kerb guttering and accessible when they get frustrated with the system, one of the toilets. We have heard that regional areas continue to reasons Melbourne is one of the world’s most livable experience issues relating to access to and coordination cities is that it gets rated quite highly on its public of public transport. The establishment of the Public transport system. Transport Development Authority is certainly a step in the right direction to fix the problems of Victoria’s To say the system is not integrated is wrong; to say it is transport system. The minister said in his opening wrecked is wrong. As politicians we experience some statement to Parliament that it is time we put passengers of that problem. We have it in opposition, and then first, and I agree. This bill will successfully do that, and when in government we end up having to deal with the I commend it to the house. consequences. This is exactly what the government is trying to do with this bill. We try to differentiate Mr PANDAZOPOULOS (Dandenong) — It is a between products. Attempting to say the system is pleasure to speak on this bill. We will not oppose the wrecked to discourage people from using the system, bill on the basis that it was generally an election thereby encouraging them to hop into their cars when commitment, albeit not exactly, as has been spelt out by petrol is at record prices, is something we do as the shadow Minister for Public Transport. Our role in politicians to attract votes, because people do think opposition is to make sure that the government keeps to about their situation at a certain point in time and do its commitments, thus the amendments, and also to forget, for good or bad, what the history has been. keep the government accountable for a range of policy areas and actions that are not part of election When we came into government we had a whole lot of commitments. other problems. You, Acting Speaker, as the member for Rodney, said a couple of things — for example, I often talk on public transport issues. Dandenong is ‘What about all those cancelled train services?’. When proudly a public transport manufacturing electorate. we came to government a whole lot of railway lines had Most of our trains, trams and buses have been and are been closed. It is a bit hard to complain about cancelled being manufactured in Dandenong. It is good that services when there are none. We expanded a lot of Bombardier has received another contract recently, as those and therefore increased congestion in the has Volgren following the massive expansion of the bus system — by putting on more trains and adding more system in the last decade to service our rapidly growing lines we added to the congestion. We also increased community. The integration of public transport policy service and met customer and community needs. But and delivery is very important, and that is what this bill every extra train and every extra service adds to does, but it is an insult to everyone in both the public congestion on our system, because we have accepted and private sectors involved in the delivery of public the historic situation we inherited. transport to imply, as an excuse for this bill, that there is no integration, that everyone is working in silos and We have a spiral system for Melbourne, with a few that no-one works together. That is clearly wrong. The areas that do not have good fixed rail access, such as reality is that most of the same people who have been Doncaster and Rowville. I hope the government will doing what has been going on in the last decade or so not walk away from its election commitments to service will end up being the same people doing this, except those communities by using this authority’s supposed that there will be a new statutory body and the director independence, because really this authority is a bit of of public transport will no longer be there — so it is an smoke and dagger — — insult. Ms Allan interjected. The reality is that since the privatisation of the system it has been very much a split up service. Some people Mr PANDAZOPOULOS — No, smoke and would say it has not actually worked too badly. We all dagger. I am talking about the smoke of independence. have criticisms of public transport. I think from our If you are not going to proceed with the Rowville earliest memories we have heard complaints about railway service you can say, ‘Independent directors of people having missed the bus, about trains running late this statutory body have advised the minister’ — and about insufficient services, not enough services in although they will not be independent and will get growing areas and congestion on the roads as a result of advice only from the minister, act on behalf of the trains on railway crossings. It is just the reality of a minister and implement the minister’s budget
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
4810 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011 outcomes — as the new excuse for why things will not is the determinant of what makes a priority? Is it growth happen. I hope this will not be the case. of population? Is it growth in public transport usage? Is it the number of accidents on the system? Whatever it Also, it is hard to predict what our growing population is, that criterion is publicly known. will be. We have had record post-war migration in recent years, mostly from the John Howard I urge the government, when creating a statutory body, government, which is quite interesting. How do you to think that there are some good statutory bodies that predict that when it takes so long to create new lines work quite well in Victoria. They have boards and they and to deal with the historic anomalies? When make themselves accountable to their stakeholders. In Melbourne’s underground rail system was opened we the case of public transport the stakeholders are the may have thought at the time it was of world standard, people of Victoria. We have water bodies that consult even though there were other cities in the world that regularly with their stakeholders. Whether it is had bigger metropolitan systems. When we actually Gippsland Water or South East Water out my way, they look at integrating public transport, we know our do consult. They consult, they put out newsletters and biggest impediment to getting things done for they respond to emails and phone calls. When there are Melbourne and for country rail services is the city loop works, they consult with the communities. They consult system. The city loop is limiting our ability to grow the well with local councils. I would like the minister when public transport network: to expand it, to put on more he comes back when we are summing up on the bill to services and to meet the growing needs of the tell us what the role of this board is in consulting with community. the stakeholders and reporting back to the stakeholders.
There have been some projects — obviously the The Minister for Tourism is at the table, and she knows regional rail link is part of that — to address that very well that one of the great things about Tourism problem. There have also been fixed rail deficiencies in Victoria is that the members of the board are out there the western suburbs, because when the lines were put in as a board working closely with the tourism industry, place, mostly in the Liberal-National party years, there because we can only grow the tourism that we have was not much population there and those areas were not done so well when we are coordinating efforts together serviced afterwards. In considering this bill let us not and we are listening rather than just making simple believe there has been no integration. It is a cheap shot one-off press release announcements that might look against very dedicated public sector workers and those good on a particular day. We all work a lot better when in the private sector who worked pretty hard to make we get to where the real priorities are, where the sure that under very difficult and trying circumstances community says the priorities are, where the experts say we have been generally meeting the vast majority of the priorities are and where the private sector says the needs of public transport users. priorities are, and I would hope that the new authority does that as well. I find it quite interesting as a fan of public transport how many people in cities all over the world complain At the end of the day this is an election commitment. about their public transport system. I guess when you We will support it. I would like to see more are in a hurry — it has happened to me as well — you transparency and more reporting back to this Parliament think, ‘Maybe I should have left 5 minutes earlier’, and stakeholders, thus the amendments, but I look ‘Maybe I shouldn’t have taken that phone call’ or ‘It forward to everyone else’s contributions to the debate. was a bummer I missed that parking spot at the car park and I’ve got to park a bit further away’. It is very easy Mrs POWELL (Minister for Local Government) — to sit there and say it is the rail system’s fault as well. It I am pleased to speak on this legislation and say how is important that we acknowledge that sometimes, as proud I am that this is another example of the Baillieu dedicated supporters of the public transport system and government delivering on another election as commuters, we get it wrong ourselves. But there is commitment. no doubt that there are a whole lot of things that need to be done. The purpose, as was said earlier, is to establish a new statutory authority — the Public Transport At the end of the day public transport is really about Development Authority (PTDA). The authority is to ensuring the future and continuing viability of our city have a look at all of those issues that are so important to and our state to continue to retain that world livability people as they use public transport — the planning, the status we have. It is all about investment, and it is all coordination, the managing — and it is not just for rural about making sure that out of this process we get not areas; it is for metropolitan rail services as well. The political projects but projects funded on priorities. What PTDA board will have a look at all of those issues
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4811 around trains, trams and bus services, so it is going to The impact is huge on people who use public transport be really important. and miss connecting buses when they come back to rural areas. They might be late for appointments, and As former speakers have said, there has been growth for people in country areas sometimes it takes many over the last 10 or 11 years in the public transport months to get an appointment with a specialist in system, but the former government did not fix the Melbourne; they have no alternative, no other choice. If problems, and it is up to this minister and this a train or bus gets in late to Melbourne, they can miss government to try to fix these problems. It is not going their appointment, and if they are late for an to be easy, because there are some massive problems to appointment and have to wait in the waiting room of do with growth corridors and not being able to integrate one of those specialists and miss the late train, they some of the regional services into those growth have to stay overnight because they do not have other corridors. options. Many people have come to my office and said that they have missed the train because they were late There are also — after 11 years of the former or that the train left early and they were not able to get government knowing that this growth has occurred but that train back to Shepparton or other regional areas. not fixing the problems — massive issues in country areas and for country rail travellers. I get those I have had a number of people come into my office — complaints all the time in my office. There were too and I know the member for Rodney mentioned this in many authorities dealing with the public transport his presentation — who have been on trains in the service, and I would like to congratulate the Minister middle of summer when the air conditioners have for Public Transport for his hard work and commitment broken down. A number of people over a period of in providing Victorians with better public transport months came into my office in Shepparton and already. He is already getting the basics right. Already complained about being on trains in the middle of trains are running on time. That was not able to be done summer — and you can imagine what the heat would under the former government. In the last number of be like — and having to leave from either Melbourne or months under this minister the trains have been on time, Seymour in a train that had no air conditioning. It puts so already we are getting a better service. We applaud people off using public transport. We cannot afford to the Minister for Public Transport in the work he is have people leaving public transport. We need to have doing with the authorities and the work he is doing with them on there to stop them from having to travel by car. the stakeholders in making sure that trains run on time Some of those people do not like travelling by car and making sure that those train services are because they do not like driving in Melbourne or they convenient, reliable and all of those things that people do not like having to try to find a car park in need when they want to travel on the public transport Melbourne. service. A lot of people really want to use the train service, so The PTDA will be governed by an independent board, we have to make sure that the service is safe, and although it will be appointed by the minister, it will convenient and all the things that make people want to be independent. Members are put on that board for their use it again and again. I know the Minister for Public expertise, for their skills and for their knowledge about Transport is looking at all those issues. public transport, and I know that this board will really look at the best way to bring forward public transport Over the last 10 years Shepparton district train for the community of Victoria. It also has to make sure travellers have raised with me a number of issues about that the transport service in Victoria is safe, clean, better timetables and trains getting in before punctual and reliable. That is what people ask for of a 9.00 a.m. so that professional people can go to lectures public transport service. They just want those things. and business appointments. I have spoken to the Minister for Public Transport about this. He came to Some people do not have a choice about travelling to Shepparton and heard about the timetabling issues. We Melbourne or travelling to wherever they are going have a number of different sorts of timetables. From other than by using public transport, so they rely on it to Monday to Thursday we have three train services and get to their appointments on time. I know that some of two coach/train combinations from Shepparton to the unreliability on country trains now is happening Melbourne, and on Fridays we have an additional because they have to wait in line in those corridors for coach/train combination. There are three train services the Melbourne trains to either leave the stations or leave and three coach/train combinations from Monday to the corridors, or because the rural trains are getting Friday from Melbourne to Shepparton, so that is six caught in that blockage of the congestion of trains services a day. On Saturdays we have two trains in each going into Melbourne. direction between Shepparton and Melbourne, and on
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
4812 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Sundays we have three trains and a coach/train crossings. This government is making sure that people combination in each direction between Shepparton and have somewhere to go if they have complaints and that Melbourne. The patronage has increased substantially those complaints are listened to. I commend the on the Shepparton line. Minister for Public Transport for the great work he is doing. I commend this bill to the house, and I urge the The Minister for Public Transport was able to Parliament to pass it. I wish it a speedy passage. experience this service firsthand when he came with me on the train from Melbourne to Shepparton last Ms GARRETT (Brunswick) — I rise to make a Wednesday. I have to say it was a fantastic train contribution to the debate on the Transport Legislation service. It took about 2½ hours to get from Melbourne Amendment (Public Transport Development Authority) to Shepparton. On the train we spoke to a number of Bill 2011. I do so following on from several other people who use the service on a regular basis. It is speakers from the opposition and state that Labor does really great to know that people use and enjoy that train not oppose the bill; however, it has some serious service because sometimes that is the only means they concerns about its content. The shadow Minister for have to get to Melbourne. Public Transport has proposed some excellent and outstanding amendments, which we urge the The minister was in Shepparton on an overnight stay. government to take on board in order to ensure that the The next day he met with a number of organisations overblown rhetoric regarding this piece of legislation, including the Goulburn Valley Highway Action Group both prior to the election and what we have just heard and Shepparton RAILS, which gave the minister a in this house, at least comes somewhere near the mark suggested timetable and its thoughts about improved of being realised. rail services. The minister also met with the City of Greater Shepparton council, which stated that one of its As we have heard from members of the government, it biggest priorities was to achieve improved rail services came to power on the back of a catchcry to ‘fix the between Shepparton and Melbourne and to increase problems and build the future’. Over the coming years patronage at the stations. we will see whether the implementation of another authority by basically moving some Lego pieces around The minister returned to Melbourne on the afternoon will stand the test of time and be judged as fixing the train service with his adviser so he was able to problems and building the future. experience train travel both ways, and that is really important. I know the minister takes his responsibilities We cannot wait to see the number of magical things very seriously and travels right around the state. He this public transport body will apparently do, according talks to people in Melbourne about their experiences of to the many speakers on the government benches; we public transport services and to people right across cannot wait to see this almost perfect transport system. country Victoria as well to get an idea of what is We have heard there will be no train delays, a seamless needed in the public transport sector and what the coordination of all services and cleanliness of the travelling public needs. He understands that people highest order — an extraordinary list of things that will want reliable, safe and convenient train and bus come from moving these Lego pieces around. We will services which arrive on time and on which people feel see whether or not what is promised in this sort of safe. overblown rhetoric, like so much of what this government does, comes to fruition or not. I know patronage has increased right across Victoria and not just in country areas, but the patronage on the What is clear is that this government made a very Shepparton to Melbourne train line service increased to strong promise prior to the election that this body 273 146 patrons in 2009–10 compared to 138 959 would be an independent body for the purposes of patrons in 2004–05. More people are using public running, advocating for and planning the public transport, both trains and trams. Governments of all transport network — a frank and fearless advocate, if persuasions have to make sure they look to the future you like, with a consumer focus. This is the promise and do not just provide a public transport service for that the Victorian people are entitled to expect to be today. They need to understand what public transport delivered, and it is the test on which the government travellers need from their train and tram services over will be judged, but on the face of this legislation we can the next decade. see that this is a test which it is clearly going to fail.
This government is doing the work. It is having a look This authority was supposed to be a frank, fearless and at the basics. It is getting the basics right. It is making independent advocate for the consumer and for public sure, for instance, that there are safety barriers at level transport, independent of government. Yet in the
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4813 legislation we see that the role of this authority is forward by the coalition prior to the election. I highlight restricted to acting within the goals of the Department to the house amendment 2 as proposed by the shadow of Transport and its minister. If you are going to create minister, which provides: a genuine advocate then that advocate needs to be free to advocate for whatever it believes is most appropriate The Public Transport Development Authority must publish any report provided to the minister under subsection (1)(k) on and to take up the concerns of those it advocates for, the Public Transport Development Authority’s internet whether or not this falls within the narrow scope of website within 14 days of providing the report to the minister. what the department or the minister may like the body to focus on. You certainly cannot create a free advocate This would be openness and transparency. This would if you so significantly constrain the scope of their be in accordance with the commitments made. This advocacy. would satisfy the test that the government set itself of creating a truly independent body that would act at The shadow Minister for Public Transport has proposed arms length from government in the best interests of the some very sensible amendments to address this public transport system and its users. We ask the particular issue. Amendment 1 proposes that the government what on earth it has to be afraid of, and I authority would act: think we know the answer. We know that under this legislation the minister is able to intervene in the affairs … as an independent advocate and spokesperson for the of this authority at any time he chooses. We know that public transport system, including advocating for a position which may not be in accordance with the government’s the authority is to be constrained by the goals of the public transport policies or the department’s planning department. It is not independent. This is just another framework … layer of secrecy and another failure to provide transparency for what was promised. There is no point pretending you have an independent advocate for the consumer and the customer if they are The public transport system is a key area of service so dramatically constrained. If the government is going delivery to all Victorians, particularly in my electorate to be true to its commitment and stand up to what it said of Brunswick. Recent census data shows that nearly a in the public domain, we urge that it adopt that quarter of the people in my electorate use public amendment. transport, which places it in the top three. What people in my electorate want to see are actual outcomes in Similarly, the legislation before the house allows the public transport to continue the investment made by the minister to intervene and give the authority direction as previous government. We have major issues of he sees fit. Hang on. The government is supposedly overcrowding on our trams, including on routes 1, 8, creating an independent authority but it is then able to 19, 55 and 96. There are major problems with the train intervene when it does not like that authority’s views? system and yet we have this policy, this flagship policy We now know what this government meant when it of this government, which is a moving around of the said it intended to ‘fix the problems’. Lego pieces and the creation of another authority which Ms Green — The fix is in! was meant to be independent and which this legislation clearly shows will be anything but. Ms GARRETT — The fix is in! On its flagship policy on public transport, the fix is certainly in. Again It is time that this government started to match some of we highlight the amendments that the opposition is its rhetoric prior to the election and to invest properly in proposing to ensure that the independence of the the public transport system, not rip services out of the authority is absolutely protected. I go to amendment 5, west, not commit repeatedly to feasibility studies that which we say should be inserted to ensure that: seem to go nowhere, not approach this policy with all of the nonsense and huff and puff that we have heard The Public Transport Development Authority is not subject to today about what a magic bullet and magic wand this the direction or control of the minister in respect of the transport authority will be when it is just a moving performance of its duties and functions and the exercise of its around of the Lego pieces. Supposedly it is creating a powers. perfect system, yet where is the investment in that In a similar vein, if we are interested in openness and system? Where is the vision for transport? How is the accountability, as this government led the Victorian government addressing the growth areas? Where is people to believe it was prior to the election, then there there an acknowledgement of the fact that Melbourne is should be requirements for regular surveying and the fastest growing city in Australia? Where is the reporting of the authority to be made public. On any government’s approach to regional Victoria? Where is assessment this would seem to be the expectation of the the response to all of these issues? community on the basis of the clear commitments put
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
4814 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
This government is letting the Victorian public down Then we have the ultimate in cost blow-outs, aside by creating smokescreens and mirrors, by serving up from the desalination plant — the myki ticketing nonsense, by serving up what it says achieves the system. This is another black hole that was left to us by promises it made when it clearly does not; even on its the previous government. I still have fond memories of own tests it does not. We call on the government to the press conference with the previous transport look at the amendments that have been circulated and at minister where that machine fell apart; I assume a the very least to get the independence of this authority media adviser no longer worked for the minister after right. The government should deliver on what it has that incident. Even the federal member for promised, and then, for heaven’s sake, government Corangamite, in one of his recent media releases, members should roll up their sleeves and start doing agreed that the Baillieu government has unfortunately some genuine work to deliver real solutions and inherited a black hole in myki. He was certainly outcomes for a growing state. criticising his own by saying that, and three of them are here in the chamber — the members for Lara, Geelong Mr KATOS (South Barwon) — It gives me great and Bellarine. However, the Baillieu government is pleasure to rise this afternoon in support of the continuing with myki as it would cost more to start Transport Legislation Amendment (Public Transport from scratch, and that is the problem. To remove that Development Authority) Bill 2011. This bill will system and start again would cost taxpayers a lot more. establish the Public Transport Development Authority, The difference is that we will get myki right. a statutory authority, to plan, coordinate and manage all metropolitan and regional public transport services, The three examples I have provided of the including trains, trams and buses. The Baillieu incompetence and cost blow-outs of the previous government has a strong mandate to introduce this new government reinforce the Baillieu government’s authority as it was one of the centrepieces of its public decision to implement the Public Transport transport policy, which was announced on Development Authority. The authority will oversee the 14 November last year. delivery of a safe, punctual and clean transport network. It will plan, coordinate and manage Victoria’s public Victoria has simply had too many transport bodies and transport system to deliver outcomes that are focused they have not operated in a coordinated fashion. The on its customers — that is, the general public. incompetence of the previous Labor government resulted in some quite embarrassing cost overruns and The authority will administer arrangements to provide black holes. There is a litany of these projects. The tram, bus and rail services in metropolitan Melbourne previous Labor government spent $919 million on the and trains and buses in regional Victoria. The authority regional fast rail project, which included the will be the face of Victoria’s public transport system. It Geelong–Melbourne line. When this project was first will focus on the fundamentals of having clean, reliable announced, it was costed at $80 million. There was a public transport services that arrive on time. That is cost blow-out of $839 million. Do members know how what the people of Victoria want. They do not want to much time that saved on the Geelong–Melbourne line? see millions of dollars wasted on advertising, such as the ads commissioned by the previous government to Honourable members interjecting. tell us about its Victorian transport plan with those nice, catchy jingles that used to be on television and which Mr KATOS — It is a good thing the member for we have thankfully removed. One could never forget Frankston has asked that. The project provided a time the $20 million that was to be spent on fairy lights for saving of around 3 minutes. That is about $300 million the West Gate Bridge — another thing we scrapped. It per minute, which is clearly not good value for the would have been an absolute waste of money. taxpayers of Victoria. The authority will be focused on improving public Then there is the regional rail link — another cost transport safety, reliability and efficiency. This side of overrun that has added up to almost $1 billion. Despite the house has made a commitment to public transport the overrun, it is a worthy project that the Baillieu safety, with an additional 100 transit police and government is undertaking despite the Gillard federal 940 protective services officers. Under the bill the government’s callous deferral of $500 million in authority will replace and incorporate the roles and funding, which will see the project completion blow out responsibilities of the director of public transport, by another year; it will be finished in 2015 instead of Metlink Victoria Pty Ltd and the Transport Ticketing 2014. Clearly under the previous state government one Authority. The Public Transport Development hand did not know what the other was doing. Authority will be governed by an independent board appointed by the minister. These appointments will be
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4815 based on expertise in the field. They certainly will not manage all metropolitan and regional train, tram and be cronies who were put there for political reasons; bus services. According to the bill the authority is also these will be people who have expertise in transport. to be responsible and accountable for achieving The board will consist of a chairperson, a deputy significant improvement in the reliability, efficiency chairperson, a community representative and up to four and integration of public transport services across the more directors. The authority will be required to submit state. reports to Parliament twice a year in its first two years and annually thereafter. It will be given an appropriate Obviously there is a lot of responsibility on this charter and the corporate powers necessary to deliver statutory body. It is good to see the Minister for Public on the government’s transport policy. Transport in the house. I think he possibly wants to use this authority as a scapegoat for any problems that may We might take a look at what happens in other states. arise in the future. I suspect this statutory body is being New South Wales has recently passed a bill that established so that in the Sergeant Schultz examples we established Transport for NSW, which is a new often see in the house, where ministers say, ‘I know authority that will enable other agencies to focus solely nothing; it is not my problem’, there will be a statutory on delivering quality services. In 2008 the TransLink authority that will take the blame for the problems that Transit Authority was established in Queensland. The occur in public transport. By the same token, if there is TransLink Transit Authority in Queensland has some good news coming out of this authority, I am sure responsibility for operational network planning; the minister will take credit for it. I know he will ensure purchasing and delivery of services, including, for that he shares good news, when good news occurs, example, the coordination of timetables of different through his direction to the statutory body. modes of transport; and managing and maintaining delivery of infrastructure for these critical services. I feel sorry for the members of this new board, who will Queensland has gone along this way to have a be hand-picked. I hope that the board is not centralised body, as has New South Wales. Western hand-picked to the extent of it being ‘jobs for the boys’. Australia has had a centralised body since 2003. I certainly hope that the people who are chosen to be on Obviously a lot of other states have gone down this this particular statutory body are picked on the basis of path. It is the right way to go: having one authority that talent and ability and will make sure that the job they do manages everything rather than all these little is, to a certain extent, not what the minister wants in authorities acting in silos, with each not knowing what terms of hiding some of the problems that may occur in the others are doing. That is clearly not in the interests the public transport system. It should be an up-front of public transport users. statutory authority that is independent in terms of things that occur and the decisions it makes. I commend the Minister for Public Transport, who is at the table as we speak, for his fine work on this piece of Obviously what needs to happen first and foremost is legislation. Certainly when the minister was a shadow that we make sure that we have a public transport minister he was always talking about getting back to the system that is able to cope with growing demands. I go basics of public transport instead of using fancy spin. back to 1999 before Labor came to government. Public He talked about having trains that work, that do not transport was almost non-existent then. One of the break down, that arrive on time and that are clean. That reasons it was non-existent was that no money was is what public transport users want. They do not want to being invested in it. see their money wasted on spin and advertising. I commend the minister for his work in bringing this bill Mr Watt interjected. to the house. This is what people want: safe, reliable Mr EREN — I suggest, through the Acting Chair, transport. With that I commend the bill to the house. to some of the cleanskins who are sitting up the back Mr EREN (Lara) — I too wish to speak on this bill interjecting, which is totally inappropriate, that they before the house, which is the Transport Legislation should probably do some research to find out what little Amendment (Public Transport Development Authority) investment there was in public transport. It was the Bill 2011. Labor government that made the investment into public transport that was necessary to make it what it is today. Mr Watt interjected. We are very proud of the massive investment we made in public transport. Before that the public transport Mr EREN — In essence this bill establishes a new system was not being utilised by the community statutory authority, the Public Transport Development because it was non-existent. Everybody recalls the Authority, which will allegedly plan, coordinate and slash-and-burn policies the Kennett government
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
4816 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011 implemented right throughout the public sector, with transport system needs to be nurtured, particularly, for workers being sacked from the education sector, the example, the regional rail link. police force and from health. They were also sacked from the public transport sector. I happen to represent an electorate that covers the fastest growing region in the nation, the Wyndham I think that some time back in August this year the Vale-Manor Lakes area, which is growing at a rate of minister indicated that he might have one of the people 10 000 to 12 000 people per annum. The infrastructure from what I would have called, back in those days, the needs of that area, particularly for public transport, are Kennett razor gangs, leading this board. I am not sure enormous. We are fortunate enough to have a whether that will be the case. I certainly hope not, brand-new station allocated to Manor Lakes and because the Victorian public has a very bad memory of another brand-new station allocated for the Tarneit those seven dark years of the Kennett government, electorate, which adjoins mine. I know the regional rail when there were thousands and thousands of public link will improve the public transport system service sector — — tremendously. There is no question about that.
Mr Katos interjected. I return to the point of ensuring that this new authority is going to be a genuine body that will improve the Mr EREN — The member for South Barwon public transport system and not just a body the minister obviously doesn’t — — will use when he needs good news or when things go bad. I am a bit sceptical about some of the decisions The ACTING SPEAKER (Mrs Victoria) — this government makes. I am really sceptical about Order! Interjections are disorderly and so is responding some of the decisions it has made on level crossings, to them. I ask the government members to be respectful for example, with the Brighton area getting upgrades to of the speaker who is on his feet. some of its level crossings when those crossings are not Mr EREN — You are right, Acting Speaker. I a priority at all. Clearly some decisions are being made, should not respond to some of those comments being money is being allocated and funding is being given on made by new members — — the basis of politics rather than need. That is a real concern. The ACTING SPEAKER (Mrs Victoria) — Order! And the member will not respond to those I hope this new body will resolve some of the problems comments. of politics that are being played out in the first 12-month period of this government. I hope this Mr EREN — But having made some of those statutory body will be a genuine, independent body that comments, those members should research the seven will oversee and overcome some of the politics of the dark years of the Kennett government. I am fearful of day-to-day running of the government. some of the ghosts of the past being brought back in terms of the head of this very important statutory body. I go back to my point that the regional rail link is one of For what it is worth, I would say that if this is a genuine those projects that is obviously very important. It will attempt to make the public transport system work, the carry thousands and thousands of people. It will have a authority should be an independent body that is not dedicated line into Southern Cross station. I am very subject to the interference of the minister. fortunate in having a station planned for my electorate, and I look forward in five or six years time — The Minister for Public Transport, the member for whenever the project is completed, which I hope will be Polwarth, is one of those performers on the other side on time — to it servicing the population of my who, leading up to the election, was a very strong electorate of Lara, as it should. advocate for public transport. Obviously now the shoe is on the other foot. Now that he is the minister he Again, I return to the point of hoping that this is not just clearly sees a different side to it, which is a massive another jobs for the boys thing, where the ghosts of the responsibility. Do you know, Acting Speaker, why it is past come back to haunt us. I would hope that this will now a massive responsibility? It is because of the be a genuine statutory authority that will do good work investment that the Brumby and Bracks Labor for public transport. governments made in public transport. There are The ACTING SPEAKER (Mrs Victoria) — thousands and thousands of people coming back to Order! The member’s time has expired. public transport because of the investment we made. I do not think the government can deny that. The public Mr SHAW (Frankston) — I am pleased to be able to talk about the Transport Legislation Amendment
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4817
(Public Transport Development Authority) Bill 2011. was to have sensible water solutions; and the fifth was My electorate of Frankston has two stations: Frankston to have a government we can trust. A government we and Leawarra. The member for Lara said, ‘You should can trust is what this is all about. It is also about fixing probably do some history and look back at some of the the fundamentals of the transport system. It is not lines’, and I did. I looked at the Frankston line, which necessarily about putting more trains on the network or was established 130-odd years ago in the 1880s. Back increasing punctuality, but it is a step towards what we then it took 1 hour and 20 minutes to get from want to do. Public transport is a big portfolio, and I Frankston to the city or from the city to Frankston, commend the minister. There is a huge task across all which was a beach suburb at the time. It took 1 hour levels of government. Every day thousands of patrons and 20 minutes over 100 years ago, which is quite use the public transport system. interesting. It takes slightly over an hour now, and there are obviously more stations. The Frankston line ran to The primary objective of the Public Transport Mornington, but that line is closed. Because there were Development Authority is to ensure that the public other ways to get to Mornington, it was not utilised transport system operates as part of an integrated much. It has been closed for many years, but the Stony transport system. Quite often, as people get off the train Point line runs down past Hastings, Somerville and at Frankston, I hear that they have just missed their bus, Baxter. and that is sad for them. It could be because of train delays and the bus leaving at exactly the right time. We The Frankston line is in the news quite extensively. In are seeking to better meet the needs of commuters and July 2010, four months before the election, public transport users and therefore add confidence to 30.3 per cent of trains on the Frankston line were more the system so that when people go to a station on the than 5 minutes late; close to one-third were more than Frankston line they know that only 7.4 per cent of trains 5 minutes late. Since May this year, a year later, only will be more than 5 minutes late. That is a great 7.4 per cent of trains have been recorded as late. That is improvement on the 30.3 per cent in July last year. We an efficiency improvement. On this side of the house aim for little efficiencies every single time. we believe in doing things efficiently. It is not a matter of chucking money at things. The member for South I am on the Economic Development and Infrastructure Barwon was saying before that $939 million was spent Committee. One of the mining companies we visited on his train line, but it was first costed at $80 million. If has a tunnel that goes to a goldmine, and the company that had been done by those on this side of the house, was grading the road in the tunnel. We asked, ‘Why are there is no doubt that we would have done it for that you doing that?’, and the company said, ‘When the type of figure. Be that as it may, that was not the case. trucks come out, the tyres won’t wear as much and The Frankston line from Caulfield to Frankston cost they’ll use less petrol’. These tiny things make a ₤175 000-odd when it was built some 100-odd years difference to big volume turnover. That is what we are ago. How things have changed. How many more zeros doing in the public transport system. We want to make get added to projects when it does not have to be the sure there are efficiencies. It is not about throwing case. money at things; it is about making things more efficient and more reliable. The new authority will be a The Public Transport Development Authority will plan, one-stop shop that people can go to. We are delivering coordinate, provide, operate and maintain a a more customer-focused service by planning, customer-focused public transport system consistent coordinating and managing Victoria’s public transport with the vision statement and transport system system. objectives contained in the Transport Integration Act 2010. A customer-focused transport plan is quite Yarra Trams, Metro Trains Melbourne and V/Line will unusual, and it is great to see the Minister for Public all come under this body. It will be the face of public Transport putting customers first. This government is transport — a one-stop shop. It will administer trams, putting the customer first. buses and trains to provide a safe, punctual, reliable and clean public transport system, and that is all that It was a pre-election commitment to establish the commuters want. They want to get on a train that is safe Public Transport Development Authority and to fix the and clean. They want the system to be reliable so that problems with the public transport system. During the they can get back to their families and punctual so that election campaign we had five objectives: the first was they are not waiting around. They also want integrated to have a growing and strong economy; the second was services that match up with each other so that they can to fix the fundamentals of the transport system, of move to other areas of the state, to their home or to their hospitals, of policing and of roads; the third was to have work. This is a step towards having that come to strong and vibrant families and communities; the fourth
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
4818 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011 fruition, and that is what we want from a public Mr SHAW — Not that old? I think the member for transport system. Gembrook is. The blue ones came along, and now we have the silver ones. We are improving all the time. It This morning I drove here from Frankston. One still takes an hour or so to get from Frankston to the hundred years ago it took 1 hour and 20 minutes on the city, but these little improvements and efficiencies train, and today it took me 1 hour and 50 minutes to make the system more reliable and more punctual. drive. If I had caught a train, it would have been just They make our trains and public transport system safer over an hour, so we have a pretty good service. and cleaner, which will bring confidence back. People However, things can always get better. We do not sit will say, ‘Instead of taking 1 hour and 50 minutes to get here and say, ‘That’s enough’; we want the system to there’ — as I did this morning — ‘we can catch the be better. We want it to be more reliable, cleaner and train’, and that will be in an environment that is clean, more punctual. reliable and safe for families and communities. I commend the bill to the house. The Public Transport Development Authority will also have control over the 940 protective services officers Ms NEVILLE (Bellarine) — I am pleased to rise to (PSOs) who will be rolled out throughout this term of speak on the Transport Legislation Amendment (Public government. They will keep our railway stations safer Transport Development Authority) Bill 2011. I make it by protecting the employees and commuters at stations. clear to everyone opposite that the opposition is here to Not so long ago Shrek and Lord Farquaad came to help, and that is what the amendments the opposition Frankston. They had their picture in the paper with a has circulated are all about. We urge those opposite to couple of Labor stooges from the council, and the think carefully about these amendments. We are here to mayor was there as well. They said, ‘We want these help. PSOs’. They have not even been recruited or trained yet. We will get them, and there is no doubt that These amendments are about ensuring that the Frankston will be right up there. According to front-line government can say it has met its election operations, the Frankston line is fourth highest in terms commitments, and certainly throughout this afternoon of assaults, so I assume we will be right up there for the and this evening we have heard all the members delivery of PSOs. I will be putting that forward, saying, opposite who have spoken on this bill say that it is ‘We want PSOs at Frankston’. I think that is well meeting an election commitment. If you have a look at known by the police and also by the Minister for Police the media release that was put out by the then and Emergency Services, especially given that opposition leader on 14 November 2010 during the Frankston has received the highest number of police — election campaign, that media release actually talks an allocation of 46 for the year. That is a fantastic result about a promise to rebuild the public transport network for Frankston. It makes the image of Frankston better and fix the system — — and makes it a safer place. Mr Mulder — Fix the problems. The Public Transport Development Authority will replace three other statutory bodies: the director of Ms NEVILLE — Fix the problems, and, most public transport within the Department of Transport; importantly, part of doing that was to establish a new Metlink, which is a private corporation jointly owned independent statutory public transport authority — that by Metro Trains and Yarra Trams; and the Transport is what is referred to in this media release — that would Ticketing Authority, which was established under the plan, coordinate and manage our public transport State Owned Enterprises Act 1992. The authority will system. In that media release there are words like consolidate public transport responsibilities into a ‘audit’, ‘promote’, ‘deliver’ and ‘allocate funding’ but single customer-focused agency to provide reliability what I cannot see in the media release are the words and a one-stop shop. The bill closely reflects our ‘restrictions on the powers’ of the independent statutory election policy, and the authority will audit all Victorian authority or mention of the fact that there are powers to transport assets and report publicly on the value and be allocated to the minister to intervene. Unfortunately condition of those assets. I remember travelling on the that is what this bill does. It does not establish an Frankston line in the red rattlers. Some members may independent statutory public transport authority. In fact remember the old red rattlers. They were improved, and what is clear from the bill is that the authority will be we got the blue ones next. subject to the goals of the minister and the Department of Transport, and it will be a body in which the minister Mr Battin interjected. can intervene.
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4819
Again I say those elements do not appear to be in this However, now that the plan has been cut that will come election commitment bill. The elements in here to an end. The minister may not have realised that. continue to talk about independence, but the bill does not deliver on that election commitment. Going back to As an example, the previous transport plan committed the beginning again, as I said earlier, we are here to to a major improvement of bus services in the Geelong help. The proposed amendments that are before the region. Luckily Labor was in government long enough house tonight are there to assist those in government to to deliver a substantial amount of that plan, because we meet their election commitment. have seen incredible improvements in bus services across Geelong and particularly in my electorate of Unfortunately one of the other failings of the bill is that Bellarine. There are additional services from while most independent authorities also have Queenscliff, Leopold, Portarlington, St Leonards and requirements about reporting to the Parliament, there is Drysdale, all delivered by the previous government, but no commitment in here for regular reporting of what the now the plan is gone, there is no money and no more public transport authority is doing. I imagine that is bus services for the Bellarine electorate. because it appears it is not going to have many powers or will actually be able to deliver very much. Despite What about the extra train services from Geelong? It the claims of those opposite, they are not delivering on was a great success story, the fast rail service from their election commitment. It is another example of Geelong, and that is why in the last election campaign those opposite saying one thing before an election and we committed to providing additional services running delivering another after the election. every 30 minutes from Geelong. I have mentioned to the Minister for Public Transport before that these One very interesting element for the house to consider services are absolutely critical. Geelong is a major is how this authority will be able to work within the regional city, our second biggest city, and there are a lot confines of the goals of the minister and the of commuters to and from Geelong, but again there is department. The problem is that this may be very nothing for the area: there is no plan from this new difficult to achieve because, as far as I can see, there government, only the scrapping of our transport plan does not appear to be a plan or a goal other than ‘to fix and therefore no new additional services — all lost. the problems’. According to the minister we have almost met that goal, so the minister can have a bit of a What we have also seen, as I have touched on, is the holiday, but apart from the broad statement that ‘We minister and those opposite claiming that they have are fixing the problems’ there does not seem to be a fixed or nearly fixed the problems. Earlier I think I plan for this public transport authority to work to. The heard someone say that the problem of air conditioning comprehensive transport plan which was backed up by on hot days has been fixed. Apparently — and I hope $38 million by the previous government has gone; it the minister heard this — never again will trains stop or has disappeared; it no longer exists — shelved. break down because of a hot day and the air conditioning stopping the trains. We have fixed that On one level the minister is pretty lucky at the moment. problem, apparently. The minister who claims that he has nearly fixed all the problems is pretty lucky. Of course we have fixed the problem of the trains running on time! Apparently they are now all running Mr Mulder — Not all of them. I have only been on time. If only we had realised it was that simple: just here 11 months. Give me time. add minutes to the timetable. The member for Frankston said 35 per cent of trains used to be Ms NEVILLE — I am pretty sure that the minister 5 minutes late. Apparently that situation has improved. said earlier, just today in fact, that it is nearly done. If I wonder if that is because the timetable has changed members reviewed in Hansard a question asked of the and increased the train service frequency by 5 minutes. minister a couple of weeks ago, they would think from It could be. It is a dangerous thing to say that the that answer that it was all done, as I did. government has fixed all of those problems, because that is on the record and that is what Victorians now It is lucky for the minister, because a lot of the ticks he expect to see continue. I am sure there will be no is giving the government in terms of fixing the 40-degree days over this summer when the tracks might problems are the result of the programs and projects expand and the trains will not be able to run. funded by the former Labor government continuing to roll out. The extra trains and trams that we funded are Mr Mulder interjected. now rolling out, and the minister is ticking those off.
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
4820 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Ms NEVILLE — Again, I refer the minister at the many times of the day people feel slightly table to his previous comment about being ‘nearly uncomfortable or look over their shoulders. The system done’, or his comment of two weeks ago that the will be clean. It will be a public transport system that problems were ‘fixed’. Many members opposite have people feel comfortable on. They will be happy to sit claimed today that the problems are ‘fixed’. Again I say down and enjoy the experience rather than endure it, that the opposition is here to help. We urge members which so often has been the case. It will be a system across the table to support our amendments so that the that is punctual, where services arrive and depart when government can deliver on its election commitment of they are supposed to. Finally, the transport system will an independent public transport authority, one that can be reliable, one that actually runs, rather than, as I make some real changes and ensures that this mentioned, the experience of the Frankston line where government has a plan and delivers improvements to at one stage four out of five trains between 6.00 p.m. public transport in this state. and 6.30 p.m. were cancelled.
Mr MORRIS (Mornington) — I am pleased to join An integral part of achieving a safe, clean, punctual and this discussion on the establishment of the Public reliable environment for public transport is to have the Transport Development Authority. When you consider capacity to plan the system and to be able to coordinate the extensive list of failures of the previous government services. We have had a lot of discussion about over the past 11 years, you would have to say that in a coordinating services, but despite all the rhetoric it has range of failed issues public transport was a stand out not yet been achieved. I am sure the authority will be case. After many years of walking away from public able to get stuck into this issue in a practical manner, an transport, the public came back to the system, but the achievement which seems to have eluded the grasp of system and the government could not handle it and the so many for so long. Another important objective of the whole thing came crashing down. authority is to manage the system in a manner which is customer service oriented, not a system that is focused The member for Frankston has already referred to on whatever outcomes the government, the operators, failures on the Frankston line, a line that we have in the unions or the staff of the various enterprises want to common. There were incredible punctuality and achieve. It is about a customer-focused system, and the reliability issues on those dreadfully hot days, customers are the very people for whom the service particularly around the time of Black Saturday. They exists in the first place. For too long their interests have were extreme conditions but they played absolute been overlooked. Finally, the authority will become the havoc with the rail system. Indeed the Frankston line face of public transport in Victoria. When you think developed the unenviable reputation of being the worst about it, for a very long time we have had a confusing line in the metropolitan system. Its performance was tangle of agencies, operators and quangos, and somewhere down near the 60 per cent range; it was members of the public have had to try to work out absolutely shocking. There has been some commentary where they need to go to get their particular issue dealt already on this, but I want to recognise the efforts of the with. The authority will take up that role as well. minister in the last 10 or 11 months in getting the system, particularly the Frankston line, back to running This bill is good public policy and good legislation; it is at an acceptable level. It is a remarkable change, and I a bill of substance. I doubt I will have the opportunity commend the minister for achieving that. to come back to speak in detail about the bill, but if I do, I will do that later. I want to make the point that this Trains are an important part of the public transport government has a very strong mandate to proceed with system. In many ways they are the backbone of the this legislation. There is no doubt that the state public system, but they are not all of it. The proposed authority transport found itself in towards the end of the previous will administer arrangements not only for trains but also government’s era became a symbol of the Brumby for buses and trams in the metropolitan area, and in the administration and emblematic of the failure of process regional areas it will administer both the train and bus and policy that was evident across so many areas of systems. The authority has the intent of creating a safe, government administration. punctual, reliable and clean network. It is important to dwell on that statement and exactly what is intended, to The opposition commentary generally and some of the contrast it with a system that not only has not been comment that has been wafting across the table over the working but which has failed the public in so many past few minutes clearly shows that Labor members other ways. have learnt absolutely nothing from their defeat last November. Their approach to this bill demonstrates This system will be safer. It will be one which people clearly that they do not understand their failures and are happy to travel on, rather than one where at so that they are not willing to embrace an alternative
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4821 approach. They prefer to carp, criticise and selectively Mr McGUIRE (Broadmeadows) — After less than misinterpret the bill — and that is what has been going a year in office, the Minister for Public Transport is on in this debate. promoting himself as the poor man’s Mussolini: he has personally taken credit for the improvement in the I was interested that in the Age of 11 October the day-to-day running of Victoria’s public transport member for Northcote, as the opposition transport services. This is not a claim made by him while in an spokesperson, was reported as having said that ‘the intoxicated state or as an idle, off-the-record boast. On authority would be too controlled by the government to 13 October, less than two weeks ago, the Minister for be effective’. That has been backed up in the debate. I Public Transport told Parliament that he gets updates on thank the library staff for reminding us in their research his phone on a regular basis throughout the day and that brief that back in 2010 we had the Select Committee on his last update was that more than 90 per cent of trains Train Services. The minority Labor report indicated were running on time. His claim to this house was: that having the Secretary of the Department of Transport responsible for the delivery of train services, We have been in office for 11 months, and we have turned which of course was the subject of the inquiry, was best this around. practice. Now, just a few short months later, we have And before that: opposition members saying, ‘Oh, no. We really didn’t mean it when we said that a bureaucratic system was It took 11 years to pull it down, and it has taken 11 months to the best way. What we really meant was a totally fix it up. deregulated system’. The backflips are entertaining, but they certainly do not add to the public debate. In attempting to take all the credit for the improvement in performance on the rail network, the minister is The authority will be an independent statutory body misleading the public. The improvement is due largely and, like any government body, it will have to act to the extra trains that Labor organised, invested in and broadly in accord with government policy. That appears bought. Among a range of initiatives, Labor also raised to be news only to opposition members. Given that they the amount of money necessary to be invested in have just come out of 11 years in government, it is maintenance by Metro. The minister’s Mussolini-style mind boggling, I have to say. claims are the measure by which he will be judged. If he wants updates throughout the day on transport Public transport is part of a wider network, and it has to services not running on time, that can be arranged. operate within that wider framework. Yet opposition Given the stance adopted by the Minister for Public members seem to be suggesting that the authority can Transport, it would be more appropriate to categorise operate without having those links and the appropriate the Transport Legislation Amendment (Public governance structure to operate within the system. We Transport Development Authority) Bill 2011 as the have had suggestions that it does not need to be Poor Man’s Mussolini Mulder Manifesto. After more responsible to anyone else in developing plans. Perhaps than a decade in opposition, this is the coalition’s grand it is that view of the world which has caused us to have plan to make trains, trams and buses run on time. This housing developments across the state, which are not is the measure by which Victorians will hold the serviced or are very poorly serviced by public transport. Baillieu-Ryan regime to account for its It has not been linked in. That is not a mistake that we election-winning promise to fix the problems. want to continue making. What is the integrated strategy to provide better Another criticism relates to the procurement of rolling infrastructure and maintenance and deal with railway stock, with the suggestion that bodies should be able to crossings, to name just some of the key issues? It is a go out and buy their own rolling stock. There is no strategy to simply shift responsibility, to pass the commentary about how funding for that might be blame. This is too cute by half. The minister’s achieved. I certainly do not think you should expect arrogance is playing Victorians as mugs. According to these bodies to fund their own capital expenditure. the minister, no longer will Victorians have to endure Perhaps the suggestion is that the authority should have the confusion, the blame shifting and the frustration that a blank cheque. I think the Auditor-General might have characterised the state’s troubled public transport something to say about that. The legislation will system over the previous decade. The coalition’s claim provide the foundation for the rebuilding of public is that the Public Transport Development Authority will transport in this state after years of Labor neglect and be responsible for achieving reliability, efficiency and failure. It will create a safe, reliable, clean and punctual integration of public transport services across the state. system. It is excellent legislation, and I am delighted to support it. By being framed as the silver bullet for addressing public transport issues, the bill exposes the rolling public relations campaign driven by the Baillieu-Ryan
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
4822 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011 regime. The bill fits the coalition’s modus operandi. It The article goes on to quote Committee for Melbourne fails to address key problems in Victoria’s public chief executive Andrew MacLeod as having said: transport that must be confronted — that is, further investment in infrastructure and the historic challenges If you were to put enough trains on the Dandenong line to meet current demand, not future demand, then the level of level crossings. Nowhere is this more emblematic crossings along the Dandenong line would be shut for the than in and around the electorate of Bentleigh. The entire morning and evening peak period … coalition’s big promise to win this seat, which subsequently determined who would govern Victoria, The article further states: was grade separation at three locations. Each would An effective train service, which had services at least every cost more than $100 million. That is what the 8 minutes, would cause massive disruption for the roads. community believed would be delivered. The fine print in the coalition’s promise reveals that the only amount ‘That means every level crossing closed 2 out of every that will be allocated in the next four years is money for 4 minutes’, Mr MacLeod said. planning. The problems will continue to exist; the Therefore much more than a self-styled, coalition will not build the future. Its members will customer-friendly Public Transport Development have misled the public yet again. Authority is required. The minister triumphantly This is another example of gesture politics, but you can claimed in this house that we are now experiencing: only fool some of the people some of the time. In a poll … a great era for public transport in Victoria …We said we published in the Age on 12 May, which asked the would get back to basics … We are getting back to basics, question, ‘Does the Baillieu government have its level and we are delivering. crossing priorities right?’, 81 per cent of Victorians answered no. This is a decisive vote of no confidence I do not believe peak hour commuters would share his on this issue, which needs to be highlighted in the view, nor would workers stuck in their cars at the public interest. It is not appropriate for the Minister for Glenroy railway crossing in my electorate be amused Public Transport to leave the chamber at this critical that the government placed politics ahead of safety in time. He should understand what is at stake. its priorities for upgrades.
According to the Minister for Public Transport: I take this opportunity to call on the coalition to give the Glenroy railway station redevelopment the priority it The new authority will also focus on the stronger deserves, based on independent assessments of safety, maintenance effort and on-the-ground improvements needed as one of the top 10 Melbourne crossings in need of to support a public transport system that is reliable and safety improvements, according to the Australian level dependable … crossings assessment model report. Victorians have to This task will be greatly assisted by the $100 million trust that governments will act in good faith, Maintaining Our Rail Network Fund promised by the particularly on issues of safety, rather than resorting to coalition … the political expediency we have seen from the This brings us to the reality check on the coalition’s Baillieu-Ryan regime on this issue, which should be promises which were not costed before the election but above partisanship. which were nevertheless promoted in what is now There is no use establishing a so-called independent clearly revealed as a confidence trick misleading body and then rejecting its findings out of the politics of Victorians. The average cost of replacing one level convenience. I therefore urge the Baillieu-Ryan regime crossing with an overpass or underpass is about to support Labor’s amendments to this bill, because that $100 million, according to Herald Sun reports. The would ensure that the public transport development Melbourne metropolitan area alone has 172 level authority was a genuinely independent body. crossings and there are 1872 throughout the state. By way of contrast, Sydney has 8. These level crossings The member for Rodney raised the issue of are having a detrimental impact on commuter times, accountability for train tracks that buckled under result in a loss of productivity and are preventing train extreme heat and said that it was fair for criticism to be operators from running enough services to meet current levelled at the government of the day. Therefore the demand, not to mention future demand. minister will have to explain the justification for his grandiose claims of success during the summer months An article in the Herald Sun of 27 June reported: should tracks buckle, services suffer and confidence in Metro will not be able to introduce enough services to cope the system decline. These are not arbitrary performance with booming patronage because of Melbourne’s level measures; these are the standards the minister has set crossings. and the standards by which Victoria will hold its government to account.
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4823
What is needed is far more than just a public transport The purpose of this bill today basically is to create the development authority. What is needed is an effective Public Transport Development Authority. That is a investment in infrastructure. To plan for the future the statutory authority, and the really important reason it is Victorian government must outline a detailed plan of needed is to improve the public transport system. The vision to replace its metropolitan level crossings with coalition went to the election talking of this because it underpasses or overpasses. Instead the Baillieu-Ryan could recognise that there was a huge need to improve regime has cut Labor’s strategic Victorian transport the public transport system and in fact that many people plan to deliver more trains, trams and buses; more were having a lot of problems dealing with the system tracks and stations; better and safer roads; and more as it was. Issues such as reliability and efficiency — or choices for Victorians living in the suburbs and the perhaps lack of efficiency — were on everyone’s regions. tongue.
The coalition’s big vision for Victorian transport is to Another word, which I like, used in this bill and its establish a token fund that will barely cover the cost of purpose clause is ‘integration’ — the integration of upgrading a single level crossing — one down, only public transport systems. That integration is often 171 to go. Worse, it is establishing a body that will be forgotten. We do have the trains, trams and buses in the restricted to the confines of the goals of the Department metropolitan area, and it is important that those services of Transport and the Minister for Public Transport, and are integrated so that the system provides a better it will allow the minister to intervene as he sees fit to customer experience for the people alighting from one appoint the board of directors. According to the and getting on the next one, but it is also important to Committee for Melbourne, at the current rate it would have that integration in the regional areas where we take 68 years to upgrade Melbourne’s level crossings. have the trains and buses as well.
Despite all the spin and bluster whipped up by several One of the other things that the creation of the Public members opposite about the Liberal Party being the Transport Development Authority brings to light is the party for business, according to the Herald Sun on customer focus. It is really important that the 11 August, business groups are fed up with government customers, who are the end users, remain the focus of inaction. What is needed is a government that is the intent of the legislation in terms of what they visionary, not vacuous. This is a regime that is all steps experience and how they experience it. It is also about and no journey, all finishing touches and no creation, all managing their expectations. If you manage the symbols and no substance. expectations of the customers well, you will get a better outcome for everybody. Looking at this government’s legislative record we see there are only two possible conclusions: either we have Everybody knows of or perhaps has had that experience a fledging government suffering from chronic priority of sitting on a train that is stuck going into Spencer misjudgement or we have a regime that does not know Street if you are coming from the northern suburbs or what to do or how to do it; missing in action on issues indeed from Seymour, or sitting at Flinders Street rail of state significance and ruthless in the pursuit of yards if you are coming from the south and east, not political self-interest. The Baillieu-Ryan regime has no knowing why the train is stuck, how long you are going vision, no plan and no shame. After nearly a year in to be stuck for and if in fact you are going to be government, Victoria has a regime that is arrogant, moving. Having customer expectations and a customer complacent and conniving. We have a regime that, focus is a good thing. according to its own advisers, is manipulating the media and the political cycle for its political Another example of that customer experience that I self-interest. think a lot of people may have gone through is that you can receive an SMS notifying you about any delays or Sitting suspended 6.29 p.m. until 8.02 p.m. cancellations in your train service, but it is terrific if you receive that notice before the departure time, not Ms McLEISH (Seymour) — It gives me great 10 minutes afterwards or when you are sitting on a train pleasure tonight to speak in support of the Transport and the SMS is telling you that it is yet to depart and it Legislation Amendment (Public Transport already has departed. That customer focus is very Development Authority) Bill 2011. It is also great to be important as well. delivering on yet another election promise. I think every time I have stood up in this chamber in the last One of the other issues we talked about here was few weeks it has been to speak on our election improving the public transport system. It is no secret commitments. that there was a need for this. When I heard the shadow
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
4824 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Minister for Public Transport and the member for I did hear commentary from the opposition side that Bellarine speaking earlier, espousing their views on all people on the government side of the chamber needed the answers and all the solutions, I could only wonder to do a little bit of research into what has happened in whether they were really part of the previous the past. One great example of the lack of planning for government, whereby they would have had the growth was the Doncaster corridor. In fact I think it was opportunity to feed their ideas to the minister of the the Cain government that sold off the Doncaster day. Perhaps they have forgotten that in fact they had reserve, and the passionate member for Doncaster, the 11 years to work on putting forward their ideas and Minister for Mental Health, mentions quite frequently solutions. But it seems they did not do anything about that this was an absolutely appalling lack of planning. I it; in fact the way they are speaking suggests that hear the opposition talking about the regional rail link. I everything was going to be delivered for them in 2012, am sure that was eight years too late — definitely eight which was too late. years too late. We hear lots of talk now, but what we have found is severe underfunding. There is no money We had the example of myki, the absolute debacle of there for trains or for grade separations. Whilst that project management but also the cost blow-outs. regional rail link will go some way towards solving some of the issues, it certainly will not impact directly Mr Nardella interjected. on the Seymour line, because there was nothing going Ms McLEISH — I will respond here. We have north — it was all going west; perhaps indirectly it reviewed the contracts — and had our government had might remove some of that city bottleneck and impact the opportunity to review the contracts for the positively on my electorate. desalination plant we would be in a hell of a lot better One of the other things I want to touch on is the number state than we are in at the moment, having to spend of authorities that were involved previously. What we $2 million a day for the next number of decades. are offering through this bill is a more streamlined Getting back to some of the issues that people approach. Under the Public Transport Development experience regarding connectedness and integration, Authority, the functions of the director of public there is a need to improve a lot of the bus-train transport will be progressively transferred across; the connections. I hear of people in the outer suburbs who ticketing functions through the Transport Ticketing rely on catching a train to the end of the line, perhaps to Authority, once the implementation of myki has been Lilydale, having to then get a bus to get to Healesville, completed, will be transferred across; and what I have and there is a lack of connectedness there. People already talked about earlier, the customer service complain that they see the rear lights of the bus going functions and the information functions that are off into the distance as their train is just pulling in currently carried out by Metlink will also be transferred because the coordination element is not present, but that across. will be part of this new Public Transport Development I have heard a lot of rhetoric about the changes we are Authority. making in government, and given that there is a lot to I will talk for a moment about the Seymour line. Prior be done and given the state public transport was in to the election there was a big delay or lack of when we picked it up, all the legislation that is being performance on the Seymour line, where there were 29 introduced — I certainly commend the minister on his out of 30 months when those trains failed to meet work — is beginning to facilitate the process so that expectations and performance measurements. The Melbourne’s and Victoria’s public transport systems trains did run, but their punctuality was appalling. I will be a lot more reliable and a lot more efficient. would like to state now the figures for the last four There is a greater emphasis on planning and months, June to September. In June the punctuality coordination and the integration of not only trains, performance was 93.1 per cent, so the target was trams and buses in the metropolitan area but also trains exceeded; July, 96.1 per cent, target exceeded; August, and buses in country areas. I commend the minister on 95.4 per cent, target exceeded; September, 93.4, target working towards bringing one of our pre-election exceeded. Prior to the election, when 29 out of 30 trains commitments to fruition and congratulate him on the were not arriving on time, it was a pretty poor situation work that has been done. I commend the bill to the for public transport to be in. Also some of those delays house. have been blamed on bottlenecks in the city and Mr LANGUILLER (Derrimut) — It gives me certainly the lack of planning for growth. pleasure to speak in the debate on the Transport Legislation Amendment (Public Transport Development Authority) Bill 2011. Specifically the bill
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4825 establishes the Public Transport Development adds services that are required and warranted rather Authority under the Transport Integration Act 2010. than changing timetables around in order to meet basic What it will do presumably is: standards.
deliver more customer-focused services by planning, The coalition first said it would establish a body that coordinating and managing the public transport system; would be independent, but there is no mention of that administer the arrangements for the provision of metropolitan independence at all in the announcement made by the trams, trains and buses and regional trains and buses; Premier and by the minister. Further to that, if one refers to the act — because one would have to suggest operate as the face of public transport; and that if you are going to have an independent body, if improve the service experience and create a public transport you are going to be open and transparent, what you shopfront for passengers and stakeholders. would do if you were a fair dinkum government that was committed to delivering on promises that it made It would be very remiss of the opposition not to hold and the minister made, would be to enshrine that in the government to account and indeed the minister to legislation. account. We need to go through a little bit of history and background very quickly. If one refers to a media Let me refer to the legislation. If one looks at the new release of Sunday, 14 November 2010, by the then section 79AE, one sees it begins by stating that the leader of the Liberal and National coalition, now the authority’s functions are to act as the public face of the Premier — and I will provide it to the house — one will public transport system in Victoria. It then goes through see it reads: the range of provisions and actions and goals of the legislation, including providing and disseminating Coalition to rebuild the basics of Vic public transport network. information, or arranging for the provision of information, managing the public transport brand, Then it goes on to say: managing relationships with and between stakeholders, and acting as an advocate — and so it continues. The coalition’s plan to rebuild Victoria’s public transport network includes: It goes on: A new independent public transport authority — the Victorian Public Transport Development Authority. (c) construct or vary public transport infrastructure, including rail infrastructure, roads, road-related The then opposition, the now government, promised it infrastructure, roadsides and other transport assets, as directed by the minister; would establish an independent authority. If one then goes to the new media release by the now Minister for Proposed section 79AE(1)(c) includes: Public Transport and Minister for Roads dated 14 September 2011 and entitled ‘New authority to drive (iii) putting into service and maintaining rolling stock, buses better transport for Victoria’, one sees it contains not a or other vehicles for passenger services or other ancillary or incidental transport services; word about independence, not a word about the then opposition and now government saying prior to the (iv) procuring passenger services, rolling stock and transport election of November 2010 that this body would be assets, including other ancillary or incidental transport independent. services and assets, as directed by the minister …
For the record, we have not gone into the details of The legislation goes on to state that another function of whether the mechanisms the new government is now the authority is to: establishing of integrating agencies will be better or (o) manage and administer matters relating to freight as worse than the previous mechanisms. That will remain directed by the minister … to be seen with the passage of time. Throughout the history of public transport use, throughout the couple of Proposed section 79AE(2) states: centuries since we have had it, there have been a range of agencies that have been good, bad or indifferent. The In performing the functions conferred on the Public Transport Development Authority, the Public Transport Development government has a mandate to integrate the agencies, Authority must — and if it believes that by so doing it will provide better public transport, so be it and good luck to it. If that … turns out to be the case, the opposition will stand up and (d) perform the functions consistently with government say well done to the minister, provided the minister policies and strategies for rail freight in Victoria. does not fiddle with the timetable; provided the minister
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
4826 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
The act goes on to say that this is the way it will work. government said the new body would be independent. That is fair enough. That is the way they do it. But the In this legislation we do not see that this body will be point that we the opposition are making in holding the independent. We are not persuaded by the slogans and minister and the government to account is that this is the spin of the government and the minister that this another broken promise. The press release from this will be an independent body. We urge the minister and government when it was in opposition talked about a the government to deliver on their promises that they new, independent public authority. would set up an independent body.
The government has been criticised not just by the Mr BULL (Gippsland East) — I rise to support the opposition but by others. For example, the president of Transport Legislation Amendment (Public Transport the Public Transport Users Association, Daniel Bowen, Development Authority) Bill 2011 and in doing so note said: what a great bill this is. It will allow the establishment of the Public Transport Development Authority — a It’s not going to be as open as people would hope. new, independent statutory authority that will Two weeks before the 2010 election the coalition coordinate and manage the Victorian transport system released a press release which stated: as well as plan for its future.
Victoria badly needs a new, independent, statutory authority This is about fixing the problems of our transport to plan, coordinate and manage our public transport system. system and providing improvements across a range of areas, particularly reliability and efficiency, with a We challenge the minister and the government to general ethos that puts passengers first. These are issues enshrine the independence and openness of this new that are very important to country Victorians who body. We challenge the government to ensure that this depend on the transport system for a number of reasons body will be open to the public and to scrutiny so that but particularly in two critical areas. Firstly, city trains the public and public transport users will be able to need to run on time to allow country services to meet understand how it operates and functions. We challenge their windows of access to the city; and secondly, when the government to ensure that this body is to some country people arrive in town via public transport they extent at arms length from the minister — not in all rely on a consistent and punctual service in the city to areas but in some areas. One would think that the be able to do their business. minister and the government would have enshrined the authority’s independence in legislation, but if one reads In providing a one-stop shop for public transport users the Transport Legislation Amendment (Public through this authority, Victorians will no longer have to Transport Development Authority) Bill 2011, there is tolerate the buck-passing and blame shifting that went only one direction and one destination, and that is that on in the past when public transport issues were made there will not be independence. The government is not obvious to the general public. The issue that has going to comply with the promises it made in plagued the public transport system is that there have opposition; it is not giving Victorians what it said it been too many transport bodies. More effective systems would give them. both in Australia and overseas do not suffer from the fragmentation we have experienced here in Victoria. The opposition and the shadow Minister for Public Transport have advanced a range of good amendments. We presently have a situation where we have a tangled These amendments are there to assist the government to web of bureaucracy. There have been many cases comply with the promises it made when it was in where we have had problems in the public transport opposition. These amendments, if adopted and accepted sector and no-one has wanted to accept responsibility or by the government, will give the minister and the take the blame for them. There has been a lot of government the chance to say, ‘We have now delivered buck-passing and no-one has taken responsibility for on the promises we made in November 2010’. The fixing the problems. This government came to power range of amendments go to the function and operation with a plan to improve transport services, and this is the of the new body. There is an important amendment that centrepiece of that commitment. It is a commitment on relates to the Public Transport Development Authority which we are delivering. not being subject to direction and control and another that relates to land acquisition, which we think is also The new Public Transport Development Authority will important. replace and assume many of the responsibilities of the previous organisations, those being the office of the With these remarks I say the then opposition made a director of public transport, Metlink Victoria and the promise. It is a broken promise. When in opposition the Transport Ticketing Authority. The authority will be
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4827 governed by an independent board appointed by the responsibility and getting rid of the buck-passing and minister, and it will report to Parliament on the nitpicking that we have had going on in the past. performance of the public transport system on a regular basis. Initially that will be twice a year for the first two Stronger infrastructure maintenance is also a key area, years and then subsequent to those first two years of its and this will be greatly assisted by the $100 million operation it will report to Parliament on an annual basis. Maintaining Our Rail Network Fund promised by the coalition and subsequently delivered in our first budget. Apart from offering a one-stop shop for the public, this A more open and accountable customer service culture, new agency will be the central liaison point for where services speak to users and have people who will franchisees and other agencies in the public transport genuinely help users solve their problems, will be well sector in Victoria. It will be a one-stop shop not only received by all Victorians. for public transport users but also for the operators. It will work with tram and train franchisees. It will also The state will face increasing transport needs into the work with V/Line, which provides very important future, and the authority will be entrusted with meeting services to rural and regional Victoria, and bus those needs. In my own electorate of Gippsland East we contractors right across the state, with the common have a perfect example of the changing needs of public thread being to continually improve performance and transport. We have three rail services to Melbourne plan for the future. It will be the new face of public every day. Over the past 12 months we have found that transport in Victoria. Very importantly it will reduce a lot of those services have been booked out and there bureaucracy, which was another pre-election is an increasing need in those areas. commitment from this government, and it will improve the quality and consistency of the services throughout The government has consulted with key stakeholders our public transport system. and there is broad support for the establishment of this authority. This legislation and the recruitment of the Victorians have made it very clear that they want a safe, protective services officers (PSOs) to protect clean and reliable public transport system, and this passengers and staff after dark are two significant and government has already put in place steps that have major steps in restoring confidence in our public made significant improvements. Since the introduction transport system. Some country areas will not have of the metropolitan train timetable changes in May, we PSOs, and that has been recognised by members on have already seen significant improvements in both sides of the house, but it should be noted that the punctuality, and this is a trend that needs to be PSOs will be where the problems are. Country people consolidated to continue to restore confidence. I want to feel safe when they come to Melbourne. They congratulate the Minister for Public Transport on these want to be able to travel around the city and know they timetable changes that have already made a real are going to be safe after dark. That is why the difference to services. government’s commitment to introducing PSOs has been so well supported and received by people living in The government is putting the customer first, and the rural and regional Victoria. authority will have key focus areas that reflect this by having an emphasis on what the public wants from its This legislation will remove bureaucracy and improve services. Some of the points and focus areas will be services. That has also been well received by people in trains, trams and buses that run on time. We have rural and regional Victoria. In summing up, as a result already seen evidence of that improving. We want of the establishment of this authority, Victorians will no buses that meet trains and trains that meet buses to longer have to tolerate the buck-passing and blame improve transport structures both around the city and in shifting that has gone on in the past. Victorians will country areas. We want simple and reliable timetables have a one-stop shop that will help them out. It will be which are easy to follow and which get people to their the new face of public transport. It will reduce chosen destinations on time. We want passenger bureaucracy, which was another key commitment of comfort and timely and accurate communication. this government, and it will improve the quality and consistency of services. It must be stated that whilst operators will still be responsible and accountable for the day-to-day services, We have to say goodbye to the nightmares of myki and the authority will be responsible and accountable for the disastrous goings-on in the public transport system improving the overall performance of the system as a of the past 11 years. We are turning over a new leaf. whole. It is very important that we have one agency, The minister has already done a wonderful job in his one body or one organisation, taking on that relatively short time in the portfolio. This legislation will go a long way towards restoring public confidence
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
4828 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011 and again providing us with a more reliable, safe and The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Morris) — Order! punctual transport system, and I am delighted to The member for Yuroke will address her comments commend this bill to the house. through the Chair.
Ms BEATTIE (Yuroke) — I rise to speak on the Ms BEATTIE — Indeed, and I hope the Chair will Transport Legislation Amendment (Public Transport advise the member for Seymour to send her Development Authority) Bill 2011. I heard the previous constituents down to Craigieburn rather than sending speaker talk about turning over a new leaf. I will get them west. back to that in a moment, but this has been a broad-ranging debate. I heard one member talking We all know that some of the problems with the about desalination plants and the previous member transport system go back to the dark years of the talking about protective services officers, so I will join Kennett government when the then Premier, Jeff in this spirit of a broad-ranging debate. Kennett, along with some of the people on the other side of the house, sold off the transport system. We hear To go back a little bit in history, after World War II we them waxing lyrical about more regional services — — saw the use of public transport decline because, as members here — or certainly members on this side of Mr Gidley — On a point of order, Acting Speaker, the house — would know, Australia started producing this has been a wide-ranging debate, but I ask that you its own cars and indeed it was fashionable to own a car. draw the member back to the bill. The bill is about the In the last 10 to 15 years there has been a rise in public Public Transport Development Authority; it is not transport use and huge increases in transport numbers. about Labor members rewriting history from 1992 to In particular there has been a marked increase in the 1999. As much spin and shame as they have put number of adults using public transport. Once upon a forward, I ask you to draw the member back to the bill. time it seemed to be the domain of women workers and students, but certainly a number of things have The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Morris) — Order! happened since then: the increase in population; inner The member for Yuroke understands the point of city gentrification, where public transport is more relevance. It would assist if she came a little closer to accessible; rising employment in the central business the bill. I accept that it has been a wide-ranging debate; district; petrol price fluctuations — we are all aware of however, an association with the bill would be useful. those; the global financial crisis; and indeed Ms BEATTIE — I will return to the bill, and I hope environmental concerns. those who mentioned desalination will return to the bill People have returned to using public transport. Indeed as quickly as I do. Labor formulated and funded the in 2001–02 there was a total of 378.9 million Victorian transport plan. That was an overall plan to passengers boarding the transport system, but by deliver a vision for more trains, trams and buses, more 2010–11 this figure had increased by a whopping stations, better and safer roads and more transport 44 per cent to 547.2 million passenger boardings. With choices for both people living in the suburbs and people that there have also been extra regional boardings. I will living in the regions. So far we have seen a cut to that go back to that, because one of the things Labor did that plan and no money in the plan. Instead what we have I am very proud of was abolish zone 3, and there is now here is a bill for the Public Transport Development a two-zone system. Authority.
I was most surprised to open the papers on the weekend The previous speaker talked about turning over a new and read that the South Morang rail extension was the leaf. I do not think a new leaf has been turned over, first rail extension for many years. We have the new because privatisation came in back in 1999. The Coolaroo station and the new Roxburgh Park station. member for Mount Waverley can jump up and take a Labor extended the electrified line to Craigieburn, as point of order if he likes, but in turning over that new members on this side of the house will know. It does leaf, who has been brought back to run the not seem that the member for Seymour knows that, long-promised Public Transport Development because she has talked about people going west. They Authority? None other than Mr Ian Dobbs. Who is only have to catch the train down to Craigieburn, my Mr Ian Dobbs? Mr Ian Dobbs is widely understood to dear, and they can hop on the train — the city service. be the interim chief executive and chair of the new Perhaps instead of advising your constituents to ‘Go authority. Mr Dobbs was responsible for the loss of west, young man’, you could advise them to go south to thousands of jobs in the public transport sector in the Craigieburn! 1990s. We say that rather than turning over a new leaf this is a throwback to the Kennett era. This man was
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4829 one of Kennett’s key henchmen. He cut thousands of We have another policy based on listening to the people jobs and thousands of services. I certainly hope he has of Victoria — and not just listening but understanding turned over a new leaf. what their concerns are. By introducing the Public Transport Development Authority we will move to What we see here is a lot of rhetoric and not much having an independent authority. We will move to action. We will have the Public Transport Development focusing on the needs of the consumers — the users of Authority totally under the control of the minister and the system. We will move to better planning, better the Department of Transport. The government coordination and better management. Those are things promised independence and a new era of open and that users of the system have been crying out for for so transparent government. What the coalition government long. I think those opposite probably wish they had has ensured is that the functions of the new authority thought of something like this when they were in will be subject to strict control and oversight by both government, but the concerns of the users of the public the minister and the department. We can see this all the transport system fell on deaf ears. The former way through the bill. Many people, including Daniel government refused to acknowledge those concerns, it Bowen, have been reported as saying that it is stopped listening to Victorians and it did not understand something of a surprise to see that the authority’s about getting back to basics. independence is not enshrined in legislation. We would welcome that. What we have here enshrines the How many times have we heard about how much minister and the Department of Transport as having money the former Labor government threw at total control. Rather than being open, accountable and everything, including how much it threw at public transparent, what do we have? We have more of the transport? On this side of the house we know that it is same from the dark days. We will have Ian Dobbs not about just throwing money at things, that it is responsible for running the system. He will be actually about looking at the fundamentals. It is not responsible for the preliminary planning — a man who about just throwing money and saying, ‘We threw ripped thousands of jobs out of the old transport system. money and we’ve fixed it’; it is actually about looking It is well known, and I will hark back to other years, at reform, and reform has to start with the fundamentals that Labor had to pump many millions of dollars into and the foundations. To rebuild an effective and the transport system just to keep it going, because efficient public transport system the basics need to be without Labor pumping money into the transport fixed. system it would have closed down under the failed Dobbs plan. You cannot build a house on poor foundations; they have to be solid. You cannot expect the house to stay I understand that some amendments to this bill have upright and secure if the framework is not sturdy and if been circulated. I urge the Minister for Public Transport the foundations are weak. That is what we had here. to start listening to the opposition and accept to those You cannot build further on a public transport system amendments rather than listening to somebody who is that has unstable foundations. You have to deal with the described as one of Kennett’s henchmen and who cut problem, and that is what the government is doing with thousands of jobs from the service. Let us get public this bill. There is no point in throwing money at the transport moving again, and let us see some of that situation when the basic building blocks are not openness and transparency that we hear so much about properly in place. We know the former government but have not seen yet. Let us lift the curtain that has does not understand process very well. We saw that in fallen down. I ask the minister and the Department of question time today. And because those opposite do not Transport to lift the curtain, to make themselves open understand process, they did not understand how to fix and accountable and to come back to us with another the system. So what did the former government do? It bill that will enshrine the authority’s independence in threw money at the appearance. It forgot to go back and legislation. look at the foundations — to look at the basis of the problem and at the basics. It forgot to look at the Ms RYALL (Mitcham) — I rise in support of the framework. And because of this it did not understand Transport Legislation Amendment (Public Transport the instability that needed to be fixed before Development Authority) Bill 2011. This is another improvements could be made. election commitment from the Baillieu government. It is interesting that the shadow Minister for Public For too long Victorians suffered with late trains, Transport mentioned earlier that Labor is here to help, cancelled services, unreliable information and but we have just heard from the member for Yuroke infrastructure that was left wanting. They would see condemnation of every aspect of the bill. I am not sure their buses disappearing in the distance as they how being here to help and condemnation go together. disembarked their trains and walked off the platform. I
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
4830 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011 heard a member opposite saying earlier that generally needed for them to get from where they are to where things are okay. If those opposite think that things are they need to be. okay, once again it highlights the fact that they were not listening to the public, that there was no understanding The member for Brunswick talked about outcomes and of what the fundamental problems were and no demanded outcomes from this government. I am just understanding of foundational problems and the process wondering what happened to reviewing the outcomes needed to fix them. Clearly those opposite have not that occurred under the former government. What learned anything. I have heard that said a number of happened to outcomes on its watch? We saw that public times in this house. Clearly they still do not get it. transport was a shambles. People were unhappy; they could not get where they wanted to go on time. As I The Baillieu government was elected to fix the said, they saw their buses off in the distance when they problems, and it is doing just that. This bill will enable arrived on trains. I have noted that many of the integration. It is about getting a more cohesive and Auditor-General’s reports that have come out have seamless approach to managing our comprehensive highlighted the fact that the measurement of outcomes public transport system. It is about improving was scarcely done under the former government, so it is governance and, through better governance, achieving interesting for the member for Brunswick to demand better process, better integration and better outcomes. outcomes when outcomes were not something that When organisations are well structured and have good tended to be measured under the previous Labor governance systems in place, they have much better government and when the Victorian people’s foundations for good service delivery. It is about getting understanding and experience of those outcomes was the understanding of correct governance, correct service actually so poor. delivery and correct outcomes. Those opposite became accustomed to blame shifting. No-one would take I commend the minister for this bill. I am pleased that responsibility for the problems. It was always someone the Baillieu government is fulfilling another election else’s fault. This bill is about clarity of responsibility. It commitment. I am pleased about getting rid of the is about oversight. It is about doing away with the fragmentation and about getting a comprehensive blame shifting and it is about the improved service system that is going to improve service delivery, that is delivery that Victorians have been asking for for so going to improve management of the system overall long. and that is going to start to get the improvements and outcomes that Victorians have been looking for for so As well as being about those of us who live in this long. Unfortunately those cries fell on deaf ears under fantastic state of Victoria, this bill is about those who the former government. I am grateful for this bill and visit our state. Our tourism industry wants to know that the improvements it will bring. I commend the bill to the public transport system actually delivers and that it the house. will get visitors to where they need to be on time. This bill is not just about the livability of the state but also Mr NARDELLA (Melton) — I rise to speak on the about those who visit the state. It is about improving Transport Legislation Amendment (Public Transport their public transport experience. It is also about Development Authority) Bill 2011. I have heard improving the integration of our transport services and, members on the other side of the house talk about this as a result, improving service delivery and the bill. The member for Seymour talked about how the bill experience for all Victorians. will assist those opposite, now that they are in government, in going down the path of meeting targets. The commuters of the Mitcham electorate have been Those opposite are saying that the targets are now being calling out to be heard. They have been calling out for met. I will explain it this way: the targets have been met accountability, and they are thrilled that we are going to because the standards have been reduced. The standards have an integrated public transport authority that will and the targets that were aimed for under our mean every agency can have information about what is government were much higher, but this government going on and which will start to get that integration and and this bill are all about spin. The bill will not put on compatibility between services so that outcomes can be the ground one more carriage, one more bus service, delivered. The fragmentation of bodies in the past was a one more tram service or any other service within hindrance to seamless transport service delivery. That suburban Melbourne or the rural and regional areas of fragmentation in effect worked against service delivery Victoria. improvement as opposed to working for it. The commuters of the Mitcham electorate are pleased to see One of the functions of the Public Transport a body that will start to deliver on the outcomes that are Development Authority (PTDA) will be to audit and report on public transport assets. So far the government
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4831 has a terrible record in regard to public transport. In the In the last 10 months we have had no new services and first instance where this government could have no new trains, but there have been crossing upgrades. advocated for more services, for better services and for When the authority does its audit, where will it find a the extension of services, the government was found to crossing upgrade? Given the priority list of 400, where be asleep. The government dozed through the will it find one? At 256 or thereabouts, and in the submission process for Infrastructure Australia. When minister’s electorate; it is not even part of the top 10. Infrastructure Australia was calling for a cooperative The government is spending $2 million on a railway approach with the federal government to extend public crossing at New Street, Brighton, which is probably transport services within Victoria, the government did 326 out of 400. The priority should be St Albans not even put in a submission. Instead this government railway station or Furlong Road, where unfortunately left it to the new Liberal government in New South just recently there was another fatality, but there is no Wales, to Queensland, to South Australia, to Western upgrade and no work being done. Australia, to the Northern Territory and to Tasmania to put in submissions to Infrastructure Australia about There are lots of studies, though. The authority will be public transport. Where was Victoria? It was asleep at able to investigate the studies that have been done by the wheel. this government. There is the Doncaster line in the east and an Avalon Airport line is being investigated. There Ms Ryall — On a point of order, Acting Speaker, is also a Tullamarine airport link being investigated. the member has strayed somewhat from the bill to Avalon is the priority for this government, yet 95 per speak about Infrastructure Australia submissions. I ask cent of people use Tullamarine airport. These are the you to draw the member back to the bill. priorities of this government.
The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Morris) — Order! Will the government reopen the Mildura line? Will this As the member for Melton is aware, it has been a authority advocate, as is allowed under the legislation reasonably wide-ranging debate. I have showed before the house, to reopen the Mildura line? tolerance to both sides, and I intend to continue to do Government members have all been up there, visiting that, but a passing association with the bill would be the member for Mildura. They have gone to the useful. riverfront and to restaurants — they have been swanning around — but will they reopen the Mildura Mr NARDELLA — I was talking about the audit line? They closed the Mildura line, along with the and report requirements of the PTDA. In regard to the Bairnsdale line and four others, as part of six closures provision of services to growing outer suburbs, where during the 1990s. Will they open the Mildura line in the was this government with the construction of a new land of The Nationals? No, they will not. Under part 2 Caroline Springs station, which was fully funded under of the bill the new authority can advocate. This open the last budget? It cancelled that project. The money and accountable government has said, ‘Yes, this was there and the road was built, but there is no station. legislation will make the authority an advocate for When the authority audits these things it will find that public transport in Victoria, be it rail, bus or tram’, but there is no station at Caroline Springs. it can only advocate in accordance with the government’s public transport policies and priorities In regard to the upgrade of the Melton railway station, and under the Department of Transport’s planning there are lots of cars because it is a growing framework. community. It is part of the outer suburbs. As part of the further upgrading that needs to occur, Labor Mr Watt — On a point of order, Acting Speaker, allocated $800 000 to seal the car park and for more when the member for Melton was talking about train closed-circuit television. We have had cars stolen at line closures he forgot to mention the Alamein train line Melton railway station, but the upgrades have not been closure last year. done. As part of the Victorian transport plan we had a bus review at Bacchus Marsh, yet there have been no The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Morris) — Order! upgrades and no commitment to any new bus services There is no point of order. That was very close to a for the new estates that are being built. The regional rail frivolous point of order. upgrade was opposed by the Minister for Public Transport when he was in opposition. There are Mr NARDELLA — As the members for Yuroke 202 more services each day, yet when the audit is and Derrimut said earlier, the new authority will not be finally done under this bill it will find that the flagship independent in any way whatsoever. It cannot advocate service for Ballarat was cancelled by this government. for better services if the government will not allow it to It has gone. do so because better services are not part of the
PUBLIC INTEREST MONITOR BILL 2011
4832 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011 government’s policy, framework or planning. That is a retrieval warrant, an assistance order and an approval especially the case given that the government is of an emergency authorisation for surveillance devices; bringing back one of the toecutters of the Kennett telecommunications interception warrants by Victoria government. Ian Dobbs will be running the show. He Police and the Office of Police Integrity under the will be not only CEO but also chair of the authority. Ian Telecommunications (Interception and Access) 1979 Dobbs, a toecutter of the Kennett government, (cth); privatised and disassembled public transport and covert search warrants, preventative detention orders created a mess at that time, when coordination went out and prohibited contact orders by Victoria Police under the back door. Putting Ian Dobbs in that position in this the Terrorism (Community Protection) Act 2003; authority means that this government is not fair dinkum coercive powers orders by Victoria Police under the about public transport. Major Crime (Investigative Powers) Act 2004; and Under the Victorian transport plan we had extensive an extension, variation, renewal or revocation of an consultation. Everybody was involved, people attended order, warrant or approval for these powers. many sessions and they worked through the priorities. Surveillance device warrants and retrieval warrants are made We were implementing those priorities, but now that under the Surveillance Devices Act 1999 (SD act) and has all stopped. This legislation and this government authorise the placement and retrieval of surveillance devices. will be judged on what they deliver and how they Victoria Police and the OPI’s power to intercept telephone perform, and we will be bringing them to account at communications is provided for under the every opportunity within this area of government. Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (cth). Victoria Police and the OPI are declared eligible Debate adjourned on motion of Mr WAKELING authorities for the purposes of an application for a warrant (Ferntree Gully). authorising telecommunications interception. The Victorian Telecommunications (Interception) (State Provisions) Act 1988 imposes additional procedural requirements on Victoria Debate adjourned until later this day. Police and the OPI in relation to telecommunications interceptions. PUBLIC INTEREST MONITOR BILL 2011 The PIM will also be present at applications under part 2 and 2A of the Terrorism (Community Protection) Act 2003 (TCP Statement of compatibility act). Part 2 and 2A powers include: covert search warrants, allowing a search to be Mr McINTOSH (Minister responsible for the conducted without the knowledge of the owner and/or establishment of an anti-corruption commission) occupier of a premises; tabled following statement in accordance with Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act preventative detention orders, allowing for the detention of a specified suspect for a period of time; and 2006: prohibited contact orders, allowing the authorised In accordance with section 28 of the Charter of Human Rights agency to prohibit a specified person from contacting and Responsibilities Act 2006 (the charter act), I make this other specified persons. statement of compatibility with respect to the Public Interest Monitor Bill 2011 (the bill). The PIM will also be present in all applications, extensions and variations of coercive powers orders under part 2 of the In my opinion, the bill, as introduced to the Legislative Major Crime (Investigative Provisions) Act 2004 (MCIP act). Assembly, is compatible with the human rights protected by the charter act. A PIM will appear at hearings for these powers to test the content and sufficiency of the information relied on and the I base my opinion on the reasons outlined in this statement. circumstances of the application. Further to this function, the role of the PIMs includes: Overview of bill to ask questions of any person giving information in The purpose of the bill is to establish a principal public relation to the application; and interest monitor and deputy public interest monitors (PIMs). to make submissions as to the appropriateness of The object of the bill is to provide a further safeguard for granting the application. applications for: The PIMs will also have the functions conferred on them by surveillance device warrants by Victoria Police, the any other act or law. Office of Police Integrity (OPI), the departments of primary industries and sustainability and environment, and the Australian Crime Commission under the Surveillance Devices Act 1999;
PUBLIC INTEREST MONITOR BILL 2011
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4833
Human rights issues Warrants, orders and approvals issued in ex parte hearings occur in the absence of the affected party. Material gained 1. Human rights protected by the charter that are under some of these powers could be used in criminal relevant to the bill proceedings. The PIM will be able to make submissions on an application in the public interest, offering additional comfort Privacy and reputation (section 13 of the charter act) that decisions to grant these powers have been informed by the PIM’s submissions on the merits of the application. This Section 13(a) of the charter act provides that individuals have therefore promotes the right to a fair hearing. a right not to have their privacy unlawfully or arbitrarily interfered with. The right to privacy concerns a person’s Conclusion ‘private sphere’, which should be free from government intervention or excessive unsolicited intervention by other For the reasons given in this statement, I consider that the bill individuals. An interference with privacy will not be unlawful is compatible with the Charter of Human Rights and provided it is permitted by law, is certain, and is appropriately Responsibilities Act 2006. circumscribed. Interference will not be arbitrary, provided that the restrictions on privacy are reasonable in the particular Andrew McIntosh, MP circumstances and are in accordance with the provisions, aims Minister responsible for the establishment of an and objectives of the charter act. anti-corruption commission. Clauses 23, 31, 43 and 44 amend the SD act, TISP act, TCP Second reading act and MCIP act to require that the PIM be provided with a copy of the relevant application and any supporting affidavit Mr McINTOSH (Minister responsible for the and other material. These documents may contain personal information collected by investigators that would previously establishment of an anti-corruption commission) — I have been made known only to law enforcement officers, move: integrity officers and judicial officers hearing the application. Increasing the distribution of this information to include a That this bill be now read a second time. PIM engages the right to privacy and reputation. However, personal information shared with PIMs will be protected by This bill establishes public interest monitors to provide strict confidentiality obligations. Clause 17 of the bill important checks and balances on the use of significant provides that a PIM must not disclose any information covert investigations and coercive powers in Victoria. obtained in the course of his or her role, except in the performance of his or her functions as a PIM. A breach of this obligation constitutes an offence. Covert investigations and coercive powers, such as surveillance devices, telecommunications interceptions, I consider that clauses 23, 31, 43 and 44 do not constitute a covert searches, preventative detention, prohibited limitation, interference or restriction on the right to privacy. A contact orders and coercive power orders are among the PIM’s entitlement to receive applications for these powers and supporting material is an arrangement that will be lawful, most intrusive powers available to integrity and law will not be arbitrary, and is appropriately circumscribed by enforcement bodies in Victoria. confidentiality obligations outlined above. For the reasons stated, I consider that there is no limitation on the right to Strong accountability measures should exist for the use privacy under section 13 of the charter act. of such significant powers. It is critical that the The engagement with the right to privacy must be considered Victorian community has full confidence that in light of the public interest purpose of the bill. The bill applications for covert investigation and coercive establishes the PIM as a further safeguard to help ensure that powers are subject to optimal safeguards and oversight. particular warrants, orders and approvals for law enforcement purposes are granted only in appropriate cases. As The recent report of the Victorian Ombudsman, applications for these powers are usually considered at ex parte hearings, the introduction of the PIM to consider Investigation into the Office of Police Integrity’s applications and act as a contradictor (where appropriate) Handling of a Complaint, has expressed concerns about enhances the right to a fair hearing. the oversight of telecommunications interception Right to a fair hearing (section 24 of the charter act) powers and recommended the introduction of measures to ensure there is merits-based assessment of Section 24 of the charter act holds that a person charged with telecommunications interceptions in Victoria. In that a criminal offence or a party to a civil proceeding has the right report the Ombudsman states: to have the charge or proceeding decided by a competent, independent and impartial court or tribunal after a fair and public hearing. It also holds that all judgements or decisions This gap in accountability with regard to telecommunication made by a court or tribunal in a criminal or civil proceeding interception has been recognised in some other states. must be made public, unless exceptions apply including that a (paragraph 39) law other than the charter act otherwise permits. Section 24 deals with the right to a fair hearing, incorporating principles The measures taken or being considered in New South Wales of procedural fairness. Procedural fairness concerns the extent and Queensland are measures that may be of assistance in to which the procedures of a hearing protect the rights of the ensuring that there is an effective merits-based assessment of parties, such as the right of a party to be provided a telecommunication interceptions in Victoria. In this regard, I reasonable opportunity to present his or her case under recommend that consideration be given to developing conditions that do not place that party at a substantial appropriate measures to allow the merit of telecommunication disadvantage vis-a-vis his or her opponent.
PUBLIC INTEREST MONITOR BILL 2011
4834 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
interceptions to be assessed and monitored in Victoria. will provide increased accountability for integrity and (paragraph 44) law enforcement agencies. The government has taken swift action to help ensure The bill introduces public interest monitors into that applications for the use of such powers are tested in application processes by amending the Surveillance the public interest, through the introduction of public Devices Act 1999, Telecommunications (Interception) interest monitors. (State Provisions) Act 1988, Terrorism (Community The bill provides for public interest monitors to have a Protection) Act 2003, and the Major Crime role at hearings of applications for these powers. At the (Investigative Powers) Act 2004. application hearing, a public interest monitor will The telecommunications interception powers regime is represent the public interest by testing the content and governed by commonwealth legislation. Introduction of sufficiency of material relied upon in the application public interest monitors into the application process and the circumstances of that application. will require amendments to commonwealth legislation. The government has long been on the record about the The government has notified the federal need to ensure integrity and law enforcement bodies are Attorney-General about this important legislation. subject to robust oversight. Consultation has Officers from the Victorian Department of Justice will highlighted the importance of ensuring the use of these progress this issue with the federal Attorney-General’s significant powers is scrutinised carefully. Public department as a matter of priority to ensure public interest monitors will assist state and federal judicial interest monitors are authorised to attend hearings for officers and Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) applications for telecommunications interception members to provide that scrutiny at the time of warrants as soon as possible. applications are sought. This will give Victorians Public interest monitors performing substantially confidence that the content and sufficiency of material similar functions have existed in Queensland since relied upon in support of the application is vigorously 1998 and in the Australian Capital Territory in relation tested. to terrorism offences since 2005. In 2010 alone, Victoria Police and the OPI made The key aspects of the Public Interest Monitor 424 applications for telecommunications interception Bill 2011 are as follows: warrants. None of these applications was refused. Applications for telephone interception warrants were Functions routinely heard by members of the AAT; records show that in the last three years not a single application by a Public interest monitors will have a role prior to, and at Victorian agency has been refused. hearings of, applications for:
The figures for surveillance device warrants tell a surveillance device warrants, retrieval warrants, similar story. Over the last three years, 2007–08, assistance orders, and approvals of emergency 2008–09 and 2009–10, there were 423 applications for authorisations by Victoria Police, the OPI, the surveillance device warrants made by Victoria Police departments of primary industries and sustainability and the OPI, and only two were refused. and environment, and the Australian Crime Commission (when applying for warrants regulated These applications are heard ex parte, without the under Victorian legislation) under the Surveillance knowledge of the target of the covert power and Devices Act 1999; without the opportunity to appear at hearings for the application. Public interest monitors will be entitled to telecommunications interception warrants by appear at hearings of these applications, to test the Victoria Police and the OPI under the material on which they are based, in the public interest. Commonwealth Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (subject to other necessary Public interest monitors will offer additional comfort commonwealth legislative amendments); that decisions to grant these powers have been informed by public interest monitors’ submissions as to the covert search warrants, preventative detention appropriateness of the application. Public interest orders, and prohibited contact orders by Victoria monitors will assist the relevant judges, magistrates and Police under the Terrorism (Community Protection) AAT members by appearing at the hearings of Act 2003; and applications for these powers. Public interest monitors
PUBLIC INTEREST MONITOR BILL 2011
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4835
coercive powers orders by Victoria Police, for the In addition, a public interest monitor must not be chief examiner, under the Major Crime employed in or by, or seconded to, any body that is (Investigative Powers) Act 2004. eligible to apply for any of the warrants, orders and approvals specified in the act. Public interest monitors will also have a role at applications for extensions, variations and revocations A public interest monitor must avoid any actual or of such warrants. At a hearing, a public interest monitor potential conflict of interest, and may declare that he or will be able to ask questions of any person providing she is unable to carry out the functions of a public information about the application. A public interest interest monitor in a particular case if a potential or monitor will make submissions to the judge, magistrate actual conflict arises. They will also be subject to strong or AAT member on the appropriateness of the obligations of confidentiality to ensure that sensitive application. information remains confidential.
Public interest monitors will appear at applications Reporting made by the OPI, and subsequently the IBAC when it is authorised to apply for such warrants. The principal public interest monitor will report annually to the minister on the performance of the Requirement to notify functions of all public interest monitors. The minister will cause the report to be laid before Parliament within An officer of an integrity or law enforcement body will 14 sitting days of receiving it. The report will include be required to notify a public interest monitor about an the total number of applications at which a public application to exercise one of these powers. This interest monitor appeared, the number of applications obligation includes giving a public interest monitor a by each agency at which a public interest monitor copy of the application and any affidavit. appeared, the number of orders made, warrants issued or authorisations approved on applications by each The bill amends the enabling acts under which these agency, the number of applications made by telephone, powers may be applied for to introduce a positive and the number of applications by each agency that obligation on an applicant to provide full disclosure of were refused or withdrawn. all matters relevant that are adverse to the application. A breach of this obligation to provide full disclosure The inaugural principal public interest monitor and will be an offence. The offence highlights the critical deputy public interest monitors will be appointed by the role of public interest monitors, and the importance of Governor in Council as soon as possible following the applicant providing all information to the public passage of the legislation. interest monitor as part of the application process. The offence will not be a strict liability offence — it will Covert investigation and coercive powers are require a knowing or reckless failure. significant powers. Strong accountability measures should exist for the use of significant powers. It is Principal public interest monitor and deputy public critical that the Victorian community has full interest monitors confidence that applications for covert investigation and coercive powers are subject to optimal safeguards and There will be one principal public interest monitor, who accountability. This is why we are establishing the will be supported by deputy public interest monitors. office of public interest monitor. Public interest monitors must be Australian legal practitioners. The principal public interest monitor may I commend this bill to the house. issue guidelines about how the deputy public interest monitors perform their functions. Debate adjourned on motion of Ms HENNESSY (Altona). It is necessary that, in performing their functions, public interest monitors act independently and avoid any Debate adjourned until Tuesday, 8 November. conflicts of interest. Therefore a person will be ineligible for appointment if they are a member of the Parliament of the commonwealth or a state or territory, or the Director of Public Prosecutions, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions, any person appointed under the Public Prosecutions Act 1994, or employed in, or seconded to, the Office of Public Prosecutions.
SENTENCING AMENDMENT (COMMUNITY CORRECTION REFORM) BILL 2011
4836 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
SENTENCING AMENDMENT community correction order and attach one or more (COMMUNITY CORRECTION REFORM) optional conditions. I would like to go through those BILL 2011 conditions briefly. They will be able to include up to 600 hours of community work; up to 12-hour curfews, Second reading which is a significant issue that I will come back to later, as well as no-go zones; conditions on where an Debate resumed from 15 September; motion of offender may live; restrictions on contact with specified Mr CLARK (Attorney-General). persons; driving licence suspension, restriction and cancellation; impoundment of a vehicle; and GPS Ms HENNESSY (Altona) — I rise to speak on the monitoring. Sentencing Amendment (Community Correction Reform) Bill 2011. I would like to say at the outset that The provisions of the bill also apply to any offence that it is not Labor’s intention to oppose this bill, subject to attracts a penalty of 5 penalty units or more, and the a number of concerns that we will canvass throughout order can last as long as the maximum term of the course of this debate. Should the government not be imprisonment for an offence. Critically, though, as I in a position where it is adequately able to address those said, the Labor opposition is not hoodwinked by the issues, then the opposition will reserve its right to spin that has surrounded this bill, because many of the consider amendments when the bill is in the other powers listed in the bill already exist. This bill is in fact place. Most importantly, we are not fooled, persuaded a codification of those powers. We are not persuaded or hoodwinked by the government’s rhetoric, by any kind of spin that this is a revolutionary piece of specifically on reforms in this bill, and law and order legislation. Almost all the powers already exist as generally. Before the last election the coalition made a reserve powers. The bill is in the main simply a promise to the Victorian people: ‘We are going to repackaging of existing options. overhaul the community correction system’. The coalition said it would put teeth into community orders. It is interesting to note also that the effect of the bill is The truth about this bill is that it is predominantly an to give back to the judiciary powers that the coalition exercise in window-dressing. sought to take away with much great fanfare in recent times. A fine example of this is suspended sentences. This bill recasts a number of the powers that the courts We know that coalition members like to run around already have in respect of community correction orders saying that they have abolished suspended sentences. and rolls them into a single order. Community-based Members of the opposition know the truth, which is orders have evolved over the past few decades at that the coalition government has abolished six various points in time. We saw reforms in respect of the suspended sentences, and only three in toto because Kennett, Bracks and Brumby governments, so the three have been abolished only in the context of an evolution of community-based orders reflects the offence that is not heard as an indictable offence. In this varying responses to the need for appropriate bill we see the government giving back the power by non-custodial penalties. effectively ensuring that the judiciary can apply community-based orders for offences for which the Currently we have broadly grouped community-based coalition has taken away suspended sentences. and intensive correction orders. We also have combined custody and treatment orders. Providing the judiciary Home detention is yet another fine example of that. We with an appropriate suite of powers is really important have seen the abolition of home detention. Yet in this for ensuring that it has appropriate sentencing options bill we see the regulation around a power that ensures to meet the aims and aspirations of the sentencing that judges can effectively detain someone at home on a legislation. That legislation obviously requires a curfew for 12 hours. It seems that what the coalition hierarchy of options to reflect, among other things, the taketh away from the judiciary in part — in respect of severity of the crime. many of the conditions that will be able to be applied to community-based orders — it has given back. So the The orders that the bill reforms give judges a full suite coalition spin around ‘jail means jail’ is in fact a bit of a of penalties that sit between fines at the low end and furphy. imprisonment at the high end. When we go to the detail, what does the bill do? All existing There is one other great fundamental flaw in the community-based options are abolished and replaced coalition’s law and order narrative. Coalition members with a single community correction order. If a judge are really big on the tough guy rhetoric, but the decides that the appropriate punishment resides fundamental test of any criminal justice system and between a fine and imprisonment, a judge can make a community safety regime requires a
SENTENCING AMENDMENT (COMMUNITY CORRECTION REFORM) BILL 2011
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4837 whole-of-government approach in investing in understand that the lead speaker has a fairly liberal preventing crime occurring in the first place. Yet we opportunity, but I ask the member not to stray too much have not heard anything from this government about a further. whole-of-government crime prevention program. Ms HENNESSY — I will certainly take on board We have seen the cutbacks around the Victorian your reminder, Acting Speaker, but let us not forget that certificate of applied learning (VCAL). Much of the one of the fanciful purposes articulated when members research around VCAL indicates that it has been opposite speak about the objects of the bill is crime incredibly effective in bringing back into the education prevention. If we want to hold the bill up to a test, we system children who have been exposed to the juvenile must test it in context, and that context is compelling justice system. That is what the research shows. It was and disappointing cuts in service after service that written about quite persuasively in an article by Jill fundamentally goes to what causes crime in the first Singer that appeared in the Herald Sun only last week. place.
Ms Ryall — On a point of order, Acting Speaker, Another example I would like to talk about in the member has well and truly strayed from the bill. I preventing crime is this government’s failure to support ask that you draw the member back to the bill. the nationally acclaimed Be Safe! program that keeps women in regional Victoria safe. The coalition was Ms HENNESSY — On the point of order, Acting happy to bask in the glory when the program won a Speaker, you would of course be aware of the latitude national award but was not so happy when the health that is afforded to lead speakers on bills. Perhaps you service — — would like to remind the member on the other side of that latitude. Given that significant latitude was given to Mr Delahunty — On a point of order, Acting non-leading speakers in the last debate, I urge you to Speaker, the member is going well off the bill. She is take that into consideration in your ruling. talking about a defunded federal government program called Be Safe!, which has nothing to do with the state The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Tilley) — Order! I government. I ask you again to bring her back to this have been listening to the member’s contribution. There bill. is no point of order. The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Tilley) — Order! Ms HENNESSY — As I was saying, the research On the topic of Be Safe!, the member is now straying. I around VCAL shows that it is a program that supports warn the member not to stray any further but to come young people to be retained in the education system. back to the bill. We know that young people who fall out of the education system are more likely to be exposed to the Ms HENNESSY — Thank you, Acting Speaker; I criminal justice system. will heed your warning. I understand why members of the state government are deeply embarrassed by their If you are committed to ensuring that crime does not position on that. occur, you need to ensure that families have proper support around them. The child protection system is The bill also contains a range of conditions around another example of that. Which service does the employment programs as determined conditions of Department of Human Services have to use regularly community-based orders. By way of stark contrast, I for child protection? It is occasional child care. What do posit this government’s failure to support programs we see from the coalition government? A complete such as the Goodbye Graffiti program in Laverton. That abandonment of funding of the Take a Break is a program in which long-term unemployed people occasional child-care program. On the one hand the clean graffiti from walls along local train lines. The government’s attitude is that children should be referred people who run the program also take the opportunity to occasional child care, but on the other hand it of ensuring that those people are placed in employment defunds the program and pretends to care about crime programs to use their skills in appropriate trades. What prevention. does the government do? It refuses to fund the program.
Mr Delahunty — On a point of order, Acting Government members say that they are tough on crime Speaker, the member is well off the bill. I ask you to and they are going to bring in new, revolutionary bring her back to the bill. community-based orders to try to prevent crime. It is a farce. The only test of judgement is what this The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Tilley) — Order! It government does to invest in the prevention of crime is a similar point of order to the one raised last time. I occurring in the first place. Time and again we see this
SENTENCING AMENDMENT (COMMUNITY CORRECTION REFORM) BILL 2011
4838 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011 government trying to pretend that it is tough on crime, crime, in public transport and in roads. I am confident and we say it should start focusing on the reduction of that they would much prefer their hard-earnt taxpayer crime. Is it any wonder that the minister, who I happily dollars to go into those sorts of services rather than see here in the house tonight, has been unable to building new prisons. While we are all politicians here articulate what the effect of these so-called and might throw around all our plaudits, and we all like revolutionary changes will be on the actual crime rate, to claim a deeper understanding of what community and has said only that ‘The crime rate may not reduce views are around the criminal justice system, I also for another year’. think it is important that we listen, reflect and use the wisdom, experience, intelligence and data of those who The government also refused to put any crime reduction know what they are talking about in this space. targets in the budget output measures. Why? Because it does not want to be held accountable. It does not want It would be remiss of me not to mention a report that to have to commit to actual outcomes on which its was given to this government recently on this very performance can be judged. That would be highly topic. The Sentencing Advisory Council has a statutory inconvenient for the government. It is much more function to gauge public opinion on sentencing matters. effective to come out with headline spin issues around In March it gave a report to the government called being tough on crime while it rips the guts out of Alternatives to Imprisonment — Community Views in community services. It is much easier for this Victoria. The summary of this report given to the government to pretend and say, ‘We are the tough guys government by the Sentencing Advisory Council says: and they are soft on crime’ because this government does not want to be measured on whether and how it This report shows that, contrary to common myths and misconceptions about a punitive public, people are open to a actually reduced crime. policy of increasing the use of alternatives to prison such as supervision, treatment and community work. Victorians are After an eight-year decline in recidivism, what do we especially accepting of appropriate alternatives for mentally see in the government’s own budget papers? It forecast ill, young or drug-addicted offenders, preferring a policy of an increase in recidivism — not just an increase in treatment, rehabilitation, counselling and education programs recidivism around the correction system but specifically to prison. around those who have done community-based orders. Its own report gives quite an insight into what If there is one accuracy in the coalition rhetoric it is community views are around the divisive issue of this: it has predicted its own failure. I would usually prison versus non-custodial sentencing. commend honesty, but it is a fraud on victims to pretend that you are tough on crime, to come with This brings me to my next point: the question of repackaged law and order policies and then to walk resources. Communities need to ensure that the away from ensuring that crime is not committed again treatment options that will support the or that it is prevented in the first place. community-based orders are funded and resourced properly. If community correction orders are to be The next fallacy the coalition tries to trot out is when it effective in addressing the causes of crime, it is says, ‘We are meeting community expectations’. I put absolutely critical that there is adequate resourcing. on record my strong support for a criminal justice That means not just within the Department of Justice system which the community has faith and confidence and the community correction system but also for the in. It is my strong view that community views and input service providers. I can certainly speak to the should inform public policy. It is most regrettable that five-and-a-half-month waiting list for those who might this government has botched its own online sentencing be the subject of an apprehended violence order out in survey, to say the least, because rather than being an the western suburbs who actually require anger opportunity to have credible, well-informed data around management treatment. There is not a dollar from this what community views might be on a certain section of government for the sorts of conditions that will attach the sentencing arena, the authenticity of those results to these sorts of orders. has been undermined right from the get-go. But I do not contest the principle, and I also note that there has been The effectiveness of this sort of monitoring also goes to some significant evolution within the judiciary about the investment in information and communications saying that it wants to better reflect community views. technology. I know that is a big issue, particularly around the monitoring of sex offenders and serious sex I am confident in my view that Victorians want less offenders. We will be monitoring the government’s crime, not more crime. I am confident in my view that resource allocation and holding the government to the Victorian community wants more investment in account. schools, in hospitals, in the sorts of services that prevent
SENTENCING AMENDMENT (COMMUNITY CORRECTION REFORM) BILL 2011
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4839
It was also interesting to read in the annual report of the Secretary of the Department of Justice, and we would Adult Parole Board of Victoria that it is urging the make the point concerning the separation of powers government to resource monitoring more fulsomely. even if it were. But there is a very, very structured The adult parole board made a series of comments, not delegation process here, which means that we are not just in respect of monitoring but also around the necessarily talking about those who are sitting at the treatment options. Many of those who work in the highest levels in the Department of Justice. One of the criminal justice arena are also making those sorts of questions we have is: is it appropriate to provide urgings to the government, particularly around resource Department of Justice officials, who lack public allocation. I share their concerns about court pressures accountability, with those extrajudicial powers? One of and what criminal justice legislative change does to the really interesting arguments that the law institute court pressures. I share their concern about the inability makes is that community corrections officers often of offenders to be referred to treatment options — necessarily develop close and very complex options that may address the causes of their offending relationships with offenders under their management, in the first place. and it questions whether it is appropriate that they then act as judge and jury and then exercise an extrajudicial The Law Institute of Victoria has cited several instances power in respect of variations to their penalties. where conditions of benefit are not recommended by community corrections officers during the We want to hear what the government has to say about court-ordered assessments due to the unavailability of those issues, because we feel uncomfortable with placement in those courses. There are unacceptably allowing a bureaucrat to determine extrajudicial high waiting lists for many of the courses to which penalties without going back to court. We do want to these conditions attach, and we fail to have any hear what the government has to say about that. information, data or material outlined in the budget Further, we would not want the entire community papers about how this will be resourced. correction order system to come tumbling down after it is inevitably subject to a constitutional challenge in the It will also be important to ensure that the government High Court on this very issue. If the government is is transparent around this system. Transparency is confident on this issue, it should tell us that and should incredibly important because it goes to the issue of release the advice; it should give us the information that community confidence, and we are all agreed that forms the basis of its confidence that this is not an community confidence in the criminal justice system is unconstitutional breach of the separation of powers. a good thing. But one of the deep concerns that the That is a point we would specifically like to hear those opposition holds about this bill is the potential for the on the other side of the house address in the course of separation of powers to be breached. Interestingly there this debate. Failing that, we reserve our right to take up are provisions in this bill that grant Department of this matter in the other place when the bill goes there. Justice bureaucrats power to extend a sanction imposed by courts in respect of curfews and community work. I look forward to the ongoing debate on this bill. It is That means the penalty can be varied by a bureaucrat important that we reflect upon the whole basis for without the person who is the subject of the order debating this matter, and that is: the greatest thing you having their day in court. can do to be tough on crime is to prevent crime occurring in the first place. I think it is important that as public policy-makers we reflect upon and question whether we really want such Mr WAKELING (Ferntree Gully) — It gives me a blurring of the powers of the executive and judicial great pleasure to rise to speak in the debate on the arms of government. Is that transparent? Is that fair? Sentencing Amendment (Community Correction Can the government guarantee that it has rock solid, Reform) Bill 2011. I am very pleased to support this credible advice that such an arrangement would be bill because it is another demonstration of the coalition constitutional? What obligation will an official have to government delivering on a very important election advise a person that they have a right to challenge any commitment — that is, to get tough on crime. This is a variations in court? Why has the government not found government that is getting tough on crime. With the the deep concerns expressed by the Law Institute of greatest respect to the member for Altona, I was Victoria persuasive on this issue? In fact the law bemused by the comment in her contribution when she institute has asserted that this is a clear erosion of the was talking about the Take a Break program, a program principle of the separation of powers. that has actually been axed by the federal government. I am straining to understand how three-year-olds are The fact that there are also significant delegation related to community-based orders. I am unaware of powers in the legislation means this is not just about the too many three-year-olds who are subject to
SENTENCING AMENDMENT (COMMUNITY CORRECTION REFORM) BILL 2011
4840 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011 community-based orders, but never mind, I am sure No such reference was made, and the member’s there is some link! comments were rude and out of line.
This government was going to be tough on crime, and Mr WAKELING — On the point of order, if I that is exactly what it is doing. If you look at our record may, Acting Speaker, when I made reference to and what we said we would do, you will see we have Mr McNamara there were certainly noises coming from done just that. We have abolished the legal fiction of that side of the house that were offensive. suspended sentences for a wide range of serious crimes. We also have legislation currently before Parliament The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Tilley) — Order! that seeks to abolish home detention so that jail will There is no point of order. mean jail. That is exactly what the Victorian community voted for at the last election, and that is Mr WAKELING — This bill seeks to reform the exactly what we are delivering in government. We said community-based sentencing system and provide for a in opposition that the then government should do it, but broad range of flexible new powers and sentencing it was not prepared to listen. We said to the Victorian options. Under this bill we will be amending the community at the election that if we were successful in Sentencing Act 1981 to reform community-based winning government, we would introduce the necessary sentencing laws and provide courts with a broad range legislation to put these things in place, and that is of strong and effective new powers and sentencing exactly what we are now doing. We are standing up in options. It will replace the current range of this house and proposing legislation, which is community-based sentencing laws with a single something the Victorian community has been crying community correction order (CCO). It will also provide out for. We will be proceeding with the complete courts with new powers to suspend or cancel drivers abolition of suspended sentences, the introduction of licences and disqualify persons from driving for any statutory minimum sentences for gross violence offence for any period. In addition it will create new offences and the introduction of baseline sentencing for offences to deal the with contraventions of the CCOs serious crime. These significant reforms will further and existing orders. It will also provide Corrections restore truth and transparency to sentencing. Victoria with new powers to respond effectively to less serious non-compliance issues with a CCO without In the community I represent I have no stronger returning offenders to court. advocate in this area than Mr Noel McNamara, the head of the Crime Victims Support Association. That This is sensible legislation. What it will mean gentlemen has stood up for victims of crime in this effectively is that under the sentencing structures we state. will have in this state, those people who were issued with a custodial sentence will get just that: they will go Honourable members interjecting. to jail. Jail will mean jail under a sentence handed down in this state. If, however, a member of the judiciary is of Mr WAKELING — Those opposite can belittle the the view that a jail sentence is not appropriate for an man, but he is somebody who lost his daughter to offender, they will have the capacity to have a murder and who is prepared to put that grieving behind community correction order issued to that person. We him and stand up for victims in this state. I am one will not have this nonsense of people being handed a person who is prepared to stand up in this house and custodial sentence and having it wholly suspended. If say I am proud of the work he has done for victims, and somebody is provided with a sentence, they will have I am proud to stand up in this house and support just that: they will have a custodial sentence, and they legislation that supports victims. Those opposite have will see out their time in jail. However, there will be a the gall to belittle someone like Noel McNamara, who, flexible arrangement that will be afforded to the along with his wife, Bev, fielded phone call after phone judiciary — that is, this community correction order. It call from families of victims looking for justice under is quite sensible and quite timely that we are taking the previous system, which was in place under the these important steps to do that. responsibility of the member for Niddrie and his colleagues. All that the community and those people he The member for Kilsyth is a strong advocate for his represented wanted was to — — community on issues like law and order. The Minister for Multicultural Affairs and Citizenship, who is at the Ms Hennessy — On a point of order, Acting table, is also a longstanding and passionate advocate for Speaker, the member made an assertion that people on law and order in this house. You need only read his this side of the house were belittling Noel McNamara. contributions on these issues to see that. You only need to look at this side of the house. We are prepared to
SENTENCING AMENDMENT (COMMUNITY CORRECTION REFORM) BILL 2011
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4841 stand up for Victorians on important pieces of would rather be tough on the causes of crime. I would legislation. like to see money put into preventing crime.
A range of optional conditions will be allowed under The previous member asked us to nominate stations this bill. These will include unpaid community work of where we do not want to see protective services up to 600 hours and curfews of up to 12 hours per day officers. I do not want to live in a society where there is for up to six months. They can impose areas of a cop on every corner. I want to live in a society where exclusion or restriction. There will be non-association there is a crime prevention scheme and money put into conditions that ban association or contact with a crime prevention so that crime is prevented. Then we specified person or specified classes of person. There is would not have to build more jails, because that is not a range of options in the bill which those in the house the answer. could certainly read if they were willing to do so. However, Labor will not be opposing this bill. The bill This is a government that has said it will get tough on is largely about window dressing. We all know it is crime with 1700 new police and 940 new protective window dressing and the rehashing and rebadging of a services officers. I stand up here saying that these number of existing powers that are already available to protective services officers are important members of courts and rolling them into a single order. the Victorian community. Those opposite will call them Community-based orders have evolved over a number plastic police and will belittle those important officers of years — right through the Kennett years and the in this state, but we on this side of the house will stand Bracks and the Brumby years too — and there are now up for protective services officers because we know a variety of community-based orders, intensive that they will be performing important tasks on our corrections orders and combined custody and treatment railway stations. orders. Along with home detention and suspended sentences the orders give judges a full suite of penalties My community is more than happy to have protective that sit between fines at the low end and imprisonment services officers protecting their railway stations. I ask at the higher end. those members opposite to nominate those railway stations in their electorates where they do not want It seems to me that the crime prevention policy of this protective services officers protecting their government has been influenced by a survey in the communities. I wonder if the member for Monbulk, the Herald Sun. That survey in the Herald Sun was broadly shadow minister for police, is saying that the people in condemned by anybody who has any experience in Upwey, Upper Ferntree Gully and Belgrave should not crime prevention; indeed it was dismissed as rhetoric have protective services officers at those stations. I am and window dressing. It did not give people a backdrop sure he, like all of us, knows that in his heart of hearts to a crime. It had a question of a couple of dozen words. protective services officers are something that his A judge will sit down and read hundreds of pages of community would want. evidence, yet this government seems to have based its policy on a Herald Sun tick-this-box type of survey. This is important legislation, but it is not the final piece of legislation we will see from the Attorney-General The legislation effectively codifies many of the and from this government in this important field. We penalties available to judges under the current regime, have already introduced important legislation into the but it also gives judges some of the options which have house this year. This is another important piece of been stripped from them with much fanfare in recent legislation. There is more to come. This a government months, so I am pleased that the government has seen that went to the election saying, ‘We will be tough on the error of its ways and has given judges back some of crime’, and that is exactly what we are doing. We are the options. Like suspended sentences, there is really delivering on our commitments, and the Victoria less to this bill than meets the eye. We have a community is telling this government that it is pleased government that stands up all the time and beats its to finally see a government that is going to do chest about being tough on crime, yet the Minister for something about law and order in the state of Victoria. Crime Prevention has repeated that the government’s new approach might not reduce crime rates for around Ms BEATTIE (Yuroke) — Good advice was given 20 years or so and that the budget shows that the to the previous member when somebody said, ‘Sit government expects rates of reoffending to rise over the down and read the bill’. I wish he had, because we have forward estimates. Nevertheless, what we see here is a heard lot of rhetoric about being tough of crime. There government that went to the election with a policy to is nobody in this house who is soft on crime, but I replace the existing community-based sentences with a single order, and on this side of the house we accept
SENTENCING AMENDMENT (COMMUNITY CORRECTION REFORM) BILL 2011
4842 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011 that the government has the right to implement this have been in the house for a number of years — there policy. are a range of circumstances that each member would have had to address that range across the breadth of Some of the conditions enabled by this legislation criminal offences. In my own constituency it has ranged include up to 600 hours of community work; curfews of from murder, rape, sexual assault, theft and road rage to up to 12 hours per day and no-go zones; conditions on multiple other offences arising under the Crimes Act where an offender may live; restrictions on contact with 1958 and related legislation. specified persons; drivers licence suspension, restriction or cancellation; impounding of vehicles; restrictions on As a community we have a responsibility to enforce the access to licensed premises; and global positioning principles of sentencing, which range from punishment, system monitoring. The bill also broadens the scope of reform, deterrence — and deterrence might be specific these types of orders. deterrence to the individual concerned and also the notion of general deterrence to the world at large — One of the things that particularly concerns me is the and making offenders responsible for their actions. The principle that either the departmental secretary or his or bill before the house countenances a range of her delegate will be able to increase the sanction circumstances where the nature of the sanction is not imposed by the court. We are concerned about the one that warrants a jail sentence but nevertheless where delegation of those powers. I would ask: what important issues need to be taken into account. obligation does the official have to advise the person that they have a right to challenge any curfew increase? An important aspect of the judicial process prior to a I am concerned about the separation of powers. Indeed penalty being applied is the notion of there being some I am not the only one concerned about this. The Law sort of pre-sentence report where an expert in the Institute of Victoria has expressed profound concerns relevant field would interview the accused and provide about the increase of the powers to the departmental a report to the court regarding the suitability for a secretary as described. The law institute even made the community correction order. The community correction point that the Secretary of the Department of Justice is a orders drawn together under the act include a range of public servant who is effectively being authorised to options. exercise judicial power and that the move is a clear erosion of the principle of the separation of powers. The Members have referred to the notion of unpaid law institute also goes on to say that it is clearly community work. I know in the Sandringham electorate undesirable and inappropriate to provide unelected over a number of years particular office of corrections community corrections officers who lack public work crews have improved the presentation of the accountability with these extrajudicial powers. foreshore. They have also cleared the former Sandringham courthouse site and undertaken works We hear those on the other side rattling on about an along railway corridors in removing graffiti. Good open and transparent government, and yet there is no work has been undertaken by the Department of Justice openness or transparency here. It is most unclear what and the office of corrections in assembling work crews public accountability the secretary of the department where there is the provision of a supervisor, the has. The secretary of the department is a public servant requisite training and equipment to enable them to and not a judicial officer. embark upon certain works where there is ultimately a net community benefit through unpaid community There are many other speakers who want to speak on work. this bill, so in closing I will just say that one of the aspects which I am also concerned about is that the I would also digress briefly to the Friends of Mentone 12-hour curfew looks suspiciously like home detention Station and Gardens who through their diligence have with work release to me. All in all, as I said in my assisted in the detection, through collaboration with the opening remarks, this is just a rebadging and a local police and transit police, of over 100 graffiti rehashing of a number of powers that are already offences for which over 70 people have been charged available to courts by rolling them into a single order. over a period of time. Some of the conditions of the With those few remarks I will let others take up the sentence or penalty imposed upon offenders would debate. include cleaning up graffiti.
Mr THOMPSON (Sandringham) — I am pleased There is also the area of treatment and rehabilitation. A to join the debate on the Sentencing Amendment number of people who have committed offences as a (Community Correction Reform) Bill 2011. As result of drug or alcohol addiction can have a treatment members of Parliament know — certainly those who program prepared as a result of the pre-sentence report.
SENTENCING AMENDMENT (COMMUNITY CORRECTION REFORM) BILL 2011
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4843
Other orders that are available include a supervision other than to note that there are a range of sanctions order. In other circumstances there can be a possible short of a jail sentence which might strengthen non-association order. I think it was a number of years the principles of sentencing being applied to an ago that the laws of consorting in this state might have offender. These include unpaid community work, a been changed, but going back 35 years or so there was treatment and rehabilitation order, a supervision order, a a respected policeman, Angus Ritchie, who was non-association order, a residence restriction, a curfew responsible for that particular area of jurisdiction. There condition, an alcohol exclusion condition, provision for was this notion that certain people who had committed judicial monitoring and drivers licence penalties. offences were not to consort with other people in particular places and establishments, which could give I had been covering the field more immediately in rise to other crimes being planned. relation to the role of the victim impact statement, its importance and how it enables those who have been Under the legislation there can be a residence affected by a crime to speak to the court to enable the restriction, which can confine a person pursuant to perpetrator of a crime to understand the impact of their conditions under the legislation. There is a curfew behaviour on those affected by his or her conduct. I condition and also an alcohol exclusion condition. This might note again that I am familiar in more recent times can be quite broad and restrict a person from entering a with people whose lives have been tragically impacted particular area of licensed premises where they might upon by murders and violent attacks — in one case an be more vulnerable. There is scope for judicial attack with a butcher’s knife and in another, a person monitoring, and interestingly there is scope for a drivers who was repeatedly kicked around the head and face licence penalty, not just in a circumstance where one and who required extensive corrective surgery — and might ordinarily presume that a licence may be others who have been impacted by crimes. removed, such as for a drink-driving offence. There is also an extended provision where, for example, an act It is important to note that there are a range of people of road rage has occurred and the court in its discretion coming before the courts with a range of conditions. might adjudge it appropriate in a particular Some might have a psychiatric disability. I recall a case circumstance that a person’s drivers licence be a number of years ago where there was a person who suspended or cancelled as part of the sentence. The had an acquired brain injury. In that particular case court has the capacity to provide a number of additional there were of necessity important issues that needed to sanctions or conditions as an alternative to jail, which be taken into account by a court, and it is the nevertheless represent a level or regime of penalty to pre-sentence report process that would inform a court the person who has perpetrated a particular offence, officer of those circumstances. In another case there pursuant to and aided by the information that might be was an example of a person who had an intellectual provided in a pre-sentence report. disability and a diminished level of responsibility for the offences he committed. These are important matters The legislation also reiterates the scope of victim that would be brought to the attention of the magistrate impact statements. It is generally understood that the or judicial officer, and those matters would be taken role of the victim impact statement has been an into account as a result of the pre-sentence report. important reform in the criminal law in Victoria where those people who have been seriously affected by a I pay tribute to those people who have contributed to crime have the opportunity to either express their the judicial process and certainly to the survivors and viewpoint directly or have their views conveyed to the those who have been affected as victims. I commend court. I know of a number of people whose families the bill to the house. have been the victims of a murder that has occurred — — Ms CAMPBELL (Pascoe Vale) — I appreciate the opportunity to speak on this important Sentencing Business interrupted pursuant to sessional orders. Amendment (Community Correction Reform) Bill 2011. It is a pleasure to follow the member for Sitting continued on motion of Mr KOTSIRAS Sandringham for whom the Parliament extended the (Minister for Multicultural Affairs and Citizenship). sitting of the house. I am sure it had nothing to do with the visit of Her Royal Highness. It was all to do with Mr THOMPSON (Sandringham) — Before the the member for Sandringham and the importance of me business of the house was interrupted, I was speaking rebutting a number of the points that he raised! on the matter of the Sentencing Amendment (Community Correction Reform) Bill 2011. I will not The member for Sandringham made a significant go through all the provisions to which I have alluded contribution to supposedly support the bill. He
SENTENCING AMENDMENT (COMMUNITY CORRECTION REFORM) BILL 2011
4844 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011 highlighted a number of instances in which the court that is in clause 60 of the bill, where a new has the capacity to impose sentences or the courts have section 83AU is inserted into the Sentencing Act the capacity to provide additional sentencing. The 1991 — pre-sentence reports that go to the court provide the opportunity to include victim impact statements, and and the power of the secretary to increase specified curfew hours in addition to those imposed by the court — the courts, on the basis of pre-sentence reports and an understanding of the conditions of the offender and the and that is also in clause 60. circumstances of the crime, make the decision on what sentence is imposed. When they entered this house most people would have been well aware of the power of the courts to impose As our shadow minister outlined extremely well, we on sentences, but if we agree to this bill, we are agreeing to this side of the house have a degree of concern that we give additional powers to the Secretary of the expect to be addressed, and that is the fact that it is not Department of Justice, who is a public servant and a the courts alone, as outlined by the member for member of the executive arm of government. That of Sandringham, that in future will be imposing sanctions course goes to areas of concern in relation to the on the prisoner, but in fact we will be moving to a separation of powers. It is a clear erosion of the situation where offenders could have additional principle of the separation of powers. punishment imposed on them by people who are not officers of the court. These would be public servants, What is also of concern to me and the Law Institute of not members of the judiciary. That is of significant Victoria are the new powers contained in proposed concern to those on this side of the house as it is to the section 115D of the Sentencing Act 1991, which is Law Institute of Victoria. As the member for inserted by clause 69 of the bill, allowing an authorised Sandringham outlined, some people who have acquired person appointed by the secretary to serve an brain injury go before the courts and their infringement notice on an offender where the circumstances have to be taken into consideration, as authorised person has reason to believe that the the courts take into consideration the nature of the offender has failed to obey a direction of the secretary. crime, but it is not the courts that will necessarily be That issue was not answered to my satisfaction by the looking at imposing additional sanctions on that person Attorney-General in the second-reading speech, and I with an acquired brain injury — it could be public hope that when he comes into the house to sum up the servants. debate the concerns of the Law Institute of Victoria will be addressed. As the member for Yuroke outlined to the house, there are concerns that have been expressed in relation to this I quote from a letter from the Law Institute of Victoria: bill not only by the opposition but also by the Law It is clearly undesirable and inappropriate to provide Institute of Victoria. I have correspondence from the unelected community corrections officers, who lack public Law Institute of Victoria that clearly outlines its accountability, with these extrajudicial powers. Community concerns. The Law Institute of Victoria has expressed corrections officers necessarily develop close and complex profound concern about the increased powers of the relationships with the offenders under their management. Secretary of the Department of Justice. Those concerns We are left here in this house with the question, ‘As go to the concerns of the opposition also, and they are community corrections officers, how do people about the principle of the secretary or her or his responsibly undertake their allocated role of developing delegate being able to increase the sanction imposed by complex, close and important relationships with the the court, and I refer to curfews and unpaid community offenders under their management and at the same time work. have a role that is akin to that of a member of the I go to the correspondence I have from the Law judiciary?’. To me it just does not add up appropriately. Institute of Victoria in relation to this matter, which We require some further explanation in this house from states: the Attorney-General.
The LIV is extremely concerned at the proposal to increase The member for Sandringham could well have been a the powers of the Secretary of the Department of Justice, member of the opposition when he outlined very clearly namely, the power of the secretary to direct an offender to the important role of the judiciary in sentencing perform unpaid community work in addition to that imposed by the court — offenders. That is rightly the responsibility of the judiciary. Officers of the Department of Justice have quite a different role, and the separation of powers is an important matter. I believe those issues require the
SENTENCING AMENDMENT (COMMUNITY CORRECTION REFORM) BILL 2011
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4845
Attorney-General to give us some information in his What we have here is a replacement of the current summing up. range of community-based sentences. It will deliver one community correction order regime, and this allows In the few minutes I have remaining I want to address a that regime to provide some flexibility in strengthening matter that has been tabled in the house via the Scrutiny community sentencing. It will also enable of Acts and Regulations Committee’s Alert Digest common-sense sentences to be applied to the offender No. 11 of 2011, which was tabled in this house on and to the offence itself. Tuesday, 11 October. There are some rather interesting dates and figures there. I draw the house’s attention to What will the community correction order (CCO) page 13 of Alert Digest No. 11 where the committee deliver through its singular and flexible system? That is states that it has decided to write to the minister and answered in part in the second-reading speech. The seek further advice on why this bill has a delayed CCO will allow courts to impose core conditions and commencement date. Under the delegation of optional conditions, including curfews and no-go zones, legislative power we are usually looking at a one-year which I will talk about a little bit later in my rule. This goes beyond that, and SARC highlights in its contribution. There will be new sanctions for report that: non-compliance, which I will also refer to later on. In addition the courts will be given an expanded power to Where delayed commencement is considered necessary or suspend or cancel the drivers licence of an offender or desirable SARC would prefer some explanation to be provided in either the explanatory memorandum or the to disqualify an offender found guilty of any offence. second-reading speech. That was mentioned by the member for Sandringham in his contribution. That might be something the Department of Justice officials who are listening to this debate might like to Community-based sentencing is an important part of address. I am sure they really do not want to put the the judicial system. Some offences may not necessarily Attorney-General in a position where he has to answer incur a term of imprisonment. It is therefore vital that to SARC and to this Parliament as to why there is such we have a flexible and practical approach. That is a delay in the commencement of this legislation. It is a imperative where community-based sentencing applies. matter that is rather unfortunate, and as I said, it is good It is also important that there be public confidence in that there are people from the department here in the the system. Others on this side of the house have house to directly report back to those who draft spoken about ensuring that there is public confidence in legislation that they should give a lot more attention to law and order and in the judicial system. That is of SARC’s practice note no. 1 of 2005. It is a document paramount importance. that has been around for six years, and 99 per cent of those who sign off on briefs in the Department of At this point in time I will digress a bit to say that in the Justice have been around for six years or longer. This is last 12 months or so I conducted a community survey not new, and the issue should have been addressed in across the Morwell electorate and received very strong the second-reading speech or, using the other option, in feedback that people want law and order in this state to the explanatory memorandum. SARC looks forward to be enhanced. That is something that this government receiving a reply from the Attorney-General on this took to the election. The coalition went to the election matter. with those principles, and I believe that was a strong reason for our election to government. Mr NORTHE (Morwell) — It gives me pleasure to rise this evening to support the Sentencing Amendment The coalition government has put in place and (Community Correction Reform) Bill 2011. This bill committed to a broad range of law and order initiatives. essentially does three key things: firstly, it amends the It has committed to 1700 additional police right across Sentencing Act 1991, seeking to simplify the Victoria and 940 protective services officers based in sentencing hierarchy by abolishing the metropolitan and major regional centres across the community-based order, the intensive correction order, state. We have increased penalties for offences such as the combined custody and treatment order and the alcohol-fuelled violence and other alcohol-related intensive correction management order, which has yet crimes. In his contribution the member for Ferntree to commence; secondly, it creates a single community Gully made reference to the abolition of suspended correction order, which I will refer to as a CCO, to sit in sentences for serious crimes, the abolition of home the sentencing hierarchy between imprisonment and a detention and minimum sentences ultimately being fine and which has a broad range of optional applied for acts of gross violence. conditions; and thirdly, it creates new offences to deal with any contraventions of CCOs or existing orders.
SENTENCING AMENDMENT (COMMUNITY CORRECTION REFORM) BILL 2011
4846 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
These are important measures. At the same time, they it is a good option and again gets back to the issue of are not meant to be strong measures directed providing flexibility for these orders. exclusively against the offenders. The government is making sure we have a good balance by ensuring that The bill will give courts new powers to suspend or those who perpetrate crimes are also provided with cancel a drivers licence or disqualify a person from adequate supports. That is why this government has obtaining a drivers licence or from driving in Victoria made the very strong commitment of having a Minister for any offence and for any period. The member for for Crime Prevention. There have been some strong Sandringham raised in his contribution the example of a funding announcements and commitments in the area road rage attack which resulted in a brawl. In that case of crime prevention since we came to government as there would be the flexibility to allow that person’s well. licence to be suspended or cancelled for a period of time. The MyViews website, which is seeking feedback from the community with respect to sentencing in this state, In the short time remaining to me I want to touch on the has received some 18 000 submissions, which gives fact that many aspects of the amendments we have some sense of the feelings and sentiments in Victoria before us were supported by the Sentencing Advisory with respect to law and order. Council in its 2008 final report on suspended sentences. Some of its recommendations have certainly been As we know, there are approximately 5500 persons accommodated in the legislation before us tonight. who are currently on a range of different orders, whether they be intensive correction orders (ICOs), As I said, one of the key purposes of the legislation combined custody and treatment orders (CCTOs) or before us is to make sure that governance and community-based orders. What we will see now is a enforcement are adhered to. There is an expectation transition of those across to other community correction from the community that someone who is the subject of orders. As I asked before, why the change in what we a CCO should abide by that particular CCO, and this are doing? One reason is to allow the judicial system legislation puts some stronger powers and measures in some flexibility. There is no better example of the need place. In summary, the bill is a great step in the right for that than the current regime, in which two years is direction. I commend the bill to the house. the maximum period that a community-based sentence can be imposed for. For the more serious orders, such Mr PERERA (Cranbourne) — I rise to speak on the as the CCTOs and the ICOs, the maximum is one year. Sentencing Amendment (Community Correction The amendments we have before us this evening will Reform) Bill 2011. Tough-on-crime rhetoric was a very allow the courts to tailor the length of an order rather big part of this government’s election platform, with than it being limited to a fixed period. I believe that strong commitments to be really tough. Speaker after provides a very flexible and common-sense approach. speaker on the government side has proudly mentioned the 940 protective services officers (PSOs) to be placed Some of the reforms we have before us tonight are at regional and metropolitan stations. It looks like some outlined in a number of different conditions that would metropolitan stations, like Hallam, will not get PSOs apply under a CCO. I will run through a couple of because they do not have toilets. It is hard to have PSOs them. What the bill states is that at least one option or where there are no toilets, so those stations will not get condition must be contained in the order. Optional PSOs, and neither will the stations get toilets. However, conditions include things such as unpaid community the Minister for Crime Prevention has shamelessly work of up to 600 hours; curfews of up to 12 hours per repeated that the government’s new approach may not day for up to 6 months duration; place or area reduce crime rates for 20 years. That is a long time. The exclusions under which an offender may be ordered not government’s budget shows that the government to enter or remain in a specified place or area; and expects rates of reoffending to rise over the forward non-association conditions that ban association or estimates period. contact with any specified person or class of person. There are a range of other optional conditions that may Despite all these failures from the government, the apply, but time precludes me from going through them opposition accepts that the coalition went to the election all. with a policy to replace the existing types of community-based sentences (CBSs) with a single order. In addition to this, senior officers of Corrections Therefore the opposition accepts that the government Victoria will be given new powers to issue on-the-spot has a right to implement this policy, and Labor will not fines. I know this is something that opposition members be opposing the bill. have raised some concerns about; however, we believe
SENTENCING AMENDMENT (COMMUNITY CORRECTION REFORM) BILL 2011
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4847
The bill is largely an exercise in window-dressing, come to terms with the separation of powers in a rebadging a number of the existing powers available to democratic system of government. courts and rolling them into a single order. It must have been really hard work for the minister. The Law Institute of Victoria is concerned about the Community-based orders (CBOs) are not a new proposal to allow the court to suspend, cancel or invention that the Baillieu government can take credit disqualify a drivers licence or learners permit for; CBOs have evolved over a number of years subsequent to a conviction or finding of guilt for any through the Kennett, Bracks and Brumby governments. offence. Such suspension, cancellation or Today there are community-based orders, intensive disqualification is likely to be a disproportionate corrections orders and combined custody and treatment response to all but the most serious types of offending. orders. Along with home detention and suspended The cancellation of such a licence can have a profound sentences, these orders have given judges a full suite of and disproportionate effect not just on the offender but penalties between fines at the lower end and also on the offender’s family. The loss of a licence can imprisonment at the higher end. This legislation place an offender’s employment in jeopardy and place effectively codifies many of the penalties available to an undue burden on other family members to take up judges under the current regime. those duties that require transport — the weekly shopping, taking children to school et cetera. This type The bill has the effect of giving back to judges some of of punitive action could drive offenders to commit the options that have been stripped from them with more crimes, given that these actions take away their much fanfare in recent months. Just like suspended opportunities to work and lead decent and normal lives. sentences, there is less to this bill than meets the eye. If a judge decides that the appropriate punishment resides Many of the powers provided to judges as part of this between a fine and imprisonment, the judge can make a reform are already available to them as general reserve community correction order (CCO) and attach one or powers, so it is just a repackaging of the many existing more optional conditions, including up to 600 hours of options available to judges. By broadening the community work; curfews of up to 12 hours per day circumstances in which a judge can impose a CBS, the and no-go zones; conditions on where an offender may new CCO will almost certainly be applied to many live; restrictions on contact with specified persons; offences for which suspended sentences previously driving licence suspension, restriction or cancellation; applied. In other words, the abolition of suspended impounding of vehicles; restrictions on access to sentences will not lead to ‘jail means jail’, as the licensed premises; and GPS (global positioning system) coalition has implied. Instead these offenders will get a monitoring. The bill broadens the scope of these types CCO. They will still be out in the community but at far of orders. Previously community-based sentences could greater cost to the taxpayer. This is a blatant reversal of last no more than two years, limiting the types of the vacuous rhetoric of jail means jail. offences they could be applied to. A new CCO can be applied to any offence that attracts a penalty of The government has not provided any detail as to what 5 penalty units or more and can last as long as the additional resources will be required to support a large maximum term of imprisonment for the offence. increase in the number of offenders on CCOs. However, as with the government’s other reforms, it The bill grants Department of Justice bureaucrats the will undoubtedly mean that an ever-increasing share of power to extend the sanctions imposed by the courts in the state budget is being spent on corrections, on the respect of curfews and community work. The court system and inevitably on services such as legal opposition is concerned about a principle that sees aid, and it will be in circumstances in which the either the Secretary of the Department of Justice or her government cannot or will not reveal what the dividend delegate being able to increase a sanction imposed by a for the community will be. Will the crime rate fall? court, such as a curfew or unpaid community work. The Will rates of reoffending fall? Will we be safer? The Law Institute of Victoria has expressed serious minister has already conceded that crime rates will not concerns about these initiatives. What obligation does be reduced by this approach. the official have to advise the person that they have a right to challenge in court any curfew increase, The bill effectively reinstates home detention as an community work increase or fine? The Secretary of the option, just weeks after the government abolished it. Department of Justice is a public servant and a member The 12-hour curfew looks suspiciously like home of the executive arm of government, and the extension detention with work release. I am sure that very soon of these judicial powers to the secretary is a clear the government will bring back in-home detention erosion of the principle of the separation of powers. rebadged as something else. As mentioned earlier, the This is a clear display of the government’s inability to opposition will not oppose the bill.
SENTENCING AMENDMENT (COMMUNITY CORRECTION REFORM) BILL 2011
4848 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Mrs VICTORIA (Bayswater) — It is with great Each order will also have another optional condition delight that I speak on the Sentencing Amendment added in, and I will give the house examples of some of (Community Correction Reform) Bill 2011. This is the them. One may be unpaid community work of up to next stage of the Baillieu government getting tough on 600 hours, which is a substantial amount of working sentencing and the next stage of our reform program. It time. It may be that they will have curfews of up to is a follow-up to the abolition of home detention and 12 hours every day of the week for up to six months. suspended sentences. In this case the government has Offenders might also have non-association conditions sought to implement a range of sentencing options. attached to their order which might mean they will be banned from having contact with a person or a I have heard other speakers, especially those in the particular class of person or perhaps they will be opposition, saying that we have not stuck with our banned from entering a particular place. There might mantra, as I think somebody called it, which is ‘jail also be bans on their entering licensed premises. Each means jail’. The most serious offenders who warrant a of these conditions will be totally in line with the custodial sentence will still receive a custodial sentence. offence that has been committed. So whatever the There is no option on that anymore — those who reason they have come to the court, the optional extras should be incarcerated will be incarcerated. However, will be imposed according to the crime they have we all know that for those who commit less serious committed. offences jail may not be the best place to be reformed or to do some sort of reparation work. There will also be an option for rehabilitation and treatment conditions, and I think this is very sensible. This bill covers lots of different areas, and I am going The last thing we want is to have people who are to touch on a few of them tonight. One of the addicted to substances being able to go through the amendments introduced in the bill provides the courts court system and in some circumstances go to jail or with new powers to suspend or cancel a drivers licence have a CCO imposed on them but not receive any and also to disqualify persons from driving for any treatment or help and then go back out through that offence over any period. That is a completely new revolving door. This will give the courts the option of option open to the courts. There are two stages to the being able to say, ‘You need to have some sort of reform process. I will talk about some of the other rehabilitation’. It might be alcohol or drug treatment, amendments in a moment, but some of them are just but it might also be treatment for mental health issues. reiterations. We know that people with mental health issues are overrepresented in our criminal justice system. It might The first stage of the reform will happen next year, be that there are rehabilitation programs to deal with early in 2012, and the second stage will come in around violence or any of those sorts of issues. For each CCO midyear. The second stage will introduce community there will be an optional condition added on. correction orders (CCOs), which will include such things as bond conditions; new powers to suspend, There are new offences for contravention of a CCO, disqualify or cancel drivers licences; and also new and these will certainly be upheld in the court system. If powers for Corrections Victoria. It is very important someone fails to comply with the conditions of a that the courts have those powers in order for them to CCO — again going back to the treatment options or implement the new laws. the non-contact options — or if they have an existing order in place and do something to contravene that The new community correction order will replace a order, they will be committing an offence. The series of other options that have been available in the maximum penalty will be up to 30 penalty units, which past and will make the process much easier and more at this point in time, is just over $3600. They could also streamlined. It will replace the intensive correction receive three months imprisonment or, for more serious order, the combined custody and treatment order, the offences, they may be subject to both. A panel will be community-based order and also the intensive established to set out how the sanction powers are to be correction management order, which has not actually exercised. That will not be up to the magistrate; it will commenced yet. There will be standard terms in every be up to a panel to decide all of that. order, providing for conditions including that the person must not reoffend whilst they are serving an order, that Unlike the sentences that have been in place in the past, they must not leave Victoria without first getting these are not intended to replace a prison sentence. permission and that they will need to report to a Again, as we have always said, jail means jail, and we community corrections officer. will not shy away from that. If you have committed a serious offence, you will go to jail. It is designed to impose tough conditions upon an offender. It is not an
SENTENCING AMENDMENT (COMMUNITY CORRECTION REFORM) BILL 2011
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4849 easy situation, and those who deserve it will attract somewhat confused. We have heard a lot of talk about prison time, but there are those for whom a court can the government’s tough-on-crime approach, so I was deem, in the fullness of time following an explanation expecting to see the Rocky Marciano of bills here. I through a trial, that a custodial sentence is highly was expecting to see the Rocky Marciano of retribution inappropriate. We are giving the courts lots of options, in terms of a piece of legislative implementation. but for those who need jail, it will still mean jail. It will also ensure our prison cells are reserved for the most Mr Wynne interjected. serious of offenders in our society and that there will be room for those who need to be given a custodial Mr PALLAS — The retributive urge, that is it. I sentence. was expecting to see the tooth and claw of the retributive urge. Instead what I saw was the Pee-wee I want to look at some of the non-custodial statistics Herman of sell-outs. The sum of the parts is nothing released by the Australian Bureau of Statistics in June more than the whole reconstituted, and that is exactly 2011. There were 8928 offenders serving what this legislation seeks to do. We have sat back and community-based orders in Victoria. At the same time heard from this government time and again about its Queensland had almost double that number at just over great desire to lead by example in terms of its 15 000 people on community-based orders and New tough-on-crime approach. On this side of the table we South Wales had over 16 000. The Victorian figure have a different approach that is somewhat summed up equates to approximately 205 people per 105 000, by the words of the former Prime Minister of the which is the lowest per capita figure in any part of our United Kingdom, Tony Blair: tough on crime and country. Only 26 of these people were on what was tough on the causes of crime. That is about a societal known as a restricted movement program, more approach to the way we address the fundamental commonly known as home detention. About 26 per problems in our community. cent of total sentences imposed were community service orders or reparatory orders and fines and, with Imagine, if you would, that we are in a situation where, the exception of the Australian Capital Territory, in a piece of legislation, we have simply rebadged a Victoria has the lowest number of persons per capita range of sentencing orders that are available to the serving full-time custodial sentences. courts at the moment and that we say, effectively, that that is a substantive change to the way sentencing The other states have a variety of sentencing options orders will be dealt with. It is almost as though if we available to their courts. In New South Wales they can badge it appropriately, it will be seen as a range from fines to good behaviour bonds to substantive improvement in the way the courts operate, non-association orders, which are similar to the ones we but perhaps more importantly in the way that we deal are bringing in, to home detention. In Queensland they with offenders before the courts. Our view — a view I classify crimes as being of a low, intermediate or high think should be reflected more generally — is that level. They have things like banning notices and terminology is not a substantive means by which we non-contact notices, but they do not use restricted can address the underlying causes of crime in our movement orders. In South Australia they have home community or, indeed, a substantive reason for us to detention, which is certainly one of their most common seek to console the community that we have a strategy ways of doing things, but they also make use of aimed at reducing recidivism. community service orders a whole lot more than we do in Victoria. As many speakers on this side of the chamber have said, this government has nothing more than a This is a continuation of the very strong leadership that window-dressing approach towards the way the the Baillieu government is showing in the reformation proposed legislation will operate. It is a rebadging of a of our sentencing laws and the way we deal with those number of existing powers that are already available to who need not just a custodial sentence but perhaps the courts, and it rolls them into a single order, as if the something more appropriate to their circumstances. I sum of the whole was better than the parts. A range of wish this bill a very speedy passage through the house. sentencing options were developed in the Kennett, Bracks and Brumby years, whether they were Mr PALLAS (Tarneit) — I rise to speak on the community-based orders, intensive correction orders or Sentencing Amendment (Community Correction community custody and treatment orders. It is as if by Reform) Bill 2011, and I must admit that I rise with simply rebadging them as ‘really-tough-on-crime some degree of discombobulation about this bill. I am orders’ the government will substantively change the discombobulated because, whilst Labor is not opposing way in which the courts address the responsibilities this bill, I am pained to say that we in opposition are they are most appropriately charged with.
SENTENCING AMENDMENT (COMMUNITY CORRECTION REFORM) BILL 2011
4850 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Looking at the way this bill will operate, what we Of course it is a flawed philosophical position, but if the increasingly see from this government is nothing more government actually believes it, it should incorporate it than sleight of hand. As I said, many of the powers in legislation. Why has it not? We know exactly why provided to judges as part of this reform are already the government has not done so. Apart from it being part and parcel of a general range of reserve powers fundamentally flawed, everybody in justice would have available to the courts. It is a demonstration that been telling the government that it has to allow for a window-dressing means that nothing much must broad range of sentencing options in recognition of the change. As the member for Bayswater said, when jail fact that courts have to apply the circumstances to the means jail it means jail means jail, except when it does sentencing options — — not mean jail, in effect. That has always been the case. The judiciary must have the capacity to assess the Mr Wynne — Judicial oversight. circumstances and the wellbeing of not only the community but the offender so it can look towards a Mr PALLAS — Judicial oversight. But more than process by which rehabilitation constitutes the basis that, you can imagine the consternation on the faces of under which offenders can become productive Treasury officials when the tough-on-crime, members of the community in the long term. jail-means-jail approach first came across their desks. It was a battle of wits between those Muhammad Ali By broadening the circumstances in which a judge can advocates for taking the tough-on-crime approach and impose community-based orders and new community those who look after the budgetary position. correction orders, they will almost certainly be applied to many offences to which suspended sentences were Mr Wynne — The black arts. previously applied. This bill all but reinstates home Mr PALLAS — The black arts of budget balancing. detention as an option, just weeks after the government Guess who won? The bureaucrats won yet again. I do effectively abolished it. There are 12-hour curfew not believe they won on the basis of advocating for an options, and there is also the capacity to provide for appropriate justice regime; they won on the basis that work release. It looks suspiciously like home detention nobody in their right mind who is serious about with work release. You can imagine how this rehabilitating people in the community and about tough-on-crime approach has now morphed into a new, making sure they do not exacerbate the crime problem single order with a whiz-bang new name, and you can simply by not giving people hope that the courts will understand exactly why that is because in the undertake a just consideration of their circumstances sentencing the government has put in place the large would go down the path of jail means jail. They would print giveth and the small print taketh away. It is spin, recognise that going down that path would ultimately window-dressing and a sop to a constituency that has do a disservice not only to the offender but also to the been treated with contempt in the way this government community as a whole. On that basis, whilst I am has lived up to its flawed rhetoric on law and order and discombobulated by this underwhelming bill, Labor a tough-on-crime approach. will not be opposing it.
This bill is also a demonstration of the failure of this Mrs FYFFE (Evelyn) — I am pleased to rise to government. As the opposition understands it, there are speak on the Sentencing Amendment (Community no crime reduction figures in the budget, despite the Correction Reform) Bill 2011. The significance of this recognition that for eight consecutive years there has bill cannot be ignored. Its effective and strong new been a decline in recidivism; yet the budget papers powers will make community-based sentences real admit that recidivism will increase. This proposed sentences. It replaces the current range of community legislation is testament to a government that will protect sentences by a single, flexible community correction its own failure. If we want evidence, we can just go to order. Courts will be able to impose optional the budget papers. As James Russell Lowell once said, conditions. There will be new sanctions for those who ‘Not failure, but low aim, is crime’. If we want to see choose not to comply with their sentence. This the greatest crime, it is the fact that this government legislation adds to the other legislation that has been consistently shoots below the mark of appropriate brought into this house towards fulfilling the coalition’s policy. It goes through the process of pandering to a election commitments on law and order. constituency without any demonstrable or substantive means by which it can ensure that its rhetoric is backed Jail is a serious punishment. Community-based up by a legislative regime that incorporates part and sentencing is also a punishment, and offenders need to parcel its philosophical position. understand this. Community correction orders allow offenders to stay in their community, carry on with their
SENTENCING AMENDMENT (COMMUNITY CORRECTION REFORM) BILL 2011
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4851 employment, live with their families and stay in touch The treatment and rehabilitation condition (TRC) will with their friends. Community correction orders are the include at least one of the following: assessment and only sentencing options between imprisonment and treatment, including testing, for drug abuse or fines. Over the last few years we have seen a slackening dependency; assessment and treatment, including off regarding the conditions imposed under community testing, for alcohol abuse or dependency; assessment correction orders and a reduction in their effectiveness. and treatment at a residential facility for withdrawal The work undertaken under community correction from or rehabilitation for alcohol or drug abuse or orders must be real work. It must be supervised at a dependency; and medical assessment and treatment, good standard and the hours sentenced must be served. including, but not limited to, general or specialist The standard conditions of every order will state that medical treatment, or treatment in a hospital or the offender must not reoffend and must not leave residential facility. Very importantly, one of the things Victoria without permission. There is a range of eight in the TRC list could be mental health assessment and optional conditions, at least one of which must be treatment, including, but not limited to, treatment in contained in the order. Community correction orders such areas as mental health, psychological, made by a Magistrates Court can last up to two years. neuropsychological or psychiatric conditions, or treatment in a hospital or residential facility. In the time I have left to me I will highlight the alcohol exclusion condition. As all of us know, alcohol is Another condition could be programs aimed at associated with many crimes. Many crimes are addressing factors relating to the offending, which committed under the influence of alcohol or in an would be the various things that may have caused the attempt to obtain alcohol — even more than in an person to offend or be deemed to be one of the reasons attempt to obtain drugs. In the Yarra Ranges we have a that the person has offended. Another in the TRC list is lot of alcohol-related crime, whether it is domestic any other treatment and rehabilitation that the court violence, breaking and entering or simple assaults considers necessary or desirable including, but not against vehicles or persons. The Mail newspaper group limited to, employment or educational, cultural and should be commended on the stand it is taking on personal development programs consistent with the domestic violence through two of my local newspapers. purpose of this condition. I know it will be interested in this sentencing legislation. That last one is really important, because sadly there are still quite a few people in our society who are illiterate. Under the alcohol exclusion condition the offender may This lack of ability to read, write and converse can be barred from knowingly entering, remaining in or make them feel that they are on the outside, and often consuming alcohol in a licensed premises. Offenders they react with behaviour that does not fit into the will be banned from entering some licensed premises normal socially appropriate forms. They can end up in completely, such as nightclubs, bars, restaurants, cafes court and be sentenced. This type of variation to and function centres. Offenders will also be completely correctional sentencing is important if a person can be banned from attending major events or festivals that are given help with their education. We have people who licensed. Offenders may be permitted to enter other have moved 15 times during their primary school years types of licensed premises, such as public buildings, and others who have been with one foster family after theatres and sporting venues, provided they do not enter another. the bar area and do not consume alcohol on any part of the premises. We also have children whose parents have not valued education and have kept them away from school. When The court may specify that the exclusion applies all day they reach their teen years they tend to mix with or at particular times during the day. The court may like-minded people and drift into petty crime and then also specify a licensed premises that is excluded from more serious crime. They may start with graffitiing and the ban. This may, for example, permit the offender to continue on to smashing and robbing. They need to be attend his or her workplace or a family function. The given the opportunities to break away from that pattern. court will decide whether to impose those conditions. So when magistrates are considering sentencing, it is They are flexible and can be applied in many different very important that they include educational, cultural ways. Alcoholism is a disease or illness and something and personal development programs. I support the bill that we have to support the courts on. By those and recommend its speedy passage through the house. restrictions being applied, an offender is being told that if they break the conditions, they will receive a further Mr SCOTT (Preston) — Given the time, I will sentence, so hopefully they will try to comply. make a very brief contribution to the debate on the Sentencing Amendment (Community Correction
ADJOURNMENT
4852 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Reform) Bill 2011. As has been stated by other improve the safety there and would assist people in speakers on this side, Labor will not oppose the bill. I crossing the road. noted in the earlier contributions reference to the reformation of sentencing law. I was unaware that As I said, budgets of recent years have allocated when Martin Luther was hammering his protests onto $40 million, but there has been no allocation in this the door of the Castle Church in Wittenberg he was budget. That reflects pretty much the situation with the making reference to the Sentencing Amendment Cranbourne tip pledge. This week I noticed in the (Community Correction Reform) Bill 2011. I thought Casey Weekly — Cranbourne a report of a member for his protests were about indulgences. I was unaware that South Eastern Metropolitan Region saying she was the previous Labor government had been issuing embarrassed by the tip pledge. That has still not been indulgences for sins with the Fugger brothers sitting delivered on, and I think the cost was $24 million. It is there to collect their dues from the payment for the obviously a concern. We are not only not getting a lot indulgences — but I digress. of money for roads but the commitments which were made to the community in November 2010 in relation Labor will not be opposing the bill. The bill brings to these important local infrastructure works in the city community-based orders into a single framework, of Casey are not being met. I think various promises including conditions such as 600 hours of community were also made by the Liberal candidate for work and curfews up to 12 hours a day. Cranbourne, Geoff Ablett, in relation to roads and the like. Debate adjourned on motion of Mr NEWTON-BROWN (Prahran). A lot of these promises have not been met. These are important issues for our local community. The large Debate adjourned until later this day. intersection of Narre Warren North and Belgrave-Hallam roads is heavily used. Remaining business postponed on motion of Belgrave-Hallam Road links through to Wellington Mr McINTOSH (Minister for Corrections). Road, which is a back road used for travel between Belgrave and similar areas. It is quite dangerous. ADJOURNMENT Unfortunately a person was killed there in the last two months. Funding is required for substantial The SPEAKER — Order! The question is: improvements to the intersection.
That the house now adjourns. Timber industry: government policy
Belgrave-Hallam–Narre Warren North roads, Mr BLACKWOOD (Narracan) — I wish to raise a Narre Warren North: safety matter for the attention of the Minister for Agriculture and Food Security. The action I seek is for the minister Mr DONNELLAN (Narre Warren North) — My to schedule in his diary a visit to an operating logging adjournment matter tonight is for the Minister for coupe in the Noojee area in my electorate of Narracan Roads. The action I seek is the provision of funding to early in 2012. I am very keen for the minister to see improve and upgrade the safety of the intersection of firsthand the professionalism of the logging crew, the Belgrave-Hallam and Narre Warren North roads, Narre significant investment in plant and equipment, and the Warren North. This is a seriously dangerous controls and prescriptions that have to be adhered to intersection. Recently I sent out 2500 petitions, of while harvesting. The minister will have an opportunity which I received 338 back, which is a pretty good to see the enormous attention to detail provided to return. There is a serious issue of road funding across ensure the safety of the logging crew, VicForests staff the board in the city of Casey. Over the last 10 years an and visitors to the coupe. He will also gain an average of about $40 million has been spent each year, understanding at the coalface of the sensitivity that is but in the last budget there was no allocation for local applied to retaining trees for habitat, seed tree retention road upgrades. This issue is of serious concern to local and stream-side buffers. residents. The installation of a roundabout or traffic lights is definitely needed. I have suggested things like On his visit the minister will also gain an insight into a roundabout because I was looking at the most the action that is taken to protect water and soil quality reasonable way of dealing with the dangerous during and after harvesting and the importance of the intersection. It has been slated for duplication in future collection of seed from the trees that are being years — and I mean some way off — but at this stage harvested to be used in the regeneration of the site at the something like a roundabout would substantially completion of harvesting. I am very confident that once
ADJOURNMENT
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4853 the minister gains a better understanding of the way young people, who for a number of reasons cannot live timber harvesting is performed with modern and very at home. I supported the request of local residents to expensive equipment that provides a very high level of extend supervision hours to 24 hours a day, seven days safety for the logging crew, machinery that facilitates a week. adherence to the strict prescriptions dictated by the code of practice for timber production, which demands a The project proceeded, and local young people have very high level of environmental compliance, he will be lived at the units on Bellevue Drive without incident for suitably impressed and the confidence he has in the almost two years. Indeed residents had not reported any native forest industry will be more than justified. incidents to me until recently. However, there has been an unfortunate incident of a stabbing on Bellevue Drive Prior to the 2010 election the coalition adopted a policy in which one of the young residents was implicated. of ensuring that the native forest timber industry was Advice I received from WAYSS indicates that the provided with a long-term, sustainable and viable youth concerned had been living at the units for eight future. This policy was adopted in part because it was months without incident but had intervened in an seen as far more responsible to harvest our own altercation between two other people. The youth home-grown timber on a sustainable basis than replace suffered a minor injury, which was treated locally. our locally produced product with timber from a Third World country that has no forest management practices I acknowledge that residents have genuine concerns or, worse still, import timber harvested and processed and are deeply worried about what happened and what illegally. At the present time it is estimated that over may happen next, and I certainly sympathise with them. $400 million worth of timber harvested illegally Local residents have told me, and the local newspapers overseas is imported into Australia each year. Surely it have indicated, that they would like the facility is far more responsible for Victoria to continue to relocated. I also note that supervision for 24 hours a harvest timber on a sustainable basis from only 10 per day, seven days a week ceased around 10 months ago. I cent of our public native forest estate. Surely it is more am of the opinion that the young residents of this responsible for governments to support an industry that facility should be supervised 24 hours a day, seven days provides local jobs in rural communities, supports a week. Currently there is only 24-hour supervision regional economies by creating a need for service between Friday and Sunday. industries to the timber industry and provides a renewable, home-grown and processed product that is I fully understand why an incident like this would in huge demand locally, interstate and overseas. exacerbate concerns that local residents already hold. However, if the young people are going to stay at the The confidence of the native forest industry has grown current site in Berwick — the Baillieu government has enormously with the election of the coalition so far shown no inclination to relocate the facility — government and its rock-solid commitment to that then we need this issue resolved as fairly as possible for industry. A visit to the coalface, so to speak, of the both the local residents and the young people living in industry will significantly add to that confidence, and the units. We need to meet the needs of young people in once the minister has delivered on the changes needed the care of WAYSS but also ensure that there is as little to get the industry back on a long-term, viable and impact as possible on the amenity of local residents. sustainable footing, we will see this once great industry Local residents have the right to live in safety and returned to its former prominence in contributing to the peace. I strongly believe that supervision for 24 hours a Victorian economy. day, seven days a week would go a long way towards achieving this, as it has in the past, and would address Youth: Berwick housing some of the concerns of local residents. I call on the minister to act on this matter immediately. Ms GRALEY (Narre Warren South) — My adjournment matter is for the attention of the Minister Mount Waverley Secondary College: for Housing and concerns the youth accommodation ministerial visit facility in Bellevue Drive, Berwick, which is operated by WAYSS (Western Port Accommodation and Youth Mr GIDLEY (Mount Waverley) — The matter I Support Services). The action I seek is that the minister raise this evening on the adjournment is for the Minister reinstate supervision of the residents of this facility for Education. The action I seek from the minister is 24 hours a day, seven days a week. When the youth that he visit Mount Waverley Secondary College, both accommodation facility at the Berwick site was first junior and senior campuses, in the Mount Waverley proposed around two years ago local residents had electorate. We know education is important to young concerns about the limited hours of supervision of the people. We know the value that education can bring to
ADJOURNMENT
4854 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011 a young person’s life and that it can assist in building Melton Highway: safety their interpersonal and social skills. We know it can assist them in gaining the knowledge required to enter Mr NARDELLA (Melton) — My adjournment the workforce or undertake further study. But we know matter is for the Minister for Roads. The action I seek is education and schools cannot do it all. We know that he urgently upgrade the Melton Highway, communities have a great role to play in education. We previously called the Keilor-Melton Road, so that the know that whilst governments can provide quality tragic deaths and injuries on this road will be infrastructure, it is communities, teachers, students and eliminated. There have been 280 accidents on the families that are in many ways the key components. We Melton Highway since 1987. There have been also know the importance of a competitive education 13 fatalities on it since that time, including 5 fatalities in system. the last 12 months. This is a tragic cost to the people — the families and friends — who have been touched by I am pleased to say that the Liberal-Nationals coalition these awful events. The ongoing rehabilitation for government has put all these things together in the people is heartbreaking, and the Transport Accident Mount Waverley electorate. If you look at the Commission’s costs are also heartbreaking. comprehensive package we have for education in Waverley, you see that it is quite extraordinary after a The community, led by Narelle Bowden following the decade-plus of neglect by the former Labor tragic death of her nephew in December 2010, has government. It includes over $1 million to make sure organised to fix this dangerous road. Narelle has set up that both Mount Waverley Primary School and Mount a Facebook site, the ‘Campaign to duplicate the Melton Waverley North Primary School can be rebuilt; Highway’ page, which over 610 people have joined. $4.5 million to ensure that Pinewood Primary School The community, through Narelle, has collected the can have a full refurbishment undertaken; and signatures of over 2000 petitioners on this matter as $7 million to ensure that building at Essex Heights well. I would be happy to provide the minister with a Primary School, which would not have been able to be copy of that petition if he wishes — I have it here. progressed with the black hole left by Labor, has now been funded. Importantly the government has also Andrew Jefferson and Liam McAleer of the Melton committed to funding independent schools to 25 per Leader and the Moorabool Leader are supporting the cent of the average cost of educating students in campaign and have also highlighted the dangerous Victorian government schools. This means we will nature of this road. Under the previous Labor have a competitive education system, with government government the road was duplicated to Beattys Road, and independent schools supporting communities with Hillside, a large roundabout was built at Plumpton good-quality infrastructure. Road and the speed limit was reduced between the Galli Estate Winery and Ryans Lane. This work needs Mount Waverley Secondary College is an important to continue, especially at the dip at Kororoit Creek. The part of that, and I am pleased to say that the police, through Inspector Fiorentino, have said that the Liberal-Nationals coalition government is looking to road is one of their ‘highest road safety priorities’. open that school shortly as a result of the hard work of Melton Shire Council mayor, Cr Justin Mammarella, the Minister for Education and the school community. has said he ‘wholeheartedly supports’ the campaign to However, there are challenges because, like so many duplicate the road. The community group would like to projects, there was no foresight by the previous Labor meet with the minister via a delegation to him, and this government. Part of the secondary college will be request will be received by the minister shortly in a rebuilt for one particular learning format and the other letter I have sent to him. part for a different learning format. The teaching methods used for students in the junior campus will not With Melton having the highest population growth in be able to be replicated in the senior campus. Australia, I seek on behalf of my community urgent action to duplicate the Melton Highway, with the It is my great hope that when the minister visits Mount Kororoit Creek dip being the first stage of this upgrade Waverley Secondary College he will not only be able to via the redesign and construction of the road. The open the new junior campus but will also be able to see Kororoit Creek dip is the most dangerous section of the the importance of ensuring that the senior campus is highway and needs a bridge built over it. The redeveloped. I hope he will ensure that the years of duplication could be extended from Ryans Lane over neglect and lack of foresight of the previous Labor Kororoit Creek and onto the other side as the next stage government are not repeated by the Liberal-Nationals of the duplication and upgrade. coalition.
ADJOURNMENT
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4855
The community is really concerned about what is informed that there is a considerable risk to newborns, occurring on this road. The personal tragedy, heartbreak as they cannot be vaccinated against the disease for a and hell that people are going through are real. I read little while after birth, thus they are vulnerable to out a number of statistics about this road just now, but infection. I am also informed that a child died from the those statistics represent real people. I know the disease in New South Wales in the last year. I strongly minister will listen to the voices of the people and urge parents, grandparents and other family members community I represent in Melton, and I implore him to who are visiting newborns to ensure that they are take urgent action on this road. vaccinated. The cost of vaccination is quite small compared to the risk to an unvaccinated newborn. Whooping cough: vaccination I believe we need a strong campaign to make people Mr CRISP (Mildura) — The matter I raise is for the aware of this disease, the need to get treatment if they attention of the Minister for Health. I ask the minister to suspect they have the disease and for the population to outline what actions he is taking in response to the update their vaccinations. I request that the minister growing incidence of pertussis, better known as work to raise awareness in the community of the threat whooping cough. I have been contacted by Dr Gerald that this disease poses to both newborns and the Murphy, who is a general practitioner in Mildura and a productivity of the workforce. Perhaps we have here yet local public health officer, who expressed concern over another example of an old disease that we had almost the increasing incidence of whooping cough in the said goodbye to rearing its ugly head. Mildura area and the risk this poses to infants. Canterbury Road Urban Forest: future Issue 2 of volume 4 of the Victorian Infectious Diseases Bulletin of June 2011 states: Mr FOLEY (Albert Park) — The matter I raise is for the urgent attention of the Minister for Public A total of 2918 confirmed and probable cases of pertussis Transport. The action I seek is that the minister were notified to the department in the first quarter of 2011, a 60 per cent increase on the 1158 cases notified in the same immediately undertake to direct his agency VicTrack to quarter of 2010 … Notification rates amongst infants were transfer land it owns on behalf of the Crown, known as again higher in the first quarter of 2011 with a total of the Canterbury Road Urban Forest, to the City of Port 59 cases in zero to six-month-olds, compared with 36 cases Phillip as public reserve. There are a number of ways for the same period in 2010, and 35 cases for the same period in 2009. No outbreaks were reported in the quarter. One death that the minister might seek to do this: either through a due to pertussis occurred in a two-week-old infant; this was freehold title method by designating the area as the first death in an infant attributed to pertussis since 2004. reserved for public open space on the title plan, or by vesting the land in the City of Port Phillip. Having established that there has been a 60 per cent Alternatively, through his Crown land powers, the increase in cases of pertussis in the last 12 months I can minister might permanently reserve the land under understand Dr Murphy’s concern that we could be in section 4 of the Crown Land (Reserves) Act 1978 for the midst of the worst whooping cough outbreak for a public purposes under that act, in this case being for an very long time. Most adults think protection from urban bushland. whooping cough is included in one of the childhood vaccinations and that you are covered for life. Alternatively the land could be given committee of Dr Murphy informs me that this is not correct and that management status under section 14 of the Crown Land whooping cough requires boosters every 10 years or so. (Reserves) Act. It would be the latter option that would The whooping cough vaccination is coupled with the provide the most assurance for my local community of tetanus and diphtheria vaccines, and I encourage all Middle Park and St Kilda West, because, despite the adults in my electorate to review their vaccination protestations of government, disturbing new records to ensure that they have protection against information has come to the community’s attention whooping cough. suggesting that the minister and his agencies continue to harbour plans to sell off and develop this valuable I have been made aware of a number of adults who piece of urban forest. This is land that harbours wildlife. have had considerable time off from work in the last Some rare visiting species of birds have been sighted year due to contracting whooping cough. Dr Murphy there from time to time, and there is a range of native indicates to me that he is signing two or three disease flora that the community has planted, tended and notifications each week to the Department of Health safeguarded for over 30 years. After initial denials that and that this is causing him considerable concern. We the government was planning to rezone and develop the are faced with a difficult task of what to do about the land the community was temporarily reassured. In July spread of whooping cough in our community. I am the general manager of property at VicTrack wrote:
ADJOURNMENT
4856 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
… VicTrack has no intention whatsoever to rezone or Mordialloc has also embraced this decision and is develop the land as we fully appreciate its significance to the excited about the delivery of this commitment. local community. In August 2011 the minister wrote to a number of The people of Bentleigh are delighted to hear that the constituents stating that: Baillieu government is delivering on its commitment. The Minister for Public Transport is working hard to fix VicTrack has no plans to develop or rezone the land in the transport system in Victoria and is doing a question. marvellous job. The Baillieu government has been in office now for 11 months, and the Minister for Public Imagine the surprise of the community when an FOI Transport has already made an impact on the railway request showed up documents from February and June network. Improvements to reliability, punctuality and that directly contradict the minister and his agency. efficiency are just a few initiatives that we are Imagine the surprise when these same documents addressing — in fact so much so that for the last four revealed that it was the minister’s own agency, months Metro has met its targets. That is right — it has VicTrack, which commissioned these reports. In one met its targets! This is the best performance since 2008. instance the minister said: The Baillieu government is honouring its commitments The objective of the phase 1 ESA was to gain an to fix the problems and build for the future. understanding of potential for contamination, with a view to considering what restrictions this may pose on future Earlier this year the Minister for Public Transport development … informed the house that the Department of Transport had taken the first steps towards this project becoming a Later in the same document he states: reality. I call on the Minister for Public Transport to VicTrack are seeking to understand the development potential provide to the house an update on the progress of this of the site. very important project for the people of Bentleigh and the electorates neighbouring Bentleigh to ensure that Another document that came to light was the Heritage we are on track. Insight report, which was also commissioned by VicTrack. It states: Victorian certificate of applied learning: The assessment is aimed at informing VicTrack of any funding heritage issues on the property in the event of future rezoning and/or subdivision. Mr LIM (Clayton) — The matter I raise tonight is for the attention of the Minister for Education, and the It is clear that despite the minister’s protestations his action I seek is that funding for the Victorian certificate agency continues to harbour plans to subdivide this of applied learning (VCAL) for 2012 and beyond be area. restored as a matter of urgency. The withdrawal of funding for the VCAL program is part of a disturbing The DEPUTY SPEAKER — Order! The trend of the Baillieu government. My electorate of member’s time has expired. Clayton has three secondary schools within its Rail: Southland station boundaries, two government schools and one independent school, which all operate the VCAL Ms MILLER (Bentleigh) — My adjournment program. This year Westall Secondary College has matter is directed to the Minister for Public Transport, been operating the VCAL program off-site at two and the action I seek is for the minister to provide an locations. It is a successful program. In fact it is so update on the progress of our commitment to build a successful the college was intending to expand it by railway station at Southland. My election commitment also operating two classes at the main campus in 2012. to the Bentleigh electorate was to build a railway station The funding cut to this school will be $105 000, and it at Southland. The people of Bentleigh have been asking is unacceptable and intolerable. for this railway station for at least 11 years, and the I take pride in the fact that Westall Secondary College Baillieu government has listened to the people, made a is one of the few schools that offers English as a second commitment to the people and acted on behalf of the language VCAL, with many of the students coming people. Most importantly, we are delivering on this from refugee backgrounds. This year Westall commitment to the people of Bentleigh and the wider Secondary College VCAL students of Burmese descent community. The wider community from the won a major prize at the Bayside Film Festival for a neighbouring electorates of Sandringham and documentary film about their journey from Burma to the freedom of Australia. Westall’s program also
ADJOURNMENT
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4857 achieved further success in that its 2011 local education country in one year alone. Much of this cost will be a and employment re-engagement program won a major burden on our small businesses, including local prize for being an excellent community VCAL businesses like Jax Wax in Officer. Jax Wax is a local provider, awarded by the Bayside Glen Eira Kingston employer and is already in fear of the cost of the carbon Local Learning and Employment Network. tax on its business. It understands what it is like to face tough times, and the last thing it needs is the extra cost Westall Secondary College operates in a low of adjusting to a new federal occupational health and socioeconomic environment and is doing significant safety program that will not have any benefit for its work with refugee students, new migrants and business. Why should small to medium businesses in disengaged students from its catchment area and from the state of Victoria have to wear this cost when most other local secondary colleges. It is extremely important of these businesses will gain no ongoing benefit? that these marginalised young people do not slip outside the system. In fact it will be a failure of this I regularly speak to local businesses in the electorate, government if it turns its back on these young people. including Paul Fletcher from It’s Individual, a small The funding cut means that money will need to be local hairdresser in Berwick. Mr Fletcher talks of the found from an already tight school budget, and it could daily concerns to his business. He speaks highly of his see the school operate in deficit. staff and of ensuring that safe work practices are their no. 1 priority. When we spoke of occupational health I implore the minister to take immediate action to and safety harmonisation and costs which could be felt restore funding, provide certainty to this college and to by his business, he asked, ‘Why?’. I agree — why all 400 providers and, most of all, show support to our should a small business that employs four people have most vulnerable and needy students. cost impacts so that large business has the benefits of removing red tape across state lines? Occupational health and safety: national harmonisation I call on the minister to ensure that small to medium businesses are given ample time should federal OHS Mr BATTIN (Gembrook) — The action I seek harmonisation come into effect. When we consider tonight is from the Assistant Treasurer. I ask that he changes to OHS legislation we need to review how this ensure the protection of small to medium businesses in will impact on all businesses in Victoria. We must Victoria and act on behalf of the many small businesses ensure that the benefits to business are balanced with that will be affected by the federal proposal of the cost on business. As the proposal that was due to occupational health and safety (OHS) harmonisation. I become effective on 1 January 2012 stands, there is no call on the minister to attend my electorate to discuss benefit to local small business in the Gembrook these concerns with local businesses. electorate. There is no benefit for many small businesses across the state. However, it appears the cost Three years ago the state and federal governments impact will weigh heavily on these small businesses. committed to a national framework for work safety to The large businesses that will have the most to benefit reduce the red tape that is in place for businesses that will have less impact on their costs. operate in more than one state in Australia. This framework should aim for the highest possible safety The DEPUTY SPEAKER — Order! The for workers in Victoria and Australia as well as take member’s time has expired. into consideration the cost impact on all businesses that will be required to make changes as the legislation is Responses passed. As Victoria is the leading state when it comes to work safety, with the latest Occupational Health and Mr MULDER (Minister for Public Transport) — Safety Act which came into effect in 2004, the The member for Melton raised an issue with me in Assistant Treasurer has an obligation to protect the relation to the Melton Highway. As I understand it, in workers and businesses in Victoria that may be the most recent five-year period to 30 June 2011 there affected. have been 22 run-off crashes, 3 fatalities and 11 serious injury crashes. The VicRoads statistical database shows It is a concern to many businesses in my electorate that there have been 13 fatalities and 260 injuries on the to gain an agreement we may have to go backwards to Melton shire section of the road since 1987. That was compensate for the states that are many years behind in reported in the Melton Leader on, I think, 6 October the area of occupational health and safety. The 2011. The latest fatality was on 26 September when a estimates to date have costed the changes to a national 46-year-old Melton West man died in a collision near program to be at approximately $650 million across the the Plumpton Road intersection.
ADJOURNMENT
4858 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
I understand there is a community road forum meeting to February, indicating that VicRoads was looking at tomorrow night at the Melton community hall. Guest site assessments, future development opportunities and speakers will include Melton highway patrol members, heritage inquiries. I am not sure whether the February Chief Magistrate and former coroner Noreen Toohey, FOI document was instigated by the former and Christine Harrison from Road Trauma Support government or how that came about, but I am more Services. They will discuss issues of concern in relation than happy to go back and have a look at what brought to this section of road. those inquiries about. I will have a further look at those FOI documents, but I can give the member assurances I can inform the member for Melton that VicRoads is that there are no plans to do anything with the urban currently developing a proposal to undertake safety forest; we accept the fact that it is very important to the improvements along the 19 kilometres of the Melton local community and to the environment of that area. Highway between Sunshine Avenue and the Western As I said, once I get some further information on those Freeway. Upgrades being investigated include minor earlier assessments and earlier work I will be more than road widening, asphalt resurfacing works in selected happy to have that conversation once again with the areas, installation of safety barriers, hazard removal, member for Albert Park. But it would appear to me that new signage and improved delineation. with the February issue there could have been some direction from the former Labor government in that The investigation of the proposed safety improvements area. is anticipated to be finalised by the end of the year before being submitted for future funding The member for Bentleigh raised an issue with me in consideration. It would appear that that investigation relation to Southland railway station. The member has work had not been carried out in the past, and at the worked tirelessly within her community to push and moment VicRoads is doing that work for my promote Southland railway station development, which department. I am more than happy to have a will be a great improvement in that area. It will provide conversation with the member for Melton as that a great public transport service for the people who want proposal is developed. When you look at the history of to access Southland shopping centre. that road there is no doubt that some improvements can be made in relation to its safety. I will have that As to where we are with Southland station, I can inform discussion with the member for Melton as soon as I get the member for Bentleigh that $700 000 has been the information back from VicRoads. provided by the coalition government in the 2011–12 budget to enable consultants GHD to be engaged to The member for Narre Warren North raised an issue prepare a concept design. I also understand from the with me in relation to the Belgrave-Hallam Road and feedback I am getting from the department that the the Narre Warren North Road. The member indicated planning and design work is going well. The coalition there is a wish within the community for duplication of government’s station user panel is also assisting the this section of road. The member indicated that in the Department of Transport in the development of these meantime perhaps traffic lights or a roundabout may proposals. Given that we had so many disasters with assist in some areas. He also indicated that there has railway station developments under the former Labor been a fatality at that location in the last two months. I government we felt it was important to put in place a will get some further information from VicRoads in station user panel. We do not want similar issues with relation to that matter and get back to the member for the projects we embark on. We therefore have a very Narre Warren North. strong panel to inform design and look at issues in relation to functionality around stations. The member for Albert Park raised an issue with me in relation to the Canterbury Road urban forest. As we The member for Bentleigh will be delighted to hear that know well, the member for Albert Park has on different Southland station is getting that level of support. The occasions in the past claimed that the current government expects formal community consultation to government was going to develop that site. The commence around March. The government will also be member is also very much aware of the fact that I have seeking input from community members about the written to people who have raised this issue with me, design of the station and will work with the station user and also VicTrack has confirmed to the council that panel, using the concept design prepared by GHD as a there are absolutely no plans to develop the Canterbury reference point. Many major stakeholders are also Road urban forest. giving feedback. I would like to thank the local councils for their interest and work in that regard. I can inform The member in his request to me indicated that he had the member for Bentleigh that the Department of FOI documents dating back to June, and one even back Transport will be having further discussions with
ADJOURNMENT
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4859 shopping centre owners Ventana Pty Ltd, the Westfield The member for Gembrook raised a matter for the Group and AMP in relation to this very important Assistant Treasurer, seeking the Assistant Treasurer’s project. It is an exciting project which will increase the assistance to protect small and medium size businesses accessibility of Southland shopping centre and the bulk in his electorate that may be affected by proposals to goods retail stores nearby, not to mention the local light move to a national occupational health and safety industrial areas. Once again I congratulate the member harmonisation scheme. for Bentleigh on the great leadership she has shown in pursuing this project for her community. The member for Narre Warren South raised a matter for the Minister for Housing relating to youth facilities in Mr WALSH (Minister for Agriculture and Food Bellevue Drive, Berwick. I will ensure that the minister Security) — I rise to respond to the member for responds to the member about that matter. Narracan regarding his adjournment issue to me in relation to visiting a logging coupe in Noojee. I had the Finally, the member for Clayton raised a matter for the pleasure of visiting far East Gippsland with the member Minister for Education in relation to the funding of the for Narracan while in opposition in the previous Victorian certificate of applied learning. I will pass that Parliament. We took a two-day trip there to view the matter on to the minister. forest industry firsthand. Unfortunately it rained at the time, and although we could see a lot of the machinery The DEPUTY SPEAKER — Order! The house is that was used, we could not actually see it in operation, now adjourned. so it is a pleasure to be able to join the member in going House adjourned 11.39 p.m. to see an active logging coupe early in the New Year. We hope the weather is suitable to see the machinery actually working this time.
I would like to put on the record my thanks to the member for Narracan for the work he is doing as my parliamentary secretary, particularly on issues around the forest industry. I know he has a long family history in the industry. The fact is that he, like all members on this side of the house, is actually committed to having a profitable and prosperous native timber industry in Victoria, something those on the other side of the house spent 11 years trying to destroy. This is something that we are very committed to having into the future. I will enjoy joining the member for Narracan in going to see an active logging coupe, something members on the other side should also do so they actually understand what is really involved in the industry in Victoria rather than trying to tear it down and destroy the jobs that are created by it.
Mr McINTOSH (Minister for Corrections) — The member for Mount Waverley raised a matter for the Minister for Education seeking a visit to the Mount Waverley Secondary College, not only to open the new facilities but also to see the work that is being done at that school and address its concerns. I will certainly pass that on to the Minister for Education.
The member for Mildura raised a matter for the Minister for Health asking the minister to outline what action he is taking in respect of whooping cough or pertussis. I will ensure that the Minister for Health deals with that matter.
4860 ASSEMBLY
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4861
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 5. unsafe work practices; 6. a lack of systems for the monitoring or reporting of The SPEAKER (Hon. Ken Smith) took the chair at workload; 7.03 p.m. and read the prayer. It was just a litany of the challenges that this system — — QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE Mr Donnellan — On a point of order, Speaker, the Children: protection question asked was quite simple. It was relevant. I asked: has the minister reviewed the 90 cases which Mr DONNELLAN (Narre Warren North) — My were closed just before the end of the financial year? question is to the Minister for Community Services. I refer the minister to the Ombudsman’s report tabled The SPEAKER — Order! What is the member’s yesterday in which he describes the practice of the point of order? culling of child protection case lists, including 90 cases just two days before the end of the financial year, and I Mr Donnellan — The minister’s answer is not ask: has the minister personally reviewed these 90 cases relevant to the question. to ensure that these children are no longer in danger? The SPEAKER — Order! I do not uphold the point Ms WOOLDRIDGE (Minister for Community of order. The minister’s answer was relevant to the Services) — I thank the honourable member for his question that was asked, which was about the question. The Baillieu government welcomes both the Ombudsman’s report. investigation by and the report from the Ombudsman in relation to the child protection system. He has had a Ms WOOLDRIDGE — As I have said in longstanding interest in this area and has highlighted welcoming the report and looking at all the details in many challenges for the system over a number of years. relation to it, we have accepted every one of the six It is also very useful because it is a timely reminder of recommendations the Ombudsman has put in place. the absolute chaos that the former government left the Mr Andrews interjected. child protection system in. The SPEAKER — Order! The Leader of the Honourable members interjecting. Opposition is on a warning! The SPEAKER — Order! The minister, to return to Ms WOOLDRIDGE — We have accepted each of answering the question. the recommendations that have been put in place, Ms WOOLDRIDGE — What the Ombudsman’s which are very important and go towards the work that report has said — — we have committed to — the need to reform the child protection system. As I have said in this house before, Mr Andrews interjected. we have put in place a very significant inquiry to which we will forward the Ombudsman’s report for it to be The SPEAKER — Order! The Leader of the incorporated — — Opposition! Mr Hulls — On a point of order, Speaker, I know Ms WOOLDRIDGE — I would like to quote you have given the minister a lot of leeway, but she is directly from the Ombudsman’s report in relation to a now clearly debating the question. The question was manager in the child protection system, who is quoted specifically about the 90 cases that were closed on her on page 19 of the report as having stated: watch. Has she reviewed them — yes or no?
When I commenced my position with the Department of The SPEAKER — Order! I do not uphold the point Human Services, Loddon Mallee region (LMR) child protection program in April 2010, I found that the program of order! had: Ms WOOLDRIDGE — We will be forwarding the 1. significant number of cases waiting for allocation; report of the Ombudsman on this important inquiry with all of its recommendations, the cases identified 2. significant staffing instability at both the management and case carrying level; and the cases highlighted, to the inquiry for it to incorporate in its advice to the government about how … we change this.
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
4862 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
The Ombudsman has identified a number of cases that Royal visit: events he has requested be reopened. They were the focus of his interest, and every single one of those cases has Mrs FYFFE (Evelyn) — My question is to the been reopened, reinvestigated and looked at in detail. Premier. Can the Premier advise the house of the Some of those cases have been closed — — success of today’s visit to Victoria by Her Majesty the Queen and the Duke of Edinburgh? Ms Allan — On a point of order, Speaker, just to clarify, the minister is not answering the question that Mr BAILLIEU (Premier) — I thank the member was asked. The question referred not to the 59 cases for her question. I was delighted on behalf of the people that the Ombudsman asked to be reviewed but rather to of Victoria to participate with members of both sides of the 90 that were chopped off the list under her watch. this house in the visit to Victoria of Her Majesty and That is the question we want the minister to answer. His Royal Highness today. It was a great day that highlighted many of the wonderful things in our history The SPEAKER — Order! I do not uphold the point and indeed our present and future. As I said this of order on the basis that the answer was relevant to the morning, there was a sweet symmetry in Her Majesty’s question that was asked. visit to the Royal Children’s Hospital at Parkville this morning. As I am sure members know, in 1963, nearly Ms WOOLDRIDGE — The Ombudsman 50 years ago, the Queen opened what we must now call reviewed many cases in the Department of Human the old Royal Children’s Hospital. On that occasion she Services system and identified for us 59 cases that was hosted by the then president of the hospital, Dame needed to be reopened and reinvestigated. We have Elisabeth Murdoch, and it was a fabulous thing to see taken his advice — — Her Majesty and Dame Elisabeth reunited today at the opening of the new Royal Children’s Hospital. Mr Donnellan — On a point of order, Speaker, the question specifically related to 90 cases. The minister is However, the real stars today were the children at the debating the question. I asked about the 90 cases closed hospital, their families and the exceptional staff and temporarily, not 59. support teams that assist in the care of the children. The faces of those young patients truly lit up when the The SPEAKER — Order! The preamble to the Queen and the Duke of Edinburgh arrived. It was an question becomes part of the question. The member for occasion to remember, and I am sure the Leader of the Narre Warren North referred to the Ombudsman’s Opposition would agree with that. Much credit goes to report. The minister is referring to the Ombudsman’s all those involved at the Royal Children’s Hospital for report. the completion of this great facility. As I said this Ms WOOLDRIDGE — I say again, the morning, credit goes to successive governments, Ombudsman looked at many different cases, including Liberal and Labor, for their commitment to this the 90 that were closed. He identified — — important institution over more than 60 years and to former Premiers Bracks and Brumby for their Honourable members interjecting. commitment to and support for the new hospital.
The SPEAKER — Order! The members for Yan Mr Eren interjected. Yean and Bendigo East will refrain from interjecting in that way. The SPEAKER — Order! The member for Lara is on a warning! Ms WOOLDRIDGE — The Ombudsman identified 59 cases that were of concern. We have Mr BAILLIEU — It was also wonderful to see the opened every one of them and reinvestigated. A small thousands of Victorians who lined the streets of number have been substantiated, a number have been Melbourne from the airport to the Royal Children’s closed and a number are still being investigated. I have Hospital and then on to the National Gallery of Victoria reviewed each of them in detail, and I am confident that and down St Kilda Road to Government House. I thank we are doing the work that we committed to do, which again those at the gallery, which marks its 150th year did not happen under the previous government, to this year. The reception in Federation Square was very protect vulnerable children. enthusiastically received and very warm. I know — and I can speak on a personal basis — that both Her Majesty and His Royal Highness were delighted with the reception. I also want to particularly thank those who designed and decorated the special royal tram,
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4863 which I think hit the spot. That tram will be in service The SPEAKER — Order! A member of the for the next year as a special reminder not only of this opposition has asked a question. The barrage of visit but to mark Her Majesty’s diamond jubilee in a interjections is not allowing the minister to answer the particularly Melbourne way. question. If members of the opposition want to get an answer, I suggest they be quiet and listen to the answer Finally, I want to record our thanks to His Excellency that is being given. the Governor and his wife, Mrs Chernov, for the reception they held at Government House, guests at Ms WOOLDRIDGE — The Ombudsman spent a which came from a wide cross-section of the Victorian number of months looking in great detail at each of the community, including our multicultural communities, cases that have gone through the process — — our faith communities and victims of flood and bushfire in recent years. It was a wonderful cross-section of the Ms Thomson interjected. Victorian community. Melbourne turned on a beautiful sunny day and a beautiful sunny welcome. My The SPEAKER — Order! The member for conclusion is that it was a cheerful, positive and very Footscray! happy visit. Ms WOOLDRIDGE — The Ombudsman asked us to consider 59 cases, which we did. Both the Children: protection department and I personally have looked in detail at Mr DONNELLAN (Narre Warren North) — My each of these cases. question is again to the Minister for Community Mr Andrews — On a point of order, Speaker, the Services. I refer the minister to her previous answer, question related to 90 cases and what the minister has and I ask: has the minister reviewed all 90 cases? If so, done. It did not relate to the work of the Ombudsman. It what action has she taken? related very simply to those 90 cases, not the 59. It was Ms WOOLDRIDGE (Minister for Community very specific. The question was asked straight out: has Services) — I thank the honourable member for his the minister reviewed those cases, and what action has question, which was written by the Leader of the she taken? If she has done nothing, she should just say Opposition — — so.
Honourable members interjecting. The SPEAKER — Order! I do not uphold the point of order. I believe the answer was relevant to the Ms WOOLDRIDGE — I refer the honourable question that was asked. member to my previous answer, which was very clear. The Ombudsman had unfettered access to DHS Ms WOOLDRIDGE — What I am saying is that (Department of Human Services) systems and looked at we have done exactly what the Ombudsman asked us to many cases. Of those cases he reviewed, he had do. That is what we will continue to do, because our concerns in relation to 59 of them. We have reviewed objective is to focus on protecting vulnerable children. those he identified to us in detail. We have had a look What we were left by the former Labor government and reassessed each of those cases in relation to what was an absolute mess. We are committed to making a needed to happen for an assessment to be done. difference to and changing — —
Mr Donnellan — On a point of order, Speaker, on a Mr Hulls — On a point of order, Speaker, quite matter of relevance. I was specifically asking the clearly this embarrassed minister is debating the minister about 90 cases that were closed before the end question. She was asked what she personally has done of the financial year, not the 59 cases the Ombudsman in relation to these 90 cases. She is the minister, not the identified and asked DHS to review. The question was Ombudsman. specific to the 90 cases. The SPEAKER — Order! I do not uphold the point The SPEAKER — Order! The minister will return of order. to answering the question. Ms WOOLDRIDGE — As a government we are Ms WOOLDRIDGE — The context is I am trying committed to cleaning up the mess that was left to us to help the honourable member — — and protecting Victoria’s children.
Honourable members interjecting. Mr Andrews — On a further point of order, Speaker, again I put it to you that question time is not
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
4864 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011 an opportunity for the minister to run a political The government’s objective is to finalise a preferred commentary on the former government or the hotel developer and operator by mid-2012. opposition. That is not what question time is about. Respectfully I submit that to you, Speaker. This The Minister for Planning has become the responsible question was asked straight out. It was a very narrow authority for administering and enforcing the question about 90 cases and whether the minister has Murrindindi planning scheme as it relates to the reviewed them. The minister’s answer is not relevant. development site. Amendment C38 to the Murrindindi The minister is also debating the question, and that is an planning scheme was gazetted on 21 October 2011. I offence against the standing orders. This is not an take this opportunity to congratulate and thank the Shire opportunity to abuse other members of this house. I ask of Murrindindi for its cooperation and assistance in this you to call her back to answering the question she was regard. Regional Development Victoria, the asked. government’s lead economic development agency in regional and rural Victoria, has responsibility for The SPEAKER — Order! I ask the minister to delivering this magnificent and exciting project. RDV return to answering the question. The minister has will be working with other government departments completed her answer. and private property consultants on delivering the project. An external probity adviser has also been Bushfires: Marysville recovery engaged to ensure fairness and consistency in all dealings with the private sector. Ms McLEISH (Seymour) — My question is to the Deputy Premier and Minister for Bushfire Response. The government’s ultimate objective is to provide Can the Deputy Premier advise the house of how the Marysville with a conference centre capable of holding coalition government is working with the Marysville events for up to 300 people, with a large multipurpose community to create new economic activity, tourism theatrette and exhibition space. The facility will have opportunities and more local jobs following the around 80 to 120 hotel rooms, and it will represent very devastating 2009 fires? high-quality architecture and interior design that embraces the surrounding natural environment. This is Mr RYAN (Minister for Bushfire Response) — I an exciting project, and I am sure that all members of thank the member for her question. She continues to do the house will agree. It will underpin the re-emergence a wonderful job on behalf of the members of her of a thriving tourism industry in the Marysville region, communities who were devastated by the appalling and it will support a range of other ancillary tourism events of Black Saturday. The development of a major businesses. hotel and conference centre facility has been identified as a catalyst project that will stimulate economic Only today, during the course of the reception at recovery in the Marysville region subsequent to the Government House, there were many people present fires of 2009. The coalition government made an who were impacted upon by the fires, and it was election commitment of $19 million to establish a new wonderful to see Her Majesty stop and have hotel and conference centre in Marysville in partnership conversations with some of those folk. Many people, as with the private sector. we in this chamber all know, continue to suffer as a result of the awful events of that terrible day. The I am pleased to be able to tell the house that the government is looking very much to the future. The government has recently secured the ownership rights conference centre will be an integral part of the future over a strategically positioned development site located of this great region. The community centre is at 32, 34 and 42 Murchison Street, Marysville. We have approaching completion and will soon be opened. The purchased that land. The land value of the Murchison work at the golf course is being settled in terms of the Street site will be part of the state government’s dimensions of the project and its participants, and we $19 million commitment to this great project. The will have more to say about that shortly. The Lake development of the Marysville conference centre Mountain project will be opened in the not-too-distant proposal will occur in two stages. The first stage will be future. This announcement today is another absolutely an expression of interest stage. It commenced today; it important stage in the recovery of the region and also in closes on Wednesday, 30 November. The second stage looking to the future for these great communities. will be a request for proposals. Short-listed organisations from the expression of interest stage will Children: protection be requested to submit more detailed proposals. The request for proposal stage will commence in early 2012. Mr DONNELLAN (Narre Warren North) — My question is to the Minister for Community Services. I
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4865 refer the minister to the premature closure of 59 child have done that through putting on more staff, and we protection cases in the Loddon Mallee region, and I are doing that through a revised workforce structure — ask: what action has the minister taken to review other and we will have a better equipped workforce to make regional offices of her department to ensure that they good decisions and make sure children are protected. have not prematurely closed child protection cases under her watch? Women: Australian Institute of Company Directors scholarships Ms WOOLDRIDGE (Minister for Community Services) — I thank the honourable member for his Mrs BAUER (Carrum) — My question is to the question. The cases that were closed are an important Minister for Women’s Affairs. Can the minister update part of the Ombudsman’s investigation in relation to the the house on positive steps the Baillieu government is Loddon Mallee region of the Department of Human taking to enhance the status of women in Victoria? Services. As I have mentioned, I want to comment in relation to those 59 cases. They have all been Ms WOOLDRIDGE (Minister for Women’s reassessed. Some have been closed again, some have Affairs) — I thank the member for Carrum for her been substantiated and some are still in the assessment question and for her leadership as a strong woman in and investigation stage. The reality with child her community and as a role model and as an advocate protection is that it involves a judgement call. These are and champion for others. The Baillieu government is people making very difficult decisions — — committed to both promoting and enhancing the role of women in Victoria and also to celebrating the Mr Hulls — On a point of order, I do not know if contribution women make in our community. We know the minister is deliberately misinterpreting the question there is still a lot more work to do in terms of enhancing or did not hear it, but she is now clearly debating the the status of women — for example, we seem still to be question. The question was about the action she has making slow progress in relation to the number of taken in relation to other regional offices to ensure that women represented in executive roles and board roles the practices at Loddon Mallee have not been in many of our companies across the state. happening at those other offices. According to the latest Australian Institute of Company The SPEAKER — Order! I do not uphold the point Directors figures, women hold 12.5 per cent of board of order on the basis that the answer was relevant to the positions, 8 per cent of executive management roles and question that was asked. 4 per cent of line management positions in the top 200 ASX companies. For a long time we have argued Ms WOOLDRIDGE — This is really important for gender equity on those bases and on social terms, work to ensure that our workforce has the skills, but we also have more evidence in relation to the capacity and resources to be able to make these very economic arguments for having women in these senior difficult decisions at the intake and assessment stage in roles. Recent McKinsey research shows that on things relation to what is happening with families. In like return on equity and earnings before interest and recommendation 2 the Ombudsman called on us to tax, companies that have a higher share of women ‘implement an ongoing audit program in each region to executives significantly outperform companies that do review the appropriateness of decision making in intake not. units’. We have accepted that recommendation. This report was tabled yesterday, and in the 24 hours that I The same research also shows that women have a have had since the report was tabled we have already tendency not to promote themselves. I thought this commenced that process. issue would be of interest to this house because it is so important, and it is disappointing that we are seeing so I am very pleased that we are committing to every little respect in relation to these important issues from recommendation that the Ombudsman makes in members on the other side. The Baillieu government is relation to this, including one relating directly to the committed to helping women increase their skills and question. That makes sure that the issues and challenges therefore also their confidence in putting themselves the Ombudsman has identified in the Loddon Mallee forward for board and senior positions. region are also dealt with right throughout the state. This is work that is under way and ongoing, and the Mr Noonan interjected. most important thing we can do is the work we are doing to assist the members of our workforce, who The SPEAKER — Order! The member for have to make these decisions every day, to have the Williamstown is on a warning. training, the support and the oversight they need. We
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
4866 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
Ms WOOLDRIDGE — I was pleased to announce accepted that there need to be far higher standards in last week a new partnership between the Australian relation to rooming houses. The member should be Institute of Company Directors and the Victorian aware that the Baillieu government has issued a government to increase women’s capacity to be regulatory impact statement to provide for 11 standards effective and high-impact directors. Thirty-four for rooming houses. We are going through that scholarships will be available to women to undertake process — — the highly regarded company directors course offered by the Australian Institute of Company Directors. The Mr Wynne interjected. scholarships will be open to women throughout Victoria who are currently members of a board of a The SPEAKER — Order! The member for government-funded, non-profit organisation. Richmond will not get an answer by interjecting.
These new scholarships will deepen the capacity of Mr O’BRIEN — We are currently going through women to be good directors in their current roles; they that regulatory impact statement process with the goal will also open up other directorships in for-profit and of implementing higher standards for rooming houses. non-profit companies across the state. The partnership As recently as Monday afternoon the Minister for will also strengthen the community organisation on Housing and I were in a meeting with the Victorian which they serve in times of increasing demand, Council of Social Service to discuss a number of issues increasing complexity and increasing requirements for about this. Consumer Affairs Victoria has also been good governance and accountability. very proactive in tackling the sorts of landlords that the member for Albert Park was talking about. Mr Andrews interjected. Mr Hulls — On a point of order, Speaker, at the risk The SPEAKER — Order! We do not need the of insulting the minister, I do have a handkerchief for ongoing commentary from the Leader of the him if he starts crying — the sook. Opposition. The SPEAKER — Order! The member will state Ms WOOLDRIDGE — I thank the Australian his point of order or I will sit him down. Institute of Company Directors for its partnership. We were also very pleased to announce this week the Mr Hulls — The minister is clearly debating the calling of nominations for the Victorian Women’s question. He was asked about licensing. Without Honour Roll for 2012. This is an opportunity for all insulting him, I ask that you, Speaker, bring him back Victorians to promote and nominate inspirational to the question. women and to recognise them. The honour roll The SPEAKER — Order! I do not uphold the point recognises both high-profile women and our unsung of order raised by the member for Niddrie. heroes. This year’s nominees will join 478 women recognised over the previous 10 years. I have put out a Mr O’BRIEN — The question was about what the press release to publicise this call for nominations. I coalition government is doing to raise the standards of would welcome any member who may choose to do so rooming houses. We are going to be implementing using part or all of the release to promote the honour higher standards. roll. The Baillieu government is committed to promoting women in this state. Mr Wynne — On a point of order, Speaker — — Rooming houses: regulation Mr Hodgett interjected.
Mr FOLEY (Albert Park) — My question is to the The SPEAKER — Order! The member for Kilsyth Minister for Consumer Affairs. Does the minister is on a warning. support the government’s decision to reject the rooming house standards task force recommendation of Mr Wynne — Are you still getting your three pays? establishing a licensing regime, thus allowing slum Speaker, with respect, the minister is debating the landlords to continue exploiting vulnerable families and question. This was a specific question that related to the children? recommendations of the rooming house task force chaired by the member for Albert Park, which relates to Mr O’BRIEN (Minister for Consumer Affairs) — I the Business Licensing Authority Victoria, which is thank the member for Albert Park for his question, directly within the control of the Minister for Consumer misguided as it is. The coalition government has Affairs, and his preparedness to enact those
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4867 recommendations. I ask you to get him to come back to Honour Roll, the first initiative of its kind in Australia. answering the specifics of the question. We all know that reconciliation begins with respect and recognition. I am pleased to advise the house that the The SPEAKER — Order! I do not uphold the point coalition government is delivering on its election of order. I believe the minister’s answer was relevant to promise to recognise indigenous success and the question that was asked. achievement through the establishment of the honour roll. Mr O’BRIEN — I was referring to the activity that Consumer Affairs Victoria is taking against rogue I can advise that I have appointed an honour roll landlords in relation to rooming houses to ensure that advisory panel comprised of six highly respected the laws are actually enforced. In August this year Aboriginal Victorians and that the members of the Consumer Affairs Victoria successfully obtained an panel share our enthusiasm for the honour roll. As I injunction in the Supreme Court against Betta Housing said, this is the first of its kind in Australia, and other Pty Ltd requiring that it must employ a licensed agent states are looking to see how it is established with a to manage its properties. The Tenants Union of Victoria view to copying the concept. The panel members are has praised the work of this government and Consumer Joy Murphy Wandin, a respected Wurundjeri elder; Affairs Victoria in relation to enforcing the laws against Vicki Clark Walker, co-chair of Reconciliation rogue rooming house operators, something that the Victoria; Tim Kanoa, coordinator of the Victorian former government dropped the ball on over 11 long Indigenous Youth Advisory Council; Jason Mifsud, the years. This government is determined to actually raise AFL’s community engagement manager; Belinda the standards, enforce the laws and make sure those Duarte, executive director of Korin Gamadji Institute; people are better protected than they ever were in the and Daphne Yarram, a recipient of an indigenous former government’s 11 years in office. leadership fellowship.
Mr Foley — My point of order, Speaker, relates to a The advisory panel has now met twice to consider the number of grounds under standing orders. The first is applications and to look at nominations. I can update one of relevance, whereby the minister seems to be the house by advising that on 24 October I met with the misunderstanding the nature of the question. He is indigenous honour roll panel to get a firsthand account responding in his answer on the issue of standards; the of the number of applications and how their question related to the licensing of agencies of the deliberations are progressing. The panel members told particular rogue landlords. The second point on which I me that there are many examples of remarkable raise the point of order is one of debating the question. leadership with contributions in a number of fields, The minister was clearly going down the path of ranging from business to community service, sport and reflecting on the performance of the government that service provision. There are also many indigenous introduced the standards and the licensing regime people who make great contributions. They do so which this minister refuses to bring to bear. without any fuss, and they are not known to many outside their own communities. Many of them have The SPEAKER — Order! The minister has worked quietly and tirelessly for their families and concluded his answer. communities without the expectation of recognition or Victorian Indigenous Honour Roll: acknowledgement. establishment The coalition government believes it is important that we recognise and celebrate indigenous Victorians who Mr MORRIS (Mornington) — My question is to have made significant contributions. It is important that the Minister for Aboriginal Affairs. Can the minister their work be acknowledged so that all Victorians learn update the house on the status of the indigenous honour about our remarkable and exceptional Aboriginal roll? Victorians and that future generations of indigenous Mrs POWELL (Minister for Aboriginal Affairs) — and non-indigenous Victorians will be aware of these I thank the member for Mornington for his question. I outstanding role models. I thank the panel members for also acknowledge the great work he does for the local their commitment and support, and I am confident they Aboriginal community. The Victorian coalition will make wise choices. government is committed to closing the gap on On Thursday, 24 March, as part of the re-signing of the indigenous disadvantage and fostering and developing government’s commitment to closing the gap, the reconciliation. The 2011–12 budget provided $480 000 Premier announced the release of the discussion paper over four years to establish the Victorian Indigenous on the operation of the Victorian Indigenous Honour
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
4868 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
Roll. On Monday, 30 May, when the Premier Ms Allan interjected. announced the opening of nominations for the indigenous honour roll, he took the opportunity to The SPEAKER — Order! The member for present the first two nominations on the roll. These Bendigo East has asked her question. were nominations of two very well-known and very well-respected indigenous elders, William Barak and Mr RYAN — I welcome any press releases which Sir Douglas Nicholls. Nominations for the honour roll may yet be issued welcoming this recent have now closed, and I am pleased to advise that announcement, to which the member now refers. I 44 nominations were received. Additionally there are recently went to the electorate of Rodney with the 33 female indigenous Victorians on the Victorian member — a great local member — to make this Honour Roll of Women who are eligible for announcement. It is an announcement which I believe consideration, three of whom have already been will do an enormous amount not only to grow local included in the 44 nominations received. industry and enterprise but, very importantly, to grow local employment. I had the pleasure of being in the The panel members have told me that they are excited company of the local member and those associated with by the challenge of recommending the first inductees to the development of this important project. be recognised on the honour roll and are really pleased to be able to put those role models and mentors onto a What the project will achieve is the production of roll for all Victorians and all Australians to see. Plans biodiesel in the way in which the member has broadly are under way for a gala event in early 2012, and I outlined this evening. There is no question that the expect that this will become an important annual event substantive part of the biodiesel which is going to be on the indigenous calendar and also hopefully on the produced as a result of what the proponents of this non-indigenous calendar. scheme are intending to do is going to be used in the community generally as well as in the proponents’ own Biofuel: Madowla Park project enterprises. There is no question that there will be a shared usage in that sense of the material which is Ms ALLAN (Bendigo East) — My question is to produced. the Minister for Regional and Rural Development. I refer the minister — — The great thing about this is that it is another example of a government that is interested in partnering Mr Walsh interjected. communities and making sure that it helps and participates with the proponents for innovative Ms ALLAN — You are so funny! I have got a file programs so that we can continue to grow these on you, Walshie, don’t you worry. communities and the projects with which they are directly associated. I might say also that this is a great My question is to the Minister for Regional and Rural example of an application of our $1 billion Regional Development. I refer the minister to the $500 000 grant Growth Fund. he recently announced towards the $1.3 million Madowla Park integrated bioenergy project that he said We are very pleased that through the investment of will produce 1.5 million litres of biodiesel. I ask: can these funds we will see another initiative which we the minister give a guarantee that the fuel that will be hope will be able to flourish. We understand and accept produced as a result of this grant will flow into the local that when funds are contributed to these programs they fuel supply and increase fuel competition for regional are subject to careful consideration by the department, Victorians? and that is happening in this instance. We anticipate success for this project, as we always hope will be the Mr RYAN (Minister for Regional and Rural case. The same applied under our predecessors. We are Development) — I thank the member for what I think very pleased to have supported this project. We wish it is her first question to me about matters regarding well. I did so at the time, and I do so again. regional development. Racing: Bendigo Cup Ms Allan — Be careful what you wish for. Mr BATTIN (Gembrook) — My question is to the Mr RYAN — Be careful what I wish for, interjected Minister for Racing. Can the minister advise the house the member. I am delighted to say that in recent press whether the coalition government’s policy to extend the releases I have been able to make a number of distance of the Bendigo Cup has been a success? announcements which have been supported by a wide range of people in our community.
INDEPENDENT BROAD-BASED ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMISSION BILL 2011
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4869
Dr NAPTHINE (Minister for Racing) — I thank The race itself was won by Tanby, which is owned by the member for Gembrook for his question and for his Lloyd and Nick Williams and which finished second interest in the racing industry and the contribution it earlier in the Geelong Cup. makes to jobs and the economy in this great state. I am pleased to advise the house that today’s Bendigo Cup, Honourable members interjecting. which I had the pleasure of attending, was an enormous success. This success was a tribute to the great work of The SPEAKER — Order! The member for the Bendigo Jockey Club committee, headed by its Footscray is on a warning. enthusiastic chairman, Brendan Drechsler, and CEO, Dr NAPTHINE — The member for Bendigo East, Ian Hart. It was also a tribute to the successful who obviously is not interested in her own cup, asked implementation of another terrific Liberal-Nationals who came second. The horse that came second was the policy that delivers for regional and rural Victoria. fast-finishing At First Sight, which is also owned by the In the coalition’s racing policy for the last election we Williams family and which had an outstanding committed to working with the Bendigo Jockey Club to Melbourne Cup run-up. extend the Bendigo Cup from 2200 metres to Honourable members interjecting. 2400 metres to make this great regional race a Melbourne Cup qualifying race. This policy was The SPEAKER — Order! I am not going to ask the implemented by Racing Victoria, and this attracted a house to come to order again. The next member who top-quality field to the Bendigo Cup, including yells out or interjects will be sent out without further internationals such as Sahara Sun, trained by Luca warning. Cumani — and it was great to see Luca and Francesca Cumani at the Bendigo Cup today — and the Irish Dr NAPTHINE — While the Queen was unable to horse, At First Sight, which is part of the Williams attend, I am sure she would be pleased that a horse team, and Nick Williams was at the cup today. There named Balmoral won race 7 at Bendigo today. I would were two horses from the Gai Waterhouse stable. It was like to congratulate the Bendigo Jockey Club, the City great to see the queen of cups, Gai Waterhouse, at of Bendigo and the well-behaved, enthusiastic crowd. Bendigo today. It shows her commitment to the This great event was a tribute to the implementation of Bendigo Cup at this new distance. Bart Cummings, the another coalition policy, which shows how the coalition cups king, was at Bendigo today. He had Cosmonaut in works with regional communities and with the racing the field. industry to deliver positive outcomes for regional and rural Victoria. The crowd was in excess of 10 000 people. Brendan Drechsler said they had to put in 10 additional workstations to cater for the extra media representatives INDEPENDENT BROAD-BASED who were demanding to be there. There were six to ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMISSION BILL eight helicopters flying patrons into the event, because 2011 it is such a great and popular event. Introduction and first reading Honourable members interjecting. Mr McINTOSH (Minister responsible for the The SPEAKER — Order! I ask the house to come establishment of an anti-corruption commission) — I to order. I ask members to be quiet and to listen to the move: answer that is being given by the Minister for Racing. That I have leave to bring in a bill for an act to establish the Honourable members interjecting. Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission, to amend the Parliamentary Committees Act 2003 and certain The SPEAKER — Order! The member for other acts, and for other purposes. Geelong is on a warning. Ms HENNESSY (Altona) — I ask the minister for a Dr NAPTHINE — Extending the distance of the brief explanation of the bill. Bendigo Cup has turned it into a truly international Mr McINTOSH — I can certainly understand why event, making Bendigo and the Bendigo Cup centres of the member would want an explanation, given that the attention in the lead-up to the Victoria Racing Club former government had 11 years to do something like Melbourne Cup carnival next week. this and could not do it.
VICTORIAN INSPECTORATE BILL 2011
4870 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
The bill will establish the broadbased anticorruption PETITIONS commission — — Following petitions presented to house: Honourable members interjecting. Puppy farms: abolition Ms Hennessy — On a point of order, Speaker, given that this minister has had over three years to get his act To the Legislative Assembly of Victoria: together on the implementation of this policy, and given The petition of the residents of Victoria brings to the attention that he is the so-called Leader of the House, I ask that of the house the hidden industry behind the pet shop window. you direct him back to giving us a brief explanation of his delayed bill. Puppy factories farm puppies and sell them to pet shops and trade them online. The dogs are often kept in cramped, filthy The SPEAKER — Order! There is no point of conditions for their entire lives and their behavioural needs are never met. The dogs not only suffer physically but are order. psychologically traumatised due to confinement and constant breeding; when they are no longer able to breed they are Mr McINTOSH — This bill establishes the killed and replaced. Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission and enables the appointment of a commissioner and The petitioners therefore request that the Legislative Assembly of Victoria support Oscar’s law and abolish puppy indeed allows, uniquely for this state, a joint factories and ban the sale of factory-farmed companion parliamentary committee to oversee the commission. animals from pet shops and online. Motion agreed to. By Mr WAKELING (Ferntree Gully) (47 signatures). Read first time. Puffing Billy: funding VICTORIAN INSPECTORATE BILL 2011 To the Legislative Assembly of Victoria: This petition of certain citizens of the state of Victoria draws Introduction and first reading to the attention of the Legislative Assembly the need for an additional $15 million funding to support the Puffing Billy Mr McINTOSH (Minister responsible for the historic rail line. establishment of an anti-corruption commission) — I move: In particular, we note:
That I have leave to bring in a bill for an act to establish the 1. it is a popular and iconic tourist attraction, carrying more Victorian Inspectorate to provide oversight of the than 250 000 people each year; Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission, to amend certain acts and for other purposes. 2. the rail line enjoys huge community support, with hundreds of volunteers offering their time to support the Ms HENNESSY (Altona) — I ask that the minister rail line; provide a brief explanation of the bill. 3. Puffing Billy supports hundreds of local jobs, many local businesses and delivers a regional economic Mr McINTOSH — This bill establishes the benefit of $23 million per year. Victorian Inspectorate to oversee the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission, another The petitioners therefore request that the Baillieu government immediately commit the $15 million needed to ensure the rail form of oversight that will dramatically improve line’s survival. oversight measures in relation to the anti-corruption commission and indeed the anticorruption regime in By Mr MERLINO (Monbulk) (580 signatures). this state. Casey Hospital: funding Motion agreed to. To the Legislative Assembly of Victoria: Read first time. The petition of certain citizens of the state of Victoria draws to the attention of the house the Baillieu government’s election promise to fix Victoria’s health system.
In particular we note:
growing demand on Casey Hospital’s services is straining resources yet no additional funding was allocated in the state budget;
DOCUMENTS
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4871
the Baillieu government is delaying and abandoning By Ms GREEN (Yan Yean) (34 signatures). hospital projects across Victoria. Tabled. The petitioners therefore request that the Legislative Assembly urges the Baillieu government to properly fund Victoria’s hospitals, including the Casey Hospital. Ordered that petition presented by honourable member for Narre Warren South be considered By Ms GRALEY (Narre Warren South) next day on motion of Ms GRALEY (Narre Warren (120 signatures). South).
Schools: Doreen Ordered that petition presented by honourable member for Ferntree Gully be considered next day To the Legislative Assembly of Victoria: on motion of Mr WAKELING (Ferntree Gully). The petition of certain citizens of the state of Victoria draws to the attention of the house the rapid increase in families Ordered that petition presented by honourable moving to Doreen and Mernda, suburbs of northern member for Monbulk be considered next day on metropolitan Melbourne. motion of Mr MERLINO (Monbulk). In particular, we note:
1. there are now almost 1000 students enrolled at DOCUMENTS government primary schools in Mernda and Doreen, with that figure set to increase in the years to come; Tabled by Clerk:
2. there are no government secondary colleges in Mernda Auditor-General: or Doreen; Procurement Practices in the Health Sector — Ordered 3. land has been purchased by the previous Labor to be printed government for a secondary college to be built in Cookes Road, Doreen. TAFE Governance — Ordered to be printed
The petitioners therefore request that the Legislative Financial Management Act 1994: Assembly urges the Baillieu government to urgently fund the building of a secondary college in Doreen. Report from the Minister for Environment and Climate Change that he had received the Report 2010–11 of the By Ms GREEN (Yan Yean) (16 signatures). Commissioner for Environmental Sustainability Report from the Minister for Finance that he had Children: Take a Break program received the Report 2010–11 of VicFleet Pty Ltd
To the Legislative Assembly of Victoria: Health, Department of — Report 2010–11
The petition of the following residents of Victoria draws to Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Trust — the attention of the house that funding for the Take a Break Report 2010–11 occasional child-care program, which is provided at more than 220 neighbourhood houses and community centres National Parks Act 1975 — Report 2010–11 on the working across Victoria, will cease after 31 December 2011. of the Act
The Take a Break occasional child-care program allows Professional Standards Council — Report 2010–11 (two parents and guardians to participate in activities, including documents) employment, study, recreational classes and voluntary community activities, while their children socialise and Public Prosecutions — Director, Committee and Office — interact with other children in an early-learning environment. Report 2010–11
Full funding for the program was provided by the previous Royal Botanic Gardens Board — Report 2010–11 state Labor government but will not be continued by the Baillieu government beyond December 2011. Statutory Rule under the Transport (Compliance and Miscellaneous) Act 1983 — SR 114 The cut to funding will mean that families across Victoria will be unable to access affordable, community-based occasional Subordinate Legislation Act 1994 — Documents under s 15 child-care to undertake tasks that benefit the family and allow in relation to Statutory Rule 114 them to take a break. Trust for Nature (Victoria) — Report 2010–11 The petitioners therefore request that the Legislative Assembly of Victoria urgently calls on the Baillieu government to reinstate funding for the Take a Break occasional child-care program.
APPROPRIATION MESSAGES
4872 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
APPROPRIATION MESSAGES Bank through the Schools First seed funding awards. The funds were awarded to the Albury Wodonga Message read recommending appropriation for Community College for its youth re-engagement Public Interest Monitor Bill 2011. project, which was run in partnership with YES Youth and Family Services. Offering an alternative to mainstream education, the partnership was formed to MEMBERS STATEMENTS support students who have become disengaged from education and provide other pathways. These students Whittlesea City Little Athletics Centre often lack the basic skills necessary for success with Ms HALFPENNY (Thomastown) — On Saturday traditional education and are ill prepared to cope with morning I was very pleased to attend the Whittlesea the demands of the workplace and life in the wider City Little Athletics Centre opening ceremony for the community. 2011–12 season. The centre is based at the very fine Albury Wodonga Community College is one of facility of Meadowglen International Athletics Stadium 50 schools around Australia to have been awarded this and is made up of a number of little athletics clubs from funding. It is wonderful to see the community the local suburbs of Lalor, Thomastown, Epping, Mill partnerships in education, and I congratulate all Park and South Morang. Unfortunately the athletic involved, particularly Mr Rodney Wangman and all his events were called off due to inclement weather, but we staff. all enjoyed ourselves with interesting conversation, a nice morning tea and lots of laughing. Sergeant Ceryn Campbell
As I travel around the Thomastown electorate it never Mr TILLEY — On another matter, I refer to ceases to amaze me how active and community minded Sergeant Ceryn Campbell. Sergeant Campbell arrived so many residents are. These are people who want to at the Wodonga police station in 1975. Wodonga had make their communities, the places they live and work never had female police members before that, and of in, better places not only for themselves but for others course she became the talk of the town. Sergeant as well. Many committee members and other Campbell’s focus was community policing. She ran the volunteers at the clubs have grown-up children who no Wodonga Blue Light disco for 18 years. Her longer participate, yet they still make big contributions contribution to the Wodonga community has been to the clubs. invaluable. Her support of other police members has been significant, and her exemplary work ethic and Congratulations to life members who attended and the dedication to the community and Victoria Police are president, Phil Atkins, the secretary, Cheryl Duff, and irreplaceable. After 37 years as a member of Victoria the treasurer, Debbie Cook, all of whom I met on the Police, Sergeant Campbell retired last week. I thank her day. Brittany Kelly was the holder of the club’s high for her leadership during my time and career as a jump record. She stands with people like Anthony member of the police force at the Wodonga police Koutoufides, the former Carlton football player, who station. was also a little athletics record holder at the club when he was growing up in Lalor. Peter Gelo
The Whittlesea City Little Athletics Centre teams Ms KAIROUZ (Kororoit) — I would like to wish encapsulate so much of what is great in the the best of luck to a local ALP branch member in my Thomastown electorate. There are so many groups of area as he contests a seat in the Croatian parliamentary people having a good time and contributing to making elections in December this year. Peter Gelo has been a the community thrive. There are four or five clubs that long-serving and loyal party member since he joined share the space at the Meadowglen International the ALP almost 20 years ago. In his time in the party Athletics Stadium, and they work well together for the Peter has served on many ALP policy committees interests of all. contributing to the party platform, and as a long-time Albury Wodonga Community College: Schools state conference delegate from Maribyrnong he has contributed to debate at conferences. First funding Over the years Peter has tirelessly organised and Mr TILLEY (Benambra) — On 20 October I had manned the St Albans East Primary School booth at the pleasure of attending a ceremony at which the both state and federal elections, something for which I Albury Wodonga Community College was presented am personally indebted to him since my election as with a cheque for $25 000 from the National Australia
MEMBERS STATEMENTS
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4873 member for Kororoit in 2008. Peter has been awarded a Threadgold for her outstanding work and contribution Victorian Multicultural Commission award for to the performance, along with the president Carolyn excellence for his services to members of the Croatian Brown and committee members Helga Anderson, community, and he continues to serve them through his Gudrun Gawantka, Ruth Ewart, Deidre Lynch, Roy involvement with the Croatian community radio Seager, Shirley Bean, Yvonne Beacall, Leanne Cutler, program on 3ZZZ. Peter also serves the community, Anne Slykhuis and her husband, Dolph Slykhuis. The especially Croatian-Australians, in his role as a justice friends have done a magnificent job in preserving the of the peace. heritage of Black Rock House, the holiday home of Victoria’s first Auditor-General and an inaugural As president of the St Albans East branch of the ALP, member of this place. Peter puts in many hours of service to the party and members in the St Albans area. I know I am not alone St Joseph’s Primary School, Brunswick West: in wishing him the best of success. We are all behind centenary him. Sretno, Peter! Ms GARRETT (Brunswick) — I rise to Turkey: earthquake congratulate St Joseph’s Primary School in Brunswick West on the centenary of the school and its vibrant and Ms KAIROUZ — On another matter, I also rise caring school community. I was delighted to attend two today to grieve for the hundreds of Turkish citizens significant events this month to mark this important who are dead or missing as a result of the disastrous milestone, the first being a formal dinner dance for past earthquake last Sunday. I represent a sizable Turkish and present students held on 14 October, which was community in the electorate of Kororoit and have many followed the next day by a commemorative mass at friends of Turkish descent; this is a significant tragedy St Joseph’s Church in Melville Road. The St Joseph’s that has affected both my constituents and friends. I parish community began in February 1911 with the hope the Australian government can be generous in the construction of the church and school buildings. The aid and assistance it provides to the Turkish people in current church was built in 1918. From this time the this difficult time if it is required. school grew rapidly, supporting a vibrant working-class community and reflecting the rich multicultural suburb Australian Hellenic Memorial: in which it is located. It is from this strong and rich 10th anniversary history that the heart and soul of this diverse and inclusive school community has flourished. Mr THOMPSON (Sandringham) — On Sunday, 25 September 2011 the Australian Hellenic Memorial The school currently has an enrolment of Committee, guests and friends marked the approximately 280 students and receives really terrific 10th anniversary of the Australian Hellenic Memorial, support from the school board, parents and friends, which was built in memory of Australian Hellenic men fundraising and canteen staff. This all adds up to a and women who fought and died in the Second World community that just loves its school, which you can see War. I pay tribute to those people who had the vision on the faces of the parents and friends. The celebratory and the organisational skills to draw it together, dinner was a huge success, with everyone done up to including Pantelis Kalimnakis, Antonis Tsourdalakis, the nines. It was a great dance, and the commemorative Peter Andrinopoulos, Frank Milner, Steve Kyritsis, mass was a very special occasion at which I was Brigadier Keith Rossi, Kosta Katsambanis, Alan grateful to speak. I would like to place on the record the Ferrari, Ivor White and Lucky Kayalicos. I also gratitude I know many in the community feel towards acknowledge the ongoing contributions of many of the teachers, parents and administrators of the school, those members, some of whom are unfortunately particularly principal Genevieve Moss and Father deceased, together with the good work of new board Patrick Harvey for his much-loved and respected members including Galatia Samarias, Emanouel leadership. Starakis, Emanuel Karvelas, Minelaos Anagnostou and Paul Sougleris. Melbourne Prayer Breakfast
Black Rock House: 155th anniversary Mr SHAW (Frankston) — I attended the annual Melbourne Prayer Breakfast that was held this month Mr THOMPSON — The Friends of Black Rock with a former cabinet member in the United Kingdom House recently presented a 155th anniversary tribute to Parliament, Jonathan Aitken, as guest speaker. This Black Rock House with a presentation of the Jewel by breakfast is attended by around 1000 people and was the Sea. I congratulate writer and director Cheryl started in 1984 to bring together leaders in politics,
MEMBERS STATEMENTS
4874 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011 business, commerce, industry and other members of the The SPEAKER — Order! The member’s time has general community to encourage and pray for our expired. nation, our leaders and our people. Victorian volunteer small grants program: Greater Frankston Business Chamber: closure business expo Mr LIM (Clayton) — I wish to draw to the attention Mr SHAW — I attended the Greater Frankston of the house that this government has scrapped the Business Chamber annual expo the Sunday before last. Victorian volunteer small grants funding program Over 50 exhibitors showcased their offerings to other without any notice or consultation with stakeholders. businesses and members of the community. A great This funding program was introduced by the Bracks effort was made by all involved. and Brumby Labor governments and was aimed at attracting volunteers from diverse ethnic and cultural OzChild: nurturing day for carers backgrounds to the wonderful world of volunteering. Over the years community groups, including Mr SHAW — OzChild recently held its annual non-migrant groups, have benefited significantly from nurturing day for carers. OzChild places babies and this program by applying to the Department of Planning children of all ages into safe temporary and permanent and Community Development. accommodation. Consistently these children come from the most socially and psychologically damaging As late as April this year government MPs and environments. OzChild’s motto is that ‘Every child ministers were still singing the praises of this program deserves the chance to shine’. I thank the carers for and calling on community groups to apply. A number their support — a number of them have been taking of my local community groups responded to those calls kids into their homes for over 20 years. and tried to obtain application forms from the official website. From mid-June community groups noticed Frankston electorate: student leaders that the program just disappeared from the website. The government did not even have the courtesy or decency Mr SHAW — The last of six year 12 leaders to inform people that it had scrapped this funding. A meetings was held at my old school, John Paul College. cruel joke indeed! I congratulate all the schools involved for their new insights on how other schools operate and friendships As part of Labor’s A Fairer Victoria program, this are made. I wish them all the best for their upcoming program was allocated $3 million for three years on an final exams. ongoing basis, with no closing dates for applications. It was very well received and popular among small Lakewood child care centre: closure community groups, especially migrant groups, because Mr SHAW — A number of concerned parents and they could take time to apply and were not under residents of Lakewood have contacted me regarding the pressure to meet a closing date. This house should be outraged and concerned that our volunteers and closure by Frankston City Council of the Lakewood voluntary community groups are being disadvantaged child care centre. The council decided to close this and discriminated against by this government’s facility without public consultation and behind closed insensitive and heartless scrapping of this funding doors, and with only eight weeks of the year to go residents are fuming. This important facility services program and should demand that this program be restored as a matter of priority and urgency. the family area of Lakewood, and I implore the council to consult with its high rate paying residents and listen Relay for Life: Echuca-Moama to their concerns. Mr WELLER (Rodney) — I would like to take this Frankston District Tigersharks: presentations opportunity to congratulate the community of Echuca-Moama for so generously embracing and Mr SHAW — I attended the Frankston District supporting this year’s Relay for Life event, which was Tigersharks presentation night. This great veterans club held at the weekend. More than 600 people from has three teams — over-35s, over-40s and over-47s. I congratulate our over-35s coach, Matt Shaw, who won 28 teams participated in the eighth Echuca-Moama Relay for Life, raising $107 059 for the Cancer Council the best and fairest, and Steve Shaw, who was runner Victoria. Through the tireless work of the volunteer up — no relation — — committee, the event has grown from strength to strength since it was first held in Echuca in 2004. I have
MEMBERS STATEMENTS
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4875 been privileged to take part in a number of different former student of this great school and as a keen capacities, including team member and relay patron. supporter of the arts. Exhibited at the show was the very best work of the design and technology, and visual For those members who have not experienced Relay for arts students. The students’ work was simply Life for themselves, it is more than just a fundraising outstanding, and the hall was packed with proud parents event. It is the coming together of a community — and friends. Congratulations to principal Bernard men, women and children — for a common cause. The Dobson; the head of visual arts, Benjamin Brice, and event itself is powerful, emotional and confronting. For Amy Muratore from his team; Colin Johnson, head of some it signifies a time for remembrance and healing. technology; and most importantly visual arts prefect For others it signifies a time to celebrate life. Perhaps Tessa Van Eckelen and all the other gifted students who the most poignant part of the Relay for Life is the produced these incredible works. I encourage them to evening candle-lighting ceremony to remember those continue on their creative and inspirational paths. who have lost their lives to cancer and those who are still fighting the disease. Candles in bags circle the oval, Alexandra: community reading day many with messages about loved ones who have died or those bravely fighting cancer. Yes, there is sadness, Ms McLEISH (Seymour) — Reading is a but overall the atmosphere is one of hope and gratitude: wonderful leisure activity which can open up new hope that through important events like this we may worlds for us. Whether it be through the creation of a one day be able to find a cure for this terrible illness and vivid imagination or by gaining access to new gratitude for all the goodness in life — our health, our information and ideas, reading can certainly broaden friends and our family. our scope. We know it is good to read to our children and to have our children learn to read keenly and Sherbrooke Community School: building independently. The benefits of reading are well known, program and it is one of life’s key skills. It helps with basic speech skills, communication and logical thinking and Mr MERLINO — On Monday I was delighted to can enhance concentration and discipline. officially open Sherbrooke Community School’s outstanding new primary building or, as it has already Recently I had the pleasure of volunteering with my been affectionately nicknamed, Little Land. This new federal colleague Sophie Mirabella at this year’s Early building, constructed through the federal Labor Learning is Fun (ELF) community reading day in the government’s Building the Education Revolution main street of Alexandra. The day was colourful, with program, has transformed primary education at this many volunteer readers and children wearing costumes terrific P–12 school. The BER was an important of their favourite book characters. Reading Five Green component of the federal government’s $42 billion and Speckled Frogs I was equipped with appropriate economic stimulus plan to boost economic activity and props and actions. It is pleasing to know that the simple support jobs as the nation dealt with the global financial concept of ELF actually originated in Alexandra in crisis. It provided a massive boost to education that will 2003. At the time, teachers in the area identified that a leave a positive legacy for decades. large number of children who were beginning school did not have the basics required to build literacy. It is not an exaggeration to say that the primary students Working with Berry Street, an innovative method of at Sherbrooke today enjoy the best facilities and tackling literacy in a fun way was developed for educational opportunities in the history of the school. I children. know principal Anne Broadribb, the teachers and students are delighted with the new building and the The success of this program is terrific. It now runs beautiful butterfly garden. At the opening we were also across the state in both country and city areas and has delighted to be entertained by some of the school’s even extended into the Karen and Sudanese talented singers. Tonight Sherbrooke is launching the communities. David Hall and the many other staff at latest CD of 14 original songs titled The Journey. Berry Street in Alexandra, the teachers and students of Congratulations to music teacher Luciano Menolascina the Cathedral cluster, volunteers, community members and his talented students on a great achievement. and local businesses are to be commended on their efforts over a long period of time, in particular for their Mount Lilydale Mercy College: art show enthusiasm and involvement in the recent — —
Mr MERLINO — On Monday night I was proud to The SPEAKER — Time! open the Mount Lilydale Mercy College year 7 to year 11 art show. I was delighted to be there both as a
MEMBERS STATEMENTS
4876 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
Narre Warren South electorate: student closely followed by Berwick. Some may claim it was leadership rigged, as Cockatoo was the only team that got to practise on grass rinks before coming here. Ms GRALEY (Narre Warren South) — Each year I present my Community Spirit and Leadership award to Emerald Community House one grade 4 student from each primary school in the Narre Warren South electorate. Teachers select as Mr BATTIN — I would like to encourage all the award winners those who are regarded as having the staff and volunteers at the Emerald Community House, potential to play a future leadership role in our who continue to amaze me with the work they put in community and who display a range of qualities, each and every week. I encourage all members to look including being considerate of others, civic-mindedness up the Go List to see how this local initiative can help and initiative. Debbie Cusack, assistant principal of their communities in the event of fire or floods. Just log Berwick Lodge Primary School, nominated Kaitlyn on to thegolist.org.au. It is a great example of Stones and said that Kaitlyn has been a committed communities helping communities. member of the J Rock team and is always thinking of ways to improve the school environment. The teachers George Harmon at St Kevin’s Primary School could not decide on just Mr BATTIN — As we approach difficult times one student to receive my award. There were three very with much uncertainty in the world economy, I deserving students. Well done to Anna Andronis, Sarah encourage business owners to step back and review Fahey and Gianmarco Hernandez. their businesses to ensure that all is going as best as it The teachers at Berwick Fields Primary School can. George Harmon in Belgrave is making sure that nominated Aidan Radley, describing him as a friendly traders in Belgrave are doing this, and he is and enthusiastic member of the class who gets along encouraging members of the local traders association to well with others while demonstrating excellent work together to prepare for the future. Never forget leadership skills through his thoughtfulness when that local shops are like muscles — use them or lose working with others. Luke McKigney from Coral Park them. Primary School was nominated by his teacher, Solange National Bandanna Day Nancarrow, who said that Luke has a wide range of friends who look to him for support and assistance both Mr BATTIN — I direct the attention of the house to in the classroom and outside. Their fellow award National Bandanna Day on Friday, 28 October. This winners included: Eden Brehaut and Jarryd Barker important event raises money for and an awareness of a from Hillsmeade Primary School; Alexandra Jones national charity, Canteen. Canteen is a national support from Brentwood Park Primary School; Liam Dallafiore organisation for young people with cancer. Canteen from Courtenay Gardens Primary School; and Shayni believes that no young person should go through cancer Derbyshire and Anna Judge from Berwick Chase alone. People can assist by buying a Canteen bandanna Primary School. They are all fabulous students and to show their support to this great cause. future leaders. I hope one of our young stars will one day be the member for Narre Warren South. Moreland Bicycle User Group Congratulations and well done. Ms CAMPBELL (Pascoe Vale) — Congratulations Gembrook Primary School: Walk to School to the Moreland Bicycle User Group (BUG) for its day great work in promoting healthy and clean-energy transport. The group’s work assists all Moreland Mr BATTIN (Gembrook) — I would like to cyclists, from those for whom it is their principal form congratulate and thank Gembrook Primary School for of transport to those who enjoy being recreational its recent Walk to School day. Staff and parents at the cyclists. Its website and email communication keeps school understand the importance of getting active and everyone informed of current and future events. Thanks how this can assist with students’ academic results. to Julia Mischke, whose emails keep us informed, and to all those at the Moreland BUG committee for their Parliament House: bowls event commitment. Thanks to those who work at Moreland City Council and dovetail in with local cyclists, Mr BATTIN — On Friday I hosted a bowls event particularly the infrastructure team headed by Nerina here at Parliament House between Warburton, Yarra di Lorenzo, who has completed the ‘shovel ready’ plan Junction, Cockatoo and Berwick. The event was well for the final link of the Upfield shared pathway. Thanks attended, and the final result was a win for Cockatoo,
MEMBERS STATEMENTS
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4877 to Sebastian Motta, whose work has addressed safety Viewbank College: gala concert width and beautification around the Western Ring Road, which has been widened. When partnership, hard Mr CARBINES (Ivanhoe) — On Monday, work and a comparatively small amount of funding all 17 October, I attended the Viewbank College and combine, sustainable and healthy cycling transport Friends of Music gala concert at Plenty Ranges Arts occurs. and Convention Centre. Hundreds of parents and friends attended this annual event. My congratulations The next big project is the Craigieburn rail corridor bike go to the head of music, Mr Andrew van Gemert, and path, which is the next project for the Moreland BUG. the music staff — passionate teachers who enjoy their The Moreland BUG, Moreland City Council and the work and achieve stunning results. Needless to say, the Department of Transport all require action to bring this impressive performances of the students reflect their great idea to fruition. Because of the work by Moreland dedication and application to their music studies. I City Council’s infrastructure team, detailed designs are extend congratulations to principal Judith Craze and to available for Department of Transport staff when they the school community on a great night of entertainment are ready to action a rail corridor project. and celebration. Well done to Arthur Cichocki, the Congratulations to Cr Kathleen Matthews-Ward, whose 2012 music captain, and Jack Naughton, for their vision and persistence taught us that it was possible, leadership in these roles in 2011. and to Paul McKay and Rod Callander, who showed up the pitfalls and solutions. I also was pleased to host parents, friends and the senior concert band at Queen’s Hall at Parliament House Benalla electorate: Advancing Country Towns earlier this month. I know members enjoyed their program performance. As a past student of Viewbank College I was humbled to have them here to perform, and the Dr SYKES (Benalla) — On Monday, 24 October gala was very much a welcome encore. 2011, I attended the inaugural meeting of the Benalla Advancing Country Towns project steering group. As Viewbank College is the school of choice for many chair Cr Barbara Alexander noted, this was a significant families in my electorate of Ivanhoe. They entrust their step towards addressing social disadvantage in Benalla children’s academic futures to the college. The teaching and follows many hours of input by members of the staff and school community achieve excellent academic local community. The Benalla community has results year after year. I recommit myself to advocating, identified three priority areas for action: education from with the college and the parent community, for secure the early years through to the completion of year 12 and capital funds to ensure that the quality of the college’s the attainment of tertiary qualifications; employment facilities matches the outstanding quality of education and the need to upskill people to take advantage of the school provides to over 1000 students. current and future employment opportunities; and better integration of and access to services, including those Mornington: Tidy Towns awards provided by government and non-government agencies. Mr MORRIS ( Mornington) — The annual Tidy The local community already has projects under way, Towns awards were held in Rutherglen last weekend, including: attracting more babies and toddlers to and I am delighted to advise the house that Mornington playgroups and kindergarten, working with took out the title of Tidy Town of the Year. Members disconnected and at-risk young people to encourage will recall that some weeks ago I praised the large them to continue their education and the Benalla number of local entrants that made it through to the education regeneration project, which has strong finals, with the town accounting for 11 of the 94 places. community support and is at the master plan stage. The On Saturday night not only did the town take the project coordinator, Judy Jeffrey, has already overall title but St Macartan’s Parish Primary School demonstrated that she has a good grasp of the issues. took out the Pam Keating Environmental Sustainability Given this favourable situation, a significant component Award. Mornington has a long and proud history of of the $810 000 state government contribution will be environmental protection and a community that really directed towards kick-starting several priority projects cares about our town. The award recognises the hard and attracting additional funds from other sources. work of the many people who make Mornington such a No-one underestimates the size of the challenge, but the great place to live. steering group and the agencies and community groups which it represents are committed to making it work.
MEMBERS STATEMENTS
4878 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
Mornington: sesquicentenary anchor the long-term success of the Werribee employment precinct. Mr MORRIS — It was a very big weekend for Mornington, with the town celebrating its Monash Volunteer Resource Centre sesquicentenary with a tremendous celebration in Mornington Park last Sunday. The day marked the Mr GIDLEY (Mount Waverley) — The Monash declaration of the town of Mornington, which had been Volunteer Resource Centre (MVRC) has been better known in its earlier days as Snapper Point. At the supporting the community of Monash since 1985. The time it was truly the capital of the peninsula, housing organisation produces good outcomes, connecting the post office and the courthouse and of course volunteers with opportunities in community possessing an excellent harbour. Interestingly the first organisations. In fact in most years more than member for Mornington was elected before the town 1600 volunteers are placed in over 400 community formally took the name. I was very pleased to be service organisations through the Monash Volunteer invited to participate in the event and with Cr Bev Resource Centre. I recently held a round table Colomb to plant a tree to mark the occasion. discussion with the Deputy Premier’s office and Congratulations to Diane White, the Mornington representatives from the Monash Volunteer Resource Historical Society and the shire for making the Centre to discuss the effectiveness of the Department of anniversary an event to remember. Planning and Community Development’s volunteer portal and the department’s communication and general City of Wyndham: employment engagement with the volunteer sector. I thank the MVRC for its strong community outcomes and its Mr PALLAS (Tarneit) — In Australia’s fastest continued interest in effective government support of growing local government area, Wyndham, nearly programs that improve the volunteer sector. 60 per cent of residents leave the city for work — a figure that is close to double that of other Rotary: Monash charity golf day municipalities. The lack of localised employment places pressure on our transport network and road Mr GIDLEY — On Tuesday, 18 October, I infrastructure. More than that, it affects our sense of attended the Monash charity golf day dinner. The community and lessens the time spent with our full-day event is organised by the Monash Rotary clubs families. As Wyndham and Melbourne’s western and the City of Monash. Over the years the event has suburbs continue to grow at unprecedented rates these supported a number of worthy not-for-profit local problems will only become more pronounced. organisations. Proceeds from this year’s event are to be directed towards the Cerebral Palsy Education Centre in To address these problems the state government must Glen Waverley. The CPEC specialises in programs for seek to create employment opportunities closer to babies and children with cerebral palsy and is the only home. This requires the government to consider the one of its type in Australia. I commend the Monash decentralisation of government services and investment Rotary clubs on another successful golf day in raising in local infrastructure that will attract employment to funds from their event. Their continued financial and the area, such as the Werribee employment precinct. non-financial support for these invaluable not-for-profit The Werribee employment precinct, a project promised organisations, such as the CPEC, makes a tangible by Labor prior to the last election, will, over a 30-year difference to people’s lives. period, bring jobs closer to home for up to 60 000 Wyndham residents and generate new industries St Helena Secondary College: arts and in Melbourne’s west. technology awards
Wyndham is also in great need of a justice precinct, Mr HERBERT (Eltham) — St Helena Secondary which in addition to providing jobs locally would College is a great school in beautiful Eltham North address capacity issues at the current Werribee which offers fantastic arts programs. I had the pleasure courthouse and the broader justice needs of the growing of visiting the school’s annual art and technology community of Wyndham. The Wyndham City Council exhibition last Wednesday. The exhibition includes has called for the precinct to include a new police over 1000 art and technology exhibits produced by station, courtrooms and an emergency services hub. students from year 7 to year 12 at the school. It was a very impressive, broad range of media. It is time that the government addressed the growth needs of the west by investing in local jobs and social I congratulate all the winners of the arts awards, and in infrastructure such as a justice precinct, which would particular Georgia Hall, year 12 arts dux, and Adrian
MEMBERS STATEMENTS
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4879
Barca, year 12 technology/vocational education and Prahran: mental health forum training furnishing dux. I also congratulate Darianne Willmott, who coordinated the exhibition, and Natasha Mr NEWTON-BROWN — A mental health forum Roberts and Marvin Wright from St Helena on their was organised in Prahran by the federal member for work in organising the event. Higgins, Kelly O’Dwyer, recently. We had a huge turnout to hear Jeff Kennett and others talk about this While I was at the school I also attended the launch of a critical issue, and many people shared their personal new CD, called EPIC, from the school’s senior jazz stories with the audience. band. It was a great performance in the school square from a very accomplished jazz group, and the recording Sylvia Fahey by these 23 young musicians and two vocalists — Taylor Penrose and Olivia Manos — is excellent. The Mr NEWTON-BROWN — It is great to see that CD was cut at a professional recording studio, and it Sylvia Fahey is back at the Hornby Street milk bar, shows talent and maturity beyond the years of the fighting fit after a health scare. Well done, Sylvia, and performers in a very challenging musical form. I keep up the great work in the community you know and congratulate the students and staff on their epic new love. Note to any aspiring local politicians: if you do jazz CD, copies of which can be obtained from the not have Sylvia’s support, do not bother running. school for the low price of $10. Helen Round The SPEAKER — Order! That sounds very reasonable. Mr NEWTON-BROWN — Well done to Prahran local Helen Round — otherwise known as Fat Helen — St Kilda Primary School: fair for her tireless work in advocating against animal cruelty. The proposed legislation before this Parliament Mr NEWTON-BROWN (Prahran) — A new to shut down illegal puppy farmers has been a cause she benchmark was set by the St Kilda Primary School for has fought long and hard for. its innovative promotion of its school fair, which was held last Saturday, which included a YouTube movie. I Astor Theatre had a brilliant day there with the member for Caulfield, and we look forward to the next fair in 2013. Mr NEWTON-BROWN — Recently I had the amazing experience of looking through the projection Prahran Mission: Mullets for the Mission room at the Astor Theatre. From its state-of-the-art digital projection equipment to the old-style projectors Mr NEWTON-BROWN — Queen’s Hall was the from earlier days in cinema, the Astor is a unique venue for a footy fundraiser for the Prahran Mission institution that enables films to be screened in a way this month. The Mullets for the Mission was a great that cannot be replicated in multiplex cinemas. cause that enabled guests to channel their inner bogan and don their favourite mullet wig for the day. The SPEAKER — Order! The member for Ballarat West has 12 seconds. Safe Schools Coalition Victoria: funding Victorian certificate of applied learning: Mr NEWTON-BROWN — The local gay, lesbian, funding bisexual and transgender community greatly appreciated meeting with the Minister for Education Ms KNIGHT (Ballarat West) — I would like to this month to discuss homophobic bullying in schools. I congratulate all of the principals in my electorate for was pleased the great work of the Safe Schools being determined to keep VCAL (Victorian certificate Coalition Victoria was recognised with further funding. of applied learning) going in the face of cruel and savage funding cuts. They know how important this Fr Bob Maguire VCAL program is.
Mr NEWTON-BROWN — Fr Bob Maguire The SPEAKER — Order! The member’s time is should be recognised as a community legend. As his up. allotted time as the local parish priest draws to a close, I hope that a meaningful role can be found for him to continue his work with the local community, which so desperately needs him.
ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY AMENDMENT (TRANSITIONAL FEED-IN TARIFF SCHEME) BILL 2011
4880 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY AMENDMENT Given that this is a crystal clear policy and election (TRANSITIONAL FEED-IN TARIFF commitment, I pose the question: how is it that the SCHEME) BILL 2011 government is now breaking these very promises? I want to look at these promises one by one. Firstly, I Second reading want to look at the promise to refer an inquiry into the design and implementation of a gross feed-in tariff Debate resumed from 12 October; motion of scheme to the Victorian Competition and Efficiency Mr O’BRIEN (Minister for Energy and Resources). Commission. As I speak it appears the government has still not referred this inquiry to VCEC. We have heard Ms D’AMBROSIO (Mill Park) — I rise to speak the occasional mooted reference to an inquiry, but on the Electricity Industry Amendment (Transitional nothing concrete has yet been presented by the Feed-in Tariff Scheme) Bill 2011. This bill brings to an government. In fact there is increasing doubt as to this end the very successful premium solar feed-in tariff government’s intention to make good its promise, scheme introduced by the former Labor government. It despite its claims to the contrary. effectively excludes up to 90 per cent of the solar energy generation market by making installations of up Let us take a look at the second-reading speech made to 5-kilowatt-hour capacity ineligible to apply for the by the Minister for Energy and Resources. I quote some standard or general feed-in tariff scheme. In its stead of the closing lines from his speech regarding this the bill introduces a transitional feed-in tariff scheme at government’s so-called election commitment. He a fixed rate of 25 cents per kilowatt hour for five years. stated:
This bill is an insult to Victorians on several fronts. In accordance with the Baillieu government’s election Firstly, it breaks a key election commitment of the commitment, the Victorian Competition and Efficiency coalition parties with respect to the renewable energy Commission will be completing a review of feed-in tariff schemes in 2012. tariff schemes. The government provided a detailed election policy position on feed-in tariffs. Amongst the Second-reading speeches are very important — we all policy detail was a promise to refer an inquiry into a know that — as they are used to signal the gross feed-in tariff scheme to the Victorian Competition government’s policies, intentions and plans. The and Efficiency Commission. I quote from that policy minister does not mention anywhere in his speech that document: an inquiry into the design and implementation of a gross feed-in tariff scheme will be referred to VCEC. A Liberal-Nationals coalition government will:
… Mr Walsh — That is not relevant to the legislation. You have missed the point of what a second-reading direct the Victorian Competition and Efficiency speech should be. It is about the legislation. Commission (VCEC) to inquire into and report on the design and implementation of a market-based gross Ms D’AMBROSIO — He put it in his feed-in tariff scheme. second-reading speech. I have checked the websites of Further on the policy document states: both the Department of Primary Industries and VCEC this afternoon, and as at that time, around 5 o’clock this There is significant community support to provide separately afternoon, there was no reference to a review into tariff for the feed-in of power to the grid and the drawing of power schemes, let alone an inquiry into a gross feed-in tariff out of the grid. Under a gross feed-in tariff, any source feeding into the grid would be able to earn a price based on scheme. the value of the total amount of power fed in, determined on a basis that is fair and straightforward. When will this occur? I think we are at a critical time given that the minister referred to this review of tariff … schemes in his second-reading speech for this bill and … the Liberal-Nationals coalition will have VCEC conduct we are yet to hear from the minister exactly when this an inquiry into the features that a market-based gross feed-in will occur. I ask the minister to come clean now and tariff scheme should have, with a focus on promoting the stop the pretence, because what we have on display is a take-up of lower emission generation … pretence. It is proposed that the current ‘premium’ net feed-in tariff scheme will remain in place as an additional option for the The minister needs to explain to the house exactly what time being. Retailers will also be able to continue to offer a he intends to do. Simply repeating the line that the ‘one for one’ or other feed-in tariff under the existing ‘fair’ minister is acting in accordance with ‘the Baillieu tariff requirements. government’s election commitment’ is not the same as
ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY AMENDMENT (TRANSITIONAL FEED-IN TARIFF SCHEME) BILL 2011
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4881 him actually doing it — doing it is something very and offended this week. When it comes to helping different. I ask the minister provide an explanation to many people who want to do their bit for the the house before this bill is put to a vote. The record so environment, it is a pity there is no penalty for the far is not good in terms of the minister addressing minister for insulting and offending Victorians. It is the questions raised in debate, but we live in hope. other way around: there is one law for ordinary Victorians, another law for the minister; one promise Let us have a look at this government’s propensity to for Victorians today, a broken promise tomorrow. say one thing and do another when it comes to solar energy generation and feed-in tariff schemes. What did Let us have a look at the premium scheme. This was we hear from the then opposition on the proud occasion designed by Labor to kick-start small-scale solar energy when the then Labor Minister for Energy and generation until the industry was able to compete on Resources, Peter Batchelor, introduced a bill to bring in more cost-equitable terms with other energy sources, a the premium tariff scheme in 2009? I would like to point we have not yet reached. People in the 60 cent remind the house of what is recorded in Hansard. I premium scheme signed up for a 15-year contracted refer to contributions made on 31 March 2009. The period or until 2024. This was to ensure that people had former member for Murray Valley said: a reasonable period of time within which they could recoup the value of their investment. By all accounts it The gross feed-in system is the best system and is used in was an efficient and cost-effective scheme. The bill acts many other countries. on the premium solar net feed-in tariff scheme by The member for Benalla said: closing it off to new entrants. It is another broken promise. Moving on to the key aspects of the bill that have been broadly canvassed by many previous speakers, obviously a As I mentioned earlier, this government promised to major issue is that the bill provides for a net feed-in tariff, keep the premium tariff in place until its gross scheme whereas a strong argument has been put by our side of the house that a gross feed-in tariff is more likely to encourage was ready to replace it. Instead we have a minister who people into using solar power and therefore achieving the announced on 1 September this year the total abolition objective of greater use of renewable energy. of the premium tariff scheme, giving consumers and industry only four weeks to put panels on roofs and The member for Malvern said: lodge their paperwork. With respect to submitting There are some real concerns the coalition parties have with paperwork for eligibility for the premium tariff, the this bill which have been outlined by the member for Box Hill minister’s own media release of 1 September 2011 in his usual comprehensive and expert fashion. These reported him as saying: concerns include that the scheme only applies to net generation … Neither is there any indexation or adjustment of … Failure to meet the 30 September deadline will mean the 60 cent tariff. people will not be considered for the PFIT — … National programs in place around the world have the premium feed-in tariff. consistently proven that a gross feed-in tariff bill is one of the most cost-effective ways to encourage the uptake of solar energy. He was further quoted as saying: I refer to the Age of 24 November 2010, where the Given it can take up to several months to complete the required steps, it is very unlikely that people purchasing a member for Malvern was quoted as saying: solar system from today will have enough time to qualify for the premium rate. We think there is a lot of interest in a gross feed-in tariff as a way of boosting investment in renewables. What an extraordinary admission of guilt; to drop an What an absolute build-up, a build-up that has turned axe and kill off the scheme then and there at one fell into a massive backflip. What is more, this bill rips into swoop. It also showed an appalling disregard for the heart of the small-scale solar energy generation consumers and industry. Let us have a look at how industry. This is a new take on the phrase ‘boosting industry responded to this announcement. The industry investment in renewables’ used by the member for was given opportunities to discuss the future of the Malvern, now the Minister for Energy and Resources, tariff scheme with the minister’s department. At no in November last year. stage was industry informed that axing of the scheme was an option that was being seriously considered. We have a government that says one thing and does the exact opposite. Every Victorian who may have believed On 12 September I received a lengthy letter from this government meant what it said it would do in the Russell French, the managing director of Sun Empire area of solar energy policy has the right to feel insulted Solar Systems. His company is absolutely appalled at
ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY AMENDMENT (TRANSITIONAL FEED-IN TARIFF SCHEME) BILL 2011
4882 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011 the government’s lack of regard for the industry’s needs Further still: and the consequences of its decision for his business. He wrote: That this is not the 10 or more years that the government is aiming for highlights the government’s lack of industry understanding and consultation with the industry. They are We are working ourselves ragged to try and get all our simply out of touch. systems installed in the ridiculously short amount of time given to us by the state government, which essentially is less than four weeks. When we met with the Department of And further still — and I hope they are listening over Primary Industries (DPI) some weeks ago, we were told that there: they had advised the energy minister, Michael O’Brien, that the best way forward was a three to four-month period to We believe we will have to reduce our number of employees allow companies to install systems and for interested to survive and I have now given the business until Christmas consumers to be made aware of the feed-in tariff scheme to see if we can continue on and if the business is not viable to changes and give them a fair and reasonable amount of time shut up shop. to purchase and install their solar PV system at the higher, 60 cent rate. Of course we made our objections made clear — I can go on; I have many other important quotes that are very critical. Essentially what suffers is our there is a little bit of a typo, but I will read that in for the environment and those who suffer are the purpose of being accurate — disadvantaged householders who still have spiralling electricity costs and the solar industry professionals to even this version of the stripping of the 60 cent tariff and methodology, but to then have a snap decision made where who are losing jobs because of poor, ill-informed and we had four weeks to work within? Please Minister, that is rushed decision making. I was quoting an industry too much to swallow, and unfair and unreasonable to boot! installer. They are his words, not mine, and I could not Well, you can understand this distressing position we are now have put it better myself. These words have been totally faced with. We have solar panels stuck on boats coming from ignored by this government. Germany which were ordered months ago and won’t arrive in time. When they do arrive who will buy them with no real The industry body, the Clean Energy Council, has done feed-in tariff to recompense consumers for their exported modelling that shows that scrapping the premium tariff electricity? We have a severe lack of stock available to would cause demand for small-scale solar energy service customers who were already signed up or were in the process of signing up for a system. There is a lack of installers installations to plummet, with 1800 Victorian jobs available to get these rushed systems installed and a lack of likely to disappear from the industry. Many of these available inspectors to sign off on the systems in time. We jobs are in regional Victoria. have our backs against the wall, fighting our way through to make all of this happen. To highlight the impact of this government’s arrogant decision and backflip, I turn to an international I will pick up some further comments in the letter company that was poised to expand its Melbourne regarding potential customers who have rung the operations to four regional locations in Victoria on the business complaining about this decision: back of the retention of a premium tariff scheme. I turn … and they have indicated they will not be interested in to a very important source of information on this investing in a solar power system after September until the company to highlight this point. I quote from an article government sorts out this solar debacle. written by the environment editor of the Age, Adam Morton, and published on 25 August: Further: A British solar energy company says it will scrap plans to People want to make a difference to their electricity expand into four regional Victorian centres, creating up to consumption and the impact they are having on the 120 jobs, if the Baillieu government substantially cuts a environment by investing in a solar power system, but household subsidy scheme for rooftop panels. without a decent buyback feed-in tariff, many people feel it is just a waste of time and money to purchase such a system and Mark Group chief executive Rob Grant said a decision to the big opportunity to make that significant difference is open offices in Geelong, Ballarat, Bendigo and the Latrobe gone … Many consumers ask us the same thing: ‘Why would Valley had been put on hold until the announcement of the state government help build an industry just to destroy it changes to a program that pays households a premium rate for again by reducing the feed-in tariff?’. We think this shows a energy fed into the power grid. real lack of foresight and industry consultation by government and that this all clearly highlights a boom and bust mentality … by government and will have a dramatic and perhaps dire impact on my business, Sun Empire Solar Systems. Mr Grant said Mark Group opened its Australian operation in 2009 after being courted by government agencies, including Further: the federal government’s Austrade and Invest Victoria. He said attempts to build the business had been frustrated by What we have seen is that the government payback uncertainty over whether renewable energy programs would calculations don’t stack up … survive. The company employs 25 people in Victoria.
ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY AMENDMENT (TRANSITIONAL FEED-IN TARIFF SCHEME) BILL 2011
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4883
Mr Grant also said: entrants whenever the minister decides. It could be that the generation capacity is 1 megawatt and the If the scheme is significantly changed, the regional operations pass-through cost is 50 cents, but if the minister wakes will not go ahead and the growth in Melbourne will be significantly curtailed. up one day and says, ‘I feel like closing the transitional feed-in tariff scheme’, he can — and he will. I have had several discussions with Rob Grant, who is a very committed and smart businessman who Given the minister’s callous disregard for the solar understands the renewable energy industry and the industry and for jobs and families, I would entertain the pivotal place solar energy has in that. He was absolutely thought that many in the industry, including many gutted when the announcement was made to shut down families who are committed to changing their the premium scheme. behaviours and doing the right thing by the environment, would be somewhat sceptical about this An honourable member interjected. third trigger point and when it will take effect. It would be advisable — and I ask the minister to do it — to Ms D’AMBROSIO — You should get out more explain to Victorians why he feels the need to have this often and listen to what people are saying. The coalition third trigger point, which in effect means that he can said in its election promise that it would maintain pull down the shades on the solar industry transitional Labor’s one-for-one standard or general net feed-in tariff scheme any time he feels like doing so. tariff scheme introduced in 2004. That is another promise that has been broken. To rub salt into the I remind the house that it appears that the industry industry’s wounds, the government hid this little detail annual report into the premium scheme has not yet been from the industry representatives in their briefings until presented to government. Certainly we have not heard the bill hit this house, when it was revealed. That is a that that is the case, and indications are that it is not disgraceful, arrogant approach to industry — a slap in expected until later this year. It is the height of the face when its representatives least needed it. hypocrisy for the government to be strangling the industry without waiting to be presented with the most The standard tariff provides the same rate for surplus up-to-date data on installed capacity and cost. Instead electricity generated as a generator pays for electricity the government has encouraged speculation and they buy from the grid. As the cost rises, so does the rumours about the data, so adding to anxiety amongst rate they receive. This was an ongoing scheme consumers and the industry. available to all generators up to 100-kilowatt-hour capacity. This scheme is now closed to generation of up The government has broken promises. I have gone to 5-kilowatt-hour capacity, which in effect represents through each and every one of them. What has about 90 per cent of the market, which has generation happened is in sharp contrast to what government capacity of 5 kilowatt hours or below. Instead, the only members said they represented when they were going option this government is providing through this bill is into the election. They are hiding behind claims that the the transitional tariff scheme, which has a fixed rate of solar industry is now at a point where investors can be 25 cents and a statutory contract period of five years assured of a payback period of less than 10 years. This only. claim, which is made repeatedly by the minister as an explanation or an attempt to justify the backflip and the New entrants will be eligible for only the government’s abject breaking of promises, is hotly disputed by the new transitional tariff, which again is a fixed price industry and by renewable energy organisations. tariff, as the minister said in his second-reading speech. People’s electricity bills will continue to increase, but I wish to refer to those organisations which very the tariff paid to people for surplus electricity they quickly, in exasperation and disbelief, put out generate will not increase. In a short time the comments in media statements on the day that the transitional tariff will be worth less than people pay for Minister for Energy and Resources decided to bring electricity. The one-for-one nexus will be broken. down the blinds on the solar energy industry. I refer to the Alternative Technology Association media release The bill sets three trigger points for closing the of 1 September, in which the energy projects and policy transitional scheme. One trigger point is a generation manager, Mr Damien Moyse, is quoted: capacity of 75 megawatts. The second point is a pass-through cost of $5. The pass-through cost is the … Mr Moyse said it was impossible under the new tariff for a cost of the scheme spread out across all consumers in a consumer to pay off a system within a decade. distribution area. The third and most telling trigger … There’s no way a solar household will pay off a system point is that the scheme can be closed off to new within 10 years based on such a short policy.
ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY AMENDMENT (TRANSITIONAL FEED-IN TARIFF SCHEME) BILL 2011
4884 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
If there is no value for the exported electricity from their solar organisations that have expressed grave concerns for system after 5 years, and a household exports half or more of the investment opportunities that it seems Victoria will its solar power as many households do, it will be closer to 15 or 20 years by the time the system is paid off. forgo as a consequence of this government’s policies. The government has given every indication since the I continue quoting from the media release: election that it is very much looking to kill off feed-in tariff schemes, not expand them. Again, that is an Mr Moyse said the Victorian government had missed the opposite position to its election commitment. If this is point of a feed-in tariff, which was a temporary mechanism to maintain healthy support for solar technology before the not the intention of the government, then the minister achievement of grid parity. should rule it out. When the minister sums up on the bill — if he chooses to sum up, because I think this The words ‘before the achievement of grid parity’ are minister has summed up zero times so far — he should telling, and I remind the house, as I interrupt my rule it out and provide certainty to the industry, quotation from this document, that we are nowhere near certainty in jobs and certainty for investment achieving grid parity. I continue to quote Mr Moyse opportunities. from the media statement: This government’s record on renewable energy speaks ‘Hot on the heels of their disastrous wind energy policy, volumes. It has killed off the wind energy industry which will cost the state millions of dollars in lost investment and hundreds of jobs, this is another bad blunder by the through its draconian planning laws, and it is now Baillieu government. strangling the small-scale solar energy industry by removing assistance from Victorians who ‘So far, the government has done virtually nothing on climate overwhelmingly want to do their bit to reduce their change and renewable energy but stall and cut back programs’. carbon footprint and create greener jobs for their kids — highly skilled, greener, cleaner jobs; the jobs of That statement comes from the Alternative Technology the future — which this government has now said are Association. no longer important. In short, this government has taken Victoria from being the nation’s leader in clean I also refer to Environment Victoria. I note that during energy and tackling carbon emissions to lagging very the debate on the premium solar feed-in tariff, the much in the slipstream. opposition at that time was very keen to quote Environment Victoria as a notable, laudable We heard the Minister for Environment and Climate organisation and expert in the field. Environment Change this week say there will be a review of the Victoria’s response to the decision of the Minister for Climate Change Act 2010. The Minister for Energy and Energy and Resources on 1 December to axe the Resources and the Premier, on a number of occasions, premium solar scheme was stated in its media release, have backed off at 100 miles an hour on commitments which says: they made to the people of Victoria and this house that they would support renewable energy targets and Environment Victoria’s Mark Wakeham said today: targets for reductions in carbon emissions. A lot has ‘The decision to reduce support for solar power, in the been done in such a short period of time to undo the same week as the decision to shut the door to new wind good work already done in Victoria, taking Victoria farm development, is extremely disappointing. from being the nation’s leader in growing greener jobs … and investment to now being a state that is letting the sun go down on the small-scale solar energy industry. This decision is premature and damaging to Victoria’s This government is quickly becoming known in the clean energy future. community as the dirty energy government. … Mr Foley — Just dirty! This announcement caps off a disastrous week for renewable energy in Victoria. It appears that the only Ms D’AMBROSIO — I will not go that far. We plan the coalition has on climate change is to ensure have a government that is putting up roadblocks to Victoria misses out on the clean energy investment boom’. investment opportunities in the state. When it does that it needs to take responsibility for the consequences. It Here is a government that says it cares about jobs — needs to take responsibility for the millions of dollars perhaps — but it does so half-heartedly. It indicated that Victoria stands to lose from the wind energy some time ago that it will present a jobs policy, but we industry, which is no longer a viable scenario in have yet to see one. We have heard nothing in the last Victoria. It must also take responsibility for stunting the two months on that front. Now there are two notable growth in greener jobs in Victoria. It needs to take
ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY AMENDMENT (TRANSITIONAL FEED-IN TARIFF SCHEME) BILL 2011
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4885 responsibility for gutting the small-scale solar energy New South Wales, Western Australia, Tasmania, the industry. Northern Territory and the Australian Capital Territory. Interestingly, South Australia reduced its rate to What are deemed to be the consequences of this 16 cents in October this year. decision: the disappearance of 1800 jobs at least from the solar energy industry in Victoria alone. That is an Importantly, it must be said that those who are part of absolute disgrace. The bill represents an arrogant litany the premium feed-in tariff scheme will continue to of broken promises, and I am adamant in saying that the receive their particular rate of 60 cents per kilowatt opposition will oppose this bill. hour. This new scheme will operate for a period of five years. In the future the scheme can be closed to new Mr NORTHE (Morwell) — It gives me pleasure to applicants if a couple of points arise, one being if the rise this evening to speak on the Electricity Industry capacity of 75 megawatts is reached. Amendment (Transitional Feed-in Tariff Scheme) Bill 2011. The bill amends a couple of acts, the Electricity It is interesting to note that in her contribution to the Industry Act 2000 and the National Electricity debate the honourable member for Mill Park spoke (Victoria) Act 2005. The objective of the bill is to about a lot of things, but she did not speak about the establish a transitional feed-in tariff scheme to replace cost impost upon consumers. One of the key aspects of the premium solar feed-in tariff scheme. The premium the transitional feed-in tariff is to ensure that we can solar feed-in tariff scheme was introduced into Victoria assess the scheme itself if an annual consumer cost cap in 2009 and applied to customers who installed rooftop of $5 is reached. This is important in the context of the solar panels of less than 5 kilowatts. At that time the conversation. I guess what the government and the premium feed-in tariff was a net feed-in tariff of minister have tried to do is reach a balance in making 60 cents per kilowatt hour. sure that we have investment in renewable energy in this state but at the same time making sure that Importantly, where we are today is that the government consumers and businesses are not compromised by has to review the capacity of 100 megawatts as the having to pay outrageous costs for their electricity. statutory capacity is close to being reached. Essentially we are at this juncture in the road where the It is somewhat hypocritical for the member for Mill government has to make a decision about what to do Park and the opposition to criticise this government for with the feed-in tariff. As the minister said in a press its performance in renewables. Let us look at the cost of release on 1 September this year, we have reached that electricity associated with the debacle of the smart capacity and what we decided to do, unlike many other meters. As we know, many consumers who might not states and territories, is to ensure that we have a even have them are paying for smart meters, and they reasonable rate for customers over this transitional offer no real benefits. That point has been articulated period, and that is set at 25 cents per kilowatt hour of many times in this house. Labor has a reputation in the electricity that is fed back into the grid through those federal sphere at the moment because of its carbon tax, rooftop solar systems. which will have massive implications for jobs and costs for consumers, businesses and otherwise. Contrary to what the member for Mill Park said in her contribution to the debate, this scheme will still mean What the opposition has not done is support a that people will have a payback period of concession rate for consumers. Earlier this year this approximately 10 years. Contrary to what the member government introduced year-round discounts on said, modelling has been done by the Department of electricity bills for those who are doing it tough in their Primary Industries and industry has been involved in communities: pensioners, concession card holders, that payback system. Also, to further refute some of the health-care card holders and holders of veterans gold comments made by the member for Mill Park, the cards. Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission will be doing a review of the feed-in tariff system and the Mr Nardella interjected. solar system scheme in 2012. That has been articulated by the minister on many occasions, including in that Mr NORTHE — It was actually introduced earlier. press release of 1 September 2011. This concession was very much supported by many people in our community. Unfortunately it was not As I said, it is interesting to know what other supported by the opposition at the time, and that was jurisdictions have done over a period of time. If you extremely disappointing. have a look at some of the other states and territories, you note no new tariffs will apply for new customers in Also it is important to note, as I say, that we have tried to strike a balance with this transitional feed-in tariff
ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY AMENDMENT (TRANSITIONAL FEED-IN TARIFF SCHEME) BILL 2011
4886 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011 scheme. In other states it has been either boom or bust There are many others I could read out, but time does where the feed-in tariff rate has actually been abolished. not allow me to do that. The 25 cents that applies through this transitional tariff is quite sensible. As I said earlier, the average payback The coalition government has undertaken other period, which has been based on modelling undertaken measures with respect to improving energy efficiency by the Department of Primary Industries, and the in this state. We know it has committed funding to establishment of which has involved the industry itself, things like the CarbonNet project in the Latrobe verifies that this time frame will be achieved. Also to Valley — $30 million has been committed to that. In the point is the fact that the cost of solar panels the state budget for this year another $41 million has themselves has reduced significantly over the last been allocated to the ETIS, or energy technology couple of years, so from an affordability perspective innovation strategy. We have effectively doubled the there is little change in this regard. targets for the energy saver incentive scheme, and more importantly we have allowed businesses to access that In striking a balance the government must consider this important scheme. From my local perspective, a key point, along with the fact that electricity consumers are component of the Latrobe Valley Advantage Fund is effectively paid for the feed-in tariff. As I say, dedicated to ensuring that low-technology development consideration must be given to pensioners and can occur. low-income households that have to deal with that. I believe the government and the minister have made a To put it into perspective for the member for Mill Park very fair and balanced decision in regard to this. Of in regard to the credibility of that side of the house, the course it is important that we have investment in the Victorian Auditor-General’s Office had a lot to say in industry. Whilst the member for Mill Park articulated April this year about the former government’s proposed some concerns, there is also great support out there. Victoria-wide large-scale solar feed-in tariff, which it found would increase household electricity bills by $23 I will quote from an article that appeared in the to $47 a year on average. However, Labor claimed at Wangaratta Chronicle of 5 September this year, which the time it would only be in the vicinity of $5 or $15 a states: year — a difference of 500 per cent.
… Wangaratta-based Steintech Electrical and Solar chief I find it a bit rich that the member for Mill Park and executive officer, Michael Steinlauf, said it was a positive indeed the opposition can somehow question the move. credibility of this government. We believe the decision He said 25 cents is a good tariff compared to Western that has been made by the minister and the government Australia and New South Wales, which have already ended strikes a fair balance whereby there will still be their solar incentives altogether. significant investment in the solar energy industry in … this state while at the same time we are making sure that consumers are able to pay their electricity bills. It is ‘Looking at our business going into the future, we expect it to a fair balance. If you compare that with what has get busier’, Mr Steinlauf said. occurred over a period of time in other states and Also, Rob Capuano said in the Casey Weekly in territories, you will see the minister has done a great job September of this year — — in ensuring that industries will still grow and prosper in this state while at the same time making sure that Mr Nardella — Who? customers, householders and businesses will be able to pay their electricity bills into the future. I commend the Mr NORTHE — It states: bill to the house.
Rod Capuano of Hallam, solar retailer SolarMyHome agreed Mr FOLEY (Albert Park) — I rise to make a the feed-in tariff cut could have been a lot worse. ‘I don’t hold any fears for it. Even if you were getting solar power on a contribution to the debate on the Electricity Industry one-to-one basis, it’d be a great deal … Amendment (Transitional Feed-in Tariff Scheme) Bill 2011 and make it clear that the contribution made by ‘The cost of solar units are about $2000 cheaper than four the member for Mill Park completely summed up the months ago so, even though the feed-in tariff is less, the payback rate for the systems is about the same’. opposition’s opposition to this shonky proposal from this shonky mob opposite. What we have seen is a The biggest threats to the industry were shonky telemarketers, classic Tory backflip with this bill: say one thing before unqualified installers and poor-quality imports, he said. the election, do precisely the opposite after. He said sales were picking up again after the federal government reduced solar rebates on July 1.
ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY AMENDMENT (TRANSITIONAL FEED-IN TARIFF SCHEME) BILL 2011
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4887
To illustrate what we had before the election I will entrepreneur who had retrained in this area at quote from the then Liberal-Nationals coalition policy considerable expense — and I point out to the member document, from which the member for Mill Park has for Morwell that he employed a substantial number of already quoted. It states that the coalition will: people, over 20 contractors, in the member for Morwell’s electorate. The day the member for Mill Direct the Victorian Competition and Efficiency Commission Park and I were there one of this business’s last (VCEC) to inquire into and report on the design and implementation of a market-based gross feed-in tariff scheme. customers felt so badly about the way the company had been treated that he had come up from Fish Creek — And then further: although that might be in the electorate of the member for South Gippsland — to support this company in the There is significant community support to provide separately efforts it had made. for the feed in of power to the grid and the drawing of power out of the grid. Under a gross feed-in tariff, any source feeding into the grid would be able to earn a price based on It was not enough to rip the entire basis of this young the value of the total amount of power fed in, determined on a entrepreneur’s business out from under him, but the basis that is fair and straightforward. manner in which it was done was appalling. It was not, as the member for Morwell expressed it, one of the … the Liberal-Nationals coalition will have VCEC conduct an inquiry into the features that a market-based gross feed-in shonk call-ins. Here was a guy who had put tariff scheme should have, with a focus on promoting the considerable effort into retraining and skilling up a take-up of lower emission generation … whole number of contractors and was buying quality solar panels from Germany. They were high-market … panels that really should have been produced in It is proposed that the current ‘premium’ net feed-in tariff Australia, but given these sorts of actions we can see scheme will remain in place as an additional option for the little opportunity for that. He had ordered them on the time being. Retailers will also be able to continue to offer a basis of advice from the Department of Primary one-for-one or other feed-in tariff under the existing ‘fair’ tariff arrangements. Industries as to when this scheme would be ended, and acting on that advice he put forward considerable What happened to that policy position? Where did that capital in booking that material. That material was on a rock-solid commitment to the Victorian people boat from Germany at the time the minister made his disappear to? It disappeared in a whiff of scepticism in rapid announcement about ending this scheme earlier regard to the science and the reality of climate change than his department had advised the industry. That was being induced by human activity from the mob of frankly shameful. sceptics opposite. That is where that went. In the debate about this premium feed-in tariff in the last Parliament, Sure, be sceptics, be hardnosed if you do not believe in those opposite, including the Chair — and I would not climate change, be anti renewables, if that is what you want to cast too many reflections on the Chair, because really believe, but to go out and deliberately gut private the Chair does a fine job, but I recall being in the house sector businesses that are employing large numbers of and I did go and check Hansard, and perhaps it was the contractors and leave them high and dry at substantial Chair among a range of others — went so far as to say financial cost and leave their customers in a similar it was not enough and that it should have gone further. position is really an absolutely shameful act from a party that pretends that it is the friend of small business, I am sure from the different perspective on the other from a party that pretends it is there — — side there we can see a proposition. Indeed the then shadow minister, the minister at the table now, the Mr Gidley interjected. Attorney-General, took a similar position as I recall from a quick recollection of Hansard. Where did those Mr FOLEY — The member for Mount Waverley, positions go? In less than 12 months we have seen the well-known — — those opposite do a complete backflip that would give The DEPUTY SPEAKER — Order! The member any Olympic diver the heebie-jeebies. They have totally for Mount Waverley! Interjections are disorderly. The recanted on the position they took to the Victorian member for Albert Park will not take up interjections. people on this issue. Mr FOLEY — Thank you, Deputy Speaker, and I This is not just some remote, esoteric issue. With the welcome your protection from the thug over there in the member for Mill Park I attended a small and, up until corner. this point, growing business in my electorate — that being the Sun Empire Solar Systems company in Port The DEPUTY SPEAKER — Order! Melbourne. Here was a young, enthusiastic
ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY AMENDMENT (TRANSITIONAL FEED-IN TARIFF SCHEME) BILL 2011
4888 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
Mr FOLEY — If I can continue with my The DEPUTY SPEAKER — Order! That is contribution without being rudely interrupted by the sufficient on the point of order. I ask the member for freshman over there in the corner, if this backflip from Albert Park to come back to the bill. the government was not objectionable enough on the grounds of its scepticism of the need for renewable Mr FOLEY — The member for Mount Waverley energies and to tackle man-made climate change — if clearly was not in the Parliament last time, because if he that was not bad enough for dealing with its, quite had been, like all his mates, he would have voted for frankly, low act of treachery to small businesses that same bill, just to get across the line in the election. seeking to grow in this area more broadly — what does They never meant a word of it. They did not for one it say about this mob’s vision for where growth in second have any intention of sticking to that renewable employment in high-skilled industries is going? energy target, and everything they have done since confirms that. For example, look at their decimation of What we have seen here is yet another capitulation to the wind energy industry, where it is easier now to short-term planning on the part of a government that build a coal-fired power station within 2 kilometres of a shows no vision as to where the jobs of the future are house than it is to generate renewable energy via a coming from. It is not only with Sun Empire Solar clean wind energy system. This bill is a disgrace, and Systems and the opportunities created by Mr French this Labor opposition will be opposing it. It reflects and his hardworking business or any number of other everything that is wrong about this government — it is opportunities that we have seen this from those duplicitous, shallow, hollow and meaningless. opposite. We have seen it more and more. There has been this promise of a jobs package, a job policy, but Mr CRISP (Mildura) — I rise to make a we will not see them any time soon, because these contribution in the debate on the Electricity Industry government activities are not related to being antijobs Amendment (Transitional Feed-in Tariff Scheme) Bill and antiskills just in this area; we see it in everything 2011. The purpose of the bill is to amend the Electricity this government does. We see it in its cuts in the Act 2000 to introduce a new energy feed-in tariff Victorian certificate of applied learning sector in scheme that will commence after the premium solid education. We see it in the cuts it seeks to make in this feed-in tariff scheme reaches its capacity and to amend sector and we see it in the government’s total reliance the National Electricity (Victoria) Act 2005 to facilitate on and subservience to the carbon-based areas of the introduction of the transitional feed-in tariff scheme. energy generation in this state. The first part of that pretty much rebuffs most of the argument from the other side, but let us now get some The foreshadowed changes that the Minister for of the history right. Environment and Climate Change has put before the people of Victoria with regard to the 20 per cent This government is committed to fair and sustainable renewable energy target is clearly an issue that needs to support for the renewable energy industry, including be worked into the mix in this debate, because this rooftop installations. The new transitional feed-in tariff government has made it clear that when those people will be 25 cents per kilowatt-hour available for five who now form part of the government benches were in years from 2012. It is not retrospective; none of the opposition in the last Parliament every one of them changes in the bill will be retrospective. The new voted for that bill. Every single one of them got up and feed-in tariff will allow for a payback period on current said, ‘Yes, we are going to vote for this; we support it’. prices of around about 10 years, the same period that Now, in a collective act of amnesia, this is apparently applied under the Labor government feed-in tariff somehow or another an aspirational target. In some introduced in the previous Parliament, because there vague, sweeping statement made by the dynamic have been dramatic reductions in the cost of solar Treasurer of the state — I notice that after he has been panels over the last two years. They have now become in office less than 12 months even the Age is calling for more affordable and so the higher rates of subsidy are him to be shipped off — we see a proposition where no longer required. those opposite — — I am going to expand on some of those issues now. Mr Gidley — On a point of order, Deputy Speaker, Firstly, the federal government obviously agrees the debate has been wide ranging, but the member for because it reduced its support for the rooftop solar Albert Park is now referring to lies about the Victorian industry back in July. That is a fact. That was a Labor certificate of applied learning and former opposition government decision. It too is working its way through votes on legislation. I ask you to bring him back to the this. Secondly, Labor set the 100-megawatt limit when bill and thereby stop the spin and the rewriting of it put it into law; 100 megawatts is Labor law. The history. Labor government could have set a figure of
ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY AMENDMENT (TRANSITIONAL FEED-IN TARIFF SCHEME) BILL 2011
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4889
200 megawatts; it could have set a figure of Ms D’Ambrosio interjected. 500 megawatts. Why did it not do that? I suspect that it knew 60 cents per kilowatt-hour was appropriate to Mr CRISP — To quote Shakespeare, I fear the start the solar industry, but it did not want to commit member for Mill Park doth protest too much on this. As Victorians to the long-term cost beyond that start-up I said before, it was Labor’s decision to set this limit; period. Victorian homes and industries cannot afford that limit has been reached. To refute the argument 60 cents per kilowatt-hour to go on forever. Labor from the member for Mill Park about our commitment knew that when it introduced its legislation. We knew it to this, we could have ended this when we came to when we drew up this legislation, and that is why we power. We did not; we honoured that 100 megawatts. It agreed to it. I think the shadow minister has clearly has closed up very quickly and we have seen that out. missed that point. We have honoured the previous government’s commitment to make that 100 megawatts. This is further supported when we look at what the Auditor-General said on this issue. The Also I think we need to look at what those other states Auditor-General has brought a number of stark realities have been doing. In South Australia it is 6 cents a to the fore, particularly the cost to families. The cost of kilowatt for the surplus. That is nowhere near what 100 megawatts has gone way beyond Labor’s estimate. Victoria is offering, which is also better than what is on I never thought I would be standing here today teaching offer in New South Wales. We have offered something the opposition, the Labor Party, about how to be fair to for some people that is just a little bit above what is the socially disadvantaged in our committee. The normally paid for electricity. I know that in the northern reality is that those people who are seeking that 60 cent part of the state, because we have long line losses — — feed-in tariff have got $10 000 to $20 000 to invest and get a return at the expense of those working-class Ms D’Ambrosio — Deputy Speaker, I draw your families who cannot afford their current power bills, let attention to the state of the house. alone an increase to those bills of $20 to $40 a year. It Quorum formed. might not seem much to some people, but to the pensioners in my community, who have the Mr CRISP — To conclude, families are already disadvantage of facing higher costs in country areas, it feeling the cost impact of this energy program. Let us is unaffordable. That is quite clearly where we are at. It send it off to the arbitrator to find out the best way to go is not affordable to continue with a 60 cent feed-in forward. That would be the Victorian Competition and tariff, and that is before we even get to the cost to Efficiency Commission (VCEC) to which we have industry if we were to have this utopian environment referred this program. Let us get the best tariff scheme where tomorrow everybody would pay 60 cents per for Victoria. That is what this bill does: it refers it to kilowatt-hour for their energy. The lights would go out that organisation so that we can find out the best way to for those likely to be most affected and hurt by that go forward. Solar power has a great future in Victoria. decision. Ms D’Ambrosio — On a point of order, Deputy As I said before, the federal government has also Speaker, I believe the member is misleading the house. reduced its support for the scheme. As we look to the The bill does not give effect to a referral to VCEC for future a scheme is still in place for rooftop solar panels an inquiry into feed-in tariffs. for those families who want to invest in achieving a saving on their power costs. You can still put a 1.5 to The DEPUTY SPEAKER — Order! That is not a 2-kilowatt unit on top of your home and reduce your point of order. power bill. It is not a profit-making venture, but it is about securing your future. I got a quote the other day Mr CRISP — We need a tariff to go forward. This regarding the cost of this; it is about $2.04 per watt government knows we need that tariff to go forward. installed. That is how tight or good the market is. I We need solar power to have a future, and we are going believe the market for retailers now is in installing units to find the best way to deliver that in a sustainable way on top of family homes to supply those homes, but not that will not impact on families or businesses and will as a money-generating or wealth-shifting exercise from deliver Victoria future security for solar power. those who can least afford it. We cannot let that process Ms EDWARDS (Bendigo West) — I would also stagnate. I urge those businesses that have lost some of like to contribute to the debate on the Electricity those 5-kilowatt-type installations to look at getting Industry Amendment (Transitional Feed-in Tariff those families who are trying to save on their power Scheme) Bill 2011. Hopefully I will not get as bills back into the heart of their businesses. emotional about it as some of the government
ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY AMENDMENT (TRANSITIONAL FEED-IN TARIFF SCHEME) BILL 2011
4890 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011 members. This bill amends the Electricity Industry Act the community or the solar industry and effectively 2000 and the National Electricity (Victoria) Act 2005 to pre-empted the promised review by the Victorian establish a new transitional feed-in tariff scheme, which Competition and Efficiency Commission into ways to is expected to commence on 1 January 2012. Labor will strengthen and support solar power. not be supporting this bill, because in conjunction with the other announcements by the Liberal-Nationals This decision means that the once-booming solar panel government regarding renewable energy, such as wind industry in Victoria is about to experience a permanent power, it would appear that it is effectively turning the solar eclipse. Since Labor’s feed-in tariff came in lights off in Victoria when it comes to renewable 18 months ago the Victorian industry has installed energy. 70 megawatts of solar panel generation capacity. Now thousands of solar panel installers across the state, Broken promises are becoming the order of the day for particularly in regional Victoria, face a very uncertain this government. It made a clear commitment before future indeed. Some solar companies have now the election last year to conduct a Victorian indicated that they will abandon plans to invest in Competition and Efficiency Commission review to Victoria. For example, the Mark Group has put on hold look at strengthening feed-in tariffs. Not once did it a planned massive expansion in regional Victoria. This mention that its energy policy proposed cutting the includes the company’s plan to open offices in tariff. Coalition members were strong supporters of Geelong, Ballarat, Bendigo and the Latrobe Valley, Labor’s solar power initiatives when they were in which would have supported 200-plus jobs. According opposition; it is quite hypocritical for them to now to the Clean Energy Council there are renege on that support. The Liberal-Nationals energy approximately — — and resources policy released on 23 November 2010, just four days before the election, stated that a coalition Ms Ryall — On a point of order, Deputy Speaker, I government would: fail to see how the Department of Premier and Cabinet opening regional offices has anything to do with this … consider a subsidy scheme to encourage solar, wind, fuel bill. cells and other low-emission power sources if elected … The DEPUTY SPEAKER — Order! I am not The coalition said it would look into a gross feed-in upholding the point of order because the member is tariff scheme that would pay a premium rate to actually relating her comments to the bill. households, businesses, farms and community groups for all the energy they generated, whether used on site Ms EDWARDS — I think the member is a little bit or fed into the grid, and that the Victorian Competition confused. I actually said the Mark Group has put on and Efficiency Commission would be asked to design hold plans for a massive expansion in regional Victoria. the scheme. Neither of those things has happened. The then energy spokesman and now Minister for Energy According to the Clean Energy Council there are said: approximately 3400 people employed by the Victorian solar industry. It estimates that these changes to the We think there is a lot of interest in a gross feed-in tariff as a scheme will put at risk around 1800 existing jobs in way of boosting investment in renewables. Victoria, most of them in regional areas. The premium Under this Liberal-Nationals government, just feed-in tariff was introduced by Labor to subsidise 11 months later Victoria finds itself heading backwards installation costs of rooftop solar. It was a boon for when it comes to renewable energy. This is the only regional jobs, for investment and for the environment. It clear direction we have from this government on encouraged hundreds of regional families to install renewable energy policy. solar power units and supported massive overseas investment in regional Victoria. Around 40 per cent of This bill represents the government’s decision to restrict all systems installed have been in regional areas. access to the state’s standard feed-in tariff that has been in place since 2004 for new solar panel systems What was most disappointing about the government’s generating less than 5 kilowatts, and that is a disgrace decision to reduce the feed-in tariff from 60 cents to given that those solar panel systems represent the lion’s 25 cents was the way it went about it, given that people share of installations; in fact, they represent over 90 per who had paid a deposit for a solar system or who were cent of total installations. This bill means that the in the process and waiting for inspections to be carried Victorian premium feed-in tariff will be reduced from out were given just four weeks to the end of September 60 cents per kilowatt hour to 25 cents per kilowatt hour. to have all their paperwork filled in and signed off. Leading up to this ridiculous deadline my electorate This decision was made without any consultation with office was inundated with people who found
JUSTICE LEGISLATION FURTHER AMENDMENT BILL 2011
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4891 themselves caught out by this decision. They were JUSTICE LEGISLATION FURTHER frantically trying to get their inspections done and AMENDMENT BILL 2011 trying to find the right paperwork and get it to their supplier on time. My office alone assisted a number of Statement of compatibility people by faxing their documents for them. Many of these people were pensioners who thought they were Mr CLARK (Attorney-General) tabled following doing the right thing by investing in solar panels only to statement in accordance with Charter of Human find themselves shafted by this government. The Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006: Central Victoria Solar City group located in Castlemaine had over 300 people in one week calling In accordance with section 28 of the Charter of Human Rights and asking for clarification about the cut-off date for the and Responsibilities Act 2006 (charter act), I make this statement of compatibility with respect to the Justice higher rate and for assistance to meet the government’s Legislation Further Amendment Bill 2011. deadline. People missed out on the cut-off and they are angry; they will not forget. In my opinion, the Justice Legislation Further Amendment Bill 2011, as introduced to the Legislative Assembly, is There is mounting evidence that feed-in tariffs are compatible with the human rights protected by the charter act. helping to reduce energy demand, especially when it is I base my opinion on the reasons outlined in this statement. hot and power is at its most expensive. They defer Overview of bill infrastructure spending and lower overall electricity prices, which is completely contrary to the The purpose of the bill is to amend: scaremongering of the Minister for Energy and 1. section 49(12) and 50(2) of the Major Crime Resources and others who claim that paying some (Investigative Powers) Act 2004 to extend the operation homeowners a feed-in tariff increases prices for of s 49 (Contempt of Chief Examiner) and 50 (No everybody else. This bill means that households double jeopardy) to 1 January 2016; installing smaller solar systems will now only be able to apply for the transitional 25-cent tariff that will be in 2. section 328(c) of the Criminal Procedure Act 2009 to place for five years. This effectively means that the allow police prosecutors to represent protective services officers who are informants in criminal proceedings in minister can shut down the scheme at any time. the Magistrates’ Court; and
Some households have invested around $30 000 in their 3. section 2 of the Road Safety Amendment (Hoon Driving solar system. The transitional feed-in tariff of just and Other Matters) Act 2011 to remove the default 25 cents per kilowatt hour is barely above the retail commencement date applicable to sections 11, 13, 14, price. It is unlikely that they will be able to pay off their 15, 16, 17 and 22 of that act, being provisions that are dependent upon the commencement of the system within 10 years. According to the Alternative commonwealth Personal Property Securities Act 2009. Technology Association, if there is no value for the exported electricity from their solar system after five Human rights issues years and households export half or more of their solar power, as many households do, it will be closer to 15 or Human rights protected by the charter that are relevant to 20 years before the system is paid off. the bill Clauses 3 and 4 of the bill extend the operation of sections 49 The bill reflects the Liberal-Nationals coalition and 50 of the Major Crime (Investigative Powers) Act 2004, government’s lack of commitment or even interest in which would otherwise cease on 1 January 2012. regional Victoria — in investing in regional jobs, in supporting regional families — and is a damning Section 49 prescribes the circumstances in which a person attending the chief examiner in answer to a witness summons indictment of its lack of concern or interest in investing is guilty of contempt and sets out the procedure by which a in any renewable energy in this state. This government person may be charged and detained. The provision engages has become a carbon copy of its federal mates. The bill the liberty rights in section 21 of the charter act as well as the reveals its true nature: its members are climate change criminal procedure rights in section 25. sceptics and climate change deniers, and they will stop Section 50 protects the right against double jeopardy in at nothing when it comes to putting political section 26 of the charter act by ensuring that while a person opportunism ahead of regional jobs and the may be able to be proceeded against in respect of an offence environment. Labor opposes this bill. under the act and a contempt of the chief examiner, but is not liable to be punished more than once for the same act or Debate adjourned on motion of Mr GIDLEY omission. (Mount Waverley). The proposed amendment to section 328 of the Criminal Procedure Act 2009 does not raise any issues in relation to Debate adjourned until later this day. human rights protected by the charter act.
JUSTICE LEGISLATION FURTHER AMENDMENT BILL 2011
4892 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
Liberty rights appear on behalf of a protective services officer acting Although section 49 enables detention of persons, that as the informant in criminal proceedings in the detention is compatible with the liberty rights in section 21 of Magistrates Court. The amendment is consistent with the charter act. Detention occurs in prescribed circumstances the existing section that allows a police prosecutor to and in accordance with clear procedures and cannot be appear on behalf of the informant in such proceedings regarded as arbitrary. The right to be brought promptly before where the informant is a member of the police force. a court is given effect to through the procedures set out in subsections (3) to (9). Secondly, the bill amends the Major Crime Criminal procedure rights (Investigative Powers) Act 2004 to extend the duration of the operation of contempt powers currently available Although there are questions raised in other jurisdictions as to whether and when contempt proceedings amount to a to the chief examiner where a person fails without criminal charge so as to engage the criminal procedure rights reasonable excuse to answer questions, produce in section 25 of the charter act, the provisions in the act are documents, be sworn or make an affirmation, or compatible with those rights. otherwise behave in a manner that would constitute Section 49(2) requires the chief examiner to issue a written contempt of the Supreme Court. In addition, the certificate charging the person with contempt and setting out amendment will ensure that a person who is guilty of or attaching details of the alleged contempt. This would both an offence under the act and contempt is only satisfy the right to be informed of the nature and reason for prosecuted once. the charge in section 25(2)(a) of the charter act. Although section 49 does not expressly require provision of the charge Under the current provisions, the ability of the chief to the arrested person, police officers are public authorities and would therefore be required to act compatibly with the examiner to take action against a person for contempt charter and ensure this occurs. and the protection against double jeopardy where a person is guilty of both an offence under the act and Section 49(11) provides that a certificate of charge is contempt will cease from 1 January 2012. The bill evidence of the matters set out in or attached to it. This provision engages the right to examine, or have examined, extends the sunset period in sections 49(12) and 50(2) witnesses against him or her, unless otherwise provided for by to 1 January 2016. The amendments allow the law. However, I consider the right is not limited by this continuation of the provisions to be revisited by the evidentiary provision as it does not prevent the chief examiner Parliament at a later time. from being called to give evidence and be cross-examined in the event the matters set out in or attached to the charge are Finally, the bill amends the Road Safety Amendment disputed. (Hoon Driving and Other Matters) Act 2011 to ensure Section 49(1) provides that a person is guilty of contempt if that certain provisions of that act will not come into the person fails without reasonable excuse to: produce a operation prior to the provisions of a related document or other thing; or refuse or fail to answer certain questions. This provision imposes an evidential burden only commonwealth act. on an accused to raise the possibility of a reasonable excuse. Ultimately, the burden remains on the prosecution to prove The personal property securities register is to be the offence beyond reasonable doubt. Accordingly, I consider established under the commonwealth Personal Property that the provision does not limit the right to be presumed Securities Act 2009. It represents arguably the largest innocent in section 25(1) of the charter act. reform to security interests in goods ever undertaken in Conclusion this country. The commonwealth recently advised that the commencement of the Personal Property Securities For the reasons given in this statement, I consider that the bill Act 2009 has been delayed from October 2011 to late is compatible with the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006. January 2012. There is a risk that the commencement may be delayed further still. Robert Clark, MP Attorney-General This delay has ramifications for certain, as yet unproclaimed, provisions in the Road Safety Second reading Amendment (Hoon Driving and Other Matters) Act Mr CLARK (Attorney-General) — I move: 2011, which amend the Road Safety Act 1986 and the Police Regulation Act 1958. Those amendments will, That this bill be now read a second time. when they come into force, provide that where the police are taking or have taken vehicle impoundment, The bill makes minor technical amendments to three immobilisation or forfeiture enforcement action with acts. respect to a vehicle, the Chief Commissioner of Police must lodge a notice, called a financing statement, with Firstly, the bill amends section 328 of the Criminal Procedure Act 2009 to allow a police prosecutor to
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT AMENDMENT (SCHOOLS) BILL 2011
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4893 the registrar of the commonwealth personal property or purchasing land for a school, or carrying out building work securities register. for a school or buildings ancillary to a school. This is consistent with and builds on the government’s The main purpose of the lodgement of a financing commitment to remove the requirement for non-government statement on the commonwealth register is to inform schools to pay a GAIC on land they currently own in growth any person considering purchasing the vehicle or taking areas. The bill will apply the policy to all government and a security interest in the vehicle of the enforcement non-government primary and secondary schools. action that has been taken or is pending with respect to The GAIC scheme establishes a requirement for persons the vehicle. This measure will help to protect subdividing, purchasing or undertaking building work on land consumers and security holders. in Melbourne’s growth areas to contribute to the provision of essential infrastructure in those areas. The provisions of the Road Safety Amendment (Hoon Three GAIC events trigger the imposition of a GAIC. These Driving and Other Matters) Act 2011 are currently are the issue of a statement of compliance relating to a plan of subject to a default commencement date of 1 February subdivision of land; making of an application for a building 2012. This default date was deliberately chosen to permit to carry out building work on land in the contribution ensure that the Victorian requirements will come into area; and the occurrence of a dutiable transaction relating to land in the contribution area. In each case, there are various force simultaneously with the commonwealth personal classes of actions which do not trigger GAIC. These are set property securities regime. out in the act and referred to as excluded events. The bill removes this default commencement date to The bill amends the act to make the issue of a statement of ensure that the relevant provisions of the Road Safety compliance for subdividing land solely to provide a site for a school, or making a building permit application to carry out Amendment (Hoon Driving and Other Matters) Act building work for the purpose of a school or ancillary 2011 will not commence operation until the buildings, excluded GAIC events. commonwealth personal property securities register commences operation. Human rights issues The bill does not engage any human rights protected by the I commend the bill to the house. charter act.
Debate adjourned on motion of Mr WYNNE Conclusion (Richmond). I consider that the bill is compatible with the charter act because it does not engage any human rights protected by the Debate adjourned until Wednesday, 9 November. charter act.
Robert Clark, MP PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT Attorney-General AMENDMENT (SCHOOLS) BILL 2011 Second reading Statement of compatibility Mr CLARK (Attorney-General) — I move:
Mr CLARK (Attorney-General) tabled following That this bill be now read a second time. statement in accordance with Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006: The purpose of this bill is to amend the Planning and Environment Act 1987 (the act) to implement a In accordance with section 28 of the Charter of Human Rights government election promise to remove the and Responsibilities Act 2006 (charter act), I make this statement of compatibility with respect to the Planning and requirement for non-government schools to pay a Environment Amendment (Schools) Bill 2011. growth areas infrastructure contribution, commonly referred to as GAIC, on land they currently own in In my opinion, the Planning and Environment Amendment growth areas. This bill implements the government’s (Schools) Bill 2011, as introduced to the Legislative Assembly, is compatible with the human rights protected by commitment to ensure a non-discriminatory approach the charter act. I base my opinion on the reasons outlined in between government and non-government school this statement. providers, and to ensure that any person or body establishing or expanding a school in a growth area will Overview of bill not be required to pay GAIC. The purpose of the Planning and Environment Amendment (Schools) Bill 2011 (the bill) is to amend the Planning and The GAIC scheme establishes a requirement for Environment Act 1987 (the act) to ensure that a person or persons subdividing, purchasing or undertaking organisation is not required to pay a growth areas building work on land in Melbourne’s growth areas to infrastructure contribution (GAIC) in respect of subdividing
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT AMENDMENT (SCHOOLS) BILL 2011
4894 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011 pay to the state a contribution toward providing this term has the meaning that it has in the Building Act essential infrastructure for urban development in 1993. growth areas. This is separate from any requirement to pay a contribution toward local infrastructure under a Clause 4 of the bill amends section 201RF of the act, development contribution plan incorporated in a which sets out classes of excluded subdivisions of land planning scheme. that are not GAIC events. It adds an additional class of excluded subdivision — the subdivision of land solely A GAIC is a once-only charge. It is imposed when the for the purpose of creating a site for an existing or first GAIC event occurs in relation to land in a proposed school. A subdivision solely to provide land contribution area, unless the person liable to pay the for transport infrastructure or any other public purpose GAIC is exempted from the liability. If an exemption is already an excluded subdivision, which means that a applies, a GAIC is imposed in respect of the next GAIC subdivision solely to provide a site for a government event that occurs. school is not a GAIC event. It is inequitable that an equivalent subdivision solely to provide a site for a Three GAIC events trigger the imposition of a GAIC non-government school is a GAIC event. The bill (section 201RA of the act). These are the issue of a remedies this by inserting a specific exclusion that statement of compliance relating to a plan of applies to all schools. subdivision of land in the contribution area; making an application for a building permit to carry out building Clause 5 of the bill amends section 201RG of the act, work on land in the contribution area; and the which sets out excluded building work. Currently there occurrence of a dutiable transaction relating to land in are no excluded events which would cover all building the contribution area. In each case, there are various work for a school. The effect of the proposed classes of actions which do not trigger GAIC. These are amendment will be that building work to construct, set out in the act and referred to as excluded events. modify or extend any building for the purpose of a school or which is ancillary to a school will not be a In addition to excluded events, section 201TB of the act GAIC event. This could include a multipurpose hall or provides that no GAIC is payable in respect of a recreation building, a place of worship, or a preschool dutiable transaction relating to land if duty would not be centre, all of which could be seen as part of an chargeable under specified provisions of the Duties Act integrated school complex. The key point is that the 2000. These include section 45, which provides that no building must be ancillary to a school existing on the duty is chargeable in respect of a transfer of dutiable site. property to, or a declaration of trust over dutiable property to be held in trust for, a religious, charitable or The bill does not include any provisions relating to educational purpose, or a corporation or body of GAIC charges that have already been imposed on land persons established for a religious, charitable or to be developed for a school. These may be effectively educational purpose. The State Revenue Office has built into the cost of a school site which may, for advised that section 45 of the Duties Act 2000 applies example, be purchased as part of a comprehensive to the transfer of dutiable property to a school, or to the development estate. Addressing this issue will be relevant minister for school purposes. Therefore no complex. Rather than delay action on remedying the provision is required in this bill to exempt the purchase specific problem referred to in the government’s of land by school providers from triggering GAIC. election policy, this matter will be addressed after further consideration. The bill amends the act to make subdividing land solely to provide a site for a school, or making a building The important point is that as a result of the changes permit application to carry out building work for the implemented by this bill, no school provider will be purpose of a school or ancillary buildings, excluded required to pay a GAIC as a result of any action taken GAIC events. directly to subdivide land solely to provide a site for a school, purchase a site for a school, or obtain a building I will now refer to the key provisions of the bill. permit for any building work to establish, expand or Clause 3 of the bill defines a school in terms of the improve a school. Education and Training Reform Act 2006. The new exclusions will apply to primary schools and secondary I commend the bill to the house. schools, not to preschool or tertiary education facilities. The clause also inserts a definition of construction to Debate adjourned on motion of Mr WYNNE make it clear that for the purposes of part 9B of the act, (Richmond). Debate adjourned until Wednesday, 9 November.
LIQUOR CONTROL REFORM FURTHER AMENDMENT BILL 2011
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4895
Business interrupted pursuant to sessional orders. demerit points, and will receive demerits where nominated offences occur. The accrual of demerit points will lead to Sitting continued on motion of Mr O’BRIEN automatic suspension, and the suspensions are not reviewable or appealable. These amendments therefore engage the right (Minister for Gaming). to a fair hearing.
Section 24 of the charter act provides that a person charged LIQUOR CONTROL REFORM FURTHER with a criminal offence or a party to a civil proceeding has the right to have the charge or proceeding decided by a AMENDMENT BILL 2011 competent, independent and impartial court or tribunal after a fair and public hearing. This right has been interpreted as Statement of compatibility encompassing proceedings which are determinative of private rights and interests in the broad sense, including Mr O’BRIEN (Minister for Consumer Affairs) administrative proceedings. tabled following statement in accordance with Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act Under the Infringements Act 2006, individual convictions and infringements can be appealed, including the nominated 2006: offences that will lead to demerit points under the principal act once amended. As such, licensees have an opportunity to In accordance with section 28 of the Charter of Human Rights a fair hearing in each instance that a conviction or and Responsibilities Act 2006 (charter act), I make this infringement is received. Further, the responsible minister statement of compatibility with respect to the Liquor Control will have the power to change (delay or shorten) or cancel a Reform Further Amendment Bill 2011. suspension in exceptional circumstances. ‘Exceptional circumstances’ is defined broadly to provide the minister with In my opinion, the Liquor Control Reform Further the power to change a suspension when the benefits of the Amendment Bill 2011 (the bill), as introduced to the suspension are outweighed by the costs to the community. Legislative Assembly, is compatible with the human rights Licensees are able to seek the minister’s consideration of protected by the charter act. I base my opinion on the reasons exceptional circumstances at the time at which they were outlined in this statement. notified of an upcoming suspension. Should the minister require, the suspension will be able to be delayed until the Overview of bill minister has determined whether it is to be changed in any The purpose of the bill is to amend the Liquor Control way. Reform Act 1998 (the principal act) to: Accordingly, I consider that the suspension provisions in the a. introduce a 5-star rating system that will reward bill are compatible with the right to a fair hearing in responsible liquor licensees with discounts on their section 24 of the charter act. annual liquor licensing renewal fees; Conclusion b. introduce a demerit points system applicable to liquor For the reasons given in this statement, I consider that the bill licensees where demerit points are incurred for is compatible with the Charter of Human Rights and nominated offences, and once a demerit point threshold Responsibilities. is met the licence will be automatically suspended for a set period of time; Michael O’Brien, MP Minister for Consumer Affairs c. introduce a new category of licence for wine and beer producers to simplify and modernise the existing Second reading regulatory regime for vignerons;
d. reflect in the objects of the act the importance of live Mr O’BRIEN (Minister for Consumer Affairs) — I music to the hospitality industry and the broader move: community; That this bill be now read a second time. e. ensure that licensees that exclusively supply packaged liquor obtain a packaged liquor licence; and This bill amends the Liquor Control Reform Act 1998 to fulfil a number of the government’s election f. make a number of other minor and technical commitments made in the Victorian Liberal Nationals amendments. Coalition Plan for Liquor Licensing. This is the second The bill also makes a consequential amendment to the tranche of election promises being implemented by the Infringements Act 2006. Baillieu government in regard to liquor, following the commencement of new secondary supply laws in Human rights issues August this year, and the introduction of new powers Fair hearing rights and tougher fines to combat public drunkenness and maintain public order in October. The bill introduces a star rating and demerit points system for licensees and permittees. Licensees and permittees will receive a discount off their renewal fees where they have no
LIQUOR CONTROL REFORM FURTHER AMENDMENT BILL 2011
4896 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
This bill will bring about some significant Under the demerit points system, liquor licences will be enhancements to the Liquor Control Reform Act 1998, automatically suspended when a venue accumulates including introducing a 5-star rating and demerit points sufficient demerit points. system for liquor licensees that will reward responsible licensees and penalise those that repeatedly do the Demerit points will be applied for ‘non-compliance wrong thing. incidents’, which are defined as paid infringements, successful prosecutions and infringements that are It will replace the outdated vigneron’s licence with a unpaid and in respect of which enforcement orders have new wine and beer producer’s licence that is more been issued, for the same relevant offences that apply to flexible and representative of modern Victorian winery the 5-star rating system. One non-compliance incident and brewery businesses. will incur one demerit point.
Further, the bill will recognise the important role the There will be three suspension thresholds. Five demerit live music industry plays in the hospitality industry and points within a three-year period will lead to a 24-hour the broader community, and will address an inequality suspension; 10 demerit points will lead to a 7-day in the way packaged liquor outlets are regulated by suspension; and 15 demerit points will lead to a 28-day ensuring that licensees that exclusively sell packaged suspension. liquor have a packaged liquor licence. Finally, the bill makes a range of minor and technical amendments that The bill provides that the Victorian Commission for will improve the operation of the Liquor Control Gambling and Liquor Regulation must maintain a Reform Act 1998. demerits register, which must record details of demerit points. The commission will be required to notify a Five-star rating and demerit points system licensee or permittee within a certain period of time when a demerit point has accrued in relation to their The bill establishes a 5-star rating and demerit points licence, and when a suspension of the licence is system, which will reward licensees who behave pending. The commission may publish on its website responsibly and penalise those who repeatedly do the details associated with a licence, including the star wrong thing. rating and demerit point level of all licences.
Under the 5-star rating system, licensees will receive The bill also provides an equitable framework to enable discounts on their annual licence fees if they the commission to calculate on what date a suspension consistently obey relevant liquor laws. All licensees is to take place. The suspension must commence either will commence at a 3-star rating. Once the scheme is on the same day of the week as the day that the established, 3-star rated licensees will move to a 4-star non-compliance incident occurred that resulted in the rating if they have not committed any relevant latest demerit point being recorded; or, if the last infringements in the previous 24 months. If they non-compliance incident occurred between 12.01 a.m. continue to comply with liquor laws, they will move to and 7.00 a.m., the suspension must begin on the same a 5-star rating 12 months later. However, if a licensee day of the week as the previous day that the incident subsequently commits a relevant offence, they will lose occurred. For example, if the demerit point occurred at the higher star rating and will no longer qualify for the 2.00 a.m. on a Sunday, the suspension must begin on a fee discount. Saturday.
The ‘relevant offences’ are those under sections 108(4), Further, the suspension must begin on a day no less 119 or 120 of the Liquor Control Reform Act 1998. than 14 days after the date of the notice being provided These offences relate to the presence on licensed to the licensee or permittee, and no more than 60 days premises, and service of, minors and intoxicated after the date that the latest demerit point was recorded patrons. They are the same offences that underpin the on the demerits register. existing compliance history risk fee. The minister will have a power to delay, cancel or The details of the 5-star rating system are not contained shorten a suspension in cases in which he considers that in the bill. Rather, the bill creates a new the cost to the community of the suspension would regulation-making power so that the details of the 5-star outweigh the benefits. Where a suspension is cancelled rating scheme can be prescribed in the Liquor Control or reduced, alternative enforcement action will be Reform Regulations 2009. explored for that licensee.
If a licence or permit that has accrued demerit points has been transferred to another person under section 32
LIQUOR CONTROL REFORM FURTHER AMENDMENT BILL 2011
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4897 of the Liquor Control Reform Act 1998, the new where tourists travelling through Wangaratta can licensee or permittee may apply to the commission to sample the winery’s product and purchase sealed remove any demerit points from the demerits register bottles to take home. These activities will all now be accrued before the transfer. There will be a fee in captured by the new licence. relation to this application, and the bill sets out a number of factors that the commission may consider in The wine and beer producer’s licence also provides for making its decision. an optional authorisation to be included on the licence that will permit the licensee to attend an unlimited Wine and beer producer’s licence number of promotional events, at which the licensee’s product is authorised to be supplied for consumption by The bill will introduce a new wine and beer producer’s the glass at the event or in sealed bottles to take away. licence to replace the existing vigneron’s licence. The This optional authorisation allows wineries and vigneron’s licence is viewed as being too restrictive and breweries to attend events to promote their product complex by industry, is not sufficiently flexible to under the same licence that authorises the range of cover all the activities undertaken by a modern winery, other activities undertaken at the licensed premises. and does not cater for breweries at all. This has resulted This innovation removes the burden for licensees of in some wineries and breweries, most of which are needing to apply for a temporary limited licence each small businesses, often being required to obtain several time they wish to attend a promotional event, saving the licences and as a result incur multiple fees and licensee time and money. The annual cost of the significant administrative burden. additional authorisation is the same as the cost of one temporary limited licence. Licensees that have obtained The new wine and beer producer’s licence will the authorisation will be able to attend all events other authorise wine and beer producers to supply the than major events (as defined in the act) and licensee’s own product to any other licensee, the horseracing events. licensee’s own product from the licensed premises for off-premises consumption, any liquor from the licensed The new licence is designed for producers of wine, premises for on-premises consumption (for example, at cider, brandy, perry and beer, in particular small a restaurant or function centre) and the licensee’s own businesses, who produce a product that is uniquely product by way of email, telephone, facsimile theirs. As such, in the case of wine, cider, brandy and transmission, internet or other electronic perry, the eligible producers will either grow their own communication. fruit and produce the product themselves; grow their own fruit but have financial responsibility for someone Supply of liquor under the wine and beer producer’s else producing the product; purchase fruit grown in licence will be authorised from two premises: a primary Australia from someone else and produce the product premises and a retail premises. The primary premises themselves; or purchase fruit grown in Australia from will be the premises used by the licensee for the someone else and have financial responsibility for production, storage or distribution of liquor that is the someone else producing the product. In the case of licensee’s product. At the primary premises, all beer, the product must be brewed by or at the direction activities under the licence are authorised to take place. of the licensee and the licensee assumes the financial The retail premises, on the other hand, is designed for risk. In all circumstances, the product must be uniquely those wineries and breweries that have a retail outlet the licensee’s own. that is in a different location from their primary winery or brewery site. The retail premises must be within the The bill sets out transitional provisions for existing same wine growing region as the production premises, vigneron’s licence-holders to automatically transfer to and the only form of supply authorised here is the the new wine and beer producer’s licence. It also allows supply of the licensee’s own product for off-premises for producers that currently hold another type or types consumption. That is, at the retail premises only of licence to choose to transfer to the new licence if tastings and take-away sales are permitted. An example they are eligible and wish to do so. Licensees in either is a winery 5 kilometres out of Wangaratta. This of these scenarios that currently have more than one premises is where the winery has its vineyard and licence will have the opportunity to effectively where the production facilities are situated. Also at this consolidate these licences into one. The transitional site, the winery has a storage facility from which it fills provisions in the bill provide that holders of other internet orders, a restaurant and a warehouse where licences will have 12 months from the date of bottle shops can purchase the licensee’s product commencement to transition to the new licence without wholesale. However, this winery also has a cellar door needing to pay a variation fee or being subject to in the Wangaratta town centre. This retail outlet is planning approval or display requirements. After that
MINES (ALUMINIUM AGREEMENT) AMENDMENT BILL 2011
4898 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011 date, eligible licence-holders remain able to transfer to Minor and technical amendments the new licence, but will be required to pay the requisite licence variation fee and will need to comply with the The bill also includes a number of minor and technical planning and display requirements as per any variation amendments to improve the operation of the act. of licence category under the act. In switching to the new licence during the transition period, the conditions For example, the bill will clarify that the directors of a a licensee currently has on their licence will be body corporate which holds a licence are liable as if replicated on the new licence. This is so there is not a they were the licensee. An equivalent amendment will need for the licensee to seek further planning be made in relation to the members of the committee of permission to undertake new activities, making the management of an unincorporated club that holds a transition process a simple and seamless one for licence. licensees. In addition, the bill will provide the commission with Live music discretion to decide whether to grant a licence to premises that are intended by the occupier of the The bill amends the objects of the act to recognise the premises to be primarily used by people under the age role of live music in licensed venues as a valued part of of 18 years. This amendment will allow the the hospitality and entertainment industries. Live music commission to grant a licence to premises that are for is an important part of the social and cultural fabric of the most part used by people under the age of 18 years our state. Many of our greatest musical talents have but on some occasions have a legitimate reason for honed their craft in the pubs and bars and lounges of seeking a licence, such as schools or junior sporting Victoria. The existence of a variety of live music clubs that seek a licence for fundraising events venues is critical to nurturing young musical talent. involving parents or other adult supporters. Live music also provides an important economic benefit for Victoria, with many people employed The bill will clarify that a packaged liquor licence and a directly and indirectly in the industry. It is important late night (packaged liquor) licence may authorise that liquor licensing law reflects the economic and trading on Christmas Day and/or Good Friday. This social contribution of live music to Victoria. power was unintentionally removed following amendments to the act that commenced on 1 January Amending the objects of the act will reflect the 2010. The amendment will also validate any decision significance of live music to the hospitality industry and made by the commission or the former director of the wider community and ensure that live music is an liquor licensing since 1 January 2010 that relied on this ongoing consideration across all liquor licensing power. decisions. I commend the bill to the house. Packaged liquor Debate adjourned on motion of Ms NEVILLE Under existing licensing arrangements, a general (Bellarine). licensee may exclusively supply packaged liquor, ostensibly operating a bottle shop while avoiding the Debate adjourned until Wednesday, 9 November. higher fee and additional regulatory requirements of a packaged liquor licence. Accordingly, general licensees MINES (ALUMINIUM AGREEMENT) trading in this way attract an unfair competitive AMENDMENT BILL 2011 advantage over packaged liquor licensees. Statement of compatibility The bill addresses this anomaly by prohibiting the exclusive supply of packaged liquor under a general Mr O’BRIEN (Minister for Energy and Resources) licence. As a result, licensees operating a typical bottle tabled following statement in accordance with shop will have to obtain a packaged liquor licence and Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act adhere to the same requirements as other comparable 2006: licensed premises. This amendment will prevent instances of this inequity arising in future and will In accordance with section 28 of the Charter of Human Rights establish a more even playing field amongst packaged and Responsibilities Act 2006 (charter act), I make this statement of compatibility with respect to the Mines liquor outlets. (Aluminium Agreement) Amendment Bill 2011.
In my opinion, the Mines (Aluminium Agreement) Amendment Bill 2011 (the bill), as introduced to the
MINES (ALUMINIUM AGREEMENT) AMENDMENT BILL 2011
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4899
Legislative Assembly, is compatible with the human rights The agreement was validated by the Mines (Aluminium protected by the charter act. I base my opinion on the reasons Agreement) Act 1961. The agreement gives Alcoa the outlined in this statement. right to mine coal in the leased area. Overview of bill It was an important agreement in its day and continues The purpose of this bill is to amend the Mines (Aluminium to be so today because the government is committed to Agreement) Act 1961 (the act). The amendments to the act are of a minor and technical nature. The bill also enables the the responsible development of Victoria’s natural Minister for Energy and Resources (the minister) to authorise resources, and to attracting more jobs and investment to the acquisition of an interest in land by Alcoa of Australia Pty our state in the minerals and resources sector. Ltd. This bill will further that commitment. It will amend the Human rights issues mines aluminium agreement and make a series of Property rights amendments to the Mines (Aluminium Agreement) Act 1961. Clause 11 of the bill inserts a new section 7A into the act, enabling the minister to authorise the compulsory purchase of The bill ratifies, validates and approves the mines an interest in land. aluminium agreement entered into by Alcoa and the Section 20 of the charter act provides that a person must not state in 1961 by amending and restating the agreement. be deprived of their property other than in accordance with It reflects the extension of the agreement for a further the law. This means that any law that deprives a person of term of 50 years, a legal option provided to Alcoa by their property must be sufficiently precise, accessible and should not allow arbitrary interference with property. the 1961 agreement and which Alcoa advised the state of Victoria in 2008 that it is exercising. The terms set Clause 11 of the bill provides that the Land Acquisition and out in the amended agreement reflect the willing Compensation Act 1986 (land acquisition act) will apply to negotiations undertaken by both parties to achieve the acquisition of interests in land under the bill. Acquisition of land under the land acquisition act gives rise to a right to long-term benefits for the regional community, the compensation on just terms. Parties with an interest in the economy of Victoria, Alcoa’s ongoing operations in land to be acquired may dispute any offer of compensation, this state and significantly improved environmental and disputed compensation claims may be submitted for outcomes. review by the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal or the Supreme Court of Victoria. Furthermore, the land Alcoa makes a significant contribution to the Victorian acquisition act sets out clear notification requirements and procedures for acquisition and the lawfulness of an economy, including annual sales of $1.6 billion and acquisition may be challenged through judicial review. expenditure of $770 million. It also employs Authorisation to acquire land will thus only be given as the approximately 1550 people and 250 contractors. result of a detailed and transparent statutory process involving the consideration of the rights and interests of all affected New definitions parties.
Accordingly, there is no limitation of the property right under The amendment agreement updates the plan of the section 20 of the charter act, because any deprivation of lease area to correlate with the definitions of ‘leased property would be in accordance with law. area’, ‘freehold land’, ‘purchased land’ and ‘prior land’ and a copy of the plan will be lodged with the Central Conclusion Plan Office and accessible to the public. The For the reasons given in this statement, I consider that the bill amendment agreement amends the definitions of ‘prior is compatible with the charter act. land’ and ‘purchased land’ to provide clarity on Michael O’Brien, MP descriptions of these areas of land which are subject to Minister for Energy and Resources the agreement. These definitions refer to parcels of land within the boundary of or adjacent to the leased area Second reading that Alcoa owns. These definitions are largely of historical significance only. The definition of ‘specified Mr O’BRIEN (Minister for Energy and area’ used in the agreement is a new term introduced Resources) — I move: into the agreement which refers to the specific area That this bill be now read a second time. where mining operations are authorised under the deemed approved work plan and any area which has On 22 November 1961, the state and Alcoa entered into been the subject of an approved mine extension plan. a 50-year agreement supporting the development of the Point Henry aluminium smelter and the operation of the power station and associated coal mine at Anglesea.
MINES (ALUMINIUM AGREEMENT) AMENDMENT BILL 2011
4900 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
Application of the Mineral Resources (Sustainable mine operation. The 1961 agreement provides only Development) Act 1990 limited references to environmental issues in relation to the operations of the mine and does not outline any Alcoa’s mining operations on the leased area will now systematic and comprehensive approach to the be regulated by the Mineral Resources (Sustainable management of environmental issues. Development) Act 1990, with the exception of that act’s rent and royalties, and compensation regimes. Mining operations to 2016 will occur within the current This will bring the Alcoa mine largely into line with the detailed mining area and include removing overburden compliance requirements that apply to all other coal (the removal of soil, lying above the coal resource) and mines in Victoria and provide for a clear and the underlying coal for approximately 10 hectares of transparent regulatory regime that was not evident land. Beyond 2016, the proposed mining operations under the 1961 agreement. outlined in the work plan extend beyond the current mining area into 246 hectares of the adjacent land in Key benefits that derive from the adoption of this stages which provide for progressive mining and regulatory regime include the requirement for a work rehabilitation over the next 50 years. This means that plan which now provides a transparent outline of the the work plan provides for increased mining operations work to be undertaken in the next 50 years within the over the next 50 years in 246 hectares of the total leased specified area. Future mining proposals that seek to area of 7145 hectares, or 3.4 per cent. This adjacent mine coal outside the specified area will attract the land is currently the subject of a separate cooperative variation to work plan processes under the Mineral agreement between Alcoa and the Department of Resources (Sustainable Development) Act 1990 for the Sustainability and Environment that provides for the review of operational and environmental issues. protection and management of the Anglesea Heath.
The application of the rehabilitation provisions ensures Alcoa has established an environment management that Alcoa must provide a significant rehabilitation system which includes an environmental policy and bond and develop a rehabilitation plan to ensure that the plans and management programs to ensure that land is properly rehabilitated after mining work has activities at Anglesea are managed to minimise impacts been completed. on the environment. The work plan also includes a mine rehabilitation and closure plan and an The powers of the state to ensure Alcoa’s compliance environmental management plan that addresses water with the deemed work plan are strengthened by the management, hydrocarbon and waste management, adoption of the Mineral Resources (Sustainable dust and noise control and provides for the preparation Development) Act 1990 as inspectors under the act of a regular environment improvement plan. The have powers of entry, seizure, to give directions, and to community engagement plan outlines a process for execute warrants. Inspectors can also issue identifying community issues and documentation of infringement notices and order Alcoa to cease work. No stakeholder engagement. such powers were available to the state under the 1961 agreement. Victoria’s native vegetation management framework for action applies to mines established since the Compensation introduction of the framework in 2002. As the Alcoa Alcoa’s obligations to pay compensation to the owner, Anglesea mine predates the framework, it does not occupier or lessee from the Crown of any adjoining apply to Alcoa’s current mining operations. land, in respect of any damage caused by Alcoa under Accordingly, Alcoa has no legal obligation to comply the agreement have been retained in preference to the with the framework in the work plan endorsed by the compensation scheme under the Mineral Resources Department of Primary Industries for the next 50 years (Sustainable Development) Act 1990. Alcoa regards the of mining activity. However, the maintenance of the latter provisions as involving a significant and Anglesea Heath area (outside the specified area to unquantifiable risk, compared to its existing which the work plan applies) by Alcoa provides an obligations. implicit offset to the mining operations within the specified area. Further, if Alcoa decides to undertake Management of environmental impacts and the work outside the specified area, then Alcoa will be Anglesea Heath required to comply with native vegetation offsets.
The new agreement provides for a new clause 21D to Clause 21D will give Alcoa and the community outline a process for the assessment of additional certainty as to how additional significant environmental significant environmental impacts beyond the current impacts will be assessed and provides the Victorian
MINES (ALUMINIUM AGREEMENT) AMENDMENT BILL 2011
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4901 government and community with a transparent process definition of this term when the amendment agreement that has not previously existed under the 1961 comes into effect. In order to overcome this problem, agreement. the term will be defined as having the meaning that it had in the act immediately before the commencement The process in clause 21D is modelled on an of the bill so that the current definition is effectively environmental assessment process applied to mine preserved. The bill also updates legislative references to expansions under section 42A of the Mineral Resources other acts and deletes provisions that are no longer (Sustainable Development) Act 1990 where planning applicable. permits are not required for some work variations. In a broader context, this process will form part of a wider The bill makes it clear that the Occupational Health and assessment undertaken by the Department of Primary Safety Act 2004 applies to Alcoa’s Anglesea mining Industries in relation to Alcoa’s work plan to assess all operations in the same manner that the act applies to all the implications of the mine expansion proposal other mines in Victoria. There has been some consistent with the approach adopted for all other mines uncertainty about the status of the Anglesea mine in the in Victoria. past because the term ‘mine’ in the relevant occupational health and safety regulations was A key element of the proposed process is that it previously defined as a place at which work is done provides for interdepartmental consultation regarding under a mining licence granted under the Mineral the potential for additional significant environmental Resources (Sustainable Development) Act 1990. Alcoa impacts of any proposed future mine expansion. The does not have a mining licence under the act as its right outcome of this preliminary consultation is to provide to mine is conferred by the agreement. This amendment feedback to Alcoa and enable refinement of a proposal to the agreement ensures that consistent obligations are for a mine extension including its environmental imposed on the Alcoa Anglesea operation to protect the management. Advice must also be sought from the health and safety of all workers. minister responsible for the Environment Effects Act 1978 concerning the proposal. If this advice confirms The bill gives effect to clauses 21A and 21B of the potential for additional significant environmental agreement. Clause 21A provides that the work plan impacts, the process provides for the Minister for prepared by Alcoa and endorsed by the Department of Planning to require Alcoa to prepare an environmental Primary Industries is deemed to be an approved work impact and management report. This report and related plan under the Mines (Aluminium Agreement) consultation together with relevant expert advice would Act 1961 and that Alcoa is also deemed to have a work underpin an assessment of the proposal by the Minister authority. Deeming an agreed work plan to exist at the for Planning. commencement of the agreement balances the state’s objective of ensuring that the Mineral Resources The assessment also informs a decision on the mine (Sustainable Development) Act 1990 applies to Alcoa’s extension proposal and conditions that might be future mining operations, while giving Alcoa adequate imposed in the work plan other than conditions that are certainty that its existing right to mine under the inconsistent with the company’s rights under the agreement is maintained and the validity of such rights agreement. is not disturbed. This also forms the basis for the environmental review process to apply to the specified As part of the broader environmental management area to which the work plan applies. strategy of which the mines aluminium agreement is a part, Alcoa has also agreed to review the Anglesea Clause 21B provides that for the avoidance of doubt the Heath Cooperative Land Management Agreement 2000 Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006 applies as far as which focuses on the management of the Anglesea reasonably practicable to Alcoa’s Anglesea mining Heath in the area not being mined by Alcoa. operations. Clause 21B makes a clear statement regarding the value of indigenous cultural heritage to Technical and other amendments the state of Victoria and the bill requires Alcoa to The bill also makes a number of technical amendments. prepare a cultural heritage management plan before any For example, the bill amends the Mines (Aluminium mining activity authorised by the work plan is Agreement) Act 1961 to include a new definition of the undertaken except where the area has been subject to term ‘reserve area’. This term is currently used in previous significant ground disturbance. section 5 and section 6 of the act, and is defined by The bill also includes a new section 7A in the principal reference to the definition included in the agreement. act that enables Alcoa to apply to the minister for However, the agreement will no longer include a approval to compulsorily acquire an interest in land for
STATE TAXATION ACTS FURTHER AMENDMENT BILL 2011
4902 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011 the purposes of the agreement. This provision has been STATE TAXATION ACTS FURTHER inserted to preserve Alcoa’s existing rights under the AMENDMENT BILL 2011 agreement. The agreement currently refers to powers of compulsory acquisition contained in section 26 of the Statement of compatibility State Electricity Commission Act 1958. That section has been repealed, and the new section 7A of the Mr WELLS (Treasurer) tabled following statement principal act effectively replicates what was previously in accordance with Charter of Human Rights and in section 26 of the State Electricity Commission Responsibilities Act 2006: Act 1958. In accordance with section 28 of the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (charter act), I table a statement The bill also repeals the Mines (Aluminium of compatibility for the State Taxation Acts Further Agreement) (Brown Coal Royalties) Act 2005 which Amendment Bill 2011 (the bill). has never come into operation. This act was passed by the Parliament on the understanding that it would not In my opinion, the bill, as introduced to the Legislative Assembly, is compatible with the human rights protected by come into operation without Alcoa’s agreement being the charter act. I base my opinion on the reasons outlined in obtained to amendments that sought to increase the this statement. royalties paid commensurate with the royalties paid by the other coal mines in Victoria. Alcoa has never Overview of bill agreed to an increase in royalties for the coal resource The purpose of this bill is to amend the Duties Act 2000 removed from the Anglesea mine. The negotiations to (duties act), the Land Tax Act 2005 (land tax act), the extend the current agreement resulted in the current Livestock Disease Control Act 1994 (livestock act), the royalty rate remaining unchanged, unless Alcoa uses Taxation Administration Act 1997 (TA act), the Payroll Tax Act 2007(payroll tax act) and Valuation of Land Act 1960 coal mined from the leased area to generate electricity (VL act). These amendments are aimed at clarifying the at a time when it is no longer operating its aluminium operation of Victoria’s revenue laws and maintaining their smelters at either Point Henry or Portland. If that currency to produce better outcomes for taxpayers. happens, then the royalty rates under the Mineral The duties act is amended to clarify the starting point for Resources (Sustainable Development) Act 1990 will calculating the eligible pensioner exemption and concession apply. In return for the royalty rate remaining from duty to ensure that the same level of benefit is available unchanged, the state has secured Alcoa’s acceptance for ‘off the plan’ purchasers and owner builders and to reduce that the mine will be subject to regulation under the the time period for the paying duty from 90 to 30 days. Mineral Resources (Sustainable Development) The primary production land exemption in the land tax act is Act 1990 which includes a significant rehabilitation amended to ease the eligibility criteria for land which cannot bond, and the application of a significant environmental be used for urban development, and clarify the application of impacts review process for future mine expansions. the exemption in respect of land owned by trusts, corporate trustees, and joint owners. The land tax act is also amended to The agreement and bill will provide a legal framework deem the manager of titles based time-sharing schemes to be the owner of the land for land tax purposes. for the future development of coal resources at Anglesea that will contribute to the economy of The payroll tax act is amended to limit the payroll tax Victoria and provide for significantly improved exemption for charities to wages paid for work, which environmental and socially sustainable development supports the charitable purposes of those organisations, and clarifies the application of the maternity and adoption leave including for our rural and regional communities. exemption in relation to part-time employees. Through the agreement, and the application of the Mineral Resources (Sustainable Development) Consequential amendments are made to the TA act and land Act 1990, the regulatory framework that applies to tax act in response to changes to the VL act, which give municipal councils the option to transfer to the valuer-general mining operations in Victoria will now complete its their responsibility for completing rating authority valuations. coverage to provide a consistent regulatory framework A number of minor technical amendments to the VL act are for all coal mines in Victoria. also made by this bill.
The bill reflects the government’s ongoing commitment Finally, the TA act and livestock act are amended to provide for the administration and enforcement of livestock duty to the sustainable development of Victoria’s mineral under the TA act. resources. 1. Human rights protected by the charter that are I commend the bill to the house. relevant to the bill
Debate adjourned on motion of Ms NEVILLE This bill engages the following human rights protected under (Bellarine). the charter act: right to privacy and reputation; and Debate adjourned until Wednesday, 9 November. recognition and equality before the law.
STATE TAXATION ACTS FURTHER AMENDMENT BILL 2011
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4903
The impact of the bill upon each of these rights is discussed in (a) What is the nature of the right being limited? turn below. The prohibition on discrimination is one of the cornerstones Right to privacy and reputation of human rights instruments and this is reflected in the preamble to the charter act. However, as with all rights Section 13(a) of the charter act provides that a person has the protected by the charter act, the section 8 right to equality right not to have his or her privacy, family, home or before the law may be subject to reasonable limitations, correspondence unlawfully or arbitrarily interfered with. pursuant to section 7 of the charter act.
Clause 46 of this bill provides that the secretary of the (b) What is the importance of the purpose of the limitation? Department of Primary Industries may disclose information obtained in relation to the administration of livestock duty to The purpose of this limitation is to reduce the cost of the commissioner of state revenue. downsizing for self-funded retirees. This limitation is important to ensure that older Victorians can access suitable This information will generally relate to livestock agents or accommodation within the communities in which they have farming enterprises, which are not protected by the charter formed connections and attachments, where they may not act. These provisions could nevertheless engage the right otherwise have been able to afford to do so. under section 13 of the charter act where the information relates to individuals carrying on these businesses as sole (c) What is the nature and extent of the limitation? traders. Holders of a commonwealth seniors card are entitled to a duty However, to the extent that this provision interferes with concession resulting in less duty being payable on the privacy, I consider that the interference is neither arbitrary nor purchase of a principle place of residence. However, the unlawful. The circumstances in which the information can be exemption or concession is available only once in a person’s disclosed, are limited and clearly set out in the bill. The lifetime, and access to the benefit is subject to a number of provision is not arbitrary because it ensures that the other eligibility criteria, including that the property purchased commissioner can administer and enforce livestock duty, must not exceed $750 000. thereby protecting the integrity of the funds used to pay compensation to farmers when livestock dies, or is ordered to (d) What is the relationship between the limitation and its be destroyed, on the outbreak of disease. purpose?
I therefore consider that these provisions do not limit the right There is a direct relationship between the limitation and the to privacy. purpose of assisting self-funded retirees living within restricted means to downsize their homes whilst remaining in Recognition and equality before the law the communities that they have lived in during their working lives. It is expected that this will contribute to their quality of Section 8(3) of the charter act provides that every person is life and the transition into retirement. equal before the law and is entitled to equal protection of the law without discrimination. Discrimination, in relation to a (e) Are there any less restrictive means reasonably person, means discrimination within the meaning of the Equal available to achieve its purpose? Opportunity Act 1995 on the basis of an attribute set out in section 6 of that act. There is no less restrictive means available.
Clause 26 of this bill clarifies the starting point for calculating For these reasons, I consider the limitation on section 8 of the pensioner concession from duty. The concession applies charter to be ‘reasonable’ in the circumstances. to reduce the duty payable by ‘eligible pensioners’ on the purchase of a principal place of residence. The pensioner Conclusion concession is available to certain concession card holders including holders of the commonwealth seniors health card I consider that the bill is compatible with the charter act. issued under the Social Security Act 1991 (cth). Qualification for the commonwealth seniors health card is dependent upon Kim Wells, MP a person’s age. ‘Age’ is a specified attribute under section 6 Treasurer of the Equal Opportunity Act 1995. Therefore, this amendment engages section 8 because it amends a law that Second reading limits access to a benefit on the basis of qualification for the commonwealth seniors health card which requires a person to Mr WELLS (Treasurer) — I move: be at least over 60 years of age. That this bill be now read a second time. 2. Consideration of reasonable limitations — section 7(2) This State Taxation Acts Further Amendment Bill 2011 On balance however, the limitations upon this right are amends the Duties Act 2000 (duties act), the Land Tax reasonable and justifiable in a democratic society for the Act 2005 (land tax act), the Livestock Disease Control purposes of section 7(2) of the charter act, having regard to Act 1994 (livestock act), the Taxation Administration the factors set out below. Act 1997 (TA act), the Payroll Tax Act 2007 (payroll tax act) and Valuation of Land Act 1960 (VL act).
STATE TAXATION ACTS FURTHER AMENDMENT BILL 2011
4904 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
The Victorian government is committed to producing This bill amends the land tax act to deem the managers better outcomes for Victorian taxpayers. This bill of titles-based time-sharing schemes to be the owner of supports this commitment by making amendments to the timeshare resort for land tax purposes. This update and clarify Victoria’s revenue laws. These amendment will allow the SRO to continue the measures will make it easier for Victorians to comply administrative practice of assessing the managers of with their taxation obligations and introduce greater titles-based schemes rather than individual timeshare equity and fairness to the tax system. owners. This amendment is aimed at building a fairer and more equitable tax system by ensuring that The duties act provides an exemption and concession managers of titles-based and non-titles-based schemes from duty for eligible pensioners. Since being elected, are treated the same way under the land tax act. this government has demonstrated its commitment to reducing the cost of living by increasing the upper limit This bill also makes several other amendments to the for the duty concession from $440 000 to $750 000 and land tax act aimed at improving the operation of the extending the availability of the exemption and primary production exemption from land tax. This concession to holders of commonwealth seniors health government is committed to improving housing supply cards. This bill continues this reform by clarifying the and affordability. Therefore, to discourage land starting point for calculating the eligible pensioner banking, land that is within greater Melbourne and in exemption and concession from duty. Consistent with an urban zone must satisfy more stringent criteria to current administrative practice, this amendment will receive the primary production land tax exemption. ensure that the same level of duty benefit is available These requirements are not, however, intended to apply for ‘off the plan’ purchasers and owner-builders, to land that cannot be used for urban development as a providing greater equity in the application of the result of planning restrictions. Accordingly, this bill exemption. amends the definition of ‘urban zone’ to ensure that certain parts of the urban zone can be excluded from This bill will also amend the duties act to reduce the these requirements in line with the intended operation time period for paying duty from 90 days to 30 days. of the exemption. This bill will also make a number of The government is committed to building a more minor amendments aimed at clarifying the application sustainable budget position for Victoria. This measure of the exemption in respect of land owned by trusts, supports this commitment by bringing forward corporate trustees, and joint owners. Importantly, it additional revenue into the 2011–12 financial year and clarifies that the exemption is available in relation to providing the government with earlier access to funds land held by trustees of certain discretionary trusts. which are used directly to benefit Victorians. It is an economically responsible measure that does not result This bill makes a series of amendments to the TA act in Victorians paying more tax — 85 per cent of duty is and the land tax act, in response to changes to already remitted within 30 days. However, in Victoria’s valuation system, which give municipal recognition that some businesses may need to adopt councils the option to transfer to the valuer-general new working methods and practices to implement this their responsibility for completing valuations for rating measure, the reduced period for paying duty will not purposes. These amendments, while minor, are commence until 1 April 2012. essential to the integrity of the land tax system because they ensure that the SRO can use these valuations for In opposition, this government blocked moves by the the purposes of assessing land tax, and that taxpayers former Brumby government to reduce the period for have the right to object to a land tax assessment that is paying duty from 90 days to 14 days. Fourteen days did based on a valuation made by the valuer-general under not allow enough time for banks and lawyers to prepare the new system. the documents necessary to transfer property and pay the required duty. Rural and regional lawyers were This government is committed to fostering a stronger particularly disadvantaged by the previous and more competitive Victorian economy by making it government’s proposal and it increased the risk of easier for Victorians to do business. This bill makes a taxpayers being exposed to penalty and interest on late contribution in this area by enacting further measures as payment. This government has listened to these part of the national program of payroll tax concerns and seeks to balance them against the harmonisation. community benefit of having use of this money earlier. A 30-day period for payment achieves this balance for This bill amends the payroll tax act to limit the all Victorians. exemption to wages paid for work, which supports the charitable purposes of those organisations. This amendment is made in response to the decision of the
SERIOUS SEX OFFENDERS (DETENTION AND SUPERVISION) AMENDMENT BILL 2011
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4905
High Court in Commissioner of Taxation v. Word SERIOUS SEX OFFENDERS Investments Ltd which extended the common-law (DETENTION AND SUPERVISION) definition of charity to include organisations that AMENDMENT BILL 2011 conduct predominately commercial activities to fund their charitable objects or donate their profits to another Statement of compatibility charity. This decision had the unintended impact of extending the payroll tax exemption to wages paid for Mr McINTOSH (Minister for Corrections) tabled commercial activities. This amendment will restore the following statement in accordance with Charter of intended operation of that provision and will promote Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006: business productivity and competitiveness by ensuring that all businesses operating in commercial markets in In accordance with section 28 of the Charter of Human Rights Victoria receive the same treatment under the payroll and Responsibilities Act 2006 (charter act), I make this tax act. statement of compatibility with respect to the Serious Sex Offenders (Detention and Supervision) Amendment Bill This bill also amends the payroll tax act to clarify the 2011. application of the maternity and adoption leave In my opinion, the Serious Sex Offenders (Detention and exemption. Currently, the 14-week exemption period Supervision) Amendment Bill 2011 (the bill), as introduced to can be pro-rated to the equivalent of 14 weeks leave for the Legislative Assembly, is compatible with the human full-time employees who take their leave at less than rights protected by the charter act. I base my opinion on the full pay, but the act does not provide equivalent reasons outlined in this statement. treatment for part-time employees. To ensure consistent Overview of bill and equitable treatment of wages paid to full-time and part-time employees and in line with current The main purpose of the bill is to enhance community safety administrative practice, this amendment will allow the by amending the Serious Sex Offenders (Detention and Supervision) Act 2009 (the principal act) and to make 14-week period to be pro-rated for part-time employees consequential and related amendments to other acts. on the basis of the wages that would have normally been paid for that period. The bill will amend the principal act to —
This bill will amend the TA act and livestock act to allow police to dispense with the notice period required before filing a charge sheet for the offence of breaching provide for the administration and enforcement of a condition of a supervision order, in limited livestock duty under the TA act. The SRO and circumstances; Department of Primary Industries jointly administer livestock duty and this amendment will ensure that the suspend the requirement for the secretary or the Director commissioner of state revenue can administer and of Public Prosecutions to apply for a periodic review of an order if an application to renew the order has been enforce livestock duty in the same way as all other filed, or the offender is being held in custody on remand; taxes and duties. This measure will help to protect the integrity of the scheme by ensuring there are modify the provisions of the act that apply to offenders appropriate systems in place to detect late payment and subject to interim supervision orders; deter non-compliance through the imposition of penalty clarify the existing information sharing provisions and and interest on unpaid duty. In line with the intention of include additional relevant persons and relevant acts; this scheme, any penalty and interest collected by the commissioner will be payable into the relevant clarify provisions allowing a court to make interim livestock compensation fund, which are used to orders on the basis that the material before it, if proven, compensate owners affected by an outbreak of would justify the making of an order and the ability of parties to dispute evidence; livestock disease. amend the range of applications that enable the Director Finally, this bill also makes several amendments to the of Public Prosecutions to apply to the Supreme Court for VL act. These amendments are minor and technical in a interim detention order; and nature and are aimed at clarifying the operation of clarify the relationship between the act and the Disability certain provisions as a result of the new valuation Act 2006 and the Civil Procedure Act 2010. system. Human rights issues I commend the bill to the house. The bill alters the provisions of the principal act requiring the Debate adjourned on motion of Ms NEVILLE secretary or Director of Public Prosecutions to seek periodic (Bellarine). review where an application to renew a supervision or detention order has been made, or where an offender is subject to an order and is in custody on remand. In my view, Debate adjourned until Wednesday, 9 November. these amendments will reduce pressure on court time and
SERIOUS SEX OFFENDERS (DETENTION AND SUPERVISION) AMENDMENT BILL 2011
4906 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
resources, and do not limit human rights protected under the supervision order. The transitional provisions of the principal charter act because the principal act provides that an offender act deal with the management of offenders still subject to may seek leave to have an order reviewed at any time in orders under the Serious Sex Offenders Monitoring Act 2005, accordance with section 68. but there remain inconsistencies in their treatment compared with offenders subject to orders under the principal act. The I have also considered the following human rights issues bill resolves these inconsistencies, providing greater raised by the bill: transparency and certainty of management of all offenders residing at a residential facility. 1. Information sharing The bill expands the transitional provisions of the principal Clause 13, which amends section 189 of the principal act, will act contained in schedule 2 to include two additional expand both the range of relevant persons with whom the provisions; section 142 (the power to search) and section 146 secretary may share information about offenders and the (the power to use force in certain circumstances). These relevant acts under which information may be shared. A amendments do not alter the overall operation of the scheme, provision which allows the sharing of personal information but extend these particular management powers to offenders engages the right to privacy in section 13 of the charter act. subject to orders under the Serious Sex Offenders Monitoring Act 2005 and accordingly, the expanded search power Right to privacy (section 13) engages offenders’ right to privacy.
Section 13(a) provides that a person has the right not to have Right to privacy (section 13) his or her privacy unlawfully or arbitrarily interfered with. Section 142 allows an officer to order a search of a part of a In my opinion, the extension of the sharing of information in residential facility, an offender, a visitor to a facility or an this context does not limit the right to privacy as the offender’s correspondence. disclosure of information will not be arbitrary. Information sharing with relevant persons is prohibited under the principal While section 142 does interfere with the privacy of persons act, unless the person disclosing the information believes on who are subject to a search under this clause, the interference reasonable grounds that it is necessary to enable a person to will not be arbitrary for the following reasons: the officer carry out a function under the principal act or other nominated must reasonably believe that the search is necessary; the relevant acts. Section 190 of the principal act contains a circumstances in which a search can occur are clearly further safeguard requiring a relevant person to develop specified in the legislation and tailored to ensure the power is guidelines in relation to accessing of shared information to not applied arbitrarily; the nature of the search is limited to a ensure that access to the information is restricted to the garment or pat down search; and finally, in relation to an greatest extent possible without interfering with the purpose offender’s correspondence, the provision excludes the power of the principal act or relevant acts referred to in section 189. to read letters in a range of important circumstances. Additionally, in my view, both staff and offenders, as well as Accordingly, information exchanges will only occur where it visitors to residential facilities, would be aware of the highly is necessary to administer the scheme and ensure its regulated nature of the facility and thus have a lower consistency with other schemes. Additional relevant acts have expectation of privacy in that environment. been included in the bill because the consequences of prosecutions or other proceedings under these acts may result 3. Disputing reports filed with applications for interim in orders, applications or proceedings that may impact on an orders offender’s capacity to comply with the terms of an order made under the principal act. Section 113 of the principal act provides that the offender, the secretary, or the Director of Public Prosecutions may file with In addition, the secretary may be in receipt of information that the court a notice of intention to dispute the whole or any part she reasonably believes would assist the Victorian child of an assessment report, progress report or any other report protection authorities to discharge their obligations to protect filed with an application under the act. The court is then children and young people under the Children Youth and precluded from considering matters in dispute until they are Families Act 2008, or information that is relevant to a able to be tested by the parties. Clause 9 of the bill amends determination under the commonwealth Migration Act 1958 section 113 to exclude applications for interim orders under (where the offender is not an Australian citizen or permanent part 4 of the principal act. resident, and may be required to be detained in immigration detention). Such disclosure is consistent with provisions of Clause 10 inserts a new section 113A into the principal act, the Information Privacy Act 2000 that permit disclosure of providing that the parties may file with the court a notice of information where it is necessary to lessen or prevent a intention to dispute the whole or any part of any report made serious threat to public health, public safety or public welfare. to the court or other report made to the court in relation to an The overall purpose of the collection of information under the application for an interim order under part 4. If the notice is principal act is to carry out functions to enhance the filed prior to the determination of the application the court protection of the community. I am satisfied that the may give the party the opportunity to lead evidence on information is being shared under this provision for the same disputed matters and cross-examine the author of the report overall purpose of enhancing community protection. on its contents. The section then provides that where a notice is not filed the court is not required to give parties the 2. Expansion of search power opportunity to lead evidence on matters in dispute. The court will retain the discretion, in either case, to hear evidence Some offenders continue to be managed under orders made making an interim order. A provision which restricts a under the Serious Sex Offenders Monitoring Act 2005 and respondent’s right to lead evidence on disputed matters or are residing at the residential facility established under the principal act, as required by the conditions of their extended
SERIOUS SEX OFFENDERS (DETENTION AND SUPERVISION) AMENDMENT BILL 2011
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4907
cross-examine the applicant’s witnesses engages the right to This government is committed to continuing the fair trial in section 24 of the charter act. post-sentence supervision and detention of serious sex Right to fair trial (section 24) offenders because any degree of recidivism in this group of high-risk offenders cannot be tolerated and we Section 24 of the charter act provides that a person charged recognise that it is imperative that appropriate with a criminal offence or a party to a civil proceeding has the right to have the charge or proceeding decided by a legislative responses are available to protect the competent independent and impartial court or tribunal after a community and rehabilitate offenders. fair and public hearing. In the 2010–11 financial year, there were The amendment will clarify the ability of the court to decide 36 supervision orders made under the act. Twenty-one applications for interim orders under sections 53 and 54 of the principal act without the examination of witnesses unless a of these were new orders, and 15 resulted from the notice of intention to dispute is filed. review of an existing order made under the preceding scheme, the Serious Sex Offenders Monitoring Act However, I consider the right to a fair trial not to be limited 2005. by this amendment because it applies only at the interim application stage, and a number of safeguards are in place to ensure that the offender is not unfairly disadvantaged. The A legislative response is one part of a suite of programs amendment does not prevent the offender from testing the aimed at reducing the risk of reoffending by high-risk evidence against him or her, or from tendering competing sex offenders through facilitating their identification, evidence, so long as the notice is filed. The court will retain management and rehabilitation. the discretion to control proceedings and may allow examination of witnesses where it deems it necessary to Another aspect of the response is safe housing for satisfy the requirements of sections 53 and 54 which set out the requirements for when a court may make interim orders. offenders. Corella Place provides transitional accommodation for sex offenders on post-sentence In circumstances where an interim order is made without the supervision where appropriate housing has not been respondent being given the opportunity to lead evidence on found elsewhere in the community. The purpose-built disputed matters, I note that an interim order cannot be made unless the court can satisfy the detailed criteria set out in the residential facility has the capacity to accommodate up principal act and that an interim order cannot exceed four to 40 offenders and dedicated staff provide a specialist months (unless exceptional circumstances exist). level of case management while monitoring offender Furthermore, the respondent’s right to dispute evidence is still compliance with their orders. maintained at the final hearing, where both parties will have the opportunity to lead evidence, cross-examine report The aim of the Serious Sex Offenders (Detention and authors and fully investigate the opinions of witnesses. Supervision) Amendment Bill 2011 is to strengthen the Conclusion Serious Sex Offenders (Detention and Supervision) Act 2009 by making a number of technical amendments. I consider that the bill is compatible with the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006, because, to the extent that some provisions may engage human rights, those In summary, these amendments will: provisions do not limit these rights. modify the obligations that apply to offenders Andrew McIntosh, MP subject to interim supervision orders; Minister for Corrections suspend the requirement to apply for a review of an Second reading order if an application to renew an order has been Mr McINTOSH (Minister for Corrections) — I made; move: suspend the requirement to apply for a review if the That this bill be now read a second time. offender is held in custody on remand; Since the Serious Sex Offenders (Detention and clarify the process for making interim orders to Supervision) Act 2009 (the act) came into force on increase flexibility and efficiency; 1 January 2010 the scheme has protected the community from the serious physical and psychological allow nominated senior police to dispense with the harm posed by serious sex offenders. This act protects notice period that is required if an offender is to be the most vulnerable members of the community. The charged with the offence of breaching supervision long-term harm caused by sexual offending not only order conditions; has devastating impacts on the emotional wellbeing of broaden and clarify the existing information-sharing victims but contributes to community anxiety and provisions; undermines our sense of community safety.
SERIOUS SEX OFFENDERS (DETENTION AND SUPERVISION) AMENDMENT BILL 2011
4908 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
amend the parts of the act that apply to offenders that consideration is not engaged during a periodic review, are subject to orders made under the Serious Sex but in both cases the court must consider if a Offenders Monitoring Act 2005; supervision or detention order continues to be warranted or should be removed. The aim of this clarify when interim detention orders can be made; amendment is to reduce duplication and unnecessary use of court resources. Offender eligibility is considered clarify the relationship between the act and the at both a periodic review and a renewal hearing so Disability Act 2006 and the Civil Procedure Act offenders will continue to be able to ask the court to 2010. consider their individual progress and the merits of Turning now to each of the amendments contained in continuing the order. the bill. The bill will also remove the obligation to apply for a Interim supervision orders periodic review if an offender is held in custody on remand. The act already suspends the requirement to The time between the decision being made to apply for apply for a periodic review if an offender is serving a a supervision order and the order being made by a court term of imprisonment. It is also appropriate to suspend can take several months. In order to manage the risk to the requirement to conduct periodic reviews when an the community posed by offenders who have reached offender is held on remand because as part of the the end of their sentence before this hearing, the act preparation for a periodic review all offenders are permits interim supervision and detention orders to be extensively interviewed in the clinical assessment made. Interim supervision orders permit a court to put process. If an offender is held in custody on remand for into place an interim management regime for the additional offending it may be difficult for the offender offender until such time that a full hearing is conducted. or report author to avoid consideration or discussion of The bill will rectify an apparent oversight in the matters additional unproved offending behaviour and these that are deemed to apply to this group of offenders by discussions may prejudice the defence of the offender. ensuring that: In addition a clinical report that does not contain these details may not represent an accurate assessment of the time spent in custody on remand will be taken into risks posed by the offender. account in calculating the remaining period of the interim order; Interim orders and disputed reports
interim supervision order conditions do not apply to Section 113 of the act provides that the offender, a person serving a sentence while in custody or held secretary or the Director of Public Prosecutions may in custody on remand; file with the court a notice of intention to dispute the whole or any part of an assessment report, progress the conditions of interim supervision orders will report, or other report made to the court or filed with an apply when the person is released on parole or at the application under the act. After this notice is filed that end of their sentence; and evidence is put aside until both parties can examine the report author. This provision conflicts with the powers the conditions of an interim supervision order are to of the court in section 53 that allow it to make an be served concurrently with the operation of any interim supervision order if it appears to the court that community based order. the documentation, if proved, would justify the making of the supervision order. The requirement to apply for periodic reviews To solve this problem the bill will insert a new The bill also modifies the requirement for the secretary section 113A dealing with applications for interim or the Director of Public Prosecutions to seek periodic orders. This section provides that the secretary or the reviews in some cases. The first change is when an Director of Public Prosecutions may file with the court offender is subject to a renewal application and a a notice of intention to dispute the whole or any part of periodic review is also due. In this case the bill will an assessment report, progress report, or other report amend the act so that the obligation to apply for a made to the court. If a notice is filed prior to the periodic review will be suspended until such time that determination of the application the court may before the renewal application is withdrawn or dismissed. The taking the report in dispute into account when difference between renewal and periodic review determining the application, give the party that filed the hearings is that upon renewal, a court can consider the notice the opportunity to lead evidence on the disputed term of a supervision or detention order. This matters and cross-examine the author of the report on
SERIOUS SEX OFFENDERS (DETENTION AND SUPERVISION) AMENDMENT BILL 2011
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4909 its contents. The section then provides that if a notice is authorities in order to assist with the protection of not filed the court must take the report into account children and young people. Some of this information is when determining the application and is not required to currently provided under ministerial authority under the give any party to the application the opportunity to lead Corrections Act 1986 but the changes contained in the evidence or cross-examine on the contents of the report. bill enables information obtained under this act to be It is anticipated that this reform will reduce the length shared. of interim hearings while maintaining judicial discretion to receive evidence. The relevant acts in section 189(4) do not include the Crimes Act 1958 or the Summary Offences Act 1966 The notice period and breach offences or the Commonwealth Crimes Act 1914 or Criminal Code Act 1995. Sentencing outcomes for federal Section 160 of the act sets out the offence of failing to offences may result in orders, for example, comply, without reasonable excuse, with a condition of recognizance release orders, that may conflict with the a supervision order. Before bringing proceedings, the term of an order made under the act or may have the secretary must give the offender 14 days notice of his or effect of suspending the operation of an order. her intention to file a charge sheet. In cases of serious Sentencing outcomes for Victorian crimes or offences breaches, the secretary has the capacity under may have similar effects. The bill therefore adds these section 172(3) to dispense with the notice period and acts to the list of relevant acts in section 189(4). The may proceed to file a charge sheet after forming the relevant acts in section 189(4) do not currently contain view that a ‘charge sheet should be filed without delay, the Bail Act 1977 or the Sentencing Act 1991 where, having regard to the seriousness of the alleged breach for example, consideration of supervision order of the order’. conditions may be relevant to the assessment of community risk, or, essential to the framing of a Victoria Police are frequently involved in the compatible community based disposition. apprehension or investigation of serious breaches of supervision order conditions. Victoria Police also The relevant acts listed in section 189(4) do not include apprehend offenders for further relevant offending. To the commonwealth Migration Act 1958. If an offender avoid the delays that may be caused by the requirement is not a permanent Australian resident, the commission that only the secretary can dispense with the notice of sexual offences may result in visa cancellation and period, the bill will amend the act so that senior police the decision to detain an offender in immigration at or above the level of inspector (and one particular detention, or, the imposition of a requirement that the sergeant, with specialist expertise) may exercise the offenders reside at a residential facility, such as Corella discretion currently limited to the secretary. Limiting Place, until such time as immigration matters are the discretion to senior police will also ensure that the concluded. In these circumstances it is desirable that decision to exercise the discretion will be made at arm’s information regarding offenders can be provided to length from arresting officers by senior and experienced immigration officials to ensure that supervision order police. conditions are compatible with the terms of any residence determination made by the commonwealth Information sharing immigration minister and the risks of offending are Section 189 of the act authorises the divulging or made clear to protect the community. communication of information in circumstances when a The bill also amends the act to clarify that information relevant person believes on reasonable ground that it is about persons subject to post-sentence supervision necessary to do so to enable persons to carry out orders or applications can be provided by Corrections functions under the act or a relevant act. The relevant Victoria to relevant persons to assist them to administer acts listed in section 189(4) do not include a number of relevant acts. acts and persons with whom and in respect of which Corrections Victoria may have legitimate cause to share It is noted that the limitations on information sharing information about offenders subject to orders. These and privacy protections included in the act continue to additional relevant persons and relevant acts have been apply, regardless of these amendments, including the identified since the scheme came into operation. requirement that officers sharing information believe on reasonable grounds that communicating is necessary to Most notably the list of acts does not include the enable a person to carry out functions under the act (or Children, Youth and Families Act 2005. It is important a relevant act). In addition, section 190 requires that Corrections Victoria is able to share information relevant persons to develop guidelines that attempt to concerning sex offenders with child protection ensure that access to the information is restricted to the
SERIOUS SEX OFFENDERS (DETENTION AND SUPERVISION) AMENDMENT BILL 2011
4910 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011 greatest extent that is possible and this provision has the community posed by the offender and it is not been updated. sufficient to allow the offender to remain in the community on a supervision order until such time as Managing offenders who are subject to an order the court is able to consider, in full, the detention order made under the Serious Sex Offenders Monitoring application. Act 2005 To address this issue the bill will amend the act to Some offenders continue to be managed at the permit an application for an interim detention order residential facility established under the act under where the application for a detention order is the result orders made under the previous act: the Serious Sex of the periodic review of a supervision order under Offenders Monitoring Act 2005. The bill amends the section 73. transitional provisions contained in schedule 2. This schedule provides that nominated sections of the act Amendments to other acts apply to this group of offenders as if they were residing at the residential facility under one of the orders that Section 12 of the bill amends the Civil Procedure Act can be made under the act. 2010. Section 79(1) of the act provides that proceedings under parts 2, 3, 5 and 7 are civil in nature. In addition, The amendments contained in the bill will ensure that section 79(2) provides that the rules regarding practice all of the following provisions apply to offenders still and procedure in civil proceedings do not apply to these subject to old act orders that are required to reside at proceedings and the act sets out required procedural Corella Place: steps for various types of applications, hearings and proceedings. In addition the secretary and the Director section 137, the power for supervision officers to of Public Prosecutions are bound to act as model give directions; litigants in proceedings under this act.
section 142, the search provisions Section 4 of the Civil Procedure Act 2010 provides that the act does not apply to proceedings under a number of section 143, seizure provisions acts such as the Crimes (Mental Impairment and section 144, the register of seized items Unfitness to be Tried) Act 1997 as well as the Family Violence Protection Act 2008 and the Stalking section 145, photographing; and Intervention Orders Act 2008. To ensure that the operative intent of section 79(2) of the act is not in section 146, the ability for supervision officers to use doubt the bill will amend the Civil Procedure Act 2010 force to enforce instructions in certain to clarify that it does not apply to proceedings under the circumstances. act.
In the future many of the residents of Corella Place Clause 18 of the bill addresses an interface issue subject to orders made under the old act will be between the act and the Disability Act 2006. As a result transitioned to orders made under the new act, but until of the high proportion of offenders with intellectual this occurs the different procedures for managing the disabilities subject to orders under the act it is important two groups of offenders is administratively that the interface between the two schemes is clear and burdensome. The amendment contained in the bill will unambiguous. Also, some offenders that are subject to ensure that Corella Place staff have the legislative tools supervision orders are required to reside at the to manage this group of offenders. residential facility established under the Disability Act 2006 with their treatment plans overseen by the Interim detention orders Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT).
The final amendment to the act that I will highlight Upon commencement of the act on 1 January 2010 the concerns interim detention orders. On review of a Disability Act 2006 was amended to provide that the supervision order under section 73, the DPP can decide ability of VCAT to vary a treatment plan for an to apply for a detention order. However, as such an offender required to live at a DHS — Department of application is not one that triggers section 51, pending Human Services — residential facility is subject to that resolution of the application for the detention order. variation being consistent with an order made under the act. The same requirement also applies with respect to The DPP may form the view that the evidence annual reviews of treatment plans but did not apply to presented at the review of a supervision order warrants the initial treatment plan formulated when an offender an immediate detention order in response to the risk to
ADJOURNMENT
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4911 is admitted. As a result it is possible that the initial odour. EPA Victoria suggests that this odour is coming from treatment plan may be inconsistent with the terms of an the Boral quarry area and is impacting both our area — order made under the act. Brimbank Gardens —
In order to address the potential for inconsistency the and the Caroline Springs area. bill will amend the Disability Act 2006 to provide that initial treatment plans prepared by program officers The issue has been ongoing for months. My must be consistent with court orders, including orders constituents have recorded times and dates, and this made under the act. matter has been reported to the Brimbank council and to the EPA, but to date no resolution has been found. I In summary, this bill contains a range of technical ask the minister to investigate, to provide a report and amendments to strengthen and support the to assist the communities of Brimbank Gardens and post-sentence supervision and detention regime that is Caroline Springs with a way forward and a resolution. helping to protect the Victorian community from the risks posed by serious sex offenders. Acting Speaker, you would be aware that the challenge for the western suburbs — given industry growth and I commend the bill to the house. given that the area is increasingly being populated by new residents — is to find a way for residents, industry Debate adjourned on motion of Ms NEVILLE and business to coexist. I wholeheartedly support (Bellarine). growth and the establishment of new industries as well as the coming into the area of new residents, because Debate adjourned until Wednesday, 9 November. people want to live near where their jobs are, near Remaining business postponed on motion of industry, and conversely industry requires that people Mr McINTOSH (Minister for Corrections). live near the industry and where the jobs are. Acting Speaker, you would understand that we have to find the middle ground — a way in which residents and ADJOURNMENT industry can coexist. One of the challenges is to ensure that despite the social challenges and in this case the The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Nardella) — environmental challenges that can potentially arise, we Order! The question is: can coexist and live together. The problems need to be resolved successfully, because we want both the That the house now adjourns. residents and the industry. If the minister could find a Brimbank Gardens estate: air quality way forward and achieve a resolution, that would be welcomed. Mr LANGUILLER (Derrimut) — I raise a matter for the attention of the Minister for Environment and Carbon tax: Bayswater electorate Climate Change. The action I seek from the minister is Mrs VICTORIA (Bayswater) — I rise to ask the a comprehensive investigation of and report on Minister for Innovation, Services and Small Business, complaints received by me about the Brimbank who I am delighted to see is in the chamber this Gardens estate in my electorate with a view to reaching evening, to visit my electorate and update local a resolution. I refer the minister to the following complaint I received from a resident in Sterling Drive, business owners on a range of matters that are important to them. Some of them have come to me, but Derrimut: in particular some of the questions are about the It is regarding a foul odour in the air around our area, which measures the government has or is planning to put in smells like a rubbish tip mixed with sewage. It is actually place to protect Victoria’s business sector from the very bad at times, and as per my notes which I have been impact of the federal Labor government’s carbon tax. recording, it is worse in the evenings every day. We all know that Victoria will be very hard hit by the A further quote from my constituent reads: implementation of this unnecessary tax. While those opposite have not dared to criticise their federal Labor … I took initiative and called EPA — colleagues, government members in this house understand that now is the time to stand up for Environment Protection Authority — Victorians and ensure that our economy does not suffer … on 6 June, and I was pleasantly surprised to receive a call because of an ill-conceived policy. back on 7 June, informing me of the actual source of the
ADJOURNMENT
4912 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
The prospect of this tax has fuelled grave concerns prices. Hundreds of thousands of people will no longer among the business community in the Bayswater have the opportunity to experience this majestic train district. For many of them, times are already tough ride through the Dandenongs. An article in the Age of enough. The last thing they need is to have to pass on 14 September, under the title ‘Warning Puffing Billy at the cost of yet another tax to their consumers. Business risk, Asher cool on cash help’, states: operators competing in the global market are especially concerned that this new tax will obliterate any The previous Labor government promised $10 million to upgrade Puffing Billy, but Ms Asher said the Liberal Party competitive advantage they once enjoyed over their ‘did not give any commitment’ in the election campaign. international rivals. I have a great range of quite diverse businesses in my electorate. No, it did not — and it does not seem interested now it is in government. But what did the Liberal Party say A specialty fibreglass manufacturer came to me quite before the election? Prior to a visit to Puffing Billy in recently with some worries. I also have people who January last year, the then shadow Minister for Tourism make antiballistic body armour and have the same sorts said: of worries. I even have people who are manufacturing soaps and body products. I have some who are making The state government needs to ensure that Puffing Billy is very high-end products, including parts for the joint adequately funded and invests in its capital infrastructure … the state government needs to commit to investing in the strike fighter. At an international level we in Bayswater future of Puffing Billy and provide funding that are really punching above our weight with a lot of acknowledges the significant part Puffing Billy plays both manufacturing and a lot of very small businesses doing historically and within our tourism sector. some really amazing, internationally renowned work, but they are genuinely worried and they have come to The then Liberal candidate for Gembrook, now the me with this. member for Gembrook; the then shadow Minister for Tourism and Major Events, who is now the Minister for In the current economic climate businesses are besieged Tourism and Major Events; and Edward O’Donohue, a by uncertainty. In the interests of giving renewed member for Eastern Victoria Region in the Council, confidence to local businesses, I ask the minister to join visited Puffing Billy on 20 January last year. They me in a discussion with them about the challenges they made all the right noises about supporting Puffing will face in the years to come and what the Baillieu Billy. government is going to do to help. On 3 February last year Edward O’Donohue said in Puffing Billy: funding Parliament:
Mr MERLINO (Monbulk) — I raise a matter for … the future of Puffing Billy is not secure. the Minister for Tourism and Major Events. The action It has an ageing infrastructure that needs upgrading … I I seek is that the minister commit to a $15 million congratulate the chief executive officer of the Puffing Billy injection of funds urgently required by Puffing Billy, railway, Eamon Seddon, for putting together a comprehensive one of our greatest and most beloved tourist icons. business case … Puffing Billy is one of the finest preserved steam … railways in the world. Hundreds of thousands of locals and tourists visit it every year. In fact it carried a record It appears to me to be a good investment for the state to secure the long-term future of Puffing Billy … It will be a number of passengers in the last financial year — very important job creator for the Dandenongs and the outer almost 269 000 people. It is vitally important to the east. community and local businesses in my region. It delivers a massive economic benefit of $23 million per … year. It supports hundreds of local jobs, and almost … the action I seek from the minister is that he work with the 1000 volunteers work tirelessly to keep this wonderful government and Puffing Billy so the $15 million sought can steam train in service. be provided …
But Puffing Billy as we know and love it is under That is what the Liberal Party said before the election. I threat. Unless there is significant government support, could not have said it better myself. we face the very real possibility of Puffing Billy being I am proud of Labor’s longstanding support of Puffing forced to significantly downgrade its service. Without Billy, including the multimillion-dollar commitment we urgent investment to upgrade its ageing infrastructure, it made during the last campaign. If it is good enough for will be a shadow of what we enjoy today. Puffing Billy the Liberal Party to support Puffing Billy and call on will be forced to drastically cut services and increase the then Labor government to provide $15 million in
ADJOURNMENT
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4913
2010, it is good enough for it in 2011. I have already Nicholson–Miller streets, Brunswick East: received 580 supporting signatures on a petition that I safety have distributed along the Puffing Billy railway line. The community wants the government to deliver on Ms GARRETT (Brunswick) — I wish to raise a what it was calling for last year. matter for the attention of the Minister for Roads, and I am pleased to see him in the house this evening. The Rodney electorate: flood recovery funding action I seek is the minister’s urgent approval for a representative of VicRoads and other public servants to Mr WELLER (Rodney) — I wish to raise a matter attend an onsite meeting at the intersection of for the attention of the Minister for Sport and Nicholson and Miller streets in Brunswick East to Recreation. It is good to see the minister in the house discuss traffic and safety issues that have been raised by here tonight, and it is good that the trend for ministers Our Lady Help of Christians Primary School. to actually come in and answer questions put to them has continued since the coalition came into The intersection is also a tram stop and a bus route, government. The issue I raise is with regard to the with buses turning into Nicholson Street from Miller $4 million joint state-commonwealth Floods Street with no signals. There is considerable bicycle Community Recovery Fund. The action I seek from the traffic both ways. There are no traffic lights at this minister is an update on the fund and whether any intersection, but there is a pedestrian crossing and a set flood-affected communities in my electorate can expect of pedestrian lights further down the road on Nicholson to share in a slice of the latest round of funding for Street which can cause bank-ups and confusion. As sporting groups and facilities. I am aware that more members can picture, this intersection creates a very than $2 million of the fund has already been distributed chaotic environment at school drop-off and pick-up to some 118 community organisations across Victoria, times, one I have witnessed on numerous occasions. helping to deliver more than 200 flood recovery projects. A number of incidents have occurred that have caused great concern to the school and the parent community, The fund is an excellent initiative, one that is making a and the situation is set to worsen with the imminent meaningful difference to communities so devastated by completion of a large number of new residential units in the floods. I am also aware that the Victorian coalition Miller Street. There are a number of authorities government has been working very closely with local involved in the management of this intersection, councils, key stakeholders and community groups to including VicRoads and public transport authorities. identify further recovery projects and to ensure the The intersection is also on the municipal boundary of funding brings about the best local outcomes in the the Yarra and Moreland city councils. aftermath of the floods. I understand that, as part of this latest round of grants, funding has been allocated to a Given the seriousness of the situation and the number range of projects, including the replacement of sporting of parties involved, it was suggested that an onsite equipment as well as large restoration projects to repair meeting be convened so all representatives could hear flood damage. the views and concerns of the school and witness the difficulties firsthand. My office contacted the regional There are a number of sport-related projects in my office of VicRoads earlier this year and asked it to be electorate, particularly in the Rochester area, which involved in such a meeting. After some delay in would benefit enormously from assistance through this responding, my office was advised that the issue was fund. The Rochester Tigers cricket club requires being examined and a brief would be submitted to the funding to replace a range of essential playing regional director. equipment, including guards, pads, gloves, bats, balls and helmets. The Rochester table tennis club is in need After considerable time had elapsed we again contacted of assistance to replace essential items such as tables, VicRoads. Unfortunately we were then told that we had bats and ping pong balls. Finally, a new flood-resistant to seek the minister’s approval for a VicRoads walking path along the Campaspe walking trail needs to representative to attend a meeting. As a result last be laid after the old path was badly damaged by month I emailed the minister with an outline of the floodwaters. purpose of the meeting, those who we were seeking to be involved and a request for his approval. Again we I seek the minister’s advice as to whether any of these received no response. In considerable frustration, we sporting groups have been successful in gaining then telephoned the minister’s office last week and funding through the latest round of Floods Community were told that the request for a meeting had been denied Recovery Fund grants.
ADJOURNMENT
4914 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011 and that we had to put any suggestions for changes to Morack golf course, various walking tracks, pockets of the intersection in writing to the minister instead. natural bushland and acres of beautiful open space.
Everything about this issue is disturbing, from the fact Many residents continue to contact me to express their that my requests for a meeting were ignored for months views in relation to the possible future uses of this land, to having what is, by any measure, a highly reasonable and I look forward to ongoing interaction with them to request made on behalf of a primary school with deep achieve an outcome that will provide a positive result concerns about the safety of its students denied by the for all stakeholders. The consultations and discussions minister and/or his office. Members of the school that will occur regarding this land will provide the community are understandably considerably upset. community with a clear opportunity to have direct input into the future use of the land. This input from local While I am happy to write another letter to the minister, residents, community groups and other stakeholders it is simply a fact that letters will not come close to will be welcomed. The residents of Forest Hill are providing a proper, common-sense approach to a indeed blessed, firstly, to have such a wonderful area situation of this type where all the parties can meet, available, and secondly, to have the opportunity to witness the situation and ask and answer questions of provide input to shape the future use of this land. I am each other. Therefore I ask that the minister urgently pleased the new government will listen and consult reconsider his position on this matter and approve the with the local stakeholders as part of this process. participation of his officers in an onsite meeting at this dangerous intersection so that the significant anxiety of I would welcome the opportunity to meet with the the school community can start to be addressed Minister for Roads, who I note is in the chamber properly and in a manner in which any Victorian tonight. I look forward to the visit of the minister to school, regardless of its postcode, deserves. Forest Hill and to having the chance to show him this land and discuss with him this very important local Healesville freeway reservation: future issue. Mr ANGUS (Forest Hill) — I raise a matter of Public transport: fares importance for the attention of the Minister for Roads. The action I seek is for the minister to visit the Ms RICHARDSON (Northcote) — I am also very electorate of Forest Hill and join with me and other pleased to see the Minister for Public Transport here in local residents to inspect the land previously designated the house, because the matter I wish to raise concerns for the Healesville freeway reserve, to discuss the future him and his portfolio. It concerns the decision he made use of this land and to provide an update in relation to to scrap the Victorian transport plan while at the same the public consultation process being undertaken. time refusing to scrap the 2012 and 2013 scheduled fare increases that were designed to help pay for that plan. As I have previously mentioned in this house, the seat The action that I seek from the minister is for him to of Forest Hill is very fortunate to have within it a large guarantee that he will not slug commuters in this way expanse of land that was set aside by VicRoads for a while offering no plan of his own to improve Victoria’s freeway reserve some 40 years ago. Following the public transport system. Surely the minister would decision by VicRoads almost two years ago not to agree that the 5 per cent increases for those two years proceed with this freeway, local residents have been that were scheduled to improve Victoria’s public concerned about the future use of this land. This transport system are now no longer needed given that remains a very important local issue, one on which I he has binned the plan. Why is the minister mute when look forward to continuing to work with various it comes to questions about these fare increases? Why is stakeholders to ensure that there is a successful he refusing to rule them out comprehensively? outcome for the local community. There is of course another reason why he could rule out Last month I had the great pleasure of hosting the these scheduled fare increases, because in his words, as Minister for Planning as he toured this site with me and he has put it, the job is done. He has fixed the problems representatives from local environmental groups. He, in public transport, and that means, presumably, in his like most visitors to this well-hidden local treasure, was words, that there is no need for these increases to fares. pleasantly surprised by what he saw tucked away Tonight he could stand up and guarantee that these fare behind the built-up area. The land is some increases will not take place. He has backed away just a 3.5 kilometres long and is currently used for a wide tad. He has said that he has nearly fixed all of the range of purposes, including sporting activities, an problems. When I said to the minister, ‘We are 99 per off-lead dog park, some leasehold activities, part of the cent there’, he said, ‘Yes’; he agreed, ‘We are 99 per
ADJOURNMENT
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4915 cent there to fixing the problems’. He has done such a there is substantial damage to the playing surface. The great job in 11 months, so tonight is his opportunity, I new irrigation system is being installed, so the pipes are guess, to crawl out from under the desk, put down the there to water the oval. There is a new pump being Terang racing club form guide, step up to the plate and installed, and I understand there will be a separate deliver what Victorians want to hear from the minister supply to the turf wicket, which has somehow survived as he leaves the chamber. the flooding in some state. I understand the turf is being prepared off site. Mr Mulder — I’ll be back. All of the buildings on the site have been destroyed Ms RICHARDSON — Hopefully he will come along with of the equipment. Having been under water back. He has certainly refused to respond to this for a month or more, nothing has survived. Planning is question in the last few weeks. I hope he actually gives under way for new combined facilities for the football, us an emphatic response and guarantees that he will not netball and cricket clubs, with clubroom facilities some increase fares. Prior to the last election Liberal time off, but with the ground being transformed the members said that they would address Victorians’ cost clubs want to get back to playing and enjoying their of living. sports. The cricket club needs essential playing equipment. The season is under way and the equipment Mr Weller — The coalition, actually. accumulated over generations has been lost. The Ms RICHARDSON — They said quite football club needs to replace its defibrillator, and we emphatically — The Nationals as well, of course — all know how important it is to sporting facilities to that they would do something to address Victoria’s cost have a defibrillator nearby. of living, but there I was in January this year reading The Cardross show has shown that the community is the newspaper and there was the Minister for Public bouncing back. It just needs some support to continue Transport announcing fare increases for public to take to the field, even if it is not its own. The sports transport commuters. If he is going to rule out 5 per are continuing, and they are using borrowed grounds cent fare increases over the coming year and the next, elsewhere, but it is that essential equipment that has he could also rule out the consumer price index fare accumulated over generations and the lifesaving increases if he wants to address Victoria’s cost of living equipment that is needed. I urge the minister to consider concerns as the coalition promised it would prior to the this community’s request to replace that vital last election. This would mean that we would see fare equipment. increases across the board. There would be significant impacts on commuters, and the minister would earn his Outer Suburban/Interface Services and reputation as the Sheriff of Nottingham — all take and Development Committee: livability inquiry no give. Ms HUTCHINS (Keilor) — I rise to raise a matter Cardross: sports equipment for the Minister for Planning. The action I seek is for him to provide the government submission to the Outer Mr CRISP (Mildura) — I raise a matter for the Suburban/Interface Services and Development attention of the Minister for Sport and Recreation. The Committee’s current inquiry into livability options in action I seek is support for the replacement of sports outer suburban Melbourne. and other equipment lost in the February 2011 floods. Submissions for this inquiry closed to the public on The floods of 2011 caused considerable damage in 30 June. So far the committee has received 79 written Mildura. Our annual rainfall arrived in under 24 hours. submissions. However, the committee has not received The Mallee is a series of basins and the water collects at a submission from the government. Almost five months the bottom of those basins — that is, floods generally after the closing date, there have been requests to the come and go, but floods in the Mallee come and stay. government from both committee staff and committee I will focus on Cardross, which is in a large basin with members for it to provide a submission, yet nothing has the community’s facilities at the bottom. The sporting been forthcoming. facilities have been hardest hit. I toured the Cardross The issue of livability in the outer suburbs is extremely oval, clubrooms and change rooms recently with the important, and the inquiry is looking into issues relating federal member for Mallee, John Forrest, as we were to population growth, trends and impacts, and the both attending the Cardross show. The works in pressure on medical health and support services in the progress on the site are being done by the Mildura outer suburbs. The committee is also looking at best Rural City Council. It is levelling the ground, because
ADJOURNMENT
4916 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011 practice in urban renewal. These are extremely school earlier this year, and it did not take long to important issues to residents in the outer suburbs, but recognise the benefits that improved facilities would the government is yet to respond to this inquiry. bring to the school community. I recently attended a school council meeting at the invitation of the school The National Growth Areas Alliance has made a whole council president, Mr Tim Watson. It was certainly a range of statements on its website in regard to the very productive meeting, and the school council is to be effects of growth areas, the needs of families and the commended on its proactive and cooperative approach support that is needed for families in the outer suburbs. to working with me as its local member in order to It claims that: advance the school rebuilding project.
Whilst the growth areas play an integral role in Moriac is without doubt growing and on the rise. The accommodating growth in metropolitan regions across the nation, they are not equitably equipped with public transport primary school had approximately 170 pupils in 2007; and social infrastructure services — this has risen to 220 students at present. It is another example of a school and a community that have such as health, education and cultural and community experienced growth that the previous Labor services. Certainly through the committee’s hearings so government ignored, its members having had their far these are some of the things we have seen. heads in the sand for 11 years. The Baillieu government has inherited a similar situation in Torquay as a result As the member for Keilor I represent one of the biggest of 11 years of inaction and poor planning by Labor. I growth areas in Australia, not just Victoria. The western look forward to continuing to work with the minister, region is predicted to rise from 85 000 residents up to the principal, Mr Durkin, and the school council to 245 000-plus by the year 2026. They are the ensure that modernisation works progress to the next projections, but serious plans are yet to be put in place stage. by this government on how that growth will be managed in the next 15 years. Responses
Certainly as population growth continues to add tens of Ms ASHER (Minister for Innovation, Services and thousands of new residents to both the Melton and Small Business) — The first issue that was raised with Brimbank regions every year, the disparity between the me was by the member for Bayswater in my capacity as west and other areas of Melbourne will continue to Minister for Innovation, Services and Small Business. widen unless this issue is met with a sustained and The member for Bayswater asked if I would visit her committed policy response. The challenge for electorate of Bayswater to meet with various small government is to develop infrastructure and increase the businesses, and perhaps others given her broader quality and quantity of service provision at a pace that discussion about business in her electorate, to have a can keep up with the rapid growth that is predicted over discussion with them. Of course I am delighted to do the next 15 years. I ask the minister to get his act so. I know the member for Bayswater has spent together, to pull together the government submission considerable time making sure that businesses in her and to respect the inquiry, the committee and most electorate have access to her and understand the range importantly the families of the outer suburbs. of programs and services offered by the government.
The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Nardella) — The member for Bayswater specifically raised the issue Order! The honourable member’s time has expired. of the carbon tax and the additional costs that that will impose, particularly on the small business sector. I was Moriac Primary School: rebuilding handed a very alarming letter the other day from one Mr KATOS (South Barwon) — It is my pleasure to business to another business which said they cannot rise this evening and request some action from the place any further orders because they are scared about Minister for Education, who has just entered the house. the carbon tax. I think that is an alarming thought, and I The action I seek is for the minister to visit Moriac am more than happy to discuss some of the problems Primary School in the electorate of South Barwon and associated with the carbon tax and the fact that the view plans to reconstruct the school. I have been federal proposal will require small businesses to absorb working closely with the principal, Mr Steve Durkin, in the costs of this particular tax. Of course I will go to the providing representations to assist the school to electorate of the member for Bayswater. Of course I advance to the next stage of works. will be delighted to meet with a range of businesses, and I will discuss any matter that the member wishes Moriac Primary School has been involved in planning me to discuss at that forum or any other type of activity for its building project for some time. I visited the that she wishes to organise.
ADJOURNMENT
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4917
The member for Monbulk raised a very important issue. accommodation, which would have to be funded However, just before I respond to that — and I through the private sector. There also is talk of a whole congratulate the member on becoming a father again; I range of additional improvements, including basic am happy to do that — I wish to make another more safety maintenance, but also significant enhancements, substantive point, and that is that I think the member for such as a new diesel locomotive and shed, locomotive Monbulk, as a former minister, should be pleased that upgrades and improvements and so on. The total ask for there is now a minister in the chamber who is prepared the grand plan is $45 million, and the total ask of the to answer his adjournment issue. I sat in this chamber public sector for the grand plan is $25 million. for 11 years in opposition and not one of my adjournment issues was ever answered by a minister in I acknowledge that the Labor Party, in its dying days of the previous government. I might add that when I was government during the election campaign — because I previously a minister in the Kennett administration — recall getting the phone call about it — did allocate an and I am sure the Acting Speaker will verify this — I amount of $10 million. Had it been re-elected, how that regularly attended adjournment debates and I answered would have been done I do not know. However, it is issues put to me by members of the Labor Party. I will factually correct that in its dying days of government maintain that tradition of ministerial responsibility and the Labor Party allocated $10 million. give the member for Monbulk a big shock by having a minister in the chamber actually answer the I also wish again to refer to a call by Edward adjournment issue he raised. O’Donohue, a member for Eastern Victoria Region in the other place, for the railway to be adequately funded. Mr Hodgett — Time! I also want to take this opportunity to mention the member for Gembrook, who has raised this matter with The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Nardella) — me on a number of occasions, both before he was the Order! The honourable member for Kilsyth is out of his member for Gembrook, when he was the candidate, and place. obviously after his election as the member for Gembrook. He is encouraging me with considerable Ms ASHER — The government recognises the vigour to look at a whole range of funding opportunities importance of Puffing Billy, the number of people who for Puffing Billy but in particular to look at basic safety travel on Puffing Billy and the significant economic and obviously to take into account the grand plan on advantage to the local area of Puffing Billy. That is why which, as I said, I have been fully briefed. the previous coalition administration funded to such a large extent a range of capital improvements for The matter has been raised with me by representatives Puffing Billy via the Community Support Fund, so I of Puffing Billy themselves, and because the member think we have a very good track record on that. The for Monbulk has been a minister, he knows budget member would also be aware that I allocated $500 000 processes. I appreciate his wanting to make some this year to Puffing Billy for urgent rail safety work, as representations on the part of Puffing Billy — that is was required. I do not think he is disputing that fine, and he is getting an answer — but he is familiar allocation at all. One of the main problems for Puffing with the budget process. I will work through the budget Billy is that there have been ongoing maintenance process, and I can give him and the member for issues, which have existed for many years. However, Gembrook an undertaking that the matter will be another and more substantive matter, which is the one seriously considered. the member is raising with me, is Puffing Billy’s grand plans for what it would like to do in the future. Mr MULDER (Minister for Public Transport) — The member for Brunswick raised an issue with me in I will take a moment of the house’s time to walk relation to the intersection of Nicholson and Miller members through what the grand plan is, because I was streets in Brunswick East and the fact that that acquainted with it as a member of the opposition. intersection poses a danger to school children in the Basically Puffing Billy’s representatives are proposing area, particularly at drop-off and pick-up times. There is a very substantial combination of private and public also a tram stop and a very busy bus route involved at sector investment opportunities which they think will that location. I must say that I am somewhat surprised provide a very fine tourism product — and no doubt that this issue has turned up at such an early stage in the their plan will provide a tourism product. They are life of the new government. If my memory serves me talking about having a discovery centre, which would correctly, the former Parliamentary Secretary for interpret history relating to the Dandenong Ranges, in Transport was also the member for Brunswick. I would addition to engagement with railway and steam have thought he would have dealt with that very experiences. There is talk of the possibility of quickly if there was a significant safety issue there.
ADJOURNMENT
4918 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
The member for Brunswick also indicated that she had VicRoads is looking at a number of options, including been blocked in terms of having access to local providing an appropriate return on a state-owned asset, VicRoads officers to meet at that particular site. I know provision for additional housing and public facilities, the member for Brunswick is a new member, and I improved public amenity through additional open space know the member for Bayswater, who was listening to and preservation of important aspects of cultural her contribution, pointed out to me that it was very heritage and native flora and fauna. This work will be common practice in the last government for ministers to undertaken in such a way as to ensure that stakeholders intervene and refuse members of the then opposition and the broader community are engaged and provided access to local authorities. I know the member for the opportunity to voice their opinion on the best use of Bayswater indicated that she was trying to get access to the land. VicRoads is currently considering the best a local ambulance officer to talk to him about issues approach to the project — either dividing the and that her access was continually blocked, but I am geographical area into sections or the whole area being not going to go down that pathway. covered at once.
I will say to the member for Brunswick that I am going Consultation has begun between VicRoads and major to arrange a meeting for her with the local VicRoads stakeholders, such as the City of Whitehorse, the people at that location so that she can point the issue out Department of Planning and Community Development, to them and have a discussion as to whether or not there the Department of Sustainability and Environment and are some short-term, medium-term and long-term Parks Victoria. Property surveys have been undertaken safety improvements we can make to that location. If to formally establish the boundaries of the geographical possible, I will attend, but it is not always possible, and area. Over the next 12 months a community reference I will try to get someone from my office to also attend group will be established. There will be continued that particular meeting. face-to-face meetings with major stakeholders on issues and expectations, consultation processes to establish We are very keen as a new government to continue community perspective on the best use of land within some of the good work that has taken place in relation the Healesville freeway reservation, recruitment of to road safety improvements throughout the state. At town planning and urban design consultants and the moment I know we have something in the order of various types of community consultation, including 20 less deaths on the current road toll as compared to letterbox drops, newspaper workshops, online forums the position we were in at this time last year. We are and flora and fauna surveys. very keen to continue with that. Today I launched a further road safety program involving young children I would be more than happy to go out there and meet over at the Melbourne Museum: a helmet rap with a with the member for Forest Hill, who has been very group of very interested community organisation active in trying to get the best possible outcome that he representatives, educators and parents, who are keen to can in relation to the Healesville freeway reservation. do something about some of the issues we have had in We will meet with members of the local community relation to fatalities involving young children. I know and local interest groups, take a walk along the that on the day before that a further program was raised reservation and see what we think we can add to that. I in relation to fatalities we have had in driveways, which am sure the member for Forest Hill is happy with the are of grave concern to the government. I will organise role that VicRoads has undertaken to this point in time, that for the member for Brunswick, and my office will but if we can improve on that, we will. I certainly look be in touch as soon as it can. forward to meeting the member for Forest Hill at that location. The member for Forest Hill raised an issue with me in relation to the Healesville freeway reservation. The The member for Northcote raised a very important background to this particular issue is that in 2009 issue with me in relation to the former Labor VicRoads completed a strategic review of the section of government’s buy now, pay later fare increase that the Healesville freeway reservation from Springvale currently sits within the state budget documents. The Road to Boronia Road. It is no longer required for member for Northcote suggested to me that this VicRoads’s purposes, and the section comprises an area particular fare increase, which was imposed on of approximately 35.6 hectares within the suburbs of Victorians by the former Labor government, be Forest Hill, Vermont and Vermont South. The idea is scrapped due to the fact that the items in the transport that VicRoads is currently exploring options for the plan that were to be funded by this particular increase Healesville freeway reservation. have been scrapped by the current government.
ADJOURNMENT
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4919
I will inform the member for Northcote about a couple The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Nardella) — of issues. Firstly, if she would like to go to page 71 of Order! The member for Northcote is to desist. the former Labor government’s transport plan, she will see it says: Mr MULDER — It is here in black and white, and I am happy to table it for the member for Northcote if she When new trains and additional capacity are delivered to the would like. It is a buy-now, pay-later scheme. All those public transport network in 2011, fares will increase above involved have been acknowledged. Not only that, but a consumer price index (CPI) to reflect some of the cost of the investment. lot of those people currently sit on the frontbench in opposition. They should hang their heads in shame. The trains are being delivered — boom, boom! The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Nardella) — I go to page 160 of the Victorian transport plan Order! The Minister for Education, to respond to the prepared by the former Labor government, which says: member for South Barwon. Before I go any further, I would like to give my condolences to the minister. When new trains and additional capacity are delivered to the public transport network in 2011, fares will increase above Mr DIXON (Minister for Education) — Thank you, CPI to reflect some of the cost of the investment. Acting Speaker. Not only are the new trains being delivered, but the government is also ordering additional trains on top of I will respond tonight to the member for South that. The regional rail link project is proceeding, South Barwon’s contribution regarding Moriac Primary Morang is going forward, the Sunbury electrification is School. That school has a great school community going forward and protective services officers are going which has done a lot of great work over the years in to be on stations. organising and lobbying for the future planning and rebuilding of the school. The member for South I will also go to the introduction of the Victorian Barwon has been very involved in that and is a great transport plan in which the architects of this CPI representative of all the schools in his electorate. He is increase — this buy now, pay later scheme — are one of those who frequently knock at my door to talk to acknowledged by the former Premier. I will quote from me about the needs of the schools in his electorate. the document of the architects of this buy now, pay later fare increase, which was put together by the I have always found — when members from both sides former Labor government and is currently sitting in the of the house invite me — that it is worthwhile to visit budget documents. The former Premier’s message says: schools. You might see a plan or a letter on paper, but when you actually go and see the conditions at the I thank the members of the Victorian cabinet transport school, where it is placed, meet the people and see the subcommittee, my ministerial colleagues the Treasurer, John site itself it makes a big difference to your Lenders, the Minister for Public Transport, Lynne Kosky, the understanding of the issues. I am more than happy to Minister for Roads and Ports, Tim Pallas, the Minister for Planning, Justin Madden, the Minister for Regional and Rural take up the invitation of the member for South Barwon, Development, Jacinta Allan, and the Minister for who, as I said, is a great advocate for his schools. I will Environment and Climate Change, Gavin Jennings. certainly visit Moriac Primary School community early next year; I do not think I will have an opportunity to He wanted to thank them for putting the scheme do it this year. I look forward to meeting with that together, a scheme that was imposed by the former community and hopefully taking the opportunity to Labor government on commuters in Victoria. I say to visit a few other schools in the area when I am down the member for Northcote that this was a Labor there. government buy-today, pay-later scheme. That is the typical economics of a Labor government. We have to Mr DELAHUNTY (Minister for Sport and look at this funding model put forward by the former Recreation) — Firstly, I would like to respond to the Labor government. It sits within the budget forward issues raised by the members for Rodney and Mildura. estimates. If the money were to come out, it would have They both raised the issue of severe flooding that to be found from somewhere else. We have to fund the impacted on their electorates earlier this year. There is desalination plant, the myki ticketing system and all no doubt that the effects of the floods that hit Victoria these types of projects, but they are the doing of the are still being felt by communities not only in their former Labor government. The member for Northcote areas but right across Victoria. Sporting clubs were knows this to be the case. particularly badly affected because a lot of their facilities were built along rivers and streams, so Ms Richardson interjected. clubrooms and facilities were affected. Some were completely wiped out and some lost valuable sporting
ADJOURNMENT
4920 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011 equipment. That is why the Floods Community Sporting clubs right around Victoria will also receive Recovery Fund was established. funding as the regional staff of the Department of Planning and Community Development continue to The fund is a joint initiative of the state and work closely with local councils, community groups commonwealth governments to provide $4 million to and peak bodies to identify further recovery projects. assist Victorian communities with the massive clean-up The coalition government will continue to work closely they faced. Since the fund was established, more than with local councils and key stakeholders to ensure that $2.6 million has been distributed to 25 councils and this funding brings about the best local outcomes, as 118 community organisations, supporting the delivery have been outlined by members, in the aftermath of the of over 200 flood recovery projects. That has been an floods. The $4 million Floods Community Recovery enormous task, and congratulations are due to all who Fund, to which the state and commonwealth have been involved up to this point. governments have each contributed $2 million — and I thank the federal government for supporting us — Flood-affected communities are starting to see an array supplements other available funding and provides of projects being delivered with funding assistance financial support to help flood-affected communities from the Floods Community Recovery Fund, and get back on their feet. Well done to those two members. grants for sporting groups and facilities, like the ones we are announcing here tonight, are among the latest The member for Derrimut raised a matter for the round of grants. Funding is being provided for a range Minister for Environment and Climate Change. I am of projects, ranging from replacement of sporting pretty sure it was in relation to Stirling Drive in equipment to large restoration projects at sporting Derrimut. There are some odour problems in that area facilities to repair flood damage. impacting on the Brimbank Gardens and Caroline Springs communities. The member is looking for As the member for Rodney has highlighted, these assistance from the Environment Protection Authority. I grants can make a meaningful difference to sporting will pass that request on to the Minister for groups in communities. We often get the best local Environment and Climate Change, and I am sure he outcomes when departments work with local will move quickly on that, as he does with a lot of these communities. Sporting-related projects are significant, things. particularly in the electorate of Rodney. I am pleased to announce tonight that in relation to the issues the The other request was made by the member for Keilor member for Rodney has raised, the Campaspe walking to the Minister for Planning. It related to the inquiry trail, the Rochester Table Tennis Club and the into the livability options in outer suburban Melbourne. Rochester Tigers Cricket Club will share in over She spoke about the fact of population growth — and $10 000 to replace sporting equipment and lay a new she is right. On the western side of Melbourne there is walking track to replace that damaged by the floods enormous growth. As Minister for Sport and Recreation earlier this year. I have seen the requests coming in for sporting grounds and facilities; there are a lot of requests for them. The It has been highlighted by the member for Mildura — member spoke about livability, but she really put the and I have a son who lives in Mildura — that rain pressure on the minister by telling him to get his act equivalent to the annual rainfall fell there in 24 hours. together. In Victoria as minister for sport I have a board Sporting facilities were hit hard. It was pleasing to see called the Boxing and Combat Sports Board. It is that the member for Mildura was out there working responsible for approving combat sports, such as with the community and was assisted by the federal boxing et cetera. I wonder whether the member for member for Mallee, John Forrest. The federal member Keilor had a permit for a fighting event in her office had had to deal with a pretty tough period of drought between the former member for Keilor and a staff over the previous 10 or 12 years, so it was a great member of the member for Macedon. Again I will pass change to have this enormous flood, which particularly the member’s request on to the Minister for Planning, impacted the area of Cardross. Many of the and I am sure he will move quickly on this one, as he organisations there, whether they be football, netball or does. cricket clubs, have been working together, and that is great to see. I am pleased to announce for the member The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Nardella) — for Mildura that the Cardross Cricket Club, the Order! The house is now adjourned. Cardross Football Netball Club and the Red Cliffs Lawn Tennis Club will share in over $4500 from this House adjourned 11.51 p.m. very important fund to assist in replacing essential equipment that was damaged by the floods and cannot be recovered.
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (MARINE SAFETY AND OTHER AMENDMENTS) BILL 2011
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4921
Thursday, 27 October 2011 BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE
The SPEAKER (Hon. Ken Smith) took the chair at Notices of motion: removal 9.34 a.m. and read the prayer. The SPEAKER — Order! I advise the house that notices of motion 1 to 20 will be removed from the TRANSPORT LEGISLATION notice paper unless members wishing notices to remain AMENDMENT (MARINE SAFETY AND advise the Clerk in writing before 2.00 p.m. today. OTHER AMENDMENTS) BILL 2011
Introduction and first reading PETITIONS
Dr NAPTHINE (Minister for Ports) — I move: Following petitions presented to house:
That I have leave to bring in a bill for an act to amend the Planning: green wedge development Marine Safety Act 2010, the Marine Act 1988, the Port Management Act 1995 and the Transport Integration To the Legislative Assembly of Victoria: Act 2010 and for other purposes. This petition of certain citizens of the state of Victoria draws Mr PALLAS (Tarneit) — I ask the minister for a to the attention of the Legislative Assembly the current brief explanation of the bill. review seeking to turn green wedge land into commercial and housing developments.
Dr NAPTHINE (Minister for Ports) — The bill The protection, nurturing and enhancement of green wedge makes a range of changes to the Marine Safety land has been supported by both political parties for over Act 2010 and other legislation to improve safety on the 30 years in recognition of the important role that open space water and to increase the effectiveness of marine and plays in improving the mental and physical health of the community and maintaining the livability of Melbourne. port regulation generally. It adjusts the Marine Safety They are the lungs of our city. Act 2010 to facilitate the commencement of that act. The changes include ensuring that persons operating We are concerned that the current review of the green wedge, hire and drive vessels are subject to the same duty of which only looks at opportunities for commercial and housing development, does not get the balance right because it does care as operators of recreational vessels, facilitating not consider the impact that bulldozing green wedges will better renewal procedures for marine licences and have on the environment, the mental and physical health of permissions and enabling Victoria to recognise the community and the livability of Melbourne. certificates issued by class societies and other We are concerned that once gone the green wedges are gone international authorities. forever and that future generations will regret the destruction of the green wedges. The bill clarifies marine pollution responsibilities and cost recovery by ensuring that the Secretary of the The petitioners therefore request that the Baillieu government Department of Transport has the power to recover costs stop the current review which only recognises green wedges as a development opportunity, agree to strengthen and grow incurred in marine operations where pollution is rather than reduce green wedge space and work with the prevented. The bill also adjusts the regulation of community to enhance and improve Melbourne’s green Victorian ports in response to the review conducted by wedges. the Essential Services Commission in 2009 of the price monitoring regime for the sector. This includes By Ms HENNESSY (Altona) (214 signatures). repealing the Victorian channels access regime. It also lifts the three-year sunset for regulation of towage at the Victorian certificate of applied learning: port of Melbourne. funding To the Legislative Assembly of Victoria: Motion agreed to. This petition of certain citizens of the state of Victoria draws Read first time. to the attention of the Legislative Assembly the Baillieu government’s axing of $48 million funding for the Victorian certificate of applied learning program.
In particular we note:
1. VCAL provides an important learning alternative to the VCE for students across Victoria;
DOCUMENTS
4922 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011
2. secondary schools stand to lose up to $125 000 in In particular we note: funding, which will impact heavily on teachers expected to deliver the support and services despite having 1. that this petition is in tribute and loving memory of Jake inadequate time and resources to do so; Fenech, who died on 30 April 2011 after running off the Whittlesea-Yea Road between Kinglake and Whittlesea; 3. funding has been axed despite strong objections from principals, teachers, parents and students across Victoria. 2. it is also for the three young lives that have been lost on the same stretch of road in the months that have The petitioners therefore request that the Baillieu government followed Jake’s death and the many additional fatalities immediately reverse its decision and restore funding to this and injuries that have occurred over the years on vital program as a matter of urgency. Whittlesea-Yea Road; By Ms GARRETT (Brunswick) (161 signatures). 3. a reduction in the speed limit would be a necessary first step; however, it will not eliminate vehicles running off Lawn bowls: television coverage the road on the dangerous curves that wind their way up and down the mountain from Whittlesea to Kinglake. To the Legislative Assembly of Victoria: The petitioners therefore request that the Legislative The petition of the residents of Victoria draws to the attention Assembly of Victoria urge the state government to address of the house the recent decision by the Australian this situation and immediately take action to prevent more Broadcasting Corporation to cancel its coverage of the sport loss of life and heartache. This includes sensible road barriers of lawn bowls. being built to dramatically decrease vehicles coming off the road. We insist that this be addressed with the utmost of The petitioners therefore request that the Legislative urgency as four young people have already lost their lives Assembly of Victoria urge the federal Minister for between April and July 2011. Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy to restore coverage of lawn bowls on ABC television. By Ms GREEN (Yan Yean) (10 signatures). By Mr WAKELING (Ferntree Gully) Tabled. (14 signatures) and Mr NORTHE (Morwell) (27 signatures). Ordered that petition presented by honourable member for Brunswick be considered next day on Bacchus Marsh: Avenue of Honour motion of Ms GARRETT (Brunswick).
To the Legislative Assembly of Victoria: Ordered that petition presented by honourable member for Altona be considered next day on The petition of residents of Victoria and elsewhere draws to the attention of the house that the famous Bacchus Marsh motion of Ms HENNESSY (Altona). Avenue of Honour, commemorating soldiers from the district who served and died in World War I, being registered on the Ordered that petition presented by honourable Victorian heritage register as having historical, cultural, member for Yan Yean be considered next day on scientific and aesthetic significance to the state of Victoria, is motion of Ms GREEN (Yan Yean). in the opinion of the executive director of Heritage Victoria, the opinion of the National Trust of Australia (Victoria) and Ordered that petition presented by honourable in the opinion of the undersigned in danger of having its heritage significance substantially and permanently adversely member for South Barwon be considered next day affected by the plans of VicRoads to create a new heavy on motion of Mr KATOS (South Barwon). vehicle arterial road through the avenue at the intersection of Woolpack Road, with the removal of magnificent 90-year-old elm trees planted by the families of soldiers who were killed DOCUMENTS in action in France, and the intrusion of a roundabout and associated road works, signs and lights. Tabled by Clerk: The petitioners therefore request that the Legislative Assembly of Victoria pass a motion condemning the Australian Grand Prix Corporation — Report 2010–11 proposed roadworks. Commissioner for Law Enforcement Data Security, Office By Mr KATOS (South Barwon) (435 signatures). of — Report 2010–11 Docklands Studios Melbourne Pty Ltd — Report 2010–11 Whittlesea-Yea Road: safety Financial Management Act 1994: To the Legislative Assembly of Victoria: Report from the Minister for Environment and Climate The petition of certain citizens of the state of Victoria calls on Change that he had received the reports 2010–11 of the: the state government to improve the safety conditions on the Whittlesea-Yea Road. Barwon Regional Waste Management Group
BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4923
Calder Regional Waste Management Group MEMBERS STATEMENTS Central Murray Regional Waste Management Group Floods: small business assistance
Desert Fringe Regional Waste Management Group Ms ASHER (Minister for Innovation, Services and Small Business) — I rise to provide a brief report to the Gippsland Regional Waste Management Group house on how the government has handled flood relief Goulburn Valley Regional Waste Management for small business. Members will recall that the Group government established a Business Relief Fund with Grampians Regional Waste Management Group the Victorian Employers Chamber of Commerce and Industry (VECCI) and allocated $1.5 million to that Highlands Regional Waste Management Group fund. That funding was for businesses that were not directly flooded but had been impacted by the floods — Mildura Regional Waste Management Group for example, by road closures. Mornington Peninsula Waste Management Group I report to the house that approximately 200 businesses North East Victorian Regional Waste Management have received grants under this program, ranging from Group $1500 to $5000 — the majority were $5000 grants. South Western Regional Waste Management Grants were distributed in 59 towns; the top three for Group grants were Horsham, Echuca and Kerang. In addition to these grants, there were 4000 clean-up and National Parks Advisory Council — Report 2010–11 restoration grants totalling $54 million; a $1 million Ombudsman — Investigation into how universities deal with tourism flood recovery program to encourage visitation international students — Ordered to be printed to those flood-affected areas, which has been quite Phillip Island Nature Parks — Report 2010–11 successful; and another $700 000 that has been allocated for business mentoring services for flood- Police Integrity, Office of — Crossing the Line — Report of affected businesses. There are a range of other flood an investigation into the conduct of a member of Victoria assistance programs being ably handled by the Deputy Police undertaking secondary employment as a Ministerial Adviser and his relationship with a Deputy Commissioner of Premier, but I wanted to provide that report to the house Victoria Police — Ordered to be printed on the business fund allocations, and I am delighted that those businesses were assisted. I also thank VECCI for Sustainability Victoria — Report 2010–11 its help in delivering that program. Terrorism (Community Protection) Act 2003 — Reports 2009–10 and 2010–11 under s 21M Roads: truck action plan
Treasury and Finance, Department of — Report 2010–11 Ms ALLAN (Bendigo East) — During August I had Victorian Catchment Management Council — Report a series of meetings with concerned residents and 2010–11 community representatives in the inner west, along with my colleagues the members for Williamstown and Victorian Funds Management Corporation — Report Footscray, regarding the Baillieu Liberal government’s 2010–11 failure to proceed with the important truck action plan that would dramatically reduce truck movements on the BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE streets of the inner west. During this meeting residents raised with me significant issues of truck pollution Adjournment caused by these truck movements and the fact that the Environment Protection Authority was regularly Mr McINTOSH (Minister for Corrections) — I monitoring this noise pollution. move: On behalf of those with whom I met and my That the house, at its rising, adjourns until Tuesday, colleagues, on 13 September I wrote to the Minister for 8 November 2011. Environment and Climate Change — as I was advised Motion agreed to. to do following a phone call to his office — to request a meeting with the CEO of the Environment Protection Authority to discuss this matter. On 22 September I received a response from the minister’s chief of staff, who refused to respond to this request. I have since
MEMBERS STATEMENTS
4924 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011 written again, on 4 October and 25 October, seeking which is to be held in the Queenscliff town hall. The art this meeting. show has already attracted artists both local and national, and will be another great showcase for their The Environment Protection Authority is an talent. independent statutory authority established by an act of Parliament. It is clearly within its scope to hold a The Rotary Club of Ocean Grove has decided to donate meeting with members of Parliament regardless of their the profits from the art show equally between three very political persuasion, and I am concerned that the significant local institutions — Cottage By The Sea, the minister and his office are intervening and stopping the Disabled Surfers Association of Australia, and the Environment Protection Authority from performing one Rainbow Riders. of its independent duties — briefing members of Parliament who are making representations about This event, as with all events staged by the Ocean environmental matters on behalf of concerned members Grove rotary club, could not happen without the hard of the public. work of many willing and capable volunteers. I am sure that the first annual art show will be a great success. Tyrell College: community partnership St Leonards Community Festival Mr WALSH (Minister for Agriculture and Food Security) — I congratulate Tyrrell College at Sea Lake Ms NEVILLE — On another matter, this weekend I on its success with the outstanding partnership program will be opening the St Leonards Community Festival, between the college and AWB Grainflow, Sea Lake the theme of which is a century of progress by the AGRIvision and many other local farmers and St Leonards Progress Association. The original businesses in the area. This partnership is aimed at progress association was responsible for the memorial keeping young people in the farming industry by hall in which this year’s festival will be held. Photos providing practical, student-centred learning with and documents which represent the changes in the expert input from the program’s partners. It involves small town over the last 100 years will be displayed, industry representatives working with the college and thanks to the hard work of progress association the students in delivering agronomic knowledge and members Bob Hynes, Beryl Halpin and Peter Munster. skills, and it means the students have hands-on There will also be other festival activities, including experience of many aspects of on-farm activities. music, dancing and a market.
This program specifically targets one of the major In keeping with the historical theme, I shall also be issues for our food and fibre producing industry — that launching Peter Munster’s wonderful book, of keeping young people involved in agriculture. The Remembering Our Anzacs, which tells the stories of college has been recognised for this program by being 37 young men from St Leonards and Indented Head one of 11 Victorian schools and 60 from across who fought in World War I. Australia to receive a $50 000 NAB impact award. It will be a great weekend on the Bellarine thanks to the The college has now been declared the Victorian state efforts of so many community members and volunteers. award winner, which will give it a further $50 000 to They are what makes Bellarine such a great place. use to support the program. This also makes the school eligible for the national award, where it can potentially Rail: Doncaster win another $400 000. These NAB Schools First Ms WOOLDRIDGE (Minister for Mental awards are based on highly effective school and Health) — I am delighted that the Minister for Public community partnerships that address an identified need Transport has announced that work is now under way or opportunity that will benefit specific school students. on the $6.5 million Doncaster rail study. The study will The Tyrrell College-Grainflow-AGRIvision partnership provide an extensive and independent assessment of all is a fantastic example of this. I congratulate the school, of the requirements involved in constructing a rail line the local businesses and the entire community on the to Doncaster. initiative, and I wish them well at the national awards It will examine a number of options for the best route to ceremony on 23 November. deliver a rail line in Doncaster. The study team will Rotary Club of Ocean Grove: art show liaise closely with local councils to identify the key challenges for the local communities involved in this Ms NEVILLE (Bellarine) — This weekend is the project. Members of the local community will have a Rotary Club of Ocean Grove’s first annual art show, number of opportunities during this process to provide
MEMBERS STATEMENTS
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4925 their input and ideas. The study will examine key issues temperatures close to zero and snow predicted for such as patronage, demand, land use and nearby mountains, the hard work is still ahead. environmental, social and economic sustainability. I wish to express my condolences to those who have Tim Gosbell from URS Australia will lead the major lost loved ones in this tragic earthquake. I would like to study. Tim has over 20 years experience in transport let the residents of south-eastern Turkey and the and engineering planning. This is a great opportunity surrounding affected areas know that the residents of for the people of Doncaster, and I will be working to Victoria and Australia feel their pain and that our ensure our local community has a strong voice in the thoughts are with them at this horrible time. Again, my process. heartfelt condolences go to the families of the people who have lost their lives. My thoughts and prayers are Breast Cancer Awareness Month with the families and friends of the victims of this devastating earthquake. Ms WOOLDRIDGE — In Breast Cancer Month I would like to thank Judy Sammut for all her work for Lilydale to Warburton rail trail: bridge women with breast cancer and for again working with me to undertake a Mini-Field of Women for the Breast Mrs FYFFE (Evelyn) — On Saturday I was proud Cancer Network Australia. For the sixth year in a row to officially open the Warburton rail trail bridge we displayed the distinctive pink ladies at The Pines in crossing over Maroondah Highway at Lilydale, which East Doncaster and held a stall to raise awareness, marked the completion of the trail from Lilydale to provide information and raise funds for women. Warburton. Community groups and townships along the trail had displays and activities, including a skate I would like to recognise and congratulate Lyn park event at Mount Evelyn, a mini market at Mont De Swinburne for founding and leading the Breast Cancer Lancey in Wandin, an art display at Woori Yallock, an Network Australia. Lyn is only weeks away from old steam engine display at Yarra Junction and an retiring as CEO after 13 years, and as well as leaving a animal petting zoo at Warburton. The bridge is a strong, vibrant organisation with over 60 000 members, fantastic asset for the community. Even on a rainy day she leaves a very personal legacy of having made a real it was good to see so many people walking, cycling and difference for many thousands of women across this riding the trail. country. My sincere thanks to Lyn Margery and the team at Turkey: earthquake Yarra Ranges Council for their hard work in organising the day. Many people have been involved in the Mr EREN (Lara) — I wish to speak to the house establishment of this valuable asset. As always, I today regarding the recent devastating earthquake in hesitate to try to list everyone who has contributed to its Turkey. The 7.2 magnitude earthquake which struck on success, but if I could just single out the former Shire of Sunday in south-eastern Turkey caused a lot of Upper Yarra, which started the work in 1988; Graeme destruction and also collapsed a seven-storey building Stoney, a former member of the Legislative Council in one of the central areas in the city. who worked tirelessly on establishing this trail; the Friends of the Warburton Trail, who not only showed At the moment it is reported that close to 460 people tenacity and determination in lobbying for funds but have been killed and hundreds of others have been left also rolled up their sleeves and weeded, planted, spread injured or trapped. It is looking like 40 000 people may gravel and cleaned rubbish, and who can be justifiably have been left homeless. It is also reported that shoddy proud of their achievements; the land-holders who construction contributed to the high casualty toll in that relinquished their grazing rights; my fellow earthquake. Casualties were concentrated in the town of commissioners, who saw the tourism value of the trail; Ercis and the provincial capital Van, with officials still and the Shire of Yarra Ranges for its ongoing checking and confirming fatalities in the outlying maintenance. I would also like to thank the former villages. Aftershocks have been severe and have made member for Evelyn, Heather McTaggart, for securing it nearly impossible for thousands of people to return to the funding for the rail trail bridge. their homes.
I commend the efforts of the members of the rescue St Mary’s House of Welcome teams and the Turkish Red Crescent who have been Mrs FYFFE — Last week, like many other working tirelessly through the rubble and debris to set members of Parliament, I was able and fortunate up relief camps and assist those in need. With enough to go to St Mary’s in — —
MEMBERS STATEMENTS
4926 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011
The SPEAKER — Order! The member’s time has Maintenance won the Efficient Energy award for its expired. self-sustaining, energy-efficient workshop. City of Brimbank: Places of Worship tour Jenny Bennie and Josie Munro
Ms HUTCHINS (Keilor) — Last Thursday I Mr McCURDY — The Red Cross performs great embarked on an amazing cultural experience organised work, as we all know, and I would like to pay tribute to by the Brimbank City Council, in particular Mete two Strathmerton ladies, Jenny Bennie and Josie Temurcin, community planning and engagement Munro, who were presented with laurel wreaths in officer, on a tour called Places of Worship. recognition of 50 years dedicated service to the Red Cross at the region 22 annual conference recently. Around 70 residents from Sudanese, Greek, Vietnamese, Turkish, Macedonian and Chinese Show days: regional and rural Victoria backgrounds travelled by bus to visit three iconic places of worship within the cities of Brimbank and Mr McCURDY — October is show month in the Maribyrnong. Those places of worship included the Murray Valley, and last week I was honoured to Westgate Baptist Church, the Quang Minh Buddhist officially open both the Numurkah and the Cobram Temple and the Deer Park Muslim mosque. All on the shows. Numurkah was celebrating particularly good tour enjoyed the experience. Multiculturalism is alive crowds with the return of its show day holiday, which and well in Brimbank, and I would like to thank the had been lost under the previous government. Show Brimbank council and local police for organising this days are a calendar highlight in rural communities, and very important community event. congratulations to those who do such a great job to organise them. Breast Cancer Awareness Month Invergordon: closer settlement anniversary Ms HUTCHINS — The month of October is Breast Cancer Awareness Month, and I would like to Mr McCURDY — A huge crowd gathered at encourage women to regularly check their breasts and Invergordon over the weekend to celebrate the for those over 50 to have regular mammograms. Too 50th anniversary of closer settlement in the region. A many women lose their lives to breast cancer in history, Small Community, Big Heart — The Australia, and I would like to acknowledge the Invergordon Closer Settlement Story, compiled by one important work done by Jean Travers, who coordinates of the original settlers, Rosemary Kennett, was the Brimbank BreastWest cancer support group. launched, and I was delighted to open the History Hall, Despite battling breast cancer herself, she takes the time established in the former guide hall, which has been to volunteer to support other women. I would also like renovated. to acknowledge those in my life who are battling breast cancer and those who live in my electorate, particularly Cobram Community House my neighbour Karin, who is currently going through a Mr McCURDY — It was a privilege to attend the very long and hard battle with breast cancer, and Teresa annual general meeting of Cobram Community House Sykes and my good friend Nadine Sercombe, who have and hear about the wonderful work it is doing. The managed to beat breast cancer and to go on and live full programs it delivers are an important aspect of lives. upskilling our community. We rely on and appreciate The SPEAKER — Order! The member’s time has such dedicated team spirit. Well done. expired. Royal Children’s Hospital: opening Keep Australia Beautiful Victoria: awards Ms PIKE (Melbourne) — Yesterday I was Mr McCURDY (Murray Valley) — honoured to be able to attend the opening of the new Congratulations to the Robinson family, who did Royal Children’s Hospital, and I want to thank the Wangaratta proud at the Keep Australia Beautiful government for the kind invitations issued to me and Victoria awards at Rutherglen at the weekend. Travis former premiers Steve Bracks and John Brumby to Robinson, Wangaratta’s Young Citizen of the Year for attend that marvellous occasion. 2011 and head prefect at Wangaratta High School, was Many thousands of people have been involved in the a worthy winner of the Young Leaders — Individual construction of the new Royal Children’s Hospital. As award. Family business Robinson’s Truck and Coach it is impossible to name everyone at those formal
MEMBERS STATEMENTS
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4927 occasions, I wanted to put on the public record my airport has around 50 aviation-related businesses, gratitude and that of many others to some very special generating much-needed income for the local economy. people. From the Department of Health I would like to Those aviation businesses will benefit from establishing thank Tony Lubofsky, Fran Thorn, Lance Wallace and a chamber to support each other in challenging Anna Burgess, who were there right at the beginning economic times. and who worked incredibly hard to bring the project to fruition. From the hospital itself Tony Cull, the former Singapore: tourism infrastructure CEO, was instrumental in the design and development, which was then followed through by Christine Mr MADDEN (Essendon) — Earlier this year I had Kilpatrick and now John Stanway. the good fortune to travel to Singapore to familiarise myself with and witness firsthand the massive scale of a From the board’s perspective, Tony Beddison and Max tourism and infrastructure investment undertaken by the Beck always had the vision that this would be the best Singapore government in partnership with business. It children’s hospital in the world, and I am sure they are has taken place over the last decade and has basically absolutely delighted that this has come to pass. led to thousands of new jobs and billions of dollars of Thousands of people were involved during the economic benefit to the Singaporean economy. Key to construction, and I pay tribute to every single person this infrastructure is what is known as the Marina who played a part. barrage, which is at the entrance to Marina Bay. It has turned Marina Bay into a calm body of water and a Governor of Victoria Export Awards: freshwater catchment that is suitable for recreational Mordialloc electorate purposes. What we have seen in this precinct with this renewal is massive investment in facilities such as the Ms WREFORD (Mordialloc) — On Wednesday, Singapore Flyer, Theatres on the Bay, convention and 19 October, I attended the Governor of Victoria Export exhibition centres, an art and science museum, the Awards and was thrilled to see two businesses from my Marina Bay Sands theatres, the integrated resort — or electorate, both in Braeside, win awards. MTECH the Marina Bay Sands hotel, as it is known — SkyPark, Systems won the Small Business Exporter award. It the Float and a casino component, and under operates in the aviation meteorology sector, with development are very impressive massive-scale civic multimillion-dollar projects in Taiwan, Nigeria and gardens known as Gardens by the Bay. India. In India it is redeveloping 60 airports so that planes can fly safely in fog. What is interesting is that basically this is Southbank and Docklands on steroids. If imitation is the greatest Ronstan International won the Small to Medium form of flattery, then certainly this flatters Melbourne, Manufacturers award. It supplies high-strength and because Singapore has obviously been inspired by lightweight rigging products around the world. Its work Melbourne’s tourism infrastructure. The key to this is can be seen at Federation Square, the MCG, Denver that basically the challenge from Singapore in terms of International Airport and the San Diego Yacht Club. It the tourism market is great. With the strength of the is good to see local businesses doing so well when the dollar the way it is, the new government needs to make threat of the carbon tax is hurting so many businesses. sure that it does not stand still and allow Melbourne to be overtaken by Singapore. Mordialloc Preschool: 50th anniversary Langwarrin Park Kindergarten: extension Ms WREFORD — On Sunday, 23 October, I had the pleasure of attending the 50th birthday of Mr BURGESS (Hastings) — On Thursday, Mordialloc Preschool, which was founded in 1961. 29 September, I had the great honour of turning the first Mordialloc Preschool was a leader. A group of mothers sod for the extension works being undertaken at came together, fundraised and obtained a grant to start Langwarrin Park Kindergarten and maternal and child it. Fortunately many of those original founders were at health centre with Frankston mayor Cr Kris Bolam. For the celebration. Their drive has provided so much for the last decade Langwarrin Park Kindergarten has been children and families in the area ever since. one of the most successful kindergartens throughout the region. Langwarrin Park Kindergarten has received a Moorabbin Airport: chamber of commerce $200 000 state government renovation and refurbishment grant to extend the existing single Ms WREFORD — On Thursday, 20 October, I playroom kindergarten to include an additional attended a meeting to establish a chamber of commerce playroom, community room and a maternal and child at Moorabbin Airport. This is an exciting concept. The health consulting room. This will increase the licensed
MEMBERS STATEMENTS
4928 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011 capacity to 60 to ensure that future demands of the recommendation, and its implementation was what the centre are met. These extension works will enhance the coalition committed to when it was in opposition. But educational opportunities and health care for local what do we see the coalition doing now that it is in families. I congratulate president Glenda Stewart, staff government? It is backflipping, breaking promises and and local families for their hard work and wonderful not implementing the recommendations of the royal achievement. commission. Moonlit Sanctuary Wildlife Conservation Park: This scheme recently announced by the government is 10th anniversary limited to people affected by Black Saturday. This is not a scheme for people who live in high bushfire risk Mr BURGESS — On Wednesday, 28 September, I areas. It leaves people in my electorate excluded from attended the celebrations of the 10th anniversary the scheme regardless of their bushfire risk. This is celebrations of the Moonlit Sanctuary Wildlife completely contrary to the intention of the Conservation Park in Pearcedale. The Moonlit commissioners and their report, and I condemn this sanctuary is an award-winning, eco-certified wildlife government for it. Victorians paid dearly for this report experience. It has received Victorian tourism awards and the learnings contained in it. It was not the intention and a sustainable cities award for protection of the that such a scheme would only apply to the footprint of environment and was found by the Royal Automobile the 2009 fires. This is a perversion of those Club of Victoria to be in the top 30 of Victoria’s findings — — 101 favourite tourism attractions. I congratulate owner Michael Johnson and his wonderful staff for their The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Weller) — Order! success over the last 10 years. The interaction with The member’s time has expired. native and endangered species that this sanctuary provides is world class, and I encourage everyone to get Bairnsdale Boxing Club: tournament along and enjoy the wonderful and unique Moonlit Mr BULL (Gippsland East) — I wish to sanctuary experience. congratulate the committee and members of the Hastings: Tidy Towns awards Bairnsdale amateur boxing club led by chief organiser Rohan Tomkins for the running of its annual Mr BURGESS — On Wednesday, 5th October, in tournament, which was held last weekend. Proceeds Hastings I presented participation and finalist aided the Make-A-Wish Foundation. The event certificates to local entrants in the Tidy Town of the attracted the best and up-and-coming boxers from Year competition. I would like to congratulate all across Victoria and interstate, with local James Allen entrants — — receiving the Park-Tomkins Memorial Award for the best fighter on the day. The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Weller) — Order! The member’s time has expired. East Gippsland Business Awards Bushfires: royal commission recommendations Mr BULL — The inaugural 2011 East Gippsland Business Awards run by the East Gippsland Regional Ms DUNCAN (Macedon) — The Baillieu coalition Business and Tourism Association, and in particular the government promised to implement all of the CEO, Tim Ellis, was an outstanding success. Up to recommendations of the 2009 Victorian Bushfires 50 local businesses and individuals were recognised as Royal Commission, and if memory serves, the finalists in 14 categories, with winners from Orbost, government actually made that commitment prior to the Lakes Entrance, Metung, Bruthen and Bairnsdale. It release of all of the recommendations. While this would was my great pleasure to present the Outstanding have been a highly reckless move for any government, Achievement award to Patties Foods, which is based in let alone an opposition, the coalition made that Bairnsdale. The award recognised the longstanding commitment nonetheless. As the member for Macedon contribution of Patties Foods to the local business I represent one of the most fire-prone areas of this state, community. Patties has grown from its humble so my electorate has a keen interest in these beginnings 45 years ago as a small family-owned cake recommendations and their implementation. One of the shop to become one of Australia’s largest food recommendations was to include ‘a scheme for non- manufacturing companies. It now incorporates brands compulsory acquisition by the state of land in these such as Four’N Twenty, Herbert Adams and Nanna’s. areas’, which referred to existing developments in areas of unacceptably high bushfire risk. This was the
MEMBERS STATEMENTS
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4929
Mallacoota and District Historical Society: I congratulate all the graduating year 12 students. They exhibition have done their families and their community very proud, and we are looking forward to all the changes Mr BULL — The Mallacoota and District they will make and the contributions they will no doubt Historical Society is currently presenting a new make to our wider community. All the best! exhibition which tells the story of Mallacoota’s beginnings at Lakeview on the eastern shores of the St Benedict’s Primary School: art show inlet and the subsequent history of the town, which has largely gone untold. Mrs Jo Grant, honorary curator, Mr WATT (Burwood) — On 24 October I had the said the exhibition raises public awareness of the pleasure of opening the art show at St Benedict’s town’s interesting heritage and the fact that Mallacoota Primary School. The art work is a credit to the efforts of is fortunate to have both a historical society and a the students, and I commend the arts teacher, Mrs Erika museum. Pollehn, for all her hard work. I was particularly taken by the combined work of 1/2WH. Maffra and District Agricultural Pastoral and Horticultural Show Rowen Street Kindergarten: family fun day
Mr BULL — It was also my great pleasure last Mr WATT — I attended the Rowen Street weekend to attend the Maffra show, which recently Kindergarten family fun day, which was held on received a grant of $8661 — — 23 October. It was great to be able to speak to members of the committee about the myriad problems they face The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Weller) — Order! as a result of the policies of the federal Labor-Greens The member’s time has expired. government. Despite this, they had a successful day and the kinder continues to have a fantastic reputation in the Northcote High School: graduation ceremony local area.
Ms RICHARDSON (Northcote) — Last Friday Our Lady’s Primary School, Wattle Park: fete night I was privileged to attend Northcote High School’s 2011 year 12 graduation ceremony at Wilson Mr WATT — On 22 October I attended the fete at Hall at the University of Melbourne. Northcote High Our Lady’s Primary School, Wattle Park. The weather School, led by principal Kate Morris and school council held off for the afternoon, which allowed for a great president John Butera, is one of our state’s leading high day for the whole community. Congratulations to the schools, and this year’s graduating class has once again organisers, particularly principal Patrick Torpey, on exceeded our community’s high expectations. School such a well-run event. captains and subject and award recipients Siyu Wu and Luke Corcoran spoke brilliantly and glowingly about St Michael’s Parish Primary School: art show their graduation class and thanked their deputy captains Mr WATT — On 21 October I attended the for all their work. St Michael’s Parish Primary School art show, which In the limited time I have available, it is not possible to was opened by John Bertrand. The art work by the mention everyone, but subject prizes and awards were students was commendable, and the indigenous dancing given to Hanh Phuong Dao, Ngaire Freemann, Yan was well received. I commend the organisers, Chen, Ting Huang, Zena Barakat, Wen Jiang, Jacky particularly the art teacher, Mrs Deb Chapman, on such Kwok, Eve Walton-Healey, Isobel Gordon, Charles a great exhibition. Cornwallis, Dominica Scott, Huei Hsien Wang, Ramon Yousef, Konstance Spiropoulos, Phoebe Godfrey, Ashwood, Ashburton and Chadstone Public Martin Ditmann, Georgia Miller, Rebecca Elrachkidi, Tenants Group: annual general meeting Yong Lin, Sam Lockart, Alexander Smart, Michael Mr WATT — On 20 October I had the pleasure of Davies, Shannon Hickey, Wendy Lam, Megan being the guest speaker at the annual general meeting of Edwards, Nicholas Kenyon, Yi Qin Lu, Carina the Ashwood, Ashburton and Chadstone Public Petersen, Caitlin Friend, Mark Langley, Priyanka Tenants Group. As someone who grew up in public Krishnan-D’Souza, Caitlin Mountford and Sosanita housing, it is good for me to see such a strong advocacy Cheung. Twenty-five outstanding citizenship awards group. I wish to put on the record my appreciation for were also awarded on the night. the work of Lucille Horo, who has stepped aside this year to move on to a new and challenging role. I also wish Natalie Rabey all the best for her term as
MEMBERS STATEMENTS
4930 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011 chairperson and look forward to working constructively and I cannot even imagine her loss, with her in the future. will it grow back, will she feel displaced, Ashburton Support Services: annual general will she live without it, feeling naked and vulnerable meeting hiding in corners or shadow maybe, or will she die? Mr WATT — On 20 October I attended the annual general meeting of Ashburton Support Services. I want I urge the Minister for Water and Melbourne Water to to place on the record my appreciation for all the hard generously assist Casey’s flood victims and fix the work and tireless efforts of Hal Hobbs, who has problems. Casey residents need help, not more decided to take a step back this year from his position hindrances. as president and also from the board. Girl guides: Bentleigh electorate Glendi Dimitria festival Ms MILLER (Bentleigh) — Recently I met the Mr WATT — On 23 October I attended the annual Bentleigh district girl guides and heard firsthand about Macedonian Glendi Dimitria festival on behalf of the the great work the girls are doing for their local Minister for Multicultural Affairs and Citizenship. I community. That evening we had a wonderful wish to congratulate the Pan-Macedonian Association presentation on the changes to the uniform over the of Melbourne and Victoria on a great event. Moving the years. Congratulations to the girls — keep up the good festival to Eaton Mall was a great initiative. work! City of Casey: flood protection Jump 4 Toby
Ms GRALEY (Narre Warren South) — I was Ms MILLER — Last weekend I was privileged to interested to read recently in the Casey Weekly Berwick attend an event to raise funds to support families who that Melbourne Water has declared some of the areas in have gone through bereavement, the death of a child or the city of Casey which were affected by this year’s a life-threatening illness. Jump 4 Toby was supported summer floods as not extreme flood risks. It was by Very Special Kids and Springfree Trampoline in reported that these areas will not be included in memory of Toby McCredie. Congratulations to Penny Melbourne Water’s flood protection works. The floods and Tim for a successful event. in the city of Casey in February this year were not a 1-in-100-year event. Anybody who was around my Royal Children’s Hospital: opening electorate at the time or who saw the images published in the local papers — images of almost fully submerged Ms MILLER — I congratulate the Baillieu cars and buildings — would agree that all flood- government for opening Victoria’s new Royal affected areas of Casey need to be included in the flood Children’s Hospital yesterday with the patronage of Her protection program. The streets referred to by Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, who was accompanied by Melbourne Water as not carrying extreme risk have His Royal Highness Prince Philip, the Duke of been flooded in the past. Edinburgh. Her Majesty once graciously described the hospital as a monument to the humanity and public Many local residents are still not back in their homes, spirit of Victorians. I have no doubt that it was, still is and many of them are afraid of this happening all over and always will be such a monument. again. Michelle Halsall, a tireless community advocate in Hampton Park, has formed a Casey community flood The Premier and the Governor-General hosted a support group which gives flood victims the wonderful program, and I am certain all Victorians opportunity to come together and support each other. enjoyed the visit, knowing that our sparkling new jewel One of the group’s members is an 85-year-old flood in the crown — the new Royal Children’s Hospital — victim who is still not back in her house. She wrote the has been officially opened by this government. It is following poem, which sums up the feelings and wonderful to see visionary plans from the Kennett era emotions of the many local residents who have not yet completed by the Baillieu government. It is great to see returned home: this project finally completed after 11 years of inaction by the previous government. Don’t step on a snail please she may lose her house, crushed on her back by careless shoes, not many people really care,
VICTORIAN RESPONSIBLE GAMBLING FOUNDATION BILL 2011
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4931
Broadmeadows electorate: government services VICTORIAN RESPONSIBLE GAMBLING building FOUNDATION BILL 2011
Mr McGUIRE (Broadmeadows) — The Second reading Baillieu-Ryan regime has created a crisis of confidence with its silence over the proposed government services Debate resumed from 12 October; motion of building in my electorate. Its refusal to answer Mr O’BRIEN (Minister for Gaming). questions from stakeholders and the media over the future of this development has raised deep concern that Ms D’AMBROSIO (Mill Park) — I rise to speak the coalition is backing away from its multimillion- on the Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation dollar commitment to the people of Broadmeadows. Bill 2011. I state from the outset that the opposition will The project would create 500 jobs and is a vital not be opposing the bill. I will give an outline of the investment in the aspirations and character of an area functions of the bill and then move on to a number of that deserves to have its courage and labour honoured. issues that arise from the bill. I convey a sense of It would be the next step in meeting the challenge that concern on the part of the opposition with respect to Broadmeadows confronts: the historic failure of these issues. We would certainly appreciate comment generations of conservative governments to coordinate from the government to allay some of those concerns. vital infrastructure, which only Labor governments The bill establishes the Victorian Responsible have delivered. Gambling Foundation. This foundation is charged with The Baillieu-Ryan regime announced this proposal and developing new ways of meeting the challenges of led everyone to believe it was a done deal by including problem gambling, and that is certainly something that it in its first budget. The plans are being drawn up and is very important. I believe we all equally share the community is waiting, but the site remains concerns about problem gambling and the need for untouched because of the government’s failure to build governments to provide assistance to attempt to curtail for the future. The coalition promised to govern for all the worst effects of problem gambling, and I certainly Victorians. Walking away from this iconic project hope for a diminution of those effects in our would repeat the mistakes of the past and relegate the community. people of Broadmeadows to being the truly forgotten The bill sets the framework for the foundation to people in the eyes of conservative administrations. consider research, educative and treatment approaches I have dealt in good faith with and acknowledged the in relation to problem gambling in our community. It coalition government on a range of issues, and we have looks at establishing the foundation as an independent succeeded in using common sense and bipartisanship to body. The government has made many comments in deliver the best result for the community. In the spirit of respect of the independence of this body. As the good faith I offer the relocation of my electorate office minister said in his second-reading speech, the bill as an anchor tenant if this would help deliver the provides for representation on the foundation to be government services building and provide more white- derived from: collar jobs within the Broadmeadows community. Such … people of goodwill from across the community, including a coordinated strategy would deliver the best result for both sides of Parliament. taxpayers and be in the public interest. The Baillieu- Ryan regime’s inaction and silence has raised anxiety Certainly it is vitally important for the board of any that the government is looking to walk away from this foundation or government body to be reflective not landmark project. only of the broader community but also of community members with a concern and a passion for tackling the Natimuk Fringe Festival challenges that are presented to the board. With respect to this foundation, of course those are the challenges of Mr DELAHUNTY (Minister for Sport and problem gambling. I will comment a little bit later in Recreation) — All the best to the Natimuk Fringe my contribution on this point of the representation on Festival for the performing arts festival being held this the board, as the minister has said, of both sides of weekend at Natimuk in my electorate. Parliament.
The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Weller) — The The government has indicated that the model for the time for members statements has concluded. Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation draws heavily on the VicHealth model. VicHealth is very much lauded throughout the community and by both
VICTORIAN RESPONSIBLE GAMBLING FOUNDATION BILL 2011
4932 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011 sides of the Parliament. It has certainly done some fine gambling, nor will it be permitted to lobby government work over the years. It has done exceptional work and for reforms it considers appropriate or salutary in its is well regarded and well respected because of both the endeavours to achieve a reduction in problem functions afforded it and also its truly independent gambling. status in the community in terms of the advocacy role it plays. It plays that role quite avidly, robustly and with A board will be established to guide and oversee the expert opinion and fiat behind it. foundation. The board will include three positions for the three major parties represented in the Victorian The new foundation will be given certain Parliament, and it will draw other representatives from responsibilities, including, as I touched on earlier, across the community. In public debate about the new developing and implementing prevention strategies for foundation and in the second-reading speech the gambling addiction and communication and education government and the minister have stated that VicHealth strategies. It is fundamentally important not only that is essentially the model for the new foundation. Like we deal with the consequences of problem gambling VicHealth the Victorian Responsible Gambling but also that we look at its front end — that is, Foundation will have a board with an allowance for gambling before it becomes problem gambling. That is bipartisan representation together with members from where the educative functions and communication the broader community. The government has said that functions, underpinned by research and dialogue with is based on the VicHealth model. the community, are important. The foundation will not only have a research focus but also a responsibility for The government has further drawn similarities with the the implementation of the above-mentioned activities. VicHealth model with respect to the process for appointment of the chief executive officer of the It will also be expected to work in collaboration with foundation — that is, the minister will be required to service delivery organisations, such as Gambler’s Help. consult with the board about the appointment of the Intersecting with the work of front-line organisations chief executive officer — and that will finally be that provide counselling and treatment services will be subject to a Governor in Council appointment. The a critical function of the foundation. Agencies at the foundation’s chair will have the role of employing staff, coalface will tell you lots of stories about problem who will be employed as public servants and be gambling and the indicative data that is available in accountable to the chair of the foundation. terms of what is feeding it in certain members of the community — whether that is mortgage stress, loss of The foundation will draw its financial support from a employment, lack of financial management or family new fund to be established by government called the breakdown. That expectation of the foundation’s Responsible Gambling Fund. Funds will in turn be activities and the way its activities will be undertaken is derived from the Community Support Fund. The a very important element of it. government has stated that for the purposes of funding the foundation’s work the Responsible Gambling Fund The foundation will also act as an information point, will have first call on money from the Community providing advice on processes related to gambling and Support Fund, and that follows the tradition of previous gambling regulations to educate organisations, agencies governments with respect to the first call on the and individuals, thereby equipping them to more Community Support Fund — that is, for problem effectively deal with problem gambling. Again, that gambling. Whilst the government states that the new makes a lot of sense and will be a significant activity of foundation will be independent of government, I note the foundation. In his second-reading speech the that it will be required to develop annual business plans minister expressed an expectation that the foundation after consultation with the minister. Variations to the will establish a gambling information resource centre as annual business plans will need to be done after a separate office within its organisation. That is not consultation with the minister. The plans will be made technically provided for in the bill, but I note the available to the public, which is by form. minister’s expectation that the foundation will do that as a result of its establishment. I will now comment on the issues that arise from this bill for the opposition. The first point is on the matter of The government has expressly stated that the Victorian the foundation’s independence from government. It is Responsible Gambling Foundation will not have an an effort to reconcile the minister’s claim that the advocacy role, nor will it advise on policy or develop Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation is policy. That is my understanding of the government’s independent with the facts contained in the bill and the expectations. Importantly the foundation will not be second-reading speech, and we need to reconcile the able to participate in public debate on problem assertions of true independence with the facts. One fact
VICTORIAN RESPONSIBLE GAMBLING FOUNDATION BILL 2011
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4933 is that via the Governor in Council the minister has the government has heralded the advent of the new function of appointing the chair, deputy chair and chief foundation, as it is presented in the bill, as a significant executive officer of the foundation. We also need to turning point in tackling problem gambling; I give that consider the fact that coalition members on the board to the government. However, the certainty of that will no doubt be appointed following ministerial sentiment is not extended to longer term funding for the involvement in the party system. The amount of funds Responsible Gambling Advocacy Centre. Here we have allocated to the foundation via the new Responsible strong sentiments and assertions that the new Gambling Fund will be determined by the minister foundation will be a critical turning point in tackling through government allocation. The foundation’s problem gambling, yet we have the Responsible annual business plans and variations to the plans must Gambling Advocacy Centre not being guaranteed of be developed in consultation with the minister. funding beyond 30 June 2012. Importantly the foundation cannot enter into public debate, nor can it play an advocacy role. This concerns the opposition because it raises questions as to the government’s longer term commitment to the The second issue of concern for the opposition is that Responsible Gambling Advocacy Centre, and that is the government has gone to great lengths to draw something on which we seek comment from the parallels between the VicHealth model and the new government during the course of this debate in the Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation, but in house. It would be good to have assurances that the some important respects they are very different. It is funding, which is not articulated beyond 30 June, is important for us to take that into account when we assured beyond that date, but as yet we have before us consider the true independence of the new foundation. only the knowledge that it is not. We therefore have an Unlike VicHealth, the Victorian Responsible Gambling obligation to raise concerns about that. Foundation will be strictly prohibited from developing policy and engaging in advocacy. VicHealth’s I wish to move on to another issue, regarding potential reputation is well established because of the expert board conflict. There is certainly no impediment to the voice it brings to advocacy and policy development. minister appointing current executives of gambling Many Victorians, including many in my electorate, do companies or consortia to the Victorian Responsible not think of government when VicHealth is mentioned. Gambling Foundation board. The bill does not provide There is a sense of separation from government, and important barriers to this type of representation on the VicHealth is lauded and considered to be a truly board — appointments that may be considered independent body in all respects. Therefore the advice undesirable in terms of openness. The minister and and opinions that come from VicHealth through other government speakers should certainly take the research, public comment and advocacy have a status opportunity during the course of this debate to have it that in many respects is untouchable. shown in the Hansard record whether the government intends to make any such appointment. The opposition is therefore yet to be convinced of the government’s claims that the Victorian Responsible It would be a good move for the government to rule out Gambling Foundation will be truly independent in the appointments of such a nature; certainly that would be mould of VicHealth. It may have similarities to considered a good message to the community regarding VicHealth in its structure, make-up and governance, yet the integrity of the foundation and what it aims to the heart of what VicHealth seeks to do is strictly achieve — that is to squarely and, as the government prohibited to the foundation — that is, to have a strong, would put it, independently tackle problem gambling at independent and expert voice out in the community to its heart and effectively lead to a reduction in problem guide public opinion, debate and discourse. The strong gambling in our community. The foundation must have advocacy role VicHealth plays is well and truly beyond teeth. That ultimately will be the test of the success or reproach. Whilst the opposition does not oppose the otherwise of this foundation and its function in the bill, we reserve our right to move amendments in the community. other house to this part of the bill. In terms of the broader issues of problem gambling and The third issue of concern for the opposition is that what has occurred in recent times with respect to funding for the Victorian Responsible Gambling dealing with this issue, we know that, according to the Advocacy Centre is not assured beyond 30 June next Victorian Commission for Gambling Regulation, year. There is some difficulty in reconciling the rhetoric Victorians lost almost $5 billion through gambling in of the government’s commitment to wholeheartedly 2009–10, with electronic gaming machines accounting and with a new sense of vigour tackle problem for over half of those losses. gambling with some of the facts that are before us. The
VICTORIAN RESPONSIBLE GAMBLING FOUNDATION BILL 2011
4934 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011
I think it is important to reflect on the work that was and hindered from playing the role that VicHealth plays done by the previous Labor government in dealing with as a truly independent, honest and expert voice in the problem gambling. In 2003 the previous government community advocating for change and conveying good introduced the Gambling Regulation Act 2003, which information to the community about tackling problem established the Victorian Commission for Gambling gambling. Regulation. That initiative established a whole series of strong, tough and effective regulations to ensure that I will leave my contribution to those words. As I said gambling was conducted in a responsible and fair way earlier, the opposition does not oppose the bill, but we in terms of community involvement in gambling reserve our right to raise amendments in the other house activities. In 2005 Labor introduced regulations which on the question of the true independence of the further strengthened the Gambling Regulation Act foundation. 2003. We also initiated the Taking Action on Problem Gambling strategy. This initiative was a five-year Mr NORTHE (Morwell) — It gives me pleasure to strategy with over $135 million worth of funding for rise today to speak on the Victorian Responsible initiatives which went to the heart of problem gambling Gambling Foundation Bill 2011, yet another policy in our community. We were very serious in terms of implemented by the coalition government — it is a bit our commitment. monotonous, but it is another one. What we have here today is a unique piece of legislation, an Australian We guaranteed money up-front for a five-year period first, in that we seek to establish the Victorian for a blueprint which knitted together a whole-of- Responsible Gambling Foundation. The legislation not government focus, not just a series of unrelated only establishes the foundation itself but also makes activities, on tackling problem gambling. Labor also put consequential amendments to the Gambling Regulation caps on withdrawals of funds from ATMs. We initiated Act 2003. a ban on ATMs in gaming venues, which is due to come into effect in 2012, and we look forward to that What are the objectives of the foundation? They are commencement date as another important step — — many, but primarily it will be an independent body with a mandate to reduce the prevalence of problem and Mr Noonan interjected. harm-related gambling and foster responsible gambling in Victoria. We seek through this legislation to have The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Weller) — Order! this operational by 1 July 2012. The foundation has The member for Mill Park will continue without many core functions. It seeks to work with reputable assistance. organisations, such as the Council of Gambler’s Help Services and others, to help deliver important Ms D’AMBROSIO — I am very happy to receive counselling and treatment services. It will develop and assistance from the member for Williamstown. implement communication and education strategies, as referred to by the member for Mill Park. The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Weller) — If the member for Mill Park needs assistance, she can sit The foundation will also commission problem down and the next speaker can stand up. gambling research, which is vitally important. The member for Mill Park alluded in her contribution to the Ms D’AMBROSIO — We on this side of the house Gambling Information Resource Office, and the are very eager to remind the government of the operation of this office will be an important role and successful programs put in place by the previous function of the foundation. It will provide information government to tackle problem gambling. I certainly and advice to any person or organisation that wishes to welcome the member for Williamstown’s comments in engage in gambling policy, the regulatory processes or this debate, albeit from his position over there. public debate associated with problem gambling.
The legislation is a result, as I said, of the government’s The bill establishes a legislative framework similar to election commitment to create a responsible gambling that of the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation, foundation, and I turn back to the bill to see what its better known as VicHealth, and the member for Mill commitment was. We acknowledge that the Park spoke at length about VicHealth in her government is here to see through its election contribution. It is a respected model and has bipartisan commitment. However, where it falls short of its support, and indeed the members for Yan Yean and election commitment is in how its foundation is Forest Hill and my colleague the member for Gippsland modelled. Despite the assertion that it is modelled on East are current VicHealth board members. It is a the VicHealth model, it is far from that, and our reputable model. As I said, this is a unique Australian concern is that the foundation will be somewhat muted
VICTORIAN RESPONSIBLE GAMBLING FOUNDATION BILL 2011
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4935 first which we seek to implement with respect to Clause 18 refers to the terms of appointment of the problem gambling. CEO. I will now speak to clauses 19 and 20, which talk about the establishment of the Responsible Gambling The bill sets out the foundations, objectives and Fund. The explanatory memorandum states in relation functions of the foundation. It establishes a board to to clause 19: govern the foundation and establishes the position of the chief executive officer. It talks about the ministerial The fund is administered by the foundation and is the primary power to direct the foundation. It also talks about the source of funding for achieving the objectives and functions of the foundation. establishment of the Responsible Gambling Fund and implementation arrangements for staff of the The explanatory memorandum goes on to talk about the foundation. Clause 9 of the bill refers to the structure of establishment of payments from the Community the board. The explanatory memorandum states in part: Support Fund under clause 20. This government has a commitment of $150 million to the fund over The board will be comprised of three elected members who are elected from the members of the Legislative Assembly or four years, which is a significant investment in the Legislative Council. Elected members are to be elected by anyone’s language. We will see $37.5 million per year the Legislative Assembly and the Legislative Council jointly. committed through the Community Support Fund to assist the foundation in its endeavours. That figure is in This is the same practice that occurs with the comparison to the amount committed by the previous appointment of VicHealth board members. government of around $26.5 million per year. This Elected members are not eligible to be appointed as a government has effectively committed to an additional chairperson or deputy chairperson of the board. 41 per cent in funds over a period of four years.
Between four and eight members of the board will be In terms of the role, operations and functions of the appointed by the Governor in Council on the foundation, it is important to note that the proposed recommendation of the minister. model is very similar to that of VicHealth. Whilst the Clause 11 talks further about the board, its role and its member for Mill Park alluded in her contribution to terms of office. The explanatory memorandum states: some issues around independence and so forth, when you are using public money for the purpose of Elected members of the board will hold office for either four establishing this foundation it is imperative that you years after their election to the board, or until a house of have an independent structure but that it is accountable Parliament is prorogued or the Legislative Assembly is dissolved, whichever is sooner. Elected members may be re- at the same time. That is the expectation of the elected at the commencement of a new parliamentary term. community. It is probably a little bit rich of the opposition to question the independence and integrity Members appointed by the Governor in Council are appointed for a period specified in their instrument of of the gaming system, given what occurred over the last appointment. This period cannot exceed four years. term of Parliament and before, where integrity around Appointed members may be reappointed by the Governor in the gaming system was questioned on a very regular Council. basis.
It is imperative that there be bipartisan support for this This bill is great news. Our respective communities modelling, and that has certainly been the case for a recognise that problem gambling needs to be tackled in period of time. All board members are subject to the a different environment through this foundation and in obligations that fall within the Public Administration association with a number of service organisations Act 2004 except for part 3 of that act. which assist in the counselling and treatment of problem gamblers. This is a great step in the right Clause 17 of the bill talks about the establishment of the direction. I know through local media in my electorate position of the chief executive officer and how the that the idea and model for the foundation have been appointment occurs. The explanatory memorandum well supported, and the foundation should be supported states that clause 17: throughout the community. establishes the position of chief executive officer of the foundation that is appointed by the Governor in Council on As I said, the coalition went to the election in 2010 with the recommendation of the minister. a particular policy and commitment to establish this foundation. There are people who are prone to problem The chief executive officer is responsible to the board for the day-to-day management and administration of the affairs of gambling living in all of our electorates. We have to the foundation, in accordance with the strategic direction find ways and means of tackling what is a difficult determined by the board. issue. There are a range of measures being put in place, and the best model to approach it with is being
VICTORIAN RESPONSIBLE GAMBLING FOUNDATION BILL 2011
4936 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011 discussed and debated across the country right now. The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Weller) — Order! I From a Victorian perspective it is great to see that we do not believe it is relevant. It is a gambling bill and the have a proactive minister and a proactive government member is talking about another bill. I suggest he come that has been prepared to put money on the table. back to speaking on the gambling bill.
As I said previously, the government has committed Mr NOONAN — Acting Speaker, I have been through the Community Support Fund $150 million addressing the terms of this particular legislation — — over four years to help establish the foundation. It is real money on the table that seeks to deliver real and Honourable members interjecting. tangible outcomes in tackling the problem and to facilitate an understanding of the data and detail about The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Weller) — Order! how it should be tackled in the future. Some of the The house will come to order, and the member will aspects I spoke about earlier are that we will be making return to the bill. sure we have the data and statistics available and that Mr NOONAN — I am here looking at the bill. I we will be able to feed them into better programs in the have been through the bill. I just wanted to make sure future, and our work in conjunction with a number of for the minister’s new foundation that there is no clause different organisations, such as the reputable Gambling in this particular bill which would make it — — Help organisation, augurs well for us into the future. The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Weller) — Order! I We look forward to the bill being supported by the have read the bill and there is no clause like that in the opposition and the foundation being operational by bill, so the member should stop being mischievous and 1 July 2012 so that the government can really get into come back to the bill. the job of tackling what is a scourge across many communities. These are real issues that impact on Honourable members interjecting. families tenfold, and it is important that we address them as best we can. As I said, our government has put Mr NOONAN — I just want the minister’s new the money on the table — $150 million over four foundation to be — — years — and is providing a structure and a model which has been well recognised over a long time. We look Mr R. Smith — On a point of order, Acting forward to the opposition supporting it. I commend the Speaker, I think you have made it very clear to the bill to the house. member for Williamstown that you would like him to progress, and I ask that you bring him back to the bill. Mr NOONAN (Williamstown) — I am pleased to rise to join the debate on the Victorian Responsible The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Weller) — Order! I Gambling Foundation Bill 2011, which the Minister for uphold the point of order, and I ask the member to Gaming has referred to as the flagship of the coalition come back to the bill. government’s responsible gambling policy. The Mr NOONAN — How sensitive is this? We cannot Minister for Gaming has, of course, been in the news of even talk about the very topical issue of how sensitive late, as he tends to like to be. When I was preparing a this minister is about any potential insult that might few notes to speak on this bill, I spotted this piece in my come his way through this or any other bill. I just local Hobsons Bay weekly newspaper. It was written wanted to make sure that his new foundation board by the editor, Sarah Harris, and states: members actually understand what might be possible in This week the Victorian upper house will consider legislation the future. that would make it a criminal offence to call the gaming minister names. The GACTIN SPEAKER (Mr Weller) — Order! The member will come back to the bill. It goes on: Honourable members interjecting. How did we get to this? It’s never been government policy, it wasn’t part of the election campaign — yet suddenly you face fines of up to $11 945 — — Mr NOONAN — It was well worth putting on the record, because the minister is still sensitive. The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Weller) — Order! Is this on the bill? Mr O’Brien interjected.
Mr NOONAN — This is relevant.
VICTORIAN RESPONSIBLE GAMBLING FOUNDATION BILL 2011
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4937
The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Weller) — Order! concentration of losses tends to be in areas of The Minister for Gaming! The member will come back socioeconomic disadvantage. I know that in the western to the bill. suburbs of Melbourne problem gambling has hurt many families. Mr NOONAN — I will come back to the bill. Clearly the government is too sensitive about this for Going forward, if we look at this as a flagship policy members to make a contribution about, or to allow for the new government, I question the boldness of that debate about, the minister’s sensitivity. Contrary to the assertion. If members of the Baillieu government minister’s grandly stated view that establishing this wanted to demonstrate real leadership on this issue, foundation will be the start of a whole new era in the they would be advocating for further gaming reforms prevention and treatment of problem gambling in immediately. For example, they do not need a new Victoria, I think it is a well-known fact that for a long foundation to tell them that adding greater strength to time Victoria has been recognised as a leader in this the existing codes of conduct would be a responsible space of tackling problem gambling. I say this because thing to do. Similarly government members do not need over the time during which Labor held office the a foundation to tell them that refreshing ad campaigns proportion of problem gambling in our community makes sense or that continuing Victoria’s actually declined from 2.1 per cent of the Victorian research-based advertising campaign is a good thing. adult population in 1999 to 0.7 per cent in 2010. But let me pose some questions in the context of this debate. What would happen if this foundation were to Labor introduced a raft of reforms to tackle problem recommend a mandatory precommitment scheme for gambling, including massively increasing investment in gaming machines? Would members of the Baillieu gamblers help services; capping machine density across government acknowledge that their current objection to Victoria and giving local councils more control over such a policy is wrong? These are real questions, and where machines were located; reducing maximum bet there are some questions also, as the member for Mill limits and spin rates on gaming machines from $10 Park posed, about the independence of the foundation. down to $5 from January last year; banning ATMs from gaming venues from 2012 — and Victoria Under this legislation the minister will effectively is the only mainland state to have taken that step; appoint or hand-pick the chair, the deputy chair, the investing heavily in research, including $7.2 million to chief executive officer and two coalition MPs from his help establish the University of Melbourne and Monash own parliamentary team as the board members. The University Problem Gambling Research And Treatment minister will have the power to determine the size of Centre; mandating responsible gambling codes of the foundation’s allocation from the Community conduct for venues; and fixing the number of gaming Support Fund to run its activities. The minister will also machines in Victoria to 27 500 for the post-2012 period have the power to help determine the foundation’s and for the next 10 years. Victoria was also the first annual work plan and any variations to that work plan. state to announce that it would mandate precommitment for all gaming machines. These are all The minister has very cleverly positioned the significant reforms that relied upon policy leadership. establishment of the foundation as some sort of VicHealth model. We all know that VicHealth is a But, for all that, we know there is still a problem with world-leading health advocacy body and that it has gaming machines in particular and people’s addiction to done some wonderful work in Victoria. The reason them. It is a serious problem for both our community VicHealth is so revered is that its members tackle the and this Parliament. Those problems were set out in an issues by advocating very strongly. The minister has Auditor-General’s report last year, which I am sure the made sure through this legislation that his foundation to minister has read. The report indicates that it is tackle problem gambling will have no advocacy role. estimated there are some 29 000 problem gamblers in The minister describes this as some sort of VicHealth this state and a further 97 000 who are deemed model, which it may be in governance, but in reality the moderate-risk gamblers. The Auditor-General has bill provides for no advocacy, essentially muzzling the profiled who problem gamblers are. They are usually foundation in its capacity to really challenge the males under the age of 65 with very modest incomes of minister and his government on the decisions they between $31 200 and $52 000. Most disturbingly many might make in the future. problem gamblers have a mental health disorder or suffer from depression or anxiety or have experienced In conclusion, in the time I have left, having been so some sort of trauma in their life. There is a real rudely interrupted during my contribution — — challenge for any government of the day in how to handle that. A more concerning factor is that the Honourable members interjecting.
PARKS AND CROWN LAND LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2011
4938 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011
The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Weller) — Order! PARKS AND CROWN LAND The house will come to order. LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2011
Mr NOONAN — The minister is still very Statement of compatibility sensitive, clearly. It is worth recording that when in opposition the now Premier stated very clearly his Mr R. SMITH (Minister for Environment and support for precommitment technology for gaming Climate Change) tabled following statement in machines. In fact, he said: accordance with Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006: The implementation of precommitment is an essential means of seriously tackling problem gambling … In accordance with section 28 of the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (charter act), I make this That is what the Premier said in opposition, but now statement of compatibility with respect to the Parks and that he is in government the Premier and the minister Crown Land Legislation Amendment Bill 2011. are talking about how they will launch a High Court In my opinion, the Parks and Crown Land Legislation challenge to defeat the potential passing of the Amendment Bill 2011 (the bill), as introduced to the commonwealth’s mandatory precommitment scheme Legislative Assembly, is compatible with the human rights for gaming machines. protected by the charter act. I base my opinion on the reasons outlined in this statement. Mr Wynne interjected. Overview of bill
The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Weller) — Order! The bill will: The member for Richmond! (a) create Lake Tyers State Park and Gippsland Lakes Mr NOONAN — That is typical of — — Reserve (Raymond Island) and add areas to the Alpine, Chiltern-Mount Pilot, French Island, Grampians, Mr R. Smith interjected. Kinglake, Lower Goulburn, Mitchell River, Mornington Peninsula and Warby-Ovens national parks, Gippsland Lakes Coastal Park, Macedon Regional Park and Otway The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Weller) — Order! Forest Park; The Minister for Environment and Climate Change, who is at the table, should come to order. (b) change the name of St Arnaud Range National Park to Kara Kara National Park; Mr NOONAN — That is typical of a government (c) extend the maximum lease term for the Arthurs Seat that is more about dithering and deceiving than chairlift; delivering in government. Instead we get this so-called independent foundation which is supposed to be the (d) extend the period in which firewood can be collected coalition’s flagship policy on problem gambling, but from former logging coupes in Barmah and Gunbower from my perspective — and I suspect the perspective of national parks to 30 June 2015; many Victorians — if this is the best the Baillieu (e) reclassify Frankston Natural Features Reserve as a government can come up with, then I expect that the nature conservation reserve; people living in places like Brimbank, Casey, Maribyrnong and Dandenong are going to be in for a (f) streamline the approvals process for fire prevention works on certain Crown land; whole lot more pain, because setting up new bodies and foundations might deliver a feelgood factor for the (g) enable regulations to continue to be made for the care, minister and members of the government benches but protection, management and use of reservoir parks; and the true test for the Baillieu government will be whether (h) make other amendments of a minor or technical nature, it can reduce the proportion of problem gambling per including repealing spent provisions. head of population, as Labor did when it was in government, through real policies. Human rights issues
Debate adjourned on motion of Ms WREFORD Section 12 — Freedom of movement (Mordialloc). Section 12 of the charter act provides for the right for every person to move freely within Victoria and to enter and leave it Debate adjourned until later this day. and to have the freedom to choose where to live. It includes the freedom from physical barriers and procedural impediments.
Clause 4 of the bill substitutes a new section 32CA in the National Parks Act 1975. Proposed section 32CA will enable
PARKS AND CROWN LAND LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2011
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4939
the minister to lease land in Arthurs Seat State Park for the Second reading purposes of a chairlift and associated visitor facilities at Arthurs Seat for a period of up to 21 years or, in specified Mr R. SMITH (Minister for Environment and circumstances, up to 50 years. The granting of a lease conveys a right to occupy an area to the exclusion of others in Climate Change) — I move: accordance with the terms of the lease. This provision may limit the right to freedom of movement within areas over That this bill be now read a second time. which a lease is granted, but any limitations are justified under section 7(2) of the charter act. The Parks and Crown Land Legislation Amendment Bill 2011 (the bill) will amend the National Parks Act The maximum lease term is being extended in order to 1975, Crown Land (Reserves) Act 1978, Forests Act encourage and support the private investment needed to 1958 and Water Industry Act 1994. In particular: construct and operate a new chairlift at Arthurs Seat as a major tourist attraction on the Mornington Peninsula, thereby supporting the local economy. A long-term lease is the only the bill will create Lake Tyers State Park and suitable way of providing the required degree of security of Gippsland Lakes Reserve (Raymond Island), add tenure for large investments on public land. areas to existing parks, reclassify Frankston Natural Features Reserve as a nature conservation reserve Section 20 — Property rights and change the name of St Arnaud Range National Section 20 of the charter act provides that a person must not Park to Kara Kara National Park; be deprived of his or her property other than in accordance with law. the bill will also make a range of other amendments, In relation to the new park areas under the National Parks Act including facilitating investment in a new chairlift at 1975, to the extent (if any) that an apiary licence or right, a Arthurs Seat, extending the period during which tour operator licence or a water frontage licence constitutes firewood may be collected from sawlog harvesting some form of property right, proposed clauses 9, 10 and 14 of residue in former logging coupes in Barmah and proposed part 3 of schedule one AA to the National Parks Act Gunbower national parks, and improving the 1975 (as inserted by clause 15 of the bill) provide that any such licence or right existing immediately before the creation workability of the legislation. of specified park areas is saved. Proposed clause 12 of that proposed part preserves a lease at Lake Tyers State Park. New park and reserve areas In relation to the new reserve areas under the Crown Land The bill will amend the National Parks Act and the (Reserves) Act 1978, proposed clause 8 of the second Crown Land (Reserves) Act to create new park and schedule to that act (as inserted by clause 22 of the bill) provides that, when the reserve areas are created, the land reserve areas of approximately 10 000 hectares. forming the reserve areas is taken to be freed and discharged from all trusts, limitations, reservations, restrictions, Of particular note is the creation of Lake Tyers State encumbrances, estates and interests. This provision could be Park under the National Parks Act and Gippsland Lakes taken to extinguish property rights. However, proposed Reserve (Raymond Island) under the Crown Land clause 7 of the second schedule (as inserted by clause 22 of (Reserves) Act. This will implement longstanding the bill) explicitly states that the interests listed in that section will not be affected by the operation of proposed clause 8 of recommendations of the former Land Conservation the second schedule. There are no known interests in the land Council as well as an obligation in the Recognition and other than those of the nature listed in clause 7 of the second Settlement Agreement between Gunaikurnai Land and schedule. Accordingly, there is no known limitation or Waters Aboriginal Corporation and the State of restriction of the right protected under section 20 of the charter act. Victoria 2010. The agreement settled a native title claim with the Gunaikurnai people and includes an Conclusion obligation for the state to act expeditiously and do everything it can to create Lake Tyers State Park and I consider that the bill is compatible with the charter act because, to the extent that a lease may limit the right to Gippsland Lakes Reserve (Raymond Island). The freedom of movement under section 12, any limitations are agreement also requires the granting of Aboriginal title reasonable. over those areas under the Traditional Owner The Hon. Ryan Smith, MP Settlement Act 2010, and for the park and reserve to be Minister for Environment and Climate Change jointly managed by the state with the Gunaikurnai people.
Lake Tyers State Park covers approximately 8600 hectares and includes the coastal forests surrounding Lake Tyers, as well as Mount Nowa Nowa and the scenic Boggy Creek gorge immediately north of Nowa Nowa township. The park also includes warm
PARKS AND CROWN LAND LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2011
4940 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011 temperate rainforest and significant faunal values. The Aboriginal heritage. ‘Kara Kara’ was the name of the area, most of which has been managed as a park for former shire and the former state park, which was many years, offers opportunities for bush camping, incorporated in the national park in 2002, and means picnicking, walking, scenic driving and fishing and gold in the Dja Dja Wurrung language. The change in provides access to the waters of Lake Tyers, which are name has been endorsed by the Registrar of Geographic not included in the park. Names.
The bill provides for various licences and other Frankston Nature Conservation Reserve authorities to continue in the new park, including apiary licences and rights. It will also enable the minister to The Frankston reservoir and surrounding bushland grant a reasonable right of access through the park to a were transferred from the ownership of Melbourne person whose freehold land is surrounded by or Water to the state in 2008 and reserved under the adjoining the park. The National Parks Act will also be Crown Land (Reserves) Act as a natural features amended to enable recreational hunters to be authorised reserve. The bill will reclassify the area as a nature to carry firearms in the park, subject to conditions. This conservation reserve in response to a desire within the provision is intended to apply to the camping area at local community to give a higher level of recognition to Pettmans Beach, which is used by hunters visiting the the area’s significant natural values. Opportunities for adjacent Ewing Morass State Game Reserve at certain recreation activities will be provided consistent with the times of the year. status of the reserve.
The Gippsland Lakes Reserve (Raymond Island) covers Arthurs Seat chairlift 215 hectares and comprises most of the Crown land on the island. It has special cultural significance to the The chairlift at Arthurs Seat has been a very popular Gunaikurnai People. tourism attraction on the Mornington Peninsula for nearly 50 years, drawing visitors to enjoy the The bill will also add nearly 1300 hectares to twelve magnificent panoramic views across Port Phillip Bay. existing parks: the Alpine, Chiltern Mount Pilot, French However, the chairlift ceased operating in 2006 and Island, Grampians, Kinglake, Lower Goulburn, requires replacement. Mitchell River, Mornington Peninsula and Warby Ovens national parks as well as Gippsland Lakes The new section 32CA to be inserted in the National Coastal Park, Macedon Regional Park and Otway Parks Act will encourage and support the private Forest Park. There are also small additions to Arthurs investment needed to construct and operate a new Seat State Park which I will come to later. chairlift and associated visitor facilities by providing for a 50-year maximum lease term, instead of the current The park additions include ecological communities 20-year lease. The provision is similar to the other underrepresented in the parks and reserves system, as long-term lease provisions in the National Parks Act well as former freehold areas located within the parks. applying to particular areas in Mount Buffalo and Point Most of the additions were purchased as part of the Nepean national parks. conservation land purchase program or to offset clearing associated with the construction of strategic The bill will also add to the park several areas of fuel breaks on public land elsewhere. However, I would airspace where the proposed new chairlift passes over particularly like to highlight the generous donation of the Arthurs Seat Road, thereby enabling the one leasing nearly 27 hectares for addition to Kinglake National provision to apply to the whole of the chairlift Park by the late Ms Karma Hastwell, who had a long operation. association with the park but who tragically lost her life Firewood collection in Barmahd an Gunbower in the 2009 Black Saturday bushfires. national parks
Kara Kara National Park The legislation creating Barmah and Gunbower The bill will change the name of St Arnaud Range national parks enabled the collection of firewood from National Park to Kara Kara National Park. This sawlog harvesting residue lying on the ground in amendment follows considerable community specified former logging coupes in the two parks until consultation in the course of developing the 30 June 2011, for domestic or camping purposes management plan for the park, and reflects a outside the parks. community desire to have ‘Kara Kara’ recognised in The floods and wet conditions in northern Victoria the name of the park to acknowledge its history and made it virtually impossible to remove the available
PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS AMENDMENT BILL 2011
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4941 wood by 30 June 2011, and there is still considerable Water has entered into a new lease with Parks Victoria. firewood remaining. In recognition of the importance of The bill will amend the act so that regulations can domestic firewood to local communities and consistent continue to be made with respect to the reservoir parks with the intent of the original legislative provision, the covered by the new lease and future leases. bill will amend the National Parks Act to extend, until 30 June 2015, the period during which firewood may Other amendments be taken from the specified areas of the two parks. This date takes into account the possibility of future flood The bill will also update the references to the plans events that may further limit access to the former defining Greater Bendigo National Park in section 40 of coupes. the National Parks Act, and will repeal several spent provisions in that act and the Crown Land (Reserves) The bill does not alter the specified areas where Act. firewood may be collected, nor the requirement that the firewood must only be collected from wood that was Conclusion felled in timber harvesting operations which predate the The bill highlights the government’s commitment to creation of the parks. The times and conditions protecting and enhancing the state’s parks and reserves associated with firewood collection will be determined system. It will add several significant areas to the state’s by the Secretary to the Department of Sustainability parks and reserve system and will make a series of and Environment. miscellaneous amendments which respond to various Streamlining the approvals process for fire community views, facilitate investment in key tourism prevention and suppression works on certain public infrastructure and improve the workability of the land legislation.
The Forests Act contains provisions relating to fire I commend the bill to the house. prevention and fire suppression in state forest, parks Debate adjourned on motion of Mr WYNNE under the National Parks Act and other Crown land (Richmond). declared to be protected public land. One such provision requires the Secretary to the Department of Debate adjourned until Thursday, 10 November. Sustainability and Environment (the secretary), who is responsible for ensuring appropriate measures are taken for fire prevention and suppression on that Crown land, PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS AMENDMENT to obtain consent from public land managers prior to BILL 2011 carrying out fire prevention and suppression works. Statement of compatibility The bill will remove the requirement for prior consent in respect of emergency fire suppression works. In Mr CLARK (Attorney-General) tabled following respect of planned fire prevention works, the bill will statement in accordance with Charter of Human replace the consent requirement with a requirement for Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006: the secretary to consult if the land manager is a body In accordance with section 28 of the Charter of Human Rights other than the secretary. The bill will also repeal a and Responsibilities Act 2006 (charter act), I make this related but redundant provision in the Crown Land statement of compatibility with respect to the Public (Reserves) Act. Prosecutions Amendment Bill 2011.
Application of regulations to reservoir parks In my opinion, the Public Prosecutions Amendment Bill 2011, as introduced to the Legislative Assembly, is compatible with the human rights protected by the charter act. There are 10 reservoir parks totalling nearly I base my opinion on the reasons outlined in this statement. 500 hectares associated with water storages around Melbourne and the Tarago and Thomson dams. The Overview of bill Water Industry Act currently enables regulations to be The bill refines the existing arrangements in the Public made with respect to the care, protection, management Prosecutions Act 1994 (the act) to clarify the role and use of the reservoir parks, but only if a lease is in relationships between the Director of Public Prosecutions place which is the same or similar to one which (DPP), chief Crown prosecutor (CCP) and the Solicitor for previously existed between Melbourne Water and the Public Prosecutions (SPP). The bill also revises the role of associate Crown prosecutor. The bill will also remove the Minister for Environment and Climate Change. The minimum term of reappointment for senior Crown lease referred to in the act has expired and Melbourne prosecutors in certain circumstances.
PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS AMENDMENT BILL 2011
4942 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011
The bill gives the Director of Public Prosecutions new Second reading functions under the act and transfers functions from the Committee for Public Prosecutions to a director’s committee Mr CLARK (Attorney-General) — I move: comprising the DPP, CCP and the SPP. The bill abolishes the Committee for Public Prosecutions. That this bill be now read a second time. The bill also makes consequential amendments to the act and the Public Administration Act 2004 and provides transitional Overview arrangements in relation to these amendments. The government is committed to enhancing Victoria’s Human rights issues public prosecutions service after the difficulties of recent times. This bill delivers a key component of that The bill engages the right to recognition and equality before the law. commitment, by amending the Public Prosecutions Act 1994 (the act) to refine the existing arrangements, The bill will remove the minimum term of reappointment for including in particular refining the role relationships SCPs who are eligible for the pension under section 35 of the between the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), the act. The pension entitlement for SCPs is based on section 14 of the County Court Act 1958. Generally, pension entitlement chief Crown prosecutor (CCP) and the Solicitor for is determined according to age and duration of appointment Public Prosecutions (SPP). prior to resignation or retirement from office. The bill will build on the strengths of the current act Section 8(3) of the charter act provides that every person is and ensure the continuation of the important and equal before the law and is entitled to the equal protection of the law without discrimination and has the right to equal and valuable work of Victoria’s public prosecutions service. effective protection against discrimination. The bill retains the key roles and functions established by the current act, including the separation of The bill will provide that a SCP who is eligible for the prosecution and support functions that was a key pension under section 35 may be reappointed to the office of SCP for a period of up to 10 years. Due to the nature of innovation introduced by my predecessor, the eligibility for a pension under the County Court Act 1958, the Honourable Jan Wade, MP. This reform has worked potential effect of this provision is to create differential well to free up successive DPPs to focus on their key treatment on the basis of age. Therefore this provision may role as the chief prosecutorial decision-maker for the limit the right to equality however I consider that any limit on the right to equality is reasonable and justified under state of Victoria. section 7(2) of the charter act. This bill will refine the existing arrangements in the act The purpose of this amendment is to encourage SCPs who are to support a responsive and effective prosecutorial eligible for the pension to remain as salaried advocates to service for the state of Victoria. The bill will realign the ensure that the public prosecutions service retains the benefit of their skills and experience. Under the current existing role relationships to assist the DPP in the arrangements, the minimum term of reappointment for a SCP performance of his or her functions and powers under is 10 years and a shorter term of appointment cannot be the act. The overall effect of the bill will be to unify the accommodated. existing public prosecution offices into an integrated The removal of the minimum term of reappointment for SCPs public prosecutions service under the DPP, while will allow for greater flexibility and may encourage SCPs to ensuring that the DPP and the Crown prosecutors have remain in the public prosecutions service for a further period the necessary support to enable them to focus on the of up to 10 years instead of retiring upon the expiration of DPP’s core function — the prosecution of offences on their initial term of appointment. behalf of the Crown. Conclusion Director of Public Prosecutions For the reasons given in this statement, I consider that the bill is compatible with the Charter of Human Rights and The bill strengthens the position of the DPP as the Responsibilities Act 2006. person with overall responsibility for the conduct of Robert Clark, MP public prosecutions and with accountabilities to ensure Attorney-General the proper exercise of that responsibility.
The bill continues all of the existing powers and functions of the DPP and gives the DPP new functions in relation to Victoria’s public prosecutions service. The public prosecution service is defined for the first time by the bill to include the DPP, the CCP, Crown prosecutors (CPs — which includes senior Crown
PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS AMENDMENT BILL 2011
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4943 prosecutors), associate Crown prosecutors (ACPs), the The bill will also remove the minimum term of SPP and the Office of Public Prosecutions (OPP). reappointment for SCPs in certain circumstances. The purpose of this amendment is to encourage SCPs who The bill makes clear that the DPP is the head of the are eligible for the pension to remain as salaried public prosecutions service. The bill provides that the advocates to ensure that the public prosecutions service performance of functions of the CCPs, SPPs, CPs and retains the benefit of their skills and experience. ACPs are subject to the general direction and control of the DPP, while continuing the independent Under the existing arrangements, the minimum term of prosecutorial discretions of the CCP and CPs. This reappointment for a SCP is 10 years and a shorter term balances the prosecutorial decision-making of appointment cannot be accommodated. By removing independence of the CPs with the need to ensure that the existing minimum term, the act will allow for the public prosecutions service functions as an greater flexibility and may encourage SCPs to remain integrated and cohesive organisation. This change will in the public prosecutions service for a further period of ensure that the CCP, SPP, CPs and ACPs are all up to 10 years instead of retiring upon the expiration of accountable to the DPP for the performance of their their initial term of appointment. functions and duties on his or her behalf. Associate Crown prosecutors Those provisions of the act which provide for the independence of the DPP and define the relationship The bill will make substantial changes to the role of between the DPP and the Attorney-General continue ACPs. Future appointments to the role of ACP will be unchanged. made by the DPP after consultation with the director’s committee. ACPs will be employed as part 3 employees Chief Crown prosecutor under the Public Administration Act 2004 (PAA). The SPP will exercise the functions of a public service body Currently there is no provision in the act for a standing head in relation to the ACPs, including the function of deputy to act as DPP when the DPP is on leave or termination in accordance with the PAA. These during vacancy in the office of DPP. The bill provides changes will ensure that the merit and equity safeguards that the CCP is the standing deputy for the DPP and of the PAA are applicable to the position of ACPs. will act as DPP when the office of DPP is vacant or the DPP is absent from duty or otherwise unable to carry Appointment by the DPP after consultation with the out the duties of office. The current provision relating director’s committee is also a more appropriate mode of to the appointment of an acting DPP by the Governor in appointment having regard to the classification, nature Council will be retained so as to continue to allow for and duties of the role. Governor in Council flexibility in the acting arrangements, particularly for appointments of Crown prosecutors will in future be longer absences or a vacancy. reserved for those positions which carry the responsibility of making independent prosecutorial The bill will update the description of the CCP’s decisions on behalf of the Crown. functions in relation to CPs and ACPs. The performance of these functions will be aligned with the ACPs will continue to be managed on a day-to-day need to conduct prosecutions in an effective, efficient basis by the CCP as part of the team of Crown and economic manner. The bill will also amend the act prosecutors, and it is envisaged that ACPs will perform to remove the reference to CPs and ACPs functioning functions similar to junior counsel at the private bar. as a group, in order to remove any doubt as to whether the CCP may manage the performance of functions and These changes will strengthen and clarify the role of duties by an individual CP or ACP. ACPs. They will lay out more clearly a career path available for solicitor advocates within the OPP who Crown prosecutors and senior Crown prosecutors are interested in making the transition to act as counsel, and they will also facilitate and encourage the The bill will preserve the qualification, retirement, movement of legal practitioners between the Victorian pension and resignation requirements for CPs. Bar and the public prosecutions service. However, the bill will alter the current process for making recommendations to the Attorney-General for Transitional provisions will allow for the ACPs the removal from office of a CP. This function will currently holding office to serve the balance of their transfer from the Committee for Public Prosecutions to term under Governor in Council appointment on their the DPP following consultation with the director’s current terms and conditions of appointment. committee comprising the DPP, the CCP and the SPP.
VICTORIAN RESPONSIBLE GAMBLING FOUNDATION BILL 2011
4944 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011
Office of Public Prosecutions and solicitor for public assume this function in relation to the ACPs appointed prosecutions under the act as amended by the bill.
The SPP will retain administrative responsibility for the The PAA will also be applied to the DPP for the limited OPP, so as to enable the DPP to focus on the role of purpose of employing the SPP and the ACPs. This will chief prosecutorial decision-maker in the state. ensure that principles of merit and equity are applied to However, the bill will provide that the SPP manages the relevant processes and decisions. OPP on behalf of the DPP. The bill will recast the role of the SPP as an executive appointed and removable by Transitional arrangements the DPP under part 3 of the PAA. In order to ensure the seamless ongoing operation of the These reforms will continue the operational separation public prosecutions service, the bill includes transitional of the solicitor and administrative support functions of arrangements to preserve the basis and terms of the OPP from the prosecution roles of the DPP and appointment of the current SPP and ACPs for the Crown prosecutors, which has generally worked well, duration of their appointments. while at the same time ensuring that the DPP has ultimate capacity and responsibility to ensure the proper After 17 years in operation, the Public Prosecutions Act provision of those functions as part of a single public 1994 has served this state well. The changes proposed prosecutions service. by the bill will further enhance the act to support a just, responsive and effective public prosecutions service The functions of the OPP will be updated by the bill to into the future. include the appearance of staff of the OPP in proceedings on behalf of the DPP subject to any I commend the bill to the house. relevant guidelines established by the director’s Debate adjourned on motion of Mr DONNELLAN committee. (Narre Warren North).
Director’s committee Debate adjourned until Thursday, 10 November. The bill retains the director’s committee, which must be convened by the DPP if he or she is making a special VICTORIAN RESPONSIBLE GAMBLING decision. The primary role of the director’s committee FOUNDATION BILL 2011 is an advisory one which enables the director to consult with the director’s committee before making particular Second reading decisions. Debate resumed from earlier this day; motion of The bill will build on the role of the director’s Mr O’BRIEN (Minister for Gaming). committee as a formal consultation mechanism and transfer functions to the director’s committee from the Ms WREFORD (Mordialloc) — I rise in support of Committee for Public Prosecutions. The Committee for the Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation Bill Public Prosecutions, which has been largely inactive in 2011. For a long time I have held strong views on recent years, will be abolished. gambling. Victoria can and must do much better in dealing with the gambling problem, and this bill is a These reforms will enable the director’s committee to very powerful step in the right direction. In fact it is a operate as an executive committee supporting the DPP revolutionary step. It is the flagship of our gaming in relation to the operation and management of the policy. public prosecutions service. The new functions will also promote formal coordination and consultation Let us consider how bold some of the principles behind between the DPP, the CCP and the SPP on key this bill are. It includes the biggest investment in decisions. This will include consultation on proposed reducing problem gambling that any Australian state or candidates for appointment and reappointment to the territory has ever made. It represents a whopping 41 per role of CP and ACP. cent bigger investment than the previous Labor government ever made. The foundation will be the first Amendments to the Public Administration Act 2004 of its kind in Australia and perhaps even the world. It is designed to take a new and innovative approach to The bill will make some consequential amendments to gambling and harm minimisation. To demonstrate its the PAA. The SPP will retain the functions of a public importance, we are making this large investment at a service body head in relation to the OPP and will
VICTORIAN RESPONSIBLE GAMBLING FOUNDATION BILL 2011
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4945 time when finances are extremely tight. Victoria is impacts. We do not want people in the community with reeling from Labor’s gambles on things like the good ideas being put off bringing them forward on the desalination plant, myki, smart meters, GST share cuts, basis of political preference. This issue requires the and the biggest one of all, the carbon tax, which is still goodwill and innovative thinking of all parts of the to come but is already affecting business. community to deliver the optimum outcome. We want everyone to participate to ensure the best possible Mr Donnellan — On a point of order, Acting delivery of results. Speaker, I ask that you bring the member back to the bill. Innovation is a key element of this reform. This foundation is a first. We want the best ideas around it. The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Blackwood) — We want education and communication strategies that Order! I uphold the point of order. I ask the member to are innovative and which cut through; we want the come back to the bill. delivery mechanisms to be the best they can. We want the best research and treatment. We need to be bold Ms WREFORD — We are establishing a because we have a genuine desire to solve problems. VicHealth-style board, where power is taken from the The foundation will be responsible for deciding the minister and given to a bipartisan board and distribution of funds for research, treatment and organisation. These are all bold moves, but they are communications. This is a better approach. It is wise to moves that will make a dramatic difference to problem leave the distribution of funds to a foundation which gambling in Victoria, which will in turn improve life will have the experts available to make decisions based for so many Victorians. It is a good policy. The on where the greatest community need is. The message it sends is loud and clear: the coalition foundation will work with organisations like Gambler’s government regards problem gambling as a top priority. Help to deliver counselling and treatment services. At its heart this bill moves to create the Victorian Decisions will be taken at arm’s length from the Responsible Gambling Foundation. This is a brand- government, and there is a good reason for that. new, independent organisation with the specific Many people in the community clearly perceive a purpose of reducing the prevalence of problem potential conflict of interest in gambling for gambling and the severity of gambling-related harm — government. On one hand government regulates the that is right, it aims to reduce the prevalence of problem industry, on the other hand it receives taxes from gambling and the severity of gambling-related harm. It gambling. On top of that, it is also responsible for is not just there to run an advertisement or two; it is delivering programs to prevent problem gambling. We designed to make a genuine difference. We want and and the community can clearly see the potential for expect to be the leader in harm minimisation and conflict. The reason for the perception is clear, and we prevention programs. This is the first time that such a can fix it. This legislation clearly removes the conflict body will have existed. Its independence is an and provides a much better mechanism than Victoria important part of its design, and its design is based on has every had before. I am pleased to be part of a the highly successful VicHealth model. An independent government that is taking such strong action. What is board will be formed. The board will have up to more, this issue is resourced like never before. We have 11 members, including a member from each of the committed $150 million over four years to this issue. parliamentary Liberal, National and Labor parties. That is easily the biggest investment that any state or Bipartisanship is important to this board, just as it is to territory has ever made towards fixing problem the VicHealth board. The issues the Victorian gambling. It is a 41 per cent increase above what the Responsible Gambling Foundation will be dealing with previous government provided. That is significant. The are too important for the situation to be otherwise. Its money will come from the Community Support Fund bipartisanship demonstrates our belief that we need to to do what that fund should be doing — supporting the take the best ideas from all places to make the biggest community. It will be used to reduce a problem that is impact. This is why VicHealth has worked so well. important for the whole community. It will help so It is slightly unusual for a government to take functions many families, couples and children — people from all out of a minister’s hands and put them in the hands of a parts of every community — to live much better lives. body with representation from the opposition. Significantly we are making this commitment at a time However, this demonstrates there is an open and when it would be easy to say that we need to use the accountable process with a true desire to have everyone money elsewhere. The previous Labor government’s working towards the ultimate outcome — a significant black hole projects like the desalination plant have left a reduction in problem gambling and its negative big dent in Victoria’s finances — —
VICTORIAN RESPONSIBLE GAMBLING FOUNDATION BILL 2011
4946 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011
Mr Nardella — On a point of order, Acting the findings that many of its clients were middle-aged, Speaker, the honourable member is straying from the around 38 years old — I am not quite sure if that is bill completely. I ask you once again, after the previous middle-aged; they were divided fairly evenly between point of order, to bring the member back to the bill. males, at 54 per cent, and females, at 46 per cent; and around one-quarter of the clients were born overseas. The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Blackwood) — The service found that in the northern suburbs some Order! I uphold the point of order. I ask the member to 48 per cent of its clients had incomes below $20 000. A come back to the bill. further 30 per cent had incomes between $20 000 and $40 000. This compares with the finding that only 2 per Ms WREFORD — I was showing that the finances cent of the northern suburbs population that earnt above we put towards this are high on our priority list, as $60 000 was attending the service in relation to opposed to some of the other things that we could have problem gambling. That was the situation going back to been tackling. That is the point I am trying to make the mid to late 1990s. What has changed since that time here — that we see this bill as really important in terms that relates to these problem gambling services, which of this government caring for the community. There the government seeks to address through the Victorian have been a lot of competing projects in terms of where Responsible Gambling Foundation Bill 2011? money will go, but we have put this high on the list and it is key to what we want to do in the community. We I turn to more recent work that was done by the local want to fix the gambling problems. council in my electorate, the Banyule City Council. When I was a councillor there we adopted an electronic This is the biggest investment in reducing problem gaming machine policy and plan. From my perspective gambling that any state or territory has ever made. It it was about how we could advocate to ensure that represents a 41 per cent increase in investment over that problem gambling matters were addressed in the made by any previous government. The foundation will northern suburbs, which I represent, particularly in the be the first of its kind in Australia, and it has been Banyule area, which is a local government area (LGA) designed to take a new and innovative approach to that is completely encompassed by my electorate of gambling. We are making a large investment at a time Ivanhoe. Some of the reports we had at that time when finances are extremely tight. We are establishing included problems raised by people in my electorate, a VicHealth-type board where powers are taken from and the government will need to address those through the minister and given to a bipartisan board and the work of the Victorian Responsible Gambling organisation. Foundation.
The message this bill sends is loud and clear: the In its electronic gaming machine policy and plan, which coalition government regards problem gambling as a was endorsed in May 2008, the Banyule City Council top priority. We are setting up a foundation that will reflected that it had some 650 electronic gaming probably be a world first, certainly a nation first. I machines in 11 venues across the municipality. That commend this bill to the house. was the equivalent of about seven machines per Mr CARBINES (Ivanhoe) — I am pleased to make 1000 adults, which was above the state average at that a contribution in regard to the Victorian Responsible time. The council found that in excess of $60 million Gambling Foundation Bill 2011. I want to start by was lost by adults using electronic gaming machines setting some context around these matters. I will go located within the Banyule LGA; that is essentially back to 1998 to look at issues that were being raised $60 million coming out of the community of the some time ago and then look at where we have got to Ivanhoe electorate through losses on gaming machines. today. That is the equivalent of something like $650 per adult. That is the sort of revenue that is coming out of the In particular I refer to a submission of the Banyule northern suburbs in my electorate of Ivanhoe. These are Community Health Service, which is in my electorate. the sorts of resources that people are losing and which This is a very active organisation and it provides great are causing a lot of problem gambling issues. These are community services. In talking about gambling and the sorts of issues that will go to the heart of what needs problem gambling services in particular, that service to be addressed through the Victorian Responsible determined that the term ‘problem gambling’ referred Gambling Foundation when we set out some of the to a situation where gambling in our society ‘gives rise ideals and aspirations that the government has to harm to the individual player, and/or his family, and suggested it will seek to address. extends into the community’. The scope of the research of that service went back to the late 1990s and included My concerns in relation to the bill are around the way in which it seeks to address problem gambling issues,
VICTORIAN RESPONSIBLE GAMBLING FOUNDATION BILL 2011
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4947 which, as I have outlined, have drawn significant approval of the minister — all of the foundation’s revenue out of the northern suburbs and the people in objectives and priorities, as determined by the board, my electorate. My concerns also relate to the under the approval of the minister. The foundation’s composition of the board, which obviously will drive plan for what it intends to do over the next financial these changes and reforms. In clause 9 of the bill it is year needs to be approved by the minister and needs to noted that the board of the foundation will consist of include — to quote from the explanatory memorandum, between 7 and 11 members. It is also noted in clause 9 clause 24 — ‘any other matters that the minister that elected members will not be eligible to be requires in writing’. appointed as chairperson and deputy chairperson of the board and that between 4 and 8 members of the board So matters that might be raised by members of the will be appointed by the Governor in Council on the community or by problem gambling advocacy groups recommendation of the minister. What is clear from who would like to see particular matters addressed that arrangement is that potentially 11 members of the cannot be taken directly to the foundation. They have to board of this foundation will be appointed by the take them to the minister, because it is the minister who minister and that 10 of those members will be will determine what matters the foundation will appointed directly either as government members or by consider either directly or through the approval of the the minister of the current government. Potentially one foundation’s business plan. So what will be the of the 11 members of the board of this foundation may arrangements allowing the one potential member of the not be a government appointment. I think that leaves opposition on the foundation to have a concerted role? the door open, and we should be concerned about what How could people from the northern or western agenda the foundation is running and just how suburbs of Melbourne have a role in the foundation — independent its role will be. that is, people who work hard on problem gambling services and advocacy? Could they be involved in the I note that clause 12 provides that members of the creation of the foundation’s work plan, objectives or board can be removed from office by the Governor in priorities or its financial arrangements and its plans for Council, so the government can remove members of the what it intends to do? board. It appoints the 11 members, but in particular it has complete say over 10 of the 11 appointments. There These are some of the concerns of the opposition in is no indication that anyone from problem gambling relation to how there is going to be community services in the northern suburbs would be appointed. confidence in the role and work of the foundation. It is There are people in the northern and western suburbs of not as simple as saying that we will have a joint sitting Melbourne who represent significant numbers of of Parliament and that that will somehow mirror the people there who have problem gambling issues. I work VicHealth does. VicHealth’s studies, its wonder if they are going to be represented on this publications, are all works that are made public. They foundation, given that 10 of the 11 appointees are are made available to all political parties and all essentially of the government’s and of the minister’s community organisations, but we have made it very choosing. clear that under this foundation none of the material, none of the research information and none of the work I note that the appointment of the position of CEO is that it will undertake — which will only be work also on the recommendation of the minister. That is undertaken under the approval of the minister — will pointed out in clause 17. The explanatory memorandum be made available to anyone but the minister. states that clause 23: The foundation is entirely reliant on the minister of the … provides the minister with the power to direct the day. It reflects poorly on the government’s view of foundation in writing in relation to the objectives and VicHealth that it feels it can somehow create a veneer functions of the foundation, and that the foundation must comply with the direction. of credibility for this foundation by aligning it with a very credible organisation such as VicHealth. The only Clause 24 provides that the annual business plan of the area in which there is any similarity between the foundation must be done in consultation with the proposed foundation and VicHealth is that a joint sitting minister. So the minister would essentially approve the of Parliament is required for the opposition — the work plan for the foundation, appoint all 11 members Labor Party — to appoint 1 of the 11 representatives so and have sole discretion over the appointment of 10 of that it has some say in representing the communities of those 11 members. the northern and western suburbs of Melbourne that are particularly affected by problem gambling. These are Clause 24 provides that the annual business plan must, clearly concerns that need to be addressed by the at minimum, include — given that it requires the government.
VICTORIAN RESPONSIBLE GAMBLING FOUNDATION BILL 2011
4948 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011
The government needs to outline how it will ensure that reverse that trend in the community and to address this there will be an open and transparent process so that the very serious issue for all Victorians. work and the research of this foundation is made available to the community, so that we have some say As I said, the policy that the coalition team took to the in setting the agenda, work plan and resources that will election last November committed the government to be required to investigate issues that affect problem establishing a foundation as well as a whole range of gamblers in the northern and western suburbs of other measures, including restoring integrity, probity Melbourne, so that the groups which are already and responsibility to the forefront of gambling working very hard to provide those advocacy services regulation in Victoria. There are a number of key will not have their budgets slashed because all the principles that underpin the government’s approach in resources are going to be tied up in a foundation which promoting a responsible, sustainable and transparent is going to be largely spoken for, appointed by, its work gambling industry, and I would like to take a moment plan and budget and 10 out of its 11 members in my contribution to identify some of those principles. determined by a minister in the Baillieu government. The first one is the issue of probity. It is very important. Mr ANGUS (Forest Hill) — It is with great pleasure It goes almost without saying, but I am going to say it, that I rise this morning to speak in favour of the that within this particular area, because there are Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation Bill 2011. significant amounts of money at stake on a very regular At the outset I note that this is yet another policy which basis with huge financial consequences, there must be was announced and clearly articulated to the people of high levels of probity. Victoria during the 2010 election and is now being delivered by the new coalition government. The In terms of responsibility, gambling is potentially objective of this particular bill is essentially threefold. It harmful and it is very important that the government is to implement the government’s policy, as I just overcomes what can be seen as a conflict of interest. By mentioned, to establish an independent body with a that I mean that the government must not allow its mandate to reduce the prevalence of problem gambling, interest in gambling tax revenue to undermine its the severity of harm related to that gambling and also to responsibility to regulate in the public interest. This bill foster responsible gambling in Victoria. makes a clear statement in that regard. Despite the budget impact of gambling revenue on the state, the The bill will create the Victorian Responsible Gambling government, nevertheless, is going to try to address the Foundation, which is going to have an integrated whole area of problem gambling. approach to working with established organisations — various of those have been cited by other speakers, but In terms of efficiency, it is the view of those on this side Gambler’s Help is one amongst others — that will be of the house that any regulation or any new legislation involved in delivering counselling and treatment should impose the lowest cost necessary to achieve its services. It will develop and implement communication goals. That is also a very important aspect. and education strategies, it will commission problem With enforcement, any law has to be able to be gambling research and it will also have an information enforced. That goes almost without saying as well. In and advice function. The legislation we are bringing terms of evolution, any piece of legislation has to be into this place is extremely important, because there is able to keep pace with changing business and consumer no doubt that problem gambling is a major problem and practices. a major issue in the community for a number of reasons, not the least of which is the adverse effect Many members have talked about the financial irresponsible gambling has on families and on the commitment the government has made, and I would broader community in terms of cost to the community. like to contribute to that discussion as well. The By that I mean the cost of gambling in terms of not coalition government has committed $150 million over only the financial consequences but also the social four years, or $37.5 million per annum — a significant consequences to the community, which are huge. increase of over 41 per cent on the previous budget allocation — the commitment of which sends a clear In relation to the financial aspect, we know it has been message to the community about how seriously we take well publicised. It is on the public record, and many this issue and this challenge for our community. offenders have found themselves before the courts in this state, particularly for so-called white-collar If members turn to part 1 of the bill, they will see the offences, because an addiction to gambling has purposes clearly stated. They are: influenced their behaviour. It has been a motivating factor which has come out in the course of their trials. (a) to establish the Victorian Responsible Gambling This legislation will go quite some way in helping to Foundation; and
VICTORIAN RESPONSIBLE GAMBLING FOUNDATION BILL 2011
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4949
(b) to make consequential amendments to the Gambling addiction. We need to be able to intervene to help them Regulation Act 2003. and enable them to get their lives back on track not only Other speakers have discussed various aspects of the for their own sake but also for their families and, in above and I do not intend to repeat what has been said, many cases, their young children. We need to be able to but suffice it to say that the proposed structure provides assist them to get back on the right track. for an independent and accountable regime to address The foundation also needs to provide information and the particular issue. The Victorian Responsible advice in relation to all aspects of the gaming industry. Gambling Foundation will be a robust and It has to provide information to enable people to make appropriately structured body and an appropriate submissions and participate in inquiries and governance model. As I have said before in this place, consultations and so on. Clause 6(f) of the bill says the and I am sure I will say it again, we on this side of the foundation is to ‘undertake research and evaluation house are very keen on and enthusiastic about activities related to its functions and objectives’. As I appropriate governance, because it is at the very heart said, that is a very important part of it as well, and I am of any legislative change that we may make. We must very keen to see this bill get through. I am very keen to get the governance structure right, because if we do not, see this foundation established. The model that will be the measure will ultimately fail and be exposed in that replicated here has been proven to work in relation to way. It will not achieve the objectives that we are all VicHealth; it is a robust and successful one. I am very looking for in relation to the community outcomes. much looking forward to this getting up and going and Clause 5 of the bill outlines the objectives of the impacting in a positive way in our community to help foundation. They are what we on this side of the house address this very important and critical area in our need to be proud of and what I trust all of us in this community. I strongly commend the bill to the house. place will be enthusiastically supporting — that is, to Ms KNIGHT (Ballarat West) — I welcome the reduce the prevalence of problem gambling and the opportunity to speak on the Victorian Responsible severity of harm related to gambling, and to foster Gambling Foundation Bill 2011 on behalf of my responsible gambling. As I said, that is the nub of it. constituents, and I note from the outset that the That is what we are trying to achieve because we know opposition is not opposing this bill. A lot of people in the impact that problem gambling has on families and my electorate engage in gambling. A lot of adults on the broader community. gamble, and they do so in a legitimate and responsible In my previous job I encountered many people who, way. I am sure that a lot of people will have a bit of a sadly, had offended in this way and suffered the flutter on the Ballarat Cup on 20 November, as I consequences of stealing money that did not belong to probably will. It is quite a legitimate pastime. them — I guess that is the definition for taking other I spoke to one of my constituents a couple of weeks people’s money, stealing — and becoming involved in ago. She will go to the pokies once a week with her white-collar crimes. It was a very sad situation. Many friends. She takes a specific amount of money, and of the offenders were people who had no previous once that is gone, it is done; she walks away. That is a criminal convictions or records of any sort. They good night out for her and in no way impacts on her life became trapped in the gambling cycle, the gambling or her lifestyle. Unfortunately not everyone can engage addiction, and that is the problem we must address and in gambling in a responsible way, and it is the problem will address as the new government. gamblers who we will be focusing on with this bill. Clause 6 of the bill talks at length about the functions of These are the people who need some assistance and the foundation. As I said, other speakers have discussed require services, and legitimately so. It is a the relevant points on that. We can see that it is going to government’s responsibility to provide some assistance undertake preventive and other activities to address the to people who cannot impose their own boundaries determinants of problem gambling. That is what we around gambling — those problem gamblers. want, that is what the community wants and needs, and Labor led the way in Victoria in looking at problem we will make sure it happens. gamblers and taking that issue seriously. We see now Again, the education and information program is a very that Victoria is leading the nation when it comes to important aspect in providing treatment, counselling responsible gambling. We provided support and services and intervention services. What more critical assistance to problem gamblers through a number of role needs to be played in the community than in those measures, including the $132 million Taking Action on areas? It is about getting in and trying to assist people Problem Gambling initiative. Labor recognised the once they are on that treadmill, so to speak, of gambling need for a more responsible gambling industry and also
VICTORIAN RESPONSIBLE GAMBLING FOUNDATION BILL 2011
4950 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011 the need to reduce the incidence of problem gambling Relationships Australia, Centacare, Child and Family in Victoria. We reduced the number of problem Services and Lifeline. According to the Victorian gamblers significantly. As a social worker and an Commission for Gambling Regulation, Victorians have ex-Lifeline manager, I know how important that is and lost almost $5 billion through gambling. Those how welcome those measures have been, particularly in wonderful counsellors at the not-for-profit services see the not-for-profit service industry. the human face behind those dollars every day.
Some of the important gains include reducing This legislation stems from an election commitment to maximum bet limits from $10 to $5 for all gaming establish the Victorian Responsible Gambling machines from January 2010, increasing penalties for Foundation, with the view that the foundation will work allowing minors to gamble, mandating responsible on a number of issues relating to problem gambling, gambling codes of conduct for gaming venues, including preventive measures to address the reasons requiring venue operators to have a self-exclusion problem gambling occurs; information and educational program approved by the Victorian Commission for programs; treatment, counselling and intervention Gambling Regulation, and giving local councils more services; information and advice around licences and planning powers in relation to the placement of gaming processes relating to licences; and research on and machines. Media and community education campaigns evaluation of its aims and objectives. have also been very valuable in highlighting the risks associated with problem gambling. Victoria was the What the foundation will not be doing is advocacy. I first state to announce that it would mandate think that is problematic. I would argue that advocacy is precommitment for all gaming machines, maximising absolutely critical in reducing problem gambling the capacity for people to make informed decisions behaviours in this state. While the minister suggests about the way they play and about staying in control. that this model is like the VicHealth model, with an That is putting in place a system that the constituent I absence of advocacy and an absence of policy was talking about before had already self-imposed. development it is nothing like the VicHealth model, which is well respected and highly regarded in the One of the measures I am most pleased about is the broader community. For me this brings to mind what former Labor government’s commitment to ban happened in the Kennett years, when former Premier ATMs in gaming venues, which will come into effect Jeff Kennett did not just take a knife to advocacy in 2012. The importance of this was brought home to services but took a machete to them. As a result we saw me when I had another constituent come to see me. She increases in problem behaviours and the caseloads of was a problem gambler and would probably classify service providers increasing. I remember that because I herself as still being a problem gambler. She lost a was working in the field at the time. significant amount of money through the pokies, and when she came to see me she identified the fact that the In light of that history and alongside my statement ATM was right there, meaning that she could take very regarding advocacy I would also like to express my few steps between the poker machine and the ATM, as concern about the minister’s refusing to guarantee being quite a significant part — not the whole part but funding for the Responsible Gambling Advocacy quite a significant part — of the issues she had with Centre beyond the end of June 2012. Along with my gambling. She thinks that if she had had to walk some colleagues on this side of the house, I will be watching distance or in fact had to walk outside, up the road and the future of that centre very closely. From a social around the corner in order to access money, she work perspective I find it unbelievable that you can talk probably would have just kept walking and gone home. about tackling problem gambling and not even consider That is a very legitimate intervention that will be the role of advocacy in that equation. In conclusion, coming into effect. It was really just too easy for her to while the opposition does not oppose this bill we will take those steps to the ATM. To her credit she was very certainly be keeping an eye on how it plays out in terms proactive; she went out and got some help, which I of future funding for critical services that my would encourage anybody who has issues with problem constituents expect a government to deliver to them and gambling to do. their families.
Acting Speaker, with your indulgence I will stray from Debate adjourned on motion of Mr SOUTHWICK the bill for a moment to acknowledge the great work (Caulfield). that is done by the service providers in my electorate of Ballarat West. They do amazing work; they are really Debate adjourned until later this day. on the side of problem gamblers. These providers offer services such as the Gambler’s Help programs at
CHILDREN’S SERVICES AMENDMENT BILL 2011
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4951
CHILDREN’S SERVICES AMENDMENT This legislation is being put in place to enable the water BILL 2011 authorities to capture that role of the Essential Services Commission to apply to the ACCC to act as the Introduction and first reading delegate for the accreditation of the provisions that need to be applied under those commonwealth changes that Received from Council. were made in legislation in 2007 and 2010 for that role of price determination. Read first time on motion of Ms WOOLDRIDGE (Minister for Mental Health). It is interesting to note when you go back a step to the commonwealth legislation that the genesis of this legislation was discussions that took place between a WATER LEGISLATION AMENDMENT former Premier and a former Prime Minister, both of (WATER INFRASTRUCTURE CHARGES) whom were very interested in water infrastructure. BILL 2011 They were, of course, Premier John Brumby and Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, who were very keen to look at Second reading how they could reduce red tape. It did not make sense Debate resumed from 12 October; motion of to have a duplicate system with the Essential Services Mr WALSH (Minister for Water). Commission and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission occupying the same space. Ms ALLAN (Bendigo East) — I am pleased to rise They were also keen to look at how we could support on behalf of the opposition as lead speaker on the irrigators because the Labor government at the state Water Legislation Amendment (Water Infrastructure level has always worked to support irrigators, Charges) Bill 2011. I say at the outset of my particularly during periods of extreme drought. That is contribution to the debate that the opposition is not the genesis of some of the legislation, and, as I said, it opposing this legislation. As I will indicate later, we are goes to matters around enabling the ESC to act as a actually very proud of the investment we made in water delegate for the ACCC. infrastructure in our state. During an extended period of drought we supported many country Victorian The bill clearly states that it goes to issues around water communities by providing vital water infrastructure. I infrastructure charges. It would be almost impossible to will touch on that a bit more, as I said, later in my talk about a bill regarding water infrastructure without contribution. reflecting on where this state has come from over the past decade in terms of investment in major water As members are aware from reading both the second- infrastructure projects that have made a remarkable reading speech and the legislation, the bill puts in place difference to local communities. streamlined arrangements for the determination of the price that is set for irrigators in both Lower Murray Mr Delahunty — Such as the Wimmera–Mallee Water and Goulburn-Murray Water district areas. The pipeline. changes to this bill come about as a result of legislative Ms ALLAN — I will get to that too in a minute. We changes that were made at the commonwealth level to have been talking recently about that time during the both the Water Act 2007 and the commonwealth Water course of this year when many communities were Charge (Infrastructure) Rules 2010. Those changes devastated by floods, and we should never forget that have resulted in the Australian Competition and the floods followed a period of about 12 years of Consumer Commission (ACCC) having powers to extreme drought and hardship for many parts of the approve or determine the charges imposed by state, particularly in northern and western Victoria infrastructure operators in northern Victoria, in where the drought gripped really hard and for a very particular those two water authorities I mentioned, long period. which manage more than 250 gigalitres of water per year. As I said earlier, that applies to the Lower Murray As a Labor government we took the approach that we Water and Goulburn-Murray Water services areas. were not going to sit back and pray for rain. We decided to take an approach that was about investing in I note from reading the second-reading speech that the water infrastructure to improve the efficiency of the government has accepted the premise that there needs distribution of water and to make sure that it was being to be in place a consistent set of rules, because the supplied in a way that reduced the loss of water through Essential Services Commission (ESC) already has a its distribution mechanisms. We also wanted to ensure role to play in price determination when it comes to the that water was available to rural communities so that price that water authorities set for water consumption.
WATER LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (WATER INFRASTRUCTURE CHARGES) BILL 2011
4952 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011 irrigators and farmers could continue their important In making a passing comment on this important project, productive role and to ensure that water was available I remind members of the house that this project was to urban communities as well. actually opposed by the Liberal Party and The Nationals at the time. I remember that a former member The minister at the table, the member for Lowan, is for Rodney ran a bit of a petition against the goldfields begging me to talk about the Wimmera–Mallee pipeline super-pipe. They were not too fussed about Bendigo, a project. It is great to see that there is bipartisan support large regional centre, not receiving water, but Labor for that project, but I remind him that it was the Labor was, and that is why we invested in that project. government that started the Wimmera–Mallee pipeline project. It was good to finally see the then federal water That brings me to the other water infrastructure projects minister, John Anderson, support that project. The that I want to touch on briefly in my contribution today. proof of the pudding — — The Minister for Water himself was standing up in this place just a couple of days ago singing the praises of the Mr Delahunty — The proof is in the pipeline. food bowl modernisation project. It was fantastic to see that convert on the road to Damascus standing up here Ms ALLAN — The proof is in the pipeline, as the and talking about it. It is going to be a transformative Minister for Sport and Recreation has just said. It is a project for the Goulburn Valley, which is a vital food great project, and if you are in the Wimmera-Mallee bowl area, but we should not forget that the project also today, as I was a few weeks ago, you will no longer includes communities to the west of what is known as hear discussion about the desperate need for a secure the Goulburn-Murray irrigation district, communities water supply. It is now about what the future economic such as Swan Hill, Boort and Pyramid Hill, which will opportunities for the region are and how tourists are also support this project. coming back to the region because the lakes are full once again. Farmers are going into a very productive Honourable members interjecting. time, and the rural townships are attracting more people. That is a shining example of the sorts of results The ACTING SPEAKER (Mrs Victoria) — you can deliver by investing in water infrastructure. If I Order! Can we have a little bit of order in the chamber? remember rightly, it was a project that was delivered on budget and under time. Ms ALLAN — I am pleased to hear that the Minister for Water, who is also the local member for Mr Walsh — In front of time. that area, has finally had his on-the-road-to-Damascus conversion and has become a great supporter of the Ms ALLAN — They delivered it early. food bowl — —
Mr Walsh — Thanks to John Forrest. An honourable member — You’re reading his press release! Ms ALLAN — That is what happens, Acting Speaker, when you build projects during a period of Ms ALLAN — I am happy to read some other drought. It did not rain, so there were no work comments from a press release of 2009 from the then stoppages due to bad weather and therefore the project shadow minister for country water resources in which was completed well and truly ahead of time. Grampians he talked about the Northern Victorian Irrigation Wimmera Mallee Water did a great job in delivering Renewal Project, colloquially known as NVIRP. His that project. press release states that it is the aim of the NVIRP ‘to close down at least 60 per cent of irrigation Another project which demonstrates the enormous infrastructure of the region’. He said it would do little to benefit of investing in water infrastructure is the halt the exodus of water from northern Victoria. goldfields super-pipe, which connects Ballarat and Bendigo to the Goulburn system and which delivered In June 2010 the Leader of The Nationals also called literally life-saving water to Bendigo a couple of this project a ‘water-savings mirage’. It is great that summers ago. Without the construction and completion they have turned around and are now converts to the of the goldfields super-pipe to Bendigo, the city would project. The Johnnies-come-lately finally recognise that have literally run dry. We were facing a very difficult this is a great project that state Labor started and funded period of drought and Labor invested in the goldfields and that federal Labor came in and supported. I super-pipe in recognition that we needed to deliver that acknowledge that there have been negotiations between vital water security to Bendigo. We then extended it to the state Minister for Water and the federal Minister for Ballarat, where it has also made a huge difference. Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, and it is great to see that cooperation
WATER LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (WATER INFRASTRUCTURE CHARGES) BILL 2011
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4953 across both levels of government. I will have a little bit goldfields super-pipe for Bendigo and Ballarat. She more to say in a minute about how we will need that played politics with those projects because they were level of cooperation into the future. not the communities she represented. But when it comes to the food bowl, this is a project in her It was incredibly pleasing last week to see that the electorate which will make a fundamental difference to federal Labor government is delivering on its her communities. I was shocked last week when she $1.2 billion commitment to stage 2 of the food bowl came out bagging the program once again — I would modernisation project. It is fantastic that it turned a deaf have thought that even for Sharman that was a bridge ear for a long time to the carping criticisms from The too far. I would have thought that her friends in the Nationals and the Liberal Party, whose members would Victorian government, her good friends in The not support this project, but who do so now that they Nationals and the Liberal Party, would have gone are in government in Victoria. The Office of Water around to her and said, ‘Come on, Sharman, get on must have some pretty good departmental briefers who board; it is about time you hung up your boots on this finally convinced the minister to turn up his hearing aid one — — and listen to how great this project is, a project that we know will save a dramatic amount of water. Mr Weller — You obviously don’t know her!
Let us look at the three groups this project supports. It is Ms ALLAN — Can the record show that the fantastic that it is going to provide additional water for member for Rodney made a very funny interjection. I irrigators, because as I said the food bowl is such an do not know the federal member for Murray well; I important region to our state and it makes an enormous have met her on a few occasions, but I take his point contribution to our economic productivity. It has had well and truly. Let us consider her history on this one: some tough times lately, with the announcement of the during the 2007 November federal election campaign loss of around 300 jobs in the area, but I am confident the federal member for Murray said at her campaign that as a result of this investment in water infrastructure launch that Malcolm Turnbull, the then federal leader there will be future investment opportunities for of the Liberal Party, ‘would stop the $1 billion food companies which are either there now or which may bowl modernisation project’. want to come to the region in the future, confident that there is a secure water supply that underpins the Thank goodness Malcolm did not last too long. Thank economy of the region. That is why Labor started, goodness Sharman obviously has not had her way with invested in and pushed on with this project in the face her new leader, Tony Abbott, and thank goodness she of adversity from local members of Parliament, who has not had her way with the Victorian Minister for should have been standing with us and supporting the Water, either. He has been able to ignore the overtures project. from the federal member for Murray, who goes on — and she certainly does go on in our region — to As I said, until the local members came into continue to criticise the deal that was done last week by government, at every step of the way they did not the Victorian and federal governments. She said that it support the project. I put in a request to the Minister for ‘will come at a further cost to the irrigators and Water to pick up the phone or even pop over to communities of northern Victoria’. Shepparton to have a chat with the federal member for Murray, Sharman Stone. She is country Victoria’s most As the local member, she now has a $2.2 billion senior Liberal Party representative in the federal infrastructure project in her electorate thanks to federal Parliament. and state Labor governments, with the latter-day support of the Victorian Liberal-Nationals coalition Mr Walsh — A bridge too far. government. Yet she continues to go out and bag and slag this project, which flies in the face of all the Ms ALLAN — The Minister for Water thinks that evidence about the difference the program is going to may be a bridge too far. I am suggesting he build a make. I do not often commend the Minister for Water, bridge, and get over it to talk to the federal member for but thank goodness he has turned a deaf ear to the Murray, because she is nothing but a water claims of the federal member for Murray, Sharman infrastructure wrecker. For year upon year she has Stone. Long may he do so when it comes to this opposed important infrastructure projects that are about project, and long may she be condemned for the fact making a difference to her community. She has failed that she continues not to support infrastructure projects to stand up for her community and support these in her electorate. projects, and to make matters worse she wants to wreck these projects for other communities. She opposed the
WATER LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (WATER INFRASTRUCTURE CHARGES) BILL 2011
4954 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011
I could speculate, although that would not be on the the expense of relationships with other states in the content of the bill, that that could demonstrate a bit of a Murray-Darling Basin, and we have always advocated rift between the Liberal and National parties in northern for what is in the best interests of this state, be they for Victoria. Far be it from me to make any further the irrigators, for the farmers, for the urban rural commentary on that, but it may be that there is a bit of a communities or for the environment. Those are rift and that not all is happy on the good ship Coalition important areas that we need to focus on. In recent when it comes to the politics of northern Victoria. I am years, under the leadership of Labor, we in Victoria sure that in their contributions members of The have stood up for these interests. We have seen strong Nationals can clarify that for me later in this debate. results as an outcome of that representation in the form of policy change at the national level and investment in In concluding my contribution on this — — infrastructure.
Honourable members interjecting. I look forward to the Victorian government continuing that strong advocacy, because it is important that we get Ms ALLAN — Members of the cattle class are it right. I indicate again that the Labor opposition is certainly having a day out today, aren’t they? prepared to work with the Liberal-Nationals In concluding my contribution to the debate on this government to make sure that we put the best foot bill — — forward for Victoria on these issues. They go absolutely to the heart of the economic prosperity of our Honourable members interjecting. regions — regions that I represent and regions that the Minister for Water and others in this chamber represent. Ms ALLAN — I am happy to continue. I quite We are all very passionate about our regions, and we enjoy having the support of The Nationals in the see on this issue that there is perhaps an opportunity to chamber. I think I will continue. put politics aside and work together to get the best outcome for the state of Victoria. The ACTING SPEAKER (Mrs Victoria) — Order! The member will come back to the bill. With those comments, and with the great support of my colleagues and friends in The Nationals, I am very Ms ALLAN — I want to make a couple of pleased to indicate that, as I said, the opposition is not additional comments on the future and on something I opposing this bill. We commend the bill to the house. think all members would agree is a serious matter. In a few short weeks the Murray-Darling Basin Dr SYKES (Benalla) — What a delightfully Commission will be handing down a very important entertaining presentation by the member for Bendigo report that will go to the next stage and policy East. She will be able to put her fairytale-telling ability directions for the future management of the Murray- to great use in the near future, and I wish her well in Darling Basin (MDB) system. This comes off the back that area. With the member’s permission, I might even of a period when there has been much debate over pinch a few of her lines to put in my media release on previous reports that have released by the Murray- this subject. Darling Basin Commission and the content that had not appropriately taken into account the economic impact The Water Legislation Amendment (Water of some of the recommendations that the Infrastructure Charges) Bill 2011 is another example of Murray-Darling Basin Commission was making. I common-sense legislation brought before this know that a huge amount of work has been done and Parliament by a minister who really is in touch with the that Craig Knowles, as the chair of the MDB water industry, primary industries, the people of rural commission, is doing an enormous amount of work in Victoria and Victorians in general. The Minister for getting out and about and consulting with local Water was well supported by the staff who have put the communities. He should be commended for doing that. intentions into place in well-worded, clear-cut legislation. I indicate to the government, and particularly to the Minister for Water, that members of the opposition The bill enables the Essential Services Commission to would welcome doing ongoing work with the minister seek accreditation by the Australian Competition and in terms of making sure that Victoria is well Consumer Commission (ACCC) to enable the ESC to represented during the course of the debate. Victoria set charges for the price of water in the Murray-Darling has long been a nation leader in its contributions to the Basin. We are talking about rural water supplied by national debate on water management and support. We Goulburn-Murray Water and Lower Murray Water. have always taken a strong leadership position, often at The benefit of this bill being passed is that we will have
WATER LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (WATER INFRASTRUCTURE CHARGES) BILL 2011
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4955 people who know about the issues of delivering and and be able to continue to put food on the table. That charging for water and have extensive corporate has meant that good country has gone out of knowledge — that is, those at the ESC — setting the production. charges. Taking advantage of that will ensure that the pricing structure remains practical and relevant to the Linked with that is that we need a profitable agriculture needs of the irrigators and that they make their industry to support our local communities, because contributions to the systems running efficiently. each property that functions generates many jobs. The member for Rodney could give me a figure, but I think In addition, for the purposes of setting charges, it is that every 100 megalitres of water is equivalent to Goulburn-Murray Water and Lower Murray Water will one job? need to relate to only one authority, the ESC. If this bill is not passed and the ESC is not given approval to set Mr Weller — It is 150 megalitres equals eight jobs. charges, the two water authorities would need to relate to the ACCC for rural water charging and the ESC for Dr SYKES — The figure is that 150 megalitres of urban water charging, and that is nonsensical. The water translates to eight jobs, so water and irrigated timing of the passage of the bill is critical. It needs to agriculture are extremely important — — pass in the next couple of weeks and be completed by An honourable member interjected. 31 December so that application can be made to the ACCC for the ESC to be an approved agency for Dr SYKES — We are going to have a great debate setting water prices. That is the guts of the bill; it is very here on the numbers, but the bottom line is, as was simple, and a lot of it is about making that happen. evident when the Labor Party came up with that proposition for the draft Murray-Darling Basin plan, it I will follow the lead of the member for Bendigo East forgot that profitable irrigated agriculture is and just put this bill in context. I begin with the fact that fundamental to country communities — and country in the electorate of Benalla water is extremely communities need to be there because of job creation important. For a start, the electorates of Benalla, and servicing people. The other aspect in relation to the Benambra and Seymour are the upper catchment areas environment is that you need to be trading in the black of much of the Murray-Darling Basin. In fact I think to be able to be green and to protect the environment; something like 38 per cent of the water going into the and that relates both to the management of your own Murray-Darling Basin comes from those catchment particular parcel of land and also to the management of areas represented by the members for Benambra and public land, of which there is so much along the Murray Seymour and me, so the area is an extremely important River. We need profitable irrigated agriculture. source of water for the basin. Of course my colleagues the members for Rodney, Swan Hill, Mildura, For profitability we need efficient delivery of water and Shepparton and Murray Valley all represent the gravity a reasonable price structure. This bill is about setting irrigators who benefit so much from the water that is the price structure and, as I have said, it makes sense distributed. and I am sure it will operate correctly. In relation to efficient delivery, we heard some discussion by the We need to have in place a functional and cost-effective member for Bendigo East on the upgraded irrigated system so that we can have prosperous agriculture. We infrastructure, and I make it very clear that this side of need prosperous agriculture to ensure the ongoing the house has always supported the upgrade of production of food and fibre, the viability of our local irrigation infrastructure in northern Victoria and communities and the protection of the environment. If elsewhere. The problem we had was the gross people cannot make a dollar out of producing food and mismanagement by the former Labor government. Lots fibre for Victorians, Australians and the export market, of activity was undertaken at a very high cost per they do not remain viable and it all falls over. In the megalitre of water saved, investments in areas where past 10 or 12 tough years we have seen that, with there was a subsequent closing down of those particular people struggling to be viable. That has been as a result irrigated areas and generally a further example of inept, of a number of factors, one of which has been the incompetent mismanagement of taxpayers money. natural elements, which have been extremely tough. The consequences of nature have been compounded by We have come into government and seen the evidence a heartless, inept Labor government that has made it of the practical, common-sense and experienced extremely tough for country Victorians to do what they approach of the Minister for Water, who has negotiated do so well — that is, produce food and fibre for the an outstanding arrangement in relation to stage 2 of the benefit of everyone. We have had situations where Northern Victoria Irrigation Renewal Project where we people have had to sell their water to reduce their debt will get better value for taxpayers money. Victorians
WATER LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (WATER INFRASTRUCTURE CHARGES) BILL 2011
4956 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011 will manage the project, not federal bureaucrats who The house needs to understand that the genesis of this know little about on-ground matters. The minister legislation was a discussion between the previous achieved that through some wise negotiation, Premier Brumby and former Prime Minister Rudd. It temporarily removing the water trading cap and making was designed to reduce red tape and enshrine the rights an arrangement whereby for an extra $200 million from of irrigators after ESC powers were handed over to the the federal government, the commonwealth and the ACCC. As the member for Bendigo East said, we have environment are guaranteed extra water for the had a great tradition, particularly over the last decade, environment which provides the benefit to the irrigators of Victoria leading this type of reform and taking a lead of avoiding a 25 per cent to 40 per cent increase in their on the national stage, making a strong contribution to cost of water. We have a clear way forward. We will improving the infrastructure of our water delivery have responsible management and value for money, systems in this state. We will look back on this time and and this bill is part of that process. at the decisions and projects that were delivered by government in partnership with the federal government I am also pleased that the Labor Party, the as transformational and being up there with the Snowy opposition — I repeat: the Labor Party, which is now in River project in terms of the impact they will have on opposition — is supporting this bill. That is because in water security in the future. the development and lead-up to this, the former Premier, Mr Brumby, wrote to his good mate We can be laissez-faire and think that happy days are Kevin 07 — or was it Kevin 747? — and he received here again because the 12-year drought has broken, but strong support for the Essential Services Commission the cyclical nature of the climate in the southern part of in Victoria retaining the ability to set charges. There is Australia means that a return to drought conditions will support from both sides of the house for this bill, but certainly take place. Therefore I am extremely proud of what we will see with the implementation of this piece the difficult decisions that we took to protect Victoria’s of legislation is that general water-related legislation water security. Unlike The Nationals — the flat earth and general legislation overall will be more wisely, society on the other side — our policy was not just to more practically and more sensibly managed in the take the good old solution of dam it and be damned, future. We will have honesty in government, and we and I was particularly proud of a former Minister for will see the delivery of water that will ensure profitable Water, John Thwaites, responding to my irrigated agriculture, which will ensure the long-term representations to remove from the planning scheme a survival of our regional communities and a better proposed future dam in my electorate around Christmas outcome for the environment — and all of us who Hills, adjacent to the Sugarloaf Reservoir — — appreciate the environment will do our best to ensure its longevity. Dr Sykes interjected.
Ms GREEN (Yan Yean) — It is with great pleasure Ms GREEN — That is the Sugarloaf Reservoir, for that I join the debate on the Water Legislation the member for Benalla. It is a very important part of Amendment (Water Infrastructure Charges) Bill 2011. our water infrastructure and has the Winneke treatment The member for Benalla and I have been in Parliament plant there as well, which we significantly upgraded since 2002. I think it is the first time I have actually during our term in government. But there was a heard him supporting a water legislation bill. The proposed dam on the books in that area that would have member for Bendigo East before me expressed surprise flooded and destroyed the pristine Watsons Creek. If about the conversion on the road to Damascus by the members of The Nationals had had their way, they various members of The Nationals in relation to water would have dammed the beautiful Watsons Creek and infrastructure; it shows that if you wait long enough in cut off access between Eltham and Yarra Glen. But I politics, you will see everything. am pleased to say that, because of action taken by the former minister, this will now not occur. Under commonwealth and state legislation separate price determinations for parallel matters are necessary I know how important water security is in the area of for irrigators in the Lower Murray and the Wimmera–Mallee pipeline, having lived on that Goulburn-Murray water areas. The bill seeks to give the side of the state. It is important for food production, and Essential Services Commission (ESC) the authority to because of the legacy of open channels and the leakages act as a delegate of the Australian Competition and and losses from the system, particularly through Consumer Commission (ACCC) to enable one body to evaporation, the many actions we took to secure water make the price determination. As indicated by the for regional cities like Ballarat and Bendigo were member for Bendigo East, the opposition will not be necessary, because these areas were at very serious risk opposing this bill. of not having sustainable water for their populations.
WATER LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (WATER INFRASTRUCTURE CHARGES) BILL 2011
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4957
Certainly I know from my dealings as a former not limit, restrict or interfere with the scope of that right Parliamentary Secretary for Emergency Services that because people impacted by this bill will have access to there were very real concerns during those periods of a fair hearing through the state or commonwealth drought for communities along the Murray, and even judicial systems. for large rural cities as big as Swan Hill. During that time there were serious concerns about there not being As I said at the outset, the opposition does not oppose adequate water to fight fires that might have occurred in the bill. I am glad to see that various members of the that area. So these communities do welcome the coalition and the Minister for Water are broadly changes and the water security on which our supportive of water reform and of investment in water government led the way, and I am pleased to see that infrastructure to protect Victoria’s infrastructure, we have had some conversions. irrigators and the system.
Honourable members interjecting. In my electorate I have irrigators, winemakers and fruit growers who are incredibly reliant on irrigation and on Ms GREEN — Goodness me. You really — — safe and secure access to water because 20 per cent of the agriculture, horticulture and viticulture product is The ACTING SPEAKER (Mrs Victoria) — grown and produced in the Port Phillip region. I will Order! The interjections are disorderly, but replying to always stand up for the right of those producers in the them is also. I ask for some order in the chamber. Port Phillip region to have good access to water. I hope The Nationals remember that there are those sorts of Ms GREEN — Thank you, Acting Speaker. I think producers in the Port Phillip region, and I commend the some of the newer members will learn, once their — — bill to the house.
Honourable members interjecting. Honourable members interjecting.
The ACTING SPEAKER (Mrs Victoria) — The ACTING SPEAKER (Mrs Victoria) — Order! Responding to interjections is disorderly. Order! The member for Rodney will have the call when Ms GREEN — I would say that the genesis of this I have some quiet in the chamber. legislation was initiated by two significant Labor Mr WELLER (Rodney) — It is a pleasure to rise to leaders, but the bill before the house is probably one of talk on the Water Legislation Amendment (Water the most dense, least comprehensive pieces of Infrastructure Charges) Bill 2011. In summary, the bill legislation ever presented to Parliament. Whilst the bill is about giving the Essential Services Commission the does not take away any rights — in fact it gives ability to carry out the role it has always carried out irrigators greater rights — prima facie it takes away when it comes to overseeing the pricing of water in the rights, and it will be difficult for the government to Goulburn-Murray irrigation district and the Lower explain to the contrary as it notionally takes away the Murray Water area. second purpose of the Essential Services Commission Act 2001, which promotes the long-term interests of It is a common-sense bill. It avoids duplication. Victorian consumers. Goulburn-Murray Water and Lower Murray Water, as my good friend the member for Benalla has already While the bill deals with the three-tier system, in simple pointed out, will now have to refer to only one terms the bill lets the ESC (Essential Services authority, being the Essential Services Commission, Commission) apply to act as a delegate for the rather than the Essential Services Commission and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission ACCC (Australian Competition and Consumer regarding Murray-Darling Basin water charges for a Commission). We are all about reducing red tape, and it 10-year period. Various other sections have no impact is a very fine thing to do. unless Victoria re-establishes farmer-run water cooperatives, and I doubt either the current or former I have listened to some interesting comments from water minister would want to re-establish the First members opposite. Interestingly the member for Mildura Irrigation Trust. Bendigo East made a statement that the opposition supports irrigators. What I remember is that in the last As to the stakeholders, I understand that important term of Parliament, when the opposition was in stakeholders, such as the Victorian Farmers Federation government, the Pyramid-Boort Water Services and the Consumer Utilities Advocacy Centre, are Committee had the audacity to disagree with the broadly supportive of the bill. On rights issues, the bill government. And what happened to it? It was sacked. It engages section 24 of the charter act. However, it does
WATER LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (WATER INFRASTRUCTURE CHARGES) BILL 2011
4958 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011 was replaced with an appointed committee rather than congratulated, as should the member for Bendigo one that was democratically elected by the irrigators. East — I will give her her due — in that the minister actually got an agreement from the federal government This opposition has form when it comes to saying it on how it will deliver the $1.2 billion. All we had at supports irrigators. In actual fact it did not listen to each election campaign was, ‘Oh, yes, there is another them. It said, ‘You will tow the line or you will not commitment’, but it was never rolled out. Now the have a role’. Then the member for Bendigo East went funding is there and will be delivered, because the on to say, ‘Invest in water infrastructure’. The member Minister for Water and people on this side of the house for Bendigo East also said that I, the member for understand the impact of costs on the irrigators. The Rodney, did not support investment in water minister has done a deal and got $200 million plus, infrastructure. She should go back and read Hansard. I which means irrigators will not have to find that have always said that I support upgrading the irrigation $200 million, avoiding cost rises of between 25 to system. It is just that Labor cannot manage major 45 per cent, depending which area you come from. That projects. It could not manage the implementation and was a very good deal achieved by the minister, who oversight when it was in charge of the Northern should be congratulated on getting on with it. Victorian Irrigation Renewal Project (NVIRP). When Labor was looking after it there was a lot of frustration The member for Bendigo East spoke about the voiced by the farming community. goldfields super-pipe that now goes from Colbinabbin in my electorate all the way to Ballarat, but the first What the Labor side of politics never understands is section was from Colbinabbin to Lake Eppalock. She how these things impact practically on the day-to-day spoke about how important that was and how I opposed farmer. There was no flexibility as to where the it. What I opposed was that the former government, backbones of the channels finished. Once the channel rather than finding the water for Bendigo out of got down there, if there were fewer than 20 delivery savings, came into the market and just bought water. If shares, that channel finished there and there had to be you take water out of productive agriculture, you lose provisions for connections from there back to wherever jobs; it is as simple as that. What the former you were. The minister, because he understands it, has government should have done was to obtain the water made it more flexible. He is saying now that the that it was going to run down that pipeline through backbone will not necessarily finish where we get down savings, not by just entering the market and devastating to fewer than 20 delivery shares. It may be some figure my communities. Then the member for Bendigo East less than that if it can be established that there is a need talked about losing jobs at Girgarre and losing jobs at and there are farmers who have been investing in the Shepparton. You have to have water to have jobs. If latest technologies for efficient water use on their you take the water away, there are no jobs. farms. Why should they be cut free? They are the ones we want to encourage. The member for Yan Yean made one of her famous statements in the last Parliament. You can go back There were also lots of concerns in the irrigation through Hansard and find her statement to the last community about the management of the program, and Parliament in one of her rants when she was getting that is why the Ombudsman had an inquiry. We are yet into The Nationals about building dams. She said, to hear the outcome of that, but I can tell the house that ‘Don’t The Nationals understand that it is never going there have been lots of submissions from many farmers to rain again?’. In the last Parliament the member for in the community about problems where there were Yan Yean made the comment that it was never going to meant to be pod meetings — a pod being a small rain again. She has lost all credibility. We have seen — section of channel that is going to be remodelled or and I agree with her on this — that the weather is done away with and people connect back in other forms cyclical. You go through dry periods, you go through to the backbone — at which everyone could have input. wet periods and you go through average periods. It has It is alleged that NVIRP would pick off one or two, get always been cyclical, so at long last it may be that she them happy and forget about the rest. The process was has found out that it does actually go in cycles. not working as it should have, and it would also seem that there were allegations that it was being done in a The member for Yan Yean also spoke about the very wasteful way. There was great frustration about Wimmera–Mallee pipeline and how it was the state our not getting bang for our buck. Labor government that actually delivered it. I have been around a while, and I can say that a third of the funding It is a great review. The minister is getting on and for the Wimmera–Mallee pipeline, just for the benefit improving the rollout of the Northern Victoria of the house, was paid for by the community and Irrigation Renewal Project. The minister should also be irrigators in the Wimmera-Mallee area. John Forrest,
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4959 the federal member for Mallee, convinced John The ACTING SPEAKER (Mrs Victoria) — Howard, the then Prime Minister, to come up with a Order! third, and yes the state government came up with its third. To say it was the Brumby or Bracks pipeline is a Mr DONNELLAN — This is a disgrace. lot of rot. They were involved, along with John Forrest, who convinced John Howard. We should build a brass The ACTING SPEAKER (Mrs Victoria) — monument to John Forrest, the member for Mallee, for Order! That sort of behaviour is very unparliamentary convincing the federal government and the state from all members in the chamber. government to come to it. I commend the bill to the Sitting suspended 12.59 p.m. until 2.02 p.m. house. Business interrupted pursuant to standing orders. Mr DONNELLAN (Narre Warren North) — I welcome the opportunity to speak today on the Water Legislation Amendment (Water Infrastructure Charges) PARLIAMENTARY SECRETARIES Bill 2011. As indicated earlier, the opposition will not be opposing this bill because it is part of an ongoing Mr BAILLIEU (Premier) (By leave) — I advise the process of reform in the water industry. It is well house that the member for Benambra has resigned from known that we spent a lot of years improving the way his position as Parliamentary Secretary for Police and water is allocated in this state and also substantially Emergency Services. improving the infrastructure.
One of the issues that needed to be dealt with was the QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE costing of water infrastructure, and I think this bill appropriately deals with this by allowing the Essential Former deputy commissioner of police: meeting Services Commission, with the reference of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, to Mr ANDREWS (Leader of the Opposition) — My provide pricing. In relation to water pricing I think this question is to the Deputy Premier and Minister for bill is appropriate. Police and Emergency Services. I refer the minister to page 47 of the Office of Police Integrity report in which What concerns me is the amount of water which flowed the then Parliamentary Secretary for Police and into the ocean from South Australia this year. From Emergency Services told the OPI that the minister was what I understand, this year about 13 000 gigalitres aware of his visit to Sir Ken Jones’s home and to the have flowed into the ocean from South Australia. That minister’s subsequent evidence that he was not aware is a lot of water, especially when you consider that the of this meeting and that he was not aware of the total holding capacity of Melbourne dams, which approach to persuade Sir Ken to withdraw his include the Cardinia, Thomson and Upper Yarra dams, resignation. I ask very clearly: who misled the OPI — is about 1700 gigalitres. In other words we have the member for Benambra or the minister? 13 000 gigalitres flowing down to South Australia and into the ocean. As we know, South Australians have not Mr RYAN (Minister for Police and Emergency dealt with water being allocated on a market basis; they Services) — I thank the Leader of the Opposition for are still pretty much over-allocating everything. his question. The OPI report tabled today is a report which is welcomed by the government, because we You would have thought that some of that finally have available to us, as a Parliament and the 13 000 gigalitres could be diverted to fill up the people of Victoria, the full background in relation to the domestic dams of Melbourne. An editorial of 7 August matters which have occupied a fair deal of the thinking 2011 in the Sunday Herald Sun stated: time of a lot of us in this chamber and of those beyond its walls over the course of these past few weeks and But in a rash decision designed to appease Nationals voters in the region, the Liberal-National coalition led by Ted Baillieu indeed months. I refer to page 13 of the report just by pledged that if it were elected, it would turn the pipe off. And way of one of those basic benchmark aspects that this so it sits, empty and unused, while billions of litres of water report finally concludes with. It says: run away and flush out into the ocean. In contrast, the limits of Mr Weston’s authority are clear and That is a disgrace; that is an absolute disgrace. The the evidence of his abuse of that authority overwhelming, Sunday Herald Sun has hit the nail on the head. It is a confirmed by his own admissions and condemned in the joke. In other words Melbourne domestic users have to strongest terms by Minister Ryan and the minister’s chief of pay more for water because there is a deal between the staff, Mr Hindmarsh. Liberal and National parties — — Mr Andrews interjected. Honourable members interjecting.
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
4960 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011
Mr RYAN — The Leader of the Opposition says he schemes, so it is highly relevant to the interests of hopes he is listening. All I am doing is reading out the Victorian taxpayers. content of the report. In opposition the coalition was critical of some aspects Honourable members interjecting. of the VFMC.
The SPEAKER — Order! The Leader of the Honourable members interjecting. Opposition has asked his question. The SPEAKER — Order! The Leader of the Mr RYAN — Insofar as the issue that has been Opposition is on a warning. raised by the Leader of the Opposition is concerned, I refer the Leader of the Opposition to the commentary Mr WELLS — I give one example: in 2007 the within the report that appears at page 46, which says: disastrous investment into life settlements under the previous Labor government. This product was bought Mr Weston confirmed he had never received a request from for $1 billion and had to be written down by anyone in government to try to persuade Sir Ken to submit a $421 million. In light of this disaster the incoming letter withdrawing his resignation. chairman at that time, John Fraser, commissioned a The long and the short of this is that this whole business report into that decision to ensure that disastrous about anybody in government being engaged in some decisions are not made in the future. We are strongly sort of process which was to do with propositions of supportive of the efforts that have been put in by the inviting the withdrawal of a resignation from Sir Ken chairman, John Fraser, and the CEO, Justin Arter. Jones is an absolute fiction. The VFMC’s annual report for 2010–11, which was Mr Andrews — On a point of order, Speaker, the released today, shows that it has outperformed its question clearly related to page 47 and the evidence and performance benchmarks, which is good news. In accounts of both the then parliamentary secretary, the addition, when the Baillieu government was elected it member for Benambra, and the Deputy Premier. There commissioned a further review by KPMG into aspects is no accord between those two accounts, and I sought of the corporation’s performance, governance and from the Deputy Premier an answer to the question: did operations. Today I am releasing the KPMG review and he mislead or did the member for Benambra? That is the government’s response to that review. The response the question that needs to be answered. outlines the VFMC’s role, prudential supervision and executive remuneration. Over the last decade or so The SPEAKER — Order! I do not uphold the point VFMC has changed significantly, from having a staff of order. The answer was relevant to the question that of about 25 to having over 85 now. was asked. Today’s statement from the government makes it clear Mr RYAN — The simple fact is that there has been that we want the VFMC to be a high-performing public a chapter of events unfold here in relation to which the sector investment manager. We do not want the VFMC government at all times has done the right thing, and it to be taking on broader industry policies, nor do we will continue to do the right thing. want it to manage private sector funds. We already have prudential supervision in organisations such as the Victorian Funds Management Corporation: Treasury Corporation of Victoria, and we will have the reform same standards for the VFMC.
Mr THOMPSON (Sandringham) — My question We are also taking steps to ensure the VFMC continues without notice is to the Treasurer. Could the Treasurer to become more client focused, and a formal client advise the house as to how the government proposes to satisfaction key performance indicator will be reform the Victorian Funds Management Corporation? introduced and reported on. Performance will be determined on a client-specific basis rather than at a Mr WELLS (Treasurer) — I thank the member for whole-of-organisation level, so clients will pay a Sandringham for his question and for his interest in the performance fee linked to the investment returns. Victorian Funds Management Corporation. The VFMC Bonuses will be paid from this fee revenue, ensuring a plays a vital role in delivering strong financial closer link between the payment of bonuses and the management for the people of Victoria. The VFMC is performance that has been achieved on behalf of the the centralised funds manager for our major clients. We will require the VFMC to justify all in- government-owned insurance and superannuation house cost managements against the alternative source of external managers.
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4961
These reforms will take important steps in ensuring that Mr RYAN — In addition to that, on the face of the the VFMC focuses on the core role of a high- report it is apparent that no documentation has been performance public sector investment fund. This will produced to the OPI or otherwise that is reflective of add to the improvements that are being introduced by the so-called briefing that Mr Weston is purported to the current chairman, Mr John Fraser. have provided to me or indeed to anybody else. I say again that when one has regard to the content of the Minister for Police and Emergency Services: report, when one considers, for example, all the former adviser material around this purported deal, which was never a reality, it all goes to demonstrate — — Mr ANDREWS (Leader of the Opposition) — My question is directed to the Deputy Premier and Minister Mr Hulls — On a point of order, Speaker, under the for Police and Emergency Services, and I ask: how is it standing orders the minister is clearly now debating the that the Deputy Premier can continue to deny all question. He would know that at page 26 of this report knowledge of a so-called deal regarding the withdrawal it is said he wanted to employ someone with a of Sir Ken Jones’s resignation when Mr Weston, his strong — — former senior adviser, said he briefed both the Deputy Premier and the Deputy Premier’s chief of staff on this The SPEAKER — Order! The Deputy Leader of matter? the Opposition, the member for Niddrie, is on a warning. Another outburst like that and there will not Mr RYAN (Minister for Police and Emergency be a third warning. Services) — I thank the Leader of the Opposition for his question. The tenor of this report is absolutely Honourable members interjecting. compelling in that the director of the Office of Police Integrity (OPI) makes it very clear that what The SPEAKER — Order! The member for Mr Weston did consistently throughout the 90 days that Gembrook is on a warning. he was employed in my office was in flagrant disregard Mr RYAN — As I was saying, the simple fact is of his responsibilities as an adviser. He was not a senior that the purported briefing note was never provided to adviser; he was an adviser in my office. me. It has never been produced to the OPI. Honourable members interjecting. Accordingly, I completely refute the proposition which has been advanced by the Leader of the Opposition. The SPEAKER — Order! I ask the house to come to order. The Leader of the Opposition asked a Road safety: numberplate messages question. I cannot hear the answer from where I sit, and Mr BLACKWOOD (Narracan) — My question is I do not expect anyone else in the house can either. I to the Premier. Can the Premier advise the house about would like a little bit of quiet, and I would like a little the public response to the government’s initiative to bit of respect. place road safety messages on vehicle numberplates? Mr RYAN — The responsibilities of Mr Weston are Mr BAILLIEU (Premier) — So far this year set out in the report at page 24. It is very clear from the 221 lives have been lost on Victorian roads, and more findings of the director of the Office of Police Integrity than half of those deaths have been in country Victoria. that what Mr Weston did consistently and flagrantly I believe that every member of this house would regard was to act outside the scope of his duties. any death on the roads as unacceptable. Indeed since Honourable members interjecting. the early 1970s there has been a bipartisan, long-term effort to drive the road toll down. The SPEAKER — Order! I am not going to ask members again. Recently we launched the initiative, Talk the Toll Down, engaging with 60 regional newspapers and their Mr RYAN — In addition to that — — editors. That campaign has been exceptionally well received, and those newspaper editors continue to The SPEAKER — Order! The Leader of the provide us with information and support for that Opposition is on his second warning. One more and he initiative. In addition to that, the government has been will be out. looking at ways to further promote a reduction in the road toll. I was fortunate recently to be able to launch a Honourable members interjecting. plan to put road safety messages on Victorian car registration plates.
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
4962 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011
There are some four million registration plates in are committed to what they are involved in by way of circulation across Victoria at any one time. What better their working for us as members of staff. That is no place to reinforce important road safety messages than different in my office. In my office I have a group of on the road itself, where the message is constantly in people who have been working with me for many front of motorists, cyclists and pedestrians. But it is also years, through those dark, terrible days in in front of passengers, particularly children. Many opposition — — members of Parliament will have engaged in those sorts of observations about numberplates which amuse Mr Hulls — On a point of order, Speaker, I am sure children when parents are driving cars. We believe you would agree that this is not relevant to the question there is an opportunity to place road safety messages on that was asked. This report exposes the underbelly of registration plates and in the process to sell that conservative politics in this state — — message to a broader audience. The SPEAKER — Order! I do not uphold the point It is proposed that for a number of weeks Victorians of order, but I ask the Deputy Premier to come back to will have the opportunity to submit their ideas for a 23- answering the question. letter message and that there be a default on those plates, including the letters ‘VIC’. Victorians have been Mr RYAN — I invited Tristan Weston into that making submissions on www.premier.vic.gov.au. So group which has been working with me for some years, far there have been more than 2000 responses on the and I appointed him as a ministerial adviser — not a website and more come in every day. Many of those senior adviser, a ministerial adviser. suggestions are creative and many of them are sensible; Honourable members interjecting. of course there is the occasional other type as well. Mr RYAN — I like to be right about these things. I want to reinforce that this is all about getting people thinking and talking about how to improve road safety, Mr Andrews interjected. whether it be motorists, whether it be passengers, whether it be children or those on the roads more The SPEAKER — Order! The Leader of the widely. In the process we anticipate that with the Opposition is pushing it. evolution of the numberplates, which in their current form are scheduled to be renewed in the next few Mr RYAN — Mr Weston came to my office with months, we will be able at minimum cost to replace the 15 years of service as a police officer. He was a message with a default message, then in time there may member of the security intelligence group. well be other messages appropriate to join in the Ms Thomson interjected. campaign to talk the road toll down across regional Victoria and more broadly across all drivers and roads The SPEAKER — Order! The member for in Victoria. Footscray is on a warning.
Minister for Police and Emergency Services: Mr RYAN — He was cleared with a security level ministerial staff which was amongst the highest in the Australian nation, and he was therefore appointed as a member of my Mr ANDREWS (Leader of the Opposition) — My staff. question is to the Deputy Premier and Minister for Police and Emergency Services. Can the Deputy Mr Andrews — On a point of order, Speaker, very Premier guarantee to the house and to all Victorians simply, the question sought an assurance that no other that no other members of his staff are subverting the member of the minister’s staff was conducting Freedom of Information Act 1982 by deleting, themselves as the Office of Police Integrity clearly shredding and sending emails to private addresses as found that Mr Weston did. I do not believe that the clearly admitted by the Deputy Premier’s former senior answer is in any way relevant to the guarantee that was adviser, Mr Weston? sought. Are any other staff acting in that inappropriate way — yes or no? It is very simple. Mr RYAN (Minister for Police and Emergency Services) — I thank the Leader of the Opposition for The SPEAKER — Order! I do not uphold the point his question. One of the things that underpins the of order. I believe the answer was relevant to the totality of the report and the way our respective offices question that was asked. operate is that we, as a matter of course, have people who generally speaking and almost without exception
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4963
Mr RYAN — The report demonstrates that during who have suffered as a result of problem gambling the 90 days in which Mr Weston was employed in my rebuild their lives. I also had the privilege of meeting office — from 8 March to 6 June — the leaks which with a couple of clients of Gambler’s Help. These are are in part the subject of this report occurred. That is so. people whose lives have been turned upside down by problem gambling, either by their own gambling By way of further amplification, I can assure the house behaviour or that of a loved one. This really drove that those who have worked with me have over the home the message that problem gambling is a very years faithfully worked with me, assisting me in the serious issue in our community and that we must do roles I have had over that time, just as I am sure when I more to tackle it. look around this chamber that every other member of this Parliament has members of staff upon whom they On 15 September I was pleased to launch the Baillieu rely — and they can rely on therm because they trust government’s new $2 million information campaign to them. warn of the risks and consequences of excessive online gambling. I launched this campaign at the MCG, and it Honourable members interjecting. followed the MCG Trust’s decision to say that at the end of its current advertising contracts there will be no The SPEAKER — Order! Earlier I asked for more gambling advertising on the iconic MCG silence when answers were being given. I again ask for scoreboard, which currently has a live display of silence in the house when answers are being given. gambling odds. This is a very welcome move by the Members ask questions and want answers, but they will MCG Trust. The government welcomes it; it is a not be heard if the interjections continue in the way responsible move. We would urge other organisations they have been going. to follow suit, because we think it is a good thing for Mr RYAN — We all invest enormous trust in each families to be able to go to the MCG and watch a other — both members of Parliament and members of sporting event without having live gambling odds put in our staff. their faces the entire time.
Mr Andrews — On a point of order, Speaker, the This new campaign that we launched is the first of its question sought an assurance in relation to adherence to kind to specifically tackle online gambling. It is the Freedom of Information Act 1982, and the minister necessary because the rise of technology means that is refusing to provide that assurance. The answer is not gambling is easier than ever to access, whether through relevant to the question that was asked, and I ask you to smart phones or tablets or anything else. We launched draw him back to the question as asked. this campaign with this important message: ‘Online gambling — it’s easy to bet, too easy to lose’. This The SPEAKER — Order! I ask the Deputy Premier campaign has been run on radio, on TV and online, and to come back to answering the question. it has gone right throughout the community. I am happy to now report to the house on the effects of this Mr RYAN — I have complete, utter and full faith important campaign. that all my staff who now work with me are in compliance with all aspects of their responsibilities in As a result of this campaign — comparing the five the discharge of their important roles in assisting me as weeks before the campaign to the five weeks after the a member of this place. campaign — hits to the Gambler’s Help website increased from 2456 in the five weeks prior to the Problem gambling: advertising campaign campaign to 50 051 in the first five weeks of the campaign. That is a 1900 per cent increase. The new Ms MILLER (Bentleigh) — My question is to the mobile site was particularly successful, going from Minister for Gaming. Can the minister inform the house 60 unique visits before the campaign started to about the new campaign launched recently to tackle 22 845 visits afterwards. There has also been a direct online problem gambling? increase in the number of people accessing online gambling counselling. There has been a 38.5 per cent Mr O’BRIEN (Minister for Gaming) — I thank the increase since the campaign started in online gambling member for Bentleigh for her question and for her counselling access and a nearly 25 per cent increase in strong interest in tackling problem gambling in her calls to the Gambler’s Help telephone line. community. The member for Bentleigh and I recently visited Bentleigh Bayside Community Health, and we This is only possible because the Baillieu government met with its CEO, John Turner, and the Gambler’s Help puts its money where its mouth is when it comes to counsellors, who do such a terrific job in helping people tackling problem gambling. We have committed
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
4964 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011
$150 million over four years to seriously tackle this Mr ANDREWS — I am seeking the beliefs of the issue. That is a 41 per cent increase over the paltry minister. If that is simply a matter of opinion as amount of funding provided by the Labor Party when it opposed to what he believes — — was last in government. There has been a 41 per cent increase because we are serious about tackling problem The SPEAKER — Order! The Leader of the gambling. The Labor Party is happy to have its Opposition is seeking an opinion. conference at a pokies venue, but Labor members will still not stand up and say — Mr ANDREWS — I am happy to rephrase the question. My question is to the Deputy Premier and The SPEAKER — Order! A point of order. Stop Minister for Police and Emergency Services. Does the the clock. Deputy Premier maintain that he had no knowledge of the fact that the Attorney-General’s office and his own Mr O’BRIEN — whether they support voluntary office arranged a meeting between Sir Ken Jones and precommitment, which was their election policy — the Minister responsible for the establishment of an anti-corruption commission to discuss Sir Ken Jones’s The SPEAKER — Order! role at the IBAC? Does that remain the position of the Deputy Premier? Mr O’BRIEN — or do they back up to their federal mates? Mr RYAN (Minister for Police and Emergency Services) — I thank the Leader of the Opposition for The SPEAKER — Order! I will not ask the his question. I invite Victorians to consider the terms of minister again. When I call order, I want order. this report. I think the outcomes referred to in the report Ms Allan — On a point of order, Speaker, which are self-evident. The answer to the Leader of the goes to the relevance of the minister’s answer. Clearly Opposition’s question is yes. it is okay for him to insult the opposition but it is not Desalination plant: progress okay for anyone in Victoria to make comments against the minister. He is clearly out of order, and he fails to Ms WREFORD (Mordialloc) — My question is to understand that where he had his Liberal Party the Minister for Water. Can the minister update the conference — — house on recent developments at the Wonthaggi desalination plant? The SPEAKER — Order! I do not uphold the point of order. Mr WALSH (Minister for Water) — I thank the member for Mordialloc for her interest in this issue and Mr O’BRIEN — The only insult is the way the for her representations on behalf of her constituents Labor Party treated problem gamblers in this state about the huge increase in the price of water that will during 11 long, dark years in office. occur in Melbourne because of the desalination plant Former deputy commissioner of police: meeting that was signed up to by the previous government. There has been a lot of speculation about the Mr ANDREWS (Leader of the Opposition) — My completion date of the desalination plant. I was question is to the Deputy Premier and Minister for informed today that Suez Environnement and Leighton Police and Emergency Services. I ask: does the Deputy Holdings have announced today that they have lodged Premier really expect Victorians to believe that the claims with their client, AquaSure, and that AquaSure Attorney-General’s office and his own office arranged a has passed on those claims to the Victorian meeting between Sir Ken Jones and the Minister government. These claims include a claim for force responsible for the establishment of an anti-corruption majeure — for acts of God — and for industrial action commission to discuss Sir Ken’s role at the to-be- at the site. formed IBAC (Independent Broad-based Anti- corruption Commission) without the Deputy Premier’s Under the force majeure the building contractors are knowledge? Does the minister really expect Victorians claiming 70 days have been lost at the site as a result of to believe that? what they call ‘cyclonic events’ between April 2010 and August 2011. They have also claimed there have Honourable members interjecting. been 193 days lost at the site as a result of industrial action at the site, including a half-day of lost time due The SPEAKER — Order! I believe the question is to a union rally in Wonthaggi to protest against the trial seeking an opinion. Would the member for Mulgrave of a construction worker in Adelaide. Also there was a like to rephrase his question?
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4965 half-day site-wide shutdown due to dirty water in the when they were in opposition. I ask that you allow the amenities at the site. Clearly the government has no Leader of the Opposition the opportunity of asking a influence over these sorts of issues at the site. We question that is important because it goes to the heart of believe these claims are baseless, and we will be the issues that are being confronted by this government. defending them vigorously. We believe the customers We believe Victorians have the right to get some of Melbourne Water have enough to pay with the answers, and we ask that you provide that opportunity $23 billion legacy the Labor Party left them without in this Parliament. having to pay any more for these claims on behalf of the building contractors. Honourable members interjecting.
AquaSure has also lodged a claim for an extension of The SPEAKER — Order! Members are very much time on the contract. At this stage that extension of time aware of the number of times I have said that points of has not been articulated, but AquaSure has advised of order will be heard in silence. its intent to seek an extension of time. Again we will be defending those particular issues. This is a contract that Dr Napthine — On the point of order, Speaker, I the Labor Party entered into and this is a contract that ask that you continue to desist from accepting the point AquaSure entered into, both with their eyes open, and of order. The Leader of the Opposition is an we expect the contract to be performed against. It is experienced member of Parliament. He knows the AquaSure’s right to seek a variation under that deed, question was out of order. You previously ruled another but it is also the right of the Victorian government to of his questions to be out of order. He is simply trying defend the interests of Melbourne water customers in to engage in a political stunt rather than ask a genuine order to make sure their bills do not go up even more question. He knows the question is seeking an opinion than they will go up because of the actions of the Labor and is out of order. You have called the member for government. Gippsland East to ask the next question, and I think we need to get on with the job. Minister for Police and Emergency Services: The SPEAKER — Order! I do not uphold the point conduct of order from the member for Bendigo East. I have Mr ANDREWS (Leader of the Opposition) — My called the member for Gippsland East. question is to the Deputy Premier and Minister for Honourable members interjecting. Police and Emergency Services. I refer the Deputy Premier to the fact that Simon Overland is gone, The SPEAKER — Order! The member for Altona! Sir Ken Jones is gone, Tristan Weston is gone and the The house will come to order. I have called the member member for Benambra is gone. It seems the minister is for Gippsland East. the last man standing, because he apparently knows nothing. I ask: how stupid does the Deputy Premier Mr Hulls — On a point of order, Speaker, in think Victorians are? relation to the ruling you have just made, I respectfully ask in the name of open and accountable government The SPEAKER — Order! The question is out of that you reconsider your ruling and allow the Leader of order. The Leader of the Opposition was seeking an the Opposition to rephrase his question on the basis that opinion. your ruling would be unprecedented on a day when the most damning report ever handed down against — — Honourable members interjecting. The SPEAKER — Order! The SPEAKER — Order! The house will come to order. The question was out of order. It was seeking an Mr Ryan — On the point of order, Speaker, in the opinion. That is the second time today. I call the context of wishing to assist the passage of business member for Gippsland East. through the house, I am perfectly happy, with respect, that the Leader of the Opposition have the opportunity Ms Allan — On a point of order, Speaker, there has to rephrase his question if that is what he would like to been a standard practice in the past both in this do. Parliament and in previous parliaments of an opportunity to be afforded from the Chair for a question The SPEAKER — Order! I have already called the to be reworded. You have on previous occasions member for Gippsland East. offered that opportunity to the opposition, and previous Speakers also did so for members of the government Honourable members interjecting.
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
4966 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011
The SPEAKER — Order! If the house does not The SPEAKER — Order! I call the member for come to order, I will suspend the sitting of the house. Gippsland East. Members will make up their minds! Honourable members interjecting. Honourable members interjecting. The SPEAKER — Order! Did members listen to The SPEAKER — Order! I am on my feet! The what the Deputy Premier said? I will take up the member for Niddrie is on another warning, and he will suggestion of the Deputy Premier. I call the member for be out if he keeps that up. I have called the member for Gippsland East. Gippsland East. Police: livestock and farm crime Ms Allan — On a point of order, Speaker, I refer you to page 151 of Rulings from the Chair for July Mr BULL (Gippsland East) — My question is to 2011 — — the Deputy Premier and Minister for Police and Emergency Services. Can the minister advise the house Honourable members interjecting. how the coalition government is delivering on its commitment to crack down on livestock and farm Ms Allan — Juveniles! Under the guidelines I refer crime in regional and rural Victoria? to — — Honourable members interjecting. Honourable members interjecting. The SPEAKER — Order! We will continue when I The SPEAKER — Order! We will hear points of have some silence. order in silence. Mr Madden interjected. Ms Allan — I refer you to guideline (5), which says: The SPEAKER — Order! I will crack down on the The minister has discretion as to whether or not the question is answered … member for Essendon. He is on a warning. Clearly the Deputy Premier has indicated to the house Mr RYAN (Minister for Police and Emergency that he is prepared to answer the question. Given that Services) — I would hope this is an issue of great you have refused to allow the opposition to have the significance and importance to all members of the question rephrased, I suggest that that opportunity be house, because livestock and farm theft is an important given to the opposition so that there is no curtailment of issue for our farming communities across regional our opportunities to scrutinise this government, which Victoria. The figures show that there has been a 129 per are being brought to a halt by your rulings in the cent increase in the number of sheep recorded stolen government’s favour. from 2009 to 2010.
The SPEAKER — Order! The rulings I make are The coalition government promised at the last election not in the government’s favour. I rule from here on to crack down on livestock theft and farm crime. what I see to be right and fair. Already the opposition Recently I had the great pleasure of visiting Eddington, leader has had to rephrase one of his questions because near Bendigo, to announce a new livestock and farm it was seeking an opinion. The second question he crime specialist group that is to be established within asked was again seeking an opinion. Victoria Police.
Mr Ryan — On the point of order, Speaker, again Mr Hulls interjected. from the perspective of looking to advance the smooth The SPEAKER — Order! The member for Niddrie running of the house, might I suggest, with respect, that is on a second warning. the call to the member for Gippsland East stand. Then, by leave, the government is prepared to grant to the Mr RYAN — It will investigate livestock theft, it Leader of the Opposition the opportunity to ask his will undertake targeted operations, it will prosecute question in a rephrased form. That would accord with offenders and it will roll out crime prevention the rulings you have made and would deal with the initiatives. matter in a manner that would enable the Leader of the Opposition to have his opportunity. Mr Madden interjected.
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4967
The SPEAKER — Order! The member for when a very important report is being tabled he is Essendon is on a second warning. talking about sheep, for goodness sake. He should be talking about corruption. Mr RYAN — Livestock theft is a unique crime that requires investigative skills and a good partnership The SPEAKER — Order! The Deputy Premier, to between government, police and agricultural groups to continue. catch those responsible. I would say farm theft is in the same category. This year in the western part of the state Mr RYAN — The media release from the VFF there have been 69 reports of farm theft in relation to states: very significant farming assets. They include the theft The establishment of a new Victoria Police livestock and of 28 tractors and 18 Bobcats from farm properties. As farm crime specialist group is great news for Victoria’s part of this statewide initiative on the part of the farmers and is an outcome the Victorian Farmers Federation government investigators will undergo world-class (VFF) has been lobbying for, said Chris Nixon, president of training to become specialists in the field of livestock the VFF livestock group. theft and farm crime. Mr Nixon went on to say that the Victorian government We are going to establish, through police command, a is to be congratulated on this initiative. These are very specialist group of up to 12 police officers who will be important matters. We are pleased to be able to deal located across different parts of the state. They will with them in the manner in which we said we would, have that all-important contact with farmers to better and we want to reduce the extent to which this crime enable them to report these crimes and have them occurs in our farming communities. investigated appropriately. Minister for Police and Emergency Services: Ms Thomson interjected. conduct
The SPEAKER — Order! The member for The SPEAKER — Order! The Leader of the Footscray is also on a second warning. Opposition on the rephrased question.
Mr RYAN — A committee that will be chaired by Mr ANDREWS (Leader of the Opposition) — I Victoria Police will include representatives from the thank you, Speaker, for the call. My question is to the Victorian Farmers Federation (VFF), the Department of Deputy Premier and Minister for Police and Emergency Primary Industries, the Municipal Association of Services. Given the minister’s refusal to answer Victoria and the Victorian Stock Agents Association. questions today and given the minister’s refusal to offer They will meet regularly to deal with these particular any credible explanation for his conduct and the issues and exchange information around this important conduct of his office, I ask: how is the minister’s claim initiative. I have with me a media release which is also that he knows nothing and the conduct of his office supportive of government programs and the initiative consistent in any way with the Baillieu government’s we have taken — — commitment to openness and transparency?
The SPEAKER — Order! Members of the Mr RYAN (Minister for Police and Emergency opposition will put the props down or they will be out Services) — I thank the Leader of the Opposition for of the chamber with their props. his question. The way this whole matter has been dealt with by the government is absolutely, utterly and Mr RYAN — This media release is from the entirely consistent with the principles which we took to Victorian Farmers Federation — — Victorians at the time of our election.
The SPEAKER — Order! I will not again warn Honourable members interjecting. members of the opposition. Members will stop waving around props. The SPEAKER — Order! The member for Lyndhurst and the Leader of the Opposition! Mr RYAN — The media release from the VFF states that: Mr RYAN — It is instructive to consider in part the material which has been, as I understand it, attributed to The establishment of a new Victoria Police livestock and Sir Ken Jones and which has just been released. It says: farm crime specialist group — — On 9 May I learned that Mr Weston’s proposal that I Mr Hulls — On a point of order, Speaker, the withdraw my resignation had become tangled up with some minister is clearly debating the question. On a day other problems he was trying to resolve. They were of no
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
4968 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011
relevance to me and it became clear that much of what he was The SPEAKER — Order! I was on my feet. The saying was speculative and not credible. I communicated my Leader of the Opposition does not have to hear me. I scepticism to Mr Weston — — ask him to remove himself from the chamber for Mr Andrews — On a point of order, Speaker, the 30 minutes. question related to this minister’s conduct and his refusal to answer questions in this place today — his Honourable members interjecting. feeble excuse that he knows nothing. It did not relate to The SPEAKER — Order! No point of order. I have Sir Ken Jones — — asked the Leader of the Opposition to remove himself The SPEAKER — Order! Your point of order is? from the chamber. I gave him two warnings.
Mr Andrews — The question related to this Mr Andrews — If you want me out, you can name minister’s conduct and the government’s commitment me. to openness and accountability. It did not mention Ken The SPEAKER — Order! I am asking the Leader Jones; it is about this minister and his refusal to be of the Opposition to remove himself from the chamber. transparent. Mr Andrews — You can name me if you want me The SPEAKER — Order! I asked the Leader of the out. Name me! Opposition what his point of order was. I do not uphold the issue he is raising. NAMING AND SUSPENSION OF MEMBER Mr Andrews — On a further point of order, Speaker, I am happy to clarify my point of order. The Member for Mulgrave point of order is relevance. The question related, Speaker, as I think most of us heard, to this minister’s The SPEAKER — Order! I name the Leader of the conduct — Opposition, and I ask the minister in charge of the house to take the appropriate action. The SPEAKER — Order! Mr McINTOSH (Minister for Corrections) — I Mr Andrews — his refusal to answer questions and move: the fact that he thinks Victorians are fools. That the member for Mulgrave (Mr Andrews) be suspended The SPEAKER — Order! from the service of the house during the remainder of the day’s sitting. Mr Andrews — That is what the question related to, and that is what should be answered. House divided on motion:
The SPEAKER — Order! Sit down! Ayes, 44 Angus, Mr Mulder, Mr Honourable members interjecting. Asher, Ms Napthine, Dr Baillieu, Mr Newton-Brown, Mr Questions interrupted. Battin, Mr Northe, Mr Bauer, Mrs O’Brien, Mr Blackwood, Mr Powell, Mrs Bull, Mr Ryall, Ms SUSPENSION OF MEMBER Burgess, Mr Ryan, Mr Clark, Mr Shaw, Mr Member for Mulgrave Crisp, Mr Smith, Mr R. Delahunty, Mr Southwick, Mr The SPEAKER — Order! The Leader of the Dixon, Mr Sykes, Dr Fyffe, Mrs Thompson, Mr Opposition is on his third warning, and he is out. Gidley, Mr Tilley, Mr Hodgett, Mr Victoria, Mrs Honourable members interjecting. Katos, Mr Wakeling, Mr Kotsiras, Mr Walsh, Mr The SPEAKER — Order! I was on my feet and the McCurdy, Mr Watt, Mr Leader of the Opposition just kept on going. McIntosh, Mr Weller, Mr McLeish, Ms Wells, Mr Mr Andrews — I didn’t hear you. Miller, Ms Wooldridge, Ms Morris, Mr Wreford, Ms
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4969
Noes, 43 no clear or apparent offence the Leader of the Allan, Ms Hulls, Mr Opposition has been thwarted from asking questions. I Andrews, Mr Hutchins, Ms would like to record — — Barker, Ms Kairouz, Ms Beattie, Ms Knight, Ms Honourable members interjecting. Brooks, Mr Languiller, Mr Campbell, Ms Lim, Mr The SPEAKER — Order! I will not say again that Carbines, Mr McGuire, Mr D’Ambrosio, Ms Madden, Mr points of order will be heard in silence. Donnellan, Mr Merlino, Mr Duncan, Ms Nardella, Mr Ms Allan — Your turfing out and fining of the Edwards, Ms Neville, Ms Leader of the Opposition is a very serious matter. I Eren, Mr Noonan, Mr would like to indicate that the opposition will, later this Foley, Mr Pallas, Mr Garrett, Ms Pandazopoulos, Mr day, be moving a motion of dissent from your ruling, Graley, Ms Perera, Mr given that your ruling has done nothing but further Green, Ms Pike, Ms establish that this government is being protected for its Halfpenny, Ms Richardson, Ms dodgy practices. Helper, Mr Scott, Mr Hennessy, Ms Thomson, Ms Dr Napthine — On the point of order, Speaker, this Herbert, Mr Trezise, Mr Holding, Mr Wynne, Mr is an absolutely outrageous political stunt from the Howard, Mr opposition. We had a circumstance where the Leader of the Opposition himself on a number of occasions called Motion agreed to. for himself to be named. He did it of his own accord. Honourable member for Mulgrave withdrew from Now we have seen this political stunt from the chamber. opposition rabble who are not anywhere near fit enough to be considered to be the government of this state, let Mr Hulls — On a point of order, Speaker, in light of alone to be in this house. It is outrageous behaviour and what has just occurred in this house — an absolute political stunt by opposition members when they should be showing more respect to the Parliament Honourable members interjecting. which they were elected to by the people of Victoria.
The SPEAKER — Order! Points of order will be We had the Leader of the Opposition challenge you, heard in silence! Speaker, on more than one occasion to name him. He called for himself to be named. Now members opposite Mr Hulls — on a day of substantial significance for are crying crocodile tears about the Leader of the democracy and transparency in this state, and in light of Opposition being named and fined. This is an the fact, as you, Speaker, would know, that legislation outrageous, disgraceful, appalling political stunt — the has already passed this place fining MPs who are worst I have seen in nearly 25 years in Parliament. It is named, which will have the consequence of the Leader an embarrassment to the opposition, an embarrassment of the Opposition being fined for daring to ask to what was formerly the proud Labor Party of this state questions about propriety and integrity in this and an embarrassment to this Parliament — and place — — opposition members are an embarrassment to the people of Victoria. The SPEAKER — Order! What is the member’s point of order? This opposition and this point of order ought to be ruled out of order. The Leader of the Opposition called for Mr Hulls — I ask you, Speaker, to reconsider in himself to be named. He challenged you as Chair on future taking the outrageous action that you have taken more than one occasion. He was given a number of today in naming the Leader of the Opposition simply opportunities to rephrase his question because he for asking questions about propriety, integrity and simply could not get it right, because he was simply transparency in government. playing political games rather than according with the The SPEAKER — Order! There is no point of forms of this house. I ask you to rule the point of order order. out of order.
Ms Allan — On a point of order, Speaker, I would Mr Hulls — On the point of order, Speaker, in like to record that the opposition is obviously extremely relation to the issues raised by the member who has just concerned about the behaviour this afternoon, when for been on his feet, I would respectfully submit that for him to be crying tears in relation to the conduct of the
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
4970 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011 opposition simply because we asked questions about compelling, and I think the ultimate determination that integrity and transparency is absolutely outrageous. We one takes out of this is that Mr Weston conducted as an opposition and elected members of this himself in a manner completely contrary to the bases Parliament are entitled to ask questions. If you, upon which he was engaged to work within my office. Speaker, believe it is appropriate that those questions be rephrased, we are entitled to do that. This report goes to The SPEAKER — Order! The time for questions the heart of democracy in this state; it goes to has concluded. corruption in the minister’s office. For the Leader of the Opposition to be kicked out — — Ms Allan — I desire to move, by leave: That this house dissents from the Speaker’s ruling made Honourable members interjecting. during question time today, where the Leader of the Opposition has been — — The SPEAKER — Order! I do not uphold the point of order raised by the member for Bendigo East. The SPEAKER — Order! The member cannot move a motion at this stage. QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE Ms Allan — I can request to move a motion by leave, Speaker: Ministerr fo Police and Emergency Services: conduct that the Leader of the Opposition has been ejected and fined for fulfilling his — — Questions resumed. The SPEAKER — Order! It is not the business before the Chair, and this is not a time to raise that Mr RYAN (Minister for Police and Emergency issue. We will return to the government business Services) — As I was saying, this statement goes on to program. say:
I communicated my scepticism to Mr Weston and distanced myself from what was being proposed. WATER LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (WATER INFRASTRUCTURE CHARGES) Furthermore, on page 10 the report goes in part to the BILL 2011 comments that have been reflected upon by the Leader of the Opposition in his questions today. The statement Second reading of the director states in part on page 10: Debate resumed. … Mr Weston confessed to the minister’s chief of staff, Mr Hindmarsh, that he had lied to the minister — — Mr DONNELLAN (Narre Warren North) — I Mr Hulls — On a point of order, Speaker, in think at the stage I left my contribution to the debate I relation to relevance, the answer that is now being was looking at an article from the Herald Sun of given by the minister has nothing to do with the 7 August about precious water going down the drain. question that was asked, which was about how many What it highlights is that, as I have mentioned, this year people the minister has actually knifed. He cannot 13 000 gigalitres have flowed into the ocean off South continue to be Bart Simpson and claim, ‘I didn’t do it. Australia. That is an incredible amount of water when, I Nobody saw me do it. You can’t prove anything’. reiterate, the total holding capacity of all Melbourne dams, including the Upper Yarra Reservoir and the The SPEAKER — Order! I do not uphold the point Cardinia Reservoir, is about 1700 gigalitres. of order. It seems criminal to be sending all that water down after Mr RYAN — As I said: the infrastructure has been put in place to divert some of the water to ensure that the Melbourne dams, if we … Mr Weston confessed to the minister’s chief of staff, have dry times again, as will happen eventually, will be Mr Hindmarsh, that he had lied to the minister and, contrary full. The problem is that for some God-forsaken reason, to assurances he had previously given Mr Hindmarsh, that he was ‘the government source’ for a number of media articles blow me down, I guess The Nationals might suggest critical of Victoria Police and the chief commissioner. these are environmental flows. I do not know what would be suggested but we will leave them as I invite all Victorians to consider the terms of this environmental flows. Realistically that water, when we report. It is an important document. We agree across have got the north–south pipeline sitting there and it is this chamber that such is the case. Its findings are
DISSENT FROM SPEAKER’S RULING
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4971 not a costly exercise to open it up and send the water network of infrastructure across the state to ensure that into the dams to get them 100 per cent full for the we can transfer water from one end of the state to the domestic services — — other. We are the only state in Australia that has got that, and it was a visionary exercise, compared to what Mr Walsh interjected. has happened in other states, such as South Australia, that have not put their water on a market-based footing. Mr DONNELLAN — Yes, the northern dams are We somehow seem to have the Liberal Party, full, but you can actually move water out of the supposedly the party of free enterprise, not believing in northern to the southern — — an open marketplace. It believes that somehow or other Mr Walsh interjected. it needs to interfere in the marketplace to keep its friends in The Nationals happy. Melbourne-based Mr DONNELLAN — Yes you can, and that is domestic water users will pay more for water in the clearly exactly what Mr Woodland is reported in the long run because of a dodgy decision. article to have said. The minister suggests it cannot be done, but Melbourne Water supply manager John This legislation is an appropriate move forward because Woodland said that the state was experiencing good it deals with the costing of infrastructure services and flows into its major dams and it made sense to make the the like. It is legislation that was begun under the most of them before pumping reserves from Lake previous government, but the logical part of the Eildon, which has been done. In other words, there is exercise of looking at market-based water pricing does the capacity to move water around these reserves and not fit with the rest of the Liberal-Nationals coalition maximise so that they are 100 per cent. water policy. It just does not make sense. There have been enough studies which have suggested that the My concern is that there is an attitude that somehow or allocation of water should be done on a market-based other the domestic water users of Victoria should be mechanism, not on the basis of keeping a couple of paying more for their water because the Liberal Party, people in Yea and the like happy and convincing them in its wisdom, has made a decision that we will not be somehow or other that they should decide what able to access that water forever. In my eyes that is happens with water policy across the whole state. It is a criminal. I know my constituents would be horrified at hysterical joke. It is a joke that I suspect domestic water the idea that we should pay three to four times more for users will get incredibly upset about in the long run if the price of water, whether it be through desalination or water supplies, rainfall and the like dry up. We other means, when we have already expended the cost highlight that, although water needs to be supplied to cover a supply of about 150 gigalitres for the across the state, one type of water user should not have Cardinia, Thomson and Upper Yarra dams. For the life to pay a lot more than they need to because of a policy of me I cannot understand why we continue going not to commit to opening the north–south pipeline. down the path we are taking. With that short and appropriate contribution I commend the bill to the house. The Herald Sun put it simply in its editorial of 7 August headed ‘Time to pipe up and go with it’, which says: Debate adjourned on motion of Mr BATTIN (Gembrook). But in a rash decision designed to appease Nationals voters in the region, the Liberal-National coalition led by Ted Baillieu Debate adjourned until later this day. pledged that if it were elected, it would turn the pipe off.
We know that, and that is fair enough — DISSENT FROM SPEAKER’S RULING And so it sits, empty and unused, while billions of litres of water run away and flush out into the ocean. Ms ALLAN (Bendigo East) — I desire to move, by leave: As I mentioned previously¸ 13 000 gigalitres have done so this year. What is probably more telling is the That this house dissents from the Speaker’s ruling made comment further on in the article which says: during question time today when the Leader of the Opposition was ejected and fined for performing the role of Her Majesty’s opposition in seeking answers on behalf of It’s time to put common sense ahead of politics. Premier Victoria regarding the gross misconduct of the office of the Baillieu should reverse his populist decision, and turn the pipe Minister for Police and Emergency Services. back on. I very much agree with that. It is ridiculous when we Leave refused. have the infrastructure in place. We have provided a
INDEPENDENT BROAD-BASED ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMISSION BILL 2011
4972 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011
INDEPENDENT BROAD-BASED Human rights issues ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMISSION BILL 1. Human rights protected by the charter act that are 2011 relevant to the bill
Statement of compatibility Privacy and reputation (section 13 of the charter act) Section 13(a) of the charter act provides that individuals have Mr McINTOSH (Minister responsible for the a right not to have their privacy unlawfully or arbitrarily establishment of an anti-corruption commission) interfered with. The right to privacy concerns a person’s tabled following statement in accordance with ‘private sphere’, which should be free from government Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act intervention or excessive unsolicited intervention by other individuals. An interference with privacy will not be unlawful 2006: provided it is permitted by law, is certain, and is appropriately circumscribed. An interference will not be arbitrary provided In accordance with section 28 of the Charter of Human Rights that the restrictions on privacy are reasonable in the particular and Responsibilities Act 2006 (charter act), I make this circumstances and are in accordance with the provisions, aims statement of compatibility with respect to the Independent and objectives of the charter act. Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission Bill 2011. Clauses 25, 28 and 31 of the bill enhance the right to privacy In my opinion, the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption by requiring the Commissioner, any deputy commissioner, Commission Bill 2011 as introduced to the Legislative the chief executive officer and IBAC officers, to take an oath Assembly, is compatible with the human rights protected by or affirmation that (amongst other things) he or she will not the charter act. I base my opinion on the reasons outlined in disclose, except as authorised by law, any information this statement. received in the performance of the functions or the exercise of Overview of bill the powers of the office.
The purpose of the bill is to establish the Independent Broad- Clause 36 allows the Governor in Council to make based, Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC), and to constitute regulations to prescribe matters in relation to security checks a joint house committee of Parliament to oversee IBAC. for IBAC officers and other persons engaged by IBAC under clause 29 and 30. It further allows for the making of The objects of the bill are to: regulations setting requirements for the disclosure and reporting of pecuniary interests by IBAC officers, and for the (a) assist in the prevention of corrupt conduct; compilation, maintenance and publication of registers of pecuniary interests of such persons. It also provides that such (b) facilitate the education of the public sector and the regulations may provide for the information collected community about the detrimental effects of corrupt pursuant to this clause to be included by IBAC in its annual conduct on public administration and the ways in report. which corrupt conduct can be prevented; Such regulations have the potential to require officers of (c) assist in improving the capacity of the public sector IBAC and consultants to disclose personal information. For to prevent corrupt conduct; and example, regulations to enable security checks by IBAC could require an IBAC officer or consultant to disclose (d) provide for the investigation and exposure of personal or sensitive information to ensure that the officer or corrupt conduct. consultant is a fit and proper person to hold a position within IBAC. The bill provides IBAC with prevention and education functions to achieve those objectives, including: Any requirement that officers disclose personal information will be clearly linked to the purpose of conducting security examining the systems and practices in the public sector checks to ensure the probity of officers appointed to IBAC. and public sector legislation, and publishing information This is of utmost importance in a public body whose on ways to prevent corrupt conduct; functions include assisting in the prevention of corruption. As an additional protection, IBAC, as a body established or providing information to, consulting with and making appointed for a public purpose by or under an act, will be recommendations to the public sector and assisting the subject to the Information Privacy Act 2000 and will be public sector to prevent corrupt conduct by providing required to hold any personal or sensitive information advice, training and education services; obtained securely and in accordance with that act.
educating the community about the detrimental effects In addition, IBAC officers may be required to disclose of corruption on public administration, and ways in pecuniary information which could then be made publicly which to assist in preventing corrupt conduct. available on a register of pecuniary interests and by publication in IBAC’s annual report.
The requirement that officers disclose pecuniary interests is important in order to maintain the integrity of IBAC and for IBAC and its officers to avoid conflicts of interest or perceived conflict of interest. In many cases, that information will already be publicly available (for example, on registers of
INDEPENDENT BROAD-BASED ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMISSION BILL 2011
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4973
shareholder interests) and so will only engage the right to The limitations on the right are direct, proportionate and privacy in limited circumstances. balanced with both the need to ensure public trust and confidence in the offices of the Commissioner and deputy I consider that any interference with privacy occasioned by commissioners, and also the need to ensure the independence clause 36 will not be arbitrary, as the information which may of those roles. The limitation is reasonable, as it is not an be required of officers will be clearly linked to their fitness to absolute prohibition on employment, business or community undertake work within IBAC, or alternatively will be activity. The limitation supports the objects of the act to necessary to determine if their private interests conflict with prevent corruption, which in turn enhances the right to take their public duties. part in public life, a right that the charter act seeks to protect and promote. For the reasons stated, I do not consider that clause 36 provides for the unlawful or arbitrary interference with The limitations are reasonable and demonstrably justifiable in privacy and there is therefore no limitation on the right to a free and democratic society based on human dignity, privacy under section 13 of the charter act. equality and freedom. I consider there are no less restrictive means reasonably available to achieve the intended purposes. Right to freedom of association (section 16 of the charter act) Right to take part in public life (section 18 of the charter act) Section 16(2) of the charter act says that every person has the right to freedom of association with others. This right protects Section 18 of the charter act holds that every person in the right of all persons voluntarily to group together for a Victoria has the right, and is to have the opportunity, without common goal. It applies to all forms of association. discrimination, to participate in the conduct of public affairs, directly or through freely chosen representatives. This The right to free association reflects the freedom of a society, includes the right to be elected in state elections. and is essential to the exercise of other human rights, such as freedoms of movement, expression, religion and belief. The The bill enhances the right to take part in public life through right is particularly important in a free and democratic society the objects outlined in clause 4 which include the facilitation to ensure that a person’s eligibility to participate in elections of education of both the public sector and the community for public office is not restricted unjustifiably on the grounds about the prevention of corrupt conduct. This will provide of their membership of an association. However, the right is IBAC an opportunity to engage with the public, and to not absolute and can be subject to reasonable limitations in enhance its understanding of the nature of public section 7 of the charter. administration. More generally, the promotion of good public governance and the prevention of corruption will enhance the Clauses 14(2)(b), 18(11), (12) and (13), 19(1)(d) and 21(1)(d) right to take part in public life. of the bill engage the right to freedom of association. Clauses 14(2)(b), 19(1)(d), 21(1)(d) of the bill, discussed Election to Parliament above, which prevent the Commissioner or a deputy commissioner from being a member of Parliament, limit the Clause 14(2)(b) renders a person ineligible from being right to take part in public life. This right may be limited on appointed as a Commissioner of IBAC if he or she is a objective, non-discriminatory and reasonable grounds. The member of the Parliament of Victoria or of the limitation is in place to prevent actual or perceived conflicts commonwealth or of another state or a territory. of interest arising between the Commissioner or a deputy Clauses 19(1)(d) and 21(1)(d) respectively hold that the commissioner’s duties in relation to the IBAC, and duties and Commissioner and a deputy commissioner will cease to hold interests that would attach to the public office of being an office if he or she nominates for election for the Parliament of elected member of the Parliament. This is particularly Victoria or of the commonwealth or of another state or a important given that the IBAC will be overseen by a joint territory. parliamentary committee and that the Commissioner and deputy commissioner/s may have a role in educating and Restrictions on employment, business and community advising parliamentarians in relation to ways to prevent activity corruption.
Clauses 18(11), (12) and (13) place restrictions on the The limitations on the right are direct, proportionate and Commissioner or a deputy commissioner’s employment, balanced with both the need to ensure public trust and business or community activity. Subclauses (11)–(12) confidence in the offices of the Commissioner and deputy prohibit the Commissioner or a deputy commissioner from commissioners, and also the need to ensure the independence engaging in any employment, business or community of those roles. The limitations are reasonable and activity, or from entering into a contract to provide services, demonstrably justifiable in a free and democratic society that may create an actual or perceived conflict of interest with based on human dignity, equality and freedom. I consider his or her role. there are no less restrictive means reasonably available to achieve the intended purposes. Subclause (13) requires the Commissioner or a deputy commissioner to seek the approval of the Governor in Conclusion Council to apply for or hold any professional, trade or business licence (including a legal practising certificate under For the reasons given in this statement, I consider that the bill the Legal Profession Act 2004), and to conduct any trade, is compatible with the Charter of Human Rights and business or profession, or accept any other employment. Responsibilities Act 2006.
The purpose of the limitations is to prevent actual or Andrew McIntosh, MP perceived conflicts of interest arising between the Minister responsible for the establishment of an Commissioner or a deputy commissioner’s activities outside anti-corruption commission of their role and the fulfilment of their public duties.
INDEPENDENT BROAD-BASED ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMISSION BILL 2011
4974 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011
Second reading establishment of an independent broadbased anticorruption commission. Mr McINTOSH (Minister responsible for the establishment of an anti-corruption commission) — I The government has long been on the record about the move: importance of ensuring that bodies with significant powers are subject to appropriate scrutiny. The need for That this bill be now read a second time. such measures was recently highlighted by the The Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Ombudsman in his October 2011 report, Investigation Commission Bill 2011 implements a key election into the Office of Police Integrity’s Handling of a commitment of the coalition government to establish an Complaint. anticorruption commission for Victoria. At the same time as the introduction of this bill, the This bill establishes Victoria’s first ever Independent government is also introducing a bill to establish the Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC). Victorian Inspectorate, to oversee the IBAC. The This is historic legislation for Victoria. Victorian Inspectorate is a key feature of the government’s legislative arrangements to ensure that The establishment of the Independent Broad-based the IBAC is subject to robust oversight. Together with Anti-corruption Commission is the keystone of the the joint house committee of Parliament established government’s integrity reforms — the most far- under this bill (the IBAC Parliamentary Committee), reaching and fundamental reforms to the anticorruption the Victorian Inspectorate will ensure that IBAC’s use and integrity system in Victoria’s history. of its powers is both appropriate and proportionate. The Victorian Inspectorate will have broad jurisdiction to The Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption investigate the conduct of IBAC, to ensure that it is Commission Bill 2011 is the first stage of the appropriate and lawful. establishment of IBAC. The bill enables a Commissioner to be appointed, and facilitates the The government has also recently introduced legislation practical process of establishing IBAC. Further to establish the office of the Public Interest Monitor to legislation vesting IBAC with investigative powers will provide important checks and balances on applications follow before the end of the year. Once appointed, the for the use of covert investigation and coercive powers Commissioner can commence setting up the new body in Victoria. It is critical that the Victorian community in time for the body to receive its investigations powers. has full confidence that applications for, and the use of, covert investigation and coercive powers are subject to This bill also establishes IBAC with education and optimal safeguards and oversight. Together, the Public prevention functions and powers. The bill will allow the Interest Monitor, the Victorian Inspectorate and the IBAC Commissioner to begin educating the Victorian IBAC Parliamentary Committee are designed to do just community about corruption and its negative effects, that. and proactively preventing corruption. This is important work, recognised by experts as key components of any The key aspects of the Independent Broad-based Anti- effective anticorruption system. corruption Commission Bill 2011 are as follows:
With the exception of Victoria and South Australia, Functions every state in Australia has an independent anticorruption commission. The New South Wales The bill provides IBAC with education functions for Independent Commission Against Corruption was the purpose of preventing public sector corruption. established over 20 years ago. South Australia has A prescriptive but non-exhaustive list of IBAC’s committed to introducing an anticorruption education and prevention functions is set out in the bill. commission. This includes: Victoria has never had a dedicated commission with the assisting in the prevention of corrupt conduct; ability to tackle corruption across the whole of the public sector. facilitating the education of the public sector and the community about the detrimental effects of corrupt The government believes that the integrity of the conduct on public administration and ways to Victorian public sector, and community confidence in prevent corrupt conduct; and public sector accountability, is best assured with the
INDEPENDENT BROAD-BASED ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMISSION BILL 2011
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4975
helping to improve the capacity of the public sector Reporting to prevent corrupt conduct. As a body led by an independent officer of the This bill gives IBAC the flexibility to conduct a wide Parliament, IBAC will be able to report to Parliament range of activities in performing its education and directly. prevention functions. These include: The bill requires IBAC to report at least annually to developing education and prevention programs, Parliament on its functions. modules and information resources; IBAC will also have the power to table a special report conducting general and targeted training and in each house of Parliament on any matter relating to information sessions; IBAC’s functions and, if it considers it necessary, make recommendations on how better to prevent corruption. conducting and publishing research about corruption and best practice models for preventing it; New joint house committee of Parliament
conducting outreach programs targeting rural and A further key feature of the bill is the establishment of a regional communities; and joint house committee — the IBAC Parliamentary Committee — to oversee IBAC. The role of this publishing material for specific community groups committee will be to: and the community as a whole. monitor and review IBAC’s exercise of its functions; In addition, the bill specifically allows IBAC to proactively work with public sector agencies to identify examine any reports made by IBAC; and corruption risks and to assist agencies to improve their systems and processes in order to prevent corruption report to both houses of Parliament on any matter occurring. connected with the exercise of its functions that require the attention of Parliament. IBAC Commissioner The composition of the IBAC Parliamentary The bill establishes the IBAC Commissioner as an Committee will be determined in accordance with the independent office-holder of the Parliament. The Parliamentary Committees Act 2003. Commissioner will have an equivalent level of independence to other independent officers of the Further legislation Parliament and comparable interstate officers. Preparation of the legislation outlining IBAC’s The Commissioner must be, or have been, a judge, or a investigative role is well progressed and will follow person who is eligible for appointment as a judge. before the end of the year.
The Commissioner is to be appointed by the Governor This further legislation will vest IBAC with in Council for a non-renewable term not exceeding five investigative functions, powers and safeguards. IBAC years. Given that IBAC will have a role in overseeing will be given significant powers in order to combat parliamentarians and the executive, the non-renewable public sector corruption. The further legislation will fixed term will help to ensure the Commissioner’s include: independence. details of IBAC’s jurisdiction; The IBAC Parliamentary Committee will be able to veto the appointment of the IBAC Commissioner, with own-motion powers and receipt of complaints and the exception of the inaugural appointment. For the first referrals; appointment, prior to the establishment of the IBAC general investigation powers, including a range of Parliamentary Committee, the Premier will consult with coercive powers; the Leader of the Opposition. provisions dealing with the conduct of examinations; The bill also provides that one or more full-time deputy and commissioners may be appointed by the Governor in Council. It is anticipated that one or more deputy additional powers for the Victorian Inspectorate to commissioners may be required as IBAC expands its reflect IBAC’s expanded powers and functions. operations.
VICTORIAN INSPECTORATE BILL 2011
4976 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011
The government has been clear about the importance of In my opinion, the Victorian Inspectorate Bill 2011, as getting IBAC’s investigative powers and oversight introduced to the Legislative Assembly, is compatible with the human rights protected by the charter act. I base my arrangements right. The government has also been clear opinion on the reasons outlined in this statement. about the importance of ensuring that what we introduce in Victoria is the best model for Victorians. Overview of bill The Victorian community will be best served by an The purpose of this bill is to establish the Victorian IBAC that is tailored to our local environment. Inspectorate to provide oversight of the Independent Broad- based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC). The bill provides The government appointed a consultation panel headed the Victorian Inspectorate with functions designed to enhance by former Supreme Court judge Stephen Charles, QC, IBAC’s compliance with the Independent Broad-based to canvass the views of a range of legal, community and Anti-corruption Commission Act 2011 (IBAC act) (when passed) and other laws, and ensure IBAC performs its duties operational stakeholders on key issues relating to and exercises its functions and powers in an appropriate and IBAC’s investigative role. The consultation panel’s lawful way. report is being carefully considered in the development of the further legislation. The recently introduced IBAC bill establishes IBAC and provides it with important anticorruption education and prevention functions. The government intends to introduce IBAC will be established as soon as practicable further legislation in the near future to provide IBAC with following passage of this bill. The search for a further functions, including complaints handling and Commissioner is well under way and the government investigation powers. Given the nature of IBAC’s role, which looks forward to announcing the appointment of the government intends will include investigating corruption, IBAC’s inaugural Commissioner. Once appointed, the and the powers that will be required to fulfil those functions effectively, such as the power to summons witnesses and Commissioner will be able to commence IBAC’s examine them under oath, and telecommunications important education and corruption prevention role. interception, IBAC must also be subject to scrutiny by a body capable of robust and effective oversight. This bill is the first stage of these important reforms. By enabling the IBAC Commissioner to be appointed, the IBAC will be overseen by two bodies: a joint house committee, which will be created by the IBAC bill, and the bill will facilitate the practical process of establishing Victorian Inspectorate. IBAC as the first stage of implementation of a robust, comprehensive and cohesive system. This bill sets out the functions and powers of the Victorian Inspectorate, allows for the appointment of an Inspector, and The government is committed to ensuring a cohesive sets out the complaints handling and investigation powers and procedures for the Victorian Inspectorate to fulfil its and comprehensive integrity and anticorruption system functions. These functions and powers have been drafted with for Victoria. The Independent Broad-based Anti- the IBAC’s current functions in mind, and also with a view to corruption Commission Bill 2011 is the centrepiece of providing the Victorian Inspectorate with the right framework these historic reforms. for effective oversight of IBAC into the future as its complaints handling and investigation functions are I commend the bill to the house. established. Human rights issues Debate adjourned on motion of Mr DONNELLAN (Narre Warren North). 1. Human rights protected by the charter act that are relevant to the bill Debate adjourned until Thursday, 10 November. Right to freedom of association (section 16 of the charter act)
Section 16(2) of the charter act states that every person has VICTORIAN INSPECTORATE BILL 2011 the right to freedom of association with others. This right protects the right of all persons voluntarily to group together Statement of compatibility for a common goal. It applies to all forms of association. The right to free association reflects the freedom of a just Mr McINTOSH (Minister responsible for the society, and is essential to the exercise of other human rights, establishment of an anti-corruption commission) such as freedoms of movement, expression, religion and tabled following statement in accordance with belief. The right is particularly important in a free and Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act democratic society to ensure that a person’s eligibility to 2006: participate in elections for public office is not restricted unjustifiably on the grounds of their membership of an association. However, the right is not absolute and can be In accordance with section 28 of the Charter of Human Rights subject to reasonable limitations under section 7 of the charter and Responsibilities Act 2006 (charter act), I make this act. statement of compatibility with respect to the Victorian Inspectorate Bill 2011.
VICTORIAN INSPECTORATE BILL 2011
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4977
Clauses 14(2)(b), 17(10), (11) and (12), and 18(1)(d) of the The limitations on the right are direct, proportionate and bill engage the right to freedom of association. balanced with both the need to ensure public trust and confidence in the Inspector, and also the need to ensure the Election to Parliament independence of this role. The limitations are reasonable and demonstrably justifiable in a free and democratic society Clause 14(2)(b) renders a person ineligible from being based on human dignity, equality and freedom. I consider appointed as an Inspector if he or she is a member of the there are no less restrictive means reasonably available to Parliament of Victoria or of the commonwealth or of another achieve the intended purposes. state or a territory. Clause 18(1)(d) provides that the Inspector will cease to hold office if he or she nominates for election for Right to a fair hearing (section 24 of the charter act) the Parliament of Victoria or of the commonwealth or of another state or a territory. Section 24 of the charter act holds that a person charged with a criminal offence or a party to a civil proceeding has the right Restrictions on employment, business and community to have the charge or proceeding decided by a competent, activity independent and impartial court or tribunal after a fair and public hearing. It also holds that all judgements or decisions Clauses 17(10) and (11) prohibit the Inspector from engaging made by a court or tribunal in a criminal or civil proceeding in any employment, business or community activity or from must be made public, unless exceptions apply including that a entering into a contract to provide services, that may create an law other than the charter act otherwise permits. actual or perceived conflict of interest with his or her role. Subclause (12) requires the Inspector to seek the approval of Section 24 deals with the right to a fair hearing, incorporating the Governor in Council to apply for or hold any professional, principles of procedural fairness. Procedural fairness concerns trade or business licence (including a legal practising the extent to which the procedures of a hearing protect the certificate under the Legal Profession Act 2004), and to rights of the parties, such as the right of a party to be provided conduct any trade, business or profession, or accept any other a reasonable opportunity to present his or her case under employment. conditions that do not place that party at a substantial disadvantage vis-a-vis his or her opponent. Nature of the limitation The bill provides the Victorian Inspectorate with the ability to The purpose of the limitations is to prevent actual or conduct investigations in order, amongst other things, to perceived conflicts of interest arising between the Inspector’s assess the conduct of IBAC and IBAC personnel activities outside of their role and the fulfilment of their public (clause 9(2)(d)). At the conclusion of such an investigation, duties. the Victorian Inspectorate is able to express an opinion, and to include such an opinion in a public report. To that extent, the The limitations on the right are direct, proportionate and Victorian Inspectorate’s functions share similarities with civil balanced with both the need to ensure public trust and proceedings. However, it is my view that for the purposes of confidence in the Inspector and therefore the Victorian the charter act, the Victorian Inspectorate is not a ‘tribunal’, Inspectorate, and also the need to ensure the independence of and its investigation functions do not constitute ‘civil those roles. The limitation is reasonable, as it is not an proceedings’. That is because some key features that are absolute prohibition on employment, business or community inherent to those concepts are not present — namely, that the activity. The limitation also mirrors a limitation placed upon Victorian Inspectorate is not capable of making any binding the IBAC Commissioner in the IBAC act (when passed). The determination as to the parties’ rights or liabilities; and that limitations are reasonable and demonstrably justifiable in a there are not two ‘parties’ involved in a contest over rights free and democratic society based on human dignity, equality and liabilities. and freedom. I consider there are no less restrictive means reasonably available to achieve the intended purposes. Nonetheless, the bill contains procedural safeguards in relation to investigations and reports which do accord Right to take part in public life (section 18 of the charter act) procedural fairness in line with the principles contained in section 24 of the charter act, including that: Section 18 of the charter act holds that every person in Victoria has the right, and is to have the opportunity, without the Victorian Inspectorate must notify IBAC of a discrimination, to participate in the conduct of public affairs, decision to investigate IBAC, unless that notice would directly or through freely chosen representatives. This prejudice the investigation (clause 30(2)); includes the right to be elected in state elections. if the Victorian Inspectorate intends to include in a Clauses 14(2)(b) and 18(1)(d) of the bill, discussed above, report a comment or opinion which is adverse to IBAC which prevent the Inspector from being a member of or any IBAC personnel, it must first provide that person Parliament, limit the right to take part in public life. This right with a reasonable opportunity to respond to the material, may be limited on objective, non-discriminatory and and fairly set out that defence in its report (clauses 36(2) reasonable grounds. The limitation is in place to prevent and 38(2)); actual or perceived conflicts of interest arising between the Inspector’s duties, and duties and interests that would attach the Victorian Inspectorate is prohibited from including to the public office of being an elected member of the in a report a finding or opinion that would prejudice a Parliament. This is particularly important given that the criminal investigation or proceedings or an IBAC Victorian Inspectorate will be overseen by a joint house investigation, or that a person should be prosecuted for, committee and that IBAC, the body that the Victorian or has committed, is committing or is about to commit, a Inspectorate will oversee, is intended to have a role in relation criminal or disciplinary offence (clauses 36(3)–(5) to parliamentarians. and 38(3)–(5)).
VICTORIAN INSPECTORATE BILL 2011
4978 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011
Investigations conducted by the Victorian Inspectorate must Victorian Inspectorate, respectively, to take an oath or be conducted in private, and recommendations made by the affirmation that (amongst other things) he or she will not Victorian Inspectorate which are not contained in a public disclose, except as authorised by law, any information report must be made in private. Whilst section 24 of the received in the performance of the functions or the exercise of charter act states that all judgements or decisions made by a the powers of the office. court or tribunal in a criminal or civil proceeding must be made public, it is my view that this requirement is not In addition, if the Victorian Inspectorate makes a applicable to the Victorian Inspectorate’s investigation recommendation to IBAC that disciplinary action be taken processes. against a member of IBAC personnel, that recommendation must be made in private (clause 35(1)). Aside from the premise that the Victorian Inspectorate is not a tribunal and the procedures do not constitute ‘civil Regulation making power proceedings’ for the purposes of section 24, as discussed above, conducting the investigation in private may be a Clause 42 allows the Governor in Council to make necessary protection. It will protect those subject to the regulations to prescribe matters in relation to security checks investigation from reputational damage from untested for Victorian Inspectorate officers. It further allows for the allegations, or from the risk of future prejudice if the subject making of regulations setting requirements for the disclosure matter of the investigation does later form the basis of a civil, and reporting of pecuniary interests by those officers, and for disciplinary or criminal proceeding. the compilation, maintenance and publication of registers of pecuniary interests of such persons. It also provides that such The Victorian Inspectorate will be able to publish its regulations may provide for the information collected conclusions in a public report which will provide the pursuant to this clause to be included by the Victorian opportunity for public scrutiny if it is appropriate in the Inspectorate in its annual report. circumstances. The provisions are an appropriate balance between the right to a fair hearing and other relevant rights Such regulations have the potential to require Victorian such as the right to privacy and reputation (discussed below). Inspectorate officers to disclose personal information. For In this way, the bill protects the right to a fair hearing in example, regulations to enable security checks could require relation to possible concurrent or future civil or criminal an officer to disclose personal or sensitive information to proceedings. Further protections for the right to a fair hearing ensure that the officer or consultant is a fit and proper person for such concurrent or future hearings are provided by to hold a position within the Victorian Inspectorate. clauses 36(3)–(5) and 38(3)–(5) which prohibit the Victorian Inspectorate from reporting in a way that would prejudice a Any requirement that officers disclose personal information criminal investigation, criminal proceedings or an IBAC will be clearly linked to the purpose of conducting security investigation, respectively. checks to ensure the probity of officers appointed to the Victorian Inspectorate. As an additional protection, the It is also of note that both the Victorian Inspectorate and the Victorian Inspectorate, as a body established or appointed for Inspector will be a public authority for the purposes of the a public purpose by or under an act, will be subject to the charter act, and will therefore be obliged to act in accordance Information Privacy Act 2000 and will be required to hold with the rights set out in the charter act, and to take human any personal or sensitive information obtained securely and in rights into account in making decisions, unless a statutory accordance with that act. provision or other law requires otherwise (section 38 of the charter act). The Victorian Inspectorate will therefore be In addition, Victorian Inspectorate officers may be required to obliged to take into account the right to a fair hearing disclose pecuniary information which could then be made wherever it may be applicable insofar as such matters are not publicly available on a register of pecuniary interests and by already provided for by the bill or any other law. publication in the Victorian Inspectorate’s annual report.
Privacy and reputation (section 13 of the charter act) The requirement that officers disclose pecuniary interests is important in order to maintain the integrity of the Victorian Section 13(a) of the charter act provides that individuals have Inspectorate and for its officers to avoid conflicts of interest or a right not to have their privacy unlawfully or arbitrarily perceived conflict of interest. In many cases, that information interfered with. The right to privacy concerns a person’s will already be publicly available (for example, on registers of ‘private sphere’, which should be free from government shareholder interests) and so will only engage the right to intervention or excessive unsolicited intervention by other privacy in limited circumstances. individuals. An interference with privacy will not be unlawful provided it is permitted by law, is certain, and is appropriately I consider that any interference with privacy occasioned by circumscribed. An interference will not be arbitrary provided clause 42 will not be arbitrary, as the information which may that the restrictions on privacy are reasonable in the particular be required of officers will be clearly linked to their fitness to circumstances and are in accordance with the provisions, aims undertake work within the Victorian Inspectorate, or and objectives of the charter act. alternatively will be necessary to determine if their private interests conflict with their public duties. For the reasons Section 13(b) provides that individuals have the right not to stated, I do not consider that clause 42 provides for the have their reputation unlawfully attacked. The expression unlawful or arbitrary interference with privacy and there is ‘unlawfully attacked’ is not defined in the charter, but could therefore no limitation on the right to privacy under section 13 mean a public attack involving untrue statements that are of the charter act. intended to harm the reputation of a person. Investigation powers Clauses 22 and 26 of the bill enhance the right to privacy by requiring the Inspector and staff and consultants of the Under clause 32 of the bill, the Victorian Inspectorate in conducting an investigation has full and free access to the
VICTORIAN INSPECTORATE BILL 2011
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4979
records of IBAC, and may require the IBAC Commissioner I consider that any interference with privacy occasioned by or other IBAC personnel to give the Victorian Inspectorate the Victorian Inspectorate’s investigation and inquiry powers information, or to attend before the Victorian Inspectorate to will be lawful, will not be arbitrary, and are appropriately answer questions or to produce documents. Clause 33 circumscribed with the protections outlined above. requires the IBAC Commissioner to give any assistance, and ensure that IBAC personnel give assistance, which the For the reasons stated, I do not consider that clause 32 of the Victorian Inspectorate reasonably requires. bill provides for the unlawful or arbitrary interference with privacy and there is therefore no limitation on the right to The powers of the Victorian Inspectorate to access documents privacy under section 13 of the charter act. and information of IBAC, and to require IBAC personnel to attend and answer questions or produce documents, will Reporting engage the right to privacy if personal or sensitive information is provided to the Victorian Inspectorate under Clause 36 enables the Victorian Inspectorate to make a these processes. special report to Parliament, including a report on the outcome of an investigation (clause 37). However, it is my view that this engagement of the right to privacy is not a limitation on the right and does not breach the Clause 38 requires the Victorian Inspectorate to make an charter. The purpose of the powers is to enable the Victorian annual report, including: Inspectorate to carry out its functions in relation to ensuring that IBAC is conducting its affairs in a lawful and appropriate details of IBAC’s compliance with the bill and the manner. It is not the intent of the powers to enable the IBAC act (subclause (1)(c)); Victorian Inspectorate to access personal or sensitive details of the comprehensiveness and adequacy of information outside the scope of the investigation, although reports made to the Victorian Inspectorate by IBAC such information may be disclosed as a consequence of the under this bill (subclause (1)(d)); powers. However, the application of the powers will be lawful and certain, applying in clearly articulated details of the extent to which action recommended by circumstances, and therefore not arbitrary. the Victorian Inspectorate to be taken by IBAC has been taken (subclause (1)(e)). The ability to seek information and the production of documents is an appropriate power for the role of the Reports made under clauses 36 and 38 could engage the right Victorian Inspectorate, and is comparable to other Victorian to reputation set out in section 13(b) of the charter act, oversight bodies. Without such powers, the Victorian because they could contain findings about IBAC officers Inspectorate would not be properly equipped to achieve its which could impact on their personal or professional objectives or undertake proper investigations. These powers reputation. For example, the Victorian Inspectorate could will become even more crucial to the effectiveness of the make a finding that an IBAC officer had acted contrary to Victorian Inspectorate when IBAC is provided with its own law, and report on that pursuant to clause 36, including a significant investigation powers, such as telecommunication recommendation to IBAC that disciplinary action be taken. It interception powers, subject to commonwealth approval. could then report on IBAC’s report back in relation to that recommendation in its annual report, in accordance with The Victorian Inspectorate’s powers are appropriately clause 38(1)(d). circumscribed. The Victorian Inspectorate may only make use of or disclose information in accordance with its functions However, a report made under clause 36 or 38 will be made and powers under the bill. If the Victorian Inspectorate in accordance with the law, and will therefore not be in intends to, as a result of an investigation, make an adverse breach of the charter act. The right to reputation is further finding about IBAC or any IBAC personnel in a public protected by the requirement in clauses 36(2) and 38(2) that report, it must first put that material to the relevant person/s, the Victorian Inspectorate provide any such adverse material provide them an opportunity to respond, and set out their to IBAC or relevant IBAC personnel prior to reporting, allow defence fairly in the report. Additionally, the Inspector and that person a reasonable opportunity to respond and fairly set members of staff will be subject to requirements to keep any out their defence in the report. In addition, the Victorian information obtained in the course of performing their Inspectorate: functions confidential by virtue of: may only conduct an investigation, including a hearing, the oath which they will be required to take under in private; clauses 22 and 26 (see above); may only publicly report a recommendation that an the obligation on Victorian Inspectorate staff not to IBAC officer be subject to disciplinary action if IBAC disclose information obtained in the course of their has failed to take appropriate action in relation to the employment except in the course of the performance of recommendation (clause 35(1) and (2)). their functions or the exercise of their powers in accordance with the law (clause 27); The Victorian Inspectorate is prohibited from including in a report a finding or opinion that would prejudice a criminal the fact that the Victorian Inspectorate will be subject to investigation or proceedings or an IBAC investigation, or that the Information Privacy Act 2000; and a person should be prosecuted for, or has committed, is committing or is about to commit, a criminal or disciplinary the confidentiality requirements that apply to staff of the offence (clauses 36(3)–(5) and 38(3)–(5)). Victorian Inspectorate by virtue of the relevant public sector code of conduct.
VICTORIAN INSPECTORATE BILL 2011
4980 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011
Conclusion Victorian Inspectorate will oversee IBAC and the For the reasons given in this statement, I consider that the bill Special Investigations Monitor (SIM) will continue to is compatible with the Charter of Human Rights and oversee the Office of Police Integrity (OPI). Once Responsibilities Act 2006. IBAC’s investigation powers are operational it is intended that the Victorian Inspectorate will take over Andrew McIntosh, MP Minister responsible for the establishment of an anti- and build upon the SIM’s powers — in addition to the corruption commission inspectorate’s IBAC oversight role — so that there will be a single body monitoring the use of special covert Second reading investigation and coercive powers by Victorian investigative agencies. Mr McINTOSH (Minister responsible for the establishment of an anti-corruption commission) — I The government has recently introduced legislation to move: establish the office of the Public Interest Monitor to provide important checks and balances on the use of That this bill be now read a second time. significant covert investigation and coercive powers in This bill establishes the Victorian Inspectorate to Victoria. It is critical that the Victorian community has oversee the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption full confidence that applications for, and the use of, Commission (IBAC). The Victorian Inspectorate is a covert investigation and coercive powers are subject to key feature of the government’s integrity reforms that optimal safeguards and oversight. Together, the Public will ensure that IBAC is subject to robust oversight. Interest Monitor, the Victorian Inspectorate and the The government has long been on the record about the IBAC Parliamentary Committee are designed to do just importance of ensuring that bodies with significant that. powers are subject to appropriate scrutiny. Together This bill will enable an Inspector to be appointed, and with the joint house committee of Parliament to establish systems and processes for monitoring established under the IBAC bill (the IBAC IBAC’s investigation powers in readiness for when Parliamentary Committee), the Victorian Inspectorate IBAC is vested with those powers. will ensure that IBAC’s use of its powers is both appropriate and proportionate. The key aspects of the Victorian Inspectorate Bill 2011 are as follows: An independent Inspector, which provides robust oversight, is a fundamental feature of anticorruption Functions commission models across Australia. In developing the model for the Victorian Inspectorate, the government The Victorian Inspectorate will: has drawn on interstate experience, as well as the extensive consultation conducted by a consultation monitor the compliance of IBAC and IBAC panel led by the Honourable Stephen Charles, QC. personnel with the law;
The need for robust oversight for bodies with assess the effectiveness and appropriateness of significant powers was recently highlighted by the IBAC’s policies and procedures; Ombudsman in his October 2011 report, Investigation into the Office of Police Integrity’s Handling of a receive complaints about IBAC and investigate and Complaint. assess the conduct of IBAC and IBAC personnel; and The Victorian Inspectorate will have broad-ranging functions to monitor the compliance of IBAC with its make recommendations and reports. own act and other laws. In addition, the Victorian This broad suite of functions will enable the Victorian Inspectorate will have powers to investigate complaints, Inspectorate to have oversight of the full range of assess policies and procedures and make reports and IBAC’s functions and operations, its internal policies recommendations. When IBAC is vested with and procedures, its adherence to its enabling legislation, investigation powers, a key role of the Victorian the appropriateness of the conduct of IBAC staff in Inspectorate will be to oversee the use of those powers. pursuing their functions, and IBAC’s pursuit of its The Victorian Inspectorate has been created by a overall objectives. separate piece of legislation so as to be independent of the IBAC and to facilitate the inspectorate having a broader oversight role in the future. Initially, the
WATER LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (WATER INFRASTRUCTURE CHARGES) BILL 2011
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4981
The Victorian Inspectorate itself will be subject to Reports and recommendations oversight by the joint house committee — the IBAC committee. The Victorian Inspectorate will report to Parliament.
The Inspector The Victorian Inspectorate will also be able to make recommendations to IBAC, either privately or through The Victorian Inspectorate will be led by an Inspector, a written report to Parliament. The Victorian who will have responsibility for the strategic leadership Inspectorate will be able to require IBAC to respond to of the organisation. The bill ensures the independence its recommendations. of the Inspector, establishing the role as an independent officer of Parliament not subject to the direction or If necessary, the Victorian Inspectorate may control of the government. recommend that further investigatory action be taken by another body such as Victoria Police. The Inspector will be a person who is, was, or is qualified to be, a judge. He or she must not have held The government will appoint an Inspector as the role of Commissioner, acting commissioner, deputy expeditiously as possible. The establishment of the commissioner or acting deputy commissioner of IBAC. Victorian Inspectorate at the same time as the establishment of IBAC will enable the Victorian The Inspector will be appointed by the Governor in Inspectorate to monitor IBAC from the outset, and Council. Apart from the first appointment, the develop an integrated integrity model for Victoria with appointment of the Inspector will be subject to the strong checks and balances from the start. approval of the IBAC committee, which will have a veto power. For the first appointment, the Premier will I commend this bill to the house. consult with the Leader of the Opposition. Debate adjourned on motion of Mr DONNELLAN Investigations (Narre Warren North).
The Victorian Inspectorate will be able to investigate Debate adjourned until Thursday, 10 November. the conduct of IBAC and IBAC personnel, either in response to a complaint, or on its own motion. The Victorian Inspectorate will be provided with a broad WATER LEGISLATION AMENDMENT jurisdiction to assess IBAC’s exercise of its functions (WATER INFRASTRUCTURE CHARGES) and powers, as well as powers to enable its BILL 2011 investigations to be carried out effectively. The Victorian Inspectorate will have access to all the Second reading records of IBAC, and may investigate any aspect of Debate resumed from 12 October; motion of IBAC’s operations or conduct of IBAC personnel. Mr WALSH (Minister for Water). IBAC will be required to provide all assistance to the Victorian Inspectorate that it reasonably requires. The Mr BATTIN (Gembrook) — I am pleased to stand jurisdiction is comparable to that of other independent up today to speak in support of the Water Legislation oversight bodies including interstate inspectors, giving Amendment (Water Infrastructure Charges) Bill 2011. the Victorian public confidence that IBAC will be It is a shame that following a political stunt by the subject to effective and robust scrutiny. opposition there are not too many of its members in the chamber to stand up for their communities, especially The government intends to introduce further legislation country members whose constituents these water bills that will provide the Victorian Inspectorate with will particularly affect. It is a shame that they decided functions and powers commensurate with the to deal with political issues rather than stand up for their investigative powers intended for IBAC. This includes communities. overseeing the use by IBAC of covert and coercive investigation tools, such as telecommunication The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Morris) — Order! interception warrants issued under the Before we go any further, that is well away from the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act bill. Let us not start down that path. 1979 (cth). The government looks forward to further discussions with the commonwealth government to Mr BATTIN — I will refer back to the member for facilitate the Victorian Inspectorate being vested with Narre Warren North’s contribution in which he was access to material obtained under the commonwealth talking about Sugarloaf and opening up the pipe. I legislation. know Dr Sykes was very excited about plugging the
WATER LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (WATER INFRASTRUCTURE CHARGES) BILL 2011
4982 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011 pipe, yet the opposition is now trying to campaign to Quorum formed. get it reopened. It has all these good reasons. ‘Just send it through to Sugarloaf’, which is full. I would like to Mr BATTIN — It is fantastic to see the member of ask the member for Narre Warren North which the opposition who brought the Holding tax to Victoria particular town he would like to flood in his plan to put enter the house. That was a fantastic tax which more water into a dam that is already 100 per cent full. everyone very much appreciated. It does not quite make sense to me. He was also talking about the cost of water. I can tell you I would not want The Murray-Darling Basin is made up of catchments to pay for water that is flowing through my town. from the Murray River and the Darling River and all the creeks and rivers that flow into them. The basin Mr Donnellan — On a point of order, Acting covers areas in Victoria, New South Wales, South Speaker, the member for Gembrook is very much Australia and Queensland as well as the entire straying from the bill. I ask you to bring him back to the Australian Capital Territory. The large area covered by bill. the basin is very diverse. Water providers in the basin region of Queensland would have different priorities to The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Morris) — Order! those in the basin region in Victoria, such as the It is clearly Thursday afternoon. Goulburn-Murray Water Corporation and the Lower Murray Water Corporation, which is why continuing to Mr BATTIN — On the point of order, Acting have the ESC as the price regulator for the Victorian Speaker, in relation to what the member for Narre area of the Murray-Darling Basin makes sense. Warren North said, it has been a wide-ranging debate. I am only referring back to the previous debate that This bill will enable the ESC to seek accreditation from occurred in relation to Sugarloaf and opening up the the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission pipeline. (ACCC) to remain the price regulator for all of northern Victoria. This will then enable the ESC to remain as the The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Morris) — Order! price and service standard regulator for all of Victoria. There is no point of order, but it would assist if the The ESC has been the regulator for water pricing and member’s comments related to the bill that is being service standards in Victoria for over seven years. It has debated. experience and knowledge of Victoria’s water infrastructure and water service requirements. The ESC Mr BATTIN — There are approximately is very familiar with the challenges faced in rural 19 businesses supplying water, sewerage and related regions such as the Murray-Darling Basin and is services to customers in Victoria. These customers therefore better equipped to regulate water suppliers in include residents, irrigators, commercial operators and rural Victoria. This bill cuts through the red tape that industry. often appears when corporations have to deal with In 2004 the Essential Services Commission became the several authorities. There will be greater certainty when Victorian economic regulator of the water sector. It was dealing with only one regulator. established under the Essential Services Commission In order for the ESC to gain accreditation from the Act 2001. The role of the ESC includes the regulation ACCC it will need to seek it by 31 December this year, of water prices in Victoria, the monitoring of service because the application for accreditation needs to be standards, the monitoring of market conduct and the made at least 12 months before 1 July 2013. Should the resolving of disputes between regulated water ESC be accredited, the accreditation will last for businesses in relation to the supply of bulk water 10 years. On that note, I support the Water Legislation services. Amendment (Water Infrastructure Charges) Bill 2011, The ESC regulates the service standards for all of and I commend the bill to the house. Victoria including the Murray-Darling Basin region. At Ms McLEISH (Seymour) — I rise to speak in the moment the ESC also regulates the water support of the Water Legislation Amendment (Water infrastructure charges for all of Victoria. However, Infrastructure Charges) Bill 2011. This bill will under the Commonwealth Water Act 2007, from 1 July essentially allow the Essential Services Commission to 2013 the water infrastructure charges on the Murray- apply to the Australian Competition and Consumer Darling Basin will be regulated — — Commission for accreditation of the arrangements Mr Donnellan — Acting Speaker, I draw your under the bill so that the ESC may approve or attention to the state of the house. determine basin water charges instead of the ACCC doing it.
WATER LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (WATER INFRASTRUCTURE CHARGES) BILL 2011
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4983
By way of explanation, and as members would no the Murray-Darling Basin. I have always been one to doubt be aware, the ESC has been the regulator of all support consistency. I have spoken about the need for water prices here in Victoria for some time — in fact, consistency across different jurisdictions and even until earlier this year. Things have changed a little bit as authorities. What this result means here in regard to a result of things that happened at the federal level with consistency is that there becomes more than one regard to the Water Act 2007 and the Water Charge regulator with their fingers in the water charges pie (Infrastructure) Rules 2010. The implication for the when it comes to price determination and charges for industry now is that the ACCC will be able to approve water services across the state. This gets messy when and determine charges imposed by the infrastructure you have a couple of players in the field, because there operators in northern Victoria. Until now the ESC has is a little bit of argy-bargy that goes on in the been able to approve and determine basin water negotiations as well as duplication. charges. Something that I have also spoken about quite often in The changes in this bill will enable the ESC to apply to the house is the importance of processes and the ACCC for accreditation of arrangements to approve efficiencies. This bill will introduce some streamlined or determine basin water charges, where we have a processes so that the water authorities themselves do couple of players. not have to deal with two regulators and two lots of paperwork, for instance, and it will make allowances The charges of the infrastructure operators in Victoria for and avoid that unnecessary duplication. Really it are related to irrigation services and drainage services means that the Essential Services Commission will be and to disconnection from both those irrigation and able to apply to the ACCC for accreditation within its drainage services, as well as to bulk water services. The system so that the arrangements under the bill will lead two Victorian water corporations operating in northern to it being able to approve or determine basin water Victoria are the Lower Murray Water Corporation and charges instead of the ACCC. When you think of the the Goulburn-Murray Water Corporation, which is the burden of administrative red tape, which we very often one I deal with quite a bit. If you looked at a map of my hear about, you realise that if this change were not electorate of Seymour you would see that extending made, the authorities would have to duplicate their across the top from Eildon, my area of Molesworth, efforts. Often that involves some negotiation and often through Yea and then through Seymour itself we have there is that argy-bargy. If you are having to do that quite a reliance on the Goulburn-Murray Water twice with two different regulators, it can be an Corporation. These arrangements will have an impact absolute pain in the backside; not only that but it takes on the charges after 1 July 2013, which is a bit over time, and we know that time is money. We also know 18 months from now. that the water corporations are not laden with cash.
We need to think about the fact that the commonwealth One of the things I made mention of earlier was the government is moving towards some consistency commonwealth Water Charge (Infrastructure) Rules across the Murray-Darling Basin, and as members 2010. It is important that the ESC, which this bill is would know, the Murray-Darling Basin is absolutely designed around, is still operating within the rules that enormous. It crosses Queensland, New South Wales — have been set up at that commonwealth level. it is very dominant there — South Australia and Obviously we have that need, and this bill has actually Victoria. In fact it covers 14 per cent of the area within been drafted in such a way that it satisfies the criteria Australia. When you look at the area that is covered by set out in these rules. desert in the middle, this 14 per cent on the eastern side of Australia is really quite significant. Within the There are a number of benefits to this legislation. Murray-Darling Basin, there are some 23 river valleys, Unlike the ACCC, the Essential Services Commission from the Roma River Basin up in Queensland, which I holds long-term and detailed corporate knowledge of have actually had a bit to do with through some of their Victoria’s water infrastructure and water service mining operations, to the lower end in the Goulburn requirements. It has been dealing with them for a long River valley in my electorate. time. If you think about the corporations I mentioned earlier, the Goulburn-Murray Water Corporation and I have mentioned that the commonwealth government Lower Murray Water, they have a good history and an is moving towards some consistency here because the understanding of what goes on — all the river flows, basin expands across several states and different the charges, the history of those charges, dealing with legislatures. The consistency I am talking about is really people — and so that knowledge would be lost or a lot around the rules governing the water infrastructure of time would have to be spent bringing the ACCC up charges that are applied to rural water services across to speed. That is certainly a benefit here. As I have also
WATER LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (WATER INFRASTRUCTURE CHARGES) BILL 2011
4984 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011 mentioned, one of the other benefits is the reduction in the same impact as the air we breathe. We get very the regulatory burden for the water corporations by passionate about water — you will find we are very avoiding them having to submit and negotiate their passionate about anything to do with water, because it basin and non-basin pricing plans with the two does not make up a small part of our community; it regulators. This will actually assist in providing both really makes up the biggest part of our community, the water rule and the non-water rule services. whether it is the flow-on into the community of jobs in the rural sector or right throughout the towns. I will talk I will also mention here my electorate’s attachment to about that a bit more as we go through the bill. the importance of water. We know that within the Seymour electorate there is a very large area of The main aim of this bill is to enable the Essential farmland used for the grazing of cattle and sheep. Cattle Services Commission to apply to the Australian certainly are quite predominant. We also have the Yarra Competition and Consumer Commission for Valley, which relies quite heavily on water for some accreditation of arrangements under which the ESC great production. The additional water that we have had may determine the Murray-Darling Basin water charges in the last 12 months has made some of those grapes a in Victoria instead of that being done by the ACCC. little bit juicier. With this reliance on water and the The way this bill will achieve this is firstly by drought we had over the last number of years, we saw incorporating relevant parts of the commonwealth how the former government began to address the water Water Charge (Infrastructure) Rules 2010 in state law problem and the water issues. I heard great claims and secondly by enabling the ESC to apply to the about all of the fabulous things that the former ACCC for accreditation of the state-applied provisions. government had done, but I did not hear any talk about The third part is enabling the ESC to approve or the gross mismanagement of the desalination plant determine basin water charges in northern Victoria. project or the needless implementation or stick-it-in- the-ground approach of the north–south pipeline, which To put this into some context, under the commonwealth is really quite superfluous. Water Act 2007 the commonwealth Minister for Water has made the Water Charge (Infrastructure) Rules 2010, We have had members say in the house previously that which have had legal effect in Victoria and other basin it was no longer going to rain, and we know that is not states since 12 January 2011. For Victoria these rules true. People in my area speak to me often and say that enable the ACCC or the state agency, as it might be, to they cannot believe it when they hear members of the regulate the prices for bulk water and certainly rural opposition continuing to say, ‘Pump water from the water services in the basin. The benefit of this is that the pipeline into Sugarloaf’, when they know that people who will be setting and determining the pricing Sugarloaf is absolutely full and there is no room in the are people who know what this is all about. Goulburn- dam to take that water. Despite some of the noises that Murray Water and Lower Murray Water understand were made earlier, the pipeline does not go backwards this process. as well. If that dam gets too full, the water cannot be channelled back up. The key ingredient to this is making sure that our communities understand this price determination. In summary, the Water Legislation Amendment (Water Within the electorate of Murray Valley we accept that Infrastructure Charges) Bill 2011 will allow the there are many facilities we do not have and Essential Services Commission to apply to the ACCC opportunities we cannot get that those who live in for accreditation of the arrangements under this bill so it metropolitan Melbourne get. Sometimes we are happy can approve or determine basin water charges instead to accept that we do not get these opportunities, but of the ACCC doing that. As I have outlined, those when it comes to water and the pricing of water, it is water corporations have a long history in this state and something that is very close to our hearts. the knowledge that goes with it will reduce the administrative burden, the red tape, the negotiating and As members will have seen, the Murray-Darling Basin having to do things twice. With that, I commend this plan has caused an uproar over the last few months, and bill to the house. we are still on tenterhooks. The Murray-Darling Basin Authority will release another draft plan in the next few Mr McCURDY (Murray Valley) — I am delighted months, and that is when our communities will unite to to rise to make a contribution to the debate on the make sure that it is recognised that this resource is very Water Legislation Amendment (Water Infrastructure important to us, because our communities rely very Charges) Bill 2011. Many hear us talk about water on a heavily on water. If the water is taken away, then regular basis and people might get a little bored communities will start to be destroyed. Our sometimes, but for those in many electorates water has communities have demonstrated that they can coexist
WATER LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (WATER INFRASTRUCTURE CHARGES) BILL 2011
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4985 with the Murray Darling Association and certainly with commonwealth has come in over the top and agriculture and the flow-on effects from that, such as empowered the Australian Competition and Consumer tourism, which forms a very big part of our business in Commission to do this work, but the risk is that, one, it the north. Without water we will not have that. does not have the experience and, two, even if it did, we would have a regulatory burden and the possibility of I turn now to the orchards and our dairy farmers. We an interaction between two organisations that are heard the member for Rodney speak earlier about the endeavouring to do the same job. flow-on effects from these industries and about water and the jobs associated with water. Fruit fly has given Much of this debate has been carried by the members the orchards a bit of a tough time over the last couple of for Benalla, Rodney and Murray Valley, who have years and the droughts as well, particularly in relation provided a country perspective and have talked about to their export markets. They need to be sure that the the issues in detail. I strongly support this measure by security of their water is in good hands, because trees the government. It takes common sense to manage the do not grow overnight and there is a need to plan well cost of water, something that is extremely important to in advance. Hence it is important to them. our growers, and to handle it in a way that shows both common sense and experience. With that, I wish the bill Under the commonwealth Water Act 2007 the federal a speedy passage. Minister for Water has made water infrastructure charge rules which give the ACCC the power to Mr HODGETT (Kilsyth) — It is with pleasure that determine water infrastructure charges that Lower I rise to make a contribution to the debate on the Water Murray Water and Goulburn-Murray Water may levy Legislation Amendment (Water Infrastructure Charges) from 1 July 2013. The bill will enable the ESC to seek Bill 2011. Unfortunately given the time of the day I am accreditation from the ACCC of the Victorian applied going to have to be very brief in my contribution. Other provisions in this bill, which will enable the ESC to honourable members have set out the main purposes of remain the price regulator for all water businesses in the bill, which are contained in clause 1. They are to northern Victoria — as I said before, metropolitan and apply the ‘applied provisions’ in the Water Charge rural water. The bill is time critical, because under the (Infrastructure) Rules 2010 as state law, and this will commonwealth rules the ESC must apply for make this applied law under the Water Industry Act accreditation before 31 December 2011. 1994; to enable the Essential Services Commission to apply to the Australian Competition and Consumer The bill will reduce red tape and regulatory costs to Commission for accreditation of these state-applied water authorities by having them deal only with the provisions; and to amend the Essential Services ESC instead of with both the ACCC and ESC. This will Commission Act 2001 to make it a new function of the also ensure that irrigation customers have greater ESC to approve or determine basin water charges for certainty in dealing with only one regulator. I sum up water services provided in northern Victoria. Finally the by saying that water is very important to all our bill will make consequential amendments to the Water communities. The bill will provide certain provisions Industry Act 1994 and other acts. for the ESC to take control where the ACCC has previously governed. With that, I commend the bill to It is important — — the house. Dr Napthine interjected. Mr CRISP (Mildura) — I rise to make a brief contribution to the debate on the Water Legislation Mr HODGETT — The minister at the table, the Amendment (Water Infrastructure Charges) Bill 2011. Minister for Ports, asks what that means. I refer him to The purpose of the bill is to amend the Water Industry the bill and to a number of clauses therein, in particular Act 1994 to apply certain provisions of the Water to clause 6(4) which says: Charge (Infrastructure) Rules 2010 of the (4) The Acts Interpretation Act 1901 of the commonwealth commonwealth as law of the state to enable the applies to the applied 15 Victorian provisions to the Essential Services Commission, established under the same extent that that act applies to the commonwealth Essential Services Commission Act 2001, to approve or Water Charge Rules … determine charges for the provision of certain water services in the state. I will not go over paragraphs (a) and (b) of subclause (4), because I know the minister is familiar This bill is about the right body doing an important job. with that section of the bill. Suffice it to say that the bill Clearly the Victorian Essential Services Commission applies commonwealth law as a law of the state of has a long history in setting water prices. The Victoria to allow the state economic regulator to
TRANSPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011
4986 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011 approve or determine water charges in the provision of SENTENCING AMENDMENT water services in the north of the state. (COMMUNITY CORRECTION REFORM) BILL 2011 We have had a number of contributions on this bill, all touching on a wide-ranging debate about the Second reading importance of water — — Debate resumed from 25 October; motion of Dr Napthine interjected. Mr CLARK (Attorney-General).
Mr HODGETT — I will take up that interjection Motion agreed to. by the Minister for Ports about the desalination plant. It is a disgrace, and it is something that we are now going Read second time. to have to pay for for the next 30 years — our children and their children will be paying it off. It was an act of Third reading panic by the Brumby government when it thought Melbourne was going to run out of water. The Labor Motion agreed to. government left it for 11 long, dark years. We went to the 2006 election with a policy for a moderate-sized Read third time. desalination plant which was to be turned on only in times of emergency; it was not to be the water of first ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY AMENDMENT use. Obviously the Labor proposal was not well thought through at all, and with that — — (TRANSITIONAL FEED-IN TARIFF SCHEME) BILL 2011 The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Morris) — Order! The time set down for consideration of items on the Second reading government business program has arrived, and I am Debate resumed from 26 October; motion of required to interrupt business. Mr O’BRIEN (Minister for Energy and Resources). Motion agreed to. The ACTING SPEAKER (Mr Morris) — Order! Read second time. The question is: That this bill be now read a second and a third time. Third reading House divided on question: Motion agreed to. Ayes, 44 Read third time. Angus, Mr Mulder, Mr Asher, Ms Napthine, Dr Baillieu, Mr Newton-Brown, Mr TRANSPORT LEGISLATION Battin, Mr Northe, Mr AMENDMENT (PUBLIC TRANSPORT Bauer, Mrs O’Brien, Mr Blackwood, Mr Powell, Mrs DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) BILL 2011 Bull, Mr Ryall, Ms Burgess, Mr Ryan, Mr Second reading Clark, Mr Shaw, Mr Crisp, Mr Smith, Mr R. Debate resumed from 25 October; motion of Delahunty, Mr Southwick, Mr Mr MULDER (Minister for Public Transport). Dixon, Mr Sykes, Dr Fyffe, Mrs Thompson, Mr Gidley, Mr Tilley, Mr Motion agreed to. Hodgett, Mr Victoria, Mrs Katos, Mr Wakeling, Mr Read second time. Kotsiras, Mr Walsh, Mr McCurdy, Mr Watt, Mr Third reading McIntosh, Mr Weller, Mr McLeish, Ms Wells, Mr Motion agreed to. Miller, Ms Wooldridge, Ms Morris, Mr Wreford, Ms Read third time. Noes, 42 Allan, Ms Hulls, Mr Barker, Ms Hutchins, Ms Beattie, Ms Kairouz, Ms Brooks, Mr Knight, Ms
VICTORIAN RESPONSIBLE GAMBLING FOUNDATION BILL 2011
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4987
Campbell, Ms Languiller, Mr employment program known as i-STEP. The program Carbines, Mr Lim, Mr was established by the Labor government, which had a D’Ambrosio, Ms McGuire, Mr Donnellan, Mr Madden, Mr demonstrable commitment to jobs, to our young people Duncan, Ms Merlino, Mr and to Victorian manufacturing — three things this Edwards, Ms Nardella, Mr government has shown a casual disregard for at best Eren, Mr Neville, Ms and a cynical hostility towards at worst. As examples, Foley, Mr Noonan, Mr apprentice completion bonuses are gone, Victorian Garrett, Ms Pallas, Mr Graley, Ms Pandazopoulos, Mr certificate of applied learning coordinators are gone and Green, Ms Perera, Mr wind farm technology is gone. Halfpenny, Ms Pike, Ms Helper, Mr Richardson, Ms The i-STEP program is a successful initiative that has Hennessy, Ms Scott, Mr found work for more than 80 people, many of them Herbert, Mr Thomson, Ms Holding, Mr Trezise, Mr school leavers in Melbourne’s north. It is managed by Howard, Mr Wynne, Mr the NORTH Link business network and works with job seekers and the manufacturing industries that make up Question agreed to. the heart of employment across Melbourne’s northern suburbs, including my electorate of Thomastown. The Read second time. i-STEP program works with manufacturers and Third reading understands their need for experienced staff, apprentices and new trainee workers. It assesses the Motion agreed to. suitability of job seekers to a particular role before referring them to manufacturing businesses that are Read third time. crying out for people as a result of the skill shortages. The Labor government introduced this and similar programs across the state as part of its commitment to VICTORIAN RESPONSIBLE GAMBLING address skill shortages and to support local FOUNDATION BILL 2011 manufacturers, most of which are small and medium size businesses, and also of course to support young Second reading people in the north. Debate resumed from earlier this day; motion of The i-STEP program is also successfully working with Mr O’BRIEN (Minister for Gaming). schools and TAFEs in Melbourne’s north to help Motion agreed to. inform young people about job opportunities and apprenticeships in the metal trades and manufacturing Read second time. areas. These often bypass people’s minds as they think of the better understood trades, such as electrical or Third reading carpentry. The i-STEP program has also worked to help new migrants to Victoria, where possible, through the Motion agreed to. process of having the skills and qualifications they acquired overseas recognised for Australian industry Read third time. requirements. Business interrupted pursuant to sessional orders. Victorian manufacturing has been the backbone of much of our state’s prosperity for generations. ADJOURNMENT Victorian manufacturing can continue to be world class and to provide a pathway to a rewarding career for The SPEAKER — Order! The question is: future generations of Victorians but it needs coordination, a plan and a vision from government. That the house now adjourns. Small and medium size businesses particularly often need help with recruiting to skilled roles. These Manufacturing: i-STEP program businesses have plenty of technical know-how but not Ms HALFPENNY (Thomastown) — I rise to raise much experience in human resources. That assistance a matter for the Minister for Manufacturing, Exports has been successfully provided to them by the i-STEP and Trade. I rise to call on the minister to continue program. funding the very successful industry skills training and
ADJOURNMENT
4988 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011
Therefore I call on the manufacturing minister to However, against that wider backdrop, the specific continue to fund this program that is due to finish on matter I wish to raise for the attention of the minister 17 December and to make sure that his priority is today is the stability of the cliff face, particularly young people and jobs in manufacturing. proximate to 357–358 Beach Road, Black Rock, but also more generally along the foreshore, to ensure that Beach Road, Black Rock: embankment Beach Road is well supported into the future. Mr THOMPSON (Sandringham) — I have a Anticorruption commission: opposition briefing matter that I wish to raise with the Minister for Roads, and it concerns the need for an engineer’s assessment of Ms HENNESSY (Altona) — I wish to raise a parts of the embankment supporting Beach Road, more matter for the attention of the Minister responsible for specifically between McGregor Avenue and Central the establishment of an anti-corruption commission, Avenue in Black Rock. Proximate to 357–358 Beach and the action I seek is that the minister instruct his Road there has been some recent slippage of earth from department to, as a matter of urgency, facilitate a the embankment. What I seek from the minister is a briefing for the opposition in relation to the medium-term assessment of the stability of the cliff at Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission that point to ensure that Beach Road will be well Bill 2011 and the Victorian Inspectorate Bill 2011. supported into the future. It is an important road corridor and arterial road that carries both recreational The government committed a long time ago to ensuring cyclists and heavy vehicle traffic, albeit with a range of that the anticorruption commission would be curfew hours. It is also an important conduit for established and implemented by 1 July this year. It has commuters to the city during the week. failed spectacularly to meet that commitment. What we have seen is a litany of events and occurrences where In recent years a wide range of matters have impacted members of the government, their staff and their upon local roads. In particular the increase in the supporters have undermined independent statutory volume of traffic on roads such as Bluff Road, Reserve offices. The government’s failure to deliver on its Road, Balcombe Road and Bay Road, in addition to the election promise has had significant consequences for Nepean Highway and Beach Road, has had an impact. good public administration in Victoria. As well as serving to provide access to local industry and local housing, local roads have an important Today we saw tabled an Office of Police Integrity function. report that is incredibly damning of a number of people who either worked for this government or were One problem that has arisen in recent times with the associated with this government. The impact of the increasing volume of traffic that has accompanied the delay is being severely and significantly felt. It was population growth of Melbourne has been the difficulty with great fanfare that the government went out and numbers of people have experienced in crossing the attempted to announce that it was delivering on its road. Elderly citizens in Hyatt have had difficulty election promise through the introduction of its crossing Bay Road. Factory workers have had difficulty independent, broadbased anticorruption commission accessing local businesses on the other side of the road, legislation today. But lo and behold, when one goes to particularly during lunch breaks. There has been, the detail of that legislation, one finds it is sorely serendipitously, an increase in the number of people wanting. It is essentially enabling legislation — — approaching my office at around the same time seeking traffic light intervention along those roads. There have Dr Napthine — On a point of order, I seek your been people experiencing some considerable difficulty guidance, Deputy Speaker with regard to the rule of in crossing local roads. These matters have been anticipation. I think the member is straying into the constructively addressed by VicRoads. It has been great contents of the bill, which was second read this to work with people such as Trevor Smith from afternoon, is now on the notice paper and will be VicRoads as transport solutions have been sought in the debated later in the house. It is not appropriate for her to local area. There are also a number of schools which anticipate the debate on the bill. use local roads. In Sandringham some important traffic light work will be undertaken in the current financial The DEPUTY SPEAKER — Order! I uphold the year to provide senior citizens, local school students point of order and ask the member to speak on the and users of the local shops, schools and churches with adjournment matter, which is seeking a briefing from the safety of traffic lights. Related issues include the minister. transport speed zones within my electorate.
ADJOURNMENT
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4989
Ms HENNESSY — Thank you, Deputy Speaker. create opportunities for both mentors and mentees to The purpose of the briefing is to ensure that there can share learning throughout the school year and foster be adequate scrutiny of the legislative regime that will rich, mutually satisfying relationships founded on an seek to put anticorruption checks and balances in place expectation of mutual respect and benefit. This program in Victoria. Central to that at a general level of course is has proved invaluable to both U3A and the school, and the need for the Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations participation is growing as the word spreads. Committee to have adequate time to consider the legislation. It would also be highly disappointing if we The enormous growth in membership has resulted in an found ourselves in a position where changes to the increased demand for U3A computer courses in accountability mechanisms that exist in Victoria were particular. It currently offers 10 classes a week with the rammed through. There needs to be adequate capacity for only eight students at a time — meaning it parliamentary time to have debates around these sorts is limited to 80 students a week — and it has a long of issues, and I ask that the minister take urgent action waiting list. to ensure that a briefing is provided sooner rather than later. With membership at $30 a year and a fee of only $3 per class, it is most likely the cheapest education in University of the Third Age: Frankston Victoria, if not in Australia. Frankston U3A is therefore looking to expand the size of the computer classroom Mr SHAW (Frankston) — I would like to raise a so it can accommodate more students. It has the matter with the Minister for Ageing. The action I seek approval of John Paul College to do the necessary is that he visit the University of the Third Age (U3A) in alterations and would like to have these completed in the electorate of Frankston, tour its facilities and talk time for the commencement of classes in 2012. with the stakeholders about the services it offers and the need for expansion. It would be a timely visit One of our election commitments was to provide considering that Seniors Week was in earlier this $10 000 to assist with these alterations, and we are month. delivering on that commitment. I acknowledge the great work of president Gail Dudek and Margaret Mace and Frankston U3A is a place of learning for over-55s of all the other volunteers. which was established in 1985. The learning process is centred on volunteer members who have a specific skill I invite the minister to visit the electorate of Frankston and are willing to pass it on to other members who want and meet with local stakeholders at Frankston U3A and to learn that skill. Although called University of the see how important this expansion is to the organisation, Third Age, there are no qualifications needed, either its members and the wider community of Frankston. required of or given to participants. The Frankston U3A has close to 600 members, and this is reflective of the Wallaby Run, Gisborne: access fact that Frankston has a much higher population of Ms DUNCAN (Macedon) — The matter I wish to over-55s and over-65s than the state average. raise is for the attention of the Minister for Roads. The The University of the Third Age moved to new action I am seeking is for the minister to give premises at the site of my old school, John Paul consideration to a petition signed by over 1500 of my College, in October 2010. Over 50 courses of study on constituents who oppose access in or out of Wallaby a range of topics are provided. These include various Run from Station Road in Gisborne. Unfortunately the languages, Australian history, understanding and using petition is not in a format that can be tabled in computers, photography, painting and singing. Parliament, but I bring it to the attention of the minister. It states: U3A also conducted a community mentoring program We, the undersigned residents and ratepayers of Macedon with Elisabeth Murdoch College. The program was Ranges shire, formally advise council, VicRoads and created in 2010 as part of Elisabeth Murdoch College’s Townsend Homes that we totally oppose any access in or out application to the National Australia Bank-sponsored of Wallaby Run from Station Road between Cherry Lane and Schools First initiative, which encourages schools from Frith Road, Gisborne, on a permanent basis. across the state to form meaningful, sustainable Given the potential black ice, steep descent, concealed entry partnerships with organisations within their local and a blind bend at this location, this outdated design with its community. Led by students, EMC developed a many potential collision points puts the safety of all motorists, partnership with Frankston U3A. The aim of the pedestrians and cyclists at great risk, if implemented. partnership is to develop a student-led program that Therefore we seek a more suitable alternative safe access until enables U3A members to mentor EMC students and to a roundabout can be constructed at Ross Watt Road and
ADJOURNMENT
4990 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011
Morrow Road for this new estate, Sunny Acres, at Jacksons The action I seek is for the minister to visit my Creek. electorate to meet with representatives from the local There is widespread concern about this access point council and sports clubs, as well as with members of into Station Road, Gisborne, despite VicRoads and the the local community, to discuss local sports issues and minister stating that the Wallaby Run intersection is in the potential for grants for sports uniforms for the optimal location. The community has formed the community-based sport and recreation clubs. Gisborne Road Group, and it has made a number of Each weekend we see thousands of Victorians coming recommendations, which have to date been largely together to put on their sports uniforms and grace fields rejected, including restrictions on turns into and out of all over the state, representing their local communities Wallaby Run and the installation of variable speed and engaging in a variety of sports and recreational limits and a zebra crossing. opportunities. Sport is the backbone of a number of our The Gisborne Road Group has determined, through its rural and regional communities and plays a very own research, that the crash history of this road would important role. That is why this government has a make it eligible for black spot funding, despite earlier number of programs in place at the grassroots level advice from VicRoads. I ask the minister to reconsider supporting sport and local sporting organisations, his previous advice in light of this additional particularly in the area of grants for the uniforms information. In 2008 VicRoads advised there had been essential for playing sport. That is an area that I would two minor accidents at this location. It has now been like to focus on in my request to the minister. confirmed there have been eight accidents in the last In my previous employment with the Australian Sports five years to June and that of those three have been Commission I spent seven years working in the Active serious. This makes the road eligible for consideration After-school Communities program, and I certainly saw for black spot funding. the benefits of sport to our younger generation. In the Traffic volumes are increasing significantly, and electorate of Gippsland East we have over currently there are approximately 14 500 vehicles using 1000 children participating in this sporting program. It the road per day, which will add to the risks. In helps so many children, particularly those in rural and addition, the cycling footpath that connects New regional communities where there is not a wide Gisborne to the Gisborne township was not in existence selection of sporting clubs. when the Wallaby Run and Station Road intersection In towns like Cann River, Heyfield, Maffra and Swifts was designed. This path further complicates the Creek we have some very strong sporting clubs — movement of vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists along Swifts Creek having won back-to-back premierships Station Road. Black ice is another factor impacting on this year — but there is not a wide scope, and the this road, and I ask the minister to give consideration to support that we can give to clubs to get off the ground this aspect as well. in these rural and regional areas is very important. For I acknowledge that VicRoads has agreed to reduce the that reason the sports uniform grants scheme is speed limit and has funded a traffic survey of Station particularly crucial. Road, covering both Gisborne and New Gisborne, and I am led to believe a number of clubs in my region have is working with council on this. However, any safety expressed an interest in this grants stream. They are measures arising from this work will occur in the clubs from Bairnsdale, Bruthen, Lakes Entrance, future, and I ask the minister to look again at this issue Orbost, Swifts Creek and Swan Reach. Assistance in and give further consideration to implementing safety the area of sports uniforms is critical for our local clubs, measures now. particularly in the area of junior sport, because it helps I commend the Gisborne Road Group and its chair, reduce the financial barriers to participation. This grants Russell Mowatt, for their efforts to date to improve stream helps out those clubs, particularly in rural safety along this road, and I again ask the minister to communities where low socioeconomic factors apply. reassess the advice he has been given on this issue to In conclusion, I repeat my call for the Minister for Sport date. and Recreation to come to Gippsland East to meet with the local council, local sports clubs and members of the Gippsland East electorate: sports uniform community to discuss sporting issues, and in particular grants grants for sporting uniforms for local clubs.
Mr BULL (Gippsland East) — I raise a matter for The DEPUTY SPEAKER — Order! The the attention of the Minister for Sport and Recreation. member’s time has expired.
ADJOURNMENT
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4991
Preston Reservoir Adult Community and provides opportunities for the most disadvantaged Education: funding members of our community, who are the ones in my community who suffer the brunt of the thoughtless and Mr SCOTT (Preston) — I raise a matter for the ill-conceived cuts to VCAL coordination funding. I attention of the Minister for Higher Education and urge the Minister for Higher Education and Skills to Skills relating to the government’s recent decision to take action to ensure that the wonderful people at cut VCAL (Victorian certificate of applied learning) PRACE have the funding they deserve. coordination funding for Preston Reservoir Adult Community Education (PRACE). The action I seek is Electricity: smart meters that VCAL funding for Preston Reservoir Adult Community Education be restored. PRACE works with Mrs BAUER (Carrum) — I wish to raise an issue young people who have fallen through the cracks, many with the Minister for Energy and Resources. The action of whom are the most disadvantaged members of our I seek is that the minister visit my electorate to attend a community. The cut to VCAL coordination funding has community meeting to discuss the rollout of smart been particularly cruel in its effect on PRACE, whose meters. Since the government has been in office many funding will be cut by about 20 per cent. Adult residents from the Carrum electorate have contacted me community education providers do not have the same about the smart meter project, raising concerns about global funding as schools and so cannot make good any the costs, the impacts on health and safety and the shortfalls. They do not have welfare coordinators or purpose of the new smart meters. Labor failed to year level coordinators. Of course schools are also consult the community or to implement the 2009 having great difficulties making up the funding recommendations of the Victorian Auditor-General on shortfall. the program. This means there is significant public concern and a lack of confidence in smart meters. PRACE has been running VCAL programs since its Thanks to Labor, all Victorian households and most inception in 2003. Coordination funding has been businesses are paying for smart meters, whether or not available since then. Coordination funding sounds like they have a smart meter installed. Labor’s legacy to the bureaucracy, but it is not. The money is used to work people of my electorate is summed up in the botched with potential employers and training providers to find smart meter program. Labor did not listen to or consult opportunities for young people, and this is an ongoing Victorians and oversaw a massive cost blow-out. process. Work placements will not be so successful without it because PRACE will not have the resources Former federal Labor MP Alan Griffin, in his Review of to devote to them. The fear is that they may not take the 2010 Victorian State Election for the Victorian place at all. These cuts will have a severe negative Branch of the Australian Labor Party, wrote: impact on PRACE and other adult community Where voters perceived that the government had wasted education providers around the state as they have little money on big projects such as the desalination plant — — capacity to divert funds from other sources. Mr Scott — On a point of order, Deputy Speaker, It is important to note that the students PRACE serves this is not related to a matter of government business. are some of the most difficult and disadvantaged This contribution is simply reflecting upon the members of our community. They suffer from opposition, which is disorderly. homelessness, mental illness and chronic illness. Some are victims of crime and various forms of abuse, and Mr O’Brien — On the point of order, Deputy they often have low rates of literacy and low numeracy Speaker, the member was referring to comments on the skills as they are serial non-attendees at school — some problems the smart meter policy has caused for the have never gone to secondary school at all. Many have community. The fact that this reference was made by a parents who are drug or alcohol-dependent and do not former Labor member of federal Parliament does not have supportive homes. In some cases they do not even mean it cannot be introduced into the adjournment eat properly. There is a particular community of debate, given the topic is the concern about smart disadvantaged students who have been served ably by meters in the member for Carrum’s community. PRACE. The DEPUTY SPEAKER — Order! The It is also important to note that after completing VCAL comments were relevant to the adjournment debate. 82 per cent of PRACE students engage in further education and training, apprenticeships, traineeships or Mrs BAUER — The quote is: full-time employment. PRACE has informed me that Where voters perceived that the government had wasted no student who has undertaken VCAL training, after money on big projects such as the desalination plant or having been referred to the service by Youth Justice, imposed unnecessary extra cost burdens on households such has reoffended. This is a fantastic program that works as smart meters, they punished the government.
ADJOURNMENT
4992 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011
The Baillieu government is implementing the adjournment debate on 25 May. I have had the recommendations of the Auditor-General and has opportunity to speak to him and tell him I would be commissioned an independent cost-benefit analysis of raising it tonight. I hope he has time to come into the the smart meter rollout to determine how smart meters house and give some further information and possibly can deliver value for money. good news for the Moreland Bicycle User Group. The group will have its annual meeting tonight. It would be Many people do not want a meter and want the sensational to be able to tell the group that the minister government to stop the rollout, but many people in my has yet again come up with money for cycling that will electorate already have a smart meter. I understand that be well used. The Western Ring Road cycle path and almost 850 000 meters have now been installed across the Upfield shared pathway are well patronised. Victoria. So whatever the results of the government Currently we have more than 2500 cyclists using the review and the cost-benefit analysis are, it is vitally Upfield shared pathway every weekday. important that we find a way to deliver benefits for consumers from the new meters. There is great concern Dining Room mission, Croydon in my community about the future of the rollout, the costs of it and how we are going to get any value out of Mr HODGETT (Kilsyth) — I rise today to call on the meters. I look forward to having the minister visit the Minister for Community Services to visit the Dining my electorate to hear firsthand from my community the Room mission in my electorate to present funding for concerns they have about smart meters. the valuable work the Dining Room does in our local community. The Dining Room mission is a Cycling: Upfield shared pathway professionally organised and efficiently run service that provides meals to individuals and families in need. It Ms CAMPBELL (Pascoe Vale) — I appreciate the operates at the hall behind the Anglican St John the opportunity to raise a matter for the Minister for Roads Divine Church in Croydon and has been serving meals in his capacity as minister responsible for cycling. The to locals in need every Tuesday since 2005. action I seek is that he fund the last component of the Upfield shared pathway. This vibrant pathway is used I have had the privilege of visiting the Dining Room on principally by cyclists but also by people in wheelchairs many occasions over the past few years and have seen and those with prams and walkers. It really is a well- firsthand the tireless and valuable work that David used path. Significant work on the pathway was Knoop and his team of volunteers undertake each and undertaken under Labor, particularly the previous every week to support some of the less fortunate ministers, Peter Batchelor and the current member for individuals in our local community. David is supported Tarneit. They funded the pathway section by section as by approximately 52 volunteers and senior students Moreland City Council worked on detailed plans from Oxley College and Luther College. The Dining component by component. The plans have now been Room has proved a very worthwhile community finalised and are ready for the remaining section, which service avenue for these students, and I have heard is from Box Forest Road to the Western Ring Road. much great testimony from locals who speak highly of the impact the Dining Room has had on the local If we can get that remaining $1.1 million or community. In addition to meals the Dining Room also $1.2 million — and I know Moreland City Council provides clothing, remedial massage therapy and appreciated the opportunity to raise this matter a couple information and referrals regarding personal and social of weeks ago directly with the minister — to complete services to those in need. Most importantly, however, it the shared pathway, it will enable cyclists to access the provides a place for acceptance and community. Upfield shared pathway from the Western Ring Road rather than having to travel down the very dangerous Last year I was thrilled to announce that, should it be section of the northern part of Sydney Road. elected, a coalition government would commit $10 000 Considerable work has been done by those working in to the Dining Room. Once in government the coalition Moreland council and those working on the widening reaffirmed its commitment to this worthwhile project of the Western Ring Road to improve the shared by ensuring that this funding was delivered in the first pathway. As the ring-road is being widened at the year. While the work the volunteers at the Dining moment, that will of course encourage many more Room undertake is widely regarded and respected, the people to cycle. venue does not run for free. Last year David Knoop approached me and explained that, due to the immense I ask the minister yet again as a matter of urgency to popularity of the program and the needs in the local fund the last link of the Upfield shared pathway. I community, the Dining Room was quickly outgrowing raised the matter with the minister during the its space and its budget. He said that he was in the
ADJOURNMENT
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4993 process of arranging a newsletter and that fridge space Before the election the coalition issued a policy saying was in desperately short supply. that it would do what the Auditor-General said the former government should have done but failed to do, Given the excellent work done by the Dining Room and so we are undertaking a full and independent cost- its volunteers, it is a fantastic result that the Baillieu benefit analysis of this absolutely botched project. The coalition government has shown its support for the Auditor-General said the problem was that the benefits program by delivering this funding. This funding will were basically there for the electricity distribution help the Dining Room mission to continue its great businesses; they were not there for the consumers. This work in the Croydon community. For this reason I call is the mess that we are in. on the Minister for Community Services to visit the Dining Room mission and to see firsthand the work that We have made it clear to the distribution businesses is done there and to present this funding. that while this cost-benefit analysis and program review are under way consumers who are in line to receive a Responses smart meter and at this stage do not wish to receive one have the option to go onto a deferred list. Also it is a Mr O’BRIEN (Minister for Energy and requirement of the relevant regulatory code that Resources) — I thank the member for Carrum for consumers receive two notifications prior to the raising this very important matter concerning smart installation of any smart meter. I make the point that it meters and how it affects her constituents. I know the is very important that the distribution businesses member for Carrum is a very in-touch member. She is observe that regulatory requirement. hardworking, she has been a resident in her electorate for many years, she has been involved with community We will make a decision on this program before the end groups there for many years and she has served on of the year. The reason why it needs to be made before Kingston City Council as deputy mayor, so she the end of the year is that under the arrangements that understands what the community is concerned about. Labor entered into the distribution businesses already The fact that she is sitting in this place today as the had the green light to charge for smart meters member for Carrum is testament to that — it was a throughout the whole of calendar year 2011. There was terrific election victory. As the member said, one of the no point in having a moratorium on the program this reasons it was such a victory was that, as the state year — because Labor had already given the green light Labor Party’s own election review has demonstrated, to charge every single Victorian for the smart meters one of the concerns the community had was the Labor whether or not they actually had them. Whether or not Party’s failure to properly manage major projects, one people have a smart meter, Labor was quite happy for of which was smart meters. Victorians to be charged for it. The budget for this system has been blown and consumers are being ripped In November 2009 the Auditor-General, when he off because the governance arrangements were handed down his report concerning the smart meter absolutely hopeless. This is causing a great deal of project, was absolutely scathing. He said that ‘project concern in the community. governance has not been appropriate’, ‘There is no risk management strategy for AMI (advanced metering I can say to the member for Carrum that I will be very infrastructure)’, ‘The merits of the economic case for happy to come to the Carrum electorate with the the project are quite uncertain’ and ‘It is … possible member for Carrum to speak to her constituents and that there will be an inequitable … transfer of economic explain to them this absolute mess that the government benefits from consumers to industry’. It is a Labor Party has inherited — Labor’s smart meters. project taking money out of the pockets of consumers and giving it to the big electricity distribution Honourable members interjecting. companies. That is the system members opposite set up. Is it any wonder that power bills are going up and up Mr O’BRIEN — It is funny that those opposite and more Victorians find it harder to pay their bills were very keen to claim ‘Labor’s Royal Children’s because of the enormous cost blow-outs of the smart Hospital’. Will they be so keen to claim ‘Labor’s smart meter project instigated by the Labor Party when in meters’? I wonder about that one. government? The smart meter really stands as a Dr Napthine interjected. testament to the economic incompetence of the former Labor government — it was absolutely economically Mr O’BRIEN — As the Minister for Ports points incompetent. out, they are Labor’s myki meters. I think I coined the phrase, saying that the smart meters were the myki of metering, as they have many of the same features.
ADJOURNMENT
4994 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011
We are determined to do whatever we can do opportunity to purchase uniforms ranging from tops practically to try to bring forward any benefits to and shorts to footwear and the like. consumers and to try to minimise the cost blow-outs of this dud project that Labor has foisted on the people of This initiative is very important for people from the Victoria. Gippsland East area, and the member has mentioned a lot of clubs in his electorate. Whether they be at Mr Nardella interjected. Bairnsdale, Bruthen, Lakes Entrance, Orbost, Woods Creek or Swan Reach, I know a lot of those clubs have Mr O’BRIEN — I will be very happy to speak to made applications under the sporting uniform grants the people of Carrum and anywhere else. I will even go program, and announcements will be made shortly in to Melton and explain to the people of Melton what the relation to that. Labor Party has done to this state through smart meters. I am happy to say to the member for Gippsland East Mr DELAHUNTY (Minister for Sport and that I look forward to accepting his offer and visiting Recreation) — I rise to respond to the matter raised his electorate, which is the third largest in the state, I am with me by the member for Gippsland East, who is a informed, behind my electorate and the Swan Hill very hardworking and committed member of that electorate. I ask the member to work with my office, community. We all know him as the Billy Brownless of and I look forward to visiting his electorate, because Gippsland East, and he has been doing fantastic work in there are a lot of small community clubs there and some his community. Even before the member came into this that greatly need assistance. I look forward to meeting place he was working for the Australian Sports with some of the key stakeholders and other sport and Commission on the Active After-school Communities recreation participants in the Gippsland East area, program, which is a federally funded program. It will probably early in December. be interesting to see if the federal government also cuts that program. I think the member was working with Ms WOOLDRIDGE (Minister for Community 1000 children in that program, so he is very committed Services) — I thank the member for Kilsyth for the to getting schoolchildren and young people active in opportunity to provide a response. The member for sport and recreation. Kilsyth has long been an advocate for the Dining Room mission, having been a vocal supporter and advocate The member has said he would like me to pay a visit for the really important work that is done by both David and talk about what assistance could be available for Knoop and the many volunteers who are so active in sporting clubs in his community. The coalition that organisation. As part of that support, the member government is very keen to encourage participation in for Kilsyth has had the commitment for $10 000 in sport and recreation. We know it strengthens funding to support that very important work, and it is communities, and importantly it improves the collective part of what the member for Kilsyth is able to commit wellbeing of people within the member’s constituents. to and deliver in government. Each week thousands of Victorians come together to put on their local club colours and represent their I am pleased to be able to support the request from the communities in a variety of sport and recreation member for Kilsyth to present the funding to the Dining opportunities. Room mission to recognise the important work it does. The organisation has been critical to many families who Our program — the sporting uniforms grants are struggling to pay the rent and feed themselves. The program — is about boosting team morale, increasing work the Dining Room mission does addresses the participation in sport and encouraging people to be heart of some of the challenges people face from the active and connected with their communities. The rising cost of living. I am very pleased that this coalition government has initiated this program to investment in Croydon, through the member for support grassroots sport by providing Victorian Kilsyth, reflects the broader agenda that the community-based sporting clubs and organisations with government has about how we ease the cost of living grants for uniforms which are essential for those clubs. pressures for families that have low incomes or Such funding provides sporting clubs with the challenges in relation to their financial situation. necessary resources to not only benefit existing players but also hopefully attract new members. The This is also a very timely adjournment matter, because government’s program aims to reduce the financial we are on the eve of the extension of the year-round barriers that we have spoken about numerous times in electricity concession on 1 November. Under the this house by providing sporting clubs with the previous government the electricity concession ran for six months, and at 31 October families would have no
ADJOURNMENT
Thursday, 27 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4995 longer been eligible for the concession for a six-month are interested in those issues. It is really terrific, and I period. Many struggling, low-income Victorians would am sure the Minister for Ageing will take that on board. choose to turn off their cooling over the very hot months of summer. I am pleased that now, as of The member for Macedon raised with the Minister for 1 November, more than 850 000 households — that is Roads the need to give consideration to some safety 1.5 million Victorians — will be able to continue to issues that she presented in the form of a petition on enjoy the year-round electricity concession because of behalf of residents with respect to Wallaby Run and the work and the commitment to them by the coalition Station Road at Gisborne. I will pass that on to the government. Minister for Roads.
Other commitments include the halving of the The member for Preston raised with the Minister for ambulance membership fees; stamp duty reductions for Higher Education and Skills the issue of VCAL first home owners and young farmers buying their first (Victorian certificate of applied learning) funding, and I farm; stamp duty reductions on pensioners’ homes; a remind the member that there has been no reduction in gas heater rebate; and a number of different areas where funding in terms of students and VCAL, but I am sure the coalition government has committed to recognising that the Minister for Higher Education and Skills will the very significant pressure many low-income respond directly to the member for Preston on that Victorians, older Victorians and others who are issue. struggling with their cost of living pressures are experiencing. The coalition government has made these The member for Thomastown raised with the Minister commitments to help ease those cost of living for Manufacturing, Exports and Trade the issue of the i- pressures. STEP program, and I will pass that on to the Minister for Manufacturing, Exports and Trade. I am very pleased to announce in this adjournment response that I will soon be able to visit Kilsyth, meet The member for Sandringham, who is a very the people from the Dining Room mission, and present experienced and hardworking local member who this very important cheque to help it continue to do the always brings to this house important issues of local very important work it does for the community. That is concern, raised with the Minister for Roads the need for reflected in the commitment of the member for Kilsyth. an engineer’s assessment of the embankment He has seen this as a priority, has advocated actively for supporting 357–358 Beach Road, particularly with it and has been an active supporter in recognising the regard to the assessment of the stability of the cliff in work of both the staff and the volunteers. His is a very that area. That is an important issue, and I am sure the important and valuable commitment to his local Minister for Roads will get back to the member for community. Sandringham on that important issue.
Dr NAPTHINE (Minister for Ports) — The Finally, the member for Altona raised a matter for the member for Pascoe Vale raised an issue for the Minister Minister responsible for the establishment of an anti- for Roads in his capacity as being responsible for corruption commission seeking a briefing on the cycling, and it is of note that this weekend we have the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission time-honoured Melbourne to Warrnambool Cycling Bill 2011, which was second read in the house today. It Classic, which is a great event and shows the great is interesting that after 11 years of inaction by the interest and resurgence in cycling in Victoria in recent previous Labor government, despite the scandals and years, particularly with the performance of Cadel stench of corruption associated with the Windsor Hotel Evans. The member sought assistance from the minister issue, the Brimbank council issue and a raft of other with respect to funding of what she described as the last issues involving Labor, Labor members and Labor component of the Upfield shared pathway, and I will fellow travellers — — pass that on to the Minister for Roads. Honourable members interjecting.
The member for Frankston raised with the Minister for Dr NAPTHINE — They are now seeking to Ageing a call for the minister to visit Frankston and sidetrack and undermine the efforts of this meet with the University of the Third Age in that area, government — — and he outlined some of the excellent work done by the University of the Third Age, which is endorsed by all Mr Nardella interjected. sides of the house and is a great organisation. It has great volunteers and does a great job with people who The DEPUTY SPEAKER — Order! The member for Melton!
ADJOURNMENT
4996 ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27 October 2011
Dr NAPTHINE — After 11 years of Labor inaction, in 11 months this great minister has brought forward this legislation — —
Mr Nardella — On a point of order, Deputy Speaker, there are rulings from the Chair that the adjournment is not a time to attack the opposition on a referred matter, and I ask you to bring the minister back to referring matters to the responsible ministers.
The DEPUTY SPEAKER — Order! The level of interjection prevented me from hearing everything the minister said. However, I will ask the minister to come back to answering the matter raised.
Dr NAPTHINE — I will pass this matter on to the minister, and I am sure the minister will respond accordingly.
The DEPUTY SPEAKER — Order! The house is now adjourned until the next day of sitting.
House adjourned 4.53 p.m. until Tuesday, 8 November.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4997
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Answers to the following questions on notice were circulated on the date shown. Questions have been incorporated from the notice paper of the Legislative Assembly. Answers have been incorporated in the form supplied by the departments on behalf of the appropriate ministers. The portfolio of the minister answering the question on notice starts each heading.
Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Consumer affairs: Affairs of State
479(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Affairs of State; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Affairs of State
479(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Affairs of State; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
4998 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Youth affairs: Affairs of State
479(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Affairs of State; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Affairs of State
479(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Affairs of State; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Allygroup
606(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Allygroup; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 4999
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Allygroup
606(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Allygroup; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Allygroup
606(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Allygroup; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Allygroup
606(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Allygroup; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5000 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: AusAccess Unit Trust
607(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm AusAccess Unit Trust; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: AusAccess Unit Trust
607(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm AusAccess Unit Trust; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: AusAccess Unit Trust
607(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm AusAccess Unit Trust; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5001
(2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: AusAccess Unit Trust
607(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm AusAccess Unit Trust; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Australian Public Affairs Partnership Ltd
608(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Australian Public Affairs Partnership Limited; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5002 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Gaming: Australian Public Affairs Partnership Ltd
608(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Australian Public Affairs Partnership Limited; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Australian Public Affairs Partnership Ltd
608(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Australian Public Affairs Partnership Limited; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Australian Public Affairs Partnership Ltd
608(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Australian Public Affairs Partnership Limited; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5003
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Baber Roger Peters
609(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Baber Roger Peters; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Baber Roger Peters
609(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Baber Roger Peters; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Baber Roger Peters
609(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Baber Roger Peters; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5004 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Baber Roger Peters
609(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Baber Roger Peters; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Barton Deakin
610(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Barton Deakin; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Barton Deakin
610(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Barton Deakin; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5005
(2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Barton Deakin
610(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Barton Deakin; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Barton Deakin
610(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Barton Deakin; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5006 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Consumer affairs: Berkeley Consultants Pty Ltd
611(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Berkeley Consultants Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Berkeley Consultants Pty Ltd
611(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Berkeley Consultants Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Berkeley Consultants Pty Ltd
611(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Berkeley Consultants Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5007
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Berkeley Consultants Pty Ltd
611(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Berkeley Consultants Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Bluegrass Consulting
612(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Bluegrass Consulting; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Bluegrass Consulting
612(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Bluegrass Consulting; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5008 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Bluegrass Consulting
612(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Bluegrass Consulting; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Bluegrass Consulting
612(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Bluegrass Consulting; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Burson-Marsteller
613(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Burson-Marsteller; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5009
(2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Burson-Marsteller
613(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Burson-Marsteller; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Burson-Marsteller
613(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Burson-Marsteller; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5010 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Assistant Treasurer: Burson-Marsteller
613(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Burson-Marsteller; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: CamCom-Campaign Communications
614(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm CamCom-Campaign Communications; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: CamCom-Campaign Communications
614(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm CamCom-Campaign Communications; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5011
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: CamCom-Campaign Communications
614(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm CamCom-Campaign Communications; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: CamCom-Campaign Communications
614(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm CamCom-Campaign Communications; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Cameron Milner
615(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Cameron Milner; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5012 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Cameron Milner
615(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Cameron Milner; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Cameron Milner
615(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Cameron Milner; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Cameron Milner
615(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Cameron Milner; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5013
(4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Cannings Corporate Communications
616(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Cannings Corporate Communications; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Cannings Corporate Communications
616(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Cannings Corporate Communications; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Cannings Corporate Communications
616(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Cannings Corporate Communications; if so:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5014 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Cannings Corporate Communications
616(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Cannings Corporate Communications; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Carney Associates
617(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Carney Associates; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5015
Gaming: Carney Associates
617(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Carney Associates; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Carney Associates
617(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Carney Associates; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Carney Associates
617(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Carney Associates; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5016 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Chris Schacht
618(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Chris Schacht; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Chris Schacht
618(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Chris Schacht; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Chris Schacht
618(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Chris Schacht; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5017
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Chris Schacht
618(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Chris Schacht; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Clean Economy Services
619(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Clean Economy Services; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Clean Economy Services
619(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Clean Economy Services; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5018 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
(2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Clean Economy Services
619(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Clean Economy Services; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Clean Economy Services
619(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Clean Economy Services; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5019
Consumer affairs: Clifton Consulting Services Pty Ltd
620(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Clifton Consulting Services Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Clifton Consulting Services Pty Ltd
620(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Clifton Consulting Services Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Clifton Consulting Services Pty Ltd
620(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Clifton Consulting Services Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5020 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Clifton Consulting Services Pty Ltd
620(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Clifton Consulting Services Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Corporate Words Australia Pty Ltd
621(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Corporate Words Australia Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Corporate Words Australia Pty Ltd
621(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Corporate Words Australia Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5021
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Corporate Words Australia Pty Ltd
621(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Corporate Words Australia Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Corporate Words Australia Pty Ltd
621(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Corporate Words Australia Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Cosway Australia
622(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Cosway Australia; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5022 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
(2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Cosway Australia
622(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Cosway Australia; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Cosway Australia
622(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Cosway Australia; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5023
Assistant Treasurer: Cosway Australia
622(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Cosway Australia; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Cox Inall Communications
623(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Cox Inall Communications; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Cox Inall Communications
623(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Cox Inall Communications; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5024 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Cox Inall Communications
623(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Cox Inall Communications; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Cox Inall Communications
623(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Cox Inall Communications; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: CPI Strategic
624(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm CPI Strategic; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5025
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: CPI Strategic
624(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm CPI Strategic; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: CPI Strategic
624(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm CPI Strategic; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: CPI Strategic
624(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm CPI Strategic; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5026 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
(4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: CPR Communications and Public Relations Pty Ltd
625(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm CPR Communications & Public Relations Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: CPR Communications and Public Relations Pty Ltd
625(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm CPR Communications & Public Relations Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: CPR Communications and Public Relations Pty Ltd
625(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm CPR Communications & Public Relations Pty Ltd; if so:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5027
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: CPR Communications and Public Relations Pty Ltd
625(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm CPR Communications & Public Relations Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: CSR Ltd
626(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm CSR Limited; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5028 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Gaming: CSR Ltd
626(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm CSR Limited; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: CSR Ltd
626(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm CSR Limited; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: CSR Ltd
626(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm CSR Limited; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5029
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Dan Cass and Company
627(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Dan Cass & Company; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Dan Cass and Company
627(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Dan Cass & Company; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Dan Cass and Company
627(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Dan Cass & Company; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5030 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Dan Cass and Company
627(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Dan Cass & Company; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Daskay Pty Ltd
628(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Daskay Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Daskay Pty Ltd
628(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Daskay Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5031
(2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Daskay Pty Ltd
628(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Daskay Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Daskay Pty Ltd
628(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Daskay Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5032 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Consumer affairs: Daymark Public Relations Pty Ltd
629(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Daymark Public Relations Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Daymark Public Relations Pty Ltd
629(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Daymark Public Relations Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Daymark Public Relations Pty Ltd
629(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Daymark Public Relations Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5033
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Daymark Public Relations Pty Ltd
629(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Daymark Public Relations Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Diplomacy Pty Ltd
630(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Diplomacy Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Diplomacy Pty Ltd
630(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Diplomacy Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5034 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Diplomacy Pty Ltd
630(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Diplomacy Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Diplomacy Pty Ltd
630(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Diplomacy Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: EC Strategies Pty Ltd
631(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm EC Strategies Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5035
(2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: EC Strategies Pty Ltd
631(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm EC Strategies Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: EC Strategies Pty Ltd
631(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm EC Strategies Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5036 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Assistant Treasurer: EC Strategies Pty Ltd
631(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm EC Strategies Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Edunity
632(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Edunity; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Edunity
632(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Edunity; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5037
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Edunity
632(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Edunity; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Edunity
632(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Edunity; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Embark Worldwide Consulting
633(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Embark Worldwide Consulting; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5038 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Embark Worldwide Consulting
633(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Embark Worldwide Consulting; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Embark Worldwide Consulting
633(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Embark Worldwide Consulting; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Embark Worldwide Consulting
633(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Embark Worldwide Consulting; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5039
(4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Endeavour Consulting Group Pty Ltd
634(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Endeavour Consulting Group Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Endeavour Consulting Group Pty Ltd
634(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Endeavour Consulting Group Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Endeavour Consulting Group Pty Ltd
634(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Endeavour Consulting Group Pty Ltd; if so:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5040 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Endeavour Consulting Group Pty Ltd
634(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Endeavour Consulting Group Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Enhance Corporate Pty Ltd
635(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Enhance Corporate Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5041
Gaming: Enhance Corporate Pty Ltd
635(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Enhance Corporate Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Enhance Corporate Pty Ltd
635(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Enhance Corporate Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Enhance Corporate Pty Ltd
635(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Enhance Corporate Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5042 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Essential Media Communications
636(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Essential Media Communications; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Essential Media Communications
636(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Essential Media Communications; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Essential Media Communications
636(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Essential Media Communications; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5043
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Essential Media Communications
636(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Essential Media Communications; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: FIPRA Australia Pty Ltd
637(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm FIPRA Australia Pty Limited; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: FIPRA Australia Pty Ltd
637(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm FIPRA Australia Pty Limited; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5044 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
(2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: FIPRA Australia Pty Ltd
637(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm FIPRA Australia Pty Limited; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: FIPRA Australia Pty Ltd
637(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm FIPRA Australia Pty Limited; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5045
Consumer affairs: G&A Commerical Services Pty Ltd
638(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm G & A Commerical Services Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: G&A Commerical Services Pty Ltd
638(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm G & A Commerical Services Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: G&A Commerical Services Pty Ltd
638(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm G & A Commerical Services Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5046 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: G&A Commerical Services Pty Ltd
638(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm G & A Commerical Services Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: G. F. Richardson
639(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm G. F. Richardson; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: G. F. Richardson
639(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm G. F. Richardson; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5047
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: G. F. Richardson
639(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm G. F. Richardson; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: G. F. Richardson
639(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm G. F. Richardson; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Galbraith and Company Pty Ltd
640(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Galbraith & Company Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5048 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
(2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Galbraith and Company Pty Ltd
640(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Galbraith & Company Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Galbraith and Company Pty Ltd
640(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Galbraith & Company Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5049
Assistant Treasurer: Galbraith and Company Pty Ltd
640(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Galbraith & Company Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Gell Southam Group Pty Ltd
641(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Gell Southam Group Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Gell Southam Group Pty Ltd
641(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Gell Southam Group Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5050 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Gell Southam Group Pty Ltd
641(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Gell Southam Group Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Gell Southam Group Pty Ltd
641(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Gell Southam Group Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Government Relations Australia Advisory Pty Ltd
642(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Government Relations Australia Advisory Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5051
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Government Relations Australia Advisory Pty Ltd
642(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Government Relations Australia Advisory Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Government Relations Australia Advisory Pty Ltd
642(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Government Relations Australia Advisory Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Government Relations Australia Advisory Pty Ltd
642(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Government Relations Australia Advisory Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5052 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
(4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Government Relations Solutions Pty Ltd
643(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Government Relations Solutions Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Government Relations Solutions Pty Ltd
643(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Government Relations Solutions Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Government Relations Solutions Pty Ltd
643(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Government Relations Solutions Pty Ltd; if so:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5053
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Government Relations Solutions Pty Ltd
643(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Government Relations Solutions Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Hawker Britton
644(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Hawker Britton; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5054 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Gaming: Hawker Britton
644(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Hawker Britton; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Hawker Britton
644(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Hawker Britton; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Hawker Britton
644(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Hawker Britton; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5055
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Hill and Knowlton
645(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Hill & Knowlton; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Hill and Knowlton
645(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Hill & Knowlton; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Hill and Knowlton
645(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Hill & Knowlton; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5056 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Hill and Knowlton
645(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Hill & Knowlton; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: HTT Trust
646(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm HTT Trust; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: HTT Trust
646(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm HTT Trust; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5057
(3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: HTT Trust
646(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm HTT Trust; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: HTT Trust
646(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm HTT Trust; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5058 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Consumer affairs: Hugo Halliday Pty Ltd
647(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Hugo Halliday Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Hugo Halliday Pty Ltd
647(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Hugo Halliday Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Hugo Halliday Pty Ltd
647(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Hugo Halliday Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5059
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Hugo Halliday Pty Ltd
647(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Hugo Halliday Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: InsideOut Strategic
648(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm InsideOut Strategic; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: InsideOut Strategic
648(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm InsideOut Strategic; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5060 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: InsideOut Strategic
648(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm InsideOut Strategic; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: InsideOut Strategic
648(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm InsideOut Strategic; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: InterCapital Group Pty Ltd
649(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm InterCapital Group Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5061
(2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: InterCapital Group Pty Ltd
649(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm InterCapital Group Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: InterCapital Group Pty Ltd
649(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm InterCapital Group Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5062 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Assistant Treasurer: InterCapital Group Pty Ltd
649(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm InterCapital Group Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Intermediary Consulting Pty Ltd
650(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Intermediary Consulting Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Intermediary Consulting Pty Ltd
650(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Intermediary Consulting Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5063
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Intermediary Consulting Pty Ltd
650(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Intermediary Consulting Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Intermediary Consulting Pty Ltd
650(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Intermediary Consulting Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Ivydale Nominees Pty Ltd
651(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Ivydale Nominees Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5064 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Ivydale Nominees Pty Ltd
651(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Ivydale Nominees Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Ivydale Nominees Pty Ltd
651(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Ivydale Nominees Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Ivydale Nominees Pty Ltd
651(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Ivydale Nominees Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5065
(4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Jackson Wells Pty Ltd
652(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Jackson Wells Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Jackson Wells Pty Ltd
652(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Jackson Wells Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Jackson Wells Pty Ltd
652(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Jackson Wells Pty Ltd; if so:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5066 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Jackson Wells Pty Ltd
652(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Jackson Wells Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Jeni Coutts and Associates Pty Ltd
653(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Jeni Coutts & Associates Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5067
Gaming: Jeni Coutts and Associates Pty Ltd
653(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Jeni Coutts & Associates Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Jeni Coutts and Associates Pty Ltd
653(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Jeni Coutts & Associates Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Jeni Coutts and Associates Pty Ltd
653(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Jeni Coutts & Associates Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5068 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: John Connolly and Partners Pty Limited
654(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm John Connolly & Partners Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: John Connolly and Partners Pty Ltd
654(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm John Connolly & Partners Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: John Connolly and Partners Pty Ltd
654(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm John Connolly & Partners Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5069
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: John Connolly and Partners Pty Ltd
654(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm John Connolly & Partners Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: John Cook
655(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm John Cook; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: John Cook
655(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm John Cook; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5070 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
(3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: John Cook
655(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm John Cook; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: John Cook
655(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm John Cook; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5071
Consumer affairs: John Martin McQuilten
656(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm John Martin McQuilten; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: John Martin McQuilten
656(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm John Martin McQuilten; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: John Martin McQuilten
656(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm John Martin McQuilten; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5072 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: John Martin McQuilten
656(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm John Martin McQuilten; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Kenneth Gordon Betts
657(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Kenneth Gordon Betts; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Kenneth Gordon Betts
657(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Kenneth Gordon Betts; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5073
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Kenneth Gordon Betts
657(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Kenneth Gordon Betts; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Kenneth Gordon Betts
657(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Kenneth Gordon Betts; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: KPMG
658(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm KPMG; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5074 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
(2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: KPMG
658(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm KPMG; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: KPMG
658(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm KPMG; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5075
Assistant Treasurer: KPMG
658(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm KPMG; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Kreab Gavin Anderson (Australia) Ltd
659(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Kreab Gavin Anderson (Australia) Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Kreab Gavin Anderson (Australia) Ltd
659(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Kreab Gavin Anderson (Australia) Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5076 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Kreab Gavin Anderson (Australia) Ltd
659(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Kreab Gavin Anderson (Australia) Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Kreab Gavin Anderson (Australia) Ltd
659(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Kreab Gavin Anderson (Australia) Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: LESL Services Pty Ltd
660(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm LESL Services Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5077
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: LESL Services Pty Ltd
660(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm LESL Services Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: LESL Services Pty Ltd
660(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm LESL Services Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: LESL Services Pty Ltd
660(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm LESL Services Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5078 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
(4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: LK Creative
661(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm LK Creative; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: LK Creative
661(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm LK Creative; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: LK Creative
661(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm LK Creative; if so:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5079
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: LK Creative
661(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm LK Creative; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Manallack Pty Ltd
662(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Manallack Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5080 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Gaming: Manallack Pty Ltd
662(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Manallack Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Manallack Pty Ltd
662(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Manallack Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Manallack Pty Ltd
662(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Manallack Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5081
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Markstone Group Pty Ltd
663(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Markstone Group Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Markstone Group Pty Ltd
663(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Markstone Group Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Markstone Group Pty Ltd
663(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Markstone Group Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5082 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Markstone Group Pty Ltd
663(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Markstone Group Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Marshall Place Associates Pty Ltd
664(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Marshall Place Associates Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Marshall Place Associates Pty Ltd
664(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Marshall Place Associates Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5083
(2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Marshall Place Associates Pty Ltd
664(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Marshall Place Associates Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Marshall Place Associates Pty Ltd
664(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Marshall Place Associates Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5084 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Consumer affairs: Martin Jones
665(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Martin Jones; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Martin Jones
665(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Martin Jones; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Martin Jones
665(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Martin Jones; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5085
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Martin Jones
665(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Martin Jones; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Max Jackson and Associates
666(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Max Jackson & Associates; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Max Jackson and Associates
666(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Max Jackson & Associates; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5086 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Max Jackson and Associates
666(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Max Jackson & Associates; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Max Jackson and Associates
666(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Max Jackson & Associates; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Media Affairs
667(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Media Affairs; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5087
(2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Media Affairs
667(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Media Affairs; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Media Affairs
667(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Media Affairs; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5088 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Assistant Treasurer: Media Affairs
667(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Media Affairs; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Melbourne Public Relations Group
668(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Melbourne Public Relations Group; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Melbourne Public Relations Group
668(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Melbourne Public Relations Group; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5089
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Melbourne Public Relations Group
668(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Melbourne Public Relations Group; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Melbourne Public Relations Group
668(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Melbourne Public Relations Group; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Michael Kelly
669(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Michael Kelly; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5090 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Michael Kelly
669(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Michael Kelly; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Michael Kelly
669(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Michael Kelly; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Michael Kelly
669(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Michael Kelly; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5091
(4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: MPR
670(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm MPR; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: MPR
670(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm MPR; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: MPR
670(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm MPR; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5092 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
(2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: MPR
670(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm MPR; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Next Generation Thinking
671(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Next Generation Thinking; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5093
Gaming: Next Generation Thinking
671(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Next Generation Thinking; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Next Generation Thinking
671(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Next Generation Thinking; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Next Generation Thinking
671(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Next Generation Thinking; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5094 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Numbat Consulting
672(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Numbat Consulting; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Numbat Consulting
672(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Numbat Consulting; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Numbat Consulting
672(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Numbat Consulting; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5095
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Numbat Consulting
672(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Numbat Consulting; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Paris Walter Pty Ltd
673(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Paris Walter Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Paris Walter Pty Ltd
673(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Paris Walter Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5096 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
(2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Paris Walter Pty Ltd
673(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Paris Walter Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Paris Walter Pty Ltd
673(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Paris Walter Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5097
Consumer affairs: Parker and Partners Pty Ltd
674(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Parker & Partners Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Parker and Partners Pty Ltd
674(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Parker & Partners Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Parker and Partners Pty Ltd
674(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Parker & Partners Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5098 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Parker and Partners Pty Ltd
674(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Parker & Partners Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Pesel and Carr
675(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Pesel & Carr; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Pesel and Carr
675(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Pesel & Carr; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5099
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Pesel and Carr
675(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Pesel & Carr; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Pesel and Carr
675(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Pesel & Carr; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Phoenix Public Affairs
676(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Phoenix Public Affairs; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5100 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
(2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Phoenix Public Affairs
676(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Phoenix Public Affairs; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Phoenix Public Affairs
676(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Phoenix Public Affairs; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5101
Assistant Treasurer: Phoenix Public Affairs
676(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Phoenix Public Affairs; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Place Consultancy
677(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Place Consultancy; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Place Consultancy
677(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Place Consultancy; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5102 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Place Consultancy
677(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Place Consultancy; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Place Consultancy
677(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Place Consultancy; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Porter Novelli
678(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Porter Novelli; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5103
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Porter Novelli
678(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Porter Novelli; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Porter Novelli
678(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Porter Novelli; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Porter Novelli
678(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Porter Novelli; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5104 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
(4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Primary Communication Pty Ltd
679(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Primary Communication Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Primary Communication Pty Ltd
679(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Primary Communication Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Primary Communication Pty Ltd
679(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Primary Communication Pty Ltd; if so:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5105
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Primary Communication Pty Ltd
679(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Primary Communication Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Profile Management Consultants Pty Ltd
680(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Profile Management Consultants Pty Ltd as trustee for Profile Trust; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5106 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Gaming: Profile Management Consultants Pty Ltd
680(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Profile Management Consultants Pty Ltd as trustee for Profile Trust; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Profile Management Consultants Pty Ltd
680(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Profile Management Consultants Pty Ltd as trustee for Profile Trust; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Profile Management Consultants Pty Ltd
680(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Profile Management Consultants Pty Ltd as trustee for Profile Trust; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5107
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Public Affairs Network Pty Ltd
681(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Public Affairs Network Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Public Affairs Network Pty Ltd
681(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Public Affairs Network Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Public Affairs Network Pty Ltd
681(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Public Affairs Network Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5108 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Public Affairs Network Pty Ltd
681(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Public Affairs Network Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Public Relations Exchange Pty Ltd
682(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Public Relations Exchange Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Public Relations Exchange Pty Ltd
682(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Public Relations Exchange Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5109
(2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Public Relations Exchange Pty Ltd
682(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Public Relations Exchange Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Public Relations Exchange Pty Ltd
682(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Public Relations Exchange Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5110 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Consumer affairs: RedStick Strategic Communications
683(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm RedStick Strategic Communications; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: RedStick Strategic Communications
683(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm RedStick Strategic Communications; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: RedStick Strategic Communications
683(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm RedStick Strategic Communications; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5111
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: RedStick Strategic Communications
683(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm RedStick Strategic Communications; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Relate Technical Communications Pty Ltd
684(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Relate Technical Communications Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Relate Technical Communications Pty Ltd
684(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Relate Technical Communications Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5112 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Relate Technical Communications Pty Ltd
684(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Relate Technical Communications Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Relate Technical Communications Pty Ltd
684(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Relate Technical Communications Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Reputation Pty Ltd
685(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Reputation Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5113
(2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Reputation Pty Ltd
685(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Reputation Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Reputation Pty Ltd
685(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Reputation Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5114 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Assistant Treasurer: Reputation Pty Ltd
685(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Reputation Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Res Publica
686(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Res Publica; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Res Publica
686(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Res Publica; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5115
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Res Publica
686(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Res Publica; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Res Publica
686(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Res Publica; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Richardson Coutts Pty Ltd
687(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Richardson Coutts Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5116 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Richardson Coutts Pty Ltd
687(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Richardson Coutts Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Richardson Coutts Pty Ltd
687(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Richardson Coutts Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Richardson Coutts Pty Ltd
687(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Richardson Coutts Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5117
(4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Royce (Vic) Pty Ltd
688(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Royce (Vic) Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Royce (Vic) Pty Ltd
688(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Royce (Vic) Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Royce (Vic) Pty Ltd
688(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Royce (Vic) Pty Ltd; if so:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5118 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Royce (Vic) Pty Ltd
688(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Royce (Vic) Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: SAS Group
689(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm SAS Group; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5119
Gaming: SAS Group
689(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm SAS Group; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: SAS Group
689(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm SAS Group; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: SAS Group
689(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm SAS Group; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5120 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Shac Pty Ltd
690(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Shac Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Shac Pty Ltd
690(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Shac Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Shac Pty Ltd
690(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Shac Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5121
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Shac Pty Ltd
690(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Shac Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Shelly Freeman Consultant
691(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Shelly Freeman Consultant; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Shelly Freeman Consultant
691(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Shelly Freeman Consultant; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5122 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
(2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Shelly Freeman Consultant
691(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Shelly Freeman Consultant; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Shelly Freeman Consultant
691(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Shelly Freeman Consultant; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5123
Consumer affairs: Socom Pty Ltd
692(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Socom Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Socom Pty Ltd
692(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Socom Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Socom Pty Ltd
692(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Socom Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5124 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Socom Pty Ltd
692(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Socom Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Statecraft Pty Ltd
693(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Statecraft Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Statecraft Pty Ltd
693(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Statecraft Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5125
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Statecraft Pty Ltd
693(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Statecraft Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Statecraft Pty Ltd
693(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Statecraft Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Strategic Advice Australia Pty Ltd
694(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Strategic Advice Australia Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5126 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
(2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Strategic Advice Australia Pty Ltd
694(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Strategic Advice Australia Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Strategic Advice Australia Pty Ltd
694(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Strategic Advice Australia Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5127
Assistant Treasurer: Strategic Advice Australia Pty Ltd
694(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Strategic Advice Australia Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Strategic Partnership Group
695(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Strategic Partnership Group; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Strategic Partnership Group
695(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Strategic Partnership Group; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5128 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Strategic Partnership Group
695(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Strategic Partnership Group; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Strategic Partnership Group
695(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Strategic Partnership Group; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: The Agenda Group Pty Ltd
696(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm The Agenda Group Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5129
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: The Agenda Group Pty Ltd
696(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm The Agenda Group Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: The Agenda Group Pty Ltd
696(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm The Agenda Group Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: The Agenda Group Pty Ltd
696(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm The Agenda Group Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5130 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
(4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: The Civic Group Pty Ltd
697(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm The Civic Group Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: The Civic Group Pty Ltd
697(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm The Civic Group Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: The Civic Group Pty Ltd
697(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm The Civic Group Pty Ltd; if so:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5131
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: The Civic Group Pty Ltd
697(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm The Civic Group Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: The Strategic Counsel
698(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm The Strategic Counsel; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5132 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
Gaming: The Strategic Counsel
698(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm The Strategic Counsel; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: The Strategic Counsel
698(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm The Strategic Counsel; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: The Strategic Counsel
698(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm The Strategic Counsel; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5133
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: The Trustee for the S. and L. Santoro Family Trust
699(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm The Trustee for the S & L Santoro Family Trust; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: The Trustee for the S. and L. Santoro Family Trust
699(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm The Trustee for the S & L Santoro Family Trust; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: The Trustee for the S. and L. Santoro Family Trust
699(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm The Trustee for the S & L Santoro Family Trust; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5134 ASSEMBLY Tuesday, 25 October 2011
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: The Trustee for the S. and L. Santoro Family Trust
699(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm The Trustee for the S & L Santoro Family Trust; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Consumer affairs: Wilkinson Group
700(i). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Consumer Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Wilkinson Group; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Gaming: Wilkinson Group
700(r). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Gaming for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Wilkinson Group; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Tuesday, 25 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5135
(2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am advised that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Youth affairs: Wilkinson Group
700(ar). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Youth Affairs for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Wilkinson Group; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Assistant Treasurer: Wilkinson Group
700(au). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Treasurer for the Assistant Treasurer for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Wilkinson Group; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
5136 ASSEMBLY
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5137
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Answers to the following questions on notice were circulated on the date shown. Questions have been incorporated from the notice paper of the Legislative Assembly. Answers have been incorporated in the form supplied by the departments on behalf of the appropriate ministers. The portfolio of the minister answering the question on notice starts each heading.
Wednesday, 26 October 2011
Local government: Affairs of State
479(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Affairs of State; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Allygroup
606(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Allygroup; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5138 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
Local government: AusAccess Unit Trust
607(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm AusAccess Unit Trust; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Australian Public Affairs Partnership Ltd
608(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Australian Public Affairs Partnership Limited; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Baber Roger Peters
609(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Baber Roger Peters; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5139
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Barton Deakin
610(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Barton Deakin; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Berkeley Consultants Pty Ltd
611(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Berkeley Consultants Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Bluegrass Consulting
612(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Bluegrass Consulting; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5140 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
(4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Burson-Marsteller
613(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Burson-Marsteller; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: CamCom-Campaign Communications
614(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm CamCom-Campaign Communications; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5141
Local government: Cameron Milner
615(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Cameron Milner; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Cannings Corporate Communications
616(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Cannings Corporate Communications; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Carney Associates
617(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Carney Associates; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5142 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Chris Schacht
618(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Chris Schacht; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Clean Economy Services
619(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Clean Economy Services; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Clifton Consulting Services Pty Ltd
620(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Clifton Consulting Services Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5143
(4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Corporate Words Australia Pty Ltd
621(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Corporate Words Australia Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Cosway Australia
622(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Cosway Australia; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5144 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
Local government: Cox Inall Communications
623(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Cox Inall Communications; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: CPI Strategic
624(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm CPI Strategic; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: CPR Communications and Public Relations Pty Ltd
625(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm CPR Communications & Public Relations Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5145
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: CSR Ltd
626(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm CSR Limited; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Dan Cass and Company
627(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Dan Cass & Company; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Daskay Pty Ltd
628(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Daskay Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5146 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
(4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Daymark Public Relations Pty Ltd
629(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Daymark Public Relations Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Diplomacy Pty Ltd
630(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Diplomacy Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5147
Local government: EC Strategies Pty Ltd
631(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm EC Strategies Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Edunity
632(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Edunity; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Embark Worldwide Consulting
633(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Embark Worldwide Consulting; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5148 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Endeavour Consulting Group Pty Ltd
634(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Endeavour Consulting Group Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Enhance Corporate Pty Ltd
635(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Enhance Corporate Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Essential Media Communications
636(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Essential Media Communications; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5149
(4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: FIPRA Australia Pty Ltd
637(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm FIPRA Australia Pty Limited; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: G &A Commerical Services Pty Ltd
638(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm G&A Commerical Services Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5150 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
Local government: G. F. Richardson
639(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm G. F. Richardson; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Galbraith and Company Pty Ltd
640(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Galbraith & Company Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Gell Southam Group Pty Ltd
641(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Gell Southam Group Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5151
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Government Relations Australia Advisory Pty Ltd
642(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Government Relations Australia Advisory Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Government Relations Solutions Pty Ltd
643(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Government Relations Solutions Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Hawker Britton
644(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Hawker Britton; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5152 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
(4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Hill and Knowlton
645(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Hill & Knowlton; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: HTT Trust
646(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm HTT Trust; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5153
Local government: Hugo Halliday Pty Ltd
647(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Hugo Halliday Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: InsideOut Strategic
648(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm InsideOut Strategic; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: InterCapital Group Pty Ltd
649(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm InterCapital Group Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5154 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Intermediary Consulting Pty Ltd
650(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Intermediary Consulting Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Ivydale Nominees Pty Ltd
651(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Ivydale Nominees Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Jackson Wells Pty Ltd
652(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Jackson Wells Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5155
(4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Jeni Coutts and Associates Pty Ltd
653(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Jeni Coutts & Associates Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: John Connolly and Partners Pty Ltd
654(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm John Connolly & Partners Pty Limited; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5156 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
Local government: John Cook
655(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm John Cook; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: John Martin McQuilten
656(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm John Martin McQuilten; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Kenneth Gordon Betts
657(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Kenneth Gordon Betts; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5157
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: KPMG
658(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm KPMG; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Kreab Gavin Anderson (Australia) Ltd
659(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Kreab Gavin Anderson (Australia) Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: LESL Services Pty Ltd
660(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm LESL Services Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5158 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
(4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: LK Creative
661(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm LK Creative; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Manallack Pty Ltd
662(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Manallack Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5159
Local government: Markstone Group Pty Ltd
663(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Markstone Group Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Marshall Place Associates Pty Ltd
664(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Marshall Place Associates Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Martin Jones
665(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Martin Jones; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5160 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Max Jackson and Associates
666(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Max Jackson & Associates; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Media Affairs
667(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Media Affairs; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Melbourne Public Relations Group
668(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Melbourne Public Relations Group; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5161
(4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Michael Kelly
669(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Michael Kelly; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: MPR
670(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm MPR; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5162 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
Local government: Next Generation Thinking
671(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Next Generation Thinking; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Numbat Consulting
672(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Numbat Consulting; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Paris Walter Pty Ltd
673(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Paris Walter Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5163
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Parker and Partners Pty Ltd
674(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Parker & Partners Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Pesel and Carr
675(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Pesel & Carr; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Phoenix Public Affairs
676(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Phoenix Public Affairs; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5164 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
(4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Place Consultancy
677(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Place Consultancy; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Porter Novelli
678(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Porter Novelli; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5165
Local government: Primary Communication Pty Ltd
679(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Primary Communication Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Profile Management Consultants Pty Ltd
680(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Profile Management Consultants Pty Ltd as trustee for Profile Trust; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Public Affairs Network Pty Ltd
681(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Public Affairs Network Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5166 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Public Relations Exchange Pty Ltd
682(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Public Relations Exchange Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: RedStick Strategic Communications
683(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm RedStick Strategic Communications; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Relate Technical Communications Pty Ltd
684(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Relate Technical Communications Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5167
(4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Reputation Pty Ltd
685(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Reputation Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Res Publica
686(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Res Publica; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5168 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
Local government: Richardson Coutts Pty Ltd
687(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Richardson Coutts Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Royce (Vic) Pty Ltd
688(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Royce (Vic) Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: SAS Group
689(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm SAS Group; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5169
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Shac Pty Ltd
690(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Shac Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Shelly Freeman Consultant
691(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Shelly Freeman Consultant; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Socom Pty Ltd
692(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Socom Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5170 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
(4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Statecraft Pty Ltd
693(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Statecraft Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Strategic Advice Australia Pty Ltd
694(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Strategic Advice Australia Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5171
Local government: Strategic Partnership Group
695(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Strategic Partnership Group; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: The Agenda Group Pty Ltd
696(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm The Agenda Group Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: The Civic Group Pty Ltd
697(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm The Civic Group Pty Ltd; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
5172 ASSEMBLY Wednesday, 26 October 2011
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: The Strategic Counsel
698(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm The Strategic Counsel; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: The Trustee for the S and L Santoro Family Trust
699(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm The Trustee for the S & L Santoro Family Trust; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept. (4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
Local government: Wilkinson Group
700(v). Ms HENNESSY to ask the Minister for Local Government for the period 2 December 2010 to 16 August 2011, did the minister (or the minister’s staff) meet with representatives of the lobbying firm Wilkinson Group; if so:
(1) On which date was the meeting held. (2) Was the minister (or the minister’s staff) accompanied by departmental representatives. (3) Were any notes or records of the meeting kept.
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Wednesday, 26 October 2011 ASSEMBLY 5173
(4) Was the lobbyist acting on behalf of a client; if so, what was the name of the client.
ANSWER:
I am informed that:
Government ministers and ministerial staff members continue to adhere to the Victorian government professional lobbyist code of conduct introduced in August 2009.
The government is currently preparing a new lobbyist code of conduct.
5174 ASSEMBLY
MEMBERS INDEX
ASSEMBLY i
MEMBERS INDEX ASHER, Ms (Brighton) (Minister for Innovation, Services and Small Business and Minister for Tourism and Major Events)
ALLAN, Ms (Bendigo East) Adjournment Carbon tax: Bayswater electorate, 4916 Bills Puffing Billy: funding, 4917 Water Legislation Amendment (water Infrastructure Charges) Bill 2011, 4951 Members statements
Business of the house Floods: small business assistance, 4923 Program, 4786 BAILLIEU, Mr (Hawthorn) (Premier and Minister for the Arts) Dissent from Speaker’s ruling, 4971 Parliamentary secretaries, 4959 Members statements Roads: truck action plan, 4923 Questions without notice
Points of order, 4780, 4862, 4964, 4965, 4966, 4969 Police: enterprise bargaining, 4780 Puppy farms: regulation, 4775 Questions without notice Road safety: numberplate messages, 4961 Biofuel: Madowla Park project, 4868 Royal visit: events, 4862
ANDREWS, Mr (Mulgrave) (Leader of the Opposition) BATTIN, Mr (Gembrook)
Bills Adjournment Domestic Animals Amendment (Puppy Farm Enforcement and Occupational health and safety: national harmonisation, 4857 Other Matters) Bill 2011, 4782 Bills Points of order, 4776, 4777, 4778, 4779, 4863, 4960, 4962, 4963, Water Legislation Amendment (water Infrastructure Charges) Bill 4968 2011, 4981
Questions without notice Members statements Former deputy commissioner of police: meeting, 4959, 4964 Emerald Community House, 4876 Minister for Police and Emergency Services Gembrook Primary School: Walk to School day, 4876 conduct, 4965, 4967 George Harmon, 4876 former adviser, 4961 National Bandanna Day, 4876 ministerial staff, 4962 Parliament House: bowls event, 4876 Police: enterprise bargaining, 4775, 4777, 4778 Points of order, 4982 Public sector: government wages policy, 4775 Questions without notice ANGUS, Mr (Forest Hill) Racing: Bendigo Cup, 4868
Adjournment BAUER, Mrs (Carrum) Healesville freeway reservation: future, 4914
Bills Adjournment Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation Bill 2011, 4948 Electricity: smart meters, 4991
Members statements Bills Carbon tax: economic impact, 4793 Transport Legislation Amendment (Public Transport Development Authority) Bill 2011, 4807 Multicultural affairs: Forest Hill electorate, 4793 Nunawading Soccer Club: presentations, 4793 Members statements St Mary’s House of Welcome, 4792 Carrum volunteer coastguard: Kingston Guardian, 4796 Mates Day on the Bay, 4796 Patterson Lakes Primary School: Cyber Girls chess team, 4796
MEMBERS INDEX ii ASSEMBLY
Questions without notice BURGESS, Mr (Hastings) Women: Australian Institute of Company Directors scholarships, 4865 Members statements Hastings: Tidy Towns awards, 4928 Langwarrin Park Kindergarten: extension, 4927 BEATTIE, Ms (Yuroke) Moonlit Sanctuary Wildlife Conservation Park: 10th anniversary, 4928 Bills Sentencing Amendment (Community Correction Reform) Bill 2011, 4841 CAMPBELL, Ms (Pascoe Vale) Transport Legislation Amendment (Public Transport Development Authority) Bill 2011, 4828 Adjournment Cycling: Upfield shared pathway, 4992 Members statements South Asian Community Link Group: fundraising, 4794 Bills Sentencing Amendment (Community Correction Reform) Bill 2011, 4843 BLACKWOOD, Mr (Narracan) Business of the house Adjournment Program, 4789 Timber industry: government policy, 4852 Members statements Questions without notice Moreland Bicycle User Group, 4876 Road safety: numberplate messages, 4961 Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee Rulings, 4945, 4946 Alert Digest No. 12, 4784
BROOKS, Mr (Bundoora) CARBINES, Mr (Ivanhoe)
Bills Bills Transport Legislation Amendment (Public Transport Development Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation Bill 2011, 4946 Authority) Bill 2011, 4806 Members statements Viewbank College: gala concert, 4877 BULL, Mr (Gippsland East)
Adjournment CLARK, Mr (Box Hill) (Attorney-General and Minister for Gippsland East electorate: sports uniform grants, 4990 Finance)
Bills Bills Transport Legislation Amendment (Public Transport Development Justice Legislation Further Amendment Bill 2011, 4781, 4891, Authority) Bill 2011, 4826 4892 Members statements Planning and Environment Amendment (Schools) Bill 2011, 4781, 4893 Bairnsdale Boxing Club: tournament, 4928 Public Prosecutions Amendment Bill 2011, 4781, 4941, 4942 East Gippsland Business Awards, 4928 Maffra and District Agricultural Pastoral and Horticultural Show, Questions without notice 4929 Honorary justices: government support, 4780 Mallacoota and District Historical Society: exhibition, 4929
Questions without notice CRISP, Mr (Mildura) Police: livestock and farm crime, 4966 Adjournment Cardross: sports equipment, 4915 Whooping cough: vaccination, 4855
MEMBERS INDEX
ASSEMBLY iii
Bills Questions without notice Electricity Industry Amendment (Transitional Feed-in Tariff Children: protection, 4861, 4863, 4864 Scheme) Bill 2011, 4888 Water Legislation Amendment (water Infrastructure Charges) Bill 2011, 4985 DUNCAN, Ms (Macedon)
Members statements Adjournment Mildura: home show, 4793 Wallaby Run, Gisborne: access, 4989 Red Cliffs Primary School: royal visit outing, 4794 Members statements Bushfires: royal commission recommendations, 4928 D’AMBROSIO, Ms (Mill Park) Petitions Bills Gisborne Secondary College: funding, 4783 Electricity Industry Amendment (Transitional Feed-in Tariff Medical practitioners: physician associates, 4783 Scheme) Bill 2011, 4880 Liquor Control Reform Further Amendment Bill 2011, 4782 Mines (Aluminium Agreement) Amendment Bill 2011, 4782 EDWARDS, Ms (Bendigo West) Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation Bill 2011, 4931 Bills Points of order, 4889 Electricity Industry Amendment (Transitional Feed-in Tariff Scheme) Bill 2011, 4889
DELAHUNTY, Mr (Lowan) (Minister for Sport and Recreation Members statements and Minister for Veterans’ Affairs) Maldon Folk Festival, 4796 Mount Tarrengower: hill climb, 4796 Adjournment Brimbank Gardens estate: air quality, 4920 Cardross: sports equipment, 4919 EREN, Mr (Lara) Gippsland East electorate: sports uniform grants, 4994 Bills Outer Suburban/Interface Services and Development Committee: livability inquiry, 4920 Transport Legislation Amendment (Public Transport Development Rodney electorate: flood recovery funding, 4919 Authority) Bill 2011, 4815
Members statements Members statements Natimuk Fringe Festival, 4931 Turkey: earthquake, 4925
Points of order, 4837 FOLEY, Mr (Albert Park)
DIXON, Mr (Nepean) (Minister for Education) Adjournment Canterbury Road Urban Forest: future, 4855 Adjournment Bills Moriac Primary School: rebuilding, 4919 Electricity Industry Amendment (Transitional Feed-in Tariff Scheme) Bill 2011, 4886 DONNELLAN, Mr (Narre Warren North) Points of order, 4867 Adjournment Questions without notice Belgrave-Hallam–Narre Warren North roads, Narre Warren North: safety, 4852 Rooming houses: regulation, 4866
Bills FYFFE, Mrs (Evelyn) (The Deputy Speaker) Water Legislation Amendment (water Infrastructure Charges) Bill 2011, 4959, 4970 Bills Points of order, 4861, 4862, 4863, 4945, 4982 Sentencing Amendment (Community Correction Reform) Bill 2011, 4850
MEMBERS INDEX iv ASSEMBLY
Members statements Members statements Lilydale to Warburton rail trail: bridge, 4925 Lyn Swinburne, 4792 St Mary’s House of Welcome, 4925 Petitions Questions without notice Children: Take a Break program, 4871 Royal visit: events, 4862 Planning: green wedge development, 4784 Schools: Doreen, 4871 Rulings, 4888, 4889, 4890, 4988, 4991, 4996 Whittlesea-Yea Road: safety, 4922
GARRETT, Ms (Brunswick) HALFPENNY, Ms (Thomastown)
Adjournment Adjournment Nicholson–Miller streets, Brunswick East: safety, 4913 Manufacturing: i-STEP program, 4987
Bills Members statements Transport Legislation Amendment (Public Transport Development Whittlesea City Little Athletics Centre, 4872 Authority) Bill 2011, 4812
Members statements HENNESSY, Ms (Altona) St Joseph’s Primary School, Brunswick West: centenary, 4873 Adjournment Petitions Anticorruption commission: opposition briefing, 4988 Victorian certificate of applied learning: funding, 4921 Bills
GIDLEY, Mr (Mount Waverley) Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission Bill 2011, 4869 Adjournment Justice Legislation Further Amendment Bill 2011, 4781 Public Prosecutions Amendment Bill 2011, 4781 Mount Waverley Secondary College: ministerial visit, 4853 Sentencing Amendment (Community Correction Reform) Bill Members statements 2011, 4836 Monash Volunteer Resource Centre, 4878 Serious Sex Offenders (Detention and Supervision) Amendment Bill 2011, 4783 Rotary: Monash charity golf day, 4878 Victorian Inspectorate Bill 2011, 4870 Points of order, 4828, 4888 Petitions Planning: green wedge development, 4921 GRALEY, Ms (Narre Warren South) Points of order, 4837, 4840, 4870 Adjournment
Youth: Berwick housing, 4853 HERBERT, Mr (Eltham) Members statements Members statements City of Casey: flood protection, 4930 Practically Green Festival: Kids Teaching Kids conference, 4795 Narre Warren South electorate: student leadership, 4876 St Helena Secondary College: arts and technology awards, 4878 Petitions Casey Hospital: funding, 4870 HODGETT, Mr (Kilsyth)
Adjournment GREEN, Ms (Yan Yean) Dining Room mission, Croydon, 4992 Bills Bills Water Legislation Amendment (water Infrastructure Charges) Bill 2011, 4956 Water Legislation Amendment (water Infrastructure Charges) Bill 2011, 4985
MEMBERS INDEX
ASSEMBLY v
Business of the house Ballarat Outrigger Academy, 4795 Program, 4787 Victorian certificate of applied learning: funding, 4879
Members statements KOTSIRAS, Mr (Bulleen) (Minister for Multicultural Affairs and Maroondah Prevention and Recovery Care: opening, 4797 Citizenship) Mooroolbark Football Club: awards, 4797 Members statements
HULLS, Mr (Niddrie) Turkey: earthquake, 4798
Business of the house LANGUILLER, Mr (Derrimut) Program, 4787 Adjournment Points of order, 4861, 4863, 4865, 4866, 4961, 4962, 4965, 4967, 4969, 4970 Brimbank Gardens estate: air quality, 4911
Bills HUTCHINS, Ms (Keilor) Transport Legislation Amendment (Public Transport Development Authority) Bill 2011, 4824 Adjournment Members statements Outer Suburban/Interface Services and Development Committee: livability inquiry, 4915 Republic of El Salvador: humanitarian assistance, 4793
Members statements LIM, Mr (Clayton) Breast Cancer Awareness Month, 4926 City of Brimbank: Places of Worship tour, 4926 Adjournment Victorian certificate of applied learning: funding, 4856 KAIROUZ, Ms (Kororoit) Members statements Members statements Victorian volunteer small grants program: closure, 4874 Peter Gelo, 4872 Turkey: earthquake, 4873 McCURDY, Mr (Murray Valley)
Bills KATOS, Mr (South Barwon) Water Legislation Amendment (water Infrastructure Charges) Bill Adjournment 2011, 4984 Moriac Primary School: rebuilding, 4916 Members statements
Bills Cobram Community House, 4926 Invergordon: closer settlement anniversary, 4926 Transport Legislation Amendment (Public Transport Development Authority) Bill 2011, 4814 Jenny Bennie and Josie Munro, 4926 Keep Australia Beautiful Victoria: awards, 4926 Petitions Show days: regional and rural Victoria, 4926 Bacchus Marsh: Avenue of Honour, 4784, 4922 Questions without notice Questions without notice Bushfires: royal commission recommendations, 4776 Environment: Communities for Nature grants, 4777
McGUIRE, Mr (Broadmeadows) KNIGHT, Ms (Ballarat West) Bills Bills Transport Legislation Amendment (Public Transport Development Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation Bill 2011, 4949 Authority) Bill 2011, 4821
Members statements Members statements Ballarat: parliamentary education visit, 4794 Broadmeadows electorate: government services building, 4931
MEMBERS INDEX vi ASSEMBLY
McINTOSH, Mr (Kew) (Minister for Corrections, Minister for Questions without notice Crime Prevention and Minister responsible for the establishment of an anti-corruption commission) Police: enterprise bargaining, 4780
Adjournment MILLER, Ms (Bentleigh) Mount Waverley Secondary College: ministerial visit, 4859 Occupational health and safety: national harmonisation, 4859 Adjournment Victorian certificate of applied learning: funding, 4859 Rail: Southland station, 4856 Whooping cough: vaccination, 4859 Members statements Youth: Berwick housing, 4859 Girl guides: Bentleigh electorate, 4930 Bills Jump 4 Toby, 4930 Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission Bill 2011, Royal Children’s Hospital: opening, 4930 4869, 4972, 4974 Public Interest Monitor Bill 2011, 4832, 4833 Questions without notice Serious Sex Offenders (Detention and Supervision) Amendment Problem gambling: advertising campaign, 4963 Bill 2011, 4783, 4905, 4907 Puppy farms: regulation, 4775 Victorian Inspectorate Bill 2011, 4870, 4976, 4980
Business of the house MORRIS, Mr (Mornington) Program, 4785 Bills Naming and suspension of member Transport Legislation Amendment (Public Transport Development Member for Mulgrave, 4968 Authority) Bill 2011, 4820
Members statements McLEISH, Ms (Seymour) Mornington sesquicentenary, 4878 Bills Tidy Towns awards, 4877 Transport Legislation Amendment (Public Transport Development Authority) Bill 2011, 4823 Questions without notice Water Legislation Amendment (water Infrastructure Charges) Bill Victorian Indigenous Honour Roll: establishment, 4867 2011, 4982 Rulings, 4828, 4831, 4982 Members statements Alexandra: community reading day, 4875 MULDER, Mr (Polwarth) (Minister for Public Transport and Questions without notice Minister for Roads) Bushfires: Marysville recovery, 4864 Adjournment Belgrave-Hallam–Narre Warren North roads, Narre Warren North: MADDEN, Mr (Essendon) safety, 4858 Canterbury Road Urban Forest: future, 4858 Members statements Healesville freeway reservation: future, 4918 Singapore: tourism infrastructure, 4927 Melton Highway: safety, 4857 Nicholson–Miller streets, Brunswick East: safety, 4917 MERLINO, Mr (Monbulk) Public transport: fares, 4918 Rail: Southland station, 4858 Adjournment Puffing Billy: funding, 4912 NAPTHINE, Dr (South-West Coast) (Minister for Ports, Minister Members statements for Regional Cities, Minister for Racing and Minister for Major Projects) Mount Lilydale Mercy College: art show, 4875 Sherbrooke Community School: building program, 4875 Adjournment
Petitions Anticorruption commission: opposition briefing, 4995 Beach Road, Black Rock: embankment, 4995 Puffing Billy: funding, 4870
MEMBERS INDEX
ASSEMBLY vii
Cycling: Upfield shared pathway, 4995 NOONAN, Mr (Williamstown) Manufacturing: i-STEP program, 4995 Preston Reservoir Adult Community Education: funding, 4995 Bills University of the Third Age: Frankston, 4995 Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation Bill 2011, 4936 Wallaby Run, Gisborne: access, 4995 Members statements Bills Newport Gardens Primary School: opening, 4791 Transport Legislation Amendment (Marine Safety and other Amendments) Bill 2011, 4921 NORTHE, Mr (Morwell) Points of order, 4965, 4969, 4988 Bills Questions without notice Electricity Industry Amendment (Transitional Feed-in Tariff Racing: Bendigo Cup, 4869 Scheme) Bill 2011, 4885 Sentencing Amendment (Community Correction Reform) Bill 2011, 4845 NARDELLA, Mr (Melton) Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation Bill 2011, 4934
Adjournment Members statements Melton Highway: safety, 4854 Carbon tax: economic impact, 4795
Bills Petitions Transport Legislation Amendment (Public Transport Development Lawn bowls: television coverage, 4922 Authority) Bill 2011, 4830
Points of order, 4946, 4996 O’BRIEN, Mr (Malvern) (Minister for Gaming, Minister for Consumer Affairs and Minister for Energy and Resources)
NEVILLE, Ms (Bellarine) Adjournment Electricity: smart meters, 4993 Bills Parks and Crown Land Legislation Amendment Bill 2011, 4783 Bills Transport Legislation Amendment (Public Transport Development Liquor Control Reform Further Amendment Bill 2011, 4782, 4895 Authority) Bill 2011, 4818 Mines (Aluminium Agreement) Amendment Bill 2011, 4782, 4898, 4899 Members statements Rotary Club of Ocean Grove: art show, 4924 Points of order, 4991 St Leonards Community Festival, 4924 Questions without notice Problem gambling: advertising campaign, 4963 NEWTON-BROWN, Mr (Prahran) Rooming houses: regulation, 4866
Members statements Astor Theatre, 4879 PALLAS, Mr (Tarneit) Fr Bob Maguire, 4879 Bills Helen Round, 4879 Prahran: mental health forum, 4879 Sentencing Amendment (Community Correction Reform) Bill 2011, 4849 Prahran Mission: Mullets for the Mission, 4879 Transport Legislation Amendment (Marine Safety and other Safe Schools Coalition Victoria: funding, 4879 Amendments) Bill 2011, 4921 St Kilda Primary School: fair, 4879 Sylvia Fahey, 4879 Members statements City of Wyndham: employment, 4878 Questions without notice Honorary justices: government support, 4780
MEMBERS INDEX viii ASSEMBLY
PANDAZOPOULOS, Mr (Dandenong) RYALL, Ms (Mitcham)
Bills Bills Transport Legislation Amendment (Public Transport Development Transport Legislation Amendment (Public Transport Development Authority) Bill 2011, 4809 Authority) Bill 2011, 4829
Members statements Members statements Doveton: reunion, 4790 Bill and Ruby Hoskins: 71st wedding anniversary, 4794 Keith and Gillian Horlock: 50th wedding anniversary, 4794 Marion Blaze, 4794 PERERA, Mr (Cranbourne) Motocross: KTM Ride4Kids, 4794 Bills Water: Tankulator, 4794 Sentencing Amendment (Community Correction Reform) Bill Points of order, 4831, 4837, 4890 2011, 4846
Members statements RYAN, Mr (Gippsland South) (Minister for Police and Emergency Frankston: graffiti strategy, 4798 Services, Minister for Bushfire Response and Minister for Wedge–Frankston-Dandenong roads, Carrum Downs: traffic Regional and Rural Development) management, 4798 Points of order, 4965, 4966
PIKE, Ms (Melbourne) Questions without notice Biofuel: Madowla Park project, 4868 Members statements Bushfires Royal Children’s Hospital: opening, 4926 Marysville recovery, 4864 royal commission recommendations, 4776 POWELL, Mrs (Shepparton) (Minister for Local Government and Former deputy commissioner of police: meeting, 4959, 4964 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs) Minister for Police and Emergency Services conduct, 4967, 4970 Bills former adviser, 4961 Transport Legislation Amendment (Public Transport Development ministerial staff, 4962 Authority) Bill 2011, 4810 Police: livestock and farm crime, 4966 Members statements
Aboriginals: war service exhibition, 4790 SCOTT, Mr (Preston) Questions without notice Adjournment Victorian Indigenous Honour Roll: establishment, 4867 Preston Reservoir Adult Community Education: funding, 4991
Bills RICHARDSON, Ms (Northcote) Sentencing Amendment (Community Correction Reform) Bill 2011, 4851 Adjournment Public transport: fares, 4914 Members statements Preston Reservoir Adult Community Education, 4797 Bills Transport Legislation Amendment (Public Transport Development Points of order, 4991 Authority) Bill 2011, 4798
Members statements SHAW, Mr (Frankston) Northcote High School: graduation ceremony, 4929 Adjournment University of the Third Age: Frankston, 4989
Bills Transport Legislation Amendment (Public Transport Development Authority) Bill 2011, 4816
MEMBERS INDEX
ASSEMBLY ix
Members statements THOMPSON, Mr (Sandringham) Frankston District Tigersharks: presentations, 4874 Adjournment Frankston electorate: student leaders, 4874 Greater Frankston Business Chamber: business expo, 4874 Beach Road, Black Rock: embankment, 4988 Lakewood child care centre: closure, 4874 Bills Melbourne Prayer Breakfast, 4873 Sentencing Amendment (Community Correction Reform) Bill OzChild: nurturing day for carers, 4874 2011, 4842, 4843
Members statements SMITH, Mr R. (Warrandyte) (Minister for Environment and Australian Hellenic Memorial: 10th anniversary, 4873 Climate Change and Minister for Youth Affairs) Black Rock House: 155th anniversary, 4873
Bills Questions without notice Parks and Crown Land Legislation Amendment Bill 2011, 4783, Victorian Funds Management Corporation: reform, 4960 4938, 4939
Points of order, 4936 TILLEY, Mr (Benambra) Questions without notice Members statements Environment: Communities for Nature grants, 4777 Albury Wodonga Community College: Schools First funding, 4872 SOUTHWICK, Mr (Caulfield) Sergeant Ceryn Campbell, 4872 Rulings, 4837, 4840 Members statements Courage to Care: exhibition, 4796 Gilad Shalit, 4796 VICTORIA, Mrs (Bayswater) Glen Eira College: Just BU panel, 4797 Sukkot in the City, 4797 Adjournment Carbon tax: Bayswater electorate, 4911
SPEAKER, The (Hon. K. M. Smith) Bills Sentencing Amendment (Community Correction Reform) Bill Absence of ministers, 4775 2011, 4848
Business of the house Business of the house Notices of motion: removal, 4783, 4921 Program, 4788
Naming and suspension of member Members statements Member for Mulgrave, 4968 Country Fire Authority: Bayswater brigade, 4792 Melbourne International Arts Festival, 4792 Rulings, 4776, 4777, 4778, 4779, 4780, 4861, 4862, 4863, 4864, 4865, 4866, 4867, 4870, 4960, 4961, 4962, 4963, 4964, 4965, Mildura: arts facilities, 4792 4966, 4967, 4968, 4969, 4970 VCA Foundation, 4792
SYKES, Dr (Benalla) WAKELING, Mr (Ferntree Gully)
Bills Bills Water Legislation Amendment (water Infrastructure Charges) Bill Sentencing Amendment (Community Correction Reform) Bill 2011, 4954 2011, 4839
Members statements Members statements Benalla electorate: Advancing Country Towns program, 4877 Ferntree Gully electorate: student leaders lunch, 4791 Ferntree Gully North Primary School: production, 4791 Questions without notice Friends of Koolunga, 4791 Water: trading agreement, 4779 Knox Churches Soccer Club: funding, 4791 Robert Ives, 4791
MEMBERS INDEX x ASSEMBLY
Tasty Trucks, 4791 WELLS, Mr (Scoresby) (Treasurer)
Petitions Bills Lawn bowls: television coverage, 4922 State Taxation Acts Further Amendment Bill 2011, 4782, 4902, Puppy farms: abolition, 4870 4903
Points of order, 4840 Questions without notice Police: enterprise bargaining, 4775, 4777, 4778 Public sector: government wages policy, 4775 WALSH, Mr (Swan Hill) (Minister for Agriculture and Food Security and Minister for Water) Victorian Funds Management Corporation: reform, 4960
Adjournment WOOLDRIDGE, Ms (Doncaster) (Minister for Mental Health, Timber industry: government policy, 4859 Minister for Women’s Affairs and Minister for Community Services) Bills Domestic Animals Amendment (Puppy Farm Enforcement and Adjournment Other Matters) Bill 2011, 4781, 4782 Dining Room mission, Croydon, 4994
Members statements Bills Tyrell College: community partnership, 4924 Children’s Services Amendment Bill 2011, 4951
Questions without notice Members statements Desalination plant: progress, 4964 Breast Cancer Awareness Month, 4925 Water: trading agreement, 4779 Rail: Doncaster, 4924
Questions without notice WATT, Mr (Burwood) Children: protection, 4861, 4863, 4865 Members statements Women: Australian Institute of Company Directors scholarships, 4865 Ashburton Support Services: annual general meeting, 4930 Ashwood, Ashburton and Chadstone Public Tenants Group: annual general meeting, 4929 WREFORD, Ms (Mordialloc) Glendi Dimitria festival, 4930 Our Lady’s Primary School, Wattle Park: fete, 4929 Bills Rowen Street Kindergarten: family fun day, 4929 Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation Bill 2011, 4944 St Benedict’s Primary School: art show, 4929 Members statements St Michael’s Parish Primary School: art show, 4929 Governor of Victoria Export Awards: Mordialloc electorate, 4927 Points of order, 4831 Moorabbin Airport: chamber of commerce, 4927 Mordialloc Preschool: 50th anniversary, 4927
WELLER, Mr (Rodney) Questions without notice Desalination plant: progress, 4964 Adjournment Rodney electorate: flood recovery funding, 4913 WYNNE, Mr (Richmond) Bills Transport Legislation Amendment (Public Transport Development Bills Authority) Bill 2011, 4804 Planning and Environment Amendment (Schools) Bill 2011, 4781 Water Legislation Amendment (water Infrastructure Charges) Bill 2011, 4957 Points of order, 4866
Members statements Relay for Life: Echuca-Moama, 4874
Rulings, 4936