DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography and Further Reading

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliography and Further Reading Herring: Medical Law and Ethics, 7th edition Bibliography and Further Reading Aasi, G.-H. (2003) ‘Islamic legal and ethical views on organ transplantation and donation’ Zygon 38: 725. Abdallah, H., Shenfield, F., and Latarche, E. (1998) ‘Statutory information for the children born of oocyte donation in the UK’ Human Reproduction 13: 1106. Abdallah, S., Daar, S., and Khitamy, A. (2001) ‘Islamic Bioethics’ Canadian Medical Association Journal 9: 164. Abortion Law Reform Association (1997) A Report on NHS Abortion Services (ALRA). Abortion Rights (2004) Eroding Women’s Rights to Abortion (Abortion Rights). Abortion Rights (2007) Campaign for a Modern Abortion Law Launched as Poll Confirms Overwhelming Public Support (Abortion Rights). Academy of Medical Sciences (2011) Animals Containing Human Material (Academy of Medical Sciences). ACC (2004) Annual Report (ACC). Ackernman, J. (1998) ‘Assisted suicide, terminal illness, severe disability, and the double standard’ in M. Battin, R. Rhodes, and A. Silvers (eds) Physician Assisted Suicide (Routledge). Action for ME (2005) The Times Reports on Biological Research (Action for ME).Adenitire, J. (2016) ‘A conscience-based human right to be ‘doctor death’’ Public Law 613. Ad Hoc Advisory Group on the Operation of NHS Research Ethics Committees (2005) Report (DoH). Adams, T., Budden, M., Hoare, C. et al (2004) ‘Lessons from the central Hampshire electronic health record pilot project: issues of data protection and consent’ British Medical Journal 328: 871. Admiral, P. (1996) ‘Voluntary euthanasia’ in S. McLean (ed.) Death Dying and the Law (Dartmouth). Adshead, G. (2003) ‘Commentary on Szasz’ Journal of Medical Ethics 29: 230. Advisory Group on the Ethics of Xenotransplantation (1996) Report (DoH). Affleck, P. (2009) ‘Is it ethical to deny genetic research participants individualized re-sults?’ Journal of Medical Ethics 35: 209. © Jonathan Herring, 2018. All rights reserved. Herring: Medical Law and Ethics, 7th edition Agar, N. (2004) Liberal Eugenics (Cambridge University Press). Agar, N. (2007) ‘Embryonic potential and stem cells’ Bioethics 21: 198. Agar N. (2012) Humanity’s end (MIT Press). Agar N. (2015) ‘Moral bioenhancement is dangerous’ Journal of Medical Ethics 41: 343. Agar, N. and McDonald, J. (2017) ‘Human Enhancement and the Story of Job’ Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 26: 449. Age Concern (1999) Debate of the Age (Age Concern). Agich, G. (2003) Dependence and Autonomy in Old Age: An Ethical Framework for Long Term Care (Cambridge University Press). Agich, G. and Siemionov, M. (2005) ‘Until they have faces: the ethics of facial allograft transplantation’ Journal of Medical Ethics 31: 707. Ahlin, J., (2017) ‘The impossibility of reliably determining the authenticity of desires: implications for informed consent’ Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy forthcoming. Ahola-Launonen, J. (2015) ‘The Evolving Idea of Social Responsibility in Bioethics’ Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24: 204. Ahuja, J. (2015) ‘Liability for psychological and psychiatric harm: the road to recovery’ Medical Law Review 23: 27 Ahuja, K., Mostyn, B., and Simons, E. (1997) ‘Egg sharing and egg donation: attitudes of British egg donors and recipients’ Human Reproduction 12: 2845. Ajaj, A., Singh, M., and Abdulla, A. (2001) ‘Should elderly patients be told they have cancer?’ British Medical Journal 323: 1160. Akhtar, S. (2016) ‘Respecting Embedded Disability’ Journal of Applied Philosophy 33: 33., Akker, van der, O. (1999) ‘Organizational selection and assessment of women entering a surrogacy agreement in the UK’ Human Reproduction 14: 262. Alan Guttmacher Institute (2017) Facts on Induced Abortion Worldwide (AGI). Albin, R. (2005) ‘Sham surgery controls are mitigated trolleys’ Journal of Medical Ethics 31: 149. Alcohol Concern (2002) Alcohol and Teenage Pregnancy (Alcohol Concern). Alderson, P. (2002) ‘Prenatal counselling and images of disability’ in D. Dickenson (ed.) Ethics Issues in Maternal-Foetal Medicine (Cambridge University Press). © Jonathan Herring, 2018. All rights reserved. Herring: Medical Law and Ethics, 7th edition Alderson, P., Madden, M., Oakley, A. et al (1995) ‘Access and multicentre research’ Journal of Medical Ethics 105: 13. Alldridge, P. (1994) ‘Who wants to live for ever?’ in S. Lee and D. Morgan (eds) Death Rites: Law and Ethics at the End of Life (Routledge). Alldridge, P. and Morgan, D. (1992) ‘Ending life’ New Law Journal 142: 1536. Alghrani, A. (2005) ‘Deciding the fate of frozen embryos’ Medical Law Review 13: 244. Alghrani, A. (2008) ‘Regulating the reproductive revolution: ectogenesis—a regulatory minefield?’ in M. Freeman (ed.) Law and Bioethics (Oxford University Press). Alghrani, A. (2016) ‘Yes, uterus transplants should be publicly funded!’ Journal of Medical Ethics 42: 566. Alghrani, A. and Brazier, M. (2011) ‘What is it? Whose is it? Repositioning the fetus in the context of research?’ Cambridge Law Journal 70: 51. Alghrani, A., Brazier, M., Farrell, A-M, Griffiths, D., and Allen, D. (2011) ‘Healthcare scandals in the NHS: crime and punishment’ Journal of Medical Ethics 37: 230. Alghrani, A. and Harris, J. (2006) ‘Reproductive liberty: should the foundation of families be regulated’ Child and Family Law Quarterly 18: 191. Al-Herz, W. Haider, H., Al-Bahhar,M. and Sadeq, A. (2013) ‘Honorary authorship in biomedical journals: how common is it and why does it exist?’ Journal of Medical Ethics online. Allain, J. (2011) ‘Trafficking of persons for the removal of organs and the admission of guilt of a South African hospital’ Medical Law Review 19: 171. Allen, J. and McNamara, B. (2011) ‘Reconsidering the value of consent in biobank research’ Bioethics 25: 155. Allen, M. (2004) ‘The clinical trial directive will improve trial quality’ in Healthwatch Newsletter 53: 1. Allen, M. (2007) ‘Re-detention after recent discharge: a role for judicial review?’ Medical Law Review 15: 253. Allen, N. (2007) ‘Re-detention after recent discharge: a role for judicial review?’ Medical Law Review 15: 253. Allen, N. (2010) ‘The Bournewood Gap (as amended?)’ Medical Law Review 18: 78. Allmark, P. (2002) ‘Can there be an ethics of care?’ in K. Fulford, D. Dickenson, and T. Murray (eds) Healthcare Ethics and Human Values (Blackwell). © Jonathan Herring, 2018. All rights reserved. Herring: Medical Law and Ethics, 7th edition Allsop, J. and Mulcahy, L. (1998) ‘Maintaining professional identity: doctors’ responses to complaints’ Sociology of Health & Illness 20: 802. Almqvist, E. (1999) ‘A worldwide assessment of the frequency of suicide, suicide at-tempts, or psychiatric hospitalization after predictive testing for Huntingdon Disease’ American Journal of Human Genetics 64: 1293. Al-Shahi, R. and Warlow, C. (2000) ‘Using patient identifiable data for observational reseach and audit’ British Medical Journal 321: 1031. Alvar Gonzalez, D. (2016) ‘The Constitution of the Human Embryo as Substantial Change’ Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 41: 172. Alward, P. (2002) ‘Thomson, the right to life, and partial birth abortion or two MULES for Sister Sarah’ Journal of Medical Ethics 28: 99. Amarasekara, K. and Bagaric, M. (2002) Euthanasia, Morality and the Law (Peter Lang). Ancell, A. and Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2017) ‘How to Allow Conscientious Objection in Medicine While Protecting Patient Rights’ Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 26: 120. Anderson, M. (2006) ‘Xenotransplantation: a bioethical evaluation’ Journal of Medical Ethics 32: 205. Anderson, P. (1992) ‘Good death’ Tricycle 36. Anderson, R., Brown, I., Dowty, T. et al (2009) Database State (Joseph Rowntree). Andorno, R. (2004) ‘The right not to know: an autonomy based approach’ Journal of Medical Ethics 30: 435. Andreou, A. (2008) ‘Making a clean break: addiction and Ulysses contracts’ Bioethics 22: 25. Andrews, K. (1989) ‘Recovery of patients after four months or more in the persistent vegetative state’ British Medical Journal 306: 1600. Andrews, K., Murphy, L., Munday, R. et al (1996) ‘Misdiagnosis of the vegetative state’ British Medical Journal 313: 13. Andrews, L. (2001) Future Perfect: Confronting Decision about Genetics (Cambridge University Press). Andrews, L. and Nelkin, D. (2001) Body Bazaar: The Market for Human Tissue (Crown). Angell, E. and Dixon-Woods, M. (2009) ‘Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval?’ Journal of Medical Ethics 35: 130. Angell, E., Sutton, A., Windridge, K. et al (2006) ‘Consistency in decision making by research ethics committees: a controlled comparison’ Journal of Medical Ethics 32: 662. © Jonathan Herring, 2018. All rights reserved. Herring: Medical Law and Ethics, 7th edition Annas, G. (1986) ‘Pregnant women as fetal containers’ Hastings Centre Report 16: 13. Annas, G. (1990) ‘Nancy Cruzon and the right to die’ New England Journal of Medicine 323: 670. Annas, G. (1998) ‘The bell tolls for right to assisted suicide’ in L. Emanuel (ed.) Regulat-ing How We Die (Harvard University Press). Annas, G. and Glantz, L. (1986) ‘Rules for research in nursing homes’ New English Journal of Medicine 315: 1157. Anon (2004a) ‘Young girls seek IVF2’ Bionews, 7 July 2004. Anon (2004b) ‘Woman denied IVF because of wrong hair colour’, Bionews, 19 July 2004. Anon (2005) ‘Fears over UK egg and sperm donor shortages’, Bionews, 29 March 2005. Anscombe, G. (1981) ‘Ethical problems in the management of some severely handi-capped children’ Journal of Medical Ethics 7: 122. Anstey, K. (2002) ‘Are attempts to have impaired children justifiable?’ Journal of Medical
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Right to End-Of-Life Palliative Care and a Dignified Death 1
    THE RIGHT TO END-OF-LIFE PALLIATIVE CARE AND A DIGNIFIED DEATH 1 CONTRIBUTION FROM UN-ECLAC FOR THE EXPERT GROUP MEETING ON “CARE AND OLDER PERSONS: LINKS TO DECENT WORK, MIGRATION AND GENDER” 5-7 December 2017 United Nations Headquarters, New York – Secretariat Building, Conference Room S -2725 1. The right to life and dignity in old age The approach of death involves a number of activities, as different practicalities pertaining to the end of life have to be organized. It is essential for these activities —which are carried out by family members, caregivers and medical personnel, among others— to meet standards that ensure appropriate living conditions until such time as clinical and biological death supervenes. Older persons are among the most vulnerable to death. Their position in the age structure of society becomes almost by default a predictor of their demise. This social construction of old age prompts a particular way of treating the elderly: “The social structures in which [older persons] are involved are oriented to the fact of their forthcoming death; their families have become increasingly independent of them; the scope of references to the ‘future’ has progressively narrowed; ‘dying’ is of considerably less consequence for others, e.g., it is not felt to be a matter which requires drastic revision of others’ life plans, as does the ‘fact’ that a young adult is dying” (Sudnow, 1967).2 Older persons are sometimes treated like cadavers even when they are, clinically and biologically, still alive. This occurs especially in cases where they are dying or suffering from terminal illnesses, although they do not necessarily have to be in this predicament to receive degrading treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • End of Life and the European Convention on Human Rights
    Factsheet – End of life and the ECHR April 2021 This Factsheet does not bind the Court and is not exhaustive End of life and the European Convention on Human Rights Judgments of the Court Pretty v. the United Kingdom 29 April 2002 (Chamber judgment) The applicant was dying of motor neurone disease, a degenerative disease affecting the muscles for which there is no cure. Given that the final stages of the disease are distressing and undignified, she wished to be able to control how and when she died. Because of her disease, the applicant could not commit suicide alone and wanted her husband to help her. But, although it was not a crime in English law to commit suicide, assisting a suicide was. As the authorities refused her request, the applicant complained that her husband had not been guaranteed freedom from prosecution if he helped her die. The Court held that there had been no violation of Article 2 (right to life) of the Convention, finding that the right to life could not, without a distortion of language, be interpreted as conferring the diametrically opposite right, namely a right to die. The Court also held that there had been no violation of Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) of the Convention. Even if it could not but be sympathetic to the applicant’s apprehension that without the possibility of ending her life she faced the prospect of a distressing death, nonetheless, the positive obligation on the part of the State which had been invoked would require that the State sanction actions intended to terminate life, an obligation that could not be derived from Article 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Hitler's Unwanted Children
    1 Hitler's Unwanted Children Sally M. Rogow Half a century old, the Holocaust still mocks the idea of civilization and threatens our sense of ourselves as spiritual creatures. Its undiminished impact on human memory leaves wide open the unsettled and unsettling question of why this should be so. (Langer, 1994 p. 184) The years of disaster have enmeshed all of us in guilt deeply enough, as it is, and the task of the day is to find bridges that will lead us to deeper insight. (Mitscherlich and Mielke, 1947, p.151) Childhood in Nazi Germany was cast in the mythic illusion of a super race. Children who did not meet the social or biological criteria of " perfect" children were removed from their homes and communities, isolated in institutions, hospitals, work and concentration camps, and many thousands were murdered (Aly, 1993; Burleigh, 1994; Friedlander, 1994; Peukert, 1987). It is a myth that only children with severe disabilities were killed or that the killings stopped in 1941; the last child was killed almost a month after the war was over. Unwanted children were orphans, children in care because of emotional or behavior problems, adolescent non-conformists as well as children with physical disabilities or mental handicaps (in addition to Jewish, Gypsy and non-white children). The campaign to remove unwanted children from the community was not only the result of Nazi racial biology and eugenics, it was part and parcel of the effort to impose control and conformity on the entire German population. In a climate of social chaos, economic depression and poverty, the Nazis created an economy of privilege and conflicting spheres of jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Complexity of Nurse Practitioners' Role in Facilitating a Dignified
    Journal of Personalized Medicine Article Complexity of Nurse Practitioners’ Role in Facilitating a Dignified Death for Long-Term Care Home Residents during the COVID-19 Pandemic Shirin Vellani 1,2 , Veronique Boscart 1,3, Astrid Escrig-Pinol 1,4 , Alexia Cumal 1,2 , Alexandra Krassikova 1,5 , Souraya Sidani 6, Nancy Zheng 1, Lydia Yeung 1 and Katherine S. McGilton 1,2,* 1 KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute–University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2A2, Canada; [email protected] (S.V.); [email protected] (V.B.); [email protected] (A.E.-P.); [email protected] (A.C.); [email protected] (A.K.); [email protected] (N.Z.); [email protected] (L.Y.) 2 Lawrence S. Bloomberg, Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P8, Canada 3 Canadian Institute for Seniors Care, Conestoga College, Kitchener, ON N2G 4M4, Canada 4 Mar Nursing School, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08002 Barcelona, Spain 5 Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1V7, Canada 6 Daphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 1Z5, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Due to the interplay of multiple complex and interrelated factors, long-term care (LTC) home residents are increasingly vulnerable to sustaining poor outcomes in crisis situations such as Citation: Vellani, S.; Boscart, V.; the COVID-19 pandemic. While death is considered an unavoidable end for LTC home residents, Escrig-Pinol, A.; Cumal, A.; the importance of facilitating a good death is one of the primary goals of palliative and end-of-life Krassikova, A.; Sidani, S.; Zheng, N.; care.
    [Show full text]
  • Physician-Assisted Suicide and Voluntary Euthanasia: Some Relevant Differences John Deigh
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 88 Article 14 Issue 3 Spring Spring 1998 Physician-Assisted Suicide and Voluntary Euthanasia: Some Relevant Differences John Deigh Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation John Deigh, Physician-Assisted Suicide and Voluntary Euthanasia: Some Relevant Differences, 88 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 1155 (Spring 1998) This Criminal Law is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4169/98/8803-1155 THE JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW& CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 88, No. 3 Copyright 0 1998 by Northwestern University, School of Law Prinfd in U.SA. PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED SUICIDE AND VOLUNTARY EUTHANASIA: SOME RELEVANT DIFFERENCES JOHN DEIGH" Yale Kamisar, in a series of influential articles on physician- assisted suicide and voluntary active euthanasia, has written elo- quently in opposition to legalizing these practices.1 Today he revisits the first of these articles, his seminal 1958 article, Some Non-Religious Views Against Proposed "Mercy-Killing"Legislation. 2 In that paper Professor Kamisar used the distinction between the law on the books and the law in action to quiet concerns about the harsh consequences of a blanket prohibition on mercy kill- ing. A blanket prohibition, after all, if strictly applied, would impose criminal punishment on physicians and relatives whose complicity in bringing about the death of a patient, or loved one was justified by the dying person's desperate condition and lucid wish to die.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Interstate and Overseas Travel Undertaken by Members of Parliament Funded by the Imprest System
    REPORT OF INTERSTATE AND OVERSEAS TRAVEL UNDERTAKEN BY MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FUNDED BY THE IMPREST SYSTEM FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED 30 JUNE 2011 This report contains a summary of all interstate and overseas travel undertaken by Members of Parliament on official business funded by the Imprest system. REPORT OF INTERSTATE AND OVERSEAS TRAVEL UNDERTAKEN BY MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED 30 JUNE 2011 FUNDED BY THE IMPREST SYSTEM MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT PARLIAMENT TRAVEL - IMPREST SYSTEM INTERSTATE TRAVEL I BRITZA MLA (M) 08-Apr-11 11-Apr-11 HOBART INVITED TO SPEAK TO KAREN $3,037 PEOPLE AND MEETINGS WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF STATESIDE CONSTRUCTIONS J QUIGLEY MLA (M) 17-Apr-11 20-Apr-11 SYDNEY VARIOUS MEETINGS FOR $1,630 TOURISM AND TRAINING PROJECT P TINLEY MLA (M) 19-Apr-11 26-Apr-11 CANBERRA, SERIES OF MEETINGS $4,080 SYDNEY RELATED TO WESTERN AUSTRALIA HON T STEPHENS MLA (M) 25-Apr-11 01-May-11 CANBERRA, MEETINGS WITH MINISTERIAL $4,227 SYDNEY OFFICE STAFF IN CANBERRA AND MEETING IN REFERENCE TO SPONSORSHIP OF AN INDIGENOUS PROJECT J WOOLLARD MLA (M) 02-May-11 06-May-11 MELBOURNE VARIOUS MEETINGS $4,678 REGARDING EARLY CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND EDUCATION T SIMPSON MLA (M) 13-May-11 15-May-11 HOBART DEAF AUSTRALIA INC. $1,884 NATIONAL CONFERENCE AND 25TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION L BAKER MLA (M) 13-May-11 15-May-11 BRISBANE NATIONAL LABOR WOMENS $1,974 CONFERENCE C MARTIN MLA (M) 13-May-11 16-May-11 BRISBANE NATIONAL LABOR WOMENS $4,577 CONFERENCE J FREEMAN MLA (M) 14-May-11 15-May-11 BRISBANE NATIONAL LABOR WOMENS $4,502 CONFERENCE
    [Show full text]
  • DAVID S. COHEN Drexel University Thomas R
    DAVID S. COHEN Drexel University Thomas R. Kline School of Law 3320 Market St. Philadelphia, PA 19104 (215)571-4714 [email protected] TEACHING EXPERIENCE DREXEL UNIVERSITY THOMAS R. KLINE SCHOOL OF LAW, Philadelphia, PA 2006-current Professor of Law Teach Constitutional Law courses and Sex, Gender, and the Law. AWARDS: Dean Jennifer L. Rosato Excellence in the Classroom Award (2009, 2010, 2012, 2015, 2016) Abortion Care Network Person of the Year (2016) Center for Reproductive Rights Innovation in Scholarship Award (2015) UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW SCHOOL, Philadelphia, PA 2003-06 Lecturer-in-Law Taught upper-level seminar each spring entitled “Sex Discrimination and the Law.” UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, Philadelphia, PA 2004-05 Adjunct Professor Taught undergraduate seminar each fall entitled “Law and Social Policy of Sex and Reproduction.” LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY, Brooklyn, NY 2000-01 Adjunct Assistant Professor Developed and taught graduate-level political science classes entitled “The American Constitution and Political System” and “Current Topics in Law and Politics.” EDUCATION COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, J.D. 1997 Honors: Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar, 1994-97 Public Interest Commitment Award Columbia Human Rights Fellowship Activities: Columbia Human Rights Law Review, Managing Editor/Head Articles Editor Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, Articles Editor Professor Kimberlé Crenshaw, Research Assistant DARTMOUTH COLLEGE, B.A. in Philosophy with Women’s Studies minor, 1994 JUDICIAL CLERKSHIPS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, NINTH CIRCUIT, Santa Ana, CA 1998-99 Judicial Law Clerk for the Honorable Warren J. Ferguson 1 SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY, Trenton, NJ 1997-98 Judicial Law Clerk for the Honorable Alan B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Constitutional Status of Morals Legislation
    Kentucky Law Journal Volume 98 | Issue 1 Article 2 2009 The onsC titutional Status of Morals Legislation John Lawrence Hill Indiana University-Indianapolis Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Law and Society Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Recommended Citation Hill, John Lawrence (2009) "The onC stitutional Status of Morals Legislation," Kentucky Law Journal: Vol. 98 : Iss. 1 , Article 2. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj/vol98/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kentucky Law Journal by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TKenf]iky Law Jornal VOLUME 98 2009-2010 NUMBER I ARTICLES The Constitutional Status of Morals Legislation John Lawrence Hiff TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION I. MORALS LEGISLATION AND THE HARM PRINCIPLE A. Some Difficulties with the Concept of "MoralsLegislation" B. The Near Irrelevance of the PhilosophicDebate C. The Concept of "Harm" II. DEFINING THE SCOPE OF THE PRIVACY RIGHT IN THE CONTEXT OF MORALS LEGISLATION III. MORALS LEGISLATION AND THE PROBLEMS OF RATIONAL BASIS REVIEW A. The 'RationalRelation' Test in Context B. The Concept of a Legitimate State Interest IV. MORALITY AS A LEGITIMATE STATE INTEREST: FIVE TYPES OF MORAL PURPOSE A. The Secondary or IndirectPublic Effects of PrivateActivity B. Offensive Conduct C. Preventingthe Corruptionof Moral Character D. ProtectingEssential Values andSocial Institutions E.
    [Show full text]
  • Child Euthanasia: Should We Just Not Talk About It?
    Luc Bovens Child euthanasia: should we just not talk about it? Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Bovens, Luc (2015) Child euthanasia: should we just not talk about it? Journal of Medical Ethics, 41 (8). pp. 630-634. ISSN 0306-6800 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102329 © 2015 British Medical Journal Publishing Group This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/61046/ Available in LSE Research Online: July 2015 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Child Euthanasia: Should we just not talk about it? Luc Bovens, LSE – Department of Philosophy, Logic, and Scientific Method, Houghton Street, London, WC2A2AE, UK, email: [email protected]; Tel: +44- 2079556822. Keywords: Euthanasia, Children, Decision-Making, End-of-Life, Paediatrics Word count: 4877 words Abstract. Belgium has recently extended its euthanasia legislation to minors, making it the first legislation in the world that does not specify any age limit.
    [Show full text]
  • The Epidemiology of Abortion and Its Prevention in Chile, 79(5) Rev
    Gene Gene Start Gene End Motif Start Motif End Motif Strand Exon Start Exon End HS Start HS End Distance NLGN4X 5808082 6146706 5821352 5821364 gtggccacggcgg ‑ 5821117 5821907 5811910 5813910 7442 AFF2 147582138 148082193 148048477 148048489 ccaccatcacctc + 148048319 148048609 148036319 148040319 8158 NLGN3 70364680 70391051 70386983 70386995 gtggatatggtgg + 70386860 70387650 70371089 70377089 9894 MECP2 153287263 153363188 153296166 153296178 gtggtgatggtgg ‑ 153295685 153296901 153306976 153308976 10798 FRMPD4 12156584 12742642 12739916 12739928 ccaccatggccgc + 12738647 12742642 12721454 12727454 12462 PHF8 53963112 54071569 54012352 54012364 ccaccatgtcctc ‑ 54012339 54012382 54025089 54033089 12725 RAB39B 154487525 154493852 154493567 154493579 cctccatggccgc ‑ 154493358 154493852 154478566 154480566 13001 FRMPD4 12156584 12742642 12736309 12736321 ggggcaagggagg + 12735619 12736909 12721454 12727454 14867 GRPR 16141423 16171641 16170710 16170722 cctccgtggccac + 16170378 16171641 16208454 16211454 37732 AFF2 147582138 148082193 148079262 148079274 cccccgtcaccac + 148072740 148082193 148036319 148040319 38943 SH3KBP1 19552082 19905744 19564111 19564123 cctccttatcctc ‑ 19564039 19564168 19610454 19614454 46331 PDZD4 153067622 153096003 153070331 153070343 cccccttctcctc ‑ 153067622 153070355 153013976 153018976 51355 SLC6A8 152953751 152962048 152960611 152960623 ccaccctgacccc + 152960528 152962048 153013976 153018976 53353 FMR1 146993468 147032647 147026533 147026545 gaggacaaggagg + 147026463 147026571 147083193 147085193 56648 HNRNPH2
    [Show full text]
  • Dr Andrew Hilson FRCP
    Assisted dying survey 2014 Consultation document Why is the RCP consulting on this issue? In 2006, following the introduction into the House of Lords of Lord Joffe's Assisted Dying for the Terminally Ill Bill, the RCP asked our fellows and members for their views on whether or not the law should be changed. Another, similar, private member's bill, in the name of Lord Falconer of Thoroton, is now before the House of Lords. Given this context, RCP Council believes that it should again provide fellows and members with the opportunity to review how RCP positions itself in this debate. While recognising that this is a contentious and difficult issue for many people, the decision was taken at RCP’s Council on 15 July 2014 to consider this issue. A special meeting of RCP Council took place on 30 July and decided to formally consult on this issue. In order to present a united view of the medical profession, this consultation document has been informed by the document used in 2013 by the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) to consult with its members and fellows. We are grateful to the RCGP for allowing us to update and share their consultation document. Definitions While the term 'assisted dying' has no real meaning in law, we have chosen to interpret it as the supply by a doctor of a lethal dose of drugs to a patient who is terminally ill, who meets certain criteria and who requests those drugs in order that they might be used by the person concerned to end his or her life.
    [Show full text]
  • Attitude of Doctors Toward Euthanasia in Delhi, India
    Published online: 2019-04-05 Original Article AAttitudettitude ooff ddoctorsoctors ttowardoward eeuthanasiauthanasia iinn DDelhi,elhi, IIndiandia ABSTRACT Introduction: Deliberation over euthanasia has been enduring for an extended period of time. On one end, there are populaces talking for the sacrosanctity of life and on the other end, there are those, who promote individual independence. All over the world professionals from different areas have already spent mammoth period over the subject. A large number of cases around the world have explored the boundaries of current legal distinctions, drawn between legitimate and nonlegitimate instances of ending the life. The term euthanasia was derived from the Greek words “eu” and “thanatos” which means “good death” or “easy death.” It is also known as mercy killing. Euthanasia literally means putting a person to painless death especially in case of incurable suffering or when life becomes purposeless as a result of mental or physical handicap. Objective: To study the attitude of doctors toward euthanasia in Delhi. Methodology: It was a questionnaire based descriptive cross-sectional study carried out between July 2014 and December 2014. The study population included Doctors from 28 hospitals in Delhi both public and private. Equal numbers of doctors from four specialties were included in this study (50 oncologists, 50 hematologists, 50 psychiatrists, and 50 intensivists). Demographic questionnaire, as well as the Euthanasia Attitude Scale (EAS), a 30 items Likert-scale questionnaire developed by (Holloway, Hayslip and Murdock, 1995) was used to measure attitude toward Euthanasia. The scale uses both positively (16 items) and negatively (14 items) worded statements to control the effect of acquiescence.
    [Show full text]