2012-BU18.1 TTC Pres DEC 6.Ppt

t e t g e d g d u u B B g g n n i i t t a a r r e e p p O d O (Agency Name) n Toronto Transit Commission 0 a l 1

a 2012 Recommended Operating Budget & 0

t 2012 Recommended Operating Budget & i 2 p

a 2012 –2021 Capital Budget and Plan d 2012 –2021 Capital Budget and Plan C e d d e n d e n e m m m m o o c c e e R R f f f a f t a S t Dec. XX, 2011 S

DDeecceemmbbeer r 2 2, ,5 5, ,6 6, ,2 200111 t Agenda e t g e d g d u u B B g g • Overview n n i i t t a a r r e • 2011 Service Performance e p p O d O • 2012 Staff Recommended Operating Budget n 0 a l 1 a 0 t • Capital Overview i 2 p a d C e • 2011 Capital Performance d d e n d e n • 2012–2021 Staff Recommended Capital Budget & Plan e m m m m o o c c e e R R f f f a f t a S t Dec. XX, 2011 S Overview t TTC Operating Budget e g d u B g n i t a r e p O 0 2 1 0 2 d e d n e m m o c e R f f a t S

4 t Key Service Objectives e g d u

B Accommodate ridership growth consistent with g n Commission-approved service standards i t a r e p O 0 2 1 0 2 d e d n e m m o c e R f f a t S

5 t 2012 Program Map e g d u Toronto Transit Commission To provide safe, reliable, courteous and efficient regular transit services to the public B g

Conventional Conventional Conventional Wheel-Trans n Conventional Transit Transit Transit Conventional Transit Fuel & Wheel-Trans i Transit Fleet Infrastructure Management Wheel-Trans Wheel-Trans Transit Fuel & Management Transit Energy Transit Transit Fleet t Management Management & Facilities & Energy & Management Administration Administration a

r Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: Purpose: To ensure To provide To provide To provide To provide To provide To provide To provide To provide e mobility of repair and fuel and custodial, comprehensivsafe, reliable, repair and fuel and comprehensive approximately preventive energy to security, e and courteous and preventive energy and integrated p 2.7 million maintenance support building & integrated efficient maintenance support to management, residents of services for Conventional infrastructure management, specialized services for Wheel-Trans administration, O the City of vehicles and Transit maintenance administrationdoor-to-door vehicles and Transit and support Toronto and equipment to operations and services , and support transportation equipment to operations services to

0 2 additional support to services to service for support Wheel-Trans commuters Conventional Conventional Conventional persons with Wheel-Trans Transit. 1 from other Transit Transit Transit. the greatest Transit

0 municipalities operations operations need for operations and comply accessible and comply

2 with transportation with legislative legislative requirements. requirements. d Track & Structure Management e d Stations &

n Buildings Management e Legend:

Signals/Electrical/ Program Activity m Communications Service Management m

Conventional Transit Conventional Transit Infrastructure Wheel-Trans Transit Wheel-Trans Transit Fuel & o •Transit Rider &Facilities Management •Wheel-Trans Transit Rider Energy •Businesses •TTC Conventional Transit •Businesses •Wheel-Trans Transit c •Employers •Transit Riders •Employers •Neighbouring Municipalities Wheel-Trans Management & e •Neighbouring Municipalities Conventional Transit Management •All individuals in the City of Toronto •All individuals in the City of Toronto Administration & Administration •Wheel-Trans Transit R Conventional Transit Fleet •Conventional Transit Wheel-Trans Transit Fleet •Wheel Transit Fleet Management •Conventional Transit Fleet •TTC Wheel-TransTransit Management •TTC Conventional Transit Management •Wheel Transit Fuel & Energy f •Transit Rider •Conventional Transit Fuel & Energy Management f Conventional Transit Fuel & Energy Management Management •Conventional Transit Infrastructure a •TTC Conventional Transit & F acilities Management t •Transit Rider •Transit Rider S

6 t Service Levels e g d u

B • Record high ridership of 503 M for the fifth consecutive g n i t year a r e • Ridership may be higher if economy holds p O 0 2 1 0 2 d e d n e m m o c e R f f a t S

7 t Organization Chart e g d u B g n i t a r e

p CGM

O 537* 0 2 1

0 Engineering & Construction Executive Operations

2 320 687 11,340** d e d n e m m o c e R f f * Includes 284 for Transit Expansion a t ** Includes 529 for Wheel-Trans S

8 t Staffing Trend e g d u B g n

i 12,000 t 10,249 10,622 10,570 10,706 10,513 a 10,500 9,835 r 9,483 9,156 9,289 e

p 9,000

O 7,500 0 2

1 6,000 0

2 4,500 d e 3,000 d

n 1,500 e 0 m

m 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 o Rec c e R f f a t S

9 t Workforce Analysis –2004 to 2012 e g d u B • Population: +5% g n i t Ridership: +20% a r

e indicates favourable shift in modal split p O 0 2 1 0

2 • Ridership: +20% d e Workforce: +15% d n indicates significant labour productivity e m improvement m o c e R f f a t S

10 2011 Service Performance Comparison of Transit Performance t e Large Canadian and U.S. Properties (2009) g d u B

g Revenue/ Operating Trips Subsidy/ n i City Cost Subsidy t (M) Rider a

r Ratio ($M) e

p TTC 471 67% 442 $0.94 O

0 2 Montreal 383 56% 457 $1.19 1

0 Vancouver 188 48% 577 $3.07 2 d Chicago 290 41% 825 $2.84 e d

n Los Angeles 217 29% 1,115 $5.13 e

m New York 2,381 55% 4,190 $1.76 m

o Philadelphia 231 37% 730 $3.17 c e Source: CUTA, NTD Dollars shown are in $Cdn. R f f a t S Comparison of Transit Performance t e Local Area Properties (2010) g d u B g n i

t Revenue/ Subsidy/ a City Cost r Rider e Ratio p TTC 71% $0.84 O

0 2 Brampton 43% $2.81 1 0

2 Burlington 37% $4.04 d Durham Region 38% $3.32 e d Hamilton 51% $1.64 n e Mississauga 47% $2.36 m

m Oakville 35% $4.27 o c York Region 39% $5.03 e R f f a t S t 2011 Major Achievements and Awards e g d u

B • Major Achievements g n

i th t 90 Anniversary a r e Carried over 28 Billion riders to date p

O Projecting all-time record ridership of 499 million 0 2 1

0 Record high service levels operated 2 d

e Continued roll-out of e-alerts, internet trip d n planner and next vehicle arrivals notification e m New Toronto Rocket subway trains introduced m o into service c e R f f a t S

14 2012 Staff Recommended TTC Operating Budget Where the Proposed $1.441B Gross Expenditure t e

g Goes d u B

g $000s n i Services & t Other a Equipment, Rents, $48,100 , r Expenditures, 3.3% e $27,137 , 1.9% Interdi vi si onal $36,143 , 2.5% p Charges, $3,302 ,

O Materials and 0.2% 0 2 Supplies, 1

0 $287,711 , 20.0% 2 d e d n e m m o c e

R Salaries and

f Benefits, f $1,038,454 , a t 72.1% S

16 t Where The $1.441B Money Comes From e g d u B g n

i $000s t a r e p O City Funding, 0 2 $404,101 , 28.0% 1 0 2 d e d n e m m o c e User Fees &

R Donations, f $1,036,747 , f

a 72.0% t S

Staff Rec’d 2012 Net Operating Budget t e

g - By Category and Funding Source ($000s) d u 2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 Change from

B Actual Actual Budget Projected Recommended 2011 Approved Category of Expense Actual Budget Budget g $ $ $ $ $ $ % n i t Salaries and Benefits 975,747.0 1,051,229.0 1,054,625.0 1,065,838.0 1,038,454.1 (16,170.9) (1.5%) a Materials and Supplies 233,660.0 234,362.0 266,621.3 269,521.0 287,711.4 21,090.1 7.9% r Equipment 22,937.0 10,752.0 26,400.0 19,500.0 27,137.1 737.1 2.8% e Services & Rents 41,200.0 42,800.0 48,100.0 48,100.0 48,100.0 0.0 0.0% p Contributions to Capital

O Contributions to Reserve/Res Funds

0 2 Other Expenditures 55,196.0 35,321.0 36,843.5 40,643.0 36,142.6 (700.9) (1.9%)

1 Interdivisional Charges 3,302.3 3,302.0 3,302.3 - 0.0% 0

2 TOTAL GROSS EXPENDITURES 1,328,740.0 1,374,464.0 1,435,892.1 1,446,904.0 1,440,847.5 4,955.4 0.4% d Interdivisional Recoveries e Provincial Subsidies d Federal Subsidies n Other Subsidies e User Fees & Donations 886,407.0 987,500.0 1,006,781.4 1,020,231.0 1,036,746.5 29,965.1 3.0% m Transfers from Capital Fund Contribution from Reserve Funds m Contribution from Reserve o Sundry Revenues c e TOTAL REVENUE 886,407.0 987,500.0 1,006,781.4 1,020,231.0 1,036,746.5 29,965.1 3.0% R

f TOTAL NET EXPENDITURES 442,333.0 386,964.0 429,110.7 426,673.0 404,101.0 (25,009.7) (2.7%) f a t

S APPROVED POSITIONS 10,325.0 10,710.0 10,706.0 10,706.0 10,513.0 (193.0) (1.8%)

t 10% Reduction Target Achieved e g d u B

g 2011 2012 Recommended Operating Budget Change - 2012

n Recommended i 2011

t 2011 Appvd. 2012 Rec. 2012 Rec. 2012 Rec. Operating Budget v. Projected a Budget Base New/Enhanced Budget 2011 Appvd. Budget

r Actual e (In $000s) $ $ $ $ $ $ % p GROSS EXP. 1,435,892.1 1,446,904.0 1,440,847.5 0.0 1,440,847.5 4,955.4 0.3 O REVENUE 1,006,781.4 1,020,231.0 1,036,338.5 408.0 1,036,746.5 29,965.1 3.0 0 2

1 NET EXP. 429,110.7 426,673.0 404,509.0 (408.0) 404,101.0 (25,009.7) (5.8) 0

2 Approved Positions 10,706.0 10,706.0 10,513.0 0.0 10,513.0 (193.0) (1.8) d e

d 2012 10% Target

n 10% Reduction vs. % e Reduction 2012 Rec.'d 2012 Rec'd Target Comparison Target* Reduction Reduction m 2012 Reductions (85,473.4) (64,408.0) (21,065.4) 7.5% m o

c *The 2012 reduction target totals $85.5 million and is comprised of $46.1 million, which represents the 10% reduction, as well e as $39.4 million, which represents the estimated 2012 increase in costs from the 2011 budget. R f f a t S

t Service Level Adjustments –Summary ($000s) e g d 2012 Recommended Service Changes u % of 2012 B Position Gross Net Budget Description g Changes Expense Expense Reduction n Target i t # $ $ % a Base Changes: r Base Expenditure Changes e Legal Expense Savings, Capitalization p of Overhead, Maintenance Efficiencies O etc. (5,000.0) (5,000.0) (1.2%)

0 2 Reduce Non Labour Expenses (2,000.0) (2,000.0) (0.5%)

1 Base Expenditure Changes (7,000.0) (7,000.0) (1.6%)

0 Sub-Total Base Budget Changes (7,000.0) (7,000.0) (1.6%)

2 Service Efficiencies

d Diesel Fuel Savings (15,000.0) (15,000.0) (3.5%)

e Advertising Revenue Increase (5,000.0) (1.2%)

d Workforce Reductions (150.0) (14,000.0) (14,000.0) (3.3%)

n Reductions in Absenteeism and

e Overtime Requirements (5,000.0) (5,000.0) (1.2%) Benefits Expense Reduction (2,000.0) (2,000.0) (0.5%) m Increased Workforce Gapping (2,000.0) (2,000.0) (0.5%)

m Sub-Total Service Efficiencies (150.0) (38,000.0) (43,000.0) (10.0%)

o Revenue Adjustments: c Parking Lot Fee after 3pm (408.0) (0.1%) e Sub-Total Revenue Adjustments (408.0) (0.1%)

R Major Service Impact: Core Service Review - Reverse RGS f

f Peak/Off-peak Load Standard

a Improvements (171.0) (21,200.0) (14,000.0) (3.3%) t Sub-Total Major Service Impacts (171.0) (21,200.0) (14,000.0) (3.3%) S Total Service Changes (321.0) (66,200.0) (64,408.0) (15.0%) 20 t User Fee Changes - Highlights e g d u B • New Fees g n i t • Commuter Parking fees after 3 pm on weekdays +$408K a r e p • Approved by Commission at its meeting of September 16, 2011 O

0 2 • TTC staff will recommend a standard 10¢ adult token fare increase 1 0

2 at December 14, 2011 Commission meeting d e d n e m m o c e R f f a t S

21 t Key Issues for 2012 and Beyond e g d u

B • Multi-year strategy to address fares, service levels and predictable, g n long-term sustainable funding is required i t a r e p O 0 2 1 0 2 d e d n e m m o c e R f f a t S

22 MULTI-YEAR OUTLOOK t e

g 2012-2015 PRO FORMAS d u

B 2012 g (Millions) BUDGET 2013 2014 2015 n i t a

r Rides (without fare increases) 503 515 526 536 e p Revenues - Passenger $970 $987 $1,002 $1,014 O - Other 67 67 68 67 0 2 1

0 Total Revenues 1,037 1,054 1,070 1,081 2

d Expenses* 1,473 1,538 1,627 1,703 e d Total Subsidy Required 436 484 557 622 n e Total Subsidy Available 415 415 415 415 m

m Additional Subsidy Required 21 69 142 207 o c e

R * Actual CBA settlement results TBD. f f a t S

23 MULTI-YEAR OUTLOOK t e

g 2012-2015 PRO FORMAS d u

B 2012 g (Millions) BUDGET 2013 2014 2015 n i t a

r Rides (with annual 10¢ fare increases) 502 510 517 523 e p Revenues - Passenger $1,000 $1,056 $1,112 $1,165 O - Other 67 67 68 67 0 2 1

0 Total Revenues 1,067 1,123 1,180 1,232 2

d Expenses* 1,473 1,536 1,621 1,693 e d Total Subsidy Required 406 413 441 461 n e Total Subsidy Available 415 415 415 415 m

m Additional Subsidy Required **(9) (2) 26 46 o c e

R * Actual CBA settlement results TBD. f f ** 2012 TTC surplus to offset Wheel-Trans shortfall of $8 million. a t S

24 t Wheel-Trans Operating Budget e g d u B g n i t a r e p O 0 2 1 0 2 d e d n e m m o c e R f f a t S

25 t Key Service Objectives e g d u

B • A reliable service to our customers g n i • Incorporate new buses into the fleet t a r

e • Maintain our outstanding safety records p

O • Maintain our favourable customer relations 0 2 1

0 • Achieve productivity improvements 2 d • Continue to move bookings away from telephones e d n • - Touch tone/Internet e m • Continue to move trips to conventional system m o c e R f f a t S

26 t 2012 Program Map e g d u Toronto Transit Commission To provide safe, reliable, courteous and efficient regular transit services to the public B g

0 municipalities operations operations need for operations and comply accessible and comply

2 with transportation with legislative legislative requirements. requirements. d Track & Structure Management e d Stations &

n Buildings Management e Legend:

Signals/Electrical/ Program Activity m Communications Service Management m

Conventional Transit Conventional Transit Infrastructure Wheel-Trans Transit Wheel-Trans Transit Fuel & o •Transit Rider &Facilities Management •Wheel-Trans Transit Rider Energy •Businesses •TTC Conventional Transit •Businesses •Wheel-Trans Transit c •Employers •Transit Riders •Employers •Neighbouring Municipalities Wheel-Trans Management & e •Neighbouring Municipalities Conventional Transit Management •All individuals in the City of Toronto •All individuals in the City of Toronto Administration & Administration •Wheel-Trans Transit R Conventional Transit Fleet •Conventional Transit Wheel-Trans Transit Fleet •Wheel Transit Fleet Management •Conventional Transit Fleet •TTC Wheel-TransTransit Management •TTC Conventional Transit Management •Wheel Transit Fuel & Energy f •Transit Rider •Conventional Transit Fuel & Energy Management f Conventional Transit Fuel & Energy Management Management •Conventional Transit Infrastructure a •TTC Conventional Transit & Facilities Management t •Transit Rider •Transit Rider S

27 t Service Levels e g d u

B • Record high ridership of 2.9 M g n i t a r e p O 0 2 1 0 2 d e d n e m m o c e R f f a t S

28 t Organization Chart e g d u B g n i t a r e

p CGM

O 537* 0 2 1

0 Engineering & Construction Executive Operations

2 320 687 11,340** d e d n e m m o c e R f f * Includes 284 for Transit Expansion a t ** Includes 529 for Wheel-Trans S

29 t Staffing Trend e g d u 12,000 B g 10,500 n i t 9,000 a r 7,500 e p 6,000 O

0 2 4,500 1

0 3,000 2 1,500 530 532 529 d 386 397 416 459 491 462 e 0 d

n 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Rec e m m o c e WORKFORCE ANALYSIS: 2004 TO 2012 R Ridership: +61% f

f Workforce: +37% a t S

30 2011 Service Performance t 2011 Major Achievements and Awards e g d u

B • Major Achievements g n i Replaced and expanded bus fleet to 198 t a r Completed 50 ELF bus rebuilds e p 40% optimum bus modal split O

0 2 Expanded peak period and focused bus service 1 0

2 New scheduling system implemented d

e Increased bus productivity standard to 2.4 pph d n Utilizing AVL/GPS to adjust service real-time e

m Re-organizing staff resources m o c e R f f a t S

32 2012 Staff Recommended Wheel-Trans Operating Budget Where the Proposed $95.2M Gross Expenditure t e

g Goes d u B

g $000s n i t Other a r Expendi tures, e $532 , 0.6% p Servi ces & O Rents, $33,458 , 0 2 35.1% 1 0 2 d e d n e m m o c Sal ari es and e Benefi ts,

R Materi al s and Suppl i es, $50,226 , 52.8% f f $10,991 , 11.5% a t S

34 t Where The $95.2M Money Comes From e g d u B g n i $000s t a r User Fees & e Donations, p $5,325 , 5.6% O 0 2 1 0 2 d e d n e m m o c e R f f Ci ty Funding, a t $89,882 , 94.4% S

Staff Rec’d 2012 Net Operating Budget t e

g - By Category and Funding Source ($000s) d

u 2009 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 Change from Actual Actual Budget Projected Recommended 2011 Approved B Category of Expense Actual Budget Budget g $ $ $ $ $ $ % n i Salaries and Benefits 41,208.1 45,232.5 49,355.4 50,411.2 50,225.8 870.4 1.8% t Materials and Supplies 9,721.5 9,199.4 12,641.6 12,154.0 10,990.9 (1,650.7) (13.1%) a r Equipment e Services & Rents 28,701.1 33,708.3 34,131.4 32,405.6 33,458.0 (673.4) (2.0%) p Contributions to Capital

O Contributions to Reserve/Res Funds Other Expenditures 338.2 526.5 494.0 521.7 532.0 38.0 7.7% 0 2 Interdivisional Charges 1 0 TOTAL GROSS EXPENDITURES 79,968.9 88,666.7 96,622.4 95,492.5 95,206.7 (1,415.7) (1.6%) 2

d Interdivisional Recoveries e Provincial Subsidies d Federal Subsidies n Other Subsidies e User Fees & Donations 4,220.3 5,099.2 5,610.9 5,214.6 5,324.6 (286.3) (5.1%)

m Transfers from Capital Fund Contribution from Reserve Funds m Contribution from Reserve o Sundry Revenues c e TOTAL REVENUE 4,220.3 5,099.2 5,610.9 5,214.6 5,324.6 (286.3) (5.6%) R

f TOTAL NET EXPENDITURES 75,748.6 83,567.5 91,011.5 90,277.9 89,882.1 (1,129.4) 4.0% f a t

S APPROVED POSITIONS 454.0 531.0 532.0 529.0 529.0 (3.0) (0.6%)

t 10% Reduction Target Achieved e g d u B 2011 2012 Recommended Operating Budget Change - 2012 g Recommended n 2011 i 2011 Appvd. 2012 Rec. 2012 Rec. 2012 Rec. Operating Budget v. t Projected Budget Base New/Enhanced Budget 2011 Appvd. Budget a Actual r

e (In $000s) $ $ $ $ $ $ % p GROSS EXP. 96,622.4 95,492.5 95,206.7 0.0 95,206.7 (1,415.7) (1.5) O REVENUE 5,610.9 5,214.6 5,324.6 0.0 5,324.6 (286.3) (5.1) 0 2

1 NET EXP. 91,011.5 90,277.9 89,882.1 0.0 89,882.1 (1,129.4) (1.2) 0

2 Approved Positions 532.0 529.0 529.0 0.0 529.0 (3.0) (0.6) d e 2012 10% d Target 10% Reduction vs. n %

e Reduction 2012 Rec.'d 2012 Rec'd Target Comparison Target* Reduction Reduction m 2012 Reductions (16,001.2) (8,000.0) (8,001.2) 5.0% m o c *The 2012 reduction target totals $16.0 million and is comprised of $9.1 million, which represents the 10% reduction, as well e as $6.9 million, which represents the estimated 2012 increase in costs from the 2011 budget. R f f a t S

t Service Level Adjustments –Summary ($000s) e g d u B

g 2012 Recommended Service Changes n i t % of 2012 a r Position Gross Net Budget e Description p Changes Expense Expense Reduction

O Target 0 2 # $ $ % 1

0 Service Efficiencies 2 Diesel Fuel Price Savings (659.0) (659.0) (0.7%) d e Reduction of 3 Positions (3.0) (389.0) (389.0) (0.4%) d

n Maintenance Efficiencies (1,952.0) (1,952.0) (2.1%) e Sub-Total Service Efficiencies (3.0) (3,000.0) (3,000.0) (3.3%) m Major Service Impact: m o Core Service Review - Elimination of c

e Dialysis Trips (5,000.0) (5,000.0) (5.5%)

R Sub-Total Major Service Impacts (5,000.0) (5,000.0) (5.5%) f f a t Total Service Changes (3.0) (8,000.0) (8,000.0) (8.8%) S

38 t User Fee Changes - Highlights e g d u B • New Fees g n i t • TTC staff will recommend a standard 10¢ adult token fare increase a r e at December 14, 2011 Commission meeting p

O • Wheel-Trans customers pay the same fare as conventional system 0 2 1

0 riders 2 d e d n e m m o c e R f f a t S

39 t Key Issues for 2012 and Beyond e g d u

B • Multi-year strategy to address fares, service levels and predictable, g n long-term sustainable funding is required i t a r • Funding for dialysis trips by ambulatory passengers who do not e p meet the Wheel-Trans eligibility criteria O 0 2

1 • Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA) Legislation 0

2 Effective 2014 d e 0.5% unaccommodated rate d n

e Accommodate trip requests made prior to 8 p.m. within 3 hours of notice m Service to be operated 24 hours per day, 7 days a week m o c e R f f a t S

40 MULTI-YEAR OUTLOOK t e 2012-2014 PRO FORMAS g d u (000s) B g n i t 2012 a r BUDGET 2013 2014 e p

O Rides (without fare increases) 2,896 2,800 3,145 0 2 1

0 Revenues 5,325 5,187 5,685 2 d Expenses* 95,207 95,027 103,835 e d

n Total Subsidy Required 89,882 89,840 98,150 e

m Total Subsidy Available 81,881 81,881 81,881 m o Additional Subsidy Required 8,001 7,959 16,269 c e R f f a

t * Excludes pending CBA financial impact which City has made a budgetary provision. S

41 MULTI-YEAR OUTLOOK t e 2012-2014 PRO FORMAS g d u (000s) B g n i t 2012 a r BUDGET 2013 2014 e p

O Rides (with annual 10¢ fare increases) 2,896 2,800 3,145 0 2 1

0 Revenues 5,546 5,404 5,922 2 d Expenses* 95,207 95,027 103,835 e d

n Total Subsidy Required 89,661 89,623 97,913 e

m Total Subsidy Available 81,881 81,881 81,881 m o Additional Subsidy Required 7,780 7,742 16,032 c e R f f a

t * Excludes pending CBA financial impact which City has made a budgetary provision. S

42 2012 Capital Overview n a l

P Capital Overview - Scope of Assets: d n a t 2012-2012 e g d

u Base Program $6.3 Billion B l a Infrastructure t i p a • Yonge Subway – almost 60 years old C 1

2 • Bloor-Danforth subway – almost 50 years old 0 2 • SRT - approaching end of useful life – 2 1 0 2

d Key Elements e d

n • Facilities e m • Automatic Train Control m o c • Fare Related e R f

f • Accessibility a t

S • Other 44 n a l

P Capital Overview d n a t e Vehicles g d u •

B Bus fleet in good shape age wise l a t • i Subway fleet – T1s and Toronto Rockets p a • Streetcars – LRV Legacy order C 1

2 • SRT Cars – approaching end of useful life 0 2 – 2 1 0

2 Expansion d e • TYSSE: Fully funded ($2.634B) $2.0 Billion d n e • Metrolinx – Eglinton Crosstown $8.4 Billion m m • City – Sheppard Subway $4.2 Billion o c e R f f a t S

45 n a l

P Capital Overview d n a t e

g Key Objectives d u

B C ontinue to m aintain and im prove upon the SO G R of the existing transit l a t i system p a C C ontinue to deliver service and ensure system reliability and 1 2 0

2 im provem ents such as system accessibility and autom atic fare – 2

1 collection 0 2 th d Increased ridership (5 year in row at all time record high) e d n

e Continue significant commitment to replace vehicles and infrastructure m m o c e R f f a t S

46 2011 Capital Performance n a l

P Summary of Major Projects Completed in 2011 d n a KEY ACCOMPLISHMENTS – 2011 t e

g • Capital infrastructure replacement and rehabilitation work progressed d u • Continued milestone payments for LRVs with receipt of two prototypes expected B l a t in 2012 i p a • Delivery of 14 Toronto Rocket trains expected by the end of 2011 C 1

2 • Significant milestone payments for YUS ATC Resignalling project 0 2

– • Awarded various Design Contracts for the Toronto Rocket/T1 Rail Yard 2

1 Accommodation project 0 2

d • Wilson Facility Modifications for new TR trains nearing completion e d

n • GTA Farecard (PRESTO) - TTC continuing to work with Province and GTA Transit e m Agencies m o

c • Toronto-York-Spadina Subway Extension construction well underway e R

f • Continued pursuit of funding for capital needs with Provincial and Federal f a t governments S

48 2012 –2021 Staff Recommended Capital Budget & Plan Summary of Major Projects in the 10-Year Capital n a l P Budget and Plan d n a t e

g 2012 Key Projects d u • Vehicle Procurements & Overhauls $424M B l a t (Payment LRVs, TR Cars, Delivery of Diesel & WT Buses) i p a • Buildings & Structures $389M C 1

2 (LRV MSF/TR Y&S Acc/EA III/FVU/Fac Mods/Bridges&Tunnels) 0 2 • Track, Signals & Power, Other $267M – 2 1 0

2 Total $1.080M d e d n e m m o c e R f f a t S

50 n a l

P CAPITAL BUDGET d n a t e g d • In 2011-2020 Capital Budget City limited TTC Capital u B

l spending - $2.3 billion shortfall a t i p a

C • In 2012-2021 Capital Budget, City indicated that TTC must 1 2

0 provide a plan to address the $1.5B funding shortfall and 2

– live within the City debt targets 2 1

0 Staff undertook a review of capital needs and identified project 2 d deferrals and deletions, thus reducing the overall shortfall: e d n e m m o c e R f f a t S 51 n SHORTFALL REDUCTION PLAN a l P d n a t e

g • 60 TR Subway Cars – deleted $161 Million d u • Wilson Yard – deferred 182 Million B l • ATC BD – deferred 150 Million a t i • Buses – reduce 134 50 Million p a • Temporary Bus Storage Capacity – delete 23 Million C

1 • 204 LRV order – reduce 15 71 Million 2

0 •

2 Fire Ventilation – deferred work 39 Million

– • On-Grade Paving – defer work 50 Million 2

1 • Collector Booth Renewal – delete mods 8 Million 0 2 • Other (9 Million) d e Total $725 Million d n e m m o • Remaining shortfall of $807 million c e R f f a t S 52 n a l 2012 – 2021 CAPITAL BUDGET P d n a t

e Revised 2012 – 2021 Capital Program includes: g d u

B Vehicle and infrastructure replacement: l a t i

p • Subway Capacity and Reliability a

C Toronto Rockets $304 Million 1 2

0 Wilson Yard $370 Million 2

– ATC - Y-U-S $288 Million 2

1 - B-D $241 Million 0 2 • Bus Fleet d e 40’ $195 Million d n e W-T $ 34 Million m • LRV’s m o c Cars $784 Million e

R MSF $370 Million f f a t Total $2.6 Billion S 53 n a l 2012 – 2021 CAPITAL BUDGET P d n a Balance of program is basic infrastructure (SOGR) t e Track $540 Million g d Traction Power/Electrical $220 Million u

B Communications $145 Million l a Building/Subway Finishes $170 Million t i

p Building/Subway Equipment $207 Million a

C Yards/Roads/Bridges/Tunnels $616 Million

1 Building and Structures Projects $634 Million 2

0 Vehicle Overhauls $559 Million 2

– Non-revenue Vehicles $ 54 Million 2

1 Shop & Other Equipment $ 37 Million 0

2 Revenue/Fare Handling Equipment $ 19 Million d Electronic Fare Collection $180 Million e d Environment $ 48 Million n e IT $232 Million m Transit Signal Priority $ 24 Million m o c TOTAL $ 3.7 Billion e R f f GRAND TOTAL $ 6.3 Billion a t S 54 n a l 2012 – 2021 Capital Program P d n a • 2012CP funding shortfall Commission submission $1,508 t e g Sept 16, 2011 Commission Approval: d u Decrease in Base Capital program $(725) B l a Funding impact Prov 1/3 commitment $ 24 (701) t i p 807 a

C • Amendments to DCs (44) 1 2 0 2

– • November 17, 2011 reinstatement of Capital Reserve 2

1 (received from Province in 2009) (57) 0 2 d e

d • City Reserve – Monetization of Assets (Nov 24, 2011) (700) n e TTC 2012-2021 Shortfall $ 5 m m o c e 2011 City Debt Carryforward (68) R f f a t TTC 2012-2021 Surplus $ (62) S 55 2012 Capital Budget by Project Category and n a Funding Source l P d n a

t 2012 Capital Budget by Project Category 2012 Capital Budget Funding Source e (In Millions) (In Millions) g d u B l a t i 2% 15% p a 92% C 36% 1 2 0 2 – 2

1 1% 4% 45% 0 2% 2% 2 d e Provincial/Federal d 1% n DC e SOGR m Reserve/Reserve Funds m Legislated o Debt c Capacity Enhancements e

R Service Improvements Other Revenue f f Expansion a t S 56 n 2012 –2021 Capital Plan by Funding Source a l P d n a t e g d

u $1,350,000 B l a $1,200,000 t i p a $1,050,000 C 1 2

0 $900,000

2 Development Charges – $750,000

2 Other Revenue 1

0 Reserve/Reserve Funds 2 $600,000 d

e Debt d $450,000 n Provincial/Federal e m $300,000 m o c $150,000 e R f f $0 a t 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 S 57 n 2012 –2021 Capital Plan by Category a l P d n a t e g $1,100,000 d u

B $1,000,000 l a t i $900,000 Capacity p a Enhancement C $800,000 Expansion 1 2

0 $700,000

2 Improvement – $600,000 2

1 Legislative 0 $500,000 2 d SOGR

e $400,000 d n $300,000 e m $200,000 m o c $100,000 e R f

f $0 a t 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 S 58 n 2012 –2021 Fleet a l P d n a t e g $375,000 d u $350,000 B l

a $325,000 t i

p $300,000

a W-T Buses

C $275,000 1

2 $250,000

0 Buses

2 $225,000 – $200,000 2

1 Subway Cars

0 $175,000 2 $150,000 d e LRVs $125,000 d n

e $100,000 m $75,000 m o $50,000 c e $25,000 R f

f $0 a t 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 S 59 n a l

P Key Issues for 2012 and Beyond d n a t e g d • Expansion is necessary in view of ridership demand, but, existing transit u

B system needs must be addressed first l a t i p a • Project specific Federal/Provincial funds coming to an end – need to renew C 1 2 0

2 • Need long term, permanent, predictable and stable funding dedicated to –

2 public transit 1 0 2 d e d n e m m o c e R f f a t S

60 n a l P d n a t e g d u B l a t i p a C 1 2 0 2 – 2 1 0 2 d e d n e m m o c e R f f a t S