Geothermal Energy for Hawaii: a Prospectus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Geothermal Energy for Hawaii: a Prospectus LEGAL NOTICE This book was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Govern- ment nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or im- plied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favor- ing by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors ex- pressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. FOREWORD It is critical to the well-being of present and future generations in Hawaii that our Islands gain greater energy self-sufficiency, primarily through the orderly, well-planned development of alternate energy resources. One of Hawaii's major alternate energy resources is geothermal energy. In the summer of 1981, Hawaii became the second State in the United States with on- line electric power generated from geothermal steam. The development of our first geothermal power plant on the Island of Hawaii has attracted worldwide interest. Our Federal Government's Department of Energy contributed much to this project and related work. One of its contributions was the preparation, by specialists with the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory of the University of California, of this new volume, Geothermal Energy for Hawaii: A Prospectus. It is the story of geothermal power in our Islands. Because of its value, and the information it contains, our State Department of Planning and Economic Development is publishing it in this form. Other, more technical, volumes are available for specialists. Through such publications, our people are kept informed of the progress they make possible through their cooperation, their taxes, and their participation in the projects their governments carry out. We are grateful to all who have made this useful document available, and to all who have contributed to Hawaii's progress toward greater energy self- sufficiency. INTRODUCTION The key to Hawaii's successful development of alternate energy resources is not found primarily in money, although this is essential; it is not found in new technology, although this is sometimes critical; it is not found in the abundance of the basic resources themselves. Rather, the key to success is found in the cooperation of individuals who work in harmony toward a desired goal. Without such harmonious kokua—the Hawaiian word for helpful, sincere cooperation—Hawaii would have no chance for success in lessening its dependence on imported petroleum for its energy needs. The work of developing Hawaii's geothermal resources, and the successful completion of the State's first geothermal power plant in the Puna District of the Island of Hawaii, are prime examples of kokua. The Federal, State and County Governments and their agencies joined with the private sector and the people of the Big Island to achieve various objectives. This cooperation continues. It is indeed a wonderful example for others seeking to attain difficult goals. This new volume, a handy resource booklet for all interested in Hawaii's geothermal power, progress and potentials, is only one of a number of practical examples of how our U.S. Department of Energy has helped the people of Hawaii achieve their goals. We look forward to a continuation of this profitable partnership. Economic Development and State Energy Resources Coordinator PREFACE Most experts agree that development of geothermal energy in Hawaii is less a technical and economic question than a social one in part, this is because of a geographic and cultural environment which makes the state more sensitive to technological change than the mainland united States. The impact of geothermal development will be more quickly experienced throughout the islands because of the. smaller-economy, the limited land area, the complex cultural setting, and the need to create new institutions with which to manage the development process. An increasing number of developers, private citizens, engineering and planning consultants, and government officials are now becoming involved in various aspects of geothermal development. Each time a new person becomes involved, basic questions about geothermal energy and its poten- tial uses must be answered before the person is able to make an intelli- gent contribution to the decision-making process. At present, such information is available only through technical reports and occasional newspaper and magazine articles. This document is intended to provide an overview of geothermal develop- ment to potential contributors and participants in the process: develop- ers, the financial community, consultants, government officials, and the people of Hawaii The goal of the document is to describe the issues, programs, and initiatives that have been examined to date and, to show that geothermal energy is a realistic option in Hawaii's future. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors would like to express their appreciation to members of the geothermal community in Hawaii for their hospitality and assistance. This document could not have been possible without the help of the staff and consultants at the Department of Planning and Economic Development, the Hawaii Institute of Geophysics, the Hawaii Natural Energy Institute, the HGP-A Wellhead Generator Demonstration Project, and members of the faculty of the University of Hawaii at both the Manoa and Hilo campuses. We would also like to thank representatives of the County of Hawaii government and the Puna Hui Ohana for their generous cooperation. And :the support and guidance of the Hawaii Geothermal Advisory Committee and the U.S. Department of Energy is gratefully acknowledged. Finally, we would like to record our indebtedness to our LBL colleagues in the Hawaii Integrated Energy Assessment Project who generously shared their insights on energy issues and alternatives. We are also grateful to David M. Chambers, Jon F. Elliott, and Stephen P. Vonderhaar for their comments and contributions, and to Sharon Strocchia for her produc- tion assistance. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. ENERGY AND HAWAII 1 2. WHAT IS GEOTHERMAL ENERGY? 7 3. HOW CAN GEOTHERMAL ENERGY BE USED? 13 4. GEOTHERMAL PROJECTS IN HAWAII 27 5. BALANCING THE BENEFITS AND COSTS OF GEOTHERMAL DEVELOPMENT 35 6. MAKING GEOTHERMAL POWER A REALITY 45 APPENDICES A. GLOSSARY OF TECHNICAL TERMS 57 B. LEGISLATION AND REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO GEOTHERMAL DEVELOPMENT 69 C. THE GEOTHERMAL COMMUNITY: A DIRECTORY 75 D. AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 83 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS 1. State of Hawaii Oil Imports 2. County Energy Consumption 3. Electricity Costs 4. Comparison of Alternate Energy Sources 5. A Hydrothermal Reservoir in Hawaii 6. Potential Geothermal Resource Areas 7. Geothermal Development Process 8. "Windows" for Geothermal Electric Power by County 9. HGP-A Geothermal Power Plant 10. Direct Use Applications 11. Potential Markets for Geothermal Power on the Island of Hawaii 12. Proposed Inter-Island Submarine Cable Transmitting Geothermal Power 13. Location of the HGP-A Wellhead Generator Demonstration Project 14. Feasibility Study: Piping Geothermal Fluids to a Sugar Factory at Keaau 15. Sugar Processing and Power Production 16. Use of Geothermal Fluids for Fuel Drying 17. Use of Geothermal Fluids for Sugar Processing and Gasohol Production 18. Possible Responses to Public Concerns 19. H2S Abatement at HGP-A 20. Noise Characteristics at HGP-A 21. Dissolved Solids in HGP-A Effluents 22. Potential Environmental Impacts from Geothermal Development 23. Reponsibilities of Federal Agencies in Geothermal Development 24. Energy organization 25. Implications Associated with Different Levels of Geothermal Development 26. Government Actions to Reduce Geothermal Development Uncertainties 27. State Projects to Reduce Geothermal Development Uncertainties 28. Status of Geothermal Projects 1 1. ENERGY AND HAWAII Hawaii is making a one-time transition from fossil to renewable energy resources. At present, the state is almost totally dependant on imports of crude oil and petroleum products and so is vulnerable to disruptions and price fluctuations in the global energy market. In 1980, annual energy imports represented an outflow of about $1 billion from the state's economy. Because of Hawaii's recent volcanic origin and geography, the state has no indigenous fossil fuel reserves and is isolated from systems such as coal and natural gas. Fortunately, Hawaii is rich in renewable energy resources which are becoming available under new and improved technolo- gies. These resources include geothermal, solar, wind, and ocean thermal gradients. Hawaii currently obtains about 92 percent of its energy supply from imported petroleum. Figure 1 depicts the flow of oil imports into the state. Crude oil is shipped to refineries on Oahu from Saudi Arabia, Oman, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Alaska. Refined petroleum products come from California, the Carribbean, and Singapore. The remainder is sup- plied by indigenous energy resources - bagasse from sugar mills (7%) and hydroelectricity (1%). Energy consumption has increased from 78,940 billion Btus in 1963 to 203,940 billion Btus in 1977. Over 82% of the state's energy is con- sumed in the City and County of Honolulu, where the state's population and tourist activities are concentrated. Of the remainder, 7.4% is con- sumed in Hawaii County, 7.0% in Maui County (islands of Maui, Molokai, and Lanai), and 3.3% in Kauai County. A comparison of energy consump- tion in the various counties is shown in Figure 2. About 20% to 25% of the State's imported fuels are used for electricity generation. Since 1974, the cost of electricity generation has trebled. See Figure 3. Many authorities believe that the price of oil (in 1980 dollars) may be $50 per barrel in 1985 and above $80 in 1990. Hawaii would have serious problems with such prices, even with a guaranteed supply of oil.
Recommended publications
  • Another Record Year for Energy Mergers and Acquisitions
    February 15, 2016 TO: CLIENTS AND OTHER FRIENDS OF THE FIRM 2015 – Another Record Year for Energy Mergers and Acquisitions Each year around this time we take the opportunity to review the transactions and other significant industry developments over the past year and offer our views on what they may mean for the coming year. Mergers and acquisitions activity in the energy industry during 2015 was, to Contributors: say the least, robust. The low interest rate environment and favorable James H. Barkley economic conditions that contributed to record deal volume in 2014 persisted Brooksany Barrowes into 2015. With the tailwind of economic conditions and interest rates, total Emil Barth transaction volume exceeded the all-time high watermark of $184 billion established in 2014 by almost $20 billion.1 By the end of 2015, approximately Megan Berge $202 billion of transactions had been announced. 2016 also is off to a fast start William M. Bumpers with roughly $20 billion of transactions announced in the first 6 weeks of the Michael Didriksen year. Jessica Fore More than half the 2015 activity involved pipelines, midstream companies and Jerrod Harrison MLPs. In that sector, deal volume maintained its robust activity, increasing Hillary H. Holmes slightly in 2015 to $133.3 billion as compared to 130.8 billion for 2014. Transactions among regulated electric utilities notched a similarly modest William S. Lamb increase, from roughly $30 billion in 2014 to almost $34 billion in 2015. Luckey McDowell Among LDCs, volume shot up from $3.4 billion to over $18 billion, driven by Steven R. Miles transactions involving AGL Resources and Piedmont Natural Gas Company.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Solar Community Energy Storage for Supporting Hawaii's 100% Renewable Energy Goals Erin Takata [email protected]
    The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center Master's Projects and Capstones Theses, Dissertations, Capstones and Projects Spring 5-19-2017 Analysis of Solar Community Energy Storage for Supporting Hawaii's 100% Renewable Energy Goals Erin Takata [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.usfca.edu/capstone Part of the Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Oil, Gas, and Energy Commons, and the Sustainability Commons Recommended Citation Takata, Erin, "Analysis of Solar Community Energy Storage for Supporting Hawaii's 100% Renewable Energy Goals" (2017). Master's Projects and Capstones. 544. https://repository.usfca.edu/capstone/544 This Project/Capstone is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, Capstones and Projects at USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Projects and Capstones by an authorized administrator of USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This Master's Project Analysis of Solar Community Energy Storage for Supporting Hawaii’s 100% Renewable Energy Goals by Erin Takata is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Science in Environmental Management at the University of San Francisco Submitted: Received: ...................................……….. ................................………….
    [Show full text]
  • Public Attitudes About Renewable Energy in Hawai'i (2014)
    RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT 2014 PUBLIC ATTITUDES ABOUT RENEWABLE ENERGY IN HAWAI‘I ABSTRACT — A representative BACKGROUND AND survey of 1,214 Hawai‘i residents PURPOSE — Increasing the pro- was conducted for the purpose of portion of energy provided by renewable assessing public attitudes about sources is a key goal of regional, national, different technologies for generating and international energy policies. Multiple electricity. Renewable energy pressures on conventional energy sys- (RE) technologies were very highly tems include increasing levels of energy favored: 97% of the public supported consumption, the cost of fossil fuels, the increased development of at least specter of peak oil, potential international some forms of RE in our state. conflict related to control of energy re- This support for RE was motivated sources, and the urgent need to reverse by concerns for environmental global warming and stem environmental protection, sustainability, and energy degradation. independence and by frustration with local energy prices. Solar and Energy concerns are particularly striking wind power were the most widely for the state of Hawai‘i, which faces accepted forms of RE (with 92% and energy-related issues that distinguish 86% favorable opinion, respectively), it from the rest of the nation. With no followed by hydroelectric (76%) internal sources of fossil fuel, our state and geothermal power (75%). is dependent on imported petroleum Municipal waste (58%) and biomass (primarily of foreign origin) for both combustion (53%) were less widely transportation and electricity generation. endorsed but were still acceptable In 2011, Hawai‘i imported 93% of its total to the majority of residents. Only a energy needs (U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawaii Renewable Hydrogen Program Plan 2010–2020
    Hawaii Renewable Hydrogen Program: 2010-2020 Hawaii Renewable Hydrogen Program Plan 2010–2020 August 2011 Hawaii Renewable Hydrogen Program: 2010-2020 Project Title: Hawaii Renewable Hydrogen Program: 2010-2020 – Final Report Recipient: University at Manoa - School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology – Hawaii Natural Energy Institute Award Number: Contract No. 57598 Working Partner: Author: Mr. James M. Ewan – University at Manoa - School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology – Hawaii Natural Energy Institute – Hydrogen Systems Program Manager Acknowledgments: The Hawaii Natural Energy Institute’s contributions to this report were funded by the Hawaii Renewable Hydrogen Program Contract No. 57598. The author is solely responsible for any omissions or errors contained herein. This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the State of Hawaii government. Neither the State of Hawaii government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the Hawaii State government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the Hawaii State government or any agency thereof. 1 Hawaii Renewable Hydrogen Program: 2010-2020 Executive Summary HCEI and the Renewable Hydrogen Program The Hawaii Clean Energy Initiative (HCEI) is a partnership between the state of Hawaii and the US DOE launched in 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Maui County Energy Alliance Report
    Page | 2 “Our precarious dependence on imported fossil fuel underscores the urgency for us to actively pursue renewable energy options.” ‐‐ Mayor Charmaine Tavares (2007) “Through the Clean Energy Initiative and our year‐round resources of wind, solar and waves, Hawaii is uniquely poised to become a global model for renewable energy." ‐‐ Governor Linda Lingle (2008) This report was prepared by the Maui Economic Development Board, Inc. (MEDB) in conjunction with County of Maui Office of Economic Development for the Maui County Energy Alliance (MCEA). We wish to acknowledge the leadership, support, and work of the members of the MCEA Oversight Committee: Mayor Charmaine Tavares, County of Maui; Sheri Morrison, Managing Director, County of Maui; Deidre Tegarden, Coordinator, Office of Economic Development, County of Maui; Dr. Victor Reyes, Energy Commissioner, County of Maui; Jeanne Unemori Skog, President, Maui Economic Development Board; Leslie Wilkins, Vice‐President and Director, Women in Technology, Maui Economic Development Board; Dr. Clyde Sakamoto, Chancellor, Maui Community College; William Parks, Jr., Deputy Assistant Secretary, U.S. Department of Energy (on assignment to the Hawaii State Department of Business, Economic Development & Tourism). MEDB and the County of Maui Office of Economic Development also wish to acknowledge the tireless contributions of the volunteer members of the MCEA Working Groups, and especially the Working Group Chairs. A listing of members is included in the Supplement of Supporting Documents. Summary of MCEA Working Group Recommendations ‐‐ Sustainable Energy: Strategies for Implementation 09/2009 Page | 3 Summary of MCEA Working Group Recommendations ‐‐ Sustainable Energy: Strategies for Implementation 09/2009 Page | 4 Summary of MCEA Working Group Recommendations ‐‐ Sustainable Energy: Strategies for Implementation 09/2009 Renewable Energy Action Plan: Recommendations from the MCEA Working Groups Table of Contents Page | 5 Overview 7 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc. INTEGRATED RESOURCE PLAN 2009–2028
    Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc. INTEGRATED RESOURCE PLAN 2009–2028 Docket No. 2007-0084 September 30, 2008 Hawaiian Electric Company, Inc. HECO IRP-4 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY…………………………………………………………. ES-1 1 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................1-1 1.1 Purpose of IRP.............................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Commission Ruling on HECO IRP-3 ......................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 May 2007 Evaluation Report....................................................................................................... 1-1 1.4 Major Changes since HECO IRP-3 ............................................................................................ 1-4 1.4.1 Hawaii Global Warming Solutions - Act 234 ............................................................................ 1-4 1.4.2 Hawaii Renewable Portfolio Standard ....................................................................................... 1-4 1.4.3 Hawaii Clean Energy Initiative..................................................................................................1-5 1.4.4 Biofuels Legislation ................................................................................................................... 1-5 1.4.5 Renewable Energy Infrastructure Program Docket...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Smart Grid Technologies –
    Analysis of Smart Grid Technologies – Tools to Enable Renewable Energy in Hawaii Prepared for the: State of Hawai‘i Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism Under Supplemental Contract No. 1 for Contract #60514 for the NETL Grant Project Task 1, Subtask 4, Smart Grid Technologies Prepared by: Black & Veatch Submitted by: Hawai‘i Natural Energy Institute October 2013 ANALYSIS OF SMART GRID TECHNOLOGIES – TOOLS TO ENABLE RENEWABLE ENERGY IN HAWAII B&V PROJECT NO. 179326 . All rights reserved. 2 PREPARED FOR Hawaii Natural Energy Institute ©Black & Veatch Holding Company 201 1 OCTOBER 2013 ® ® Hawaii Natural Energy Institute | TOOLS TO ENABLE RENEWABLE ENERGY IN HAWAII Table of Contents Legal Notice.............................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.0 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Scope of Work ........................................................................................................................................ 1-2 1.2 Report Organization ........................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.2.1 Introduction and Purpose ............................................................................................. 1-3 1.2.2 Grid Flexibility ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sempra U.S. Gas & Power and BP Wind Energy Complete Hawaii
    Sempra U.S. Gas & Power And BP Wind Energy Complete Hawaii Wind Farm ULUPALAKUA, Maui, Hawaii, Dec. 27, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- Sempra U.S. Gas & Power and BP Wind Energy today announced the full commercial operation of the 21 megawatt (MW) Auwahi Wind facility. The power project includes eight new wind turbines on the southeast ridge of Maui's Haleakala volcano. "We are very pleased to complete construction of Auwahi Wind both on time and on budget," said Jeffrey W. Martin , president and CEO of Sempra U.S. Gas & Power. "The addition of new, clean energy from our project will be a boost for Maui's infrastructure and will help Hawaii achieve its goal of securing 40 percent of its energy from renewable sources by 2030. This project could not have been built without the enthusiastic support of the local community, the Ulupalakua Ranch and neighbors who recognize the importance of sustainable energy." The power from Auwahi Wind has been sold to Maui Electric Company (MECO) under a 20- year contract. The turbines will generate enough clean electricity to power about 10,000 typical Maui homes. An important component of the project is a 10 MW battery capable of storing 4.4 megawatt-hours of power. Energy from the battery will help regulate and sustain power to the MECO grid during light wind conditions. "Innovation is a big part of what Sempra U.S. Gas & Power brings to all of our projects," Martin said. "The battery storage component of Auwahi Wind includes state-of-the-art monitoring and safety controls which will help maximize the benefit that the Maui Electric Company and its customers receive from this project." Construction of the wind farm on Ulupalakua Ranch began in March 2012, and involved more than 180 workers.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy in America
    Renewable Energy in America: Markets, Economic Development and Policy in the 50 States Spring 2011 Update This Page Intentionally Blank Contents About the American Council On Renewable Energy ............................................................................................................. 2 User’s Guide ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Glossary ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 State Summaries ............................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming International ACORE Members .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hawaii Bar Journal (May 2013)
    from 108.7 solar rights megawatts laws and tax (“MW”) were incentives to utility pro- installed in 2012 – curement mechanisms mandat- enough to provide electricity ed by the Public Utilities Commission, to approximately 37,000 homes.4 such as the Net Energy Metering and Larger, utility scale solar PV facilities in Feed-in Tariff programs. Zoning and Hawaii now range in size up to six MW.5 permitting laws governing larger utility And in its 2012 annual survey, the Solar scale solar PV projects have also played Energy Industries Association ranked an important role. by Douglas A. Codiga Hawaii the seventh-best state in the The rapid growth of solar energy is nation for solar energy, noting that supported by foundational Hawaii cli- Solar energy – especially photo- Hawaii gets a greater percentage of elec- mate and clean energy laws and policies. voltaic, or PV – has emerged as an tricity from solar than any other state.6 Following the launch of the Hawaii important source of renewable energy in Under Hawaii law, “renewable Clean Energy Initiative (“HCEI”) in Hawaii, driven by its relative cost-effec- energy” is defined to include “energy January 2008, a landmark agreement tiveness, high levels of public accept- generated or produced using . [t]he (commonly referred to as the Energy ance, and supportive statutory and regu- sun[.]”7 This broad statutory definition Agreement) was signed by the Hawaiian latory law and policy. Although renew- encompasses different types of solar Electric Company, Inc. and the State of able energy production in Hawaii is pri- energy devices and technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Attitudes About Renewable Energy in Hawai'i
    RENEWABLE ENERGY REPORT 2014 PUBLIC ATTITUDES ABOUT RENEWABLE ENERGY IN HAWAI‘I ABSTRACT — A representative BACKGROUND AND survey of 1,214 Hawai‘i residents PURPOSE — Increasing the pro- was conducted for the purpose of portion of energy provided by renewable assessing public attitudes about sources is a key goal of regional, national, different technologies for generating and international energy policies. Multiple electricity. Renewable energy pressures on conventional energy sys- (RE) technologies were very highly tems include increasing levels of energy favored: 97% of the public supported consumption, the cost of fossil fuels, the increased development of at least specter of peak oil, potential international some forms of RE in our state. conflict related to control of energy re- This support for RE was motivated sources, and the urgent need to reverse by concerns for environmental global warming and stem environmental protection, sustainability, and energy degradation. independence and by frustration with local energy prices. Solar and Energy concerns are particularly striking wind power were the most widely for the state of Hawai‘i, which faces accepted forms of RE (with 92% and energy-related issues that distinguish 86% favorable opinion, respectively), it from the rest of the nation. With no followed by hydroelectric (76%) internal sources of fossil fuel, our state and geothermal power (75%). is dependent on imported petroleum Municipal waste (58%) and biomass (primarily of foreign origin) for both combustion (53%) were less widely transportation and electricity generation. endorsed but were still acceptable In 2011, Hawai‘i imported 93% of its total to the majority of residents. Only a energy needs (U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Staff Proposal for Updated Performance-Based Regulations
    STAFF PROPOSAL FOR UPDATED PERFORMANCE-BASED REGULATIONS Proceeding to Investigate Performance-Based Regulation (2018-0088) Hawaii Public Utilities Commission | February 7, 2019 CONTENTS 1 Introduction: The Need for Regulatory Reform ................................................................ 2 1.1 The Imperative: Highest Rates in the Nation ................................................................... 3 1.2 The Opportunity ............................................................................................................... 3 1.2.1 Shifting from Fossil Fuel to Cost-Effective Renewable Energy ................................. 3 1.2.2 Managing Capital Expenditures ................................................................................ 6 1.2.3 Reducing Operational Expenses ............................................................................... 7 1.3 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 8 2 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Regulatory Goals and Prioritized Outcomes for Utility Regulation ............................... 10 2.2 Updated Performance-Based Regulation to Achieve Priority Outcomes ...................... 10 2.3 Next Steps ...................................................................................................................... 13 3 Regulatory Goals and Outcomes to Guide PBR in Hawaii ..............................................
    [Show full text]