On Semantic Issues Connected with Incomplete Information Databases ” .’

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

On Semantic Issues Connected with Incomplete Information Databases ” .’ On Semantic Issues Connected with Incomplete Information Databases ” .’ ::: WITOLD LIPSKI, JR. 1 Institute of Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences Various approaches to interpreting queries in a database with incomplete information are discussed. A simple model of a database is described, based on attributes which can take values in specified attribute domains. Information incompleteness means that instead of having a single value of an attribute, we have a subset of the attribute domain, which represents our knowledge that the actual value, though unknown, is one of the values in this subset. This extends the idea of Codd’s null value, corresponding to the case when thii subset is the whole attribute domain. A simple query language to communicate with such a system is described and its various semantics are precisely defined. We emphasize the distinction between two different interpretations of the query language-the external one, which refers the queries directly to the real world modeled in an incomplete way by the system, and the internal one, under which the queries refer to the system’s information about this world, rather than to the world itself. Both external and internal interpretations are provided with the corresponding sets of axioms which serve as a basis for equivalent transformations of queries. The technique of equivalent transformations of queries is then extensively exploited for evaluating the : :. interpretation of (i.e. the response to) a query. Key Words and Phrases: database, incomplete information, query language semantics, modal logic, ; .’ relational model, null values CR Categories: 3.50, 3.70, 4.33, 5.21 1. INTRODUCTION The notion of information incompleteness seems to be inherent in the domain of t databases. However, very little has been done toward clarifying the problems connected with incomplete information and creating a theoretical background for studying them. This is probably one of the reasons why present database products provide little or no support for information incompleteness, though the situation when data are incomplete is quite common. In this paper we propose a mathematical model of a database with incomplete information, which we call an information systeni. Basically, such a system stores information concerning properties of some objects. The information may be incomplete in that it may not be known whether or not an object has a property. Permission to copy without fee all or part of this material is granted provided that the copies are not made or distributed for direct commercial advantage, the ACM copyright notice and the title of the publication and its date appear, and notice is given that copying is by permission of the Association for Computing Machinery. To copy otherwise, or to republish, requires a fee and/or specific permission. This work was supported by the Polish Academy of Sciences under Contract MR 1.3. A version of this paper was presented at the Third Internstional Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Tokyo, Japan, October 1977. Author’s address: Institute of Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 22, 06-901 Warsaw PKiN, Poland. 0 1979 ACM 0362-5915/79/0900-0262 $00.75 ACM Transactions on Database Systems, Vol. 4, No. 3, September 1979,Pages 262-296. Incomplete Information Databases 263 We describe a simple language for formulating queries to such a system. A query can either define a property of objects (the response should then be the set of objects satisfying this property), or express some property of the system as a whole (the expected response is then “yes” or “no”). Simple queries can be combined into more complex ones by using “not,” “or,” and “and.” We first define the semantics of our language in the special case when the information is complete. This semantics is intuitively evident, and is “the only natural one.” It is no longer so when the information is incomplete. For instance, what should be the response to the query “list all objects which are red or blue”? Should we list only those objects known to be red and those known to be blue, or should we also include the objects whose color is determined only to the extent that is known to be red or blue? And what about objects for which the possibility of being red or blue cannot be ruled out? The need for a precise formal semantics is evident here. It is also clear that a query can be interpreted in many different ways, of which none is distinguished as “the only natural one.” This fact raises the problem of making sure that the user’s intention expressed in a query and the system’s understanding of that query coincide. Of course, in order to solve this problem, it is not sufficient to merely realize that there may be many different interpretations of a query. Rather, we should understand these differences. As we shall see, there are two essentially different ways of interpreting a query-the external interpretation and the internal interpretation. The external interpretation refers the queries directly to the real world modeled (in an incomplete way) by the system, whereas under the internal interpretation the queries refer to the system’s information about this world, rather than to the world itself. Let us consider the following simple example. Suppose that an information system contains four objects a, b, c, d, and that the set of objects which are known to be red consists of the single object a, whereas the only object known not to be red is d (it is not known whether or not b and c are red). Then the external interpretation of the query red (i.e. “list all red objects”) is the set of all the objects which are red in reality, that is, it may be {p}, {a, b}, (a, c}, or {a, b, c} . Of course, the information contained in the system is not sufficient to exactly determine this set. In this sense our interpretation is “external” with respect to the system. However, we may consider, for any query Q, the following two bounds on the external interpretation of Q: (i) 11Q II*, the set of objects for which we can conclude, from the information available in the system, that they are in the external interpretation of Q, and (ii) 11Q II *, the set of objects for which we cannot rule out the possibility of belonging to the external interpretation of Q. (If Q is a “yes-no” query then the above definitions should be modified in a natural way.) In other words, II Q II * and II Q II* are the best possible bounds on the external interpretation of Q logically derivable from the system. In our example 11red II * = {a}, IIredlj* = {a, b, c}. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, Vol. 4, No. 3, September 1979. 264 * Witold Lipski, Jr. It is very easy to compute I] Q ]I *, I] Q I( * when Q expresses an elementary property (e.g. red), since in such a case ]I Q ]I * and ]I &]I * are usually explicitly contained in the system. The situation becomes much more complicated when Q is a Boolean combination of elementary properties. We are then to derive ]I Q ]I .+ and ]I Q (I* from the bounds on elementary properties occurring in Q. To illustrate what kind of problems may arise in this connection, let us consider the following example. Suppose that a medical database contains information concerning the group of blood (0, A, B, or AB) for a large collection of individuals. Sometimes it may happen that we have only partial information on the group of blood of a person, derived from the group of blood of the parents, or from some partial tests of the blood. For instance, if one of the parents has group AB, then group 0 is excluded; if the parents’ groups are A and 0 then the only possible groups are 0 and A, etc. Now suppose that we are looking for candidates for transfusion with group 0 or A. Then any person with parents’ groups 0 and A is appropriate, even if we do not exactly know his group-it is sufficient that we know this group to be in the set (0, A}. In other words, every such person is in the set ]I BLOODGROUP = A OR BLOODGROUP = 0 ]I * , and consequently in the external interpretation of the query BLOODGROUP = A OR BLOODGROUP = 0. Of course, not every such person need be in 1)BLOODGROUP = A ]I * U I( BLOODGROUP = 0 I] * . This shows that usually ]I Q1 OR QZ ]I * cannot be found by simply taking the union ofIIQ~II~andIlQ4~. Notice that partial information on the value of an attribute is usually not expressible in the approach based on null values (see Codd [3]). Indeed, if we use null values, then we are restricted to the following two extreme cases: (i) Everything is known about the value of an attribute. (ii) Nothing is known about the value of an attribute. Let us consider another example, involving a “yes-no” query. Suppose that we classify objects a, b, c, d, e with respect to color. Assume that the color of no object is known, but our partial knowledge about the colors is as follows: possibly red objects a, b possibly blue objects a, b, c, d, e possibly green objects a, c possibly white objects a, b, c possibly black objects b, c (We do not exclude the possibility of an object having a color other than those colors listed above.) Now consider the query “Are there objects of all colors in our collection?” We may provide a definite response, though the color of no object is known.
Recommended publications
  • Probabilistic Databases
    Series ISSN: 2153-5418 SUCIU • OLTEANU •RÉ •KOCH M SYNTHESIS LECTURES ON DATA MANAGEMENT &C Morgan & Claypool Publishers Series Editor: M. Tamer Özsu, University of Waterloo Probabilistic Databases Probabilistic Databases Dan Suciu, University of Washington, Dan Olteanu, University of Oxford Christopher Ré,University of Wisconsin-Madison and Christoph Koch, EPFL Probabilistic databases are databases where the value of some attributes or the presence of some records are uncertain and known only with some probability. Applications in many areas such as information extraction, RFID and scientific data management, data cleaning, data integration, and financial risk DATABASES PROBABILISTIC assessment produce large volumes of uncertain data, which are best modeled and processed by a probabilistic database. This book presents the state of the art in representation formalisms and query processing techniques for probabilistic data. It starts by discussing the basic principles for representing large probabilistic databases, by decomposing them into tuple-independent tables, block-independent-disjoint tables, or U-databases. Then it discusses two classes of techniques for query evaluation on probabilistic databases. In extensional query evaluation, the entire probabilistic inference can be pushed into the database engine and, therefore, processed as effectively as the evaluation of standard SQL queries. The relational queries that can be evaluated this way are called safe queries. In intensional query evaluation, the probabilistic Dan Suciu inference is performed over a propositional formula called lineage expression: every relational query can be evaluated this way, but the data complexity dramatically depends on the query being evaluated, and Dan Olteanu can be #P-hard. The book also discusses some advanced topics in probabilistic data management such as top-kquery processing, sequential probabilistic databases, indexing and materialized views, and Monte Carlo databases.
    [Show full text]
  • Download a Copy of the 264-Page Publication
    2020 Department of Neurological Surgery Annual Report Reporting period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020 Table of Contents: Introduction .................................................................3 Faculty and Residents ...................................................5 Faculty ...................................................................6 Residents ...............................................................8 Stuart Rowe Lecturers .........................................10 Peter J. Jannetta Lecturers ................................... 11 Department Overview ............................................... 13 History ............................................................... 14 Goals/Mission .................................................... 16 Organization ...................................................... 16 Accomplishments of Note ................................ 29 Education Programs .................................................. 35 Faculty Biographies ................................................... 47 Resident Biographies ................................................171 Research ....................................................................213 Overview ...........................................................214 Investigator Research Summaries ................... 228 Research Grant Summary ................................ 242 Alumni: Past Residents ........................................... 249 Donations ................................................................ 259 Statistics
    [Show full text]
  • Best Answers Over Incomplete Data : Complexity and First-Order Rewritings
    Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-19) Best Answers over Incomplete Data : Complexity and First-Order Rewritings Amelie´ Gheerbrant and Cristina Sirangelo Universite´ de Paris, IRIF, CNRS, F-75013 Paris, France famelie, [email protected] Abstract as if nulls were usual data values, thus merely using the stan- dard database query engine to compute certain answers. Answering queries over incomplete data is ubiqui- In general though it is a common occurrence that few if tous in data management and in many AI applica- any certain answers can be found. If there are no certain an- tions that use query rewriting to take advantage of swers, it is still useful to provide a user with some answers, relational database technology. In these scenarios with suitable guarantees. To address this need, a framework one lacks full information on the data but queries to measure how close an answer is to certainty has recently still need to be answered with certainty. The cer- been proposed [Libkin, 2018b], setting the foundations to tainty aspect often makes query answering unfeasi- both a quantitative and a qualitative approach. We focus on ble except for restricted classes, such as unions of the qualitative notion of best answers. Those are a refinement conjunctive queries. In addition often there are no, of certain answers based on comparing query answers; one or very few, certain answers, thus expensive com- that is supported by a larger set of complete interpretations is putation is in vain. Therefore we study a relax- better. Best answers are those answers for which there is no ation of certain answers called best answers.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Tarski's Influence on Computer Science
    Tarski’s influence on computer science Solomon Feferman The following is the text of an invited lecture for the LICS 2005 meeting held in Chicago June 26-29, 2005.1 Except for the addition of references, footnotes, corrections of a few points and stylistic changes, the text is essentially as delivered. Subsequent to the lecture I received interesting comments from several colleagues that would have led me to expand on some of the topics as well as the list of references, had I had the time to do so. *********** Almost exactly eight years ago today, Anita Feferman gave a lecture for LICS 1997 at the University of Warsaw with the title, “The saga of Alfred Tarski: From Warsaw to Berkeley.” Anita used the opportunity to tell various things we had learned about Tarski while working on our biography of him. We had no idea then how long it would take to finish that work; it was finally completed in 2004 and appeared in the fall of that year under the title, Alfred Tarski: Life and Logic. The saga that Anita recounted took Tarski from the beginning of the 20th century with his birth to a middle-class Jewish family and upringing in Warsaw, through his university studies and Ph.D. at the ripe young age of 23 and on to his rise as the premier logician in Poland in the 1930s and increasing visibility on the international scene-- despite which he never succeeded in obtaining a chair as professor to match his achievements. The saga continued with Tarski coming to Harvard for a meeting in early September, 1939 when the Nazis invaded Poland on September 1st, at which point he was, in effect, stranded.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonapplicable Nulls
    Theoretical Computer Science 46 (1986) 67-82 67 North-Holland NONAPPLICABLE NULLS Nadine LERAT and Witold LIPSKI, Jr. Laboratoire de Recherche en Informatique, E.R.A. 452 du C.N.R.S. "AI Khowarizmi", Universit~ de Paris-Sud, Centre d'Orsay, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France Communicated by M. Nivat Received December 1985 Abstract. A nonapplicable null appears in a relation whenever the value of the corresponding attribute does not exist. In order to evaluate a query on a relation r involving such null values, the information contained in r is represented by a set of null-free instances, then the query on r--expressed in a user-friendly query language (Generalized Relational Calculus)---is translated into a set of queries on the null-free instances. Conversely, we define the operations on relations with nulls (Generalized Relational Algebra) and we proved an extension of Codd's completeness theorem. Introduction It often happens in database practice that we are not able to provide the value of an attdbutennot just because we do not know this value, but rather because (we know that) the attribute does not apply, i.e., this value simply does not exist. Typically, a special symbol, called a nonexistent null or nonapplicable null, is inserted in such a situation into the appropriate field in the database. One should make a clear distinction between nonapplicable nulls and the usual 'existential nulls' denoting 'value exists but is not known'. Indeed, these two cases of nulls have a completely different flavor and it should be stressed that a situation necessitating the use of a nonapplicable null has nothing to do with information incompleteness.
    [Show full text]
  • My Six Encounters with Victor Marek — a Personal Account
    My Six Encounters with Victor Marek — a Personal Account Mirosław Truszczynski´ Department of Computer Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA [email protected] 1 Introduction Co-editing the volume dedicated to Victor Marek in honor of his 65th birthday turned into an occasion to reflect on the influence Victor has had on my life. Since 1985, we have worked together day in and day out, and over the years we have grown to be friends (I hope he sees it the same way). However, the story starts about 10 years earlier, and whenever I think about it, it invariably boils down to what I call six encounters. In 1973, I entered the Warsaw University of Technology and had to attend lectures on the foundations of mathematics. While in high school, I had never heard about the subject but was soon under its spell. There was clarity and elegance in it and, to my (pleasant) surprise, also questions that went beyond mathematics into the realm of phi- losophy. To be sure, it was not easy, and for a while I feared I could fail to master the subject. Fortunately, I learned that there was an excellent problem book. Owing to the color of its cover, it was known as the ”black book” among my fellow students. It helped me a lot. In fact, for a while it was indispensable! The authors were Victor Marek and Janusz Onyszkiewicz [1]. Such was my first, albeit indirect, encounter with Victor. It quite possibly saved a young aspiring mathematician. (By the way, there is also an English edition of the book [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Ooo Ooto •Oooo
    PRACE IPI PAN • ICS PAS REPORTS o o oO . 1 Q Tomasz Imielinski, Witold Lipski, jr ooto O O O f O A systematic approach 0 0 0 O O *° relational O # # database theory 90900 00900 OOO ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 457 •oooo0#000 INSTYTUT PODSTAW INFORMATYKI POLSKIEI AKADEMII NAUK INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER SCIENCE POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ooooo 00-901 W A R SA W , P. O. Box 22, P O L A N D Tomasz Imieliński, Witold Lipski, A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO RELATIONAL DATABASE THEORY. 457 Warsaw, January 1982 Rada Redakcyjna A. Blikle (przewodniczący), S. Bylka, J. Lipski (sekretarz), W. Lipski, L. Łukaszewicz, R. Marczyński, A. Mazurkiewicz, T. Nowicki, Z. Szoda, M. Warsrus (zastępca przewodniczącego) Pracę zgłosił Andrzej Blikle Mailing addresses: Tomasz Imieliński Witold Lipski Institute of Computer Science Polish Academy of Sciences P.O. Box 22 00-901 Warszawa PKiH iss : : 0138 - 0648 J? X. f ' r , \ ! D 4 ? z \ ’ L1»• o , • *<w PB Printed as a manucsript Ha prawach rękopisu Nakład 700 egz. Ark. Wyd. 1,25; ark. druk. 1,75, Papier offset, kl. III, 70 g, 70 x 100. Oddano do druku w atyczniu 1982 r. W. D. H. Zaa. nr Sygn. J d k 2 ć |.k 5 ł nr inw. Abstract • COJ(0P*®HM , streszczenie In an attempt to eliminate motivational inconsistencies, we propose a new approach to relational database theory. Basically, a database schema is treated as a relational view defined over certain atomic, selfexplainable relations, constituting wnat we call a conceptual schema. In this new framework, we revisit some basic notions of the relational database theory, such as dependencies and schema equivalence.
    [Show full text]
  • Oooo Oo#Oo Oteoo
    h 14P6/175 f i ' PRACE co PAN • cc PAS REPORTS Oooo2 1 5 5 b ^ “ " o o o « o OOOM oo#oo 00* 0« 00990 00999 Witold Lipski omooo 09009 Variaits of file organization for a family 09099 of threo sets oteoo 09909 09990 _______ t75 1974 OOOO WARSZAWA O O O w CENTRUM OBLICZENIOWE POLSKIEJ AKADEMII NAUK COMPUTATION CENTRE POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 00*0 WARSAW PKIN, P. O. Box 2 2, POLAND Witold Lipski VARIANTS OP PILE ORGANIZATION POR A PA1CELY OP THREE SETS 175 Warsaw 1575 Komitat Redakcyjny A. Blikle (przewodniczący), J. Lipski (sekretarz), L. Łukaszewicz, R. Marczyński, Ł. Mardoń, A. Mazurkiewicz, Z. Pawlak, Z. Szoda (zastępca przewodniczącego), M. Warmia Pracę zgłosił Zdzisław Pawlak Mailing adirees« Witold Lipski, Jr ul. Afrykańska 14P 14, 03-946 Warszawa Ob)ic o PA. b Ina. Printed as a nanuscript Ba prawach rękopisu Bakład 700 egz. Ark. wyd. 0,75 ark. druk. 1,00. Papier offset. kl. XH, 70 g, 70 x 100. Oddano do druku w październiku 1974 r. W. D. B. Zam. nr 733/O 1 Abstract . CojepxaHHe • Streszczenie In the paper the following combinatorial problem related to file organization is considered: given three sets find an arranging of X such that each is a segment (cf.t3l). Certain theorems concerning a file organization introduced by Ghosh [21, which are connected with the above problem, are also proved. BapHaHTH opraHH3anHH MHOsceciBa Aawmtx b ciyqae ceMeRciBa Tpex u b o z s c t b B paCoie paccuaipHBaeTca npoójtewa KOMÓHHaiopHKH, cbs- 3aHHaa c opraHH3anne$ MHOxeciBa flammx, a mieHHo: no AaHiaai ipeii MBoxecTBau M ^ Mg, Mg » 1 BaflTH TaKoe ynopaflO^ieHHe MHoatecTBa X, ^to6bi Ka^woe mbokoctbo M npe,ncTaBJiajio codofi 0ipe3OK /cpaBBH c [3J /.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Answers Over Incomplete Data: Complexity and First-Order Rewritings
    Best Answers over Incomplete Data : Complexity and First-Order Rewritings Amélie Gheerbrant, Cristina Sirangelo To cite this version: Amélie Gheerbrant, Cristina Sirangelo. Best Answers over Incomplete Data : Complexity and First- Order Rewritings. the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2019), Aug 2019, Macao, China. hal-02971723 HAL Id: hal-02971723 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02971723 Submitted on 19 Oct 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Best Answers over Incomplete Data : Complexity and First-Order Rewritings Amelie´ Gheerbrant and Cristina Sirangelo Universite´ de Paris, IRIF, CNRS, F-75013 Paris, France famelie, [email protected] Abstract as if nulls were usual data values, thus merely using the stan- dard database query engine to compute certain answers. Answering queries over incomplete data is ubiqui- In general though it is a common occurrence that few if tous in data management and in many AI applica- any certain answers can be found. If there are no certain an- tions that use query rewriting to take advantage of swers, it is still useful to provide a user with some answers, relational database technology.
    [Show full text]
  • FINDING a MANHATTAN PATH and RELATED PROBLEMS by Witold
    FINDING A MANHATTAN PATH AND RELATED PROBLEMS by Witold Lipski, Jr. This work was supported in part by the University of Illinois. FINDING A MANHATTAN PATH AND RELATED PROBLEMS Witold Lipski, Jr. Coordinated Science Laboratory University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana, IL 61801, USA Abstract. Let S be a set of n horizontal and vertical segments on the plane, and let s, t € S. A Manhattan path (of length k) from s to t is an alternating sequence of horizontal and vertical segments s = r^,r.,...,r^ = t where r^ 2 intersects r^+ p 0 < i < k. We give an 0 (nlog n) algorithm to find, for a given t, a tree of shortest Manhattan paths from all s € S to t. We also determine a maximum set of crossings (intersections of segments) with no two on the same segment, as well as a maximum set of nonintersecting segments, 3/2 2 both in 0(n log n) time. The latter algorithm is applied to decomposing, 3/2 2 in 0(n log n) time, a hole-free union of n rectangles with sides parallel to the coordinate axes into the minimal number of disjoint rectangles. All 2 the algorithms require O(nlogn) space, and for all of them the factor log n can be improved to lognloglogn, at the cost of some complication of the basic data structure used. Keywords and phrases: computational geometry, horizontal and vertical segments, segment tree, Manhattan path, minimal decomposition into disjoint rectangles. On leave from the Institute of Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences, P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relational Model of Data and Cylindric Algebras
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER AND SYSTEM SCIENCES 28,8&102 (1984) The Relational Model of Data and Cylindric Algebras TOMASZ IMIELI~KI AND WITOLD LIPSKI, JR. Institute of Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences P.O. Box 22, 00-901 Warsaw PKiN, Poland Received August 24, 1982; revised April 25, 1983 It is shown how the theory of cylindric algebras (a notion introduced by Tarski and others as a tool in the algebraization of the first order predicate calculus) can give a new insight into Codd’s relational model of data. The relational algebra of Codd can be embedded in a natural way into a cylindric algebra where the join operation becomes the usual set-theoretical inter- section. It is shown, by using known facts from the theory of cylindric algebras, that a version of the relational algebra is not finitely axiomatizable and that the equivalence problem for certain relational expressions is undecidable. A duality between the project-join and select- union operator pairs is also briefly discussed. 1. INTRODUCTION A general classification of query languages which turned out to be convenient in database theory and practice is that into nonprocedural and procedural languages. A query in a nonprocedural language expresses what we want without necessarily saying how to obtain it. A query in a procedural language explicitly specifies the actions that should be taken, or procedures to be invoked, to obtain the response. While no practical query language is either purely procedural or purely nonprocedural, it is clear that nonprocedural languages are more convenient for the user, whereas procedural languages are easier to implement.
    [Show full text]
  • Query Processing on Probabilistic Data: a Survey
    Foundations and Trends R in Databases Vol. 7, No. 3-4 (2015) 197–341 c 2017 G. Van den Broeck and D. Suciu DOI: 10.1561/1900000052 Query Processing on Probabilistic Data: A Survey Guy Van den Broeck Dan Suciu University of California University of Washington Los Angeles Seattle Contents 1 Introduction 198 2 Probabilistic Data Model 203 2.1 Possible Worlds Semantics . 204 2.2 Independence Assumptions . 205 2.3 Query Semantics . 212 2.4 Beyond Independence: Hard Constraints . 215 2.5 Beyond Independence: Soft Constraints . 218 2.6 From Soft Constraints to Independence . 225 2.7 Related Data Models . 229 3 Weighted Model Counting 236 3.1 Three Variants of Model Counting . 236 3.2 Relationships Between the Three Problems . 241 3.3 First-Order Model Counting . 243 3.4 Algorithms and Complexity for Exact Model Counting . 249 3.5 Algorithms for Approximate Model Counting . 252 4 Lifted Query Processing 258 4.1 Extensional Operators and Safe Plans . 260 4.2 Lifted Inference Rules . 265 4.3 Hierarchical Queries . 269 ii iii 4.4 The Dichotomy Theorem . 271 4.5 Negation . 278 4.6 Symmetric Databases . 281 4.7 Extensions . 284 5 Query Compilation 292 5.1 Compilation Targets . 293 5.2 Compiling UCQ . 300 5.3 Compilation Beyond UCQ . 311 6 Data, Systems, and Applications 313 6.1 Probabilistic Data . 313 6.2 Probabilistic Database Systems . 315 6.3 Applications . 318 7 Conclusions and Open Problems 321 Acknowledgements 323 References 324 Abstract Probabilistic data is motivated by the need to model uncertainty in large databases. Over the last twenty years or so, both the Database community and the AI community have studied various aspects of probabilistic relational data.
    [Show full text]