DOCSLIB.ORG

Mineria Ingles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mineria Ingles IMPROVING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROCESS IN MINING Centro Mexicano de Derecho Ambiental (CEMDA) Mexico Canadian Institute for Environmental Law and Policy (CIELAP) Canada Comité Pro Defensa de la Fauna y Flora (CODEFF) Chile Environmental Law Institute (ELI) United States Sociedad Peruana de Derecho Ambiental (SPDA) Peru Manuel Pulgar Vidal, Adriana Aurazo, Editors Susan Bass and Wendy Sandoz, Co-editors Sociedad Peruana de Derecho Ambiental Improving Citizen Participation in the Environmental Impact Assessment Process in Mining Published by the Peruvian Society for Environmental Law – Sociedad Peruana de Derecho Ambiental (SPDA) with the support of the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) PO Box 8500, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1G 3H9 Copyright: ã Sociedad Peruana de Derecho Ambiental (SPDA) También impreso en español bajo el título: Mejorando la Participación Ciudadana en el Proceso de Evaluación de Impacto Ambiental en Minería First Edition: January 2004. Legal deposit in the Biblioteca Nacional del Perú 1501222003-1392 ISBN 9972-792-41-2 Cover design by: Gisele Rodríguez U., Piucce Company S.A.C. Printed by: LERMA GÓMEZ E.I.R.L. - AV. LA PAZ 860 - MIRAFLORES - PERÚ This publication is the result of the collaboration of: the Sociedad Peruana de Derecho Ambiental (SPDA), Peru, the Environmental Law Institute (ELI), United States, the Canadian Institute for Environmental Law and Policy (CIELAP), Canada, the Centro Mexicano de Derecho Ambiental (CEMDA), Mexico and the Comité Nacional pro Defensa de la Fauna y Flora (CODEFF), Chile, under the auspices of the International Development Research Centre (IDRC), Canada. These organizations worked in the search to improve existing public participation tools in their respective countries. This work is the conclusion their efforts. We would like to especially thank the following people: Anne Mitchell, Malcolm Rogge, Christine Elwell, Anicia Bonilla, Miguel Stutzin, Patricia González, Alberto Cortés, Susan Bass, Rose Edmonds, Wendy Sandoz, Maria Elena Mesta, Juan Carlos Carrillo and Ada Alegre, who actively participated in the preparation of the English and Spanish versions of this text and in the field visits. Editors. CEMDA - CIELAP - CODEFF - ELI -SPDA 6 Improving public participation in the environmental impact assessment process in mining INDEX PRESENTATION .......................................................................................................................................................9 IMPROVING CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROCESS IN MINING ................................................................................................................................................................... 11 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... 11 2. Environmental impact assessment .....................................................................................................................13 3. The role of different actors in environmental impact assessment ......................................................................17 4. Citizen participation ............................................................................................................................................20 5. How to rebuild confidence in environmental impact assessment? .....................................................................22 6. Formal and informal mechanisms for citizen participation .................................................................................27 CRITERIA AND TERMS OF REFERENCE ............................................................................................................37 I. CRITERIA TO SELECT THE CASE STUDIES ....................................................................................................39 1. Objective .......................................................................................................................................................39 2. Criteria ...........................................................................................................................................................39 II. CRITERIA TO DEVELOP THE CASE STUDIES ................................................................................................41 1. Objectives......................................................................................................................................................41 2. Criteria ...........................................................................................................................................................41 III. TERMS OF REFERENCE .................................................................................................................................43 1. General Information ......................................................................................................................................43 2. Objectives......................................................................................................................................................43 3. Contents ........................................................................................................................................................43 4. Summary .......................................................................................................................................................43 CHARTS .................................................................................................................................................................45 I. MATRICES ON CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT IN MINING: CANADA, CHILE, UNITED STATES, MEXICO AND PERU .............................................................................47 II. CENTRAL ELEMENTS TO EVALUATE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN MINING-METALLURGIC PROJECTS ...............................................................................................................52 COUNTRY REPORTS ............................................................................................................................................57 I. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION AND MINING IN CANADA ........................................................................................59 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................59 2. Environmental impact assessment processes ..............................................................................................59 3. Common participatory mechanisms ..............................................................................................................62 4. Other legal mechanisms ...............................................................................................................................64 5. Non-legal mechanisms .................................................................................................................................64 6. Successful results .........................................................................................................................................66 II. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION AND MINING IN CHILE ............................................................................................67 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................67 2. The Environmental Impact Assessment Process .........................................................................................67 3. Citizen participation mechanisms .................................................................................................................69 4. Other formal mechanisms .............................................................................................................................71 5. Successful experiences of citizen participation in environmental management ...........................................72 III. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION AND MINING IN THE UNITED STATES .................................................................75 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................75 2. Environmental Impact Assessment Process.................................................................................................75 3. Common participatory mechanisms ..............................................................................................................77 4. Other legal mechanisms ...............................................................................................................................78 5. Non-legal mechanisms .................................................................................................................................81 6. Successes .....................................................................................................................................................81 7. Weaknesses .................................................................................................................................................82 IV. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION AND MINING IN MEXICO .......................................................................................83
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Towards-Sustauinable-Mining-Report
    2018 2018 Progress Report Table of Contents Introduction About Towards Sustainable Mining® (TSM®) 3 TSM Guiding Principles 4 Message from the Chair of the TSM Governance Team and MAC’s President and CEO 5 2017 Statement from the Community of Interest Advisory Panel 7 How TSM Works 11 Industry Performance Understanding the Results 15 Communities and People 16 Aboriginal and Community Outreach 16 Crisis Management and Communications Planning 17 Safety and Health 19 Preventing Child and Forced Labour 21 Environmental Stewardship 25 Tailings Management 25 Biodiversity Conservation Management 27 Energy Efficiency 32 Energy Use and GHG Emissions Management 32 International Application of TSM 35 TSM Awards TSM Excellence Awards 47 TSM Leadership Awards 50 TSM Performance by Company 51 © 2018 The Mining Association of Canada. Trademarks, including but not limited to Towards Sustainable Mining®, TSM®, and the diamond shaped figure arcs and quadrilaterals designs, are either registered trademarks or trademarks of The Mining Association of Canada in Canada and/or other countries. TSM Progress Report 2 2018 Introduction About Towards Sustainable Mining Towards Sustainable Mining ® (TSM®) is an award-winning performance system that helps mining companies evaluate and manage their environmental and social responsibilities. It is a set of tools and indicators to drive performance and ensure that key mining risks are managed responsibly at participating mining and metallurgical facilities. Mining companies that participate in the TSM initiative demonstrate their strong commitment to responsible mining. By adhering to the TSM Guiding Principles, mining companies exhibit leadership by: Committing to the Engaging Driving world-leading safety and health of with communities.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release
    NEWS RELEASE Release Time IMMEDIATE Date 17 April 2013 Number 05/13 BHP BILLITON PRODUCTION REPORT FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED 31 MARCH 2013 . Full year production guidance is retained for our major businesses following another quarter of robust operating performance. Western Australia Iron Ore achieved record production for the nine month period ended March 2013. Production guidance of 183 million tonnes (100% basis) for the 2013 financial year remains unchanged, despite cyclone related downtime during the period. An annualised production rate approaching 200 million tonnes (100% basis) is anticipated for the June 2013 quarter. Onshore US produced more than five million barrels of liquids during the March 2013 quarter and the Eagle Ford is now our single largest liquids producing field. Petroleum production guidance for the 2013 financial year remains unchanged at approximately 240 million barrels of oil equivalent. Copper in concentrate production at Escondida increased by 61% during the nine month period ended March 2013. Total Escondida copper production remains on track to increase by at least 20% in the 2013 financial year. Queensland Coal production was affected by adverse weather conditions during the March 2013 quarter. However, recently installed flood mitigation infrastructure enabled a rapid recovery in performance and the business was operating at full supply chain capacity at the end of the period. Petroleum MAR MAR MAR YTD13 MAR Q13 MAR Q13 2013 2013 vs vs vs YTD QTR MAR YTD12 MAR Q12 DEC Q12 Crude oil, condensate and natural gas liquids (‘000 boe) 66,610 20,871 1% -4% -10% Natural gas (bcf) 659.78 207.27 10% -1% -6% Total petroleum products (million boe) 176.57 55.42 6% -2% -7% Total petroleum production – An average production rate of 644 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day was achieved during the nine month period ended March 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Ekati Diamond Mine Environmental Agreement and Water Licence Annual Report Summary 2018 May 24, 2019
    Ekati Diamond Mine Environmental Agreement and Water Licence Annual Report Summary 2018 May 24, 2019 Loretta Ransom Manager – Environmental Assessment and Monitoring Environmental Stewardship and Climate Change Environment and Natural Resources Government of the Northwest Territories P.O. Box 1320 Yellowknife, NT X1A 2L9 Jaida Ohokannoak Chair - Independent Environmental Monitoring Agency PO Box 1192 Yellowknife, NT X1A 2N8 Michael Roesch Senior Implementation Negotiator/Senior Policy and Program Analyst NWT Region Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada 4923 52nd Street Gallery Building Box 1500 Yellowknife, NT X1A 2R3 Chair - Joseph Mackenzie Wek’èezhìi Land and Water Board #1, 4905-48th Street Yellowknife, NT X1A 2P6 Re: Ekati Diamond Mine – Environmental Agreement and Water Licence Annual Report Summary 2018 Dominion Diamond Mines ULC (Dominion) is pleased to submit the attached Environmental Agreement and Water Licence Annual Report Summary 2018. This report was prepared in accordance with the annual reporting requirements of Part B Condition 10 and Schedule 1 Condition 1 of Water Licence W2012L2-0001 and Article 5 of the Environmental Agreement. Dominion trusts that you will find this report to be clear and informative. Please contact Claudine Lee, Head of Environment at [email protected] or 403-910-1933 x 2401 should you have any questions. Sincerely, Claudine Lee, M.Sc., P.Geol. Head of Environment Table of Contents Introduction 1 The Ekati Diamond Mine Story 1 The Ekati Diamond Mine Location 2 The Ekati Diamond
    [Show full text]
  • Ekati Diamond Mine
    2019 EKATI DIAMOND MINE SOCIO-ECONOMICEKATI DIAMOND MINE 2019 AGREEMENT Socio-Economic Agreement REPORT Report 1 2 CONTENTS 5 COO’s Message 6 Community Development 9 Health & Safety 10 Environment 15 Employment 24 Business Spend 29 Appendix A: Position Listings 35 Appendix B: Interpretations & Definitions EKATI DIAMOND MINE 2019 Socio-Economic Agreement Report 3 4 COO’S MESSAGE Dominion Diamond Mines ULC (“Dominion” or “the company”) is pleased to present the 2019 Socio-Economic Agreement Report (SEA Report) for the Ekati Diamond Mine, in which we describe the results of our commitments to the Government of the Northwest Territories (GNWT) as set out in the SEA. Dominion is continuing to make a positive difference in the North through support for education, training, community development, employment and business opportunities. ABOUT THE COMPANY 2019 was a challenging, but exciting year for Dominion. By the Dominion is a Canadian mining end of the year we had updated our current Life of Mine company and one of the world’s plan, which now includes the Point Lake project with the largest producers and suppliers of intention to follow with the Jay pipe development. As well, premium rough diamonds to the Dominion has applied to continue its exploration of the Lac global market. de Gras and Glowworn Lake regions. These projects will continue to keep the Ekati mine operating while providing The company operates the Ekati ongoing opportunities for the North. As we move into 2020, Diamond Mine, in which it owns we continue to work diligently towards the future of the a controlling interest, and owns Ekati mine.
    [Show full text]
  • For Announcement to the Market
    20 February 2013 For Announcement to the Market Name of Companies: BHP Billiton Limited (ABN 49 004 028 077) and BHP Billiton Plc (Registration No. 3196209) Report for the half year ended 31 December 2012 This statement includes the consolidated results of the BHP Billiton Group, comprising BHP Billiton Limited and BHP Billiton Plc, for the half year ended 31 December 2012 compared with the half year ended 31 December 2011. The results are prepared in accordance with IFRS and are presented in US dollars. US$ Million Revenue down 14.1% to 32,204 Profit attributable to the members of the BHP Billiton Group down 57.8% to 4,238 Net Tangible Asset Backing: Net tangible assets per fully paid share were US$11.77 as at 31 December 2012, compared with US$11.59 at 30 June 2012. Dividends per share: Interim dividend for current period US 57 cents fully franked (record date 8 March 2013; payment date 28 March 2013) Interim dividend for previous corresponding period US 55 cents fully franked This statement was approved by the Board of Directors. Jane McAloon Group Company Secretary BHP Billiton Limited and BHP Billiton Plc WorldReginfo - 48e7f989-b053-4af9-872f-13baefa08e8a NEWS RELEASE Release Time IMMEDIATE Date 20 February 2013 Number 04/13 BHP BILLITON RESULTS FOR THE HALF YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2012 . The December 2012 half year was more challenging for the global resources industry. Against this backdrop, BHP Billiton’s solid financial results were built on the foundations of strong operating performance, our continued focus on costs and the benefits of our differentiated strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • BTI 2020 Country Report Peru
    BTI 2020 Country Report Peru This report is part of the Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index (BTI) 2020. It covers the period from February 1, 2017 to January 31, 2019. The BTI assesses the transformation toward democracy and a market economy as well as the quality of governance in 137 countries. More on the BTI at https://www.bti-project.org. Please cite as follows: Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2020 Country Report — Peru. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2020. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Contact Bertelsmann Stiftung Carl-Bertelsmann-Strasse 256 33111 Gütersloh Germany Sabine Donner Phone +49 5241 81 81501 [email protected] Hauke Hartmann Phone +49 5241 81 81389 [email protected] Robert Schwarz Phone +49 5241 81 81402 [email protected] Sabine Steinkamp Phone +49 5241 81 81507 [email protected] BTI 2020 | Peru 3 Key Indicators Population M 32.0 HDI 0.759 GDP p.c., PPP $ 14393 Pop. growth1 % p.a. 1.7 HDI rank of 189 82 Gini Index 43.3 Life expectancy years 76.3 UN Education Index 0.692 Poverty3 % 9.8 Urban population % 77.9 Gender inequality2 0.381 Aid per capita $ -0.2 Sources (as of December 2019): The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2019 | UNDP, Human Development Report 2019. Footnotes: (1) Average annual growth rate. (2) Gender Inequality Index (GII). (3) Percentage of population living on less than $3.20 a day at 2011 international prices. Executive Summary In the 2016 to 2018 period, the political changes that have taken place in Peru have been as numerous as they have been substantial.
    [Show full text]
  • South32 Roadshow Presentation
    TAO2013\Comms\2015.03.16 - South32 Global Roadshow Pres\150305 South32 Global Roadshow Pres POST BAC Submission_v14.pptx MAKING A DIFFERENCE FROM THE GROUND UP ROADSHOW PRESENTATION MARCH 2015 TAO2013\Comms\2015.03.16 - South32 Global Roadshow Pres\150305 South32 Global Roadshow Pres POST BAC Submission_v14.pptx IMPORTANT INFORMATION AND DISCLAIMER Nature of this presentation The information contained in this presentation does not constitute a prospectus or other listing document in relation to BHP Billiton or the new company proposed to be demerged from BHP Billiton (‘South32’) in any jurisdiction and is summary information provided for information purposes only. Any investment decision in relation to South32 should be made only on the basis of the information contained in the Listing Document for the relevant jurisdiction. The “Listing Documents”, which are available, subject to applicable securities laws, on the BHP Billiton website at www.bhpbilliton.com/demerger, comprise a prospectus which has been approved by the UK Listing Authority in connection with the proposed admission of South32’s ordinary shares to the standard listing segment of the Official List of the UK Financial Conduct Authority and to trading on the Main Market for listed securities of London Stock Exchange plc, an information memorandum in connection with South32’s application for the admission of its ordinary shares to listing on the Australian Securities Exchange and a pre-listing statement in connection with South32’s application for the admission of its ordinary shares to listing on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. This presentation should not be relied upon in connection with voting on the proposed demerger.
    [Show full text]
  • TROUBLED WATERS How Mine Waste Dumping Is Poisoning Our Oceans, Rivers, and Lakes
    TROUBLED WATERS HOW MINE WASTE DUMPING IS POISONING OUR OCEANS, RIVERS, AND LAKES Earthworks and MiningWatch Canada, February 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................1 TABLE 1. WATER BODIES IMPERILED BY CURRENT OR PROPOSED TAILINGS DUMPING ................................. 2 TABLE 2. MINING CORPORATIONS THAT DUMP TAILINGS INTO NATURAL WATER BODIES .......................... 4 TAILINGS DUMPING 101....................................................................................................5 OCEAN DUMPING ....................................................................................................................................... 7 RIVER DUMPING........................................................................................................................................... 8 TABLE 3. TAILINGS AND WASTE ROCK DUMPED BY EXISTING MINES EVERY YEAR ......................................... 8 LAKE DUMPING ......................................................................................................................................... 10 CAN WASTES DUMPED IN BODIES OF WATER BE CLEANED UP? ................................................................ 10 CASE STUDIES: BODIES OF WATER MOST THREATENED BY DUMPING .................................11 LOWER SLATE LAKE, FRYING PAN LAKE ALASKA, USA .................................................................................. 12 NORWEGIAN FJORDS ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Open Pit Or Block Caving? a Numerical Ranking Method for Selection
    The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 2014 SOMP Annual Meeting F. Rashidi-Nejad, F. T. Suorineni, and B. Asi Open pit or block caving? A numerical ranking method for selection F. Rashidi-Nejad*, F. T. Suorineni*, and B. Asi† *School of Mining Engineering, UNSW Australia †BBA Consulting Engineers, Canada Mining in the 21st century is facing many challenges, among which are low-grade and high- tonnage orebodies. One great (r)evolution in mining occurred in the early 20th century when Daniel Jackling proposed the concept of economies of scale for large-scale (bulk) mining at Bingham Canyon. At that time, there were many shallow deposits around the world suitable for open pit mining. Hence, this method grew rapidly and the majority of iron, copper, and gold production came from open pit mines. Open pit mining method has many advantages such as increased safety, higher production rates, more flexibility, lower cost, less operational risk, etc., so normally it considered as preferred option; but break-even depth, high stripping ratios, and environmental issues have become significant challenges facing this method in 21st century. In underground mining, block caving is the only method with the costs comparable to surface mining methods, especially open pit mining. A switch from open pit mining to block caving mining could be another great development in this century. However, even though an increasing number of mines are being developed using block caving, this method involves many technological and environmental challenges. The depth of the orebody is one of the most important factors governing selection of the mining method.
    [Show full text]
  • FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE MARSHALL HIMES JOINS GALWAY AS CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER Vancouver, British Columbia: May 17, 2006
    Suite 920-475 West Georgia Street Tel: 1-604-687-9931 Vancouver, BC V6B 4M9 Fax: 1-604-688-0094 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE MARSHALL HIMES JOINS GALWAY AS CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER Vancouver, British Columbia: May 17, 2006 - Galway Resources Ltd. (GWY: TSX- V) is pleased to announce that, in addition to serving as a Director, Marshall Himes has agreed to join Galway as its Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Himes will be in charge of Galway’s technical team as the Company staffs up. Marshall retired several years ago after serving as the Chief Geologist for advanced projects for BHP worldwide. This role involved evaluating projects at the advanced exploration stage for acquisition, or managing existing advanced projects to move them along to development. “We look forward to working with a person of Marshall Himes’ caliber. Marshall’s vast experience working with advanced exploration projects, coupled with his intimate knowledge of the Indian Springs Project, bodes extremely well for Galway’s future. Further, having Marshall join Galway after a few years in retirement, speaks scores about the vast potential of the Indian Springs Project.” stated Robert Hinchcliffe, the President and CEO of Galway. Earlier on in his career, Mr. Himes was the Project Manager at the Indian Springs Property with Utah International beginning in 1977. He was responsible for the day-to- day geologic activities of mapping, sampling, drilling and resource estimates. He also coordinated the metallurgical bulk sampling and worked with the mining engineers in developing a preliminary mine plan at Indian Springs. Mr. Himes received a B.S. in Geology from the University of Washington and an M.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual-Report-2019.Pdf
    ANNUAL REPORT 2019 OUR PURPOSE WHO WE ARE Our purpose is to make a South32 is a globally diversifi ed mining and metals company. We produce di erence by developing natural bauxite, alumina, aluminium, energy and metallurgical coal, manganese, resources, improving people’s nickel, silver, lead and zinc at our operations in Australia, Southern Africa and lives now and for generations South America. We are also the owner of a high grade zinc, lead and silver to come. We are trusted by our development option in North America and have several partnerships with owners and partners to realise the junior explorers with a bias to base metals. potential of their resources. OUR VALUES Care Trust Togetherness Excellence We care about people, We deliver on our We value di erence and We are courageous and the communities we’re commitments and rely we openly listen and share, challenge ourselves to be a part of and the world on each other to do knowing that together the best in what matters. we depend on. the right thing. we are better. This Annual Report is a summary of the operations, activities and CONTENTS performance of South32 Limited (ABN 84 093 732 597) and its controlled entities and joint arrangements for the year ended 30 June 2019 and its fi nancial position as at 30 June 2019. Our company 1 South32 Limited is the parent company of the South32 Group of Board of Directors 11 companies. In this report, unless otherwise stated, references to South32, the South32 Group, the Company, we, us and our, refer to South32 Lead Team 15 Limited and its controlled entities and joint arrangements, as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Thatdeliver the Strategicdrivers
    5041 BHPB AR06 cover_UK 13/9/06 10:35 PM Page 1 BHP Billiton Annual Report 2006 BHP Billiton Annual Report The Strategic Drivers that deliver the Essential Elements www.bhpbilliton.com Annual Report 2006 WorldReginfo - c6478d1e-7999-4617-a7c0-05343b86108a 5041 BHPB AR06 cover_UK 13/9/06 10:35 PM Page 2 Corporate Directory BHP BILLITON GROUP MARKETING OFFICES New Zealand We are BHP Billiton, a leading global resources REGISTERED OFFICES The Netherlands Computershare Investor Services Limited Level 2/159 Hurstmere Road company. BHP BILLITON LIMITED Verheeskade 25 2521 BE The Hague Takapuna North Shore City Australia Postal Address – Bag 92119 Auckland 1020 BHP Billiton Limited Telephone (31 70) 315 6666 Telephone (64 9) 488 8777 Our purpose is to create long-term value through the BHP Billiton Centre Facsimile (31 70) 315 6767 Facsimile (64 9) 488 8787 discovery, development and conversion of natural 180 Lonsdale Street Singapore Melbourne VIC 3000 168 Robinson Road #10-01 United States resources, and the provision of innovative customer Telephone (61 3) 9609 3333 Capital Tower Computershare Investor Services Facsimile (61 3) 9609 3015 Singapore 068912 2 North LaSalle Street and market-focused solutions. Telephone (65) 6349 3333 Chicago, IL 60602 BHP BILLITON PLC Facsimile (65) 6349 4000 Postal Address – PO Box 0289 United Kingdom Chicago, IL 60690-9569 Our seven strategic drivers assist us in achieving our Neathouse Place Telephone 1 888 404 6340 objectives. These drivers are our people; our licence to London SW1V 1BH SHARE REGISTRARS AND (toll-free within US) Telephone (44 20) 7802 4000 TRANSFER OFFICES Facsimile (1 312) 461 4331 operate; our world-class assets; the way we do business; Facsimile (44 20) 7802 4111 Australia ADR Depositary, Transfer Agent and Registrar our financial strength and discipline; our project pipeline; Company Secretaries BHP Billiton Limited Registrar JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA Computershare Investor Services JPMorgan Service Center Karen J Wood (Group Company Secretary) Pty Limited PO Box 3408 and growth options.
    [Show full text]