List of Range States of CMS-Listed Species

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

List of Range States of CMS-Listed Species Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals Secretariat provided by the United Nations Environment Programme 14 th MEETING OF THE CMS SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL Bonn, Germany, 14-17 March 2007 CMS/ScC14/Doc.26 LIST OF RANGE STATES OF MIGRATORY SPECIES INCLUDED IN THE CMS APPENDICES 1. The present list has been compiled by the UNEP/CMS Secretariat, in accordance with Article IX, paragraph 4f), of the Convention, based on information obtained from Parties and supplemented by other sources. Species added to the Appendices by the Conference of the Parties (Bonn: 1985, Geneva: 1988 and 1991, Nairobi: 1994, Geneva: 1997, Cape Town: 1999, Bonn: 2002, Nairobi: 2005), have been included. 2. The term “Range State” used in the present context has the same meaning as defined in Article I, paragraph I, of the Convention: “... f) “Range” means all the areas of land or water that a migratory species inhabits, stays in temporarily, crosses or overflies at any time on its normal migration route; ... h) “Range State” in relation to a particular migratory species means any State (and where appropriate any other Party referred to under sub-paragraph (k) of this paragraph) that exercises jurisdiction over any part of the range of that migratory species, or a State, flag vessels of which are engaged outside national jurisdictional limits in taking that migratory species; ... (k) “Party” means a State or any regional economic integration organisation constituted by sovereign States which has competence in respect of the negotiation, conclusion and application of international agreements in matters covered by this Convention for which this Convention is in force.” 3. The present list serves the following purposes: • to assist the Parties in determining whether they are Range States in the sense of the above definitions; • to assist the Conference of the Parties in making recommendations to the Parties for improving the conservation status of migratory species and reviewing the progress being made under Agreements; and • to provide the basic information necessary for the Scientific Council to consider, recommend or coordinate appropriate conservation measures to the Conference of the Parties for the species listed in Appendices I and II. 4. In order to maintain an up-to-date list, Parties are required under Article VI, paragraph 2, of the Convention to keep the Secretariat informed in regard to which of the migratory species listed in Appendices I and II they consider themselves to be Range States, including provision of information on their flag vessels engaged outside national jurisdiction or limits in taking the migratory species concerned and, where possible, future plans in respect of such taking. For reasons of economy, documents are printed in a limited number, and will not be distributed at the meeting. Delegates are kindly requested to bring their copy to the meeting and not to request additional copies. Notes 1. Place names appearing in the list correspond to those used in the United Nations Terminology Bulletin No. 347/Rev.1 (United Nations, 1997), as amended, and the ISO 3166 International Standard (International Organisation for Standardisation, 1988), as amended. A number of country names have been inverted to facilitate reference, as follows: Congo, Democratic Republic of the; Korea, Democratic Republic of; Korea, Republic of; Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of; Moldova, Republic of; Tanzania, United Republic of. A number of abbreviated names have been used, in accordance with the above: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (United Kingdom); and United States of America (United States). 2. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this list do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. 1 3. The names of Range States that are Parties to the Convention as at 1 February 2004 are shown in capitals: e.g., ALBANIA. If a CMS Party has entered a reservation with respect to a particular species, its name appears in normal, underlined type: e.g., Norway . 4. Where appropriate, dependant territories, overseas departments, provinces, states etc. appear in parentheses following the name of the State concerned, according to the following convention. The entry “UNITED KINGDOM (Montserrat)” indicates that only the island of Montserrat, and not the mainland, is to be considered part of the range of a particular species. Conversely, the entry “UNITED KINGDOM (including Montserrat)” indicates that the range encompasses mainland United Kingdom as well as the island of Montserrat. If the Convention does not apply to a dependant territory, overseas department etc. of a Party, the entry is shown in normal type: for example, “Denmark (Greenland)”. 5. “(?)” after a country listing denotes unconfirmed sightings. 6. “(Ex)” after a country listing denotes that the taxon is extinct in that country. Some species have only recently disappeared from those countries; if individuals recover in number they may still return to parts of their former range. For this reason, these countries are also included in the list. 7. Reference to “international waters” indicates migration of a species in or above the sea or oceans beyond the limits of national jurisdiction, which falls within the substantive scope of the Convention, pursuant to Article I, paragraphs 1f) and h). The text in parentheses indicates the specific regions of these waters in which migration takes place. 8. The list does not distinguish different categories of known usage and occurrence. Therefore, many of the countries listed as Range States for certain species, e.g. Numenius tenuirostris, have been identified as such based on records of vagrancy rather than established patterns of migration, according to the information available. 9. For Aves in Appendix II, Range States have been listed only for individual species or for taxa that include a small number of species; Range States will be specified for taxa with larger numbers of species when Agreements for particular species or groups of species are negotiated. 1 A dispute exists between the Governments of Argentina and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland concerning sovereignty over the Falkland Islands (Malvinas), South Georgia, South Sandwich Islands and their surrounding marine areas. 2 References CITES 1988. Identification Manual, Manual de Identificación, Manuel d`Identification. Vol. 1 & 1a. Mammalia - Monotremata to Cetacea/Carnivora to Artiodactyla. CITES Secretariat, Geneva, Switzerland. CITES 1995. Identification Manual, Manual de Identificación, Manuel d`Identification. Vol. 3. Reptilia. CITES Secretariat, Geneva, Switzerland. del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. & Sargatal. J. (eds) 1996. Handbook of the Birds of the World. Vol. 1-3. Lynx Editions, Barcelona. Görner, M. & Hackethal, H. 1987. Säugetiere Europas. Enke Verlag Stuttgart und Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, Munich. Hagemeijer, E.J.M. & Blair, M.J. (Eds) 1997. The EBCC Atlas of European Breeding Birds: Their Distribution and Abundance. T & A D Poyser, London. Jefferson, T.A., Leatherwood, S. & Webber, M.A. 1993. Marine mammals of the world. FAO species identification guide. Rome, FAO. Madsen, J., Cracknell, G. & Fox, T. (eds) 1999. Goose populations of the Western Palaearctic. A review of status and distribution. Wetlands International Publ. No. 48, Wetlands International, Wageningen, The Netherlands. National Environmental Research Institute, Rønde, Denmark. Scott, D.A. & Rose, P.M. 1996. Atlas of Anatidae Populations in Africa and Western Eurasia. Wetlands International Publ. No. 41, Wetlands International, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 3 App Class Order Family Taxon Range Date of Entry I Mammalia CHIROPTERA Molossidae Tadarida Antigua and Barbuda; ARGENTINA; Bahamas; Belize; BOLIVIA; Brazil; CHILE; Colombia; Costa Rica; 1979 brasiliensis Cuba; Dominica; Dominican Republic; ECUADOR; El Salvador; FRANCE (Guadeloupe, Martinique); Guatemala; Haiti; Honduras; Jamaica; Mexico; NETHERLANDS (Aruba, Saba, Sint Eustatius, Sint Maarten); Nicaragua; PANAMA; PARAGUAY; PERU; Saint Kitts and Nevis; Saint Lucia; United States (including Puerto Rico); UNITED KINGDOM (Montserrat); URUGUAY; Venezuela I Mammalia PRIMATES Hominidae Gorilla gorilla ANGOLA; CAMEROON; Central African Republic; CONGO, DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE; cop8 Equatorial Guinea; Gabon; NIGERIA; CONGO, REPUBLIC OF THE; RWANDA; UGANDA I Mammalia CETACEA Physeteridae Physeter ARGENTINA; AUSTRALIA; BELGIUM; Brazil; Canada; CHILE; China; Colombia; Costa Rica; cop7 macrocephalus * DENMARK (including Greenland); ERITREA; FRANCE (French Polynesia); INDIA; Indonesia; IRELAND; Japan; KENYA; Korea, Democratic People's Republic of; Korea, Republic of; LIBERIA; Mexico; Mozambique; Myanmar; NETHERLANDS; NEW ZEALAND; NORWAY; PANAMA; PORTUGAL; SOUTH AFRICA; SPAIN; SRI LANKA; Suriname; TANZANIA, UNITED REPUBLIC OF; Thailand; UNITED KINGDOM (including Falkland Islands (Malvinas), St. Helena); United States; URUGUAY; Venezuela; international waters I Mammalia CETACEA Platanistidae Platanista BANGLADESH; Bhutan (?); INDIA; Nepal; PAKISTAN cop7 gangetica gangetica * I Mammalia CETACEA Pontoporiidae Pontoporia ARGENTINA; Brazil; URUGUAY; international waters (Southwest Atlantic Ocean) cop5 blainvillei * I Mammalia CETACEA Delphinidae Delphinus delphis ALBANIA; ALGERIA; Bosnia-Herzegovina; CYPRUS;
Recommended publications
  • Monarch (Danaus Plexippus) in Canada
    Species at Risk Act Management Plan Series Management Plan for the Monarch (Danaus plexippus) in Canada Monarch 2016 Recommended citation: Environment and Climate Change Canada. 2016. Management Plan for the Monarch (Danaus plexippus) in Canada. Species at Risk Act Management Plan Series. Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa. iv + 45 pp. For copies of the management plan, or for additional information on species at risk, including the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) Status Reports, residence descriptions, action plans, and other related recovery documents, please visit the Species at Risk (SAR) Public Registry1. Cover illustration: Monarch © Karine Bériault 2007 Également disponible en français sous le titre « Plan de gestion du monarque (Danaus plexippus) au Canada » © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Environment and Climate Change Canada, 2016. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-1-100-25735-8 Catalogue no. En3-5/71-2016E-PDF Content (excluding the illustrations) may be used without permission, with appropriate credit to the source. 1 http://sararegistry.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=24F7211B-1 Management Plan for the Monarch 2016 PREFACE The federal, provincial, and territorial government signatories under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk (1996)2 agreed to establish complementary legislation and programs that provide for effective protection of species at risk throughout Canada. Under the Species at Risk Act (S.C. 2002, c.29) (SARA), the federal competent ministers are responsible for the preparation of management plans for listed Special Concern species and are required to report on progress within five years after the publication of the final document on the SAR Public Registry.
    [Show full text]
  • Salticidae (Arachnida, Araneae) of Thailand: New Species and Records of Epeus Peckham & Peckham, 1886 and Ptocasius Simon, 1
    Salticidae (Arachnida, Araneae) of Thailand: new species and records of Epeus Peckham & Peckham, 1886 and Ptocasius Simon, 1885 Barbara Maria Patoleta1, Joanna Gardzińska2 and Marek Żabka1 1 Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Siedlce, Poland 2 Warsaw College of Engineering and Health, Warsaw, Poland ABSTRACT The study is based on new material from the collections of the Naturalis Biodiversity Centre in Leiden (RNHM) and the Hungarian Natural History Museum (HNHM) and addresses issues in two genera: Epeus Peckham & Peckham, 1886 and Ptocasius Simon, 1885 from Thailand. Both genera are of Asian/Indomalayan origin, the latter with a diversity hotspot in the subtropical valleys of the Himalayas. Based on morphological data, we propose three new species of Epeus (Epeus daiqini sp. nov. (♂♀), Epeus pallidus sp. nov. (♀), Epeus szirakii sp. nov. (♀)) and two new species of Ptacasius (Ptocasius metzneri sp. nov. (♂♀) and Ptocasius sakaerat sp. nov. (♀)). Additionally, we redescribed E. tener (Simon, 1877) and added photographs of morphological characters. The genus Ptocasius is redefined due to the inclusion of 37 species, previously included in Yaginumaella Prószyński, 1979. Relationships and distribution of both genera are discussed in reference to molecular, morphological and distributional data, published by other authors in recent years. Subjects Biodiversity, Biogeography, Entomology, Taxonomy, Zoology Keywords Salticidae, Jumping spiders, Oriental region, Taxonomy, Distribution, Thailand, Epeus, Submitted 28 January 2020 Ptocasius Accepted 23 May 2020 Published 22 June 2020 INTRODUCTION Corresponding author Barbara Maria Patoleta, The list of jumping spiders from Thailand comprises 29 genera and 46 species (WSC, [email protected] 2020), seven genera and 13 species being poorly documented and in need of verification Academic editor (Żabka & Gardzińska, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • SA Spider Checklist
    REVIEW ZOOS' PRINT JOURNAL 22(2): 2551-2597 CHECKLIST OF SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) OF SOUTH ASIA INCLUDING THE 2006 UPDATE OF INDIAN SPIDER CHECKLIST Manju Siliwal 1 and Sanjay Molur 2,3 1,2 Wildlife Information & Liaison Development (WILD) Society, 3 Zoo Outreach Organisation (ZOO) 29-1, Bharathi Colony, Peelamedu, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641004, India Email: 1 [email protected]; 3 [email protected] ABSTRACT Thesaurus, (Vol. 1) in 1734 (Smith, 2001). Most of the spiders After one year since publication of the Indian Checklist, this is described during the British period from South Asia were by an attempt to provide a comprehensive checklist of spiders of foreigners based on the specimens deposited in different South Asia with eight countries - Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The European Museums. Indian checklist is also updated for 2006. The South Asian While the Indian checklist (Siliwal et al., 2005) is more spider list is also compiled following The World Spider Catalog accurate, the South Asian spider checklist is not critically by Platnick and other peer-reviewed publications since the last scrutinized due to lack of complete literature, but it gives an update. In total, 2299 species of spiders in 67 families have overview of species found in various South Asian countries, been reported from South Asia. There are 39 species included in this regions checklist that are not listed in the World Catalog gives the endemism of species and forms a basis for careful of Spiders. Taxonomic verification is recommended for 51 species. and participatory work by arachnologists in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • A Key for Identification of Spiders at Qena Governorate, Upper Egypt
    American Journal of Life Sciences 2015; 3(6-1): 13-23 Published online August 31, 2015 (http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/ajls) doi: 10.11648/j.ajls.s.2015030601.13 ISSN: 2328-5702 (Print); ISSN: 2328-5737 (Online) A Key for Identification of Spiders at Qena Governorate, Upper Egypt Ahmad H. Obuid-Allah 1, Amal A. Mahmoud 2, ElAmier H. M. Hussien 2, * 1Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt 2Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt Email address: [email protected] (E. H. M. Hussien) To cite this article: Ahmad H. Obuid-Allah, Amal A. Mahmoud, ElAmier H. M. Hussien. A Key for Identification of Spiders at Qena Governorate, Upper Egypt. American Journal of Life Sciences. Special Issue: New Horizons in Basic and Applied Zoological Research. Vol. 3, No. 6-1, 2015, pp. 13-23. doi: 10.11648/j.ajls.s.2015030601.13 Abstract: Spiders are one of the more diverse arthropod taxa, ranking seventh in global diversity, which makes them a fascinating group to study [1]. The correct identification of many spider species is considered problematic due to complex variation in morphology [2]. The Egyptian spider fauna are incompletely known due to scarcity of studies on this group especially in Upper Egypt. So, the present key for identifying terrestrial spiders at Qena Governorate is a part of a comprehensive study conducted at the region to study the ecology and taxonomy of this group. The present key was designed to facilitate identification of terrestrial spiders at Qena Governorate using their morphological characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Dynamics of Terrestrial Spiders -.:: Natural Sciences Publishing
    J. Eco. Heal. Env. 6, No. 1, 47-55 (2018) 47 Journal of Ecology of Health & Environment An International Journal http://dx.doi.org/10.18576/jehe/060106 Population Dynamics of Terrestrial Spiders (Arachnida) at Qena Governorate, Upper Egypt Ahmad. H. Obuid-Allah1, Amal. A. Mahmoud2 and Elamier. H. M. Hussien2* 1 Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Asyut University, 71515 Asyut, Egypt. 2 Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, South Valley University, 83523 Qena, Egypt. Received: 1 Oct. 2017, Revised: 10 Dec. 2017, Accepted: 21 Dec. 2017. Published online: 1 Jan. 2018. Abstract: In the present study, monthly and seasonal fluctuations of densities of terrestrial spiders were recorded in six different sites at Qena Governorate during the period of one year (February, 2012 - January, 2013). The study revealed the occurrence of 1247 specimens belonging to 14 families and including 23 species of order Araneae. Family Salticidae recorded the highest number during the whole period of study (278 specimens) while family Agelenidae recorded the lowest number in the same period of study (4 specimens). It was observed that the maximal number was collected from Thanatus albini (199 specimens), while Halodromus barbarae was the least species in number since only 2 specimens were collected. The densities of the recorded spiders varied seasonally and the general seasonal peak was recorded during autumn (363 specimens), while the lowest density was observed during winter (215 specimens). Regarding the sex ratio of the collected spiders from all sites, it was clear that there were 213 adult male specimens, whereas the adult females were represented by 440 specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition to Protect the Monarch Butterfly (Danaus Plexippus Plexippus) Under the Endangered Species Act
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR © Jeffrey E. Belth PETITION TO PROTECT THE MONARCH BUTTERFLY (DANAUS PLEXIPPUS PLEXIPPUS) UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT Notice of Petition Sally Jewell, Secretary U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20240 [email protected] Dan Ashe, Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1849 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20240 [email protected] Douglas Krofta, Chief Branch of Listing, Endangered Species Program U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 420 Arlington, VA 22203 [email protected] Monarch ESA Petition 2 PETITIONERS The Center for Biological Diversity (“Center”) is a nonprofit, public interest environmental organization dedicated to the protection of imperiled species and the habitat and climate they need to survive through science, policy, law, and creative media. The Center is supported by more than 775,000 members and activists throughout the country. The Center works to secure a future for all species, great or small, hovering on the brink of extinction. The Center for Food Safety (“CFS”) is a nonprofit public interest organization established in 1997 whose mission centers on protecting public health and the environment by curbing the adverse impacts of industrial agriculture and food production systems on public health, the environment, and animal welfare, and by instead promoting sustainable forms of agriculture. As particularly relevant here, CFS is the leading nonprofit working on the adverse impacts of genetically engineered crops and neonicotinoid pesticides. CFS and its over half-a-million members are concerned about the impacts of industrial agriculture on biodiversity generally, and on monarch butterflies specifically.
    [Show full text]
  • A Treatise on the Jumping Spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) of Tea Ecosystem of Dooars, West Bengal, India
    Available online at www.worldscientificnews.com WSN 53(1) (2016) 1-66 EISSN 2392-2192 A Treatise on the Jumping Spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) of Tea Ecosystem of Dooars, West Bengal, India Tapan Kumar Roy1,a, Sumana Saha2,b, Dinendra Raychaudhuri1,c 1Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, IRDM Faculty Centre, Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananda University, Narendrapur, Kolkata - 700103, West Bengal, India 2Department of Zoology, Barasat Govt. College, Govt. of West Bengal, Kolkata - 700124, India a-cE-mails address: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ABSTRACT The present study is devoted to 23 salticids under 20 genera recorded from the tea estates of Dooars, West Bengal, India. Of these, Cheliceroides brevipalpis is considered as new to science; Cocalus murinus Simon, 1899 and Phaeacius fimbriatus Simon, 1900 are new from India. The former two genera are the first records from the country. While providing diagnosis of the newly recorded genera, description and necessary illustrations of the new species are also provided. Recorded genera and species are suitably keyed together with relevant illustrations. Lyssomanes sikkimensis Tikader, 1967 is considered as the junior synonym of Telamonia festiva Thorell, 1887. Keywords: Salticidae; New taxa; Tea Estates; Dooars; West Bengal Reviewer: Prof. Jerzy Borowski Department of Forest Protection and Ecology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW, Warsaw, Poland World Scientific News 53(1) (2016) 1-66 1. INTRODUCTION Tea, a major monoculture plantation crop, is a permanent but typical ecosystem (Fig. 1) that provides habitat continuity for 1031 species of arthropods and 82 species of nematodes globally (Chen & Chen 1989; Hazarika et al. 2009). In Asia, 230 species of insects and mite pests attack tea (Muraleedharan 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Facultative Monophagy in the Jumping Spider ..Plexippus Paykulli
    PECKHAMIA 65.1, 03 October 2008 ISSN 1944-8120 This is a PDF version of PECKHAMIA 2(6): 92-96, December 1990. Pagination of the original document has been retained. Editor's note (65.1): Corythalia canosa is now Anasaitis canosa (Edwards, G. B. 1999. Insecta Mundi 13(1-2): 10). 92 FACULTATIVE MONOPHAGY IN THE JUMPING SPIDER, PLEXIPPUS PAYKULLI (AUDOUIN) (ARANEAE: SALTICIDAE) M. Nyffeler, R. G. Breene and D. A. Dean Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University College Station, Texas 77843 INTRODUCTION Field assessment of the natural diets of jumping spiders is difficult and time-consuming. In a recent 200 man-hour period of direct field observation in Texas (M. N. and D. A. D. unpubl.), only 50 of 700 jumping spider individuals encountered were feeding. Due to difficulties like these, little is known about the natural diets of jumping spiders and Plexippus paykulli (Audouin), a common jumping spider of approximately 9-12mm adult length, is no exception. This species is geographically cosmopolitan in distribution (Platnick 1989). It was reported from Africa (Mathis and Berland 1933) and Asia (Rao et al. 1981, Miah et al. 1986). Plexippus paykulli was introduced to the American continent according to Edwards (1979a), and occurs from Florida to Texas, south to Paraguay (Edwards 1979a, Jackson and Macnab 1989). In North America, adult and immature P. paykulli can be found throughout the year and usually take up residence in and on buildings (Edwards 1979a), however, it also has been found in Florida citrus groves (Muma 1975, Mansour et al. 1982), and Alabama cotton fields (Skinner 1974).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Modern Threats to the Lepidoptera Fauna in The
    MODERN THREATS TO THE LEPIDOPTERA FAUNA IN THE FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM By THOMSON PARIS A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2011 1 2011 Thomson Paris 2 To my mother and father who helped foster my love for butterflies 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I thank my family who have provided advice, support, and encouragement throughout this project. I especially thank my sister and brother for helping to feed and label larvae throughout the summer. Second, I thank Hillary Burgess and Fairchild Tropical Gardens, Dr. Jonathan Crane and the University of Florida Tropical Research and Education center Homestead, FL, Elizabeth Golden and Bill Baggs Cape Florida State Park, Leroy Rogers and South Florida Water Management, Marshall and Keith at Mack’s Fish Camp, Susan Casey and Casey’s Corner Nursery, and Michael and EWM Realtors Inc. for giving me access to collect larvae on their land and for their advice and assistance. Third, I thank Ryan Fessendon and Lary Reeves for helping to locate sites to collect larvae and for assisting me to collect larvae. I thank Dr. Marc Minno, Dr. Roxanne Connely, Dr. Charles Covell, Dr. Jaret Daniels for sharing their knowledge, advice, and ideas concerning this project. Fourth, I thank my committee, which included Drs. Thomas Emmel and James Nation, who provided guidance and encouragement throughout my project. Finally, I am grateful to the Chair of my committee and my major advisor, Dr. Andrei Sourakov, for his invaluable counsel, and for serving as a model of excellence of what it means to be a scientist.
    [Show full text]
  • Download From
    Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) – 2009-2014 version Available for download from http://www.ramsar.org/ris/key_ris_index.htm. Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7 (1990), as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the 8th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2002) and Resolutions IX.1 Annex B, IX.6, IX.21 and IX. 22 of the 9th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2005). Notes for compilers: 1. The RIS should be completed in accordance with the attached Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for completing the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands. Compilers are strongly advised to read this guidance before filling in the RIS. 2. Further information and guidance in support of Ramsar site designations are provided in the Strategic Framework and guidelines for the future development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Wise Use Handbook 14, 3rd edition). A 4th edition of the Handbook is in preparation and will be available in 2009. 3. Once completed, the RIS (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Ramsar Secretariat. Compilers should provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the RIS and, where possible, digital copies of all maps. 1. Name and address of the compiler of this form: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY. DD MM YY Dr. Sálim Javed Manager, Terrestrial Assessment & Conservation Environment Agency – Abu Dhabi Designation date Site Reference Number PO Box 45553, Abu Dhabi, UAE Tel: +971-2-6934711 Mob: +971-50-6166405 Fax: +971-2-4997282 E-mail: [email protected] Dr. Shaikha Al Dhaheri Executive Director, Terrestrial and Marine Biodiversity Sector Environment Agency – Abu Dhabi PO Box 45553, Abu Dhabi, UAE Tel: +971-2-6934545 Mob: +971-50- Fax: +971-2-4997282 E-mail: [email protected] Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Life History of Jumping Spiders, Plexippuspaykulli. International Journal of Agricultural Technology 13(7.1): 1087-1092
    International Journal of Agricultural Technology 2017 Vol. 13(7.1): 1087-1092 Available online http://www.ijat-aatsea.com ISSN 1686-9141 Life History of Jumping Spiders, Plexippus paykulli Madee T. and S. Bumroongsook* Department of Plant Production Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology King Mongkut‘s Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand. Madee T. and S. Bumroongsook (2017). Life History of Jumping Spiders, Plexippuspaykulli. International Journal of Agricultural Technology 13(7.1): 1087-1092. The jumping spider [Plexippus paykulli (Audouin)] is ranked in the Araneae, family Salticidae. It isone of the common spider in asiaticpennywort growing areas and its surrounding areas. It is a small spider that can eat various types of insect pests. A female lays egg in a silken sac around 30-65 eggs. Egg incubation period is 11-12 days. It undergoes 7 spideringbofore being adults. The immature stages take 112.38 days and adults live for 19-30 days. Hairs are found cover its entire body and legs. The females are nearly the same size as males. Color of carapace and abdomen of adult spider can be used for identification of males and females including palpi. Key words :Asiaticpennywort, Plexippus paykulli Introduction Spiders are classified in the Arachnida class in the phylum Arthhropoda. Plexippus paykulliis. Its common name is a jumping spider, ranked in the Araneae family. Salticidae are small spider. Tanhiret et al. (2014) stated that the male spider is black color and has a white striped pattern alternately, and the front of the legs are completely black. The females are brown and have a light brown band in the middle of the thorax to the ventral part of the abdomen (Nyffeler and Benz, 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • A Classification of Danaus Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)
    Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKZOJZoological Journal of the Linnean Society0024-4082The Lin- nean Society of London, 2005? 2005 1442 191212 Original Article CLASSIFICATION OF DANAUSD. A. S. SMITH ET AL. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2005, 144, 191–212. With 3 figures A classification of Danaus butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) based upon data from morphology and DNA DAVID A. S. SMITH FLS1*, GUGS LUSHAI FLS2 and JOHN A. ALLEN FLS2 1Natural History Museum, Eton College, Windsor SL4 6EW, UK 2Ecology & Biodiversity Division, School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton SO16 7PX, UK Received September 2003; accepted for publication March 2005 Classification of the cosmopolitan butterfly genus Danaus (Nymphalidae: Danainae) is revised at subgeneric, specific and subspecific levels, combining for the first time mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequence information with mor- phological data. Tree topologies based on the nuclear genome (allozymes, pheromone components, the morphology of all life history stages and nuclear DNA sequences), on the one hand, and mitochondrial DNA, on the other, are incon- gruent and challenge the current taxonomy of the genus. Although earlier classifications, based on adult morphology alone, are, in general, well supported by an analysis of total evidence, the mitochondrial phylogeny shows that the species D. chrysippus and its subgenus Anosia are deeply paraphyletic. Subspecies dorippus of D. chrysippus is the basal clade of the genus and is reinstated as the species D. dorippus. The former species D. plexaure is demoted to a subspecies of D. eresimus. The specific status of D. erippus, as distinct from D. plexippus, is tentatively supported. On the strength of the new data, division of the monophyletic genus Danaus s.l.
    [Show full text]