61664 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 7, 2016 / Notices

administrative review, in whole or in Notification Regarding Administrative DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE part, if a party that requested the review Protective Orders withdraws its request within 90 days of International Trade Administration This notice also serves as a reminder the date of publication of the notice of [A–533–820] initiation of the requested review. All to parties subject to administrative protective orders (‘‘APO’’) of their requesting parties withdrew their Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat responsibility concerning the return or respective requests for an administrative Products From India: Notice of destruction of proprietary information Preliminary Results of Antidumping review of the 18 companies or groups of disclosed under an APO in accordance companies listed in the Appendix to Duty Administrative Review; 2014– with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 2015 this notice within 90 days of the date of continues to govern business publication of the Initiation Notice. proprietary information in this segment AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Accordingly, the Department is of the proceeding. Timely written International Trade Administration, rescinding this review with respect to notification of the return or destruction Department of Commerce. these companies, in accordance with 19 of APO materials or conversion to SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce CFR 351.213(d)(1).4 The administrative judicial protective order is hereby (the Department) is conducting an review will continue with respect to all requested. Failure to comply with the administrative review of the other firms for which a review was regulations and terms of an APO is a antidumping duty order on certain hot- requested and initiated. violation which is subject to sanction. rolled carbon steel flat products from India (hot-rolled steel). The period of Assessment This notice is issued and published in accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the review (POR) is December 1, 2014, The Department will instruct U.S. Act and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). through November 30, 2015. This review covers four companies, Ispat Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) Dated: August 31, 2016. to assess antidumping duties on all Industries Ltd. (Ispat), JSW Steel Ltd. Christian Marsh, appropriate entries. For the companies (JSW), JSW Ispat Steel Ltd. (JSW Ispat), for which this review is rescinded, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Tata Steel Ltd. (Tata). We and Countervailing Duty Operations. antidumping duties shall be assessed at preliminarily determine that Ispat, JSW, rates equal to the cash deposit of APPENDIX JSW Ispat, and Tata had no entries of subject merchandise during the POR. estimated antidumping duties required • Jinko Solar Co. Ltd./Jinko Solar Import and Interested parties are invited to at the time of entry, or withdrawal from 5 Export Co., Ltd. comment on these preliminary results. warehouse, for consumption, in • Canadian Solar International Limited DATES: Effective: September 7, 2016. accordance with 19 CFR • Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Changshu), FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department Inc. George McMahon or Eric Greynolds, intends to issue appropriate assessment • Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Luoyang) AD/CVD Operations Office III, instructions directly to CBP 15 days Inc. Enforcement and Compliance, after publication of this notice. • Risen Energy Co., Ltd. • Zhejiang Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. International Trade Administration, Notification to Importers • Yingli Energy (China) Company Limited U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th • Yingli Green Energy International Trading Street and Constitution Avenue NW., This notice serves as the only Limited Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) reminder to importers whose entries • Baoding Jiasheng Photovoltaic Technology 482–1167 and (202) 482–6071, will be liquidated as a result of this Co. Ltd. respectively. • rescission notice, of their responsibility Baoding Tianwei Yingli New Energy SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a Resources Co., Ltd. certificate regarding the reimbursement • Beijing Tianneng Yingli New Energy Scope of the Order of antidumping duties prior to Resources Co. Ltd. The merchandise subject to this order • liquidation of the relevant entries Hainan Yingli New Energy Resources Co., is certain hot-rolled carbon steel flat during this review period. Failure to Ltd. • products from India. The merchandise comply with this requirement could Hengshui Yingli New Energy Resources subject to this order is currently Co., Ltd. result in the Secretary’s assumption that classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff • Lixian Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) the reimbursement of antidumping Ltd. duties occurred and the subsequent • Shenzhen Yingli New Energy Resources at subheadings: 7208.10.15.00, assessment of double antidumping Co., Ltd. 7208.10.30.00, 7208.10.60.00, duties. • Tianjin Yingli New Energy Resources Co., 7208.25.30.00, 7208.25.60.00, Ltd. 7208.26.00.30, 7208.26.00.60, 4 See Appendix. As stated in Change in Practice • Shanghai BYD Co., Ltd. 7208.27.00.30, 7208.27.00.60, in NME Reviews, the Department will no longer • Canadian Solar Inc. 7208.36.00.30, 7208.36.00.60, consider the non-market economy (‘‘NME’’) entity [FR Doc. 2016–21499 Filed 9–6–16; 8:45 am] 7208.37.00.30, 7208.37.00.60, as an exporter conditionally subject to 7208.38.00.15, 7208.38.00.30, BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P administrative reviews. See Antidumping 7208.38.00.90, 7208.39.00.15, Proceedings: Announcement of Change in 7208.39.00.30, 7208.39.00.90, Department Practice for Respondent Selection in 5 In the final determination of the underlying Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional investigation we treated Jinko Solar Co. Ltd. and 7208.40.60.30, 7208.40.60.60, Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Jinko Solar Import and Export Co., Ltd. together 7208.53.00.00, 7208.54.00.00, Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 with Renesola Jiangsu Ltd. and Renesola Zhejiang 7208.90.00.00, 7211.14.00.90, (November 4, 2013) (‘‘Change in Practice in NME Ltd. as a single entity. See Certain Crystalline 7211.19.15.00, 7211.19.20.00, Reviews’’). The PRC-wide entity is not subject to Silicon Photovoltaic Products From the People’s this administrative review because no interested Republic of China: Final Determination of Sales at 7211.19.30.00, 7211.19.45.00, party requested a review of the entity. See Initiation Less Than Fair Value, 79 FR 76970 (December 23, 7211.19.60.00, 7211.19.75.30, Notice. 2014). 7211.19.75.60, and 7211.19.75.90.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:30 Sep 06, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM 07SEN1 mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 7, 2016 / Notices 61665

Products subject to this order may also subject merchandise during the POR,2 shipments of subject merchandise enter under HTSUS subheadings: and a query of U.S. Customs and Border entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 7225.11.00.00, 7225.19.00.00, Protection (CBP) data did not show any for consumption on or after the 7225.30.30.50, 7225.30.70.00, POR entries of subject merchandise by publication of the final results of this 7225.40.70.00, 7225.99.00.90, Ispat, JSW, JSW Ispat, and Tata.3 In administrative review, as provided by 7226.11.10.00, 7226.11.90.30, addition, CBP did not identify any section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash 7226.11.90.60, 7226.19.10.00, entries of subject merchandise from deposit rates for respondents noted 7226.19.90.00, 7226.91.50.00, Ispat, JSW, JSW Ispat, and Tata during above, which claimed no shipments, 7226.91.70.00, 7226.91.80.00, and the POR in response to an inquiry from will remain unchanged from the rates 7226.99.00.00. Subject merchandise the Department asking CBP for such assigned to the companies in the most may also enter under 7210.70.30.00, information.4 Based on the foregoing, recently completed review of the 7210.90.90.00, 7211.14.00.30, the Department preliminarily companies; (2) for merchandise 7212.40.10.00, 7212.40.50.00, and determines that Ispat, JSW, JSW Ispat, exported by producers or exporters not 7212.50.00.00. Although the HTSUS and Tata had no shipments of the covered in this administrative review subheadings are provided for subject merchandise, and, therefore, no but covered in a prior segment of the convenience and customs purposes, the reviewable transactions, during the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will Department’s written description of the POR. continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently merchandise subject to this order is Assessment Rate dispositive.1 completed segment of this proceeding; Upon issuance of the final results of (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered Methodology this administrative review, the in this review, a prior review, or the Department shall determine, and CBP original investigation, but the producer The Department conducted this shall assess, antidumping duties on all is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate review in accordance with section appropriate entries, in accordance with established for the most recently 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 19 CFR 351.212. The Department completed segment of this proceeding amended (the Act). For a full intends to issue assessment instructions for the producer of the subject description of the methodology to CBP 15 days after publication of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit underlying our preliminary results, see final results of this review. rate for all other producers or exporters the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. In accordance with the Department’s will continue to be 38.72 percent, the The Preliminary Decision Memorandum ‘‘automatic assessment’’ practice,5 for all-others rate established in the less- is a public document and is on file entries of subject merchandise during than-fair value investigation, as electronically via Enforcement and the POR produced by each respondent amended. These cash deposit Compliance’s Antidumping and for which they did not know that their requirements, when imposed, shall Countervailing Duty Centralized merchandise was destined for the remain in effect until further notice. Electronic Service System (ACCESS). United States, we will instruct CBP to Disclosure and Public Comment ACCESS is available to registered users liquidate unreviewed entries at the all- at http://access.trade.gov and is others rate if there is no rate for the Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), available to all parties in the Central intermediate company(ies) involved in interested parties may submit cases Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main the transaction. briefs not later than 30 days after the Department of Commerce building. In We intend to issue instructions to date of publication of this notice. addition, a complete version of the CBP 15 days after publication of the Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised Preliminary Decision Memorandum can final results of this review. in the case briefs, may be filed not later be accessed directly on the internet at than five days after the date for filing Cash Deposit Requirements http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/ case briefs.6 Parties who submit index.html. The signed Preliminary The following cash deposit comments are requested to submit: (1) A Decision Memorandum and the requirements will be effective upon statement of the issue; (2) a brief electronic version of the Preliminary publication of the notice of final results summary of the argument; and (3) a Decision Memorandum are identical in of administrative review for all table of authorities.7 All briefs must be content. A list of the topics discussed in filed electronically using ACCESS. An the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 2 See Letter from JSW titled, ‘‘Certain Hot-Rolled electronically filed document must be Carbon Steel Flat Products from India: No Shipment received successfully in its entirety by is attached as an Appendix to this Certification of JSW Steel Ltd.’’ (February 12, 2016). notice. JSW’s letter stated, ‘‘{p}lease note that this the Department’s electronic records statement applies as well to the companies listed system, ACCESS. Preliminary Determination of No in the Department’s initiation notice as Ispat Interested parties who wish to request Shipments Industries Ltd. and JSW Ispat Steel Ltd. Those a hearing must submit a written request companies no longer exist as separate entities, but to the Assistant Secretary for have been merged into JSW Steel.’’ See also Letter Ispat, JSW, JSW Ispat, and Tata Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. submitted timely-filed certifications that from Tata titled, ‘‘Antidumping Duty Review of Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from Department of Commerce, using they had no exports, sales, or entries of India: Tata Steel Limited Certification of No Enforcement and Compliance’s ACCESS Shipments’’ (March 11, 2016); see also Initiation of system within 30 days of publication of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 1 A full description of the scope of the order is this notice.8 Requests should contain contained in the memorandum to Paul Piquado, Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 6832 (February 9, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 2016). the party’s name, address, and Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy 3 See Memorandum to the File titled, ‘‘Customs telephone number, the number of Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and and Border Protection (CBP) Data Query Results,’’ participants, and a list of the issues to Countervailing Duty Operations, titled ‘‘Certain dated February 17, 2016. be discussed. If a request for a hearing Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from India: 4 See CBP Message Numbers: 6083305 and Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results 6083306, dated March 23, 2016. of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 5 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 6 See 19 CFR 351.309(d). 2014–2015’’ (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 7 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2), (d)(2). dated concurrently with and adopted by this notice. FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice). 8 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:30 Sep 06, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM 07SEN1 mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES 61666 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 173 / Wednesday, September 7, 2016 / Notices

is made, we will inform parties of the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE countervailing duty (CVD) scheduled date for the hearing which investigations concerning CTL plate will be held at the U.S. Department of International Trade Administration from Brazil, the PRC, and Korea.3 On Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution [A–433–812, A–423–812, A–351–847, A–580– July 26, 2016, the Department received Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at 887, A–583–858, A–489–828, C–580–888] timely allegations, pursuant to sections a time and location to be determined.9 703(e)(1) and 733(e)(1) of the Tariff Act Parties should confirm by telephone the Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to- of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 date, time, and location of the hearing. Length Plate From Austria, Belgium, CFR 351.206, that critical circumstances Brazil, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, exist with respect to imports of CTL Unless the deadline is extended and Turkey; Antidumping and plate from Austria, Belgium, Brazil, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Countervailing Duty Investigations: Korea, Taiwan, and Turkey.4 Based on Act, the Department will issue the final Preliminary Determinations of Critical information provided by the petitioners, results of this administrative review, Circumstances data placed on the record of these including the results of our analysis of investigations by the mandatory AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, the issues raised by the parties in their respondents, and data collected by the case briefs, within 120 days after International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. Department from Global Trade Atlas issuance of these preliminary results. (GTA), the Department preliminarily SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce determines that critical circumstances Notification to Importers (the Department) preliminarily exist for imports of CTL plate from determines that critical circumstances certain producers and exporters from This notice serves as a preliminary exist for imports of certain carbon and Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Taiwan, and reminder to importers of their alloy steel cut-to-length plate (CTL Turkey. responsibility under 19 CFR plate) from certain producers and Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.206(c)(2), the 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate exporters from Austria, Belgium, Brazil, petitioners requested that the regarding the reimbursement of Taiwan, and Turkey. Department issue a preliminary antidumping duties prior to liquidation DATES: Effective September 7, 2016. of the relevant entries during this affirmative determination of critical FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: circumstances on an expedited basis. In review period. Failure to comply with Edythe Artman at (202) 482–3931 accordance with sections 703(e)(1) and this requirement could result in the (Austria), Elizabeth Eastwood at (202) 733(e)(1) of the Act, because the Secretary’s presumption that 482–3874 (Belgium), Mark Kennedy at petitioners submitted their critical reimbursement of antidumping duties (202) 482–7883 (Brazil), Steve circumstances allegations more than 20 occurred and increase the subsequent Bezirganian at (202) 482–1131 (Korea– days before the scheduled date of the assessment of the antidumping duties AD), John Corrigan at (202) 482–7438 final determination, the Department by the amount of antidumping duties (Korea–CVD), Tyler Weinhold at (202) must promptly issue preliminary critical reimbursed. 482–1121 (Taiwan), or Dmitry circumstances determinations. These preliminary results of review Vladimirov at (202) 482–0665 (Turkey), Section 703(e)(1) of the Act provides AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and are issued and published in accordance that the Department will determine that Compliance, International Trade critical circumstances exist in CVD with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of Administration, U.S. Department of the Act. investigations if there is a reasonable Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue basis to believe or suspect: (A) That ‘‘the Dated: August 26, 2016. NW., Washington, DC 20230. alleged countervailable subsidy’’ is Paul Piquado, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: inconsistent with the Agreement on Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Background Subsidies and Countervailing Measures Compliance. (SCM Agreement) of the World Trade In response to petitions filed on April Organization, and (B) that ‘‘there have Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 8, 2016,1 the Department of Commerce been massive imports of the subject the Preliminary Results Decision (the Department) initiated antidumping merchandise over a relatively short Memorandum duty (AD) investigations concerning period.’’ Section 733(e)(1) of the Act imports of CTL plate from Austria, I. Summary Belgium, Brazil, the People’s Republic provides that the Department will II. Background of China (PRC), France, the Federal preliminarily determine that critical III. Scope of the Order Republic of Germany (Germany), Italy, circumstances exist in AD investigations IV. Preliminary Determination of No Japan, the Republic of Korea (Korea), if there is a reasonable basis to believe Shipments South Africa, Taiwan, and Turkey 2 and or suspect: (A)(i) That ‘‘there is a history V. Recommendation of dumping and material injury by [FR Doc. 2016–21490 Filed 9–6–16; 8:45 am] 1 See Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to- reason of dumped imports in the United BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Length Plate from Austria, Belgium, Brazil, the States or elsewhere of the subject People’s Republic of China, France, the Federal merchandise,’’ or (ii) that ‘‘the person by Republic of Germany, Italy, Japan, the Republic of whom, or for whose account, the South Africa, Taiwan, and Turkey—Petitions for the Imposition of Antidumping and Countervailing merchandise was imported knew or Duties, dated April 8, 2016 (collectively, the petitions). The petitioners for these investigations 3 See Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to- are ArcelorMittal USA LLC, Nucor Corporation, and Length Plate From Brazil, the People’s Republic of SSAB Enterprises, LLC (the petitioners). China, and the Republic of Korea: Initiation of 2 See Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-To- Countervailing Duty Investigations, 81 FR 27098 Length Plate From Austria, Belgium, Brazil, France, (May 5, 2016). the Federal Republic of Germany, Italy, Japan, the 4 See Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-To- Republic of Korea, the People’s Republic of China, Length Plate From Austria, Belgium, Brazil, the South Africa, Taiwan, and the Republic of Turkey: Republic of Korea, Taiwan, and Turkey: Critical Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 81 Circumstances Allegations, July 26, 2016 9 See 19 CFR 351.310. FR 27089 (May 5, 2016). (Allegations).

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:30 Sep 06, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07SEN1.SGM 07SEN1 mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES