Diagnosis of Ferlaviruses in Snakes and Characterization of Isolates Based on Gene Sequences
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Rare Species of Shield-Head Vipers in the Caucasus
Nature Conservation Research. Заповедная наука 2016. 1 (3): 11–25 RARE SPECIES OF SHIELD-HEAD VIPERS IN THE CAUCASUS Boris S. Tuniyev Sochi National Park, Russia e-mail: [email protected] Received: 03.10.2016 An overview is presented on shield-head vipers of the genus Pelias distributed in the post-Soviet countries of the Caucasian Ecoregion. The assessment presents the current conservation status and recommendations to vipers’ ter- ritorial protection. Key words: Caucasian Ecoregion, shield-head vipers, current status, protection. Introduction The Caucasian Ecoregion (the territory south- to-landscape descriptions (Tunieyv B.S. et al., 2009; ward from the Kuma-Manych depression to north- Tuniyev S.B. et al., 2012, 2014). The stationary works eastern Turkey and northwestern Iran) is the centre (mostly on the territory of the Caucasian State Nature of taxonomic diversity of shield-head vipers within Biosphere reserve and Sochi National Park) conducted the genus Pelias Merrem, 1820, of which 13–18 a study of the microclimatic features of vipers’ habitats species are found here. Without exception, all spe- including temperature and humidity modes of air and cies have a status of the different categories of rare- the upper soil horizon. The results were compared with ness, they are included on the IUCN Red list, or in thermobiological characteristics of the animals (Tuni- the current and upcoming publication of National yev B.S. & Unanian, 1986; Tuniyev B.S. & Volčik, and Regional Red Data Books. Besides the shield- 1995). In a number of cases difficult to determine the head vipers the Caucasian Ecoregion inhabit three taxonomic affiliation, in addition to the classical meth- representatives of mountain vipers of the genus ods of animal morphology and statistics, biochemistry Montivipera Nilson, Tuniyev, Andren, Orlov, Joger and molecular-genetic analysis methods have been ap- & Herrman, 1999 (M. -
Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N. -
Differential Features of Fusion Activation Within the Paramyxoviridae
viruses Review Differential Features of Fusion Activation within the Paramyxoviridae Kristopher D. Azarm and Benhur Lee * Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-212-241-2552 Received: 17 December 2019; Accepted: 29 January 2020; Published: 30 January 2020 Abstract: Paramyxovirus (PMV) entry requires the coordinated action of two envelope glycoproteins, the receptor binding protein (RBP) and fusion protein (F). The sequence of events that occurs during the PMV entry process is tightly regulated. This regulation ensures entry will only initiate when the virion is in the vicinity of a target cell membrane. Here, we review recent structural and mechanistic studies to delineate the entry features that are shared and distinct amongst the Paramyxoviridae. In general, we observe overarching distinctions between the protein-using RBPs and the sialic acid- (SA-) using RBPs, including how their stalk domains differentially trigger F. Moreover, through sequence comparisons, we identify greater structural and functional conservation amongst the PMV fusion proteins, as compared to the RBPs. When examining the relative contributions to sequence conservation of the globular head versus stalk domains of the RBP, we observe that, for the protein-using PMVs, the stalk domains exhibit higher conservation and find the opposite trend is true for SA-using PMVs. A better understanding of conserved and distinct features that govern the entry of protein-using versus SA-using PMVs will inform the rational design of broader spectrum therapeutics that impede this process. Keywords: paramyxovirus; viral envelope proteins; type I fusion protein; henipavirus; virus entry; viral transmission; structure; rubulavirus; parainfluenza virus 1. -
New Rattlesnakes in the Genera Crotalus Linne
AustralasianAustralasian JournalJournal ofof HerpetologyHerpetology Hoser, R. T. 2020. New Rattlesnakes in the genera Crotalus Linne, 1758, Uropsophus Wagler, 1830, Cottonus Hoser, 2009, Matteoea Hoser, 2009, Piersonus Hoser, 2009 and Caudisona Laurenti, 1768 (Squamata: Serpentes: Viperidae: Crotalinae). Australasian Journal of Herpetology 48:1-64. ISSN 1836-5698 (Print) ISSN 1836-5779 (Online) ISSUE 48, PUBLISHED 3 AUGUST 2020 2 Australasian Journal of Herpetology Australasian Journal of Herpetology 48:1-64. Published 3 August 2020. ISSN 1836-5698 (Print) ISSN 1836-5779 (Online) New Rattlesnakes in the genera Crotalus Linne, 1758, Uropsophus Wagler, 1830, Cottonus Hoser, 2009, Matteoea Hoser, 2009, Piersonus Hoser, 2009 and Caudisona Laurenti, 1768 (Squamata: Serpentes: Viperidae: Crotalinae). LSIDURN:LSID:ZOOBANK.ORG:PUB:F44E8281-6B2F-45C4-9ED6-84AC28B099B3 RAYMOND T. HOSER LSIDurn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F9D74EB5-CFB5-49A0-8C7C-9F993B8504AE 488 Park Road, Park Orchards, Victoria, 3134, Australia. Phone: +61 3 9812 3322 Fax: 9812 3355 E-mail: snakeman (at) snakeman.com.au Received 1 June 2020, Accepted 20 July 2020, Published 3 August 2020. ABSTRACT Ongoing studies of the iconic Rattlesnakes (Crotalinae) identified a number of reproductively isolated populations worthy of taxonomic recognition. Prior to this paper being published, they were as yet unnamed. These studies and taxa identified and formally named herein are following on from earlier papers of Hoser in 2009, 2012, 2016 and 2018, Bryson et al. (2014), Meik et al. (2018) and Carbajal Márquez et al. (2020), which besides naming new genera and subgenera, also named a total of 9 new species and 3 new subspecies. The ten new species and eight new subspecies identified as reproductively isolated and named in accordance with the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (Ride et al. -
Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily re ect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scienti c institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the rst time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N. -
Biodiversity Assessment for Georgia
Biodiversity Assessment for Georgia Task Order under the Biodiversity & Sustainable Forestry IQC (BIOFOR) USAID C ONTRACT NUMBER: LAG-I-00-99-00014-00 SUBMITTED TO: USAID WASHINGTON E&E BUREAU, ENVIRONMENT & NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION SUBMITTED BY: CHEMONICS INTERNATIONAL INC. WASHINGTON, D.C. FEBRUARY 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I INTRODUCTION I-1 SECTION II STATUS OF BIODIVERSITY II-1 A. Overview II-1 B. Main Landscape Zones II-2 C. Species Diversity II-4 SECTION III STATUS OF BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION III-1 A. Protected Areas III-1 B. Conservation Outside Protected Areas III-2 SECTION IV STRATEGIC AND POLICY FRAMEWORK IV-1 A. Policy Framework IV-1 B. Legislative Framework IV-1 C. Institutional Framework IV-4 D. Internationally Supported Projects IV-7 SECTION V SUMMARY OF FINDINGS V-1 SECTION VI RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVED BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION VI-1 SECTION VII USAID/GEORGIA VII-1 A. Impact of the Program VII-1 B. Recommendations for USAID/Georgia VII-2 ANNEX A SECTIONS 117 AND 119 OF THE FOREIGN ASSISTANCE ACT A-1 ANNEX B SCOPE OF WORK B-1 ANNEX C LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED C-1 ANNEX D LISTS OF RARE AND ENDANGERED SPECIES OF GEORGIA D-1 ANNEX E MAP OF LANDSCAPE ZONES (BIOMES) OF GEORGIA E-1 ANNEX F MAP OF PROTECTED AREAS OF GEORGIA F-1 ANNEX G PROTECTED AREAS IN GEORGIA G-1 ANNEX H GEORGIA PROTECTED AREAS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT DESIGN SUMMARY H-1 ANNEX I AGROBIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN GEORGIA (FROM GEF PDF GRANT PROPOSAL) I-1 SECTION I Introduction This biodiversity assessment for the Republic of Georgia has three interlinked objectives: · Summarizes the status of biodiversity and its conservation in Georgia; analyzes threats, identifies opportunities, and makes recommendations for the improved conservation of biodiversity. -
National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan of Georgia
Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan - Georgia – Tbilisi, 2005 Foreword Georgia signed the Convention on Biological Diversity in 1994, thus accepting responsibility to safeguard the nation’s rich diversity of plant, animal, and microbial life, to begin using biological resources in sustainable way, and to ensure equitable sharing of benefits from biodiversity. Later the country joined other conventions including the Convention on Climate Change, the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands, CITES and the Bonn Convention. As a signatory to these important international environmental treaties, Georgia enters the world scene with the potential for joining the most advanced nations in the field of environmental protection. At the present moment of transition, Georgia has a unique opportunity to use the early experiences of other countries, and avoid irreversible changes in the quality of its environment. The national legislation on environmental protection adopted over the past few years provides an adequate legal basis for this, although further elaboration and reinforcement of the existing legislation is needed. With the Ministry of Environment being currently reorganised and assuming broader responsibilities, Georgia’s institutional arrangements for environmental protection already has the necessary structure for improving the quality of the environment throughout the country. The role of non-governmental groups has been very important in resolving problems related to nature conservation. Georgia has shown an excellent example of co-operation between governmental and non-governmental organizations in the field of environment, and particularly in the field of biodiversity conservation. After signing the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Georgian Government immediately acted to develop a Biodiversity Country Study, in partnership with UNEP, and implemented by NACRES, a local conservation organisation. -
Expert Advice on Terrestrial Biodiversity Conservation, Land Take and Compensation Report
Dariali Hydropower Plant Project Expert Advice on Terrestrial Biodiversity Conservation, Land Take and Compensation Report Tbilisi 2013 INTRODUCTION Botanical and Zoological surveys have been carried in order to address the key data gap existing in ESIA of Dariali HPP Project from the Biodiversity standpoint that is provided in the “Expert Advice on Terrestrial Biodiversity Conservation, Land Take and Compensation Report” that includes two Annexes: I. Survey and comparative analysis of flora and vegetation of Dariali Hydropower Plant Project Corridor and compensation sites (carried out by Botanists: Dr Mariam Kimeridze and Mr David Chelidze) and II. Survey and comparative analysis of fauna of Dariali Hydropower Plant Project Corridor and compensation sites (carried out by Zoologists: Dr Alexander Bukhnikashvili, Dr Teimuraz Kokosadze and Mrs Marine Gioshvili). Three small areas of land were removed from the Kazbegi National Park for the Dariali HPP construction totaling 8,737 ha that belonged to the area within the Boundaries of Traditional Use Zone of the KNP. Three territories have been added to the Protected Areas as compensation areas for the land lost at Dariali due to HPP: Nature Monument of Sakhiznari Cliff Columns-335,7ha, Nature Monument of the Abano Mineral Lake-0,04 ha and Nature Monument of the Truso Travertines-4,2 ha. For additional information with regard to impact of Dariali HPP construction on KNP please see the report prepared by Dr Mariam Kimeridze “Impact of Dariali HPP on Kazbegi National Oark Traditional USE Zone” dated 31.05.2013). The detailed botanical and zoological studies were carried out in the river Tergi gorge within the borders of the Project Corridor and Compensation Sites. -
Taxonomy of the Order Mononegavirales: Update 2017
HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author Arch Virol Manuscript Author . Author manuscript; Manuscript Author available in PMC 2018 August 01. Published in final edited form as: Arch Virol. 2017 August ; 162(8): 2493–2504. doi:10.1007/s00705-017-3311-7. *Corresponding author: JHK: Integrated Research Facility at Fort Detrick (IRF-Frederick), Division of Clinical Research (DCR), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), B-8200 Research Plaza, Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD 21702, USA; Phone: +1-301-631-7245; Fax: +1-301-631-7389; [email protected]. $The members of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) Bornaviridae Study Group #The members of the ICTV Filoviridae Study Group †The members of the ICTV Mononegavirales Study Group ‡The members of the ICTV Nyamiviridae Study Group ^The members of the ICTV Paramyxoviridae Study Group &The members of the ICTV Rhabdoviridae Study Group ORCIDs: Amarasinghe: orcid.org/0000-0002-0418-9707 Bào: orcid.org/0000-0002-9922-9723 Basler: orcid.org/0000-0003-4195-425X Bejerman: orcid.org/0000-0002-7851-3506 Blasdell: orcid.org/0000-0003-2121-0376 Bochnowski: orcid.org/0000-0002-3247-3991 Briese: orcid.org/0000-0002-4819-8963 Bukreyev: orcid.org/0000-0002-0342-4824 Chandran: orcid.org/0000-0003-0232-7077 Dietzgen: orcid.org/0000-0002-7772-2250 Dolnik: orcid.org/0000-0001-7739-4798 Dye: orcid.org/0000-0002-0883-5016 Easton: orcid.org/0000-0002-2288-3882 Formenty: orcid.org/0000-0002-9482-5411 Fouchier: -
Evolution and Diversity of Bat and Rodent Paramyxoviruses from North America Brendan B
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.01.450817; this version posted July 2, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Evolution and diversity of bat and rodent Paramyxoviruses from North America Brendan B. Larsen1, Sophie Gryseels1,2*, Hans W. Otto1, Michael Worobey1 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 2 Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Rega Institute, KU Leuven, Laboratory of Clinical and Evolutionary Virology, Leuven, Belgium * Current addresses: Evolutionary Ecology group, Department Biology, University of Antwerp, Belgium OD Taxonomy and Phylogeny, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Belgium Abstract Paramyxoviruses are a diverse group of negative-sense, single-stranded RNA viruses of which several species cause significant mortality and morbidity. In recent years the collection of paramyxoviruses sequences detected in wild mammals has substantially grown, however little is known about paramyxovirus diversity in North American mammals. To better understand natural paramyxovirus diversity, host range, and host specificity, we sought to comprehensively characterize paramyxoviruses across a range of diverse co-occurring wild small mammals in Southern Arizona. We used highly degenerate primers to screen fecal and urine samples and obtained a total of 55 paramyxovirus sequences from 12 rodent species and 6 bat species. We also performed illumina RNA-seq and de novo assembly on 14 of the positive samples to recover a total of 5 near full-length viral genomes. -
Taxonomy of the Order Mononegavirales: Update 2018
HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author Arch Virol Manuscript Author . Author manuscript; Manuscript Author available in PMC 2019 August 01. Published in final edited form as: Arch Virol. 2018 August ; 163(8): 2283–2294. doi:10.1007/s00705-018-3814-x. TAXONOMY OF THE ORDER MONONEGAVIRALES: UPDATE 2018 A full list of authors and affiliations appears at the end of the article. Abstract In 2018, the order Mononegavirales was expanded by inclusion of 1 new genus and 12 novel species. This article presents the updated taxonomy of the order Mononegavirales as now accepted by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) and summarizes additional taxonomic proposals that may affect the order in the near future. Keywords Anphevirus; Arlivirus; Bornaviridae; bornavirus; Chengtivirus; Crustavirus; Filoviridae; filovirus; ICTV; International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses; mononegavirad; Mononegavirales; mononegavirus; Mymonaviridae; mymonavirid; mymonavirus; Nyamiviridae; nyamivirid; nyamivirus; Paramyxoviridae; paramyxovirid; paramyxovirus; Pneumoviridae; pneumovirid; pneumovirus; Rhabdoviridae; rhabdovirid; rhabdovirus; Sunviridae; sunvirid; sunvirus; virus classification; virus nomenclature; virus taxonomy INTRODUCTION The virus order Mononegavirales was established in 1991 to accommodate related viruses with nonsegmented, linear, single-stranded, negative-sense RNA genomes distributed among three families [19, 20 ]. Today, the order includes 8 families [1, 2, 11, 21 ]. Amended/ *Corresponding -
1 International Aruba Island Rattlesnake Studbook CROTALUS
1 International Aruba Island Rattlesnake Studbook CROTALUS UNICOLOR Compiled by: Stan Mays Curator of Herpetology Houston Zoo, Inc. 1513 N MacGregor Houston, TX77030, USA Telephone: (713)533-6510 Fax: (713)533-6755 Email [email protected] (713) 533-6527 Data current as of 22 December 2007 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface 3 Studbook Disclaimer 3 Current Status of the Captive Population 3 Introduction and Natural History 4 Conservation Status 4 Captive Management 5 Husbandry and Reproduction 5 Incoming/Outgoing Specimens 5 Housing 5 Temperature 6 Photoperiod and Lighting 6 Feeding/Nutritional Requirements 6 Reproduction 6 Description of Data Fields 7 Bibliography 8 Living and Historical Specimens Listed by Studbook Number 10 Living and Historical Specimens Listed by Institution 57 Institution Glossary 199 3 PREFACE This is the second edition of the Aruba Island Rattlesnake International Studbook and replaces the one published in 1999. Over the past several years many people too numerous to mention have offered constructive advice during the preparation of this studbook. Thank you to all of them, and to the support the Houston Zoo has given. Thanks also to the many registrars, curators, animal keepers, and others who took the time and effort to answer my requests for information and did so in a timely manner. Hopefully, the material in this studbook will be useful to them. Finally, thanks to Andy Odum for all the conservation work he has accomplished on Aruba and who has made the Aruba Island Rattlesnake SSP a model program. STUDBOOK DISCLAIMER Copyright 2008 by the Houston Zoo, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in hard copy, machine-readable or other forms without advance written permission from the Houston Zoo, Inc.