84313 FSPLT3 1450940.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

84313 FSPLT3 1450940.Pdf I. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Biological Assessment/Biological Evaluation (BA/BE) is to review the proposed Whisky Ridge Ecological Restoration Project (ERP) in sufficient detail to determine the potential effects on Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive (TES) plant species. Specifically, the BA will analyze effects on federally proposed, threatened, or endangered species and/or critical habitat; and determine whether formal consultation or conference is required with the US Fish and Wildlife Service, pursuant to the Endangered Species Act. The BE will analyze effects on Forest Service Sensitive Plant species to determine whether the proposed action and/or alternatives would be likely to result in a trend toward a Sensitive species becoming federally listed. This BA/BE was prepared in compliance with direction established in Forest Service Manual 2670 (USDA Forest Service 2005, 2009) and conforms to legal requirements set forth under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (19 U.S.C. 1536 (c), 50 CFR 402.12 (f) and 402.14 (c). The Sierra National Forest (SNF), Bass Lake Ranger District (BLRD) is proposing the Whisky Ridge Ecological Restoration Project (Map 1). The project would involve the implementation of a series of ecological restoration treatments on up 9,200 acres within an overall project boundary of 18,285 acres. The remaining 9,085 acres have no treatments proposed due to slopes greater than 35%, Forest Land and Resource Plan (LRMP) standard and guideline limitations on treatment and/or the fact that no treatment is needed in those areas to meet the purpose and need. This project is grounded in restoring ecosystem structure and process to create a more resilient landscape of ecosystem components that can better withstand future disturbances (e.g. wildfire) and continue to provide resources for environmental, social, and economic needs of future generations. Restoring ecosystem components within meadows, riparian areas, and forests would be part of the overall project scope; and removal of non-native invasive weeds would occur to minimize the harmful effects these plants have on ecosystems and to reduce their spread (see Final Environmental Impact Statement on the Sierra National Forest web site at http://www.fs.usda.gov/sierra/, go to Quick links, NEPA Project Documents) The Threatened, Endangered, or Sensitive Plants considered in this document are: • Bruchia bolanderi BOLANDER’S CANDLE MOSS FS Sensitive • Calyptridium pulchellum MARIPOSA PUSSYPAWS Fed Threatened • Camissonia sierrae ssp. sierra MONO HOT SPRINGS EVENING PRIMROSE FS Sensitive • Collomia rawsoniana RAWSON’S FLAMING TRUMPET FS Sensitive • Fissidens aphelotaxifolius BROOK POCKET-MOSS FS Sensitive • Helodium blandowii BLANDOW’S BOG-MOSS FS Sensitive • Hulsea brevifolia SHORT-LEAFED HULSEA FS Sensitive • Lewisia disepala YOSEMITE LEWISIA FS Sensitive • Lewisia kelloggii ssp. kelloggii KELLOGG’S LEWISIA FS Sensitive • Meesia uliginosa ONE-NERVED HUMP MOSS FS Sensitive • Peltigera gowardii (hydrothyria) VEINED WATER LICHEN FS Sensitive • Platanthera yosemitensis YOSEMITE BOG ORCHID FS Sensitive The species shown in bold are known to occur within the project boundary. The other species are highly likely to occur but have not been found within the project area. Whisky Ridge Ecological Restoration Project FEIS : Biological Assessment/Biological Evaluation for Plants Page 2 of 37 Appendix A provides the rationale for eliminating the other Sierra National Forest Sensitive Plant species from analysis in this BA/BE. Map 1. Location of the Whisky Ridge Ecological Restoration Project and areas to be treated. II. CONSULTATION TO DATE The Sierra National Forest Botanist checked the US Fish and Wildlife Service web site for federally listed plants that may be found in the project area (US Fish and Wildlife Service 2013). The list contains two plant species and two categories of critical habitat that may occur within the Forest. Sidalcea keckii (Keck’s checkerbloom) is only known from outside the Forest to the south, and if it were to occur in the Sierra National Forest, it would not be found north of the San Joaquin River at the elevations of the Whisky Ridge ERP. This foothill plant grows in clay soils (derived from serpentine) in sparsely-vegetated grasslands at elevations between 400 and 1,400 feet in Whisky Ridge Ecological Restoration Project FEIS : Biological Assessment/Biological Evaluation for Plants Page 3 of 37 the foothills of California's central western Sierra Nevada (http://sacramento.fws.gov/es/plant_spp_accts/kecks_checkermallow.htm). The proposed critical habitat for Keck’s checkerbloom falls entirely outside the Sierra National Forest boundary. The other category of proposed critical habitat is for vernal pool plants, and it does not fall within the Whisky Ridge ERP area or within the Forest. Furthermore, none of the federally listed vernal pool plants are known or expected to occur in the Sierra National Forest. Calyptridium pulchellum (Mariposa pussypaws) is known to occur in the Sierra National Forest at elevations below 3600 feet, but there are no known occurrences of Mariposa pussypaws in or near the project area, and no suitable habitat exists. This species grows on rock outcrops and gravel soil in foothill woodland, no populations are known from the coniferous zone of the Sierra Nevada. The elevation of the Whisky Ridge ERP is just above the upper elevation limit for the Mariposa pussypaws. No consultation is necessary with US Fish and Wildlife Service, and no further analysis will occur for federally listed species. III. CURRENT MANAGEMENT DIRECTION Existing management direction for federally listed or candidate species and Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region sensitive species is summarized as follows: Forest Service Manual 2672 (USDA Forest Service 2009) provides standards for biological evaluations and provides a list of all Regional Forester designated sensitive wildlife and plant species occurring on National Forest System lands. Current policy as shown in the Forest Service Manual (FSM 2672.4) is to conduct a pre-field review of available information, and in instances where there is evidence of Sensitive Plant species or habitat, conduct a field reconnaissance if necessary to determine whether the project poses a threat to Sensitive Plants. The results of surveys and conflict determination and resolution (if applicable) are documented in the BE. Sierra National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan, as amended (USDA FS; 1991, 2004). The Forest Plan direction for Sensitive species is to develop and implement management practices to ensure Sensitive species do not become threatened or endangered because of Forest Service actions. Under Forest Plan Management Standards and Guidelines, the forest is to a) develop Sensitive Plant species management guides to identify population goals and compatible management activities that will maintain viability (S&G 67) and b) manage Sensitive Plant species to avoid future listing as threatened and endangered. Standard and Guideline 68 directs the Forest to ensure maintenance of genetic and geographic diversity and viable populations of Sensitive plants. The Forest Plan also states that the Forest will conduct Sensitive Plant surveys and field investigations prior to any ground-disturbing activity in areas that Sensitive Plants are known or suspected to occur. Avoidance or mitigation measures are to be included in project plans and Environmental Assessments (USDA FS 1991). The Forest Wide Goals and Objectives identified in the Forest Plan for threatened, endangered, and proposed plant species and Forest Service R5 Sensitive Plant species are: a) Manage fish, wildlife and plant habitats to maintain viable populations of all resident fish, wildlife and plant species, b) Manage habitat for State and Federally listed threatened and endangered fish, wildlife and plant species to meet the objectives of their recovery plans, c) Emphasize habitat improvement for sensitive, threatened, endangered and harvest species, d) Manage habitat for Forest Service sensitive fish, wildlife and plant species in a manner that prevents any species from becoming a candidate for threatened or endangered status. Manage botanical resources to maintain present diversity of species. Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment, US Forest Service 2004: Standard and Guideline for Sensitive Plant Surveys 125. “Conduct field surveys for TEPS plant species early enough in the project planning process that the project can be designed to conserve or enhance TEPS plants and their habitat. Conduct surveys according to procedures Whisky Ridge Ecological Restoration Project FEIS : Biological Assessment/Biological Evaluation for Plants Page 4 of 37 outlined in the Forest Service Handbook (FSH 2609.25.11). If additional field surveys are to be conducted as part of project implementation, survey results must be documented in the project file.” IV. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED WHISKY RIDGE ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION PROJECT (from the FEIS) Alternative 1 No Action This alternative was developed based, in part of, using the “Indicators” for the significant issues #2, 3, and 9 where no tree removal, harvesting, mechanical and prescribed burning treatments are proposed under this alternative. Under the No Action alternative, current management plans would continue to guide management of the Project Area however no actions would be taken to implement those plans at this time or without additional environmental analysis. No restoration treatments would be
Recommended publications
  • Sierra Nevada Framework FEIS Chapter 3
    table of contrents Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment – Part 4.6 4.6. Vascular Plants, Bryophytes, and Fungi4.6. Fungi Introduction Part 3.1 of this chapter describes landscape-scale vegetation patterns. Part 3.2 describes the vegetative structure, function, and composition of old forest ecosystems, while Part 3.3 describes hardwood ecosystems and Part 3.4 describes aquatic, riparian, and meadow ecosystems. This part focuses on botanical diversity in the Sierra Nevada, beginning with an overview of botanical resources and then presenting a more detailed analysis of the rarest elements of the flora, the threatened, endangered, and sensitive (TES) plants. The bryophytes (mosses and liverworts), lichens, and fungi of the Sierra have been little studied in comparison to the vascular flora. In the Pacific Northwest, studies of these groups have received increased attention due to the President’s Northwest Forest Plan. New and valuable scientific data is being revealed, some of which may apply to species in the Sierra Nevada. This section presents an overview of the vascular plant flora, followed by summaries of what is generally known about bryophytes, lichens, and fungi in the Sierra Nevada. Environmental Consequences of the alternatives are only analyzed for the Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive plants, which include vascular plants, several bryophytes, and one species of lichen. 4.6.1. Vascular plants4.6.1. plants The diversity of topography, geology, and elevation in the Sierra Nevada combine to create a remarkably diverse flora (see Section 3.1 for an overview of landscape patterns and vegetation dynamics in the Sierra Nevada). More than half of the approximately 5,000 native vascular plant species in California occur in the Sierra Nevada, despite the fact that the range contains less than 20 percent of the state’s land base (Shevock 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Terr–3 Special-Status Plant Populations
    TERR–3 SPECIAL-STATUS PLANT POPULATIONS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY During 2001 and 2002, the review of existing information, agency consultation, vegetation community mapping, and focused special-status plant surveys were completed. Based on California Native Plant Society’s (CNPS) Electronic Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California (CNPS 2001a), CDFG’s Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB; CDFG 2003), USDA-FS Regional Forester’s List of Sensitive Plant and Animal Species for Region 5 (USDA-FS 1998), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Species List (USFWS 2003), and Sierra National Forest (SNF) Sensitive Plant List (Clines 2002), there were 100 special-status plant species initially identified as potentially occurring within the Study Area. Known occurrences of these species were mapped. Vegetation communities were evaluated to locate areas that could potentially support special-status plant species. Each community was determined to have the potential to support at least one special-status plant species. During the spring and summer of 2002, special-status plant surveys were conducted. For each special-status plant species or population identified, a CNDDB form was completed, and photographs were taken. The locations were mapped and incorporated into a confidential GIS database. Vascular plant species observed during surveys were recorded. No state or federally listed special-status plant species were identified during special- status plant surveys. Seven special-status plant species, totaling 60 populations, were identified during surveys. There were 22 populations of Mono Hot Springs evening-primrose (Camissonia sierrae ssp. alticola) identified. Two populations are located near Mammoth Pool, one at Bear Forebay, and the rest are in the Florence Lake area.
    [Show full text]
  • 39516 Federal Register / Vol. 50, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 1985
    39516 Federal Register / Vol. 50, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 1985 / Rules and Regulations reaction irreversibility or by formation polarography or square-wave (3) Irving, H., “The Stability of Metal of two or more complex species in polarography). Complexes and Their Measurement equilibrium with each other. In this last (3) Interpretation and evaluation of Polarographically," Advances ih case it is necessary to apply the method resu lts, (i) Stability constants Polarography Proceedings of the 2nd by De Ford and Hume paragraph (d) (8) determined for a new substance can be International Congress, Ed. I.S. of this section to calculate stepwise compared with literature values for Langmuir (Pergamon Press, 1960). formation constants. standard substances (see Reference (4) Perrin, D.D., Dempsey, B., B u ffe r (2) Test report, (i) The test report substances, above) and used therefore for pH and Metal Ion Controls. should list for each metal ion to evaluate the strength of its (Chapman and Hall: London, 1974). investigated the half-wave potential complexing ability. (5) “Stability Constants of Metal-ion Complexes,” Part B, Organic Ligands, Ei /2 , co-ordination number and overall (ii) The system is physically stability constant. Compiled by D.D. Perrin, IUPAC meaningful if (A) the value of the Publication on Chemical Data Series, stability constant is positive and (B) the (ii) In addition, the following should No. 22 (Pergamon Press, 1979) also be reported: standard error is less than the constant (6) Grabaric, B., Tkalcec, M., Piljac, L, (A) Type of polarisable micro­ (the t-test should be used as a criterion).
    [Show full text]
  • A Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks Appendix 14 – Plants of Conservation Concern
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science A Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks Appendix 14 – Plants of Conservation Concern Natural Resource Report NPS/SEKI/ NRR—2013/665.14 In Memory of Rebecca Ciresa Wenk, Botaness ON THE COVER Giant Forest, Sequoia National Park Photography by: Brent Paull A Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks Appendix 14 – Plants of Conservation Concern Natural Resource Report NPS/SEKI/ NRR—2013/665.14 Ann Huber University of California Berkeley 41043 Grouse Drive Three Rivers, CA 93271 Adrian Das U.S. Geological Survey Western Ecological Research Center, Sequoia-Kings Canyon Field Station 47050 Generals Highway #4 Three Rivers, CA 93271 Rebecca Wenk University of California Berkeley 137 Mulford Hall Berkeley, CA 94720-3114 Sylvia Haultain Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks 47050 Generals Highway Three Rivers, CA 93271 June 2013 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae James R. Shevock Research Associate, Department Of
    Curriculum Vitae James R. Shevock Research Associate, Department of Botany California Academy of Sciences 55 Music Concourse Drive, Golden Gate Park San Francisco, California 94118 USA [email protected] Education B.S. Botany (1976) and M.A. Biology (1978), California State University, Long Beach. Master’s Thesis: A vascular flora of Lloyd Meadows Basin, Sequoia National Forest, Tulare County, California. Federal Career with U.S. Forest Service and National Park Service *1978. Began 30+ year federal career with USDA Forest Service. First position was wilderness ranger for the Golden Trout Wilderness. *1979-84. Became the first forest botanist for the Sequoia National Forest. Developed and administered the botany/ecology program. *1984-86. Served on a special assignment on loan from the Forest Service to the California Department of Fish & Game as staff botanist to the Natural Diversity Data Base. Increased interagency use of this statewide resource. *1986-98. Served as Regional Botanist for the Pacific Southwest Region, USDA Forest Service. Administered the threatened, endangered and sensitive plant program. Developed regional guidelines for forest planning toward natural resources. *1998-2003. Associate Regional Director for Resources Stewardship, Partnerships & Science, National Park Service, Pacific West Region. Provided oversight for cultural and natural resources management across 58 park units within six western states and trust territories in the Pacific. *2004-2008. NPS Research Coordinator, Californian Cooperative Ecosystem
    [Show full text]
  • 5.6 Biological Resources
    MADERA COUNTY SIERRA MEADOWS ESTATES SUBDIVISION EIR 5.6 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES The purpose of this Section is to identify existing biological resources on-site and in the local area, analyze potential Project-related impacts to these resources (including sensitive species) and recommend mitigation measures to avoid or reduce the significance of impacts that are identified. Information in this Section is based on analysis conducted by Foothill Associates. Appendix 15.6, Biological Technical Report includes technical information from Foothill Associates and Live Oak Associates Inc. This Section describes the biological character of the site in terms of vegetation, flora, wildlife, and wildlife habitats and analyzes the biological significance of the site in view of Federal, State and local laws and policies. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK The following describes federal, state, and local environmental laws and policies that are relevant to the CEQA review process. Federal Endangered Species Act and California Endangered Species Act The United States Congress passed the Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA) in 1973 to protect those species that are endangered or threatened with extinction. The State of California enacted a similar law, the California Endangered Species Act (CESA) in 1984. The Federal and State Endangered Species Acts are intended to operate in conjunction with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to help protect the ecosystems upon which endangered and threatened species depend. The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) is responsible for implementation of the FESA, while the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) implements the CESA. Section 7 of the FESA and its implementing regulations outline procedures for Federal interagency cooperation to conserve Federally listed species and designated critical habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • L.Fish Camp Biotic Report 12122014
    Tenaya Lodge Explorer Cabins Biotic Report Project #3540-02 Prepared for: Blair, Church & Flynn Consulting Engineers Isaac Wedam 451 Clovis Ave., Suite 200 Clovis, CA 93612 Prepared by: H. T. Harvey & Associates December 2014 7815 North Palm Avenue, Suite 310 Fresno, CA 93711 Ph: 559.476.3160 F: 559.476.3170 Executive Summary H. T. Harvey & Associates (HTH) has prepared this biotic report to: 1) document the existing environmental conditions and biological resources on a parcel (the Project site) that has been proposed as the location of a high end camping facility consisting of Explorer Cabins (the Project); 2) identify the impacts of the Project on these resources; and 3) recommend mitigation measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate Project impacts. HTH followed the California Environmental Quality Act guidelines (State CEQA Guidelines) during the assessment of the level of significance of the Project’s potential impacts on biological resources. We proposed mitigation measures to reduce significant impacts to less-than-significant levels, when those impacts cannot be avoided. This report is intended to support the Project Proponent’s compliance with CEQA. The Project site encompasses approximately 24.23 acres in Fish Camp, Mariposa County, California. The Project site is undeveloped, and is within the main timber belt of the central Sierra Nevada dominated by lower montane coniferous forest. Elevations on the Project site range from approximately 4970 to 5050 feet (ft) above sea level. The Project will include 34 prefabricated cabins, a clubhouse, a swimming pool, paved parking areas and roads, and campfire pits. The site plan has been designed to avoid wetlands, meadows, a pond, rock formations, and significant vegetation, and incorporates existing roads and clearings.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Rare Bryophytes in Unique Wetland Ecosystems on the Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest
    Inventory of Rare Bryophytes in Unique Wetland Ecosystems on the Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest Photo: L. Wilson 2010 U.S.D.A Forest Service Region 6 and U.S.D.I Bureau of Land Management Interagency Special Status and Sensitive Species Program Authors Clint Emerson is a botanist, USDA Forest Service, Rogue River Siskiyou National Forest, Gold Beach and Powers Ranger Districts, Gold Beach, OR 97465 Scot Loring is a botanist, Pacific Crest Consulting, LLC, Talent, OR 97540 Introduction The Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest (RRSNF) dissects a geographically diverse area of Oregon, creating a high level of endemism with regard to vascular plants. At this point much less is known about non-vascular plant diversity in the region so botanists on the forest proposed a project to inventory unique wetland ecosystems for Region 6 Sensitive, Strategic and Oregon Biologic Information Center (ORBIC) list 3 and 4 bryophytes (mosses, liverworts and hornworts). The project received funding from the Interagency Special Status and Sensitive Species Program (ISSSSP) for field work to begin during the 2009 field season. This report summarizes findings of the inventory. Wetland ecosystems are an uncommon feature of the steep and highly dissected Siskiyou Mountains in Southwest Oregon. They are dispersed more so within the Southern Oregon Cascade portion of the forest, but are still considered an uncommon feature on the landscape when compared to unique upland ecosystems such as prairies or rock outcrops. In comparison to northwestern Oregon and western Washington little information exists with regard to Sensitive wetland associated bryophytes in southwest Oregon. This may be due to the fact that large metropolitan areas with universities are mostly lacking from the region and therefore the expertise and funding to accomplish this type of work is not as available.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 63, No. 177/Monday
    49022 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 177 / Monday, September 14, 1998 / Rules and Regulations Species Historic range Family Status When listed Critical Special Scientific name Common name habitat rules ******* Poa atropurpurea ..... San Bernardino U.S.A.(CA) .............. PoaceaeÐGrass ..... E 644 NA NA bluegrass. ******* Taraxacum California taraxacum U.S.A.(CA) .............. AsteraceaeÐSun- E 644 NA NA californicum. flower. ******* Trichostema Hidden Lake U.S.A.(CA) .............. LamiaceaeÐMint .... T 644 NA NA austromontanum bluecurls. ssp. compactum. ******* Dated: September 1, 1998. (Rawhide Hill onion), Carpenteria notice for these six taxa concurrently Jamie Rappaport Clark, californica (carpenteria), Fritillaria with this final rule. This final rule Director, Fish and Wildlife Service. striata (Greenhorn adobe lily), Lupinus discusses the final determination to list [FR Doc. 98±24502 Filed 9±11±98; 8:45 am] citrinus var. deflexus (Mariposa lupine), four species as threatened. Robert Hoover (1938) first described BILLING CODE 4310±55±P Mimulus shevockii (Kelso Creek monkeyflower) and Navarretia setiloba Brodiaea pallida based on specimens (Piute Mountain navarretia) is being collected near Chinese Camp in DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR published concurrently with this final Tuolumne County. Brodiaea pallida is rule. an erect, herbaceous perennial plant Fish and Wildlife Service DATES: This rule becomes effective belonging to the lily family (Liliaceae). October 14, 1998. Brodiaea pallida grows from 50 CFR Part 17 underground bulbs to a height of 1 to 3 ADDRESSES: The complete file for this decimeters (dm) (4 to 12 inches (in)), RIN 1018±AC99 rule is available for public inspection, and has long, narrow, thick, succulent by appointment, during normal business Endangered and Threatened Wildlife leaves.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Status Vascular Plant Surveys and Habitat Modeling in Yosemite National Park, 2003–2004
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Special Status Vascular Plant Surveys and Habitat Modeling in Yosemite National Park, 2003–2004 Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SIEN/NRTR—2010/389 ON THE COVER USGS and NPS joint survey for Tompkins’ sedge (Carex tompkinsii), south side Merced River, El Portal, Mariposa County, California (upper left); Yosemite onion (Allium yosemitense) (upper right); Yosemite lewisia (Lewisia disepala) (lower left); habitat model for mountain lady’s slipper (Cypripedium montanum) in Yosemite National Park, California (lower right). Photographs by: Peggy E. Moore. Special Status Vascular Plant Surveys and Habitat Modeling in Yosemite National Park, 2003–2004 Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SIEN/NRTR—2010/389 Peggy E. Moore, Alison E. L. Colwell, and Charlotte L. Coulter U.S. Geological Survey Western Ecological Research Center 5083 Foresta Road El Portal, California 95318 October 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations.
    [Show full text]
  • Rationales for Plant Species Considered for Species of Conservation Concern
    Rationales for Plant Species Considered for Species of Conservation Concern Sierra National Forest Prepared by: Botanists and Natural Resources Specialists Pacific Southwest Regional Office and Sierra National Forest For: Sierra National Forest June 2019 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992.
    [Show full text]
  • Sensitive Species That Are Not Listed Or Proposed Under the ESA Sorted By: Major Group, Subgroup, NS Sci
    Forest Service Sensitive Species that are not listed or proposed under the ESA Sorted by: Major Group, Subgroup, NS Sci. Name; Legend: Page 94 REGION 10 REGION 1 REGION 2 REGION 3 REGION 4 REGION 5 REGION 6 REGION 8 REGION 9 ALTERNATE NATURESERVE PRIMARY MAJOR SUB- U.S. N U.S. 2005 NATURESERVE SCIENTIFIC NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME(S) COMMON NAME GROUP GROUP G RANK RANK ESA C 9 Anahita punctulata Southeastern Wandering Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G4 NNR 9 Apochthonius indianensis A Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1G2 N1N2 9 Apochthonius paucispinosus Dry Fork Valley Cave Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 Pseudoscorpion 9 Erebomaster flavescens A Cave Obligate Harvestman Invertebrate Arachnid G3G4 N3N4 9 Hesperochernes mirabilis Cave Psuedoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G5 N5 8 Hypochilus coylei A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G3? NNR 8 Hypochilus sheari A Lampshade Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2G3 NNR 9 Kleptochthonius griseomanus An Indiana Cave Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 8 Kleptochthonius orpheus Orpheus Cave Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 9 Kleptochthonius packardi A Cave Obligate Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G2G3 N2N3 9 Nesticus carteri A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid GNR NNR 8 Nesticus cooperi Lost Nantahala Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 8 Nesticus crosbyi A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G1? NNR 8 Nesticus mimus A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2 NNR 8 Nesticus sheari A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2? NNR 8 Nesticus silvanus A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2? NNR
    [Show full text]