DOCSLIB.ORG

Tone, Style, and Syntax: Considerations for Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tone, Style, and Syntax: Considerations for Analysis TONE, STYLE, AND SYNTAX: CONSIDERATIONS FOR ANALYSIS I. TONE SHIFT: often a change or shift in tone b. A compound sentence contains will be signaled by the following: two independent clauses joined by Key words (but, yet, nevertheless, however, a coordinating conjunction (and, although) but, or) or by a semicolon: The Punctuation (dashes, periods, colons) singer bowed to the audience, but Stanza and paragraph divisions she sang no encores. Changes in line and stanza or sentence length. c. A complex sentence contains an independent clause and one or II. STYLE: when analyzing style, consider the more subordinate clauses: You following: said that you would tell the truth. A. Diction (word choice): describe diction by d. A compound-complex sentence considering the following: contains two or more principal 1. Words may be monosyllabic (one clauses and one or more syllable in length) or polysyllabic subordinate clauses: The singer (more than one syllable in length). bowed while the audience The higher the ratio of polysyllabic applauded, but she sang no words, the more difficult the content. encores. 2. Words may be mainly colloquial C. A loose sentence makes complete sense if (slang), informal (conversational), brought to a close before the actual ending: formal (literary) or archaic (old We reached Edmonton that morning after a fashioned). turbulent flight and some exciting 3. Words may be mainly concrete experiences. A periodic sentence makes (specific) or abstract (general). sense only when the end of the sentence is 4. Words may be euphonious (pleasant reached: That morning, after a turbulent sounding), such as butterfly or flight and some exciting experiences, we cacophonous (harsh sounding), such as reached Edmonton. pus. D. In a balanced sentence, the phrases or 5. See also your list of words to describe clauses balance each other by virtue of diction their likeness or structure, meaning and/or B. Syntax (sentence structure): describe the length: He maketh me to lie down in green syntax by considering the following: pastures; he leadeth me beside the still 1. Examine the sentence length. Are the waters. sentences telegraphic (shorter than E. Natural order of a sentence: the sentence five words in length), medium is structured so that the subject comes (approximately 18 words in length) or before the predicate: Oranges grow in long and involved (30 or more California. Inverted order (sentence words). Does the sentence length fit inversion) involves constructing a the subject matter? What variety of sentence so that the predicate comes before sentence length is present? the subject: In California grow oranges. 2. Examine the sentence patterns. This is a device in which normal sentence Some elements to consider are: patterns are reversed to create an emphatic a. A declarative sentence makes a or rhythmic effect. Split order of a statement: The king is sick. sentence divides the predicate into two b. An imperative sentence gives a parts with the subject in the middle: In command: Stand up. California oranges grow. c. An interrogative sentence asks a F. Juxtaposition is a poetic and rhetorical question: Is the king sick? device in which normally unassociated d. An exclamatory sentence makes ideas, words, or phrases are placed next to an exclamation: The king is dead! one another, creating an effect of surprise 3. Are sentences simple, compound, or and wit: The apparition of these faces in complex? the crowd:/Petals on a wet, black bought a. A simple sentence contains one (“In a Station of the Metro” by Ezra subject and one verb: the singer Pound). bowed to her adoring audience. G. Parallel structure (parallelism) refers to B. A metaphor is a comparison without the a grammatical or structural similarity use of like or as. The writer specifically between sentences or parts of a sentence. states that one thing is another. It is It involves an arrangement of words, usually a comparison between something phrases, sentences, and paragraphs so that that is real or concrete and something that elements of equal importance are equally is abstract: Life is but a dream developed and similarly phrased: He was C. Personification is a kind of metaphor walking, running, and jumping for joy. which gives inanimate objects or abstract H. Repetition is a device in which words, ideas human characteristics: The wind sounds, and ideas are used more than once cried in the dark for the purpose of enhancing rhythm and D. Hyperbole is a deliberate, extravagant, and creating emphasis: . government of the often outrageous exaggeration. It may be people, by the people for the people . used for either serious or comic effect: The I. A rhetorical question is a question which shot that was heard ‘round the world. expects no answer. It is used to draw E. Understatement (Meiosis) is the opposite attention to a point and is generally of hyperbole. It is a kind of irony which stronger than a direct statement: If Mr. deliberately represents something as much Ferchoff is always fair, as you have said, less than it really is: I could probably why did he refuse to listen to Mrs. manage to survive on a salary of Baldwin’s arguments? $2,000,000 per year. J. Examine the following: F. Paradox is a statement which contradicts 1. sentence beginnings and endings: is itself. It may seem almost absurd. there a good variety or does a pattern Although it may seem to be at odds with emerge? ordinary experience, it usually turns out to 2. the arrangement of ideas in a sentence. have a coherent meaning and reveals a Are they set out in a specific way for a truth which is normally hidden: The more purpose? you know, the more you know you don’t 3. the arrangement of ideas is a know. paragraph: what is the structure? G. Oxymoron is a form of paradox which combines a pair of contrary terms into a III. TREATMENT OF SUBJECT MATTER: describe single expression. This combination the author’s treatment of the subject matter by usually serves the purpose of shocking the considering the following: has the author been: reader into awareness: sweet sorrow. A. Subjective? Are conclusions based on H. A pun is a play on words which are opinions? Are they rather personal in identical or similar in sound but which nature? have sharply diverse meanings. Puns may B. Objective? Are conclusions based on have serious as well as humorous uses facts? Are they impersonal or scientific? when Mercutio is bleeding to death in C. Supportive of the main idea? If so, how Romeo and Juliet, he says to his friends, does the author support claims? Does the “Ask for me tomorrow, and you shall find writer: me a grave man.” 1. state opinions? I. Irony is the result of a statement saying 2. report experience? one thing while meaning the opposite. Its 3. report observations? purpose is usually to criticize: “It’s simple 4. refer to sources, such as statements by to stop smoking. I’ve done it many times.” experts or statistical data? J. Sarcasm is a type of irony in which a person appears to be praising something IV. FIGURATIVE LANGUAGE: while he is actually insulting the thing. Its A. Simile: a comparison of two difference purpose is to injure or hurt: “My parents things or ideas using the words like or as: are really cool.” a specifically stated comparison, the writer saying one thing is like another: The warrior fought like a lion. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tragedy, Euripides, Melodrama: Hamartia, Medea, Liminality
    Vol. 5 (2013) | pp. 143-171 http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_AMAL.2013.v5.42932 TRAGEDY, EURIPIDES, MELODRAMA: HAMARTIA, MEDEA, LIMINALITY BRIAN G. CARAHER QUEEN’S UNIVERSITY BELFAST, NORTHERN IRELAND [email protected] Article received on 29.01.2013 Accepted on 06.07.2013 ABSTRACT This article examines socio-historical dimensions and cultural and dramaturgic implications of the Greek playwright Euripides’ treatment of the myth of Medea. Euripides gives voice to victims of adventurism, aggression and betrayal in the name of ‘reason’ and the ‘state’ or ‘polity.’ Medea constitutes one of the most powerful mythic forces to which he gave such voice by melodramatizing the disturbing liminality of Greek tragedy’s perceived social and cultural order. The social polity is confronted by an apocalyptic shock to its order and its available modes of emotional, rational and social interpretation. Euripidean melodramas of horror dramatize the violation of rational categories and precipitate an abject liminality of the tragic vision of rational order. The dramaturgy of Euripides’ Medea is contrasted with the norms of Greek tragedy and examined in comparison with other adaptations — both ancient and contemporary — of the myth of Medea, in order to unfold the play’s transgression of a tragic vision of the social polity. KEYWORDS Dramaturgy, Euripides, liminality, Medea, melodrama, preternatural powers, social polity, tragedy. TRAGEDIA, EURÍPIDES, MELODRAMA: HAMARTÍA, MEDEA, LIMINALIDAD RESUMEN Este artículo estudia las dimensiones sociohistóricas y las implicaciones culturales y teatrales del tratamiento que Eurípides da al mito de Medea. Eurípides da voz a las víctimas del aventurerismo, de las agresiones y de las traiciones cometidas en nombre de la ‘razón’ y del ‘estado’ o el ‘gobierno’.
    [Show full text]
  • Logophoricity in Finnish
    Open Linguistics 2018; 4: 630–656 Research Article Elsi Kaiser* Effects of perspective-taking on pronominal reference to humans and animals: Logophoricity in Finnish https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2018-0031 Received December 19, 2017; accepted August 28, 2018 Abstract: This paper investigates the logophoric pronoun system of Finnish, with a focus on reference to animals, to further our understanding of the linguistic representation of non-human animals, how perspective-taking is signaled linguistically, and how this relates to features such as [+/-HUMAN]. In contexts where animals are grammatically [-HUMAN] but conceptualized as the perspectival center (whose thoughts, speech or mental state is being reported), can they be referred to with logophoric pronouns? Colloquial Finnish is claimed to have a logophoric pronoun which has the same form as the human-referring pronoun of standard Finnish, hän (she/he). This allows us to test whether a pronoun that may at first blush seem featurally specified to seek [+HUMAN] referents can be used for [-HUMAN] referents when they are logophoric. I used corpus data to compare the claim that hän is logophoric in both standard and colloquial Finnish vs. the claim that the two registers have different logophoric systems. I argue for a unified system where hän is logophoric in both registers, and moreover can be used for logophoric [-HUMAN] referents in both colloquial and standard Finnish. Thus, on its logophoric use, hän does not require its referent to be [+HUMAN]. Keywords: Finnish, logophoric pronouns, logophoricity, anti-logophoricity, animacy, non-human animals, perspective-taking, corpus 1 Introduction A key aspect of being human is our ability to think and reason about our own mental states as well as those of others, and to recognize that others’ perspectives, knowledge or mental states are distinct from our own, an ability known as Theory of Mind (term due to Premack & Woodruff 1978).
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing Syntax
    A.P. Language and Composition Analyzing Syntax A writer’s style is indicated by his/her choice of words and by the way he/she puts those words together: the sentence is usually considered the backbone of a writer’s style. Syntax encompasses word order, sentence length, sentence form, sentence function, sentence focus, and punctuation. I. A sentence can be studied for its form. Is it simple, compound, or complex? A. Simple: The boys were already in the classroom. (one independent clause) B. Compound: The boys were already in the classroom, and they began to work. (two independent clauses) C. Complex: The boys who were already in the classroom began to work (one independent clause and one or more dependent clauses) D. Compound-Complex: When the teacher walked into the classroom, the boys were already there, and they began to work. (two independent clauses and one or more dependent clauses) *** The important point to remember when analyzing the sentence form would be the purpose of that form; what effect does it have on the piece of writing? For example, Hemingway’s short stories about Nick Adams include mostly simple sentences with some compound and complex sentences. Hemingway is famous for this technique and its effect of emphasizing Nick’s careful denial of his emotions when he returned from the war. When considering sentence form, you might ask yourself how the effect of a sentence would be different if its form was altered? For example, if a writer writes two short simple sentences in a row (i.e. I am frustrated.
    [Show full text]
  • II Levels of Language
    II Levels of language 1 Phonetics and phonology 1.1 Characterising articulations 1.1.1 Consonants 1.1.2 Vowels 1.2 Phonotactics 1.3 Syllable structure 1.4 Prosody 1.5 Writing and sound 2 Morphology 2.1 Word, morpheme and allomorph 2.1.1 Various types of morphemes 2.2 Word classes 2.3 Inflectional morphology 2.3.1 Other types of inflection 2.3.2 Status of inflectional morphology 2.4 Derivational morphology 2.4.1 Types of word formation 2.4.2 Further issues in word formation 2.4.3 The mixed lexicon 2.4.4 Phonological processes in word formation 3 Lexicology 3.1 Awareness of the lexicon 3.2 Terms and distinctions 3.3 Word fields 3.4 Lexicological processes in English 3.5 Questions of style 4 Syntax 4.1 The nature of linguistic theory 4.2 Why analyse sentence structure? 4.2.1 Acquisition of syntax 4.2.2 Sentence production 4.3 The structure of clauses and sentences 4.3.1 Form and function 4.3.2 Arguments and complements 4.3.3 Thematic roles in sentences 4.3.4 Traces 4.3.5 Empty categories 4.3.6 Similarities in patterning Raymond Hickey Levels of language Page 2 of 115 4.4 Sentence analysis 4.4.1 Phrase structure grammar 4.4.2 The concept of ‘generation’ 4.4.3 Surface ambiguity 4.4.4 Impossible sentences 4.5 The study of syntax 4.5.1 The early model of generative grammar 4.5.2 The standard theory 4.5.3 EST and REST 4.5.4 X-bar theory 4.5.5 Government and binding theory 4.5.6 Universal grammar 4.5.7 Modular organisation of language 4.5.8 The minimalist program 5 Semantics 5.1 The meaning of ‘meaning’ 5.1.1 Presupposition and entailment 5.2
    [Show full text]
  • The Idea of Mimesis: Semblance, Play, and Critique in the Works of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W
    DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences 8-2012 The idea of mimesis: Semblance, play, and critique in the works of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W. Adorno Joseph Weiss DePaul University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd Recommended Citation Weiss, Joseph, "The idea of mimesis: Semblance, play, and critique in the works of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W. Adorno" (2012). College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations. 125. https://via.library.depaul.edu/etd/125 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Liberal Arts & Social Sciences Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Idea of Mimesis: Semblance, Play, and Critique in the Works of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W. Adorno A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy October, 2011 By Joseph Weiss Department of Philosophy College of Liberal Arts and Sciences DePaul University Chicago, Illinois 2 ABSTRACT Joseph Weiss Title: The Idea of Mimesis: Semblance, Play and Critique in the Works of Walter Benjamin and Theodor W. Adorno Critical Theory demands that its forms of critique express resistance to the socially necessary illusions of a given historical period. Yet theorists have seldom discussed just how much it is the case that, for Walter Benjamin and Theodor W.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a Shared Syntax for Shifted Indexicals and Logophoric Pronouns
    Toward a Shared Syntax for Shifted Indexicals and Logophoric Pronouns Mark Baker Rutgers University April 2018 Abstract: I argue that indexical shift is more like logophoricity and complementizer agreement than most previous semantic accounts would have it. In particular, there is evidence of a syntactic requirement at work, such that the antecedent of a shifted “I” must be a superordinate subject, just as the antecedent of a logophoric pronoun or the goal of complementizer agreement must be. I take this to be evidence that the antecedent enters into a syntactic control relationship with a null operator in all three constructions. Comparative data comes from Magahi and Sakha (for indexical shift), Yoruba (for logophoric pronouns), and Lubukusu (for complementizer agreement). 1. Introduction Having had an office next to Lisa Travis’s for 12 formative years, I learned many things from her that still influence my thinking. One is her example of taking semantic notions, such as aspect and event roles, and finding ways to implement them in syntactic structure, so as to advance the study of less familiar languages and topics.1 In that spirit, I offer here some thoughts about how logophoricity and indexical shift, topics often discussed from a more or less semantic point of view, might have syntactic underpinnings—and indeed, the same syntactic underpinnings. On an impressionistic level, it would not seem too surprising for logophoricity and indexical shift to have a common syntactic infrastructure. Canonical logophoricity as it is found in various West African languages involves using a special pronoun inside the finite CP complement of a verb to refer to the subject of that verb.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Basic Categorial Syntax
    Hardegree, Compositional Semantics, Chapter 1 : Basic Categorial Syntax 1 of 27 Chapter 1 Basic Categorial Syntax 1. The Task of Grammar ............................................................................................................ 2 2. Artificial versus Natural Languages ....................................................................................... 2 3. Recursion ............................................................................................................................... 3 4. Category-Governed Grammars .............................................................................................. 3 5. Example Grammar – A Tiny Fragment of English ................................................................. 4 6. Type-Governed (Categorial) Grammars ................................................................................. 5 7. Recursive Definition of Types ............................................................................................... 7 8. Examples of Types................................................................................................................. 7 9. First Rule of Composition ...................................................................................................... 8 10. Examples of Type-Categorial Analysis .................................................................................. 8 11. Quantifiers and Quantifier-Phrases ...................................................................................... 10 12. Compound Nouns
    [Show full text]
  • PARATEXTUALITY and the LOST URTEXT Anthony Enns the Term
    ANTHONY ENNS PARATEXTUALITY AND THE LOST URTEXT Anthony Enns The term “paratext” refers to the elements of a literary work that ac- company the text but are not considered part of the text itself, such as title pages, introductions, annotations, appendices, etc. Gérard Genette famously described the paratext as the “threshold…between the inside and the outside” of a text, and this threshold represents “a privileged place of a pragmatics and a strategy, of an influence on the public, an influence that…is at the service of a better reception for the text and a more pertinent reading of it” (2). In other words, the contextual information and critical commentary provided in the paratext ultimately serves the author’s own interests by ensuring that the text is interpreted correctly: “The way to get a proper reading is…to put the (definitely assumed) reader in possession of information the author considers necessary for this proper reading…[such as information] about the way the author wishes to be read” (209). Genette also noted that paratextual elements have expanded over time in order to satisfy “the educated public’s growing curiosity about the ‘making’ of the text and about the unearthing of versions the author had abandoned” (339). Paratexts were thus increasingly seen as necessary “supplements” or “acces- sories” to a literary work, and a text without a paratext is now viewed as “a power disabled…like an elephant without a mahout” (410). If a text without a paratext is “an elephant without a mahout,” then a “paratext without its text is a mahout without an elephant,” which Gen- ette dismissed as “a silly show” (410).
    [Show full text]
  • Intro to Linguistics – Syntax 1 Jirka Hana – November 7, 2011
    Intro to Linguistics – Syntax 1 Jirka Hana – November 7, 2011 Overview of topics • What is Syntax? • Part of Speech • Phrases, Constituents & Phrase Structure Rules • Ambiguity • Characteristics of Phrase Structure Rules • Valency 1 What to remember and understand: Syntax, difference between syntax and semantics, open/closed class words, all word classes (and be able to distinguish them based on morphology and syntax) Subject, object, case, agreement. 1 What is Syntax? Syntax – the part of linguistics that studies sentence structure: • word order: I want these books. *want these I books. • agreement – subject and verb, determiner and noun, . often must agree: He wants this book. *He want this book. I want these books. *I want this books. • How many complements, which prepositions and forms (cases): I give Mary a book. *I see Mary a book. I see her. *I see she. • hierarchical structure – what modifies what We need more (intelligent leaders). (more of intelligent leaders) We need (more intelligent) leaders. (leaders that are more intelligent) • etc. Syntax is not about meaning! Sentences can have no sense and still be grammatically correct: Colorless green ideas sleep furiously. – nonsense, but grammatically correct *Sleep ideas colorless furiously green. – grammatically incorrect Syntax: From Greek syntaxis from syn (together) + taxis (arrangement). Cf. symphony, synonym, synthesis; taxonomy, tactics 1 2 Parts of Speech • Words in a language behave differently from each other. • But not each word is entirely different from all other words in that language. ⇒ Words can be categorized into parts of speech (lexical categories, word classes) based on their morphological, syntactic and semantic properties. Note that there is a certain amount of arbitrariness in any such classification.
    [Show full text]
  • ELEMENTS of FICTION – NARRATOR / NARRATIVE VOICE Fundamental Literary Terms That Indentify Components of Narratives “Fiction
    Dr. Hallett ELEMENTS OF FICTION – NARRATOR / NARRATIVE VOICE Fundamental Literary Terms that Indentify Components of Narratives “Fiction” is defined as any imaginative re-creation of life in prose narrative form. All fiction is a falsehood of sorts because it relates events that never actually happened to people (characters) who never existed, at least not in the manner portrayed in the stories. However, fiction writers aim at creating “legitimate untruths,” since they seek to demonstrate meaningful insights into the human condition. Therefore, fiction is “untrue” in the absolute sense, but true in the universal sense. Critical Thinking – analysis of any work of literature – requires a thorough investigation of the “who, where, when, what, why, etc.” of the work. Narrator / Narrative Voice Guiding Question: Who is telling the story? …What is the … Narrative Point of View is the perspective from which the events in the story are observed and recounted. To determine the point of view, identify who is telling the story, that is, the viewer through whose eyes the readers see the action (the narrator). Consider these aspects: A. Pronoun p-o-v: First (I, We)/Second (You)/Third Person narrator (He, She, It, They] B. Narrator’s degree of Omniscience [Full, Limited, Partial, None]* C. Narrator’s degree of Objectivity [Complete, None, Some (Editorial?), Ironic]* D. Narrator’s “Un/Reliability” * The Third Person (therefore, apparently Objective) Totally Omniscient (fly-on-the-wall) Narrator is the classic narrative point of view through which a disembodied narrative voice (not that of a participant in the events) knows everything (omniscient) recounts the events, introduces the characters, reports dialogue and thoughts, and all details.
    [Show full text]
  • The Syntax of Word Order Derivation and Agreement in Najrani Arabic: a Minimalist Analysis
    English Language Teaching; Vol. 10, No. 2; 2017 ISSN 1916-4742 E-ISSN 1916-4750 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education The Syntax of Word Order Derivation and Agreement in Najrani Arabic: A Minimalist Analysis Abdul-Hafeed Ali Fakih1 & Hadeel Ali Al-Sharif2 1 Department of English, University of Ibb, Yemen & Department of English, University of Najran, Saudi Arabia 2 Department of English, University of Najran, Saudi Arabia Correspondence: Abdul-Hafeed Ali Fakih, Department of English, University of Najran, Saudi Arabia. E-mail: [email protected] Received: December 1, 2016 Accepted: January 7, 2017 Online Published: January 9, 2017 doi: 10.5539/elt.v10n2p48 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n2p48 Abstract The paper aims to explore word order derivation and agreement in Najran Arabic (henceforth, NA) and examines the interaction between the NA data and Chomsky’s (2001, 2005) Agree theory which we adopt in this study. The objective is to investigate how word order occurs in NA and provide a satisfactorily unified account of the derivation of SVO and VSO orders and agreement in the language. Furthermore, the study shows how SVO and VSO word orders are derived morpho-syntactically in NA syntax and why and how the derivation of SVO word order comes after that of VSO order. We assume that the derivation of the unmarked SVO in NA takes place after applying a further step to the marked VSO. We propose that the default unmarked word order in NA is SVO, not VSO. Moreover, we propose that the DP which is base-generated in [Spec-vP] is a topic, not a subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Harbrace College Handbook
    Harbrace College Handbook REVISED THIRTEENTH EDITION WITH 1998 MLA STYLE MANUAL UPDATES SUB Gttttlngen 7 ••% 208 52018X 98 A14435 Contents Preface vi GRAMMAR Chapter 1 Sentence Sense ss The parts of a sentence 2 la Recognizing verbs and predicates 3 lb Recognizing subjects, objects, and complements (1) Subjects of verbs 4 (2) Objects of verbs 6 (3) Subject and object complements 7 (4) Word order 8 lc Recognizing parts of speech 10 (1) Verbs 13 (2) Nouns 13 (3) Pronouns 15 (4) Adjectives 15 (5) Adverbs 16 (6) Prepositions 16 (7) Conjunctions 18 (8) Interjections 18 Id Recognizing phrases 19 (1) Kinds of phrases 19 (2) Phrases used as nouns 21 (3) Phrases used as modifiers 22 XIX xx Contents le Recognizing clauses 24 (1) Independent clauses 24 (2) Subordinate clauses 24 If Sentence form and function 28 (1) Examining sentence forms 28 (2) Examining the purpose or function of sentences 29 Chapter 2 Sentence Fragments frag 31 Testing for fragments 31 2a Phrases 32 2b Subordinate clauses 33 Chapter 3 Comma Splices and Fused Sentences cs/fs 36 How to separate clauses 36 How to link and relate clauses 37 3a With coordinating conjunctions 38 3b With conjunctive adverbs or transitional phrases 41 3c Divided quotations 42 Chapter 4 Adjectives and Adverbs ad 45 4a Adverbs 46 4b Adjectives used as subject or object complements 47 4c Comparative and superlative forms 48 (1) The comparative 49 (2) The superlative 50 (3) Incorrect double comparatives or superlatives 50 4d Awkward or ambiguous use of a noun as an adjective 51 4e The double negative 52
    [Show full text]