TROPICAL STORM ANDREA (AL012013) 5 – 7 June 2013
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Town of East Haven Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2012
TOWN OF EAST HAVEN HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE 2012 ADOPTED MAY 1, 2012 MMI #2731-02-1 Prepared for: TOWN OF EAST HAVEN Town Hall 200 Main Street East Haven, Connecticut 06512 (203)468–3840 http://www.townofeasthavenct.org/ Prepared by: MILONE & MACBROOM, INC. 99 Realty Drive Cheshire, Connecticut 06410 (203) 271-1773 www.miloneandmacbroom.com TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page CONTACT INFORMATION ....................................................................................................ES-1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................ES-2 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background and Purpose ................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Hazard Mitigation Goals .................................................................................................. 1-4 1.3 Identification of Hazards and Document Overview ........................................................ 1-5 1.4 Discussion of STAPLEE Ranking Method.................................................................... 1-10 1.5 Discussion of Benefit-Cost Ratio................................................................................... 1-12 1.6 Documentation of the Planning Process ........................................................................ 1-12 1.7 Coordination with Neighboring Communities ............................................................... 1-12 2.0 COMMUNITY PROFILE 2.1 Physical Setting ............................................................................................................... -
Climatology, Variability, and Return Periods of Tropical Cyclone Strikes in the Northeastern and Central Pacific Ab Sins Nicholas S
Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School March 2019 Climatology, Variability, and Return Periods of Tropical Cyclone Strikes in the Northeastern and Central Pacific aB sins Nicholas S. Grondin Louisiana State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Climate Commons, Meteorology Commons, and the Physical and Environmental Geography Commons Recommended Citation Grondin, Nicholas S., "Climatology, Variability, and Return Periods of Tropical Cyclone Strikes in the Northeastern and Central Pacific asinB s" (2019). LSU Master's Theses. 4864. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/4864 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CLIMATOLOGY, VARIABILITY, AND RETURN PERIODS OF TROPICAL CYCLONE STRIKES IN THE NORTHEASTERN AND CENTRAL PACIFIC BASINS A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in The Department of Geography and Anthropology by Nicholas S. Grondin B.S. Meteorology, University of South Alabama, 2016 May 2019 Dedication This thesis is dedicated to my family, especially mom, Mim and Pop, for their love and encouragement every step of the way. This thesis is dedicated to my friends and fraternity brothers, especially Dillon, Sarah, Clay, and Courtney, for their friendship and support. This thesis is dedicated to all of my teachers and college professors, especially Mrs. -
CENTRAL AMERICA: Disaster Management Is Key Challenge
http://search.proquest.com.libproxy.nps.edu/printviewfile?accountid=12702 Back to previous page document 1 of 1 CENTRAL AMERICA: Disaster management is key challenge OxResearch Daily Brief Service. (Dec 31, 2014). Find a copy http://sfxhosted.exlibrisgroup.com/nps?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book& genre=unknown&sid=ProQ:OxResearch&atitle=& title=CENTRAL+AMERICA%3A+Disaster+management+is+key+challenge&issn=&date=2014-12-31&volume=& issue=&spage=1&au=&isbn=&jtitle=& btitle=CENTRAL+AMERICA%3A+Disaster+management+is+key+challenge&rft_id=info:eric/&rft_id=info:doi/ Abstract Disaster preparedness in Central America. In recent months, Central American countries have been boosting regional cooperation for the enhancement of security strategies in response to the increase in child migration through the region en route to the United States. Less high-profile regional efforts are also being made in the area of emergency preparedness in this disaster-prone region. Full Text SUBJECT:Disaster preparedness in Central America. SIGNIFICANCE:In recent months, Central American countries have been boosting regional cooperation for the enhancement of security strategies in response to the increase in child migration through the region en route to the United States. Less high-profile regional efforts are also being made in the area of emergency preparedness in this disaster-prone region. ANALYSIS: Impacts. The United States will continue to support training exercises, as natural disasters increase regional vulnerability, thus driving migration. 1 of 6 12/13/2015 4:07 PM http://search.proquest.com.libproxy.nps.edu/printviewfile?accountid=12702 Long-term urban planning will remain a key factor in the reduction of the impact of natural disasters in the region. -
Hurricane and Tropical Storm
State of New Jersey 2014 Hazard Mitigation Plan Section 5. Risk Assessment 5.8 Hurricane and Tropical Storm 2014 Plan Update Changes The 2014 Plan Update includes tropical storms, hurricanes and storm surge in this hazard profile. In the 2011 HMP, storm surge was included in the flood hazard. The hazard profile has been significantly enhanced to include a detailed hazard description, location, extent, previous occurrences, probability of future occurrence, severity, warning time and secondary impacts. New and updated data and figures from ONJSC are incorporated. New and updated figures from other federal and state agencies are incorporated. Potential change in climate and its impacts on the flood hazard are discussed. The vulnerability assessment now directly follows the hazard profile. An exposure analysis of the population, general building stock, State-owned and leased buildings, critical facilities and infrastructure was conducted using best available SLOSH and storm surge data. Environmental impacts is a new subsection. 5.8.1 Profile Hazard Description A tropical cyclone is a rotating, organized system of clouds and thunderstorms that originates over tropical or sub-tropical waters and has a closed low-level circulation. Tropical depressions, tropical storms, and hurricanes are all considered tropical cyclones. These storms rotate counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere around the center and are accompanied by heavy rain and strong winds (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NOAA] 2013a). Almost all tropical storms and hurricanes in the Atlantic basin (which includes the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea) form between June 1 and November 30 (hurricane season). August and September are peak months for hurricane development. -
Eastern North Pacific Hurricane Season of 1995
1152 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW VOLUME 126 Eastern North Paci®c Hurricane Season of 1995 EDWARD N. RAPPAPORT,LIXION A. AVILA,MILES B. LAWRENCE,MAX MAYFIELD, AND RICHARD J. PASCH National Hurricane Center, Tropical Prediction Center, NWS/NOAA, Miami, Florida (Manuscript received 3 September 1996, in ®nal form 28 January 1997) ABSTRACT The 1995 eastern North Paci®c hurricane season is reviewed. The activity comprised 11 tropical cyclones, consisting of seven hurricanes, three tropical storms, and one tropical depression. Hurricane Ismael caused a large loss of life in the southern Gulf of California. 1. Introduction gion. This pattern is also consistent with fewer than normal storms forming in the Paci®c and enhanced ac- The western hemisphere was a scene of stark contrasts tivity over the western Caribbean region (cf. Lawrence in tropical cyclone activity during 1995. More tropical et al. 1998). cyclones formed in the Atlantic hurricane basin than in In contrast to these atmospheric features, anomalies the eastern North Paci®c Ocean for the ®rst time in 26 of sea surface temperature (not shown) were small and years (cf. Lawrence et al. 1998). In fact, while the At- thought to be insigni®cant. In fact, when atmospheric lantic produced 19 tropical storms, its second largest conditions were conducive for development, the warm total during the past 125 years, the total of 10 tropical eastern Paci®c waters allowed three of the 10 tropical storms in the eastern North Paci®c Ocean ranks as the storms to strengthen to category 4 status on the Saf®r± second fewest in the 30-yr period of routine satellite Simpson hurricane scale (1-min wind speeds exceeding surveillance (1977 had 8 storms) and is 6 fewer than about 58 m s21). -
BARBARA (EP022019) 30 June – 5 July 2019
NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER TROPICAL CYCLONE REPORT HURRICANE BARBARA (EP022019) 30 June – 5 July 2019 John P. Cangialosi National Hurricane Center 25 August 2019 VISIBLE SATELLITE MODIS IMAGE OF HURRICANE BARBARA AROUND THE TIME OF ITS PEAK INTENSITY. IMAGE COURTSEY OF NASA. Barbara was a category 4 hurricane (on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale) that rapidly intensified and remained out at sea. The hurricane then rapidly weakened and became a post-tropical cyclone just east of the central North Pacific basin. Hurricane Barbara 2 Hurricane Barbara 30 JUNE – 5 JULY 2019 SYNOPTIC HISTORY The genesis of Barbara appears to be associated with a tropical wave that moved off the west coast of Africa on 18 June. This disturbance produced disorganized deep convection while it was travelling across the Atlantic Ocean, especially when it interacted with an upper-level trough near the Lesser Antilles on 22 and 23 June. Showers and thunderstorms remained disorganized near the wave axis as it entered the far eastern North Pacific basin on 26 June, but the convective activity gradually increased during the next couple of days while the disturbance passed well south of Mexico. Environmental low-level southwesterly flow helped the wave establish a broad circulation on 29 June. Deep convection continued to increase later that day, and the system developed a well-defined center by 0600 UTC 30 June, marking the formation of a tropical cyclone about 550 n mi south-southwest of Manzanillo, Mexico. Since scatterometer data indicated that winds were already near 35 kt, tropical storm status is shown at the time of genesis. -
United Nations Environment Program Terminal Evaluation Of
United Nations Environment Program Terminal Evaluation of Mainstreaming the conservation of ecosystem services and biodiversity at the sub-watershed scale in Chiapas, Mexico By Robert Hofstede Evaluation Office November 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 1 ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................................................................... 5 I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 6 II. THE EVALUATION .............................................................................................................. 6 III. THE PROJECT ..................................................................................................................... 7 A. PROJECT CONTEXT ..................................................................................................... 7 B. OBJECTIVES AND COMPONENTS.............................................................................. 8 C. TARGET AREAS/GROUPS ............................................................................................ 9 D. MILESTONES/KEY DATES IN PROJECT DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION..... 9 E. IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS ....................................................................10 F. PROJECT FINANCING ..................................................................................................10 G. PROJECT -
BARBARA (EP022013) 28 – 30 May 2013
NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER TROPICAL CYCLONE REPORT HURRICANE BARBARA (EP022013) 28 – 30 May 2013 Daniel P. Brown National Hurricane Center 1 19 August 2013 GOES 14 SATELLITE IMAGE OF HURRICANE BARBARA AT 1815 UTC 29 MAY, NEAR THE TIME OF LANDFALL IN SOUTHERN MEXICO. IMAGE COURTESY OF THE NOAA ENVIRONMENTAL VISUALIZATION LABORATORY. Barbara was an early season category 1 hurricane (on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale) that made landfall along the Pacific coast of southeastern Mexico. Barbara’s landfall location is the easternmost recorded landfall point for an eastern North Pacific hurricane. Barbara’s landfall date of 29 May marks the second-earliest hurricane landfall date in the basin since records began in 1949. 1 Original report date 6 August 2013. Corrected for tropical cyclone status in Table 1 and Figure 1. Hurricane Barbara 2 Hurricane Barbara 28 – 30 MAY 2013 SYNOPTIC HISTORY Barbara appears to have formed from the interaction of a tropical wave with an eastward-moving atmospheric Kelvin wave during an active period of the Madden-Julian Oscillation (Fig.1 ). Satellite data suggest that the low-amplitude tropical wave departed the west coast of Africa on 16 May and crossed Central America on 24 May. The wave moved over the far eastern Pacific Ocean shortly thereafter, and a broad low pressure area formed southwest of the coast of Nicaragua on 25 May after the atmospheric Kelvin wave passed the longitude of the disturbance (Fig. 1). The broad low moved west-northwestward during the next few days while the associated shower and thunderstorm activity gradually increased. Early on 28 May, the circulation became better defined, which resulted in the formation of a tropical depression by 1200 UTC, about 110 n mi south-southeast of Puerto Angel, Mexico. -
P3.4 the Distribution of Precipitation Over the Northeast Accompanying Landfalling and Transitioning Tropical Cyclones
20th Conf. on Weather Analysis and Forecasting Seattle, WA, 11–15 January 2004 P3.4 The Distribution of Precipitation over the Northeast Accompanying Landfalling and Transitioning Tropical Cyclones David P. DeLuca*, Lance F. Bosart, Daniel Keyser University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York and David R. Vallee National Weather Service Forecast Office, Taunton, Massachusetts 1. INTRODUCTION United States. Approximately 3500 surface stations were analyzed for each storm period (currently: 1950– Landfalling and transitioning tropical cyclones 1991) by Ron Horwood of NWS WFO Taunton, MA. pose a significant heavy precipitation forecast challenge Obvious erroneous data were removed to obtain the most over the northeastern United States. The forecast accurate analyses possible. challenge is heightened because the heavy rainfall distribution associated with these tropical cyclones can A subset of eight storms (Fig. 1) where the be modulated significantly when the poleward-moving precipitation distribution is possibly influenced by storms interact with mobile midlatitude upper-level coastal frontogenesis was chosen from well–documented troughs and coastal fronts over regions of complex or famous cases. Detailed analyses were conducted terrain. The purpose of this paper is to document the using the four times daily (0000, 0600, 1200 and 1800 large spatial and temporal variability of heavy UTC) NCEP/NCAR reanalysis dataset (Kalnay et al. precipitation that accompanies landfalling and 1996; Kistler et al. 2001) and archived DIFAX surface transitioning tropical cyclones, and to determine the charts in an attempt to elucidate both synoptic and physical basis for the observed rainfall distribution. mesoscale processes. 2. METHODOLOGY 3. RESULTS A 38-storm dataset (Fig. -
The 2005 Atlantic Hurricane Season Is the Most Active on Record
dr WORLD METEOROLOGICAL ORGANIZATION RA IV HURRICANE COMMITTEE THIRTY-SIXTH SESSION CANCUN, MEXICO (7 to 10 April 2014) FINAL REPORT 1. ORGANIZATION OF THE SESSION At the kind invitation of the Government of Republic of Mexico, the thirty-sixth session of the Regional Association (RA) IV Hurricane Committee was held in Cancun, Mexico from 7 to 10 April 2014. The inauguration ceremony for the Meeting took place early Monday afternoon 7 April, and it included the following participants: 1. Lic. Roberto Borge Angulo. Gobernador Constitucional del estado de Quinta Roo 2. Dr. David Korenfeld Federman. Director General de la Comisión Nacional del Agua 3. M. en C. Juan Manuel Caballero González. Coordinador General del Servicio Meteorológico Nacional de la Comisión Nacional del Agua 4. Dr. Richard Knabb. Chairman of the RA-IV Hurricane Committee 5. Sr. Taoyong Peng. Jefe del Departamento de Ciclones Tropicalesde la Organización Meteorológica Mundial 6. Almirante C.G. DEM Juan Ramón Alcalá Pignol. Comandante de la Quinta Región Naval. 7. Lic. Paul Carrillo de Cáceres. Presidente Municipal Benito Juárez 8. C. P. Roberto Pinzón Álvarez. Director General del Organismo de Cuenca Península de Yucatán 9. QFB José Luis Blanco Pajón. Director Local en Quintana Roo de la Comisión Nacional del Agua 10. Lic. Luis Carlos Rodríguez Hoy. Director General de Protección Civil en el Estado de Quintana Roo . 1.1 Opening of the session 1.1.1 Mr Juan Manuel Caballero Gonzalez, Coordinating Director of the Mexican Meteorological Services of CONAGUA and Permanent Representative of Mexico with WMO made welcome remarks. He reviewed the unusual number of hurricanes that hit Mexico last year, which resulted in severe damages to the country. -
Virginia HURRICANES by Barbara Mcnaught Watson
Virginia HURRICANES By Barbara McNaught Watson A hurricane is a large tropical complex of thunderstorms forming spiral bands around an intense low pressure center (the eye). Sustained winds must be at least 75 mph, but may reach over 200 mph in the strongest of these storms. The strong winds drive the ocean's surface, building waves 40 feet high on the open water. As the storm moves into shallower waters, the waves lessen, but water levels rise, bulging up on the storm's front right quadrant in what is called the "storm surge." This is the deadliest part of a hurricane. The storm surge and wind driven waves can devastate a coastline and bring ocean water miles inland. Inland, the hurricane's band of thunderstorms produce torrential rains and sometimes tornadoes. A foot or more of rain may fall in less than a day causing flash floods and mudslides. The rain eventually drains into the large rivers which may still be flooding for days after the storm has passed. The storm's driving winds can topple trees, utility poles, and damage buildings. Communication and electricity is lost for days and roads are impassable due to fallen trees and debris. A tropical storm has winds of 39 to 74 mph. It may or may not develop into a hurricane, or may be a hurricane in its dissipating stage. While a tropical storm does not produce a high storm surge, its thunderstorms can still pack a dangerous and deadly punch. Agnes was only a tropical storm when it dropped torrential rains that lead to devastating floods in Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Virginia. -
Feasibility Study: NC 12 Ocracoke Island Hot Spot Ocracoke Island, Hyde County
Feasibility Study: NC 12 Ocracoke Island Hot Spot Ocracoke Island, Hyde County Prepared for: North Carolina Department of Transportation, Project Development and Environmental Analysis Prepared by: WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff Raleigh, NC December 2016 Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................ 1-1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Project History ..................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Funding ................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.3 Problem Statement and Purpose of Study...................................................... 2-2 2.4 Project Limits ....................................................................................................... 2-2 3.0 COASTAL CONDITIONS ......................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Shoreline and Erosion Studies ......................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Definition of Vulnerability and Methods for Evaluation .................. 3-1 3.1.2 Setback ...................................................................................................... 3-2 3.1.3 Background Erosion Rates ..................................................................... 3-3 3.1.4 Baseline Conditions................................................................................