Effects of Experimental Small-Scale Grassland Fragmentation on Spatial Distribution, Density, and Persistence of Ant Nests
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Landscape-Scale Connections Between the Land Use, Habitat Quality and Ecosystem Goods and Services in the Mureş/Maros Valley
TISCIA monograph series Landscape-scale connections between the land use, habitat quality and ecosystem goods and services in the Mureş/Maros valley Edited by László Körmöczi Szeged-Arad 2012 Two countries, one goal, joint success! Landscape-scale connections between the land use, habitat quality and ecosystem goods and services in the Mureş/Maros valley TISCIA monograph series 1. J. Hamar and A. Sárkány-Kiss (eds.): The Maros/Mureş River Valley. A Study of the Geography, Hydrobiology and Ecology of the River and its Environment, 1995. 2. A. Sárkány-Kiss and J. Hamar (eds.): The Criş/Körös Rivers’ Valleys. A Study of the Geography, Hydrobiology and Ecology of the River and its Environment, 1997. 3. A. Sárkány-Kiss and J. Hamar (eds.): The Someş/Szamos River Valleys. A Study of the Geography, Hydrobiology and Ecology of the River and its Environment, 1999. 4. J. Hamar and A. Sárkány-Kiss (eds.): The Upper Tisa Valley. Preparatory Proposal for Ramsar Site Designation and an Ecological Background, 1999. 5. L. Gallé and L. Körmöczi (eds.): Ecology of River Valleys, 2000. 6. Sárkány-Kiss and J. Hamar (eds.): Ecological Aspects of the Tisa River Basin, 2002. 7. L. Gallé (ed.): Vegetation and Fauna of Tisza River Basin, I. 2005. 8. L. Gallé (ed.): Vegetation and Fauna of Tisza River Basin, II. 2008. 9. L. Körmöczi (ed.): Ecological and socio-economic relations in the valleys of river Körös/Criş and river Maros/Mureş, 2011. 10. L. Körmöczi (ed.): Landscape-scale connections between the land use, habitat quality and ecosystem goods and services in the Mureş/Maros valley, 2012. -
Response of Orthoptera Assemblages to Management of Montane Grasslands in the Western Carpathians
Biologia 66/6: 1127—1133, 2011 Section Zoology DOI: 10.2478/s11756-011-0115-1 Response of Orthoptera assemblages to management of montane grasslands in the Western Carpathians Vladimíra Fabriciusová, Peter Kaňuch &AntonKrištín* Institute of Forest Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Ľ. Štúra 2,SK-96053 Zvolen, Slovakia; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Montane grassy habitats in the Western Carpathians are relatively well preserved, maintain high species richness and are often important in accordance to the nature conservation policy in Europe. However, knowledge about the impact of farming on the habitat quality there is rather poor. The influence of various management types (permanent sheep pen, irregular grazing, mowing) on Orthoptera diversity and species determining assemblages of these habitats were analysed on 72 plots in Poľana Mts Biosphere Reserve. Altogether, 36 Orthoptera species (15 Ensifera, 21 Caelifera) were found, whereas the highest number of species was found on plots with irregular grazing (28 species), followed by plots with mown grass (17) and permanent sheep pens (14). All four measures of the assemblages’ diversity confirmed significant differences. Using Discriminant Function Analysis, correct classification rate of Orthoptera assemblages was unambiguous according to the type of management. Each form of the management harboured several characteristic species. Thus implications regarding the biodiversity conservation and grassland management were given. Key words: bush-crickets; grasshoppers; pasture; ecology; nature conservation Introduction or the influence of plant succession in meadows without any management (Marini et al. 2009). Higher species Various systems used to manage grasslands have a diversity was found in grazed compared to mowed significant influence on plant and animal communi- meadows in alpine habitats (Wettstein & Schmid 1999; ties, their species richness and abundance (Kampmann Kampmann et al. -
Diversity and Distribution of Orthoptera Communities of Two Adjacent Mountains in Northern Part of the Carpathians
Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle “Grigore Antipa” 62 (2): 191–211 (2019) doi: 10.3897/travaux.62.e48604 RESEARCH ARTICLE Diversity and distribution of Orthoptera communities of two adjacent mountains in northern part of the Carpathians Anton Krištín1, Benjamín Jarčuška1, Peter Kaňuch1 1 Institute of Forest Ecology SAS, Ľ. Štúra 2, Zvolen, SK-96053, Slovakia Corresponding author: Anton Krištín ([email protected]) Received 19 November 2019 | Accepted 24 December 2019 | Published 31 December 2019 Citation: Krištín A, Jarčuška B, Kaňuch P (2019) Diversity and distribution of Orthoptera communities of two adjacent mountains in northern part of the Carpathians. Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle “Grigore Antipa” 62(2): 191–211. https://doi.org/10.3897/travaux.62.e48604 Abstract During 2013–2017, assemblages of bush-crickets and grasshoppers were surveyed in two neighbour- ing flysch mountains – Čergov Mts (48 sites) and Levočské vrchy Mts (62 sites) – in northern part of Western Carpathians. Species were sampled mostly at grasslands and forest edges along elevational gradient between 370 and 1220 m a.s.l. Within the entire area (ca 930 km2) we documented 54 species, representing 38% of Carpathian Orthoptera species richness. We found the same species number (45) in both mountain ranges with nine unique species in each of them. No difference in mean species rich- ness per site was found between the mountain ranges (mean ± SD = 12.5 ± 3.9). Elevation explained 2.9% of variation in site species richness. Elevation and mountain range identity explained 7.3% of assemblages composition. We found new latitudinal as well as longitudinal limits in the distribu- tion for several species. -
Orthoptera: Acrididae)
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/119560; this version posted March 22, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 2 Ecological drivers of body size evolution and sexual size dimorphism 3 in short-horned grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) 4 5 Vicente García-Navas1*, Víctor Noguerales2, Pedro J. Cordero2 and Joaquín Ortego1 6 7 8 *Corresponding author: [email protected]; [email protected] 9 Department of Integrative Ecology, Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Avda. Américo 10 Vespucio s/n, Seville E-41092, Spain 11 12 13 Running head: SSD and body size evolution in Orthopera 14 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/119560; this version posted March 22, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 15 Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is widespread and variable in nature. Although female-biased 16 SSD predominates among insects, the proximate ecological and evolutionary factors promoting 17 this phenomenon remain largely unstudied. Here, we employ modern phylogenetic comparative 18 methods on 8 subfamilies of Iberian grasshoppers (85 species) to examine the validity of 19 different models of evolution of body size and SSD and explore how they are shaped by a suite 20 of ecological variables (habitat specialization, substrate use, altitude) and/or constrained by 21 different evolutionary pressures (female fecundity, strength of sexual selection, length of the 22 breeding season). -
Population, Ecology and Morphology of Saga Pedo (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) at the Northern Limit of Its Distribution
Eur. J. Entomol. 104: 73–79, 2007 http://www.eje.cz/scripts/viewabstract.php?abstract=1200 ISSN 1210-5759 Population, ecology and morphology of Saga pedo (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) at the northern limit of its distribution ANTON KRIŠTÍN and PETER KAĕUCH Institute of Forest Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Štúrova 2, 960 53 Zvolen, Slovakia; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Tettigoniidae, survival strategies, endangered species, large insect predators, ecological limits Abstract. The bush-cricket Saga pedo, one of the largest predatory insects, has a scattered distribution across 20 countries in Europe. At the northern boundary of its distribution, this species is most commonly found in Slovakia and Hungary. In Slovakia in 2003–2006, 36 known and potentially favourable localities were visited and at seven this species was recorded for the first time. This species has been found in Slovakia in xerothermic forest steppes and limestone grikes (98% of localities) and on slopes (10–45°) with south-westerly or westerly aspects (90%) at altitudes of 220–585 m a.s.l. (mean 433 m, n = 20 localities). Most individuals (66%) were found in grass-herb layers 10–30 cm high and almost 87% within 10 m of a forest edge (oak, beech and hornbeam being prevalent). The maximum density was 12 nymphs (3rd–5th instar) / 1000 m2 (July 4, 510 m a.s.l.). In a comparison of five present and previous S. pedo localities, 43 species of Orthoptera were found in the present and 37 in previous localities. The mean numbers and relative abundance of species in present S. -
Herbivore Species Identity Mediates Interspecific Competition Between Plants
COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 14(1): 41-47, 2013 1585-8553/$20.00 © Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest DOI: 10.1556/ComEc.14.2013.1.5 Herbivore species identity mediates interspecific competition between plants S. Ibanez1,3, M. Bison2, S. Lavorel2 and M. Moretti1 1 Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Community Ecology Research Unit, CH-6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland 2 Laboratoire d’Ecologie Alpine UMR CNRS 5553 Université Joseph Fourier B.P.53, 38041 Grenoble, France 3 Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Key words: Diet, Gomphocerinae, Grasshoppers, Plant competition, Tolerance. Abstract: Herbivory is a major driver of plant communities. Most herbivores preferentially consume dominant species and slow down plant succession, but it remains unclear in which ways different herbivore species have contrasting effects on plant communities. In this study, we investigated the extent to which closely related insect herbivores with slight differences in their feeding behaviour induce contrasting reactions in plant communities. We studied the impact of herbivory by two Gomphocer- inae grasshopper species, Chorthippus scalaris and Euthystira brachyptera, on the outcome of competition between the plant species Dactylis glomerata and Festuca paniculata. Under a controlled choice experiment, C. scalaris preferentially consumed D. glomerata while E. brachyptera preferred F. paniculata, but in an experimental plant community (mesocosm) both species consumed the plant species proportionally to their abundance and the amount of herbivory marks detected on the leaves did not depend on the specific grasshopper species. The herbivory pressure of both grasshopper species significantly reduced the vegetative height and the number of tillers of F. paniculata, with C. scalaris showing a stronger effect. As a consequence, herbivory by E. -
'Impact of Regional Species Pool on Grasshopper
Knop, E; Schmid, B; Herzog, F. Impact of regional species pool on grasshopper restoration in hay meadows. Restoration Ecology 2007, E-Pub ahead of print. Postprint available at: http://www.zora.uzh.ch University of Zurich Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich. Zurich Open Repository and Archive http://www.zora.uzh.ch Originally published at: Restoration Ecology 2007, E-Pub ahead of print. Winterthurerstr. 190 CH-8057 Zurich http://www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2007 Impact of regional species pool on grasshopper restoration in hay meadows Knop, E; Schmid, B; Herzog, F Knop, E; Schmid, B; Herzog, F. Impact of regional species pool on grasshopper restoration in hay meadows. Restoration Ecology 2007, E-Pub ahead of print. Postprint available at: http://www.zora.uzh.ch Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich. http://www.zora.uzh.ch Originally published at: Restoration Ecology 2007, E-Pub ahead of print. Impact of regional species pool on grasshopper restoration in hay meadows Abstract Agri-environment schemes are the most widely adopted political measure to maintain and restore farmland biodiversity in Europe. However, abiotic and biotic factors often limit the success of ecological restoration. Among the biotic factors, the size of the local and regional species pool is a major constraint. This is only well documented for plants. We therefore wanted to know if a small regional species pool can also limit restoration efforts of invertebrates. Specifically, we tested if by relocating grasshoppers from further away, we could overcome regional species pool limitations on hay meadows under the Swiss agri-environment scheme, so-called Ecological Compensation Area meadows (ECA meadows). -
Checklist of Romanian Orthoptera (Insecta) and Their Distribution by Eco-Regions
Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle © Novembre Vol. LI pp. 119–135 «Grigore Antipa» 2008 CHECKLIST OF ROMANIAN ORTHOPTERA (INSECTA) AND THEIR DISTRIBUTION BY ECO-REGIONS IONUÞ IORGU, ELENA PISICÃ, LAURA PÃIª, GABRIEL LUPU, CLAUDIU IUªAN Abstract. The Orthoptera fauna of Romania is represented by 182 species, 94 belonging to the Ensifera suborder and 88 species belonging to the Caelifera suborder. Four of these species are each represented by two subspecies (Isophya modesta modesta, I. m. longicaudata, Platycleis albopunctata albopuctata, P. a. grisea, Tetrix bipunctata bipunctata, T. b. kraussi, Miramella ebneri ebneri and M. e. carpathica); also, the presence of a interspecific hybrid (Chorthippus albomarginatus×oschei) in the North-eastern part of the country was very interesting to find. Nine species are endemic to Romania and represent important values that should be protected: Isophya dobrogensis, I. harzi, Callimenus montandoni, Odontopodisma carpathica, O. acuminata, O. montana, Zubovskya banatica, Podismopsis transsylvanica and Chorthippus acroleucus. Résumé. La faune d’Orthoptères de Roumanie est représentée par 182 espèces, dont 94 appartiennent au Sous-Ordre des Ensifera et 88 au Sous-Ordre des Caelifera. Quatre de ces espèces sont représentées chacune par deux sous-espèces (Isophya modesta modesta, I. m. longicaudata, Platycleis albopunctata albopunctata, P. a. grisea, Tetrix bipunctata bipunctata, T. b. kraussi, Miramella ebneri ebneri et M. e. carpathica); on a trouvé aussi un intéressant hybride interspécifique (Chorthippus albomarginatus X oschei) dans le Nord-Ouest du pays. Neuf espèces sont endémiques en Roumanie, représentant des valeurs importantes qui doivent être préservées: Isophya dobrogensis, I. harzi, Callimenus montandoni, Odontopodisma carpathica, O. acuminata, O. montana, Zubovskya banatica, Podismopsis transsylvanica et Chorthippus acroleucus. -
BIO2CARE WP3 Deliverable (Activity 3.1)
INTERREG V-A COOPERATION PROGRAMME GREECE – BULGARIA 2014 – 2020 Reinforcing Protected Areas Capacity through an Innovative Methodology for Sustainability – BIO2CARE – (Reg. No: 1890) WP3 Deliverable 3.1 One (1) study collecting information and producing knowledge regarding anthropogenic activities and status of nature (incl. SWOT analysis) of the areas The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Communities. The European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. Deliverable 3.1 Project Acronym: BIO2CARE -1- INTERREG V-A CP Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Chapter 1: Introduction – Definition of study areas and their significance .................................................. 4 Chapter 2: Study Area 1- National Park of Eastern Macedonia and Thrace (GR) ....................................... 11 2.1 Status of Nature of Study Area 1 .......................................................................................................... 11 2.1.1 Geographical characteristics .............................................................................................................. 11 2.1.2 Flora .................................................................................................................................................. -
Orthoptera, Blattodea and Mantodea of Vrachanska Planina Mountains
Bechev, D. & Georgiev, D. (Eds.), Faunistic diversity of Vrachanski Balkan Nature Park. ZooNotes, Supplement 3, Plovdiv University Press, Plovdiv, 2016 Orthoptera, Blattodea and Mantodea of Vrachanska Planina Mountains ALEXI POPOV, DRAGAN CHOBANOV Abstract. So far, 81 species of the orthopterid orders are found in Vrachanska Planina according to the published and original data (Orthoptera – 79 species, Blattodea and Mantodea – one species each). Other 6 species of Orthoptera have been recorded in the areas up to 5 km beyond the borders of the mountain. First records from Vrachanska Planina are reported here for 1 order, 1 superfamily, 2 families, 5 subfamilies, 8 tribes, 16 genera, 3 subgenera and 31 species. Published and original material of 70 species is checked and LGHQWLÀHG $ VXEVSHFLHV LV V\QRQ\PL]HG Ephippiger ephippiger ephippiger (Fiebig, 1784) (= Ephippiger ephippiger balkanicus$QGUHHYDsyn. n.). Typical mountain species with a lower limit of distribution in Bulgaria running through the highest ridge of Vrachanska Planina are Psorodonotus Àeberi, Gomphocerus sibiricus and Myrmeleotettix maculatus. The reported species are divided in 25 categories by chorology and 14 categories by origin. Most numerous according to chorotypes are the Eurosiberian (20 %) followed by the Central and South European (16 %) species as well as according to origin the Siberian (23 %) followed by the Central European (19 %) faunal elements. Endemic taxa of Orthoptera in Vrachanska Planina are 1 genus, 5 species and 1 subspecies, one of which is Bulgarian endemic species and the remaining taxa are Balkan endemics. The northernmost, westernmost, easternmost and southernmost localities in the ranges of 1 genus and 4 species are situated in Vrachanska Planina. -
View Preprint
Saving Waves: BioAcoustica Progress Report 1 Ed Baker March 2016 Abstract This report details work on the BioAcoustica project up to the end of March 2016. Functionality and datasets currently available are described and ongoing work is listed. Usage statistics are provided and future plans are presented. Outputs of the project are listed in appendices including a list of peer-reviewed papers generated by the project and peer-reviewed papers that have deposited their bioacoustic data in BioAcoustica. In ad- dition a list of species which are represented in the BioAcoustica database is provided. Contents 1 History 2 2 Current Functionality 3 2.1 Annotation . .3 2.2 Analysis . .3 2.3 bioacousticaR . .4 2.4 Collections . .4 2.5 Data Sharing . .5 2.5.1 Global Biodiversity Informatics Facility (GBIF) . .5 2.5.2 Encyclopedia of Life (EoL) . .5 3 Current Datasets 5 3.1 Global Cicada Sound Collection . .5 3.1.1 GCSC1: South Africa and Malawi . .5 3.1.2 GCSC2: Thailand . .5 3.1.3 GCSC4: Marshall et al, 2016; Lee et al, 2016 . .5 3.1.4 User Contributions . .6 3.2 Soundscapes . .6 3.3 BioAcoustica Talks . .6 3.3.1 BioAcoustica Talks Podcast . .6 3.4 3D Scans of Singing Burrows of Mole Crickets . .6 1 PeerJ Preprints | https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1948v2 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 12 Apr 2016, publ: 12 Apr 2016 EWB7 1 HISTORY 4 Usage 6 4.1 Wikipedia . .6 5 Ongoing Collections Work 7 5.1 NHM Sound Collection . .7 5.1.1 Orthoptera: Grylloidea . -
Ecological Drivers of Body Size Evolution and Sexual Size Dimorphism in Short-Horned Grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae)
1 2 Ecological drivers of body size evolution and sexual size dimorphism 3 in short-horned grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) 4 5 Vicente García-Navas1*, Víctor Noguerales2, Pedro J. Cordero2 and Joaquín Ortego1 6 7 8 *Corresponding author: [email protected]; [email protected] 9 Department of Integrative Ecology, Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Avda. Américo 10 Vespucio 26, Seville E-41092, Spain 11 12 Running head: Grasshopper Ecomorphology 13 1 14 15 16 Abstract 17 Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is widespread and variable in nature. Although female-biased 18 SSD predominates among insects, the proximate ecological and evolutionary factors promoting 19 this phenomenon remain largely unstudied. Here, we employ modern phylogenetic comparative 20 methods on 8 subfamilies of Iberian grasshoppers (85 species) to examine the validity of 21 different models of evolution of body size and SSD and explore how they are shaped by a suite 22 of ecological variables (habitat specialization, substrate use, altitude) and/or constrained by 23 different evolutionary pressures (female fecundity, strength of sexual selection, length of the 24 breeding season). Body size disparity primarily accumulated late in the history of the group and 25 did not follow a Brownian motion pattern, indicating the existence of directional evolution for 26 this trait. We found support for the converse of Rensch’s rule (i.e., females are proportionally 27 bigger than males in large species) across all taxa but not within the two most speciose 28 subfamilies (Gomphocerinae and Oedipodinae), which showed an isometric pattern. Our results 29 do not provide support for the fecundity or sexual selection hypotheses and we did not find 30 evidence for significant effects of habitat use.