OREGON
SUMMER 2000 VOLUME XVII, ISSUE XIV & XV A JOURNAL OF OPINION thethe summersummer
issueissue You are here. MISSION STATEMENT
The OREGON COMMENTATOR is an independent journal of opinion published at the University of Oregon for the campus community. Founded by a group of concerned student journalists Sept. 27 1983, the FOUNDED SEPT.27, 1983 • MEMBER COLLEGIATE NETWORK COMMENTATOR has had a major impact in the “war of ideas” on cam- EDITOR-IN-CHIEF PUBLISHER pus, providing students with an alternative to the left-wing orthodoxy William Beutler Skye Tenney promoted by other student publications, professors and student groups. During its seventeen-year existence, it has enabled University students MANAGING EDITOR ASSOCIATE EDITORS Brandon Oberlin Brian Boone, Ted Whitaker to hear both sides of issues. Our paper combines reporting with opin- ion, humor and feature articles. We have won national recognition for NEWS EDITOR WEBMASTER our commitment to journalistic excellence. Ben Nahorney Cory Falk The OREGON COMMENTATOR is operated as a program of the
COPY DESK Associated Students of the University of Oregon (ASUO) and is staffed Heather McConochie solely by volunteer editors and writers. The paper is funded through student incidental fees, advertising revenue and private donations. We PHOTOGRAPHY Dan Atkinson, Sho Ikeda print a wide variety of material, but our main purpose is to show stu- dents that a political philosophy of conservatism, free thought and indi- CONTRIBUTORS vidual liberty is an intelligent way of looking at the world — contrary Dakia Anheluk, Aaron K. Breniman, Jerome Cole, Danzig, Jason Larimer, Napoleon Linardatos, Amanda to what they might hear in classrooms and on campus. In general, edi- Nottke, Brian Ouellette, Amber Plaunty, Joe Ryan tors of the COMMENTATOR share beliefs in the following:
• We believe that the University should be a forum for rational and BOARD OF DIRECTORS informed debate — instead of the current climate in which ideological William Beutler, Chairman Brandon Oberlin, Director, Skye Tenney, Director dogma, political correctness, fashion and mob mentality interfere with academic pursuit. ALUMNI ADVISORY BOARD Thomas Mann ‘88, Charles H. Deister ‘92, R.S.D Wederquist ‘92, Scott Camp ‘94, • We emphatically oppose totalitarianism and its apologists. Ed Carson ‘94, Owen Brennan Rounds ‘95, Farrah L. Bostic ‘98, Mark Hemingway ‘98, Andrew Oberriter ‘98 • We believe that it is important for the University community to view the world realistically, intelligently and, above all, rationally. BOARD OF TRUSTEES Richard Burr, Robert Davis, Paul S. Holbo, Michael Rust • We believe that any attempt to establish utopia is bound to meet with failure and, more often than not, disaster. The OREGON COMMENTATOR is a conservative journal of opinion. All signed essays and commentaries herein represent • We believe that while it would be foolish to praise or agree mindless- the opinions of the writers and not necessarily the opinions of ly with everything our nation does, it is both ungrateful and dishonest this magazine or its staff. The COMMENTATOR is an independent publication and the Oregon Commentator Publishing Co., Inc. not to acknowledge the tremendous blessings and benefits we receive is an independent corporation; neither are affiliated with the as Americans. University of Oregon nor its School of Journalism. And, con- trary to popular, paranoid opinion, we are in no way affiliated • We believe that free enterprise and economic growth, especially at with the CIA, the FBI or the Council on Foreign Relations. the local level, provide the basis for a sound society. The OREGON COMMENTATOR accepts letters to the editor and commentaries from students, faculty and staff at the University of Oregon, or anyone else for that matter. Letters and • We believe that the University is an important battleground in the commentaries may be submitted personally to Room 205 “war of ideas” and that the outcome of political battles of the future are, EMU; placed in our mailbox in Suite 4 EMU; mailed to P.O. to a large degree, being determined on campuses today. Box 30128, Eugene, OR, 97403; e-mailed to ocomment@dark- wing.uoregon.edu; or phoned in to (541) 346-3721. The OREGON COMMENTATOR can be found on the world wide web • We believe that a code of honor, integrity, pride and rationality are the at http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~ocomment. fundamental characteristics for individual success. We reserve the right to edit material we find obscene, libelous, inappropriate or lengthy. We are not obliged to print • Socialism guarantees the right to work. However, we believe that the anything that does not suit us. Unsolicited material will not be returned unless accompanied by a stamped, self-addressed right not to work is fundamental to individual liberty. Apathy is a envelope. Submission constitutes testimony as to the accuracy. human right. VOLUME XVII, ISSUE XIV & XV
inside this issue GTF YOU If you are reading this, then you can be There can be only one thing worse than reasonably certain that you are cur- being taught by a Graduate Teaching rently in Eugene, Oregon. Which is fine, Fellow: being one. unless you are reading this between By Brian Boone the months of June and September. If PAGE 10 so, what the hell are you doing here? RADICAL SON Being a liberal at this school is easy. Being Shouldn’t you be waterskiing Tahoe, a conservative here is a bit harder. But bottle of Coors in hand, sporting a defecting to the right at the UO is... well, killer tan? As penance, drink a gallon you’ll find out. of whiskey, douse yourself with sunless By Napoleon Linardatos tanning lotion, and run wild through PAGE 12 the Millrace.
THE GENIE IN THE BOTTLE Luddites notwithstanding, Napster and its That’s the best you’ll do around here. file-sharing brethren are poised to usurp the music industry, bring down the status quo, and piss off Lars Ulrich all in one fell swoop. By Ben Nahorney
PAGE 14
FREE PORN MP3s are not the only information avail- able online to draw censure: even an insti- Yes, that’s right. Right here. tution as sacred as internet pornography is on thin ice. By Amber Plaunty PAGE 15
PAT BUCHANAN UBER ALLES! No no no, we’re not serious about that. We’re conservatives, not fascists. By Jason Larimer PAGE 18 DEPARTMENTS EDITORIAL 4 NOBODY ASKED US, BUT... 5 RANDOM STICK THOUGHTS 16 RED MEAT 26 ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE 28 SPEW 30
Summer 2000 Copyright ©2000 Oregon Commentator Publishing Co., Inc. Message to Jeff Q: Lock your door tonight — Dad wants to “celebrate.” Perhaps, however, there is a light at the end of this electoral tunnel. In recent elections and this year in par- ticular, so-called third-party candi- dates have captured the American imagination like we haven’t seen since Eugene V. Debs pulled in near- ly a million votes in 1920. The argu- ment that both parties have too much influence has been a persuasive one for a long time. Ross Perot, Pat Buchanan and Ralph Nader would all like to claim their title as political vanguard, but even Theodore WRONG LIGHT, made his own unsuccessful bid on his own Progressive Party tick- et in 1912, and we’ve already covered socialist hero Debs. To that end, some polls show independent non-affiliation ris- ing, especially with the younger and (currently) less politically WRONG TUNNEL active. Ask around, and most twenty-somethings registered as an elephant or donkey have more than their share of reservations. Third parties and campaign finance Party loyalism at the University of Oregon is pretty much limited reform may be popular solutions to the to the College Republicans, but crowded their meetings are not. failures of the US electoral system. What More recently, the issue of campaign finance reform has become the hallmark of reform-minded politicians seeking atten- does that mean for you? About as much tion. Spearheaded by John “Luke Skywalker” McCain until he as the two would do good for the system: predictably tripped over Super Tuesday, the cause was promptly probably not much. picked up — albeit clumsily — and waved around by Al Gore for all to see. The push to close the “loopholes” left open by the 1976 Supreme Court Buckley v. Vallejo ruling has become a cause cele- hese are dismal times for U.S. electoral politics. We are bré among younger voters. told that we have two identical candidates supported by However, it must be said that neither a “true third-party sys- T two identical parties, fueled more by money than by pop- tem” nor an overhaul of the laws regulating campaign contribu- ularity, and that participation is at an all-time low. Illustrative are tions are going to save the American electoral process news articles from the summer: For instance, the likelihood of a strong third party to compete Republican nominee G.W. Bush has collected $100 million in seriously with the mainstream is too improbable to consider. The campaign contributions, the most any candidate for office has emergence of two recently popular alternatives, the Greens and ever raised. the Reformers (née United We Stand America), has excited many The Nation reports that 52 percent of Americans believe spe- a voter and even converted a fair number — but what have they cial interests have the most control in Washington (Congress done to change the shape of the political landscape? topped out at 19 percent, voters with only five). The problem is not in the party system itself, but in the way And who can forget that UPN’s “WWF Smackdown” beat out people choose to organize: just as your average booze hound CBS’ Democratic convention coverage, as cyber-journalist Matt could opt for an Anchor Steam or Sheaf Stout at the local 7-11, he Drudge gleefully reported. is more likely to pick up a forty of Pabst Blue Ribbon. Humans Based on the analysis of mainstream television pundits and have the tendency to organize themselves, and in political partic- newspaper columnists, the numbers indicate that the election is ipation, this is evidenced by the emergence of the large party out of the voters’ hands, money is increasingly more important “machine.” Not only do they want to win, but they can attract the than individual efforts, and no matter who wins, we are going to most number of voters by finding a candidate who appeals to a elect a President we don’t want this November. Dissatisfaction multitude of demographics. Hence your free-trading Democrat with the mainstream candidates is an American institution all by who criticizes the sensationalist media (Gore’s selection, Joe itself, it seems. Lieberman) and your pro-choice, moderate Republican (Hillary’s
4 OREGON COMMENTATOR editorial
opponent, Rick Lazio). In today’s political nomenclature, they are campaign finance reform. It may seem a good idea to limit the not “contradictory.,” Instead, we say they are “balanced.” amount of money any one person can donate to a political cam- Compromise, of course, means that no one is happy. Perhaps paign, but the rules it draws around what is and is not acceptable the “lesser of two evils” should be rephrased as “the candidate you means of participation are in many cases unethical. disagree with least.” It isn’t that the electoral system does not pro- Currently, donations to political parties and political action duce good candidates, it’s just that there is no consensus on what committees are not regulated; under many proposals, the hypo- makes a candidate good. thetical efforts of Bill Gates to pour millions into Republican The major parties are themselves a conglomeration of con- party coffers would be illegal. To the many concerned with the cession and acquiescence. In fact, they’re a lot like the coalition governments in France or Germany. Republicans and Democrats may have one plat- Perhaps the “lesser of two evils” form, but each is born out of compromise among the many factions and wings under each umbrella. should be rephrased as “the can- Just because Jerry Falwell and P.J. O’Rourke will didate you disagree with least.” It both be voting for Bush, don’t think that means they have the same views on religion, or drugs. isn’t that the electoral system does That the two parties are so similar speaks vol- umes about the political nature of Americans. The not produce good candidates, it’s ideological differences between the mainstream left and right are so miniscule, one wonders why just that there is no consensus they waste the time of holding elections in the first on what makes a candidate good. place. Minority political views are ignored not because they are threatening and politically dan- gerous, but because not very many people share those ideals. The persuasive power of money, this is comforting. But what about the support just isn’t there, and no matter what Pat Buchanan or Ralph non-hypothetical millions that Robin Williams or Barbra Nader may tell you (and on this they sound eerily similar), most Streisand raise for the Democratic party by giving special con- Americans realize that everyone will eventually benefit from the certs, open only to the elite and monied? This form of participa- promulgation of NAFTA.Truly, the American public agrees on a tion is allowed, but it takes no great thinker to realize that one lot more than they don’t. Sure, many people are concerned with individual made all of that money possible — even the loopholes the income gap and what they perceive as dishonest corporate have loopholes. practices, but these are the relatively insignificant breaks of living Secondly, money is only so influential in politics; it is far in a free society. Just because Microsoft bullies its way into new from an absolute. More often than not, money follows support markets doesn’t mean we should all divide into Prince rather than the other way around. John McCain was not rolling Kropotkin’s agrarian mini-utopias. in money until the week after he won the New Hampshire pri- So where is this new third rail going to come from? Unless mary; if Bush loses in November, McCain is the presumptive there is an unequaled rift in one of the parties, or a new issue push- go-to guy for 2004. If money did convert efficiently into votes, es itself to the fore, it isn’t. Even then, the likelihood of a third we would be in year four of the Forbes administration, or year party to consistently poll around 30%, or even in the double digits eight of the Perot era. is incomprehensible. This is not a bad thing in and of itself; just Whether the aggregate of society truly is skeptical or not, all because a third party is not as widely popular as the Big Two does Americans would like to think that they are worldly voters on not mean they are not important contributors to the process. Often whom no fast ones could be pulled, and they act accordingly. a third party’s most useful function is to introduce new issues or The twin powers of money and organization are only as good attract a protest vote. Ralph Nader has been roundly criticized by or bad as the cause for which it is used. So long as we live in a free left-wing groups who fear the election of George Bush, but here society, all participants deserve the benefit of the doubt, in all the Nader is doing the right thing. Even if Al Gore does overcome this ways in which they choose to participate. burden and become President, the party is aware of a shift in their base, and will factor their force into future legislation. The other major issue which has more tangible support is
SUMMER 2000 5 nobody asked us, but...
Cartoon Eyes and Cartoon Suits Apologies are far and few between up here in Room 205. That is, unless someone knocks over your beer; then, it’s just a matter of tact. Nevertheless, we are compelled to straighten out a misunderstanding about our most recent issue. Throughout July and August, Issue XIII (right) routinely disap- peared from distribution boxes around campus, particularly from our box behind PLC, next to the Knight Library. It wouldn’t be the first time, and usually we can chalk it up to the hippies or whatever group has been maligned by the most recent issue. However, following an interesting conversation with one of this cam- pus’ unsung icons, it turns out that the real culprit is Hatoon: the talka- tive “crazy lady” outside the library. According to Hatoon, “All the children of the world are being born with cartoon eyes,” and somehow, the OC is responsible. While the OC categorically denies any and all connections to such a cartoon-eyed newborn syndrome, we regret any actions on our part that may lead one to think otherwise. Neither the management nor the staff of the OC would condone such a thing, and we would like to go on the record as to say so explicitly, so there are no further misunderstandings. Now please, Hatoon, leave the goddamned issues alone already. WWhathat dodo youyou thinkthink ofof thethe OregonOregon DailyDaily EmeraldEmerald’s’s newnew covercover design?design?
Officially I gave Jack all So long as they don’t run my best wishes, but that story on my obses- when I told him I just sive collection of loved the new look — Abercrombie & Fitch cat- that was just my final act alogues, they can do of sabotage. Muahahaha! whatever they want. Laura Cadiz, former editor Mike Bellotti, football coach
Mowe big. Mowe play You know what’s cool? basketball. Mowe not The cover of the read Emerald. Mowe eat Emerald. You know Big Mac and play what’s real cool? The basketball. Emerald not cover of the Emerald: basketball. on ether! Jenny Mowe, Ducks center Guido, Chemistry major
6 OREGON COMMENTATOR letters
Who the hell are Woodstein! Bernwood! these guys? Dear OREGON COMMENTATOR, The reason I’m writing this letter is to tell you a true and We have no problem with the concept of campus authorities; any almost unbelievable story that just happened to me and my wife college needs good security — but it sure as hell doesn’t need any- in two south coast school districts. If this story doesn’t offend more assholes. One weekend in September, an OC editor and a fel- your sense of justice and decency, nothing will! Please bear with low alcoholic, were “victims” of the assholes we all know so well me as I attempt to convey exactly what happened. It’s a story of as the OPS. two school superintendents, arrogance, and abuse of power. The two were peacefully walking through campus — one with The following is a brief summary of the essential elements. an “accidentally” opened twenty-two ouncer — when an overly I have been employed as a high school counselor for almost enthusiastic OPS officer who, more often then not probably tells a year now at North Bend High School, North Bend, Oregon. My people he’s a real cop, stealthily shadowed them at a distance of wife works as an English teacher in neighboring Reedsport High about three yards. What a psycho. He stopped them and gave the School, Reedsport, Oregon. I recently suffered from what was normal talk, which they had no great quarrel with. Then, however diagnosed by my psychiatrist as a “major clinical depression.” I he called the good old EPD who also probably tell people they’re was hospitalized for four days and placed on suicide watch. I am real cops. The Eugene officer proceeded to give the aforemen- home now taking two anti-depressants and on a medical leave of tioned alcoholic a ticket for his open container. Not all that big of absence. Three days after requesting a form (801) for worker’s a deal, but it pissed him off. compensation, my wife was not rehired at Reedsport High School Why did he have to call the cops? There was no real reason. in spite of a stellar performance, high praise from building admin- Seriously though, judging by the the way this guy was tailing them, istrators and co-workers, and after stepping in at mid-year to clean another one might as well have jumped out of a tree or descend by up a nightmare of a situation left by a former first-year teacher. way of parachute. It seemed at times that he was getting aroused My wife had put her heart and soul into that job. She was during the incident, while marveling at his carefully planned absolutely devastated. approach to his subsequent triumph over... who? Two guys walk- Also, something else happened that was very curious. Two ing across a campus that they pay to attend, holding bottled filled days before my wife was not re-hired, the superintendent of North with some kind of liquid. Bend Schools called me and wanted to talk. I went to his office. The UO campus is private property, and since he pays through During our conversation, he just happened to let me know that he the nose for tuition and fees, it would make sense that he be was a personal friend of the Reedsport superintendent, where my allowed to do as he likes on his own piece of ground. The officer wife worked. He said he and the Reedsport superintendent go to could have asked him just to pour it out without involving the EPD, church together. He also just happened to inform me that superin- and he may well have done it. tendents are a “tight knit” bunch of guys that “stick together.” He Who the hell are these guys? I normally don’t mind OPS, volunteered all of this information. although they can be annoying, and they drive around in their stu- My wife and I have talked a lot about this whole situation and pid marked cars — as if anyone ever paid attention to them — but the series of events that occurred. We are fairly well educated I do mind when they hire idiots like this guy. people who don’t rush to judgement in matters. However, after much discussion and deliberation, there is absolutely no doubt in my mind or my wife’s mind that they conspired to try get [sic] me Correction to drop the worker’s comp claim as well as any possible lawsuit. After talking with the teacher’s union representative, we were In “At Year’s End,” from the June 21 edition, the COMMENTATOR told that there have been other similar “horror” stories in the past. erroneously reported the name of the individual to file the first One sad part about this kind of story, nothing can usually be done grievance against the Gabbe/Larson campaign during this year’s about it. Most people like us don’t have the resources to pursue or elections. The actual grievant was student senator Jennifer investigate it. The other sad part is that these kinds of people con- Greenough. We regret that historical revisionism is not our forté. tinue to get away with these kinds of acts that devastate people’s financial and emotional lives. Also, my wife wants you to understand a little more about the Things to do school district she taught in (Reedsport, Oregon). Not only does it have one of the lowest “state report cards” (can be verified on- • Listen to KWVA from 6:30-7:00pm on Tuesday nights, and get line), but also things were so out of control in the classroom that • on the air by calling 346-0645. Reader listening is encouraged. she was asked to “rescue” at mid-year that the principal informed • Listener participation is required. her that students were setting fires in the classroom and throwing • Whatever you do, do not accept a “Lemon Leprechaun” — from objects at the former teacher. My wife agreed to take the teaching • anyone, for any purpose, at any bar. We’re looking out for you. position at mid-year because she was CONTINUED ON PAGE 20
SUMMER 2000 7 nobody asked us, but...
The salutes...
...the man on the left, former OC Publisher, the man behind the Daily Fart,Max’s bartender and OSPIRG/State Board of Ed. litigant: Owen William Brennan Rounds.
When he’s not drinking himself into a belligerent stupor, the esteemed Mr. Rounds finds time to write speeches for Mr. Rudolph Giuliani of New York City.
Rounds’predecessor,Mr. Chuck Deister, is a former press secretary for New York governor George Pataki.
With Eugene and New York under our control, the OC has completed the first leg of its quest for world domination.
Happy reading!
Broken MoJo ¡Viva la Agua! Feigning surprise, the Eugene community discovered in early Okay, nobody asked me, but why does there seem to be an annu- September that the University of Oregon had been chosen by Mother al liquid revolution on this campus? One year coffee is all the Jones, in their September/October edition as the most politically rage, everyone walks to class with their java jugs displayed for all active campus in the contiguous forty-eight. Mother Jones is a peri- the world to see, and then they have to talk about it, for gosh odical which categorizes itself as “progressive,” thereby increasing sakes. “Oh shoot, I’m out of Coffee.” “Thank goodness for the likelihood that their reporting will not focus on issues that will Coffee! I was up so late last night!” As if coffee is the savior of all lead to anything resembling “progress.” that is good in the world. Before you get all excited and start making signs for the next But wait, the Liquid Revolution strikes! The coffee drinkers rally, you champion protesters, don’t forget that you owe it all to Phil become water drinkers, and suddenly it’s au natural to carry Knight. As the article “Real Reformers, Real Results” mentions, the around plastic bottles of plain water as if this juice came directly signing of the WRC “provoked the ire of Phil Knight, Oregon alum from the fountain of youth. What’s worse is that everyone carries and CEO of Nike, which is a founding member of the FLA. He with- around the worst excuses for water jugs; you’ve seen them — the drew a $30-million pledge to the school’s athletic program and screw on caps hanging from hippie packs with the compulsory vowed he’d never give again.” duct tape attached. Apparently duct tape is the secret ingredient Funny that, since the Willamette Week reported this summer that for this tap water, even if these “revolutionaries” just fill their bot- Knight has already donated money to the business school since his tles of ambrosia straight from the tap. ugly break up with President Frohnmayer. What makes this all worse is that this water craze isn’t limit- So what is Mother Jones trying to say? Well, they dub Eugene ed to single groups. On the high end, you can find Evian in sizes the “anarchist capital of America.” However: a) They’re not the first from the personal hand-held bottle, up to the two liter varieties. to notice that, and b) Is that something to be proud of? What will this year hold for our campus? This writer is going In fact, this is the second time since 1996 that the UO has topped to push for mugs of PBR. Since I’m generous, I’ll even allow duct the list. So put the balloons away — the party was over years ago. tape and a fancy slogan if that’s what floats your boat.
8 OREGON COMMENTATOR The advises...
...that you not attempt to put one over on the University Bookstore during your stay at the UO.
Indeed, it may be advisable to steer clear of the Bookstore entirely, as this bill from the collec- tions agency demonstrates.
We have withheld the name and account num- ber of this unfortunate soul, perhaps to send a message: he was an everyman. His loss is every- one’s loss.
He could be you or me, your best friend, my roommate, or your best friend’s roommate.
His credit rating will be missed.
SUMMER 2000 9 commentary
GTF YOU BY BRIAN BOONE
They teach. Or at least they try.Well, some don’t even try. Who are they? Graduate Teaching Fellows, commonly known as GTFs. And boy do they suck.
he pasty dweeb of a professor at the front of my class is we will be taught by learned professors who are masters in their trying in vain to lecture a few dozen students at the 300 respective fields, but we instead fall prey to the old bait-and- T level. Judging by his inability to make up answers to the switch. Often a professor is to busy to actually teach, thanks to questions posed, his general lack of teaching skill, and a tenuous their research, book deals and commitments to out-of-state think grasp on the course material, I’d say this person isn’t a day over tanks. fifteen. As I lose interest, stop taking notes and start reading a Thus, the GTF moves from the teacher’s assistant-like duties magazine, it strikes me: this is no professor at all, but merely of taking roll call and passing out papers, to delivering lectures another damn GTF staring blindly into the headlights. they didn’t know they had to give and conducting discussion sec- “GTF” is campus vernacular for “Graduate Teaching tions. The problem is that GTFs are still in the process of master- Fellow.” This title belies the job it represents, which is the illegit- ing their field when professors pawn off their classes to them - imate mongrel child of a lazy professor and an overworked basically the equivalent of asking a candy striper to punch out a teacher’s assistant. Because professors have better things to do knee surgery. In other words, the person in charge is flying blind than teach classes, many have handed over the responsibility (or and bring the rest of the class down in a fiery tailspin equalled at least the grunt work of teaching and grading) to overburdened only by JFK Jr.’s Cessna. GTFs. Most GTFs are greatly unprepared for co-teaching a class The idea of Graduate Teaching Fellows is not inherently bad, or leading a discussion session in a topic that they are themselves and it can be valuable practical experience for those who aspire to still studying. A GTF is primarily a student in pursuit of a degree, teach. A major flaw with the program, however, is that the stan- just like everybody else, albeit with one or two extra years of a dards determining who gets to be a GTF are inadequate, if not substandard public education under his or her belt. Being a GTF nonexistent. Basically, if you’re a grad student, you are allowed is a lot like being an intern: lots of work, no respect, little money, (that is, forced) to be a GTF. Despite the fact that many GTFs end and lots of struggling to keep their incompetence under wraps. up flat-out teaching college-level courses, there doesn’t appear to Officially, professors are here to teach classes and add pres- be a uniform set of hiring qualifications. It doesn’t matter if a tige to the university. They often do not teach discussion sections, graduate has no interest in or ability to teach: all that matters is conduct review sessions, grade papers or even hold office hours. that they are a grad student. A pending Masters degree seems to be In such situations, these essential course components are left to the only prerequisite. the somewhat qualified and multi-tasking GTFs, who end up The GTF evolved out of the teacher’s assistant: primarily doing the same work for a lot less pay. roll-takers and handout-distributors for gigantic core curriculum This is as universal to the college experience as the beer classes. Professors still taught discussions until universities bong: we pay a lot of money to attend college under the guise that became overcrowded, and until professors felt more pressure to
10 OREGON COMMENTATOR establish their professional reputations and secure their tenure. To Their research is of utmost importance to them, and that’s fine pick up the instructional slack, GTFs have had thrust upon them because the relationship between research and universities has the duties previously reserved for those with actual doctorates. long been clear. My real beef is with liberal arts and humanities GTFs seem to be responsible for more and more aspects of a professors who avoid teaching - they aren’t doing research. At course. They can’t help it if they’re inept; they shouldn’t be teach- best, they’re writing a book. Perhaps this is why being a college ing in the first place. professor is such a plum job - you get paid for writing a book at Let it be said: there are a lot of really terrific GTFs at the your own pace, which ironically, 99 percent of America is already University. For one thing, GTFs are frequently more accessible doing, although they aren’t getting paid for it. than are professors. The graduate who taught my Writing 121 As of late, the most controversial flaw in the GTF program is class held us to a high standard and made me work unbelievably the inability of more than a few to communicate fluently in hard for a B minus. Ironically, she had no plans to teach anything English. International graduate students are subject to no more ever again. It’s interesting to note that Writing 121 isn’t taught by full-fledged professors at If an inept GTF can teach the same class all. Instead, GTFs from various departments teach it for the small honorarium that helps to as a professor, that makes the two posi- offset the tremendous cost of graduate school. Of course, their dream of going to graduate tions virtually interchangeable. Why have school and spending all of their time studying to master an area of knowledge has been hijacked by the University, which has them professors at all when students are per- working too hard at too many hours for too lit- tle pay. fectly capable of teaching each other? Of course, if an inept GTF can teach the same class as a pro- pre-employment scrutiny than are their English-speaking brethren fessor, that makes the two positions virtually interchangeable during the GTF selection process. GTFs exist so as to be of help from the undergraduate perspective. If these GTFs are already to students; when they cannot communicate verbally, they are educated enough to teach at the college level, why bother to con- more trouble than they are worth. Often, the focus of a foreign- tinue their education at all? For that matter, why have professors GTF-led class shifts from learning, to merely trying to figure out at all when students are perfectly capable of teaching each other? just what it is being said. Still, it’s not the fault of these particu- If graduate students can competently educate their undergraduate lar GTFs; they are likely as frustrated by the language barrier as peers, some of these professors might not be quite so esteemed their students. and authoritative. Using the aforementioned preoccupied professors as an exam- Then again, GTFs are typically still young, and can thus be ple, the GTF crisis may find a solution via imitation. Since profes- just as immature and uninterested as many undergrads. Coupled sors don’t bother to show up or do the work they are supposedly with an especially preoccupied professor, this can create an utter- here to do, then I also will not bother with my commitment to the ly useless educational experience. For instance, my Visual university either — attending class, doing homework, learning. I Communication professor passed control over to her two GTFs, too can pawn off my work on someone weaker than myself. In the first of whom, could not speak English. The second admitted retaliation, I propose another position, with a whole new acronym to having never read the textbook. All three were completely inef- to represent it: the ULF, or Undergraduate Learning Fellow. fectual; the class was a consummate waste of time and money. It is almost contemptuous how professors blow off their stu- What made the GTF crisis all the more clear was James dents. Hiring a ULF is a way to return the favor. Basically, when Fentress’ Biopsychology course. Fentress was a guest professor I feel the need to do research (surfing the Internet for porn) or who would often miss class, unbeknownst to the two GTFs, who attend a conference (binge drinking in Canada), I’ll just send my would promptly patch together something to present in lecture. ULF to class in my place, armed with a vague outline of notes Fortunately, these two knew their stuff, though not as much as beyond his skill level. I will also make him do my homework and Fentress himself. Many basic questions were left unanswered or force him to mentally retain what I would have mentally retained answered on an ad hoc basis. Fentress frequently left the GTFs to had I actually gone to class. For this I will pay him ridiculously cover for him while he jetted off to psychology conferences. low wages, give him even less respect and make him perform Many times, they had to jam a week’s worth of lectures into a sin- other duties not listed in the job description, simply because I am gle hour of discussion, while at the same time writing tests, grad- just too busy writing my book. Finally, I will tell him that all of ing papers and somehow managing their own course load. this is educational, and for his own good. GTFs are also generally helpful. This is especially true for I just hope he speaks English. biology courses where classes tend to be very large and fairly dif- ficult. Many science professors are here for their research first and Brian Boone, a senior majoring in Journalism, is an Associate to teach second, yet a few still take the teaching duties seriously. Editor for the OREGON COMMENTATOR
SUMMER 2000 11 R ADICAL S ON B Y N APOLEON L INARDATOS
n “American Beauty,” Kevin Spacey plays a middle-aged opium derivative, as Marx tells us), vote Republican, own guns, man who is fed up with his middle-class life. His wife is a or all of the above. All in all, very unfortunate. greedy woman occupied with the lesser, material things; his I grew up in Greece. When I left, the first place I stayed was neighbor is a repressive (and repressed) religious right-wing in New York City. For every American liberal, New York is the military man. While an excellent movie, it nonetheless plays on ideal city, or at least the best possible. It taxes everything, and it common stereotypes about conservatives. It is also far from has intellectuals, minorities, artists, politicians, activists and alone. commentators galore. After seven months I had to move west, In “JFK,” a president is murdered because he wanted to and at first, I was hesitant. I was afraid that Oregon might be a “change things.” In “Philadelphia,” a gay man infected with conservative state. Soon after I arrived, the fear started to fade, AIDS confronts the corporate fat cats that fired him. If you want and was in fact completely eradicated when I enrolled at more of the same, read mainstream newspapers, watch main- Portland State University. In class after class, my politics were stream television, and since you are a college student, you can repeatedly validated. Back then, I thought, “How open-minded always attend your professors’ lectures. Bottom line: In this and outspoken these people are.” world it is not hard to be a liberal. The liberal mind- At PSU I met Richard Brinkman, an Economics professor set is pervasive, persuasive, and most students opt who specialized in evolutionary economics. What’s the defini- for the political path of least resistance. tion of evolutionary economics? Capitalism is too “conspicu- From I was one, once, and I was very proud of it. ous,” therefore we need social democracy: everybody votes on To me, the world could be easily separated into what everybody else does. Professor Brinkman believed that the the the good, the bad, and the ugly. United States economy had stagnated in the past thirty years; social- The good was us, the liberals: sensi- she should reform herself and copy France, the nation of tive, benevolent, informed, open-minded, thoughtful indecision. And why not go a little further? She ist hell caring, intelligent and compassionate. should copy Sweden, the nation of socialism with results. The bad was them, the conserva- I went to various lectures around town, most notably one of tives: sexist, homophobic, greedy, given by Noam Chomsky, hero of the disaffected left. However, short-sighted, racist, narrow-mind- it was Chomsky as usual: corporate conspiracy this and military Greece to ed, philistine, egotistical, warmon- conspiracy that. I learned nothing new or interesting from this ger plutocrats. or any other speech I attended. No matter how hard I sought new the Eugen The ugly were all of those ideas, the professors and activists sounded all too predictable, poor souls who didn’t know uniform, and tedious. I was so desperate that I once attended a Oregon, here isany better and many times meeting of the Socialist Workers. This meeting had all of the thought the same way the usual suspects: the odorous student activists, minimum wage the story of one“bad” did: children of a laborers, and of course, female sociology professors. lesser God who didn’t When they had nothing new to say, it was time to visit the man who conver-recognize or under- library. I read works by thinkers of the left like Michael Sandel, stand their class Richard Rorty, Cornelius Castoriadis, Stephen Toulmin, Charles ted to conservatisminterests. Probably Taylor and Michael Walzer. Fatefully, I once picked up a copy — they would go to of libertarian F.A. von Hayek’s Mirage of Social Justice. This church (an was a great mistake: the seeds of doubt were planted in my
12 OREGON COMMENTATOR commentary mind. I could live with it so long as I didn’t pay much serious the result of attention to my doubts and instead concentrated on my beliefs. a few irre- Fatefully, I once After two years at PSU, I transferred to the University of sponsible indi- Oregon, for no reason apparent to me. Nothing special hap- viduals. The sys- picked pened during the winter of 1998, and lucky for me, because I tem was perfect. was still trying to find my way around campus. If it were the The only complica- up a copy of F.A. right building, it would be the wrong time. If it were the right tion? Its utter failure. von Hayek’s floor, it would be the wrong room. Though my leftist Eventually, I actually started attending the classes I’d reg- impulses were now fad-“Mirage of Social istered for, and by spring term, the weather had become very ing fast, I did my best to much unlike Oregon. That term I signed on as an Economics remain a liberal.Justice.” When This was peer advisor. Other than random students asking for directions Collegio recommended to me (the same buildings, times, floors and rooms, which I now Barry Siegel’s Economics 494, a great mis- “knew” so well), peer advising proved a rather harmless duty. Issues in Modern Economictake: the seeds There I met Jonathan Collegio, now late of the OREGON Thought, I understood that this COMMENTATOR. Our political differences revealed themselves would be a holy war. We wouldof read doubt were quickly, and we started calling each other the appropriate “The Constitution of Liberty” by names: he called me a “commie,” and I called him a “fascist.” Hayek, the patriarch of laissez-faire whonow plan- At the time, Collegio was busy with his mini-war against had first upset my ideals in Portland few OSPIRG, the Honesty campaign. Back then, nobody thought years earlier. To prepare myself, I revisited lib - that he stood much of a chance. A solitary Collegio shouting his books by Michael Sandel and Charles Taylor. brains out through a megaphone hardly seemed a threat to the I would be ready. Barry Siegel turned out to be eral dozens of colorful OSPIRG supporters parading up and down an awfully kind and knowledgeable man who 13th Avenue for their cause. When the polls closed and the welcomed students’ arguments. After awhile there results came out and OSPIRG fell, no one was more surprised was practically no lecture: just open debate. than I. It was a classic David-and-Goliath story: a tiny group of For the first time in my life we were not instructed, but conservative-minded students trumped the UO’s best-organized debating with the professor, and in some respects, with the and best-funded student group. author. Every phrase and every word coming out of Siegel’s How could it happen? Probably because many students like mouth was examined and re-examined. Nothing went unchal- me voted against OSPIRG. I wasn’t against them per se — I lenged. Some students were angered because we argued so agreed with the purpose of the organization — but the Honesty often, but it was a learning experience. After the course’s end, I campaign had successfully made the case that OSPIRG was cor- gradually came to terms with the fact that I was a liberal no rupt, and so I voted against them. more. I felt guilty for doing so. Thus, I sought redemption. I con- It was a painful process, since I still had feelings for the sidered joining the Student Insurgent, but after reading a couple nobler liberal causes. With the more I read, the more comfort- of issues, I decided this was a bad idea. The Insurgent’s most able I became, and after awhile I felt that I had reached an inter- distinguishing characteristic was its commonness, as if the arti- nal balance. For the first time, my politics and my personal life cles had been copied directly from USSR textbooks. Each issue were guided by the same principle: do nothing. was identical to the previous. The only difference would be that From a philosophical point of view, I am no longer a social the articles appearing in the back were now in the front, and animal. I am a libertarian, or perhaps a conservative with strong those at the bottom of the page were now at the top. Dry, monot- libertarian leanings. Whatever my exact ideological disposition, onous, pedantic, humorless and rigid, it clearly represented the things had fallen apart. The communitarian statues within me tendencies of contemporary critical thinking. were seized and torn apart by an unruly populace who would For a very long time, my leftist beliefs had been in decline. not be deluded any longer. As time progressed, I found myself defending not coherent Five years ago on a summer night in Greece, a family friend arguments, but nostalgia for an earlier era: I remembered rem- was talking to me about my pilgrimage to America. A leftist nants of those days in the eighties when I believed that the activist for the last thirty years, he told me in a tone full of cer- socialists who gained power in Greece would work for justice, tainty and melancholy, that “Greeks who go to America become and for progress. Today I cannot forget the pathos that reigned right-wing.” Silly nonsense, an impossibility, I thought. in the streets back then. I was five when the new leader, Stubbornly I replied, “Not me.” Papandreou, promised a “third way” between capitalism and communism. Eight years later, everything would go wrong in the worst possible way. Was the system wrong, or were the people? The Napoleon Linardatos, who holds an utterly useless degree in convenient answer was the people. A failure here or there was Economics, is a staff writer for the OREGON COMMENTATOR
SUMMER 2000 13 news
Whether Napster survives its legal battle or not will be nothing less than irrelevant for anonymous, widespread file sharing across the internet. Once the genie is out of the bottle, it’s not going back in.
revolution is underway in the way people listen to music, and at the heart of the bat- tle is a program called Napster. What makes Napster, as well as other MP3 file A sharing programs, so different from traditional means of gathering and listening to music is that it gives people the ability to find any song they want through a simple search and download it on the spot. Traditional musical formats, such as radio and compact discs, could be seeing the end of their dominance in the music industry. This revolution hasn’t occurred without controversy. Napster has forced the music industry to sit up and take notice, particularly because of the issue of copyright laws. Sued by the leading companies in the industry and its lobby, Napster is now entwined in a legal fight for its survival. But will programs such as Napster be squashed by the reigning pow- ers of the music industry or will MP3 file sharing technology change the way we listen to music? File sharing is not a new technology. Since the advent of the computer file itself, they have been shared between computers, even on the most primitive of networks. An activi- ty as common as downloading a web page is a form of file sharing; the files from the page are copied and then stored in a temporary folder while you view the web page. MP3 technology is also nothing new. In 1988, the Moving Pictures Expert Group (MPEG for short) was founded to establish a file format that could decrease the size of video and audio files to workable sizes. In 1992, the MPEG organization released their first video and audio file format, called MPEG-1. In the mid-1990s, after a number of updates and revisions to the MPEG format, the MPEG organization released a standard called MPEG Audio Layer III (MP3 for short) – a format specifically created for digital audio. After the format was released, software programmers began developing programs that made it possible to copy compact disks and store them as MP3s on a computer hard drive. It was only a matter of time before someone devised an online system for swapping
14 OREGON COMMENTATOR commentary