VISUAL NAVIGATION in ANTS Antoine Wystrach
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
TTHHÈÈSSEE En vue de l'obtention du DOCTORAT DE L’UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE Délivré par l'Université Paul Sabatier - Toulouse III Discipline ou spécialité : Neurosciences, Comportement et Cognition Présentée et soutenue par Antoine Wystrach Le 28 Novembre 2011 Titre : Visual navigation in ants JURY Pr Barbara Webb (IPAB, University of Edinburgh) Rapporteur Dr Brunot Poucet (LNC, Université de Provence) Rapporteur Pr Martin Giurfa (CRCA, UPS Toulouse III) Directeur d'équipe Dr Guy Beugnon (CRCA, UPS Toulouse III) Directeur de thèse Ecole doctorale : CLESCO Unité de recherche : Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, UMR 5169 Directeur(s) de Thèse : Pr Ken Cheng et Dr Guy Beugnon Rapporteurs : Pr Barbara Webb et Dr Brunot Poucet VISUAL NAVIGATION IN ANTS Antoine Wystrach Centre de Recherche sur la Cognition Animale Université Paul Sabatier Submitted October 2011 Thèse en vue de l’obtention du Doctorat de l’Université de Toulouse TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE SUMMARY i RÉSUMÉ iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vii INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER I Ants learn geometry and features 13 CHAPTER II Geometry, features, and panoramic views: ants in 29 rectangular arenas. CHAPTER III Views, landmarks, and routes: how do desert ants 71 negotiate an obstacle course? CHAPTER IV Landmarks or panoramas: what do navigating ants 95 attend to for guidance? CHAPTER V Ants might use different view-matching strategies 123 on and off the route. CHAPTER VI Ant visual memories: multiple snapshots or holistic 151 encoding? CHAPTER VII Why we study insect navigation – Ants, Umwelts 179 and Morgan's Canon. CONCLUSION 195 REFERENCES 205 APPENDIX I Formatted publication of chapters 1,2,3 and 4. 221 APPENDIX II Other publications related to insect navigation. 271 SUMMARY Navigating efficiently in the outside world requires many cognitive abilities like extracting, memorising, and processing information. The remarkable navigational abilities of insects are an existence proof of how small brains can produce exquisitely efficient, robust behaviour in complex environments. During their foraging trips, insects, like ants or bees, are known to rely on both path integration and learnt visual cues to recapitulate a route or reach familiar places like the nest. The strategy of path integration is well understood, but much less is known about how insects acquire and use visual information. Field studies give good descriptions of visually guided routes, but our understanding of the underlying mechanisms comes mainly from simplified laboratory conditions using artificial, geometrically simple landmarks. My thesis proposes an integrative approach that combines 1– field and lab experiments on two visually guided ant species (Melophorus bagoti and Gigantiops destructor) and 2– an analysis of panoramic pictures recorded along the animal’s route. The use of panoramic pictures allows an objective quantification of the visual information available to the animal. Results from both species, in the lab and the field, converged, showing that ants do not segregate their visual world into objects, such as landmarks or discrete features, as a human observers might assume. Instead, efficient navigation seems to arise from the use of cues widespread on the ants’ panoramic visual field, encompassing both proximal and distal objects together. Such relatively unprocessed panoramic views, even at low resolution, provide remarkably unambiguous spatial information in natural environment. Using such a simple but efficient panoramic visual input, rather than focusing on isolated landmarks, seems an appropriate strategy to cope with the complexity of natural scenes and the poor resolution of insects’ eyes. Also, panoramic pictures can serve as a basis for running analytical models of navigation. The predictions of these models can be directly compared with the actual behaviour of real ants, allowing the iterative tuning and testing of different hypotheses. This integrative approach led me to the conclusion that ants do not rely on a single navigational technique, but might switch between strategies according to whether they are on or off their familiar terrain. For example, i ants can recapitulate robustly a familiar route by simply aligning their body in a way that the current view matches best their memory. However, this strategy becomes ineffective when displaced away from the familiar route. In such a case, ants appear to head instead towards the regions where the skyline appears lower than the height recorded in their memory, which generally leads them closer to a familiar location. How ants choose between strategies at a given time might be simply based on the degree of familiarity of the panoramic scene currently perceived. Finally, this thesis raises questions about the nature of ant memories. Past studies proposed that ants memorise a succession of discrete 2D ‘snapshots’ of their surroundings. Contrastingly, results obtained here show that knowledge from the end of a foraging route (15 m) impacts strongly on the behaviour at the beginning of the route, suggesting that the visual knowledge of a whole foraging route may be compacted into a single holistic memory. Accordingly, repetitive training on the exact same route clearly affects the ants’ behaviour, suggesting that the memorised information is processed and not ‘obtained at once’. While navigating along their familiar route, ants’ visual system is continually stimulated by a slowly evolving scene, and learning a general pattern of stimulation rather than storing independent but very similar snapshots appears a reasonable hypothesis to explain navigation on a natural scale; such learning works remarkably well with neural networks. Nonetheless, what the precise nature of ants’ visual memories is and how elaborated they are remain wide open questions. Overall, my thesis tackles the nature of ants’ perception and memory as well as how both are processed together to output an appropriate navigational response. These results are discussed in the light of comparative cognition. Both vertebrates and insects have resolved the same problem of navigating efficiently in the world. In light of Darwin’s theory of evolution, there is no a priori reason to think that there is a clear division between cognitive mechanisms of different species. The actual gap between insect and vertebrate cognitive sciences may result more from different approaches rather than real differences. Research on insect navigation has been approached with a bottom-up philosophy, one that examines how simple mechanisms can produce seemingly complex behaviour. Such parsimonious solutions, like the ones explored in the present thesis, can provide useful baseline hypotheses for navigation in other larger-brained animals, and thus contribute to a more truly comparative cognition. ii RÉSUMÉ Les remarquables capacités de navigation des insectes nous prouvent à quel point ces « mini- cerveaux » peuvent produire des comportements admirablement robustes et efficaces dans des environnements complexes. En effet, être capable de naviguer de façon efficace et autonome dans un environnement parfois hostile (désert, forêt tropicale) sollicite l’intervention de nombreux processus cognitifs impliquant l’extraction, la mémorisation et le traitement de l’information spatiale préalables à une prise de décision locomotrice orientée dans l’espace. Lors de leurs excursions hors du nid, les insectes tels que les abeilles, guêpes ou fourmis, se fient à un processus d’intégration du trajet, mais également à des indices visuels qui leur permettent de mémoriser des routes et de retrouver certains sites alimentaires familiers et leur nid. L’étude des mécanismes d’intégration du trajet a fait l’objet de nombreux travaux, par contre, nos connaissances à propos de l’utilisation d’indices visuels sont beaucoup plus limitées et proviennent principalement d’études menées dans des environnements artificiellement simplifiés, dont les conclusions sont parfois difficilement transposables aux conditions naturelles. Cette thèse propose une approche intégrative, combinant 1- des études de terrains et de laboratoire conduites sur deux espèces de fourmis spécialistes de la navigation visuelle (Melophorus bagoti et Gigantiops destructor) et 2- des analyses de photos panoramiques prisent aux endroits où les fourmis naviguent qui permettent de quantifier objectivement l’information visuelle accessible à l’insecte. Les résultats convergents obtenus sur le terrain et au laboratoire permettent de montrer que, chez ces deux espèces, les fourmis ne fragmentent pas leur monde visuel en multiples objets indépendants, et donc ne mémorisent pas de ‘repères visuels’ ou de balises particuliers comme le ferait un être humain. En fait, l’efficacité de leur navigation émergerait de l’utilisation de paramètres visuels étendus sur l’ensemble de leur champ visuel panoramique, incluant repères proximaux comme distaux, sans les individualiser. Contre-intuitivement, de telles images panoramiques, même à basse résolution, fournissent une information spatiale précise et non ambiguë dans les environnements naturels. Plutôt qu’une focalisation sur des repères isolés, l’utilisation de vues dans leur globalité semble être plus efficace pour représenter la complexité des scènes naturelles et être mieux adaptée à la basse résolution du système visuel des insectes. iii Les photos panoramiques enregistrées peuvent également servir à l’élaboration de modèles navigationnels. Les prédictions de ces modèles sont ici directement comparées au comportement des fourmis,