What Makes a Tornado?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

What Makes a Tornado? SNAPSHOTS What makes a tornado? The biggest swarm of tornadoes ever recorded—148 in all—rum- the first research-based bled across the U.S. Midwest and South on 3–4 April 1974. A storm chase projects, network of radars operated by NOAA’s National Weather Ser- launched in the 1970s vice caught many of the tornadic circulations, and dozens of in Texas and Okla- watches and warnings issued by the service gave many people homa, while data from ample time to seek cover. Still, more than 300 people died in the hail project helped what became known as the Jumbo Outbreak. scientists develop con- Severe weather research was still in its infancy at the ceptual models that time, and NCAR was one of its incubators. A small group underscored the 3-D of researchers, some of them involved with the National Hail nature of storms. No- Research Experiment, or NHRE (see page 20), turned their body had yet tried to attention to supercells, the long-lived thunderstorms that turn these concepts This tornado caused 3 deaths and 210 spawned the most violent tornadoes. Would it be possible to into software, though. injuries in Xenia, Ohio, during the 1974 zero in on the storm scale and generate a supercell inside a To model with a do- Jumbo Outbreak. computer model? main a supercell real- Two young scientists—Joseph Klemp (NCAR) and istically, Klemp and Wilhelmson would need to build a 3-D Robert Wilhelmson (University of Illinois at Urbana- model with a domain large enough to encompass the storm Champaign)—gave it a try. Until then, most weather modeling and its environs, but detailed enough to capture important had simulated motions and processes spanning thousands of features within the thunderstorm. miles. On a smaller scale, modelers at NCAR and elsewhere The computational challenge was immense. Tem- had made some progress in simulating severe thunderstorms perature, moisture, and wind near thunderstorms can vary in two dimensions, an approach that worked well for the lin- sharply across small distances and short time scales. Klemp ear nature of nontornadic squall lines. and Wilhelmson pared the computing demands in carefully However, supercells were more complex and three-di- chosen ways, drawing on basic research in such areas as tur- mensional, a portrait that emerged from a wealth of satellite bulence and cloud physics. Technology also gave Klemp and and radar observations as well as still Wilhelmson a major boost with the 1977 arrival of NCAR’s and moving imagery. Photos first supercomputer, the Cray-1 (see page 23). and film came from Among other things, the Klemp-Wilhelmson model captured the development of a splitting supercell, one that breaks into left- and right-moving pieces under the influ- ence of powerful upper-level winds. Over the subsequent years, as universities gained computing prowess, dozens of scientists adopted the Klemp-Wilhelmson techniques, and the field of severe-storm modeling came into its own. Today, both scientists serve as senior leaders at the same institutions from which they forged a classic NCAR-uni- versity collaboration. Wilhelmson looks forward to tornado simulation us- ing models with resolutions as fine as 10 meters (33 feet), compared to the 2 kilometers (3.2 miles) used in his earliest simulations with Klemp. “We didn’t understand at the time Modeling by Joseph Klemp, Robert Wilhelmson, and colleagues the impact we would have on the modeling community,” Wil- showed the evolution of a severe thunderstorm in strong wind helmson observes. “What we did know, however, is that we shear that splits into two cells (right) within 90 minutes. had a great time working together.” 28 | UCAR AT FIFTY VORTEX2: Rounding up severe weather he spring of 2009 saw More thanTODAY 50 vehicles program, the teams formed 140 tornadoes before V2. “If what was perhaps the were on the road from early a dense set of observing there were low-hanging fruit, largest array of vehicles May to mid-June, spanning platforms as the storm it would have been plucked ever deployed for an a study area that stretched passed. Each evening the already. The features we’re Tatmospheric study. Although from Texas to southern groups reconvened, typically looking for are subtle, and the Great Plains were oddly Minnesota. On each “go” hundreds of miles from the they’ll only come out through devoid of severe weather for morning, participants headed day’s starting point. As NCAR an arduous and complicated weeks, the second Verification out to a potentially stormy participant Timothy Lim synthesis of data.” of the Origins of Rotation area, eventually zeroing in observed, “It’s hard to get your in Tornadoes Experiment on a county-sized target laundry done when you don’t (VORTEX2 or V2) captured where a tornadic supercell know what state you’ll be in by one twister in unprecedented was deemed possible over nightfall.” detail, as well as a number a several-hour window. As Major advances in of potentially tornadic they stayed in touch through technology pushed V2 far thunderstorms that never multiple cellphone networks beyond the bounds of the first made the grade. and a Web-based chat VORTEX study, conducted in 1994–95. Several sets of mobile Doppler radars were deployed, each with their own specifications and strengths, along with an array of other “I think we observing systems. A tornado on 5 June in Goshen County, were all Wyoming, was sampled at close range as frequently as surprised by every few seconds, yielding an unprecedented data set. how well the Nontornadic cases also drew keen interest. Models communica- These radar-derived depictions of velocity (winds, left) and have trouble depicting the tions worked.” reflectivity (precipitation, right) from a Doppler on Wheels unit small pools of cool, moist show circulation around the 5 June 2009 tornado in Goshen air that descend from severe —Paul Markowski, storms and appear to help County, Wyoming, at a height of about 200 meters (660 feet). Pennsylvania State trigger tornadoes. V2 gathered University wind, temperature, and moisture data from a number of these cold pools, including several from storms that developed strong rotation but no tornadoes. Even after a second season of sampling in 2010— and a total of more than 20 tornadoes documented—much more work lies ahead. “We’re not expecting ‘Eureka!’ data,” says NCAR visiting scientist Joshua Wurman (Center for A W-band radar deployed by the universities of Oklahoma and Severe Weather Research), Massachusetts captured the end stages of the 5 June 2009 whose mobile radars had tornado in Goshen County, Wyoming. already sampled more than THE SEVENTIES | 29.
Recommended publications
  • Workshop on Weather Ready Nation: Science Imperatives for Severe Thunderstorm Research, Held 24-26 April, 2012 in Birmingham AL
    Workshop on Weather Ready Nation: Science Imperatives for Severe Thunderstorm Research, Held 24-26 April, 2012 in Birmingham AL Sponsored by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and National Science Foundation Final Report Edited by Michael K. Lindell, Texas A&M University and Harold Brooks, National Severe Storms Laboratory Hazard Reduction & Recovery Center Texas A&M University College station TX 77843-3137 17 September 2012 Executive Summary The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) workshop sponsored a workshop entitled Weather Ready Nation: Science Imperatives for Severe Thunderstorm Research on 24-26 April, 2012 in Birmingham Alabama. Prior to the workshop, teams of authors completed eight white papers, which were read by workshop participants before arriving at the conference venue. The workshop’s 63 participants—representing the disciplines of civil engineering, communication, economics, emergency management, geography, meteorology, psychology, public health, public policy, sociology, and urban planning—participated in three sets of discussion groups. In the first set of discussion groups, participants were assigned to groups by discipline and asked to identify any research issues related to tornado hazard response that had been overlooked by the 2011 Norman Workshop report (UCAR, 2012) or the white papers (see Appendix A). In the second set of discussion groups, participants were distributed among interdisciplinary groups and asked to revisit the questions addressed in the disciplinary groups, identify any interdependencies across disciplines, and recommend criteria for evaluating prospective projects. In the third set of discussion groups, participants returned to their initial disciplinary groups and were asked to identify and describe at least three specific research projects within the research areas defined by their white paper(s) and to assess these research projects in terms of the evaluation criteria identified in the interdisciplinary groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Sean Casey
    INTERVIEW WITH SEAN CASEY YOU HAD COME UP WITH THE IDEA FOR THE TIV WHEN YOU WERE LOCKED OUT OF A MINIVAN IN A STORM, CORRECT? Well, actually, we had come up with the concept the year before, but getting locked out of a minivan with a tornado right next to us, that kind of confirms my sneaking suspicion that if we were going to be that close we should have something a bit more rugged. WERE THERE ANY OTHER INSPIRATIONS FOR THE TIV? Mainly it was just a feeling that, you know, there’s a huge difference between filming a tornado from a couple miles away with a telephoto lens, and filming a tornado that’s on top of you with a wide-angle lens. And that’s really where all the action is. It’s right next to the tornado. And it’s close in the tornado. That’s the kind of power that I wanted to capture. I wanted to get footage that really was as powerful as the subject matter. HOW DID YOU FEEL DURING THE GOSHEN INTERCEPT? Of course it’s hard to describe. In the moment, a part of you is fearing for your life. A part of you is just overjoyed and kind of in shock. I think I was in shock at the time, really. It was such an unbelievable experience. Unbelievable to see a tornado forming half a mile away. You pick the right spot, and it’s just coming right at you, and to bear witness to that. And another thing is I’m trying not to mess up.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovation Magazine Spring 2016
    SPRING 2016 SPRING 2016 SPECIAL ciweek 2016 PROGRAM EDITION FREE To Dream THE POWER of Dreaming Big CHASING DREAMS COVER PHOTO: and the Nasty Side of Mother Nature JAMIE FOXX IN FULL ELECTRO MAKEUP FOR THE AMAZING SPIDERMAN 2. THE ART OF MAKEUP and So Much More DREAM with Focus www.dmacc.edu/ciweek LAURA JOHNSON | Merit Resources When you partner with the INS Family of Companies for your business solutions, you’re freed up to focus on what you do best. We’ll equip and support you with a full suite of business solutions including Technology, HR and Contact Center services. Offering our unique combination of top-level talent, technology and tools, we’re your valued productivity partner on the road to success. INSFamilyOfCompanies.com THE INS FAMILY OF COMPANIES One experience for everything in your life Come to Microsoft and check out Surface Pro 3, Windows Phones, and more Microsoft at Jordan Creek Town Center 101 Jordan Creek Parkway West Des Moines, IA 50266 Some apps sold separately. Some features require Windows 8.1 Update, available through Windows Update. Internet access required; fees may apply. FEATURES 7 | The Power of Dreaming Big BY SCOTT SIEPKER 13 | Chasing Dreams and the Nasty Side of Mother Nature BY DR. REED TIMMER 19 | The Art of Makeup And So Much More BY HOWARD BERGER 25 | Dream with Focus BY JASON KIESAU 31 | Student Spotlight: Dreaming Reality BY JAMIN MYCAL HARDENBROOK PROGRAM CELEBRATE! INNOVATION MAGAZINE 34 | Welcome IS PUBLISHED BIANNUALLY PROVOST ANTHONY D. PAUSTIAN, Ph.D. BY DES MOINES AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE WEST CAMPUS.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 AMS Awards Brochure
    2020 Awards AMS Fellow Ping Chang Professor and Chair Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas Ping Chang is a professor and the Louis & Elizabath Scherck chair in oceanography and serves as the director of the International Laboratory for High-Resolution Earth System Prediction at Texas A&M University. He received his Ph.D. from Princeton University in 1988. His research focuses on climate dynamics and modeling. He is a contributing author of the fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and an author of ~140 peer-reviewed scientific journal papers. AMS Fellow Donna J. Charlevoix Director UNAVCO, Boulder, Colorado Dr. Donna Charlevoix is director of Education and Community Engagement for UNAVCO and the NSF-supported GAGE facility. She worked for over a decade in academia as faculty after which she transitioned to work for non-profits that support federally-funded science facilities. She is actively involved in atmospheric science education research, co-authors university science textbooks, and serves in the leadership of the American Meteorological Society. She resides with her family in Colorado. AMS Fellow Jeffrey L. Collett, Jr. Professor Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado Dr. Collett is a professor and head of Colorado State University’s Atmospheric Science Department. He studied at MIT (Chemical Engineering) and Caltech (Environmental Engineering Science), before completing a postdoc at ETH- Zurich. Principal research topics include emissions and air quality impacts from oil and gas development; the sources, transport and deposition of reactive nitrogen pollutants; air quality impacts of wild and prescribed fires; aerosol chemistry; and air pollution processing by clouds and fogs.
    [Show full text]
  • 38Th Conference on Radar Meteorology
    38th Conference on Radar Meteorology 28 August – 1 September 2017 Swissôtel Hotel Chicago, IL 38TH CONFERENCE ON RADAR METEOROLOGY 28 AUGUST-1 SEPTEMBER 2017 SWISSÔTEL CHICAGO, IL CONNECT Conference Twitter: #AMSRadar2017 Conference Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/AMSradar2017/ ORGANIZERS The 38th Conference on Radar Meteorology is organized by the AMS Radar Meteorology and hosted by the American Meteorological Society. SPONSORS Thank you to the sponsoring organizations that helped make the 38th Conference on Radar Meteorology possible: PROGRAM COMMITTEE Co-Chairs: Scott Collis, ANL, Argonne, IL and Scott Ellis, NCAR, Boulder, CO New and Emerging Radar Technology Lead: Stephen Frasier, University of Massachusetts * Vijay Venkatesh, NASA Goddard * Boon Leng Cheong, University of Oklahoma * Bradley Isom, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory * Eric Loew, NCAR EOL * Jim George, Colorado State University Radar Networks, Quality Control, Processing and Software Lead: Daniel Michelson, Environment Canada * Adrian Loftus, NASA and University of Maryland * Francesc Junyent, Colorado State Univeristy * Hidde Leijnse, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI) * Joseph Hardin, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory General Information Quantitative Precipitation Estimation and Hydrology Lead: Walter Petersen, NASA-MSFC * Amber Emory, NASA * David Wolff, NASA * Jian Zhang, NSSL/OU AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY Microphysical Studies with Radars Lead: Christopher Williams, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder * Daniel Dawson, Purdue University * Matthew Kumjian, Pennsylvania State University * Marcus van Lier-Walqui, NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies Organized Convection and Severe Phenomena Lead: Tammy Weckwerth, National Center for Atmospheric Research * Angela Rowe, University of Washington * Karen Kosiba, Center for Severe Weather Research * Kevin Knupp, University of Alabama, Huntsville * Timothy Lang, NASA * Stephen Guidmond, Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • Erad2012 Programme
    1Sunday, 24 June 2012 1 17:00 – 19:00 Distribution of conference packages to registered participants and Welcome cocktail at Hôtel d’Assézat (Place d’Assézat, downtown Toulouse). Note: This ceremony is only open to people who have already registered online. There will be NO on-site registration at Hôtel d’Assézat. 1Monday, 25 June 2012 1 08:00 Bus transfer to Météo-France See conference booklet for details 09:00 Registration & Welcome coffee (offered by BARON SERVICES ) Centre International de Conférences of Météo-France (CIC) 10:00 Introduction Cochairs: Olivier Bousquet and Pierre Tabary, Météo-France Location: amphitheater 10:00 Welcome address M. Olivier Gupta , Deputy Head of Météo France Session 1 Quantitative Precipitation Estimation (Part I) (Plenary) Chair : Alexander Ryzhkov, CIMMS/NSSL Location : amphitheater 10:30 1.1 To provide accurate rainfall rates with quantified errors. (keynote) Anthony Illingworth , University of Reading 11:00 1.2 Rainfall estimation from an operational S-band dual-polarization radar in the monsoon dominant environment Gyuwon Lee, Dept. Astronomy and Atmospheric Sciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Soohyun Kwon, Choong-Ke Lee 11:15 1.3 The new French Operational Polarimetric Radar Rainfall Product Jordi Figueras i Ventura , Météo France, Fadela Kabeche, Béatrice Fradon, Abdel-Amin Boumahmoud, Pierre Tabary 11:30 1.4 Comparison of polarimetric techniques for operational precipitation estimation in complex orography scenarios Gianfranco Vulpiani, Presidency of the Council of Ministers – Department of Civil Protection, M. Montopoli, A. Gioia, P. Giordano, F.S. Marzano 11:45 1.5 VPR Correction of Brightband Effects in Radar QPEs Using Polarimetric Radar Observations Youcun Qi, National Severe Storms Laboratory (NOAA/NSSL), Pengfei Zhang, Jian Zhang 12:00 1.6 Rainfall estimation in mountainous regions using X-band polarimetric weather radar PC Shakti , National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disater Prevention, M.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of OKLAHOMA Office of Research Administration
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA Office of Research Administration CONTRACTUAL REPORT Awards - April, 1998 Amount 0628655882 Stephen Cook, Oklahoma Biological Survey $3,983.00 The Nature Conservancy April 1, 1998 - September 30, 1998 Early-Season Survey for Eximacris phenax and E. superbum (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in Southeastern Oklahoma 0628755808 David Penn, Center for Economic and Management Research $58,068.00 State of Oklahoma, Department of Human Services January 12, 1998 - April 30, 1998 TANF Surveys 0628855887 Keith Strevett, Civil Engineering and Environmental Science $59,999.00 National Science Foundation August 1, 1998 - July 31, 1999 CAREER: Impact of Physiological State and Macro-Nutrient Ratio on Microbial Surface Thermodynamics 0628955888 Gary D. Schnell, Oklahoma Biological Survey $21,997.00 Ana Hiott, Oklahoma Biological Survey State of Arkansas, Military Department Prime: DOD-National Guard February 1, 1998 - June 30, 1999 Evaluation Survey for American Burying Beetles on Camp Robinson, Arkansas 0629055891 Gary D. Schnell, Oklahoma Biological Survey $30,000.00 Ana Hiott, Oklahoma Biological Survey State of Arkansas, Military Department Prime: DOD-National Guard February 1, 1998 – June 30, 1999 Evaluation Survey for American Burying Beetles on Fort Chaffee, Arkansas Awards - April, 1998 Amount 0629155893 David Wiedenfeld, Oklahoma Biological Survey $2,588.04 State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Military Department Prime: DOD-National Guard January 22, 1998 - May 31, 1999 Migratory Bird Environmental Awareness Materials Camp Gruber Training Center, Oklahoma 0629255894 David Wiedenfeld, Oklahoma Biological Survey $6,468.71 State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Military Department Prime: DOD-National Guard January 22, 1998 - December 30, 1998 Biodiversity Survey of Camp Gruber Training Center, Oklahoma 0629455896 Matthew Johnson, Physics and Astronomy $200,000.00 National Science Foundation April 15, 1998 - March 31, 2002 CAREER: Scanning Probe Microscopy of Photonic and Electronic Materials 0629555897 Mark A.
    [Show full text]
  • Doppler on Wheels (DOW)
    Educational Vehicle Tour: Doppler on Wheels (DOW) About the Doppler On Wheels Tornadoes occur infrequently and often form very near the ground, making them difficult to measure with traditional stationary meteorological radars. Doppler On Wheels (DOWs) are mobile Doppler weather radars mounted on trucks that bring radars directly into the path of storms, allowing researchers to study them with greater accuracy and detail. These vehicles have allowed scientists to create the first ever mappings of tornado winds, hurricane wind streaks, and resolution of detailed tornado structure and evolution in 3D. Featured prominently in the film Tornado Alley, the DOW radar vehicles served as the backbone of the VORTEX2 research mission by mapping the overall structure and dynamics of severe storms, the DOW radars allowed scientists to identify locations where tornadoes might form, and helped guide other researchers to position their vehicles and instruments in a tornado’s path. In addition to a large, rotating radar dish and an impressive antenna, the DOW vehicles have a radar operations “cockpit” that visitors can climb into. Depending on availability, the DOW team may also bring additional mobile weather measurement tools (tornado pods, weather balloons, disdrometers (used to measure precipitation, etc.). About the Scientists In addition to a vehicle operator/technician, the DOW will be accompanied by either Dr. Joshua Wurman or Dr. Karen Kosiba, both featured scientists from the film Tornado Alley. Dr. Joshua Wurman, President, Center for Severe Weather Research. Dr. Wurman designed the Doppler On Wheels mobile radars to observe tornadoes, hurricanes and other phenomena from close range, and has pioneered the mapping of tornadic winds and vortices.
    [Show full text]
  • 63Rd Book Cover.Cdr:Coreldraw
    CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG Rick Baker, Mayor Office of the Mayor Welcome to the 63rd Interdepartmental Hurricane Conference! I would like to welcome each of you attending the 63rd Interdepartmental Hurricane Conference in our great city of St. Petersburg. We are pleased that you have come to our community to hold these important meetings! While you are here, please take time to enjoy our downtown area and The Pier, Baywalk, the Salvador Dali museum and the wide variety of restaurants and nightlife all within walking distance of your hotel. We invite you to stroll around downtown and admire some of Florida’s best Mediterranean-Revival style architecture and two dozen properties recorded in the National Historic Register. From our white sandy beaches, to our parks, to the smiling faces greeting you across our city, we hope you relish your days on the bay this week. The citizens of St. Petersburg recognize the important work you do for our city and the country and we appreciate the unique contributions you make to our safety, security and preparedness. Thank you for coming to St. Petersburg and we send our best wishes for a successful conference. Please visit us again soon. Sincerely, Rick Baker Mayor CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, P.O. BOX 2842, ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA 33731, PHONE (727) 893-7201 S E S S Session 1 I The 2008 Tropical Cyclone O Season in Review N 1 A Year of Destructive Landfalls: Overview of the 2008 Atlantic Hurricane Season Jack Beven and Dan Brown ([email protected]; [email protected]) NOAA/NWS Tropical Prediction Center/National Hurricane Center The 2008 Atlantic hurricane season continued the period of above normal activity that started in 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall/Winter 1995 After the Close of the Summer the OWSO and OMWSO Olympics and Use the Same Operations Will Utilize New in Brief
    NSSL Briefings A newsletter about the employees and activities of the National Severe Storms Laboratory NSSL works with NWS to prepare for Olympic weather support by Susan Oakland-Cobb and J.T. Johnson orld class athletes are not the only ones Laboratory (FSL), the Techniques Development diligently training for the 1996 Summer Laboratory (TDL), the National Center for WOlympic Games to be held in Atlanta, Environmental Prediction (NCEP), and the GA. Fifteen forecasters from around the world National Environmental Satellite, Data, and have spent part of the summer in Atlanta training Information Service (NESDIS) are all working to to provide weather support during the Olympics. help these activities. NSSL's J.T. Johnson has They come from the U.S., Canada, and Australia, been working in Atlanta since January, 1995 to and will begin forecasting July 1, 1996, continuing help with the OWSO set-up. Johnson will remain through the Olympics, closing August 4, 1996. in Atlanta throughout the Olympics to provide A group of alternate forecasters will continue expertise on NSSL's experimental Warning forecast operations through the Paralympics, a Decision Support System (WDSS) and to help Volume 1 No. 2 competition involving physically challenged with the overall hardware, software, and forecaster athletes. The Paralympics are held two weeks training for the OWSO. Fall/Winter 1995 after the close of the summer The OWSO and OMWSO Olympics and use the same operations will utilize new In Brief..... facilities. weather analysis tools that All of these forecasters will have never been combined in be a part of the Olympic an operational setting.
    [Show full text]
  • Applications of Vortex Gas Models to Tornadogenesis and Maintenance
    Open Journal of Fluid Dynamics, 2017, 7, 596-622 http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojfd ISSN Online: 2165-3860 ISSN Print: 2165-3852 Applications of Vortex Gas Models to Tornadogenesis and Maintenance Pavel Bělík1, Douglas P. Dokken2, Corey K. Potvin3, Kurt Scholz2, Mikhail M. Shvartsman2 1Department of Mathematics, Statistics, and Computer Science, Augsburg University, Minneapolis, MN, USA 2Department of Mathematics, University of St. Thomas, St. Paul, MN, USA 3Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, NOAA/OAR/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, OK, USA How to cite this paper: Bělík, P., Dokken, D.P., Potvin, C.K., Scholz, K. and Shvartsman, Abstract M.M. (2017) Applications of Vortex Gas Models to Tornadogenesis and Maintenance. Processes related to the production of vorticity in the forward and rear flank Open Journal of Fluid Dynamics, 7, 596-622. downdrafts and their interaction with the boundary layer are thought to play a https://doi.org/10.4236/ojfd.2017.74040 role in tornadogenesis. We argue that an inverse energy cascade is a plausible Received: October 6, 2017 mechanism for tornadogenesis and tornado maintenance and provides sup- Accepted: December 19, 2017 porting evidence which is both numerical and observational. We apply a Published: December 22, 2017 three-dimensional vortex gas model to supercritical vortices produced at the surface boundary layer possibly due to interactions of vortices brought to the Copyright © 2017 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. surface by the rear flank downdraft and also to those related to the forward This work is licensed under the Creative flank downdraft.
    [Show full text]
  • VORTEX2: the Verification of the Origins of Rotation in Tornadoes Experiment
    5.1 VORTEX2: The Verification of the Origins of Rotation in Tornadoes Experiment Joshua Wurman Center for Severe Weather Research, 1945 Vassar Circle, Boulder, Colorado Louis Wicker National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma Yvette Richardson The Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania Paul Markowski The Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania David Dowell National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado Donald Burgess Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, Norman, Oklahoma Howie Bluestein University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 1. Introduction intercepting significant tornadoes, which are This paper describes the second Verification of the uncommon. VORTEX2 made special efforts to Origins of Rotation in Tornadoes Experiment, operate near a unique, extensive, and diverse network VORTEX2, the field phases of which occurred in of stationary instrumentation in Oklahoma including a 2009 and 2010. The VORTEX2 experiment is phased array radar, an array of small stationary radars, designed to explore (a) the mechanisms of tornadogenesis, maintenance, and demise, (b) the wind field near the ground in tornadoes, (c) the relationship between tornadoes and their parent thunderstorms and the relationship among tornadoes, tornadic storms and the larger scale environment, and (d) how to improve numerical weather prediction and forecasting of supercell thunderstorms and tornadoes. VORTEX2 was by far the largest and most ambitious observational and modeling study of tornadoes and tornadic storms ever undertaken. It employed fourteen mobile mesonet instrumented vehicles, ten ground based mobile radars, several of which were dual-polarization and two of which were phased-array Figure 1. Probability of Detection (POD), False rapid-scan, five mobile balloon sounding systems, Alarm Rate (FAR), and Average Lead Time of thirty-eight deployable in situ observational weather tornado warnings in the United States.
    [Show full text]