Series P-25, No. 354 December 8, 1966

ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF STATES, BY AGE 1960 TO 1965 With Provisional Estimates for , 1966

SU1)ersecie corresponding estimates publ.ished in reports Nos. 267, series)

This report presents estimates of the total and 65 years and over, plus the cumulative age resident population of States by age groups for groups 14 years and over, 18 years and over, 1960 to 1966. The figures for 1965 and 1966 and 21 year s and over. For 1966, the age were~previously published in report No. 350 of gr oups shown are: under 18 year s, 18 to 6Y· this series (Advance Report). The age groups years, and 65 years and over, plus the cumu­ shovmifor 1960 to 1965 are: under 5 years, lative age groups 18 years and over and 21 5 to 17 years, 18 to 44 years, to 6Y· years, years and over.

PERCENT DISTRIBUTION, BY AGE, OF THE TOTAL RESIDENT POPULATION, FOR REGIONS: JULY 1965

UNDER 18 TO 44 5 YEARS YEARS UNITED STATES

NORTH­ EAST

Norm! CENTRAL

SOUTH

WEST

o 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 PERCENT

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 20402, 15 cents. Annual subscription (Series P-20, P-23, P-25, P-27, P-28 summaries, P-60, and P-65, combined), $4.00; foreign mailing, $5.25. 2

METHODOLOGY mi.gration rates for broad age groups to the rates for the school-age J)opulation 7.50 to 15.49 for Estimates for 1965.--The estimates for all the period to July 1965 are as follows: states were obtained by carrying forward the 1960 Census data (after subtracting the estimated size of the i\.rmed Forces) for each of the age groups Under 5 year s ••.•••..••••••.•• 0.824 for eachiState, and allowing for births, deaths, 5 to 17 years •••••••••.••••..• ],036 18 to 44 years ...... 1. 563 net ci vLban international and interstate migra­ 45 to 6l l· years ...... 0.1152 tion, th~ net movement of civiJjans into the Armed Forces between April 1, 1960, and the estimate These are r"elati.onships among gross interstate date, and the number of Armed Forces stationed i.n migrants for the United States as a whole. Ob-" each State on the estimate date. As a final step, viously, migrat:Lon ratios for incUvidual states the estimates were so adjusted that the sum of the may vary from the nati.onal ratios; however, annual estimates of the Eve broad. age groups for each migration figures by State are not available. state equaled the estimate of the total resi.dent Moreover, the net rati.os by age could well differ J)opulati.on of that State J)ubHshed in Current Jrom the ratios of gross rates. Nonetheless, it Series P-25, No. 348. In addi­ is assumed here that these same ratios apJ)ly the sum of the State estimates for each age equally to all States, and also for a given State, adjusted to equal the latest national that the direction of the net migration is tr18 estimates in that age grouJ).; same Jor all of the broad age groups under 65. net civilian migration for a Examination of the Current POJ)ulation Survey State, rates of migration were derived for each material on annual interstate migration has indi­ age grouJ) except age 65 years and over from the cated that, given the speci.:t'ic age pattern of St~te\B' s estimated migratton rate :t'or school-age migration rates s.hown by the Current population children for the period April 1960 to July 1965. Survey for the last several years, the ratio of Spec\fically, the net civilian migration rate, the net migration rate of a particular age grouJ) 1960 to 1965, for each age grouJ) in a given State to the net migration rate of the "school-age" J)op­ was derived by (1) obtaining the ratio of the ulation (7.50 to 15.49) will vary wi.th the length national gross interstate migration rate for that of the estimating period. Thus, the ratio of' a age group to the national rate for the age grouJ) 6-year period is different from the corresJ)ond­ 7.50 to 15.49, and (2) applying this ratio to the ing ratio for a I-year period. The procedure State's net migration rate for the age grouJ) 7.50 develoJ)ed to derive the ratios shovm above is as to 15.49. follows: Annual migration rates for ,single years Net migration rates for ages 7.50 to 15.49 by of age for each year 1960 to 1965 were derived by States had previously been estimated in the course graphic interJ)olation of the data for broad age of J)reparing the estimates of the total pOJ)ulation groups for each year provided by the Current Popu- of States for 1965 shown in Current pOJ)ulation Re­ lation Survey. The interpolated rates were then ports, Series P-25, No. 348. (The method used in converted into estimates of the number of migrants estimating migration rates for children of school wi th use of annual estimates of populati,on by age is described in that reJ)ort. It emJ)loys data single years of age, and the resulting numbers of on elementary school enrollment and data on age migrants were cumulated by cohort as requi.red :Cor from the 1960 Census.) the estimating period. For example, the number of The national interstate migration rates are migrants 45 to 64 years of age on July 1, 1965, based on estimates of interstate migration by age during the period April 1, 1960, to July 1, 1965, obtained annually from the Current Population Sur­ was derived aJ)proximately by summing the number of vey, the Bureau's continuing national sample sur­ migrants between July 1, 1964, and July 1, 1965, vey of population. 2 The ratios of the national 45 to 64 years old on July 1, 1965; the number of migrants between July 1, 1963, and July 1, 1964, 44 to 63 years old on July 1, 1964; the number of 1 National population estimates, by age, for 1965 migrants between July 1, 1962, and ,July 1, 1963, are published in Series P-25, No. 321. The national 43 to 62 years old on July 1, 1963; and so on to totals, by age, shown here differ very slightly from the number of migrants between April 1, 1960, and those in the No. 321 report. July 1, 1960. The number of migrants was then 2 U.S. Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports, Series P-20, No. 150, "Mobility of the Popu­ converted into a migration rate by dividing by the lation of the United States: March 1961t· to 1965," appropriate pOJ)ulation i.n 1960. In a si.milar man­ April 14, 1966, and the corresponding reports for ner, migration rates for the period April 1, 1960, earlier years of the decade. to July 1, 1965, werecomJ)uted for the "school-age" 3

The migration rate for the "school-age" Series P-25, No. 348. Consequently, each of these was then divided into the migration components was then distributed to appropriate age rates for these age groups to derive the ratios cohorts, using as a baSis for distribution the data shown above. by cohort, developeri in connection with the July 1, Estimates of the migration between states of 1965, estimates described above. The estimates the group 65 years old and over were based on data were also adJusted so that the total population of on the interstate migration of "aged beneHciari,es" each State agreed with the provisional State total fer each for the Hsca1 years 1959-60 and and the sum 0:[ each age group tor States agreed 1964-65 from the Soda1 Security Adminis- wi th the latest nati_onal population estimates for tration. (Since data on interstate migration of these groups. aged beneficiaries were not available for the'in­ POPULATION BASE tervening years, it was assumed that the average annual migration of these two years prevailed Tllis report makes use of the 1960 population, throughout the 1960-65 period.) The reported num­ by age, publi shed in '[,able 16, Volume I of the bers of benef:Lciaries wtlO migrated were adjusted for each State. In the for differences between States in insurance cover­ use of' the census numbers in the preparati, on of age, and the State estimates were adjusted to tie current estimates, by agfJ, there has been no ad­ in wtth trle level 01' interstate migration 01' per­ justment :('01' net und8rcounts, either in the na- sons aged 65 and over for the United States for tiona1 or State data, altrlOugfi it is recognized the 1'rom ApriJ 1960 to July 1965, as esti­ that there were both underenumeration and misre- mated from the Current population Sur'Jey. porting in tl1e census. 3 The evaluation studies The initial migration estimates derived tor relating to the 1960 Census are still under way, the age groups in each State were adjusted to be and as yet there is no defini ti ve measure of net consis,t,enp with independent State migration totals underenumeration for the total population nor of tor all ages implied in the State estimates pub­ net undercounts tor most age groups, The results lished Current Population Reports, Series P-25, of the 1960 Census Evaluation and Research Pro­ No. 348. The effect of this adjustment on the age grams are being published in Series ER-60 and 1n estimates is liiscussed in the section "Accuracy of various special papers; some initial ~esu1ts have estimates" be10w. been published and additional results wH1 be pub­ The net movement' of d vi1ians into the Armed lished as they become avaHab1e. 4 forces for each State was estimated for each age group by subtracting (1) the number of persons in SOURCES OF' DATA that age cohort serving in the Arr11')d Forces on April 1, 1960, who reported the State as their The estimates given in this report are based preservice residence from (2) the number of per­ on age data tram the 1960 Census; statistics on sons in the age group serving in the Armed Forces births and deaths provided by the Division of on the estimate date who reported the State as Vital Statistics, U.S. Public Health Service; their preservice residence. To this was added an allowance for 1'ormer residents 01' the State in the age cohort who died during this period while serv­ 3 U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1960 Census of Pop­ ing in the Armed Forces. ulation, Vol. I, Characteristics of the Popula­ tion, Part 1, United States Summary, pp. XVI-XVII, Estimates for 1961 to 1964.--Estimates tor XXXVIII-XL. July 1, 1961, to 1964 were derived in the smne I, See, for example: Conrad Taeuber and Morris H. manner as those for July 1, 1965. Hansen, "A Preliminary Evaluation of the 1960 Census of Population," Demography, Vol. I, . U.S. Bureau of the Census, Evaluation and Research Program Provisional estimates for 1966.--The esti­ of the U.S. Censuses of Population and Housing, 1960, mates for July 1, 1966, were also derived by a Series ER-60, Washington, D.C., especially, Series component approach similar to that used for pre­ ER-60, No.2, "Record Check Studies of Population paring the estimates tor 1965. Here, however, Coverage;" No.4, "Accuracy of Data on Population data by age for the components of population change Characteristics as Measured by Reinterviews;" and were not available for the period beyond. July 1, No.5, "Accuracy of Data on Population Characteristics 1965. Provisional estimates 01' the total popula­ as Measured by CPS-Census Match." Jacob S. Siegel and Melvin Zelnik, "An Evaluation of Coverage in the tion of States for July 1, 1966, and o:t' the compo­ 1960 Census of Population by Techniques of Demographic nents of change (Le., births, deaths, net civil­ Analysis and by Composite Methods," paper presented ian migration, and movement of civilians into at the annual meeting of the American Statistical the Armed Forces) tor the period April 1, 1960, Association, , Calif., August 16, 1966, to to LTu1y 1, 1966, had already been developed in be published in the 1966 Proceedings of the Social wi th 1966 State totals published in Statistics Section, American Statistical Association. 4

statisti.cs relating to the Armed Porces provided those of other age groups. In both these in, by the Department of Defense; and estimates of net stances, the estimates of migration are based on ' interstate migration, developed in part from offi­ State data relating directly to the specifi.c age cial records of school enrollment, obtained from group (school enrollment 1'01' the former and bene­ the U.S. OHice of Education, state Departments of ficiary data for the latter). Furthermore, for Catholic school systems throughout the the population 65 years old and over, migration is and The Official Catholic Dtrectory, and low in most cases, and thus even large errors i,n in part from statistics provided by the Social this component have comparati.vely li.ttle e:f!'ect on Security Administration on the movement of aged the :final estimate of popu1ation at these ages. beneficiaries c,overed by old age and survivors The assumpti ons made as to net interstate mi.gra­ insurance. Data on school enrollment for selected tion for the other age groups are so broad that, States were also obtained from the Bureau of In­ small or even moderate changes by age over t,he es­ dian Affairs and the Jewish Education Committee of timati.ng period may not be very accurate. Accuracy New York, Inc. tests made for the 1950-60 decade, however, sug­ The birth and death stati.stics used. in pre­ gest that most of the estimates reflect the true paring the estimates for States include final re­ level fair1y well (see footnote 6). Ilorts on births and deaths for 1960 through 1964, T11e estimates by age for the years 1961 and classified on a resid.ence hasis, and provisional 1962 represent a revisi.on of trw estimates by age on births and deaths for 1965 classified for these years Tlreviously pubUshed in 9urnmt on an occurrence basis. All provi.sional figures Series 1'-25, Nos. 267 and 280. were ,adjusted to a residence basis. The data on In the years prior to 1963, the initial migration births were corrected for underregistration using estimates computed for each age group by the pro­ factors extrapolated from the results of the 1950 cedure described above (which is a variati.on of B1rt~ Registration Test conducted by the National the Census Bureau's Component Method II) were ad­ Office of Vital Statistics (now Division of Vital justed to final State migration totals obtained by Statistics), U.S. Public Health Service, in con­ Method II. Because of the consistency in method­ junction with the 1950 Census of population. It ology the adjustment needed to bring the inde­ was assumed that the percent completeness of birth pendently derived migration estimate by age for registration in hospitals and out of hospitals has each State in line with State migration totals W9,S remained unchanged since 1950. Registered births fairly small. Now, tlOwever, the initial migre in hospitals and out of hospitals were corrected tion estimates byage for each of the years 1961 separately by those factors to allow for an ex­ to 1965 are adjusted to final State migration pected improvement in registration due to the in­ totals Which are based only partly on Method II creased concentration of births in hospi tals, where (see Series P-25, No. 348). Consequently, in many registration has been more comple'te. In 1964, the cases, larger adjustments than those in prj.or estimated completeness of birth registration for years were necessary to bring the initial migra­ the Nation as a whole was 98.9 percent. 5 tion estimates by age as computed here based on national migration factors into agreement wi,th the ACCURACY OF ESTIMATES final estimates of migration consistent with the published State population totals. The technique used to develop estimates by A special caution is needed relative to the age for each of the years (1961 to 1965) has been estimates for the District of Columbi.a. In gen­ employed by the Bureau of the Census for a number eral, i.t is believed that the age estimates pre­ of years. The estimates are considered to be sented in this report for this area are subject to fairly accurate, but they are subjected to sub­ substantially larger errors than those for trle stantially larger error on the average than are States. The relatively mechanical means employed estimates for the total population of states. 6 for distributing migration estimates, by age, for The estimates of population in ages 5 to 17 States may be inappropriate for use in areas like and 65 and over presented in this report are be­ the District of Columbia, Gross patterns of inter­ lieved to have relatively higher accuracy than state migration, by age, used here are not likely to be consistent with patterns of migration ex­ change, by age, occurring between the central city 5 White 99.4 percent; nonwhite 96.9 percent. of a metropolitan area (which the District of 6 A rough evaluation of the results of this method Columbia constitutes) and its suburbs. This may for selected age groups for the 19)0 decade is pre­ sented in: Meyer Zitter and Henry S. Shryock, Jr., affect particularly the distribution of migrants "Accuracy of Methods of Preparing Postcensal Population between the District and its suburbs in the States Estimates for States and Local Areas," Demography, of Maryland and Virginia for t11e population under Vol. 1, No.1, 1964, table 7. 5 years of age. It was considered prudent to, 5

the estimates for the population in this The fi.gures for 1961 to 1965 are consistent with rsroup for the District of Columbia wi tl1 those for national population estimates by age published in Maryland and Virginia, The tables in this report No. 321, although the 1964 and 1965 Hgures differ show only a single figure representing trle three slightly because of recent revisions in the na­ areas in combination for the under 5 age group. tional age totals. Proj ections of the populati.on The age estimates for 1966 are necessarily of States by age, 1970 to 1985, are given in re­ much less than the comparable estimates port No, :,\26 of this series. These proj ections, for 1965, 118,wily on extrapola- however, are not entirely consistent with the es­ tion of the of change. The provisi.onal timates Given 11erc), since they were based on an nature of the net mi.gratlon component is particu­ earlier series of State population estimates pub­ larly signiJicant, and subsequent revision of this lished in Series P-25, No. 289. The State projec­ component wi.ll have important impact on the esti­ tions are now beinG revised and will be consistent mates. Consequently, the provisional eetimate by wi ttl the figures published here. Projections of age for 1966 should be used with caution. the population of voting age for States for Novem­ ber 1968 are given in report No, 342. EELATED REP01~TS ROUNDING OD' ESTIMATES The estirD9.tes of the popu1ati.on of States by broad age groups contained in tllis report are con­ Est:lmates presented in the tables of" this si stent w] th trl8 estimatflS of the to·\,a1 population report have t)een rounded to the nearest thousand of States published i.n ~:::"::'=-"-''-.:::1=::=':=~==.'-= wi:th.out bej.ng adjusted to group totals, which are Series P-25, No. 348; the national totals by age i.ndependently rounded. Percentages are based on for 1966 agree with those shown in report No. 352. unrounded numbers.

LIST OF TABLES .'able page l.--Estimates of the total resident population, by age, for States: July 1, 1965 .... ,...... 6 2.--Total resi.dent population, by age, for States: April 1, 1960...... 7 3. - -Percent cilange i.n the total resident populati.on, by age, for States: April 1, 1960, to July 1, 1965 ••...•••...•..••.•• , .•..•..••••.•. , •••.•...••..•.....••••...• ,., •• , .•.•.... , .•. ,...... 8 4. -Percent distribution of the estimated to·tal resident population, by age, :for States: July 1, 1965, wi.th comparative figures for April 1, 1960...... 9 5.--Estimates of the total resident population, by age, for States: July 1, 1961 to 1964 ..... ,... 10 6.--Provisional estimates of the total resident population, by age, for States: July 1, 1966..... 14 6

Table l.--ESTIMATES OF THE TOTAL RESIDENT POPULATION, BY AGE, FOR STATES: JULY 1, 1965

Total Under 5 5 to 17 18 to 44 45 to 64 resident years years years years population

United States .....•••. 1-..:::1.:::9J::c",c.:7;:,9.:::5,c::00:::n::::0ll--.::2o::.c.,4:::3::::3-!.,0::0:::0+---.:.:===-+...:c6:::.6c.:,2::3:.::2-!.,0::O::0+_..::::===:::.r. ...:c==-=::.=.J_=::::..==-+-===.:..:.:=+-:::1::::1:.:!,.:.:,2:::.1:.::2-!.,:::.OO:::0

REGIONS: 31,506,000 Northeast .....•...... • It? ,61'"1 ,000 34,167,000 North e,entral...... • 54,089,000 37,504,000 South •...... •...... 60,106,000 20,lSll,OOO west .•.; •...... •. 31,983,000 NORTHEAST: 1,192/)00 8,039,000 3,668,000 26,684,000

NORTH CENTRAL: 7,793,000 J, 599 ,000 26,897,000 24,099,000 East North Central ••.•.• 4,056,000 10,076,000 12 (7m3, 000 !J,03/-t,OOO 3,211,000 1,823,000 11,236,000 10,067,000 west North Central ••.••• 1,668,000 1\ ,122,000

SOUTH: 2,429,000 20,254,000 1.8,085,000 2S,7~8,OOO 3,116,000 '7, ~~7 ,000 10,276,000 5,38o,o°°1 South Atlantic ...... • 2,436,000 1,130,000 8,984,000 7,957,000 East. South Central ••...• 12,819,000 1,393,000 3,4i)9,OOO 4,391,000 6,377,000 3,492.,000 1,594,000 12,875,000 11,462,000 west South Central ••.••• 18, 5/tO,000 2,088,000 4,990,000 : '.tIEST: l,367,000 Mountain •...... '/ ,693,000 912,000 11,7~<))OOO Pacific •...... •...• 24,290,000

NEW : 2'::~:] 253,000 319,000 195 jOlX) 111,000 '/Go,oool 626,0001 Maine •.••••••••.•.•..••• 986,000 OCl 170,000 227,000 135,000 7.1,000 483 000 t~35 ,000 Ne"u Hampshire ••....••••• 673,000 255,000 ";4,000 105,000 130,000 (\].,000 1+5,000 ?.86;OOO Ver.l'nOnt ••.••••••.••••••• ~04,000 6'), OI' 3 520,OOO 1,294,000 1,762,000 1,155,000 603,000 3,B81,OOO j •...... •• 5,361,000 5~7 ,000 593,000 213,000 305,000 192,000 95,000 653,000 Rhode Island 1 ••••••••••• 891,000 86,000 971,000 610,000 265,000 2,0%,000 1,847,000 Connect ic ut ••....••..•.• 2,830,000 283,000 700,000

MIDDLE ATLANTIC: 1,850,000 13,308,000 12,123,000 18,106,000 1 1,763,000 4,221,000 4,098,000 New york ••.••••••• , ••.•• 629,000 4,920,000 4,469,000 6,781,000 666,000 1,646,000 1,4-85,000 1,189,000 8,455,000 7,640,000 -) ~:k~;~~:~i~:::::::::::: 11,583,000 1,102,000 2,841,000 2,603,000 EAST NORTH CENTRAl,: 948,000 6,457,000 10,241,000 1,062,000 3,~53,OOO! 2,056,000 Ohio ...... %4,000 4(,7,000 3,073,000 Indiana •..••....•••••••• 4,893,000 527,000 1,642,000[ 6,857,000 1,120,000 3,522,000 2,200,000' 1,044,000 Il1inoin .•.•.•.....•.... 10,641,000 5,129,000 895,000 2,783,000 1,645,000 701,()(JO 8,317,000 2,584,000 ~~~~~~:~~::::::::::::: :: 4,140,z)()0 452,000 1,308,0001 837,000 439,OClO WEST NORTH CENTRAL: 1,110,000 699,000 387,000 2,4()8,OOO 2,197,000 Minnesota ...... 3,562,000 395,000 970,000 850,000 565,000 343,000 1,969,000[ 1,759,000 Iowa ••...... •....• 2,758,000 285,000 715,000 952,000 52.5,000" 3,243,000 2,932,000 Missouri ••••.••••••.•••• 4,492,000 <\51,000 1,109,000 1,455,000 210,000 125,000 62,000 448,000, North Dakota ••.•.... , .•• 652,000 74,000 182,000 397,00°1 209,000 132,000 77,000 473,000 418,000 South Dakota ••.•.••.•.•• 686,000 79,000 189,000 370,00C 461,000 291,000 17/+,000 1,033,000 926,OO() Nebraska ••...•.....•.••• 1,459,000 158 j OOO 738,000 447,000 254,000 1,003,000 1,439,000 Kansas •.•••••....•...•.• 2,248,000 226,000[ 583,000

SOUTH ATLANTIC: 95,000 39,000 346,000 311,000 Delaware •••••••••••••••• 503,000 57,000 135,000 935,000 682,000 255,000 2,M,8,000 2,211,000 Mary-land ••.....••.•....• 3,534,000 } 577,000 532,000 Q963, 000 { 173,000. 178,000,[ 72,000 District of Columbia, ••• 802,000 3,116,000 2,787,000 4,420,00(1 1,156,000 817,000 320,000 Virginia •••..••.•...•••• 182,000 1,31J,000 1,1CO,000 1,815,000 176,000 ";79,000 383,000 West Virginia ...... 898,000; 354,000 3,46b,OOO 3,070,000 4,935,000 536,000 " 1,329,000 North Carolina ••....•.•• 432,000 169,000 1,743,000 1,525,000 2,550,000 296,0°°1 730,000 South Carolina ••...... 795,000 319,000 3,043,000 2,()97,000 Georgia •...... •....•• 4,391,000 503,000 1,191,000 1,099,000 719,000 4,179,000 3,792,000 Florida ••...... •...•. 5,796,000 1,419,000 585. ,o001 EAST SOUTH CENTRAL: 1,077,000 b08,OOO 2,24t.,OOO Kentucky ••...•.•••....•• 3,173,000 339,000 840,o°°1 755,000 2,750,000 Tennessee ••...... ••..... 3,850,000 3%,000 998,000 1,365,000 058,000 2 j 428,000 Ala-DaTta •.....••...... 3,486,000 382,000'1 963,000 1,201,000 748,000 415,000 1·, 560,GOO Mississippi •.•...... •• 2,309,000 277,000 668,000

WEST SOU'IH CENTRAL: 388,000 208,000 1,376,000 Arkansas •.....•...... • 1,941,000 214,000 628,000 502,o001 1,209,000 (AC,OOO 264,000 2,398,000 Louisiana ...... 3,560,000 431,000 1,017,000 830,000 502,000 2(8,000 1,77'7,000 Oklahoma ...... •.• 2,448,000 244,000 G05,000 3,710,000 1,962,000 854,000 ,/,323,00°1 Texas •.••....•..•••...•• 10,591,000 1,200,000 2,860,000 MOUNTAIN: 430,000 395,000 78,000 227,000[ 137,000 66,000 !-Kl5,0001' Montana •...•...... •..•.• 703,000 195,00°1 421,000 385,000 75,000 196,000 224,000 134,000 63,000 479,000 Idaho •..•••.••....•.•..• 693,000 202,000 186,000 330,000 37,000 91,000 108,000 b5,OOO 29,000 228,00°1 Wyoming ••.•...... •• 170,000 1,35?,OOO 1,214,000 1,120,000 1,949,000 212,000 524,,000 684,000 35~ ,000 Colorado ...... 60,000 65:,OOOr 568,000 514,000 1,014,000 140,000' 307,000 344,000 163,000 New Mexico •••••...••••.• 118,000 942,000 $,'4,000 1,575,000 194,000 438,000 556,000 268,000 1,0;,'2,00°1 Arizona •••...•...... • ()8,OOO 649,000 568,000 519,000 994,000 125,000 301,000 3M) ,000 161,000 Utah •••••••••••••• - ••••• 171,000 79,000 23,000 30Cl,OOO 273,000 253,000 Nevada ••.•••••.••••...•• 434,000 51,000 110,000 PACIFIC: 1,750,000 774,000 990,000 612,000 298,000 2,127,000 Washington •...... •.... 2,973,000 299,000 1,166,000 500,000 647,000 ;,09,000 203,000 1,40'>,000 Oregon •.••..••.••.•...•• 1,938,000 180,000 10,982,000 4,637,000 6,683,000 3,575,000 1,579,000 13,110,000 California ••••.•••.••••• 18,403,.000 1,.929,000 13";,000 77,000 108,000 36,000 6,000 169,000 Alaska ...... •. 267,000 38,000 382,000 274,000 116,000 36,000 It 81 ,000 Hawaii •••.•••••••••..••• 710,000 86,000 197,000

1 Based on the census of Rhode Island -t.aken as of October 1, 1965. age group are shown for the District of Columbia, Maryland) and Virginia combined. See IlAccuracy of estimates" r~ection of text. 2 Numbers for 7

Table 2.•. TOTAL RESIDENT POPULATION, BY AGE, FOR STATES: APRIL 1, 1960 ( Total Under 5 5 to 17 18 to 44 45 to 64 65 years 1/. yee:rs 18 years 21 years Region, division, and state resident years years years years and over and over and over and over population

16,059,580 126,276,044 115,121,165 108,123,552 United Stat"es .•...... f-c:l,-79,-,,:.:.3c:.23:.c,:.:1:.;.7.:.5+t-2o,320,901 43,881,109 62,503,829 36,057,756 REGIONS: Northeast ••.•••.••.....••••..• North Central'l •....•...... South •••••••• ~ •.•••••••••.•••• vJest ••••••••• ~ ••••••••••••••••

NOm'HEJ\ST:

NORTH OENTRAL: East North Central •••...... ••. West North Central ... , ...... SOUTH: South Atlanti.c .•••.•...•.••..• East Smlth Central •.• , ...... West South Central...... •. WEST: Mountain •••••.•.•••.••••••.••• Pacific .•...... ••.•.....•....•

NEW ENGLAND: Maine ...... Net" Hampshire ••.•.•••••••...•• Vermont . .,::,' .••..•..•.....•...•• Massachusetts ••...... •.••.... Rhode Island •••••••.••.•••.•••

Connecticut ••••.. 0.' 0 ••••• 0 ••• MIDDLE ATLANTIC:

New York. 0 0 ••••••• 0 •••• • •• ••••

New Jersey ••••••••••••••••• 0 ••

Pennsy 1vania •••••••••...•.• 0 •• ElIST NORTH OiNTRAL: Ohio ...... , ...... •...... 0. Ind:an6...... •......

Wisconsin ...... WEST NORTH OENTRAL: 3,413,864: Mip..nesota •.•••••• 0 ••••••••• ••• Iowa •••••.••••••••••••••.•..•• 2,757,537 MissoUTi •••.••••••••••••••. ' ••• 4,319,813 North Dakota •••••••.•••••••••• 632,446

South Dakota ••.•••••••••••• 0 •• 680,514 NebrasltEt ••.••••••••••••••••.•• 1,411,330 Kansas •••••••••••••••••••••.•• 2,178,611 SOUTH ATLANTIC:

Delaware ••••..•••• 0 •• ••••••••• f-A.eryland •••••••••••••••••••••• District of Colwnbie. ••••••..•• Virginia ••••••..••••. , ••.•••••

'West Virginia ••••.•.•...••• 0 •• North carolina •..•.••••..•...• South Carolina •••••••••••••••• Georgia •••••.•••••••••.••••••. Florida ...... ElIST SOUTH OENTRAL: Kentucky, ••••.••• 0... ······0 .. 3,038,156 342,496 TeILYl8Ssee ••••••••••••••••••••• 3,567,089 393,674 .Alabama ••••••..•..••••••••.••• 3,266,7/i"0 390,403 Mississippi .••...... 2,178,141 278,412 "lEST SOUTH CENTRAL: / Arkansas •••••••••••••••••••••• 1,786,272 19 ,,4.U Louisiana ••••.•..••..•.•••.••• 3,257,022 422,723 Oklahoma ••••••••.•.•••••.••••• 2,328,284 242,7!n Texas ••• , ••.•••.•...•.••..•.•• 9,579,677 1,162,019 . MOUNTAIN: Montana • •••••••••••••••••••••• Idaho •..•••••••..••••••.•••••• Wyoming •••••••••••••••••••••••

Colorado ...... •...... o •• New Mexico ••••.••••.•..•.•.••• Arizona •••..•.••••.••••••••••• utah •••••...•••••••• , •••••• · •. Nevada •••••••••••••••••••••••• PAOIFIC: Washington •.•••••••••••••••••• Oregon •..•••••.••••••.•••••••• California •••.•.•..... , .•....• Alaska ••••.•••••••••••••••.••• Hawaii ••••.••••.••••••.•••• 0.'

Source: U.S. B;Jreau of the Census, ~~2.':~",-,?£.2'S~":i;J"'.", 8

Table 3.-PERCENT CHANGE IN THE TOTAL RESIDENT POPULATION, BY AGE, FOR STATES: APRIL 1,1960, TO JULY 1, 1965

21 years Total Under 5 5 to 17 18 to 41+ Region, division, and State resident years years years ye:ars and over population ______-+ ___,i~---+-----+----+-----+----1-----+----+-

+13.9 +6.0 _"_"9-'.-'6+ ___-'-'-C_+ ___+_"",,7 ..::2-+ ___ +5.6 Uni ted Sta tos .....•...•..•.. >-__-'-+::,8 ,",' 1'-41 __--'-+,0. (I

REGIONS: F).1 +3.6 1·6.6 +0.2 +D.8 +3.3 +fl.O +6. g d./t +2.0 +4.8 +lJ.O +1.1 +9.6 +13.1 +9.3 H1.6 +9.3 I 1·12.5 South .•.••..•...•• ···•••••· ..• +12.0 +13.3 ;12.8 +11.1 West •••••;; •.•••.•••••••••••••• +11; .0 +6.3 1·20.()

NORTHFJl.i3T: +3.2 +6.1 +-0.1 +13.1 +2.9 +6.0 +4.6 +6.8 +3.7 +6.7 1·0.3 +1/+.0 +3. :.3

NORTB CENTRAL: +'7.2 +6.2 +0,0 East North Central ....•• , •••.. +5.5 -4.6 '14.4 1'6.0 +3.B +1.9 Went North Central .•...... •.. +3.0 -5.1 +9.7

SOUTH: 'I +12.2 tlO.9 +9.5 +10.7 14.2 +1.'3.0 +10.0 110.7 1·15. South Atlantic ...... "',7.4 ;-8.'1 +7.5 +6.0 East South CentraL ...... -+6.4 -0.9 +6.9 +8.1 +6.5 +9.2 +'/.7 +11./1 +10.6 -f9.CJ ·I·?~ West South Central ...... +9./. +3. J +13.0 vlES1': +11. :; +9.8 +3.9 +17.fl +10.0 +13.6 +13.:; j·13.6 M011ntain •..•...... •..•..•••• +12.2 ·111. j ~JA. 3 +13.3 +1J.2 +13,3 Pacifj c ...... • +lLf,6 +7.2 +2J..6 +12.7

+2.L, j---O.9 -0.7 +1.7 -1.4 +5.2 -0. J +l.O +4.2 lTL,:.> +9.6 +8.e +ll.O +4.6 +17.5 +12.3 +6.() +7.5 ~3.0 +2.3 +0.1 +7.1 +3.5 1·2.7 +1.. 9 F3.7 +1.2 -0.2 111. :5 +0.2 +',.1 +:'.5 +2.3 +4.1 1·2.6 +1.0 -"4.7 +10.9 +0.2 +';,.5 +5.5 +':".0 +3.7 +8.2 +20.3 +8.2 ..qL" 2 +9.3 +11.6 +10.3 Connecticl1'~ •...... •...... +11.6 +1.7 MIDDLE ATLANTI C : +5.9 +4.3 +7.9 +4.3 +15.8 +5. J +5.3 +7.4 +11.'1 +10.2 +7.9 +11.8 +3.f.S +20.~ +8.~ +12.1 +12.2 +1.8 +O.e +2.3 -7.2 +8.2 -1. 9 +6.1 1·5. J 3.3 i +8.5 +5. G +6.7 ·f4.2 +2.8 EAST +5.5 -6.8 +14.9 +1.4 O~~;;:~. C~~":~_~ ~ ...... ,. 'I +6.8 +!i-.g +5.7 +3.7 +2.6 Indlana ...... , .•..•••.... +.!l.9 -2.9 +11.8 +1.7 +5.9 +7.1 +5.1 +3.2 +2.0 Illinois ...... +5.6 -0.9 +15.4 +0.5 +9.3 +9.8 +7.7 +5.4 +3.,/ Michigan ...•...•••••..•••.••.• ' +6.3 -7.7 +lS.3 +2.3 +J.9 +9.0 +5.5 +3.4 +1.8 Wisconsin., .•..••••••.•••••••• +tt .8 -3.7 +12.2 +1.4 WEST NORTH CENTRAL: -;.0 +11.8 +1.0 +3.4 +5.3 +3.1 +1. '7 Minnesota •.••••.•.••••.••••••• -1.9 --7.3 ",?1 -3.5 +0.6 -0.7 +1./+ Iowa ••.•.•.•• •••••·•••••••••• • -3.3 +11. 7 +2.3 +1.8 +2.5 Missouri .•••••••••• , ••...••.•• +5.3 +4.2 +2.0 +3.1 -7.2 +5.6 +3.9 +4.1 Nortt. Dakota •..••..••.•••••••• -0.1 -1.7 +0.9 -4.4 +5.7 -3.4 +0.7 +2.0 South Dakota., ••.•••••..•••••• +1.6 +0.1 +3.4 -1. 5 +10./, +0.5 +1.0 Nebraska ..•••.•••••.••. ·•·••• • +3.6 +2 • .3 ".0.9 Kansas •.•...••••••• , ••..•••••• +3.2 -8.0 +10.9 +0.3

SOUTH ATLANTIC: +9.8 +7.7 +12.7 F3.7 +25.2 +7.2 +15.0 +12.0 Delaware •••.....••.••.•••••••• +111-05 +12.5 +-10.5 +14.0 +21.5 +10.7 -0.2 -2.2 -1.0 +5.0 1""6.6 ,{ +22.3 -5.8 +3.9 of Cohnnbia •••••••••. +12.8 +"11.4 +11.4 } +14.8 +10.3 +14.0 +10.6 ···········,·········1 -10.2 -S.3 +2.9 +5.2 +1.5 +0.2 Virginia •...•••••.••.•.•• +9.2 +1.ll +6 • .5 +11.6 +13.3 +11.1 +10./f North Caro1~na •..••••.•••.•••• +10.4 +9. ? +8.3 +7.0 +0.2 +4.6 +8.7 +11.0 +12.0 South Carollna •••••••.•..••.•• ! +13.2 +11. 9 +10.2 +11.4 +6.7 +12.2 d2.5 +11.5 +9.9 +16.0 +14.lt +17,1 +8.1 +24.5 ;"16.3 +7.8 ;30.0 +1'/.5

EAST SOU'rH CEN'lTJtL: +4.L +6.0 +6.4 +5.1 +3.6 Kentucky •...••..••••..•••••••• 1·4.5 -1.1 +5.3 +8.6 +8.6 +10.0 +7.9 Tennessee •••.•.•.•..•.•....••. +7.9 +0.5 +9.3 +8.4 +8.7 +9.5 1·6.6 Alab81!la •.•.•..••..••••.••••••• +6.7 -2,2 +7.0 +8.3 +3.4 +5.7 +8.4 +7.1 +5.4 14ississJppi •..•..•...... ••.••• ..l..6.0 -D.6 +6.7 +9.7 WEST SOUTH CENTRAL: +.!l.2 +7.0 +1O.?" +9.6 +7.5 Arkansas •. , .•••.••••.••.•••••• .8.7 +10.0 +5.9 +lti.2 +8.1 +9.3 +10.8 +8.8 t7.0 Ioni siana. , ..••...... •..•.•.• +9.3 +1. 9 +13.9 +9.1 +7.6 +6.5 +5.7 +.!l.3 Oklahoma .....•...... •...••. +5.1 +0.6 +5.7 +6.5 +3.4 +9.5 +14.6 +11.6 +9.8 +e.!t Texas ••..•••••••••••••••••• .... +10.6 +3.2 +15.7 +9.0

MOUNTAIN: +1.6 -6.0 +10.1 +1.3 ~·9.3 +5.9 +3.7 Montana •..••...•.•..•••..••.•. +1,.2 13.5 -8.5 +5.8 +2.5 +9.3 +7.0 +5.5 Idaho ...... ,.·········· . -0.3 -2.3 -8.ll +4.9 -6.4 +6.3 +11.0 +2.0 +8.7 +1.2 +19.1 +9.2 +12.3 +7.5 -+12.2 +9.8 +7.6 +/~.8 +2.6 +6.7 +2.9 +12.3 -0.7 +13.9 +16.8 New Mexico •. , ..••.•••.••.••••. +22.0 +20.1 +20.9 +16,1 +25.1 +19.6 +lC).9 +31.1 Arizona •.•.•.•••...••. •••••·• • +10.8 +13.0 +14.0 +13.6 Utall ...... •••·· .. +11.6 -0.9 +17.6 +:56.5 +35.4 1-24.6 +48.5 +44.2 Nevada •..•••..••..•.•• · ..•...• +52.1 +54.7 +65.7

PACIFIC: +6.0 +4.1 +], 9 '"4.2 -5.4 +8.7 +8.3 +6.7 Washington •..•••.•.••.....••.. +12.3 +10.6 +8.7 !-9.6 +9.3 +10.7 +15.3 +13.7 fTl.1 +15.7 +]2.. 7 1'17.2 +29.4 +10.9 +13.8 +9.8 +8.4 Alaska ••.••••..••.•.•••••.•••• +17.9 +19.6 '24.8 +12.9 +11.8 "9.'1 Hawaii •••••••.••.•.•• ·•·••••• . +12.2 ------"------'---"----'-----_.. -'-,-----'------' Z Less than l).05. ti 1 Numbers foX' thi[; age group are shO\m for the DLstrJct.. of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia combi~ed. See ItAccuracy of estirnates section of text. 9

Tobie 4.-PERCEN1 DISTRIBUTION OF THE ESTIMATED TOTAL RESIDENT POPULATION, BY AGE, FOR STATES, JULY I, 1965, WITH COMPARATIVE FIGURES FOR APRIL 1, 1960

division, State

United REGIONS: Northeast. . ?A.O 33.8 32.8 26.2 8.3 26.6 35.0 g.6 f 2f,,1 35.5 19.1 :W.'I 33.3 21. 3 100.0 10.2 2~. 5 9.9 l 100.0 9. 'I 23.Sl J3.9 22./.;- NOR111 Cl~NTJlAL : 24. J ], .6 20.1 9, .3 ID.6 2(J.I+ 33.2 20.4 East North Central. .. , 100.0 2,;,/, 20.4 11. 2 31.7 20.2 32.6 West North CentraL ... 100.0 10.5 26.0 SOUTH: 25,7 36.0 J.8.7 8.l 100.0 10.8 26.3 35.7 18.7 Soutb btlmrLic. , ...... 26.9 33. '/ 19.0 8.7 100.0 lD.9 27.1 34.3 19.0 Ea,:rL South Central .... 3ft .5 /9.1 fl.4 J!t.4 le.S 26.1 West South CentraL ... 100.0 11.3 26.9 WEST: 35.2 17.5 '/.'/ 2,3.1 J!h:> l'l.fl 26.8 Mount.ain •••..•.••..••• 100.0 11.9 2'; .0 :36.4 19.6 8.8 ...... 100.0 10.4 25.5 35.8 1".6 NEW 21,.8 33.0 20.0 11.0 10.9 25.7 J2.4 19.8 100.0 23.8 33. J 20.9 11. 2 10.3 25.2 33.'1 20.1 100.0 25.2 32.2 20.1 11.2 100.0 10.9 26.1 32.1 19.9 22.5 3r.:.l 21.6 11.1 10.2 2/!.1 .32.9 21. 5 Massachusetts •.•• , ••.• 100.0 22.3 35.4 21./., 10.4 9.7 23.9 34.2 21. .5 Rhode Island ..••....•• 100.0 23.0 35.4 21.1 9.6 100.0 .10.0 211".7 34.3 21. 6

10.1 21. 7 23.2 10.1 100.0 23.3 34.1 22.6 10.6 22 • .'3 21.8 9.2 100.0 24.3 3/+.7 21.9 :].0.5 23.2 21. 7 10.0 100.0 9.5 24.5 33.2 22 . .5 EAST NORTH CENTRAL: 9.2 20.1 11. 7 19 • .'3 Ohio •••••••..•.••••••• 100.0 10.4 26.6 33.7 9.6 19.7 11.6 19.4 Indiana •.•••••.•••.•.• 100.0 10.8 26.4 33.6 9.7 21.5 11.2 22.9 21. 5 Illinois •.•...••••••.• 100.0 10.5 25.0 33.1 8.2 19.8 12.4 25.4 19.2 100.0 10.8 27.6 3.3.5 10.2 11.9 2/t .9 20.il ~i~~;;:~;:: ::: :: : :: ::: 100.0 10.9 26.7 31. 6 20.2 W'lST NORTH OENTRAL: 12.2 25.1'1- 19.8 10.4 Minnesota .•••••.•••••• 100.0 11.1 27.2 19.6 2ft • 7 20.4 11.9 10.3 25.9 20.5 101';a •••••..•...•..•.•• 100.0 23.0 21. '7 11. 'I 10.0 24.7 21.2 Missouri ...... ••...• 100.0 27.2 19.0 9.3 11.3 27.9 19.1 12.6 North Dakota •...•••••• 100.0 2G.3 19.2 10.5 11.6 27.6 19.2 12.2 South Dal~ota •.•..•.••• 100.0 24.1 32.5 20.4 11.6 100.0 10.8 25.7 19.9 11., Nebraska •••••••...•• " n.3 24.1 33. '7 19.8 11.0 Kansas ••••.••.•••••••• 100.0 10.1 25.9 19.9

SOUTH ATlANTIC: 2/'1-.1 36.9 8.0 11.4 26.8 35.1 19.0 12.4 Delaware •.. , ...... •• 100.0 n.B 2/+.8 3'7.1 7.3 100.0 26.5 36.0 19.3 ...... 10.2 18.7 39.2 9.1 100.0 "11.0 21.6 35.2 22.3 of Columbia .• 11.6 20.4 37.7 7.3 100.0 } 26.1 37.3 18.5 ...... 10.6 27.2 33.0 9.3 100.0 9.7 26.4 32.8 21.1 11.6 2'7 • .'+ 36.5 6.9 100.0 10.9 26.9 36.S 18.2 29 . .3 3:;.7 6.3 11.6 28.6 36.2 12.4 100.0 :26.9 35. '7 '1.4 11. C 36.0 100.0 23.0 34.3 11.2 100.0 10.1 34.1

EAST SOUTH CENTRAL: 26.3 33.7 9.6 10.'1 3/1.0 Kentucl.;y- •••••••••••••• 100.0 25.8 35.0 8.7 100.0 10.3 35.4 TennessGe ••••••••••' ••• 27.5 33.9 8.0 100.0 10.9 3~ .• tl- Alabama •••.••••••••••• 28.8 31. J 8.'7 Hississippi. ••.••...•• 100.0 12.0 32.4

WEST SOUTH CENTRAL: 26.6 30.8 10.9 Arkansas •..•.••••••..• 100.0 11.0 34.0 '7./r Louisiana •..•••••••••• 100.0 12.1 33.5 10.7 [, 10.0 2e.7 Oklahoma •...... 100.0 25.9 35.5 '1.8 Texas .••.••••••••••••• 100.0 11.3 27.1 MOUNTAIN: 9.'1 27.8 26.3 t Montana •.•••••••• •••• • 100.0 27.8 8.7 i Idaho •••.•••••••• · •••• 100.0 28.4 lfJ.6 '7.8 27.6 26.3 100.0 11.2 18.2 9.0 26.9 25.1 ...... 100.0 10.9 15.1 :>.4 U.S 30.2 28.'/' New Mexico ••.•...... • 100.0 26.9 17.6 6.9 Arizona •••••••.••..••• 100.0 12.3 27.8 1(,.0 6.7 12.() 30.3 28. 'I Utah ..••••••••••• ·• '" 100.0 23.3 20.5 6.4 Nevada •••••••••••••••• 100.0 11.8 25.4

PACIFIC: 100.0 2,.9 10.8 9.8 100.0 10.0 26.0 10.0 Washington •....•.••.•• 100.0 25.2 21.2 10.4 100.0 9.3 25.8 10.5 100.0 11.1 23.6 36.9 19. '7 8.8 100.0 10.5 25.2 8.6 ...... WIl.O 15.1 21+.2 ItS.9 12.~ 2./t 100.0 14.tl- 29.1 2.2 Alaska ••.•••••••..•••. 100.0 12.8 26.9 1+0.4 l5.~ 4.6 Hawaii ••...••.•••••••• 100.0 12.2 27.7 ~.1 !!Acc\Jracy of estimates!! section of text. oj' Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia combined. See 1 NumLcrs for this age group are shown for the District 10

Tobie 5,-ESTIMATES OF THE TOTAL RESIDENT POPULATION, BY AGE, FOR STATES: JULY 1, 1961 TO 1964

Eegion} Under 5 5 to 17 18 to 11'':1- 45 to 60 ano 13tute over restdent years years years years population ____..... ______.4- ______1~----~------4-----~------~-----~

Uni ted \~tates ...... I-===_'_'-Ij-~=_'_'_'_=-+=!C REGIONS: North Cenpnll ...... , ... . ,South •..•.••.•••.•.•...• i i\fcst •. , •••..•.•••....•..

HOm'lJEA,s'l' :

NORTH CgNTHAL ~ East North CentY'al. •..•• Wes"l Nor-Lll CentraL ••••• SOU'1'H: South Atlantj c •...... Eas"L Gouth CentraL •.... West Sou Lh CcntJ'al .•••.• WEST: Motttltain •••.. , ..••••...• Pae-1rice." ••• , •......

576,000 396,000 234,000 3,248.000 546,000 1,699,000

11, 26~ ,000 4,122,000 '? ,087 ,000

EAST NOFfm CENTlIAL: 2 021 000 938,000 5 947 000 Ohio ...... ••...... •• , 949;000 463,000 2;818;000 Indiana ...... •...... ,. 2,264,000 1,032,000 6,36'""1,000 Illinois ...... , 1,610,000 690,000 4,665,000 Michigan •.....•....•.••. 829,000 432.000 2,3°18,000 vlisconsin .....••...... ,

WEST NORTil CENTRAL: 693,000 381.000 2,018,000 Minnesota •.. , •...•.••..• 408,000 959,000 1, 08B, 000 844,000 56A· ,000 341,000 1,637,000 294,000 720,000 2,725,000 IOw;'l. •..•.••• ·•·•••···· ., l,/!-35,000 949,000 521,000 Missouri •.••• , .•...••..• 463,000 1,103,000 360,000 206,000 12<\,000 61,000 North Dal<;:ota ••••••••••• • 76,000 182,000 393,000 216,000 132,000 76,000 SOllth Dal-:ota ••••.••.••• • 83,000 193,000 869,000 t!-66,OOO 292,000 172,000 N8braska ••.•••••••.••••• 163,000 378,000 1,32B,OOO 23'; ,000 579,000 729,000 40,000 252,000 Kansas ••.• ~ .•.••.....•• , SOUTH ATIANTIC: :040,000 28', .000 58,000 1.31.000 93,000 38,000 Delaware .....•....•••..• 662,000 250,000 2,399,000 J,990,OOO 91/,,000 506,000 167,000 178,000 72,,000 576,000 of Col1.1IDbia., .• i 1962,000 { 2,522,OOll 1,150,000 800,000 314,000 3,075,000 1,311,000 1,06/+,000 181.000 493,000 381.000 180,000 Virginia ...... •.. ' 3,397,000 2,'740,000 540,00 1,329,000 880,000 346,000 North Carolina •••..•• , •• 1,717,000 1,355,000 298 }OOO 735,000 425,000 166,000 South Carolina ••..•.•••• 779.000 314,000 2,9'76,000 2":,10,000 500,000 1,178,000 3,449,000 585,000 1,385,000 1,084,000 686,000 .4,069,000

EAST SOUTH CENTRAJ:.,: 2,230,000 1,972,000 1,819,000 341, ,000 847,000 604,000 306,000 Kentucky ...... , .. ,' . 2,708,000 2,406,000 2,228,000 399,000 1,000,000 745 000 330,000 Tennessee. , .••.••...•••• 647;000 279,000 2,375,000 2,08.5,000 1,916,000 Alabama •...... , .•. 386.000 961,000 414.000 198,000 1,548,000 1, 3/t8 ,000 1,228,000 Mississippi •..•.•••.•.•. 281,000 675,000 1,119,000 VlEST SOUTil CENTRAL: 622,000 388,000 205,000 1,216,000 Arkansas ... , , , ...... 21';' ,000 509,0()0 1,897,000 1,1'10,000 630,000 2.60,000 2,060,000 Louisiana .•.•.•.••.••••• 430,000 1,003,000 1,596,000 1,4.82,000 616,000 830,000 502,000 264,000 Oklahoma •••••.••.•.•• ·• . 250,000 6,365,000 5,889,000 2,826,000 3,606,000 1,927,000 832,000 Texas ••••••••••• •·• •• •• • 1,211,000 395,000 MOUNTAIN: 225,000 135,000 66,000 483,000 427.000 Montana ..•••. , .• , ••••••. 703,000 81.000 196,000 380,000 219,000 131,000 62,000 471,000 413.000 687,000 78,000 196,000 191,000 IdallO •••••.••••• ·•·•••• • 113,000 65,000 28,000 233.000 206,000 338,000 39,000 93,000 1,119,000 683,000 3?1t ,000 168.000 1,349,000 1;204,000 1,91.1,000 217,000 520,000 511,000 342,000 160,000 58,000 645,000 560,000 New Mexico ••••••••••••• • 1,008,000 144,000 305,000 850,000 51.6,000 263,000 113,000 1,042,000 922,000 Arizona .••.•..••...•.••• 1,549,000 19';',000 433,000 508,000 329.000 157 000 67.000 633,000 553,000 977,000 129,000 295,000 246,000 Utah."" ••.• ,',·,·,·,' , 166,000 '76;000 22,000 291,000 264,000 Nevada ...... •....••••.• 418,000 50,000 105,000

PACIli'IC: 605,000 294.000 1,748,000 2,9'11,000 310,000 777,000 98.'),000 Wo fJl1ine-ton ••• , ••..•••••• 400,000 199,000 1.131,000 1,886,000 183,000 491,000 614,000 3,488}OOO 1,541,000 10,776,000 18,003,000 J.,929,OOO /+,533,000 6,513,000 130,000 106.000 35,000 6,000 256,000 3B ,000 72,000 388,000 Alaska ....•... , ....•.... 286;000 113,000 35,000 Hawaii •.••....•• ' •.•..•• 712,000 86,000 193,000 H .;, Numbers for ~hi.E age grO\lp aTe ~l1own for' ~he District of' Columbia, Ml.lryll.lnd} and Virginia combined. See lTAccuracy of estimates section of text. 11

Table 5.-ESTIMATES OF THE TOTAL RESIDENT POPULATION, BY AGE, FOR STATES: JULY I, 1961 TO 1964-Cant;nued

1963

Region, division, 21 years Total 5 to 17 18 to /.,.4 .(1.5 to 64 and State Under 5 und over resident years years years years ------I-~--II------+---

United States ...... •. 2 88 ,658,000

mcGIONS: ! Northeast, .•'~ ...... ••. 46,514,000 North 53,022,000 South.. ..•• ., ...... 58,309,000 West •••.••••• ••••••·••• • 30,813,000

NORTHEAST: 10,8'12,000 J5)6/~2)OOO NOR'llJ CENTRAL: East North CentraL..... 3'7,265,000 West Nortb CentraL..... 15,758,000 SOU'IH: South Atlantic...... • 2'/,7.<'1"(5,000 East South GentraL..... 12,538,000 West South Centr'll...... 18,024,000 WICS'r: MOuDtajn ...•••..•...... • Puc,ifiG ......

109,000 980,000 nO,OOO 251,000 321,000 195,000 132,OClO '11,000 646,000 69,000 1GO,OOO 2].1+,000 79,000 44,000 397,000 45,000 103,000 126,000 591,000 5,252,000 552,000 1,247,000 1(129,000 1,132,000 93,000 877,000 90,000 20'1,000 298,000 189,000 257,000 2,716,000 284,000 659,000 936,000 581,000

17,691,000 1,7'77,000 0,043,000 New Jersey ••••...•. ···•• 6,542,000 670 ,000 1,558,000 PenDsylvania ••.•....•... 11,.<'+08,000 1,142,000 2,771,000

EAST NORTN 'OENTRAL: 929,000 10,020,000 1,105,000 2,618,000 Ohio •...... · .. ····· • 459,000 0,'780,000 536,000 1,248,000 Indiana •...••...... •... 1,020)000 10,369,000 1,139,000 2,530,000 Illinois •..••.•..•••.•.• 678,000 8,036,000 927,000 2,174,000 425,000 ~i~~;~:~;l: :: : :::: ::: :: :: 1+,059,000 468,000 1,063,000 2,158,000 3,507,000 413,000 936,000 1,094;000 689,000 851,000 562,00CI 1,751,000 Iowa •. .•...••...... •.. 2, '758,000 298,000 709,000 943,000 2,879,000 Missouri •...... •. 4,412,000 460,000 1,069,000 1,420,000 205,000 123,000 389,000 North Dalmta ....•.•...•. 645,000 78,000 178,000 222,000 133,000 430,000 South Dakota •...... ••. 707,000 8L.,000 193,000 471,000 292,000 9:33,000 Nebrasli:a •••...•.•••.••• 1,468,000 165,000 370,000 750,000 444,000 1,4/,3,000 Kansas ••••••••..••.•••• 2,261,000 2L,2,000 576,000 SOUTH ATlANTIC: 17() ,000 91,000 38,000 Delaware •.•. , ••••••..... 480,000 5'1,000 125,000 1,205,000 l}43,OOO 245,000 3,351,000 } 875,000 289,000 178,000 71,000 of Columbia •••• 792,000 161,000 { 1,602,000 782,000 308,000 L1 ,288,OOO 1,117,000 377,000 178,000 Virginia •.•••...••• 1,815,000 182,000 092,000 586,000 1 742,000 862,000 338,000 Lt , ?86,000 537,000 1,307,000 1 NOrlJh Carolina •.•...•.•• 162,000 2/,98,000 299,000 728,000 892,000 417,000 South Carolina ..•.•...•. 309,000 4,206}OOO 492,000 1,144,000 1,498,000 762,000 Georgia •...... •..•....•. 1,074,000 655,000 Florida .....•...•...... • 5,532,000 585,000 1,332,000 1,885,000

EABT 80UTN CENTRAL: 303,000 3,121,000 34/1-,000 832,000 59'7,000 Kentucky •••••••.... ·••• • 325,000 3,742,000 399,000 978,000 732,000 Tennessee •.•...... • 275,000 3,383,000 38'1,000 942,000 GJ6,000 Alabama ••••••.•.•••••••• 412,000 197,000 Mississippi •..•••....••• 2,291,000 282,000 666,000 WEST SOUTH CENTRAL: 608,000 385,000 203,000 Arkansas ...... •...... 1,907,000 210,000 )01,000 1,1!.-1,000 618,000 256,000 Louisia.na •....•...... •. 3,410,000 428,000 967,000 830,000 500,000 260,000 Oklahoma .•.•.•.•...•...• 2,450,000 251,000 609,000 3,588,000 1,899,000 813,000 Texas ••••••••••.•..•••.• 10,257,000 1,209,000 2,748,000

MOUNTAIN: 66,000 701,000 83,000 191,000 227,000 133,000 Montana ••••••••...••.••. 62)000 689,000 81,000 194,000 222,000 130,000 Idaho •..•. , .• ·•·••• ..... (A ,000 28,000 335,000 39,000 91,000 112,000 L 347,000 166,000 1,913,000 220,000 500,000 677,000 339,000 156,000 57}OOO New Mexico ••••.••••••••• 990,000 142,000 296,000 540,000 257,000 107,000 Arizona .•.•.•••....• ·· •• 1,517,000 193,000 419,000 333,000 15),000 65,000 Utah" .... , ... ·,,··,·· ., 9'73,000 1.30,000 290,000 47,000 95,000 155,000 73,000 21,000 Nevada ••••••. •••••••••• • 391,000 PAOIFIC: 2,961,000 317,000 766,000 991,000 59'7,000 Washington ...... •.... 392,000 1,852,000 184,000 4'78,000 601,000 3,402,000 17,5.56,000 1,915,000 !1.,3~O,ClOO 6,393,000 ~~I~~~j.~: :~ :: : : : : : : : : : 105,000 33,000 Alaska ..•...... ••.... 251,000 38,000 69,000 187,000 270 ,000 109,000 Hawaii ....•.... ·.···•·· • 6f5,OOO 85,000

1 Numbers for this age group are shown for the District of Columbia J Maryland, and Virginia combined. See IIj\ccuracy of estimat.es!1 section r)f text. 12

Table 5.-ESTIMATES OF THE TOTAL RESIDENT POPULATION, BY AGE, FOR STATES: JULY 1,1961 TO 1964-Cantinued

1962 ---,------.------.------.---- dlvision, Under .5 5 to 1"/ 18 to 44 State

North Cen"1(1'1l1 •••..•••••• South ...... •. West •• •••••••••• ••••••••

NOTITHEAST:

NORTH CENTRAL: East North Central ...... West North CentraL" ... . SaUTE: ,south Atlantic ...... South Central •....• West South Cmrtral ...... 'lfmST: Mountain."... •.. .•• ..••. 'l ,3:;5 }OOO Pacif'ic .. ,...... 22,689,000

N1!1i ENGV\t!D: 629,000 583,000 990,000 408,000 3B1,OOO 630,000 2/,8,000 230,000 393,000 3,438,000 3,222,000 Massachuseirts •.•.•••.••• 5,201,000 583,000 5/.3,000 Rhode Island ...... 8'12,000 1,730,000 1,623,000 Connecticut ..•.•...••... 2,640)000 11,785,000 11,103,000 4,231,000 3,972,000 ?,t,B7,OOO 7,006,000

EAST NORTH CENTRAL: 1,962,000 922,000 Ohio ...... ······· . 923,000 (!-56,000 Indiana ...... ••.. ,. 2,207,000 1,009,000 Illinois ...... 1,550,000 668,000 Michigan ••••.•••••••••.• 815,000 '"19,000 Vlisconsin •...... •.•..• · .

WEST NORTH OENTRAL: 369,000 3,493,000 419,000 917,000 1,101,000 686,000 335,000 Minnesota •... , ... ·······1 2 759 000 303,000 700,000 859,000 562,000 Iowa .•.• ·•••··••••··••• • 466,000 1,036,000 1,405,000 937,000 514,000 Missouri ..••••.•••.•.••• 4;358:000 60,000 636,000 78,000 175,000 201,000 121,000 North Dakota •.•••••••.•. ' 74,000 703,000 85,000 190,000 222,000 133,000 South Dakota ...... 291,000 169,000 1,458,000 165,000 362,000 471,000 Nebraska •.•.••.••.•.•.•• 442,000 247,000 Kansas .•...... •.•..... 2,256,000 248,000 564,000 7%,000 SOUTH ATLANTIC: 291,000 272,000 118, GaO 166,000 88,000 37,000 De 1a'Ware .... , ...... •... 57,000 1,891,000 1,174,000 623,000 240,000 2,03'7,DOO { 831,000 510,000 290,000 177,000 71,000 538,000 of Columbia ...• 937,000 15/+ ,000 2,420,000 ' 1,571,000 762,000 301. ,000 2,636,000 1,0'79,000 1,057,000 495,000 590 000 374,000 177,000 IJ1~2,OOO 2,909,000 2,654,000 1,292,000 1 732'000 846,000 332,000 1,438,000 1,297,000 716,000 , 8'71;000 40"1,000 ' 160,000 Carolina •...... 2,509,000 2,300,000 1,114,000 1,458,000 745,000 305,000 3,532,000 3,311,000 1,279,000 1,8/.,.3,000 1,063,000 626,000

1,780,000 ••••.•••• 1 345,000 820,000 592,000 EAS'l'K~~~~~~~~':~L ~ 721,000 2,15J,000 Tennessee •.•.•••••..•••• 398,000 960,000 626,000 1,860,000 A1abanla ...... •...... 389,000 928,000 410,000 1,212,000 Mississippi ..•.•...•..•• 284,000 658,000

W!:ST SOUTH CENTRAL: 1,177}OOO 1,083,000 205,000 11'92;000 381,000 201}OOO Arkansas .•.....•...... 1,999,000 1,8<'\.0,000 429,000 944,000 610,000 253,000 Louisiana ...•.•..•...... 1,581,000 1,467,000 251,000 603,000 498,000 258,000 Oklahoma ...... ·· . 1,872,000 795,000 6,238,000 5,764,000 Texas ...•...... , .. 1,208,000 2,678,000

MOUNTAIl~: 66,000 474,000 3 0 3 000 696,000 84,000 188,000 227,000 131,000 Montana ...... •...... 61,000 470,000 323;000 695,000 83,000 195,000 22'/ ,000 129,000 Idaho ...... •..•...•..... 27,000 226,000 188,000 332,000 40,000 90,000 112,000 63,000 340,000 16/t,OOO 1,304,000 1,091,000 1,88.3,000 220,000 t!B7,OOO 67J,000 340,000 152,000 55,000 623,000 501,000 Ne1t! Mexico •..•.•••.•.••• 978 000 141,000 289,000 251,000 lOJ,OOO 983,000 809.000 1,466:000 189,000 400,000 524,000 Arizona ...... 64,000 618,000 499,000 958,000 131,000 281,000 330,000 152,000 Utah ..•• ••·••••·••••·•• • 67,GOO 20,000 245,000 208,000 Nevada •.•••••••.•••••••• 31-.7,000 42,000 83,000 136,000

PACIFIC: 319,000 751,000 9S'8,OOO 588,COO 28S ) 000 2,08/+) 000 Washington ...•.•••.•..•. 193,000 1,296,000 185,000 It 6:;',OOO 5g8,000 38f!,000 1.878,000 4,129,000 6,205,000 3,309,000 l,t;·69,OOO 12,086,000 32,000 6,000 157,000 Alaska ...... •...... 37,000 6i",000 105,000 84,000 184,000 288,000 107,000 32,000 _.1-____4_7_7 ,:..O_O_0...L ______~ __l ______~ _ Hawaii •.•.•••..••••.••••____-L. __ ~ __JL __ ~ __L_ ll 1 Numbers 1'01' thi s ag(~ group are shown for the District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia (;ornbined. See ilAccuracy of est:Lmates section of text. 13

Table 5,-ESTIMATES OF THE TOTAL RESIDENT POPULATION, BY AGE, FOR STATES; JULY 1, 1961 TO 1964--Continued

1961

division, Total Under 5 state resident years population

United Sta-bes •...... REGIONS; Northeast. ," .•....•...... North South •.••• ...... West ...... ! ...... · NORTHEAST: 6,570;000 22,005,000

NOHTH CENTRAL: ~ East No:rth Central...... West North Central .... " SOUTH: South Atlantic •...... • East South Central ••...• 'West South Central ...... WEST: Mountain ...... ••....•• Pacific .....•..•...••...

NLW .ENGIAND: 108,000 992,000 112,000 196,000 ()9,OOO 61'1,000 67,000 12Ei,OOO 44,000 79,000 44,000 J~-())OOO 581,000 5,1(;7,000 553,000 I,ll? ,000 8(,2,000 $9,000 185,000 91,000 ...... 249,000 2,5tH,OOO 281,000 549,000

MIDDLE ATlANTIC: 3,939,000 1,734,000 10,991,000 17,148,000 1,741.,000 NevI Yorlc ....•.....•..... 579,000 3,934,000 6,269,000 663,000 1,364,000 2,483,000 1,11+9.,000 7 ,081,000 11,387,000 J:,18.("OOO EAST NORTH'CENT~~::::::::::I 913,000 9,871,000 1,934,000 Ohio •. : •.••.•....••..• • . 91(,000 1+52,000 4,724,000 Indiana ••.....•..•...••. 996,000 10,115,000 2,172,000 Illinois •.••.••• , •••.•.• 607,000 7,885,000 1,520,000 Michigan ••.•.••..••..••. 810,000 413,000 Wisconsin ....••...•••••• 3,989,000

WEST NORTH CENTRAL: 681,000 363,000 2,376,000 2,006,000 3,458,000 419,000 r MimJesota ...... •.•.•••• 332,000 1,94 l,OOO l,653 J OOO 2,759,000 304,000 561,000 Iowa •.••••••••••.••••• • • 511,000 3,137,000 2,688,000 4,348,000 467,000 937,000 Missouri ...... ••.•..• 60,000 .,'t3/~,OOO 357,000 641,000 79,000 121,000 North Dakota ..•....•••.• 73,000 471,000 394,000 692,000 84,000 132,000 South Dakota •...••..•• ·., 290,000 167,000 1;018;000 867,000 1,442,000 163,000 Nebraska_" -" -,,',' -, 244,000 1,579,000 1) 342,000 "I 2,236,000 250,000 439,000 Kansas •.•..•..•...... •.•

SOUTH ATIANTIC: 37,000 318,000 271,000 460,000 57,000 86,000 Delaware •..•.•..•...•••• 235,000 2,206,000 1,862,000 3,168,000 606,000 Maryland ....••.•....•... 70,000 579,000 511,000 775,000 "925,000 17'7,000 District of Columbia •••• 298,000 2,868,000 2,376,000 4,098,000 } 742,000 Virginia •..•...•••.•.••. 176,000 1;292,000 1,068,000 1,837,000 190,000 3'13,000 West Virginia ••..•••.... 324,000 3,226,000 2,621,000 4,680,000 536,000 830,000 North Carolina •.••..•••. 156,000 1,618,000 1,284,000 2,424,000 297,000 400,000 South Carolina ...... •••. 731,000 300,000 2,757,000 2,263,000 4,027,000 480,000 Georgia •...•.••..•.•..•• 1,044,000 594,000 3,741,000 3,215,000 Florida .••••.•..•..•.... 5,205,000 569,000

EAST SOUTH CENTRAL: 298,000 1,919,000 3,071,000 345,000 588,000 Kentucky-•••••...•••••.•• 317,000 2,296,000 3,630,000 396,000 709,000 Tennessee ..•.••..•.•..•• 268,000 2,017,000 3,326,000 392,000 619,000 A1abruna ••...••••..••••.• 406,000 19!t ,000 1,303,000 Mississippi. .•...••••••• 2,224,000 280,000 WIS'r SOUTH CENTRAL: 1,138,000 480,000 564,000 3'16,000 199,000 1,278,000 Arkansas ...... ·.· ....• 1,817,000 199,000 1,960,000 917,000 1,110,000 601,000 249,000 2,199,000 louisiana •.••..•....••.• 3,300,000 424,000 1,548,000 588,000 802,000 492,000 25/+,000 1,'/14,000 Oklahoma ...... •..•••.••• 2,383,000, 247,000 6,089,000 3, It 80, 000 1,834.,000 774,000 6,763,000 Texas ••••••.• ·••· .••.••• 9,856,000 1,189,000 2,578,000 MOUNTAIN: 66,000 473,000 396,000 695,000 85,000 185,000 231,000 129,000 Montana ...•.•..• •··•·•• • 60,000 462,000 380,000 686,000 83,000 191,000 225,000 126,000 Idaho ••.•..••••• •·•••••· r 27,000 229,000 192,000 33(,000 41,000 90,000 116,000 63,000 162,000 1,267,000 1,067,000 .,l 1,835,000 21S', 000 468,000 654,000 33:',000 ...... 148,000 54,000 611,000 497,000 95S,OOO 13O,000 281,000 338,000 New Mexico ...... ·. 242,000 97,000 941,000 780,000 Arizona .•••.•..••....••. 1,405,000 183,000 379,000 50t~,OOO 488,000 324,000 148,000 62,000 602,000 Utah_,. __ , _- _., --- -" - -, 936,000 131,000 271,000 189,000 73,000 120,000 6~:,OOO 19,000 221,000 Nevada ••..•••.•• ··••••• • 312,000 37,000 1,718,060 PAOIFIC: 977,000 577,000 285,000 2,035,000 1,838,000 Washington ••.•.• , ..•...• 2,884,000 317,000 729,000 1,077,000 581,000 379,000 189,000 1,271,000 1,149,000 Oregon •.••....••••...• • • 1,788,000 180,000 404,000 9,995,..000 6,040,000 3,214,000 1,1+29,000 11,703,000 10,684,000 California ••.•..•••.•••• 16,451,000 1,838,000 3,929,000 125,000 103,000 30,000 6,000 152,000 139,000 Alaska •••••••.•.•.•••• • . 235,000 36,000 60,000 361,000 266,000 102,000 31,000 447,000 399,000 Hawaii •...•.....••..•••. 658,000 32,000 177,000

1 Numbers for this age group are shown for the District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia ~ombined. See HAccuracy of estirnatest! secti.on of text. 14

Table6! ... PROVISIONAL ESTIMATES OF THE TOTAL RESIDENT POPULATION, BY AGE, FOR STATES: JULY 1, 1966

Total Under 18 18 to 64 Region, division, and S'tnte resident years years population

United States ...... •. ·· 195,857~~ __,2~.~6~65:.',c::0~0:::O+_-"1~0:::6,'-''7~3:::6.!..,:::OO:::O~ ___1_8_,~:--'7-'-'c:.OO::..O'-+ __~25,192:c,c::O:::O;:0+_-"1;:1:::5,c::3:::4:::8'-',O::O:::0

REGIONS: 26,864,000 31,796,000 29,558,000 Nm··W'eac'".. ,_ ••• , •.••••••..•••••••••••••• 16,167,000 28,977,000 34,459,000 31,847,000 North .••••...... •....••.••..•• 19,890,000 22,6()l,OOO 32,969, 000 J8, 237,000 34,918,000 South ••...... , ...... •. ,. 17,926,000 20,?OO,OOO 19,025,000 west •.... /:...... •• 11,%'1,000

6,13g,000 ?,.338,OOO 6,797,000 20,726,000 2/1,457) 000 22,761,000

NOHTIi CENTRAL: 20,691,000 3, &'+5, 000 22,/199,,000 Eas'L North Central •...... ••• 38,480,000 8,286,000 1,837,000 9,348,000 ltiest North Oentral. .•...... •..•...•.• 15,869,000 .sOUTH: 18,503,000 16,900,000 29,220,000 16,015,000 2,/t88,OOO Sou'tIl Atlantic •....••..•...... •...•••• 6,928,000 1,148,000 8,076,000 7,354,000 East., South Central •...... ••••. 12,910,000 10,026,000 1,632,000 11,658,000 10,6E4,OOO West South Central •...... •••• 18,768,000 WEST: 4,301,000 '7} 80/1,000 ';,099,000 4,710,000 !'1ountain •••.....•..•..•..•....•...•.••• 13,827,000 15,990,000 14,724,000 PacifiC! ..•..•..•.••.•••..•••.••••.••••• 24,8t'd,OOO

Nf~W ENGLAND: 626,000 575 000 983,000 111,000 411,0,000 1,07;000 681,000 73,000 256,000 236,000 405,000 4A,OOO 3,539,000 3,286,000 5,383,000 607,000 598,000 549,000 898,000 96,000 269,000 1,879,000 1,745,000 Connecticut ...... ••.••...... • 2,875,000 . MIDDLE ATLANTIC: 12,233,000 11,410,000 18,25$,000 6,025,000 rO,339,OOO 1,893,000 NevI 4,556,000 4,228,000 6,898,000 2, 3!.f2, 000 3,916, 000 640,000 New 7,668,000 7,123,000 11,582,000 3,913,000 6,471,000 1,198,000

EAST NORTH CENTRAL: 6,028,000 3,779,000 5,569,000 957,000 6,526,000 Ohio} ••.•..•••.••.•...•..•...... •.•• 10,305,000 2,861,000 1,818,000 2,629,000 471,000 3,100,000 Indiana •..•...... •..... ··••· • 4,918,COO 6,427,000 3,802,000 5,861,000 1,059,000 6,920,000 Illinois •.• , ••.. , ...... •...... •....• 10,722,000 4.,776,000 3,190,000 4,/+71,000 713,000 5,184,000 Michigan ••...•.•...•.••...••.••....• •• • 8,374,000 2,4C6,000 1,555,000 2,162,000 445,000 2,606,000 Wisconsin ••.•...... •...... •.•• • • 4,161,000 vlEST NORTH CENTRAL: 2)043,000 1,360,000 391,000 2,215,000 Minnesota •...... •...... •.••• 3,576,000 1,627,000 986,000 31t5,000 1,761,000 Iowa •...... •...... ••... ····•·· • 2,747,000 2,741,000 1,554,000 529,000 2,954,000 Missouri ••.•.....•..•.....•..•.....•••• 4,508,000 362, 000 252,000 62,000 398,000 Nortb Dakota •.•...•.•...... •...•.••.•• 650,000 383,000 265,000 78,000 418,000 South Da}{ota •••••...... •.•....•..•.•.•• 682,000 857,000 529,000 175,000 927,000 Nebras,ka •...... •• 1,456,000 1,337,000 800,000 257,000 1,449,000 Kansas ••.••...... •...... ····••• • 2,2)0,000 SOUTH ATLANTIO: 292,000 195,000 277,000 40,000 317,000 Delaware •...... •...... •.•..••••• 512,000 2,080,000 1,JLA,OOO 2,009,000 261,000 2,270,000 3,613,000 501,000 276,000 460,000 73,000 532,000 of Col umb ia •••••.••••••••••••• 808,000 2,602,000 1,643,000 2,537,000 326,000 2,863,000 4,507,000 1,058,000 636,000 975,000 183,000 1,158,000 1,794,000 2,847,000 ~!~~i~i~~i;i~::::::::::::::::::::::::: : 1,856,000 2,782,000 362,000 3,144,000 North Carol ina •..••..•...... ••.•..•.•• 5,000,000 1,402,000 1,020,000 1,393,000 172,000 1,566,000 South Carolina •••..••....•....••..••••• 2,586,000 2,500,000 1,'703,000 2,428,000 327,000 2,756,000 Georgia ••...... •...... •...... ••• 4,459,000 3,616,000 2,045,000 3,154,000 743,000 3,897,000 Florida ••..•.•...•••...... •••.• ·····•• • 5,941,000 EAST SOUTH CENTRAL: 2,016,000 1,838,000 3,183,000 1,167,000 1,703,000 314,000 Kentucky •••...••.•...... ••.•.••.....•• 2,492,000 2,284,000 3,883,000 1,390,000 2,150,000 342,000 Tennessee •••••.•••••••••••••••••.••••• 0 2,181,..000 1 .. 982,000 3,517,000 1,336,000 1,892,000 289,000 1,387,000 1,24.9,000 2,327,000 940,000 1,183,000 204,000

WEST SOUTH OENTRAL: 1,241,000 1,134,000 1,955,000 71~., 000 1,029,000 211,000 Arkansas ••... , ....•...... , •.•...• '. 2,149,000 1,954,000 J,60J,OOO 1,454,000 1,879,000 270,000 Louisiana ••....•...... •..•.• ·····•• • 1,616,000 1,488,000 2,458,000 843,000 1,343,000 272,000 01